TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DepressiveVortex Archive

View 38 posts and 565 comments by DepressiveVortex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
283

DiscriminationDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights06/12/19 07:14 AM
112

GeneralDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights28/10/21 09:55 AM
87

HealthDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights13/12/19 11:00 PM
74

GeneralDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights29/04/20 09:17 AM
65

Activism/SupportDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:05 PM
64

Activism/SupportDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights13/12/18 09:26 AM
54

Social IssuesDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights23/12/19 06:17 PM
51

Legal RightsDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights08/03/23 10:22 AM
49

Edu./Occu.DepressiveVortex/r/MensRights29/11/18 10:02 AM
45

Marriage/ChildrenDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights10/01/23 05:47 AM
45

Marriage/ChildrenDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:30 PM
43

GeneralDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:21 AM
37

Social IssuesDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights07/03/20 08:57 PM
35

DiscriminationDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights04/12/20 03:33 AM
34

Social IssuesDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights01/06/20 12:32 PM
34

GeneralDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights24/12/19 08:45 PM
33

Activism/SupportDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights12/09/19 10:24 PM
29

Marriage/ChildrenDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights08/07/20 03:33 AM
29

Marriage/ChildrenDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights07/06/20 12:32 PM
28

Activism/SupportDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights20/09/19 01:01 AM
28

DepressiveVortex/r/MensRights08/03/20 09:45 PM
25

HealthDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights10/04/22 02:35 AM
24

Social IssuesDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights06/07/20 07:55 AM
23

FeminismDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights12/07/20 08:23 PM
23

GeneralDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights25/09/20 12:23 AM
21

False AccusationDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights26/08/20 07:23 AM
18

Social IssuesDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights13/07/20 11:47 AM
16

Activism/SupportDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights28/10/18 10:03 AM
12

Social IssuesDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:33 AM
9

GeneralDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights14/06/20 12:28 PM
8

Edu./Occu.DepressiveVortex/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:36 AM
6

False AccusationDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights02/07/18 06:20 PM
5

GeneralDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights15/07/20 05:30 AM
5

GeneralDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights12/05/20 07:42 AM
3

DiscriminationDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:36 AM
1

ProgressDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:32 PM
1

Social IssuesDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights03/09/24 07:07 PM
0

DiscriminationDepressiveVortex/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

I prefer genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:38 PM
-9

I'm sure all the right will be lauding Trump when they draft men exclusively to go die for oil.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:42 PM
-8

Trump is a pedophile rapist who is beholden to Russia.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 08:35 AM
2

I refuse to believe that men only wouldn't be conscripted in the event of war in the UK. Therefore rights are not equal.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:48 AM
69

Oh but don't you know? Those weren't 'real' feminists, and the comments about killing men? Just a joke!
/r/MensRights24/10/25 09:00 PM
12

There are too many thoughts here and none of them are coherent.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 10:25 AM
8

Did you link to the wrong article?
/r/MensRights30/04/25 09:34 PM
3

Ummm, how about we just make it apply to everyone or no one, instead of discriminating against men?
/r/MensRights10/04/25 10:36 AM
-2

Archive? I won't accept tracking cookies from this trash.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 02:52 AM
62

In the UK a woman forcing a boys penis inside her isn't even termed rape. There's always been bias against boys and men in this regard.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 08:48 PM
0

In 2021, over half of all men (55%) support drafting women, compared to about a third (36%) of women. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/military-draft-women-support-2021 Excluding women from the vote is how to free ourselves from the draft.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 03:59 PM
2

We will not solve that problem while women are in a privileged position.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 03:22 PM
2

Women should not be allowed to vote until they are required to do the same things men have to in order to vote.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:35 AM
27

If you felt it was not relevant and should not be discussed perhaps it was best not to include it in your post and invite it for discussion.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:04 PM
7

Good call, misread the header.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:11 PM
29

People definitely need to read the article before up voting this bollocks. Whatever Mens Rights issues India has, this isn't it.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 03:48 PM
2

Eh, just today I was in a conversation with a mod regarding a post I had removed. They seemed to sympathise but know it happens. Sometimes it's a case of kill them all and let god sort them out, as it seems. Sometimes that mod responding may not even agree with that. I feel I have to add that someone downvoted you so I put you back on 1. Edit: it wasn't a mod on this sub btw.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:05 PM
1

I hope not. Tbh I doubt it. I used to know a mod of this sub, and they seemed impartial to me..it would be a shame if that changed.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:56 PM
46

That isn't statutory rape in Iceland.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 08:55 AM
0

I expected a worse reaction tbh. I don't think anyone else is going to stand up for these children, we should try to. No one, no matter who they are, no matter what cause or country you support, should be able to look at this and say it's ok. We need to be aware of it and condemn it.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 08:09 PM
7

Did you even watch the video?
/r/MensRights03/09/24 07:22 PM
5

The rape of little boys has nothing to do with Mens Rights? If you say so, I would disagree though.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 07:22 PM
5

/r/mramemes
/r/MensRights29/08/24 11:59 AM
7

I know. They are the wrong 'sort' of men to care about. It's sad.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 08:53 PM
8

No, blaming a government for their actions is not and never will be antisemitic.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 08:27 PM
7

Quote me being antisemitic. You're either a bot, liar, or a false actor but you can't be anything but and you've proven it lmao
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:51 PM
3

You betray yourself with the accusations of antisemitism. It's pathetic. Israeli false actor here, folks.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:30 PM
2

Let's not pretend the genocide being committed in Palestine is an act of self defence.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 05:46 PM
-3

Jeffrey Dahmer was a serial murderer. There's exaggeration and then there's lunacy.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:45 PM
14

Yea that means they are spared any jail time if they keep their nose clean for two years. Spared jail is accurate.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:44 PM
14

Women have the privilege of deciding when they have a child by carrying it themselves. I do not consider that a burden.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:29 PM
1

I respect the effort. But I cannot respect supporting a felon. Drop it.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 01:57 PM
1

Doug I widely respect your activism efforts but why on earth send this to Donald Trump? He is a felon. Better to leave him far away.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:49 PM
2

You shouldn't be. It is better to respond with honest advice to a potential troll, than to display hate and arrogance in the face of a victim. We are not judges, that isn't our responsibility. The advice we give should apply to any rape victim, and be given the support we would want a victim to have.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 11:28 PM
0

My advice to this person doesn't change if they are male or female. We may also not know how they self identify. Edit: You're really looking at this from the wrong point of view. If this is a troll, so what? What aims might it have? The most upvoted comments here are expressing support and wanting them to get help. How does that discredit Men's Rights or us as decent people? If anything, these things prove that we care genuinely about these issues. I can't see how that is a bad thing for us to b…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 11:21 PM
0

Personally, id rather just treat what is said here as truth and give the best advice we can, than assume anything is a lie. Our responses if anything should show that we care about rape victims and want them to be able to recover and have good lives.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 11:19 PM
8

Its pretty unlikely he overpowered 5 girls and raped them at the same time, yea. Please get a grip.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:28 PM
9

This is much more likely to happen if he doesn't report it. Seriously, what gives with trying to scare OP out of doing the right thing that is best for him? The kind of trauma that this will cause him will be far worse if he bottles it up and feels trapped.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:16 PM
46

This is what many abusers tell the people they abuse to scare them. The truth is this will not happen, they say that because they themselves are scared of what happens to them. You will be protected if you tell the police. Please be sure to tell them you've been threatened as well and keep any messages you have that may show this. Stay strong brother, you will get through this.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:59 PM
11

That will never change for your country unless people speak up. But I do not feel it is right for you to wander into this topic and discourage him based on a country he doesn't live in. There's a time and place.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:37 PM
22

That doesn't matter. Don't try and put this young man off doing the right thing for him and his mental health.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:32 PM
104

Call the police and tell them everything. This isn't your fault and they shouldn't be allowed to do that to you. A strong man has the courage to speak up when bad things happen to him, no matter how difficult they are. You are not less of a man for this, but more.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:20 PM
8

The law firm's actual name is Vardag, for anyone wondering. OP must have made a 'clerical error', legally "Dewey, Phuckup, & Howe" is now their name.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 01:47 AM
6

Dude, guy tries to speak about how he feels on a topic and you feel it necessary to call him autistic? Get lost.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 07:11 AM
6

And yet certain people I won't name names, believe that the Tories are actually better for men in the UK. No party supports men which is why tying Men's Rights to existing political parties is nonsense. Support people and stances, not the bollocks and cruelty that the Tories have inflicted on the UK population
/r/MensRights08/10/23 03:24 AM
5

I believe the problem is exacerbated because some governments classify any male civilian killed by them as a combatant.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:27 PM
7

Interesting article. If you know the author they may want to have a look at this part as I'm sure something has gone wrong: Women are told to reject the struggle love, mothering grown men, taking on projects, and we’re here to say it’s time for men to stop being surrogate husbands to women.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 03:47 PM
25

Women demand Barbie doll lookalikes by themselves. Men couldn't care less most of the time.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 01:04 PM
1

Tea is an evening meal.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:53 PM
8

Tea the evening meal, not the drink.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:51 PM
11

You haven't answered my question. Does a removed part of the human body have any sensation or function, when it did before it was removed?
/r/MensRights16/05/23 12:00 PM
13

Please could you describe for me the sensation and function of a part of the human body that has been removed from the rest of the human body? Does it have any function or sensation after removal?
/r/MensRights16/05/23 11:42 AM
5

The state of the country/economy I'm not surprised people would be willing to do this. Maybe citizens would abide by the law if they weren't living in squalor. Not sure why this is in Men's Rights rather than ukpolitics
/r/MensRights16/05/23 11:39 AM
14

But there is loss of both ?
/r/MensRights16/05/23 11:31 AM
10

How does it not fit the definition of mutilation?
/r/MensRights16/05/23 11:12 AM
2

A suspended sentence is when you do not serve time, but instead see a probation officer and if you commit another crime during the suspension you will instead be taken to prison to carry out the sentence. If you don't commit another offense, you won't see any time in prison.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:13 PM
-49

So you're saying men aren't people now? xD
/r/MensRights04/05/23 01:32 PM
1

Lib Dems don't have a chance of getting elected after they teamed up with the Tories. I'm just being a realist.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:15 PM
0

It also happens to be the truth. When the Tories are out is the time to be focusing on other things.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 07:11 PM
-5

Sorry, but if you aren't voting Labour, then yes, you are supporting the conservatives. That's the current reality. You can accept it or not.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 06:58 PM
-3

That doesn't make the Tories the option for the UK. They are corrupt, orchestrated Brexit, kill thousands if not tens of thousands of disabled people, and steal the countries money to give it to their mates. Whereas it's something to be addressed at some point, potentially having misogyny listed as a hate crime is nowhere near any of the important issues that the UK actually needs to deal with.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 04:15 PM
-1

The Tories have run the UK into the ground. Labour is the only positive option for the UK.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 03:37 PM
-40

Does this look like TwoX to you?
/r/MensRights24/04/23 12:20 AM
0

So you don't think children give life any meaning, insist on using silly offensive terms (tbh I only told you that for your benefit), and are generally not a nice person. I appreciate constructive thoughts, unfortunately that doesn't count yours so please don't bother to reply to anything else I write on Reddit.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 05:31 PM
2

It doesn't matter if slightly more people who decide things like war are men. I said 'find reasons to fight'. That includes people who support it with their hot air. My comment wasn't long. Stop garbling it. ​ and these people are voted for by a majority of the electorate- which are always women. Elections are fake. Sanders had it stolen from him twice. You need a third time to see what is going on? It doesn't matter who is in the WH. That person will play ball with the oligarchs or wind up like…
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:30 PM
2

It doesn't matter if slightly more people who decide things like war are men. It's a tiny fraction of the population which does not conflate to 'men', and these people are voted for by a majority of the electorate- which are always women. In other words, no, there's not a to be fair, you're just excusing mens suffering and I find it disgusting.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:03 PM
-1

free for anyone to use [...] free of charge Nothing is free, someone will have to pay for it, presumably all of us through yet higher taxes. As much is free as we want to be, eventually. Capitalism is a means to an end, humans were not 'made' to work and if we can free ourselves from it, all the better. [The position of the sexes] leads to men being violent loners And you wish to solve this with artificial wombs? I'm not sure I follow... What is it do you think is the primary reason men need wom…
/r/MensRights09/03/23 07:20 AM
1

Thank you for your comments, you've further explained some thoughts I was having regarding the future consequences of a decision like this for men and their ability to be close to their children.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:54 PM
1

Free artificial wombs =\= mass cloning lol. You're assuming I'm wanting to take choices away from people. In reality, this only gives them more.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:45 PM
1

Well if I put you to the same test you'd also fail to find evidence your idea improved the situation so I suppose we have come to an impasse. I'm not proposing ludicrous outcomes though. You just called my idea dystopian because you don't like it for some reason. Which is fine I don't expect people to always agree. But I don't need to exaggerate. The value of human beings is mostly in their ability to create new human beings. If we can make test-tube babies en mass then the value of every human …
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:32 PM
2

Unfortunately, Capitalism should be a means to an end, but is treated as the end itself by many. Something we need to work on.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:17 PM
2

No, there's a lot of states that use state taxes to fund a healthcare program. The only point that I was making was that there is no state in the United States that provides free abortion just because people want an abortion. I mean if you say so. It's still not what I can see, and we both know it's not what's available at any rate. So comparing it to men who want to have free sex without consequences of children is not a fair equivalency. Because that's not how abortion is currently funded in t…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:13 PM
1

The value of our societies is decided by our societies. Your inferences are your inferences, if what you say would happen is backed up by evidence then show it. Lol at the suggestion it would make parents and humanity defunct though. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 08:57 PM
2

That wasn't what I was saying but that's also kind of true. Medi-cal for example is partially funded federally and partially funded with state taxes. So only one of the states it lists is different? I could be missing something but it seems like a relatively small thing compared to the rest of your post saying that none it lists is right. Do you think that states shouldn't allow the kinds of abortions that I listed? No? I'm for abortion rights in general, not even in those circumstances. But I'm…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 08:55 PM
1

I didn't deny that there are men who want that... But I don't think it's a good way. I can't see a possibility in your scenario it would be viable to actually give men the same right to have or not child that women do. Because having to pay for it precludes that. Women and men are both finate resources. So if we are going to give some choices over our lives between women and men (which we have already done in women's favour), let's make those choices made equitable.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 08:38 PM
2

If I'm understanding correctly, you're saying that 'state funded abortion' and 'state Medicaid funded abortion' are different things? If both are funded by the state, how exactly? You can go down on your own page to the table, if that display helps any for which states are allowing what.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 08:22 PM
1

Or perhaps we should invest in research that would allow the implantation of a uterus into a man's body and a way to rewire his hormones for 9 months? Birth by c-section of course. I would gladly donate my uterus to science. I mean, if you like, feel free to push for that. Seems like being against doing something good for both sexes at the same time like eliminating birth risk. Considering you're posting it as an 'or' that would somehow be 'better', I couldn't agree with you. All jokes aside...Y…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 07:54 PM
1

I don't see how removing both sexes obligations/reliance on the other encourages not cooperating. If anything, forcing a level playing field I see as the best way to be able to deal with someone who would otherwise have an advantage over you. Artificial wombs for humans don't exist yet, and the technology still needs work. But the world isn't getting better for men right now. Whereas I hope that women would fight to relinquish their privilege in society, this seems to me highly unlikely given cu…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 07:41 PM
1

Humans change the nature around them to suit themselves or at least to suit certain members. It's one of our defining traits as a species. In what way was making abortion legal, demanding child support from random men, built into nature, in a way that you can argue can not be unbuilt? We have reasoning and the capacity to use it.. it is very easy to give up on the hope we will change it because things are sad but we have done it before. And if you give up then you've already lost.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 07:25 PM
3

I'm including the general western world, as I think that may be a bit more fair than focusing on one specific country. I don't think I'd be incorrect in saying the vast majority of western countries give their citizens the right to an abortion. But I looked into this a little anyways, and it seems that even though it may not be allowed in federal funding it is at state level which for most countries would still be considered the same thing. The amendment also does not apply to cases of abortion …
/r/MensRights08/03/23 07:20 PM
2

I never claimed they are outlawed. They aren't available for free or seen as rights men should have like abortion- which in many countries is a state provided for service.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 06:36 PM
1

Societal changes/behaviours I don't see as a single issue goal and nor do I think that they can't be enforced/enacted as opposed to that. I'm not sure why we can't do both, or try to force through quicker action for equality than slow change would enact. This would be expensive, of course, to do the things I proposed in the OP. So was setting up the NHS. Or ensuring all women have access to abortion. Were either of those worth it?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 04:21 PM
1

Talking about making humanity happy is a worthwhile goal, it's ok if people have doubts, I'd be concerned over my own opinions if I couldn't try and address them.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:56 PM
4

Fighting against injustice, no matter who it's against, is one of the boldest things you can do with your life.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:55 PM
2

Because people tend to want biological children, and adopted children are not free of cost? We mandate things like abortion be paid for by the state. I see no reason this should be different.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:53 PM
4

Who would care if it did though? Men wouldn't have to rely on women for that kind of relationship, or their needs. And that is women's power over men. This mythical 80% of men with 20% of women figure seems ridiculous, but if that high a number did choose to be polyamorous... Would it matter? What is the goal of finding a mate for men?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:22 PM
4

If you feel you have insights, feel free to add them. It's what the post is for.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 12:46 PM
3

It's not a question of letting them do anything, I simply stated what they say regardless of anything else. Thanks for the unwanted advice, though.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:19 AM
24

When feminists argue for men paying child support without consenting to a child they say he knew the risks when he had sex ie- sex is consent to a child. This isn't true of course, and they argue that it is somehow false equivalence for women, but that connection to sex meaning consent to have a child is there, and the responsibility is automatically placed on the man. Without that logic toward men being changed, that it is NOT consent to a child and all that financial obligation, we will be stu…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:08 AM
6

They used leeches on your penis?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 03:01 PM
0

The question can be taken different ways. Can he not consent and maintain a relationship with me, if you watch the video, seems to be the way the question has been taken in some of the cases. Whether it is in all of them I wouldn't know.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 05:29 PM
5

Women People are dangerous. They are unstable they lie and you can't trust them. No need to be sexist to get rights.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 05:17 PM
-1

Honestly, I think the question in the video is being misunderstood. I didn't watch all the way but especially one woman said 'we do it, y'all got do it to, we down with it so you gotta be too!' This to me is meaning they have rules for a relationship that apply to both people that they have chosen to set down. At least some will be thinking along the lines, 'no, that's not part of our relationship agreement, if you say no to sex I will leave and get it somewhere else', which is fair enough if a …
/r/MensRights10/01/23 02:20 PM
1

I wouldn't say this is 100% true. Sometimes condoms do break and pills don't work, you don't always notice if a condom breaks. I do think that woman are increasingly refusing to take any responsibility in getting pregnant but I wouldn't say it's only their fault. It takes 2 to make a child. It does take two to make a child, but he hasn't consented to have one with her. She consents to have a child by choosing not to abort, give the child away or use safe haven laws. You can't make him responsibl…
/r/MensRights10/01/23 06:12 AM
29

The way they get around it is by saying things as a percentage increase. In this way they may be able to show a slightly bigger % increase than there is for the men, despite men being the majority of suicide victims and the rate increasing almost the same amount. It's a disingenuous way to pretend things are a women's issue rather than a men's issue.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:09 PM
2

Make an image comparison to 'no colored' signs in the US, if it actually says that. I can't access it.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:33 AM
6

Care must always be taken to stand up for the values of Men's Rights and not let political bullshit tarnish our goals or divide us. Some people have forgotten that.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 06:04 PM
4

It keeps going on about cannabis and wanting to blame that rather than her :/
/r/MensRights02/12/22 07:39 PM
36

Why does she get anonymity?
/r/MensRights22/11/22 12:23 PM
1

I can't see anyone involved in that discussion worth talking to.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 09:38 AM
12

I'd still favour punishing them, but one concern is people will be less inclined to come forward about lying with this, and potentially more innocent men could stay in jail.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:56 PM
2

Whoever made this is way too quiet- I can barely hear them.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:12 PM
9

Male rape and DV victims are much higher than one in four of all cases.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:26 PM
1

It's not even hypothetical. There are female soldiers and you have no example. You're a joke.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 04:58 AM
4

In England and Whales, 2/3 of all homicide victims were male. Unless your name is Jonah, or perhaps Pinnochio, going inside a whale will likely kill you.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 01:13 PM
1

To the first part about not having a source, maybe, is that the standard all wiki articles are held to though? To the second, is violence against men not relevant when considering domestic violence? Depends on context.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 04:29 PM
12

Both of those statements are still true though
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:38 AM
3

Condoms are free to both sexes and help prevent STDs for both. They are not male only, and birth control is free for women which is far better. Try again.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:41 PM
2

Name some free healthcare products for men only that cater to biological functions.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:00 PM
5

Scotland just made period products free for women. I wonder whose taxes are paying for that?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 09:04 AM
3

People are still proclaiming her innocence. On Reddit I see highly upvoted posts based on no evidence claiming to show texts between Heard and Depp showing he was the abuser.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 11:39 AM
13

And what is the aim of both those things? To look good. If you're going to be such a pedantic troll try harder. Edit: Not usually one for character attacks, but since I've called this guy out as a troll, check his post history. He posts here alright, against anything we say.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 05:20 PM
14

I didn't say they took credit for anything. I said they look good for supporting him now. Nice try though, troll.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 05:13 PM
18

Except that's not what they are doing. Now they are jumping on the bandwagon because it's obvious to anyone who can rub two brain cells together that Depp has been the victim all along. They are doing this to look good and to pretend that 'feminism cares about male victims too!' This is no different than when feminists tried to take the credit for NCFM's struggle against selective service.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 05:03 PM
19

Mars.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:52 AM
6

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights14/03/22 07:36 PM
1

This was posted 2 months ago... Dude. You've been living under a rock if you haven't seen this as a trend in non comedies as well.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 01:53 PM
3

There is no proof and you are trolling. Done here.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:32 PM
2

You don't seem to understand how things work. If I say 'God exists' and then you say 'No he doesn't' then I say to prove he doesn't, like what? I haven't proven God exists so you should have no expectation to prove that he doesn't. You haven't proven what you are saying is true, and I don't need to prove it isn't because of that. It is unproven till you prove it.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:30 PM
4

Documented evidence, not anecdotal. The only reason someone doesn't pay is if they have no income or the mother doesn't file for it.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:34 PM
5

I'm not proving something to not be the case when you haven't proved your assertion. Give me examples of when this was done.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:30 PM
4

Prove you can do it without the mother's consent then.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:25 PM
5

You cannot currently get that, no. Why are you speaking as if you know things when you don't?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:00 PM
2

https://discord.gg/pKE7Srj
/r/MensRights17/11/21 02:02 AM
21

He did literally tell her to come down there. But how the fuck is it acceptable? If I beat a woman senseless at work I assure you, and as it should be, it would not be funny.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 10:00 AM
13

It also would no longer be an amp link.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 11:51 AM
2

In a statement, the tribunal said it had essentially confirmed that there had been a sexual relationship between Martinelli and the alleged victim, L.G., but no proof that L.G., who was just seven months younger, had been forced into it. This is a quote from the daily mail article. I dont know what has gone on here, but you cant assume guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 04:43 PM
-1

Having that as a subtitle changes what he is saying to something else. Honestly don't get the downvotes. It's like people want JP to be ordering people to do something.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 06:07 PM
-1

It's "A little gratitude for that is in order" not an. And this could do without the music in the background.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:11 PM
1

You would think not, with people defending this.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:51 AM
-7

The principle is the same. If you know people can see you, don't do it.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 03:27 PM
1

Not sure if people know what it's like to live somewhere facing a busy street.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:58 PM
-12

We can walk down the street naked then. If people choose to watch, that's up to them too.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:11 PM
-13

We can walk down the street naked then. If people choose to watch, that's up to them too.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:11 PM
3

Australians all live in a prison anyway so sentences to it there are kind of moot.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 07:42 PM
32

No one blames women. Any comments here that blame women are pretty heavily downvoted, and I wouldn't doubt it being some kind of false flagging attempt. We do blame feminism, because of it's actions which have on numerous occasions advocated against men on the supposed notion that it's needed to lift up women, which it isn't, it just creates inequality. Feminism is a supremecy movement.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 01:32 PM
5

I would take a guess at both.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 11:27 AM
0

They're in different countries.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 06:33 AM
1

So we should also separate vulnerable girls from men? I think it's wrong to think every teacher is a sex abuser.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 03:58 AM
5

Think you're right, actually didn't realise the person I was talking to in this thread had changed.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:52 PM
5

You can show the same metrics we're used, thus discrediting the study referenced in the OP. I'm not sure what you're still here for, just to argue pointlessly and make MRA's out to look bad with your pointless and inaccurate comparisons?
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:28 PM
11

It makes people question the rates. People in general are far less likely to believe that a similar amount of men are sexual assaulted, even though actually fair statistics show that.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:00 PM
26

These two comments here are bollocks. Showing an equivalence to demonstrate how ridiculously biased the original study is, and that rates are comparable, is in no way whataboutism, hating on women, or anything to do with incels. If anything, the sub is hijacked by people like you two painting the movement as bad when there is absolutely no evidence for it.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 08:39 PM
1

You don't have to ignore it or be irrationally angry. There are very good reasons to be angry over discrimination against your race or sex, and with your attitude no one will bother to stop that discrimination.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 11:19 AM
8

Like I said, I don't think it's actually a good take. I just wanted to clarify what the article said (that Bernie was doing something a woman couldn't get away with) and what it didn't say (that Bernie is a bad man for having privilege.) Objectively he's got privilege - he's a millionaire and a senator, he can get away with all sorts of shit if he wants to. She claimed, without any concrete evidence, that Bernie Sanders was exhibiting white male class privilege I think you may need to examine yo…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:27 AM
12

Well it seems peeps did a good job. In the edits it says they reported it to the police and are waiting for a response.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 04:47 PM
3

Yep. This particular example would be covered under commandment VIII.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 07:59 AM
1

That's strange, I can't get it to work on RIF but I just opened it in browser and it showed. Sorry for the false alarm.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 05:59 PM
2

This image is no longer available.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 08:07 AM
2

Sometimes it can be too much. Take a step back, take a breather, and come back later with a fresh head. You don't need to rush yourself, and you don't need to immediately own all the problems of the earth. Do what you can, when you can, don't overwhelm yourself mate.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 10:21 AM
2

No worries. There's also a sub for asking questions to MRA's. r/askthemras
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:15 PM
3

Here. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g2eme/feminists_tell_you_that_the_solution_to_mens/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:09 PM
44

Since it's been deleted: https://www.ceddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/i443hy/society_has_normalised_women_treating_men_like
/r/MensRights05/08/20 03:21 PM
1

People can be idiots and kids can be cruel. I say that a man does what he wants and doesn't let others tell him the standards by which he can live by or what he can and cannot do. If you want to cry or feel you need to do it, do it. Also look for what will help you be strong in the future and create situations where you will feel better and not have the need to cry. Live the best life you can regardless of others.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 02:48 PM
5

You know its fine to demonise the guy that touched her if he's doing it on purpose, but to address it to all men is just sexist.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 09:46 PM
30

Yes, that seems right. It skews the statistics even further in that no male is an innocent civilian, at the time I remember being surprised they were able to claim such high numbers of women & children civilian deaths compared to men, and this was why. Let's not forget either that 'combat aged male' is a very rough description, some of those are actually children too.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 09:12 PM
138

Without looking into it more I can't be sure, but if I recall correctly a lot of civilian men who were killed by certain strikes were considered combatants rather than civilians as well, just by virtue of being an adult male.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 05:13 PM
-1

Tell it to the UN.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:15 AM
1

I think what they're saying is that globally girls face more 'gender-based' violence than boys, which I would take to mean sexual assault and rape. Not that the UN is fair, or that that's true, but it's easy to misunderstand here.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 04:34 AM
2

Does anyone know of a mirror since this was taken down? Not sure what this is.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 10:46 AM
6

I know this isn't exactly what you asked for, but this is the one I associate with this movement and men's struggle for equality. https://images.app.goo.gl/dYzUHkrkBUtiP3ZY7
/r/MensRights14/07/20 09:56 AM
1

This week we are hosting the chat on a Saturday-- so hopefully if you've not been able to attend because of times previously you could do so now! :) This will be on the Men's Human Right's Discord Server, looking forward to seeing you there, whether it be to take part or just listen in!
/r/MensRights13/07/20 11:51 AM
13

Single women should not be allowed to artificially inseminate themselves and companies need to stop selling to them. You shouldn't intentionally introduce a child to a single parent atmosphere where they will not receive as good of an upbringing and get the tax payer to fund you. Screw anyone who does this.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:46 AM
2

Would be good to get this in r/mramemes :)
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:36 AM
10

Good news is that the % of people identifying with feminism seems to be declining around the world. I couldn't find recent stats for Canada, but here an article from the UK: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47006912 MRA's and anti-feminists will keep making people aware of what a hateful ideology feminism is, and make sure that it keeps losing its grip on our society and stops hurting men and boys.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 03:40 AM
1

Are you making one? Be good to have a link up in here.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 09:10 PM
5

Of course anyone who would like to do this is welcome :) For those who do have a mic though, please do make sure to mute it when you aren't speaking as the convo could be being recorded.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 08:28 PM
1

Ah I see, sorry about that.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 11:59 AM
5

This will be on the Men's Human Right's Discord. See you there!
/r/MensRights06/07/20 09:25 AM
1

Oof mate you keep dropping this https://twitter.com/DougDante1/status/1279509219507687424?s=19
/r/MensRights06/07/20 07:14 AM
4

I did not watch the entire video. I don't think i could make it through it. How horrible it is how all these systems work against him to ensure he doesn't see his kids for years. This has to change.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 11:56 PM
2

That sounds awful mate. Hang in there!
/r/MensRights14/06/20 11:48 PM
9

Positively-- not that this changes how absolutely horrible this was for Ryan, not at all-- but it brought awareness to how this can happen to men. Thank God for him that it happened on camera indeed.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 11:24 PM
2

Couldn't agree more. It's telling that feminists refuse to call out their own on these hateful opinions. There are debates and disagreements in the MRM - open ones. In feminism all disagreement is treated as dissent, you will be called a troll and banned. Their beliefs cannot stand the light of day, they have to interpret any opposing view as hate or oppression. They have to dismiss people because they don't have reasonable arguments that stand up to scrutiny.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 11:12 PM
1

You're right of course, the idea of a penalty is more meant in the situation that there is no 'fault' within the marriage, such as cheating or abuse. Talking about these things and having a solid grasp on what we should be aiming for is what these chats are all about. I hope when we have the later time talks you'll come along :)
/r/MensRights11/06/20 12:42 PM
1

Come along and share your opinion! No statement there is an absolute, how do you think things would work best?
/r/MensRights11/06/20 10:31 AM
1

We can do, this is the time we have had most people attend (that we tried). The time isn't 100% fixed, and can be moved, it's also possible we could have more than one to make sure people in different time zones have an opportunity to take part. We definitely will look into hosting one at a later time more in the evening US time as well :)
/r/MensRights11/06/20 09:54 AM
11

When I see prominent feminists talking about and saving real men's issues, we'll talk.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 01:18 AM
8

Or, rape. If a man 'stealths' and removes a condom or pretends he has one on when a woman thinks he has one on and continues intercource, this is termed rape in some places. I see no reason the opposite situation should not be 'rape by deception', they are both the same thing.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 11:42 PM
2

Did not expect you to do that, actually expected a much less civil response. Good on you for not being like that, could do with more people open to slightly conflicting views on Reddit. I know how you feel when you say women are validated even in their bad behaviours, and it can easily breed resentment sometimes, I've been there. It's a societal issue that I hope can be changed, but it will take a lot of time, and we need women to help us with it too, they make up the majority of the population.…
/r/MensRights10/06/20 11:04 PM
2

The arguments about giving men credit are fine and good. But you focus a lot on tearing down women which is unnecessary. Everyone, male or female, should be valued for their own good qualities and everyone has the potential to make a positive impact on this world. Men are not 'superior' to women in practically everything, both sexes have been necessary in different roles for the vast majority of history and we worked together to get where we are today. Neither women nor men are groups which don'…
/r/MensRights10/06/20 10:37 PM
16

I doubt many men even know this as well. The lack of knowledge about this and constant bombardment of these images create a false impression that its the standard to aim for. People wonder why some men lack confidence or boldness when they are comparing themselves to unrealistic standards and no one, and I do mean no one bothers to tell them how unrealistic that is.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 09:56 PM
15

Signed. Seen a few things like this, sadly I've never seen any government take them seriously. Need to keep on at them relentlessly till they do. As an aside, that is one creepy baby picture.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 09:31 PM
4

Ortiz told The Post violators could face between one to five years in prison, in accordance with the state’s hate crime statute “if the motivation for reporting such crime is motivated by a perception or belief about their race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation.” I'm not sure that such a law would further criminalise false rape or domestic abuse accusations... They should be criminalised, but this doesn't seem like it w…
/r/MensRights07/06/20 02:40 PM
1

Thanks to everyone who came to last Friday's chat on race and how it relates to the men's rights' movement, it was a great success and we covered a lot of things. This next one is gonna be on our Discord and we hope you can come to it too, both new and existing members are welcome to come take part or just listen. As far as we know we are the only MRM community doing something like this regularly so do come along and get your views and thoughts across! Look forward to seeing everyone there :)
/r/MensRights07/06/20 12:41 PM
7

Well I mean I would blame that man, he chose to take those drugs and get himself in that state, you know? But it's great you don't blame all men for these things, he's just one person and like the man who stopped him there are good men out there too. Judging all men based off only the bad examples of them is the same as judging all women based off the ones who kill their children.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 08:48 AM
8

Wow, that's ridiculous. The people getting killed by cops are men the vast majority of the time, how the hell does it make sense to donate to a women's group?
/r/MensRights03/06/20 08:48 AM
4

Was there maybe supposed to be more to this post..?
/r/MensRights01/06/20 08:15 PM
5

Should post over on r/mramemes
/r/MensRights01/06/20 02:59 PM
2

This is gonna be on our Discord this Friday 5th June, where we have many discussions about the MRM and advancing men's rights! We are currently looking for someone who may have experience with sound editing-- these talks are all recorded and should be going up on YouTube. If you would like to help us out, please do join the discord and let us know! Look forward to seeing you all there!
/r/MensRights01/06/20 12:38 PM
1

I'm not from the US. In many countries, the US included, a man is assumed to be the father until a test can be carried out. In some circumstances, the man is still determined to be liable regardless, whether that be because of an assumed bond or taking on a fatherly roll, or perhaps even that he was assumed as the father for long enough. Different things for different cases.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 07:01 PM
-2

Children whose parent(s) fall upon hard times should be given up for adoption? Seriously? Why not just send them packing off to the poor house while we are at it? Seems like a leap given the context of the comment I was responding to, which was a single mother who slept with so many people she does not know who the father is, and can only provide food for her new born via government programs... So in situations like that yes I believe adoption should be given serious thought, notice I did not sa…
/r/MensRights31/05/20 05:58 PM
-2

A lot of what you said is reasonable, assuming it's true. And then you have to add this at the end. Also there is always adoption, and lets face it IMO if the only way the child is going to get food is via a government check well adoption should be very much a discussion Children whose parent(s) fall upon hard times should be given up for adoption? Seriously? Why not just send them packing off to the poor house while we are at it? Do you think this will result in less costs than giving their par…
/r/MensRights31/05/20 04:04 PM
11

When the government makes a woman name a father to get benefits (which she may well need) and she doesn't know who it is, this is going to continue to happen. It is pretty disgraceful when a woman wouldn't try and make sure that her child has a relationship with their father in some manner and try to find who it is even if there is some doubt. Shouldn't just name. Some random man she KNOWS isn't the father. At the same time we can't ignore that the government is encouraging and condoning this be…
/r/MensRights31/05/20 05:21 AM
19

It's often the case that male victims are denied the same support women have.. Now having the wrong ideology does too. It's a crying shame, everyone deserves support when they go through something traumatic. Why is it so offensive to some people that people from all backgrounds can be raped?
/r/MensRights29/05/20 04:39 AM
6

Of course they are. But the statement doesn't say that, it's promoting black women being with black men.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 08:52 AM
9

'value of a black woman in a black man's hands'... Exactly what is meant by this? Because it sounds like racial segregation stuff just on its face.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 07:24 AM
13

There really is a difference between it happening on a show between mates doing stupid shit- where they expect it, and then being treated as acceptable and commonplace behaviour in dramas and films of all kinds. The former is funny, the latter is influencing society to disrespect men and promote inflicting violence on them for any reason.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 07:20 AM
1

Magic.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 07:51 PM
1

How are you talking with GWW and don't know who she is?
/r/MensRights16/05/20 07:24 PM
1

Ah well, we may be changing it anyway :)
/r/MensRights12/05/20 02:15 PM
1

If you put in 'the evil patriarchy' it leads to an old twitter with this (just got it from Google images really). I think it accurately portrays what feminists feel is the patriarchy, as some satanic thing all men are part of. I make no personal judgement on satanism or paganism, rather that is how feminists see it.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 01:34 PM
2

The chat will be on the Men's Rights Discord and will be being recorded :) Please everyone keep mics muted unless you are speaking at the time! Hope to see you all there!
/r/MensRights12/05/20 07:45 AM
1

Those are great, thank you, they're not the one though. ; The one I was thinking of and always tend to think of for why we talk and hate feminists so much had a list of points going down the page and 'Feminists fought against this' in all caps after each point, and detailing how and who fought it, with links. Searching for the part I put in quotes above usually gave that answer up until maybe a year ago (it was an old post) and now it doesn't. Really should have saved it but, ah well.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 06:25 AM
14

So originally I went looking for a favourite old post that I shockingly can't find right now, sadly. It talked about the various ways that feminists have fought against different initiatives over the years such as the presumption of equal shared custody in Australia, and so many other cases I wish I could list if I could find it! But, while looking for it I did find this thread I previously hadn't seen by u/living_raven_24x7 which goes quite in depth doing a very similar thing, examining the his…
/r/MensRights11/05/20 08:05 PM
4

Honestly, the best way you can spread awareness is just by being honest with people. When things like this come up in your conversations just say it, don't run away from the topic out of fear or talk about other things, say it! Say what you know instead of letting society dictate what you can say to your friends and still be socially acceptable. Be a trend setter, not someone who's just a sheep. We know we have a facts on our side and we can back it up, don't be afraid!
/r/MensRights02/05/20 07:55 PM
1

That's certainly a strong case that they won't cater adequately for men facing domestic violence, but I am still interested if the organisation has expanded a little.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 11:26 AM
3

This is brilliant news for Minnesota. I can only hope that it keeps getting applied with that precedent and spread to other areas of the US and the world. I want children in the future and not being able to spend time with them and be as devoted a father as I can be would destroy me as it does many men. Parental alienation is damaging to both the parent but most of all to the child who doesn't get to grow up with the benefit of a loving father (or mother).
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:50 AM
6

Awesome information here, good job on the write up.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:39 AM
7

The fact is that South Africa is some 20 years ahead of its time in bestowing rights on women that many first world countries are still grappling with. What rights would these be? The examples that follow immediately after this comment are all things that have been the case in first world countries for a long time. The rest of the article is pretty good, it's right that women are choosing to have children on their own and choosing to be single mothers and yet still complain about not having enou…
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:00 AM
1

Does it now work for men as the video claims or if a man calls is he directed to anger management or told to go away?
/r/MensRights02/05/20 09:53 AM
37

Domestic violence isn't something that primarily effects women, statistics show that men and women have more or less equal rates of becoming a victim of it. In none reciprocal domestic violence cases, men are a lot more likely to be the victim than women. Yet despite these facts, we insist on making domestic violence a problem only for women, instead of a human problem. We need to tackle all forms of domestic violence and help all victims, instead of being sexist and only offering help to women.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 09:50 AM
2

Awesome, see you there :D
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:38 AM
1

There is one for that mate and will even involve rl meetings eventually, it's the discord for this sub, here is the discord link: https://discord.gg/pKE7Srj It's a slow and gradual process, it may well take a while, but it's being worked on by the development team and staff there.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:17 PM
2

Cool, look forward to seeing you there then ^
/r/MensRights28/04/20 05:47 AM
2

Absolutely, the next ones are about MGM (circumcision) this Friday, and then support for the falsely accused the Friday after. Last meeting was a great success so there's gonna be more scheduled after that :)
/r/MensRights27/04/20 01:13 PM
2

Most of the talk there is in text, and there's a lot of it, but there's actually a voice chat happening later today: https://mensgroups.info/mens-rights-meetups
/r/MensRights24/04/20 07:57 AM
3

Are there other issues you'd like to see discussed? Would you like to host a meeting? Then let us know by clicking the links at the bottom of the page or replying here! We hope to make more of these so that men's groups can better coordinate and work together toward our common goals. Thank you to our developer Lozinski for his work on the site, as well as everyone else who have put in their time and effort to make this happen! Look forward to seeing you there!
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:06 PM
0

Fuck off insulting people's countries rather than the policies they hold, seriously. You just alienate people as the only thing it does is insult and provide no objective value.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 08:47 AM
3

Dude, what happened to you seriously? Hatred of feminism isn't hatred of women or to look down on them.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:25 PM
2

Oh definitely I agree that college campuses and indeed sometimes the law use different definitions of rape that go against my comment, and that they always use this to criminalise men and not women in these circumstances. There's always been a strong bias against men on reddit and in society in general, that's why I laughed when I saw that r/ MRAPatrol states that most people on reddit are MRA's xD
/r/MensRights02/01/20 07:01 PM
1

I hate menslib but that wasn't rape. I don't believe anyone getting blackout drunk means they can't consent. Them not remembering their choice doesn't make it any less of a choice, so unless someone spiked them or literally forced the alcohol down them then it was consensual.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 05:22 PM
505

It's not like a two-tiered justice system, it is a two-tiered justice system.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 03:42 PM
0

I think you're taking it out of proportion. They aren't advocating people go out and murder others, they are saying they are surprised that people treated so unjustly by this system (which they are) don't resort to such extreme methods more often. Anger in the face of injustice is not a wrong thing to have. It says something about men in general that they put up with such hardship without becoming this vengeful.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 08:03 AM
6

That's 100% correct! If you follow feminist revisionist history, anyway....
/r/MensRights23/12/19 10:37 PM
2

Could you link it?
/r/MensRights22/12/19 11:04 PM
5

I've saved this for future talks with any feminists I come across. Long read but worth it, thank you.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 09:17 PM
1

I'm a firm believer in the 'pussy pass', but in this instance I think it's more likely a problem with police brutality. Officers seem to get away with all kinds of things in the US, at least to an outside observer.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 03:15 PM
1

No, it only says SRS is reserved only for 18+. It says HRT is usually only given to 16+. Usually. Puberty blockers are given to adolescents.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:22 PM
1

Delaying the puberty of a child won't have lasting consequences for them, their development and how they see themselves as they grow up? Lol ok. Nope, it has been studied. No it hasn't. This is about delaying puberty of normal children, not those with precocious puberty. Delaying their puberty into their teens will absolutely effect their mind set and social circles. Furthermore, the American Academy of Pediatricians and the American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians released a joint statemen…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:21 PM
2

Maybe they can get the treatment they want when they're an adult and can decide big decisions like that? That's what happens in most cases when you don't have any family to support you. But once they've gone through puberty, you can't reverse it and changes your body a lot. And you think a sex change can be reversed easily? Many people work out their issues with their gender identity by that time. Many don't equal all. It's a good enough amount to shut down messing about with kids. We don't let …
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:16 PM
2

Delaying the puberty of a child won't have lasting consequences for them, their development and how they see themselves as they grow up? Lol ok. It says hormones (testosterone, oestrogen) are irreversible and usually aren't given to those under 16 for this reason. It doesn't say it isn't done there. Even if it did, do you really believe that delaying puberty for potentially 4-5 years has no effect?
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:05 PM
3

I'm fine supporting trans men. I don't care what adults do with their bodies that doesn't harm others directly. We don't let kids get a tattoo or drink alcohol, and a lot of people work out problems with their gender identity by the time they are an adult. I'm not for making an exception for little kids.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 01:48 PM
3

Maybe they can get the treatment they want when they're an adult and can decide big decisions like that? Many people work out their issues with their gender identity by that time. We don't let kids make decisions like getting a tattoo or have alcohol, why the hell would we let them change they sex?
/r/MensRights14/12/19 01:46 PM
1

When it comes to this specifically? Yes. I don't believe in letting kids who haven't even gone through puberty yet make permanent choices about their bodies, or in giving them drugs to prevent normal bodily processes. Not sure how you got 'everything' from that.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 01:42 PM
21

You can make the argument that this shouldn't be in men's rights. However, I think it should because if feminism's claim that they represent trans issues and pushing of claims of transphobia. It is also true that in the past there have been cases of male children being coerced into saying or acting transgender. I don't believe a child has the ability to truly comprehend the decisions they are making by taking these puberty blockers, which are taken by half of the patients. Whereas we may support…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 11:05 PM
2

That's certainly the way it appears as I noted the link in the medium article doesn't go to any kind of news site I recognised, was just reading through the Wikipedia and came back to your comment! Thank you :)
/r/MensRights07/12/19 01:09 AM
3

Seriously? As a homeless charity that's pretty severe, do you have a source?
/r/MensRights07/12/19 12:25 AM
55

Oh I will be. Their web address and phone number are both listed on the letter they send out annually, and a simple Google search should bring it up for anyone who hasn't received one yet.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 07:53 AM
9

Certainly appreciate why those are worthwhile causes to support and donate to, but I did mean specifically homeless charities.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 07:52 AM
21

At least help is getting out there to the homeless, though there may be charities you would rather support. Who do you recommend and why would you say they are better?
/r/MensRights06/12/19 07:26 AM
52

I can't have been much older than 7 when a female 'friend', in my own house, slapped me full across the face several times while saying that she could because 'boys can't hit girls' and laughing. This same girl, if she was ever hurt while I was around, even if I had nothing to do with why she was hurt, I was beaten by her mother. No one ever did anything about these things. No child, male or female, deserves to be treated like that, and it is absolutely despicable that this disgusting view keeps…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:53 PM
2

Have you tried places like this? https://www.forward2me.com/ On sites like that and others you can have mail forwarded to you from an address they own. Can't speak to how good each one is. Hope this helps.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 01:51 PM
205

Thank God the kid is now in his father's custody. Feminists say #believeallwoman but believing this woman over the man has clearly had extremely negative consequences for this little boy. The father wasn't believed and he wasn't taken seriously because of attitudes like ignoring male perspectives and advancing womens. Any claim should be taken seriously and looked into, like his claims that these weren't necessary. But no one took him seriously enough and this was allowed to continue, because it…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 03:51 AM
3

Thanks! Wow, that's pretty sickening. Why are police forces going after people like this and falsifying evidence to ensure a conviction? Their job isn't to get a conviction, it's only to obtain evidence. Any push to up the conviction rate should be looked on with absolute scrutiny, as it can prevent officers from acting impartially.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 12:28 AM
5

This article can't be accessed from inside the EU, does someone have a mirror or archive?
/r/MensRights11/10/19 10:43 PM
1

The same. Your accusation that it would be different, when I haven't indicated or said anything that would suggest different, implies that it may be your position in this current topic that is clouding your logic.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 05:15 AM
0

Unless you put them in that situation, no it is not neglect to not put yourself in danger in a life or death situation.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 03:49 AM
-5

Love isn't to be determined by extreme situations. You are going by a faulty premise by assuming that not saving people from burning buildings constitutes neglect or lack of love.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:20 PM
-4

I don't like this. It's too far to compare a life or death situation, in which instinct likely takes over, to fitness to raise a child and how much they love them. Was it possible to get to them or was it not? Impossible to say based on this. Is saving children from burning buildings a prerequisite for not being tried for neglect? If confronted with the question, "would you run into a burning building to save your child" most people would answer yes. In the moment it actually happens, will you b…
/r/MensRights02/10/19 05:47 PM
3

I love anime, and some of them piss me off with their casual acceptance of female violence against men (during an argument, domestic violence situation). It's not just anime though, though it is more of a trope there, such things are despicable in any show.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 11:04 AM
16

Of course. Everything oppresses women, didn't you know that already?
/r/MensRights30/06/19 10:40 AM
1

Wonder if women can become that because they believe it will help boys (misguided as that is)... Guess not?
/r/MensRights30/06/19 09:52 AM
23

The answer to the problem is that you don't have to prove anything. They need to prove a statement, you don't need to. A statement isn't true by virtue, it must be proven first. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. Question it. You don't need to think up complicated replies. Let them do the work, that's the key. Let them exhaust themselves, instead of you.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 09:42 AM
1

I think you might be suffering from PTSD mate... You know in your heart and mind that you weren't wrong. My only insight is to recognise that and put it ahead of what other people think.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 09:12 AM
1

It's not shared if no one else is in it at the same time.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 11:08 PM
2

I'm not sure this as much a problem as us being made out, because of this: When the changes are made, bathrooms at Wagamama will be private, rather than shared spaces In other words they will all be separate? One or two will apparently be earmarked for women, which is sexist yes, but it's not as bad as men not having a woman-free space to use the bathroom, because no one else will be in there at the same time.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:46 AM
1

And that's a disgrace. Sexism advocated at the state level is appalling. Which country is that btw?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:24 PM
1

My concern is what it fair for people. As stupid as I think all the abortion banning state legislation lately has been, I think we can acknowledge that it has brought up issues regarding men and their choices as well ie: that they have none and never did. This conversation is important, and although bigoted feminists of course have typically bigoted responses, getting it into the wider sphere is good. Those states are actually making things more equal between men and women in terms of what choic…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 10:42 AM
2

Men can have the same amount of time that a woman has to abort to opt into becoming a father. If he doesn't opt in, and she continues with it, that's on her. Alternatively, if a couple is married, then they are assumed the father till a DNA test proves he is not, at which point it can be on her if he so wishes. If a woman doesn't wish to have an abortion, and the father also doesn't opt in, she can give the child to the state. Women already have this option. Contraception is, as always, both peo…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 11:41 PM
1

In what way does framing this as sexual assault benefit the MRM?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 02:38 PM
2

I agree some people will construe this that way, however I in no conscionable way could ever call it that. I disagree that what happened should be phrased in this way.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 02:32 PM
17

I actually fully support abortion rights for women, but I've been tempted to withdraw that support until men also have the same rights to say no to children that women do. Fairs fair, isn't it? As it stands, if women don't have that right, the sexes will be more equal.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 01:23 PM
21

Hurray! Finally justice against the scourge that is affirmative action. There is no difference between denying someone a job because they are a black woman, and denying them one because they are a white male. It's all discrimination based on factors which cannot be controlled.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 11:54 AM
1

Do you perchance have the article that relates to this situation?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 11:10 AM
3

She got him to not kill himself and made his life a little better for a moment. Not like there's an instant cure for depression. Seriously confused why you'd have a problem with this.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 10:35 AM
0

This is a good argument for financial abortion or an opt in scheme of payment. Maybe of people are married that can be considered the opt in? But one thing we can't do is this continuation of anti-abortion stuff being associated with men's rights. If you have that view fine, and this post is a fine example tied to the issue of financial abortion which is one. But in every topic like this there is so much argument as abortion- and abortion itself isn't a men's rights issue!
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:15 PM
1

I'm so sorry for your situation and also for seeing your post so late. You might not even read this but I hope you do. Being in your situation is not ok, and I very strongly encourage you to get out of it by any means possible. This is clearly making your life miserable and I don't blame you for that. I cut myself off from several family members because of things, you are under no obligation whatsoever here. You are not responsible for what you are being subjected to. Do what is in your best int…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:02 PM
46

Colleges shouldn't be involved in this at all. It's a legal matter, the only people who should be investigating crimes are the bloody police. One minor thing though, the article describes attempted rape and not completed. Should at least get these things right.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:38 PM
3

Hey, please could you cite this source? Am interested in it. Perhaps you could post it as its own thread? Thanks!
/r/MensRights10/05/19 05:59 PM
4

Assuming that sometimes they do charge for crimes that are unlikely to get a conviction, they aren't supposed to and it's not what the 'new' guidelines relate to. This is pretty much a non story as it's the exact policy they've always claimed to hold before. The only real story is that someone decided to tell the police that they can do this in their search for evidence in a case- which they already could ask, and then the case might be dropped due to lack of evidence.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 12:39 PM
4

New forms being handed out across England and Wales warn that if a complainant refuses to surrender their digital devices, or tries to prevent any personal information being shared, “it may not be possible for the investigation or prosecution to continue”. That's not really the same as the headline. I would actually disagree if it was. It's understandable that if not enough evidence can be gathered of all relevant facts, that a case may not go to trial. CPS don't charge for cases that are unlike…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:12 AM
1

In fairness it's at -2. Say what you want about the poster but if you're gonna say something about the sub itself, then this particular example isn't representative of it.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 01:19 AM
1

It's not what you asked for, but if it helps at all you could try out the Reddit is Fun app to see if it works any better, I've never had any problems with that one.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 05:43 PM
1

The abortion law is specifically a unique situation in which a man isn't the one having the carry the child and it is not his body effected. For this reason it is not discriminatory. However, the inability for a man to relinquish financial responsibility for the potential child, when the woman can, is.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 09:52 PM
5

I don't think demonizing men crying is the right way to go either. If it can be a release for a man to cry he shouldn't be shamed for that, even if he isn't given support like a woman would be. People cope with things in all kinds of different ways, and its not a default bad thing. So yea, I mean, crying isn't a 'bad' thing for a lot of people, so my point is the message that 'it should be acceptable for men to cry' is a positive one.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 11:26 AM
8

How many women conceive through rape? Depends on your definition. Is poking holes in a condom and then having sex with someone rape? Is lying about being on birth control rape? Is having sex with someone when they are passed out drunk rape? Male rape exists no matter your definition, and attitudes like 'it simply doesn't happen' discourage victims from coming forward or speaking about it. Introducing into law or policy a sexist agenda such as this- one rule for one sex, another for the other- is…
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:40 PM
1

If we want to be totally correct, then both are stupid, and it should be 'drunken driving.' But why get so bogged down in the semantics.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:15 AM
4

This story is a comparison of how men were treated in the past nd how they are increasingly being treated today. Men contribute greatly to society, and are willing to work themselves to death for the sake of others, yet all respect or appreciation for that is being taken away.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:05 AM
0

When you cherry pick and say 'this sub start to go full retard' and ignore everyone here who is saying it doesn't belong here, you are a troll.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 04:35 PM
2

Hey there, I think it might be useful for you to give these a look over for sources and arguments you might like to use, good luck! https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/algo35/i_triggered_my_whole_school_with_my_essay https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/a81eh4/i_never_met_an_extremist_feminist_in_my_life_i And my favourite: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/a0ezcb/save_this_for_the_next_time_a_feminist_claims
/r/MensRights20/03/19 08:07 PM
2

Anyone have a copy paste?
/r/MensRights19/03/19 09:23 AM
3

The argument over whether to take a conscious life or not is a little different than the things said by the person in the image though, don't you agree? I'm not in this thread to argue about abortion, I'm simply saying the reasons it is debated aren't the same.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:59 PM
6

I always view assigning someone a mental disorder is far too generous, she's hateful and angry for sure but I prefer not to provide an excuse for the behaviour.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:37 PM
10

There can be some parallels here in what the poster in the image is trying to say, but the issue of abortion has totally separate arguments than the things she is talking about. It's not about controlling women's bodies, it's about determining when it can be said a human life is actually a life and can be considered to have a consciousness. Also, in regards to things like the pill, the issues centre around funding for such things mainly, not banning it completely. In short, her argument is flawe…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:30 PM
1

A man is a man, and he is real without a list of qualities to adhere to.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:44 PM
1

Nope. Marry her and have kids. Search over.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:51 PM
1

I sort of envision something that has a more recreational vibe; something that has a fun and social feel to it. It would more about creating a sense of unity and network, and improving our public image and persona. Many people have the wrong image of "incel" associated with MRAs; we need to show that that's not us. Perhaps, I do think we show as much here generally regarding us not being incels though, it's just that feminists/SJW's don't care and will demonize us by any possible means. People h…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 08:40 PM
3

Non political? I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean by that? I'm sure SJW's did use social media to gain traction and support for what they claim are issues, but a private membership (public posts) Facebook for MRA's isn't really the same thing. Everyone is on Facebook, but the only people looking at or doing anything on this MRM Facebook would be MRA's, so you wouldn't be able to reach as many people. It may be infinitely easier to create MRM Facebook groups (if they're allowed). In term…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:14 PM
3

I don't think there's a point. Generally I agree that it's good for MRA's to connect, just not through something like Facebook. Instead we have places to talk about our issues, like Reddit and other MRM sites. We also have our discord of course: https://discord.gg/pKE7Srj I just don't see it as something massively different to what we already have.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:24 PM
1

Have you perhaps misunderstood? The article says that they will stop discriminating against a particular sex when it comes to scholarships. Yes it's just one institution, but it sets a precedent and is progress.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 03:06 PM
2

They say such things because men's rights doesn't pretend to adopt other causes under its wing. For example, feminism will claim to be for so many other people, trans, gay, black people, Muslims ... Basically anything that isn't 'men'. They think we should also focus on race issues or whatever, and that by not doing so, it implicitly makes every member of the men's rights movement a white supremecist and a bigot. It's simply one of the many lies feminists use to delude themselves and others that…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:54 PM
1

http://www.noharmm.org/mothering.htm This really didn't take much effort to find. The most important thing regarding circumcision is a child's right to bodily integrity. Women have this, female circumcision is banned throughout the western world, but male circumcision is not. In some places, you can't even get an infants ears pierced until a certain age, let we allow babies only minutes old to have perfectly healthy tissue cut away from them, and inflict psychological harm upon them through inte…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:29 PM
3

Everything about this is pretty dangerous... For instance, the article doesn't mention what should be done in cases where this is only alleged. Is it trying to say a simple accusation should mean a mother can take the kids and vanish to another country? It's worth considering that men are more often convicted of the same crime a woman was charged with, but the charges against her are dropped or lessened, and men are assumed at fault in cases of mutual domestic violence. This can just be a furthe…
/r/MensRights31/01/19 12:44 AM
1

You seem to have misunderstood what I said. I never said it creates a massive amount of traffic, only that it does add to it rather than subtract from it. Any little helps, doesn't it? Perhaps some people prefer the discord UI over the Reddit live chat function? Why would that be a bad thing?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 11:36 PM
2

I'm pretty sure the discord encourages activity here, not lessens it, doesn't it? I mean, if things on the subreddit are being linked to from there, then that means some people are seeing it more easily. Seems simple enough.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 10:38 PM
5

By setting the tone that men by default are abusers and commit violence, and that only at their best can men not be that, when they are policing themselves and their entire gender.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 05:40 AM
5

It's a men's rights issue because men don't deserve to be demonized like the advert does to them, and people deserve to know that.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:34 AM
4

They are showing you what the advert is saying, but using an example that involves women. Men are not responsible for a few other men's actions, and it's not right to tell all of them to be better because of those few and demonize a gender.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:33 AM
2

Looking forward to your other submissions :)
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:18 AM
7

Shack? Not all Malaysians live in shacks. Your ridiculous generalisations betray your casual racism.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:48 PM
5

They're advertising violence, report it to the police.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:45 AM
5

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the downvotes may be because race is all too often used to turn what is a sex issue into a race issue. The disparity in sentencing between men and women is greater than between the races.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:53 AM
214

Just saw this posted over in one of the news subs Can you imagine 27 years? To be convicted as a child of a crime you didn't commit and come out as an adult with your best years behind you into a completely changed world. No idea what kind of psychological trauma that has had on him. One wonders why they were convicted and how it was allowed to happen to begin with? Here's some further reading: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/baltimore-man-exonerated-after-27-years-in-prison-f…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:18 AM
1

Hi DougDante, I just watched the video you posted here, do you please happen to know if there is also a video or record of the response to what he says to them?
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:17 AM
1

Thanks for that, I'm glad it was dismissed. Yea, I can imagine having to put up costs like that on lawsuits can be pretty rough, doesn't really seem fair the justice system works that way.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 03:18 AM
1

Do you have a link to the case? It sounds very odd.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 07:01 PM
1

Why would it be deleted?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:24 AM
15

They have downvotes because people are sick of concern trolls.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:55 PM
881

That's a great way of making people take female violence more seriously... they don't care when it's a man, because he 'should be able to take it', but if you point out that violence can be turned on kids too... It's sad cause it kinda takes away from the point that we should be having empathy for men too. But if it works to end women's violence why not.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 10:34 AM
4

I'm pretty sure it's not being outlawed, anywhere. They tried in Iceland not too long ago but were met with fierce backlash and accusations of anti-semitism.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 10:21 AM
1

Yea, hard to know if they answered it correctly when we can't actually see the reply.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 08:52 AM
7

Jesus... That kid it going to grow up really well for sure. Not like they'll kill themselves or anything.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 08:18 AM
17

The same thing happened with Boko haram. They kidnapped some girls and suddenly it got worldwide attention, but hardly anyone notes that they simply killed the boys. Little girls are worthy of attention, little boys are not.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:56 PM
4

One problem I have with it is that it further perpetuates the myth that men have no sex-specific issues, so that focus isn't only taken away from men when it comes to their dire need of housing assistance, but in any other social system that discriminates against men.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 02:13 PM
2

It's possible her bail was reduced because her lawyer argued for it, and already set at less because he is currently charged with an additional crime. There isn't enough information to know. If it's the case that the gun was left in the room by a previous occupant, can they continue to be charged with child endangerment just because they went for a shower, leaving them alone for what, probably ten minutes? Seems to me both of the charges should be dropped pretty soon.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 07:17 AM
1

She might, how will you know unless we try and persuade her and the other members of the royal family?
/r/MensRights09/12/18 09:53 AM
1

What exactly do you mean? The royal family are a political symbol, but from what I recall they've never gone and said 'circumcise your baby boys' or something.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 09:43 AM
5

I'd like to call on anyone who's British (and maybe even if you're not!) like myself to write to the royal family explaining why circumcision on infants is wrong. They probably receive thousands of letters, but that doesn't mean we still can't make an impression. Imagine the support the intactivist community will receive if the Royal Family were to acknowledge how the practice is harmful. You can make a difference. Pick up a pen. https://www.royal.uk/contact
/r/MensRights09/12/18 05:02 AM
6

Good? How does that make it not a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 04:24 AM
27

People reading this should note the fact this was not a man but a 14 year old boy. He's been traumatised for life which you can see with his multiple mental issues all throughout the rest of his life. That something like this happened is a disgrace, and to receive such a small amount, for it to have taken so long to even be recognised, and for no one to be held accountable and sentenced is an insult to the poor guy.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 04:12 AM
88

Of course they don't. It should be obvious, really, and Karen gives a great example of what's been confirmed in studies: women generally have an in-group bias, and men have an out-group bias. From an evolutionary standpoint it makes perfect sense. A fellow man was a rival for a mate, his loss is your gain. Your female(s) would need to be protected so that your offspring could be cared for.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 01:41 PM
2

I think you'll find that's the same one :p
/r/MensRights29/11/18 09:58 PM
1

Not that it makes a difference in these terms, but sad to say £:$ is nowhere near 1:2 anymore.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 01:53 PM
2

Try menslib. They're all about unifying feminism and men's rights (in the same manner Hitler was all about unifying Germany and Poland). Lmao. Great comparison.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 01:31 PM
22

Pretty sure, if you were banned, it's for telling multiple people, "get lost incel" as if this is an argument. Anyone doubting this, check his post history. Good decision on behalf of the mods.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:45 AM
1

A further argument can be that women aren't often charged with crimes with the frequency men are. Women are treated more leniently by the police and courts, to the extent that male victims are the ones arrested in domestic disputes and quite possibly fall into the criminals category.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 07:23 PM
4

Saying a percentage of (insert person who commits a type of crime here) are men says nothing as to how many men out of the whole actually commit that offense.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 08:31 AM
2

shoutout (from this sub) to (political sub) for showing men some love! This is advertising the sub and indicating some sort of political affiliation or bias toward it, that it is 'better' for men's rights than the other political party. I'm done talking now because I'm sick of you strawmanning and insinuating I am supporting the left with my posts instead of insisting we keep political parties out of it entirely.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:51 PM
2

There's a massive difference between a person participating in whatever sub they want, and openly advertising/associating this sub with it. I'm pretty sure you know this and are just being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:26 PM
-4

A post from TD. If you want to tell me that this post isn't to garner support for the American right then you go ahead. I fully disagree. What the message is can be posted without saying where it's from and is already discussed all over the subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:08 PM
0

Mens rights is not an American left vs right political thing. If you want to discuss a policy then post about a particular policy enacted. Posting in support of a political party is unconstructive and divisive.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 06:49 PM
27

Stop trying to turn Men's Rights into a political thing.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:05 PM
0

No. That's not what council tax is used for. The council use it to pay for local services such as schools, rubbish collection, roads and street lighting. Living alone doesn't lower the cost of these services, you won't get less rubbish collections or lighting. Unless you're advocating that all public schools be made private your post is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:32 AM
1

A global rank of 3500 out of all the sites in the world is still pretty fucking high. The graph is also statistically not a great one as it misrepresents the scale... It's like zooming into only the affected section, it doesn't include the sites ranked 2k+ or the ones 4k- It doesn't even show a correlation because it doesn't go back to before the #metoo hate movement started.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:31 PM
28

Wouldn't it be great if you were right? But of course people know what it is, it was a 'thing' and men were accused of it. If it dies that's great, but feminists do use it as another example of their 'patriarchy'.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 01:43 AM
1

I really get where you're coming from, you know. I'm not MGTOW, I haven't given up on a woman I can love, not yet, anyway. I've also experienced heartbreak. I've been so lost I want to die. Why do you think my name is a synonym for being sucked into a void of hopelessness? I can understand why someone would never want to put themselves in that position again. It doesn't make them cowardly. Avoiding harm is what we do! Would you willingly put your hand in a blender?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 05:38 PM
7

Clearly none of the concern trolls care that any posts that are like that are downvoted to oblivion. I guess we should become precogs to prevent any and all of them.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 01:37 AM
5

It's hardly bad luck when the system is rigged that way...
/r/MensRights04/11/18 07:24 PM
4

And are the men who get married, then are told by their partner they are worthless, get cheated on, have their children taken away and prevented from seeing them, end up paying child support and alimony while they watch their child growing closer and closer to their new daddy less miserable? That's what people who are MGTOW have decided is the worse outcome. Both situations are pretty shitty things for someone to have to live with/for. Edit: my phone doesn't like me using bad words.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:33 PM
1

They're not necessarily going to be miserable choosing a path in life that doesn't involve relationships with women or having children. Some still have sex. I don't think I'm the only one who took your post to mean 'being MGTOW isn't ok'. That's how it came across, to me.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:22 PM
4

You replied to a post that said MGTOW isn't inherently toxic. You replied by saying MGTOW are just men who have given up. That's not okay.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:03 PM
10

India is the seventh largest country in the world. The second most populated after China.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:27 PM
13

Giving up isn't ok? To you, what makes MGTOW toxic?
/r/MensRights04/11/18 04:01 PM
1

Not white knighting, I'm actually considering what most would be capable of doing. Will sending them to the front line help or hinder our soldiers? I'm sure this study you're referencing is true for some women, and true for some men as well. Not everyone likes their spouse after a given period of time. I would have to actually see your study to know what results are reasonable to take from it.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 03:05 PM
10

I believe in having our views listened to and addressed by education, not through the stripping away of rights. Is it fair that women get the vote for free and men get it for agreeing to be drafted in times of war? (Even in countries without an explicit draft, you know they're gonna be expected to fight in a war anyway)... No, it's not. I believe the solution to that is that you require women to be under the same terms, even if that means that for the majority of them they are drafted to go work…
/r/MensRights04/11/18 02:29 PM
11

I don't agree with OP's concern trolling, but 'take women's rights away'? Unless you are referring to privileges masquerading as rights, which I can understand, then just no 0_o
/r/MensRights04/11/18 02:04 PM
-24

You are a concern troll. Please follow your username's advice.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 01:54 PM
4

What a shameful state society is in that arrests a father just for an alleged claim he took his daughter 'without permission', which he in fact had anyway, and then throws him in prison for 6 months without even looking into what he told them that would prove his innocence. Both those officers should've been fired for incompetence, this man's life has been irrevocably tarnished and they get warnings/counselling and he only gets £50k for being put through this ordeal, which he still has to be put…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 09:34 AM
4

How about no, that's pretty much what my question was aimed at finding? You come and say all charities are a business and don't help. Just fuck off.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 10:35 AM
4

Care to show evidence that every single charity is a business and doesn't actually help people?
/r/MensRights28/10/18 10:16 AM
2

What? All of them? Be serious please, charities do help some people.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 10:07 AM
2

You can link to whatever you want to on Reddit, so long as it's an NP link and aren't actively encouraging brigading. Mods here aren't gonna punish you if you're well intentioned.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 09:28 AM
24

By her logic, a women's officer should not exist because women are the majority of university students.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 03:44 PM
108

Miller is also charged with murder in her son's death. In exchange for testifying against Bodine, she will be allowed to plead guilty to a reduced charge of second-degree murder. That's a disgrace. She allowed and was complicit in the abuse and murder of her son, why the fuck should she be given this concession.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 09:43 PM
2

So they do. Today I learned a little bit more about amoebae and types of asexual reproduction :3
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:06 AM
25

I disagree. Making fun of the prevalent opinion by feminists that the patriarchy exists and every white male is to blame shows the absurdity of that opinion.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:37 PM
276

Those amoeba are reproducing asexually! This excludes women! Sexism!
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:35 PM
2

Beyond encouraging people to bring men's rights into political discussions, it isn't.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 08:39 PM
4

Errr, can you link to the rest of the article?
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:36 AM
1

Had to double take at the mention of SRS... Long time since anyone mentioned that old sub. I also dont think this can be classified as rape or even sexual assault. You can't know what things the person you sleep with needs to know before they change their mind because it's subjective. What are you supposed to do, tell them your entire life story? Sit down with them solidly for a year talking? If, however, it were specifically enshrined into law that it was rape unless you tell your partner certa…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 11:25 AM
22

I generally disagree with traditional values, not that I disagree with Karen on her points. Women wanted to be more independant these days so I have no problem letting them, and I'm not going to sacrifice myself for them either.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 11:29 PM
46

This particular incidence was fine... But make no mistake, Jeremy Kyle is not any kind of supporter for men's rights, he comes out with some awful stuff against men.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 11:11 PM
2

Lmao, cute :p
/r/MensRights06/10/18 06:35 PM
10

Do you believe that police really don't take women seriously when they report a crime?
/r/MensRights06/10/18 06:28 PM
0

Sounds like you are questioning my devotion to the support of men's rights, so please do check my post history...
/r/MensRights06/10/18 02:22 PM
146

Some would even say that's a kind of privilege... Hmmm...
/r/MensRights06/10/18 02:16 PM
6

Fair enough, it was just that your comment could be interpreted that way... Quite easily, really. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely, and all that stuff...
/r/MensRights06/10/18 02:12 PM
2

Never even noticed XD
/r/MensRights06/10/18 02:08 PM
41

That's because they can... If boys could do the same, surely there would be more of them doing it, too? Not really fair to blame all girls for it, people are individuals, after all. Edit: not sure why I'm being downvoted for saying people are different for the way they are taught they can act. Please do correct me on why.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 01:57 PM
426

Exactly why always believing women goes against due process... How can innocent before proven guilty possibly exist when it doesn't need to be be proven?
/r/MensRights06/10/18 01:43 PM
1

Yes it does. Outlandish means unusual, and it isn't unusual for it to be said.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:50 AM
1

Because it's not outlandish, people on this sub have heard that and similar things said honestly many times.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 10:10 AM
10

How is it either of those things?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:05 AM
2

Then I suggest you go post it on /r/jokes.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 08:21 PM
2

I don't understand why you've posted this. The age difference? If they're both happy it's fine. They don't seem to be insulting him. If a female celeb was dating someone half their age they'd do the same. This doesn't belong here. Edit: horrid spelling and grammar mistakes.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 08:15 PM
2

Already posted here: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9h51g6/father_arrested_for_not_paying_child_support?sort=confidence
/r/MensRights19/09/18 03:48 PM
7

Posts like this only serve to make it appear it is a massive problem within the MRM, and justify opponents' position that the MRM is a hate movement. It is not a pervasive issue and is not worthy of this attention.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 03:41 PM
11

That's because it is concern trolling. Anger is a valid response to injustice. It can even be argued to be necessary. https://youtu.be/1KvZI8BsSxw Some people do have trouble directing their anger to the right people. But that's a human condition, not a quality of the MRM.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:00 PM
2

Statistics I have seen show that teachers grade girls higher than boys for the same work, and that this bias is removed when the teacher does not know the child's gender.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:26 AM
1

What is it about pussypass you find sexist? Would you object if the sub were called womanpassdenied? Do you consider mansplaining a sexist term? The phrase 'pussypass' refers to women generally and provably getting lighter sentences for the same crimes, or not punished at all. It is much more likely that name stuck because of alliteration, and not out of some kind of hateful agenda. It's worth noting that if western society could see fit to punish men and women equally, there would be nothing to…
/r/MensRights17/09/18 05:10 AM
24

Because they want them, and society bends over backwards to give women what they want.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:50 AM
5

... What?
/r/MensRights14/09/18 11:38 AM
6

I agree with you in principle, but you aren't gonna gain a lot of popularity (or get people to do what you want, which should be the purpose) by acting like a total dick, you know.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 11:29 AM
9

Yea, what an informative 25 seconds that was...
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:27 PM
3

Usually there is truth in this. But what you posted doesn't say how old she was (and I haven't seen an article for this one) when that happened. Maybe she was 15 as well.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 01:00 PM
7

The title is accurate, though it would be more accurate to say she did have him convicted. And they can't be changed.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 05:53 AM
3

A woman made the claim that had him convicted. Could have been that she pretended to know about his involvement with a child, or that she claimed she was the abused child. The article doesn't specify.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 05:52 AM
2

The only reminder I see is one to fight to change unfair, manipulative practices.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:03 AM
21

I don't care that this is only winning the right to sue, and that she hasn't got anything yet. He still has to pay to defend himself in court. Alimony shouldn't exist. When people get divorced the assets and money that are accumulated during (and ONLY during) the period of marriage should be split. Why the hell should a man keep paying his ex wife? Because she chose not to work so lost out on job opportunities? Because she chose to stay at home more instead of going to work? Why should men have …
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:19 PM
7

Ted just literally responded he was using the language to mean 'Most'... And you respond with that??? 'Most women would prefer to have a flexible schedule to have more time at home with family'- true statement. 'Most men are pigs and rapists'- untrue statement. See the difference? One is correct, the other isn't.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:52 PM
1

Might be an idea to find a better source video mate, I can hardly hear what they are saying.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 04:07 PM
15

I don't really get the purpose of him wearing a frilly skirt for the ad...
/r/MensRights07/09/18 03:29 PM
3

As nice as that might be to hear, it would never happen as far as I can figure. You can't charge someone (or an entity) for committing a current crime when the offense happened before it was outlawed.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 01:20 AM
11

I would think of this more as the parent (or parents) doing it rather than the government, even if it is endorsed by them. This raises a question I hadn't thought of though- if a baby is given up at birth into government social care, would the child be circumcised?
/r/MensRights07/09/18 01:05 AM
1

Maybe you should ask on the feminism subreddit, because if they completely shirk men's rights then they won't be here, and no one well known comes to mind.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 01:02 AM
3

Do you know the people who created this movie? The link provided to watch the movie on YouTube (from https://circumcisionmovie.com/) says it is not available, and I can only find trailers by searching YouTube. Perhaps this was done because it is now monetized on other sources, if so that link should probably be removed.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 06:29 PM
1

I tend to take the view that radical feminist propaganda is pervasive in all western countries, and that the extent doesn't really matter as all countries are going to get to the same point as men become more and more like second class citizens. Focusing on a specific country and saying it is better/worse than another, in terms of the toxic nature of feminism, is useless as it's like playing the oppression Olympics. Not only that but it seeks to divide people who just want the same thing- equal …
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:44 PM
1

'The Star' tabloid contributes to that, but I know that what the person I replied to was saying is based on them specifically targetting the UK for anything that's bad, saying we are 'the worst' when it comes to things against men and for women etc. I've seen other posts he's made.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:33 PM
1

It is proof all you were doing is bashing. Since you are now resorting to insults, this convo is over and your comment is reported.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:43 PM
0

Thread has nothing to do with the UK. Going into the thread and saying verabatim 'UK is shit feminist state' when it has nothing to do with the thread = bashing.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:37 PM
-1

Yay let's go into threads and bash countries! /s
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:42 AM
11

Here's a nice read for you about the dangers of circumcision: https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/complications/
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:14 PM
8

We have no problem when people get circumcised by their own free will. We do have a problem when you genitally mutilate an infant or child.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:10 PM
2

I wouldn't be surprised if they asked this so that if the baby isn't circumcised, they can extol upon you the virtues of genitally mutilating your son, and get you to pay for the procedure.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:53 PM
2

I think they are saying lol because there is quite a difference between ovulating and menstruating, which is what I assume both of you have mixed up. Good luck with things.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 09:03 PM
1

I have no idea what point you are trying to make here. Who said it was sexist?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:39 PM
3

It's pretty interesting to me that you only addressed my last paragraph, which I deliberately stated wasn't actually part of the discussion and was more on a personal note. That wasn't an attack on you. It was an observation. If you don't want to reply to that particular part then be my guest, but why not reply to the discussion at hand?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:46 AM
3

I'm not a feminist so I'm not generally inclined to use terms like rape culture, however for the sake of this topic and how I am using it, I will accept such a term as: "widespread acceptance and disregard of rape by a populace by a sizable amount of that populace" -and if you're about to ask me to define sizable then you can just piss off with that. It is clear that when something happens to someone in prison there is a certain attitude of 'well they deserved it, shouldn't have gone to prison!'…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:28 AM
9

So you don't think the prevalence and disregard of male rape in prison by society can be termed a rape culture?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:48 AM
22

You were given a link with information about it 2 hours ago and somehow this is not good enough for you?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:25 PM
11

What's tumblr? The majority of the comments to that seem supportive.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 04:58 PM
3

ITT: People bashing Britain instead of talking about the issue, like any country doesn't have its issues. Who the fuck gives a shit about what country it is? Let's bash the USA in every USA post we can about it shall we? Talk about the issue.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 10:01 PM
1

Which are, and were, British territory.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:13 AM
3

Started? Take a history lesson.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 04:03 AM
16

He might spill some of the xylophone sauce down himself while consuming it. If he was wearing a bib they would say it was a strangulation hazard anyway.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:59 PM
3

I'm in a reddit app, that might be why. I'll do my best to remember for next time, thanks.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:08 PM
3

I do? Still appears as in np mode when I open it, for me. It doesn't for you?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:48 PM
1

No, because I don't want them to stop and search anyone. If it is done at all it should be truly random, which is hard to do. How about for the sake of discussion assume it happens anyway and then answer whether it's acceptable? Also, black people have a higher crime rate in large part because (in the U.S.) of the drug war, which was launched partly for racist reasons, and their higher level of poverty, which is also due to historically-based poverty (slavery, racism) and perpetuated by the welf…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:39 PM
1

So in your opinion, is it perfectly fine to stop and search black people deliberately more often because they have a higher crime rate? Why or why not?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 01:58 PM
6

It's not brigading if you np the link. https://np.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/927v7x/accused_of_harassmentstalking_found_not?sort=confidence Edit: changed link, see comments below.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 12:56 PM
2

When someone has accidents on their record that is an indication they will cost the insurance company more. When a gender has more accidents that is not an indication you specifically will cost the insurance company more. There is no other thing to call a practice of charging/blaming an entire gender, than sexist discrimination.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:53 PM
1

I get your point that they generally condemn all death verdicts, but this is a general statement, whereas for the Kenya woman they specifically made a statement aimed at it. If they dont usually make individual statements against all of them, then this could suggest a bias toward women.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 01:16 AM
2

Out of interest, does amnesty condemn every death sentence given in the US?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 03:43 PM
2

Needs subtitles. Can't understand hardly a thing said.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 03:48 PM
6

There used to be a time long ago, when men were responsible for their wives actions. Of course, back then, the men actually had the ability to discipline them somewhat. You know what's a similar culture to men being responsible and controlling of their wives? Islam.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 09:58 PM
1

So now you've moved the goal posts. Your arguments hold no water, there is no evidence Muslims will campaign to end abortion or other laws even if they keep gaining in number, let alone within 20 years. I'm done with the convo.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:19 PM
1

And if you looked at the graph and full list, you will see that its still impossible to be 40%.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:10 PM
1

40% of boys are not named that in the UK. It's only the 8th most popular name as of last year even. Like I said, you are wrong. https://www.google.com/amp/amp.timeinc.net/fortune/2017/09/22/muhammad-william-popular-baby-names
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:01 PM
1

No, we didn't. The problem was overstated. No, I am not happy with the way it was dealt with and neither were a lot of people of all faiths living in Britain. You have an inaccurate view of the way things are.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:34 PM
-1

No, not all of it. The most popular child name in the UK, if you don't count spelling variations, is Muhammed. It's at something like 40% if I remember correctly. Irrelevant when it comes to what laws would be frozen. 1. Not all people called Muhammad are Muslim and 2. Muhammad is a popular name especially by Muslims and British names are far broader in choice, so this says nothing about Islamic prevalence. Now let's reference something; we know from correlative evidence that violent crime and m…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:40 PM
1

This is pure speculation. You have absolutely no evidence any laws will be passed.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 05:34 PM
4

AFAIK there is no tenet of Islamic law enshrined in the British law system (that isn't otherwise in common with normal laws such as don't murder people or whatever).
/r/MensRights16/07/18 02:12 PM
2

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_female_genital_mutilation_by_country You have to look at individual countries to see if they have laws against it or not, there's no simple list that states where it isn't illegal. Malaysia specifically mentioned it isn't illegal there, which I knew anyway. I'm not going to state any countries where MGM is illegal, because I dont know of any, and never made an argument that there were.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 06:38 PM
2

It is not illegal in all Islamic countries. You're simply wrong.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 06:26 PM
2

You can't possibly be serious saying FGM is illegal in all Islamic countries, can you? Are you trolling?
/r/MensRights15/07/18 05:58 PM
0

You didn't answer any of my questions... I'm not researching the topic on the 'point' you're trying to make, you have to do that yourself.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:25 PM
0

That decision was clearly incorrect. If you actually think that is the standard regularly used by police then lol. Your article was also woefully short. Why did he have it? Was he using it for self defence? Was he waving it about like a maniac? What?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:02 PM
0

I would bet that they weren't charged and could have a chance to file a grievance with the police for inappropriate application of the law.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:41 PM
1

The courts have to prove you intended something. As screwed up as things are, innocent till proven guilty is still the standard.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:10 PM
0

'Offensive weapon'. Something can not be considered as such unless you use or plan to use it as such. I have spoken to the police in depth about this as to ascertain what I can reasonably do to defend myself.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:11 PM
0

How is it not true? You needed it earlier sometime and you forgot it was there is valid. Why would it be illegal if you weren't planning to have it for self defence? The law states you can't carry it for that reason only.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 12:57 PM
3

The way the law works, if you carry something for the purpose of self defence it is illegal. If it's not for self defence then its not. So if you start waving around the potato peeler and use it to attack people it can be said you're carrying it in self defence, unless it was never intended for that and you used it as a spur of the moment thing. If you have a valid reason for carrying it such as you want to peel some potatoes later, it's not a crime. As a victim of crime myself I hate laws like …
/r/MensRights06/07/18 08:22 AM
12

If this were a program aimed at equality it would simply target the laws on how much prison time and fines etc can be given for lower level crime. It has nothing to do with applying it at a lower sample size.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 08:18 AM
34

Why do you think that though? Women have had advantages in college and university acceptance a long time now, and have overtaken men. By your logic, we would now see programs aimed at getting men in. But we don't.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 08:15 AM
4

I saw the down vote so I upvoted this. He's being sarcastic people.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:29 PM
63

They already do receive lighter sentences. people can be so blind to female privilege and its sickening.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:29 AM
19

A brave man in a harsh world. Feminists push for women to always be believed about rape claims, but then shouldn't that apply to basically anything about believing people? He refers to what is said that isn't recorded, and he isn't believed, instead is attacked and 'shamed', to use the same language as the protagonist in this 'debate'. The western world is sexist against men (yes I'm counting Australia as western, sorry if anyone thinks this is wrong). There has been no doubt for many years now.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:17 PM
1

I don't think you understood the spirit of my comment, that everywhere has problems to face, deal with, and overcome. This isn't the oppression Olympics, let's just work toward solving whatever those problems are right?
/r/MensRights29/06/18 07:30 AM
2

Everywhere is fucked up, just in different ways. Now kiss and make up.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 06:27 AM
3

You live in a fantasy world. Try opening up some history books and quote where anything was 'given'. Russia took areas of Europe in the push back to Germany. They can't just be magicked back the way they were before. Nothing was given.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 08:24 PM
3

Thank you for your remarkable knowledge detailing why brave British soldiers died defending Europe from Nazism. /s
/r/MensRights26/06/18 07:34 PM
7

For anyone who's feeling unwell, no matter their sex, I see no problem in postponing some exams till they feel better. Less harsh marking? God no, never, everyone should be held at the same standard. I put off an exam due to severe toothache (actually went to an emergency dentist the same day it was so bad, wisdom tooth was killing the one it was pushing out above it), and simply took it later that week, can't remember how soon exactly. Confining being unwell to periods in what can sometimes be …
/r/MensRights25/06/18 08:09 AM
2

I would tend to agree blood tends to be more severe in terms of consequence, but I still argue that to have your own facial hair held against you is damaging to that person in very extreme ways in terms of job security. If we go down the road of providing free or subsidised feminine hygiene products then imo we have no choice but to do the same for men, otherwise this is just yet another thing where women are given an advantage.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:06 PM
2

My McDonald's job, although beards were said to be allowed if you wore a beard net (which is a horrible thing btw) you would be sent home if you didn't shave and had one. I understand this may not be the case everywhere, but that's no reason to deny people in similar circumstances from the same rights because of their gender. Let's not forget that beards require shaving every day in a lot of cases, whereas a period does not require wearing a pad every day. This is why it is a similar cost. All t…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:58 PM
2

I take it you didn't read the next line? I certainly couldn't do this working at my local takeaway in college. Edit: to clarify, working minimum wage, in my own place. That was not easy and to say it wouldn't apply to me... Well, shouldn't it, should this happen?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:36 PM
4

If we are talking about low income families, razors definitely are comparable. I will agree that it may not always have the same effect as bleeding through your pants, but I have literally known women to stuff toilet roll to help. Now, I wouldn't wish that on anyone. But there are a lot of high profile male positions where having facial hair simply isn't acceptable, and certainly even simple ones, barring saying you are of certain religions. If that means shaving every day, that 100% is comparab…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:21 PM
5

The thing for me, is men have hygiene products they have to buy just as much as women. For example, to maintain a respectable job, you have to buy razors to shave your face for men. Legs on women can be hidden by trousers or long skirts. If women are going to be subsidised for their biology to such an extent (they already are highly subsidised where I am in terms of basically everything else- policing, healthcare etc) then why shouldn't men?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:00 PM
2

He worded is accurately Tbh. Yes being downvoted right now cause people because don't bother to read or even try to understand, which Pisses me off.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:10 PM
2

I don't believe they were saying they women were 'better' at all. What they have is simply a contrast that shows the hypocrisy of the feminist narrative. As for 'biologically superior'... Well who among us wishes they had the choice of life or death for their child?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:07 PM
18

0.0001% of all men are CEOs! Give them moneys!!
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:05 PM
1

One thing people tend to forget when seeing this type of question... Are they asking why this is the case? It couldn't be because boys feel hopeless in the world we have, could it? That they are mistreated, abused, taught that they don't matter, could it? Things won't change, boys won't stop being angry, till we say they matter.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:55 AM
1

They sure act like they do. Do you think if you do stay away, they're going to stop there?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:11 AM
2

They aren't in the minority when it comes to ruling officials, politicians who repeatedly state the wage gap myth as gospel. Those are the people who matter, and who we repeatedly fail to change the mind of. Us doing as you do, giving in to them, making us weak, scared children, who can't fight for our own rights, defend ourselves... Please, tell me how that helps us?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:09 AM
0

Women aren't going to give up when you give in to all they want. All history has told us is that they just push for more after. Any petty accusation that can come to mind they will push for, and the reasonable women, I'm sorry to say, don't usually speak up against it. I know a ton of reasonable women... I think most are good people, as are men. But they just don't speak up.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:00 AM
1

Somehow I can't believe you actually think that. As if there is a shortage of male feminists and those who gladly bow to a woman's demand on the off chance of getting laid.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 11:49 PM
1

You don't have to agree with me, I know your position on avoiding dangerous situations and it can be respected. But I don't believe in changing ANYTHING about my life, doing anything different, because of people like this. Would it protect me more? Maybe. Would it also be giving in to an unfair world instead of fighting to change it? In my opinion- yes, definitely.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 11:39 PM
1

It's because you're changing the way you act to accommodate them. If they want to make spurious allegations they will find a way to do it anyway. Of course you can do whatever you like, but I personally am not going to change my actions out of fear- that's letting them win.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:06 PM
5

No mate, don't go out of your way for them. Stand up for yourself ffs, don't let them have their way.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 01:20 AM
11

It appears that his mother spoke to his coach about it, yes, after finding out about their previous allegations out of concern for her son. Don't think the coach had any obligation to enforce such a thing. Still, the way people had been phrasing it before I replied was for the most part in the tone of 'good on him! Why should he have to be exposed to a potential threat!' As opposed to him being told not to do so by people in authority (the coach and his mother). I definitely do think this subjec…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:15 PM
3

Sounds like life, to me.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 01:13 PM
11

I can forgive not reading an article every now and then. There are many worthy posts on this sub, even for a feminist, if they would bother to look for them. One thing I tend not to forgive is those who troll/insult a sub dedicated to a worthwhile cause.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:17 PM
46

Ok, looks like absolutely no one has bothered to read the article? It clearly states that the boy was told by his female coach that he wasn't allowed to touch them. Not that he didn't want to himself.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 11:03 AM
3

Of course not. It would detract from the narrative that women are victimised.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:25 PM
2

Please, this sub as a whole would never draw such conclusions off one statement about all women. Try reading the posts here and you'll see that for yourself. My upvoted comment here and other upvoted replies that says it isn't widespread is proof of that.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:51 PM
3

Maybe not, but clearly they think there is, and how better to know what to say to dispel their illusion than how they get to that conclusion?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:38 PM
3

Everyone has some baggage mate, no matter what form it takes.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:41 PM
1

Perfectly reasonable position. I guess I'm the kind of guy who doesn't mind that so long as I can still have my own as well.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:15 PM
4

Honestly I haven't really... I mean, May have heard the words, but not seen anyone trying to make an argument based of it. That's why I'm trying to find out what logic they are using to come to such conclusions.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:38 PM
1

You dating them or not is irrelevant... What mattered is that you assuming she did. Reacting to a debate with vitriol makes it clear exactly how intelligent you are, I suggest not doing so.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:17 PM
74

I've not heard of this position before, where are feminists saying this?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:44 AM
1

Yes, I do. But you already agreed as part of the joke that you were implying she killed him... That's exactly why I prefaced my OP with saying it may have been a joke. It's not helpful to think this way because it's saying in all circumstances where a husband dies you suspect the wife of it without even knowing the causes.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:32 AM
1

We agree that you were implying she may have killed him, that's something. Now, logically, if you assume that as a basis for this circumstance, then it is the same thing as saying in all same circumstances that is your assumption.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:10 AM
1

Then don't make statements that imply extreme things.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:53 AM
-2

Your comment implies that. I'm done talking to you.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:35 AM
0

This may be a joke but :/ Can't just assume all women kill their husbands, it's the same as saying all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:50 AM
1

Like I would say in a case against a man, she shouldn't be named yet because she hasn't been convicted of the crime she is accused yet. Only when she is found guilty should this be going public. If she is convicted, I hope she gets the same punishment and imprisonment a man would.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:54 AM
1

What if the child's father died? I get where you're coming from, but the failure of a relationship can't be pinned solely on the woman 100% of the time, and not everyone gets anything at all from a divorce. There's no shortage of both men and women who are generally crappy people with no kids at all.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 07:35 AM
9

I've been here as long as pigman as well, and no difference... We have always been trolled, and there have always been disagreements between members here, but we all agree the world currently has a bias against men that needs to be addressed.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 07:23 AM
3

It's Urban dictionary not Oxford or something.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 08:24 AM
1

Link to article? Women in the UK are not required to wear heels in any case men aren't.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:28 AM
1

Tl;dr maybe? I mean, I did read it, but what exactly are they proposing? How are they going to regulate testosterone levels?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 02:10 PM
1

Or, rather, do give government handouts, but don't base them on race or gender.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:03 PM
5

Now, I'm not saying Reddit doesn't fail to read articles or get up in an uproar for stupid reasons in general, but men as a gender being demonized needs to stop. Two things about this barely anyone takes into account, and no one cares about. This isn't a legally binding decision. It was made by local village elders. Nothing has been decided yet regarding their punishment, and God knows if it will since they could be killed by a vigilante lynch mob any day. These people are only accused of a crim…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:44 AM
1

What you meant by your words is not what you typed. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 12:49 PM
1

You can strawman your own position when you change it from one thing to another, which you just did. Insulting people in a debate helps no one. Here's a direct quote from the post I replied to, which sparked all subsequent replies. seem entitled to your preference
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:22 AM
1

No one said they were entitled to have anyone. That's a strawman. Also I don't think the people you are aiming this at are defending anyone, only a logical position. You literally said people aren't entitled to their preference, and they are. They aren't entitled to a person, but they're allowed to have whatever preference they feel like.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:16 AM
3

People are entitled to their own preference though. If they weren't then it would be the same as telling someone they can't be gay because it's not ok for them to like that. Of course I don't think it's ok for her to mock people just because they aren't what she likes, but that's a different issue than the one being pointed out in this comment chain. You thinking they are a twat and not wanting to be with them because of that preference is also your preference, even if it's one I share :p
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:59 AM
4

Did you see the reactions when this story was posted over the rest of Reddit? There were highly upvoted posts simply assuming the men were guilty, promoting vigilante violence, and that a trial isn't even necessary. This just goes as further evidence (as if it were needed) that men are treated differently and harsher by the court system. They were almost found guilty despite there being only a person's word, as if that can be said to be 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. I would say sexism embedded in…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 12:23 AM
11

One of the rare times the courts make a correct decision regarding men and women.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 07:39 PM
4

After an extremely small amount of research, looking into places you say call it soccer in fact often use both terms.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:19 AM
1

Pregnancy causes risks to a woman to continue in it, it directly effects her health. Until born/viable, a foetus is essentially a parasite which can have any number of complications, up to and including death of the host. Whether or when a foetus gains rights of course can be debated, but you shouldn't be able to force one being to become a host to another without their consent. If you consider having sex as giving consent to a child, that completely ignores what sex is in today's world, and tha…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:31 PM
2

It isn't a child. It's a foetus. This really isn't the place to have this discussion, I disagree that a woman having an abortion has anything to do with men's rights. Edit: the only way I see it factoring in, is if she chooses not to have one and he hasn't consented to be a father. Then he shouldn't have to pay child support or be involved. But a father should have no say over what a woman does with her own body.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:45 PM
2

I believe there are laws regarding when an abortion is allowed to be carried out when it is late term. A father has no rights to a foetus before it is born, no.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:36 PM
3

Men's Rights is not an anti-abortion forum.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:23 PM
1

Why wouldn't indicative also be appropriate usage?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:08 PM
7

Just to add to this, I doubt the public nature and constant villification of him helped during the trial, and the fact that he previously settled out of court a year earlier to make all that go away... I won't say whether he's innocent or guilty personally, and you have to hope the justice system does the right thing... But the whole think is indicative of other witch hunts I've read about
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:23 PM
9

You can't help but wonder what the evidence was though? There was no physical evidence and it was a he said she said debate... It says so in the article. So is the justice system working correctly or not?
/r/MensRights26/04/18 10:15 PM
5

You have to sign up to view it. May as well be behind a paywall as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:55 PM
1

It doesn't make it very clear whether the company, despite doing business in the UK and US, is effected by one or the others laws. I believe it would be against the law in the UK yes, but you'll find that the CPS and any other places that are supposed to enforce these rules can be very selective.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 01:20 PM
6

It's been done before and it didn't go well. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:04 AM
28

I would think she would be embarrassed, by her mother's behaviour.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:24 AM
3

It probably is true for teenage girls as well, it's the disparity in how it's portrayed that's a problem. It's not appropriate no matter which way the sexes are.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 04:26 PM
28

UK here. The first time I was assaulted by my ex partner, I defended myself then called the police. Because I defended myself, I was also arrested at the scene. Both me and her spent the night in the cells. We were both given a caution. At the time, I didn't question it, but looking back I do. Do not ever trust the police, they will always have the women's side.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:56 AM
1

I appreciate you having replied to me so long. We might disagree, but I think our go's are the same. I only want to help people. Thank you for replying.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:58 AM
1

I can understand that viewpoint, but is is still pandering. This sub has its purpose, and it shouldn't be pandering to other people who will never like us anyway. That is why.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:52 AM
1

It goes out of its way to appeal to the worst that is seen here- feminists. We don't like feminists, we both know that. Appealing to their ideology does nothing good, we should be appealing to a sense of logic and reasoning... The message sounds nice, yes, but the time for being nice, and appealing to feminists, is long past. I really don't think it's useful.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:15 AM
-4

This spiel is downright disagreeable.. I see it as nothing but a plea to the insane. Please stop using it.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:45 AM
68

It's not a victimless crime when people start to be arrested or under suspicion of it though. It also wastes police time which could be used for, you know, actual crimes. Maybe I think the time is excessive as well, but don't say it's a victimless crime.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:10 PM
1

Thank you for posting this. I agree with the mod.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:58 PM
1

I will have a look later, but posting it so much time after will have less of an impact than you wanted, mate.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:53 AM
4

You expand upon this greatly in the comments? Where?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:48 AM
63

There's some justification for assuming that it's women, not men, that are the victims in cases of domestic violence. No, there isn't.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:23 AM
6

I don't know what this is but I can't get it to load. Anyone else?
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:21 AM
6

Well, it is discrimination. One thing we need to be careful of though, is ensuring this can be accessed for boys instead of the NHS pulling the program entirely. As much as the NHS is shameful for not giving it to boys, it would help no one for it to go away completely.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:23 AM
7

The cop didn't have his license, just pulled up their information from his name on his car computer. That's probably standard to see if there are any outstanding warrants on the occupants of the car. The cop screwed up yes, but never assign malice to what can easily be explained by stupidity.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:07 PM
10

Does seem like an accident... It's not like that ticket is actually lawful.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:28 PM
0

You're wrong, and I consider you a friend. It isnt that at all... Women need men. We know that. What we need is to promote logic and understanding. That's what feminists lack. My love, who had never heard of either, fully agrees with me. It's ok.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:58 PM
1

No, it isn't. I know what point you were trying to make, but don't just focus on the name of it, it's beyond any hope of defence. It's the same as saying 'mankind' is a gendered term and arguing that it's misogynist. Make your point without it.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:25 AM
5

This is a bad argument imo. I wouldn't care what it was called if feminists on the whole did good for people in general. However, feminist actions do not achieve that, and it is the actions of the group that matter.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 09:20 AM
1

You're right, it is, just as your inconsiderate nature is yours.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 09:26 AM
1

They have. How she doesn't realise the hypocrisy of what she says is insane.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 11:10 PM
2

Including when people have social anxiety? Sometimes people dont have the money to get a taxi and need the bus. It's stressful for them. Edit: I'm not saying it's always acceptable. But please give someone due consideration.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 02:54 PM
1

The arguments she uses, saying men can choose not to have sex basically, to avoid conception of a child and being on the hook for child support, can equally apply to women and used as an argument to prevent abortion or other contraceptive methods. How she doesn't realise this is beyond me.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:17 PM
3

People can have reasons for not wanting to have someone next to them you know... Unless they are preventing someone standing from sitting down, just leave them alone <.<
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:02 PM
9

Alright, if you had said no, then I would have more to say, but if you honestly believe that harming a child should be allowed in those circumstances there's not much I can say to you, so yes, absolutely disagree with you, but ok. Since you were open to discourse I'm not the one who's been downvoting you btw.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:15 PM
9

I'm not strawmanning... I asked a question on if it was a religious custom, would it still be acceptable in your eyes. Why or why not are telling about your character and position.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:06 PM
14

How is it disingenuous? How is the analogy not apt and comparable, unless you count your own judgement of scale? Why, in your opinion, does religion supersede a child's right to bodily autonomy?
/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:58 PM
12

If removing one of a babies lungs was a religious custom should it be allowed? Where do you draw the line?
/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:51 PM
1

It isn't? Her dad picked us up and we were back there in about half an hour by car x_x perhaps I'm mixing it up with where she went to uni, this was a while ago.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 10:41 AM
1

Oh ok. My ex was from Groningen, near Amsterdam, perhaps that's why.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 10:07 AM
1

I believe on an IQ bound scale, there are more men at the lower and higher ends of the scale whereas women tend to be more centered in the middle.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 04:15 AM
1

I had heard people from The Netherlands hate it being called 'Holland'...
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:59 AM
8

One day that woman will be involuntarily punched in the face for doing shit like that, and she'll deserve it. People can have social anxiety and other aversions to touch, you never know who someone is.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 01:27 PM
1

I've actually been meaning to buy that book for a while now, thanks for reminding me
/r/MensRights28/01/18 01:22 PM
1

I'm not looking to debate the numbers of men and women in college/uni right now, though I agree it may be related, so have posted there as well. Thanks I'm sure I remember the change addressing younger children such as primary/high school... But it was a few years ago.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 05:11 AM
4

I remember reading on here and other sites that the education system/curriculum was changed to help girls perform better, but what happened was that in fact not only was girls' increase negligible, it worsened the performance of boys in our schools. I believe this was in the UK. Any links to relevant topics/articles are appreciated, as I can't currently find them. Thank you
/r/MensRights27/01/18 05:10 AM
1

Sick of seeing that phrase too. Its like it makes discrimination the norm, and the 'reverse' not the norm, any way it happens. Cause it only happens to women? No matter how stupid the person using it is, terms matter. It's discrimination, full stop. I would bet all I have that no one has ever complained about a female doing something so innocent as tapping a man on the back.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 06:17 PM
1

Thanks Edit: I was really hoping there was more to this story. I know police officers are supposed to be more responsible members of the public, but man or woman that sentence is harsh x_x My guess is the judge assumed she was actually drunk at the time as well, which is likely, but no way to know really.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 03:25 AM
1

This is behind a paywall...
/r/MensRights15/12/17 04:51 PM
0

I guess you aren't interested in that adult conversation I mentioned then. Oh well. Can't say I didn't try.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:58 PM
0

I do? I was under the impression that you were the one who focused on it rather than actually answer any of my questions. If you truly believe I am this thing you keep saying, then perhaps you need your 'head checked' XD Anyways, I'm more than happy to put that to bed if you'd like to answer the aforementioned questions and try to have an adult conversation rather than down vote all my comments and call me names?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:35 PM
0

I would imagine that saying to get someones head checked would infer that their is something wrong with their mind, which it isn't a huge leap to assume. But its a minor detail to focus on. You didn't actually answer any of my three questions... shrug. My personal opinion is that telling men to lie down and take it rather than have them achieve their dreams only encourages the world to carry on as it is. You can't let the world beat you down, you have to stand up and hit it back.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:21 PM
0

How will that prove anything? There is already a lack of men in teaching position, university, colleges, and yet no one in the mainstream is pushing for more at all. Exactly what is your basis for this belief? Do you not think excellent male role models as teachers in school can help to change societies biased views of men? Why do you believe it isn't worth people following their dreams to the extent that you consider them mentally ill no matter how hard it may be for them to achieve them?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:06 PM
0

Your comment reads: 'Give up and run away, don't follow your dreams'. Just because something is hard doesn't mean you don't try and do it, and change the way things are.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:55 PM
8

What they said means that (some) white people fought to keep segregation because they thought it would be like an attack on their race to be affording coloured people more rights. This was compared to how women feel when people support men's rights, as if it takes something away from women's rights. I think you were confused by the wording in the post the quote is from, to the extent you believed the OP of the comment was arguing in favour of ethnic segregation.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 04:05 PM
8

I think you need to re-read their last paragraph. And then leave if you just want to stir things up.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:55 PM
2

You are equating feminists with women. They are not synonyms.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:32 AM
1

Well, that's your prerogative, I guess. But how is painting all women with the same brush helping any kind of reasonable worldview? Is judging men as all the same just as reasonable, or would you consider it shortsighted?
/r/MensRights23/10/17 05:32 AM
16

I sincerely hope you are being sarcastic. Rights should never be taken away, only privileges. And no, not all women are feminists.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:06 AM
1

Yes, I didn't calculate it to actually know the amounts, just saying the bot is wrong. I'm guessing it rounds oddly and doesn't give the decimals.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 09:53 PM
1

Bad bot
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:03 PM
1

But this is wrong. If the difference between 100lb and 150lb is 25 kg, that makes 50lb equal 25kg, and 100lb worth 50kg. Not 45 kg.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:02 PM
1

I know, I knew you on my old account :)
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:18 PM
1

Where did you ask the question? I believe the feminism subreddits always shunt questions like this to r/askfeminists (may not be the right link). Edit: it's the right one.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter