TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DetectiveMousse Archive

View 0 posts and 210 comments by DetectiveMousse on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

She still makes comments on things she did not experienced. I feel people like her more because mens rights agree with her more, but I may be mistaken. I really don't understans the huge hate for Anita one one hand, and people saying Sommers is offerring a rare logical speech, for 'a feminist'. Both seems negative.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:26 AM
-5

Still, what IS a gamer?
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:20 AM
-6

What annoyed you in this Hit-Man video? I feel people may take it in a personal way. Her warning in her video says that it's possible to be critical of some part of the game and yet find it enjoyable.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:20 AM
-9

I saw that video many times. Still, she likes some games, but doesn't see herself as a "gamer". What is a "gamer", for you? I'm not a gamer myself, because I don't like all games. I remember seeing the demo for Bayonetta and just felt like it was utter crap.So I don't play this game. Summers is saying that the last game she played was pac-man. Do yo accept her analysis?
/r/MensRights17/09/14 12:33 AM
-5

I feel she is respected because people here agree with her. She doesn't play any games and yet analyses this difficult subject of sexism in games. I watched the video and she never presented any points on the actual subject, just vary vague observations. I'm not sure this subject is relevant to her.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 12:24 AM
-14

I wonder why Anita is seen as a 'liar' because she likes some games and not all, so she is not a "gamer", but Summers is seen a a great commenter on sexism in video games even if she hasn't played them since pacman.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 11:58 PM
6

Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat Here is the context to that quote that someone here mentioned once : http://clinton3.nara.gov/WH/EOP/First_Lady/html/generalspeeches/1998/19981117.html
/r/MensRights13/09/14 12:39 AM
–

Then again, how many here have been warned or banned for concern trolling? I suppose we can formulate logical questions and arguments, without personal attacks, but in the end, your intent is measured by someone else with their own thoughts and background.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:00 AM
-5

Thanks for the response. I get it, there are things that people don't agree with. There are things that people feel she could have researched more. I feel people wants her to be perfect in every ways, which will never happen. Do you feel her intents are lying and deceiving? That she gives "false" information to some further agenda? There are things that everyday people don't know about. They aren't evil. Do everyone you know are fully aware of what kabuki theater is? I know this is all opinions,…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:28 AM
1

Thanks. It's still sped up talking for a long 25 minutes. What was the initial thing that was censored? That she slept with a game reviewer? Or else?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:11 AM
-3

Is there a scientific way of analyzing video games, or even movies? Why is she so targeted, I wonder? Is she allowed to have opinions, or did her kickstarter stated that she would talk about everything without showing any bias whatsoever ever? I am myself biased right now. First, the OP is a redpiller, and his text is mostly empty. Secondly, I can't understand all the hate, at all. There are countless people trying to review and analyses things taking into account a social subject, like racism, …
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:54 AM
1

What is the reason, for you? I personally don't get it. It's discussions.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:39 AM
1

Could someone provide a general story of what happened with Zoey Quinn or Anita that made people here so fucking mad? The OP is more of a rant. If I search for it, I get super hateful people and "my grandmother's friend knew this gurl and let me tell you..." I can't get any facts without fucking 4 pages of opinions.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:37 AM
1

Okay, I now understand more what you meant. The words "black and white" weren't the best in that situation, I guess these are the firsts that came to my mind. I am still exploring the english language trough debates. Thanks for the response.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:36 PM
1

All I have is personal anecdotes involving the people I know, or the things I read on the interweb, so yeah I cannot provide some solid evidence of this, its more an opinions at this point. Thanks for the discussion! I will try to read more and find out if this theory of mine is true.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:33 PM
1

I agree with your definition, but I don't feel it's that clearly distinguishable. I mean, basic coordination can happen even when you are shitfaced. I personally think maybe the right thing to do is get to know the person more before having sex when there is alcohol and/or drugs involved, for both parties, because it could be a very confusing experience.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:27 PM
1

Yeah I can understand that. I suppose it should be more like "teach people about consent", or something like that? I agree it can be insulting if the men are pointed out like this. I still think there is a need for more education, because some people sincerely believe they are not doing anything wrong if they have sex with a person who is not totally conscious, for example. This is the kind of people targeted by those saying to teach not to rape, in my opinion. I could be wrong, of course.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:20 PM
1

Dude could you be a bit more civil? I'm trying to understand your points, and obviously I can't. I said that your above post is black and white, in the sense that you don't try to put yourself into other's people position, you just tell your mind like it's the truth, insulting people with other opinions in passing. I will stop now as I don't think any good conversation will happen.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:14 PM
1

Can you give me your personal idea of a rapist? Because I feel definitions may be where conflicts could arise.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:04 PM
1

and this is ignoring the whole rape is subjective issue, which also makes it more bat shit crazy. if someone feels like they were raped it doesn't necessarily mean they were raped. All your paragraph is kinda black or white personal opinions. I'm not sure what you are arguing about, it's goes in every directions. Why do you mention over and over those "hysterical idiots"? Where is the hysteria?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:02 PM
1

Yes, accidents happen. You keep bringing the car analogy. I think that in fact, immense efforts have been made towards improving security in cars, since the first model, where you could get impaled on the driving wheel. There is no actual goverment officials in every car, but a lot of government money went into impacts testing, research, new laws, more educations and prevention. Here is a cool graph : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in_U.S._by_year#mediaviewer/File:U.S.…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:55 PM
1

Some rapists don't know they're (about to, or actively) raping. Maybe the article is talking about those people? If some rapists don't know they are raping because they think what they are doing is ok, maybe they need some explanations about consent, how pressuring someone is not okay, etc. I mean, there are people out there who think it's perfectly okay to have sex with a person who is sleeping or passed out. It would be interesting to know why they think it's okay.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:46 PM
1

I do not understand. Are you saying that people should be less "hysterical" about something unpreventable, from what I'm reading?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 02:19 AM
0

So in your opinion, they are mostly trolling. I will not watch a youtube video, as I don't feel it will enlighten me in any ways. Also, the context in right here in the images. If they are jokes, then they happen a whole lot in theredpill.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 02:17 AM
1

Like you said, it's not the same. I never felt like I was drugged before because lets be honest, I don't go to bars and I have no friends. However, I could imagine it. You know when you take drugs and it hits you in the face, but you were expecting it? Maybe it's like this for people who were drugged, but they weren't expecting it and they became terrified. At least it's what I gathered from a story that my sister told me. There is a great difference between blacking out from alcohol and blackin…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 02:07 AM
1

http://imgur.com/a/bGiiW (it's an album)
/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:59 AM
1

As you said, we cannot stop rape happening. However, I see a lot of hate for people who treat strangers as a "maybe rapist", in this sub. How could we reconcile these different ways of thinking, for you?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:48 AM
1

Did you ever had that feeling of being drugged?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:37 AM
5

It may be because the nail polish is more often associated to women. In other threads, I saw men saying they would wear it too if it's clear.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:41 AM
1

Do you believe the schrodinger rapist is wrong?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:34 AM
1

She must have gotten cocky, considering how much she got away with before that because she was the hottest girl there. Is this the only explanation that exist for you?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:32 AM
1

GHB has a half-life of 30 to 60 minutes, according to wiki : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-Hydroxybutyric_acid
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:28 AM
1

Are you wondering if it happens, or you are just stating your opinions? Let's pretend you think it doesn't happen. Would this nail polish be good, or bad, in your opinion?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:26 AM
3

Thanks. While reading the article, I felt this was a very US centric view. The Pop Tart-Gun, the Pencil "Shooting"... Do you think that the draconian zero tolerance policy is like this everywhere else? I didn't research it myself, but as a non US person, I feel this is more about the US ways of dealing with violence than the actual teachers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 12:26 AM
2

Ah ok, no problems. To make myself more clear : I do disagree about the idea you seem to have that today's women have no incentives to be and stay married, as opposed to the 50s in your opinion. My original point when I first replied to you was that there is a million different stories about two people getting married. There may be more people divorcing now because it's way less frowned upon. All in all, I don't believe any happy relationship suddenly result in a divorce. Enduring a marriage ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 12:20 AM
4

Well, I was more looking for examples of the feminization, and how it affects you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/14 11:32 PM
4

I think I may not fully get what you are saying. Blue pillers seem to see a bad marriage and think divorce, instead of learning and working to make the marriage stronger. ... I was giving a personal anecdote to support my statement that people exist on a spectrum not binary. That is a truth. To me, this implies that there is (at least) two sides, or the "right way", the "wrong way" and "the X% right way". Your spectrum seems to start after the "blue" one. What about the "green" and "yellow" ? :)…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/14 11:29 PM
5

This spectrum you speak about with percentages and all are really only visible to you. What you read, believe, think and lived before are a huge part of it, no? If yes, is it fair to use perceptions as truths in arguments?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/14 10:08 PM
1

You never cease to amaze me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/14 09:42 PM
2

What is the "feminization of men since boyhood", to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/14 09:41 PM
7

I think it would be silly to pretend to know the motives of people who divorce, because of the complexity of a relationship. I wonder how you found out that "Blue pillers seem to see a bad marriage and think divorce". Is it from what you've seen recently online, or in your group of friends? Also, are "blue pillers" everybody who aren't a "red piller"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/14 09:39 PM
4

Thanks! I read this quote about 5000 times now, but I wasn't aware at all of the context. I never looked for it, and nobody ever mentions it.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:28 PM
2

Dude you replied to every comments I made itt to tell me I am an idiot for saying things I never said. You can ask me questions before going to the extreme. Why has this become about Republicans, anyway?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:32 PM
2

That's quite dramatic. Maybe we... misunderstood each others?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:16 PM
2

Oh I agree that there always will be unpopular speech, and it should be protected. However, I still believe there is a way to discuss in a productive manner. Insulting a person or many is useless. Being racist and hateful is useless. Personally, I would not mind if my a mod would delete a comment of mine where I attacked someone. I concede that some deleted comments weren't downright hateful, but in my opinion they were insulting, overgeneralizing and pointless. I feel that moderators can absolu…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:09 PM
0

I just never saw before this idea. I wanted to know more about it.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:46 AM
0

Anti-war positions are now hate speech on the grounds that the majority of soldiers are male, and thus, defending the interests of a predominately male group over that of women is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:26 AM
2

I'm wondering, what makes a paper feminist?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:31 AM
0

I was not aware of that, and to be honest I doubt it. Can you show me something objective?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:29 AM
–

Yeah. Are you saying any woman could have any unwanted attention? To be honest, I'm waiting to see if this opinion would be accepted here. The women don't say they have to do all those things "to attract men" and lamenting this fact, I believe. I think they are repeating, in an over-the-top way (but sometimes not), what men will say to women these days. I am currently commenting on another thread here, about The Gardians supposedly censoring every comments that is not feminist. Here is an extrac…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:18 AM
–

It is indeed counterproductive. However, I would argue that a lot of those points sounds familiar for women, at least in North America. Are you a woman?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:04 AM
2

It may be a piece stemming from frustrations, especially if you try and read about genders on the Interweb. For me, it's like a piece from Return of Kings with gender reversed. Outside of ROK however, like on Reddit, there is a good amount of opinions about for example, the length of a woman's hair. How makeup is only used to attract any attention, or even "cheating" one's appearance. I won't go into each point because I know it's not my place to do so here. I was thinking we could try and see b…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:01 AM
1

I know about the first amendment only from the perspective of a Canadian. I only ever heard of it when there is some kinda shitty or downright hateful opinions that people feels the need to defend. As I understand it, and correct me if I'm wrong, the first amendment doesn't protect your right to say anything and everything while not being censored. It protects you from your own government. In this current situation, the Guardian moderators removed comments that were possibly contrary to the gene…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:51 AM
1

Should only the comments with 'real hate speech' be removed? I suppose it's up to the moderators. I do think "unconstructive comment" is a good enough reason for removal.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 12:12 AM
2

I do think that the anonymity makes people less aware of the power of their words. Or they may just let it all out, without taking into consideration that there is other actual people reading it. I was curious so I googled a bit: "Comparing the tone of thousands of online comments posted by anonymous and non-anonymous users following online newspaper stories, Santana found that 53.3 percent of anonymous comments included language that was vulgar, racist, profane or hateful; only 28.7 percent of …
/r/MensRights12/08/14 12:09 AM
1

These comment may not be abusive to you, but they aren't remotely good. If I were to comment and express my opinions in that way : "Few woman find men with long hair sexy. And if MRA have a problem with that, it's not as though women don't have to maintain and groom themselves either for the opposite sex. This is just more Reddit MRA nonsense. Now men are actually growing out the hair on their heads just to spite women. And it it's not just to spite women, good luck to you on your own private li…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 12:03 AM
–

The author may be referencing articles like this one : http://www.returnofkings.com/26763/girls-with-short-hair-are-damaged
/r/MensRights11/08/14 11:47 PM
–

I think this list is simply an over-the-top reverse the gender thing. To me, the standards point you mentioned allude to the "give the good guy a chance even if you aren't attracted to him" thing, with the gender switched.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 11:44 PM
1

Well thank you for the reply, and I am tired also. We will probably discuss again in here.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 03:19 AM
1

I think I can understand you more, now that you talked a bit about what shaped your views, so thanks. I agree with you, there are some people who will basically stay the same. I am wondering if, in the case of catcalling, some of the people who do it are doing it because they never really thought about it from the other point of view. Could they stop if they learn that not many people likes it? For the example of bullies, I would guess that they don't think really far into what would be the cons…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:54 AM
2

I don't think we were discussing the close relationship of a man and a woman. For me, it was more like don't yell at people you want to fuck them because you find them sexy. Feels like common sense. I realize that this topic is way more than that to you.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:24 AM
1

Thank you for responding. I will address this first : For me, I'm not defending catcalling, but annoyed at the idea that solutions have nothing to do with the cause and simply want to make the symptom illegal so to speak. What is the cause, in your mind?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:16 AM
2

I guess this would be a good argument to tell people who do. Even if she is dressed in a way that is attractive to you, she probably will not like the comment.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:13 AM
2

Do you catcall woman yourself? I am curious as what would be your motives. If not, what do you think about it?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:02 AM
3

I really wondered if I were passive aggressive to you, but in the end I don't think I was. I am criticizing the things that were said in this thread for sure, and I think I speak clearly about my opinion and questions. I am genuinely wondering why there is no wanting the current culture we have to change a bit, because it seems there is no benefit at all to catcalling or things of the sort. I am under the impression that the general ideas of this thread is showing that things will happen because…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:55 AM
3

I still feel the traffic example is bizarre. It seems to me that all those analogies point to men being the inevitable negative outcome, you know, like how the woman is the money, and the negative thing happening to her is the robbery. In this case, I believe that people who catcall and make another person feel uneasy aren't always criminals or "those persons who would commit a crime anyway". If you reread the thread, people look like they are trying to keep the "right" to do it. Isn,t it just t…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:54 PM
4

What makes you think they want your attention, or everyone in her close proximity while she is going somewhere attention? Yeah people like to look good for some other people. Can a woman do that? Most likely, this woman passing by doesn't give any fucks about you, for example. They have a life that you aren't a part of. Also, ladies without makeup or "push-up bras" (did you really bring this up) wearing "clothes similar to what men wear" will receive unwanted attention.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:35 PM
2

I believe the superimposed image of the guy turning his head at the girl, while the narrator was speaking, was more of a conceptual imagery of sorts. Not THE ONE MOST EXTREME example. Of course a look is a look, but I think the point of this videos is about the vocal people yelling some lewd stuff, the ones following you, and of course the trying to rub their penises on your person. People loudly declaring they'd like to see you naked while you walk is not supposed to be accepted, I think.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:25 PM
3

By your logic, the man being pissed off can use this as a justification, saying a woman provoked him by being attractive to him? Passing on the street? What kind of man are we talking about here?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:19 PM
2

We can make observations, I guess, and say that someone showing some skin will get yelled at (or maybe more). Ok. We can come up with many analogies to show what we think currently happens. Why don't we stop this behavior, knowing that lots of people don't like it anyway? I saw people itt saying that they will continue "complimenting" a hot woman if they see one. There is a chance this person will not really feel comfortable with it. And I'm sure some people really think they are giving away bea…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:14 PM
-4

Alright, I went too far, I am sorry. Do you think it is okay to yell at some person that you are thinking about sex with them? Is it more okay if they dress "provocatively", even if it was not for you to 'enjoy' ?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 06:18 AM
-11

Okay so I will tag you as "WILL RAPE YOU IF HE FEELS LIKE YOU ARE PROVOCATIVE"
/r/MensRights03/08/14 06:04 AM
-2

What are you confused about? I am confused about people thinking that most other people think abuse is "the shit". I am confused about people feeling so glad you brought this up, not really to discuss it, but mostly to say that not abusing your significant other is such a rare thing. I am confused about you needing to say "as a woman, a made a little effort towards men" in your post title. I am confused about people suddenly stating that the absence of violence towards a man is crazy rare. I am …
/r/MensRights03/08/14 05:40 AM
-1

http://i1213.photobucket.com/albums/cc464/ninjasolution/Baby-Mama-Amy-stare-down.gif
/r/MensRights03/08/14 04:58 AM
0

My one ex -- female -- beat the shit out of me and I hit her back in the arm. She rubbed her arm with tears welled up in her eyes and was like, "You hit me!" and I'm like "Well, you kind of had it coming". If I saw a girl beat the crap out of a guy and he hit her back I might... laugh? As long as he didn't get arrested or some BS. -TheOneAndOnlyTained
/r/MensRights03/08/14 04:31 AM
-1

Are you serious
/r/MensRights03/08/14 04:05 AM
–

If there is enough evidence, meaning not baseless, maybe it's a good idea to report it. I've seen the most innocent videos on youtoube with the most vile comments (it's not really a revelation, just go and take a look at any video) I got one rape related PM myself, just from posting sometimes. I cannot imagine the amount of crazy comments this woman got. How would you react in this situation? In all cases, nobody should just tolerate threats because "it's the interweb, deal with it", I personall…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:54 AM
–

From the number of people complaining about her, I don't think you can say people are afraid, no?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:44 AM
–

This is so strange to see how much people will readily accept receiving threats when they talk about someone they don't agree with receiving those threats. Where is the threshold of hate messages for someone to receive before they can react in a non-hysterical way?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:42 AM
–

Do you think you received the same amount of those threats? Beyond that, what should it be casually accepted, I wonder.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:37 AM
-1

http://www.harkavagrant.com/?id=341
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:23 AM
2

They are available, but not processed: "As of 2014, the federal government estimates a nationwide backlog of 400,000 rape kits, including many from the 1990s when evidence was collected but not tested for DNA due to high costs and more primitive techniques available at the time.[24]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_kit#cite_note-24
/r/MensRights14/07/14 11:28 PM
2

You never had a condom breakage I would assume.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:50 PM
2

My logic is based on both. I cannot possibly experience everything there is to be. Empathy comes into it. I get that you have some insights, but they can be misinterpreted, if you don't know how to address another person. I feel that even if we have some truth that we believe in because of some experiences, it may not be the same at all for others. Do you think it's SJW crap?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:11 AM
3

Okay, I am not a spokesperson for TwoX or anything, be aware of that when I give you my opinion. I am interested in all identified genders and stuff, as my comment history can show. First, the title of this thread is "Sexual health scientist asks about female privilege at /TwoX. Called a moron, told to fuck off, post removed, and topic is censored." Why did you put it that way after the fact? It does seem antagonizing, I think. Second, why didn't you give a context to TwoX, as well a a clear que…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:02 AM
2

I may read it if I get the patience. I tried to read a couple of your posts but I got mostly annoyed because it looks like there is no taking into account the situations of other people, and understanding some levels of emotions, and logically trying to piece everything together. It's mostly your raw emotions. Cut the SJW crap and become more of realist. I'm sure you know that telling people how to feel is not well received. I believe in logic. I don't care what movement it can be tied with.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:31 AM
–

I am not against mensrights. I never said that people here were doing it all wrong (and the rest of things you said I never even mentioned). I felt that you, in particular, did wrong, because you have extreme views. Like in this instance, you never asked me anything. You pointed your finger at me, and a lot of other people (feminists, TwoX people), saying these people are this or that. I responded with your own words. I agree with a lot of points about mensrights, and you may find them if you re…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:14 AM
–

If what you say is true, why would you even comment on TwoX, since you don't support any of their views?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:46 AM
1

Sure, discussions are always welcome!
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:40 AM
–

If the sources you presented weren't for a validation of your claims and not factual, why present yourself as a scientist? My wording for your source IS loaded: this is not a source. I can make up my own mind about what you posted: these are not facts, these are opinions. Each thing you listed would make people try and find sources for their validity, and I believe this is not supposed to be a job for the people you ask questions to. Take one of your 48 statements one by one, provide sources (to…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:14 AM
–

Your first post on that TwoX thread you are taling about: Well I'm a guy who has been told numerous times that he is attractive and I have many many male friends, many of which have had no trouble getting attention from women. Being as honest as I can possibly be here, I can tell you that the moment I or any man I have every known in my 20+ years as an adult has seen a woman with hairy legs or hairy armpits the reaction has been unfavorable and not to an ambiguous degree. Trust me on this. Men p…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:02 AM
–

Ah well, I am not knowledgable about the censorship TwoX or MensRights does, I can't have a position on it. I don't think it makes my arguments lesser. I do feel that the scenario was equivalent! Only the subject of priviledges have been changed. To me, the OP seems like he doesn't just want to discuss genders in a scientific way.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:55 AM
–

I didn't say it was a safe place, I said it was a place for women. As you know, reddit is full of different subreddits to discuss, talk, debate or mock, with different degree of seriousness. I believe that the OP wording is really not the best. Do you think the question he asked could be seriously tackled? If the OP would go to a proper debate sub for those who are interested in debating, like /r/FeMRADebates/, I'm sure something could come out of it. Again, I will ask you if you would find appr…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:46 AM
–

I absolutely agree. It's annoying, to me at least, that we use those privileges to try and make the "other side wrong", and a lot of people do it. I'm not over it all, of course. Your point of giving anyone the benefit of the doubt is great. In this case, I really want to ask questions to the OP to find what is this really all about. I may have judged him wrong. In the end, I suppose transparency would be good when you want genuine discussions.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:38 AM
–

I didn't bother going through his comment history either because I am lazy. He didn't make any claim to be a victim, but his post is more about emotions than facts. Doing the reverse-the-gender thing (Imagine a woman that claims to be a sexual health scientist writing about 48 men's privileges without any proofs, and just say, go! debate!... Even in TwoX that would not go well) made me think this person is very unhappy about women privileges, but won't say it, throwing instead lots of cans of wo…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:44 AM
–

I see you posting in a lot of thread here, and you do exactly the thing you decry in your post.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:28 AM
–

What makes you believe the OP isn't a professional victim himself?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:25 AM
–

What would be your preferred outcome, after posting this? What is the central question? Is it one question, or 48 different questions that needs to be examined one by one? Your source is the-niceguy.com Is this a source you use frequently, as a scientist? Also, do you believe your listing was backed up with enough evidences for it to be a serious topic of discussion? You claim to be a scientist, and I really doubt that.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:24 AM
–

You may have no problems upon reading the word Privilege, but my exchanges and readings here doesn't make me feel that it's a shared feeling. Some view privilege as an insult, and some other don't think they ever had any. Some points in the list the OP posted are more opinion than anything else. TwoX is not the best place to post this, I think. TwoX seems to be a space for women, not a space to debate about genders. And yeah, the wording of the post doesn't really call for a calm discussion. Ima…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:09 AM
1

I included the word 'relatively', because this movement is not one that most people knows about (I think, I may be wrong), even if it was started around 1970.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 11:50 PM
-3

...okay. It wasn't me who said those things, so I don't know why you would just insult me. However if you really think this is a good enough reason to insult people, go ahead.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:42 AM
1

I may never understand this. Saying this Group don't use logic, based on feeling, is not logical, unless of course you have proofs.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:35 AM
-2

Alright, fair enough!
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:29 AM
1

I really don't think you can say that "MRAs are more skeptical than to simply take at face value anyone's writing" and then say that "We may appreciate seeing that others acknowledge and agree with our own point of view, but we also know that confirmation has to be more solid than another person's agreement. That's something feminists don't seem to get." It seems to me that you think only your personal liked group can apply logic. This is exactly what you decry in your op, when others do it.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:19 AM
0

I'm not sure about the whole concern thing, I'm merely asking questions, because here we are on a website where everybody does that. Is it though policing because I asked why do you agree with him/her? I didn't realize. I suppose I was frustrated with what this person wrote. I would not be here if I didn't think men's rights had a point. My point was that Imnotmrabut used every arguments that could be screenshoted from tumblr and used in this subforum.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:13 AM
0

Imnotmrabut just wrote several things: Using the physical appearance of the author to discredit anything he has to say. Saying that he would never have a sex life, because bizarre reasons, again to discredit what he has to say. Then grouping the audience of the author as fems with lotsa cats ending up eating him. I believe those kind of judgement are not welcomed here, are they? This person is probably a troll, and if he/she isn't, then that would be a perfect screenshot to put on Futrelle's blo…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 03:53 AM
1

When you read a blog that support your beliefs, do you think it's unbiased sources because it validates your feelings? Yes, I ask a lot of questions like this. I feel it's not a bad idea to ask ourselves the same questions we can deduct from the accusations, or negative opinions we freely give to another group of persons. I believe that with online discussions, it's easy to remove the individuals from the conversation. We are left with a soulless group that is easy to blame or celebrate. I don't…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 03:40 AM
-2

I understand. The movement is relatively young. I can see how it could be frustrating to read and hear negatively about something you care about.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 12:39 AM
0

I think it's true that what you described happens, unfortunately. Since you pointed out that feminists are culpable of doing such poor research, do you believe that MRA could also be doing the same things regarding the feminist movement? Do you believe that the We Hunted the Mammoth's blog audience are reading it like it's a unbiased source? Or does his audience already have some beliefs that aligns with the content?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:59 PM
1

Why did you move from 'men' to 'black'? I don't think it's a good analogy. What is the most noticeable difference between men and women, for you? For me, it's strength. I cannot say that for race. Of course nobody should get intoxicated in a place they feel is unsafe. However, rapes rarely occurs at a random place with random people. It's most likely a person you know and trust, in a familiar place. Anyway, my first point was that it's difficult for someone to absorbs all the 'tips' on how not t…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:50 PM
1

Thank you for answering. So in the army, the weakest link is literally someone who is not as strong as their peer, it seems. I can understand this to the best of my ability, but it seems bizarre to make a part of the population feels like they consciously let the other part fend for themselves, when in fact they don't want them to participate, for strength reasons or others.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:20 AM
-1

You know sometimes we watch some documentary about animals and they tell us that this species is based on patriarchy or matriarchy. Are humans so special that we cannot say is it's a patriarchy or a matriarchy?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:00 AM
0

Do you believe that women should be kept out of combat? Do you need your allies to be absolutely without a doubt as strong as you?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:57 AM
1

I would refer you to the explanation I gave to CaptainShitbeard2 in the same comment chain or, for example, this link : http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27pktl/miss_usa_dares_suggest_selfdefense_classes_for/
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:17 AM
1

It was not my initial point, sorry if I didn't make myself clear. You said that feminists tiptoe around saying all men are rapists, by saying that they may have to treat men as potential rapists. I see a lot of talk with, you know, that unlocked car door analogy, front door analogy or something like that. It seems to me that those people would like the feminists to take measures not to be assaulted, for example not blacking out (like someone ever planned that), not walking alone at night, or in …
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:14 AM
-7

At the same time, I see a lot of discussions here saying that we cannot teach men not to rape, we should teach women how not to be raped. How do you reconcile it all?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:08 AM
-2

Don't stop there! Just go on until it's valid to say that most feminists say that "All men are rapists".
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:02 AM
0

You and DavidByron2 should hang out
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:49 AM
1

This comment is very sane and balanced.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:48 AM
–

What you are saying here is that there is a significant number of predatory men, enough that a woman getting drunk and partying is absolutely asking for it. Do you think it's a good measure of protecting oneself when a woman think that a man 'may be dangerous' and change her path accordingly when she is walking, then? I'm asking because I saw comments here saying that it's a feminazi brain-washing tactic telling women that all men are monsters.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:36 AM
–

Do you believe MRA are anti-feminist, at the core?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:28 AM
1

Have you ever drank too much?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:25 AM
-1

After reading the comments, I suppose we live in a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:02 AM
–

What is the definition of rape culture, for you?
/r/MensRights07/06/14 05:51 AM
0

So... yes?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 12:24 AM
0

Are you sure the patriarchy means what you described
/r/MensRights11/05/14 10:08 AM
2

Then again, you are using one situation, which is being in "shady places" at the wrong time. It would be better to examine the situations where rapes occur. Is it mostly at 4 am in a dark alley, by a stranger?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:14 PM
–

If you like the car analogy, then the thief is like the rapist, and the owner of the car is the victim? For me, the car is the victim. Which is why I don't think it works as an analogy, beyond the fact that it's comparing stealing objects with someone forcing themselves on another human. I feel that people think people get black out drunk on purpose. Have you ever been in this situation? Was it planned?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:10 PM
1

... It's like you already forgot what I just wrote, writing back "Men have the privilege or being able to rape women? Are you kidding me? Did you know rape is a crime?" when in the very next line I address it, and already explained how it is not what I think in my last post. I researched more about the very concept of privileges today because of this conversation, which is good, to me anyway. I discussed it with friends and it was great. However, I know I cannot continue this discussion with you…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:57 AM
1

I told you about the "being playful" to illustrate that I was not trying to paint every men as a rapist, as you said I did. However yes, if there is a very significant chance I could not defend myself if any man assault me, I think they have a privilege. It's not the privilege of assault, before you tell me that's what I implied. It's the privilege of being born with a sex that produce more testosterone, yielding further muscle development. Men can do a lot of physical prowess women could not ev…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:33 AM
1

I guess you hold the absolute truth. What evidences could we gather to make a distinction? I'm genuinly asking. You and I cannot really quantify it because we are not partial. Do you believe men are not privileged in any area?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:00 AM
1

Oh btw this isn't me being aggressive yet. Oh la la, we have seen NOTHING. Come on now... Privileges doesn't mean that you are better off the rest. It means that you have advantages granted to you only on the basis of x, where in this situation it's your sex. It is not exclusive to one gender.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:57 PM
1

Here is an excerpt : On February 29, 2012, after referencing Fluke's statement that "contraceptives can cost a woman over $3000 during law school", Limbaugh stated:[15][16][17][18][19] What does it say about the college co-ed Susan Fluke [sic], who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She's having so much sex she can't afford t…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:50 PM
1

Thank for the link, I never heard about that. Here is the first hit on Google I found: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/jun/14/top-10-sexist-moments-politics Also, you don't have statistics either, why do you absolutely have to be snappy? I'm not attacking you, we're discussing.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:48 PM
1

Ah I understand, now :) Reproductive rights is absolutely something that men will have to bring up, discuss, clarify and find solutions for. If, however, women lose their reproductive rights because people in power find them immoral or say bizarre things like "You should have closed your legs if you didn't want a baby", both men and women lose, don't you think?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:38 PM
1

When I'm not sure what someone means, I ask. I try not to assume, but sometimes I probably do it, because I'm human. When I wrote about a man's grip, I was actually thinking about when my husband and I are being playful and I struggle like an idiot to "break free" while he doesn't seem to use much of his strength. (edit : but yeah, we can think about assault too, or being able to defend oneself) You know, I like to debate to practice english. I am not doing this right now to win, just to show my…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:29 PM
1

It was this sentence you quoted. If you have the time and want to, could you rephrase it?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:07 PM
1

Jesus, I didn't fully understand what you were saying because of your phrasing. English is not my first language. I literally did not understand the phrase.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:48 PM
1

Oh I get you now. I thought you were talking in general. What should be done about her? Prison? Therapy? Both?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 08:09 PM
6

Well, we cannot know what happened in his head and what are his personals beliefs. I wonder why he chose not to expel the girl as well.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:17 AM
1

WALL OF TEXT Male privileges is about being selected for a job because you won't become pregnant Like the "privilege" undocumented illegal immigrants have when they get "selected" for a job in the fields handling toxic chemicals because they have no rights which makes them good candidates for employers to exploit? Wow. Women must be asking themselves, how can i get no rights like men? Those lucky people. if only employees didn't have to treat me so much better by law than men. I'm so oppressed. …
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:08 AM
1

I chose those examples because they are the one showed in the graphic from the op. It would be interesting for me and other people reading if you could show that "In reality, problems with custody, divorce, alimony, circumcision, sentencing disparities, educational underachievement, rape, false rape accusations, body image issues and much more are all either actively supported and encouraged by mainstream feminists or kept out of discussion by them." Otherwise, what you are saying reads like a t…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 05:12 AM
4

Well, now I wonder, what did you mean by "a couple dozen unprosecuted rapes under her belt"? Just to make sure I get what you said, before further discussing it.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:41 AM
1

The director felt the guys aren't representing the values of the school. It seems that the girl had a bad childhood and other people perceive her as a nymphomaniac. I guess he chose to try to "save" her? It's bizarre.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:40 AM
2

I think he/she meant that's a cheap move to say "She's a woman. She'll probably slide into her grave with a couple dozen unprosecuted rapes under her belt"
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:34 AM
7

The school principal seems to be very distraught, but feels he made the right choice. In the article, he says that the teenage girl had a bad childhood. He state that the guys are not criminals because everyone consented, but he felt that they could no longer be together in the same school after this. He says he absolutely doesn't want them to be perceived as rapists and he would be devastated if the choice he made negatively impacted the future of the young men.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:32 AM
-2

I won't continue this discussion with you. I provided examples you asked for, and clearly stated both men and women had privileges. You turned this into a YEAH BUT ME MORE game, instead of logically discuss about it.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:00 AM
2

Ok, I misunderstood in the first place I guess. What do you think should be done about the more extreme people?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:59 AM
0

I thought you were offended because of the language you used. You did use an ad hominem argument in your previous comment too. It's easy to do when we debate, and I am guilty of it for sure. Male privileges is about being selected for a job because you won't become pregnant. It's not being critiqued in a political debate about what you wear, of if you are sexy enough, but about your actual ideas. It's not being in the center of political agendas to make abortion less and less accessible, when at…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:55 AM
-2

So yeah, they fought to have the same rights.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:26 AM
0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_military#History_2 Almost twenty years later, in 2013, an order was issued to end the policy of “no women in units that are tasked with direct combat”. On January 24, 2014, the US Army announced that 33,000 positions that were previously closed to women would integrate in the upcoming month of April,[26] though it still has yet to be determined if and when women may join the US Army's Special Operations community.[26] While reading this page, I learned t…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:24 AM
4

I think that men were dying in wars and industrial jobs before feminism. For suicide I don't know, but I suspect they were killed more than women too. As for custody of children, it was not a thing because one could not divorce without living some serious social backlash.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:17 AM
-2

Well it's a thing I realized and I looked for it on Google. I found this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communal_reinforcement . Very interesting.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:05 AM
-1

I don't understand why you would be offended because you have privileges. It's not an attack against you. For example, in our first world countries, we are very privileged. We don't go 3 days without water, or wonder when the next bomb will explode. It's not about who is screwed the most in some places, it's more about who will live. I assume you are a man. Do you feel you have some advantages in our society, or not at all?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:02 AM
3

I could point you towards a lot of disingenuous men's rights advocates, still I think the core of it is worth addressing. How difficult it is to comprehend that feminism is not the reason why more men kill themselves, or are the victims of work accidents. Women had to fight for their rights, and still have to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Senate_Bill_5 . Men formed a group to address their issues. This is a great opportunity to unite and logically take care of them, not blaming another move…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:46 AM
-4

How many examples, how prevalent is it to be mocked, as a man, when you seek help, professional or not, for mental issues? Who mocks them? Yes, if you keep reading only the worst, the worst becomes the truth.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:33 AM
0

I think it's a good thing to point out the difficulties men have, but bringing feminists into this as a competition will lead nowhere. If feminists haven't worked on these problems, it may be because they had and have their own to take care of. This is where the MRM can help. I see these 5 points brought into different graphic format a lot lately. The next step would be, in my opinion, to search for the root causes, and then find a way to make some change.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:55 PM
2

Maybe you speak about another person, I did not say anything about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 05:02 PM
2

I do not see the logic in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 12:02 AM
2

I personally believe the we don't hear much from men because, well, based on the fact that most of them were circumcised as infants, they never experienced the feeling, so there is no loss. That however should not be a reason to go ahead with it, I think. I read posts from circumcised men who will say just that (I'm happy, so it's a non-issue!) and they will use this reasoning to circumcise their sons. I learned a lot reading about it, myself!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 11:25 PM
2

I think you should offer your views.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 11:14 PM
3

Do you personally draw the line somewhere in what rights parents have over their children's body?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 11:12 PM
1

That's a very good question. I will try to find some statistics, if there is any.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 10:43 PM
2

I did not bring the example of removing the clitoris hood to make a parallel with FGM. I read that some women into body modifications do that. I thought it was a good parallel with circumcision, which is not removing the gland, but the foreskin. I suppose I tried to find an example where you would think "I know doctors could ask us if we want to do it, but the idea is so ridiculous that we will just say no". Sorry if it's a leading question but I guess I cannot understand why parents just don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 10:03 PM
4

I think the point is that since it's not even medically necessary, and more the result of culture, you don't have to take that decision, at all. If it helps, imagine arguing about removing the clitoris hood of a baby girl. The decision will fall into the hands of the grown up kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:34 PM
2

It may not be this way in you case but when I hear the "some of the most intelligent people I know..." speech, I found that you aren't really trying as hard with the men you know. Can you clarify what you mean? "Some of the most intelligent people I know..." was not said in the current discussion, also, so I'm not sure what situation you are referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:29 PM
4

I think fomicarium has a point, not necessarely in your specific situation, but in general. Did you ever have a discussion with that aquintance or friend, you know the one you can never even start to disagree with because they will immediately get mad as fuck? Or the ones who really wants to talk, but not listen? I am not saying that this is your situation at all. Just that communications skills play a big role, for the person you are talking with and yourself, and this in return will influence …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 11:39 PM
5

I never randomly met a person willing to talk about criminology, medicine, forensic medicine, pharmacology or psychology in depth with me. I suppose I could say men don't talk about these subjects. I could also say they are probably more interested in displaying their dominance over other men in the vicinity. Could this be true? The reason I haven't met a man or a woman wanting to discuss those things with me is probably more because the people around me at the moment aren't interested in that, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 11:26 PM
1

Hey, thanks for replying. Here is a wall of text : I do think I understand a bit where you come from. I sometime experience this great feeling of belonging to a group who share my beliefs and ideas. In fact, this group will reinforce it, whether it is positive or negative, do you agree? I feel that it may be good to step back once in a while and reassess things. The purple pill is a nice place for that, for me anyway. You speak about reading hundred of thousands similar stories about men issues.…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/14 11:30 PM
5

I don't feel like people here desperately try to have the last word. It's mostly an exchange of idea. About your last post : say, you get up one morning and decide to put on a blue shirt. As you get out, it starts raining. The exact same thing happened to your friend the other day, too. He had a blue shirt then BAM, rain. Conclusion : wearing a blue shirt causes rain. My point is that we (human) sometimes are aware of a very tiny amount of information regarding a situation, and I think we look f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/14 12:35 AM
1

Alright I'm gonna get a beer
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/14 02:56 AM
3

I'm sorry that I came off as mocking or attacking you, I just thought it was funny the way you said it, like there is a tiny screen at the entrance of the vagina displaying Access Granted, Propagation of Genetics Initiated. So you could say in a way, you being attracted to him and allowing him (over other men) to have you sexually helped carry on predatory genes to the next generation. Do you think most people can instantly see everything about another person, much like a decoded genetic map? Do…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/14 12:18 AM
5

We don't live in some Gattaca story yet. Sometimes you get to know someone better, dislike what you uncover and move on. "Have access to your reproductive organs and propagate his genetics", haha
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 11:20 PM
1

I see that rape culture is a concept that is rejected here. Some people say it doesn't exist at all. I feel like I get the concept: it's a culture where we, for example, kind of normalize aggressive sexual jokes (It's just a JOKE, relax!), say that a no really means a coy yes, compare bodies and beings with objects left without supervision, blame the victim on very strange points, like what they were wearing, what they had to drink and at which hour they had the audacity to go out. What would yo…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:23 AM
5

What do you think about satire magazines, shows, papers or blogs? What about comedians?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 11:42 PM
4

Why do you think a tumblr page is relevant and worth discussing?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:56 AM
2

OKAY THEN NOBODY WILL CARE ARE YOU HAPPY
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:21 AM
2

The problem with these positions is that it ignores a very real part of life as an incel- there might not be a specific girl... a guy might have trouble getting any dates or approaching any women. I agree. After watching this video http://vimeo.com/28466163 however, I would have a very difficult time coming with advices. The men in the video have low self-esteem, a full set of very rigid views that they see as facts and a combative attitude about change. For a person having good self-esteem, an …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/14 12:20 AM
8

I think ladies have sometimes false ideas and information about weight lifting. For example: it could make them too "bulky", they just want to "tone certain areas", a 2 pounds dumbbell is just fine, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 11:08 PM
2

I do think it makes senses in both ways.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 03:38 AM
–

Really? Typical reaction? That's incredibly sexist to lump all men into a group based on the actions of a few immature little assholes. There should be a pop-up with this quote each time someone writes the word feminist.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 02:09 AM
3

Oh I understand very clearly what you say about being ostracized because of the norms. I'd like to think that, in my short lifetime, I could make people more open towards new ideas, in the best of my abilities. I mean I hope so. Deep down, don't we all want to be accepted? You ask, where would those people go if they stop being ostracized? A movement of people that society doesn't readily understand will build a movement within itself, it seems (I don't have proof of that, just observation). I f…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 08:20 AM
5

I enjoy this conversation! I consider myself a feminist but I will admit that I have not studied deeply all the waves of feminists and what it supposedly represents, but at the same time I agree with the core of it. I cannot respond about the anglo-french side of it. I like your definition of geekdom but deep down I'm like, why being ostracized should be the norm? I feel like geekdom or whatever we want to call it experienced great changes, and it makes people in it kinda weary. It opened the do…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 07:22 AM
3

My first language is french! I agree that single sex spaces are important and probably good. However, I don't feel that geekdom could be such a place, because, well, technology is super interesting for everyone, don't you think? Thinking about it, what could be a safe place for men? I suppose r/mensrights is one. I think a safe place should not be a whole area of knowledge, however.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 06:36 AM
3

While I think about it more, I got more ideas, sorry if I bombard you :) I opened my mind more to exchange with you, and I think I can somewhat see more on your side of the argument. It's very difficult to do. Sometimes, I would like to write a piece on how a vast majority of men are pieces of shit when they are confronted with a women in the gaming world. In the end I do not because, well, I am not a good writer and more importantly I feel that my experience coupled with my beliefs does not rep…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 06:08 AM
3

Again, thank you for sharing your point of view. I agree that there is crazy gender roles like the one you speak about in the first section of your text, absolutely. And there is people that follow them. I guess those roles feels very alien to me, and i dislike them very much. I will not watch a movie where the man is a walking idiot, a strong but emotionally stunted being. Because that pisses me off. I will not watch a movie where the woman just ask and want and wait to be rescued. Because that…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 05:49 AM
4

Thank you for your detailed response. I asked for studies because my point of view and yours are tainted with emotions, ideas, personality and personal experiences. Women I know are working hard to achieve their goals, as men do. This is my experience, so I cannot really understand "women are taught to experience satisfaction in having others do things for them". I suppose examples would help me understand. I also have difficulties understanding when you say that women like to be seen as special…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 04:42 AM
2

I forgot to add : do you believe women adopt a false identity of geek just to have attention? I mean, if someone wants attention, there is much more easier ways to get it. I doubt that a lady with no interests whatsoever in anything nerdy will have a blast playing some online game with a bunch of men hitting on her and insulting her just because she had the audacity of being a woman.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:28 AM
3

I don't know enough about her to make my mind. However, I interpreted the quote you provided in your article in a different way. I suppose we interpret things from what we know and believe. Do you think that women need or want more attention than men? Is this area has been studied? Is it a bad thing, being seen as special? I... I don't know how this could be an advantage to women who identifies as geeky. Do you have examples? Don't you think this is what you personally feel, versus what is true?…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:22 AM
3

What are the positive incentives for women to identify as geeks?
/r/MensRights15/02/14 04:36 AM
1

Thank you, it makes more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/14 10:07 PM
2

I tried, but I cannot think of a reason why someone would be keeping meticulous track of how many people they spoke to,"how many sets I did per day", how many of those would give them their numbers, how many dates they had versus lays, then post it in a blog. I would agree that this is a kind of mental block I have because my sets of values and what I think is important may be vastly different. Can someone offer some perspective on this? Why it is important for you to categorize contacts with a …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/14 03:56 AM
3

I just re-enabled it to see, and I now remember why I disabled it in the first place. It's just ugly, and the big fixed floating pill annoys my delicate design sensibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/14 11:59 PM
2

I think I understand what you mean. I guess as humans we gather experiences and feelings about a word, or a subject. Blue mean sky, red mean blood. It is very hard to look kinda objectively at a word or subject like misogynistic. For example, say, I don't really follow those left and right political movements. Maybe I feel too much, haha, I don't know. But for only myself, a misogynist is a person who downright hate what women represents, hate their thinking, their being. Like, encountering a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/13 05:17 AM
6

I think you are a very intelligent person and to see this -no- answer to a quite logical question kinda annoyed me, not that it has any meaning to this sub or anyone ever. But, being here, I guess you want to be heard. It's just that, you know, a definition of words could easily solve some issues and bring an understanding. It's the basis of any discussions, no?.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/13 04:03 AM
1

This is an exercise of empathy, I suppose. If a woman goes trough nine month with a living organism inside her, I guess you could say they develop one connection. Then, delivering the baby, from a 3 to I don't know how many hours of labor, there is a human now, in front of her. One that she helped building, if we can say it this way. Can you imagine that? I cannot imagine how hard it must be to sign the baby away, just like that. Can you? You may be interested to read about abortion procedures a…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 06:35 AM
1

Well, theft would be in that case trying to get sperm to auto-inseminate, with the clear intention of getting pregnant, hiding it from the other person who took precautions not to (for example, condoms). I see this subject being brought up mostly on mensrights and theredpill. I guess it could be a valid concern if people could bring forward actual evidences showing that this is not a minuscule fraction of women who would attempt such things AND succeed. Law and order, House and SCI all base thei…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 06:12 AM
1

I'd like to see statistics on sperm bank robbery. That's completely new to me. And also on women who steal sperm in condom and inseminate themselves somehow. According to wikipedia According to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, for women aged 35, about 94 out of every 100 who have regular unprotected sexual intercourse will get pregnant within 3 years of trying. For women aged 38, however, only 77 out of every 100 will do so.[5] The rest is here : http://en.wikipedia.org…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:23 AM
8

So you are jumping into this discussion, saying that the subject is closed already, because you feel you talked enough about it apparently. When asked why or how, you tell them to do a search. Then you say that you are not discussing on this subject, while, again, posting about how this subject is closed. All of what you posted could have easily being played into your own head instead of interrupting the present discussion. I suggest you could write on a piece of paper, before posting, what is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/13 02:59 AM
2

Seeing posts like these, I am curious about what or who represent feminists, for people in the mensrights subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:19 AM
1

... It's from tumblr. Any group could be raging about any stuff posted on there.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:14 AM
20

Maybe the op and others want to read other opinions than yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/13 12:07 AM
1

What if people were saying to men : if you don't want to be falsely accused of rape, then don't go and sleep with a woman you barely know, because seriously, it's like leaving a car with the door unlocked.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 05:00 AM
1

This article doesn't define what is rape culture. I think a good definition of rape culture would open the door to a more substantial and intelligent debate.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:09 AM
9

I believe that is the point. Having the choice versus being an obligation.
/r/RedPillWomen31/10/13 11:44 PM
1

From wikipedia : Mammography is the process of using low-energy X-rays (usually around 30 kVp) to examine the human breast and is used as a diagnostic and a screening tool. The goal of mammography is the early detection of breast cancer, typically through detection of characteristic masses and/or microcalcifications. From what I understand, mammography is used to detect masses in their early stages, when they are not yet palpable. In the case of this man, since he already has a mass that can be …
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:18 PM
8

Please refrain from posting in this sub in the future if you don't feel like expanding on your thoughts. It is a great waste of time for people who wish to have a discussion, and for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/13 04:44 AM
16

I feel it's very hard to have a conversation with you. I WANT AN UPVOTE OR I WON'T TALK SHOW ME PROOF OF THE UPVOTE I CAN'T TRUST THE INTERWEB PICK SOME LINE OF TEXT FOR ME Why bother at all if you don't want to discuss?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/13 12:19 AM
10

Can you tell us what you understand from this?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/13 09:59 PM
27

You knows whats better that sticking your dick into a loose bucket slut vagina? Emotional Manipulation There is a certain pride you get from knowing that you can dictate a person's reality just by speaking to them. You can undermine their beliefs, sense of self, values and national identity with words. That my friends is empowering. Empowering in the true sense of the word, not feminist empowering i.e showing cleavage in the workplace for attention. Do repillers feels this is what negging is?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/13 09:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter