TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DirtyPantySommelier Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by DirtyPantySommelier on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Someone might claim sex was nonconsensual for a variety of reasons. That they do not understand that they performed a series of signifying actions that a reasonable person would interpret to indicate consent is one possibility, sure.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:03 AM
1

A reason deterrence fails is because the risk analysis of criminals discounts the "increased cost" by their expectation of being caught. If you expect to get away with it, the "increased cost" is irrelevant, since you don't expect to ever have to pay that cost.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:45 AM
1

The knowledge and intent of the other person involved. Asserting that non-consensual sex is rape includes the additional accusation that the other person understood they did not have consent and proceeded anyway.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:36 AM
1

Depends what, exactly, someone is claiming. If someone claims that they had sex and they didn't consent, you can believe that without question. They aren't making any assertions that apply to anyone other than themselves. If someone claims that they were raped, this carries a claim about another person. That additional assertion is what must be scrutinized. Feminist rape culture doesn't not foster that sort of careful approach, which is why it is generally ineffective in understanding or address…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:13 AM
1

The primary purpose of prisons is the separation of criminals from free society to prevent them from doing harm to others for the duration of their custodial sentence. If you can find something secondary to do during that time that is of additional benefit to public safety, feel free. Redefining "rehabilitation" (or punishment, for that matter) as a primary purpose leads to mission creep, e.g.: imprisoning people for nonviolent drug offenses and other "victimless crimes".
/r/MensRights02/12/17 11:49 PM
1

The presumption of innocence and right to due process applies to everyone, even female teachers who rape children entrusted to their care.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:11 AM
1

Wait she doesn't know who is accusing her? How many did she rape? That was my thought as well, but it's possible that she's being falsely accused.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:06 AM
1

"Whoever initiates" is not dating-specific etiquette. And its more about expectations than inviolable rules. It's rude to invite someone out and then when the bill comes spring on them that you're gonna need them to chip in. It's perfectly fine to include such concerns in the invitation.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 08:23 AM
1

The main way to screw up "advocacy for men" is to advocate not for men, but for for your prescriptive idea of how you want men to be.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 04:12 AM
1

Here's a problem, though. Suppose she spouts her bigotry in front of someone else who does do the right thing and then when HR looks into it they find out that you were aware of that one of your cow-orkers made disparaging remarks about members of the opposite sex and that you condoned it.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:49 PM
1

Have you mentioned this to HR?
/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:48 AM
1

From the other perspective... I'm pretty sure that if I publicly accused every person who had touched me in an inappropriate and unwanted manner, most of them would probably have no specific memory of the event. Of the fraction that even knew what I was talking about, most of those would probably honestly say they thought it was consensual. Of the last three, I'd expect one to lie and say the same, one to admit to it and apologize (insincerely; again), and the other to say nothing on account of …
/r/MensRights11/11/17 07:22 AM
1

If we're to take Louis CK as a model for "sexual abuser", then, yes, I admit to asking people if they would be interested in doing something sexual with me and then respecting their answer. I have also, on various occasions, touched women in a sexual manner without first obtaining explicit permission. The most common reaction to this I have received is for my deeply traumatized victims to immediately sexually abuse me back. I have had sex with a couple women who claimed to have been blackout dru…
/r/MensRights11/11/17 06:46 AM
1

If anyone is curious why they want to do this... Say the government has an income tax scheme where the first $10k is taxed at 10%, the second $10k is taxed at 20%, and the third $10k is taxed at 30%. If you make $10k/yr, you pay $1k. If you make $20k/yr, you pay $3k. If you make $30k/yr, you pay $6k. Alice and Bob got divorced. Alice made no financial contributions to the partnership for the duration of the marriage. Bob earned $30k/yr. For some reason, Alice is awarded $10k/yr in alimony. Under…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:30 AM
1

I doubt that a "self-identified feminist" would post about the submission using the clickbait title used here. They'd still use a clickbait title, of course, it would just be one non-critical (and probably supportive) of gender bigotry.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 12:24 AM
1

I doubt that a "self-identified feminist" would post about the submission using the clickbait title used here. They'd still use a clickbait title, of course, it would just be one non-critical (and probably supportive) of gender bigotry.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 12:24 AM
1

Due to the power imbalance the 'sacrifices' are potentially one person pursuing their desire to start a family and the other person being coerced into supporting that choice (because they will be forced to support it regardless, due to the lack of reproductive rights).
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:13 AM
1

You've framed the situation as "sacrifices that both spouses made for the other", which glosses over the power imbalance when it comes to the ability to put the couple into the circumstances which require such "sacrifices".
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:07 AM
1

Unless and until society has achieved effective gender equal protection for reproductive rights, there is little reason to presume that the decision to start a family is one made mutually or on equal terms.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:21 AM
1

From https://www.google.com/doodles/about: How can Google users/the public submit ideas for doodles? The doodle team is always excited to hear ideas from users - they can email [email protected] with ideas for the next Google doodle. The team receives hundreds of requests every day so we unfortunately can't respond to everyone. But rest assured that we're reading them :)
/r/MensRights03/11/17 05:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter