DerkNasty Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	This guy says it perfectly Generalizations get you nowhere in arguments	/r/MensRights	20/07/17 06:04 PM
-2	This guy says it perfectly Posting this in response to the comparison to criminal actions: Comparing criminal actions to a woman having sex with someone while intoxicated compares their actions to those of criminals. Additionally, nobody else can force you or manipulate you into robbing a store or shooting someone while the same can't be same for consent. Robbing a store while intoxicated is your decision alone; giving consent is something that can be easily manipulated by someone else, especially under the influence of a…	/r/MensRights	20/07/17 05:41 PM
-2	This guy says it perfectly Yes it is, any form of influence by drugs inhibits your ability to consent. The root of the problem is thinking this way.	/r/MensRights	20/07/17 05:16 PM
-1	This guy says it perfectly There are people here talking about one party being drunk and another being sober is completely acceptable, which is where my argument is involved. Having both parties intoxicated is another story completely.	/r/MensRights	20/07/17 03:27 PM
-3	This guy says it perfectly Don't really understand people here talking about how being sober and having sex with a drunk individual isn't rape. You're taking advantage of someone in an altered state without their sober consent. People who get drunk consent to intoxication, not sex.	/r/MensRights	20/07/17 01:42 PM