TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Democritus477 Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by Democritus477 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-15

>be me >have no connections or marketable skills >can't get job >can't afford to live in the most expensive city in the US >go to 4chan and blame it on women
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:20 PM
2

Yeah, nobody else ever uses "shaming language" to make points or win arguments. What the fuck?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:10 AM
2

"Respecting" women is not the same as putting them on a pedestal. The ad is not saying that you have to bow down and worship women, only that you have to treat them as fellow human beings.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:04 PM
3

Everyone deserves a certain amount of respect, regardless of their gender or character.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:03 PM
-1

Yes, you still shouldn't rape a woman even if she is "volatile" or "aggressive". I think that's the point the ad is making.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:02 PM
3

Activism is a job for Ali, whereas it's a hobby for Watson. I don't see the problem here.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:38 AM
10

Yes, you are wrong. The "ideal" woman does a lot more to maintain her appearance than simply not overeating; e.g., skin care, hairstyling and makeup.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:01 PM
1

Obviously that doesn't mean it's more important for sexual pleasure.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:01 AM
2

I deleted the quoted comment because it was unnecessary rudeness, and I realized that a couple minutes after posting it. So I'm not going to try to defend it to you. That said, I will respond to this comment. Most of it is thoroughly pointless, dealing only with trivialities. The only important part is near the end: We need to recall, however, that Guns-Cats-andRonPaul had to complain about going out of his way to back up his out-of-place claim in a subreddit designed for intelligent discourse o…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 12:59 AM
-4

Look at this, you made a claim without any supporting evidence beside your own opinion. Better downvote you! No. If an idea is obvious, you don't need to support it. The claim that MGM and FGM are different should be obvious. And in fact, OP did provide additional evidence when people claimed it was non-obvious. That's exactly how reasonable discourse should be conducted.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:00 PM
9

I don't really want to get into whether this "men's center" is a good idea or not, because frankly I know nothing about the proposal, and the fact that a project has "men" in the name does not automatically make it good any more than the word "women" automatically makes it bad. That said, this was just a really bad video. Like I said, I don't know anything about the project; and after watching this video I still know very little. What are the concerns these people have with the proposal? It seem…
/r/MensRights04/05/12 09:31 PM
9

Right, because what happens on a sinking ship is representative of society in general.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 12:33 AM
2

I enjoy hearing others' point of view, even if I don't agree with them.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 08:34 PM
1

I know many happy couples. Do you think it's possible that you could be projecting your own feelings onto these unhappy couples you claim to know?
/r/MensRights15/02/11 02:04 AM
1

I'm sorry you're stuck in that situation, but you have to admit that the institution of marriage is not to blame for you ending up with a bad wife.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 06:17 PM
3

On the contrary. In those households where the man is the primary wage earner, it is customary for the woman to clean house, care for the children, cook food, and so forth - and that's beyond the obvious benefit of being able to spend your time with someone you presumably love. That's hardly an arrangement with "no benefit" to that primary wage earner.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 11:03 PM
1

I see you didn't read the link.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 12:31 AM
-1

Second time someone has attacked my argument with a failed analogy. Maybe you should use facts or logic, instead? Men are factually more likely to be child abusers, but that doesn't mean you should treat every man like a child abuser - it means you should treat us as if we are slightly more likely to be child abusers. Likewise, it is not unfair as such to treat woman as if they are slightly more likely to be prostitutes. However, it would be unfair to treat woman in the way you mention - everyon…
/r/MensRights07/02/11 04:15 PM
-1

Treating blacks worse than whites in the sense of creating discriminatory laws is racist. On the other hand, treating them worse in the sense of feeling relatively more unease when you pass a black on the street is not - it is a simple acknowledgment of the statistical reality. Likewise, I don't think we should create institutions that discriminate against men - but I do think it is reasonable for a woman to feel relatively more unease at, say, leaving her child alone with a man. It is a fact th…
/r/MensRights07/02/11 04:12 AM
1

Good read, thanks.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 02:20 AM
1

I absolutely agree, but it still seems like useful information.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 01:35 AM
0

I don't see how that's relevant. I was referring to this claim: Men perpetrate most sexual abuse and sex crimes.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 01:16 AM
5

Acknowledging that most crimes are committed by blacks is not racism. Claiming that blacks have an innate predisposition toward criminal behavior is.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 01:14 AM
-7

It's considered wrong to treat a black man as a larger threat to be a thief but it's okay to treat a man as a larger threat to being a pedophile. This is because, statistically speaking, men are a greater risk - http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/sexual-abuse/. edit: Only here does posting facts get you downvoted.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 11:42 PM
1

She'll be posting on r/relationshipadvice and r/sex in 17 years, guaranteed. How can you guarantee that she'll find her way to reddit?
/r/MensRights06/02/11 11:40 PM
0

If you're worried about paranoid people getting you in trouble, then yes.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 11:40 PM
1

Were you neatly dressed, clean-cut, etc..? It makes a pretty big difference in how people perceive you at first.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 11:37 PM
1

If you can claim a sex can be intrinsically better or worse at sports, one can sure as heck claim a race is worse or better. The distinction is just as arbitrary at the end of the day. Your entire argument is based on a false analogy. There are large differences between the sexes, whereas most differences between races are merely skin deep. But since you insist, I went to this page and compared the records for men and women - no surprise, the records in the men's category were better every singl…
/r/MensRights18/11/10 02:48 PM
1

The fact that blacks tend to win more Olympic medals than whites doesn't mean that they are intrinsically better athletes than whites. On the other hand, women are intrinsically worse than men in essentially any sport, and have to work harder to compete with them.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 03:18 AM
1

I already read it, and it's a false analogy. Your central claim - that black people are intrinsically better at sports than white people - is totally without basis in fact. On the other hand, men are verifiably larger, faster, and stronger than women.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 12:34 AM
2

Blacks are, on average, better athletes Your comment might be relevant if this were true.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 12:24 AM
0

A woman who can compete on a top-level team is an exceptional athlete. Men are, on average, better athletes; therefore, if you allow that woman's place on the team to be taken by a man of equal skill, you are replacing an exceptional athlete with a less exceptional one. And that's unfair.
/r/MensRights17/11/10 07:20 PM
2

What point are you trying to make?
/r/MensRights17/11/10 07:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter