TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DirtyDustyDoggy Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by DirtyDustyDoggy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-13

Because it's been unequivocally proven that he's the dudes Father?!
/r/MensRights27/05/25 05:09 PM
-2

If you're bisexual, no woman will accept you and you probably prefer guys so take the safest route!
/r/MensRights26/05/25 04:44 PM
6

Yeah exactly, freedom of speech is a tool to help you know who your enemies are, you have 2 ears and one mouth, just listen and they will expose themselves.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 01:15 PM
1

This is why women WILL lose their freedom to do evil once again, just as all of human history has tried to prevent before with laws, because they are just so unspeakably evil and without empathy. Did you know having just 1 woman on a board with 99 men men, doesn't just skew the outcome of whatever their are discussing to be fair to women (men naturally want to be fair to women) it significantly increases the likelihood it will prioritize women? Thankfully the world will heal because the data sho…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 08:04 PM
1

Female empathy is cognitive empathy which is indistinguishable from psychopathy and a prerequisite of emotional and psychological manipulation. Males display real, verifiable empathy through their primary bonding method; banter, which is affectively compassionate honesty as applied empathy. Females are significantly more prone to psychopathy and manipulation, they hide their hideous hatred and jealousy behind the lies of having superior empathy. Males require 3 times as much physical affection t…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 01:57 AM
2

Absolutely! Males require 3 times as much physical affection than females to release the same amount of stress releasing oxytocin to help regulate emotions and form bonds, ultimately affecting their development.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 05:54 PM
3

This is why gay fathers are sooooo important, they obviously have a high respect for males and masculinity, but statistically children with 2 fathers do better in every measurable metric! I've seen videos of straight fathers beating their son in public while only wagging a finger at his daughter even though they were both misbehaving and it's so disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 12:43 AM
0

I had absolutely no outside influence, wasn't around any porn or anything other than seeing my uncle and grandfather naked a few times and instantly being obsessed with how much nicer they looked to me. Can't you just wear more comfortable underwear to fix any problems with uncomfortable rubbing? Perhaps what you feel as uncomfortable, would be equally problematic for me in that it causes so much stimulation and reminds me of my bare naked glans that I constantly leak pre resulting in embarrassi…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:41 PM
1

I took a pair of scissors to my foreskin when I was 11, I didn't actually cut I just wanted to and I was emotional because of how much I hated my foreskin and the many problems that come with phimosis, it might not have been so bad without phimosis, but my biggest dislike currently is my short frenulum, I have a bit of a phobia surrounding frenulums, so much strength forced upon such a needle thin piece of skin is extremely unsettling to me, mine is so tight that when I fully retract with an ere…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:21 PM
1

Ahh, no that's not me, I do find that method to have incredibly good results though, and most people I've talked to who have done it themselves say it is not painful and heals fast. I have considered that method for myself but my boyfriend insists having a professional do it, and I agree that's probably better. Maybe I'll change my mind if I can ever get this phimosis under control, but I'm still much tighter than I want to be, and stretching is so difficult and tedious for me, but it's unlikely…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:57 PM
0

I am uncircumcised, why does everyone not understand that, I don't post pictures of myself I'm incredibly insecure of my tight foreskin, similarly to how your scars are a painful reminder to you, my tight foreskin is a reminder of my neglectful childhood, I believe I would have been happier if I was circumcised as a kid but I'll never know, just like you'll never know, that's why I agree that circumcision before puberty, without even considering what the boy might want is very wrong, if I was cu…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:44 PM
0

Your constant resort to childish negatives and ad hominem attacks show your capacity for intellectual discussion has reached its limit, your belief system is starting to show its reliance on your personal preference, calling what you don't like "pathetic" and "disfigured" is unequivocally pathetic. You're obviously uneducated in evolution by natural selections part in creating the coronal ridge of mushroom heads, by all means mushroom heads exist because big mushroom headed men were more adapted…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:29 PM
0

I maintain that keratinization results in more mature glans, I understand that being more mature may seem more masculine to you though, I find it very interesting that you wish your glans we're like a prepubescent boys glans, still painfully hypersensitive and not keratinized like healthy adults. The foreskin serves to protect the glans of children before they are ready to experience sex, once they go through puberty and start experimenting the glans naturally keratinize thanks to exposure and s…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:46 PM
0

You failed to correct anything I've said, you're partially agreeing with me, about smaller penises being a sign of greater intellect at least. It's well known that many ancient cultures didn't consider a man to be naked unless his foreskin was retracted to expose his glans, as the glans are the sexual part of the penis. No body part is a work of art, it's just nature, circumcision is a man made work of art done by skilled professional, knowing someone took time out of their day to ensure your ma…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 06:35 PM
1

I do shake and am quite satisfied with how well it works compare to my bf who has extreme overhang and will release the foreskin before he's fully finished, then squeezes the shaft from base to tip, you can see additional urine come out of his overhang, adding additional moisture for smegma to fester. It's a slight overstatement saying I wash after every piss, but between every few there is a noticeable stench that needs taken care of. Circumcised men can piss in an incredibly perfect stream wit…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:39 AM
0

I wholeheartedly believe circumcision prevents suffering, but again I don't support RIC fully, I just don't believe the act itself is nearly as harmful as the secondary trama and moral panic intactivist dogma creates, the behavior of most intactivist I've experienced only further convince me of their malice, I try not to judge too harshly those driven by passion as I understand where they're coming from, I only hope they learn to put hatred aside so we can come together for rational discussion, …
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:03 AM
1

If the child is abused then it's child abuse, of course, but I wholeheartedly believe growing up circumcised is infinity better that growing up uncircumcised, especially in America where it's normal and everyone makes fun of foreskin. I don't believe circumcision is anything but beneficial, sure there can be some complications, but there are way more if he's left uncut.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:53 PM
1

That statement is a poor attempt to mislead people into believing foreskin is special, nerve endings and more sensitivity does not equal more pleasure, period. Foreskin literally has no benefits whatsoever, that's why intactavists use unrelated fact like foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis, to desperately try and make an argument for useless foreskin.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:07 PM
1

You're ignoring your biased, contradictory beliefs I called you out on, and showing how uneducated you are about circumcision, the cleanliness and aesthetics alone contribute to sexual gratification by improving attractiveness, a huge part of sexual pleasure is mental, i.e. how turned on you are, people like me see unnecessary skin as unsightly. Even your false claim of cleanliness isn't proposed correctly, I presume you mean it's unnecessary to remove body parts for cleanliness, which is simply…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:59 PM
0

I don't hold those beliefs, I openly advocate for adult circumcision, and the benefits of circumcision I'm general, in accordance with my belief that circumcision is unequivocally good. Interesting that you keep bringing up infant circumcision, it points out your cognitive dissonance, you believe infant circumcision is bad because bodily autonomy, but maintain that adults shouldn't have the right to bodily autonomy? Or do you acknowledge the rights of men who choose to get circumcised as adults?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:47 PM
0

What the world says? How is what the world says related to my beliefs and what I say?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:35 PM
-7

Learn cult terminology before you throw words around, I have no contradictory beliefs.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:32 PM
-16

Typical false equivalence fallacy. You do know men and women have different genitalia right? Regardless I'm no expert in female anatomy, but it has absolutely no place in this discussion, but to humor you, and consequently point out another fallacy, your straw man assuming we as a society would just start labiaplasties without reasoning, I understand you're malicious attempt to make circumcision look like something that hasn't been part of manhood since before written history for a plethora of r…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:57 PM
-2

That's awesome bro! I've seen so many guys self circumcising now thanks to new innovations in circ tech like the incredible ZSR! When I was 11 I held a pair of scissors to my foreskin, thankfully I didn't make the cut, obviously that would have been bad, I didn't understand how circumcision works but knew I wanted it gone and was desperate and emotional, I hate to think of other people in that position, too embarrassed to ask their parents.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:00 PM
1

You're assuming there was something abnormally wrong with my foreskin? Not in a way that it needed to be removed, I had a mild case of phimosis, it's manageable now but not ideal, I'd rather my glans be fully exposed all the time. I am still uncircumcised because I can't afford circumcision at the moment and still looking for the right doctor, My boyfriend insists we have the most qualified surgeon. Living with what you would undoubtedly consider perfectly healthy foreskin is horrible for me, gr…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:54 PM
-1

I Love your analogy, as a circumsexual I completely agree that foreskin is utterly repulsive to me for a plethora of reasons, I can say as a foreskin owner there's nothing I want more than to be liberated from my suffocating smeg rag and wish I was cut as a kid. But my preference for the aesthetics isn't why I personally defend adult circumcision, rather I see the incredible amount of abusive, predatory behavior and harassment by intactivists, going so far as to try and convince otherwise perfec…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:38 PM
2

I want to point out that people from Leonardo Da Vinci's time, and more so those of who he learned and was inspired by, did not consider a penis without the glans exposed to be naked or taboo, portraying what would be considered a naked man today, was in fact just the natural state of the male anatomy in a not explicit or sexual way, he wasn't making porn or trying to portray male beauty in a sexual way, additionally these penises were smaller as that was also more desirable in antiquity, and sy…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 06:39 PM
-7

More sensitivity does not equal more pleasure brother! In fact the opposite can be true, prepubescent glans are naturally painfully hypersensitive, it isn't until much later after puberty that the glans are more regularly exposed and subjected to much stimulation that they become mature and keratinized, once that hypersensitivity calms down, pleasure enhances, circumcision speeds up that maturing allowing stimulation to be less painful and actually enjoyable much earlier. Circumcision was not po…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 06:11 PM
-21

Many men, myself included wish they were circumcised as a baby, the results are the best and we wouldn't have to endure the pain of the healing process as adults. The only way it's morally justifiable to relate circumcision to child abuse is if we're separating the act itself, with how the parents treat and educate the child afterwords, neglectful behavior can be considered similar to abuse, but the same can be said if a child is left uncircumcised and isn't taught how to stretch at the proper t…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:45 PM
-7

Oh boy.. Prepare to be subjected to secondary trauma, by dogmatic cultists known as intactivist, while being manipulated into believing you've suffered from some first hand trauma as a child because of circumcision, that's up to you to decide, but let me assure you, foreskin is nothing but a curse, there is absolutely nothing positive about it, which is why the only argument that holds any ground is built on a complete irrelevant statement; "foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis" as a…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:14 PM
-2

You obviously know nothing about a penis if you think hypersensitivity is anything other than excruciatingly painful. Desensitization is a GOOD thing.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 04:18 PM
-5

Are you fucking kidding me? Fucking Intactalivist cultists bullshit. Site one fucking source.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 12:55 AM
0

Correct, circumcision obviously increases pleasure, as it decrease pain, these dumb fucks want boys to have inferior penises so they feel better. Go suck your smegma you undignified Intactalivists. Incoming: "wE wiLl bEcAusE wE cAN!1!" 🤣😂😭
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:16 AM
-1

You're attempt only accomplished destroying your credibility with that pathetic false equivalence fallacy.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:08 AM
-2

They don't care about reading your post, they wish to only regurgitate their vial dogmatic rhetoric. They do in fact think that a modified circumcised penis is somehow inferior, and so they see it as wrong/abnormal. But it's not, circumcision is superior in many ways, this fact has remained for most of human existence, as the first known human civilizations practiced circumcision.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:06 AM
-2

These sickening Fuckers are dogmatic cultist Intactalivist and their only wish is to make perfectly happy men suffer because they get off on it as a coping mechanism for their self hatred, they are mentally ill due to their abusive propaganda and use of cultist brainwashing tactics. For your own sanity, don't believe their lies, use objective reasoning, and learn to recognize dogmatic propaganda. It's a fact that circumcision makes sex MORE pleasurable because it makes the PAINFULL hypersensitiv…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 12:59 AM
-2

Strawman fallacy and personal incredulity fallacy.
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 11:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter