TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Different_Dust9646 Archive

View 2 posts and 20 comments by Different_Dust9646 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Exactly my thoughts. Anyone like me who’s experienced ill effects from circumcision such as myself can’t help but look over at even more drastic genital cutting and say wtf are we doing here? And you can’t convince me that if removing the foreskin of the penis causes all these issues, SRS bottom surgery has to be much much worse in terms of lost and damaged nerves and lack of sensation. Like I’ve just gotten over a period of intense grief of circumcision grief (realized the full extent what had …
/r/MensRights24/04/25 05:16 AM
7

I suffered from my circumcision that's why I speak out against it. No man should have to go through what I have(extreme bumpy rough keratinization, lack of sensitivity, and meatal stenosis (narrowing of the peehole, and usually only occurs in us cut guys)which makes my urine stream spray and takes longer to pee). But that's why I'm restoring my foreskin and literally seeing the keratin fall off in areas that are now covered by my regrown skin and sensitivity has improved so much.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 10:08 PM
8

It’s not a tiny change. The glans (penis head) is supposed to be internal and covered by the foreskin. This is because the penis head’s surface is not regular skin it’s mucosal tissue like inside your mouth. Feel the inside of your cheeks with your tongue, that’s mucosal tissue. When the foreskin is removed the body has a defense mechanism called keratinization where gradually the soft and sensitive mucosal skin of the penis head transforms to layers of keratin to protect against rubbing against…
/r/MensRights19/04/25 08:29 PM
13

Actually most 1st world countries do not circumcise. Europe overwhelmingly does not, Japan overwhelmingly does not, Australia and New Zealand also do not circumcise hardly at all. Canada is down to only 30% infant circumcision. But if you want google "map of countries that circumcise" and you will see that aside from the USA the countries you see color coded as having high rates of circumcision are also overwhemingly third world countries often places with on going conflicts, poverty, lack of ed…
/r/MensRights19/04/25 04:37 AM
7

Hell yes men are more oppressed, most of us have been mutilated as infants. We are brutalized before we even leave the hospital. Most American men have 40-50% of their penile skin amputated without their consent as infants. That is a human rights abuse. It really is that black and white. We have less rights starting the second we are born.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 05:42 AM
4

I was born in a Catholic run hospital that clearly put profits ahead of their own doctrine on the matter.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 04:06 AM
5

Cleaner? Hmm I’d say cleaner would be uncut or fully restored where the glans(penis head) is free of keratin (finger nails are made of keratin, tough material). So you may think it’s cleaner but all unrestored cut guys essentially have a layer of keratin on their penis heads which blocks 80-90% of sensation. Keratin is why cut guys almost always have rougher/bumpier penis heads and uncut guys have smooth shiny glans(penis heads)
/r/MensRights15/04/25 04:01 AM
3

Same. I’ve been against circumcision my entire adult life but it wasn’t until I started feeling the full body orgasms from dekeratinized glans at CI-4 that I realized just how much had been stolen from me and incredibly sad for most men in this country who unless they restore will never in their life experience. That’s why I’m trying to speak up about it.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 03:42 AM
3

Too funny about the DTR and stealth retainer combo! Sounds like you had a typical American high and tight cut like I did. KOT!
/r/MensRights15/04/25 03:36 AM
9

Even though the penis is now damaged I’m not supposed to call it mutilation? Meatal stenosis is something I suffer from and occurs almost exclusively in circumcised men. So yes, it is most certainly mutilation. Add to that the keratinization I have suffered with all my life. It more than qualifies as mutilation. Foreskin is not just there for “cosmetics” it’s there because it has a very important function: protecting the glans
/r/MensRights15/04/25 03:23 AM
3

I see your point but about men getting extra defensive about it coming from a woman but some guys would also take more offense from it coming from a guy. I would argue maybe for women to point out they just want their men to be 100% complete/no missing parts down there which is currently only granted to women and the lucky uncut guys. And that might come across better to some guys vs a guy suggesting it and them thinking the guy is emasculating him etc.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 03:12 AM
6

Good on you for admitting your mistake. And definitely try to share this with expectant mothers you might know so they know the truth about circumcision.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:49 AM
5

That’s why I always encourage foreskin restoration when I mention circumcision is because I want circumcised guys to know there’s hope. You really can get 70-90% of sensitivity and function back. And that’s the sad thing about circumcision is that it makes you ashamed that you are missing something and a lot of fellow cut guys take the suggestion of foreskin restoration as an attack on their manhood and belittling their penis. It’s a very tough pill to swallow when you finally realize you’ve bee…
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:39 AM
5

You could have written thoughts right out of my head! Yes we do have a unique perspective on it being gay exposes to us even more what we are missing. I’m restoring at CI-4 and already noticing such a huge difference in sensitivity. I use the DTR and weighted Stealth retainer.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:12 AM
15

Good comeback!
/r/MensRights15/04/25 01:11 AM
7

Stopping male genital mutilation should be an issue that unites all men but opposition to it isn’t yet mainstream on the right or left
/r/MensRights15/04/25 12:33 AM
18

Oh I can compare it to FGM because it’s the exact same thing. The “sewn shut” FGM is actually the less common variety. I think it’s sad that you think men don’t deserve a right to have bodily autonomy. Women like you are what keeps MGM going. What’s mgm? It means MALE genital mutilation and I am a victim of it. How dare you belittle the pain and Sid effects I experience literally every day from being mutilated at birth
/r/MensRights15/04/25 12:02 AM
17

Thanks we also need women to speak up about this too
/r/MensRights14/04/25 11:53 PM
18

You’re aware there are different types of FGM and the type that removes the clittoral hood is anatomically speaking the same as removing a foreskin. Can you imagine life without a clittoral hood? And sad to say but if your boyfriends were cut at birth like I was they don’t know what sex and masturbation are supposed to feel like. Guys like me who are restoring notice a massive improvement in sensitivity and likewise guys who get circumcised as adults usually report a massive drop in sensitivity …
/r/MensRights14/04/25 11:48 PM
26

But there’s such a double standard like my sister is socially very liberal: supports a woman’s right to choose, thinks female genital mutilation is disgusting, and yet with her newborn she had him circumcised without a second thought
/r/MensRights14/04/25 11:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter