TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Didalectic Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by Didalectic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

You claim this is caused by the patriarchy, so you have the burden of proof. You cant just say: it because of the patriarchy, not explain or exemplify what you mean by that and then expect another person skeptical of your claim (because you have not even given an argument to attack) to give examples in how your yet unkown argument is false. Then you complain about being downvoted (which, in case you are new here, leads to more downvoting, especially if you continue to refuse any debate or clarif…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:56 AM
1

Then why don't you edit it!?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:40 AM
5

Dutch person. It definitely means performance, not effort. Effort doesn't even show up as an option in google translate.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:31 AM
2

Dutch person here, the dutch word 'prestatie' doesn't mean effort. It most equal to performance/feat. Example: The Dutch presteerde/performed awesomely in skating on the Olympics, it was quite a prestatie/achievement/feat. Performance comes closest in this context. It means that a boy is less likely to get his answer recognized as right, even if a girl has presented the same performance. Same answer but less points.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:26 AM
3

De studie heeft aangetoond dat jongens slechtere punten op een toets krijgen, ook al heeft een meisje dezelfde prestatie geleverd. Translates into: The study has shown that boys get worse points on a test, even if a girl has delivered the same performance/feat. 'Prestatie' ≠ effort
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:26 AM
2

Dutch person here: The article never said equal effort, but equal performance or achievement. It means that if a boy writes the same thing on a test as a girl, he is less likely to get his answer recognised as right or get less points for it. Huge difference.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:19 AM
–

I said it as a response to your accusation I was simple of mind. You have yet to give an explanation but you are probably not going to, since you are desperately trying devalue me and hence what a said to savour the image you hold of yourself. I bet you sniff your own farts like a fine vintage. I feel sorry for your classmates, we've all had a seminar or two with one of you.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:55 PM
–

I'll have you know... I am pursuing three simultaneous bachelors, and if there were people suffering around me, then it is due to the complexity of my mind. Much like you are suffering, actually. Your arguments are fallacious (ad hominem most prominently), and this self-sacrificing nature you gift all men is a laughably idiotic fantasty is a straw mans argument, meaning that I never made that claim. That claim was made by OP, a claim that you missed and I brought to your attention along with the…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:07 PM
–

oh, yes, now I can see how this image clearly expresses that idea with sound argumentation. I am pretty sure this will be the stupidest thing I have read all day Why? I critized you for have a predetermined and unfounded opinion, something which you are doing again... right now. I am pretty sure this will be the stupidest thing I have read all week.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:32 PM
2

There were 776 male passengers of which 16% survived and 412 female of which 72% survived.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 10:29 AM
–

The post stated it wasn't chivalry or in other words a cultural construct that caused these men to act they way they did, but it was because they were men. That it is the nature of man to be willing to sacrifice himself for women and children, something that evolutionary checks out as well: the amount of people born is mostly connected to the amount of women there are. 10 men and 100 women equals more afterlife than 100 men and 10 women. Evolution, not culture sorted this mechanism or response o…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 12:17 AM
1

The things you mentioned just tires me in my core. Sighs and "really? Come on" are common reactions when I read feminists posts. A lot of them are far from objective, like religious people holding onto their ever receeding amount of valid bases for their beliefs, they have escaped into subjective inventions and contentions. The signs feminists use often might have well been equally valid as proofs for the existence of God. "See! Jesus is in my soup! God is real"
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:37 PM
2

How would you reply to this for example?: The feminist theory I've read has all been all for discussing men's issues also. In patriarchy, which is not a "feminist invention" as you might put it but a real power structure in our society, identified by many sociologists and psychologists, men are oppressed just as women are. This is a generally agreed-upon thing. It's the majority opinion in most (~90%) feminist theory. From /u/Lolita_Humbert. Discussions I've had about feminists not caring for me…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 12:21 AM
1

Fight about it until the end of time? There is no other way. From what I can deduce you seem reasonable, a rarity in both movements which has caused me to be part of neither. I feel that feminism or men's rights, because it cannot see the entire nature of inequality causes it to only jump and fix that inequality which they see, is an awful way to fix things. Aristotlean Justice is my cup of tea: the best flute should be given to the best flute player. That's it. Thanks for changing my mind thoug…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 10:33 PM
2

The evidence you have provided me with is significant and has altered my view to the extent in which feminists believe they also fight for men. Yet still, it is a definition of a single organisation of feminism and I can't help but feel that in the discussions I have had and have seen taken place the contrary was strongly fought for and didn't seem incidental by nature. Im geussing you know far more about feminism than I do, so it's weird if you wouldn't have had any similar experiences. The evi…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:27 PM
10

You yourself are anecdotal evidence. Since neither of us have the exact statistics, there is nothing but skewed evidence to use. Irregardless of what the exact evidence would state, my post would in any case attack any feminists that do hold that contention (or refrain from having it), which I know there are.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:04 PM
14

So you are saying feminism doesn't hold that pretention, great. I have been in too many debates where the contrary is stated, though. In fact, in the about 10 discussions I've had you form the exception.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 08:36 PM
3

I was quoting myself from comment 6 up from here. The point was and is that even though feminism says it fights for men's rights too, it doesn't do that. Regardless of whether Men's rights does that as well, it is in any case false. But, added to that, I think that Men's rights doesn't do that, that we do not hold the pretention that we are fighting for womens rights too. Since we do not have that pretention, it is unlike feminism that it can't be held against us if we in fact do not cover women…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 08:25 PM
30

Lets them uphold that they fighting for equality instead of just women. Something which I feel mens rights conversely doesn't pretend to do. MRA's fight for men's rights, which generally excludes womens issues, whereas feminism claims to fight for both women and men, a misconception and illusion I at least on the feminists' part try to disprove. Again, I am unsure if men's rights deludes themselves into thinking the same, but if they are, then they are wrong too. I'm against both movements in pr…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 08:06 PM
6

k.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:43 PM
3

Because men's rights concern themselves with men's rights and do not pretend to also fight for women. Feminists however claim to also fight for men, to be concerned with their issues while this is not true at all......
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:41 PM
5

Because it doesn't deal with equality? It has nothing to do with gender issues, it has to do with puppies being murdered? The ENTIRE point of my post was to show that feminists, unlike what they say, which is that they fight for men too, are not concerned with men's rights and the topic was removed as having indeed nothing to do with the topic. Seems like you are not that intelligent as you think you are, if you missed the entire point of this post(1),u (2) try to refute it with a fallacious arg…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:31 PM
8

No logic was found in this comment.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:22 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1vhkiw/mens_issues/
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:17 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1vhkiw/mens_issues/
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:17 PM
4

Calling that feminist a moron results in an immediate defeat and isn't, much like a lot (though less) of the stuff on Men's Rights here, very academic either. I support men's rights to keep feminazis in check, but much rather have both biased movements be gone. I was in a similar situation as you were in, asking for examples wherein feminism fought for men: none were provided. I hope Men's Rights doesn't dellude themselves to thinking they aren't fighting just for men too.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 04:48 PM
46

It annoys or better: tires me just as much as you, but the conviction of feminists that they fight for men too annoys me more and is an illusion that needs to be fixed, as it serves as a justification for them to concentrate on women. Lets them uphold that they fighting for equality instead of just women. Something which I feel mens rights conversely doesn't pretend to do, though I am unsure of it.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 03:58 PM
6

It's probably mostly about the present, recent past or future.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:30 PM
1

Exactly, I was always weirded out be the comments here discussing how not being able to show your emotions is worth fighting against. Crying is literally a cry for help from others, for mommy or someone else to come and help you. But actually giving in on that cry learns or conditions that person to cry more easily. What he/she should be taught is that they need to be able to handle their own shit. Take responsibility and suffer the consequences for whatever you may have done, so that you will a…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:35 PM
5

Just about any topic here should provide you with a lot of material, but the most prevalent topics are parental rights, poorer health of men due to tougher jobs(die younger, have more health issues when older), harsher criminal punishment of men and for me it's the unsuitability of the education system with the male brain. Also, much of the sexism towards men is caused by feminists. Feminism borders on dogmatism which too often accomplishes stuff out of equality, not out of reason or because it …
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:56 AM
8

Wtf? This is like the female equivalent of rape: cellular penetration without consent.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:12 AM
1

A place where I had least expected facts and scientific method to be replaced with ideology is /r/science...
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:26 AM
–

"But for whatever reason advertisers feel that an audience is more interested in men's tennis than women's so advertising opportunities are valued accordingly." Because more people watch? More people buy tickets? Isn't this all just about supply and demand: there is a greater demand for male tennis, therefore they get paid more.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter