TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DinosBiggestFan Archive

View 1 post and 547 comments by DinosBiggestFan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Good update. It would have been a red flag if she had pushed the issue, IMO.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 10:16 AM
14

Women are shown to more frequently have a rape fetish. Which is sad, but true. Rape is gross, no matter who the victim or who the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 03:12 AM
2

This doesn't make sense. Women that age literally cannot have children.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:41 AM
2

No, because too much of feminism is about supremacy now.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 12:36 AM
2

Imagine calling half of the requirement to even breed "mutations". That is literally just like a child saying "ewww, COOTIES!"
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:55 PM
10

Well, it's what they think they want but they've been misled.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:09 AM
87

That is not something they are capable of comprehending.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:08 AM
2

There are three. They're combination drunks. They slide back and forth between them, as if it gives them an alcohol induced bipolar disorder.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:54 AM
18

My friend, you spend too much time reading the mainstream rags to get your factoids.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:43 AM
14

That may be so in most places right now. Sad to say.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:40 AM
16

Pretty unnecessary way to make your point and not likely to change any minds.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:37 AM
13

Protecting family and our people has more or less died as a concept in the modern age anyway. We have almost literally an entire continent to ourselves in the U.S., and in Europe there are many alliances that make warfare fairly difficult without backing from foreign entities. ​ There is very little reason to actually war in today's world, because territory expansion is heavily rejected and the ability to wage war at long ranges gets simultaneously easier and more difficult due to how humanity w…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:36 AM
32

If you believe that the current stuff being pushed all over the place is "equal social footing", you're insane -- and sorry, egalitarianism means if there's a draft, you should be on there too. ​ That's true equality. Especially if men and women are literally no different, as what they try to push right now.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:32 AM
2

"to look like his father/brothers" What
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:29 AM
-4

I am not personally against it, but I am also not for it. ​ Most women I know state that they prefer it, but..I'm not sure that we should be dictating something like that based on what more women prefer because that's just a trap.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:27 AM
56

Not really sure how I stumbled on this thread tonight, but usually publicizing evidence can work against you so I would leave that for a last ditch effort.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:57 AM
2

Too bad the fake news pushes Black Lives Matters' agendas. The narrative of the fake news is anti-white, not anti-black. I have also actively seen this happening.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 12:18 PM
1

People are saying the teacher was just doing her job and that she wasn't actually upset. I was giving you an out so you could be perceived as asking a critical question. Fuck me right?
/r/MensRights01/11/16 04:38 PM
-1

/u/i_says_2_mabel was just doing their job, they weren't upset!
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:47 AM
1

I'm just going to say that this kid is an absolute badass.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:36 AM
2

Potentially true, but then a lot of people still don't see their supremacy BS either. It's a hard fought battle either way. Trying to educate the differences between old (real) feminism and new (female supremacy) feminism takes more effort than a lot of people seem to be willing to put forth.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:17 AM
3

Yes, but an ideology and definition can change over time and be corrupted. There are currently a very large, very loud number of people involved with the female supremacy shtick, and that is corrupting feminism. To the point where the people becoming a part of the ideology are now being taught that it's okay to think this way. I will disagree vehemently that they aren't feminists -- They are very much new wave feminists, and it needs to be prevented for sure.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:09 AM
1

That doesn't make sense though. You're a feminist both by deeds and the fact you identify as one, as we identify as MRAs. Individual feminists are as much a representation of feminism as individual MRAs are of Men's Rights. The difference is that there isn't a lot of condemnation on the feminist side, and apparently there are people on the egalitarian/Men's Rights side of things that pretend that they aren't actually feminists.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:57 AM
2

Shh, I'm not sure he's smart enough to know that.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:31 AM
1

This is far from the truth. Even doctors google things. SysAdmins google things. Every professional worth their salts know when they can google something to confirm what they already know, rather than just assuming that they're always correct.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 01:02 AM
0

Yep, it can. That's why smart people know what they're looking for.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:54 AM
4

Just want to say..Even very smart people turn to google. It leads to very good reference points.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:44 PM
8

No, it needs to be refined. Not eliminated.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:23 PM
2

Many things they do is inherently oppressive to our rights. Including our rights to speak on their subreddit, which we have invited them to do here for a long, long time. Instead, we get banned and trolled to oblivion. I've still got screenshots somewhere of being banned by one of their mods for speaking out against some of their bullshit. Comparisons are okay.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:48 AM
2

Shots fired.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:45 AM
4

I always get downvoted to fuck when I say this same thing. So have an upvote.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:39 PM
2

You have your beliefs, I'll stick with mine. Overall, shit in the world regarding racism, feminism and this "alpha/beta" shit is pretty idiotic.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 06:17 AM
1

I get absolutely nothing out of being nice, but I don't lose anything either. Maybe that's not true- I gain loyalty from people who matter, and they in return gain loyalty from me. Relationships aren't just take, take, take. It's a balance between give and take.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 06:02 AM
2

Kindness is the result of your chivalry, but it should not be the goal. Get your head game straight. There's nothing empowering about being "a nice guy." Being "empowered" is not the goal when being nice. I wanted to start with this, because you're seriously under a poor misconception. Being truly chivalrous is about not giving a fuck about what others think about you. You're trying awfully hard to do the same thing as radical feminists do- Labeling what makes a man a man. I also never claimed I…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 05:40 AM
1

What are they teaching in schools these days? Have you never learned the scientific method? That's not a rhetorical question. Please tell me whether you have ever learned the scientific method or not. Do you understand how to read in the slightest? Let me direct you toward this: "I've always felt it's a shitty way of doing things, as you're making a claim the same as I am. I know what it is, and it's my opinion that it's a pretty idiotic thing. If one person believes vehemently in something else…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 05:30 AM
1

But really how hard is it to pull out a chair or open the door? It's not hard, so why make a childish fuss about it? If you do it, great. If you don't do it, great. If you don't do it because you have some idiotic stance against it, pathetic. In fact she probably does it all the time herself when you are not around. Why yes, yes she does. How does that prevent someone from doing something for their significant other? Where do you stop? Do you do EVERYTHING for that person? Where do you draw the …
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 12:21 PM
-1

EXTERMINATE. EXTERIMINAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATE!
/r/MensRights02/05/13 12:16 PM
3

Pulling out chairs is a little bit traditionalist don't you think? That said, to make life easier on the person I love I'd do things to assist her. Is it nice? Yes. Is it appreciated? Yes. Is it necessary? No. When you're in love with someone, you do things for them. Not because it's necessary, or because society has a fucked up image and thinks you should do them, but because you want them to know that you care. It's not about getting something in return. What's "bs" is that you seem so burned …
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 12:07 PM
0

The whole idea behind taking a red pill is that you want to see the world as it is, rather than as everybody tells you. That means you have to be skeptical. I am skeptical about everything, but reading a lot of accounts from convicted rapists in journals and biographies/autobiographies a long while back somewhat nullifies that. And law enforcement officials and therapists are not scientists. They're just repeating what they've been told. They had to have been told by someone. "burden of proof" I…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 09:45 AM
3

A beta being chivalrous = shitty, you're better off not doing it. "Oh, you see how kind I am, this makes me more attractive I hope" A beta is expecting a reward or increased favor for being nice and courteous. An alpha being chivalrous = putting his woman in her place. "I pull the seat out for you because I'm manly as fuck and if you don't want me to fuck you" An alpha does shit because he wants to, not because of some reward or what people think of him. I fucking hate these labels. I'm by all m…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 09:25 AM
0

Quote a reasonable amount of credible research to disprove it, then. Repetitiousness alone isn't credible enough, but when most therapists and law enforcement officials I've met, personally or through proxy, say that it's violence/control that they get off to, not the sex itself, then I'm more inclined to believe them than some random off the internet with zero qualifications. It sounds like you're making an attempt to prove me wrong- But what you're stating is simply an opinion without much bas…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 09:07 AM
1

The end result is sexual release. But the way they reach that is violence and control. If it were just about sex itself, they'd go fuck some cheap prostitutes because there's less of a stigma about that. Thus, it's about violence even if the end result is sexual. Interestingly, what makes you think you're more qualified than essentially every other therapist?
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 08:55 AM
0

Considering everyone knows (and should know) this already. Most people rape for violence (EG: Control). Sex is barely part of it. Do you not understand this? There's a reason why most classes when training to become some sort of law enforcement has something along these lines.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 08:42 AM
11

I just learned about this. I thought the FBI just did their job and found them on their own.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:02 AM
5

Take ALL OF MY FUCKING UPVOTES.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:01 AM
-2

Generally, though. Rapists are in it for the violence, not for the sex. Especially if you consider that violence is more encompassing than just, for example, hitting or murder etc.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 08:46 AM
1

Well I'm an anti-feminist, and I used to be pro-feminism until I saw what it was nowadays. I'd prefer hopeful stories, but the hope-not-hope ratio is severely one-sided, and not toward the good one. To be honest, I don't mind this so-called circlejerk- It's opening people up more to the hypocrisy of feminism. It's also not quite so anti-feminist here, but rather anti radical. There are a lot of good feminists. But a lot of bad ones too. And often it seems like there are more bad ones than good.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 09:04 AM
2

So privileged to be poisoned by his testosterone.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:35 AM
4

Welllll, let's be honest..There are more instances of feminists acting stupid than uplifting things. I don't post here as much as I did before not because of the lack of uplifting but because everyone is just circling around. This subreddit's hivemind can never make a decision and stick with it.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 10:57 AM
1

I'm all for people exercising their right to not marry in some sort of protest against females. But it's not fair to just say "don't marry". Exercising caution with who you're spending your life with is important, and should be used for marriage prospects.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/13 08:02 AM
1

Ahhh, Mystery Men.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 03:01 AM
0

Well, at least you aren't called racist because you don't like the shit he's put our country through.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:41 AM
2

I came after being opened to the new feminism by a rad-fem moderator of CreepyPMs. Who herself has said that she's proud to be a rad-fem and, though other feminists laugh at her, it's not an insult.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:39 AM
4

I've noticed that this subreddit is geared a little bit more to the conservative side. I am nowhere close to conservative. Nowhere close.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:38 AM
1

Dude, I just said "consulted". Not even accused. That concerns you? Unless you word it as something like, for example: "This guy might have raped me, what would you describe as rape?" whilst refusing to give the person's name, then it's an accusation toward a specific and named person. Even then, how I worded it is an accusation. Even if you ask "what would you guys define as rape?", they would ask you why and you would either be forced to give a reason or have to just walk out.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:33 AM
-1

Glad I took this bullet a while ago, for reasons essentially as stupid.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:51 AM
1

Not every woman, but a large enough pool that it deserves consideration.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:22 AM
1

And likely that is what the authorities would tell her and not press charges. It doesn't hurt to check. Not if she cried rape. Because that would be victim blaming. Still not consent to penetration, that it is taken as such is just another example of how messed up society's understanding of consent is. Then communicate. Here's how things work- Yeah, maybe the guy should've asked too. But smart people understand that if you don't want something, it's your responsibility to say so. You don't assum…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 06:17 PM
0

I tend to respect the corollary far more: if you want something, make it clear. Don't just do. Ask, then do. Then she starts to feel like you don't want something, which breaks the mood. Both are at fault, but she wasn't held down in any way. She wasn't forced into it. Neither of them knew the other boundaries, so it was a mistake, not rape. Nope, he went ahead without checking with her. Why does the burden of clarity lie on her and her alone? Because in this situation, it appears to be her who …
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:54 PM
1

I agree jokes are jokes, but not all jokes should be free from consequences. Some legitimately have malicious undertones to it. While it may not be in this case, and I'm certainly not caring about it, a lot of jokes the feminists have been using for the past long while have had malicious undertones.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:49 PM
0

In reverse order: We should all know how the law treats us and act accordingly. If the authorities tell you something is rape, don't do it. As long as it's a crime, don't do it if you can't face the consequences. This is why most people aren't marrying, and a lot of people are swearing off sex now. If the authorities act in the favor of women, why bother? If you don't see this as an issue that needs to be changed, then I feel sorry for you. I didn't say anyone was allowed to, and she didn't. She…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:43 PM
1

It's not a false accusation if she's unsure. ..Yes, it is. If you weren't sure, you shouldn't have done it. Simple. It gives a bad name to legitimate rape victims. You are not, NOT allowed to change your mind after the fact. That's a ridiculous notion. Taking it to the authorities, where people actually know the law and what constitutes rape and what doesn't isn't a bad thing. The authorities changed the rape definition to penetration, which essentially directly targets men. I'm not saying she s…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:33 PM
1

Not trying to do that, just trying to have them share the blame equally. False rape accusations because you decided to get black out drunk and have sex with a guy means you've got responsibility too. To quote one of my other posts: We don't do it with drunken driving, we shouldn't do it with drunken sex. Drink responsibly or don't drink at all.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:25 PM
0

Which goes with what needs to become common practice: "Don't remove responsibility from the women in drunken scenarios and place it all on the probably-drunk men."
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:49 PM
1

I'm not actually up in arms about this license plate. Check your facts. I also want to point something the fuck out: Now, if feminists get bent out over those jokes, and then MRA's express no interest or positive interest in jokes about how a man is dumb, simple, or dependent on his wife to think it just looks better socially. It may look better socially, but we're in a feminist environment and that's what a lot of societal standards are based upon. What it looks like to feminists is that we sup…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:42 PM
1

It is not unrelated to the issue, nor is it random. He wants us to get involved in one of those topics instead of posting here- In those topics, deletions or mass downvotes and personal attacks ensue. It's very related, and if our own mods and community don't even understand that then what is the fucking point of this subreddit?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:41 PM
1

Maybe you havent heard of this whole "promise ring" thing. This is a religious based thing, I'll grant you, but it is a branch of virginity not the societal and anatomical roots themselves. Also, if hymen intact = virgin, then a lot of girls lose their virginity to bicycles. This is so, and what's wrong with that? People say that virginity shouldn't be made a big deal out of, why should it be in that case? You can argue (and you would be wrong in terms of anatomy) that virginity is a mental thin…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:39 PM
0

It's nowhere close to that, actually. People have different definitions of "hooking up", and the usual definition is referring to sex. If her definition is different than the norm, and she doesn't tell him, expecting him to know is fallacious.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:37 PM
5

Society sucks when it comes to perceived racism as well. It's very tiresome. =/
/r/MensRights02/04/13 02:17 AM
-3

And then get censored by feminists. That'll go over well, truly. That's not what we're fighting against at all. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:47 AM
6

You do not have to be here all day every day to be an MRA.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:42 AM
13

People make kitchen jokes lots. That doesn't make them misogynists. The flaw in that is that feminists think it does. I agree that humor should be able to attack anyone- But that means it must be able to be utilized against white people, black people, latinos, Asian and any other. But whenever a minority has a joke made at the expense of their color's stereotype, they label it as "racist" and jump on the person. Usually violently.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:42 AM
1

Simple: Guys are out supporting the spoiled women who get to sit at home and bitch at them. That said, I'd be totally fine if my future wife was a stay-at-home, but she better not harbor any radical feminist views behind my back like the one at Cherry-blossom. I am not supporting someone who views us as disposable.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:37 AM
2

It's wrong to ask for sex now? Wut. How many of you boys, as teenagers, constantly asked your girlfriends for sex?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:34 AM
1

... ... ...
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:28 AM
0

I have to agree with this blog post. I can agree with parts but some of it not really. "She led him on," "She shouldn't have gotten drunk," "Did you see what she was wearing?" ..believe it of not, the majority of men would find this to be disgusting I will address these in order- 1: She led him on. This is completely valid. Women send these signals all the time, and if they're party animals it's what they're there to do. You can't go into a club, strike up a conversation with some random hot guy…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:28 AM
0

Not so. Religion hasn't had much to do with virginity in centuries. It's now just a societal (and anatomical) construct. Hymen intact? Virgin. That's just how anatomy works. You obviously hate religion, and that's whatever. To each their own. But don't go seeking to bring your needless hate to topics that don't require it. Keep it in the mocking cesspool of /r/Atheism.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:17 AM
2

The cringe-worthy parts are the comments, to me. "Clearly, she was violated". No. Her definition of "hooking up" was a bunch of other sexual things but not the actual act of sex. Her definition was different, and she never thought to make sure he even understood. That's her own fault, her own responsibility. She wasn't violated- She made a mistake. There's a massive difference, and I'm starting to wonder if people are so afraid of "victim blaming" that they constantly tell themselves to feel sym…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:15 AM
2

Allegedly. This isn't a matter of fact without a trial, without at least evidence.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:09 AM
1

so I'm sure you can find some quote explaining why in some ways incest is a positive experience for the victim (and yes I called them a victim because I feel they are, as I'm sure, so does he.) A victim is someone who was wronged. I want to point out that if two people consensually do something society labels as wrong, neither of them are the perpetrator and neither of them are victims.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:07 AM
1

You do realize that the scientific chances of technical incest is so high, chances are no matter who you fuck is in some way related to you right? 200 years ago, we only had 1.5 billion people in the world. We now have 7.1 billion. Interestingly, apparently incest is defined as "parent, sibling, child or grandchild". Says nothing about cousins, uncles, aunts. Eventually you have to get over the fact that technically, two people from the same bloodline are going to fuck and have a baby, without k…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:03 AM
2

Yep. Just checked their idiotic sidebar too. "We comb the internet for the most..." Stop right there. What this means is you actively search out the worst of us, or the trolls, and then put it as a headline to try to incite people against us. You ignore the good and only take the bad, which means you're not "for men's rights but against the MRM". It means you're a radical feminist group of trolls who try to label us as trolls instead.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:56 AM
1

Another post by them to that person: what the holy fuck someone should shit down this persons throat. No, self-oppressed rad-fem. Someone should shit down your throat.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:50 AM
2

Important to choose wisely, yes. The article that this thread linked to is a good read. The boldanddetermined, not so much.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 02:42 AM
2

not fucked-in-the-head women Feminists are not exclusively women, which is what you're implying. So...
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:41 AM
1

Most of the threads feminists post here don't seem to be arguing on behalf of feminism, but rather asking what our feelings on things are.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:40 AM
1

It doesn't mean we should treat them like trash, however. Also, what's in the side bar does not equate to everyone's opinion or reasoning, which is what a lot of people ask for.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:39 AM
1

Most of us don't unless they deserve it. Though, I guess in the minds of a lot of people, they deserve it if they don't like what's sad. In the end though, Reddit's still Reddit and there are a lot of egotistical bastards here who misuse the downvote button, such as the one on yours and my own posts.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:29 AM
3

men and women both have a biological urge to protect women I can attest to this- Though I only protect legitimately sweet, cute women or women who I deeply care about. Shit's steered me wrong a few times, but more often than not this personality is effective in terms of morality.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:20 AM
-3

It'll still happen sometimes. Just wanted to make sure that it was understood that if it's a popular subreddit (refuse to go there) that there will always be these claims. Just like there will always be bad MRAs or trolls from feminism trying to make us look like a bad movement.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:18 AM
-3

Marriage 2.0 sounds like a bunch of shit to me. =/ But to each their own.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 07:16 AM
1

Unless it gets revised to, rather than use anti-feminism as an example, having the whole anti-feminist attitude criminalized. Fuck, the world is becoming a much more annoying place. Our government's fucking up, North Korea's trying to screw themselves over, China keeps tiptoeing back and forth between neutrality and siding with North Korea, Russia has its own insane problems to deal with, and soon in at least some parts of the world anti-feminism will be criminalized. Fucking hell. They want to …
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:13 AM
5

This is what I've said in the past. Facts and logic aren't enough we have to actually do something and I get downvoted. Every time I say we should be active and do something, I get hit with the "derpgandhiderp" argument and hit with downvotes as well. I agree that MRM seems lazy, but most don't like to hear that.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:10 AM
5

White males commit rape 100% of the time every time. Didn't you know? /s
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:04 AM
8

Often times they turn out to be the upstanding kind of feminist, legitimately looking for information on our movement. Is that a bad thing all of a sudden?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:03 AM
-5

it's just not the appropriate time/place, you know? I want to point out one thing- It is the time and place to state something like that if a reply like that is incited. Like "only men can rape" and "men can't be raped", etc. Good rule of thumb is, if you're not considerate to other people then why should they be considerate to you?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:02 AM
7

It still doesn't change the fact that often times men are presumed guilty. Also, police do care your gender. Check the FBI definition of rape nowadays. It requires penetration. What is that aimed at? Think about it, think about it.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:57 AM
6

Inb4 NAFALT arguments.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:51 AM
6

They often assume the women is the victim, in domestics disputes, if there is physical evidence. Man with major head injury pushes woman down in self defense, police assume man is the abuser Yep. There's nothing wrong with that at all, right?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:47 AM
8

I smell a friendship that will bloom.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:46 AM
-7

I severely dislike the "boldanddetermined" article. Her IQ won’t grow much with age. A dumb 20 year old is a dumb 30 year old. The difference is that the 30 year old dumb woman is a lot more bitter and has a whole lot less to offer. Everyone gets wiser with age, and that's what is looked at by someone who wants a smart woman. Essentially, a ton of women that the article describes ("Tight, young, firm, beautiful") are dumb at 20. I'm not going to be with someone who isn't smart. I've always been …
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 06:42 AM
-2

I feel in the dark now- What is "marriage 2.0"?
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 06:37 AM
0

p.s. stop watching western media Western media is oft the only thing that pops up on news feeds. In order to find something, I specifically have to look for it.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:28 AM
1

They usually can't.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:27 AM
1

If you think Men's Rights is as important in India as it is here, even despite all the violent crimes toward women there, then we should at least be able to agree that India is evidently a shitty place.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:26 AM
1

Define: Xenophobia "Intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries." Do not dislike or fear them. The fact of the matter is, a lot of crimes against women happens there. The only small-minded ones are those who only consider men's issues at all times.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:23 AM
1

Thank goodness for that.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:22 AM
1

..Oh. GG.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:21 AM
2

I'll keep an eye on India. I should be taking things with a grain of salt the same way I do news here. Perhaps feminism is influencing the news we get from there as much as it is for our own news.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:43 AM
-2

Just remember you're walking on a fine line. A lot of men here are adamant in circumcision always being bad at all times.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:19 AM
-2

There's just no way India can deny that women's rights are in a sorrier state there than in 70% of the world. (You know, since like..Iraqighanistaniran has a fair number of women that are oppressed religiously) While men's rights may be somewhat relevant, a lot of those laws are being made because of the pressure- rightful pressure, I'll say what I will about feminists but this is pressure well applied- to stop all the shit against women. If all the violent crimes weren't happening toward women …
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:14 AM
1

I go between this and Men's Rights Activist as needed. Officially, my beliefs are as an egalitarian. However, I've acknowledged that feminism is out of control and that males need to be brought back up in society, at least to the point where bias doesn't go toward females/mothers in court, where a male can be free from child support if the child was not his and, indeed, be paid back by the government for it, where a male can be recognized as a victim of rape when he was "enveloped" by a woman, a…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:10 AM
1

It's called equality. May have heard of it. Women can be drafted for combat positions in the same way men can, and men can go to the park with their daughter in the same way that women can, all without mocking, dirty looks or police being called on them.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:03 AM
1

It's the only way women can get privilege after all. By marrying, kicking a guy in the balls and taking all he's worth in a divorce. This is sarcasm. Talking about privilege is idiocy.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:56 AM
2

I talk about it with my brother on occasion. He's not an MRA, but he gets just as pissed off about a lot of the things too. Like a young child labeled a sex predator.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:54 AM
2

99% of all rapists are men. Men can stop rape. Nope. You imprisomed ARMA developers for nothing, AND you make this shit up. Fuuuck Greece.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:50 AM
-5

I'm going to be perfectly honest here- Men's Rights aren't the issue at all in India. If ever did I see a society that seems like a patriarchy, it's there. Just look at the news if you don't believe me. Women having acid thrown on their faces, women being shamed, women being raped in the streets. What the actual fuck, India? You over-prescribe anti-biotics and cause major diseases like tuberculosis to become resistant, you fuck with women in unimaginable ways and you still have the audacity to a…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:48 AM
-1

I just let out a big sigh. The first poster is obviously one of those women.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:43 AM
1

In other words, I'm a homosexual for loving to cook. ..Maybe feminists would use that against men's rights. "YOU HAVE SOMEONE WHO LOVES TO COOK, YOU'RE NOT MEN AFTER ALL!" or something. ..Sigh, this world becomes tiring sometimes. P.S. I wonder what I should make tomorrow. :(
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:38 AM
1

What the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:32 AM
2

Interestingly, I often see a lot of transgender and y'know..the other trans stuff.. refer to themselves as "tranny". It might be the same idea as "nigga" or "faggot", owning words that were once offensive. But I've also never seen them be offended by it either.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:30 AM
1

Body language has always been important, I agree. Ligament doesn't agree with a lot of things said here. But that's totally fine, he can complain of circle jerking and stuff in his corner. I might make a lot of people uncomfortable if they see my face. I probably look like I'm scowling all the time. Part of it is because I've been hardened over the years, but most of it is because my eyesight is definitely not the best, even with my glasses. So I'm probably squinting to read things.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:29 AM
3

I'm sad, but I have to agree. It just seems like it's all over the place, not getting to any actual point. I hate this bitch and all she stands for now, but a better article is better.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:26 AM
3

If you're not a blind radical feminist like Tygertyger, you're welcome to post here for any questions. I know a lot of us don't seem to be friendly to feminists in general- I seem to come off that way too sometimes- but only the asses resort to personal attacks and mass downvoting. Usually, you're downvoted only if you deserve it. For example, at time of posting, you have 12 upvotes 0 downvotes.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:24 AM
-1

Funny story- What's the problem? You don't have downvotes, the guy who started off with the insults was.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:15 AM
1

Either I've never been someone to objectify women (I like to think my mother raised me better than that anyway) or I never had the gift to strip someone of anything like that. I've never even had the x-ray eyes that some guys seem to have, where they can take the clothes off of a woman with their eyes and fantasize. Or some weird shit.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:13 AM
3

I probably get looks like that. When I go out I wear a hoodie and hat, and usually look downward. To anyone who gives me looks because of societal idiocy, fuck you. I just want that fucking mozzarella for my pizzas.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:04 AM
7

You mean their defense.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:03 AM
10

As the quiet guy in the corner at school, who was often bullied.. I can say that we're the ones who think everything through, and we'd all thought of a dozen ways to kill our bullies without being caught, but thought it through enough to avoid being like them. Jocks and other assorted bullies think the nerd is incapable, but we spent more time thinking everything through than anyone else in the school. On the news the other day, or maybe last week, I heard of a little boy who was a preteen or ba…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:57 AM
0

This is primarily for men's issues. Doesn't mean women's issues are unable to be discussed. Welcome to equality, bitch.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:52 AM
1

Where the fuck do you people live? I keep seeing this said, but I can find zero proof of it. Do you people all live in Afghanistan or something? I hear the Taliban is pretty bad. But in the U.S. everyone jumps to the defense of rape victims, to the point of acting upon their accusations without even a shred of evidence. Which is cool by me... except when the "rape victim" flat out lies about it in an attempt to frame a completely innocent person so she won't get in trouble for fucking her boyfri…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:51 AM
3

Votes are fuzzed. Often horribly skewed. And it seems to change how it fuzzes based on the rest of your posts. Your post is a completely opposite situation than I have seen. It's somewhat dependent on when you post, I guess. Most of us downvote comments that are actually sexist, rather than just what society claims is sexist. It's like race. The racism card is pulled way too frequently by the groups who think they're the minority- Feminists think that women are inferior (we certainly don't think…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:48 AM
2

Well, it's more frequent than it should be at the very least.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:29 AM
15

Reddit's like this a lot of the time too though.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:26 AM
1

But it's how the next generation is growing up.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:25 AM
15

Just read this story..and I am so damn outraged by it. I'm frustrated that I didn't know about it before. Girl gets off scot-free AND gets more public support? ..Welfare. What'ya gonna do?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:00 AM
6

He moved up a little bit, and then she got closer into his face. She also shoved him slightly. Also, they're all white trash. Look how they dress. How they act. The pants sagging. The over-the-top-gangsta-style ebonics. Coming from white kids. This video shows how pathetic humans are.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:41 AM
11

The sad thing about it is that white applies twice here..White guys (knights) beating up a black kid. I'm white and this disgusts me. If a bitch gets in your face, bitch gets pushed. Same as a man would.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:41 AM
1

The comments have such gems as: You're technically correct-- rape is not committed exclusively by men. It is, however, committed overwhelmingly by men, as are other violent sexual offenses and Well, in fairness, female-on-male rape is incredibly rare, whereas male-on-female rape is endemic. Let's not forget the amazing Males rape women more often than the reverse. If the truth bothers you do what you can to change it.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:37 AM
2

I fucking hate being disposable.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:32 AM
4

To support whores like this.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:30 AM
6

Perhaps a better tip is: For your first date, don't take her out to eat. Don't cook her any meals. Etc.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:27 AM
9

The whole premise of the statutory rape of children is that they lack either in sexual motivation or in the maturity to be fully responsible for sexual acts. To prosecute children for sex offences presumes they possess both the sexual motivation and the maturity to be responsible. We must decide whether children are sexually motivated and sufficiently mature to judge for themselves. If they are, then they can be prosecuted, both girls and boys equally, but then statutory rape of children must be…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:53 PM
0

I don't see how you get that from what I wrote, unless you only started at the "Um, what about the victim?" line. I was adding context to where the image most likely came from. I see. It's still early for me, I was unable to grasp that part. I'm of the party that says if two people are drinking and have consenual sex, then changing your mind when you are sober doesn't make it rape. But if you fuck someone who is unconscious, that's rape no matter how you slice it. I agree. However, there is a hu…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:46 PM
7

I do. And it's fact that there is a lack of investigation of any kind toward the mother specifically during a lot of hearings. So many drugged out mothers retain their parental rights it's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:40 PM
10

Depending on the situation, it's something I agree with. Fear of your actions being referred to as "victim blaming" has likely influenced a lot of people.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:25 PM
-7

Even a convicted rapist may not have perpetrated the crime. Google "man spends years in prison for false rape charges". All your post says to me is that "OMG OMG YOU VICTIM BLAMING OMG". Rape is a common go-to thing to say when you hate someone, for women specifically. I remain skeptical on all accusations. Evidence must be irrefutable, however most of what is brought to the table is only irrefutable to rad-fem societal standards. If you were drugged, sure. If you've got bruises that can be prov…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:22 PM
7

Correct. He should've replied with: "http://www.komonews.com/news/national/Man-who-spent-years-in-prison-for-false-rape-claim-being-freed-180364861.html"
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:15 PM
1

Yoga pants aren't anywhere "close-to-naked".
/r/MensRights17/03/13 02:36 AM
2

I see it in multiple ways: It implies that we get boners just from seeing a girl's tight-pantsed-ass. I'm not an ass guy, so I can't really relate. But, whatever. It also implies that we would act on that, which 99% of us wouldn't. It's "male oppression" on a woman's choice of clothes. As any self respecting MRA would agree, limiting something like that is idiotic, especially for that reason. Just because we're here for the rights of males doesn't mean we should ignore the rights of females bein…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:43 AM
3

It's equal, I'm sure. Just in favor of the women.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:34 AM
5

Same here. And I'm a straight male.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:32 AM
1

I came here to say this: Woman's hideous. In both personality and looks. Also this: “Did she flirt with the dude all night?” Are you fucking kidding me? If you think you can flirt with someone all night long, wrap them around your fingers and make them think that you like them, and want them, and then get defensive when the question's asked, then you're an idiot. I cannot, for the life of me, read past this point. This is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:20 AM
4

I do not use social networking sites, and thank goodness for that.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:18 AM
2

Symantec: Systematically destroys your computer (mostly administrative privileges) and hates on men.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:17 AM
1

I have a realistic opinion about a large chunk of a community I've been a part of for years now.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:39 AM
0

Maybe. But do we need to play the "we're worse off than you are" game on the topic of layoffs? Makes us no better than them.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:37 AM
2

Also boobs.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:33 AM
16

especially when huge numbers of us are being laid off What the actual fuck? Everyone is being laid off, it's not exclusive to women and it doesn't hurt women more than it hurts men. Bitch about the layoffs happening, not the layoffs happening to your gender.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:30 AM
-1

actively seek out gender discussions That implies that they're looking for discussion.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:58 AM
0

Nope. The people who donated did it because it's a girl. Source: Been playing League of Legends since beta, and you run into a LOT of guys who go "omgash girl!" if there happens to be one. If a streamer (though I do not know and probably wouldn't care for Destiny, I don't even know who he is) decided to plug a girl, guys flock to it.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:37 AM
1

But to me down voting isn't censortship, its a way to disagree (tho this is my opinion). Reddiquette states that the downvote button is actually for those who do not contribute to a conversation.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:33 AM
3

I'm going to paraphrase from the old and wise Professor Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore: "Chivalry is always available to those who deserve it."
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:31 AM
1

I hate most of them, because I rarely meet a feminist who identifies as the compassionate and egalitarian type. It's one thing to focus on one gender's problems. It's another to dismiss the other gender as a whole, mock them, laugh at them, hold hatred toward every one of them and act as if only men perpetrate rape. Do I hate all feminists? No. There would be a fallacy somewhere in that. Do I hate almost all feminists I've come across? Pretty much, near enough as makes no difference anyway.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:26 AM
14

This is probably enough to cause me to stop being friends with someone.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:22 AM
1

He's just jealous that you get a nice comfortable chair to relax on, it wasn't an insult or derogatory. He just wants your armchair.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:21 AM
1

Men don't just WANT sex, they NEED sex. Pervert here- I don't need sex, in fact I'm perfectly happy when I don't get it. I assume it's downhill from here, so I won't read any further.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:18 AM
1

Correct- But one case is not every case, though the media and femnazis would like to say so. I was also using an example, and nowhere was I referring to it as justice.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:14 AM
1

It was late, I was tired. I made a typo and then lost track of things.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:12 AM
0

You idiots Best way to preface an idiotic statement: Lash out at everyone else with insults.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:06 AM
1

No, no. I wasn't implying you were. I just went into a rant about people who find people who post in a subreddit's thread that was submitted to receive posts creepy.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:06 AM
2

Which I attempted to outline by saying they don't. Which I meant was "they don't want to be friends", and further I should've added "because of their supremacist hivemind mentality".
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:04 AM
1

Whoa, whoa whoa. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. No one called it "justice". If you walked in on someone raping your girlfriend, what would your reaction be? Would you let him finish, or would you defend her?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:49 AM
4

is probably a good idea in case you were caught in the act of writing it by a teacher. I really, really just feel that prefacing it with "fuck" in school is enough to not really care, if I'm being perfectly honest. You've gone that far, why not go all the way?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:29 AM
1

It should depend on what the couple wants. Taking the male's name is traditional, but taking the female's name is also somewhat traditional in some circles. Some people hyphenate, and that's cool too. If you, as a couple, decide to take the other person's surname, that's what matters. It should not be an issue of Men's Rights, feminism or any political correctness.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:26 AM
1

Not at all. Nor do other subreddits featuring other sexual (or human-beauty in other forms) acts. Honestly, how are replies telling you what you want to hear creepy? Idiotic and full of fallacy. People post on Gonewild because they: Want attention. Want to share their body with other people to view. Want to know what people think. Get off on it. Giving them these things is not "creepy", no more creepy than waking up in the morning and saying "nah, I don't need coffee". Seriously.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:24 AM
0

And stop making "Feminists and MRA's should be friends" threads in here, they clog things up and just piss off the general community. I disagree. We should be friends. It's just that a large number of feminists don't. If feminism and Men's Rights could become bestest friends who shared egalitarian views, then the world could progress once more.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:21 AM
1

What I gather from these "statistics" is they asked five college students, and 4 of them happened to be convicted rapists who happened to have gone to college at some point.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:13 AM
1

Unsightly is a very strong word. Though I wouldn't consider myself attractive (for various reasons, self esteem somewhat causes this though) I'm certainly not "unsightly". Unsightly implies that someone cannot, for example, look at me without getting nauseated or needing to look away.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:08 AM
1

I can’t even go on my Facebook page; it’s full of people wanting to rape me. Yeah, I don't find you even mildly attractive. I dislike you with a burning passion now, but I don't want to rape you. Because that implies you're even a little enticing, which you aren't.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:55 AM
2

or fuck her. And be accused of consensual rape.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:53 AM
1

Political correctness, right?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:50 AM
-1

This is moronic, as it's satire. Oh, sure. It mocks us. But that's what satire does. Also, because it needs to be said...Dude hacking game for daughter is sweet.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:46 AM
1

If you made the child, I stand firm that you should accept responsibility and fatherhood. Don't run out like a spineless coward. If the girl cheated on you, and the child is proven not to be yours, everything should be cut off and returned to you by the government.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:41 AM
11

Reality and Feminism do not get along You don't say? We should keep an eye on Wikipedia. All of us. See what's changed. Most of us are intelligent, and I'm sure a lot of us have bookmarked the actual studies, the actual facts.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:23 AM
1

4.2674% of the time they're right every time.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:19 AM
3

Both men (we're assuming men here right?) must obviously give some female party 50% of the total alimony between both of them.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:13 AM
11

perhaps this could be take on gender accountability? No, obviously it's victim blaming and the woman's a gender traitor. This post is 100% sarcasm, in case that needs to be pointed out.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:07 AM
-1

It's for kids who are scared (or whose parents think that the word sex is a "naughty word") of saying sex.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:03 AM
2

Idiotic, though I do agree (and people know it now after my submission here) about one point: "She says if these activists are serious about social change, 'they should try some activism'." I'm completely in agreement with this, but so many MRAs feel like the Gandhi choice is the better choice.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:01 AM
3

Cancer is cancer, and fuck it.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:56 AM
3

Fuck cancer.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:55 AM
7

She cheated on her boyfriend, then falsely accused the guy of rape, then tried to extort him for a thousand dollars, all because she's afraid of her boyfriend finding out. If this is true, being a good human being is so far out the window on the freeway that several hundreds of thousands of cars have driven over it and made it makeshift concrete to fill in cracks.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:54 AM
0

While not saying vengeful violence is okay, defending your girlfriend is. Rape's rarely about the sex (or at least, that's how it was widely considered last I checked). It's about the violence involved. And I'd be damned if I let my girlfriend have something happen to her like that. All that said, I'm a very suspicious person, and generally I start to pick up on when a girl's lying nowadays. These bastards didn't even try to listen, they just wanted to be white knights. And who knows? They proba…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:50 AM
2

I think you'd eventually get over that when you figure "I'm a badass. Girls want me. I've been sensitive AND I'm a badass with a futuristic blade that vibrates shit out of existence".
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:44 PM
1

Can't I have bikini chainmail AND immersion?!
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:43 PM
1

Our criticism is that while the traditional roles were constraining, for a long time they kept a balance between men and women. Both had it bad, but it worked, and allowed us to survive and thrive in relative peace, because it was an exchange. But now the limits on women have been lifted, but the ones on men keep piling up, often in contradictory ways. Marry and get shafted in divorce, or don't and get reviled as a "man-child". Keep chaste and be a loser, be a player and you're a rapist. Be a ni…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:05 PM
2

I already did, bro. People stronger than other people overcome. It's not exclusive to men.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:02 PM
0

And frankly I'm deeply offended that my ancestors sacrifices are now being spat on by feminists who want to further their own agenda. I'm going to agree with you, because I feel the same way. I hate the feminist movement right now, and all the NAFALT statements are also pretty frustrating. I suppose there's no "proof", because oppression is often subjective if the feminists have their way.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:01 PM
1

When you're ready for kids, love whatever comes out. Oh yes, I will. And I've always wanted sons and daughters both. But sons will have a much harder time getting through school because of all the shit feminism is causing nowadays.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:59 PM
-1

The only people referring to any dick sucking are other posters here. Perhaps you should check what words you put into other people's mouths before putting them there, bro.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:10 AM
1

Guess what? Men couldn't vote either unless they were landowners! That's nice. Men must still register for the draft. Women don't. If you actually spent more time being an MRA, you would've seen countless posts of mine where I state that this is bullshit and the fact that feminists keep backpedaling is also bullshit. Men for years had to fight in trenches, get sprayed with mustard gas etc. and you think cooking a meal is oppression? LOL. Being unable to vote is. I most certainly don't think cook…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:00 AM
-2

The illusion was there, just as the illusion exists now that we don't have much of a voice. Although, I wouldn't call it an illusion- This board is as fucked up as feminism right now, full of people who don't want to do anything except sit and link to news articles. There's very little discussion, and everyone has deluded themselves into thinking that feminism has always been bad, when it hasn't.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:58 AM
3

I never pegged you for an idiot. I've posted how many posts that constantly get labeled as "misogynistic" here, hmm? Maybe you don't remember, but we've had plenty of conversations. It's not "sucking that feminist dick", it's called being reasonable. Something you've been incapable of for the past couple weeks.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:55 AM
2

It's not feminist propaganda, it's called not being blind to things that have happened in the past. Just because I'm an MRA doesn't mean I only care about men, and only see things pertaining to men. That's what radfems do, and if you refuse to see the problems that feminism fought to get rid of back when the movement wasn't a joke, then that's your problem. Not mine.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:54 AM
0

So let me guess- You think that when women had to stay home and mind the kids, had to rub "the master's" feet, couldn't vote, couldn't have a voice in anything, you think that wasn't oppression? You must, otherwise you wouldn't call it horse shit. And therefore, that invalidates pretty much anything you have to say.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:15 PM
2

Not sure if sarcastic or serious, but it would be a plus. I just don't want them to deal with sexist bullshit during his childhood and teenage years.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:08 PM
-1

The moral high ground here is sitting and taking it.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:06 PM
1

I would love my children regardless, I just don't want to put my possible son through the troubles that male children are starting to see today.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:05 PM
2

Schools have bias too.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:04 PM
-1

No, it's actually not and if you think it is, you should get educated on history.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:04 PM
0

In this day and age, the internet is pretty close to equivalence. Cyber stalking, as it stands, is exactly as I outlined.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 07:35 AM
4

If anyone's still so fanboyish of Obama with the statements he's made and the bills he keeps trying to push through, especially to the point that they downvote someone for making a joke, then that's their moral problem and I couldn't care less about the downvotes from their sorry asses :P
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:35 AM
1

It's hard to go with the action route when it doesn't seem very many want to back it. I really don't want my possible-son to deal with sexism at all, because it's a shitty thing.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:32 AM
0

Well, at the very least we must hope that this ends. I don't think it will if we don't get active enough, but whatever.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:54 AM
1

Just want to point out the constant use of "him" as an example- Very annoying.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:53 AM
3

This is correct, A+.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:33 AM
1

To be an extremist or radical, you must be a part of that group. It's a group within a group, not a separate group. You cannot be called a "radical feminist" but not be a feminist. I was with you up until that point.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:29 AM
2

This post is exactly the thing I keep trying to get across. Feminism was legitimate and valid back then. Now it's not.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:28 AM
1

Or certain parts of Europe.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:27 AM
1

No, no. Many evil women are deadlier than just one male. That's the point he was trying to get across.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:25 AM
1

You know what one kind of deliberate inaction is? Every man in the world refusing to do the stinky or laborious jobs that women won't touch. Running any sort of power-giving establishment? Turn off the power and refuse to work. No electricity. No plumbers? Gross houses. No one willing to exterminate bugs or rodents? Well, we know what happens at that point. So you're right- Deliberate inaction could be useful for making a point. But only certain kinds of inaction. As it stands, things are sustai…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:21 AM
2

Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd this is what feminism is apparently fighting for the right to do nowadays. Because not allowing infanticide abortion is oppression.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:08 AM
2

Not sure if fake... Or supremely fucked up.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:01 AM
1

To deny the legitimacy of feminism at its inception is ignorance, ignorance I can't support.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:00 AM
1

I honestly think that it's silly that we should worry about being "punished" when we do nothing wrong. Picketing things is an action, and one that helped feminists in the past. As an example.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:58 AM
1

Yadayadafrenchmodelyadayadabonjouryada.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:54 AM
0

Aww. Would still hug. Unless that'd be considered rapey to you. In which case NO GO AWAY.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:50 AM
2

3.5 billion women are raped every second of the day.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:50 AM
2

I upvoted you, because personally I believe you're right. Proof requires some sort of, you know, proof.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:39 AM
0

Obama disapproves of your message. Because Obama supports crazy women.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:35 AM
5

Maybe for women sleeping around also isn't such a good idea? Welfare? Check Child support? Check Possible food stamps? Check The guy who spurned you tied up in court for a very long time and his reputation ruined? Check I don't think it's as bad for them as it is for men.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:34 AM
4

I'd still hug you. But I'd make damn sure you're not going to try and milk me for money before any below-the-belt action.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:32 AM
8

Oh snap.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:27 AM
9

From what I learned, no SRS subreddit has a non-circlejerk area. And I hate the term circlejerk.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:25 AM
5

Which is why a lot of us are relatively uptight. Radfems are that annoying.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:22 AM
2

It goes the other way around, as well. Women have freaked-the-fuck out and stalked men as well. It's still a very small percentage. When a guy does those things, usually it's after they've been led on and made a connection to. It might surprise you, but random acts of violence are exceedingly low chance.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:19 AM
1

Or if Julie Haschtenmeijerstanz picked up.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:16 AM
3

I'm used to the hyphens to emphasize because asterisks don't cause bold or italicized text in most things. I'll edit, if it bothers you so much. ;) It's just old habit.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:15 AM
1

Telling someone not to go somewhere where these things happen isn't wrong, or anywhere close to "bashing women". Just like it's not victim blaming to tell someone not to walk into a dark alleyway at 2 in the morning while wearing sexy clothes. You say "She goes there hoping to meet a partner who interests her", that's the same reason other people may be there for, and that one may be interested in her. It happens, and double standards should not be enacted in favor of the woman. Also, if the "pl…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:11 AM
1

I don't see the point in beating around the bush. People can get stuck on another person with relative ease, relatively quickly. Sometimes, attractions just happen. So if you're overly nice, that person thinks they're wanted. Their hope shoots up. They get happy, excited. In the end, all you've done is give someone false hope because you were too scared to say "no" and walk away.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:09 AM
1

Because they're "gender traitors". Can't have that, can we?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:41 AM
1

"Mas! Happy Mas! I want my 'sents! O, o, o, MERRY MAS!"
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:40 AM
3

I understand too...and it's fallacious.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:37 AM
2

No one's trashing early feminism- That was good for society, and improved a lot of things for women. Just wanted to make sure this is clear.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:35 AM
1

Absolute idiocy, and continues to show that my perceived notion that the radfem definition of "misogyny" is "not bowing down to the female overlords".
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:32 AM
17

I think you're right. Lowering standards of males just so females can compete isn't equality in any form. There are many tough women who can outperform men if they work for it.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:25 AM
-4

Actually, cyber stalking is anyone who uses your information to get to you. It's like saying "That person who followed you home and sat outside your house isn't stalking you at all!" I would've hoped this education would be known by /r/MensRights, but I guess I was wrong?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:24 AM
2

Pretty much this.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:20 AM
3

Radfem definition of misogynist: Anyone male who can't speak about women in an all-praising way. They also like to call women who disagree with the feminist movement "gender traitors".
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:20 AM
1

I agree. However, now that I've seen this, I respect this place a little bit less.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:18 AM
1

I've also seen the radfems over in /r/feminism defend her. "How does she matter at all?" Uhh, duh? She's the idiot who opened my eyes to your radical notions and behaviors.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:26 AM
3

CreepyPMs is run by radfems anyway. NoseFetish and Tygertyger both. Just downvote and move on.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:27 PM
2

If you're on a subreddit, and someone says something that pertains to what the subreddit is about, it's not hard to check the front page. The same front page that always appears for everyone when you're on the /r/mensrights subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:29 AM
1

Probably not, because I hate pain and that is some horrifying pain. But I'm not advocating for circumcision for other people, I just stated that I'm satisfied with my own.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:19 AM
1

And I'm just saying that there was no intent to it in the words, there was nothing in between the lines, and if anyone actually thinks that's what I was doing, that they're idiots. I don't support or condone it, which I've stated, but rather that I'm glad it happened when I was a child when I wouldn't remember it. I. Me. Not anyone else.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:14 AM
1

Only to idiots. I stated something entirely personal- That I am glad it happened to me as a child. Nowhere in my post at all mentions anyone else.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:57 PM
1

It is unreasonable to assume I support others being circumcised against their will. It was nowhere in the lines nor between the lines, it's just a made up statement by irrational people.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:02 PM
0

I was previously on the feminist side of things myself until a run-in with a radfem mod on /r/CreepyPMs. Changed my outlook on a lot of things in life, opened my eyes and now I've seen a lot of shit in the media, in my old circles of friends and on friends of friends' facebook feeds.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:06 AM
0

It's not just on Reddit. Reddit is just an outlet. Maybe the generalization is silly- Especially because I was referring to radfems almost exclusively up to this point. But eventually it got to the "well, there's so many of them time to lump" breaking point. I run into far more radfems than egalitarian-style feminists. So, silly? Maybe. However, unchanging until a substantial number of feminists condemn the radfem sentiment. One or two every week and a half is not making much of an impact.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:53 AM
0

It's not unreasonable to want the other side to try as hard as we do to stomp the anti-gender statements. We, as apparently continuously needs to be stated, reached out for a petition to /r/feminism several weeks ago and got flamed off the subreddit and banned.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:34 AM
0

I expected /r/feminism to behave like the majority, but the only impressions I have gotten are the radfem kind. The funny thing is, we downvote and mods even remove actual misogynistic posts, designed only to harm women with no relevant discussion. We at least stand up for equality, and we actively condemn truly misogynistic posts.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:25 AM
0

I will believe they all hate women until they all start condemning posts like this This is where your idiocy shows. You continuously associate feminism with women to the point where you seem to insist that the only feminists are women. They're not, and acting like they are is completely inaccurate. The fact that you think a good majority of feminists call males misogynistic for not praising women with their comments is just absolutely ridiculous. Then the so-called "majority" can stand up and de…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:14 AM
1

He'd probably tell me to continue fighting, but it doesn't mean I'm not sick of it.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:52 AM
1

It's hard to see all the examples of radical feminism with fewer examples from the so-called majority and not say that every feminist believes or acts that way. I'd like people to remember that a generalization is often used when one group is large enough to make the other seem insignificant.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:51 AM
2

Inb4 someone comes in here and says you're misogynistic for saying 99% of all feminists.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:47 AM
1

but if a guy hasn't managed to sleep with two dozen girls by the time he's 17, we think there's a real problem with that. Often, I feel like this is part of the cause of some womanizing personalities. People measure manhood based on size (lamers) and how many girls he's been with (even worse lamers) and thus, it creates a stigma around virgins. Men and women both mock these people, making them feel worse and making other women feel like every guy they are with has to be the most experienced guy …
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:43 AM
1

You claiming they hate all men is still wrong. Then as I continue to say- More feminists need to stand up and truly condemn the statements of anti male feminists. Whether you like it or not, whether ANY of us likes it or not, there are a good number of radfems. They're far more vocal than what people keep saying are the majority, so why can't the majority stand up and condemn their statements and anti-male sentiments? I'll believe "not all feminists are anti-male" when a good majority of feminis…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:40 AM
37

Sorry, I don't deal with gold diggers.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:31 AM
3

No generalization here. A very specific "What drives a woman to do this" is the title name. It's not saying "women".
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:30 AM
4

What if I'm sick of fighting?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:26 AM
5

The point was that it wasn't aimed toward a particular gender. Which is some progress, at least.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:25 AM
2

I'm so sorry. Your ex sounds like a horrible person, and it's likely she had a relatively large impact on this. Even though no one knows except him what the whole problem was.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:21 AM
1

The thread is referring to feminism. He is referring to women. There is a humongous difference.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:13 AM
1

Except, it's not. All I stated was "I would rather go through it as a child rather than as an adult, when I'm self aware". If someone seriously gets offended by that, then yes, it is completely irrational and idiotic.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:13 AM
1

His post had nothing to do with feminism. Take a read of it again- Here, I'll quote, bold and italicize for you. Oh yes, tell me more about how one facebook post indicates a general mindset for billions of women. You are such a smarty pants, you!
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:56 AM
1

More like asking for a source when it's readily available.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:53 AM
1

The snotty sarcasm.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:21 PM
1

Yes, actually. Let me read back a few of my own posts and I'll edit this one. Edited: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/18mfau/newborn_circumcision_this_needs_to_stop_nsfw/c8g4kj3
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:16 PM
0

Nay. I'm legitimately frustrated at people's inabilities to read the exact same articles and blogs that I read just a couple days prior.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:14 PM
1

The person on leave and their replacement while they're gone. How is that fair? How is it fair to be paid while not doing any work As I am not a woman, and this hasn't and probably won't ever apply to me if feminism has its way, I'm unsure. Do you get paid full salary when on parental leave? If so, I would agree that's a bit much. But keeping someone's job for when they come back is major, and any good company should be able to do it. It just requires some allocation. Even if you're not paying t…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:50 AM
2

I get mad about that. I support people who don't want to marry for most reasons, nor have kids, especially because we're seven billion strong in this world and therefore overpopulated. But to constantly make (and/or upvote) posts saying, put simply: "DON'T MARRY", seems silly. Marriage brings a lot of things. Sometimes it brings bad things, but that's why you don't marry on a whim and you make sure you and your partner are compatible for the long term.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:43 AM
1

OP should deliver. But I'm glad as fuck that website is probably worthless.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:41 AM
1

I suppose I didn't convey all my meaning. This community is extremely hyper sensitive about circumcision, and if you support your own circumcision, you get swarmed with comments that are hateful and mass downvotes.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:38 AM
-5

I think Men's Rights' fear of circumcision and marriage both are irrational. But I don't actually believe it is a fear of marriage- Rather, standing up and saying "we won't marry you if we don't get equal rights with you". Which is good. It is action.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:19 AM
2

Over half of marriages end in divorce. Because a lot of people are idiotic and get married on a whim. When I find someone that I can live my life with, I'll be willing to get married. As long as they're not a radfem. It would be interesting to have a marriage between an MRA and feminist though, and see what they can do together.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:41 AM
2

You can be a parent if you want, but a company shouldn't have to suffer because of it. Good companies are able to work something out with this. It's idiotic to say "you should be out of a job if you want to have kids". And.. and to try not to get hitched with someone who doesn't also have a job. Really? People get laid off all the time. There are many reasons they don't have a job. Does that mean they're dead weight while they're looking? No. This is a closed-minded look at things.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:35 AM
2

The Manosphere Do any of you actually refer to us as this? I'm very disappointed in you if you do.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:24 AM
-3

How idiotic are people on /r/mensrights lately? There is this thing called the front page to our subreddit, and often times on that front page there are links to blogs or news articles that point to this very thing. The blindness in posters these past few days, seriously.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:19 AM
1

It's not necessary, therefore extra.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:17 AM
1

If I decide to post on /r/gonewild, I'll use this same account for that. Doesn't matter to me if people judge for anything.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:16 AM
1

When we reached out for /r/feminism to sign a petition, all we got were flames. Also, Cherryblossomlife. And many other blogs.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:15 AM
1

It was on the front page of /r/MensRights a few days back. I'll scroll down and take a look for the link. http://www.thelesbianmafia.com/home/woman-raping-men-a-survivor-tells-his-story-on-none-other-than-huffpo-video/
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:14 AM
1

Maybe, and her personality is unattractive anyway. You can already discern that.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:13 AM
1

And I would attempt to provide proof to the contrary, because I would care slightly more than not. Also, while this dance is fun, I'm very tired. I have to cook a lot of food tomorrow, so maybe we could continue this then, if you're up for it. Cheers, babe.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:53 AM
-1

As someone who looks at beauty internally rather than externally, I'd probably be inclined to agree with you.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:38 AM
3

FUCK, I am so sorry. So sorry, man.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:36 AM
2

They're so prickly. Can't even handle the pain from words.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:30 AM
-1

It depends on the scale of your generalization and what the generalization is about. I think alphas, a relatively large portion of the male gender, are douches. I also think that women who prefer bad boys should not whine about their "real men" treating them like dirt.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:29 AM
2

You as well good sir.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:23 AM
-1

Well, radfems calls every MRA misogynist anyway. Wouldn't be anything new. You'd be exactly as justified as they are. P.S I'm having a lot of fun with our dance. P.P.S It's like prom ohmygosh.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:18 AM
-1

If citing "rape" as a generalization, then no. Because hard facts have been presented time and time again showing that the gap is almost non-existent. You also don't seem to understand that I have generalized a very specific group of your gender in a negative way, as I do with my own gender when it warrants it. Hilariously, I even did that in this same argument by referring to "alphas" as douches.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:07 AM
3

This subreddit has a lot of ups and downs. The mods don't seem to want to impede free speech unless it gets really bad. And that's totally fine, because it allows for heated discussion. Just can't care about karma here, or have to use a throwaway, because you never know when the hivemind switches stances on something.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:06 AM
1

If our government is unable to tell that something has been edited, then that's a huge problem. I agree that mistakes shouldn't ruin your life, and nor should false accusations. Which is why I'm an advocate for keeping the media out of trials, and making it law to prevent them from running something about an ongoing trial. But I respect that you disagree with me, because that is completely your choice and you bring up some fine points, even if I don't personally agree with them.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:03 AM
-1

This isn't just about me. I'm just trying to understand why you feel it's okay to make generalizations about my gender without providing facts, but not okay (and rightfully so) for someone to make generalizations about yours. Short story: I'm tired of women playing the victim when they know damn well someone's bad for them, and I have seen thousands of women do this. It's hard not to formulate an opinion and generalize a specific group of people, large or small. It's barely even gender-based. It…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:00 AM
1

The person I originally replied to said "all these women". And I am not the person you originally replied to, so referring to me as such sort of invalidates a lot of your arguments with me. But I'm humoring you. Who are you to tell me what I would consider anything to be? Personally I define a "real man" as a human being who considers himself a man. I define a "real woman" as a human being who considers herself a woman. I apologize, I shouldn't have shortened to "mostly". I should have said "mos…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:43 AM
1

And that's a totally acceptable stance. Not everyone thinks the same way. Downvotes weren't designed for personal opinion, they were designed for whether or not you're contributing to a conversation, which I am. I'm sorry if this subreddit wants me to be some sort of apologist for being circumcised and enjoying myself with what I have, and not being envious of people who didn't have it happen to them.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:37 AM
-1

If you can't show me proof then your assumption would be just as wrong as my assumption about men being rapists. Not so, as there is statistical proof about yours that is provided, so that argument doesn't stand up against it. What would you define a real man as? If you weren't currently trying to argue with me, mostly it'd be what's referred to as "an alpha", and alphas are notoriously douches who don't treat their women as well as "betas". Feminism has essentially referred to real men as "alph…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:34 AM
2

I don't agree with you in this particular instance, but I agree with your statements in a lot of different scenarios. There should be no excuse for a man forced to pay child support for a child that was dead. The woman just used the money for her own shit, and that's disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:30 AM
2

What if I said there's a ridiculously high chance you're a rapist? I'd be wrong for judging you because you're a man, right? Then why is it okay for you to judge me because I'm a woman? There is an almost equal number of female rapists as there are male rapists, so this doesn't apply. Only an uneducated radfem would try to deny it with pseudo-facts, even when provided with actual facts. You still haven't told me why this is a valid association. You still haven't told me why it isn't, at least no…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:22 AM
-2

I will grant you a GG on that. However, it's still asinine and a poor comparison. We still feel a lot of pleasure. And I'm very happy with the amount of pleasure I do feel, as it's almost unbearable at times if I really let myself go. Honestly, I understand that people don't want children to be circumcised. I totally agree with that, it's a shitty thing to do, especially upon seeing videos. But to downvote people who stand up for their own circumcisions and say that they're satisfied with them i…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:20 AM
2

Kindness is good. However, being blindly chivalrous is pointless, idiotic and overall it earns you nothing. Women still get a bad view of men due to the feminist movement, and often you'll still get looks of disgust from them. I view kindness as a two way street. If you want me to be kind to you, you should kindness to me. In this case, if you want me to be kind to you, stop saying (or stop your radicals from saying) that men should be extinct.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:16 AM
-2

Deaf people have zero hearing. Circumcised people still feel pleasure. This is an asinine attempt at a comparison, and you should be ashamed of yourself.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:13 AM
1

There is a ridiculously high chance that you do that anyway, whether you'll admit to it on Reddit or not. Sorry, but if you date a bad boy because he's a bad boy, and then complain, especially when someone grew some balls and told you not to, then you're worse than scum and I will gladly associate all women who go for bad boys with people who say they want "real men". Often, their definition of a "real man" is someone who's not afraid to do something absolutely insane or be a dick. Not in so man…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:10 AM
8

Here's a difference between Men's Rights and feminism right here- We don't hate women. You obviously hate men.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:08 AM
1

One smart thing to do: Don't joke around about burning down a building. If you get really specific in something, and talk about lying to get something done, it should be admissible. Just like it should be admissible in your example, because regardless of whether or not it was on tape, if someone heard you say it and it happened, you would, and rightfully so, be the primary suspect.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:07 AM
2

Some of us have lived beyond our teenage years and experience and see this sort of thing happen all the time.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:03 AM
-1

most modern day feminists agree the same logic applies to men Then why are male rape survivors mocked by feminists because they were "enveloped by their warmth"?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:02 AM
-4

I dislike referencing "leagues". Love should not be based on looks in any way, shape or form.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:01 AM
8

"What, I can't fucking shop for my wife? Fuck you, keep your fucking eyes on your prospective clothes and stay the hell out of my business."
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:58 AM
1

so that they don't incriminate themselves Which I think is stupid. If you're recorded telling someone your intentions, regardless of whether they know that they're being recorded or not, and in fact especially since they don't know they're being recorded, it's a confession and should be admissible in court.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:57 AM
7

I agree with this statement, with one minor addition: Radfems do piss me off, and I do not appreciate being referred to as an "it", or something that needs to die off.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:54 AM
5

I'm sure, of course, that you mean misogyny.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:53 AM
5

Or seen blogs like that Cherryblossomlife blog?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:52 AM
3

Perhaps the incredibly large number of women who date "the bad boy" and then subsequently complains about how shitty they are? Not a hard concept.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:50 AM
1

Yes, because we live in a savage world where words hurt.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:48 AM
-3

Can you prove your defense against this accusation?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:41 AM
6

I think this is pretty fucking stupid. And you know what? If/when I have a daughter, I'll damn well fucking dance with her because not only is that a sweet thing to do, it's fun. Everyone else gets left out. Ohfuckingshit! If/when I have a son, I'll damn well let him enjoy some time with his mother too. It seems like people keep trying to take away more and more activities between parent and child.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:39 AM
1

I just wanted to make sure is all. ;) There are a lot of MRAs who are..Odd, to say the least.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:06 AM
1

But for all I know, you could be referring to a specific part. As in, "what a surprise".
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:59 AM
5

Sarcasm is important to pick up on.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:19 AM
1

Now kiss.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:10 AM
-1

Yet, here you are. Making posts completely irrelevant to the topic because of a mention that I'm satisfied with my own. If you don't want to talk about my dick, then why are you talking about my dick? Logic. Get some.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:03 AM
-2

Today I learned that threads on Reddit are not about discussion, but instead short karma-grabs. You're one of the people making this place bad.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:59 AM
1

How is it a shitty implication? It implies that she's one of the good women. It doesn't say how big or small that group is. It does nothing to describe that, only that they're a good person for looking beyond their gender.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:52 AM
-6

Nowhere in my post did I even claim to speak for all men. If you just assumed that, you're an idiot. Straight up.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:50 AM
8

I don't find double standards funny anymore so much as disturbingly sad.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:48 AM
-1

I like it better because having a lot of extra skin just seems odd to me. It's possible it's because I've had it all my life, but I still probably would've preferred it this way. The reason I say I'm grateful it happened as a child is because it's much better if you don't remember it. I don't agree or advocate for it, but I'm certain that I would not want a circumcision after my brain has developed to the point where it retains memory.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:47 AM
1

It fuzzes, but I don't think that was fuzzed that hard.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:45 AM
3

I don't know if that /s means this whole post is sarcastic or not, so I won't reply to this.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:43 AM
-8

I am satisfied with my circumcision, I prefer it this way looks-wise. I am also grateful it happened as a child, because WHAT THE FUCK THAT LOOKS SO PAINFUL. Oh, clarification: I'm grateful it happened as a child because I don't remember it. Just seeing this video makes my whole groin hurt.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:20 AM
5

..Why does this have downvotes equal to the number of upvotes? And interestingly the same number as the female post above has?
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:16 AM
48

Femnazism at its finest. He wasn't raped. He was "enveloped in her warmth" as he was sleeping, and assisted her in the gift of life.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:12 AM
13

I have to agree. This sounds like an abusive relationship. Also, she's not going to be worth anything if she's just sitting at home applying for jobs. That's not bad in itself, but she should do something while she's applying. She shouldn't get offended and essentially tell you to "fuck off" for asking her to clean.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:18 AM
5

The fact that people let this be a popular opinion bothers me. There's a reason I didn't vote for Obama, and quite frankly this is it.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:14 AM
9

This is why I'm an MRA. Because radfems probably condone this behavior.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 01:47 AM
1

:( Sorry to hear!
/r/MensRights16/02/13 01:07 AM
3

This was actually a pretty good read. It's nice to see more women standing up for us with such statements. But soon radfems will call her less of a woman for it or something.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 02:27 AM
4

That's infuriating. She's either a radfem dumbass, or she took the smart way out and sent him home. Not defending what happened, but when it comes to children one doesn't want rumors to spread in any way, shape or form about a relationship between them and their students.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 02:22 AM
1

"A male claimed they were raped? You can't just take their word for it!" fixed that for you, as the person in question implies that female survivors should have their word taken without any investigation.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:23 PM
2

Because, like the cherryblossom blog, "hai im mra" comments would obviously flood it if they weren't.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:56 AM
2

It doesn't help that a lot of the bullying that happens to kids in school isn't actually taken care of. Why? "Because you're a boy, you can deal with it". Dealt with this shit 8-10 years ago, and it was ridiculous.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:55 AM
5

she is a sweetheart Late to this, but... Someone who acts completely entitled and trashes on your feelings, especially because judging by how you painted it, she knew she was doing it, this kind of person is not a "sweetheart". I hate to break it to you, but she really treated you like shit, and I've had too many experiences in life to know that a sweetheart doesn't do this.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:51 AM
2

It sounds like you're trying to condemn people for wanting to give people a home.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:17 AM
1

Leaving the children in a system where they're not treated very well is immoral, not adopting them to be a part of a family, however small that family is.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:05 AM
3

How the hell is it at all about "settling"? He wants to give someone a home, which is a good and noble goal. Plenty of single men were able to raise their children with no adverse effects. If two women or two men can adopt a child, then a single parent should be able to, as long as they're able to provide food, water, love and education.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 04:03 AM
1

I was on the fence leaning toward feminist until I got a rude awakening to radical feminism nowadays.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:24 AM
3

This sounds about correct.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:21 AM
2

Remember guys, you can go your own wayyy
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:05 AM
0

Oh. A perfectly fine stance then. I just wanted to get it out there that most of us want to be as equal as we can, rather than regaining lost "privileges" or getting ahead in the game.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:02 AM
2

Yep. All because pandas are cute and boys aren't. Or something like that.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:01 AM
8

Did you SURVIVE??!!! Did you narrowly escape the brutality of her penis-envelopment? Were you afraid for your very life? Did you just barely get away from the pregnant brute and her savage treatment? Thank God you escaped! Literally, I got this far in the post he linked to. Literally. I couldn't go further than this. First, the website: Lesbianmafia. Shouldn't need to say anything more. Secondly, how can you at all take it seriously even from a radfem standpoint? It's literally asking people to …
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:57 AM
2

Most people here are in it for the equality, rather than getting back "privileges" that we had over women in the first place, myself included. I'll damn right stand up for something that's unfair for women and men both.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:54 AM
1

Wore my last blue shirt today- Guess I'm stuck wearing it tomorrow. At least I wasn't doing anything today.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:48 AM
-1

Not really, the threads are here for everyone to read. Many top upvoted comments even directly state that things need to be fixed not for men, but women. There are a lot of women in the MRM, and they're not just fighting for men.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:40 AM
0

Pretty much every thread for the past few weeks?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:37 AM
0

MRAs focus on equality. It just so happens that we have to focus slightly more toward male issues because (radfem) feminists focus entirely toward female issues with no thoughts about men and the effects shit has on them.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:31 AM
-4

"I'm French and I surrender". All I read.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:24 AM
1

Personally I've never been afraid of going against the grain in the MRM, the worst I've received were downvotes and a couple angry replies. Seriously, not even an angry PM. MRM is chill like that. Lots of issues in our subreddit too, but every one has those kinds of people.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:30 AM
8

Tongues can't even penetrate either using the logic! THE HORROR!
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:42 AM
1

It's hardly an over generalization, aside from the last part which may be a slight generalization.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:46 PM
2

I'm sorry, I didn't realize the standard of evidence here was "unsupported assertions". In any case, I think I've clearly demonstrated that your accusation regarding feminists insulting men was false. If it were the case this list wouldn't have been so easy to compile. There have been enough blogs like the cherryblossom blog that have been posted here before that I shouldn't even need to dig them up. They're not "unsupported assertions". Should you actually look, what I said is true and supporte…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:43 PM
1

Yep. =/ Well, I'm off to bed. The frustrations of being cheated on weighs me down hard, and the depression is unthinkably powerful. Take care! If you reply again I'll toss a reply your way tomorrow.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 03:14 AM
1

I didn't misinterpret. :P It's just..y'know..in /r/feminism I'd be called misogynistic for it.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:33 AM
-2

Not quite. Status is part of it, yes. But women love the "confidence + sensitivity!" thing.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:02 AM
4

Labor, confidence, sensitivity.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:19 PM
6

Because you became a Jedi Knight, and the forces of the Sith are showing their true colors.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:38 PM
30

As someone else said yest..er..day? Women have a specific thing they desire, and we learn to adapt to it, while they also scorn us for doing so. Paraphrasing, but the message is essentially the same.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:34 PM
2

It makes me sad.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:54 PM
3

For every blog you posted as a source, there is another blog that hates men and wants us completely out of the biological picture. Truly, I applaud your efforts. However, there is some nitpicking I could do. Just an example: It's that mindset that allows them to continue taking advantage of the free pass society has given them to rape and assault women. Not only is this statement ridiculously incorrect, specifically "the free pass society has given them to rape and assault women" but also insult…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:00 PM
1

If I say I prefer women in the kitchen because I like having someone to cook with, does that make me misogynistic or does it just mean I like having someone to cook with? I love to cook, and doing so with a partner is more enjoyable and efficient. It just so happens that I'm a straight male, so I prefer it being of the female variety.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 05:56 PM
2

At the point when I posted, he had -1 points and was 10/11.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 05:48 PM
1

One of the reasons why feminists argue that telling women to dress provocatively is a bad rape-avoidance strategy is that it's insulting to men. I can assure you that the feminist movement as it stands currently gives no fucks about insulting men, and if you truly think so you should educate yourself.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 11:16 AM
14

I already avoid match.com. I stand a better chance of meeting someone on Reddit who actually shares my views than meeting someone on that abomination.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 11:12 AM
4

I genuinely did not know about r/mensrights trying to reach out to r/feminism and I'm sorry that happened. A petition was posted on /r/feminism and was shot down because "A Voice for Men has some douche at the head". Honestly, /r/feminism was such a bad experience due to the childishness that it amazes me entirely. As an example... When I had given up on it (I wasn't banned until the next day) I had stopped talking completely. 40-50 minutes had passed, and someone that was continuously trying to…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 11:09 AM
2

Everyone half asses sometimes. I'm doing that a lot right now as I'm about to fall asleep.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 10:40 AM
2

I have likes that some people mock. I don't let it bother me anymore. If your parents tease you for being a brony, they're either just joking and it's not at all a Men's Rights issue, because they love you, or your parents aren't good people. And honestly, I'm betting it's the former.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 10:26 AM
2

I was kind of all over the place in it, though. That happens when it's 5 AM and I haven't slept yet. Mind wanders a little too much from one point to the other without fully conveying my meaning.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 10:14 AM
7

It may not be black and white, but more needs to be done than what's being done, to be sure. Interestingly, all of the people on both sides of the internet aren't actually doing anything for either movement. People on /r/feminist aren't going out with picket signs (almost called them picket fences. Man, watching Spongebob with your friend's child causes odd habits to be picked up) and supporting equal rights, just like most men on /r/mensrights aren't actually going out with them either. So, bas…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 10:06 AM
5

Yeah. I'm pro-equality, and I am willing to say things that may be controversial. Why? Because I'm not weighed down by society's standards- That, in fact, is what we're trying to fight against, because society places a bias in favor of women as it stands today. Sometimes I get upvotes for my more controversial statements. Sometimes I get downvotes. I don't fucking care if I get downvotes, but the fact that so many people downvote statements because they see a couple downvotes already is essentia…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:48 AM
6

They are, if all the backpedaling they've been doing is any indication. Sorry, the feminist movement is. Probably because they're receiving backlash from sane women. "We want equality!!!" "You are now allowed in combat positions" "Wait, that's not fair! Men are better built for combat! We're thin and fragile!"
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:34 AM
22

People don't understand this. Even people in our own subreddit, judging by all your downvotes. I guess hating the feminist movement is identifying yourself as a misogynist now, even in the Men's Rights subreddit?
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:32 AM
10

When a group is so excessively vocal about their dislike, nay, hatred for the men as a whole and frequently try to define what "real men" are -for us-, it's hard to ignore them and count them as the minority. We've reached out to /r/feminism in an attempt at equality, and we got bashed and some of us even got banned for participating in a (quite heated) discussion. I have a weird relationship with feminism. I once counted myself as a feminist, but that was in regards to the old, egalitarian styl…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:30 AM
2

Well, not really. /u/Oneiorosgrip is saying that we're not at the mercy of our body chemicals, and judging by what you said, specifically: it's a miracle the majority of men have such control over their sexual urges, considering the chemical nature of testosterone That statement in itself is an affirmation that what they said is correct, and in both cases it was stated that we're not controlled by our body chemicals. Therefore it's not "one or the other", when both cases have stated it's one.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:58 AM
1

Pretty much. Say anything bad about women and you're misogynist, no matter whether it's a joke or not.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:32 AM
2

"Sure, /r/mensrights[1] has its misogynists too" to make it seem like it's a level playingfield, but it really isn't. I've stated that /r/MensRights has misogynists too, but I didn't say it to make it seem like it's a level playing field. It is, however, my belief and often downvotes are swarmed over it because of it. I agree with everything you say, but I just wanted to make it clear that not all of us say it to "make it seem like the playing field is even". Also, wow. I am outraged at that art…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:24 AM
1

He's a true bro.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:19 AM
1

Your list was insightful and I'm proud that you could come up with 25 reasons, because that's actually a lot of good reasons.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:11 AM
1

I don't support the mention of "aspergers" here. It's offensive to people who it ails. Those people are incomprehensibly worse.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:52 AM
4

If they were aimed toward females, we'd be called misogynists. That's all that needs saying.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:45 AM
-3

Well, it may not be insightful but it's true.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:38 AM
2

Many don't, and then they can't get help. It's a tragedy of the highest order. And then are mocked for "not being real men" etc.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:33 AM
1

is not something inherent in my personality--it's a learned behavior from the women who taught me that's what they desire and that's how I should act if I want to be more desirable to them. This is fact, though they'll deny it vehemently.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:31 AM
1

If you felt I insulted you personally, I apologize.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 12:26 AM
0

Ah, the personal insults. How amusing. If you must stoop so low, then you're not even worth the time that it takes for me to type out any further replies. Good day, oh childish one.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 04:34 AM
0

Your other post is the only thing legitimate you've said now. It's not a straw man- You were acting as if "because there's only a few people who downvote, it's not actually happening". No straw man here, unless pointing out that you're skewing your attacks toward me by not taking into account exactly what is being said is a straw man. In which case, proud of it and I don't view that as an insult in any way, shape or form. Weren't we done, though? Or do you consistently feel the need to make your…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:27 AM
1

This would be a legitimate statement.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:25 AM
1

I was actually saying "they see a payment option right in front of them, and to save time and effort they just pay for Norton and continue to use it".
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:24 AM
2

Better than Norton.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:41 AM
1

Edited with brackets to show how bad I truly think Norton is, to show how only the most fail can miss said C4 on the door and therefore die.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:52 PM
1

I've read about this, somewhat. Annoying.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:50 PM
1

If you say so. The argument now isn't even related to men's rights, feminism or anything in between, and therefore a waste of our time. I will, however, say that it did have relevance to the statements made in the post I was replying to, and that the statement I made "toward the community" was only toward a small piece of the community, and those it was not aimed toward should not be getting offended. But all good, no use for us to be arguing when there are more important things going on now.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:47 PM
8

Obviously not much longer. After all, men can easily accuse women of raping them and by her statements, none of them can possibly be false
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:34 PM
15

Point, however remains that the argument is illogical. You just cannot stab someone 27 times[, then slitting his throat] AND THEN SHOOT THEM [in the head TWICE] in self defense.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:06 PM
3

Still gross, but less gross with your explanation. Still "what the actual fuck" though.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:05 PM
3

What the fuck? Edit: What the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:02 PM
3

This was a message sent and heard with the Force right? Not text on that newfangled internet?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:01 PM
5

Today I learned I have a lightsaber and access to the Force. Fuck. Yeah. Going to go move some fucking rocks in a swamp now.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:51 PM
14

I have never even BEEN to Alabama, but were I there I feel that I may have been molested by Jessica Vickery. And since there are no false accusations, I feel that the intent is there and therefore she should be in jail.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:40 PM
1

But men are so much bigger than women. We're so intimidating. How else couldn't they feel threatened when they're on top of us?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:38 PM
-11

On occasion? Hah. Deception is their favorite toy. Not all women, though nearly all women can utilize it if they choose to.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:36 PM
2

When Avast lets me down, I'll move on to something else. So far, zero issues. It's a huge difference back when my computer was actually a part of a botnet when it had Norton's protection.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:35 PM
3

Where's my island? I want an island. If I'm privileged, give me an island.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:33 PM
1

"Some of them care about fashion! THAT'S MY TERRITORY BITCH!"
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:30 PM
2

I'm confused. Is being straight a privilege, or is it a separate statement?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:21 PM
2

I'll be waiting for 11 then. Because this is the first I've heard the criminal implication, though I haven't searched that hard about Norton in recent years.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:19 PM
2

McAfee has their own underhanded things, but anything's better than Norton really.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:18 PM
1

No issues with Avast here. In fact, I currently use integrated graphics and play games (albeit with low or medium graphics) far better than I reasonably should. It's not even the better, more recent Intel HD graphics.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:16 PM
4

Downside: A lot of brand name computers (and even gaming build-a-PC sites) come with a free trial. This puts people in the position of "well, I already have it, why uninstall it?" Yeah, doesn't refute your statement that they're ignorant, but ignorance of the effectiveness of an anti-virus is very understandable, if you consider how many computers at companies and such use it.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:13 PM
6

I feel like it's more akin to putting C4 [in the most conspicuous place possible] on a bank vault.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:11 PM
4

Can agree with this. Back on my Vista device, Norton caused (seemingly) irreparable harm to permissions on it. So irreparable, in fact, that spending hours manually undoing these things, purging the registry and other annoying things had no effect. I could not, for example, use Windows Live Messenger on that device, and others have reported the same judging from simple searches of my error code. This leaves me unwilling to allow anyone in my friends or family circle to use Norton, because someth…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:11 PM
0

Here's another fallacy for you- My point was it happens. I never said "mass downvoted". Your fallacy is attempting to say I'm wrong based on volume. The number of one group of people in comparison to another group does not mean it does not happen. It's essentially like saying "most days, no terrorist attacks happen in the world, therefore no terrorist attacks happen at all". They happen, there just aren't as many days that they happen compared to days they don't happen.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 09:58 PM
-1

An accusation that only harms those who do it. If you feel you have evidence to prove to the contrary, by all means present it. Don't downvote and not reply. It's childish and it shows that, unlike me, you're afraid to say what you mean.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 09:41 PM
-1

Oh well. If people want to take steps backwards in the whole point of MRM, that's their choice. Karma doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:29 PM
-2

Evidently not, judging by my -30 points on a couple posts actually defending women and their rights to post here without being downvoted into oblivion.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:18 PM
-2

When downvotes are given for constructive posts that even agree with what everyone else is saying, and they happen to start with "I'm a woman", then it's either that, jealousy or disbelief that a woman would post on MRAs. If you mean how one can see downvotes, which you should already know, then Reddit Enhancement Suite. I had to post this because I prefer completeness.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:07 PM
-3

That does not refute the fact that you -do- get downvoted for being a woman, and therefore does not at all go against my statements that there are sexist people here who downvote women just for being women posting here.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:59 PM
2

And that's a fine term, for you and I.. These women, however, still sign up under the feminist banner so it's hard to refer to them as neo-feminists outside our "cozy" little subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:57 PM
1

It's comments like this which makes many people question the reading comprehension of people in this subreddit. It was not an insult, it was a sarcastic and disapproving tone -toward MRAs- who -ARE- sexist, which you would've known if you had not come in with pre-established retardism and instead read down a few comments. I guess people don't actually pay the fuck attention on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:55 PM
2

Drugs? Alcohol? No thanks. I can get social interaction without partying, so that's not a point in its favor either.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:53 PM
1

It was just a friendly statement, as people on Reddit often complain. However, when someone points it out, they obviously get downvoted instead. So in the future, I'll avoid that part of Reddit's hivemindedness.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:52 PM
-1

Explain.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:51 PM
-4

They don't, and it'd be sad to try and convince yourself that they do. I've noticed it, others have noticed it and quite frankly I expect better from MRAs.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:51 PM
1

If there were no governments, then whatever groups existed (because people flock to groups) would become the governments. Only, there would be more different ones and many of them insane. The centralization is not the problem, it's the ones in power who are. To ask for a world without governments is to ask for a world full of anarchy.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:50 PM
4

When /r/feminist and most other feminist subreddits act this way, with countless blogs and news articles showing excessive feminazism, with false rape accusations causing a bunch of problems for people, with consistent domestic abuse perpetrators constantly being referred to as "he", with police often telling guys to suck it up when a guy's beaten to shit by a girl because he won't fight back or being arrested if he DOES fight back, with so much backtracking on something like combat positions, i…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:40 AM
1

No one (except dumbasses) stated ALL feminists are bad. However, there is a very large, very vocal portion of them acting as if males are disposable and acting as if they can do no wrong. Anonymity is a good idea, though. As long as you mean to the media, as jury and judge need access to evidence.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:28 AM
3

But the majority of feminists who identify as feminists are disgusting, sexist and seem to delude themselves into thinking women can do no wrong at all, and the fact that dinosaurs went extinct is due to mankind. Okay, slight over exaggeration but exaggerations are sometimes necessary to get points across on Reddit.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:16 AM
1

When did I refer to novels as "yucky"? Are you, yourself, so unable to read the part where I said "I love reading"? Nice. It was a friendly reminder that not everyone wants to deal with walls of text, and frankly that's what it is. ADD, by the way, is pretty much as follows: "impulsivity, hyperactivity and/or inattention". Nothing I stated was impulsive, hyperactive nor inattentive. GG.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:55 AM
5

That was kind of my point with my post. It had a little bit of a disapproving and sarcastic tone simply due to the fact that there are a few people here who hate WOMEN rather than what the feminist (as it stands today) movement stands for.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:10 AM
2

I can see what you mean. Thank you for explaining your thoughts.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:57 AM
2

Well, he was labeled a predator by parents. It's accurate, but it's inaccurate it in the fact that you might possibly assume the MEDIA is calling him a predator. In that respect, you're correct. Still, this is more of an "it's accurate but inaccurate" kind of situation because of that.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:50 AM
-20

Really? Huh, never noticed that. Then you're blind, flat out. Being downvoted is not the same as being banned. They're comparable in the fact that they're needless "punishments" imparted by the people in both situations. Are we talking about a different forum? Evidently you are, since you're blind to the MRAs that give us bad names. Edit because I want to clarify: I use quotation marks because downvotes aren't really a punishment, necessarily, and to me being banned from a sexist subreddit isn't…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:48 AM
-29

Yep. Alas, people downvote a lot of women on here, just like for example I was banned from /r/feminism for participating in a very sexist argument toward men in a thread that we posted as a reach-out for equality. Moreover, people downvote other males on here for even referring to equality. I think part of it is that a lot of MRAs also -do- want supremacy back, which in turn makes them no better than the feminists we're against. Scratch that- We're not even against feminists. We're just against …
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:38 AM
2

I did. Did you? Here: "There's no way I can just take him to another school and be that parent that just lets a predator loose," he said. By stating something like this, by having the fear that "you're the parent that just lets a predator loose", you're accepting and even maybe agreeing with it. He's not denying it, and that's just as bad.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:35 AM
7

See, there are good women out there. They're just not under the feminist banner.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:30 AM
-1

Actually, FEMINISTS (because males -can- be feminist) are somewhat backtracking now that we can send women in combat roles.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:05 AM
-1

Perhaps with more proper training things would be better for females. Well, they asked for it. They can't reasonably backtrack now. After all, in 4.3millionorwhatever years when it's just women, they'll have to fight their own wars.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:04 AM
2

Except that these people volunteer. There hasn't been a draft in a very long time, and right now DUE to these volunteers, we don't have a need for a draft. Like it or not, a power needs to have a military for defensive and offensive capabilities. We don't necessarily wave it at everyone, either. Certain questionable decisions have been made, however the questionable decisions do not revoke our need for military power. To say that "no government should have the right to send young people to fight…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:01 AM
-1

Sadly...Not everyone wants to eat from the dish. At the moment, it seems like the men are dogs, fully willing to eat from the dish, and many women are the cats also squeezing in to get some. And then there are cats with giant horns growing out of their heads snickering at everyone, calling the women who want actual equality traitors to their movement and saying "eat, men, before you're extinct in 4.3 millionorwhatever years!"
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:58 AM
0

Instead, as in the "article" in the top rated post of this thread, the article considers that and everything else "misogynist", including (what I perceive) as an unattractive nerd kissing a smoking hot "fake nerd girl". Because nerd girls can't be hot.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:55 AM
-3

Sadly, this reads like a novel. I love reading, but I had trouble getting through it. In the future, you might want to make the paragraphs much smaller, so that it's easier to get through. It's very intimidating to people who just want you to cut to the point, and doing it this way makes it harder to skim through for some. I do agree with most of the points, however, so have an upvote.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:52 AM
4

I'm very oppressive, by giving my girl foot rubs when she gets home from work, by cuddling with her constantly, by supporting her whenever she's bothered by something. Didn't you know?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:42 AM
8

I'll help, if you don't want your post to be too long. Rape is absolutely a gendered crime Oh is it? We need to be able to hold an understanding of rape as a genderless act at the same time Really, now? I have to wonder about the cases involving men But you just said up there it's a gendered act, implying that only men can commit rape. ...about expanding abortion care to people who aren’t women but who need abortions. Excuse me, what? What this tells me is that you believe your saving grace is t…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:39 AM
2

There are many possibilities, but it's way more dangerous to assume nothing happened to the kids involved to spark this. One thing that everyone should agree on, however, is that the kids are in no way liable for this, that they're just kids, experimentation is normal and a 4 year old cannot be a predator just because he is a boy.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:23 AM
1

It's true that kids often put things in their mouths. However, it's perhaps more dangerous not to investigate possible causes, because what if someone IS abusing her? It's better to, rather than ignore signs that something may have been wrong, figure out what caused it. If she DID just see it somewhere, whatever. Fine. That happens to kids all the time. But kids who need assistance breaking away from some sort of abuse fail to get it, far too many of them.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:18 AM
2

Pretty much what I said when I saw this earlier today. The fact that a child can be referred to as a predator is ridiculous. The fact that it's his own father stating this is even more ridiculous. The fact that children get any of the blame at ALL is ridiculous. Kids will experiment- This we all know well. It's okay for them to experiment, because after all, they're near each other in age. HOWEVER, what is fucking wrong with this is that this is a PRE-SCHOOL scenario, and that means this girl ha…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:14 AM
5

And no, you're not being downvoted because what you're saying is wrong- You're being downvoted because it doesn't do anything to help his situation, and it's a very serious situation. If we help him get through it or, worse, if he's fucked over for this, then he'll join us anyway, if he isn't already.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:09 AM
2

This doesn't make sense. If you actually did something wrong, why should their behavior at the time influence your feelings about them? I'm in disbelief- Are laws immune to logic in every way?
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:56 PM
7

Definitions change over time. As such, feminism has become what people under the banner of feminism are.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:54 PM
-2

And it's not rape, either. Some guy who isn't drunk MAY be taking advantage of it, but that's just it- Taking advantage of someone willing at the time. It's not morally correct, but it shouldn't be legally incorrect.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:49 PM
21

Yep..I'll just chalk this up to another good reason I don't party.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:47 PM
5

Because no one wants to be -that guy- who steps on the toes of feminists and have women barking in their ear. Like it or not, we have less people being active because so many side with women. Moreover, we don't seem to be actively participating as much as we should be.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:43 PM
1

I agree with pretty much everything you stated.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:18 AM
6

Didn't find out about this until now, but it specifically targeted /r/mensrights so unfortunately how else could you expect any different? Definitely, though..If women deserve combat roles, they deserve to be drafted into them for the same reasons men are. There's literally no room for devil's advocate in this scenario. It's attempting for more privileges. We should focus on equality first (as in no side fighting for supremacy, ahem) and then worry about what comes after.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:18 AM
12

I'd love to be there. It'd be nice to have some friendships again, but alas.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:10 AM
2

Scary indeed. And actually thinks her children humor their father.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 12:24 AM
5

Watching this unfold is relevant to my interests.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:37 PM
1

In this case you would refer to it as "freedom of expression", but we don't actually have that here in America.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:07 PM
2

and the last thing you’ll need is a husband who can’t think for himself or always sides with his mother instead of with you. Wait, we're not talking about husbands. but in the world of dating So, essentially what this person is expecting is someone they're JUST DATING to side with them over their family? That's not how this works. You earn trust and love over time, and unless you're a part of his family- read: MARRIED - then he will definitely choose his family over you, if he's smart. Also, if …
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:03 PM
-1

Uh. What? I still see the hardcore feminists posting in /r/feminism, but if there's ANOTHER subreddit too...
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:54 PM
19

And it's not something desirable for feminists or men's rights singularly. It's something that should be common sense if we were actually in the realm of equality. (I don't delude myself into thinking the world's equal though, with all the trash talk)
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:27 PM
4

I fear for the karma of whoever has the balls to post in /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:22 PM
3

I have the same viewers as that blog does, in that respect. The downside is the censoring which, sadly, was a shame. My post didn't even get put up, just censored because you can't have what's interpreted as a woman disagreeing with that sort of feminism.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:20 PM
1

People viewing this comment are reading it wrong, I'm thinking. That must be the source of the downvotes.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:16 PM
3

Women, back when they fought for equality, were glad to make themselves heard by -anyone-, no matter how small the audience. That was considered productive, and it helped put them into the position they are in today.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:13 PM
1

They're nowhere near all "white ass holes". Feminism is mixed just like Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:04 PM
3

I wanted to see the censorship first hand, so I decided to give it a try. If the best they can censor with is "Hai. I'm an MRA" then they're pathetic. Moreover, their comments section is now full of people crying, that they "are just saying they feel sorry for us". Yeah. By insulting is at every turn? We're supposed to stand for the insults and do nothing? If they're making themselves heard, we should be able to make OURSELVES heard too. That's the point of a movement. I wasn't aware we were jus…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:51 PM
2

Feminism as you know -today- is a hate culture. Feminism in the past was about equality. The difference today is the feminist movement is about supremacy.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:47 PM
1

That's the next logical step of feminism. It's what they want.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:45 PM
3

What I meant was I'm starting to not be surprised anymore.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:44 PM
4

It's harmed men too. I was technically a feminist. I actually disliked males, even as a male myself. Then I was opened up to this kind of feminism, and now it feels almost like bonding. Hopefully we manage to open other people's eyes.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:46 AM
9

This is the kind of woman we want equality with. Not supremacy. Not dominance. Not to obey. But equality. Reasonable, evidently good natured ones.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:38 AM
5

At least -this generation of feminists- are evil. It used to be about equality, not supremacy.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:36 AM
23

It's almost scary that people can be this stupid.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:25 AM
4

My new comment, let's see if it's censored too: ""Yes indeedy, Jimmy Zinn, once the species has evolved men out of existence, women are surely going to miss all that rape and murder." Women are not exempt from rape, sweet little feminista. Nor are they exempt from murdering another person. Maybe if you took a look at history you'd understand that. But with your poorly thought out "facts" and intriguing bias, I'm not sure you're capable of a single rational, non-biased and/or educated thought. To…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:12 AM
2

AND they insult you. "Oh God, they’ve turned up. This one said something about how we’re all going to realise that we do in fact really “need men” once they’ve gone. Yes indeedy, Jimmy Zinn, once the species has evolved men out of existence, women are surely going to miss all that rape and murder." "This one" "This one" "This one" She's not even referring to you as a person. She's referring to you as "this one". Which means she's referring to all of us as something bad for zero reason. Hilarious…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:05 AM
16

People got mad at me when I called the current feminists fascist. :( And I was saying it as a joke too!
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:19 AM
2

Yep..This post knows what it's saying.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 01:19 AM
1

FLYYYYYYYYYIN'
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:30 PM
1

Oh. I never that they WEREN'T physically violent. I was saying they don't have to be physically violent to abuse their partner.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:29 PM
0

Pretty much. In the "insert something about Obama" thing, "it must be his fault because he's the president at the moment. Must be female oppression, even with a ton of women in the whitehouse now" I don't really like Obama as a president, but to link him to that is funny. Blame schools on the front of raising an already high price for EVERYONE, rather than just females. Silly feminists.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:28 PM
1

Ah. Okay.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:24 PM
1

I'm trying to figure out why you're replying to my post with this, as I've stated what looks to be exactly what you're stating- That women perpetrate violent acts toward men as well.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:08 PM
1

Well, at least somehow, on Reddit, we've managed to quell an argument that probably could've gone for hours.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:23 AM
1

Some people just like to rant. I do too. I've probably brought up my run ins with an extremely feminist mod on /r/CreepyPMs more times than I should have, for an example. It's just that the poster is essentially showing that you should always distrust men, and that's not a good message you want to get across. As for having a good weekend..Well, sleeping issues for the past week means I'll -want- to sleep all weekend but have too many obligations, so that's out the window. However, hopefully you …
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:15 AM
3

The tragedy is that women really believe that they MUST have a sensitive, caring man....who is also an Alpha male! The impossibility of meeting such contradictory demands confuses men AND women who do not see that their "needs" are really "wants" and are incredibly unrealistic - which sets them up for disappointment and pain in relationships. A woman who understands that it's really unrealistic to want two different types of men bundled in one? I had no idea I was on drugs, because that can't be…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:12 AM
-8

Part of this is because a lot of males are pervs (who isn't, mirite?) who would say that. There's also a lot of homophobia, and people who are insecure with their sexuality (read: a lot of people) would refuse to ever say that they'd rather do anything with anyone (even something like "save") other than a female, whether consciously or subconsciously.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:09 AM
1

Women are literally affraid to walk around atheist conventions or be asked, asked! if they would like a cup of coffee. It bears stating that religious beliefs (or not) has nothing to do with this. Women are afraid to walk around ANY convention with men in it. Although, that's not actually completely true because you know, all those cosplay conventions with the (lovely) half naked women cosplaying in all the sluttiest attire.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:06 AM
2

Really sad, weak attempt mate, but no. I'll apologize for that. Overly irritable due to sleeping issues. Mybad. At some point people need to either stand up for themselves or bear the brunt of being bullied - this is possible with mental abuse, not so with physical abuse. Children are easily able to be influenced by a group of people mentally abusing them every day. It then becomes physical abuse, if it hasn't already. This is what causes shootings, because losing your sanity is not a pre-establ…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:01 AM
2

College can help with jobs, but not necessarily the only way. You can learn many things if you want to avoid college fees, and if you can then get someone to vouch for you at a good job, you can climb ladders and get to where you want to be.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:54 AM
5

Most women who attend our universities major in non-STEM (read bullshit) majors like English, Art, and Art History. I actually took several courses with women who said they were proud to be in "new media" programs. Basically, they're wasting the university's time and your money with their grants and subsidized loans. STEM is not the only thing in this world. That's a very poor outlook on things and honestly it makes you look like you're grasping at straws to attack women. Girls are more likely t…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:53 AM
1

Still... 20,000 dollars in an economy like this is just asking to be put into debt. It's offputting to people looking for an education but unable to obtain one due to financial situations.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:42 AM
1

I didn't notice this part, and I'm glad you pointed it out to me. That can't be serious. Feminists are too deceptive to be able to overlook that a flaw in their mathematics would completely and irrevocably break the point they're making.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:40 AM
5

I saw immediately what the point of it was. And it's not a good one either.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:39 AM
2

Mentally abusing someone is still abuse. If you're unable to accept that, you're probably someone who does so. how you let other people talk to you or treat you is your own business and not society's. Tell that to all the women who falsely accuse someone because their feelings were hurt. Women have power over men because of these situations. They can abuse someone mentally, destroy them to the point of defending themselves or make a shell out of a man. Mental trauma is equally bad as physical tr…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:38 AM
7

I can confirm it's the eleventh century. Source: Civilization games.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:34 AM
4

I had to do a double take. What in the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:32 AM
2

Same. People have too much compassion for females. Not that compassion is bad- Compassion is good. I praise females so highly, and I would -never ever- attack my girlfriend or anyone else at all. But when you show up to a domestic abuse complaint and the guy is painted in his own blood with several stab wounds struggling to live and the girl is virtually wound free, and still don't do anything about the woman, there's an issue. And sadly, this is what happens more frequently than the media will …
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:31 AM
-2

Now hold it right there. No one said a damn thing about physical abuse being the only kind of abuse you can put someone through, and women are -very- good at getting into your head.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:21 AM
1

We'll fight in the shade.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:33 PM
0

It was a non serious comment that shouldn't have hurt any feelings. It had nothing to do with a disagreement between feminists and men's rights. Sometimes things are meant to be taken light heartedly.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:07 PM
1

That's far too one-sided, so overall unreasonable. Unless you've hurt the child somehow, you shouldn't be forced to do it if you can't see them.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:58 PM
9

Which is sad. I'm not one of said cross dressers, but if someone wants to do it more power to them.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:26 AM
1

Facebook's the leading social media site, so of course features are going to be "borrowed" from it. That's how the world goes. Facebook borrowed a ton of ideas from other things too.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:12 AM
2

TIL: Best way to keep a girl from cheating on you is to break your penis off in her vagina.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:11 AM
1

Good luck in what ever you choose. Shouldn't let a stupid thing like that turn you away from something that (judging by your posts) you were passionate about though.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:09 AM
3

Good luck in what ever you choose. Shouldn't let a stupid thing like that turn you away from something that (judging by your posts) you were passionate about though.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:09 AM
1

We're not offended. We're just putting punches back toward feminists using their own methods.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:02 AM
5

Is Bimbo a better name?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:47 AM
-8

Ours is being removed as well by the fascist feminists.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:47 AM
1

Not necessarily a woman's event. For guys who care about sex first and foremost, there's that. For people who love their significant others, it's a time to relax and spend time with them and make them happy. It's not gender specific.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:30 AM
3

If I don't have to pay child support when they're the ones who wrong me, I would take on a fatherly role. I love kids. And I could love another person's kids. But the moment they cheat/lie and claim I did something horrible that I didn't, I should never have to pay child support. Ever. Doubled if I don't get to spend time with them.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:27 AM
5

Into THEIR skewed definition of men maybe.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:23 AM
5

"He's gotta be super attractive too. Oh, and a 16 inch penis. Oh, and he has to have confidence and never back down from a fight. But he also has to be the nicest guy in the world", then..Rejected. Yes, these are exaggerations. Slightly. Mostly on the penis size part.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:23 AM
2

raided our own little babysitter. I need a little information on what this means, because it SOUNDS sexual in nature but that surely can't be the case.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:11 AM
7

Go your own way, you say?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:06 AM
13

I actually agree with this. No reason someone should have to pay if they're not legally allowed to have a part of the child's life. That's her problem from that point on.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:04 AM
5

Eventually we, as men, will have to react more forcefully than we are. Not with violence, but with political agendas.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:03 AM
12

I hope to adopt a child someday, in addition to having at least one child with the girlfriend who will hopefully become my bride. I want a boy and a girl. And if I have one, I'll probably adopt the other.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:02 AM
12

Right. If I want to twirl around in a ballet outfit and still call myself a man, I damn well will. Thankfully I have no inclination to do that, but deserves to be stated.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:01 AM
3

If it doesn't work as not only a defense but also fails to incriminate her in the eyes of the law, then this world's more fucked up than I thought. Video evidence is one thing that you can't refute, unless you can tell it's been tampered with. Next the women feminists will be technologically intelligent and saying that it WAS tampered with though.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:58 AM
1

This is why if you ever get an inkling of being in an abusive relationship, you either: A) Get a really teeny tiny video camera that won't be easily noticed (not sure what the smallest viable camera is, but you know) or B) end it.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:55 AM
1

Too long. The fact that so many people agree with the feminist standpoint is funny. At some point in history, it was all about equality. Now it seems that it's about trying to make themselves superior to men. Do we seriously have to take such a large step backwards?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:53 AM
1

Interesting that someone downvoted you for stating you don't use Facebook.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:51 AM
1

Essentially, it's saying that minorities (the black man is an example, not stating they're the only minority to do so) have a high crime rate, but saying so is unacceptable. However, the second part is saying that men in general (not just white men) have a statistically high chance (proven false, of course) of being a rapist, and that it's somehow acceptable to state this. At least, that's what I gathered.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:37 AM
3

I think after running into an excessively feminist mod who threw a fit at the notion of a simple comment that had one line out of four mentioning women, I'm going to like being here. It looks like there are quite a few intelligent individuals here, which would be nice to be around for once.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:35 PM
3

It's underhanded and disgusting.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter