TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DialecticSkeptic Archive

View 1 post and 43 comments by DialecticSkeptic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

misandryDialecticSkeptic/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/21 07:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's a desperate situation in the secular West (including Europe). But it's not entirely hopeless: Speaking from personal observations and experience, there are pockets of sanity in the West but those pockets aren't secular. And it's because "secular" is the problem at bottom of all these issues. But that's a larger, more complex discussion.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:41 PM
1

Prosecutor would probably drop the charges if it was going to go before a jury. You can catch a hint of that from the fact that it was expected to be reduced to a misdemeanor, according to media reports.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:32 PM
2

That was just the straw that broke the camel's back. If suicide is an act of hopeless desperation, his reasons for ending his life would have reached back to more than just that. According to media reports, their marriage was toxic (keeping in mind his reputation for being warm and her reputation for being nasty).
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:24 PM
6

You don't need to date a woman for her to end your life as you know it. A female coworker can do it. Hell, you don't even need to know her. A complete stranger can accuse you. For all practical purposes, you have almost no support or protection from law enforcement or the legal system, especially in light of the Me Too movement.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:18 PM
7

Why? It's entirely predictable what the responses would be, so what purpose would it serve?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:05 PM
5

I was with you until you used the word "misogynistic," which is a virtue signal thrown around constantly and most often in contexts devoid of misogyny and usually as a preface to bullying or censoring men. Consequently, I lost any desire to support your point and tuned you out. I doubt my response is unique (hence your downvotes).
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:00 PM
0

Again, as I said, this is about so-called deadbeats who are avoiding support and evading enforcement (in Canada). In other words, for the loss of a license to negatively impact their ability to make support payments, that person would have to be making those payments in the first place. If they were, enforcement wouldn't be suspending their license. What if they were about to start (or restart) making payments, and now they can't because they lost their license? Then they would call the enforcem…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:56 PM
1

And if the mother becomes the deadbeat, avoiding support and evading enforcement?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 05:03 PM
-7

I don't know what it's like in the United States, but here in Canada we have similar laws and I can talk about that. Such laws here are about getting the attention of so-called deadbeats, those who (a) owe child support but are not paying and (b) are not cooperating with provincial enforcement agencies. The moment you start cooperating with the enforcement agency, they can (and usually will) remove the hold on your driver's license. It's a bullshit program, I agree, but how else do you get the a…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 07:25 AM
1

I guess I missed the point of your response to me. Anyway, since the comparison wasn't over harm in the first place, being incomparable on that score has no relevance. u/NutsLikeMelons suggested that if paternity tests were mandatory then nobody would feel like a suspect, because "it's just routine." u/OlfertFischer raised this Walmart illustration to make the point that he wouldn't like intrusive measures, perhaps especially if they were indiscriminate, which was altogether irrelevant because n…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:06 AM
1

So, you're unwilling or unable to defend your view. Okay. Well, good luck out there. Cheers.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 04:19 AM
2

"I'll explain this to you only if you already understand." Alrighty then.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 04:17 AM
1

A man pays $100,000 in child support for a child that was never his (not to mention inheritance issues, and never mind the psychological and emotional impact). Has he suffered any harm?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 04:13 AM
8

Not liking it is different from being made to feel like a suspect. His point was about the latter, and your counter was about the former. In other words, you missed. Try again. I wouldn't like it, either, if I was screened every time I shopped at Walmart—but it also wouldn't make me feel like a suspect, because EVERYONE has to do it. That was his point. Please provide a relevant counter that's more substantive than a mere autobiographical detail (e.g., "I wouldn't like it").
/r/MensRights25/12/22 05:40 PM
9

... letting the public health system humiliate their wives or themselves ... Humiliate? Please explain how a paternity test is humiliating.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 05:32 PM
3

Yes, I support women's rights too. But, try telling a feminist that ... Once upon a time, I self-identified as a feminist because I supported women's rights. After being told in very aggressive and exclusionary language that I can't be a feminist because I am a man, I stopped self-identifying that way. Apparently, only women can be feminists. Who knew? And the rise of misandry over the decades—Andrea Dworkin and her ilk—has caused me to shift my support to men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 02:54 AM
1

Does she actually hate men's rights? My instinct is to doubt it. I bet if you raised a particular men's right, she would probably agree with it. And if you raised another, she'd probably agree with that, too. If you do this several times, eventually you can point out to her, "Don't look now but you're agreeing with men's rights." On the other hand, you could raise a particular men's right and she would disagree with it—and you would promptly have a worthwhile discussion.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 02:38 AM
3

Don't think you've said anything wrong. It's an internet age problem where people read a few articles and feel like they are experts holding universal truth. That's why you will find a lot of people these days exclaiming their perceived reality as loudly as possible, instead of the good old fashion speak, listen, think, and discuss. Another problem created by the internet—or rather social media, especially Twitter and Reddit—is the compulsive need to be among the first to post something, maybe a…
/r/MensRights04/11/22 11:28 AM
72

Old timer here: What the hell does swipe right mean?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:11 PM
2

I see. But that's a case of those special, limited, prescribed circumstances in which the government can limit or deny certain rights and freedoms. Another example: The government can limit the freedom of expression when certain cases of doing so would harm others (e.g., incitement to violence). It never granted us these fundamental rights and freedoms. We're born with them. It's supposed to protect them, and it can limit or deny them in special, limited cases, such as when protecting another pe…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 01:07 PM
3

If human rights have existed for thousands of years, then they weren't given to us by the government. Rather, the government is supposed to protect these rights which we're all born with. It does not grant them. That's the crucial problem which too many people don't realize. If the government gives people their rights, it can take them away. But if we are born with natural and inalienable rights, the government cannot take them away. (It can limit or deny them, but only under carefully prescribe…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 05:13 AM
1

You believe our human rights are given to us by government?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:10 AM
2

... the basic human rights that were given to people ... By whom?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 02:55 AM
2

Equality is ... ... abandoned in favor of equity. Tragically.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 02:34 AM
2

Uh, maybe YOU don't care. But you also don't speak for the rest of us. For example, I care that she is a woman.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 06:11 AM
1

This is my own armchair opinion—I have no formal education or training in this area, so it may not be worth much. Speaking from my own experiences, I can tell you what I think are two of the most important issues related to how men are treated. 1. Stop taking men for granted. There is almost no end to the things a man is willing to do when he feels genuinely valued. The more you respect him as a man, the more he will act like one and show you love. Compliment him with three reasons why he is suc…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:59 AM
29

Also why are they her plates and not the family plates? This.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:55 PM
4

I am in favor of war as "a means of settling international disputes" (with exceptions and caveats) but I am passionately opposed to war as a preemptive strike against a nation that we believe might do something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/22 02:57 AM
4

Yeah, I punched "LPS+paper+abortion" into Google and was hit with stuff about lipopolysaccharide-mediated fetal death. Yeah, that's probably not it. So, I had to ask.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 07:16 AM
10

I hate it when people drop acronyms like everyone should just know what they mean. I'm sorry but what the fuck is "LPS"? (When you use an acronym, define it at its first use so that your reader from that point onward knows what you are saying.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 02:53 AM
7

Just because someone should admit it, "So many left-wing media outlets are misrepresenting what [fill in the blank] said in a way that they know will provoke a response."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/21 09:29 PM
28

I think we need to stop pushing the narrative that abortion laws are anti-women laws and let science do more of the speaking. But opposition to abortion is not based upon science. They are moral and political arguments; we're dealing with philosophy and theology here, not science. Ergo, letting science do more of the talking likewise won't change hearts and minds. We will never get the vast majority of antiabortion supporters to change their mind by framing it as a sexist or mysogonistic issue. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/21 06:54 PM
5

I think it might be extra words just for the sake of sounding mouthy Maybe. In which case I'd see that verbosity as belying a subconscious choice. But I'm sensitive to toxic feminism so maybe that's just my bias talking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/21 02:12 AM
2

This is the way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/21 11:32 PM
69

Also notice: She didn't ask, "Why does it matter whether a child has a gendered role model?" She asked why a "certain" gendered role model matters—that is, male. But she can't allow herself to state it that clearly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/21 11:30 PM
31

When you go to the doctor, does anyone ever ask if you feel safe in your relationship? Not ever, not even indirectly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/21 08:20 AM
2

I totally agree with your expanded comment below, so I came back to this one to hand you an upvote. Also, I agreed so hard that now I'm beginning to think I'm not a capitalist after all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/21 02:33 AM
7

I'd bet my life savings that he has previously tried to do things without asking and she got mad at him that it wasn't done the right way. I came here to say this. That is almost guaranteed (especially from the tone of her writing and the things she focused on).
/r/MensRights05/07/21 05:45 AM
9

Exactly. If this was a guy, even a male celebrity, he'd be doing time right now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/21 02:10 PM
3

That is the reason why I made this post in the first place, and the overwhelming perception seems to be that what Schumer did 1: was wrong, and 2: was rape. That may be the consensus opinion, but what are your thoughts now after reading the comments and reflecting on them? It looks like you agree with that perspective. Do you? (Guilty confession: I used to have a celebrity crush on her, once upon a time. Ugh.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/21 05:48 AM
6

Props, mate. Have an upvote. (And I didn't know that about Lena Dunham. I never liked her anyway, and that admission of hers doesn't help.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/21 05:40 AM
9

I wouldn't necessarily term this as rape, but it's scummy behaviour. I'm curious about why you wouldn't necessarily call this rape. Why not? It involved the penetration of the vagina with a body part without the consent of the victim. (Definition of rape provided by the U.S. Department of Justice.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/21 04:54 AM
25

I am struck by the stark difference in language we choose to use when describing these things. Just here it was called a "scummy incident." Someone commented and called it a clear-cut case of sexual "harassment." But now flip the genders of those involved. Suppose it was a guy who grabbed a female cab driver's hand and got her to give him a hand-job. I really don't think that would be called a scummy incident; I suspect it would be called sexual assault. Why, if the perpetrator is female (e.g., …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/21 04:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter