TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DesertJoe Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by DesertJoe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

This matter is not gendered, so it should not have any bearing on men's rights issues. Anyone trying to lump "men" as a whole to this are either low IQ NPCs or are an active part of the system trying to protect & shield the evil people who need be tried and executed publicly for all to witness. It's also not a US/American issue either. Powerful individuals across the globe are involved and multiple intelligence agencies from several nations were sponsoring and utilizing the blackmail materials t…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 01:34 AM
2

You are interpreting the discussions that they are having as moral judgements and public shaming. This is akin to "tone policing", taking issue with how they are talking about the issue instead of what is actually being said. You can call it hate, but that's because you don't like them talking about it to begin with. as it ultimately is forcing women to face the consequences of their poor choices. And no, I don't want you to go through all of those hours of content and compile a list just for me…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:45 AM
1

"calling out single moms" =/= "hating single moms" They have open discussions to help men understand the risks involved with dating single moms. This way men can make an informed decision about whether or not they would want to date one. THIS IS NOT HATE. Which is your whole premise for this post, claiming TRP has an irrational hatred towards them. The only thing irrational is your claim that they hate single moms. You simply will find no evidence of this. (And by evidence, I mean something more…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:59 AM
7

Unprovoked? No, the topic of dating single moms was part of the discussion happening at the table. I am familiar with all of the individuals you cited above, and most definitely I have not heard any of them ever express this "hatred" you keep going on about. Andrew Wilson's wife has children from a previous marriage (as did he when they met). BP shills try and call him a hypocrite because of this, which is wrong and hilarious at the same time. But, I'm open to being corrected if you have a sourc…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:39 AM
–

I never said they did. An unvetted man may be someone she knows as a casual acquaintance or someone she just met earlier that night. Point being the man hasn't been vetted thoroughly vetted enough for fatherhood viability. But despite this, she chose to engage in risky sex with him none the less.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:20 AM
5

I'm saying that you are misconstruing the TRP position on the advise for single men wondering about dating single moms being hatred. It's simply not. I've never seen prominent TRP figures calling single moms awful people or imply a moral righteousness for their position. Not once. Are there bitter incels that might express such vitriol on random threads? Sure. But that would not reflect TRP as a whole, and it would be a mistake to infer such on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:03 AM
–

So you're telling us that if a man was a convicted DV abuser in his past, you wouldn't care?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:46 AM
–

While I would concur promiscuity is bad for both, lower n-count for women has a greater importance for her chances at locking down a good man for a husband. Yes, it's a double standard. In case you were unaware, men and women are different. Biology, brain chemistry, hormones are not the same. Modern women seem to think this is unfair. Life is unfair. It is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:36 AM
–

At my age, I've gotten pretty good at gathering facts. You aren't drunk or high all the time (24/7), but the 1000 cock stare doesn't go away once it manifests itself in her eyes. But by all means, please continue the gaslighting and deflection of accountability for your choices in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:27 AM
–

Women are most definitely interested in the capacity of the man courting her to provide. ... at my whim Strange how hyperbolic your questioning has been here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:23 AM
1

I was responding to Kirra's poorly written question framing the cause of this to be the fault of men: So, you’re admitting that every man deals trauma to any woman he sleeps with? She can't see beyond her victim mentality, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:18 AM
–

There are studies that the more partners someone has in the past, the harder it is to pair bond. And this often leads to increased divorce rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:13 AM
–

I would instill the value of practicing temperance in my children. I just happen to only have 1 daughter and stressed that engaging in this behavior would have negative consequences later in life, based upon my own experiences in the past. Sleeping around with random people is bad for everyone, m'kay. Again, you're the only one here making assumptions. Edit: And the reason for different advise I would give to my daughter vs. my hypothetical son is based upon the gender roles. Women are the gatek…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:04 AM
–

Only you are making assumptions, my dear. And your wording was "every man deals trauma to any woman", which implies blame in the statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:56 AM
–

Scroll up in this thread, which referenced trauma that woman share about the shitty men they have chosen in the past. Edit: I used the word shitty to describe the men who abused and inflicted the trauma on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:50 AM
–

"Every man"??? Here we go again with the blame all men. No, we are admitting that promiscuous women demonstrate poor decision making because they choose shitty men to spread their legs to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:44 AM
–

We can see it in their eyes very often along with how they carry themselves in life. It's referred to as the "1000 cock stare". Very noticeable once you see it in a promiscuous woman vs. a chaste woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:42 AM
–

Women have agency in their own decisions. What we see today is they choose poorly with regards to the men they open their legs to. I have told my daughter to not engage in promiscuity with men who approach her. And if I had a son, I would tell him to choose a non-promiscuous woman as his wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:38 AM
7

I disagree with your assertion that TRP expresses hatred for them. Those who are vilifying men for have that preference seem to interpret this as hatred because they don't want to get with single moms, and believe TRP demonizes them for being one. It most definitely is a character judgement. Humans do this every day in lots of situations. And making judgements you disagree with is not vitriolic hatred or moral superiority on the part of the men expressing that preference. For single men who have…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:21 AM
20

When men express their preference to not date and get into LTRs with a single mom, that man is almost often vilified for believing single moms aren't worthy and called a misogynist. Case in point, numerous posts this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 12:57 AM
–

The amount of promiscuity practiced by women today is through the roof. Between abstinence, contraceptives, plan-b, and abortion available, I would argue women have full agency in the decision. Implying she consented to having unprotected sex with an unvetted man, and then chose to go through with the pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 12:42 AM
0

Yep. The men who are struggling today are in charge and are accountable for the society that has been in place long before any of us got here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 12:00 AM
–

Two parent households where both were already in an established relationship before the pregnancy is far better, if for no other reason than having a better support structure for the family. I believe the OP was asking the context of the woman getting pregnant from a man she is not in a relationship with. Implying she consented to having unprotected sex with an unvetted man, and then chose to go through with the pregnancy. I have the belief that the "I don't need no man" rhetoric plays a large p…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 11:47 PM
2

Wow, you keep making all kinds of leaps here. Where did I say women are too stupid to pick for themselves? Only you are saying that. But I guess if the shoe fits? Anyway, let's re-read what I actually said: Men can more easily pick up on cues about the caliber of other men. This is why having a trusted male family member involved in the vetting process, along with women not opening their legs so easily helped weed out the wrong choices in the past. I'm not saying anything about arranged marriage…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:46 AM
1

Because those men don't give her tingles and often come off as "boring" since they would have genuine intentions when courting her. They are choosing men who can stir the right emotions inside her and then let those men have sex very early in the courting phase. Then they either ghost her soon after they get the sex or are assholes who abuse her.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:17 AM
1

They are not picking men who are actually financially stable and conventionally attractive. They are picking men who fool them in order to have sex as quickly as they can and who often are also abusers. Men can more easily pick up on cues about the caliber of other men. This is why having a trusted male family member involved in the vetting process, along with women not opening their legs so easily helped weed out the wrong choices in the past. This is not a quick/easy solution to the problem we…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:07 AM
1

Neither Logos nor I said anything about "men complaining about women not picking them". Let's stay on topic about the men being vetted. We're saying women are not vetting the right men (which has nothing to do with incels/simps complaining about not getting picked). In the past, women had their father/brothers/uncles/etc. involved in the vetting process. Because they wanted to ensure the man she married was worthy for her. However, in modernity women are now "independent" of men and are picking …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:37 AM
0

Both can be true You don't read so well do you? He (correctly) stated that both can be true, but then you follow up with asking which one is it. In other words, the supposition is that a lot of women are keep picking men who have no intention of committing to them and/or treat them appropriately. Meaning they ignore the men who would commit to them and not cheat or beat them. Women should be picky about who they date, but need to pick (vet) better.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 01:26 AM
13

I always get a laugh when a woman tells a man he's wrong about the male experience in a post/thread that is asking men a question about their experience. Never gets old seeing this over and over on this platform.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:11 PM
18

I would say none of these "fight for men's rights". MGTOW is the movement that describes men who have made a conscious decision to no longer play the rigged game of committed relationships with women and the related societal expectations. Red Pill is not a movement, but rather a praxeology (study of human action) in the context of intersexual dynamics. It describes "what is so" about how & why men and women act the way they do in relationships. The term originates from the film "The Matrix" wher…
/r/MensRights09/01/26 02:04 PM
53

We all know this would not be the same outcome if the roles were reversed. Double standard on full display...
/r/MensRights10/12/25 11:57 PM
0

Roger Moore was no Sean Connery. /s
/r/MensRights29/11/25 03:46 AM
1

A small group of influential people long before any of us were born.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 02:37 AM
2

For the most part, yes. But not equally... Single fathers almost never expect a childless women they get into an LTR with to "step up" and financially provide for his child(ren). Also, the father is typically the disciplinarian in the family and the mother is the nurturer. Meaning she's not on the hook for financially supporting his children with no parental authority. So those points related to my post above are lower risk for a childless women getting involved with a single father due to impli…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 03:08 AM
5

Men have this right because they are legally required to sign up for Selective Service and be subject to a Draft when the US military will need conscripts for the upcoming WW3. If a man does not register for Selective Service, he is not allowed to vote, is ineligible for federal student loans, and could be imprisoned and/or fined. Women have no corresponding duty or legal requirement for the same rights and privileges. HUGE double standard where they can vote for politicians that would send us t…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 02:50 AM
6

LTRs where the man is childless and the woman has children from one or more previous relationships are a risk for the man when the relationship fails for various reasons: He will develop a bond with the child(ren) that is then broken when it ends. And he has no parental rights since they are not his biologically. If the child(ren)'s bio dad is in the picture, shit gets real risky for everyone. The mother will inevitably expect the man to "step up" and provide in some sort of financial capacity (…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 02:30 AM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 02:13 AM
-3

Cry harder. Then actually use critical thinking when watching the entire debate.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 02:12 AM
17

If you attacked my wife in the same way she attacked his, I would be even more "unhinged" than he was. Andrew was actually far more restrained than he needed to be. Chuck making ad hominem attack on Andrew's wife means the gloves come off and anything after the fact is fair game. People like you like to call Andrew and his debate style as "unhinged", conveniently leaving out the fact that Andrew just matches the energy of his interlocutor. Meaning, once they hit below the belt, he will hit back.…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 02:09 AM
34

Andrew is not an MRA. His worldview is based upon Orthodox Christianity and he is a "bloodsport debater". You being an atheist doesn't invalidate his positions anymore than him being a theist invalidates yours. Chuck resorted to attacking Andrew's wife in an attempt to claim he was immoral or hypocritical for marrying a woman who had children from prior relationships. His position on the matter ADVISES single, childless men to AVOID getting into LTRs with single moms because the stats do show th…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 12:43 AM
6

There are some states in the US where legislatively, "rape" is defined as a penetrative act upon the victim. The implication being that only women can be victims of this crime and only men are the perpetrators. These are statutes from long ago that are still on the books, and as such do not align with the modern day "consent" definition. I don't recall the specific jurisdictions that still have these in place, but this could be a topic for you to dig deeper on for your research related to the st…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 06:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter