TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dialed Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by Dialed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"Psychological abuse, also referred to as emotional abuse or mental abuse, is a form of abuse characterized by a person subjecting or exposing another to behavior that may result in psychological trauma, including anxiety, chronic depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder." "Addiction is the continued use of a mood altering substance or behavior despite adverse consequences, or a neurological impairment leading to such behaviors." as per wikipedia.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 05:03 PM
8

You know this is a way control is fostered in abusive relationships? You're promoting this because it can get you laid?
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 04:51 PM
1

I really don't know what you're trying to convey in this conversation.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 12:24 PM
1

no, I probably won't, because I don't know of anyone I know doing that.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 12:00 PM
1

Why on earth would that be "congratulations"?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 11:46 AM
26

My woman and I have sex whenever I want. She is cool with this. I am cool with this. I fail to see how we're even talking about rape here.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:10 AM
1

Owing each other regular sex and indefinite consent are nowhere near the same thing. I agree that marriage involves the need for each person to be sexually satisfied, but that involves discussion, acommodation, compromise, and maybe even divorce! It doesn't mean that if you're sexually unsatisfied, you can just hold her down and fuck her a few nights a week. She did not want another child, according to the article. She has already born "his" child. That's perfectly her decision to make. Procreat…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:31 AM
1

I think "ignoring limitations put on sex" is perfectly valid as rape when it comes to things of severe consequence, such as unprotected sex, lying about STIs, etc. Another thought is that say the couple in the article agreed to have sex, but only if he used a condom. During sex, he announces that he completely sabotaged the condom, or only pretended to put it on. Is it only rape if she were to revoke her consent and he kept going? Isn't her consent invalidated from the get-go? It's conditional o…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 06:20 AM
1

sounds fair, yeah.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:26 AM
14

Is this hard to understand? If she says "we can have sex, but only if you pull out" and you agree to that, but then during the act decide not to and tell her "I'll do what I want" as you keep going, you're raping her.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/13 09:50 PM
2

I'll be sure to direct the scads of women I repulse to you. Do you have a google plus?
/r/TheRedPill16/01/13 04:45 AM
2

I know, but it seemed to me like he was saying this is an inherent part of being a woman, not a consequence of society. I was hoping he would explain his opinions further but he's backed off of the discussion.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 08:55 PM
1

okay, so in this instance, the theory is that women are not pressured by society to become intelligent?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 08:53 PM
2

I'm good, thanks.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 08:53 PM
1

could you explain your point in linking this to me, please, so I can properly respond?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 08:50 PM
3

Okay, so you're claiming that women have poor rational decision-making and are easily emotionally compromised. Can you show me that this is true? If it is, can you show me that it's a factor of biology rather than society?
/r/TheRedPill11/01/13 09:46 AM
1

yes, I have stopped to think about why that is.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/13 08:23 AM
6

Is it too much to ask for you to explain what you're talking about without rhetorical questions and condescension?
/r/TheRedPill11/01/13 04:02 AM
6

I'm not really seeing how that equates to "women are stupid."
/r/TheRedPill11/01/13 03:52 AM
4

Why should I assume that half the people I meet are on intellectual grounds with a child?
/r/TheRedPill11/01/13 03:17 AM
1

okay, who's to say it's me cherry picking knowledgeable women, as opposed to the author cherry picking the women he's talking about? What makes his personal experience reality, and mine confirmation bias?
/r/TheRedPill11/01/13 03:13 AM
2

no, I read it. But aside from the tired stereotypes (the dieting and fashion bit), why would I assume a woman only is qualified on what she majored in in college?
/r/TheRedPill11/01/13 03:12 AM
8

I'll read the book, really. But I'm asking you: are you telling me that the women in my life who know more than I do on science, literature, history, etc. actually don't? Because that's what this article you've linked is saying to me. That if she's a woman, I automatically know more than she does.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 07:55 PM
3

is there something in this 69-page ebook that somehow disproves the idea that there are women that are more knowledgeable than I am? Because there are. I know a bunch.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 07:45 PM
3

sorry, still not buying it. I know plenty of women who are far more knowledgeable than I am on plenty of topics. This man's assertion is that a woman will not have anything of value to say to me on any topic aside from "maybe fashion", and that's really just not the case.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 07:18 PM
3

Probably because the author's point seems to be that you can safely assume that a woman will have no knowledge on any topic except "maybe fashion".
/r/TheRedPill09/01/13 06:51 PM
0

yeah, that's the one. Voltaire may have said that but I don't think anyone's found something that actually links it to a writing of his.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 04:52 AM
1

This statement has been wrongly attributed to Voltaire. It's believed to be a rephrasing of the last part of this statement by white separatist Kevin Strom: "By the way, may I remind you that in some nations of the West, it is actually illegal to doubt Jewish lies like these and one can be fined and imprisoned for doing so. That brings to mind the maxim that I stated several years ago: If you want to know the identity of the real rulers of your society, merely ask yourself this question: Who is …
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter