TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dienekes1911 Archive

View 2 posts and 92 comments by Dienekes1911 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Plenty of men don't have those functioning operations. "breathing oxygen" isn't the question, it's how well do you breathe oxygen. Taking a strong guy who's got solid biology can obviously be a better strategy than taking some 'genious' who claims he's invented a way to get rid of predators. How many people claim they've solved problems when they haven't actually? Really really important inventions don't simply catch on because sometimes people's lives being better off is not made clear by them.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 05:55 PM
2

There are a lot of other factors that are not best described by "intelligence" that let us adapt the planet's environment to suit us. 1. Without functional use of opposable thumbs, sweating, and shivering (and associated behaviors) then your intelligence dies 2. Read the Diffusion of Innovations and you'll realize there's a lot more to invention than just coming up with an ideas. There's a difficult social process to get other people to adopt your ideas and your IQ can't help you in a lot of tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 05:30 PM
4

Brazillian highschool teaches you get "more" male dna and you're muscular "more" female dna and you're less muscular? Sexual dimorphism only occurs from one chromosome and is determined by the sperm.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 05:27 PM
6

The problem with this view is that you're thinking that "intelligence" on its own can work towards the furthering of the species. Intelligence has to be directed in a certain way for it to be useful, and if you choose a less intelligent guy who has the directions nailed or a more intelligent guy who's inventing irrelevant stuff, you should pick the first one. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 03:07 PM
5

r time getting This is the most pseudoscientific explanation I've ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 03:06 PM
10

If you seize power and you aren't Ned Stark though, the kingdom is in trouble.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/19 07:39 AM
3

It should be both of your achievements, she will be upset if your achievement is dividing you two further apart.
/r/askTRP03/01/19 07:17 PM
1

That's true, but if they're 5'10" they won't survive with a tall guy's kid.
/r/askTRP03/01/19 07:16 PM
1

Find a short girl.
/r/askTRP03/01/19 04:55 PM
4

So in addition to the actual process of ejaculating, your body goes through a physiological shift from your parasympathetic to your sympathetic nervous system. One of the two systems is always prioritized, effectively shutting the other one off. Your parasymathetic nervous system is for relaxed behavior. Your sympathetic nervous system is for aroused/stress-related behavior. You're in your parasympathetic nervous system for an erection, and you ejaculate when you make the switch to the sympathet…
/r/askTRP01/01/19 09:38 PM
7

her friends probably won't testify against her, so the more bulletproof the evidence the better off you're going to be
/r/MarriedRedPill01/01/19 08:31 PM
2

Get your evidence together.
/r/MarriedRedPill01/01/19 07:17 PM
8

It sounds like you have a pretty good idea of what led to this.
/r/MarriedRedPill01/01/19 07:14 PM
15

The getting through the divorce without her taking your $$ is essential. ​
/r/MarriedRedPill01/01/19 07:13 PM
2

Fire is the essence. You nailed it.
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/19 06:30 PM
1

Another survey found the gap was 15 per men and 7 per women average.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 04:21 PM
0

And teach them the right way to interact.
/r/askTRP01/01/19 04:27 AM
-3

Just tell them not to diss you.
/r/askTRP01/01/19 04:26 AM
3

Yeah probably not the healthiest thing for him to be doing. Try to get him a hobby outside of video games.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 04:26 AM
1

That argument is used a lot, but doesn't account for people who are either a) helped by self-help books or who b) don't follow the advice. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 04:16 AM
1

I'm not sure who would openly admit to using TRP, but millions have subscribed to it on Reddit. I have a tough time imagining that none of them are successful. Furthermore, you aren't supposed to be a dedicated member of red pill ideology for your entire life. You read the ideas a couple of times, and incorporate it into your world. The guys still actively posting just haven't moved past it or they've moved to MGTOW or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 04:15 AM
1

Of course there's biased sampling, but you can reason that guys would probably overstate number of partners on a survey and girls might understate the number of partners on a survey.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 01:33 AM
8

But the average woman isn't having a new sexual partner every month. That's a small subset of women. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 01:30 AM
2

Yeah but then you're miserable the whole time
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 01:27 AM
1

I disagree, a lot of successful people look at TRP for its theories.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 01:26 AM
11

​ Highest state is utah with an average of 15.7 sexual partners. Where are you getting these 50 numbers?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 01:25 AM
2

How can you be cool being a loser? You're just contradicting yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 11:15 PM
1

Good luck!
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/18 03:07 AM
0

A lot of guys on here are saying "that's just how women are". I don't buy it. Some women will cheat, but more men cheat than women do. There are a lot of girls who have a lower sex drive and won't be driven to cheat like these girls. If you pick a girl who wants to be wild, and then she's wild, don't be surprised.
/r/askTRP31/12/18 12:13 AM
2

I think you have to choose the level of involvement you want to have in your boyfriend's life. If you care about this guy, you need to be able to have a conversation with him. Ultimately you have to choose if your relationship is going to be one where you say "you do you, and I'll do me" or if it's one where you say "you're not everything you could be, and I'm not either, so let's work together to make a better life." ​ If you choose the first option you'll be further apart and probably will fee…
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/18 12:06 AM
2

Emotional support might not be the right approach. He needs some motivation. Do you think he recognizes what happens if he keeps failing his classes? I'd make sure he recognizes just how bad things might get if this keeps on.
/r/RedPillWomen30/12/18 05:59 AM
9

Well, it changed my life man
/r/seduction29/12/18 05:12 PM
0

Look up the book 12 Rules for Life ​
/r/seduction29/12/18 05:10 PM
6

Read the book: 12 Rules for Life
/r/seduction29/12/18 05:05 PM
6

d also add "and actually help people get their lives together I think it's meant pretty literally. The idea is that you correct your child's behavior so that you like them, and if parents are a decent proxy for society, then you can make your children likeable.
/r/seduction29/12/18 05:03 PM
3

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve "Peterson says nothing! I couldn't understand him!"
/r/seduction29/12/18 05:02 PM
9

Jordan making it onto seduction threads.
/r/seduction29/12/18 04:57 PM
6

He's budget jordan peterson
/r/askTRP29/12/18 04:48 PM
4

That's true. You could also realize that the world isn't becoming stupider by the minute and then you'd have a lot of other avenues open for enjoyment.
/r/MGTOW29/12/18 06:42 AM
1

As people get over they usually need to make sure that they schedule time to retain emotional and physical intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 04:35 AM
1

When men are in a situation where they can fuck each other over, they will. I have a core group of really close friends, but we're that way because we've been through some really tough stuff together. Also, if you're the leader of the group and you aren't attracting quality girls to your friend group guys will leave.
/r/askTRP29/12/18 02:43 AM
2

In all honesty, I don't even know the difference between the two, but the way you phrase it will hint at if you're in charge of research and pushing forward the boundaries of human knowledge, or if you're following another dude's instructions. The former will be more preferable, but honesty is always good.
/r/MGTOW28/12/18 04:23 PM
1

I've never read it, but seen it a lot in libraries/bookstores. Is it worth a read?
/r/seduction28/12/18 04:19 PM
1

that's so interesting that you feel like it applies because the narrator in the book is so terrible with girls, but somehow you've retained the negative symptoms of the hyper-rational male despite having decent relationships with women...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 05:29 AM
1

The second guy really needs some help.
/r/MGTOW28/12/18 04:45 AM
3

You might want to consider taking more manageable steps. If you try to cut everything at once, what's the likelihood you're going to stop? Ask yourself what a manageable amount of porn reduction or online gaming or social media is and then try to tone it down as time goes on. Fix up your debt problem as fast as you can too! Best of luck.
/r/seduction28/12/18 04:44 AM
2

I don't know if it fully applies, but I'd recommend you read Notes from Underground by Dostoevsky. I've read a lot of your comments and it seems like you've just lost confidence in girls being moral/trustworthy. I don't know how you regain trust in women, but it will require you finding some who aren't willing to fuck over their kids and family for a dude and for you to see how useful a woman can be in your life. This will probably have something to do with the caretaking that she gives you give…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 04:38 AM
3

Be careful. Sounds like you're on thin ice in the environment.
/r/MGTOW28/12/18 03:48 AM
2

xeno_biologist Do you think it would help if you emphasized your brain power rather than your profession? I'd imagine girls would like to date Biologist more than they would a lab technician. idk that much though
/r/MGTOW28/12/18 03:41 AM
40

Brilliant. I wish we had more scientific clarity on here, especially for guys to realize that they are more than just their logical mind. That's such a small part of total being, but we try to use it after we have learned all of our theories. I'd add that there are certain connections you can't consciously override. So if you get sweaty around beautiful girls, your body believes there's something to switch to your sympathetic nervous system over. Until your being makes the judgment that girls sh…
/r/seduction28/12/18 03:37 AM
3

I think there are swings in public opinion... Trump has been president for two years and the world doesn't look like it's coming to an end yet. If he wins again I think there's going to be a crumbling of the radical left over the next few years. Also it seems like the universities are getting increasingly radicalized and there's less and less acceptance of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 03:30 AM
2

"positive correlation between facial attractiveness and sexiness of body odour for female subjects" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10380676 I'd say the gene pool hasn't been under significant pressure for the last 500 years or so, at least in the developed world. It doesn't mean female genetics are better, but we know women select from a pool of men. It does seem that female selection powered the development of human intelligence at a rate beyond what would naturally occur from natural sele…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 11:07 PM
3

Yeah but you match a healthy phenotype with a healthy phenotype you get a healthy phenotype in G1 more often than if you get G1 from an unhealthy phenotype and an unhealthy phenotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 10:54 PM
2

Well there's a scary thought. First I'd say that people actually can detect potential problems by smelling people. The science on this is in its infancy. But the work done on variability of X chromosome DNA and variability of Y chromosome DNA yields the conclusion that twice the amount of women were reproductively successful as men and that this form of sexual selection drove our species into consciousness and higher mental functioning. For the last few thousand years, and especially the last hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 10:52 PM
2

yeah but they can be half bad egg and half primo specimen or they can be half bad egg and half sup-par male genetic material
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 08:30 PM
1

I agree. Don't men get more violent when there's more inequality? I think the way women can mediate this is if the 80% of women end up marrying the top 80% of men, but then cheat on their partners (manipulate and deceive) then society benefits and the dude doesn't even know his kids aren't theirs. In the US apparently 1%-3% of men are unknowingly raising kids who aren't their own, that's about 3.25-10 million people.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 06:40 PM
3

No traits are heritable, they just come in probabilities. Two intelligent partners give birth to intelligent kids more often than two not-intelligent people. Sometimes the intelligent people will have not-intelligent kids and sometimes the not-intelligent people will have intelligent kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 06:35 PM
1

So traits aren't heritable?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 04:42 PM
11

Careful with this one... if she doesn't like it you're in deep shit.
/r/askTRP27/12/18 04:20 PM
0

There are studies that show women lie more often than men, and a manipulative woman is often built into sexual archetypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 04:05 PM
2

I think it benefits "us" as in everyone so long as you aren't the guys who don't reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 04:04 PM
2

yeah but strong people produce stronger kids than weak people on average, this is sexual selection
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 04:03 PM
1

Happy to talk more if you want to message me. Wouldn't mind hearing more about this.
/r/askTRP27/12/18 08:09 AM
31

Those poor boys who have a step-mom who doesn't even think she's responsible for them. They're her sons now.
/r/MGTOW27/12/18 08:03 AM
2

TL;DR: Find something to be confident about. Our judicial system only works because we find truth through conflict, so the right way to find what's "really true" is to disagree with people as honestly as you can and over the course of the conversation you'll figure out what you really think. You should get something to be confident about. This is some domain of competence that usually will spill out into other areas of your life, set up some territory where you know the rules and you are the one…
/r/askTRP27/12/18 08:00 AM
-3

The best strategy is to get the best genes and then find a stable provider from a biological standpoint. I think the sympathy for women comes from women are more often considered taken advantage of by guys than guys are considered taken advantage of by girls, which is probably correct.
/r/ExRedPill27/12/18 06:55 AM
-3

They aren't uniquely female problems, at all. There are loads of guys who try to do the exact same thing. The thing I see is that we usually assume that guys take advantage of girls more often than girls take advantage of guys. I think this is because, from an evolutionary standpoint, guys can take advantage of girls more often if you put it in terms of social good. A girl having a kid doesn't harm anyone. A guy having a kid could have been an opportunity cost.
/r/ExRedPill27/12/18 06:52 AM
2

A good interaction is you see your spouse and they just made you breakfast and the food is great. A bad interaction is you yell at each other because they never f*$#cking put the dishes in the dishwasher. Essentially if someone asked you after the interaction "was that a good one?" and you said "yes" it was good and "no" then it was bad. I think the "no"s are mostly arguments.
/r/askTRP27/12/18 06:46 AM
4

I'm not sure that no person wants a challenge when they date people. I think that science shows that people actually do want a challenge. There's research on the ratio of positive to negative interactions between spouses. If it's Lower than 3 good to 1 bad, then people break up because the relationship is too negative. If it's more than 11 good to 1 bad, people will break up because it's too easy. You want someone to contend with when you're dating because when you have a negative interaction yo…
/r/askTRP27/12/18 04:22 AM
1

Jordan Peterson has helped a lot of guys on here. Changed my life and super helpful. Also, recognize that as a man, for nearly all of history you were not going to reproduce unless you were in the top 20% of people (this is essentially an Alphas), so you're designed to climb dominance hierarchies in society. Get climbing by becoming physically capable of handling yourself and then working to produce valuable things for others. I wish I could answer more.
/r/askTRP27/12/18 03:47 AM
1

It seems like the content matters only insofar as it translates into meaning. And the actual words you use play a part in that, but who you are matters more than what you do, and what you do matters more than what you say.
/r/askTRP27/12/18 03:20 AM
6

Why is that so cringy? Seems to take a lot of creativity to come up with italian accent and mustache wearing. All he needed to do was show that he was fun, I guess that is a kind of low bar.
/r/askTRP27/12/18 03:19 AM
3

Ideally, answer what you've been doing, and you will have found it engaging and interesting.
/r/askTRP27/12/18 03:18 AM
2

Yes, you might also want to consider gaining social status at your high school. You hit it right on the head when you said women don't want ot re-evaluate because they already have everything mapped out. You have to insist that you've become high-value, you don't do this by only talking to girls. Look into joining some popular guys at your school and see what happens.
/r/askTRP27/12/18 03:16 AM
1

We stop evolving when women select everyone... idk man
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 03:11 AM
7

You can always draw the best and the worst story from any series of interactions. I think TRP takes the worst story of male/female interactions and doesn't cover the good side. This narrative ends up being something like "women are ruthless, so be ruthless to succeed with them" but it doesn't cover the benevolent side of women and the malevolent side of dudes. Understanding the red pill story is super helpful, though incomplete.
/r/ExRedPill27/12/18 03:10 AM
4

IN my opinion being nice and agreeable is the right thing to do when others know better than you. If someone else has a better idea or knows a better way to do things, then you being agreeable and deferential is the right thing to do. However, I doubt that is always, or maybe even often, the case. The reason being agreeable makes you unsure of yourself, is because you implicitly recognize that when you're agreeable it means that you are unsure. To not be agreeable you have to determine where you…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 10:41 PM
10

Being in residency - a difficult and conscientious position - seems prestigious enough to me. Especially if you're doing it with real purpose instead of as something you have to lug through.
/r/askTRP26/12/18 07:03 PM
1

I think this was found originally in Harvard's Grant and Glueck study, which measures lifetime happiness of like 600 people for over 75 years, but here's a time article on a similar finding. http://time.com/money/5157625/ideal-income-study/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 05:52 PM
1

I think that if you like someone it's usually based off of them doing things that you enjoy. There are some things that you could do that they might enjoy more. I've found that dates that have an activity (dancing, hiking, paintball etc.) result in a stronger bond and at you can tell a story about "that time when". I guess it's a larger investment if you have never done that with any other girl, but if this active stuff is just a part of your life, it's the same as getting coffee. I agree.
/r/askTRP26/12/18 05:47 PM
5

Don't try to reinvent the dominance hierarchy and just go with the one with girls from your school. This can ruin someone's life.
/r/askTRP26/12/18 05:34 PM
2

The pros of being "legendary" will be outweighed by the cons of several years of litigation and her imprisonment.
/r/askTRP26/12/18 05:33 PM
8

Happiness increases up until about 75k... 40k a year is tight.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 05:28 PM
1

There isn't anything inherently wrong with going for a coffee, there are just usually more exciting things you can do. If you like her, you want to give her an experience that she'll really enjoy and I'm sure you can do something unique. Do you think your chances would go up if you texted her back in a week or two and asked her to do something more active?
/r/askTRP26/12/18 05:19 PM
2

You might have blown it, maybe take a bit of time off from this one and try again later.
/r/seduction26/12/18 05:03 PM
2

You made a mistake not specifying when because it shows you're more interested in the idea of going on a date with her than with actually going on a date with her. You should have specified when she said when (e.g. "I was thinking Friday"). And if she's said no to a hypothetical this week and no to a hypothetical next week then most likely she won't hit you up when you're free. Also, why did you ask her to go for coffee? Do you really enjoy sitting in Starbucks and chatting? I feel like there mi…
/r/askTRP26/12/18 04:55 PM
1

I don't assume, but the male psyche really likes hanging on to the possibility that it is true. It's way more likely she just has a low sex drive, but you have a shot at an "ideal woman" as portrayed in fairy tales... so why not shoot your shot? Also if the 21-year-old has slept with 100s of guys, why wouldn't she keep sleeping with a lot of guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 04:23 PM
1

I grabbed 3.5 Bil from our last universal common ancestor. How can you evolve to enjoy being single without some form of self-deception? There are costs to any action, but if you recognize those costs is up to you. I'm saying to recognize the cost of being single. k
/r/MGTOW26/12/18 04:06 PM
5

There's a chance that she's just the perfect girl whose standards are so high that absolutely no one except for me could reach them... so maybe the 28-year-old.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 03:28 AM
1

Because they thought you and her could work together to become more valuable. Value isn't a set thing. Also, if they hated her so much then your friends were willing to put up with this girl to make you happier... idk why that isn't caring
/r/MGTOW26/12/18 02:45 AM
-5

So your friends are definitely trying to help you and to act like going MGTOW is not a sacrifice after you've come about from 3.5 Billion years of your ancestors not being single seems like denial.
/r/MGTOW25/12/18 07:04 PM
-1

Join r/JordanPeterson and watch his videos.
/r/seduction25/12/18 04:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter