TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dimitrisan Archive

View 6 posts and 114 comments by Dimitrisan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

No, I've seen divorced men play the exact same games: dropping off the children at their mother's house a few hours late schedule a 3 week long vacation with his children and not even mention the vacation or the dates until everything is planned and paid for drop a daughter and her 2 friends at the mother's house because the father told her that the friends could stay the night (this was a real dick move)
/r/MensRights24/12/15 09:21 PM
3

Wouldn't surprise me if it was more about simply taking the kid as a way to get back at the other parent. Some divorced parents do this type of shit to each other all the time.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 03:31 PM
309

I think a better title would have been: "Newest wage gap data shows men only paid 68 cents on the dollar compared to women."
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:57 PM
1

The Supreme Court disagrees. Different levels of scrutiny are applied to different types of discrimination: Race based discrimination gets strict scrutiny. To be constitutional, the state needs to have a compelling state interest, and the means of discrimination must be as narrowly tailored as possible to that interest. Gender based discrimination gets intermediate scrutiny. The governmental interest must be important, and the means must be substantially related, or tailored as closely as possib…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 01:04 AM
17

One of the comments marked as a NYT pick: My father was a deadbeat dad. My mother worked, but it was not enough. If it were not for my maternal grandparents, I don't know what would have happened to us. I'm not very sympathetic to these fathers.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:27 PM
109

There's also a lot of bad information spread across this subreddit regarding prenups. They are easy to have enforced if you follow common sense: Both people should have separate lawyers draft and review the prenup The prenup should not be grossly unfair The prenup should be freely signed several months in advance of the wedding
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:32 PM
92

Women vote in higher numbers than men...and politicians pander to voters. Getting men out to vote should be a top 5 priority for this sub.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 04:06 PM
2

She got shot down in the video for all except the last guy. And for all we know that last one might have been staged. ...but I don't see how this fits into this sub. Is there actually evidence of a guy trying this and getting arrested? Or is this just speculation that this would turn out significantly different? Because if the latter, then this belongs in /r/mensrants.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:32 PM
-14

this belongs in /r/mensrants
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:44 PM
0

20% of women have participated in a gang rape? I don't believe that at all. Let's go ahead and downvote this before we start looking like the crazy feminists that make up statistics.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:43 PM
3

Downvoted because this isn't a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:32 PM
53

This happens so often the issue is among the Texas Attorney General's Office frequently asked questions. According to the Attorney General even after dismissing a mistaken dad's duty to pay child support he is "still responsible for arrears", responsible for any back money owed. It pisses me off so much that Texas's solution to this problem is explaining their theft from a non-father in a FAQ section. Before I clicked on this article, I was thinking about how often we're hearing about these case…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:39 PM
7

That's actually a straw man of my position. I'll be more clear and perhaps that will help: I'm sure I'm not the only person on this sub who laughed when I heard then term 'men's rights' for the first time. The issues men face and the need for awareness are not widely discussed in our society. One of the reasons I stuck around here after first thinking this sub was a joke was a news story about a man forced to pay child support after a paternity test proved him not to be the father. I did some se…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:26 PM
28

...which is why we need to ban facebook posts like this. Posting all these anonymous idiot straw-men feminists is basically this subreddit's equivalent of crying about .77 cents on the dollar.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 03:44 PM
22

There actually could be some logic to this in certain situations. The article is not specific enough to decide if that's the case here, but I'll give you an example: A and B get married. A goes to college, and then medical school. B decides to work right out of high school as a truck driver, and decides to work extra long hours so A can focus on school and not worry about the bills. Two years after A is out of medical school, in the middle of A's residency, A and B get divorced. A is on the path…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:42 PM
2

This is a non-story to me. Women buy more stuff - especially for families, and so companies market to them. This is similar to how people enjoy men as late night television hosts. It's not a conspiracy against women - it's a company's rational reaction to the market.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:33 PM
6

This won't do anything they change the mind of a feminist. "Men are still at fault because these women have internalized patriarchy."
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:24 PM
2

I mean, with this precedent, couldn't we just say that any contract can be arbitrarily overridden by a judge? A will is not a contract. Regardless of that fact, there are a ton of reasons why contracts can be overridden by a judge. Just to name a few: fraud, duress, unconscionability, bad faith, undue influence, concealment, capacity, etc.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:16 PM
11

This is an outrage story, but not the one that really matters. After all, this guy is a billionaire. It is unjust to award his ex-wife all that money, but it's not going to have any effect on his life. What we should be outraged with and talking about every single day on this sub is the fathers who get thrown in jail after they can't afford court awarded payments to their ex-wives. It's the average man that loses this type of divorce battle who needs to be in the public eye, not the super rich b…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:36 PM
84

It's one of a number of straw man arguments they try to build up to discredit people who disagree with their view. Just look at the t-shirts and signs: "Rape is Real" I'm not sure these people actually believe that the speaker is denying the existence of rape, but that's apparently what they're trying to imply about him. "sex without consent is always rape" Are we talking about affirmative consent? I'd be surprised if every woman at the protest made sure they had their prior partners explicitly …
/r/MensRights17/02/15 06:31 PM
2

I think the opinion of anyone who is not eligible to be drafted should not be considered when considering a draft.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 06:49 PM
2

"Ban Bossy" "Shirtgate" "Manspreading" - they make up a new non-issue to be pissed off about every single week.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:20 PM
42

I liked this bit on Ayaan Hirsi Ali: She also believes that American feminists need to stop concentrating on “trivial bullshit” and start focusing on the basic human rights abuses women face around the world.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:29 PM
1

Speaking of DNA tests and the royal family....
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:58 PM
9

Why should it be easier to kick someone out accused of underage drinking or brawling than someone accused of rape? That is the question. Actually, the question is why are we kicking people out of anything based solely on accusations?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:02 PM
3

This underlines the thing that pisses me off the most about the equal pay argument. Feminists don't look at a male septic tank servicer and a female hotel maid and think it's unfair they have different salaries even if they have the same number of hours at work. I don't want to build up too much of a straw man, but sometimes I wonder if feminists think sociology and women's studies majors really work as hard as aerospace engineering and computer science majors do in college. They say equal pay f…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:25 PM
1

Private companies should be able to get rid of employees if they want to do so regardless of the reason. The NFL thinks it's good for their brand to get Ray Rice off the team and out of the league, so he's gone.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:31 PM
10

It's always the same ridiculous argument: "We don't want to prosecute her because it would discourage any false accusers (who we are constantly arguing don't exist at all) from coming forward."
/r/MensRights19/09/14 03:43 PM
3

we’re the ones who get pregnant and, overwhelmingly, have to deal with the consequences of an unwanted pregnancy. Abortion is all on us, and parenting often is, too. That line is quite infuriating. Men have no say when it comes to an unwanted pregnancy. Women have complete control over an unwanted pregnancy and can force the consequences on the man, whereas women have the option of abortion if desired.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 09:41 PM
7

I saw that Kennedy chick on Real Time a couple years ago and she stood out so much from one episode on that show that I still remember her. She stood out because she was easily the dumbest person I've seen on Maher's show - and he gets a lot of dumb people as guests. Fox must be getting really desperate to add her as a host.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 02:58 PM
1

It's a common misconception that an appeal is basically a request for the higher court to double check the evidence and see if they reach the same conclusion. That is not how an appeal works (at least in the USA). For an appeal, you have to show an error in the lower court that caused an incorrect judgment. You can't just say you appeal because you don't like the conclusion - you have to point out where the lower court made a mistake. That said, it's fairly easy to request an appeal on any case …
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:11 AM
9

Lobbyists and lawyers actually get away with logical fallacies all the time. Winning an argument does not always require perfect logic: There's a well known tort case where the plaintiff charged the defendant with negligence leading to injuries. The defendant's lawyer argued that it was a battery and requested the judge to instruct the jury to determine whether the action constituted a battery or negligence. The plaintiff's lawyer did not object to this instruction, and only objected on the inst…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 04:14 PM
12

There's no news to report - this is a stupid post. It's a lawyer's job to try and get their client out of jail by whatever means possible.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:28 PM
0

That poster says, "There's no wage gap" - and then points out a wage gap at the bottom.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:42 PM
2

I have posted similar sentiments on here before because I agree with you: I don't think you should take and show naked pictures of a person who cannot consent. That said, I can keep two thoughts in my head at once and that's the point of this story. When a woman takes naked pictures of a baby, no one thinks anything of it. A female babysitter that isn't even related to the child would probably receive more benefit of the doubt than a male relative/father taking pictures of their own child. It's …
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:49 PM
9

A 2012 federal government survey revealed that 15 million American children live in households without fathers; a stark increase over a 1960 study that showed just 11 percent lived in homes without a dad. It always bothers me seeing numbers jump from 'number of people' to 'percentage of people' when comparing two different studies or time periods. It makes me think I'm being told propaganda because they don't want to tell me the actual figures.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:14 PM
14

There's no money in people being homeless. There is money in locking people up. And with the drug war starting to fade away with states legalizing and public opinion shifting on the matter entirely, a lot of prisons are probably worried about losing customers.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 12:45 AM
0

I dislike the implied sexism in your comment: 'men think through things and women don't'.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:53 PM
-5

Not to highjack the top comment, but people on r/mensrights are always talking about how we're not associated with the red pill or whatever that sub's name is. I don't think your username is helping that situation.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:23 PM
2

Downvoted because I need an account to see whatever you're linking to.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:36 PM
-1

Yes, but this is not an issue where men are being denied rights because they are men - it is because they are gay - that's why it would fit better in other subs.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:21 PM
-11

This is somewhat misleading when posted in /r/mensrights. It's really a /r/gayrights issue. I'm not convinced this situation would be any different if this were a lesbian couple rather than a gay couple.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:03 PM
9

The Guardian is a British paper and the British spelling of defense is defence.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 05:13 AM
2

More importantly, does a depressed man deserve to be able to use 'depression' as an excuse for murder regardless of the cause of the depression?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:29 AM
1

Not to sound picky, but do you have a source besides "human-stupidity.com" ?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:09 PM
1

Did you even read my comment? I asked for an example besides statutory rape - and you didn't provide any.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:08 PM
2

There's been at least one case I've seen of statutory rape where this has been the case, but can you provide a single other example of a case other than statutory rape where a male claimed he was raped, went to the police, and was then ordered to pay child support?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 09:58 PM
1

Part of my definitions for liberal and conservative would include the following: Conservative: "wants to keep things they way they are" Liberal: "open to new ideas and information" The way I see it, liberals are the ones who are going to be open to changing at some point where as conservatives will not. The Democrats only pander to women because they vote in much higher numbers than men. If men stepped up and voted at the same rate as women, a lot of this stuff would go away.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:05 PM
3

Exact quote: "So when I say we lost the argument, we lost that argument. Now let’s move on to some other issues. I believe it’s still there, but my God if we didn’t prove it the first four years, what do you think the chances are now?"
/r/MensRights18/04/14 08:35 PM
-2

Did YOU watch the video? He says he believes it's a real issue but that they need to drop it because they've already lost the fight and it won't do any good.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:12 PM
-1

Just google search birthers in congress and you'll find plenty. Here's a video of a congressman in 2013 who's a birther: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXJd5ug4uto
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:59 PM
1

Are you kidding me? There's at least a dozen Republican birthers in congress that you can find with a simple google search (highest number I've seen is 40). The Palin thing is a ridiculous false equivalency - I challenge you to find just one congressman who said anything of the sort.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:31 PM
5

My response is that the Republicans have decided to push religion, corporatism, birtherism, and obstructionism over economic recovery. It's not news to anyone that a two party system sucks and that you're almost always picking the lesser of two evils - but in this case it's fairly obvious that voting Republican is suicide for anyone who isn't a millionaire.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:15 PM
-1

You're projecting again. I never called anyone a pedophile. Grow up.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:13 PM
-1

I never made that connection. It seems you're the one who is projecting.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:07 PM
0

When did I ever say any such thing? Oh that's right, never.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:43 PM
-1

I think it's weird that this subreddit has a giant problem with circumcision because 'an infant can't consent', but now apparently taking pictures of naked children who can't consent is all of a sudden morally acceptable.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:26 AM
-1

My point is that you don't know what's in someone else's head when you find out they have pictures of naked people. If it's going to be illegal for people to have pictures of naked strange children, it seems to follow that they shouldn't have pictures of naked children whom they might know or be related to. Otherwise it follows that you should be able to have pictures of anyone of any age fully naked so long as you don't personally sexualize them - which I think anyone can see would lead to prob…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:16 AM
-3

Your accusation makes me think you're the one who might be secretly attracted to children.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:15 AM
-1

OOC, would you think any different if it was a mom taking the picture? No, I wouldn't. Taking pictures of naked children is weird.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:25 PM
-8

I think it's strange to have pictures of naked children even if they are your own. Why does this guy have to see his kids naked? Why can't he have pictures of them playing while wearing clothes?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:47 PM
9

Bill Maher has consistently been a voice for men's issues throughout the 90's and 2000's. He's never to my knowledge used the term 'men's rights', but he actively challenges feminists and their ideas. He's wrong on this one issue, but let's not bring out our pitchforks because out of the many planks on the platform he disagrees on one of them. You win the battle of ideas through debate, not crucifixion.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:26 PM
5

Then people would think he's trying to combine equal pay day and breast cancer support.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:02 AM
2

You forget: feminists redefined the word minority to no longer have anything to do with numbers. Minority according to feminists means a group with the history of being oppressed by the group in power.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:21 PM
6

Something people haven't mentioned yet is that the girl is very attractive. I'd be interested in seeing what happens when a fat ugly chick does the same thing - do they get the same result?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:59 PM
10

Click on article Search for "rape" Word not found Sit there puzzled why there's not a feminist outrage at this double standard
/r/MensRights13/03/14 09:02 PM
1

Mine was definitely correct. Look at it again.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:52 PM
2

When in doubt, substitute another group to determine if it's sexism/racism: More white people = more black people = more money, why not make black people pay more to show up?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:24 PM
1

I love club music and i wish i could go to clubs more often. It's fun. I would literally go to clubs even if there were no women. This is how I picture you
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:26 PM
5

Agreed that 10 years is too high, but I think the woman should register as a sex offender as well.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:04 PM
3

The right to equal treatment with IPV Can someone explain to me where that one's coming from?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:58 PM
16

I'd like to see how this judge would rule on a similar case involving a 25 year old unattractive male teacher and a 16 year old girl. In this case they got a plea deal, but of course the judge has to agree to it.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:11 PM
4

I like the corollary even more: Does that mean if a woman doesn't like me, she's going to pay for herself?
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:51 PM
-3

I'll repeat a third time and then I'm done arguing with such a stupendous idiot: A few examples of women getting away with murder does not mean that women as a sex as a whole can get away with murder. I hate to have to dumb this down this much, but your thick head is apparently unable to comprehend the simple idea that a few examples do not extrapolate to the entire sex. If you don't believe me, then feel free to test this for yourself. Tell your wife/girlfriend/sister/mother to murder a few peo…
/r/MensRights12/02/14 06:10 PM
2

5 seconds of research where I found a case of a woman getting sentenced to life in prison where she didn't even pull the trigger herself. You're an idiot since you completely missed my OJ Simpson/black people killing women analogy.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:24 PM
27

In defense of the comments: the part of this post where you can drown 5 kids and get away with it is stupid. Finding a single case where a woman got away with drowning 5 kids does not mean that every woman could get away with it. OJ Simpson got away with murder, but that hardly means black men can murder white women and get away with that.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 06:03 AM
29

I wouldn't mind seeing guys use this strategy in the future: A guy and girl meet at a party - both intoxicated and have sex. The next day or two the girl regrets the encounter and reports it as rape. When arrested or brought in to the police for a statement, the guy reports the woman as sexually assaulting him and requests to press rape charges against her.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 04:43 PM
20

While I agree whole heartedly with his premise that people innocent until proven guilty; and evidence should be paramount before using someone, Woody Allen is a pedophile. He cheated on his wife with his adopted Japanese daughter. Had to flee the country because of it. Weather he attacked this girl or not is unclear but I really don't give a fuck about Woody Allen. And I dont think it belongs in MRs. I don't want this movement to be about supporting people like him. Wow. That's an ignorant comme…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:49 PM
1

I don't understand why some people use things like this which 'children write' and consider it to carry more weight than something which came from an adult. Regardless of whether or not this note was written by a child, it remains the fact that it's being passed off as the opinion of a seven year old. Seven year olds don't know anything - nor should their opinions be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:19 PM
6

I'm surprised no one has linked /r/pussypass yet.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:20 AM
12

No, that's going about this all wrong. The second he starts a custody battle, he loses all credibility for an appeal on the matter.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:19 PM
-5

Obviously she was wrong, but can we avoid using arguments from feminists in the 1960's that aren't used today? This sub would go berserk if Jezebel started using quotes from men in 1963 as fuel for their arguments. Let's not sink to that level.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 05:47 PM
13

Right to work states would have something to say about that.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 05:40 PM
2

While funny, this suggestion for one person to get in does not solve the problem of gender bias in the entire system.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 04:51 PM
9

I'm pretty sure if that gym said black and white people have separate workout times - but they're equal - that it would be a big issue.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:23 PM
2

Defense attorney Joseph Steinberger asked that sentencing be delayed for a year to allow Faustini to perform community service to show that she can be a productive citizen. He suggested she could volunteer five hours a week at either the Humane Society of Knox County or at New Hope for Women. I wonder how she'd feel about the guy volunteering 5 hours per week if he had actually committed the crime.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:17 PM
3

Are you suggesting that O.J. Simpson's murder trial didn't follow him around for years even after being found not guilty? If he had been given anonymity then it would have been different.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 05:20 PM
3

The police aren't required to give the name of the person being charged to the press either. Freedom of the press means that the press can choose to report the name if they have it. The press can do the same with alleged victims - it's their choice to report the name. As for gag orders, there are a number of challenges on the basis of the First Amendment regarding the legality of these orders. Historically they have held up in court, but it wouldn't surprise me if that changed in the future beca…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 04:50 PM
1

Yeah...I'm gonna have to go ahead and point you in the direction of the rules on the sidebar: Overview of Mod Policy: No advice animals, rage comics, or other low-effort image posts. Mods may remove these at their discretion. Now get this shit out of here.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 04:41 PM
-5

Welcome to /r/mensrights where generic stereotypes about men and women get upvoted to the top. Can we please get this shit out of here - it makes this sub look awful.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 04:04 PM
5

It's not just about rape. I sort of believe everyone should have pre-conviction anonymity regardless of the crime. Being accused of anything can potentially be life changing even if later found not guilty. However, the freedom of the press is an enumerated right in the Constitution; which means the only way to get pre-conviction anonymity would be to have a constitutional amendment which alters the First Amendment - and I don't see that happening.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 04:01 PM
-16

Wow, I'm truly disappointed in this sub for upvoting this pos. This sub is starting to go downhill fast.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:22 AM
2

Come on people - this was posted at least twice before and one of the earlier posts is still in the top 20 of /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:57 PM
4

A workplace related death due to a dangerous job is not the same thing as violence perpetrated by a coworker.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:12 PM
46

And of course, feminists seem to find a reason as to why that's the fault of men.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 12:43 PM
27

Don't forget those pathetic rock band fans. Bach is so much better than The Who, but adults today have no sense of good music.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:49 PM
12

In case anyone doesn't know, Lorena Bobbitt was found not guilty of cutting off her husband's penis (despite admitting it at the trial) and was released.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 02:16 PM
1

All men and all women do not learn the same way as one another :o
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:45 AM
4

Feminists aren't actually fighting to stop them - but I suspect that's largely because they're not very prestigious. Either way, let's not attack feminists on something they're not doing just because we think they might.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:35 AM
-2

I'm not sure I follow you. If you're saying a person's sense of morality should stop them from saying, "whites only", then why doesn't that same logic apply when a college says, "men only"?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:33 AM
3

There are still a few all male colleges in the United States, but there are many more female schools.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:13 AM
4

So a private school should be able to say, "no black people allowed"?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:12 AM
-1

You idiot. People are guilty after they have been proven to be guilty. You're just assuming there's innocent people that haven't been exonerated because you're a moron. Prove there's innocent people currently in jail before you open your mouth.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:10 AM
-2

Last thing I say before I ignore you: look at the numbers. 2,061 wrongful convictions in over 400 million cases. To think this guy would get convicted based on those odds is ignorant to a level I can't even fathom. http://theweek.com/article/index/228292/25-years-of-wrongful-convictions-by-the-numbers
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:40 PM
-7

You need to live in the real world. It's a lot harder to convict people of crimes than you think. The US isn't a racist country that locks up every black guy that gets arrested. You sound like a liberal equivalent to the idiots on Fox.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:35 PM
-3

You're the naive little kid. Do some research before you speak next time.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:33 PM
-3

You obviously know nothing about the U.S. legal system.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:09 PM
-6

Right.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:08 PM
-6

Quit acting like an ignorant child. The whole point of our criminal justice system is that you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was committed. I'm not worried one bit about ever facing this situation because no one could ever prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I did something which I did not do.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 09:52 PM
-6

While not technically a guilty plea, a no contest plea is effectively the same thing.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 09:40 PM
-4

It's not victim blaming if the victim actually did something to contribute to it. Admitting the crime certainly qualifies in my book.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 09:04 PM
-4

I would say common sense tells you not to plead guilty to something you didn't do. If I had a lawyer tell me to do that, I'd be asking for a new lawyer immediately.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:12 PM
7

Despite persistent denials, Banks eventually pleaded no contest on advice of his lawyer. He is somewhat to blame for it in that case. You don't admit to a crime if you didn't do it even if your lawyer tells you it's a good idea. You request new council if your lawyer is giving you advice that shitty. It's never a good idea to plead no contest if you're innocent. That said, he was a 16 year old kid and perhaps there was no one around to shake some sense into him. It speaks largely to the real inj…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:07 PM
162

I wanted to keep the title fairly short, but I should admit it is slightly misleading. He's still ordered to pay the back pay of child support in addition to the $30,000 he's already paid, but he's not going to have to pay in the future.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter