TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DirtyVanDijk Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by DirtyVanDijk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Oh no I agree, I wasn't blaming English people. It's your schools etc
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:50 AM
9

They did the same to Ireland, but no English person seems to have any idea of what they've actually done to other countries in the past.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 10:52 AM
5

That's a bit harsh. By that logic people watch other people play sports for hours on end, that they could play them themselves.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 09:04 PM
2

Oh no, we'd be able to go to work I'm sure. They're not that silly.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 08:27 PM
7

If by some ridiculousness this actually ever got passed, it's two steps away from putting men in concentration camps. And that's not a joke or an exaggeration.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 03:25 PM
21

I've done the exact same thing, saw a random kid running around near a tram line. Automatically went to go get him but hesitated because of that exact reason. Luckily my missus was there and I got her to go get him, but I felt sick afterwards. In that situation something can go wrong so easily, and if my missus wasn't there it could go differently very quickly. I felt so guilty afterwards even though my missus reassured me I was probably right.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:25 AM
2

That's a good thing. Usually his name would be released as soon as the accusations came out. It's better this way, let the news out after the result.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 06:02 PM
2

You're clutching at straws now. It says your girl, it's your partner
/r/MensRights09/11/20 10:02 AM
1

Meh if someone hits someone and seriously injures them, but its in self defence to assault, then tough shit
/r/MensRights17/08/20 04:23 PM
3

That just encourages them to keep going. I'm not saying do or don't hit back, its all dependant on the situation, but I do feel like the recent influx of videos of seeing women getting hit back is starting to change womens perceptions of hitting men.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 08:54 AM
4

I bet if he hired the female because "they need more women" nobody would be screaming sexism. Idiots
/r/MensRights13/08/20 10:42 PM
2

Remembering occasions (add to calendar on phone, done), purchasing and wrapping gifts. Sending out holiday cards. Noticing household items are low, making a list and replacing them. Making the arrangements for date night (usually on the man anyway), and planning get together with family and friends. So, shopping and partying basically.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 10:03 PM
11

Fuck no. Alimony shouldn't exist period, anyone with half a brain can get a job and make money. They get whatever they get after the split, and after that get a job.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:37 PM
18

She made the big personal sacrifice to divorce her basketballer husband of 3 years to get with Dre. Her ex husband mustn't have been supporting the lifestyle she wanted
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:25 PM
18

Hardly the point though is it, its the standard. Not every guy is worth 400m but get the same raw deal. And in what world does she deserve half of the money he's earned through his music. By the same logic "as fucked up as it is, give her 4m, she will be fine, she won't be going on the welfare line anytime soon"
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:16 PM
5

The 1k isn't for her and the child, it's for the child.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/06/20 08:57 AM
7

But he regretted it afterwards, that's rape in 2020 if it's a woman in that position is it not?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/20 04:58 PM
7

Why do the other taxi drivers need to have their names given? If any crime is against a woman they get anonymity yet every guy has his name dragged through the papers. Unless a man is convicted of a crime for sexual assault or rape his name should not be available anywhere linked with something like this.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/20 01:15 PM
2

Well it also needs to go hand in hand with not believing anything a woman says without proof. Or changing her mind and deciding it was rape for no apparent reason. Every other crime where you frame someone else would have repercussions for a false accusation.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/20 01:12 PM
2

You're correct. I was responding to another comment that said the same punishment, I was saying if its proven that it's fabricated it should be punished with the same sentence the man should have served. I wasn't specifically on about this case, it seems like more of a legal failure from the details given.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 01:19 PM
7

She should have to match the sentence he served Edit: *he would have
/r/MensRights28/05/20 10:36 AM
2

They get the exact same prize money. Except Nadal will have to play 5 sets vs Williams' 3. Work over 1.5 times as long for the same money, yet never hear anything about that wage gap.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 09:03 AM
5

Even women dont want to watch womens football, nobody goes to the games! They sell tickets at 5 quid and the stadiums are still empty. They want to be strong independent women yet first they want the money earned from the mens teams invested into the womens team lmao piss off. I dont see them complaining teams in div 4 arent earning as high as the top teams. It's the equivalent of an average female rapper complaining shes not paid the same as Drake, its ridiculous.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/20 05:12 PM
1

Because then we'd be no better than the people who treat all men as potential rapists.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 07:43 PM
2

You didnt mention the tattoos? In that case nature determines maturity for females to be around the same age as young boys, do you advocate that also?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:44 PM
4

My question is if theres no physical harm done to a 13 year old girl, is that ok? Theres no difference.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:40 PM
3

You're saying leave out the hypotethicals, but why? How can you ask us to answer your question if we can't compare it to another similar situation to show you how ridiculous you're being. So you believe in discrimination and that there should be certain crimes for men but not women.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:21 PM
5

So youre saying you'd be happy with a 13 year old girl performing consensual oral sex on a man, because it wouldnt get her pregnant or damage her?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 04:45 PM
5

So are you all for letting 13 year olds get drunk? Or get tattoos? They're going to do it when they're 18, and like you said most 13 year olds would love the thought of tattoos and drinking alcohol.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 04:42 PM
3

That's ok, I think people automatically get defensive on here due to the amount of trolls that frequent this sub. No hard feelings though, we're all here for the same reasons end of the day.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:36 PM
1

I didnt deny the evidence in any way, I literally said in my personal experience and I'm being attacked for it and called a clown?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:30 PM
3

I'm not denying the evidence, if that's the way it is for the majority of people then that's fair enough. My personal attestation may not matter in the grand scheme of things, but naturally it matters to me. It's hard for me to see something as the norm when I've never known any different, but I concede that if the studies show it to be then obviously im the odd one out and I was incorrect.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:29 PM
0

Why are people speaking to me about dicks as if I was a woman? I possess a penis, and a foreskin, I'm very aware of the anatomy of them, and I'm well aware what the act of circumcision entails. As I mentioned in one of my other replies already, I'm not debating the sensitivity of an uncircumcised penis versus a circumcised one. I'm merely stating the foreskin ITSELF is not sensitive. It's the reason my penis is sensitive, but it itself isnt. And fyi I'm not in favour of circumcision whatsoever, …
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:18 PM
1

All that says is places on the foreskin (ie an uncircumcised penis) are more sensitive than anywhere on a *circumcised* penis. Of course that makes sense. I'm saying as an uncircumcised male, my foreskin is not my most sensitive place. I cant speak for circumcised obviously. For me personally, if my foreskin was back in my underwear I wouldnt even be able to walk from the sensitivity, my head is the most sensitive part. I'm saying by removing the foreskin it leaves the head exposed and naturally…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:15 PM
3

Nice of you to call me ignorant about male genitalia, however I'm 100% certain because I have a penis, and a foreskin. I can personally attest to the most sensitive parts of me, and my foreskin isnt the most sensitive part. Im not advocating removing it fyi, I'm completely against circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:08 PM
1

The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis? What? I can tell you with 100% certainty that it's not at all. The foreskin protects the head, which is the most sensitive part. When guys are circumcised the rubbing and exposure of your head against underwear can cause it to become desensitized. And your constant reiteration that in your opinion 'trans women deserve the very best surgically created vagina possible' is...different
/r/MensRights27/04/20 10:29 AM
1

My arguments are foolish? I've given you multiple examples of discriminatory behaviour, you even gave some yourself with religious gatherings and theme parks. Women are physically weaker than men, some men are weaker than other men, that doesnt mean they're going to be assaulted in a public space. Just because you saw one example of a guy harassing a woman doesnt mean its commonly accepted. If that happened everywhere then women and men wouldnt be allowed into shops at the same time either. If i…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/20 09:20 PM
0

Women arent under any threat in a gym or pool. And they should most certainly not be in a state of undress in the gym. I have no problem with women hours in gyms or pools, provided they offer the equal time for males only. That's equality is it not? I'm not against any of those places no. My point is they discriminate against people for their gender or other reasons, therefore a barbers aceepting men only should be perfectly ok also if they desire it to be. As should any mens only spaces.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/20 08:26 PM
0

Oh ok so what are your views on women only gyms? Women only hours at swimming pools? Women being allowed free entry to nightclubs while men have to pay? Women only train carriages in other countries? Women only car parks? Do you have issues with all of those too? I hope you comment on posts like that all the time too and point out the discrimination
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/20 07:10 PM
1

Not at all, it's more that she's one of very few females in a male dominated environment. And for some reason guys see the gym as a place to meet women and treat it as such
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:59 PM
49

That's it, I have no complaints about women only gyms, my missus gyms with me and she struggles to workout without being stared at or approached. If women want their own gyms then let them have them, but in the same way if men want things let them have them. I do however draw the line where it's an all gendered gym but they have women only hours, and no men only hours, nor reduction in membership prices for the less hours available to men.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 03:04 PM
144

Womens only gyms, womens only parking spaces, womens only train carriages, womens only bathrooms because the mens are for any gender
/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:13 PM
2

Sounds good in theory until sports become like the workplace and each team will be forced to have a quota of 50% women because they couldn't make it on merit alone. No thank you, i like my sports the way they are without being diluted by gender politics.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 12:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter