TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Demolition_Menz Archive

View 3 posts and 154 comments by Demolition_Menz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

She's trying to stem the tide of extremist totalitarianism. At least Victorian nuts let a cad or a slut go on their way. These rules go FAR beyond anything normal. Feminists want men and boys to be placed in a fucking straight jacket. Women and girls? Do whatever you want. Men and boys? We're coming to DESTROY you. It's sick, sick stuff. Edit: At least the French have some sense.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:00 AM
1

Don't call me Shirley.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 12:52 AM
2

cAt DecApiTATes CROCidile!
/r/MensRights06/01/18 10:40 AM
3

That's ridiculous. I know a feminist who wants to close the melding gap -- oh wait, no sorry, that's my male cousin, who wants a job with some sort of melding operation. Carry on.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 10:33 AM
7

Female sexuality is glorious. Male sexuality is just gross. Did I do that right?
/r/MensRights06/01/18 10:17 AM
8

It's only because women are too awesome to work such petty jobs.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 10:15 AM
-1

There's no such thing as the male 'being done'. Sex in Bonobo society is not about the male's satisfaction, and aggressive encounters between males and females are rare anyway. Sex isn't for resolving conflicts as much as it is for bonding between friends. Hmmmm. Sounds like you're trying to justify an oppressive matriarchy. Sex isn't for resolving conflicts as much as it is for bonding between friends. What's the difference? I think you're full of shit. Lemme guess: you're a feminist and hate m…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 10:05 AM
1

Well here's to the future male Bonobo who overthrows that oppressive Matriarchal structure.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:56 AM
11

I chuckled at your first paragraph but you're actually right. Have any straight men here tried to watch Daytime television? Women, gays, more women, and more gays. Now I have nothing against gays, but c'mon, we need like a show where a straight man goes fishing or something.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:52 AM
1

We can agree that: a father should support his children. And a father should have equal access to his children. You also support the state using violence against fathers, I don't. I think women should be more responsible about their choice of mates. That's about it. Happy New Year Nina.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:09 AM
-3

Nah, feminists are scum. They enable the mass abuse of children.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 07:30 AM
-1

Well, as MLk said, a riot is the voice of the unheard. Just be very careful how you employ violence; because even those riots contributed to the creation of the police state.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 06:48 AM
0

Well there's a saying that men try to achieve power to have sex, and women have sex in order to achieve power. This is true. But we could also embrace egalitarianism. That is after all how we lived for 99 percent of our history....
/r/MensRights06/01/18 06:21 AM
-4

Because you're a feminist!? What the hell, that should have been obvious...
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:54 AM
-9

Have you ever heard of COINTELPRO? Any time some "activist" encourages you to break something or set off a bomb, it's almost always an undercover cop. In fact this goes way back to the late 19th century, when Pinkerton agents would blow up railroad lines and blame it on the local union organizer. Don't be a sucker.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:29 AM
-1

Derpitty derp derpittty derp derp doo.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:26 AM
0

Absolutely. I love bananas. In fact I'm eating one right now. I fully support the "banana way". That's a great idea! *chomps on banana
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:14 AM
1

You're...99 percent retarded.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:12 AM
-2

Do you hate little boys?
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:11 AM
6

Snap, it's the same thing, but you gotta downvote, well here's an upvote, sir.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:05 AM
-19

it's remarkable, especially antifa heheh. Those people are mostly undercover cops you fucking idiot. Learn to direct your anger in the right direction.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:03 AM
-1

It's that ...99 percent that counts.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 04:55 AM
5

Bernie's fine. He's a politician, which means he's imperfect by definition. But from my vantage point he's better than the nutcase psychopaths Hillary and Trump.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 03:26 AM
2

The great secret is that both vagina holders and penis holders benefit from support of same. When women benefit men also benefit, and when men benefit women also benefit.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:26 AM
3

Fair points. But I ask you: have you read Unwin? He charted every "sexually liberated" society in history, and he found one common theme: they suck. And they are quickly conquered by a "patriarchy." Thousands upon thousands of years. Now I prefer the idea of sexual liberation; as did Unwin. But we have hundreds of examples of patriarchies being mighty efficient in conquering matriarchies. Take China. It is the only country in the world where women commit suicide more than men. It is also likely …
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:19 AM
2

There's also the possibility that the degraded working class -- and here I'm talking about poor white men in particular, since they are endlessly maligned -- will seize the means of production. I don't consider that probable, but it's a real possibility. As for endless technological advancement -- well that also requires...men. And if men decide to chill rather than advance, that's a real problem; Unwin noted that every single society that embraced feminism underwent a sharp decline in productiv…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:04 AM
2

In keeping with the theme of this sub, one theory is that females will simply not allow trans-humanism. This idea seems completely absurd at first, but the Oxford anthropologist JD Unwin charted thousands of human cultures and he came to one conclusion: feminism = societal decline, rapidly. Then some "patriarchy" conquers the defunct society. Don't blame me. I'm just quoting him. But it's sort of an interesting addition to the "humans will never evolve because they'll all be dead" theory. At the…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 12:17 AM
2

lol! I totally support your ideals, but come on, haven't you seen a single sci-fi horror film? Something will go wrong.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 11:57 PM
-9

Hahah no. I'm married. But truth is truth.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 11:42 PM
1

Go fuck yourself. It's a beautiful song.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 09:15 PM
5

Changing human sexuality? Good luck Well that's a can of worms. Have you looked at bonobos? There is a funny quote by a zoologist that I'm going to butcher: chimps solve problems with violence, bonobos solve problems with sex. And yeah, I'd be willing to have sex with a few fat chicks if it meant world peace ;) Don't get me wrong, I'm not pretending that women will ever do the same, nor should they be expected to. When Maslow created his "hierarchy of needs", he mentioned that women seldom reach…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 09:04 PM
2

I'm also a leftist on a great many issues. It sucks that politics are so polarized. Like, I support the right of people to own guns, but I also support a social safety net. I think I'm like most people: we don't fit neatly into "left" and "right". Anyway, keep up the good work; I think women need to solve the gender war; men are sorta hamstrung.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:51 PM
7

that's just mammalian nature. True. It's still disgusting. Like when a Komodo Dragon gradually eats another animal while it's still alive. I remember a story about a wildlife photographer: he quit after watching a pack of hyenas gradually eat a baby elephant to death (sorry to ruin your day). The dogs started with the trunk. This is one of the images that trans-humanists use to justify the idea of eliminating predation in nature. The world is truly awful. But wonderful. Hopefully we can improve …
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:46 PM
6

I've seen you a few times on this sub and you're terrific :) Men deserve the rights and privileges that women have. I don't even know why that's controversial -- actually, I do. Men are supposed to "protect" women not vice versa. But kick ass women like yourself understand that supporting men also means supporting women. And besides, supporting men and boys is a noble goal in and of itself.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:33 PM
-23

Hey, I didn't suggest women should be forced to do as the author suggests. Just that that whole "toxic masculinity" thing would disappear if they did so. You're reacting to the suggestion emotionally. Try thinking about it rationally. If the precondition for sex was that a man be really good at walking on his hands, all men would be walking around on their hands. Maybe only a few men would be walking around on their feet. That is power. So like it or not, females have absolutely enormous power. …
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:20 PM
44

Make the men compete Disgusting. Just fucking disgusting. Imagine a man saying such a thing about women. He would be absolutely pilloried. The kicker? As profoundly immoral as this bitch is, she may be expressing a biological instinct. Female Mate Choice is Influenced by Male Sport Participation
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:05 PM
-39

which is completely ridiculous. Have you ever heard of bonobos? They solve most of their problems with sex. As in: problem? Let's have sex. By the time the male chimp is done, he forgets that there was a problem in the first place. We share about 99 percent of our DNA with bonobos. Her statement certainly seems ridiculous, and to a certain extent it is, but the reality is that we would have world peace overnight if women acted as she suggests. Men wouldn't need to embrace "toxic masculinity" and…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 07:46 PM
0

Also, I belt out a killer La Bamba. I don't doubt that at all :) Also, I don't know what either. "Don't drink then post on the Internet" seems to be a good rule that I've failed to follow. Apologies for waking you from your princess-like slumber, though at least I didn't do so with a kiss ;) Since you're already here, what's going on with Honey Badgers? Seems like you've practically disappeared. And when is your book due?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 07:19 PM
1

You're right...but I was just posting this on another thread: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMcHbh6HBDk It's sad, but perhaps men will simply say "fuck it". I'm half way there myself.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 01:43 PM
3

Indeed. I often wonder why bourgeois liberals are so intent on creating an even bigger rift between Irish and black;
/r/MensRights05/01/18 01:20 PM
1

Okay /u/girlwriteswhat So here's proof. Now sing me a song like Ritchie Valens...
/r/MensRights05/01/18 01:15 PM
1

Also, /u/ee4m, you should recognize the glorious history of working men and women making music together. I'm thinking of eg Woody Guthrie making music with the Mexican migrant workers of California. Or Joe Hill writing songs.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 01:10 PM
1

Those cultures were mostly created by poor whites. Ritchie went in the opposite direction, and that was my point. Culture is meant to be shared. There are also brilliant tunes where bone-white Texan "straight white males!" appropriated Mexican music. It's all good. Cultural appropriation is a dumbass concept created by bourgeois morons who don't understand how culture works.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 12:41 PM
1

Heh, most (almost all) billionaires support feminism, you disagree. Keep up the comedy routine :)
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:30 AM
12

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans the following neotenous traits are in women when compared to men: more delicate skeleton, smoother ligament attachments, smaller mastoid processes, reduced brow ridges, more forward tilt of the head, narrower joints, less hairy, retention of fetal body hair, smaller body size, more backward tilt of pelvis, greater longevity, lower basal metabolism, faster heartbeat, greater extension of development periods, higher pitched voice and larger tear duct…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 06:38 AM
11

Lovely pic. There's no sugar coating it. The modern "family" court system enables mass child abuse by denying children contact with their fathers, and feminists are entirely responsible (okay, maybe bloodsucking lawyers too).
/r/MensRights05/01/18 04:38 AM
6

I'm aware of that. Norm still created the bit about the "homeless dog", and performed it several times before appearing on the show.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 02:46 AM
6

I didn't read the article but I'll answer the question posed by the title: Why Is Fixing Sexism Women’s Work? Because men can't fix it for you. 150 years ago a group of bored, privileged, man-hating rich women declared war against men. Over time, their "reforms" have profoundly increased the amount of sexism in society -- against men and boys. As Jordan Peterson noted, men have a difficult time controlling "crazy women." It goes against our gender role (rooted in strength and the protection of w…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 12:43 AM
12

CAFE. National Coalition for Men. Many others I'm sure. But yes I agree we need more visible alternatives. Mike Buchanan in the UK is conservative, Elam is a conservative, the honey badgers are mostly right wing libertarian. These groups only represent about half (if that) of MRA's, and most of the academic literature supportive of men's rights actually comes from liberals and leftists (Earnest Bax, Warren Farrell, Paul Nathanson, David Benetar etc.). Leftist MRA's need to get their shit togethe…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:49 PM
84

It still raises some interesting issues for discussion. Norm MacDonald had a funny bit about homeless men and their pets. It's funny because it's true: when we see a homeless man with a dog, we will often feel more sorry for the dog than the man. This happens for a couple of reasons. One is that dogs are cute. Grown men? Not so much. The other is the myth of male hyper-agency. Dogs are helpless. If a man is homeless he must have some defect that justifies his being homeless. Now here is where th…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 09:22 PM
8

I'm not sure Paul's take is plausible. Women have waaaaaayy too much social and political power to allow widespread discrimination against them in hiring practices. Even the appearance of discrimination against women (in any capacity whatsoever) will engender a crackdown by the feminist state. I'm afraid we're dealing with a real Frankenstein monster here. Feminism reminds me of the fascist movement. It was bankrolled by elites throughout the west (even politicians like Churchill initially prais…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 10:17 AM
2

[boys] ... need to learn and they need to aspire Women have a problem? We need STRUCTURAL CHANGES. Boys have a problem? They should MAN UP and fix it themselves! Apparently boys have more power and agency than grown women (well, white boys at least).
/r/MensRights04/01/18 09:55 AM
8

Article is from 2012. Title is unintentionally revealing. It shows the way feminists flip flop back and forth between embracing and opposing "traditional gender" roles. They claim to want to eliminate the shaming of "non-masculine" men while simultaneously calling men pussies. Or they tell men to "express their feelings" then drink from a male tears mug. Feminists will denigrate MRA's as "pathetic pussy loser crybabies" but they're also violent tradcon duebros with toxic masculinity who make the…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 06:08 AM
2

Sooo...Mike Wallace and CBS and the Church Committee were all "nut jobs"? That's a hellluva theory you have there, genius.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 05:35 AM
6

Pseudo left, they are. It's very similar to the analogy I drew in OP: the ruling class controls both sides a la Orwell. The right is the right, same as it ever was. The quasi-"left" is increasingly less concerned about war or civil liberties or class issues; everything is about gender and race. In fact the left has become an embarrassment. Go make a post on R/socialism or R/anarchism and you'll see what I mean. They're fine with critiques of socialism and anarchism but they will not tolerate a c…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 09:16 PM
2

The right seeks to capitalize on the left's abysmal failure to support real gender equality. However, the right has no interest in gender equality; in fact they don't even have the balls to support men's rights under the gynocracy. Their supposed anti-feminism is purely rhetorical. At the end of the day, they are just as gynocentric as the left. The left wasn't always gynocentric. There was a time when eg Elizabeth Gurley Flynn -- a union leader with the Wobblies -- stated, "society moves in gro…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 08:53 PM
2

Well she has done some important work imo. For example "The War Against Boys."
/r/MensRights29/12/17 08:45 PM
2

Men are strong and always have been and always will be. But we don't know what to do in the face of female power. Our instinct is to protect women, not fight them. So when women get all feminist we're sorta like, "what the fuck?" "I saved you from the saber toothed tiger, why are you breaking my balls?" If you think Muslims are different you're wrong. Under Islam, if a man fails to provide for his wife he will be locked up. I have no idea what the answer is. I'm hoping women will at least recogn…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 08:42 PM
6

Tradcons oppose feminism for different reasons. Or at least they pretend to. Frankly I think they are full of shit. They rhetorically oppose feminism but don't do a goddamn thing to actually change the laws. Their focus is mainly abortion, which they know will never be outlawed; however their ostensible opposition to abortion keeps ordinary religious folks voting for them. I don't think Christina Hoff Sommers should be maligned because she was forced to work for a right wing outfit; it is the fa…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 07:56 PM
4

She's fine. She just got a little greedy is all. A woman needs to earn a living (under feminism). Liberals refuse to see reason on the issue of gender. So Christina was stuck with the right. Pretty sure she remains a liberal democrat.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 07:33 PM
1

I hope you're right.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:55 PM
11

Men can do almost anything: protect women from saber toothed tigers, build civilization, harness electricity, put a man on the moon. But it remains to be seen whether we can successfully oppose feminist groups. During the prohibition era, a woman named Pauline Sabin turned public opinion against the law; ironically, she used the exact same arguments as the prohibitionists: it harms women, it harms the family. It took a woman to reverse the law that women's groups had created. R/MensLib is utter …
/r/MensRights29/12/17 03:11 PM
1

crony capitalism There is no other kind that I'm aware of. You remind me of communists insisting that the Bolshevik revolution would have been just fine if it weren't for that darned Stalin. Consider that the people who work in those sweat shops have even fewer, worse options in their country without those sweatshops. Sooooo...the worst of all possible worlds could be even worse? No, no that's not true at all. When the US first invaded the Philippines they found charming little villages, not sta…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:55 PM
22

But you'll have to do the work. Unfortunately, we have considerably less empathy for men than women. So it will be about ten times as hard. But yes, change is possible. Ironically men really do need women in this respect; if you've ever had a video game style "power fantasy" about women saving men, now's your time to prove it. Jordan Peterson noted that men "can't control crazy women," it's up to women to fix this mess.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:18 PM
6

It's not a theory. It's a fact. Did you watch the video I linked? I don't know how much more obvious I can make these facts, but apparently some people are born apologists for the "intelligence community" -- which uses your tax dollars to wage psywar against the domestic population in defiance of its own protocols. Next you will defend Operation Chaos. I'm not at all averse to "conspiracy theory," but I understand that most people are too indoctrinated to understand that covert ops are a matter …
/r/MensRights29/12/17 01:27 PM
1

The lovely Diane Downs
/r/MensRights29/12/17 09:02 AM
2

Indeed
/r/MensRights29/12/17 09:01 AM
0

Perhaps. But it's still nonsense. Grow up.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:26 AM
1

First paragraph: I don't expect feminists to fix the problem. The BBC openly discriminates against males in hiring and casting Indeed. Young boys just starting their schooling are told by teachers that the girls are better than them. That's idiotic, and that's why the MRM exists. You clowns claim that all problems can be solved by...being a douche bag? No, sweetheart. You're wrong. MGTOW is fine and indeed excellent. MRA's are fine because they fight for the rights of men and boys; even if you w…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:08 AM
4

Because if we focus on race and sex rather than class, super-rich billionaires will benefit.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:02 AM
0

That's a brilliant retort, imbecile.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 03:18 AM
11

Yes. We should seek to maximize the potential of both sexes. We should also allow for outliers -- girls who are more masculine and boys who are more feminine.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 03:10 AM
5

I'm not sure there is any such thing as a neutral source. But go to 26.32 in this documentary and you'll find an actual News report by CBS from the 1970's describing the scandal of CIA using philanthropic organizations as fronts. Here is a link from NY books "The CIA and the intellectuals."
/r/MensRights29/12/17 03:03 AM
2

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol46no1/article08.html
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:42 AM
1

See edited comment.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:34 AM
3

Are you talking about links in OP? Edit: Nothing in OP is actually controversial in the sense of being disputed by historians. A U.S. Congressional investigation in 1976 really did reveal that nearly 50% of the 700 grants in the field of international activities by the principal foundations were funded by the CIA. The CIA even worked with the AFL-CIO. The FBI quote comes from an actual document leaked during the FBI's COINTLEPROs (Counter-Intelligence Operations) against the "new left" during th…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:28 AM
1

I'm fully in favor of "free markets" as they exist in your imagination. Just not the way they exist in the real world. In the real world the poor and middle class are subjected to austerity while the rich embrace "socialism for me." It is utopian to imagine that rich people will ever be content to play by the rules and accept fair labor or business practices. That's not the way human beings work. Being better Better according to what criteria? Wall Mart is certainly "better" than their competito…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:21 AM
1

This video is trash. His portrayal of the men's rights movement is false. We take issue not only with feminism but eg male disposability, which exists across all cultures. Moreover, there are proto-men's rights texts going back to the middle ages (mostly discussing the pros and cons of marriage). The socialist Earnest Belfor Bax wrote his MRA texts in the early 20th century before women even achieved the vote. As for Paul Elam -- it's true he acts in an often boorish fashion, but this is done de…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:04 AM
2

Thanks. Interesting.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 01:33 AM
1

“It cannot be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social cohesion". It's not assumed. It's demonstrated by hundreds of studies and millions of real life examples. The loss of fathers harms children at the cellular level.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:35 AM
4

The "woman slaps guy" trope is similar to the "cop tortures suspect" trope. The guy says or does something horribly offensive so therefore "deserves" to be slapped, and the suspect being tortured by cops is some sort of depraved pedophile or what have you. Of course that's not the way it works in the real world. Either way, physical violence is not justified by boorish behavior, and definitely isn't justified by being accused of a crime.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:31 AM
3

the decline could either be attributed to gender bias, or boys and girls being differently abled in different things. I think both are true. For example boys tend to do better with hands on learning and plenty of physical play. A non-gynocentric education system would maximize the potential of boys by using methods conducive to their success. Feminists want it both ways on this as usual. They claim that "gender is social construct" while simultaneously supporting educational models that favor gi…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:28 AM
1

Monopolies are transient events normally anyways. Regulation helps preserve them. Kropotkin noted hundreds of years ago that under capitalism, "competition kills competition," resulting in monopoly. Rich people aren't content to rest on their laurels -- and since they have much more money than politicians they can simply buy them. As the saying goes, "wealth is like seawater; the more you drink the thirstier you get." If you want to see what a free market looks like just go back to the private m…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:24 AM
1

The natural long-term outcome of any human society is a takeover by the rich. This has been the unmistakable pattern throughout civilized history, but it is not true of all human societies. In fact, if we're talking about the long-term, rich people have only existed for a tiny fraction of human history. We can't judge human potential merely by looking at civilized societies. It's also clear that some societies are much less unequal than others, meaning it is possible to drastically reduce inequa…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:19 AM
3

You don't seem to understand that if boys are falling way behind while girls excel then the educational model is gynocentric by default: whether by design or accident, it plays to the strengths of girls rather than boys or both sexes equally.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:03 AM
6

Sorry chap, but the paper in question was peer reviewed. And besides it's not disputed that boys have fallen behind in the education system, meaning that it is indeed gynocentric: it caters to the learning styles and temperament of girls. You can learn more about this by reading Christina Hoff Sommers' "War Against Boys." Bye now.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 11:49 PM
2

So cherrypicked! Indeed. Well, that settles it! Women must be the equal of men in Islamic countries! I didn't say that. An argument can be made that they are more privileged than males. You can also make the same argument in reverse. The point is that it's much more complicated than you appear to realize. Men have all sorts of privileges that women lack. As I said, both sexes get a raw deal. You just don't recognize the oppression that men face in Islamic societies because you are a gynocentrist…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 10:14 PM
2

So: if men overperform in some area, it's an indication of female oppression. If females overperform in some area, it's an indication of female supremacy. Your idiocy is profound.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 10:10 PM
11

better students. Right. Of course they would be "better students" in a gynocentric system. That's the whole point. Well, I just pointed out one objective measure by which men dominate academia. You absurdly claimed that academia isn't feminist because men dominate certain fields. That's pants on head retarded.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 09:51 PM
3

Women weren't allowed to drive until recently. In Saudi Arabia. A lot of women actually liked having chauffeurs and still do. Women were executed for being raped. Fake. Rape is punishable by death in Saudi Arabia. It's true that in Islamic societies female infidelity is treated with grave seriousness, however. This is to prevent cuckolding. It may not be just or fair but that's where it comes from. Women need male guardians to get married, divorce, travel, find employment, etc. This is designed …
/r/MensRights28/12/17 09:48 PM
12

polarizing online debates over gender politics If it weren't for such debates you would probably have significantly less support. I myself learned about men's issues online. While I agree it's generally fruitless to argue with feminists or tradcons one on one, when an audience is present it is possible to educate people and change their opinions. Anyway, keep the great work.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 09:12 PM
19

females are superior students Or, you know, the education system is highly gynocentric. You feminists are really something. When women are behind in some area you demand structural changes. But when men -- or even boys -- are behind, you tell them to man up. Honestly, you're just disgusting. You're not even willing to put aside your hateful ideology for children. Feminists dominate academia? I can't believe you put a question mark in front of that. What planet are you living on? Is that why the …
/r/MensRights28/12/17 09:07 PM
9

It really comes back to what you think the purpose of "education" is. If it's to create obedient little work drones then you're correct.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 08:42 PM
7

He's right. http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/34667100/poor-white-boys-get-a-worse-start-in-life-says-equality-report
/r/MensRights28/12/17 08:40 PM
9

spooky conspiracy to destroy men I didn't mention anything illegal. Why would you use the word "conspiracy"? We're talking about institutional pressure and social power. Journalism provides a good analogy. No one forces journalists at the NY Times to suck up to power, they just come to understand that certain topics are off limits. "islam helps women more than men" Of course it does. Why do you think males commit suicide much more often than females in Islamic societies? Why are men imprisoned i…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 08:27 PM
3

This is disgusting. They are using children as human shields to protect female privilege, even though every single study shows that shared parenting is in the best interests of the child. Honestly, this is just appalling. If feminists are unable to embrace gender equality even when failing to do so harms children (and ironically, harms women as well) we are going to have to rethink gender equality itself. I would go so far as to argue that they don't have much time left. They are drunk on power …
/r/MensRights28/12/17 08:19 PM
21

Wait, are you saying one academic source (with a ton of corroborating evidence) isn't good enough? Given the dominance of feminists in academia it's remarkable there is an academic source at all. According to Karen Straughan, she routinely receives emails by professors saying they would speak out against feminism if they could, but they are terrified of being socially marginalized and even losing their jobs.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 08:10 PM
21

Again, if boys are falling behind girls in schools then there is something wrong with the structure. It's the responsibility of adults to fix the problem, not little kids. I'm not saying you personally are to blame. You're doing your best to work within a structure that is obviously flawed.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 07:47 PM
5

It's different because patriarchy. Or something.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 07:41 PM
14

Consistency is key. If males are not allowed to have "male-only" events than females should not be allowed to have "female-only" events. I would like to see both allowed, at least in certain circumstances. I don't give a rats ass about female only gyms, and feminists shouldn't give a rat's ass about the boy scouts (they do, unfortunately).
/r/MensRights28/12/17 07:40 PM
39

That only demonstrates that the education system is catered toward females. Schooling in the United Stats was modeled after a military dictatorship in 19th century Prussia. During the early 20th century, social engineers explicitly spoke of training children to become accustomed to factory work. Discouraging a "rebellious spirit" was also a primary concern. The education system rewards conformity, docility and rote learning. So no, feminism isn't entirely to blame. I would argue that females are…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 07:34 PM
1

Cheers...
/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:09 AM
11

In the 1970s in the US, my mother couldn't open a bank account or take a line of credit without her father (or other male relative's) permission You know why that is, right? It's because MEN WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR WOMEN'S DEBTS. First wave feminists had every opportunity to change this and they didn't. Karen Straughan aka /u/girlwriteswhat explains: "1) Won the right for married women to own their own property and income, and hold it separate from their husband's control. [Yet] maintained the lega…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:00 AM
47

Wrong. Wrong. Wong. You're forgetting that the police are also supposed to determine whether a crime occurred in the first place. People should not be automatically arrested and sent to trial. To immediately take the side of the accuser in a rape allegation is to turn the entire justice system upside down. People like you may mean well -- but your opinions are profoundly dangerous to basic concepts of due process rights and justice. That you would make these comments -- and even describe guilty …
/r/MensRights27/12/17 05:42 AM
23

Pressure on the testicles can cause sterility. If working class men who ride the bus every day sat as feminists demanded they would be at increased risk. I doubt most of the feminist scum who complain about "manspreading" ride the bus/subway anyway. They're just spoiled brats looking for something to complain about. Men's hips are also shaped differently and we have a higher center of gravity -- it's natural for us to sit with our legs spread. However, 99 percent of us make room when someone sit…
/r/MensRights27/12/17 05:10 AM
5

The Patriarchy is losing the plot. I fully intend to bring this up at the next bi-monthly Patriarchy meeting (in our town we meet in the cemetery as the Satanic lodge is undergoing repairs). I will make it my first order of business after we discuss new ways of oppressing and/or raping women.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 11:56 PM
3

patriarchal work culture LMAO. (a) A "Patriarchal" work culture wouldn't allow women. (b) A "patriarchal" work culture would try to limit interactions between the sexes, and (just like feminists) would punish men who broke the rules.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 11:48 PM
2

Those people aren't liberals. They're feminist identarian nutbags.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 11:48 PM
8

That's it!? WTF.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 11:46 PM
11

If she was making 2x what I was ...you never would have gotten married in the first place. Why? Because as a rule, women are hypergamous. They seek to marry across or (ideally) up social hierarchies. This is why in polls a majority of women admit that they want to date men who make more money than they do, whereas the same is not true of men -- they are more inclined to value youth and beauty (these tendencies exist in all civilized cultures and are therefore in all likelihood rooted in biology)…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 07:52 PM
1

it is not an act of violence against an individual to expect them to support their child. It is when mandated by the state under threat of imprisonment. Don't get me wrong, of course every father should support his children (provided he is granted equal access), but I tend to oppose the state getting involved in people's private lives. Especially when it involves turning men into indentured servants.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:06 AM
0

Listen you racist piece of shit, I don't create media. I'm not part of a borg hive collective. I'm an individual. Now go back to to R/Feminism or SRS or whatever rats nest you crawled out of. Bye.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 12:33 AM
1

often relevant hahahhaha. I'm done with you.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 12:28 AM
1

That is the point of C-151 though, to extend the coverage of the shield. In a sense, yes: shielding the jury from crucial evidence so more innocent men will be imprisoned. Being a slut isn’t evidence of a false accusation; but you better fucking believe that the relationship of the woman with the accused, and the sex act(s) itself, are of vital importance. That’s the whole point of the trial you fucking imbecile. You’re effectively arguing that men should have no means of defending themselves fr…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 11:53 PM
2

Trying to blame women for the deadbeat behavior of men is ridiculous. Take away the state's extortion against men and perhaps women would be more responsible about their choice of sexual partners. Expecting some neck tattoo to be a responsible father is idiotic. Women shouldn't expect the state to bail them out by using violence against their former partners.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 11:51 PM
0

(a) It’s not the responsibility of white people to pander to your delicate feelings. Create your own media. Spike Lee, the Hughes brothers etc. already do this. White people even do this as well. See eg the film terrific film “Fresh”, set in the black community but made by white people. (b) Inserting “people of color” into stories to appease SJW whiners just for the sake of diversity -- rather than as an organic outgrowth of the art/entertainment itself – pisses people off. It increases rather t…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 11:47 PM
2

You can't coerce a penis to get hard bro. That's not how they work. FYI, vaginas get wet when women are raped. You're also justifying the sexual abuse of little boys. You're one sick puppy. There are cases posted on this board every week of women raping men at knife and gunpoint. Additionally, to coerce means just that. Eg if a guy repeatedly says no but she does it anyway. Such cases are basically 50/50 between the sexes. "Bro". Now fuck off with your rape apology.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 11:43 PM
2

world population I see. So should I get upset at Bollywood, Chinese media, Japanese media, Iranian media etc. for not showing enough white people? I have no problem watching films by Akira Kurosawa, Shoei Immamura, Zhang Yimou, Ange Lee, John Woo, Ringo Lam, etc. etc. despite the complete absence of white people. It's the art and entertainment that matters, not PC diversity bullshit. What about domestically? Same thing. No problem with stories about the black community, or the indigenous communi…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:48 PM
2

Of course it's possible. Can a black person be raced against blacks? Yes. See: some "house Negroes" in the old South. Can a woman be sexist against women? Yes: see eg Esther Villar. Can a man be sexist against men? Yes. In fact it's extremely common because males have out-group bias toward females (the same is not true in reverse).
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:28 PM
3

Again: maybe if men weren't enslaved by they state then women wouldn't run around irresponsibly having sex with "bad boys." If you have sex with some guy with a neck tattoo you shouldn't be surprised if he bails or ends up in prison. You place all of the responsibility on the man. At least tradcons (used to) place some responsibility on the woman.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:23 PM
1

Rape shield is not supposed to apply to the sexual event in question. That's utterly ridiculous and practically eliminates the right to a fair trial. Again: man-hater on Internet vs. respected lawyers.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:21 PM
1

Yes, when you attack "white males" you are being a racist and a sexist. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:19 PM
3

Actually: (a) women coerce men into sex just as often as vice versa. Men just don't complain about it because they have no sexual power and because society doesn't give a shit. That is an actual "rape culture." (b) the majority of male rapists were abused by women as children. Between 60 and 80 percent according to three independent studies. (c) Women are profoundly privileged compared to men, including in the justice system. Complaining about injustice for females in the criminal justice system…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:19 PM
4

You're complaining about "white dudes." You're both a racist and a sexist.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 05:35 AM
3

I believe that imprisonment for debt has no place in 21st-century society You sure sound like you do. Perhaps if the state didn't turn men into indentured servants women would be more careful about who they choose to bang. As always, it's the man that has to have responsibility, not the woman.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 05:25 AM
36

Utterly absurd. There is a huge scandal in the UK unfolding as we speak of cops with-holding evidence to ensure innocent men charged with rape are convicted. A morbidly obese lesbian woman successfully accused FIFTEEN men of rape -- some were even imprisoned -- before they finally charged her. A man was charged with sexual assault for passing by a woman in a train station even though surveillance footage proved his innocence. And that was before this metoo bullshit. You can find plenty of simila…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 03:16 AM
1

This has nothing to do with "sexual reputation" you idiot. I'm not talking about rape shield laws -- egregious though those are.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 01:38 AM
4

deadbeat If a father is not guaranteed equal access to his children he should be under no obligation to give the wife a single cent. Zero. None. Nada. Equality bitch.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:46 AM
1

You're either a man hating piece of garbage or misinformed. Since you're a self described feminist I'm gonna go with the former. "An accused will be prohibited from introducing these kinds of sexually explicit texts or emails as evidence in court unless a judge first rules them to be admissible, after conducting a closed hearing with the Crown prosecutor, which the complainant may attend, accompanied by her own lawyer if she chooses (giving the phrase “lawyered up” new depth of meaning)." Previo…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:04 AM
5

Stunning.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 08:40 PM
6

I don't have a link handy but some guy did a study on the penal system in the UK and determined that if men were treated like women by the justice system, three out of four male prisoners would be free. By the same token, if women were treated like men there would be rough parity in terms of the number of females behind bars. Women receive 63 percent shorter sentences on average, and they are also much less likely to be profiled, arrested, charged and incarcerated. What feminists are doing here …
/r/MensRights24/12/17 07:33 PM
26

Great post. Another example of this is the film Monster, about the female serial killer Aileen Wuornos. It is highly sympathetic because Wuornos was abused as a child by men. Now imagine making a highly sympathetic portrayal of Edmund Kemper because he was abused as a child by his mother. Even more disturbing is that Wuornos is celebrated by radical feminists as a fighter against the patriarchy. Fan clubs also popped up for Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction and Rosamund Pike in Gone Girl, even tho…
/r/MensRights24/12/17 07:41 AM
0

Do you understand how that law works? Yes. But evidently you don't. "This is a scandalous reversal of the traditional understanding that the burden of proof of guilt lies upon the Crown. Toronto defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger told columnist Christie Blatchford that the bill’s effect will be a “catastrophic attack on our ability to make full answer and defence. It’s unprecedented.” If this bill passes, defence lawyers will be more restricted in the evidence they can lead or the case theory they …
/r/MensRights24/12/17 01:42 AM
4

It's worse. Ask yourself: would you rather be raped or be falsely accused of rape and spend a decade or more in prison where you'll possibly be subject to beatings and rape during your confinement? Any honest person will answer "number 1".
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:30 AM
10

In the small finance group at the university’s business and economics school, for instance, the two women who were hired at the same time as male colleagues and paid the same, received a raise of about $6,000 each, leaving the 13 men far behind. That hike is much larger than the typical increase for merit pay. Feminist "equality". Disgusting. How is this even legal?
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:21 AM
1

You should pat yourself on the back, feminist. This is what you guys have been fighting for. Congrats. Hopefully the new bill in Canada -- which will make it more difficult for men to enter exculpatory evidence in rape trials -- will be pushed through as well. Listen and believe, baby. Listen and believe.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:16 AM
107

This article is horrendously bad, though the title is heartening. The author is already spouting propaganda by the second sentence, claiming that women receive "poor pay" and lack "political representation." I won't bother with the pay gap myth, that's already been debunked a thousand times, but is it true that women lack political representation compared to men? Only if you assume that if a politician has a penis he will look out for men's interests, and if a politician has a vagina she will lo…
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:22 PM
11

I'm willing to give feminists their due and agree that accusations of sexual assault (particularly in the context of date/acquaintance rape) are VERY difficult to prove. Difficult to prove yes, but convict? Over half of the people released under the innocent project were men falsely accused of rape. And those were BEFORE the current wave of feminist madness.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:08 PM
25

No that's not true either. It could well be much higher than 40 percent. We simply don't know because the majority of cases aren't proven one way or the other.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:03 PM
4

Actually 2nd wave feminists were financed by the great capitalists, especially the Ford and Rockefeller foundations. Today they are pushed by everyone from Goldman Sachs to the UN. Feminists and SJW's are useful idiots for the corporatcracy. They have nothing in common with the traditional left, and in fact serve as a divide and conquer mechanism for the working class.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 06:11 AM
13

This sub has a pretty even mix of left and right. Sometimes you'll even see posts supporting socialism upvoted (and sometimes you'll see posts supporting right wing/right-libertarian ideas upvoted). Words like 'cuck' are goofy but not enough to be bothered about.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 01:52 AM
17

Don't forget birth control, safe abortion and time saving devices in the home. Thankfully feminists expressed gratitude toward men for liberating them the drudgery of home life and even their own biology -- oh wait no, they claimed that we are patriarchal oppressors, insisted that females should be privileged in schools and workplaces, destroyed the family while opposing legislation that would grant fathers equal parenting rights, created the Duluth model -- which criminalizes male victims of do…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 11:10 PM
6

I'm sorry but this is simply false. The original lynchings provide an obvious example where presumption of innocence was thrown out the window with the tacit approval of most authorities. The internment of German Americans during WWI and Japanese/German Americans during WWII. The targeting of the New Left during the FBI'S COINTELPRO. The targeting of Muslims during the war on terror (see "The Terror Factory"). There are many other examples. The US is not immune to witch hunts due to constitution…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:53 PM
3

NO fucking way!
/r/MensRights21/12/17 11:15 PM
-1

Rape is punishable by death in many Muslim countries. Be careful about sensationalist claims by the far right about Muslims. Most of these clowns get their paychecks from Israel.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:48 PM
1

It still amounts to "who can be the most gynocentric? the left or the right?" Put it this way: if Cenk were accused of rape I wouldn't have much pity for him, but I would still insist on his right to due process and I would still embrace a healthy skepticism. The truth is more important than tribalism and partisan politics.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:32 PM
19

haha...hahahahhaha Sorry. No. I have seen feminists on the R/Canada sub trying to slander CAFE by linking to garbage by Dave Futrelle. Help men? Why would you want to help your "class enemies"?
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:27 PM
7

Holy shit. I can't believe the Guardian is actually trying to defend this madness. Most misandrist publication in history.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:12 PM
4

Yep. the media's trying to portray this as "incompetence" rather than what it is -- criminal activity by police and the feminist state.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:32 PM
1

Far worse than Jack the ripper
/r/MensRights21/12/17 07:57 PM
11

No. Not it doesn't. It derives from every feminist who has referred to accusers as "survivors," who has claimed we live in a "rape culture," who has grossly exaggerated the threat of sexual assault by conflating flirting with rape, who has demonized male sexuality. Saunders is a symptom, not a cause. But yes she should be fired and possibly charged depending on her level of corruption.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 07:57 PM
7

Men evolved better making up skills
/r/MensRights21/12/17 07:49 PM
16

Feminists are abusing female power, which derives, paradoxically, from the illusion of weakness. Their behavior is not only profoundly immoral but sadistic, since it exploits the protective instincts and good will of men. An analogy would be setting up a charity for abused children then stealing all the money.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 07:28 PM
10

We simply don't know because the majority of cases are he said/she said. The actual percentage could be even higher than 41 percent; or, as you say, it could be lower. Moreover these studies were all done twenty years ago before being a sexual assault victim became the cool thing to be. Mattress girl (whose story is patently false and was rejected even by the Kangaroo court on campus) was even invited to the State of the Union Address. When being a victim increases your social status we have ent…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 07:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter