TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DerwahreKerder Archive

View 3 posts and 190 comments by DerwahreKerder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
98

False AccusationDerwahreKerder/r/MensRights01/01/18 04:31 PM
84

IntactivismDerwahreKerder/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:03 PM
15

Social IssuesDerwahreKerder/r/MensRights27/09/17 09:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Are you crazy? It's my post! Jesus Christ, some people got nerves. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:11 PM
1

stop writing me
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:11 PM
1

Not good
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:48 AM
1

You're stupid. Sorry, but you are. There are special prisons for teenagers. Do you live under a rock?
/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:35 AM
1

Possible. But you're too fast with making judgments. I wish you the same. At least, i try to. Take care.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:21 PM
1

Here is what you wrote: Your mom did not sue you as a minor. This is a factual statement and it implies that i am a liar. She did sue me, and the court ruled in her favour, which was completly out of the legal frame. If the rule would have been enforced, it basically means that they punished a 16 years old teenager to live on the streets because he threw away meat that was off. I had no legal defence. How could i? The person who was responsible to get me a legal defence was the same person that …
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:16 PM
1

I didn't told you that because i wanted to teach you about our education system, but because i wanted to show you another case where the court made a rule completely outside of the legal frame. If a boy doesn't come to school, you should try to find the problem and help him, not use the situation to make profit out of his suffering, or to enslave him. But i consider you a complete loss anyway. So i have no hope that you could understand what i try to explain. You're part of the problem, my frien…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:58 PM
1

I wrote nothing about the case with my mother in my last statement. That was a completely different case. It happened as i wrote in my original post. You don't have to believe it, but that doesn't give you the right to call me a liar. If you make a factual statment like, what you say isn't the truth, you should be able to prove it. Of course you aren't. You make that statement without any knowledge at all. That's why you are a piece of shit. Quod erat demonstrandum :)
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:43 PM
1

See? You don't know the slightest about the laws of my country. The money wasn't the payment for the school. It was an administrative fine. It was a punishment because i didn't attendant school. It's a public school and no one has to pay for it. Also not if you do not attend. That is not how it works. The fine is meant to make you go to school. And when you're 16, the persons who is charged are usually your parents, because it is their responsibility to make you go to school. However, i had to p…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:24 PM
1

Well, when i was 16 i had to visit a certain school. It trains you for the job market in stuff like woodwork and metalwork. It is mandatory but i didn't go there, because my classmates where goons and i got ripped off in the first week, and there where constant fights. Usually, you get letters that comand you to go back to school, and in the worst case, even the police can show up to bring you to school. That's how it works here in germany. However, nothing happened for the whole year, but i rec…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:08 PM
1

I couldn't believe it either. But that is kinda the point i tried to make. That being said, if you think that everything in the world runs according to your feeling of fairness and justice, you're in serious danger because you are very naive than.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:59 PM
1

I don't need to ask you, because i know that MGTOW stuff. You can make the case that i am emotionally and subjective. But that is exactly the reason for why i told you to go and fuck yourself. Because i am telling a story about my experience. It's not about some god damn theories. You're at the wrong party, bucko.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 07:40 PM
2

I don't want to go into very private details only to proof your stupid assumptions wrong. But it is very obvious to me that i wasn't always such a beneficial friend for her.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 02:20 PM
2

Fuck you. Simple as that. :) Oh, and fuck your truth too. What a piece of shit are you, that you think you have to tell me that my friend isn't actually my friend, because she is a women? You are a real cunt. So go and fuck yourselve. :P
/r/MensRights04/01/18 03:53 AM
1

yup ... i know :/
/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:42 PM
1

Nah, my brother turned against me. If he hadn't, he would had become the object of my mothers wrath.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:33 PM
3

She's my friend, not my girlfriend. And sometimes, she makes more money in a day than i do in a year. :D And i kinda disrespect you, because you try to use my story to foster your own agenda. That is actually not okay.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 03:51 PM
1

Nope. The worst thing about my situation is that pretty much no one can relate with it. The abuse isolates you and if you try to talk about it, most people turn away because they cannot take it. The shit with the domestic abuse is only the tip of the iceberg. My mother slapped me in the face whenever she felt like. A simple disagreement was enough. One time, when she wanted to hit me, it was after the thing with the court, i told her that i wouldn't allow her anymore to beat me, and if she would…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 02:36 PM
1

I'm not looking out for revenge. At least not anymore. I just want it to be a thing of the past that never comes back. But i have no contact with my mother anymore. Of course not.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 08:09 PM
1

Germany. And yeah, i never really thought about it until now, but the ruling was actually unlawful. Parents can't get a divorce from their children, they are responsible. Heck, they are their children! No wonder i have trust issues.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 08:06 PM
3

i guess i should mention that i am from germany, but thanks for the willingness to help! i appreciate it!
/r/MensRights02/01/18 04:19 AM
3

damn ...
/r/MensRights01/01/18 09:34 PM
5

Me too. I cant listen to that person. Insufferable.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 09:24 PM
2

I wouldn't go that far. But they are used to judge in their favor.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 09:13 PM
8

Can you be annoying somewhere else, please? And try to be, let's say, around 25% less stupid. That would be awesome!
/r/MensRights01/01/18 09:07 PM
6

The judge followed the demands of my mother and her attorney, so i doubt that. But it is a really odd judgment. Usually you cannot punish a 16 year old to leave his home, since i wasn't even able to sign a contract for my own apartment. It was total indifference to male suffering, and complete devotion to female demands.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 08:14 PM
3

I'm trying, but it's tricky. Psychological changes don't happen over night. It takes time. And no, i wont give up. And neiter should you! :)
/r/MensRights01/01/18 08:08 PM
2

Life's that way structured, that i also hear and read stories all the time that make me think that i was kinda lucky. The human capacity for evil seems to be without limit. And yes, i'm doing better today. :)
/r/MensRights01/01/18 07:58 PM
6

Well, traumatized i would say. I still get nightmares. I have huge trust issues so i live pretty isolated. Had to fight with addictions, have no real education, and i never learned to take proper care of myself, so i still end up kinda regulary in situations where i let people take advantage of me. But it could be worse. Way worse. I got a job, do sport, and hope to find real good friends one day. So im kinda good, all things considered.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 07:49 PM
6

True that.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 06:26 PM
4

I guess that's true.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 06:25 PM
15

Yeah, i felt pretty guilty back than. Somehow i still do. Women are victims, men are perpetrators. A lesson l learned very early in life.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 05:27 PM
13

The view that boys run through this world, being called sir and be thanked by everyone, while girls are constantly called bitch, is highly delusional. But if she teaches the girls that this is how the world turns, we got some new insane feminists in the making. Wonderful!
/r/MensRights30/12/17 10:34 PM
6

It's an ideal, not an illusion. Those two a different things. But it is a mistake to idealize people. Or couples in that matter.
/r/MGTOW28/12/17 12:38 AM
-3

Isolation can not be the answer. Why would you be afraid of being left alone, if you are already alone?
/r/MGTOW25/12/17 11:21 PM
6

Han shot first!
/r/MGTOW25/12/17 09:09 PM
1

Idk really, but i know that this answer will solve the problem of cognitive dissonance, that the difference between public narrative and the observed world, produces.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 06:43 PM
7

I was grew up in a somewhat fundamentalist christian community, and just like you, i see it as a problem when christians try to force their identity onto others. But that is not how we encounter christians on large. If you meet someone who tells you that they are christians, you dont pretend that you belief that a guy named Jesus lived 2000 years ago, died, and came back to life after that. We accept Christians when they act as such. When they help the homeless people, for example. But we dont c…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:34 AM
5

By pushing back ideologies, that prevent a commonly accepted definition. The issue is not that we cannot solve the problem, but that we don't agree on what the problem is. That's why feminism is everything, but a solution. Because it is in itself not clear about the definition of the problem. That is good for feminism, because it justifies its existence, but it is no help for anyone who seeks for a solution/definition.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:25 AM
20

Exactly, it is like christianity. With the little but important difference, that christianity doesn't try to rule the world. At least not anymore. You can act as a christian, but christians dont expect others anymore, that they treat them like christians. No christian, or at least not many, try to enforce their identidy onto others. What you belief should only influence your own behavior, not that of others. But if you can influence others due your behavior, because you act good and others see y…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:01 AM
2

The definition of a problem is the basis to solve it. That's why there is a fight over the definition. The fact that i refuse your definition, for example, capitalism as a system of oppression, doesn't mean i dont want to solve the problem. The opposide is true. Only a definition that is commonly accepted can lead to a solution that is not a form of oppression. That means we need dialogues that everyone can take part in. Feminism and Marxism, just like any other ideologies, are demanding the pow…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:53 AM
43

Feminism is a problem because it leads to questions like this. Some ideologies fall flat because they are so ill defined. Feminism on the other hand, does so well because it is so ill defined. It is not a logical conclusion with flaws, that could be pointed out. It is a expression of motivations that hide behind a wall of ill described ideas. Like a magical belief system or a witch hunt. The problem with feminism is its mere existence.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:40 AM
4

The claim to be a marxist is similar to the claim to be a feminist. The person who makes the claims gives the definition. That is the power over the narrative, and therefore no basis for a discussion among equals. Especially a "marxist" should understand that you cannot be more than a human.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:12 AM
58

MRA is not a feminist club for men. It is the antithesis to feminism. The goal is to get rid of gender based ideology and politics, since it is a fight for the meat pot, and counter productive for any struggle for human rights. Best case szenario, MRA ends Feminism, and disapears because it fullfilled its mission.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:03 AM
5

A Right is something you alreadyhave as a human being. You dont need to convince a feminist that you have them. You only need to get rid of feminists who denies them to you. Got me?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:58 AM
8

She's not here to talk but to be passive listening. She explains this demand, that people tell her their ideas, with the claim that she is a feminist. "I am a feminist, but i will listen to your complains, and deside if your ideas are legit or not:" She demands a possition of authority for herself. If you grant her that authority, she has all that she wants, and you lost. Simple as that. That is basically the whole feministic scheme/scam.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:50 AM
5

Are you telling me to respect and accept her claims and demands, and that i should treat her as a feminist? I think this is the biggest mistake you can make, and from that point, it just goes downhill. So, no. Her claim, that she is a feminist, is an empty claim. What i read is, "Respect my authiority!" It is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:38 AM
9

I think that you, declaring yourself a feminist, already implies some sort of claim of authority. I completely refuse that. As an idea, as an identity and as a claim. I think you can act as a feminist, even though it is not a coherent set of ideas, but i dont think you can actually BE a feminist. People who declare themselves feminists already express a demand. That they want to be seen as feminists. You put yourself above others this way, and this is unacceptable. More equal than others? You're…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:27 AM
1

The interviewer asks her what happens, if women refuse to lie down on the casting couch? She answers, sometimes women don't get the part! It is wrong that people in a position of power use their power, in order to blackmail those who wish to rise to the top. But it is just as wrong to defend those people, who wish to rise to the top, and are willing to do everything in order to reach their goals. Who in their right mind would make a similiar argument in regard to other forms of corruption? What …
/r/MensRights14/10/17 09:18 AM
8

If parents treat their sons like villains, i am sure they will become very empathic people ... not.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:22 PM
9

I think the wording is ridiculous. Do i have an unpaid job in the waste disposal sector, everytime i bring out the trash? Whats with my unpaid job as a chef? I cook almost everyday, where is my payment? And what about my unpayed job as a cleaning person? I clean stuff all the time without payment. That can't be right. That is not justice. That is fraud. Someone needs to be punished for this! >:(
/r/MensRights11/10/17 07:27 AM
25

My country :) The judge said, that women are still opressed, because the CEOs are mostly men. Also work women more often in unpayed jobs in the care sector. Which means they stay at home with the kids. You cant make that shit up. Unpayed jobs in the care sector.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 07:00 PM
1

English isn't my native language either, so it doesn't bother me. :D And Cheers!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 07:48 PM
1

It is not more realistic, you just rationalise it. People do that by default. Rationalise. The problem is, people aren't rational at all. You think like, they have been hurt in their femininity, so they want to get rid of the female concept. But than, on the other hand, you see that they want to make everything more female, and you think, they must been hurt by masculinity. It seems like a contradiction, if you don't consider the simple wish to destroy something, as an possibility. Most "feminis…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 07:18 PM
1

No one knows what feminism is. I wasted a lot of time to find it out and know now even less, are more confused about it, then before. But that is not an accident, it is a scheme. Feminism is this institution that could be so good, if it just wouldn't be so evil. And because it is so evil, we have to make sacrifices for it, in the hope that it will become good, but it never will. It's a manifestation of the resentment and entitlement, greed and delusion of our societies. It is the holy inquisitio…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 06:35 PM
1

Feminism is important because you are afraid that it becomes corrupted? That is exactly how feminism has already corrupted you. Hurry up and do something for them, befor they turn on you! The only solution is to get rid of it.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:10 PM
2

Seriously, you must be nuts if you think it is a good idea to have expectations towards feminism, and wait until they grant the wishes of others. I am not going to waste my time to save your dear feminist movement. And i will as sure as hell, not ask them for anything, and emprower them with my acceptance of their authority. You are insane, and you are a feminist, and i guess you are also a women.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:40 PM
1

I really would like to see also a mixed rugby team.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:35 PM
3

The people who claim that feminism at its core is good, are the same people who enable the evil at its periphery. The social justice warrior is the bainchild of feminism, and no, i dont wish another lecture about the benefits of feminism. I had enough of it and it was all bullshit, in the end.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:32 PM
2

i dont want anything from feminism. i want it to disapear.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:16 PM
8

Yeah, boys are just bad girls in this regart.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 11:35 AM
22

Thanks for the information. I didn't knew that either until yet. Wtf ...
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:19 AM
8

it is a witch hunt
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:21 PM
10

Let's be honest, if his friend should get another fair trial, the support of the puplic or MRAs could be counterproductive. MRAs are not known for being the carrier of public sympathie.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 02:21 PM
-2

that is not a good idea
/r/MensRights04/10/17 02:19 PM
18

The problem with state appointed lawyers is, that many of them want to become judges themselves. So they side with the judge, because it is a future peer to them. Maybe your friend can get a new lawyer, and another view on his case. But you would need one who works on commission and is ready to wait for his money. Such lawyers exist, but they are rare, and it would depend on the chances to win the case. If it is very likely to win the case, you might have a chance to find a lawyer that is willin…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 01:59 PM
52

If it happened as you wrote, he should be free. I'm sorry for your friend. It's unjust.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 01:28 PM
1

Because a women can always find a guy to do the job? Maybe it has something to do that we don't help men with mental illensses that much? Prison culture? General brutalisation of men? Idk ... maybe men just like guns while a women would use poison?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:19 PM
1

If you are an democratic socialist, you are not hardcore left. you are labour. and i never said you should vote right wing parties. they do have their own version of feminism.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:44 PM
2

you're free to belief that. but i wouldn't hold my breath for it if i were you.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:32 PM
0

I am sure that women will make good drone pilots. Of course the draft becomes an option in the time of automatisation. Funny how some things simply fit. 100 years later.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 04:18 PM
1

Granted. It's more sophisticated than that. But at the bottom line, yes. But i am sure you can educate me about the real goals of feminism.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 04:11 PM
1

The justification, the underlying assumption of feminism, is a fallacy. Just like a witch hunt. It's based on claim that cannot be proved.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 04:07 PM
3

I must be in the wrong sub. But it explains why we will never solve the issue, since most here dont want to conect the cause and the effect.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 04:05 PM
1

Let the downvoting begin. Since i am wrong in this sub, because here are way to many allys. I am shocked and suprised, but that's where we are.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 04:01 PM
1

You claim that a women, that is forced to do a job that men do everyday, is a victim of war because of that. A victim because men died and cant do the dangerous jobs anymore? You got a double standard there, my friend.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:48 PM
2

Actually, according to Hillary Clinton, women are the main victims of wars. But if feminists see it as their goal to break the rule of the men, and get jobs in factories, isn't it in favour of their goals to be for war? Men go to war and women become free.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:40 PM
2

You are a good ally but you don't need to be a feminist to reach that conclusion. Question: Should women have the right to vote over war and peace, if they don't have the duty to fight the wars?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:24 PM
1

If you adopt something, you give it your name.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:05 PM
1

a healthy attitude, and yeah, i meant the other one, sorry
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:00 PM
1

You and your magical belief in equality. There are no two trees in this world that are equal. And if you want to have two equal trees, you must cut one down.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:52 PM
2

Women became the oppressors thanks to first and second wave feminism. I am not a supporter of Ideas that led to oppression.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:45 PM
1

Maybe it is right to take away mens rights, since they become oppressors, if you let them do whatever they want?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:37 PM
13

Only the third wave of feminism. Feminism at large has nothing to do with it. Just kidding.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:17 PM
1

I can't keep you from living in denial. If you think your argument with me is not based on your wish for justice, and that you don't have the urge to see people who do crimes punished, then so be it.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:15 PM
1

Yeah, i met them online. They call themselves social justice warriors.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:13 PM
1

But that's the problem. You expect a proof for something that can not be proofed. That there aren't people in this world, that are free from distructive wishes. And if you chose to belief that people without dark sides exist, there is nothing i could do to proof you otherwise. Because as long we haven't found that person, it is possible that it does exist.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:09 PM
1

Since you demand that i justify myself, i think it is fair to say, that you know that you have the wish for justice. The wish for justice is equal with the wish for punishment. You can't let me get away with a wrong claim, can't you? Human, all too human.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:03 PM
0

Because there is a basic understanding for the need of witch hunts in our societies. Your wish for purity is a justification for witch hunts. It's the hope that there must be people so free from evil, that they are able to find and fight the real witches. But the big bad wolf doesn't live in the middle of the woods, in a house made out of candy. The wolf lurks in the soul of everyone of us.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 11:52 AM
0

The wish for punishment is in a world that knows injustice, just as usual, as the wish for justice. Just as the wish for revenge is usual in a world where everyone has to die, and therefore, has to suffer. Everyone has the urge for revenge, punishment and distruction, at some point in life. Just the holy inquisition is free from those human, all too human, dark sides. That is its legend.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 11:39 AM
1

You mean we don't need witch hunters anymore, because we killed all the witches? Of course. If you burn a lot of witches, you also do away a lot of people who came to wealth by injustice. But that is no proof that the underlying assumption, the patriarchy, existed. First wave feminism stems from a time where men would die million deaths in the trenches of the first world war. The order of the white feather was a group of feminists, shaming men into those trenches. If you belive in witch craft, d…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 11:31 AM
1

Of course there were witch hunters who believed in their noble goals. All they wanted was to protect people from something evil. But the real evil is the burning of the people on the stake. First wave feminism threw bombs into stores. But what about the real witches and the good witch hunters? Again. Witches doesn't exist and it is the belive in witch craft, that harms the people. Not the witches.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 11:09 AM
9

If you have to fail at something in life, it should be feminism.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:13 AM
1

Intoduced to drugs? You mean she didn't wanted to take them out of her own intention? That is a assumption on your part without any proof. What about the argument that she is simply a distructive person? What says the hypothetical oath? First do no harm. Well, she harmed two people seriously. Herself and the person she stabbed. Actually It doesn't even matter if she is destructive or simply irresponsible. Both are character traits that disqualify her. There aren't many professions where you have…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 10:29 PM
1

The women i work with earn also the same as i do. But the Gender Pay Gap makes the claim that women should earn the same as men on avarege, solely because they are women, not because the do they same job. Because women on avarge don't do the same jobs as men.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 06:58 PM
1

You mean??? ... ?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 06:56 PM
1

The fallacy of the Gender Pay Gap is not, that there is one, but that it would be right if there isn't one.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 04:54 PM
1

Get or want? Maybe they would try harder to get those jobs if they would be significantly better paid?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 04:48 PM
1

How high is the risk for you and your coworker to die on your job? Of course people should get paid the same money for the same jobs. But not all Jobs are equal.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 04:44 PM
16

You should be treated for what you do, not who you are.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 03:42 PM
2

I like that guy.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 11:59 AM
1

I went to school while the kosovo war was going on. We had several Kosovo Albanians and one Serb in the school. I knew both. I was a good friend with the Albanian guy who was like, 2 meters tall and always involved in some fight. Everyone was scared of him. And the Serb was a member of the Handball school team i played in. Serbs and Albanians were killing eachother at that time, down in Kosovo. And they wanted to carry on that fight in school. I often negotiated between them, so they wouldn't fi…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 11:20 AM
1

The Winter war, where the Fins fought back the russians. I know. Pretty impressive but really unique. The difference is, you fought for your independence. Motivation is key. The war in syria is a proxy war. Europe supports the Kurds, USA the FSA, and under the hand Al Nusra, and Russia supports Assad. And the weapon technology is also different. They have fully automatic granatte launchers. Nasty weapons. I can't tell who is the good and who the bad guys. Can you?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 10:32 AM
1

There is a old army base near the town that i live in. There have been at one point ca. 500 or more refugees, that lived there. And I talked to a guy from Damaskus at the christmas market. He was sharp. He spoke fluent english and frensh, broken german and turkish and arabic of course. We talked very openly about the situation, and the bad thing is, it is a civil war. Brothers against Brothers. The war is a bad thing, not a good fight against something. There will be no victory for anyone. At th…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 09:19 AM
1

I don't want to be cynical because i know that people dont know that much about the situation in syria. But what party do you suggest those men should join? FSA or Al Nusra, which are related to Al Qaeda? ISIS, the butchers that cruzify people and skin them alive? I mean, you basically suggest that they should join a terrorist organisation. And those people don't fight for a country, they fight for their tribes. I have a lot of respect for soldiers, but i don't blame a men who doesn't want to go…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 10:37 PM
2

cyka blyat, doesn't sound like the russian women that i met. Maybe they dont get drunk but they defently try to.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 10:19 PM
2

The rebuilding of germany was done with huge amount of american help. And it was done because it was assumed that germany was the place were world war three would happen. Nothing against my grandparents, but the story that the germans rebuilded their country with their hands is a myth.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 10:00 PM
2

But the good thing is, if the left has supporters like you, they actually don't need an enemy.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 09:43 PM
2

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 09:37 PM
1

After 4 years of war, 90 percent of the syrian infrastructure was destroyed. I can understand the argument that most of the people are not refugees from syria. But i find it disgusting when people say, those men should fight for ruins. It's the most anti-male statement that i can think of. Those guys would be of better use for us, if they were dead.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 09:34 PM
12

I would argue that the person who gets the bullet in the head is the biggest loser. Warlords and Terrororganisation in the middle east even pay the families, the mothers and wives, for a dead husband or son. Which often leads to women shaming their man into war. Hillary Clinton is an insane bitch. But that is just my opinion.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:12 PM
10

Quote: Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today's warfare, victims. Source: https://clintonwhitehouse3.archives.gov/WH/EOP/First_Lady/html/generalspeeches/1998/19981117.html
/r/MensRights29/09/17 05:46 PM
1

no, english is not my first language. And you dont have to share or value or to understand my apolitical stance, but i disrespect you for pointing your finger at me, and demanding me to explain myself. We can talk about anything, but i don't owe you an explanation.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 04:07 PM
2

Are you telling me now that it doesn't matter who i vote, as long the public doesn't care for male issues? Thank you! Because i didn't knew that. How did i even survive till this point without the help of a genius like you. I dont know it! But that is another point why i think politics wont help us. It gives people like you a reason to bitch around and derail the conversation. Very counterproductive.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:49 PM
3

If you think you can tople this issue by policy, in a top-down style, without having the public opinion on your side, you are wrong, my friend.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:30 PM
1

Yeah, but my point was that a company shouldn't be treated as if it is an individual. And if you want to treat it as such, you must be consequent with it.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:20 PM
3

What are you trying to do. Do you want to convince me that we should help homeless people, or do you try to convince me of your political opinion?
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:19 PM
1

No. You said a company should be treated as an individual, because it is made out of individuals. Hence, all individuals must be treated as if they are the company.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:17 PM
4

Unity. I dont care for the political views of an MRA, as long they are not contradictive to the goals. But i guess it is not possible to have a political agenda, without having some contradictions at this point. It's something we have to deal with from case to case. I think we need a change in all political ideas, in regards to male issues. That would be a real victory. And i dont see why we should aim for less. If we play, we should play to win.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:02 PM
2

At least here in germany we have left wing anti feminism and pro male activism. Basically the only MRA like activists we ahve. I know that sounds weird but it is true.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:12 PM
2

haha, yeah, that's possible. If life bites you in the arse, you better develop a sense of humor about it.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:04 PM
14

Left and Right have both a bias towards males. The only confusion is which males they should hate.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:25 PM
2

when i got what he meant, i became extremly angry and looked for him in the bar and outside, because i wanted to beat him up. Which was of course a really bad idea. Later i was glad that i didn't found him. So yeah, it could have ended up really bad, and it was luck that it didn't. For both of us i would say.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:20 PM
2

Yeah, i was like, "Thank you man! You're absolutly right! I can't let people walk all over me, and everyone faces bad times at some point in life. No reason to give up!" And he made just a sad face, hahahaha, what a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 12:36 PM
1

It's pretty fucked up, yeah. What's funny about it is, that i thought he meant i should speak up for myself, and i thougt that this is a awesome idea, and i thanked him for his encouragment, and that gave him a disapointed look on his face. But it is a sad reality and it happens everyday.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 12:23 PM
3

No. Why? Do you think it is funny? You write, "come on!" but what am i supposed to tell you? It is what it is.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 12:11 PM
6

One time, back when i was homeless, i spended one night in a bar. I had a conversation with the guy that sat next to me. We talked about all kind of stuff. He told me that he was gay, and i told him about my problems. That i was homeless and such. I am someone who is very verbally active. I like to talk. Or at least, i liked to talk in the past. He told me that no one has to go hungry, as long you know how to open your mouth. It took me some time to understand what he meant. Men are vulnerable a…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 08:32 AM
1

Because there is no difference between the bank as a company and the individual banker. If people can join together to build a company, which is the amalgamation of the different individuals, and has therefor the right as an individual, evey indivudual is also responsible for the action of the bank. Or do you mean that a company has the rights as if it is a individual, because it is made of individuals, but the individual itself can not be hold responsible for the action of the company?
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:28 AM
1

I don't mean the actions of individual bankers, but all bankers that worked for the company. You can't charge a banker for something he wasn't personally involved in.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:58 PM
32

I am not sure if a person who stabbed people should become a surgeon after all. Making a hobby a profession, or what?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:45 PM
1

but it is still several houndret percent
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:23 PM
1

If a company is basically nothing more than a group of individuals, why cant the individual in the group be hold accountable for the action of the company? The bankers from 2007 didn't went to prison, because they are not the same as the company. That is also a problem with this logic. It is a one way street. The group has the right of an individual, but the individual isn't hold accountable for the group. Why is that?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:20 PM
1

All systems are based on people. And no, actually, a group of people can live without all those things. There is always one who isn't hungry, doesn't need sleep, ect.. and if someone dies, you add a new person to the company. That makes the company very different from an individual person. It's beyond me why and how you can argue for something different, but you do.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:06 PM
1

Nah, people lived from a dollar a day in this days money. Unfortunally, i can not find a proof for that right now. But i guess that was it. A dollar a day by this days money.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:02 PM
1

"the whole thing is more than the sum of its parts" a company is a system that makes money. It has no consciousness, no feeling of guilt, no voice, no face, it has no fear, it doesn't die, it won't get hungry not thirsty, it needs no sleep, it can not dream, it is a company. Not more and not less.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:51 PM
1

The average income raised around thousand percent the last hundred years, and we still have homeless people. Should make one thinking.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:43 PM
1

Yes, of course. That was bad example, or a bad way to put it. But a company has basically legal rights as if it is a individuum. Which it is not. I really dont know how you can claim anything else. A company does not underly the same natural necessities as an indivuum. It doesn't die of age, for example.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:39 PM
-2

The people in florida wanted the right thing for the wrong reason. The financial crisis put people, suprisingly also women, under pressure, and it was only logical to reduce the pressure by reforming the alimony system. But a crisis eventually passes by, and the Governor understood the motivation behind the logical conclussion, and doubled down by vetoing the bill. Feminists and Politicians understand that a logical conclussion does not necessarly lead to motivation, but that rather motivations …
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:34 PM
1

You mean if we leave the man more resources, it wouldn't be that bad if he had to deal with problems on his own. But that would mean that men safe their money for bad times. Most people don't safe money. They change their lifestyle if they earn more. We could also expect in this situation of taxation, that men lower their lifestyle in order to safe more money for bad times. It doesn't make that much of a difference.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 07:22 PM
0

Like the lawyer of an company. He represents the group as an individual. It's the same, right?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 07:15 PM
1

They claim because there are few very powerful man, all men are very powerful. They treat the group as an individual. Whites are racist. Only a individuum is able to have racist thoughts. But they claim that a group can act as an individual.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 07:07 PM
0

Of course not. But the individual cannot transfer his rights onto a system. Which is what the SJWs do by the way. They claim that groups should be treated as individuals.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 06:36 PM
3

When Peterson talked about Hitler, he described his interaction with the public as a form of communication. He understood what the people wanted, and mirrored their wishes in his speeches, in his action, and in his person. He was not the puppetmaster, but a willingly puppet of the people. I am german and i was stunned by this explanation, because it is true, at least in my estimation. I thought always that he was a scapegoat for the darkest wishes of the german people. And i think similiar about…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 06:31 PM
2

That's how we treat men. We let them work, tell them they should have family and kids, and when something goes wrong we say, fuck those people.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 05:12 PM
2

No, it's not. That's why it doesn't matter when individuals live on the streets. The public can afford to lose individuals.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:48 PM
2

Yes. But if a bank robber takes you as a hostage, the public is not in danger. If you want a, everyone on his own, policy, please be at least consequent about it.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:23 PM
1

I think that is a major flaw in the libertarian idea. Because it is quite obvious that a company is not a human. The coca cola company is not bounded by the same laws as the individual person. Otherwise it had died because of its age. It is a natural law that humans die when they get old. A company is free from this law.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:19 PM
2

A risk to the public is not the risk of an individual persons death.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:15 PM
1

That sounds reasonable.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:12 PM
2

It is up to the policemen to decide what is an acceptable risk and what not.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:07 PM
2

Without a public safty net, the policemen will think twice, if he should help you or not. That's why the army has the "No men will be left behind" policy. It increases the moral. While a, everyone is on his own, policy, decreases the moral.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:57 PM
1

A company does not underlie the same necessities as humans do. The Coca Cola Company was founded 1886. While the individual people who founded this company all died, is the company itself doing very well till today. A collective of humans is not bound to the same rules that the indivuum is bounded to. That's why it is a advantage of a company, if it has the same rights as a human, while it is not a human.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:54 PM
1

I think it is wrong to give a company the same right as a human.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:28 PM
2

If you belive that society is biased towards men, and is indifferent towards male suffering, how can you expect charitie to change something about the situation of homeless men? We have plenty of libertarians and many homeless people. I dont say that a socialistic society would make a big change. Because we also have many socialists, that also don't change a lot about the situation. Left and Right seem to agree in this point.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:01 PM
2

For libertarians, the most important thing is property rights. Unions for example, don't fit into that concept. But i don't think that the owner of a mine has the right to decide what are safe working conditions and what not. But stikes could be illegal in a libertarian society, because it is a infringment of the owners property rights. You can always replace those with little, with those who have nothing. The Ludlow Massacre comes to my mind. How would a libertarian MRA deal with that? The stri…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:57 PM
2

If every men has to deal with his suffering on his own, why do you join a movement that fights for men rights? And why do you expect other men, like policemen, to protect you? If he suffers from traumatic memories and begins using drugs, you would refuse to help him.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:48 PM
2

There is the idea that the government is basically the replacement for the family fathers. At the other hand, organized groups of men brought about legislations that improved working conditions, for example, of miners. And I see many figure heads that call themselves libertarians.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:35 PM
0

Yeah. Exxon Mobile supports feminist groups in georgie. The asian one. Smoke and Mirrors. I often like to quote Robert McNamara, Logic wont help you to understand your enemy. Strategy and Logic is not the same. Sun Tzu wrote about that 2500 of years ago.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:01 AM
1

As long the government supports lunatics, it will be hard to make a case in favour of government support. The claim is, that everyone who is supportet by the government, turns into a lunatic. The left and the right dig the same grave.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:57 AM
0

Yeah, i think that is the reason why the establishment supports the lunatic left. They build up the enemy they want to fight. That's what i would do.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:51 AM
5

A man's rights movement that fights against the indifference of society towards male suffering, that is against helping homeless men. Jesus Christ. That's a bummer.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:29 AM
3

That statement is really troubeling me now.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:11 AM
9

You can't expect from others what you aren't willing to do yourselve. Women help other women, and men help also other women. But men don't help men.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:54 AM
3

Spetsnaz knows how to strike a chord in the soul of a man.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:31 AM
2

That could make it hard to fight the indifference towards male suffering. I guess we need a better leadership than. It's true that man need to help themselves. That they have to take ownership over their own problems. But the same counts for the leadership of the MRAs. If they don't want to have the ownership over the problem of a homeless man, they are bad leaders and no role models. Leading by example is key.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:25 AM
6

Why that? I was homeless when i was young, slept also on the streets, and thought that this is a movement that challenges the status quo.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:09 AM
4

Most people who live on the streets are men. The person who made that research should actually know that, since he made that researchs. So he proofed the underlying assumption that there is a indifference of society towards male suffering. Because he ignored the fact that men without homes get less help from society than women.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:39 AM
2

Yes. Damn.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:24 PM
4

Traumatic memories can be overcome. But it is a lot of painful work. And traumatic childhood memories are really hard to overcome. Because usually, you could think through what happened logically, and develop a strategy to prevent it from happening again. That gives you back a sense of control over your life. But you was a kid. Kids depend on the protection of others because they can't defend themselves. And that defensless kid is still in you. That means that you need to protect it. Have you co…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:13 PM
9

The isolation is also a effect of the crime. You can not connect anymore with others, because they don't share your experience. Spetsnaz made videos about it. Maybe they help you. I wish you good luck! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mc_unjzJCXo
/r/MensRights27/09/17 09:37 PM
5

It's disgusting what many people think is acceptable behavior from adult women and men towards boys. A female teacher once came to me, while i was standing on the school yard at break, and i had my hands in my pockets. She asked me if i was playing pocket billiards. Which is a german saying for mastrubation.I found that quite disturbing. Also boys don't get told that they could be raped. Especially not by a woman. How insane is that? All women are saints.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:11 PM
2

As long you don't beat with a stick on a rock to get water, it's all good. :D
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:21 AM
2

Yeah, i was raised as a catholic and every friday, i think i should eat fish. Maybe that's why the Japanese have been so hostile towards christianity. Not enough fish days.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:18 AM
2

A jew that isn't a doctor? I call that a myth. Just kidding!! Okay, i understand that now. That makes a difference from the legal side i guess. Also, if your religion commands it, and you have a religious community, i guess the psychological issues aren't there, or at least, way way less. But when i ask myself why, ... it was unnecessary and that makes it really hard to deal with it. Nevertheless, sorry for my bad joke. I couldn't help it.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:07 AM
1

Doctors can hardly be sued for the risks that can take place in every surgery. Otherwise, no one would become a doctor because the risk would be too high. And the problem with the risk taking is, that in this case, the only person who takes the risk is also the only person who doesn't understand it. It's really a complicated issue, if you think about it.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 06:56 AM
2

De nada
/r/MensRights27/09/17 06:50 AM
2

Religious reasons, that is a tough nut. As long you accept that you put your child under a risk, it's kinda up to you? But if you pretend that there are no risks involved and even try to convince others of that, you do a disservice to the people around you. The doctor that circumcised me was a muslim. So i guess he was kinda biased towards this practice. But what happens if something goes wrong? Do you blame the parents and they have to face legal consequences, or do you blame the religion? I th…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 06:45 AM
5

Surgery's come always with a risk. The risk is very low, but it exist. I would say that people should avoid surgery if it isn't necessary, unless they are aware of the risks and accept it. The surgery before my last surgery was also a failure. The scars didn't heal right, so i got problems with peeing. None that was noticable with the eye. But i couldn't empty my blatter and my liver values skyrocketed. I almost died and the last treadment was incredible painful. They even thought about flew me …
/r/MensRights27/09/17 06:22 AM
3

And feminists would protest it. It is odd. I hear all those stories about what's wrong with feminism and society, and somehow, they almost all happened to me in my life. I was never married so i didn't had to deal with divorce, but my mother made false claims of domestic violence against me and i ended up infront of a judge. He ruled that i had to stay 450 feets away from my mother and my home, but he didn't told me where i should live instead. My mother beated me often without any reason. Just …
/r/MensRights27/09/17 06:03 AM
4

me too, me too!
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:24 PM
8

She was both, that's right. There are so many things that happened that traumatized me. Well, i am recovering slowly. MRAs, and especially the videos from Spetsnaz helped me a lot. But at some days i am struggling pretty hard. I'm still having a bad selfimage. But it is way more better than last year. Thanks for your kind reply, i wish you a good day, Sir.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 05:24 PM
7

"In the end, everything will be okay, and if it is not okay, it is not the end." I hope my story didn't dragged you down too much. Thank you for reading it!
/r/MensRights26/09/17 04:59 PM
5

Yeah, it is weird how many men have similar stories to tell. But the most, like me until now, remain quiet. But that is really bad, because if no one knows your history, when no one knows who you are, you become very isolated. So i am very grateful for the work that the MRAs do. It is very important indeed. And thank you! I wish you the same!
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:30 PM
12

No, i haven't seen her for two years now. But she still writes me letters in which she tells me how bad her life is. She really thinks she has a right on my life.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:22 PM
27

Yeah, she did, and she was also a feminist. She prohibit me model making, because i made tanks as a kid. I guess that was toxic masculinity for her. But it was my hobby. Instead she tried to force me to care for a baby puppet that can pee, so i wouldn't become one of those shitty men, as she put it. I pretty much broke down and cried when i imagined, that i would have to carry around a baby puppet, when playing with my friends.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:59 PM
4

Actually, it made me laugh. He is like a super vilian but he thinks he is the hero. What a strange world that we live in.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:33 PM
19

As a child, i didn't knew what had happened to me. I thought i was somehow sick. Weird to think that i was a completely healthy child. How different my life could have been.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:31 PM
10

I benefit a lot of the experience that others have shared, so i think it's just fair that i share mine.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:17 PM
1

Rest In Peace
/r/MensRights26/09/17 10:18 AM
6

While i understand why there are feminists, as in, what is their motivation, i do not understand how someone can be so ignorant about history, especially if the claim is based on presumably historic oppression. Someone should tell him about the Cybele cult in ancient rome.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter