TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Demyk7 Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by Demyk7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

why ask more than once? Because (assuming you're not asking all 10 times immediately one after the other) every time you ask, it's under different circumstances, maybe the 2nd time you just got a new haircut and outfit, maybe by the 3rd ask you hung out a few times and thought she was being flirty with you now, maybe by the 4th ask you've been hitting the gym for a while and the newbie gains are giving you more confidence, etc. It's like that saying, a man can't stand in the same river twice, be…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:29 AM
1

The women are the source in this scenario, the drugs = sex/companionship/affection.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 08:18 PM

But I’m very much aware of the fact that a lot of men don’t actually care about reality… All they care about is how something makes them feel Which is part of why I think it’s so ridiculous that they won’t just go ahead and pay for sex when they want it The answer to this is in the first statement I quoted from you "All they care about is how something makes them feel". I've paid for sex 8 times in my life and it was only really enjoyable 2 times. The other 6 times made me feel bad, and as you s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 05:41 PM

There's no way to rephrase "Hey, listen, you're really hot so I'd like to fuck you then move on shortly afterward to fucking other women" so that it'll sound like an acceptable thing to her. That's where you're wrong. It just takes a little setup but you can do it if she's already attracted to you. You just have to coach her into the right mindset and put her in the right situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 05:21 PM

Yea, that was kind of confusing for me too, I was waiting for the "but" that never came.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 05:18 PM

You mean he wants women to have men's sexuality. No, I mean he wants women to be more attracted to more men. Or is that what you meant by "men's sexuality"? Be the person you'd want to date. Do you mean to empathize with the person you want to date, or do you mean to embody the traits of the kind of person you'd want to date?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 08:40 AM

If that was the case, they'd tend towards having the same reaction when a man they find attractive does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:26 AM

Are you selectively illogical The irony of this coming from you is crazy. No, the difference is value. To women, these comments have no value coming from most men. If it was FEAR OF BEING MURDERED, OR JUST BEING USED TO COMPLIMENTS, women would react the same way whether they're coming from some random average guy on a construction site, or whichever guy they find really attractive. You see the part that is bold and in capitals? That's where I literally quoted your arguments, and the rest of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:30 AM
2

Are you selectively literate? Could you not read the rest of the words?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:40 AM
1

Are you selectively literate? Could you not read the rest of the words?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:33 AM
1

What? No, the difference is value. To women, these comments have no value coming from most men. If it was fear of being murdered, or just being used to compliments, women would react the same way whether they're coming from some random average guy on a construction site, or whichever guy they find really attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 08:50 PM
2

No, the difference is value. To women, these comments have no value coming from most men. If it was fear of being murdered, or just being used to compliments, women would react the same way whether they're coming from some random average guy on a construction site, or whichever guy they find really attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 08:02 PM
19

This reminds me of an Instagram party where a woman went around catcalling and telling men all the cliche things that women say they don't like from men, and she was shocked that every man she approached appreciated her comments
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 05:33 PM
1

This reminds me of an Instagram party where a woman went around catcalling and telling men all the cliche things that women say they don't like from men, and she was shocked that every man she approached appreciated her comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 05:32 PM
4

If you are a man and are looking to date people with male attraction patterns He's not looking to date people with "male attraction patterns", he's looking to date specifically women who specifically find most men attractive. Dating men wouldn't solve that problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 05:09 PM
0

Maybe defining what respect actually means to you would help Respect is basically recognizing and showing that somebody has worth. To me it sounds like men want ego boosting BS platitudes. That's flattery, not respect, and in some cases shows a lack of respect as well because it can be interpreted as, "I think you're dumb enough to fall for this". Does it mean just being nice? No, it means treating them as if they matter. For example, let's say you were a university student doing a group project…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 05:02 PM
2

Genuinely, why?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 09:40 PM
3

Wouldn’t fleeing your country because it’s attacking other countries tries be considered opposing war? No. That's just escaping the draft because they're afraid of personally participating in the war. What a dumb person. You shouldn't be so quick to throw around insults like that, especially not after saying something that would seem dumb to anyone who thinks about it even a little bit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/26 06:02 PM
2

If I have negative experiences with a particular race, does that entitle me to be "guarded" around that whole race? Yes. I'm guarded around white people and girls/young women, I have no problem with other people doing the same because I understand it. you dodged that point entirely like a coward rather than address it head on. I didn't dodge it, I was waiting for clarification before I proceeded. I have no problem admitting to these things because I think they're perfectly reasonable. you are be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 05:43 PM
-5

if some woman told me that they hate or fear me You see how you had to change it from women being guarded around people who are stronger and faster than they are to women hating and fearing men? I don't want to assume you did it to be disingenuous, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and let you explain why you did that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 09:39 PM
-6

Like that video of that one trans man crying on camera, but still inserting "women are guarded against men, but that's still completely valid" while complaining about the overbearing feeling of loneliness. Do you not think it's valid that women are guarded around men, especially when so many of them or someone they know has been violated or harassed by men, knowing that they have no hope of defending themselves or even running away from a man if he decided to do something to them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 02:57 PM
2

I'm pretty sure some of the older guys in my neighborhood were rapists based on the advice they gave me as a kid. Among other things, they would always advise me to get women intoxicated with alcohol or weed to make them easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 02:39 PM
2

If by "paying" you're including being enjoyable to spend time with or being attractive then you're right, but I'd never use the word that broadly. If you're paying then you're not scoring. Scoring is what happens when you play the game and win. If you pay for it that's like getting to take a picture with the trophy but you didn't actually score any points, you never laced up and got on the field.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 07:37 AM
4

The reason you're paying is because you, as a person, offer so little of value that the only way to make interacting with you worth their time is for you to compensate them monetarily. You're basically paying them for the labour that is having to endure your presence. How could you possibly spin this as anything besides being a loser?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 02:30 AM
9

I’d say the opposite. If you can afford a sugar baby, you are by definition not a loser. The mere fact that you have to pay for attention makes you a loser. It's basically an admission that you're so worthless as a person and offer so little of value as a companion that only monetary compensation could get a woman to want to stay around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:46 PM

I didn't say anyone was dodging accountability. I think the person who said that did so because the store owner has the ability to stop the theft, and is choosing to not do anything to stop them, but I don't see how that's justifying the theft either. But do you really think that explaining why something happens is the same thing as justifying it?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:46 PM

Because it quite plainly is not. What you're saying implies that persuasion and coercion are the same thing. Like If I convinced you to buy a hybrid car instead of an electric car by telling you the hybrid would get better range and would be easier to repair, you really think I bullied you into that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:43 PM

You're trying to say that women who wear make up are guilty of rape if they have sex with a man. No I'm saying women who use cosmetics and clothes with the intention to manipulate men into finding them more attractive than they naturally are is the same thing as men lying and faking with the intention to manipulate women into finding them more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:33 PM

If a man told you he didn't lie to manipulate women, he just did it because he finds it enjoyable to make up stories about himself, would that make it any less rapey to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:27 PM

You can call them out for finding most men unattractive, but that isn't going to do anything to make them find unattractive men more attractive. It's like a gay man trying to convince a straight man to have sex with him, or two straight men to have sex with each other, except in the case of incels they might just be desperate enough to do it, which is why I said you might as well go that route, since it's probably easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:24 PM

If this is the path you're going to go down you might as well advocate for incels to have sex with each other, it's basically the same thing but more attainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:07 PM

If we had that conversation then men would say women using make-up, push-up bras, shapewear, cosmetic surgery, wigs/hair-extensions, etc. to impersonate someone more attractive and both sides would think the other is being ridiculous even though they're both right about the other trying to manipulate them into finding them more attractive than they really are.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:44 PM

You really don't see how ridiculous it is to freak out about not being gifted a sweater? Ironically, I did, until u/MoreCheesePlease8676 made their position seem reasonable, which should be clear from my response. This reminds me of the first time I heard the "violinist argument", which was the first time I'd heard an argument that was convincing as an anti-choice argument, the irony being that the violinist argument is supposed to be a pro-choice argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:36 PM

Ngl, you made their position seem really reasonable with that. Is that what you were going for?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 04:08 PM

Do you truly think that explaining why something happens is the same thing as justifying it?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:24 PM

How can you look at human behavior and history and come to the conclusion that humans are inherently rational beings? We invented science as a way to teach and practice rationality because it isn't something we just naturally grasp for the most part. Sure there might be a few humans in every thousand who are naturally rational beings but that's far from the norm. What humans do naturally is pattern recognition, sometimes that gives good, useful results and often it leads to false positives.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:21 PM

How do you see and even quote the word "convincing", but manage to turn it into "bullying" by the very next sentence? Are you truly of the opinion that persuasion and coercion are the same thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:09 PM
-10

To stop the alimony payments she was making to him because he was a lazy slob who didn't want to work a job.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/25 02:46 PM
1

Only the ones who prey on children.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/25 02:08 PM
1

Men dont want their daughters to be doormats like they want their wives to be My interpretation was that they place less value on their daughter's relationship qualities than they would with their wives because they're in relationships with their wives and not looking to be in romantic relationships with their daughters.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 07:06 PM
1

What helped me was imitation. I'd try to emulate some of the characteristics of people who seemed confident. It's still not something I feel is natural to me, but it's much easier now. I can be charming and a little charismatic when I feel I need to, and I'm confident if I actually spent more time practicing more seriously it would be second nature to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 12:22 AM
29

The problem isn't that his mom does that stuff, it's that she does it publicly. There are plenty of normal people who's parents engaged in a wide variety of sex acts, so it's not the sex acts that affect them, it's being exposed to the ridicule and disgust of others.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 01:42 PM
3

How did California laws cause him to develop Lewy body dementia?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/21 02:36 AM
1

They didn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/21 02:34 AM
0

How?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/21 01:03 PM
1

But having female entry tests be different from male entry tests doesn't mean less men enter the military than if there wasn't women involved. I'm not seeing how what you're saying makes sense. Any way you slice it more women in the military means more combat duty personnel, even if it's only because you were able to hand off all non combat roles to women, it would free up far more men to participate in combat.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/21 02:42 PM
7

The US military has 1.3 million active duty personnel with 17.5% of those being women. Do you think if the military were to lose those 227,500 women it would have: A) more soldiers B) less soldiers C) about the same amount of soldiers
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/21 02:17 PM
6

...because if You're restricting military service to only half your population, you'll have less military personnel than if you didn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/21 01:14 AM
0

They use guns these days.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/21 04:30 PM
13

Somehow, I think an army of 50,000 combatants with 20,000 of them being women would crush an army of only 30,000.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/21 04:28 PM
3

Yea it's so bad that they gave the couple tens of thousands of dollars worth of gifts while promoting their own businesses.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/20 11:11 PM
139

MURDER DEATH KILL!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/20 02:44 PM
1

They will usually be a few steps ahead of you in life, experiencing things that you haven't experienced yet. Ideally you should be able to turn to them in times of need. When you want advice or a different perspective. And they are part of your family, which ideally should be your own little community/network. Humans are social animals and strong social bonds help give us a feeling of contentment and happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 09:37 PM
3

What would it take for you to change your view?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 09:18 PM
3

I've only ever heard it used by self-identified incels.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/19 03:45 PM
1

All of them?
/r/MGTOW01/10/19 04:39 PM
2

What for?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 12:06 AM
9

They're not giving their youth to people, they're doing what they want when they want. I don't see what i do as giving my youth away to the women I'm with, I just like having sex with different people. I'm taking advantage of my youth to do what i enjoy and explore sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 11:46 PM
12

Shouldn't it be higher since they live longer too?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/17 03:56 AM
2

That would depend on how you define strength. For example, let's say someone has a strong will, and they are emotionally strong(we'll assume that means that they can tolerate a high level of emotional stress), that doesn't also mean that they can't be vindictive or vengeful. It might even mean that they're more likely to be calculated in the way they intend to hurt you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 09:10 PM
1

Ideally, she wouldn't have a job. She'd be a fabulously wealthy heiress who spends all her time and money fullfiling my every desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 05:33 AM
1

While they do find the behaviours attractive, knowing some of the reasoning behind it, and the way they look in some people's eyes isn't as attractive. In other words, they like that you don't pander to them or that nothing they say bothers you. But they don't like knowing that it's because you really don't give a shit about them, and you view them as little more than children or tools to be used. That's obviously an extreme example involving misunderstandings.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 05:30 AM
1

If you Ee make and can be aroused by other males, knowing that they are males, you are not straight. These words have definitions.
/r/PussyPass04/03/17 04:29 PM
2

Woman 1: 6 Woman 2: 7.5 Woman 3: 5 Woman 4: 5 Woman 5: 8 (I have a bimbo fetish) Woman 6: 7. 5 Woman 7: 9 Woman 8: 6
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 03:18 AM
1

If it's just for sex, everything besides her physical appearance is irrelevant to me in this scenario. If it's for a relationship, I'd prefer the woman who out earns me so I can live off her money(if we're talking many millions). The others are all a close second.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 02:55 AM
1

I believe that unfaithful partners are disgusting. The kind of people that have no concept of things like loyalty, trust, foresight, strength, or empathy. Those who want to be with them deserve what they get. If they're just having sex with them, I don't think they're in the wrong as long as they're not in any committed relationships. If they want a relationship with that person, I can't help but think they're unintelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 04:10 AM
1

If I can have more than one child, then I could let the first one be a boy so his little sister would have a big brother to help her out. But of it's only one. I it really makes no difference to me. I can't see any advantages of one over the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 04:04 PM
1

Don't conflate sex with romance Enjoy what they get from sex Enjoy novelty Enjoy social interactions
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:05 AM
1

I would feel shocked and insulted in that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 01:26 AM
2

Ass and tits, assuming its just for sex Age: 24 Ethnicity: West Indian of(mostly) African descent Region: Eastern Caribbean Pill: red pill Socioeconomic status: Upper-middle class
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 03:03 PM
3

I'm sure people in control of their lives enjoy cars too. How could someone who isn't in control of their life buy something like a LaFerrari aperta at a base price of over two million dollars.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/17 04:35 PM
2

I just say, 'oh...ok' and walk away.
/r/seduction21/10/16 03:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter