TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Digger_is_taken Archive

View 10 posts and 579 comments by Digger_is_taken on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It isn't that there aren't jobs that are only open to women. It's that those jobs tend to pay less. Like teaching and nursing. High skill jobs that pay less than male dominated skill jobs. Or housekeeping, a low skill job that pays less than construction. The exceptions are when physical attractiveness is being sold. Sex work, soft sex work like service industry and modeling. We don't need to go overboard into a supremacist ideology like feminism does. There are certain areas where women have di…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/25 10:08 AM
1

My ex wife pays me child support. We have split 50/50 custody but she earns more. She also paid me alimony for 5 years, during which I was paying her child support because the alimony made my income higher than hers. I live in a solidly Blue state with a well funded and supported child support system. All of the laws are gender neutral because of the 14th amendment. I have had to be aggressive in pursuing my rights at times. I've never had to actually appeal a case. There is a "child support cal…
/r/MensRights30/01/25 09:28 PM
1

Yes, I think that was it. They muddled a very strong gender argument by bringing White racial grievance pointlessly and counterfactually, and it was very offputting. Having done a quick review of TinMen's recent posts, race is not mentioned except for once, pointing out that being perceived as dangerous is particularly bad for Black men, which is true and right to say. So I am glad to see that there has been improvement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/25 04:09 AM
1

I noticed TinMen using false statistics to shoehorn White racial grievance into men's issues in one of their infographic slide shows. Called them on it. They fixed that one particular infographic. But when I pointed out that if I can find one piece of racist misinformation, than the entire project should fall under suspicion and scrutiny, I was scolded for not assuming good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/25 06:09 AM
1

Well, that might be the one. It is a prison study about the color pink. But none of the details match. It didn't even conclude that it worked. They did not see less aggression when they changed the strip search room pink. No cell cleaning or painting involved. Maybe it's another study? Or maybe this is all bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/25 07:13 AM
4

I don't think that abuse necessarily implies intent. For instance many people used to think that it was beneficial to beat their children. I don't think that they were intentionally abusing their children, but the impact on the beaten child is that of being abused. I don't think she meant anything by it because, like many people in this thread, I don't think that she understood the gravity of what she was doing or the potential impact that it could have on me. Men and boys are not seen as vulner…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 05:25 AM
2

If giving unsolicited sexually explicit reading material to a minor without their parents' knowledge is not considered sexual abuse, the definition needs to be expanded.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 10:45 PM
6

Yes, it was an adult sexual romance book with explicit sex scenes written by and for adult women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 10:39 PM
2

"The fun in a meet cute for a romance reader is the snap, crackle, pop of the moment that sets the entire course of the romance novel into motion. As an author, the meet cute isn’t just about bringing the couple onto the same paghttps://writewithharte.com/how-to-write-a-swoonworthy-meet-cute/e of your book. It’s about making that meeting unforgettable. The spark is the heartbeat of the meet cute, the moment when everything changes, and the air crackles with possibility. It’s the magic that trans…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 10:34 PM
4

Women fantasize about taming wild beasts, and these books were written to titillate those fantasies. The male characters in them had all of the inner depth of the flag girl in a racing video game. My perspective being built from the romance novels, I thought that women really liked quiet, stoic men who stared at them with sexual intensity that they could barely contain. Learning otherwise was traumatic for me and unpleasant for several women, some of whom were kinder about it than others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 10:27 PM
2

Can you cite the study please? I'd like to read through it. I have trouble imagining how the study's author justified the structure of the study. A control group of white paint and a few groups of different color paint seems obvious. For this reason, and because the study wasn't cited in the first place, I'm going to take a guess and say that this is the "I heard about a study" sort of pseudoscience misinformation. Unless you can cite the study, please?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 06:35 PM
1

it's reality, No it isn't. It's a warped view. A reflection of what you expect to see. You can convince yourself of anything with this sort of mushy thinking.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 06:47 AM
27

In cartoon meme language I would put a black man in a cage behind the starting line.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 05:35 AM
-3

Well, they're not wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 12:16 PM
4

Feminism is spreading androphobia. Being feared is not a privilege. Stop the moral panic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/24 11:58 AM
4

Australian feminists got the Red Pill documentary canceled from many movie theaters. Erin Pizzey, founder of the first domestic violence shelter in the UK, was excommunicated from mainstream feminism for advocating for domestic violence shelter access for men. Mary Koss, award winning feminist academy researcher, insists that when a man is forced to penetrate a woman, that is not rape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 03:45 AM
-1

We have no context Exactly. We have one side of a story. A lawsuit filing. Meticulously constructed by a lawyer to spin things in his favor as much as possible, with no response. We should wait for a response, get some perspective, and think a little bit before we jump to support every single person who files a lawsuit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/24 05:39 PM
-5

Yeah, the lawsuit happened. Any of the things alleged in the lawsuit, who the hell knows? Certainly not us. Do you believe everything you read in a lawsuit? I'm pretty sure we can find a better poster boy than this "alpha male."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/24 04:28 AM
-4

Did this even happen? I have no idea. Could we get some higher standards in here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/24 09:20 PM
2

Anecdotes are not evidence.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:16 PM
-10

Muttering under her breath does not equal verbal abuse. Glaring back at you while you stare at her hard enough to determine if she has anything in either ear is not her harassing you. Get a grip.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 03:57 PM
2

The Left has been actively scorning them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/24 02:59 AM
1

This idea that not engaging with anyone who disagrees with you about something is some sort of virtue is not very helpful. How is avoiding people going to change anything? It's just making yourself miserable for no good reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 01:39 PM
1

I have a feeling that being exposed to too much misandry can be harmful Not as harmful as isolation, which is what you'll get if you cut every casual misandrist out of your life. about categorically cutting off misandrist friends, It takes a lot for me to cut off a friend. Cut off your nose to spite your face.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 01:16 PM
82

I have a lot of misandrist acquaintances, since casual misandry is used as virtue signaling in many leftist communities. I usually just don't say anything. Since that is the expectation for male-presenting people in these situations anyway, it isn't hard to blend in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/24 03:59 PM
1

Anger is the only emotion that society is capable of recognizing is men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 02:49 AM
0

You've moved the goal post (all crimes to murder) and you haven't addressed my argument or provided any evidence for your declarative statement. Please try again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/24 02:30 PM
6

Is it even true? The vast majority of crimes are not solved. How do we know the identities of the perpetrators? We know that of those convicted, most are men. But we also know that the legal system discriminates against men. We have no way of knowing how much of the disparity is based on that discrimination and how much, if any, is based in male criminality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 11:41 AM
-1

I'm not embarrassed. If it's so easy to provide a source for your specific claims, go ahead and do it please.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 12:39 PM
-1

So we're just making up statistics now. Sure, why not?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 12:37 PM
-1

Citation required.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:51 PM
-4

Only passing men. No non binary folks. You're making yourself a little bigot convention! TERFs developed the exact same way, out of women's groups that excluded men. Right down to the exact same language of expectation. "Womyn born womyn" and "lived experience." They had to bend and twist and squint in order to parse their bigotry in just exactly the precise way that would exclude who they wanted to exclude. And for what? A lesbian music festival? A space to speak your mind without worrying abou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 03:47 AM
0

So if someone looks like a woman to you, but they say that they are non binary or trans masculine, than they are welcome?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 03:14 AM
-3

Are trans men invited? How about non binary folks?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 02:16 AM
-7

Women have Women's only places And what is your opinion of the discourse that these spaces create? why can't men have theirs? Just because feminists are being sexist doesn't mean that we should imitate them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 12:19 AM
-3

I understand the impulse. But you're missing the mark. You're making the mistake of essentializing bad behavior to gender and excluding the gender rather than those who exhibit the bad behavior. Since some men suck up all the oxygen, and some women don't, excluding women doesn't create a safe space. Focus on the behavior, not the gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 12:17 AM
-9

Self segregating is not good. Do not exclude women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/24 01:57 PM
8

Not sure why you are getting downvoted on this.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 04:08 PM
1

Universal mandatory genetic testing. What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights18/03/24 02:22 PM
2

The argument is much stronger for sexism than for conservatism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/24 02:07 PM
-10

You're talking about the Andrew Tate who recently got arrested for planning to flee Romania during his sex trafficking trial. That Andrew Tate?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/24 04:36 PM
0

Maybe it's the way you're telling the story. It looks like you're say that the teacher sat down with the volleyball team after he received documents informing him that he was suspended and showed them to you.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 03:43 AM
-7

How do you know the exact contents of the documents that your teacher received? Seems sus.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 02:39 AM
-12

You provided a bunch of data and then drew conclusions that don't follow from the data. C-
/r/MensRights11/03/24 09:07 PM
8

That isn't regulation. It's called repressive coping, and it isn't healthy. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22081940/
/r/MensRights07/03/24 04:42 PM
12

Imagine settling for someone who can't handle your emotions. What an anemic love that must be. The constant fear of rejection if you slip up and express yourself through crying. Traditionalists tell us not to cry. Feminists tell us we have to cry. You're both wrong. Men should cry when and only when we feel like crying. Fuck all the way off with your gender roles.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 02:46 PM
11

Definitely belongs here! And so do you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/24 04:18 AM
2

That isn't true. There are reliable sources. You're just not looking for them because they don't always tell you what you want to hear. If it wasn't for low standards you'd have no standards at all.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 07:00 PM
-4

The role of the public has deteriorated in the past 30 years to become less media literate and more gullible. If you can only find trash media reporting on a story, than maybe that should tell you something about the truth value of that story. But in this case, you can find lots of media all across the spectrum reporting on this. I mean, most of them don't talk about "radical feminazis" but it has been widely reported that the 1/4 rape statistics are wildly misinformative. CNN said campus rape s…
/r/MensRights03/03/24 06:57 PM
-6

>Honestly, would you like me to share a CNN or an MSNBC report instead? Ad Fontes Media rates CNN (website) in the Skews Left category of bias and as Reliable, Analysis/Fact Reporting in terms of reliability. Less partisan and more reliable. Yeah I would prefer that citation. Ad Fontes Media rates MSNBC (website) in the Strong Left category of bias and as Generally Reliable/Analysis OR Other Issues in terms of reliability. CNN has a mild partisan lean and is acceptably reliable. MSNBC is more pa…
/r/MensRights03/03/24 06:46 PM
2

Oh boy, here we go. Anyone who tells me that my sources are biased and unreliable, must be biased an unreliable. There couldn't possibly be anyone out there with journalistic standards so why not just pick the people who say what I already agree with and go with that? It's no way to think. And it's certainly no way to convince anyone who doesn't already agree with you. It's echo chamber circle jerking.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 06:35 PM
-23

Get your hyper partisan bs out of here. https://adfontesmedia.com/federalist-bias-and-reliability/ Ad Fontes Media rates The Federalist in the Hyper-Partisan Right category of bias and as Unreliable, Problematic in terms of reliability.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 04:20 PM
29

According to this Pew Research poll, 43% of adults who say feminism describes them very or somewhat well also say feminism is polarizing. ​ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 06:38 PM
2

Rape is the extreme degree of sexual coercion. All rape is sexual coercion, but not all sexual coercion is rape. In the same way all billionaires are rich, but not all of the rich are billionaires. Of course what matters most to you personally is how you feel about what happened to you. If you your violation experience feels like rape it would be insane to argue with you. We still need to be able to intellectually distinguish between degrees of sexual coercion in order to have a meaningful conve…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 06:02 PM
0

It's amazing. Just replace some of the keywords with others and this looks exactly like feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 05:20 PM
1

I understand what you're saying, but I disagree. It's difficult but important to understand the differences in degree between various sex crimes. It feels wrong because our moral intuition gets overwhelmed by the gravity of the crime. It's similar to large numbers. It is difficult to think intuitively about the difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars. They feel the same but there are vast and important differences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 05:15 PM
0

That really sucks. I hope that you're doing better now? It's a bit sus to point out someone's race when it isn't relevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 02:40 PM
5

An ex lied to me claiming that I gave them an STI, A very similar thing happened to me. I hooked up with a woman and I told her I get cold sores, so she didn't want me kissing her on the lips. All well and good. I got home and checked my social media (MySpace at the time) and saw that she claimed she had a cold sore and I gave it to her so I must have kissed her while she was blacked out. She had only had a couple drinks and we had never made lip contact. I looked up the incubation period for my…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 08:25 PM
12

Women who hate men raise boys who hate themselves That is a powerfully profound statement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 08:12 PM
6

She's the mother of my children so she'll probably always be in my life. I would wish her dead but that would hurt the children. I think living well is the best revenge. Every connection I make, every moment of joy or transcendence, is partially to spite her. I know that she is miserable because she still tries to hurt me in every petty way that she can. It's just so pathetic and sad how invested she still is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 07:22 PM
2

Thank you. It feels good to know that someone understands.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 07:16 PM
9

I can understand why some people would do that but I think it's a mistake. One of the tragedies of betrayal is that it damages the ability to trust. Forming healthy trusting relationships is how we become the most human. When I choose to trust, it is to spite all those who have betrayed and hurt me. Living well is the best revenge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 07:14 PM
10

Here's to all the silent victims!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 05:16 PM
11

That is horrible! What do you even call that? There should be some sort of shorthand terminology for being tricked into parenthood. It should be a crime on par with rape. She should have to register as a sex offender for even trying that, let alone pulling it off! You're not still married to her, are you? I can't imagine trying to build an equitable relationship on that foundation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 04:58 PM
16

Yeah, I'll give you that one. But I survived and now I am thriving. I have a lot of trouble acknowledging how bad I've had it because in the end I'm still relatively privileged compared to a lot of men. My story is horrible but what I'm really trying to do is open a space for others to tell their stories too, so that we can recognize that we're all living different facets of a common experience. I went through hell. But I came through it with 50/50 custody and 50k in alimony. She threatened me a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 03:33 PM
2

Have you tried applying this method with any feminists in online discourse? Go on over to r/feminism and ask them to critically analyze the wage gap and let me know how quickly you get banned. Actually no, don't do that. My telling you to to argue with a feminist sub will get this sub accused of brigading.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 03:01 PM
38

My life is a cake walk compared to many. I've never been raped and then told that it doesn't count as rape because I was forced to penetrate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 02:38 PM
2

One of the benefits of privilege is that you don't have to see it.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 05:08 PM
1

Can I get a hit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 08:29 PM
3

Exactly. The poll doesn't say anything about lesbians as a whole. It says something about people who answer a survey claiming to be lesbians on an a poll at msnbc.com. It's junk science. There are much broader surveys using much more reliable methods, and you have to wonder why those results weren't discussed.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:36 PM
51

Look into that recent study. If it's a feminist researcher I'll bet it has a cherry picked sample size of 15. Edit : Oh, a sample size of 283 lesbians, surveyed on msnbc.com. The cutting edge of reliable social science research is unconfirmed internet surveys. /s
/r/MensRights27/02/24 01:13 PM
2

Do you believe that academic standards are lower in gender studies than in other humanities fields? (I do)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/24 05:56 AM
77

Stay the hell away from her.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 08:01 PM
-6

Lying bigoted grifters get no kindness from me.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:44 PM
-5

Yeah, Jordan Peterson is a tragic man-child with a very messy room.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:44 PM
1

So eventually you just couldn't take it anymore and you quit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 09:49 PM
9

It's not a example. It's the standard, set by Mary P Koss, a feminist hero with a list of awards. She designed the categories for the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, which is the flagship CDC survey that most of our statistics on sexual violence come from. And it doesn't categorize "being made to penetrate" as rape. I'll say that again. The NIPSVS, designed by feminist academics, does not categorize it as rape when a man is forced to penetrate a woman. https://soundcloud.co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 09:42 PM
1

I think Beck said it best.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 07:59 AM
24

Anyone who is willing to consider other beliefs will not be a feminist for long. Imagine learning that feminist academia doesn't call it rape when a man is forced to have sex with a woman, and still being a feminist. It doesn't work. Feminism is an ideology detached from reality. Like all successful ideologies it inoculates itself against conversion. The feminist rank and file are told by their leaders that we are going to chase them around the internet harassing them if they talk to us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 07:56 AM
1

Ewww. Mike Pence lite. How do you react to such a request?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 06:32 AM
1

What happened?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 06:31 AM
2

Hmmm... I think that this bias is the root cause of the stubbornness of the wage gap. It is well established that parenthood is the major driver of the wage gap. The solution is for men to do more childcare. But men who want to do childcare are treated like shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 06:30 AM
1

Not entirely certain. She already had my wife's phone number because they were my wife's friends in the first place so it may have been an oversite. The father was so sleep deprived when I took the baby he could have forgotten anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 06:24 AM
6

No worries. I was just being snarky.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/24 11:52 PM
4

From what I hear (I wasn't there at the time) gaming culture in the 80s and 90s was casually sexist and homophobic. Entreaties were made and things were changed. By the time that I got into gaming in the late 90s, I already simply didn't see any of the toxic behavior that I have been told about. There were a few holdout communities but they were being actively shunned by the mainstream, where norms had already changed. It was not lost on me that the neutral pronoun in all of the D&D books was "s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/24 10:29 PM
13

Gamergate was reactionary. Which is to say that it was a reaction to developments that those involved didn't like, attempting to maintain the status quo or go back to a previous status quo. It was not a proactive movement trying to make change. So what was gamergate reacting to? An aggressive feminist campaign, from the outside, to disrupt and destroy what it saw as a "toxic boys club." This was feminist frequency's heyday. Sarkesian was obviously not a gaming insider, was obviously lying to any…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/24 07:22 PM
2

Why don't you think you can talk to your parents?
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:06 PM
18

Well, he told you to ask. Never said that he would answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/24 04:10 PM
2

I think it's even more interesting to compare modern MR talking points to feminists talking points from 50 years ago. In some ways it's a closer match.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/24 02:42 PM
1

When a private company decides to stop paying women to walk around in skimpy clothes, that is not a violation of liberties. You are demonstrating the fact that you have no perspective.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 11:51 PM
1

Women seem to be defiant I see.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 08:52 PM
7

I went to a class for how to grow house plants at a local business. There was a woman there asking a lot of the same sorts of questions I was asking. So i said hey, do you want to get together and talk about plants? She was like yeah, can my husband come? They're coming over tomorrow for dinner.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 08:33 PM
5

it's like some crazy epidemic that no one is talking about. Lmao
/r/MensRights22/02/24 08:29 PM
-1

So you're emulating feminists?
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:37 PM
-5

Yeah, the company that owns F1 decided to try appealing to anyone else except creepy dudes and voluntarily stopped hiring women that they called girls to walk around in skimpy clothes. In 2018. That is the biggest issue facing men, deserves all of our attention, and in know way distracts from important advocacy or makes us look bad. /s "While the practice of employing grid girls has been a staple of Formula 1 Grands Prix for decades, we feel this custom does not resonate with our brand values an…
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:35 PM
-2

And yet somehow hooters survives. I guess the femiNAZIS aren't as powerful as you think. It's almost like feminists not liking something has no impact on you at all. When you complain about this petty bullshit it makes the whole movement look like a bunch of creepy old losers with no real problems to worry about. Just stfu until you have something important to say.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:48 PM
-9

Yay hooters? This sub is a train wreck.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 05:49 PM
9

Sexist double standards in dating? I don't buy it. /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/24 05:11 PM
4

Point conceded. Damn you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/24 02:52 PM
17

Edit : Stop upvoting this! I was wrong and I admitted it down thread. The only one of those posts that admits any changes need to be made within feminism is the last one. That only claims that it is a "marketing issue," and even that only has 2 up votes (himself and you I'm guessing). So no, I don't see that as particularly hopeful. The obvious answer to the question is staring us in the face. It's because feminism does not speak to the lived experience of men and actively scorns the idea of add…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/24 02:16 PM
6

Yeah, it's not that simple. For exactly the same reason that it is very difficult to prove a rape, it is also very difficult to prove a false accusation. In most cases, it's two people alone in a room and if they disagree about what happened in the room. Or actually they agree on what happened (sex) but they disagree about the verbal and non verbal communication that accompanied it (consent). It's very often that there simply is no reliable evidence either way, so the conversation moves to surro…
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:37 AM
1

In what way was anyone fucking around? I don't think that you read the article.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:16 AM
1

A trans teanager was recently beaten to death by three girls in a bathroom in Oklahoma. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/nex-benedict-dead-oklahoma-b2499332.html
/r/MensRights21/02/24 03:42 AM
1

No chauvinism, thank you. Move along.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:13 AM
-1

Yea, I am convinced by your cogent argument. The man upset that he lost his third chance to be mesmerized by high school students dancing and had to teach band class instead for the same wage is suffering severe discrimination. /s
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:05 AM
-1

He's taught the class several times before, is mesmerized by the sight of dancing teenagers, and he's so very upset that they asked him to teach band instead. What can I do about the terrible discrimination of being asked to so something else for the same amount of money, after being mesmerized by high school students dancing? Read between the lines. This guy is self reporting.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:00 AM
-3

Ummm... Getting mesmerized by high school kids dancing in unison sounds an awful lot like creepily staring at children. Did you get paid for the day? What exactly did you miss out on, besides the opportunity to watch children dance?
/r/MensRights20/02/24 09:34 PM
9

There has got to be a title IX complaint in there somewhere. And an equal protection lawsuit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/24 09:07 PM
1

Your OP appears to be challenging the idea that men face double standards. I think if you look at how you phrase the OP, you can see how that is a reasonable interpretation. I would like to see you write that you recognize the validity of a lot of the double standards that you've been told about it this thread.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/24 07:28 PM
6

I've been teaching my wife how to recognize and validate my emotions. It's slow work but we're making progress.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/24 06:35 PM
1

Okay then so if I then decide to trust women again and I get hurt again because they betray that trust would you then go and blame me for trusting the wrong woman? No, I wouldn't blame you for someone else's actions. I would say that you were brave and that sometimes brave people get hurt. I would also try to teach you some skills to identify red flaga before you invest. And no, having a vagina is not a red flag. Why are you demonizing me for this choice? You're not a demon. You're a person in p…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 07:59 AM
1

The only difference between me and women / feminists is that I don't go around announcing my story and why i'm cautious and expressly tell other people to also be cautious because of what happened to me... That's exactly what you're doing here. Until you've been in the situation I have been in you can't really judge me for taking reasonable steps to protect myself from being hurt If that action is to never trust a woman again, than yes I can judge you. You are not responsible for what happened t…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 08:17 PM
7

Really? What exactly made me think you were being argumentative?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/24 08:11 PM
38

FGM is illegal in the US but I got circumcised. If I am forced to have sex with a woman, it isn't considered rape. There are still woman-only college scholarships despite the fact that women have been the majority of US college graduates since the 80s. Should I go on or do you concede the point?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/24 04:38 PM
1

I don't think that it is. You sound miserable and defeated. No one to emulate, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 06:34 AM
-2

those experiences have scarred me for life That's a shame. because of my experiences I am now highly cautious around women It's understandable, but it's the wrong move. WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARD!? You can tell that it's wrong when feminists do it. But you think that their bad faith excuses your own. You're only hurting yourself. We should aim to do better than feminism.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 07:11 PM
-17

The common factor in all of these relationships is you. What can you do to make sure that this doesn't happen again? One strategy that I have used is to make myself vulnerable in the early stages of a relationship and observe her reactions. Some women are like you describe. Some women are not. You can only tell once you've given them the opportunity to demonstrate how they react to male vulnerability. For instance there was this one lady I was talking to a while back, and it was going really gre…
/r/MensRights18/02/24 04:28 PM
-19

If one person violates your trust, stop trusting that one person. Don't throw out the entire concept of trusting. You're only going to make yourself miserable.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 04:16 PM
-40

What a sad shrunken creature you have allowed yourself to become. Lose your ability to trust if you must. Don't make a virtue of it.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 04:11 PM
1

Sounds like a really fun date. /s A couple Goldman Sachs bankers took me out to dinner once and I got to grill them on their roll in the 2008 meltdown (saw it coming, lied to get ahead of it, profited from it). Wasn't as satisfying as you would think.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 01:09 AM
2

Yeah, but.. isn't he a sex trafficker?
/r/MensRights15/02/24 08:00 PM
2

Yeah, but he's a sex trafficker.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 08:00 PM
1

When they came to make fun of the sex trafficker with the weird face, I was not a sex trafficker with a weird face, so I said nothing.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 07:58 PM
1

You don't talk about your work at parties? That sounds odd. It's like, a cliche ice breaker question.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 04:22 AM
2

Before you go into a private place with a woman where she has the opportunity to claim that you raped her, you have the opportunity to talk to her. Get to know her. Really figure out how she ticks. She's going to want to talk with you for several hours before you are alone, because she's trying to figure out if you're going to rape her. Give her the time to figure out if you're going to rape her, and she will give you the time to figure out if she is going to claim that you raped her. Now it's j…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 03:32 PM
2

I'm sorry, I think I got turned around. I was looking for the feminist sub where we obsess about all men being potential rapists. But this seems to be the MRA sub where we obsess about all women being potentially duplicitous. It's so hard to keep track.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 03:29 PM
-3

Have you ever tried posting about women's issues here? You'll get the exact same response. The reason is the same in both cases. They are certain that they are right but actually terrified that they are wrong. They don't want to consider contrary opinions because deep down they know that they're wrong and they don't want to admit it.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 06:45 PM
3

Nope. The solution is not to create a parallel sexist structure. Why would we want to act just like feminists? We need communities of men and women not being sexist.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 05:02 AM
0

Profiling is how people make decisions regarding people that they don't know. Everyone does it. It is perfectly normal. Imagine trying to navigate the world without profiling. When a person in a position of power, it is important that they profile in the appropriate manner because of the consequences. So for example when a police officer interacts with someone, they are supposed to profile the person to determine how much of a threat they are. When the police use skin color as an indicator of da…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:25 PM
-3

> We live in a world where women go out clubbing, drink alcohol, have male friends, and the whole world justifies that behavior People are upvoting this? What the fuck?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:13 PM
1

I say that MRAs have a blind spot for women's issues, and your response is that you're an MRA and that you can't see any women's issues. Think on it.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 12:56 PM
-7

You're not wrong about feminism. But you give MRAs a bit too much of a pass. I'm not usually into "both sides" arguments but I really do think that it's true in this case. Men and women both do have it really tough in some ways, and have a lot of privileges in other ways. Each side has a very thorough understanding of the problems that they are facing, but each side is also convinced that the other side has no legitimate problems to worry about. Because each side has a blind spot for the problem…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 02:46 PM
2

It's amazing how if you just switch around the details, feminist language and MRA language looks almost identical. Basically it's two groups of people who are right about a bunch of stuff and wrong about the other group of people sucking, yelling at each other.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 11:47 AM
2

It's almost like some women want to be approached and some don't.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 11:45 AM
2

Not a lot of projecting. Just you doing it once because you thought it was clever and then me doing it once to mock you.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:17 AM
0

And what opinion, preconceived judgement, conviction, or irrational suspicion are you objecting to exactly? A woman walking home from work, is approached by a strange male who is much larger than her on a dark empty street. He makes an awkward comment that is rude and suggestive as he invades her personal space. "Hey sexy, you should smile more!" When she ignores him he starts cursing at her as she walks away. Half of the women I know have a story like this. And they're scared. Instead of being …
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:15 AM
3

How does it make you feel to beat your wife? AH
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:01 AM
0

>If you choose to live your life in constant fear of anyone physically larger than you then you'll often be in fear, and that's no way to go through life. Yeah, I wouldn't recommend it. But it is how many women think. Many women are in constant fear of getting assaulted whenever a strange man approaches them. At least that's what a bunch of women keep on telling me. And how does that impact you? Not one iota. You don't have to put one minute of thought into it. In fact you can actively scorn the…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:00 AM
3

Well yeah, I think you're right that there's a double standard there. But getting mad at women for doing something that you admit is reasonable isn't going to help anything. We should focus our anger at the people doing something objectionable. And that is the people who are telling men to harden up. When you complain about women being reasonably cautious, you're actually going in the wrong direction. If equality means that everyone is scared and no one is safe, what's the point?
/r/MensRights11/02/24 09:53 AM
-8

There's no need to gender it. Technically true. If you happen to be smaller and weaker than the woman you are approaching, you don't have to worry about this. But if you're a head taller and 30 lbs of muscle heavier than the woman that you're talking to, it would be good for you to keep in mind that she knows that you could level her with one punch. you believe women should be protected and coddled and given a pass on everything while men should be treated worse than shit. No I don't. That's one…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 06:46 AM
-1

You already agree with me, you just don't realize it. Even though the vast majority of women are decent people who would never use their social power to hurt an innocent man, the fact that most women could if they want to should make men justifiably cautious when entering into a relationship with a woman. Even though the vast majority of men are decent people who would never use their physical power to hurt an innocent woman, the fact that most men could if they want to should make women justifi…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 06:35 AM
-2

In what way is that prejudicial?
/r/MensRights11/02/24 06:25 AM
-22

It's not that they think the average man is a violent qsychopah. It's that they know that some are, and they have no way of knowing if the particular person hitting on them is violent or not until after they reject him. This can make getting hit on very scary for women, unless you do it in an appropriate way. Understanding this can help you to make it less scary for them, which will give you much better chances.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:09 AM
0

how wrong using somebody sexually is dependent on where and how it's done. Yes. That is an empirically true statement according to every ethical framework that I know of, and intuitively obvious to anyone with a properly calibrated moral compass.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 10:35 PM
1

Which is worse? Scooping a thousand pennies out of the tray by the cash register, or robbing exactly one bank?
/r/MensRights10/02/24 04:47 PM
1

Yes. You said that. And you're wrong. From a utilitarian ethical perspective, from a divine command ethical perspective. From a legal perspective. From an intuitive moral perspective. There is no coherent moral framework that agrees with you. It's like slapping a thousand people in the face or shooting one person in the face. One of the main reasons that people claim watching porn is bad is because it encourages people to do things like sexually assault coworkers.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 04:43 PM
-8

OK. So instead of posting this, you could have posted a statistical analysis of sentencing disparities. You'd have a stronger argument that you could make right now. Just a friendly suggestion.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:56 PM
-1

It's funny because the feminist subs are having very similar conversation where they are convincing each other that they are facing rampant discrimination in the workforce, with a similar lack of evidence.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 08:36 PM
2

That really sucks. I can see that you are hurting and your emotions are valid. Don't let her ruin you for everyone. There are women out there who will recognize your intrinsic value. Don't give up hope and don't settle for anyone who doesn't treat you with the care and support that you deserve. Your next chapter is going to be better than your last.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 06:51 PM
11

Have you spoken with your wife about this?
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:49 PM
1

Stay in school.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 04:34 PM
-24

You are literally reading a report of a prosecution.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 03:41 PM
-5

Rage bait anecdotes are not helpful.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 03:39 PM
19

I got 50/50 custody and 50k alimony after my ex wife painted me as an abusive drug addict and tried to force me to pay child support for supervised visitation.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 03:12 PM
3

Very well put!
/r/MensRights09/02/24 02:33 PM
-14

I think you just answered your own question. Conflating White racial grievance with men's rights is also something I've seen here. A while back I called out TinMenBlog for making inaccurate statistical claims that did this. The mods defended him and said that we should be more charitable in how I interpreted him. So, maybe that has something to do with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/24 09:52 PM
4

You say that watching porn is worse than slapping a coworker on the butt without consent. Something is seriously off with your moral compass.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 08:55 PM
1

What do you expect? People don't admit that they're wrong. If you're lucky, 1 in 10 people that you speak with will modify their opinions very slightly in your favor. But they'll do that after they're done talking with you and they'll edit their memory so that it's what they believed the whole time. You are never going to get the "oh woooow, you're right and I'm wrong" moment that you're hoping for. It just doesn't happen. This isn't about feminism. This is about people. People very rarely chang…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:50 AM
3

>being called out for genuine wrongdoing and the male demonizing produce the exact same feelings This is where you're going wrong. You're trying to use your feelings as a source of information. They aren't. When you are called out, you need to regulate your feelings well enough to set them aside and rationally determine if you are in the wrong or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/24 11:13 AM
7

In debate land, this is called a goalpost argument. The claim has the implicit assumption that mortality is the prime measurement for allocating concern. Unpack that assumption. In the US men die 6 years younger than women on average. So if we're using mortality as the measuring stick for concern, than men should be receiving the lion's share of concern. Your interlocutor is not using consistent methods to allocate concern. They use mortality to raise concern for women when it is convenient, and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/23 03:03 PM
2

You're using a standard that nobody else is held to. It's common for influencer advocates to make money doing it. I don't think it's great either. But everyone else is doing it to. Why do you single out Roma army?
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:19 AM
2

I never heard of anyone that had a cause (or fought), for a group of people, who also wanted money from that very same group. Bullshit. I can list a dozen right off the top of my head. It's the norm for influencer advocates to make money off it. "If you want to support my channel" is a stock phrase. Patreon, merch, sponsors. It's unusual not to do it.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 03:15 PM
6

This is bullshit rage bait. I doubt that OP even rides the subway. Feminists don't stalk the subways reading everyone's phones to check what subreddit they're using.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 01:21 PM
0

Yeah. Your 15 year old poster is not good enough. Obviously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 04:22 PM
1

According to your link, in 2008 20 copies of a flier were posted on bulletin boards at Coastal Carolina University. In 2015 someone posted it on reddit and a bunch of people talked about how bad an idea it is. And that's it. That's the best example that you have? You're recycling a straw man from 15 years ago. Can you find me someone making this point in 2023?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/23 02:55 PM
-2

they pretend that if a girl and a guy have been drinking before intercourse, he has automatically raped her. Bullshit. Show me anyone saying this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/23 03:26 AM
2

Universal government mandated genetic testing? Hard pass.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 05:32 PM
3

Men get raped plenty.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 09:10 PM
2

That's a very broad brush you've got there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 11:22 PM
1

That's probably a good idea. It's a tough needle to thread but you're doing a good job.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/23 01:43 PM
4

This is building up into a sweeping Equal Protection decision. Evidence is overwhelming and still mounting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/23 03:55 PM
-1

The comments in this thread answer the question through example. Cringe AF
/r/MensRights19/08/23 03:30 PM
2

This thread is cringe AF. Don't y'all have any self awareness?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 03:09 PM
4

Peterson is a whiny little lying bitch.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 05:16 PM
0

Stop with the rage bait anecdotes.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 05:11 PM
79

It is also common for women to complain about men taking too long. The woman's role in helping to time the man's climax is not mentioned. Meanwhile men are considered responsible for the occurrence and timing of female orgasm. If a man takes too long or not long enough or loses his erection without having any climax, that is his fault. If a woman doesn't have an orgasm that is also the man's fault. This is all rooted in the traditionalist view of men as sexual agents and women as sexual passive …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/23 10:14 AM
9

As the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles taught me, sometimes it's cool to be totally radical, dude. The technical definition of the word is "relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough." In the political sense, the word means "advocating or based on thorough or complete political or social change; representing or supporting an extreme or progressive section of a political party." A "reactionary" is someone who wants to undo change. Traditionalist MRAs are r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/23 02:08 PM
1

Oh, right. Whoops.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 04:29 PM
56

You missed a big one. False accusation as a method of abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/23 03:02 PM
-2

It says the divorce was filed in 2014. It was written in 2017. That's 3 years. Where does 16 years come from?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:27 PM
-29

Rage bait bullshit. Patch, citing "source." And 2014 wasn't 16 years ago. Gtf outa here.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 12:57 AM
1

Could you show us an example of this sub defending feminism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 06:38 PM
3

The Penguin had the best henchfolk. Catwoman was a loner folk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 06:12 PM
10

The correct term is henchpeople. /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 04:43 PM
2

Anita Sarkesian is a grifter. It is foolish to take her arguments at face value. She does not make them in good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/23 02:51 PM
9

Because some women don't like it. These same women ogle Chris Hemsworth in the Ghost Busters movie though, so it's easy to see that they're hypocritics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/23 07:44 AM
4

She isn't dead. She hasn't said anything publicly about the Barbie movie. So i guess the answer is, nothing. Not that she ever had anything interesting to say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/23 07:39 AM
6

The first thing to realize is that feminism is extremely conscious of language. Firemen are firefighters despite the fact that 88% of firefighters are men. Soldiers are Our Brave Men and Women despite the fact that they're 82% male. It is argued that these distinctions are important because we need to change the way we see these professions in order to create a more equal world. But it is important to see where feminism applies this standard and where it doesn't. Feminism did not create the syst…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/23 02:46 PM
3

David Goggins and Joe Rogan didn't do shit for you. You did that yourself. Take some credit for your own accomplishments. It's not like working out is some sort of secret that they told you about. Why don't you date morbidly obese women? There are plenty available. They are probably too shy to approach you first. You will have to approach them.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 12:29 PM
1

Yes. It is only a matter of time.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 02:38 AM
1

Men in prison are subject to a structural system that encourages violence. Just like black people in cities are subject to a structural system that encourages violence, which is why there is more black-on-black crime than white-on-white crime. You've got to pick a lane. If you want to be a female chauvinist than you have to be a racist too.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 12:55 AM
4

It is easy to demonstrate that the legal system discriminates against men. Just take all of the methods that demonstrate this for Black men, and apply it to men in general. The iron clad proof is that men receive longer sentences when convicted of the same crime with the same criminal history. There is similar discrimination all up and down the rest of the system. From women crying to get out of a speeding ticket to the rape factories that are male prisons, the legal system discriminates against…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:22 PM
14

We don't have universal suffrage now. Felons lose their right to vote. Depending on the state they could lose their right to vote for years after they do their time or even forever. This impacts men more than women because of the sexist legal system. So women have greater suffrage than men right now.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:51 PM
1

Just make sure to count her teeth to make sure your breeding mare is healthy.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:04 PM
-4

Ewwwww.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 02:14 PM
2

I didn't jump to conclusions. I made an assessment based on an analysis of your publication and your recent work for that publication that I have access to. As has been pointed out by others, the article you linked in OP is behind a paywall. If you would quote the part where you make a systemic criticism of capitalism or tradition gender roles, I would eat crow. But you can't do that because that isn't the sort of thing that the National Review publishes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/23 03:05 PM
1

If women are talking to you and then ghosting you, it's not an attractiveness thing. You are putting off initial interest through your behavior in some way. I know that it gets frustrating especially at your age. Try to have fun, be fun to be around. Be kind and considerate. Put a little effort in to finding interesting things to do. Make eye contact and smile.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:51 PM
1

Breaking news stories I'm assigned to write; I don't choose them. Right. So when you're writing for the National Review you're a right wing shill because that is the only stuff that the National Review publishes. It doesn't matter if you personally believe in left wing policies like Medicare for All because your editors at the National Review would never let you publish something like that. It doesn't matter if you're personally not interested in using our stories as fodder for the culture war, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/23 01:04 PM
1

You completely missed the point. Content warnings describe what is depicted. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/movie-reviews/beau-is-afraid "There's also a graphic sex scene. Male and female full-frontal nudity, kissing, and other sex-related images and dialogue." Describes the sex scene, doesn't mention that it's non consensual. The entire scene is a surreal fantasy. Hell, the entire movie is a surreal fantasy. But the suicide by drinking paint, the teen drug use, the violence. It is all mention…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/23 05:32 AM
0

I'm not interested in cheap hit culture war stuff. In the past 5 days you have published articles at the National Review on abortion, book bans, COVID conspiracy theories, marijuana at the White House, and immigration, all with a strong conservative slant. I've been vegan/vegetarian for over a decade, believe in a single-payer healthcare system, and support LBTQ+ communities. Easy for you to say. Show me the articles you published at the National Review that support these policies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/23 05:08 AM
2

Save your efforts until you are just about ready to leave anyway. Do your job really well and get good performance reviews. Cover your ass. For now, read the employee handbook cover to cover. Keep an eye out for what exactly they will fire you for. Plan what you can do that will question their narrative that is not a firable offense. When you don't need the job anymore, carry out your plan. Emails to your supervisor, what have you. Be good and loud to make sure they get the point. "I am going to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/23 03:58 AM
2

This does not belong on Left Wing Male Advocates. The national review is a right wing publication. They are staunchly conservative and traditionalist. They will ignore any systemic criticism of capitalism or traditional gender roles. They will mine your stories for culture war ammunition. https://adfontesmedia.com/national-review-bias-and-reliability/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/23 08:22 AM
-1

You go on Instagram to rant about degeneracy to people you don't know and you think that this is somehow improving the world. Cringe AF.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 01:51 PM
-3

She has no career and still has kids to raise. 40% of his income after a 20 year marriage seems reasonable. After his kids age out of child support it will become much less. She is in her 40s with no social security and no career. She needs that alimony to have a comfortable retirement. That leaves him with 60% of a 6 figure salary to support just himself, and it will be more like 80% when the kids are grown. Plus he will get social security when he retires. That is a better position than most p…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:41 PM
1

File a title IX complaint for a "hostile environment." The school should protect you from being harassed.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 01:08 PM
7

This story is bullshit rage bait. 100k for a lawyer to fight for custody? I paid a 5k flat fee and got 50/50 custody.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 02:28 PM
3

DO NOT FEED CHILDREN WITHOUT THEIR GUARDIAN'S PERMISSION. It's simple etiquette. Anyone who has kids or interacts with kids regularly knows this. Lots of people are telling you this. Nobody is asking you to apologize. Just don't do it again.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 01:01 PM
3

I would say the same thing if it were a woman buying sugar for strangers in the park. It doesn't make you "a good person at heart." It's a cheap way to steel a smile from a person who is too innocent to understand that a lot of sugar isn't good for them. if the child isn't obese already, it's just because the parents are doing a good job keeping them away from sugar. You aren't helping. You aren't doing something good. You are being obnoxious and yes, creepy. If a bunch of people are saying it, …
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:35 AM
7

You shouldn't give sugar to children without checking with their guardians first.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:25 AM
0

wtf does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights28/06/23 09:55 PM
37

You touched someone's hair, with verbal permission, in public, on your fourth date. You didn't do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 10:53 PM
67

People have called the police several times believing that the children I was watching were unattended. If I forget water on the way to the park, somehow none of the mothers there have any to spare.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 05:59 PM
35

Just chill. Ain't no thing. This reminds me of women who think that they have to walk to their car with their keys clenched like brass knuckles because feminists have convinced them, against all evidence, that there is a rapist hiding under their car. In the future just say "oh sorry. I didn't mean to brush up against you like that."
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:00 AM
1

The wage gap is mostly the result of two factors... men choosing higher paying careers, and women taking time off for family leave. Another big factor is that women do not negotiate as aggressively for initial pay and raises. with all of those factors accounted for, there is still a 2-5% wage gap left that comes down to discrimination. It is illegal but many companies get away with it anyway. go figure.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 02:42 AM
3

You don't understand AI language models very well. They do not think. Asking a current generation language model what it thinks will get you a boilerplate amalgamation of what most of the words in its training data that are related to the key words that you asked it for. If you ask Google what it thinks about a key word, it will not express an opinion that the search engine AI has. It will give you a list of websites that other people who have searched the same keywords go to.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 08:43 AM
3

If your grandmother lied to you it's conceivable that she lied to your mother.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 04:42 PM
2

I would have a hard time trusting someone who lied to me so consistently for years. Have you confronted your grandmother about this? You need to get access to you bio father and grandfather's medical records. Some diseases like cancer have genetic components.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 04:29 PM
1

The first four frames are spot on! Fifth and sixth are pretty good. It gets pretty muddled after that. Is this the final product or are you still in feedback phase?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/23 04:01 PM
1

My ex wife dumped me because I was depressed. Then she tried to use mental health stigma in our custody battle. This is anecdote, not data. I'm just saying this conversation is very personal for me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/23 03:48 PM
1

cringe
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:35 PM
1

The reporter doesn't usually write the headline. The editor does.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:33 PM
1

I think the unintentional homoeroticism is hilarious. It's a circle that makes men hard and then soft again. it's also completely ahistorical. Just a simple glance at history provides unlimited counter examples.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:21 PM
2

Yeah, I hear you. I had a lot of trouble after my divorce, because we had moved to follow my wife's career and I had no local friends. But I got out there and made friends and it got better. Now I've got a girlfriend and we bought a house together and I've got some friends. I go out dancing, go on hikes, go to the dog park, I volunteer with community organizations. It wasn't always easy to get out of the house but it's worth it in the end to make the effort.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/23 02:04 PM
18

You're never going to know until you try. If your therapist isn't a good fit, get another one. When I got divorced, I had a lot of trouble getting back into the dating scene. I was having trouble learning how to trust again. I had a therapist who helped a lot. But it took a few tries to find him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/23 04:00 PM
1

Stoicism is the area of philosophy concerned with moderating and controlling internal mental state. In order to think virtuously, we must cultivate a certain mental state, in which we understand and control our emotions and motivations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/23 03:56 PM
5

My ex wife tried to say I was abusing her during the divorce. never went anywhere. They wouldn't even take her at the DV shelter because she was so obviously full of shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/23 02:58 PM
1

I'm ok with cancelling racism at work. this is something we're just going to have to disagree on. My girlfriend got a job at an office where racist remarks were commonplace. She reported it to HR. nothing changed. she reported it to HR again. Nobody got fired but the racist remarks stopped. You have a problem with that?
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:31 PM
1

Well we're never going to know because you didn't try. if we could demonstrate a pattern of sexual harassment complaints by men being ignored we could take your company to court and you could get paid out. But if you participate in the same behavior that made you uncomfortable, don't report it, and then do nothing but whine about it in an online echo chamber, you're not going to accomplish anything.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:26 PM
1

Now you know that if someone makes you uncomfortable at work by making unsolicited sexual comments, you can report it and they'll talk to the person about it. you didn't report it, so nothing changed. She reported it, so your boss talked to you about it.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 12:34 PM
1

When you left the door open with your dick out, that was her initiating? You know, it's funny. I never see women complaining about the fact that nobody shows them their dick at work anymore. Part of your story included multiple instances of you "taking it too far," being confronted, and apologizing.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 12:29 PM
1

So you're under the opinion that reporting racist comments at work is fascist, but making racist comments at work is fine. That's a point that should be underlined.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:36 AM
1

Holy shit. way to self report. When you say, that is how we bonded, what you're really saying is, you froze out any women who wouldn't submit to sexual harassment. Those women were only playing along because they knew if they complained they'd be fired or frozen out of the work culture. That is what every woman I've ever talked to about it who worked at the time has said, including my mother. I know you were having a blast. they were navigating a minefield just to make a living. How does your pe…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:14 AM
4

Yick. I feel slimy just being in the same thread as you. If a coworker says something racists, report it. don't save it for ammunition to fire back after you say something sexist. How would that even work? "hey Ted, we have to talk. Did call Monica a MILF the other day?" "maybe I did, maybe I didn't. but I've been secretly recording all of our conversations for years and 8 months ago she made a joke about gingers. So, we good here?"
/r/MensRights26/04/23 11:19 PM
-3

it was never ok, but it used to be tolerated. you are the problem here. Is this what Men's rights means to you? pining for the good old days of casual sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 11:14 PM
7

Questions work better than statements. ask her what she calls it when a man has sex against his will. https://soundcloud.com/889-wers/male-rape
/r/MensRights26/04/23 11:32 AM
1

So you believe that men should go without support because it increases our utility to society. You're not much of an MRA. You're a traditionalist chauvinist. Healthy people are of more use to society. People who receive the support that they need are healthier. Men should not be berated and demeaned as a class. it does not make use stronger or of more use. We should be supported 24/7. Society as a whole would be better off. This is both possible and beneficial. You have to use your imagination.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 03:58 AM
1

oh, now we're getting interesting. You want to explain to me why shaming and hating on men shouldn't ever change?
/r/MensRights26/04/23 02:44 AM
1

I'd rather take a stab at making a change than spend all my time convincing other people not to bother. I've got a long string of failures behind me. but also a few successes. and a lot of incremental change. what have you got? a long string of whining and dooming. "am I not a man and a brother?" look it up.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 12:51 AM
1

That isn't how change happens.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 12:37 AM
1

how inspirational.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 12:18 AM
1

women and men have different disadvantages. feminism has addressed most of the ways that women are disadvantaged. but I'm places where feminism doesn't hold sway, with still have it pretty bad in some ways. historically, women have had plenty of disadvantages. not being able to own property, attend school, participate in science, vote. if you go back far enough, women were little more than property. read Deuteronomy and tell me women had it good back then.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 12:15 AM
0

so if you just say you don't believe in the gender binary you're good to go.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 10:44 PM
-5

you sound like a feminist ranting about the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 08:29 PM
-4

She's not illegitimate. She's just very surface level. She hasn't read very much or thought very deeply. or at least she doesn't imbue her content with any ideas or analysis that would require deep thought. She is conventionally attractive and displays herself suggestively. I don't think that she would have much of a following if this were not true because she isn't really bringing anything to the table besides bland talking points in a pretty package.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:46 PM
-1

It's a probing question. I'm trying to determine where you're getting these terrible ideas from. experience from others. Who exactly? What experiences have they told you about?
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:30 PM
3

Where are you getting your information about the American dating scene?
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:23 PM
-7

Oh I'm sorry, am I in the wrong echo chamber?
/r/MensRights25/04/23 04:49 PM
-21

You left out key details of the story. like who you were criticizing, for what, and what you said. Kind of hard to understand what's going on without that information. maybe some screenshots of the conversation, with identifiers smudged out? unless what you really want is an uncritical echo chamber hug fest. that's it, isn't it? Your feelings are hurt and you need a safe space.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 03:58 PM
-10

Is it fair to blame an entire gender for the actions of half a dozen people, most of whom are children?
/r/MensRights25/04/23 03:43 PM
2

But are trans women invited?
/r/MensRights25/04/23 02:02 PM
12

Yeah, I know. I watched the movie. When an irrational fear is involuntarily forced on someone and proven irrational, people immediately understand what happened and are grateful. That's how that works, right? Turns out that the cure for crippling anxiety was being raped. who knew? He always needed to be raped but never knew it. silly man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/23 01:54 PM
-17

So you've projected your relationship with your family of origin onto half of the human race and now you can't empathize with or form meaningful relationships with them. understandable, but not condonable. you are emotionally crippled and the only one you're hurting is yourself. get some help.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 12:52 PM
1

Have you ever heard of "the soft bigotry of low expectations"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 09:42 PM
1

So you're saying that OP and all of his 30-something virgin, carless friends who are depressed because they can't live up to the expectations society has for them, are all living with their parents.... because their parents need help paying their bills. I just don't buy it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 09:32 PM
2

Yeah, this country is a real shit hole. not as bad as Australia but pretty bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 06:07 PM
9

Yes. You should spend your entire life trying to improve your situation. The struggle is real. If your past efforts have not been fruitful, step back and reassess. Then get back into it with a new plan. don't give up. don't just accept your shitty circumstances.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 04:02 PM
2

"There's nothing I can do to improve my situation." I don't believe you. I'm not telling you to bootstrap. I'm telling you to find some traction and push.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 03:55 PM
3

Her takes are surface level. She doesn't seem to have studied the history or the theory. It is all very low effort and I think that she is coasting on her looks.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:50 PM
11

A common misconception. There is a difference between accepting blame and accepting responsibility. Consider a child lost in a crowd. Clearly it is not the fault of a random adult in that crowd. But it is the responsibility of any adult who notices to help that child. Taking responsibility is the only way to improve the situation. It doesn't mean you accept the blame for creating the shitty circumstances. It means that nothing is going to change in your life until you change it. OP has two choic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 03:44 PM
-11

You're closing one eye and squinting to justify a charitable interpretation of OPs post. Yes it is more difficult to make ends meet for millennials than it was for older generations. But that doesn't explain OPs circumstances. Living with his parents in his 30s. That means that he's had over a decade of extended dependency. And he has more than one friend in the same situation. If they have been employed this whole time, even at a low paying job, if they're not paying bills they should have enou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 03:34 PM
-13

Why not? What the hell is wrong with taking responsibility?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 03:03 PM
2

Technically it isn't rape. By FBI and CDC definitions, being penetrated is rape. Being made to penetrate is aggravated sexual assault. Of course that's the point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 02:37 PM
9

I think that being jobless with no prospects living with your parents in your 30s is troubling enough for your mental health. Getting laid is the least of your problems. At a certain point practical steps to improve your situation is a better route than looking for people who accept your current situation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 12:56 PM
0

a lot of this depends on what state you are in. You need to do a lot of reading. you need to know the law better than the lawyers do so that you can choose the right lawyer. Know your rights. Find a good lawyer. Sounds like she doesn't have many independent resources, so I wouldn't expect a lengthy legal battle. it doesn't sound like you're going to be able to demonstrate a pattern of abuse or neglect. One video from years ago is just not enough. It doesn't look like she has much interest in the…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:13 AM
-8

Everything here is accurate except 7, which is MRA circle jerk victim claiming bs. If you know your rights, most states have gender neutral laws. doesn't mean you won't have to deal with individuals who are biased. but you can push through that if you know your rights.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 05:47 AM
20

The May Queen has the option of burning her boyfriend alive or burning a volunteer and chooses to burn him. Then she smiles while she watches.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 03:52 AM
4

That's horrible! You deserve better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 03:03 AM
5

I'm really sorry to hear that. I know it might be difficult but could you tell us about some of your experiences being dismissed?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 02:25 AM
20

He enters into the ritual knowingly and willingly. But then he gets freaked out and becomes less than enthusiastic. He literally attempts to withdraw but an old lady grabs his butt and works his hips for him until he cums. It is definitely rape. At least that's the movie. never read the book. is it different in the movie?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 10:24 PM
1

Would you mind defining woke?
/r/MensRights23/04/23 04:08 PM
43

Yeah. remember the rules are enthusiastic consent that can be, ahem, withdrawn at any time. Dude gets raped in midsommar too. It's like Aster is looking for the line of sexual violence that can be included in a film without anyone talking about it or the censors putting it in the ratings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/23 12:47 PM
2

Sky News doesn't give a shit about men. They're desperately looking for allies in their dying culture war.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:35 PM
-8

Feminists don't actually kill any men. It's just rhetoric for them. There is a consistent stream of incel mass shooters. That's the kind of thing that draws scrutiny from the FBI.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 04:13 PM
-1

Lie down with dogs and you're gonna get flees. Use rhetoric that a bunch of mass shooters use, the FBI is gonna keep track of you. That's their job.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 04:12 PM
2

You're not going to get anywhere arguing with him. you need to identify and address the emotional underpinning of his beliefs.
/r/ExRedPill18/04/23 02:10 AM
-4

Can you define woke for me please?
/r/MensRights12/04/23 03:28 PM
-6

You're right. I had forgotten how important it is to inform repeated abuse victims that it's their own stupid fault. Thank you for making the world a better place.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 08:15 PM
54

Feminists are very aware of the intricacies of precise language when it is convenient for them, very obtuse when it is not.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 02:05 PM
0

Tell your supervisor that you're really shaken and ask if they can set you up with a few sessions of counseling.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 01:56 PM
-13

Yeah. Battered women are just asking for it. What a cogent and helpful point. And they say men's rights has an optics problem. Cringe AF.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 12:56 PM
-15

First he attracts them, then he takes away their passports and forces them to work as cam girls to survive while they're making him rich.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 12:51 PM
48

No, you're not. Deep breath. lawyer. It is not as bad as you think. My ex tried to use the system against me too but I know my rights and I got a lawyer and I've got 50/50 custody. A judge is going to see right through that bullshit. They want both parents involved and her trying to cut you out is not what they want to see. You need to get a lawyer and make your case. She's not going to want to take it to a judge because she might lose, because you have evidence that she's a liar. You're probabl…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 03:30 AM
1

There isn't much to say. You have confirmed that your stance is milquetoast liberalism. There isn't much to be done with your points but underline them. You think that the boot on our neck is inevitable and eternal, and you don't have any aspirations to do anything about it. You don't have a sense of urgency about the collapse of our environment. You've already given up and your intention is to die and leave younger generations to clean up the mess, if we can. If that's what you want to do, fine…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/23 02:38 AM
2

Men's issues are usually not addressed as men's issues. The best way to gain sympathy for a men's issue is to focus on how it impacts an intersection that attracts more sympathy. For instance, black men with the criminal injustice system. By reforming the system so that fewer black men are killed and imprisoned, it helps all men. One angle that I think would receive more sympathy is neuro atypical men. A lot of the people that women read as creepy are really awkward, lonely, atypical men that ar…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 01:26 AM
17

There are sure to be men who have lost jobs because of this. All it takes is one good case to set precedent.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:32 PM
33

That's the spirit! Every great social movement needs someone standing around telling everyone not to bother doing anything because it's hopeless.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:30 PM
3

Good luck to you. uphill battle.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:16 PM
1

Did you forget about me?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/23 10:11 PM
4

You've stumbled upon one of the truths of social psychology. Most ideologues are using an ideology that they poorly understand to post hoc justify their existing prejudices. You can see it happen a lot on this sub too.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 02:14 PM
8

Don't engage with people while they are being rude. Set firm boundaries of what behavior you are willing to tolerate and what you are not. This will serve you well in life. If she agrees to a thoughtful conversation, you need facts. You need to read the academic research on the subject, and understand how to criticize it. Most feminist research is absolute crap. But you need to know how to show your work getting there. Here is a great example that fits your situation perfectly. https://www.tandf…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:56 PM
-2

I didn't move the goalposts. your examples didn't cross the goalposts where they stood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/23 01:41 PM
1

it's not a question of feelings. The slam dunk response is that the mortality gap changes in different cultural situations and is therefore at least partially a result of society.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:27 PM
-1

I looked through your examples. I think that they support my point. The second one has only 25 comments on a sub that routinely gets hundreds of comments for an interesting post, which indicates that it really isn't that big a deal to most people. Of the people who did engage, top two comments point out that he specifically went looking for a very young woman on a dating app that lets him sort for age, which is a red flag. I think that's a fair point. A few people saying that they think over dou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/23 01:23 PM
0

Imagine our society as a very large boat that turns very slowly. A whole bunch of professional navigators have been telling us that we're accelerating full speed towards a rocky cliff for over four decades now, and nobody has presented any rational argument why we shouldn't slow down and change course. But the captain and his officers don't want to change course. They are personally benefitting from the way things are going. So they're sabotaging the steering equipment and pouring muddy water on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/23 12:27 PM
-1

Ugh. milquetoast liberal tone policing. Look around. You're trying to have reasonable debates with trolls while fascists actively plot civil war in plane site. Have you ever read the Turner Diaries? They're not arguing in good faith. Nazi scum can't be reasoned with. They can only be defeated by humiliation. I've been in the antifa trenches for 20 years and I know what I'm talking about. For 45 years there's been an open conspiracy of rich scum fucks actively dismantling our civil society and co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/23 03:46 AM
3

and they say men's rights has an optics issue.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:03 PM
-1

I'm not telling you how to live. Have sex with whoever you want as long as they're consenting adults. or don't. none of my business. you should afford me the same privilege.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:02 PM
0

Tell me more. do you think that I'm a moral degenerate?
/r/MensRights17/03/23 08:59 PM
2

As I said, I don't think that anyone is doing anything wrong. everyone involved is a consenting adult and it isn't really anyone's business. as far as I'm concerned everyone involved is a blameless angel because there's no blame to ascribe. I do have a general distaste for rich people of all stripes, including but not limited to rich old men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 08:57 PM
0

So you think the people downvoting are only reading the first half of the first paragraph, and not the first sentence of the second paragraph where I say "I don't think it's wrong." That makes sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 02:20 PM
-8

Fuck off puritan. you don't get to tell other people how to live anymore. go ahead and judge me if you want. it's none of your business.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 11:44 AM
1

Show me an example of someone complaining about the age gap without the financials.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 11:36 AM
1

Holy shit. is this why I'm getting downvote? did you read the rest of the sentence that you quoted? "young ladies don't choose the poor old men." rich men can cry me a river. if they don't like being rich they can give their money away. Or better yet, not warp our society and exploit workers and the environment to the brink of total economic and environmental collapse in the first place. nobody's forcing them to be rich. if they don't like it they can just stop. I mean seriously. this is Left Wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 11:35 AM
0

It just isn't a thing. I mean it's a big world. I'm sure it happens. But that isn't what people complain about. It's the rich old men dating young women who wouldn't touch a five figure salary with a ten foot pole. That's what people complain about. tell me how I'm wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 06:48 AM
-8

I think the distaste comes from the fact that it is thinly veiled prostitution. I mean, the young ladies don't usually choose the poor old men. everyone knows what's going on here. I don't think it's wrong. everyone involved is a consenting adult. But I do think it's pretty cringe to invite your prostitute to dinner parties and introduce her to your kids. America has deep puritan roots that express themselves on both sides of the political isle. Feminists have the added complaint that powerful m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 04:36 AM
0

Ok. pronoun edited.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:22 AM
-31

Never said they lose meaningful relationships I said ... loose that connecting and meaningfulness You're incoherent. Try too have it both ways and you end up milquetoast.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:20 AM
-6

Right. that's what I'm saying. He's constructing a straw man and setting it on fire.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:09 AM
-39

Um, no. That's some slut shaming bullshit right there. People do not lose the ability to form meaningful relationships when they have promiscuous sex. where did you even get such a puritanical idea?
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:04 AM
-11

Anyone saying that the want a "young, pure woman" is pretty creepy. I would question how many men actually say that.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:01 AM
-1

without repercussion? this is evidence of the repercussions playing out.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 09:37 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights16/03/23 08:05 PM
-5

If I saw a consistent denunciation of Andrew Tate and Michael Knowles and such around here, I would say you've got a point. but I do see a bunch of non critical hero worship of them, and I get downvoted when I point out that they're cringey chuds. The exaggerated depiction of a common stereotype is what to expect in a sitcom like how I met, and you don't complain when they scewer other stereotypes. Men's rights does have an optics problem. whining about it like a victim isn't doing anything to h…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:35 PM
1

I did some googling. The peace bond will show up on some record checks while it is in force. After it expires (one year) it will no longer show up on any record checks. https://wilsoncriminaldefence.com/faqs/will-a-peace-bond-be-on-my-criminal-record/#:~:text=Despite%20the%20criminal%20charges%20being,appear%20on%20any%20record%20checks.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 03:32 PM
1

Pick your battles. Getting fired isn't going to feed anyone. Reminds me of a Ben Folds lyric. "Am I right? Yeah. Am I right? Yeah. Not only am I right. I'm lonely and I'm right."
/r/MensRights15/03/23 03:22 PM
9

You will not be eligible for financial aid for college if you do not register for selective service (the draft). There are theoretically other repercussions but in practice that is it.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 02:51 AM
1

"trans ideology is trying to erase women and their boundaries." Way to self report.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/23 10:32 PM
2

you can exclude the people who display the behavior of harassing anyone, whether the victim or the perpetrator are male or female. you can do that without essentializing the characteristics to assigned sex. In fact, avoiding essentizing makes addressing the underlying issue easier. Let's provide private changing stalls for people who are uncomfortable undressing in front of others, exclude people who behave inappropriately regardless of sex, and make locker rooms gender neutral. Then everyone is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/23 10:28 PM
8

I am a little bit unclear. What exactly is the "truth of is birth" that he discovered? Were you lying to him about who his biological father is? Or were you not disclosing a messy drama that doesn't really impact him? People have a need to know the medical history, if nothing else, of their biological parents.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:03 AM
2

masculinity that contributes to male disposability is toxic. positive masculinity is kind of like the inverse of enlightened self interest. enlightened self interest is the realization that creating a just society is in your personal interest. positive masculinity is rooted in the understanding that we can best provide for and protect those we love by taking good care of ourselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/23 02:20 AM
12

None of this is new. "The best lack all conviction, and the worst are full of passionate intensity" - W. B. Yeats "I saw the best minds of my generation, destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked." - Alan Ginsberg Somehow we manage to muddle through. And in the end we leave the world a little kinder, and little more thoughtful, a little bit more humane. "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice." - Martin Luther King Jr. "The news is stained in blood soaked headl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/23 02:07 AM
1

That was WW1. Do you have a more recent example?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/23 07:08 PM
0

That is incoherent. Try to have it both ways and you end up milquetoast.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 06:05 PM
1

OK. Go for it. It certainly wouldn't make sense for me to die on this hill of telling you not to die on that hill.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 05:23 PM
-17

Yeah, I see your point. but you've got to pick your battles. Gender exclusive DV shelters, gender exclusive scholarships, funding female medical research and not male, circumcision, conscription. those are the issues that really matter, and those are the issues we should be focusing on. Being loudly lewd in public. that's a dude thing that I won't be sorry to see go. It just isn't a hill worth dying on. defend men's rights, not men's wrongs.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:44 PM
-4

You're allowed to be proud of an accident of birth. but it's cringe. ethnicities? yeah, I'm not a fan of ethno nationalism. racial pride is at the root and is cringe. beautiful people? pride in your own beauty is called vanity and it's cringe. proud to be a trust fund baby? what the hell are you talking about? proud to be athletic? sure. takes a lot of commitment and hard work to be an athlete. go ahead and feel proud. having a 10 inch dick? if you're proud of your dick keep it to yourself. smar…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:33 PM
-5

I think it's cringe when women do it too. Anyone taking pride in an accident of birth is cringe. Be proud of protecting your family, sure. but there are cowards who are men. and there are brave who are not men. being proud of being a man is like being proud of being born with elbows.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:04 PM
-33

I dunno, maybe. It really depends what he did. I would have to look at the specific law and judge it for myself. But that seems to be difficult because the article posted by OP doesn't quote the specifics of the proposed law, and none of the links that it provide do either. Doing internet searches for myself I find that the proposal is to make the enforcement of threats and harassment higher priority for police, and to make "misogynistic intent" a factor to consider existing crimes hate crimes. …
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:58 PM
-37

Is this the hill that you want to die on? The right of the pervert on the bus to make us all listen to his sex story?
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:27 PM
2

They could require any ISP operating in Virginia to throttle any site that doesn't follow the rules. tech savvy people would still be able to get around it. but your average 12 year old kid? well, this law will reduce the number of children watching porn, as intended.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:14 PM
-12

cringe
/r/MensRights10/03/23 02:21 PM
-1

You asked for feedback. I provided. I said that it appears that you are cherry picking and lying, because when you provide one source and then make a claim that the source doesn't support, it appears that you are cherry picking and lying. That is my feedback. take it or leave it. If you've got loads of studies that support what you're saying, than cite them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/23 02:58 AM
1

checked the source listed at the bottom of your post (the pictures need the citation before distribution) The claim is not supported by the source. Mixed race men have a higher rate of suicide (23.56) than white men (21.03) in the UK. It appears that you have cherry picked the piece of data that you could find that is closest to supporting your narrative, lied about it in order to make it fit, and then just hoped that nobody would notice. all in the service of shoe horning white racial grievance…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/23 12:41 AM
1

Narrative without facts is unhelpful. Either show me the facts or don't tell me the narrative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/23 09:45 PM
1

I hesitate to conflate gender and race issues because, as far as I know, white men have it better by every metric than black men. I don't see any statistics in your thread demonstrating the disparity between racial groups. I would either spell out the difference explicitly or cut the white angle entirely. There are a bunch of reactionary alt-right white genocide chuds conflating men's issues with white racial grievance. be careful about giving them more ammunition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/23 08:22 PM
18

That is a perfectly reasonable request and the guy buying the drink would probably appreciate a simple "I'm married." It does imply a certain amount of insecurity, but it's ok to be insecure as long as you own it. It sounds like you have a very healthy relationship with your wife. I hope that she has a good trip. sounds like fun.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 06:40 PM
-11

"The violent socialization of boys often normalizes violence, such as in the saying "boys will be boys" about bullying and aggression. "Self-reliance and emotional repression are correlated with increased psychological problems in men such as depression, increased stress, and substance use disorders. Toxic masculine traits are characteristic of the unspoken code of behavior among men in prisons, where they exist in part as a response to the harsh conditions of prison life. "Other traditionally m…
/r/MensRights09/03/23 04:36 AM
5

The only thing worse than a toilet is not having a toilet!
/r/MensRights09/03/23 12:29 AM
11

toilets are the shit. sanitation is the single biggest contributing factor to human well-being since agriculture. And they get shit on every day by people who don't appreciate them. it's fitting.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 12:19 AM
5

Cassie jaye, Erin pizzey
/r/MensRights08/03/23 08:09 PM
5

Shes great. right?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 08:09 PM
3

What could possibly go wrong?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 12:24 PM
2

This is a garbled mess.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 02:24 AM
1

Wow. you're next level!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/23 12:30 AM
-2

Do you really not know how to use Google? here. took me 20 seconds. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Men%27s_Day#:~:text=International%20Men%27s%20Day%20(IMD)%20is,Pillars%20of%20International%20Men%27s%20Day%27. Nov 19
/r/MensRights07/03/23 03:30 PM
0

comment has already been edited. changed "you" to "elebrin." thought it was him. that should have been obvious from context since, as you point out, you never said that you only watch men. you're being very uncharitable.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 01:39 AM
2

elebrin said "I only watch documentaries presented and written by men." I think that's worth taking issue with.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 01:33 AM
1

But what about...? So it's all trash. doesn't change the fact that daily mail is trash.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 01:26 AM
0

Red Pill is a very good documentary about the men's rights movement by Cassie jaye. but I guess elebrin won't watch it because he only watches men. unfortunate.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 01:21 AM
1

It's not my job to do your homework. You're pivoting away from the gaping hole in the center of your thesis. it's not gonna work.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 03:13 PM
1

You're not considering a future law. you're talking about a law that's been on the books for 20 years. if you can't point to anyone who has actually been harmed, what are you upset about? No, I can't tell you any of those names. but I'm not entering into a debate discussing those policies. if I were I would look up some specifics.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 02:49 PM
1

So this law has been in place for 20 years and you can't even point to one incident of it actually causing a miscarriage of justice. You're gonna get wrecked. back out of the debate.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 01:04 PM
0

Just go look at the Pew survey report itself instead of reading secondary reporting. it's linked in the daily mail article.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 09:26 AM
-1

The trouble you're having is that you're trying to make sense of a daily mail article. but they are not trying to inform you. they are trying to enflame you with anger and alarm. look at the pew survey that the article links to. overall, the difference between single women and single men is just 4%. that is largely explained by the 25% difference between gays and lesbians. women tend to date older men, which results in a lot of young single men and a lot of old single women. the daily mail takes…
/r/MensRights06/03/23 08:09 AM
-7

You think that she did. Why do you think so?
/r/MensRights06/03/23 06:13 AM
13

Wait a second. did that woman actually google you before you googled her?
/r/MensRights06/03/23 05:46 AM
1

OK. Do you have any examples of people who have been unjustly convicted by this court?
/r/MensRights06/03/23 02:25 AM
-4

yeah, sure. seems like a spartan life you lead but whatever. but, only produced and narrated by men? so I guess you skipped "red pill." that's a shame.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 02:23 AM
5

It's a good rule of thumb to humor the people who love you unless there's a good reason not to. watch the movie. even if it has ideas that you don't like in it, you will survive.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 02:08 AM
-2

lol. You just gave me and my son a great belly laugh. tell me another one!
/r/MensRights06/03/23 02:01 AM
1

Oh, fun! make your case and I'll tear it apart as best I can. that should help you prep. since they've been around for two decades, you must be able to provide plenty of examples of injustice being served.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 12:16 AM
14

It is a basic right in the US. He doesn't even have to tell you if he doesn't want to. Seems like something deeper is going on here. Trust is the basis of any healthy relationship. How is it that you two got married without him knowing about your history? if you have been less than honest with him it is only natural for him to be distrustful. How can you build that trust back? You need to apologize to him for being less than honest in the past, accept his feelings now, and be more honest in the …
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:39 AM
2

That is accurate. occasional excess is healthy.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 03:13 PM
0

Either women are really bad at it, or they're not really trying.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 03:10 PM
1

I like reading. it wasn't unpleasant. Your other links were written by lawyers and provided links to their sources. You'll forgive me if I don't take the word of a computer's voice on an Instagram video as gospel. could you provide a higher quality source?
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:33 PM
1

Cool story bro. before feminism, women never slept with bad boys in their early 20s.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 05:36 AM
2

"we've kind of confused what it means to be a man, what it means to be masculine. You've got this trope out there where you have to be tough, and angry, and lash out to be strong. I think it is just the opposite. Strength is how you show your love for people. Strength is how you are for people and how you have their back and how you stick up for other people and pushing up and out against bullies." Still some male disposability in his view of masculinity. protect others. nothing about expressing…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 04:57 AM
2

tldr : C-51 disrupts due process, the Canadian courts are taking care of it Whew! Ok. I just spent the last hour reading. I read both of your links, and I read the law, which was linked in your first link. (the C-51 that I looked up and linked is a different C-51. no wonder I couldn't find anything troublesome in it) Your first link was written right after the law was passed, and pointed out the due process issues. C-51 gives accusers knowledge of defense evidence before they testify, allowing t…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 03:33 AM
0

I agree with you about US university campuses. However those are not criminal proceedings. Fucked up as the Dear Colleagues Letter was it falls short of putting people in jail for crimes that they did not commit. I read the entire C-51 bill that your instagram video complains about. it's about 1100 words. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/pl/cuol-mgnl/c51.html Can you quote the section that dismantles due process for me? I don't see it.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 12:42 AM
-5

You are claiming that feminists have changed policy and procedure to weaken due process in Brazil. please show me evidence of that.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:18 PM
-5

what does this have to do with feminism?
/r/MensRights03/03/23 10:30 PM
3

It sounds ok in theory. But how does it work in practice? You've got a sign out front : "no men" and you've got a bouncer checking people as they come in. How does the bouncer know who to bounce? Do you just take people's word for it? You'll get performative trolls. Do you check ID? Well, now you're forcing trans women to out themselves to the state, and therefore everyone else, if they want to come into your establishment. You're also excluding trans women who don't have the resources or haven'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 06:39 PM
3

As a moral consequentialist, I don't believe that anything is inherently right or wrong. you have to look at the consequences. looking at examples, I see nothing but bad things coming from every case of gender exclusion that I can find. so as a general rule I am opposed to them. but I am open to counter examples of you can provide any. someone else has suggested gender segregated sexual assault support groups. that's the best counter example that I've seen. I do admit that in theory that could b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 05:53 PM
3

But what about all these other issues? fuck off. The Violence Against Women Act funds a comprehensive national network of domestic violence shelters that are gender exclusive. Men are literally out in the cold and if TERFs had their way so would trans women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 05:27 PM
1

I don't think that we actually have a disagreement. You're not excluding people based on gender, but based on behavior. if prudish men are not invited, and women with a sense of humor are invited, than your not being gender exclusive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 04:55 PM
4

I get notifications at upvote milestones and then do the math to figure out the downvotes based on the net count. A bunch of up votes and no downvotes meens I'm circle jerking an echo chamber. A bunch of down votes and no upvotes means I'm too far outside of the Overton window to have a productive conversation. A bunch of both means I'm in the sweet spot!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 04:46 PM
5

They minimize and ignore any F-to-M violence that they can, and then blame anything left over on patriarchy. The real fun comes when they try to explain the fact that lesbian relationships have the same rate of domestic violence as heterosexuals. Cultural hegemony baby. it's our world, you're just living in it!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 04:37 PM
-2

So if there's a woman who appreciates dark, off color jokes, can she be your friend? I agree that people should have the right to free association. But I will argue against gender exclusionary spaces and fight to deny them institutional support. So if you want to get together and watch movies with your friends and not invite any women, I'm not happy about it but you have the right to do it. But if you want to have a student group that gets together and watches action movies in the media center, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 04:33 PM
4

OK, I'll give you that one. If you want your own personal therapist's office to be gender segregated, I guess I don't have a problem with it. As far as group therapy, we're going to have to unpack that a bit. I can imagine that there are situations in which gender segregation is helpful in a thoughtful therapeutic environment. But this is far from how it plays out. The Duluth Model creates segregated support groups to talk about domestic violence. In order to gain access to their children, some …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 04:16 PM
-3

If a woman wanted to join your boardgame club, would you let her? There are two problems. First is that gender exclusive spaces have a persistent history of incubating bad ideas. For instance, these rants you speak of. If you're getting together and ranting in a way that you wouldn't if a woman were present, you should take pause and consider if those ideas are worth spreading at all. Second is that gender exclusive spaces create a quandary for people who do not fit neatly onto the peeks of the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 03:49 PM
4

I could have been more precise. What I mean to say is, trans exclusion is rooted in male exclusion, in the minds of TERFs. TERFs are excluding men. They also misclassify trans women as men, so they exclude trans women. My point is that if it weren't for male exclusion, TERFs would have no motivation to exclude trans women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 03:20 PM
1

OK. So if you can bond with other men while women are around, what need is there for gender exclusive spaces?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 03:10 PM
-1

People do act differently in gender exclusive spaces. I posit that segregation has a negative impact on behavior. Not the least of which is treating people who don't fall neatly onto the peaks of the bimodal distribution like crap. What, specifically, do you feel less comfortable doing when women are around? I can't think of an example of good behavior that segregation encourages.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 03:06 PM
0

lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 02:02 PM
1

OK. I accept that. That doesn't justify gender exclusion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 02:01 PM
3

Yeah, I can see your point. But it's a bad point. We should judge people for their own actions, not for their superficial resemblance to other people whose actions we judge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 01:39 PM
8

Not all male excluders are TERFs. But all TERFs are male excluders. I have heard no solid arguments in favor of male exclusion. Go ahead and make one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 12:31 PM
1

The presence of women does not prevent men from bonding with each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 12:26 PM
18

If men weren't being excluded in the first place, TERFs wouldn't have any reason to exclude trans women. TERFs and mainstream feminists agree that men should be excluded. The disagreement is whether trans women are men or women. If we treated everyone the same regardless of gender, than we wouldn't have to argue so much about how to classify edge cases.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 04:47 AM
-2

You can make friends and business connections with women around.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 04:26 AM
1

all of my posts have been either confirmed or denied within hours.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 03:36 AM
21

Trans people get the short end of every stick.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 02:17 AM
-2

There is no difference between kicking the women out and doing something with only men. just a semantic question of affirmative or negative phrasing. I am free around women. what is it that you can't do with women around?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 02:15 AM
-15

What, you mean like MGTOW? a reactionary chauvinist movement that creates the occasional stochastic terrorist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 02:05 AM
0

Nuanced disagreement is rarely popular.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 02:00 AM
-29

This is kind of like when Peterson claimed that he couldn't figure out the rules of how to refer to Eliot Page. it's contrived and performative. if you can't figure out how to talk to women without sexually harassing them, you're the problem. and yeah, you probably shouldn't be approaching any women until you develop some social skills.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 01:04 AM
5

For what purpose? I mean, I guess maybe a testicular cancer support group. but I wouldn't kick out a trans woman with testicular cancer. Have you ever been in a mixed group social setting and thought : "we should kick all the women out. that would make this better." I can't imagine a good reason to do that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 12:52 AM
3

well I would be interested to hear your disagreement, whenever you have the time. but then again I love to argue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 12:43 AM
1

Not less of a man, just less manly. you're splitting hairs. There are some men who are naturally stoic. but there is tremendous social pressure to push stoicism onto men. this increases our utility to the rest of society. it's called male disposability.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 12:39 AM
-11

fraternities are a good example of a female exclusionary space. They have a history of encouraging very bad behavior. I believe in the right of free association and I would not tell other people that they do not have the right to define their space. but I will argue against them and fight to deny them institutional support.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 12:31 AM
18

I disagree. Exclusionary spaces have a history of incubating terrible ideas. I can't think of anything good that has come from them. The justification for exclusionary spaces is that some women don't feel safe around men. these feelings are often justifiable based on negative experiences that some women have had with some men. But humoring these feelings by excluding men, rather than having an expectation of an unharmful behavior, essentializes bad behavior as a thing that men do. This creates a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 12:23 AM
0

what you are experiencing is called cognitive dissonance. while it is psychologically uncomfortable to encounter ideas that challenge your existing beliefs, rest assured that it causes your brain no physical damage. stoicism is considered a masculine trait. Do you believe that a man who expresses emotions or has concern for their own well-being is "less of a man?" Do you think that boys are born stoic or do you believe that it is the result of socialization?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 10:22 PM
-2

sex is a biological fact. gender is a social construct. Thus when people are speaking extremely precisely, they will refer to "female-bodied" people instead of "women" when discussing the population of people receiving prenatal care. There are people with female bodies (sex) that have a male gender (social construct). There are extremely masculine trans men who are pregnant. square that circle.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:54 PM
-10

No, masculinity describes things associated with the male gender. Do you understand the different between sex and gender?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:51 PM
1

The point is that masculine standards vary culturally. A point that you evidently already understand. Masculine standards are something pushed on us. You are not born masculine.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:48 PM
-4

Masculinity is always changing. 200 years ago it was masculine to wear a powdered wig. In Scotland it is masculine to wear a skirt. If we are advocating for men's rights, that includes the right to not conform to societal standards of masculinity if we don't want to.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:43 PM
1

Fair enough. we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. is there a reason that you think the term is unhelpful l, besides the fact that feminists use it?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:30 PM
-1

So you respect soy boy beta male cucks? bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:27 PM
-2

way to self report. I take it that you don't respect men who display traits that you consider feminine?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:15 PM
2

Beta males? cringe
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:05 PM
-14

You were born male. you were not born masculine. masculinity is a gender role. gender roles are a social construct. When people talk about your masculinity they are not talking about your nature. they are talking about your socialization process.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:04 PM
4

The usual argument goes that science can examine what is, but not what ought. Since ethics is about what ought, there is no way to apply the scientific method to it. sam Harris disagrees with this argument, saying that we can define axiomatic truths about ethics and then make various ethical claims that are falsifiable and therefore testable with the scientific method. https://www.samharris.org/books/the-moral-landscape
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/23 05:00 PM
1

Bruh, do you even bruh?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 04:50 PM
1

I don't think that we should go so far as to abolish all gender roles. but I do think that we should stop the normative pressure that pushes those gender roles onto people that they do not fit. You are not demonstrating an understanding of toxic masculinity in this conversation. you appear to be having a knee-jerk reaction to the fact that feminists use the term. Feminism casts toxic masculinity as something that men do. it is more accurately understood as something that is done to men.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 04:45 PM
2

I don't think that this is an argument often made by feminists. can you show me an example?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/23 04:09 PM
1

Anyone actually read the article? "These are not words I have ever used in relation to rape or sexual assault and the reason I am so certain that I did not say this is because I simply do not believe it; I find the phrase abhorrent. "I find this characterisation of me to be deeply upsetting, and colleagues who know me know how untrue it is."
/r/MensRights02/03/23 03:38 PM
-1

I think that your obsession with feminism is preventing you from understanding what toxic masculinity. Feminists didn't coin the term. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythopoetic_men%27s_movement Do you consider yourself an ideologue?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 01:03 PM
-2

But, um ... toxic masculinity is the reason for disproportionate male suicides.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 02:38 AM
2

A coalition of leftist organizations in my city campaigned and passed a "homeless bill of rights." This includes access to public restrooms and showers, and giving police officers CIT (conflict intervention training) that helps them to recognize and properly respond to mental health crises. The city has also begun building transitional housing in preparation for a "housing first" initiative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/23 12:49 AM
3

no
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:45 PM
1

dialectical materialism
/r/MensRights01/03/23 02:38 PM
1

Mods, please pin the suicide crisis hotline to the top of these comments: 800-273-TALK
/r/MensRights01/03/23 01:53 PM
2

There is a huge difference between a "suicide attempt" and a suicide. Women try to commit suicide more often, but men actually kill themselves more often. So either women are really bad at it, or they're not really trying. A suicide attempt is generally understood as a call for help. It is a manner of emotional expression. Suicide itself is a logistics question.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 01:49 PM
3

Your question is phrased very poorly. Why does it feel like no one cares about how we feel? Because we have learned through experience that many people do not care how we feel. A more lucid question would be, How does it feel to know that few people care about your well-being? When I was 22, I hooked up with a beautiful woman. We had a blast together and it became a repeated thing. Eventually she told me that she wanted me to take her virginity. I didn't want to have sex with her. She pressured …
/r/MensRights01/03/23 01:30 PM
1

No, the other short black comedian. oi vey.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 12:49 PM
-2

Regardless of what feminists are, you are certainly a class reductionist. you should take that criticism seriously. Reductionism in any form is bad theory, because it is incomplete compared to a holistic understanding. Case in point, your misclassification of feminism is rooted in your reductionist analysis. Where feminists do go wrong it is a result of reductionism of their own. They misclassify men as an oppressor class. This doesn't change the fact that the core of the ideology is to oppose o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/23 06:28 AM
2

Masturbating is normal and healthy
/r/MensRights28/02/23 04:26 PM
2

No, you are misinterpreting Koss. I don't know if you're doing so willfully or if you're just wrong. But at the very least you are not being precise. She does ask, "how would that happen," interviewer explains, and Koss accepts his account without skipping a beat. Nowhere does she say "a man can't be forced to have an erection" because she does not believe that. Koss does classify "being forced to penetrate" as not-rape. But it is sexual assault and she does classify male victims as victims. Kos…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 12:48 PM
1

Oh good. If you have read it, you shouldn't have any trouble telling me in what chapter Stephanopoulos claims to have seen Hillary hit bill in the face and give him a black eye. My long wait will finally be over! And you get to be right about something. I'm sure that you can hardly wait either.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 09:23 PM
-16

This sub is definitely part of the alt right pipeline. EDIT : All of the downvotes just prove my point.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:38 PM
1

Congressmen don't vote on supreme court decisions, and states don't have mayors.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:07 PM
-2

Check out r/leftwingmaleadvocates
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:04 PM
-7

^ Case in point.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 05:48 PM
-9

There are a bunch of right wing chuds around here. They keep on posting right wing talking points and reactionary chauvinist memes and call me a feminist shill when I argue with them. They will claim to speak for this sub but they do not.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 05:42 PM
1

Tell it to Peterson.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 01:02 PM
2

Did I say that? No. He most likely began writing the book before he started taking benzos. Before that he was on SSRIs for two decades. His life was not in perfect order when he published a book with a chapter heading "set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world." Why would you pay any attention to a word that this lying hypocrite has to say?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:24 AM
2

I'm not playing semantics, you are. we both know that "clean your room" is an allegory for Peterson's 6th rule. You cannot have your life in perfect order while also spiraling into benzo addiction. You don't care if Peterson is a hypocrite who pushes advice that he doesn't live by. That's on you. You don't speak for this sub.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:01 AM
2

No, I don't think that being a drug addict means that you shouldn't criticize society. But Peterson does. I am hoisting him by his own petard. in 2017 he started taking benzos. In 2018 he published 12 rules. in 2020 Peterson traveled to Russia and was placed in a medically induced coma for his benzo withdrawal. "if you can't even clean your own room who are you to give advice to the world?" turnabout is fair play. go clean your room jordan.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 04:32 AM
-2

According to his own account, Peterson began taking benzodiazepines to combat anxiety in early 2017. In early 2018 Peterson published 12 rules for life. Rule #6 : "set your house in perfect order before criticizing the world." This means that as he was sinking into drug dependency while he was writing a book telling other people to get their houses in perfect order before criticizing the world. Peterson should take his own advice and stfu.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 03:46 AM
1

Give them 15 minutes and tickle their balls. The hardness will return.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 01:57 AM
0

So, you think that Hillary would be too smart to commit assault in front of witnesses. that's a good point. So I suppose that you also question the OP claim that there are first person accounts of Hillary giving bill a black eye?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 01:02 AM
0

Are you claiming to have read a book by George Stephanopoulos? I call bullshit. In what chapter does he claim to have witnessed first hand Hillary giving bill a black eye?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 01:01 AM
-4

“If you can’t even clean up your own room, who the hell are you to give advice to the world?" - Jordan Peterson, while actively addicted to benzodiazepine
/r/MensRights27/02/23 12:50 AM
3

Oh for the days when men were hard. I pine for hard men.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 07:24 PM
-5

Jordan Peterson is a lying junkie. By his own standards he should stfu and clean his room. EDIT : Either Peterson's 6th rule is good advice, and we should not listen to him because his life is not in perfect order, or Peterson's 6th rule is bad advice, and we should not listen to him because he gives bad advice. Either way we shouldn't listen to Peterson.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 07:15 PM
2

Hop on pop. STOP! You must not hop on pop!
/r/MensRights26/02/23 07:11 PM
-6

"back in time to a better era." That is a reactionary sentiment. What era are you talking about, specifically?
/r/MensRights26/02/23 05:21 PM
-1

No. But it is the specific claim made by the OP. "first hand account" of Hillary "often hitting him." A false claim brings the whole narrative into question.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 05:04 PM
3

Right?
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:25 PM
-2

no u r
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:12 PM
-2

Ok great. Can you tell me the name of that book? While you're at it, show me one example of me blaming men for anything. argument from popularity. just because y'all don't like when I point out your bullshit lies, doesn't mean I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:06 PM
0

It's like sword fighting with a fart. I can pierce your argument a thousand times. but it's still going to hang in the air and stink. Some feminists do say "kill all men." I can easily find you an example in under a minute. one quick Google search. here. https://www.inc.com/suzanne-lucas/huffpost-editor-says-new-years-resolution-is-to-kill-all-men.html Now find me an example of a feminist saying "a man can't be forced to have an erection." The quote that you quoted in your OP. find me anyone say…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 07:03 AM
-5

Thank you! That is an excellent example of someone NOT claiming that Hillary gave Bill a black eye. She did eat a lot of chocolate cake when the entire world was talking about how he cheated on her. So interesting.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 06:42 AM
-3

Wow. 377 words about why you keep all the receipts and not a single receipt. Wouldn't it be easier to find me an example than to go on and on about why you're not? unless... maybe you don't have any examples. maybe you said that feminists say something. But actually they don't. and you just can't admit you were wrong. maybe. maybe.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 06:11 AM
-6

So that's a no. You claimed that many feminists say a thing. it should be trivially easy for you to provide an example.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 05:33 AM
-12

No. Cringe af
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:54 AM
-6

Can you show me an example of a feminist claiming that "a man can't be forced to have an erection?"
/r/MensRights26/02/23 02:54 AM
-2

I looked up the bill Clinton example. I don't think that it's conclusive that she hit him. The only claim that she did so is from a secret service agent who wrote a tell-all book 20 years later. The secret service agent doesn't even claim to have seen her strike him. and there is no corroborating evidence. in short, you're stretching.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 10:18 PM
1

basic philosophy. People have intrinsic value. Things have circumstantial value in that they are valuable to people with intrinsic value. a person living in a home is intrinsically valuable. the home is only valuable in that it provides shelter for the person. If no person lives in a house it would be worthless. if a person is homeless they still have intrinsic value. You have intrinsic value. but you also have circumstantial value, to the degree that you are useful to yourself and to other peop…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 10:04 PM
3

Can you give us some examples of these posts?
/r/MensRights25/02/23 05:28 PM
-3

"Fuck you, I think rape is hilarious!" - George Carlin.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 03:59 PM
3

selection bias
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:36 AM
2

"Although a mother can refuse a peace of mind paternity test, the mother’s permission is not needed to carry out such a test, provided her DNA is not being submitted for testing and the potential father has parental responsibility for any child being tested." https://alphabiolabsusa.com/learning-center/paternity-test-without-mother/#:~:text=Although%20a%20mother%20can%20refuse,for%20any%20child%20being%20tested.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:30 PM
2

Yeah, a stroke is when you lose brain cells and think differently. Since that is what you are describing, and you are not making any sense otherwise, I suggest that you seek medical attention immediately. time is of the essence.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:23 PM
2

Are you having a stroke?
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:21 PM
0

??? France is not a state in the US.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:14 PM
2

Which states?
/r/MensRights24/02/23 01:45 PM
1

commode. lol
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:35 AM
2

Reduce your interactions with toxic women. is there someone in particular in your life that's causing you grief, or is this a bunch of online doom scrolling? increase your interaction with nice women. do you have any female friends? go to social activities that women go to and talk to them. make friends.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:06 AM
1

Well ok. But it's not fair to dislike all women because of what some women say. You've got to learn character judgement. Judge each person as an individual. Watch what they do and listen to what they say, and treat them accordingly. There are plenty of good women out there. They will show you who they are by what they say and do, if you're looking and listening.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 01:50 AM
1

Why is it that you dislike women?
/r/MensRights24/02/23 01:40 AM
0

If you think about it, this is impossible to know. How would you even design a study to capture that data? We can't know if any given accusation is true or false, let alone sincere or lie. We can't know. Anyone who claims to know is blowing smoke.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 01:35 AM
1

That sounds very discouraging. But I bet that if you work in your social skills, your life can improve. romance is a far dream if you can't even make friends. let's start with friends and hopefully work up to romance once you've got more social skills. You say that you've tried to make friends. tell us about how that went. maybe we could provide some ideas that could help you get out of this rut.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 01:21 AM
1

lol. I can't tell if this is parody or not. you ice your balls throughout the day? Why? if you need hormone therapy talk to a doctor.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 11:55 PM
1

I can't really get with the MGTOW philosophy because there are plenty of women who are decent and kind to me, and having them in my life makes me happier and healthier. MGTOW remind me of strident feminists. essentialized gender grievance and victimhood narratives are distasteful to me.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 10:26 PM
1

masturbating is normal and healthy.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 10:20 PM
1

A further indicator? What other indicators were you presenting?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 09:50 PM
1

I read the myth of make power when I was 16. Didn't do much with it at the time. I was politically involved in apartheid divestment and it wasn't relevant. Later I got involved in resisting gentrification on a local scale. I worked with a group of anarchist activists and we failed to stop the powers that be from demolishing some public housing. After that failure the group sort of dissolved, sort of changed focus. Where we had been meeting to discuss how to support the poor people who were being…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 05:13 PM
1

A careful reading of DV research reveals that women hit more, while men do more damage. Rates of domestic violence are similar among homosexual couples as they are among heterosexual couples.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 03:54 PM
3

Just keep dating until you find someone that you get along with. It can get discouraging but eventually you'll find someone
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:02 AM
2

affordable housing for all!
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:16 AM
-2

Wow. You sound just like every feminist I've ever rolled my eyes at. ED is almost as funny as rape. But they both pale at being kicked in the balls.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:09 AM
41

There are many men's issues that the left addresses without acknowledging them as men's issues. Homeless advocacy, suicide prevention, anti bullying. Looking at history we have the fight for safe workplaces, draft resistance, child labor laws. I'll take any advocacy over none. But the inability to recognize male disposability as a primary axis of oppression is holding the left back.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/23 12:49 AM
6

I base my knowledge of Rowling's opinion on her recent public statements.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:24 PM
11

Rowling is a misandrist. she hates men and thinks that trans women are men, so she hates trans women too.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:47 PM
2

It's pretty clear what you have to do. I don't know about the legal issues where you are but in the US you can genetically test kids if you are their legal parent, without informing the other parent.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:45 PM
-2

whining about jokes that you don't like. cringe when feminists do it. cringe when you do it.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:38 PM
1

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-times-of-london/ The two word quotations. The complete lack of context. The loaded language. This is what a hack job looks like. If you were actually concerned about these kids, you would be making a sober analysis of regret and detransition rates to see how high they are and if they are trending upwards. But you're not. I'll bet that you don't even know what the hell I'm talking about. Your concern is skin deep.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:32 PM
1

I called it a right wing anti trans meme because it is a right wing anti trans meme. You are accepting it at face value because you were already in on the moral panic. Your ability to rationally interpret information is overwhelmed by your high state of emotional arousal.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 09:06 PM
3

Check YOUR privilege. How do you know who has and hasn't been raped? I know that for the men who have, there are very few resources available to them and they are very vulnerable. You could hurt someone with that sort of language.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:14 PM
1

Did I say any of that stuff? No. This is a pack of lies driven by and also driving a moral panic by a bunch of people who don't actually know or care about the underlying issues.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:11 PM
0

Tate is a chauvinist chud.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:41 AM
1

So you want us to mass flag Are We Dating the Same Guy. And you want us to join Are We Dating the Same Girl. You don't see the inherent contradiction?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:35 AM
1

And then we can all be equally miserable. Bad plan.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:57 AM
1

She is breaking the law. Contact the police. Since she has threatened you in writing it sounds like an open and shut case.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:29 PM
-3

If you're LEFT wing, why are you posting right wing trans panic memes?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:07 PM
-15

Right wing fear mongering with lots of promises but no details. The take away is that a book is going to be published next month.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:41 PM
-2

Can you give me some examples of feminists claiming that the word "female" is offensive?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:27 PM
1

So it appears, what you've done, is posted the first two links that appear to support your point, without reading them or considering how strong the evidence is. You started the conversation with an opinion and no facts, and you are back filling confirmation bias now. But do your links actually support your point? The second link is behind a paywall. And the headline is "activists fail to suppress research." Which demonstrates that this one time in the UK, one group of activists tried to get som…
/r/MensRights11/02/23 05:36 PM
-1

Ben Shapiro doesn't care about boys or men. he is just using us as a kudgel against his enemies.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 04:58 PM
0

I don't know if it matters or not because you won't tell me what it is. The more you wriggle about refusing to answer, the more I suspect that you are hiding something. It's pretty clear to me that you were saying something stupid. Take your lumps and learn from it. Don't blame the world. What could you do differently?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 11:00 PM
6

There are no reliable numbers for violence in prisons in the US, because the National Intimate Partners and Sexually Violence Survey does not interview prisoners. For numbers outside of prison, the NISVS is the flagship survey conducted by the CDC and it is the most reliable source. Look it up. But you're debating backwards. Ask them to present evidence to support their claim.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:48 PM
-10

Daily wire suuuuucks. Ben Shapiro is a chauvinist.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:17 PM
1

We don't need to use the word grooming, but that's the word people use now. Courting is the defunct word. Language changes. Always has, always will. It's nothing to get upset about. That isn't what is causing the trans groomer moral panic. It's all the right wing culture warriors spreading lies about trans people that are the problem, not the specific words they use.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:45 PM
0

ok. so you were talking to your friend where everyone could overhear you. What were you talking about?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:38 PM
-2

Far too simple. I don't think you're telling the whole story. You were just sitting there silently minding your own business and this girl says you're stupid out of nowhere? I don't buy it. There's some context that seems to be missing and you are reluctant to tell us, probably because it makes you look bad.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:46 PM
2

Ok. Let's use your definition. It's close enough. Courting a child is grooming. Why is that a defunct term? Make your point already!
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:55 PM
-2

It's like pulling teeth. What was the opinion you were expressing when your classmate called you stupid and your teacher yelled at you? And what manner were you expressing it? You seem to be avoiding the question.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:52 PM
-2

"out of nowhere?" What opinion were you expressing, and in what manner?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:29 PM
2

This is a clear case of sexual harassment. You are in a precarious situation because you have made an informal complaint, so if she retaliates you have no recourse. You need to make a formal complaint. Your employee handbook should have details of how to make such a complaint. This will protect you from retaliation. But you're still going to want to watch your ass for a while to make sure you don't give her an excuse to fuck with you. The behavior should stop after you make a formal complaint. I…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:59 PM
1

I'm not playing that game. You make the claim. You explain it. Why is the concept of grooming defunct?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:24 PM
2

Grooming is a defunct concept? Wtf?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 12:47 PM
1

I know that you don't like big words. But I'm going to teach you some basic philosophy because the lack is really hurting your ability to reason clearly. You have made an empirical claim. Which is to say that you said something about the physical world that you can look at and point to. You have said that trans people are suppressing research. I have asked you to demonstrate that claim. You have responding a priori, which is to say purely of the mind. You haven't provided any empirical facts to …
/r/MensRights10/02/23 12:28 PM
1

So you don't actually have an example of "the trans lobby" suppressing research. It's just that you're sure that they must because they're just the worst, and that is just what the worst people would do.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:47 PM
0

The blades of grass example is commonly used in discussions of statistics. That you think it's dumb says a lot about your willingness to judge that which you do not understand. Show me an example of the trans lobby discouraging research of gender dysphoria. Or is that just something else that your paranoid brain made up?
/r/MensRights08/02/23 07:13 AM
43

It isn't something that feminism created, although it does bolster it. The concerns of lower class men have always been ignored. The more disposable we are, the more utility we provide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/23 04:35 AM
1

A feminist cafe in Australia that's not even there anymore. The boy scouts deciding on their own to let girls join. Those are your best examples. You promised me feminist lawyers bullying small business owners. You don't even want to be in a male space, do you? Have you even tried to look for one? You're just looking for something to whine about.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 04:26 AM
3

A golfer hits a ball. It lands on the green What is the likelihood that it comes to rest on any particular blade of grass? Very low. Yet it does come to rest on some blade of grass or other. With a millions to one chance, and 400 million people in the country, statistically there should be 400 people in this particular situation in this country.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 07:51 PM
1

Tate is a virtue signaling chud.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 07:21 PM
-2

You haven't read Leviticus, have you?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 06:52 PM
0

You're generalizing about all women. That's misogyny. It's fine to not like women that are bad to you. But instead of whining about it and pouting through the rest of your life hating all women, find women who are nice to you and hang out with them.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:40 PM
-2

Do you have even a single example of that happening? Or is this purely paranoid fantasy? Small businesses serve women because it's dumb not to. There are plenty of manly stores. Comic book shops and suit stores. Women can shop there if they want to just like men can make pottery and go to the boutique tea shop if they want. If you want an exclusively male space, join a male sports league. A lot of churches have men's groups with no women involved. Or join a fraternal order. No lawsuits involved.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:36 PM
-2

You have free association. If you want to make a boy's club, make a boy's club. If you are *always* self censoring because you think someone will find it offensive, maybe you've got some problematic ideas that you should examine.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 03:28 PM
1

If your dating strategy is all about maintaining toxic relationships, you're going to end up in a long toxic relationship.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:32 PM
9

Women don't know how to comfort men. Men don't know how to comfort men. Therapists don't know how to comfort men. No one has any practice. Don't expect a woman to already know your emotional needs. That's something that you can explore together. You need to find someone who wants to learn.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:43 PM
-5

That attitude will get you a lot of long, cold relationships with toxic women.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:41 PM
11

Approaching all your exes? That is stalking and you should report it to the police.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:30 PM
23

Cheating is immoral. Masturbating is normal and healthy.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 02:19 PM
5

I'll take "of course" for 100, Alex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/23 05:59 AM
2

Um, why don't you just date women your own age?
/r/MensRights06/02/23 05:58 AM
0

Go ahead and block me. Then I won't have to read about the good old days when the segregated schools taught us all about love and brotherhood.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:39 AM
-3

Oh for the good old days before racial grievance. When black people couldn't swim in the public pool.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 03:50 AM
-5

Daily wire sucks. Puritan freaks. Show sounds hilarious. I'll keep an eye out for it.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 03:41 AM
4

Tate is the cringiest chud I've ever seen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 06:59 PM
1

"I've never followed tate so I don't know what he has to say." So you don't know shit. Why are you talking?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 06:55 PM
-5

Traditional boys? Commie agenda? Outrage over obscure subreddits. Cringe AF My middle school boy gets Outstanding or Satisfactory behavior marks from all of his teachers because I've raised him to be polite and considerate. Your little boy is going to have to interact with society some day. Isolating him isn't going to help.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 06:33 PM
3

It is not wise to search for the right reductionist ideology. It is wise to dabble in many and accept none.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 02:02 PM
1

Either way, you agree that it is a vector of normative pressure. I'd rather not debate semantics. If denying a pregnant woman access to an abortion is not forcible pregnancy, what do you want to call it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/23 03:16 PM
3

I read a description of nelson Mandela's coming of age ceremony. All of the boys of the same age lined up. Someone went down the line with a knife and circumcized each of them one at a time. Anyone who flinched in pain was shamed. They all yelled "now I am a man!" So you are a class reductionist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/23 03:03 PM
2

You have a misconception. You think that the most radical ideologues have the clearest view of human nature. In fact many mothers are repelled by the idea that they should fear their sons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/23 03:00 PM
1

Here is the sound of two eyes rolling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/23 02:56 PM
19

This is male disposability, and it predates feminism. For instance we had the draft before feminism. Forcing men to penetrate wasn't rape before feminism. Feminism hasn't caused these issues. But it had entrenched then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/23 12:46 PM
1

Daily caller sucks.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:24 AM
0

Well, the point is to ask men questions. If you want to criticize women, you can go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 01:29 AM
2

Those ingroup studies are looking at how people treat strangers. But most people have male family members, where they don't have family members of other races. This presents an avenue of appeal where people's minds can be changed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/23 12:46 AM
1

I know where you're trying to lead me. White racial grievance. Are the Jews trying to replace you?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 12:39 AM
2

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/overturning-roe-has-meant-at-least-10000-fewer-legal-abortions/ About 10,000 of them, I'm afraid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/23 12:29 AM
1

I think that generalized theory of ismism help us to address isms in many forms. If you don't like how I talk, feel free to not participate in conversation with me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/23 12:23 AM
1

So you were beat up by black kids who got away with it, and you've generalized that into a worldview where black people have it better, even through they objectively have it worse than white people by every measure.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 10:09 PM
5

On the subject of conscription, the Iran/Iraq war looms large. Iran used human waves. Iraq used chemical weapons. Do the math.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/23 05:02 PM
2

Yeah, there's a lot of social stigma that goes along with being a virgin. But the thing is, nobody can actually tell your virginity status just by looking at you. So unless you clam up and overthink it and act really awkward, nobody is going to know anything is up. And when you do get all awkward, they still don't know that you're a virgin. They just know that you're socially anxious, and they avoid asking you probing questions because they don't want to make you any more uncomfortable than you …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/23 09:36 AM
-1

This is not OK. She is being toxic. She needs to learn how to support you. It's OK to have emotions. You never need to justify them. She shouldn't insult you when you're upset about something. She isn't providing constructive criticism. She is demanding that you suppress your emotions and thus enforcing toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 07:51 AM
1

So you're saying that it's perfectly reasonable to consider the possibility that pleasant and kind women who never talk about feminism are really sleeper feminists who are secretly hating you but not doing or saying anything to demonstrate that. No. It's a stupid idea. People who hate you treat you like crap. People who are being nice to you don't hate you. Stop talking yourself into becoming a paranoid incel. I feel like I'm gonna read about you in the paper or something. Ew. There are also, by…
/r/MensRights29/01/23 01:29 PM
1

I'm sorry that you were bullied. I was bullied too and it was really tough. I've got my own kids now and sometimes they get bullied and it just breaks my heart that I can't always protect them. Yeah, you've got some problems that women don't have. And bullying is one of them. But you have to admit, women have some problems that you don't have too. Whining about how bad you've got it, comparing your problems to theirs and saying yours are worse, it's kind of annoying. It's one of the things that …
/r/MensRights29/01/23 01:11 PM
1

You are irritated that no one feels bad for you or tells you to be proud of your identity. Seems like much ado about nothing. You're worried that something horrible will happen in the future. What do you think is going to happen?
/r/MensRights29/01/23 02:32 AM
1

It gets worse. She has told reporters that 50 years later, she was still checking his address book to see if he had her contact information, and that if she thought he was cheating on her she would kill him. https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/dolly-partons-rarely-seen-husband-25988782 "I was looking through his address book the night before we renewed our vows. I thought, I'm gonna see if he's still got Jolene's number." https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/3321859/dolly-parton-marriag…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/23 12:56 AM
2

I'm not sure what you mean by credible. She bragged about it on stage and made a point of saying it was a true story.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/23 12:21 AM
0

Yeah man, too deep. You're having positive reactions with real women in real life. And you're talking yourself into thinking that maybe they secretly hate you.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 11:35 PM
-3

"Most women I've met have been pretty nice and respectful. Maybe they secretly hated me." Dude, you're in too deep! Time to take a break. Go get some air and talk to some nice women. Build some trust.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 07:17 AM
-6

This is so cringe. It's like you're trying to demonstrate that the most cartoonish characterizations of MRAs are accurate. You're indistinguishable from parody.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 07:11 AM
1

Suicide, alcoholism, incarceration, homelessness, death. All of that is worse for Black, latino, and native men than White men. Where does the racial aspect come in?
/r/MensRights28/01/23 07:09 AM
-3

What hardships have you face, specifically, because of your Whiteness?
/r/MensRights28/01/23 07:04 AM
4

"I consider myself a man, full of testosterone" Cringe.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 06:59 AM
2

This is exactly what's wrong with feminism. Instead of making things better for women, they're making it worse for men. Well this doesn't make it better for men, it makes it worse for women. Maybe we'll all be denied bodily autonomy equally one day. Denmark does not need conscripts. Conscripts do not make good soldiers.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:09 AM
3

The Duluth Model is a domestic violence advocacy organization that works with government and community organizations to institute policies that support victims and reduce Intimate Partner Violence. It is very explicitly gendered. Check out their FAQ. https://www.theduluthmodel.org/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 09:42 PM
1

Can you point out a specific criticism of feminism that has been made here that is unfair?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 09:22 PM
1

OK, so what do we do about it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 09:15 PM
2

It's a lot like "gender equity" policies in the states. Services and resources only available for women. Women doing better than men defined as parity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 09:11 PM
0

"Gamma bias"? So cringe.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 08:47 PM
10

I would very much like to have a meet and greet with your community.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 08:43 PM
1

Um... three or four. All of the major psychological medical associations disagree with you on this one. Suicide rates drop drastically for people suffering gender dysphoria who receive proper treatment. I'm curious, can you support your statement with any facts and/or argumentation?
/r/MensRights27/01/23 08:27 PM
3

Well yeah. Look, I've got a homeless violent felon ex con living in my house right now. I'm not talking out of my ass. You asked for advice serving a vulnerable population. I'm just saying go in eyes open. Be careful.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 08:19 PM
1

It doesn't need to be amicable. But walking away from the conversation just cedes the ground to the alt right. Whether you read it or not, impressionable people are going to read it, and if we don't engage we're going to lose. We need to counter misogynist narratives directly through engagement. We also need to counter misandrist narratives on the left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 08:08 PM
2

I find this a persistent problem with the Left. We seem determined to purify ourselves into irrelevance. Rather than engage with people that we disagree with and attempt to influence them, we just try to avoid them as much as possible because it makes us feel icky to hear people say stuff that we think is wrong. We're not going to grow a social movement or influence anyone by isolating ourselves to small groups of people that already agree with us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 07:06 PM
2

You shouldn't be upset with yourself for not noticing something. Don't waste your guilt.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 06:38 PM
0

How many trans people do you know?
/r/MensRights27/01/23 06:03 PM
0

That's the wrong kind of equality. How about bodily autonomy for everyone? If you can't get people to volunteer for your army, your nation state sucks.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 05:51 PM
2

Into the breach! Damn the hindmost!
/r/MensRights27/01/23 05:44 PM
1

Be careful. Hurt people hurt people.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 04:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter