TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dialectic-Compiler Archive

View 0 posts and 90 comments by Dialectic-Compiler on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm about as pro-worker as they come; I'd be willing to take a gamble that I'm significantly further left than yourself. This lady is receiving well-warranted consequences for stupidity. I could excuse pushing open that door, that's not entirely unreasonable, albeit foolish. But trying to weaponize what she saw while invading his privacy is the exact sort of malignant crap that is in our interests to strongly discourage. The guy probably was in no sound state and didn't realize that he failed to…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 06:34 PM
2

This justifies her invading his privacy and then trying to ruin his life over it in exactly what way? He gave her instructions to follow, she didn't, saw something she didn't bargain on and then tried to leverage both the law and an online hate mob against him only to find out in no uncertain terms that what she did was stupid, petty and malicious, for which she is now receiving consequences. This is a very simple "fuck around and find out" moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 06:20 PM
1

There isn't one. I really does boil down to that SNL skit. Be handsome. Be physically appealling; we all want an good-looking partner and good-looking people tend to wind up with other good-looking people. Be attractive. Be pleasant to be around and generally good at putting people at ease while making them feel valued and heard. Have the kind of life that other people would want to be part of. The first step is making a life that you genuinely want to be part of. Don't be unattractive. Don't be…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 04:31 PM
4

He was passed the fuck out and gave her explicit instructions to leave the food at the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 04:14 PM
1

What the hell dude? You started with a point that could gave been an interesting start to discussing how we've probably been overcorrecting in our attitudes towards female sexuality and turned into a rant about your own dissatisfying dating life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 07:21 PM
1

It's very rarely that we are made happy by getting what we want, and if we are, it rarely lasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 07:17 PM
1

This is a strange question to ask men, since the whole premise is rooted in either lacking the self-awareness to know what you actually want or in lying to yourself about what you actually want so as to conform to an ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 07:13 PM
–

Maybe, I don't really have much commentary there. I think you should go for partners you want, who you believe likewise want you in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:40 PM
–

Ideally you both should admire each other and consider the other's presence in your life a cherished gift. I remember someone described a fair deal as one in which both parties feel as though they got it in the neck just a bit, and I would say that an ideal relationship is the direct inverse of that in which both parties feel as they're making out like bandits.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:54 PM
–

Yeah, it sucks and it hurts, but what is there to do about it? You can only really keep going and looking until you find someone you want that wants you as you want them. But it's worth noting that you may never actually luck out like that, and so you just need to find other things to make it worth it in the meantime. Don't listen to any idiots that tell you to accept just being useful to someone; you're not a fucking draft animal and I hope you respect yourself more than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:41 PM
1

Yes and no. It's unlikely in objective terms that he'll have the best numbers in everything, but we're talking about a subjective valuation, which is almost limitlessly plastic, and if he isn't something genuinely exceptional in this inner framework, and she's finding him wanting compared to figures from his past, that's an incredibly bad sign.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:35 PM
1

Why are the posters here so keen to deny lived experiences when they don't line up with progressive norms? You may not have seen it, but I have seen exactly this kind of shit go down in relationships. Seriously people, extend some fucking charity to the other person's view so that you actually have a chance of engaging with it rather than constantly trying to gaslight.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:31 PM
3

Women already make it fairly obvious when they're particularly into a guy, even if they often don't outright state it. While it would be a genuine improvement if women were encouraged to communicate directly*, OP is almost certainly right that it wouldn't change much in this realm. *Not just here, but in general. My experience has been that a lot of women are prone to behaviors like passive-aggression and tacit contracts, often framed as a deficiency on men's part (they should just know, and lea…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:28 PM
1

I can't really continue this one without getting personal, but you clearly have a deeply suspicious and hostile demeanor.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:53 AM
-2

Fun fact: interacting with other people intrinsically involves pain. Not the risk of pain, but pain itself; you will suffer in the course of forming bonds and experiences with others. You can protect yourself by assuming the worst of others and never becoming vulnerable, and you will indeed be very safe, but your life will be among the worst of miseries conceivable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:17 AM
-2

I'm not doing anything; don't assume malice without good reason. My suggestion is to assume that your fellow posters are human beings with needs that don't necessarily involve obtaining their gratification at the expense of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:12 AM
2

I'm assuming that you've forgotten an "n't" in the first line, but I've definitely seen the first. I'm not sure why you'd consider it such an exotic notion that you couldn't extend the charity of assuming that they had in fact seen such, given the sheer number of damaged people here looking to hurt others to assuage their own pains.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:56 AM
-1

That's a phenomenally uncharitable assessment of their motives.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:44 AM
1

So men aren't allowed to freely associate because they may choose to use their time productively? Regardless, this is a complaint that pertains almost exclusively to bourgie women; the working class has no reason outside of false consciousness to care how their exploiters and the associated small-owner lapdogs negotiate their business.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 11:13 PM
15

Women aren't going to act like our grandmothers anyway, nor should they. Just as with the viewing of pornography becoming normalized, women changed because the material conditions of society changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:31 PM
1

Men can definitely choose wrong. How many bozos wind up ruining themselves simping or getting taken to the cleaners in a divorce after they find out that their wife was never into them? You can and in fact do always choose. You might not like the choices available to you, but that doesn't change the fact that you're making choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 05:59 PM
1

The basic premise of Aristotlean virtue applies here: vice can be found as much in an excess of a given virtue as it can a deficiency. In this case, prudence can readily become cowardice or neuroticism when taken to its extreme. The key with all virtues, to act virtuously, is to apply the correct measure of virtue for a given situation. Regarding this specifically, I think people generally apply too little prudence, because as I said, we want the people we strongly desire to be a positive inclus…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:06 PM
2

If there's one piece of advice I wish I could drill into everyone's head it would be this: learn to second-guess attraction and infatuation. I get it, we want the object of our desire to be someone good for us, and we'll often selectively interpret everything they say and do as more proof of how awesome they are, but slow down, think very carefully about your experiences with them and ask yourself if you're overlooking red flags or making excuses for bad behavior. It will only get so much worse …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:47 PM
1

One is also astronomically more prevalent than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:41 PM
–

Considering that it was movements with a strong male presence that won the labor and union protections we currently have, your arrogant thesis doesn't hold water. But you're also not getting it. The left largely lost these men; it's not that these men enmass started voted for rightoids, it's that they largely stopped voting the pathetic excuse of a left that still exists in the first world. What calls itself the left in the first world are really just Liberals whose first and only loyalty is to …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 02:33 AM
–

Those men are not generally anti-worker's rights, what they are is anti-"shitlibs that push suffocating, alienating crap and roll the fuck over whenever push comes to shove regarding capital". It's time for your reminder that neoliberalism started with Carter, and that Clinton was a more successful Reaganite than Reagan himself. Socialists were as likely to be men as women until some time after the identitarian new-left took over; I can only imagine why...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:52 AM
1

I'm going to do you the favor assuming that you're just willfully dishonest, because the alternative is you being too stupid to read between lines, but I do believe I'm done here and will waste no further time on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 09:36 PM
1

voluntarily chose to I'm sure being pressured by clamorous advocates had nothing to do with it. But I'm not a voluntaryist, since I acknowledge that choice itself is predicated by circumstance, and so don't consider something being voluntary as intrinsically sufficient justification nor as proof that a choice is not coerced. What does this have to do with anything being discussed? I'm saying that you're blind, in denial or engaging in the fallacious reasoning of the platonic advocate who can do …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 09:16 PM
–

Then I guess I'm just splitting hairs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:09 PM
–

My issue with the idea of a "looksmatch" at all, since it suggests that someone may deserve something that they aren't getting. The fact is that we deserve only what we receive (yet also deserve nothing of what we receive), and if we want different it is on us to somehow obtain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:36 PM
–

It probably just means that he isn't especially attractive overall, but has enough attractive qualities that someone with fewer good options would be willing to take a pass at him in the hopes of getting something rather than nothing, since they view him as plausibly attainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:00 PM
–

Cap. It's slang for a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:57 PM
–

There's no such thing as leagues, which would be an axiological claim of what "ought" to occur. There is just what is and what occurs. This isn't to say that there aren't people more or less generally attractive, just that this doesn't place them in a league of who they deserve to be attractive to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:52 PM
1

For example? Men's-only clubs and associations being forced to take women as members springs to mind. They have not. They have pointed out that unsolicited criticism and demonizing of overweight people is oppressive. Yes, I too live in a marvelous land where people I agree with never make unreasonable demands or hold opinions I find distasteful. I'm not really wielding the axe Dude, you turbopost as hard as Lilith with no less glaring an ideological blinder. You really ought to to put that axe d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 03:35 PM
1

Oppression is a nebulous concept. We know from past experience that something as simple as men exercising their supposed right to free association can be construed as oppression. Given the very material benefits of being considered attractive, the fact that it correlates strongly with virtually every positive life outcome, one could make a solid case that not being considered attractive is oppressive - something that body positivity advocates have done several times. I agree with you, but I also…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 02:42 PM
1

Transgression against an imposed value. Societally imposed values are quite often not reasonable or fair. Consider the expected behaviors of serfs in the old feudal order or those of slaves in slave economies. I would go so far as to say that transgression is an essential component of moral evolution, a continual ablative force that spurs us to reassessment of our values, ultimately honing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 02:32 PM
1

You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 09:46 PM
1

I find that most of the dialogue online is dominated by the middle class (this is painfully obvious in any political space), which makes sense as the majority of the anglosphere is still middle class and the middle class is more likely to have the time to waste. But dating problems are definitely not a middle class thing; this is yet another thing where things are considerably more bleak for the poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 06:42 PM
1

You're a little off about welfare being an expression of performative virtue. Aside from the fact that welfare keeps the disadvantaged pacified, the fact is that in keeping them alive, those who cannot provide for themselves do us a service by staying alive, as we have thus far found the idea of a society of plenty in which starvation and privation is a regular feature to be unacceptable; this isn't a performance, it's literally buying personal peace of mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 03:15 PM
1

I'm not flaired, so I'll be posting here. My life has value to me. I'm sure it has value to some others. It does not, in any intrinsic sense, have value; at most it can become valuable to more others through me being able to provide something of value to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 03:09 PM
0

Man, I am from a poor as shit background and let me tell you, poor as shit and seriously mentally ill people (who are way over-represented in the "poor as shit" demographic) have tons of dating problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 03:08 AM
2

Standards are a funny thing in that people's stated preferences are very rarely in line with what they actually want. They tend to either downplay how high and specific their standards are, glossing over details and pretending that certain qualities are more common than they really are or they tend to be highly exaggerated when the individual would in fact quite readily compromise in most of them, in both cases this is a means of ego defense. What I would say that what men generally mean regardi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 05:14 PM
3

You should improve upon yourself because it is all that is within your power to do to change your outcomes. You're not going to get dealt another hand, so your options are to either play the cards you've been dealt or to fold.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 01:51 AM
1

You're a man of impressive intellect, sound comprehension and I feel strongly compelled to treat you with the utmost respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 02:46 AM
1

Your arrogance does you no credit; you know absolutely nothing about me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 02:27 AM
1

So you're literally just not going to engage with the point. I'll happily take your concession, now if only you'd live up to your name.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 01:30 AM
1

The question is not "will it set him apart?" as it obviously will, but whether "will it set him far enough apart to warrant the effort?" I've known plenty of men who got into physical fitness expecting to "make it" in this domain onlt to go from invisibility to sporadic attention from women who didn't put in even a small fraction of the effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 01:24 AM
1

This kind of argument is a motte and bailey. Yes, there are strains of feminism that are just mild suggestions of a less restrictive social order, but on the whole there's a strong current of attempting to reshape men in the image of the mores of bourgeois women through social policing stemming from a stance that can only really be described as hostile to men in a general sense. The fact that feminism has been used as a weapon against class-based socialist movements, which would help large subse…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:13 PM
1

It's just a universal fact that if you want people to follow your ideology, you had better be prepared to make a case for it being in their interest to do so. It's clear that attempts to enforce this through socially hegemonic application of the stick are aren't going to work, and so you must find a carrot to offer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:02 PM
12

A fundamental component of the problem is that we like to assume that there's a human essence which is of intrinsic value to others, "treat others as an end, not as a means", when in fact people are generally only worth to each other what they can get out of each other. We obfuscate this on account of these things often being nebulous, internal matters like emotional support, entertainment, social integration, so on, but the fact remains, and so if you have little to offer that others want, or n…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 06:29 PM
4

Well that's entirely fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:17 PM
7

From what I've seen the essential claim seems to be that there's a small subset of men whom women tacitly share in non-committal relationships, of which your description sounds to me much like the women's side of this claim. Obviously the notion is clouded under various extreme and implausible exaggerations, but what you describe sounds like a state of affairs in which widespread polygyny would be quite conceivable, given the relative selectivity of women in casual relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:13 PM
1

That's really up to women to answer for themselves; I have no interest in playing salesman. I would recommend that people generally do not settle for anyone who isn't enthusiastic to be with them, but I honestly suspect that will just result in a lot of lonely people as most of us are really nothing all that special.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:49 PM
9

Isn't that essentially the claim being made by the manosphere?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:43 PM
1

It's one of those things where one would think that there'd be no need to ever discuss it, as it is by far the single most important factor in romantic success, only dipping somewhat after a given partner's presence has so completely normalized that it no longer registers as a good, but our drive to create idealistic narratives of universal justice, that one can always obtain the life one desires if the work is put in, continuously overrides this fact. I think it's an extension of the same drive…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:04 PM
1

Of course we do. Everybody wants a partner that they're attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 04:51 PM
1

Because they define success at a very low bar and most of their advice amounts to "go away and stop complaining" said with much less honesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 12:02 AM
2

It helps, but if you're not in a good spot, it's benefits to attraction may not be worth the effort. There's a reason it's commonly emphasized that you're best off doing it because you want to be fit for your own sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 12:19 AM
1

Yeah. There's a reason that the men that people tend to bring up as living fulfilling, yet asexual, lives were pretty much all clearly highly neurodivergent, grappling with sexual trauma or closeted homosexuals (Newton, Kant and Tesla, in no particular order, spring to mind) and that is because an asexual life is almost assuredly going to be absolutely miserable for the vast majority of men, being defined by a nagging, obtrusive, unfulfilled drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 08:10 PM
27

Your average man likes sex and relationships. Nearly every man likes sex, but I would say most have found their sexual and romatic lives dissatisfying. There's a reason it's called "getting lucky" and how idioms such as "can't live with them, can't live without them" or "happy wife, happy life" crop up, and the reason boils down quite simply to that it's difficult for men to find a partner that is both into them and generally supportive. Many men don't so much enjoy sex, (taken here as the whole…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 04:00 PM
1

Is that actually a fair comparison? Because this means that women are getting rejected after being accepted, which is just another way to say that it didn't work out, effectively little different from a breakup after a short relationship, and I have my doubts that this will engender the same feeling of being undesirable and unwanted. Especially considering that most relationships don't work out anyway, which means that this isn't really an abnormal outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 02:29 PM
1

I'd suggest taking up a nerdy interest like tabletop games, ideally something slightly obscure, and attempting to break into the scene; you'll encounter lots. Most of these people tend to be shut-ins, as they've learned a long time ago that many don't enjoy their company.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 12:40 PM
1

I've never been involved in such a scene, but I'm willing to go with Foucault here, regarding his critique of the free love movement, in which he claims sex became just another means of status, power and currency with its haves and have nots, which I would contrast against a study I remember which found that the comparatively sexually conservative East Germans reported higher sexual satisfaction compared to their more liberal West German counterparts. In what way would more sexual openness help …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 12:26 PM
1

It's more like a bunch of recurring patterns that I've observed, rather than taking an individual experience as significant alone. A lot of the men that fit this mould leverage that advantage to get around, and the men that get around generally fit this mould. My experiences are from a much lower income background and much less stable, so I've been around and seen some shit. I've seen men that fit this mould not get around like this, although this only becomes particularly common when they're ol…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 10:19 PM
–

you didn't hire a private investigator to plumb everything down to the depths of their qualia, therefore your observations don't matter That's disingenuous and you know it. Anyhow, my experience has been mostly watching them in social venues, bars and clubs, which I worked in for a long time. I've seen several Lotharios go through a pretty similar script, backed up by the new girlfriends they got, they women that went home with them, the women that latched on to them for the night, so on. People…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 09:27 PM
3

Why is there such a strong aversion to admitting that things might actually be kind of bleak for a lot men, romantically speaking? I think half of the reason bitter, misanthropic crap gains traction is because our culture seems to adamantly refuse to give any ground on this subject. Let's be real, there are a lot of dudes who can lift every day until the cows come home, treat Dale Carnegie like a prophet and keep such an immaculate standard of cleanliness for themselves that they could could tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 09:15 PM
–

Chad is a fiction Let's be real dude, men generally considered attractive totally exist and they have a pretty significant in most areas of social life (and thus life in generally) but especially in a romantic context. They general fit a relatively narrow archetype too; as someone once put it, to paraphrase "sure, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but if a genie gave aan the ability to choose his appearance, he'd have to be an idiot not to choose to be a tall, broad-shouldered hung dude with…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:30 PM
1

While I don't doubt that there are men who will so flippantly dismiss any advice (it's worth noting here that depressed people have generally given their circumstances a great deal of thought) I do think that you're being unfair; I'll go point by point. Hitting the gym and being social is obviously beneficial; it will make you more attractive and increase the possibility that you'll run across someone that's into you. Also it will lessen depressive symptoms. But when you're talking about someone…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:51 PM
1

men tend to have more narrow interests That's rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:00 PM
1

Man, the people in this thread make marriage sound like an unpleasant chore with no room for peace or relaxation. No wonder there's so many men taking exception to being called "husband material" - it basically amounts to somebody telling you that you're only suitable for the most unpleasant parts of the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:53 PM
–

Thanks man. It's very much something that is what it is, being bitter about it just amounts to self-harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 04:20 PM
1

Keep stewing bitterness dude, I'm sure it will make life feel worth it any day now.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 04:16 PM
1

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 04:01 PM
0

Reread my comment, slowly and carefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:43 PM
1

You just said Quote me. Nobody has to or should be doing anything. We live in an uncaring universe of force and motion, where every human is free to decide how they should live their lives in the circumstances in which they've found themselves. You can do or not do whatever you please, but you must live with the consequences. It is ultimately incumbent upon you to determine what is available to you, what of it you want and to then strive for it; at no point will it help you to childishly sulk ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:58 PM
0

You ain't gotta do shit dude. But it will improve your odds and your pool of potential partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:35 PM
0

I highly doubt that, as I doubt unattractive people are more likely to find other unattractive people hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 07:07 PM
2

If you want to be beholden to them, that's your prerogatve. But that's you making that choice to put them ahead of your own interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 02:30 PM
4

Yeah, I dunno on that one. It seems to be pretty universal between sexes. My guess is that it's a crab bucket behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 02:12 PM
0

That's felt out as part of feeling out whether you have a rapport with the person. What people call chemistry is rooted largely in mutual attraction. The bozos going around thinking about leagues are disqualifying themselves from going to bat at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 02:11 PM
1

Your error is in assuming that one's genetic traits are the same as their self, but this is just another mistaken attempt to define a general self that transcends the particular momentary self. You are exactly what you are in this exact moment, and your genetics are just chemical structures in your cells.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 02:09 PM
-1

It's not. You aren't actually losing anything by shooting your shot; you suffer more in your mind than in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 02:04 PM
1

Why should he particularly care that she's attracted to his genetics? They're just a circumstance over which he has no control.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 04:18 AM
5

Are there really motherfuckers out there thinking about what "league" they're in? I go after people I'm attracted to with which I have some rapport; I don't give a shit what my lane is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 03:44 AM
1

Where in the fuck did you impression that I don't care about that? I'm explicitly saying that such means that I'm not going to take a stance against utilizing something to my advantage to potentially improve my lot because I know that they're not gonna see some transcendent me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 03:41 AM
3

I made peace with people being superficial ages ago. What we consider to be rational or higher motives are almost entirely just post-hoc rationalizations of us acting out the impulses of an irrational will. Have you ever stopped to question things like the way our eyes can track movement before we're consciously aware that there's anything there with movements to track? We're constantly doing shit without any form of conscious reasoning behind it as our brains are continously processing and resp…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 03:30 AM
109

As men, since we don't have as many ways to disguise or downplay our physical features (and even fewer that are socially acceptable), the main thing we can do in this regard is avoid shooting ourselves in the foot. Stay in shape, keep clean and groomed and fix any glaring issues like bad skin or jacked-up teeth you have going on. Everything past that comes mostly down to putting yourself out there, learning to socialize well and hoping circumstances work out in your favor. Beyond that, you can o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 05:39 PM
11

Tattoos are cool, and I'm absolutely in favor of them as a form of self expression, but your everyday jackoff getting ink to be appealing is more likely to come across as a tryhard, because people aren't generally going to create a flattering narrative for him unless he already has the kind of look that would encourage such; it would take much more than tattoos to change this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 05:28 PM
1

Porn stars make their appearance and sexual performance their career, and they are supported by a host of nutritionists, personal trainers, directors, make up artists, photoshop experts, and marketers such that even a legit 10 wouldn't be able to compete. As far as I know, most aren't paid well at all, and them maintaining their appearances comes down to "do it or don't get work" and there's really only so mych touching up a low budget production is gonna put forward. It's been my experience tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 10:51 PM
–

This discussion is very strange and pretty well irrelevant. I know I'm nothing special, to put it kindly. I could probably go on all day about the things I don't like about my appearance. That fact doesn't change the matter that I'm still going to pursue only people that I find attractive as potential partners. Regarding physical appearance, my standard is simple and it is absolute: I have to be positively attracted to them (as opposed to "not unattracted", "they have attractive qualities that I…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 01:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter