TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DiogenesOfNike Archive

View 3 posts and 198 comments by DiogenesOfNike on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If a judge looks better they might find this out and he could maybe run into some problems in the future.
/r/MGTOW222/07/19 02:06 PM
1

Hey, let's start talking about why did she feel violated? What entitlement is this? Did the man dangle the penis in front of her? Did he do anything weird with his penis? Or did he just per?
/r/MensRights04/07/19 01:47 AM
1

So, do your lecturers imply that problematising is a good thing?
/r/MensRights04/07/19 01:42 AM
1

And your thinking is completely devoid of assumptions... hahaha
/r/TheRedPill29/06/19 03:30 PM
1

This is a very accurate remark, and I really wonder why they think that, and men don't. Maybe it's an epigenetic thing.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 01:27 AM
1

Hey, no need to disrespect for a word (which is fairly close to what you said), is there? Let's not insult over semantics next time, please. Thank you. ​ So, if a woman said 'I'd prefer 10 extraordinary men, one extraordinary man and 9 mediocre men, then 10 mediocre men in that order', would that not be slutty? And this is not hypergamous? I must be really, really obtuse then. I wouldn't try to quantify muh women, but if I found someone even better (as a fit) from my current engagement, I would …
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 01:32 PM
1

What makes you think that it's not hard for a man to stay comitted? I really can't see why you see that being the case! You mean, even if you are relatively attractive, in your 30s and with a semi-active social life it will be hard? I find that hard to believe.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 12:45 PM
1

My concern is this: do you think that a woman prefers her husband to be monogamous, or not? That it doesn't compromise a man's (you said it) non-existent ability to pair bond because chemicals, does it make it excusable to fuck in multiplicity because of 'variety'? I'm a man, and I do prefer one exquisite woman rather than 10 mediocre ones. Do you prefer different?
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 12:43 PM
1

Yeah, how? Why? What do you think makes a man able to bond, and a woman not?
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 02:32 AM
1

I'm going for it: I understand why most people here think that a woman having sex with 100 men indicates (or causes) broken ability to bond with one person. So what is it about a man 'spinning plates' that suggests otherwise? Can a man who has had sex with 100 women have a strong, long-term bond with the 101st?
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 01:47 AM
1

What the hell is this tweet about a scam artist is doing here? Is this MGTOW 1.5 already?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:09 PM
3

What do you think it might mean?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:06 PM
1

Is it ultra right to support abortion, but see that something must be done for forced fatherhood?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 12:06 PM
1

Ok dude, whatever you want.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:28 PM
1

Next time, think yours over.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:45 PM
1

You really are thick.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:18 PM
1

Go back to your echo chamber now. Muh responsabiliteh and the like. Don't forget the red pills. Baby brain.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:50 PM
1

Excellent opinion.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:48 PM
1

no u
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:47 PM
1

Bye baby. Stay safe in the chamber.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:42 PM
1

Fools tell that to themselves to feel better. I simply don't have the time or energy for this, sorry.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:38 PM
3

Thank you, woman. We'll be doing our best.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:41 PM
10

Let those companies die a death.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:39 PM
1

Where did I mention religion? I'm not fond of debating with single-minded idiots, good bye.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:29 PM
4

It's obvious that it's sarcasm, don't worry about adding markers.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:05 PM
1

I just think we are slowly transitioning towards strength of men.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 03:08 PM
1

Yes, there are systemic reasons why a college degree would be necessary; otherwise, it largely stands for bullshit. There are a few things you cannot learn faster on your own, when you are pursuing a college degree.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 03:06 PM
1

It's not fatalistic to watch and estimate over trends. Historical precedent is what precedes the present and the future, it's not destiny. Trend is much closer to destiny, and maybe it's my wishful thinking, but I see men waking up from a deep, deep, 100 year slumber.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:39 PM
1

BS doesn't stand for Bachelor of Science anymore. You could consider an alternative to college, otherwise just be careful like you said.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:35 PM
1

You are thinking on basis of fear. Let them try. It won't be easy for anyone. ​ Men have the responsibility to figure out what they want: Do they want to be treated more like women, or do they want to go full heroism? I think we are already drifting towards the former, since women also want to be treated like men.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:33 PM
1

I have quite much. I won't be spending myself on a violent (or hard) occupation, I won't sacrifice myself for a woman willingly, and where I see female privilege trampling on my rights I won't be going near. For example, marriage and kids.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:21 PM
1

What do you mean 'there won't be much left'? Civilization? Yes, I think that's where it is heading towards, albeit at a starting speed. I am not willing to die for anyone anymore. I am not feeling disposable for anything. More and more will go there.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:14 PM
1

It's based on your view, and your view only, that people should do everything they can to prevent unwanted pregnancies, even resorting to such measures as celibacy. The second step towards regression is to say that people should have sex minding procreation only. ​ I'm not saying abortion should be subsidized. But we also ruin the lives of trillions of animals for our taste buds' pleasure, and unwanted offspring could potentially ruin three lives, and maybe more.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:46 AM
1

Lawsuit incoming. Men have ALWAYS been disposable, it is our evolutionary purpose to be expendable in order to protect the species. Men and women alike sacrifice men in order to survive and be the ones on top making babies. ​ With such a population overabundance, these times are getting over.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:26 AM
1

He must be an idiot for staying in the same general area as her. That being said, university is a joke, and has been for years. We can do without another layer of authority, thank you very much.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:23 AM
-1

Emotional labor is a thing, but I don't see any one of them screeching here.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:18 AM
1

emotional support from other men will have a greater impact. How sure are you about that? I wouldn't call emotional support from women 'nice', if it reduces you to a thankful sulking blob of tears. It's powerful. Raspberry jam is 'nice'.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:16 AM
2

What is the problem with abortion, exactly?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:09 AM
1

Not anymore. You are using nature to drive your narrative, which is fallacious. Natural needs change over time. Humans don't need to procreate much anymore. That should tell you a lot.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:29 AM
2

We are getting balance in the sense that men are starting to wake up and call foul. The table is starting to get flipped and men are getting used to using outrage as well. I think it's shifting
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:27 AM
1

It's a pipe dream right now. Enough must suffer and fight for it to be possible reality. 20 years might be closer than 1000. Closer. Let's go closer.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:10 PM
3

There is no turning back to where we were. But it's getting to some balance, I think.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:22 PM
1

The ball is in their court, but not as firmly as before. Things are slowly changing, the madness doesn't last forever. People who are credited with 'shitty luck' very often choose those women and live with them for decades. I'm not sure they are entirely devoid of blame. But that's a discussion for another day, maybe.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 01:33 PM
2

It was an example. The equivalent of blowing it up with rigged explosives could be analogous to mocking and degrading women, because you can't form meaningful relationships with one. Not saying that that's the norm, though. But that's literally the terrorist mindset: If I can't have something, I'm destroying it. Rigging it in your favor could be to take what the game is at face value, and use its rules to your favor. For example, since women want independence, take them up on that, be quite inde…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 12:32 PM
2

When a game is rigged, you have a lot of options: You can ignore it, walk away, you can blow it up with rigged explosives, or you can find its weaknesses and rig it to your favor, or fight to make it a fair play game. There are a lot of options.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:53 AM
1

Whut?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:44 AM
-1

Nonsense. Biology isn't the only thing that drives us.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:17 AM
2

Yes, man. Why nobody mentions that instead?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:15 AM
1

What is 'natural' or not is a relative concept, and is being used in a fallacious naturalistic argument here.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:14 AM
5

What is a child by which point is very debatable.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:12 AM
0

Not every MRA is against abortion. I am not, and I think there are others. Those regressive laws being passed are ridiculous IMO.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:10 AM
1

Yes, we share the sentiment.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 04:26 PM
1

Alright, but is this about her being a female, or a non-conforming smoker? I could easily see a man be that stubborn in her place. And maybe not get away with it that easily, but that's another story.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 03:18 PM
1

This isn't a denied pussy pass. This isn't about her gender (not that we know of).
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 10:02 AM
5

How, oh how do you mean?
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:29 AM
2

And that's a result of discrimination and huge pay gap, you shorty-brain!
/r/MensRights05/05/19 09:36 AM
10

Whining is to say 'but women get paid more than men in modelling, that's unfair'! What you see here is sarcasm, the silent acknowledgment that men don't whine about annoying realities of life such as the pay gap. You may say it's passive, but there is stoic passive, and petty active, as well. You come off as a kind of energetic whiner, as well here.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 09:33 AM
1

Do they bring bigger crowds?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 09:26 AM
4

Sure enough.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 05:22 PM
1

I am in the same boat in general basically. So, how would you showcase the particular subreddit's abusive attitude towards men?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:39 PM
1

So, what do you think is the way forward?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:59 PM
1

That action makes men's rights look like anti womens rights ​ Fuck that. I don't care how it looks, it's an abysmal subreddit with regards to moderation and it should feel some heat. No need to ban the subreddit's name, just do away with the moderators and the current setup.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:25 PM
30

Joke's on her, that's what society has been doing to young men for years.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:01 PM
–

I'm not an expert, and you might be right. What I think of his chances to that point is kind of irrelevant, because it indeed might say more about me or the girls I would encounter in such a situation. But what you say is ambiguous works as a non-chalance if it is NOT such a corny cliche phrase (except if it was said deliberately as that, which is really difficult to do on messenger). If it's the 50th time she has heard it, no matter how 'flippant' he is, it won't be refreshing for her. My guess…
/r/seduction03/05/19 07:01 PM
3

I understand that.
/r/seduction03/05/19 08:43 AM
–

Not always. Sometimes, you just need to keep your mouth shut.
/r/seduction03/05/19 08:35 AM
–

Better silent than a clown. I know, you disagree. This is what see-through looks like on a man though. Desperate.
/r/seduction03/05/19 08:17 AM
2

Be real more next time with those girls. Not so much cockiness. Nothing or even a thumbs-up could be enough, depends on your wish and the context.
/r/seduction03/05/19 08:14 AM
1

Yes, but by their logic that doesn't make it a gender issue.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 09:24 AM
2

I'll give you a parallel: They say that men commit suicide in larger numbers because they choose deadlier methods. And they are more aggressive, and so on. By the same token, women have brought their victimization and disenfranchisement on themselves. They are less aggressive, they choose safer lives in home, and so on. Also if the male draft is patriarchy, couldn't "women at home" and all the corresponding issues be 'matriarchy'?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 09:23 AM
1

It doesn't even matter at this point.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 09:10 AM
1

That's why the foreskin is there in the first place... It's a protector that fends off outside elements and can get easily cleaned up with a normal hygiene routine.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 02:18 AM
1

Who would perform such advocacy? It needs to be taken step by step, is it not?
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:42 PM
1

I don't have any reason not to. Are you a WRA?
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:39 PM
1

Most MRAs are also WRAs? I might have missed that. ​ Back to the original point: Does feminism hold value today? You seem to think that it has none. There are countries where women cannot drive and they get beheaded for cheating, or having sex before marriage. What does an MRA who downvoted the OP thinks about that?
/r/MensRights27/04/19 01:10 PM
2

I attempt to resolve this conflict by hearing out people I meet and judging them based on their individual beliefs rather than on what labels they choose to adopt for themselves. Pretty much!
/r/MensRights27/04/19 03:36 AM
2

I never stated nor deliberately implied that being against feminism is advocating against women. All women's (or men's) issues are not born equal, and it's very important to know that you can support some issues but not others. Feminism can take many shades and it depends on what you really are against. We can't put everything in one basket and expect our monolithic judgement on it to be very accurate. So if I expect husbands not beheading their wives for cheating, I am a feminist. But if I also…
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:52 AM
1

Yeah, well, somebody has to be wrong.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 11:36 PM
1

Okay, but that's not the point. In the same vein MRA is about supremacy. The question is, are all feminists like that? That's a pretty big pigeon hole there
/r/MensRights26/04/19 09:20 PM
1

There is not someone in particular that can have one. Live your life howsoever you want, free will you may believe you have, but arguing doesn't make it so.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 09:16 PM
2

State has little to do with it, philosophically. That since it doesn't exist humans need not have rights and responsibilities is a big discussion. I'm not so sure.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 05:22 PM
0

Yes, that's the mainstream view that humanity adopts. If you look at it closely, it's clearly wrong.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 05:20 PM
3

I agree with this. The less extreme people are trying to steer the conversation presumably, but it seems too little, too late. Well said. I just wanted to clarify that you don't possibly think that every single woman that identifies as a feminist (in spite of the mainstream) thinks the way you described it.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 04:57 PM
1

I have a subtle feeling that you've constructed a man made of straws there substituting the whole thing. I'm not going to touch that. I am going to say that what you say I have seen to be true in the radical feminist, but that is all you seem to think feminists are. I have seen kinder examples. Egalitarianism is about Equality, Feminism is about hating men, MRA is about ?
/r/MensRights26/04/19 04:49 PM
2

I think most activism for women's rights falls under feminism. Isn't that so? I don't see people here disagreeing with me, in principle or in words, just the above poster and potentially you. Maybe they do. Most feminism does infringe on men's rights and equality, but my position is that there are gradations in madness. Someone said that there are some feminist MRAs, and I haven't seen that explicitly, but I'd imagine they'd hold quite a fair view of gender issues.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 04:47 PM
1

Fair enough. So, my original question was, and still is: Do you think that a feminist can't have any rational views on equality, even from a feminist perspective? For example, a woman and a man have unmarried sex in a third world country, and the woman gets executed and the man walks free. Isn't that an inequality that a woman (a feminist) can protest about and work towards solving without being labelled a sexist, a misandrist, or a female supremacist?
/r/MensRights26/04/19 04:36 PM
1

If you look closely, you will see that I'm not talking about all women, just all women who advocate for women's rights.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 04:03 PM
2

I know you're not replying to me here, but philosophically, there is no entity to have agency, so, in short, absolutely not. We speak in terms of relative agency between people because it's practical, but it's a phenomenon, not a cause.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:35 PM
0

Calling out libertarians might be inappropriate, and he might have made it a political thing to one-up certain people. That's quite inappropriate for a college teacher, but if the core of his argument was the philosophical position itself, it'd be good enough.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:33 PM
3

Not all women advocate for such practices when talking about women's rights. It's no different than 'All men are like that'. Let's not be like that.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:21 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:20 PM
1

Could you name one under a different name? Or have women not had women's rights movements?
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:18 PM
0

Not always, surely.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 12:57 PM
1

I don't understand why you are getting downvoted. I mean I do, you basically said that feminism has its place. I agree with you, let's not be simple-minded.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 12:48 PM
1

Free will indeed does not exist, and if it was said in a philosophical context it makes perfect sense and I wouldn't deem it inappropriate.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 12:45 PM
2

He is confused, don't tell him what is happening with him. It makes matters worse. If you have the patience, you could attenuate his cockiness with logic. The Socratic recipe.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:59 AM
1

Dude, it's simple. You said that women don't help in MRA and I pointed you to the legitimacy they might give for the outside perception and the analogous effect men had on feminism. It's not that hard.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:56 AM
5

Not what he asked at all.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 06:37 AM
2

College is in its last throes of life anyway. Just don't go, kids.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 06:37 AM
6

I'm a man in my late twenties, and a woman has helped me get motivated in ways I couldn't alone. I'm very grateful for her. The sign is true, surely, of course it is not always that way and it is absolutely one-sided. Few signs about how much women need men.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 06:32 AM
3

Please no. Too close.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 06:27 AM
1

Well, if you look for effectiveness, I believe that men have been effective for proliferation of 3rd wave feminism, and women for the publication of MRA. Isn't that the original point of this conversation?
/r/MensRights23/04/19 10:24 PM
1

No need to rephrase, that's what I addressed from your comment: That things continue to get worse, doesn't mean that women don't help, or have an effect in Men's Rights. It's worked bad for men when it comes to the effect of Feminism on men. If Men's Rights went the way feminism does, it could well be argued that women in MRA do damage to women. ​ I believe we aren't there (yet), and that women help MRA get a legitimate voice among skeptic women. I don't know what's so confusing about this idea.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:48 PM
1

That things get worse, doesn't mean that women don't help in Men's rights. By the way, men have lent legitimacy to the Feminist ideology as well, I'd say it's an analogous effect.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:47 AM
2

It does to me. It shows me that in a recent incident I was in scenario #1. Not that scenario #2 is ideal, but it surely can help to take a more indirect approach. It's high time the Age of Innocence for such conversations began to end.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:44 AM
21

Just like ISIS then.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:36 AM
1

All I can say to you is, there are women out there who will be perfectly understanding of such preferences such as your comment's, and will have similar/analogous views to yours. This is not r/relationships and I'm not telling you "dump her", but be aware of that, if you aren't already.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:31 AM
2

On an unrelated note, life expectancy was probably 35. Utopia.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 12:13 PM
3

Oh, it's easy, just rape someone, then they'll send you a new one.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 11:22 AM
4

All my life, reaping the fruit of puhtriarchay!!!
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:26 AM
5

That's what they say though: "The only equal-rights movement is feminism. Because only it deals with the repressed groups of society." In other words, they take the presumption that in the present, women (and LGBTQ) are the only parties that lack rights, in order to justify their cause as equalist. It's a wonderful dissonance.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:19 AM
2

You are a genius. This is it.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:15 AM
1

That's your definition of the phenomenon. Seeing what actual mgtows think, in Reddit at least, tells me otherwise. So if by protection you also mean defensive demeaning jokes, you are right, I guess.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:13 PM
6

Remember her dick is called clitoris. That should be enough. This is a joke, ladies and gentlemen
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:10 PM
4

Either they are so psychologically brainwashed or have vested interests. ​ You know the answer is yes.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:17 PM
4

To be fair, that's what feminist men do to feminism as well. They lend credibility. It sure is nice to get women caring about that stuff, but validity and realism is king.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:10 PM
5

As an unrelated third party I assumed that's a given. Thank you, by the way.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:08 PM
7

It's more like being empathic in an innocent, shallow way. It seems good to me though.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 09:26 AM
27

It could be up to 0.4% rounded down to zero.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 09:02 AM
1

Blah blah. Go make a thread in r/mensrights, no electricity. Let's see who agrees with you.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 12:00 PM
2

Got your gist. Good post!
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:51 AM
5

Not in this case, he doesn't. I think it's clear.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:19 AM
1

Also propaganda is a menace in our society, maybe we should abolish the written word! loloLogic indeed...
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:16 AM
1

You are kidding about it not being complex... aren't you?
/r/MensRights16/04/19 11:47 PM
1

Maybe going back to 1800 suits you, but I doubt it would benefit most of the society, I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 11:19 PM
0

Yes, it's hard. You need to pierce through layers upon layers of defense to do that (and I'm referring to MGTOW as well, who think that the vagina is the source of all the ills of society). It's gonna take years, if not generations (most probably generations) to reverse the damage being done today, and now is the best time to start.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 09:14 PM
3

To be honest, I wasn't aware of that sub. That being said, I'd like for this not to be an exclusive stand-off between Feminism and MRA, and include a spectrum of people not limited to, but including Feminism and MRA. I also see a lot of news, and less personal views in that sub, but I can't say that that's a deal-breaker. But I would like an engaging conversation to happen.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 10:26 PM
3

Yes. And that's why I perceive a lack of such a gender-neutral conversational sub.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 10:20 PM
0

I'm guessing you are the retarded here. I don't even know what 'simp' means.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 08:03 AM
2

Sure it can.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 05:19 PM
16

What does this have to do with MGTOW? Or is it reduced to mocking women now?
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 01:34 PM
1

Calling people retarded because they asked you a question doesn't do you any favors, just so you know. It wasn't even an argument, it was a question relating to 'her body, her choice'. I didn't even attack your argument, I just wanted to see how far does it go. Jesus.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:39 PM
1

That's why I said that women will go back to raising children on their own. Not all, of course. This type of thinking might 'empower' unstable individuals (it has nothing to do with them being female) to inflict harm they otherwise might have felt responsible not to.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:36 PM
1

It was an extreme example. Having ownership of the baby can lead to that type of thinking with unstable individuals. If you don't like stabbing, try drinking or smoking... If it is her choice and the man doesn't want it, then who is going to be taking care of the baby?
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:32 PM
1

It's not a straw man, you just don't want to give an answer.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:30 PM
1

Do you think the pregnant woman should be able to stab her belly 7 months in if she feels like it? It's her body, right?
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:46 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:43 PM
-4

It's not that simple. Yes it's her body, but to say it's absolutely her choice opens up to absurd scenarios. That's how women go back to raising the children on their own. And that leads to women not having any other life other than the familial one. It also opens women up to stabbing their bellies if they don't feel like having the baby, but that's extreme.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:40 PM
1

A few examples?
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:37 PM
7

That's evidently what she's trying to do.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:36 PM
1

I think it's the literal antithesis of feminism. Both suck. ​ Would you like to be a kid not taken care off by some deadbeat drunk dad that got away? I certainly wouldn't. I actually feel very happy that I was raised with a mother and a father, with all their shortcomings. I would neither prefer just a dad (or two of them), or just a mom (or two of those).
/r/MGTOW09/04/19 09:22 PM
1

Yes, and if they face enough backlash, these advertisements will eventually cease altogether. Isn't that what we want?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 06:11 PM
1

So, do you like this 'Russian Model' you are co-describing? Do you think it's how a society is supposed to be?
/r/MGTOW09/04/19 05:50 PM
1

She said in a tiny bikini, and a botox smile.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 03:57 PM
1

Russian women do get turned off by their men, though.
/r/MGTOW09/04/19 01:33 PM
1

Russia is the exemplification of a human society, after all.
/r/MGTOW09/04/19 01:25 AM
2

That's true of the more unreasonable ones in the spectrum. Check the edit in the previous post, if you'd like. What if they consider both instances to be inappropriate? I'd say there is a point there. Latin America is known to be an area where women get disrespected and their bodies easily exposed on media etc.. They'll probably blame this on 'patriarchy'.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 05:09 PM
0

Point conceded as poignant. Although feminists will argue it should be. By that point, we should probably be supportive of them to express themselves more in public, if that's the hill they are sitting on. ​ edit: A more likely, if stronger and more sensible argument from a feminist, might be that this is already sexist. And they will furtherly say that it's patriarchy that leads those women to expose themselves like that. And I wonder if that might also be a sensible argument.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:59 PM
4

If it's your first time here, welcome to the sub! It's nice seeing people practice rational thinking on any side. It might be tough for a woman to have in mind the struggles of men, as is vice-versa.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:54 PM
9

Extremism in MRM indeed is troublesome. So is penis circumcision, being a cliterectomy lite, but the one doesn't preclude the other.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:52 PM
2

Well, this is not a vagina next to the boy's shoulder, so, the analogy is misleading. On the other hand, if it was men with only tiny speedos on touching their chest on little girls, it'd probably be an outrage.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:47 PM
10

The substance we call fat can be healthy and beautiful in controlled amounts. Not only it can, it most often contributes to health and beauty. Not like that, though.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:27 PM
6

That's what a generation of Gender Studies™ do to you.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:25 PM
4

Basic whores. With basic values.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:23 PM
9

If you can't reach your legs, do they really exist?
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:22 PM
2

Women are awesome for men in general, just as men are for women. Would you trade the ~50/50 population for all-men? Hell no I wouldn't! This isn't men's rights. This is misogyny. And I'm pro MR.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 10:07 AM
3

Said in FUCKING ENGLISH by an Asian on twitter. Wow.
/r/MGTOW13/03/19 04:17 PM
1

Kavanaugh showed real emotion, because of his innocence? His performance was pathetic.
/r/MGTOW11/03/19 03:01 AM
1

The problem, if we indeed say 'her body her problem' (which may indeed seem like an improvement on the current state), is twofold. First, a male can't go through the pain (physical, emotional relating to a fetus getting violently scraped out of the body) that a man has to go through. So it is a little unfair, even if she does choose the abortion. It isn't the same process for women and men. So yes, I find that there is an inherent problem to 'forcing' abortion by that logic. Second, if we found …
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 03:39 AM
7

You sir, are a weightist.
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 03:23 AM
1

Touche!
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/18 11:08 AM
1

That's fair enough. Sounds like an unfair boss, anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/18 12:43 AM
1

My perspective is there is a context to each situation... If your purpose was to show muscle in a work environment, then that could be inappropriate from your part, even though she is wearing a sleeveless shirt for a different reason. Or it was blatant sexism from her part. Or it was a power play for entirely different reasons. How do I know? I only know I haven't had such issues myself, nor is this issue bothering me. So I may not be the one to answer that particular question.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/18 12:28 AM
1

So, why do you think such discrimination exists?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/18 12:56 PM
1

Attractive chests don't prevent men to go topless in public life. So there's more to it than man-boobs not being attractive. If you find that women find the shaft attractive in its display, then you are free to try it... Except that no one, man or woman will find that socially acceptable right now. Don't ask me why, but you are free to try.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/18 12:56 PM
1

Exactly. Then why the silliness with the shaft, when nobody is attracted by it?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/18 10:18 AM
6

You know what I mean. Showing your tits as a man is a non-issue at a magnitude's larger scale than women doing the same. Topless for a man is a normality in most informal cases. ​ Look at any clothing store with contemporary t-shirts for men, you will see the cleavage. ​ But tits have nothing on genitals, and women usually don't show off theirs, either.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/18 01:01 AM
7

That one is a bit nonsensical, since men can freely show their nipples, if we are talking about double standards. ​ As I can tell, women tend to not show their genital region as much as men do. ​ Nevermind that cleavage for men is a thing nowadays...
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/18 07:50 PM
1

And why was that not the fault of conquerors like Genghis Khan, or Alexander the Great? I'm curious.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 01:00 AM
1

Well, that video is a manifestation of Australia not being very football-savvy. Let's be honest, they are not very good at it, and they are not good at faking injury (that player is behaving ridiculously), and they are not good at commenting on it. Faking injuries isn't defended by the fans. A faked injury only benefits (in short term) the player. What's more important, the fans support a game that has actual technique in it, which is a fragile thing. Yes, a kick can end your career in football.…
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 10:41 PM
1

I simply don't have any more time to waste for explanations. Excuse me.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 10:47 AM
1

You just don't get the point. My comparison wasn't poor, you've changed the context. Nobody over 9 is fooled by blatant diving either, and it's really obvious to anybody over 9 that there's a motive for the player to faking it. They have a reason for doing it. If you understand that there's a motive to faking it, and it can't be done another way (because football heavily involves, undestandably, legs, and legs are easily broken by falls and from other legs), this whole false dichotomy is over.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 10:36 AM
1

Yet such people disregard football for the actions of individual players trying to shift the play to their favor (they have the incentive, in contrast to gridiron), in a real sport, which is played everywhere in the world. They don't like someone trying to fool the referee, and then they watch a show which is 'fooling' everybody. ​ The comment wasn't for you, anyway. And I'm out.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 10:22 AM
3

Sorry but everyone over 9 knows that TV wrestling is scripted ​ and yet they still watch it... ​
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 10:12 AM
4

USA is the place where they call football fake, or sissy, and then they go and watch scripted male ballet, almost completely fake, and they call it 'wrestling'.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 09:47 AM
1

Reddit seems to be predominantly male, that's the main reason.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 02:28 AM
2

That's never worked well for anyone indefinitely. They are going down, sooner or later.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 01:17 AM
1

No. I said make them use decent reasonable standards through the use of reason and intelligence. Certainly not let them use their shitty standards, but not for everybody to use their shitty standards either, as that would validate them, and would open up to more shitty standards in the future.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:45 PM
1

No, you just can't tell the difference. I said that lobbying for the same shit they lobby would be becoming like them. You want them to use single standards, but not their shitty ones.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:35 PM
1

That's not what I said. Nice try though. You are free to be like an insane one.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 11:47 AM
0

That's the opposite of what I've said though, so forgive me for still thinking you haven't got it.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:14 PM
1

You didn't get my point. My point is, you don't want everybody to get as stupid as those who argue so are. You want to hold them to sanity standards (the standards men have, for example, in modelling). Men understand that different skills earn different pay, and that's an advantage of reason, no reason to toss it in the garbage.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:01 PM
0

To the same standards as men have. There is no need to argue down on this, resorting to their bullshit arguments. All you have to do when someone says you about the pay gap you can say 'The male models are getting paid less than female, but you don't see anyone complaining'. IF you go the 'male models should get paid more' you are playing their game.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:36 PM
6

Tell them that 'Patri-' comes from Father, and Father denotes a man. So yes, you are blaming men. You could also say that 'Patriarchy' is so deliberately confusingly generic, that the institution that you end up accusing is virtually the whole male population.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 12:16 PM
16

She's made 7 movies with him! Seven! She must have gone at least 7 times at his office! Of course she's went much more, but 7 is the absolute least of times. So, she's gone once. Nothing wrong. She's gone twice. Eh, he looked at me weirdly. What the HELL happens the next 5 times??? Is she that dense to make 7 movies with him? Of course she isn't. She made them anyway. She's got her movies and now she spits the man under the bus. Her statement means nothing. Weinstein deserves to go away, the gol…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:25 AM
4

Why ask?
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:45 AM
2

Yep. It doesn't even matter what's true anymore.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:10 AM
1

What did you expect of him? It would take real guts to say anything else. All I'm saying is, now that sexual advances are off the table, women won't be getting into the business as easily by men. And men will be much more careful around women, so much so, that women will possibly have the need to do something about it. I'm not saying that's wrong, or that the previous situation is right. I'm saying that there is another side to the shit that's going down.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 10:03 PM
4

They don't have all the power and approaching is indeed a shitty job. If they did have all the power, then literally, all the power to them, but they don't. They still need things. If men were denied sex unconditionally, or are being threatened for their advances, society would change, a lot. How can a woman force a man to approach her? They can't. The tides will change, either by revisionism, by women being more proactive, or by the wedge between men and women widening drastically for a long ti…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:48 PM
5

It's not about jerking off, you are missing the point. You are also talking beyond your means with your imaginative characterizations, so... good luck I guess.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:40 PM
4

Not that clear-cut. Louis CK didn't criminally sexually assault anyone, and he still got his career smeared. And that's how you make a generation of men very cautious with their escalation, and women responsible for taking some of the weight themselves. You also assume that I'm personally having such problems with escalation. That's really rude, and probably a projection from your part. I've just said that it gets more complex for everyone. Life ain't simple.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:17 PM
5

You are not the only man in the world, you condescending 'son' of mine. Many men have problems with escalation (and many women respond to them in spite of hiccups) and with the shifting goalposts that there are, I'm not that sure at all that you won't be accused of sexual misconduct in your time, however much time you have left.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 08:52 PM
5

I will watch that, but I'm certain there is plenty to be done. Women want sexual correctedness, they will have it (as it seems), and they will most definitely not like all of it.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 08:48 PM
7

He asked, and they said yes. Now that 'yes' means 'no' more than ever, more and more men will think twice about pulling their dick out in front of women who consent, so women will have to do a lot of pulling dicks out of pants on their own (provided they desire said dick). This situation doesn't merely affect celebrities that pull their dick out (with or without consent), this affects everyone.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 08:42 PM
8

Men being afraid to escalate will mean women being lonely and having to do more.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 08:35 PM
3

He wasn't in a position of power legally. He didn't hold their hiring or resignation papers, for example. He was trying to be sexual, and got a yes for it. This whole shebang will result in women feeling lonelier. And men more scared.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 08:25 PM
1

There is such a movie, it's called 'Lore' and it's a decent one.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 09:43 AM
1

I generally agree with and share your sentiments, but, regarding genetics, have you seen a photo of Elon Musk in his twenties? Eech!
/r/TheRedPill06/06/17 11:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter