TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dis_mah_mobile_one Archive

View 1 posts and 1,176 comments by Dis_mah_mobile_one on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Dis_mah_mobile_one/r/askTRP01/11/16 10:50 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,176 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Rollo’s books really helped me translate my short term success into longer term models as I’ve grown through my twenties
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 12:29 AM
2

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 12:05 PM
12

For long term, absolutely. For short term fucking? Lmao. And that’s the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 01:02 AM
10

Hypergamy doesn’t care about a degree
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:32 PM
1

Because it works
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 06:57 PM
11

Being top 20% in as many concurrent metrics as possible for the area I’m living in
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 12:17 AM
3

Thin
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 10:37 PM
1

Historically? Submission. Today? None, and that’s the issue
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 10:11 PM
10

“Privilege” discourse may well have started out as a deeply academic study in different forms of passive status but in everyday use it’s nothing more than a way to disregard the experiences and views of someone you dislike while attempting to cover yourself from any justified backlash.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 04:46 PM
1

Controlling the direction of one’s life is unfemimine. No amount of whining and crying by women is going to change that. No one here is hating women for being unfeminine. It's more a feeling of disgust.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 11:29 PM
24

Hoes mad
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:58 AM
8

It’s solipsism my dude. Use this sub for entertainment; it’s impossible for men and women as groups to have a rational debate about sexual strategies.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 11:54 PM
10

Feminism makes rich men? Doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 11:43 PM
2

Absolutely agreed, my point is that very often there will be two different and potentially even opposing viewpoints of an action because men and women are different so that “not caring” looks and behaves differently based on that context.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 02:45 AM
22

Men and women are different. Treating dissimilar things identically is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 02:26 AM
5

Based on women’s actions tall and rich men have measurably better mindsets than other men lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 02:22 AM
18

If a woman leaves for any reason the winning strategy is to just get another one
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 02:18 AM
1

Because, like marriageable women, they no longer exist
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:46 AM
7

I too think parts of TRP and especially the men who make up it can frequently be incredibly sad. However, I don’t think that believing that men and women love differently is inherently bad, as I have seen it save a man from inevitable harm based on incorrect assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 05:08 AM
3

Agreed that marrying modern women is a poor choice
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 06:56 PM
0

Same
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 11:42 PM
5

Adoption removes some of the costs that being captain saveaho for a single mom presents yes. However, it will always be best for a man to father his actual children.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 08:01 PM
9

Being a father is very time/resource intensive, so the only way it’s worth it is if the child is mine. As well, because women are hypergamous and follow a dual mating strategy, women with children from another man are likely looking for replacement fathers that they are not aroused by or even all that attracted to. A woman with a child will only ever see a man as at best third, after her and the kid. She’s also physically less attractive than an equivalent woman without some other man’s child. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 07:14 PM
5

IRL it's much more useful to listen to what women have to say Absolutely not lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 04:25 PM
1

Who won
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 02:36 AM
3

Why lie about wanting a relationship when I can fuck them in all holes anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 02:49 PM
1

I’m not being facetious when I say I don’t follow
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 12:33 AM
-1

Lol. Just over things women don’t like always being “abusive”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 07:26 PM
0

Any sexual outcome not maximally beneficial to women is totally abuse yes
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 03:26 PM
3

A mid 30s man with no children should not be focusing primarily on women over 30
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 03:22 PM
1

They’re not all self reported. However, I am aware of the recent criticism of the studies so my opinion is that a larger study is needed, one large enough to support meta analysis, but I don’t believe the criticism invalidates the findings, but I’m biased because those findings match my lives experience so well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 03:08 PM
2

A woman’s income is not attractive to me, and especially for short term is completely immaterial. For an LTR, it’s most important that her income never become a point of hypergamous unhaaaaappiness between us, which effectively means I’ll make more. That said, the only reason I’d be in an LTR is to raise children so her working a little to spread costs would be nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 02:49 PM
1

I could link several studies that show behavioral shifts in women both between subsets of men (af/bb) as well as preference switching between short and long term partners in and out of estrous respectively, but I’ve had really poor rates of women reading links and saying “oh yeah I guess we do have a tendency to do that” lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 02:44 PM
1

I pretty much agree with that, but of course women have a dual mating strategy and so kindness and stability - though legitimately attractive to most women - is not arousing for them, and it’s in no man’s best interests to be the stable guy a woman settles for after she can no longer keep an unstable guy. It matters a lot less in this case whether a criminal has social standing or not than whether it helps him fuck. Case in point, men made Jeremy Meeks a felon (low status) but women thought he w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 02:25 PM
1

It’s not a quote, but I’ve read enough evopsych and RP blogs that some of that influence is in the language I use.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 01:50 PM
10

Do you think average guys like boring low confidence women If she’s hot. Under present conditions of material largesse, evolutionarily novel birth control and a deregulated sexual marketplace old-order concepts and strategies are either massively less successful or simply no longer work. What that means is that relationships are now sexual attraction first, with everything else following after.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 01:06 PM
2

There’s no such thing as meaningless sex. I’ve “meant” to have every bit of sex I’ve had. As for LTRs, learning how and what to vet for in women, as well as the patience to let the process of finding LTR worthy women work is so much easier once he is in a state of sexual abundance. That’s not burn out, it’s independence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 12:48 PM
1

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 05:22 AM
1

‘What they do’ is a much more important metric of boundaries than anything said, yes
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 04:08 AM
6

Of course, and those that chase them down and arrest them are also overwhelmingly men. In fact, in any case of ‘things done’ whether good or bad, it’s men doing it. The conceit that rankles men, is women using the bad behavior of some men to smear all men, while benefiting from the benefits that the majority of men grant them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 03:01 AM
0

So me in the morning once I’ve slept :)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 02:03 AM
7

Being a criminal has a marked and measurable increase in average number of partners and even children sired, for men
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 02:03 AM
1

No need to move anywhere when mere knowledge of my looks can cause people to alter themselves to look more like me
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 02:00 AM
1

Basically any systemic control on hypergamy will be touched on by RP conversations at some point
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 01:13 AM
2

But you have invented the worlds largest cosmetic surgery market to look like them lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 01:12 AM
14

“Prioritizing short term mating signals like muscularity, dark triad behaviors and social/legal deviancy to the point of precluding stability”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 01:04 AM
7

As for height, here you go: https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/9730/what-is-the-standard-deviation-of-adult-human-heights-for-males-and-females As for IQ, here you go: https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/SexDifferences.aspx You can even see this with genetic diseases, with men once again being outliers and women being nature’s control variable: https://medicine.yale.edu/genetics/news-article/20298/ I don’t really expect this to change your mind because you’ve been running on emotion this w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 12:10 AM
3

Lol I don’t care about you. I’m talking about women’s testable smaller standard deviations in height, IQ, political leanings etc. Any randomly chosen woman will be closer to the mean woman on these metrics than an equally randomly chosen man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 12:03 AM
5

Women are more monolithic than men
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 11:53 PM
6

If you do it right…..
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 11:45 PM
1

Joyeaux Noel, a French/Anglo/German film about the Christmas Truce of WW1
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 05:32 AM
1

N+ 1 always, seeing as getting naked is their largest source of agency
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 05:31 AM
6

When you’re in a basement most things go over your head
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 01:56 PM
1

Not always just 50% more likely.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 12:19 AM
0

Citation
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 07:57 PM
4

Putting social and legal limits on hypergamy isn’t punishing women for being women, and believing so is simply a victimhood narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 01:50 AM
1

It’s been misandrist since inception
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 01:29 AM
2

This one does at least
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 10:33 PM
7

And they’re frequently correct
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 10:22 PM
2

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 08:23 AM
17

It took you two comments to go from most women have low standards to there’s very little quality men these days. Solipsism is a helluva drug lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 04:26 AM
1

Case in point lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 12:50 AM
6

Hips and tits not chins and guts
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 09:54 PM
6

BMI is body mass index. Fat women aren’t beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 05:16 AM
0

To each their own. They can be fun accompaniment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 05:15 AM
4

My man
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 05:11 AM
4

all women are beautiful US BMI stats have determined that this is a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 05:06 AM
0

First dates and plates all get low investment meets like tacos or museums to weed out the bad and the crazy from the worthwhile. After that then yeah I’ve taken plates and girls on trips or to shows and stuff but she has to prove her worth first not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 04:59 AM
5

Confirmed: TRP contributes to outlier level success
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 12:09 AM
7

Denying select parts of real life is part of real life for most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 12:07 AM
1

But if you don’t fully talk out your differences then you clearly didn’t care about what you said in the first place :p
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 10:40 PM
3

“Watch what they do, not what they say” is a thing because so many men have been caught on the wrong side of the AF/BB split while having women lie to them about the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 10:29 PM
1

True, it might not. But I also don’t think “right now, but forever” has ever happened. I’m not discounting either further technological changes (artificial wombs?) or just straight up collapse (hi climate change!) to upset the way the West currently acts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 08:08 PM
1

Human sexuality did not evolve for stable societies at scale. Stability requires putting restrictions on hypergamy. TRP is a means for individual men to attempt to maximize their SMV/RMV in our current deregulated sexual marketplace. The long term fix though is basically a return to patriarchy, or eventual collapse if not (and replacement by a patriarchy). That collapse could take a long time though, because industrial levels of wealth and globalized levels of population makes for lots and lots …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 05:29 PM
2

I would not pay attention to anything most women say Based
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 05:15 PM
3

This. The reliable failure point for MRAs is the belief that there has ever or will ever be a co-equal parity between men as a group and women as a group. There will not. The goal then as goes societal rules is to create a system that takes the evolved nature of both and stably creates something greater than the sum of its parts. (This is called patriarchy). When/if that system is unbalanced or weakened, and no systemic fix is immediately on offer, then individual men or small groups of them wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 05:29 PM
0

“Anal”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 05:34 AM
3

The phrase “fire and brimstone” implies the existence of a perditional plane with both solid and liquid/gaseous varieties of pain.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 05:33 AM
1

Insurance covers accidents but not combat. That’s basically it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 05:31 AM
1

Hell yeah. That’s basically my ideal LTR
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 04:24 AM
1

Ok. Do you enjoy other women together?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 04:03 AM
2

What was the agreement you came to?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 02:05 AM
1

You didn’t know?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 02:04 AM
10

Be a lot cooler if he had
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 01:54 AM
1

Well no, because one who owns lots of cars is pretty likely to be high value
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 01:50 AM
-1

A SAHM dad probably has more time to chase other women. As well, because female breadwinners are for more likely to leave their men, then a man who is capable of keeping a woman even at such a disadvantage is more probable of a higher than average SMV, which of course is fungible towards other women. Lastly, women earning more than men inverts a very deeply evolved dimorphic polarity between the sexes, and whereas that can frequently grate on a guy, it’s tough to feel down when you have a soft h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 06:33 PM
2

A fuckboy is just any man who gets sex at a lower level of investment than a particular woman thinks he should have given. There’s no objective metric of fuckboyness and as such a man who fuckboys one or even several women could conceivably be a good boyfriend to a higher quality woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 06:26 PM
5

A man who can get ONS/casual sex is better set up to look for a relationship when he wants one than a man who must promise commitment to get anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 04:29 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 09:23 PM
8

No. Most ‘fuckboys’ aren’t rapists and most rapists aren’t Ted Buddy, and conflating the three is just “men bad” writ large
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 03:29 AM
2

Locke should be disregarded, because there is no blank slate. The more we learn about evolution and genetics the less sense he makes, and the less we should want to follow their precepts even if we want parts of their end state.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 01:08 AM
8

Most people never encounter a serial killer, but most people do have a limited experiential window for pair bonding, and women’s is even more limited than men’s so it’s far from hysteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 11:51 PM
14

It’s also easier to wait for a connection when a man has options and isn’t obligated to celibacy while he waits on an individual woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 10:45 PM
2

No one’s arguing that, not even LTP, she’s just using “mUh SaFeTy” to argue man bad woman good
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 06:15 PM
1

Midland?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 05:33 PM
13

men's feelings are in no way a part of this Female solipsism in a sentence
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 05:18 PM
1

Mmmm milk stout
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 01:29 AM
11

In the very basic trilogy story (no extended universe) Luke still loses a hand and gets beaten multiple times, has success and failure both on his journey to earn and be worthy of his powers. Nothing of any similarity happens to Rey.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 09:46 PM
0

Some women get very angry when men discuss hypergamy in a systemic way because it makes hypergamy harder to optimize.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 09:52 PM
2

couples who have a hypergamous partner In other words, all male/female relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 11:27 PM
4

I’d rather not
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 11:09 PM
2

Ok, thanks! Now I know what I’ll be bringing
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 10:41 PM
1

What’s the settings for temp and time on the baking? Same as on the box even if you substitute the wine and sausage?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 10:35 PM
1

This is my first thanksgiving away from family since we live in different states (I’m celebrating with my best friend and his family). What’s your recipe for stovetop stuffing? I want to bring something for the feast.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 10:19 PM
–

Because sex is external to the guy in question. It’s an act, and therefore means more than words
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 10:05 PM
3

Thus it’s worthwhile to figure out how to be in the minority of men having the majority of that sex with them
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 12:12 PM
3

Good girl
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 12:52 PM
1

Kind of yeah. I get annoyed sometimes when a woman says all men literally are rapists or when women try to portray some normal consensual act as rape but the statement ‘treat [object class] as potentially dangerous based on their characteristics’ isn’t offensive at all. Most of the time someone gets hurt, it’s because they had an incorrect view of those characteristics.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 12:39 PM
32

What percentage of guns are always loaded? All of them, that’s the point of gun safety. Same with AWALT
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 06:37 AM
3

Honestly, your mindset here is why many men don’t take women’s accusations of sexual assault seriously. What a stupidly solipsistic thing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 05:21 PM
0

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 05:01 PM
3

I have, which is why anecdotes are so unconvincing. “Her man” is also an interesting word choice when a lot of this process happens in the casual grey space as the woman is attempting to make a guy her man, and has competition
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 04:57 PM
6

The largest individual driver of the male sexlessness rate is women being okay with sharing men at the top, and those men are getting sex independently of whether they “mistreat” women or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 04:49 PM
1

Responding to changing incentives isn’t shitty behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 04:46 PM
2

Props to him for at least bitchditching the first one when she didn’t work out
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 03:46 AM
3

Yeah but they’re always missing just one peg
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 03:39 AM
2

They have fucking amazing chicken and dumplings though, and you can slaughter Boomers at checkers while you wait for it to arrive. It’s not all bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 03:34 AM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 03:32 AM
2

Doesn’t matter if it’s 100% or 10%, they’ll never take responsibility for it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 01:16 AM
0

100% agreed, I’m a man so it’s in my best interest to commit to a woman with a lower N-count all else being equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:48 PM
-3

Yes but the effect is far less pronounced in men than women
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 06:42 PM
3

Because men aren’t hypergamous
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 06:38 PM
5

put on makeup and make an effort to use skincare. Absolutely does not matter when the average American woman is fatter than the average man
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 06:21 PM
0

Because it makes the woman less likely to have a successful relationship with me. Your strawman naturalistic fallacy aside, whether something is natural or not is less important than whether or not it is in my interest, and if I have the option(s) to make a better choice if it isn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 06:01 PM
1

They’re generally even more entitled, bitter and openly hypergamous than average but in a lot of ways, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 05:56 PM
2

And neither necessarily means treating them the same
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 05:27 PM
1

More power to you for making that work! I’m not sure I could
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 01:21 PM
1

Le meilleur parte du Canada est Québec, c’est un fait. La nourriture, le fierté de leur propre culture, le langue, les femmes…… il se sent un peu comme l’Europe sans le vol. Le seule chose que je n'aimais pas était visiter pendant l’hiver. Le vrai nord vraiment! Le vent, putain. Mais sans ce, tout était amusant. Excuse-moi en avance pour les erreurs que je suis sûr sont présentes. Je n'ai pas beaucoup de pratique maintenent.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 01:19 PM
1

Ok, so still living in the West. Do you worry that the laws in the UK might potentially harm you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:18 AM
2

I’ve got a lot of sympathy for mgtow even though I enjoy women too much and have had too much success to ever be one. I’d be fine with having a ceremony publicly letting the world know that I’m my girl’s man, but legal marriage carries enormous risk for men, I’ve already seen a lot of my family and friends get torn up, or just realize that marriage isn’t a refuge from the SMP, and I just do not want to do it. And that puts me in a bit of a quandary, because I want the best for my future kids, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 06:35 AM
1

Any store bought pumpkin pie is a pale imitation of the homemade goodness. i found the same for poutine when I visited Quebec. As an aside, tu parles français? Also I live in the southern US and we take pies fairly seriously. Massachusetts may have invented pumpkin pie but they did not perfect it haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 01:27 AM
9

That simply has not been my experience. I understand that this is simply my anecdote against yours but it doesn’t match my experience whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 01:24 AM
19

Assuming that speech is either wholly positive or wholly negative is much more black and white thinking than anything TRP says
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 01:18 AM
1

Divorce Inc does worry me, but I’m not as cynical as you. I do ardently believe that successful, loving relationships are possible (my parents are a good example, they’re just far more religious and far less adventurous than I want to be) but I am certain that I’ll need to vet properly, set a proper frame for the relationship from the onset, and be willing to enforce boundaries up to and including burning it down if need be. But honestly, having a family seems worth the risk to me, I’ll just nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 01:16 AM
1

It’s native, and it grows easy and cheap so historically it’s been a way to root for the home team that everyone can do. Also, it’s a lot like vanilla ice cream in that while by itself it’s not the greatest, it’s simple to mix with a huge variety of stuff. I used to not like it, and I’m still not a huge fan of basic pumpkin pie, but thick dough cinnamon spiced pumpkin pie with honey roasted pecans and heavy whipped cream? Yes please!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 01:13 AM
14

Actually no in my opinion it’s only a hatefuck if both people know it’s a hatefuck. Get the poison out as Hank Moody said
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:59 AM
1

Tradition is turkey with dressing, pumpkin pie, cider, buttered rolls, green beans, squash and corn. Nowadays in the finest American tradition it’s Turkey plus as many carbs as can possibly fit of any variety, craft beer and yes pumpkin pie, likely with ice cream on top.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:57 AM
22

Hatefucking can be incredibly fun but you need an exit strategy
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:55 AM
1

I want kids eventually but that’s the only reason why I would
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:54 AM
1

You might have already said this but where do you live?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:53 AM
4

Or a fish to not need a bicycle
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:48 AM
7

modernity cowabunga it is
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:46 AM
4

The ‘manosphere’ does have a problem with grifters and the sub itself is a poster child for eternal september, and it’s hardly a movement at critical mass at a societal level because the amount of sex being had/bad continues to decline, but it has very much helped me personally as well as the couple men in real life I know who also know it and bounce ideas off one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:30 AM
6

Agreed there. I used to read and comment on TRP pretty regularly like five years ago when I was first learning all the stuff. I still peruse occasionally and it’s not like my views have changed but I just don’t have much to say because I’m well past the anger phase and into the apply the info in the real world phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:10 AM
44

Not really. I found TRP after I was falsely accused of rape, a lot of men find it after a divorce or infidelity they didn’t see coming. Parts of the two sex’s strategies are adversarial so it’s not “woman bad” it’s “avoid getting got” and there is a lot of anger and bitterness but I think it’s largely justified because a lot of the men have been very badly hurt and there’s few other places to get it out and learn how to avoid a repeat. TRP has definitely helped me have more sex, and it’s a straw…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:07 AM
1

Absolutely agreed I was just making a gangbang joke
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 11:19 PM
1

Canucksgiving was last month, Yanksgiving is in November, and while lasagna doesn’t have much of a thanksgiving tradition there’s little more New Englandy than squash
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 10:57 PM
1

An ideal attractive woman can only spend time with one man at a time. I’ve seen a couple videos disproving this
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 10:42 PM
2

Date casually? I don’t really care but I have noticed that really promiscuous girls are much more likely to have behavioral complexes that I find grating. For an LTR? I don’t expect to be a woman’s first but I do expect to be her best, so fewer partners is better because I do think that women lose the ability to pair bond much faster than men. I know women who were proverbially “alpha widowed” by the first man they ever had sex with so it’s less about absolute numbers than it is about my only wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 10:02 PM
2

men are hung up on whether another dude had to wait And rightly so
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 09:12 PM
6

Which is an entirely different and much less dire issue than whether or not they can even get it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 08:51 PM
3

Eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap, which leads to women are human beings, men are human doings. All else follows from this, and while I honestly do believe that it is theoretically possible to liberate both sexes from the rat race both find themselves in, it is impossible to do so without taking into account the evolved nature of both, and it’s very difficult to do as the evolved nature of the sexes are in many ways in direct competition, making it incredibly difficult for either to relax their…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 07:56 AM
5

Men’s definitely. I would go so far as to say that the biggest hurtful thing women do as a group towards men as a group is invalidate or be dismissive of the male experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 03:32 AM
4

Women already have porn, why do you need sex toys too?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 12:35 PM
8

Which will just exacerbate many of the issues because atomized societies where people have little in common with one another are not enjoyable to live in
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/21 09:32 PM
0

They do, it’s just much more conditional than men’s
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:08 AM
4

The wall does
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:07 AM
1

I miss Dalrock
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:33 AM
-1

Women have less variability than men: it’s less that there’s different niches for women and more that there are a set of attributes and behaviors that are attractive/arousing to an overwhelming majority of women, and it’s best for men to learn those and then vet women that are already attracted to them for things like values and submissiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 03:12 AM
4

You’re assuming a 1:1 pairing ratio and that isn’t necessary
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 03:02 AM
2

Just because a concept offends your hypergamous sense of correctness does not make it a cult or even wrong/incorrect
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 01:10 AM
3

Which will just speed up the process because atomized societies where neighbors have nothing in common are not fun places to live.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 07:07 PM
6

Dating the guys they actually go for rather than what they say
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 05:58 PM
0

Right, women want to be the one the guy in the mansion chooses above all others….. and a lot of them would happily settle for walking around naked with the other girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 10:58 AM
2

I can see why you’d think that for all of them but no. Certainly some did especially when I was in my early 20s and hadn’t built myself to where I am now and didn’t have my current experience. Some waned because they went across the country for things like grad school and jobs, and even then the best of those (those most closely following the pattern) would invite me to EDM concerts and holiday parties where they were, and it took longer to fizzle out even with the distance. In my experience giv…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 12:03 AM
1

The ones that I’m currently with, of course. Some were casual flings that just waned. Some ended earlier than they could have because of mistakes on my end, but the pattern when they were good and especially of the ones I remember most fondly were broadly similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 11:53 PM
1

I’m not trying to be dismissive but I am going off my own experiences here. My best relationships - casual or more defined - have been when the girl sees me as the leader and better than either her or her past experiences, and my worst, least happy and most rule filled ones have been when I am not. This matches TRP’s AF/BB dichotomy reasonably well, but I understand that my own experience isn’t everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 11:26 PM
1

If that man was the woman’s hypergamous ideal those dishes would never be an issue
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 08:41 PM
3

If your stats aren’t bullshit then start looking for women in their late 20s/early 30s as they enter their epiphany phase. You’ll still have to sift through to find one worthwhile but it’ll be better than one your own age
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 02:56 AM
1

I think so, or rather, because under a classic patriarchy it is men setting the sexual mores, then feminism would attempt to limit sexual restrictions (for women, not everyone) up until the point where declining returns reach critical mass and/or men responding by changing their behavior leads to a growing sex negative hypergamy ending - historically, no idea what will happen this time - in the reintroduction of patriarchy and a new balance, which is the cycle we were discussing earlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:38 PM
2

Because women are hypergamous and men are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 10:40 PM
1

Or might cycle in a different way: context matters a lot, it’s just filtered through a human nature that doesn’t change much which is why history rhymes even when it doesn’t repeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 10:33 PM
1

What about cycle theory do you dislike? I agree that some proponents are too literal with it but I think there’s a lot of utility in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 09:47 PM
2

I disagree, I think it goes in cycles though there is some truth in what you say. It’s not like this is the first time that politicized hypergamy (which is what feminism is) has arisen, it’s not even the first time in the west that free love has been attempted just read about the Hussites and the Munster Commune way back in the 15th and 16th centuries, they just failed more quickly than ours is because as you say there was less largesse to sustain it. My claim isn’t that the west is currently an…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 09:13 PM
3

I’m not sure that “we” valuing eroticism most highly will hold in the near future, or even really holds currently. When I say “we” I mean it in the “society bottom text” way you used it, not a dig at you personally. The Sexual Revolution occurred because 1) men had invented the technology to allow it (antibiotics, industrialization and birth control) and 2) it was claimed that free love would give more people more sex than ever before. The first set of preconditions is still extant so in that re…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 08:59 PM
0

Stable does not mean equal, and attempting to prioritize equity regularly leads to instability because men and women are not the same. The inverse is also true, but the west is so far away from a stable paradigm that I don’t believe it’s a risk at present. The list of preconditions for successful civilization is very long, and difficult to fully fulfill all at once; putting controls on hypergamy is one such precondition, though I don’t think it’s necessary to be completely vicious or dismissive …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 08:38 PM
2

and still be happy Rates of ever increasing antidepressant use prove this bitch wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 07:18 AM
3

But they do
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 12:57 AM
2

Feminism wanted to remove social constraints Only from women
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 11:18 PM
0

white people built America Correct
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 11:17 PM
11

Women are less likely to “wise up” than “age out” in that regard
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 07:59 PM
1

100%. I want a family eventually but I’m completely agnostic as to the means by which I accomplish that, and I do not believe that ‘traditional’ marriage even exists anymore so whatever I do I need to avoid leaving myself open to undo risk while doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 10:29 PM
6

The man should, at the very least, pay half. If so, he should have input into whether it occurs.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 06:09 AM
5

Mmm that is on me for misreading then. Still, even though current work culture is much less antagonistic towards you than a roughly similar man, I still think your workplace is not the place to meet men romantically.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 02:11 AM
5

If indeed feminism is responsible for this development, then I regret that it has had such a vast reach Oh that’s just getting started I'm a feminist My condolences I don't want to use dating apps or go to bars or Meetups. Never shit where you eat. There’s a perfusion of ways to meet the kind and caliber of women you want, but not at work. That said, the right mindset can potentially lay a lot of groundwork for if and when a girl no longer works with you, that can be fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 02:03 AM
1

Women have never and will never take responsibility of their own accord because doing so would curtail hypergamy. This is why the standard solution throughout history has been to give men greater authority than women to counteract men’s greater responsibility. Anything else is a moral hazard as you note currently.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 02:52 PM
2

No matter how many times women say this, the majority of men have enough real experience of the direct opposite actually happening to simply never believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 02:04 PM
2

Yes, industrialization is a thing. However RSA has permanent load shedding now when they didn’t used to, and their decline will inevitably continue until a tipping point is reached.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 02:49 AM
1

A link to a physician’s bio page?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 08:28 PM
1

It’s not, and here’s why. Whatever women feel internally in their 30s and 40s, their sexual power is given by men. All else being equal a 45 year old woman will never be more attractive than her younger self at 25. There are reams upon reams of data from dating apps I can link showcasing this if you’d like.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 08:24 PM
1

Haha no, they’re not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 08:08 PM
1

I don’t think that’s true. My introduction to TRP was a false rape accusation when I was in college. I was very angry and unhappy as I rebuilt from that, and justifiably so. I understand that my experiences are not everyone’s, but men and women’s sexual strategies are in large part adversarial, and I’m incredibly sympathetic to men’s frustration at this particularly when dealing with young women at their sexual peak and when there are few easy ways for them to reduce such a large power disparity…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 08:01 PM
1

Well, integrity towards what? I can tell you as a young man I have very high integrity towards things that make me arousing to women, but I’ve let most of my religious upbringing slip because it has proven to be less than optimal and getting me what I want
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:45 PM
0

It’s not normal, in that zero generations have ever before attempted to live without gender. To be honest I see the explosion of non binary and bespoke ‘identities’ as indicative of how much damage has been done to a formerly quite heavily regulated and functional sexual market: it is at least a large part of the decline TRP describes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:22 PM
0

Hahaha I agree on the vocab part entirely. I don’t think it’s Gen X’s fault, I just think Millennials are one step further on the sexual revolution timeline and the externalities continue to stack fucking up larger and larger cohorts. I think Gen Z will be even worse in this regard
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:06 PM
1

I was born around the time you graduated high school, why?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 06:55 PM
1

A man that’s devout, good father, puts his family before himself, provides, protects and has drive. My adopted parents are missionaries and I grew up in a large and active church supposedly expressly designed to facilitate this; I know several men exactly like this, doing everything “right” and I can tell you that the majority of the girls in my age group there had the same AF/BB strategy girls as anywhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 06:39 PM
3

Marriage used to be mandated, caring for a woman for a lifetime was the price of enjoying her youth at all. But now that that system has broken down and the average bride’s age at a wedding is 29, yeah there’s no reason to get married today.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:28 PM
9

In my experience that is frequently entirely untrue
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:18 PM
4

I too rely upon 18th century Prussian propaganda to explain sexual strategy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 06:15 PM
3

Monogamy is very rarely the best-case ending for an individual, it was designed as a compromise between both sexes’ strategies for beneficial societal stability. Theoretically a new mode of compromise might be possible but I’ve yet to see one in real life that does not come with massive externalities both interpersonally and socially.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 06:12 PM
1

I’d have to redownload to run a side by side. I just tinder golded for this month because I’m in a college town as the students start
/r/askTRP26/08/20 03:03 AM
8

Gotta say my reply rate after three days of tinder gold beat a month of bumble, and my city is mid sized US. Userbase size matters
/r/askTRP26/08/20 12:49 AM
14

Lol it’s real
/r/TheRedPill15/03/20 12:40 AM
2

Well, yeah. Feminism hates Western Civ so it allies itself with whatever would destroy it.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/19 09:16 AM
1

Expand that out by several orders of magnitude and that’s effectively the American school system currently.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/19 11:03 PM
1

Gender norms are both performative and biological, which means there are limits to how malleable the two sexes are. There is an average around which female behavior clusters, and feminism’s problem is that it attempts to alter that leasing either to failure or increasing unhappiness as it strays from that average for no legitimate purpose.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/19 07:28 PM
4

The Muslims feminists are in favor of importing and defending are pretty damn patriarchal, so there’s that.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/19 07:23 PM
17

The Up-Or-Out system and the necessity of officers grinding for 20+ years under it before being eligible for top rank is designed to select for middle of the road guys who won’t rock the boat. This has the negative effect of purging almost all of the deep and disruptive thinkers once they finish their line officer years (few Gavins and Ridgeways today) but as you say it also somewhat insulates them from bullshit like this, if they can last that long without getting sidelined at a more junior ran…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/19 06:56 PM
1

Yup, thanks
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 08:40 PM
3

Discrimination is not normally immoral. The Czechs and Slovaks discriminated against one another once soviet rule was ended, resulting in the Velvet Divorce, the amicable and entirely peaceful separation of Czechoslovakia into the Czech Republic and Slovakia, because even when very similar race and ethnicity matters. If Whites are truly the most dangerous and violent, then surely you’d agree that whites should be allowed to to have their own nations where they would not endanger others, rather t…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 05:04 PM
7

Black pride created the mfecane so if American whites are gonna get blamed for something European whites did then we’re gonna have to shut down everyone’s pride everywhere. Which will never happen, because denigrating white pride has only ever been about disempowering whites politically.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 03:10 PM
12

It’s retarded because it’s never enforced equally while being done so ostensibly in the name of equality. White peoples being justifiably proud of who they are have also created many of mankind’s greatest works, but only the negatives are mentioned as part of the bait and switch.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 02:56 PM
12

That’s still retarded tho
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 02:49 PM
28

Statistically you don’t understand per capita
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/19 09:45 PM
1

Born in OK here, what business did you start?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 08:53 PM
23

Provided the guy is who he says he is, he has quite a history
/r/TheRedPill11/05/19 06:27 AM
64

Holy shit are you the actual weev
/r/TheRedPill11/05/19 03:07 AM
1

Which is the buffet line for all too many
/r/TheRedPill02/05/19 10:25 PM
7

I’m assuming you’re asking in good faith so I’ll give you my reasoned answer. Postmodern marriage does not offer anything to a man currently: marrying a woman who eventually wants to detonate her marriage the man has no protection against that same as in a non married LTR, with the caveat that his legal risk if it happens is lowered. ´Traditional’ marriage solved this in a number of ways throughout history, invariably giving men more authority (and responsibility) than women to buffer against hy…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/19 09:10 PM
1

Yes, but I’m not getting married to have them
/r/TheRedPill28/04/19 07:09 PM
6

Lol
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/19 04:41 PM
27

Very much yes
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/19 03:03 PM
2

The Constitution predates the French Revolution
/r/TheRedPill16/12/18 02:01 PM
2

Nothing online is direct. That is both its strength and its weakness.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/18 03:57 AM
59

Almost like sexual dimorphism exists and is indicative of the host of differences between men and women
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/18 06:40 AM
2

One of them, but yes
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/18 10:13 PM
-2

As opposed to the second wave with Dworkin and the SCUM Manifesto and the Duluth Model, or First Wave that wanted universal women’s suffrage but not men’s?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 04:09 PM
-6

That’s not modern feminism, that’s all feminism has ever been and it’s evil.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 03:20 PM
31

True, what I was highlighting was the difference between what they say and what they do.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/18 05:20 AM
108

But only from some men, and only on their terms
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/18 01:10 AM
1

That, right there, is why Rollo says women require Indignation. Indignation to a woman is a marker that she has found something - in this case a man - that will not bow to her capricious whims. This is simultaneously incredibly arrousing in the short term and potentially dangerous to her long term security needs. It’s this paradox between security and thrill that is best balanced by an experience that gives her indignation, and she’ll manufacture it herself if she doesn’t get it from you.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 10:37 PM
4

According to the source, 40.3% of all births are to unmarried women
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 10:10 PM
2

Not really, no
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/18 03:53 PM
5

In the postmodern US the woman frequently has to work as well as the man since a single income is no longer sufficient. But what her job is doesn’t make her more attractive to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/18 05:12 AM
6

As a guy, a woman’s career choice doesn’t really have any bearing at all on her attractiveness, with the caveat that some professions make a woman less attractive. If I were a doctor it’s likely I’d pair up with another medical worker because that’s who I’d mostly be around - and because nurses are 90%+ women - but as /u/DisposableWipe said, Hypergamy is a female trait that simply doesn’t have a male analogue.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/18 01:14 AM
25

Even then, the Iranian and Chinese universities with engineering classes full of women will still see most of those women exit the full time workforce due to marriage and children anyways. We see the exact same thing in the West, but with more expensive and frequently less useful degrees being chosen.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/18 11:06 PM
3

Eh, I think the current status quo can’t last, so it won’t.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 03:57 AM
19

Exactly. Toxic feminity = politicized hypergamy = feminism. And all women have the ability to let the toxic elements of their personality run wild, and are encouraged to do so currently.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/18 06:42 PM
95

Per Heartiste: “The goal of feminism is to maximally liberate female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality”. It’s not insane, it’s malicious.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/18 04:03 PM
10

Do you think this movement is going to set women BACK even farther? I hope so. This insanity will only ever increase until there are costs for being that crazy.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 08:26 PM
5

That’s precisely his point. More than half of all US homicides come from just 6 out of America’s 3,144 counties, and all 6 are majority minority, or in other words are non-American.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 03:36 AM
40

Women aren’t planning to divorce so much as they’re planning on always keeping their options open.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 11:36 PM
25

It’s not a political debate when they’re answering a question specifically about politics that you asked.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/18 07:07 PM
4

It’s evil that the law allows her to do so at all, but that it allows it regardless of marriage? Madness
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/18 11:55 PM
14

This is why I’m never getting married
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/18 11:12 PM
9

Hypergamy is a helluva drug Well that, and an unwillingness to face the psychological pain that settling would brush her.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/17 08:29 PM
1

Yup, Spain’s laws are completely garbage when it comes to relationships.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 07:50 PM
5

There has never been a generation of women that would have been successful in Normandy
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/17 06:15 PM
-1

I’m not mad, I’m simply saying that how you see it does not match with measurements of average partner count, relationship hopping, obesity or submissiveness.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/17 03:21 PM
1

Now that is more true, yes. Our current postindustrial status is not going to last forever.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/17 01:57 AM
1

No, women don’t care if it will last or not, they simply strive to optimize their hypergamy regardless of circumstance.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/17 01:18 AM
7

White women are already the sluttiest of the race No, that’d still be blacks by far, and some flavors of Latina.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/17 11:30 PM
2

.... was about fifteen years ago.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/17 07:18 PM
4

Username is 1930s fighter plane wants to be a ground officer. Lol. All seriousness though, you are me when I was 18/19. I had a full ride ROTC scholarship until a false rape accusation took it all away. If you wanna Officer then go Officer, but know that you’ll spend more time doing “don’t rape” courses than doing training before getting out in four years like most junior grades. Milk it for all its worth tho!
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 05:43 PM
1

Well that’s fucked
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 06:55 PM
1

Why does the CNDH even exist? I know it used to be part of the government but since it’s gone under UN control it seems to only try to hamstring the Mexican State, particularly the Army and Police. Are they like, laughably Leftist?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 07:50 AM
1

Wait really?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/17 09:42 PM
26

Fuck em. Simply posting here is enough if the perpetual outrage brigade wants to start shit. Just disregard. Also, 19D?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/10/17 03:04 AM
1

Lol
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 08:07 PM
324

Oh they certainly do, but they also fight well
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/17 11:45 PM
9

yawn
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/17 11:57 PM
10

You're amusing when you're this triggered
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/17 11:42 PM
11

You say that like it's a bad thing
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/17 11:36 AM
7

Collapse generally proceeds logarithmically, which means "very slowly, and then all at once". The West obliterated itself metaphysically and culturally in the World Wars, which left itself open to the follow on infections of feminism and cultural marxism. These have been steadily raising social and in many cases financial costs for more than half a century now, and the curve is in some ways accelerating since there no longer exists a mechanism to restore what was lost and thus began the decline …
/r/TheRedPill12/07/17 02:26 AM
0

Nah I upvoted you. Bantz are bantz
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/17 05:52 PM
47

Username checks out
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/17 05:25 PM
1

lol I've been citing statistics. Guess they're overly emotional statistics.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/17 08:18 AM
2

By your logic we should immediately scrap all divorce law since it is men who live in fear of potentially losing their livelihoods and families in a divorce, with divorce being another thing that women initiate disproportionately.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/17 09:19 AM
2

Men are statistically more likely to be victims of violent crime than women. Also, you ignored the stat of women initiating 70% of non reciprocal partner violence as well as the majority of child abuse, in favor of more "woe is women" bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 08:04 PM
1

The claim (a la motte and bailey) is that it is about equality. I'd argue that superiority is exactly what feminism has always been about, whether it was "women's lib" when that was the fashionable saying or called something else.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 11:14 PM
1

can't be more equal That's the point, and why it's so funny that people still claim it is. I'm glad at least you're admitting it's not about equality though.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 10:32 PM
3

In social terms yes and they always will be. But only young women: over the age of thirty and things start to flip heavily But the sheer disparity of attractive power between a young woman and a man of the same age is a large part of why "equality" reliably becomes female superiority.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 05:51 AM
10

What are you even trying to say
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 01:56 AM
13

Women have been more equal than men since the beginning of universal suffrage since women were given the vote without the same responsibilities men still have. Women's lib has never been about equality.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 12:59 AM
2

More than buy into it: feminism is designed to denigrate men and white men in particular.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 12:54 AM
6

I actually seriously doubt it. Shes clearly crazy enough to probably be down for buttstuff no big deal but she appears WAAAYYYY too selfish to be great at sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/17 09:49 PM
15

It was. My question to that is... when? Feminism has always stood for the advancement of women. Period. First wave wanted men's rights, but rejected men's responsibilities. Second wave rejected women's responsibilities to family and society. Third wave is wanting to increase men's responsibility to women. Pretty much: feminism has been a female supremacy movement since its inception. I know or Mrs. Paglia quite well. And of how viciously she's been attacked by mainstream feminists since, unlike …
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 08:17 PM
17

The bad thing is, that's the entire point of feminism: using sexuality to control men. And you are doing absolutely the correct thing for yourself by being cautious of the evils of false rape charges - I say this as a man who was falsely accused six years ago. It's just toxic to society, which feminism either wants or doesn't care about.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 06:27 PM
24

That's because feminism was never about equality.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 05:51 PM
7

Exactly.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 05:50 PM
1

You're not. Rollo's newest piece actually touches on this point exactly: https://therationalmale.com/2017/04/30/submission/
/r/TheRedPill01/05/17 04:30 AM
2

Doesn't mean she had a shitty dad. Daddy issues is a catch all term for any youngish women who has yet to experience a man she is comfortable fully submitting to. The phrase originated from girls with absent fathers entirely, but given how out of balance intersexual relations are in the West, most girls under 25ish have daddy issues.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/17 04:15 AM
17

I wasn't defending Hitler. I'm saying that White Nationalists who look to Hitler as a good leader except for the Holocaust are wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/17 06:26 PM
5

K
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 07:16 AM
3

I'm not punching in any direction, the time for that has yet to come.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 12:25 AM
15

Oy vey! Nah Hitler was retarded if only for getting Germany surrounded and involved in a war it could never win.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 12:19 AM
-1

I've read Culture of Critique and I watch those videos (Red Ice?) lol. But I also have no interest in purity spiraling provided everyone's on the same page of pro-White Identity.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 12:14 AM
5

When a wife outearns her husband, the risk of her divorcing him skyrockets, and this on top of women initiating 70%+ of divorces. What this shows is women getting worried that they'll never get married. Or, said another way: feminism is transforming American relationships as a whole into what black America looks like. This isn't a denial, it's a catastrophe in the making.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/17 11:51 PM
10

It's not a prerequisite no. I'll admit that there's two neo-fascist subgroups of it (the old school neo-Nazis that have always been around and are latching on because the Alt-Right is new, and "bro-Nazis" that are mainly in it to trigger those who are going to call us Nazis regardless) but most of those I communicate with view Nazism as something specific to its time period that isn't even applicable to US politics as well as having failed. Alt-Right is about identity. Hating those oligarchic Je…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/17 11:42 PM
–

Excellent! I'd consider myself somewhat Alt-Right politically but those mods were atrocious and basically turned the sub into "Da Joos" and "Hitler was right". Glad they've been couped.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/17 11:01 PM
3

One woman every six months for two decades. Nice! That is one of my goals, seeing as I'm early 20s.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 03:28 AM
1

I'm not making a moral argument for gender roles, I'm saying that gender roles to begin with arose as praxeologic solutions to problems. For example, men are stronger than women and are biologically more disposed to manipulating objects. Therefore, mechanics are men. This sucks for the minority of women who want/can be mechanics and the minority of men who are stuck in family jobs do to laws forbidding them to seek other work (which has happened historically), but it benefits society as a whole,…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 09:24 PM
0

Gender roles have been further encouraged by society in order that society might better function, yet much of the differences flow originally from biological differences between the sexes.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 07:12 PM
6

You asserted that Muslims are not systemically more violent and intolerant than other religions. International polls determined that was a lie.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 11:22 PM
2

Hahaha. Good catch. Still, I'm willing to bet that soldering is also a male dominated activity.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:31 PM
3

Implying (correctly) that soldering is a manly job is going to trigger the other half of feminists. So much for her being "consistent".
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:55 PM
12

No, I used the 1840s because you did first. America was White from well before the revolution. Also, black people did not come from America. Asians did not come from America. Saying that the US - or really North America as a whole - has diversity again is false. I do concur that the "homeland story" a la Europe and Asia is a weaker argument for the Americas because the timelines are shorter, but the timelines for mass immigration into the US are even shorter still so that argument is not persuas…
/r/PussyPass31/03/17 06:15 PM
10

Solipsism.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:59 PM
3

This is good! Thanks for the sources.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:49 PM
3

Laci Green lying Yes. That's what she does.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:49 PM
2

/u/Arzu1982, use Archive! It's really easy to do.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:48 PM
16

By the 1840s the US was overwhelmingly White. Even considering remaining Indian populations (which were minuscule by then) or blacks, seeing as the slimmest ratio of black slaves to Whites in the US was in the late 1820s. If you're talking about Texas and the southwest that belonged to Mexico before being conquered (then purchased) after 1848, that's true but even by the 1870s after the California Gold Rush and the Homestead Act every state other than Mississippi and Alabama was majority White, …
/r/PussyPass31/03/17 05:45 PM
1

http://www.familyofmen.com/a-final-letter-from-earl/
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:11 AM
7

I like that this article is finally acknowledging the immoral racket that is the family court system. However, I have better advice than it: 1) Don't get married. 2) have children via surrogacy. Cheaper in the long run and they can't be stolen from you. 3) Keep money offshore or saved and always be prepared to burn everything to the ground and leave. Family courts are evil. They are designed to suck as many resources from men as possible so that the state doesn't have to pay directly for the cos…
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:31 AM
6

It is, because feminism will never have a legitimate dialogue with MRAs because feminism has never been about justice or equality or improving anything. As such, trolling feminists until they are discredited is exactly what should be done.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:52 PM
4

Because feminism hates femininity and envies masculinity. The foundational lie of feminism is "if only we could make women exactly like men", because then feminists could feel the same type of manly pride that men do when they create things and build things and discover things, which men do at levels orders of magnitude above women even with the current push to androgynize everything. In feminist parlance "Inspire" means "make more like men". But not all men, only the top 30-20% of men. Feminism…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:16 AM
11

Because feminism isn't about discourse or making sense or improving anything. Feminism is about 1) grabbing as much power as possible and 2) feeling righteous. Anything other than that will be censored because lalalalalala feelz > reelz.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:09 AM
–

If this guy took a judge with him instead of just himself I bet the state would listen sooner.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 08:40 AM
5

Still not gonna watch them lol.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:31 AM
9

You assume feminism is open for debate. It isn't and never has been. Moving the Overton window happens against direct feminist opposition. That said, the wage gap lie, the racket that is the family courts and MGM are the three largest points for now.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:29 AM
2

No. I'm simply saying that tone policing when someone asks a simple question does the exact opposite of what you're intending.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 04:47 AM
16

Lol what do you think he's going by asking you? Either you have useful information or (like you in this case) you don't. Also you're the only one trying to internet toughguy. More than a little pathetic.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 04:37 AM
2

Not ignored. These creatures need to be destroyed. Morally, ideologically, creatively destroyed. Because if not, then eventually they will be physically destroyed. Either way they'll be getting exactly what they deserve. My only worry is how many more innocents they'll take with them.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:39 AM
1

I'd be down for that :p I did read that it was in Canada but I'm no expert on Moose Law, though I'd expect SJWs don't care and the business not to unless they're caught.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:19 AM
2

I mean, you don't have to be politically motivated to know that women don't belong on combat ships.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:32 PM
6

The position is selling martial arts equipment. If anything they want a woman to attract men. The issue is that either businesses should be allowed to screen positions by sex or they shouldn't. Currently it's ok to screen, but only for women.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:27 PM
2

Good to hear
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:11 PM
1

Were you falsely accused?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:05 PM
3

Quite.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 10:41 PM
3

You hit the nail on the head. A good friend of mine is an AnCap and as much as I like teasing him on how one holds together a hierarchy without at least theoretically allowing the breaking of the Non Aggression Principle, he and his co-thinkers are at least able to debate and gather without immediately resorting to violence. These Antifa goons are the worst mixing of self hatred and feminism. It will destroy them along with their "movement".
/r/MensRights26/03/17 10:40 PM
9

Yesterday Antifa in Huntington Beach couldn't run away fast enough even when dressed in running pants. Imagine how easier it'll be when they're yet more emasculated. I mean seriously, I truly cannot tell if this is satire or not.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:57 PM
10

I wasn't arguing for the post itself. I was arguing against Vaeon's using the post to take cheap moralistic shots at men and the sub as a whole.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:10 PM
9

Quite. Women prefer to through proxies, and both men and women have an in-group bias for women. I'll source if you'd like.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:59 PM
31

Because it's not like women initiate 70+% of divorces, get child custody overwhelmingly, depend upon the cash and prizes handed out by biased family courts and frequently attempt to bilk and milk the system for all it's worth. Nope, those aren't facts, those are just men whining. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:45 PM
9

My opinion, is that nothing will change until the current paradigm breaks. Matriarchies do not last long.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:37 PM
15

It's the Guardian. You already know they're going to be pro-Establishment misandrist bullshit. Ignore them and move on. And OP, archive this next time, they don't deserve the clicks.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:32 PM
2

Thanks. I'm not really snapping at you, if what you say is true we're more alike in this regard than different. It's just been a consistent pattern I've seen and these girls do it without any care, as if it's harmless. And for them it is. Their solipsism blinds them and I hate them for it. Or just avoid them entirely.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:15 PM
12

If they'd included the Spanish Flu, then they might be justified. But dying of flu doesn't instill the sort of manly pride that having died for "Queen and Country" does, so feminism once again destroys history to steal a piece of what they never earn.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:00 PM
5

Sure, it's just been my experience that nearly every SJW/feminist bitch has some story where she was "totally raped" which comes up waaaayyy too early in the conversation to have actually traumatized her to the extent she says. I've had that conversation with nearly a dozen women from the time I first went to college in 2011 on and most of my friends say similar, and these girls reliably turn out to be disgustingly SJW. Fuels their victim complex. And I know anecdote isn't data and all, but my f…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:47 PM
6

Don't fuck either of the girls you live with. When you do fuck a girl, send her a text after asking if she got home safely. Save it and her reply as screen caps. Never date or fuck a girl who openly talks about having been raped or who identifies as a feminist.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 01:39 PM
17

Men need to stop being the "better person" in these cases. I'm happy for your friend, but having to produce that much evidence to settle for what should be the default parenting of 50/50, and in this case 100% as he is clearly the only fit parent, makes it bittersweet.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 07:21 PM
4

Seeing as it's the U.K. I'd assume anything over a letter opener is already illegal.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 05:14 PM
9

That men have traditionally had a larger burden to bear, equaled out by a larger share of authority in society. Feminism for all its lies about empowerment and liberation is completely uninterested in relieving men's responsibility, men's Burden of Performance. Instead they are interested solely in sequestering as much male authority as possible, leaving a giant mismatch between who's benefiting and who's paying, literally in the sense of the tax spread in Western nations.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:56 AM
31

This jives with the New Zealand study that showed that women paid no net taxes over their entire lifetimes. Men are the tax base. Men used to receive appropriate authority and respect for their superior responsibility. They no longer do, and it's breaking the incentives for society to function.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 07:04 PM
1

Feminism is equal parts misandry and a deluded attempt to control all intersexual dynamics so it makes sense.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 03:49 PM
3

/u/Vela_Pacas "Wtf, I get wasted with a girl and we both want to fuck but she regrets it the next day because she has a boyfriend or whatever and then says she was raped. Happens all the time. Girls need to stop being so irresponsible. We, men, get drunk too" Lol.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:36 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:45 AM
3

And my general point is that I don't care if she does or not since there's always another girl, but she is statistically only half as likely to make a full career as a doctor as a man even if she does graduate, and she costs the same to train. Besides, most women choose more domestic employment anyways.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:23 AM
4

We kinda do. Humans self-segregate. In places where diversity is forced for one reason or another to exist close together, conflict becomes much more likely all else being equal. Feminists do deny biology. Gender is a social construct came out of feminism and is just as wrong and harmful now as it was then. Feminists clamor for equality of outcome, implicitly denying the sex-based split in employment found even when there is equality of opportunity. Men and women have different brains. I'll sour…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:42 AM
3

Women's reproductive rights are important. So are men's. One is lawfully protected. One isn't. Feminists are trying to keep one unprotected. As for credit, sure, but that still holds for my main point. And women as a whole still aren't independent: see the New Zealand study from 2013 that showed that, even as the majority of women worked, none were net contributors to government coffers. In other words, women as a whole are still dependent upon outside help, tax based help, from a tax base where…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:32 AM
3

Women shouldn't have abortions. Abstinence is 100% successful. Women shouldn't have birth control. Abstinence is 100% successful. If someone is complaining about starving in the US, it would be right to point out what actual starvation looked like in places like Africa. Feminism complains about things far less severe than that. Like credit cards. By the way, the wife not having credit in her own name was sprung from the same idea that a man should pay alimony and child support to the woman in ca…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:16 AM
3

Men to this day can't decide for themselves if they want to be parents if a women decides she's having a baby. Fact. And this is exactly what I'm talking about: there are large parts of the Arab world right now who literally view they're women as the property of the man, and you're complaining about an inequality from forty years ago that no longer exists. That Arab world is busy rushing into parts of Western Europe and they're the ones with above replacement birth rates.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:07 AM
2

It's a continual loop, and I'm inclined to agree except that I think your making the error or believing that there was ever a time when men and women were perfectly equal until one day men tricked women into "bondage" (even though most chicks are into that.... wonder why lol) and proceeded from there. As for those areas of responsibility, yeah, they were, but there were very good reasons for that and it wasn't as oppressive as you think. Society didn't have the safety bubble of fossil fuels that…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:03 AM
2

How so?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:45 PM
7

True, I don't want to seem like I'm arguing for some halcyon past where everything was perfect. And yet, in the past the West did a much better job in circumstances like child custody, where even a poor man was presumed the custodial parent provided he worked, contrasting with our own age where the homeless and millionaires alike have their lives ruined and livelihoods stolen by the family court racket. In Late Middle Ages Germany a man was liable for his wife's debts and could even be imprisone…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:44 PM
2

It is telling to me that Western feminism occurred only once the Industrial Revolution (invented and powered by male coal miners, railroad layers and steel makers doing jobs that women literally could not do) opened up the greatest wealth bubble in history powered by fossil fuels and softened Western society. Feminism cannot stand up to an actual, violent Patriarchy. That feminism succeeded so well in infecting the West puts the lie to the idea that the West was ever so oppressive of women. What…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:38 PM
2

Thanks. Feminism and women as a whole are supposed to be conflated in modern society and that should not be so. I don't want to oppress women while I laugh my evil patriarch laugh<sup>tm,</sup> I just want society to mandate that authority be balanced with responsibility.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:33 PM
11

Equality of opportunity or equality of outcome? Because men are more likely to become homeless and yet the paper headline that started this whole thread is trumpeting an unequal outcome that benefits women. Much like the female-only scholarships and grants even though colleges are overwhelmingly female and trending even more so. Or divorce laws that favor the mother in all cases. Both things feminism advocated for at men's expense. Feminism isn't about equality.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:21 PM
6

Lol
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:16 PM
12

Personally? The false rape claim that destroyed my first college attempt that feminists not only claim doesn't happen but who press for more oppressive laws and Title IX star courts that destroy young men's lives without even the protection of a court like the one that threw my allegation out. In a larger sense? That "women's lib" reliably destroys relations between men and women, does not enrich those nations that attempt it, and is historically only attempted in the first place in decedant soc…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:16 PM
6

That makes no sense. Either you can recognize data or you cannot.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:09 PM
9

Gender roles grow out of biology. White people will always own more land than blacks in America because there are more whites people. Blacks have also owned property since before the revolution and a few even owned slaves, all of which is an argument that has nothing to do with the point. For all the differences between of race and culture and time and geography and technology, there has never been a civilization where men were not overwhelmingly the builders, repairers, and fighters, and where …
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:07 PM
7

Do you? Since naturally we're arguing opposite points what prerequisites should we both have? I know you're determined to make me some neck beard misogynist but you're simply wrong. The differences between men and women are more than musculature and do include differences in brain connectivity and even average size. As for intelligence, I'd post stats about bell curves and intelligence strata for women and men but apparently those facts are sexist and I can't cause I'm not a neurosurgeon.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:55 PM
10

So we're moving on to race now? Just different means exactly that, simply disagreeing with the idea that men and women evolved to become identical when biology and both sexes' own choices prove otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:44 PM
16

And yet men are responsible for the overwhelming majority of things built, repaired and defended. Biology is more than just musculature. And besides, who said anything about women suffering? Even though current western laws and notes and feminine-centric to the point of breakdown, women are consistently polled as being less and less happy. Feminism hurts everyone.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:41 PM
13

No? I've not said women are inferior, I've said they're different. Conflating the two is an overused tactic.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:38 PM
65

If sexist = men and women are different then yes, not only me but biology is sexist.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:32 PM
2

If only, they've consistently had the lowest or second lowest birth rates worldwide in recent years.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 09:16 PM
32

You're getting downvoted because you're putting all of the responsibility on men for things that are done to them by others, but you're not entirely wrong. Men are hardwired to protect women: as studies show, women have an in-group bias for women, and men have an in-group bias for.... also women. As well, in societies like England you have a truly continuous society for nearly a full millennium (will be in 2066) where men provided for women and women cared for men. Entire centuries of English Co…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 08:55 PM
135

Men are always going to be seen as more disposable, because on a purely reproductive level (a level so deeply rooted it informs a lot of higher functions) men are more disposable. Now that says nothing about individual worth, but society cares little for that anyways. What past societies figured out - and which we will eventually once the costs of feminist idiocy grow high enough to collapse the largesse necessary to spawn it - is that part and parcel of men's disposability is men's greater util…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:19 PM
3

Things are completely equal when it benefits them, but you also need to treat women differently when it benefits them.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:13 PM
2

I don't mean to speak only through quotes, but elsewhere in this thread there's a quote from the inestimable Rollo Tomassi that explains why - although women should be succeeding "equally" by now, they never will: "I would love to see women’s organic business successes despite themselves, but my guess is that every failure or setback would have some tinge of external sexism attached to them. The truth is there are very few women who actually create something of worth because the easier path to s…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 12:25 AM
1

True, but I don't think we're really arguing
/r/MensRights19/03/17 10:09 PM
2

So googling the S&P 500 gave me two in the first five companies I googled that were started by a single man. The other three were started by small groups of men. None were in any way started by women.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 09:57 PM
5

I wasn't making fun of her either, I'm speaking earnestly.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:58 PM
6

True. What /u/furchfur is saying is that united groups of men are what has built and sustained not only business but the civilization that business depends upon. Feminism wants the fruit without the effort, while also denigrating the effort men still have to put in to have the fruit. As such it is incredibly corrosive, and not only to business.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:40 PM
3

And be able to vote for it lol
/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:38 PM
6

Which means she'll only grow more bitter and miserable. Good :)
/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:37 PM
5

God, feminism is such an evil, destructive thing.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 06:51 PM
1

Lol. Petulant non argument.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 12:40 PM
4

The answer is kinda: data shows a small increase in divorce risk for men with high partner counts but no where near that for women.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 09:33 AM
1

Rojava is 1) a net oil exporter, 2) supported by outside powers and 3) too young to draw a definitive case.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 09:23 AM
1

And the suspicion, avoidance and oftentimes outright hatred of that what is not your nation and identity. Correct, humans are tribal. What that does not mean is that nationalism is inherently genocidal. Nationalism is by its definition statist Incorrect. Nations, as in homogenous groupings of people identifiable by their specific racial traits predates the concept of the State by millennia. The State dates only to the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, and was paired with the already existing nations …
/r/MensRights18/03/17 11:25 PM
2

Nationalism is the love and support of one's nation and identity. I agree that governments love to wave the flag in times of trouble as a smokescreen, but I would call that statism. The Nationalism that I or especially a guy named /u/Alt-Right_is_rising support is diametrically opposed to elitism as they are close cousins to globalism and the utopian equalist cult from which feminism came originally. They have nothing for us but contempt and yet more inequality.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 10:26 PM
8

Incorrect. Feminism at best has advocated for male authority for women without concurrent responsibility. As worst it's simple misandry while attempting to transfer as much wealth and power to women as possible. Equality has never been the goal.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:03 AM
4

Here is why they do what they do
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:46 AM
6

A distinction without a difference in my opinion. Taking men's evolved predisposition to protect their families and legally twisting into men as a group paying for women as a group is gynocentrism's - and feminism's - greatest tool of wealth redistribution and it needs to stop.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 09:49 PM
3

Feminism cannot be saved from itself because there is no other feminism than what exists now; this was an inevitable progression ever since the first wave. What this woman is attempting to do is to get the radicals to not shout their hate quite so loudly. And they don't even want to do that. They deserve all the coming backlash and more.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:26 PM
6

Betteridge's Law of Headlines. Also, anything by huffpo means I can't take it seriously vis a vis men's rights.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:46 PM
2

You're correct, but that's an indictment on America as a whole, not a complement to Schumer.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 12:44 PM
3

She's literally a pig. Not happy until she's made enough shit to roll around in.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:14 AM
4

One can only hope
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:01 AM
6

"All Jews of the world had to be annihilated,” Bauer said. “That was the intent. There was never an idea in Nazi minds to murder all the Russians.” That's patently false
/r/PussyPass17/03/17 12:40 AM
3

This shit goes in cycles, I think. Excess breeds women's lib, which isn't sustainable, which reverts back to traditionalism, which builds up resources, etc. In the mean time it makes me exceptionally unmotivated to do anything other than the bare minimum for what makes me happy and fuck society at large :)
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:23 AM
2

False rape charge cost me my ROTC scholarship and kept me out of the Marines when I tried to enlist afterwards. Fuck em.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:38 AM
11

Societal intolerance of male emotion manifests as depriving men of places to be emotional where they are not harmed for letting their guard down. It meant depriving men of all male groups, of brotherhoods that they trusted and worked with. Here they could mourn or vent as well as laugh and think. And we've destroyed almost all of that. Feminism and the larger equalism cult tried to force-fit men and women into a single mold and it has failed. So, I agree with you, men are more isolated now than …
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:38 PM
2

True, now women wear spanx or slimming jeans or just get surgery.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:14 PM
5

There's actually more women than men in London
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:11 AM
1

Man SJWs are just cancer. Glad it did you know real harm though!
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:20 PM
1

Well that sucks. I try to keep seriously important information off of Reddit.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 07:58 PM
1

Haha yep. This used to be my alt before I deleted my other account.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 07:52 PM
2

It was a joke, conflating Luton's very high and largely unassimilated Muslim population with feminism's long-noted predilection for not holding Islam to anything near the same standard of "outrageableness" that they do Western mores.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 07:22 PM
4

Luton? But I thought feminists never went after Muslims?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 06:54 AM
3

Juries are too final for them. You're correct in that they wish to be arbiters of what the world should be but it isn't even fully thought out. It's just asinine anti-Western tantrums all the way down.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:08 PM
2

They do. Men's sex drive is at once both scary to many women and a point of leverage over men.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:57 PM
2

Men don't have Hypergamy. Now, as much as I think Chesterton was exaggerating for effect, I do agree with you in that most men rejoice in seeing their women being "womanly", and for good reason.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:38 PM
3

They used to be. Destroying "patriarchy" meant destroying all gendered respect; this is especially evident in respect given to men. Feminists desperately want manly respect and will go to great lengths to be included, whether in the boardroom or the battlefield, and disregarding whether or not they merit being there. The costs are very large for performance and societal cohesion but feminists don't care. Honoring motherhood starts with women being worthy of motherhood, and the societal incentive…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:23 PM
2

Legislated integration would be "forced" integration, i e mandating that all areas be x% minority and therefore integrating minorities into the larger population. So far as I know that has been proposed but rejected. I agree with you in that the Swedish Government likes the status quo, and that it covers up or downplays any challenge to it, not just those related to immigration. Ironically it is this unwillingness to address issues head on that gives so much room for conspiracy theorists and oth…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:19 PM
2

I could not agree more. Thanks for writing this
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:09 PM
2

You missed his point entirely
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:07 PM
17

They work towards what they feel the law should be
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:45 PM
1

By "placing them equally" do you mean legislated integration? Non-Swedes do have a (1)noticeably (2)higher) birthrate than Swedes, even as Sweden does not have the terminally low birth rates of say, Spain or Germany. As for violence (and crime in general), Sweden's immigrant population is disproportionately represented and may actually be responsible for an uptick in certain kinds of crime in Sweden, source here. It's not as sensationalist as Trump says, but it's not an idyllic no-problems parad…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:39 PM
1

That Sweden's chosen minorities are particularly violent, particularly likely to take state money, particularly unlikely to integrate and particularly likely to have more children than their "host" nation.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:44 PM
184

His eldest kid burst into the room like she'd done so before, likely because the father enjoys spending time with his children as most fathers do. But feminism hates fathers and functional families so they have to try and destroy them.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:41 AM
16

Overt hypoagency plus deniable manipulation is female power. Claims of fragile hypoagency will only increase as women get more "equal" with men, because feminism doesn't care about equality but only wants female superiority.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:57 PM
101

Once the feminists that support Sharia combine with the feminists that write this shit, then that just might be the result.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:54 PM
4

"I felt, I felt, I felt, it felt...." Yeah, but never thought
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:13 AM
3

Per /u/Demonspawn: "Feminism is not a movement for it's stated goals. Feminism is a shit test to see which men have a backbone and won't let women run roughshod over them (because if he can't stand up to women, how can he stand up to other men?) Islamic men have a backbone."
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:11 AM
1

Celts 1) weren't a unified group, 2) did not uniformly use women in war, 3) lost even harder than usual when they did and 4) the only places that were still Celtic in 500 AD were what is today Scotland and parts of Ireland since the Romans conquered the rest. In classical antiquity it was just as rare as in the 18th century for men and women to be considered equal. Because perfect equality between the sexes cannot exist. Neither the Germanic tribes, nor the Greeks, nor Romans, nor (most) Celts, …
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:58 PM
3

Yes, which is why many women did not want the vote as they feared getting conscripted. Turns out feminists and their supporters simply exploited the male weakness of giving women what they want so long as they nag long enough and gave them suffrage without the responsibilities of men, and that trend hasn't changed.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:55 PM
1

I'm a bit more cynical than you, in that I think in some cases men and women's interests are opposed i e, what is best for one is not best for another, and therefore I do not believe in equality but balance, which is something I see as missing in most Western women now. Nevertheless I agree with you, in that cutting off further poisoning is a start towards getting back to a decent balance.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 06:09 AM
18

Myndddsplnnwygg
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:52 AM
11

Brad is a great example of why no man should get married regardless.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:51 PM
13

A lot of women, depending on whether it will advantage them in that particular moment or not.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:47 PM
1

Right wing has different flavors. I'm to the right of him on some issues but market fundamentalism isn't one of them. But that's not a men's rights issue so pm me if you just wanna talk about that haha.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:46 PM
11

Men evolved to manipulate the environment. Women evolved to manipulate men.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:42 PM
1

I'm subbed to Molyneux, I'll check the other guy out. I think that Molyneux can veer juuuust a tad too libertarian utopianist, but on the whole he's quite correct. There's another YouTuber called Black Pigeon Speaks that you might like.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:08 PM
3

True, you didn't, I'm not trying to put words in your mouth :)
/r/MensRights04/03/17 07:57 PM
1

Those are pretty much the most interesting questions in all of this: is the current status quo sustainable? If not, what are its breaking points? How will automation and biotechnology change our already altered social systems? Can government change itself? Even if change is possible, will momentum prove too difficult to overcome before problems arise? I have opinions on all of these but I like that you've asked these questions for yourself.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 07:56 PM
10

You've got the causation backwards. What's happened is that, as the well earned backlash against feminism builds, fewer and fewer women want to be called feminists, leaving only the man hating harpies who were in large part the thought leaders all along. But few women are campaigning to undo the damage that feminism has done in their favor.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 07:39 PM
1

A side effect of being female is that hand to hand training does fuck all against the average man
/r/MensRights04/03/17 06:48 PM
8

Mostly Russia. Lord knows the Swedish government isn't taking the lack of integration by their non Swedish population seriously yet.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 06:35 AM
5

Sounds like a few countercycical shitlord parents should request sons and set them up as harem keepers in the 2030s, how's that for guaranteeing success lol! But as to the birthrate, you're correct: I have no idea what will replace that West but at the rate it's going (or isn't going, as you pointed out) something will replace it soon enough. Women's liberation only wanted to liberate women from their responsibilities while giving them the authorities of men. It has succeeded, but that has conse…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 06:33 AM
6

Women's liberation movements are a reliable historical indicator of decedance, which does very often lead to collapse since it is not sustainable. The low point of Roman women's lib happened in the late second century at the Empire's height. Shortly after, the Crisis of the Third Century occurred, which destroyed the classic Roman Empire and set up its eventual bifurcation, and the slow stagnation and collapse of the Western half. In short, proto-feminism doesn't exactly cause collapse, but it d…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:43 PM
1

A lot of them do, especially if it's not too overt. Monogamous marriage is a male invention, because Hypergamy doesn't care. I used to think that J D Unwin was wrong, but the more I live and learn, the more I believe he was entirely correct.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 11:03 PM
2

Fucking lol. Look at this: "Out of that 40 percent, there are maybe 20 percent that we would consider, and out of those 20, 10 have girlfriends, so all the girls are fighting over that other 10 percent,”. Basically, even when women outnumber men in college (in large part due to the massive amount of financial and legal aid that only women get, male privilege my ass), their Hypergamy still won't let them consider anything other than the top 50% of men on campus. They can't help themselves. And of…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:52 PM
4

This injustice would not happen in Saudi Arabia where the wife would have needed more than just her own word against her husband's /s
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:42 PM
1

He also once broke two guys arms who tried to mug him, so
/r/TheRedPill02/03/17 07:32 PM
7

Archive this shit. HuffPo is garbage and deserves no clicks.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 07:18 PM
4

Exactly. It's the second set of books that harms men.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:57 PM
2

Very true. Being the Desired Sex manifests in everything from marked higher rates of solipsism and a corresponding dirth of concern for male suffering to the Hypergamy that makes modern women price themselves out of the relationship market with most men and contribute yet more to low birth rates. Feminism is simply the energized and politicized manifestation of these things, and while I suppose they are weatherable in individual cases (even if it's hellish on any man caught in one), it is pure p…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:43 AM
2

I think the West's current postmodern, misandrist, anti-natal malaise will end when a big crisis hits it. But I agree that it will take current Western mores with it.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:39 AM
3

Overt hypoagency plus deniable manipulation is female power, all the way back to pre-hominids or the Garden of Eden. It's never changed.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:31 AM
2

The problem with that idea is that there are two parts of the world where birth rates are still quite high, and they are the most reliably problem filled parts of the world.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:30 AM
1

I wasn't trying to reverse psychology you into a rhetorical trap. From my perspective, it falls back on a pattern I see repeated in women over and over, which is the expectation of traditionalism from men, and the expectation to opt out of traditionalism for women. Put another way, I'm not actually arguing that all women should be in the kitchen. Because that's a strawman, and no one short of the Amish made that argument even in the 1950s, and even then the Amish let the women out to churn butte…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 11:10 PM
1

Why? When tests are done it's found that the vast majority of women enjoy being submissive sexually (and yes I'll link sources if you want) and the percentage of women who leave the full time workforce in favor of children or just because they can, and thus submit themselves to a man's provisioning or the state's (which is to say all men's provisioning) is markedly higher than in men and always has been. I actually agree that sticking to the letter of traditionalism in disregard of all the chang…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 10:48 PM
14

Would linking to statistics showing how women receive lower sentences across the board regardless of the crime committed be enough? Na, that'd probably still be prejudice.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 10:30 PM
1

What about this woman advocating acting traditionally feminine triggers you so much?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 10:26 PM
8

There's two ways to fight this: either all men should declare that day that they identify as women and therefore work stops (on pain of all the potential lawsuits that could claim transphobia against the CEO bitch hahaha) or, several men should simply move to immediately sue the shit out of her and the company both for discrimination. Actually, I think a bit of both would provide maximum KEK.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 08:34 PM
1

Common law marriage is only existent in a few US states. I agree with you mostly otherwise.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 04:21 AM
5

In Paraguay after their disastrous War of the Triple Alliance in 1864-1870, at least 70% of their male population had died. Likewise in the Soviet Union in the late 1940s, three decades of world wars, purges and famine had skewed the population overwhelmingly female. In both cases the women were quite happy sharing their men, and this was recent enough to be extensively documented in both cases.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 01:08 AM
3

His mindset is "perfect sameness between men and women is the goal and any deviation is wrong/misogyny/etc". Basically, the equalist cult.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 12:47 AM
1

That's a large part of it. Adoption seeks two parent households and used to even bar gay couples, but the switch to single adoption is happening much faster for spinster women than single men.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 09:06 PM
2

Surrogacy is frequently not much more expensive than adoption, and as well it's enormously difficult for a single man to successfully adopt due to skewed laws, not so much for surrogacy and the child will be unambiguously yours.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 08:28 PM
10

It used to not be a trap. Not to say that women used to be perfect and now they're terrible, cause people don't fundamentally change over time and if you read memoirs from the supposedly halcyon fifties or before then you'll know that men trapped in marriage to harridans is a universal trope. That said, there did used to be a (both legally and culturally) enforced balance between the sexes in marriage, which was by necessity not an identical set of rewards and obligations for both parties since …
/r/MensRights26/02/17 08:19 PM
4

I think it's instructive to recognize that the switch in views over gay marriage happened after traditional marriage had collapsed. This isn't a knock against gays, just a thought that it's less about society becoming more tolerant than the definitions of what marriage is changing, even as fewer and fewer people get married.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 07:58 PM
17

Good
/r/MensRights26/02/17 07:48 PM
7

That's probably true, which is why in most cultures men used to carry greater authority in the marriage to balance that out, and also received things like dowries.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 07:45 PM
11

With the recent initiative to foist women into positions that they can't even complete the physical requirements of, I think it will soon be much the same in the US as well. Just goes to show, feminism, and the wider equalist cult of which it is part, is not just anti-Men, it is anti-West. Oh, and thank you for archiving!
/r/MensRights26/02/17 08:07 AM
14

Can this sub make a rule that you have to archive websites to post them?
/r/MensRights26/02/17 07:55 AM
36

You can trust your woman without laws. The fact remains that current post-industrial marriage gains a man no benefits he can have without it, while opening him up to a large amount of risk. As well, women initiate the majority of divorces and are frequently rewarded for doing so. It's a bad system, and it deserves to be starved out and rebuilt.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 05:17 AM
6

Everything feminism does is harmful
/r/MensRights26/02/17 04:14 AM
147

It's been that way for a while, which is why no man in the West should subject himself to marriage until the laws and culture that led to such destructive laws are changed.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 04:02 AM
9

Can't speak for jamm, but it doesn't bother me. The hypocrisy does, but not the objectification.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 09:51 PM
22

Men with pensions, don't marry.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 09:48 PM
1

Getting the maximum in resources, attention and feelsgood victimhood with the absolute minimum of effort? Nope, seems like she has it down pat.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 09:36 PM
5

Most feminists do
/r/MensRights25/02/17 04:50 AM
5

I think that Stockholm Syndrome can be a little overstated, but I'd agree that any knowledge of evolutionary biology plus women's predilection for rape fantasies and the fact of female hypergamy point to a female erotic mind that simply cannot countenance equality. That said, that same hypergamy is also based on doubt, a deep seated, immutable doubt that she is the best provisioned that she can be; I think there were immensely good reasons for this for the majority of human history, but in the c…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:42 PM
2

True, but I'm not Dutch so I can't answer that unless I looked it up
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:06 PM
2

No. I don't, because 1) there's no movement called Meninism that men subscribe to so there's no equivalency and 2) that's not simply picking and choosing simply the worst aspects, it's noting that a wide scope of women including a congresswoman and institutions backed by the government of Canada have regularly and by design used language and taken actions directly harmful to men because they are men. This is different even than simply treating men and women differently and certainly is not for e…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:40 PM
4

I'm saying that feminism as an ideology has had since its inception a bedrock of misandry, and that the further up the leadership ladder of feminist organizations one goes, and the longer feminism exists, that is the only product of feminism. And you can call MRAs whatever you like, but until you can understand that MRAs are a pushback against feminist hatred of men as a sex, you will make no headway. Examine these quotes: "I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that …
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:18 PM
6

It's sadder still that you persist in trying to create a difference when increasingly there is none, and was little to begin with.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 07:40 PM
5

The Dutch took their last conscripts in 1995, and ended conscription entirely in 1997. However, by law they only ended forced "showing up" for basic training, all Dutch males (and soon I suppose all Dutch females) will get letters detailing that they are required to report for military duty should the Dutch government pass the necessary laws. However, the Dutch Forces no longer have the capability to scale to the size that a full conscript call up would entail, meaning that only the top performi…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 07:12 PM
6

The Royal Netherlands Army has been cutting forces since the 1960s, so there's pretty much no risk of this backfiring, and they get points for equality.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 07:03 PM
10

Feminists who believe in th Duluth model are sexist and hence by definition are not feminists. Good god, that's the most blatant No True Scotsman I've seen in a while. Especially considering that the women who advocated for the Duluth model were all self-avowing feminists and advocates the Duluth Model as part of feminist theory. Actually understanding the harm that feminism does not only with Duluth, but also in cases like the National Organization for Women working against shared custody and f…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:50 PM
2

Radical feminism has shot its bolt. It is increasingly unpopular and has been shown for the lunacy that it is. But garden variety feminism, the "I'm not a misandrist but" feminist women that don't outright hate men but enjoy the things feminism has whined enough to have men gift them, aren't. So yes, it's being blunted, but there's quite a ways to go.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 05:06 AM
5

The short answer: feminism poisons everything. The long answer: feminism along with other facets of the postindustrial world have completely broken intersexual relations, without replacing it with anything near a suitable replacement. Instead, what it has done is not only increasingly sought to deprive men of spaces and missions with which to practice and cultivate masculinity, but also has increasingly sought to outright define masculinity by women. What this results in is an even more broken i…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 05:03 AM
1

Define "working better": in a hundred years the West will he hardly recognizable, but barring a global catastrophe Afghanistan will look like Afghanistan. I agree that the West is a much more productive comfortable Civilization, but a lot of that is due to having access to much higher energy surpluses, and the legacy of a superior culture. However, that energy surplus led to the same decedance wealth that spawned feminism in the first place, and has eaten away at traditional Western behavior to …
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 07:32 AM
1

That just sucks. Might not mean much from an internet stranger but that just sucks. Ever consider prostitutes and video games or whatever you're into? I mean just find what makes you happy and only focus on that and fuck everything else. Cause Western society killed respect and the promise of committed sex to a woman for most men sixty years ago and I don't think it will come back until a crisis forces a change.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:14 AM
6

Alright then, I'm a White Nationalist misogynist, so what? Behaving otherwise won't change their opinion so why not? No more taking anything they say seriously until I'm being fellated and served a sandwich.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:36 AM
1

Hypoagency plus deniable manipulation is female power, even long before feminism. Feminism is simply the worst aspects of femininity let loose on politics, and as such will never stop demanding men have all responsibility but only half or less of any authority.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:32 AM
13

Well that's the heart of my question. /u/Drclaw411 effectively said "it'd be a good sub if only those people were banned", but really, why ban anyone? I'm of the opinion that MRA will already get labeled hate speech anyways, so let's focus on good discussion and not tone policing since it won't make the hate go away.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:46 AM
2

Feminism and women's liberation only happens in wealthy nations with no clear threats. There's not enough surplus to sustain it otherwise. Feminism is effectively women throwing off their traditional responsibilities while expecting men to continue to perform theirs uninterrupted. As well - and tellingly - feminism and women's lib only arose once industrialization increased to the point that it effectively erased women's work. Feminism hurts men. Thus, men are increasingly taking the rational re…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:44 AM
16

Why them, and not the "make feminism good for men" wing?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:20 AM
4

Rep. Davis is trying to make the old system work using the new system's laws and I don't thihk it will work. The majority of divorces are already citing "incompatibility", the majority of them are initiated by women, and since family courts are already laughably biased against men making laws that allow for yet more wealth transference from men to women is stupid since marriage is already tilted in women's favor. I agree with Davis' unspoken assumption that marriage is a bedrock of society, but …
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:17 AM
1

That's called Hypergamy, and it never ends.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:47 AM
1

Feminism will end when it collapses, just as it has when other female superiority movements came to be in other places and in other times of decadence. I think it might be sooner than you think.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:46 AM
2

The pithy answer is "the Alt-Right", but in general I'd say it's anyone who realizes that there are differences between men and women and that massive changes to the ways one sex behaves will necessarily need to be balanced by commensurate changes in the other, otherwise large and growing problems will emerge that eventually endanger the prosperity that allowed such experimentation in the first place.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:52 AM
2

Basically that anything feminine can do no wrong. You see it most egregiously in churches, where women are free to divorce at will and take the kids and the man better be there to pay pay pay. They can't see traditional gender roles as the (biologically based) social compromise that is is and so therefore can't see men doing anything else than be Ward Cleaver even though June Cleaver left him fifty years ago.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:54 AM
4

Once again, feminism exhorting women to act as unfeminine as possible.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:05 AM
2

While I'm not a tradcon, I will say that at least tradcons insist that women uphold their end of the bargain as well. That so many "conservatives" are really just cheerleaders for female supremacy is exactly where the "cuckservative" meme started.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:15 AM
1

Not really. Yes, being able to even complete a pull-up makes her stronger than at least 90% of women (and most US military women based on repeated testing), but she is also much smaller than an average man with less upper body strength needed to complete pull-ups.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:16 AM
1

It's going to take more than one generation to reverse the damage. As with how connected to internet Millennials and Gen Z are, I seriously doubt marriage rates will do anything other than continue to fall.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 03:47 AM
2

Multiple guys
/r/MensRights19/02/17 03:12 AM
2

Women who earn more than their husbands divorce them at an even higher rate than the already marriage-as-an-institution breaking "normal" rates. Men pay 75% of taxes. Women even in STEM fields drop out at far higher rates than men. Equal pay rates are great if the goal is equality across the board. But the goal is not equality across the board, and women especially seem to be incapable of changing their own preferences in light of their (massively state assisted) rise to equal pay with men, lead…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 08:26 PM
8

Because feminism's goal is to maximally optimize women's sociosexual power while maximally constructing men's.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 08:18 PM
2

Here you go
/r/MensRights17/02/17 08:57 PM
3

Not quite. Women are always hypergamous, it's just that our postmodern bubble lets overcoddled women put sole priority on short term attractors while also limiting most of the consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 08:52 PM
9

I like the concept but don't think it has to be binary. Becoming conscious of women's differences, the ways in which they can harm men and, to stray a bit from MRA-dom a bit, what reliably attracts them vs what they say doesn't mean you have to be a basement dweller. A man going his own way in regards to marriage, or relationships, or sex or even contact with women is a man simply taking a more honest look than what the usual narratives allow and coming to his own conclusions, and I think many o…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:54 PM
4

I think women as a whole don't and can't understand what it's like to be a man period, including men's higher libido. However, I think women in aggregate are aware that a difference exists, and many women exploit it openly. Women being the desired sex is one of the most deeply rooted biological differences between the sexes and that in-built inequality demands a balanced compromise in order to have any harmonious balance, not the illogical hamfisted "equality" we have today.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 12:55 PM
2

I don't think that's what he was saying. What he's saying is that due to Hypergamy, women only really see the top performing men, and thus are blind to even a majority of men suffering because there's still a couple at the top that they focus on.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:54 AM
8

So what does being smart look like? What actions differ?
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 05:43 AM
8

If you think women have had no power throughout history then yeah, no point in talking.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 12:10 AM
15

That's objectively wrong. Even your terrifyingly oppressive religious books have - all of them - instructions to care for widows and orphans, the unworking women of the day. There is no equivalent statement for men. Even then, history isn't monolithic. You're alluding to Old Testament and Quranic societies but to do so you have to ignore equally religious societies like the European Middle Ages with its alms houses devoted exclusively to women and children to say nothing of nunneries and other s…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 10:47 PM
28

What about men being the majority of all workplace and violent deaths ever, or medieval men being responsible for their wives potential debts, but not the reverse, or the majority of men not being able to vote, or men getting executed at demonstrably higher rates throughout history, or the fact that for most of human history work took much more muscle power which women couldn't do, without any "oppression" being involved. There's a reason women's lib only happens in wealthy, unthreatened and som…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 10:28 PM
4

Translation: I'm not going to actually discuss any of the male issues and mindsets presented, instead I'm just going to fall back on shaming language.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 09:21 PM
5

The problem with "misogyny" is that for the past forty years it's been a completely emotion based argument since women are the majority on college campuses. As well, women interpret men treating them as equals as being sexist so claims of "undercurrents of misogyny" to me just sound like women not getting everything they want. The numbers actually show the opposite for nursing, in that men actually leave at higher rates than women within four years. However, the gap is very small, at ~7 men and …
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 09:17 PM
52

Thats the way it normally goes. Women are never held to the same standard men are, and that becomes a moral hazard when feminists clamor for legal equality without taking that into effect. That's how you get current situations where colleges are 60% women and there's a furor every time men get a single scholarship, or the still ticking wage gap lie even though men pay 75% of taxes. Feminism doesn't care about those things because feminism has never been about an equal balance between the sexes.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 09:07 PM
6

Numbers do not bear you out. Drop out rates for female engineering students are higher than males, and they also quit the workforce in significantly higher rates than men. I'll source if you want em.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 08:55 PM
80

Is a perfect example of what I'm talking about. Men as a whole did not have universal or even majority suffrage for most of human history. In the US, male suffrage came with the responsibility of potentially being drafted. Women had no such responsibility when they received the vote and still don't. Inequality of outcome does not equal oppression. That's an illogical argument that feminists and other equalists have used to gain power without responsibility.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 08:39 PM
8

And you think after reading everything in the rest of the thread about the massive pro women biases in STEM that that didn't have something to do with it?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 08:35 PM
33

Except women weren't oppressed
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 08:14 PM
1

Who's the "our" here, the Western, feminist ones with universally negative birth rates?
/r/MensRights11/02/17 07:03 PM
1

You have a very twisted view of equality. What you're advocating is effectively equality of outcome über alles, where you see the decades worth of sources that show that it's actually men and only men that fund not just taxation, but post-industrial civilization as a whole, but you still support women having by mandate absolutely identical outcomes to men while having a massively lower cost to earn that outcome. Because equality. There's really two arguments here. The first is the purely financi…
/r/MensRights11/02/17 06:56 PM
2

Women aren't ever going to pay like men do, so that's a false equivalency. The reason that women are let go after pregnancy is their very well known trend of simply not coming back to work after childbirth, or only coming back part time. And yes, I have sources. So effectively, letting pregnant women go seems to be exactly what they want. Unless it isn't, and they can get attention and/or lawsuit money out of it. Feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 12:33 PM
6

Source: Men pay far more taxes than women, to the point where without men the system would collapse Source: I was off, women in the US are responsible for only 75% of consumer spending Regardless, the numbers make clear that post-industrial civilization is the greatest wealth transfer in history, from men to women.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 12:02 PM
11

Both genders do not and never have paid equally. Men pay 75% of all taxes and women are responsible for 80% of all domestic spending. Men are going to be paying more then women in order to make women "equal", just like the entirety of feminism since its beginning.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 06:28 AM
10

Men already pay for it anyways
/r/MensRights11/02/17 02:42 AM
45

That's no shit the majority of female degree holders. Female doctors and engineers drop out in huge and predictable numbers both for marriage and especially for childbirth. And god help the husband of a degreed woman if the man makes less than her.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 01:24 AM
61

PEOPLE SAY that women engineers won't quit at far greater rates than men, but THEY WILL
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:09 PM
2

Both. I want women to realize that men's anger is valid. I'm not the poster that said all women are the same. I think almost all women have certain trends in behavior (like all men have different trends in theirs), and that feminism has brought out the worst trends in femininity, but I also think women can becave as individuals otherwise I wouldn't have commented.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 07:32 PM
1

Men's anger is the only thing the law listens to. If MRAs were angrier and an actual threat to the status quo things would change. If men drop out sufficiently to threaten the status quo things would change. Otherwise, things will not change, and reading a woman trying to tone police a man on an MRA forum is just sad.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 07:10 PM
1

"Long live Bill the Butcher!" Haha and yeah, populism rises every time large numbers of migrants enter a nation. In fact, you can still see century-old voting pattern differences between Irish and Italian and English American neighborhoods in places like Boston, even though they're all about as well assimilated as can be, and the differences between them never quite as large as those between Sunni Islam and the West.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 01:10 AM
1

Sure, France has had a rather intimate relationship with Algeria since 1830 and the whole Maghreb since the 1850s or so. Thing is though, transmission goes both ways. If these people grow up speaking French (and Arabic), intaking French media (and Islam).... I mean, you surely understand that there are limits to what a liberal state can make before it begins to not be liberal, and that a liberal state has never organically emerged from a Muslim or African state. That's not even taking into accou…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 12:35 AM
1

That's part of the problem. If their French citizenship conflicts enough with their identity, then that is now states self destruct.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 07:06 PM
14

Easy fix buddy, just never ever get married.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:15 PM
31

We men would be cleaning up. I still think it should happen though.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:09 PM
1

I mean, you're not wrong.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:05 PM
1

Not likely with the hands she probably has. Besides men can do that too.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:56 AM
5

Haha you're welcome. It was fun to write.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:54 AM
9

Typical radical lesbian feminist bitterbitch shit. Just laugh, realize there's a 75% chance this author is obese, a 44% she beats her partner (highest rate in the world), and glory in the knowledge that no matter how much she impotently hates men, we'll always fuck a woman deeper than her fat fingers ever could.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:17 AM
6

I was just about to archive this shit lol. Thanks for the work you do.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:12 AM
4

Not OP, but I will say that although Google is most assuredly capitalist to their (solid state) core, they are massive purveyors of the Equalism Cult and are anti Traditionalist because being so helps their profit margins. Even though I'm reasonably pro free market, I do find it ironic that in many cases it is capitalism that is driving some of the worst aspects of misandry and feminism (though I repeat myself) since it creates parallel workforces and captureable markets. Just as in the relation…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:43 AM
2

No, the reason that "Alt-Right" exists is because any question of any part of the Equalist Cult gets you labeled a Nazi.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:48 AM
1

Mainstream media and academia are frequently the thought leaders and partial funders of some protest leaders. Which is the point.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:24 AM
1

Are you insinuating that Trump precipitated that attack?
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:14 AM
25

I forgot where I first read the quote: "I'm not scared of marriage. I've simply studied it, found it not worthwhile, and am avoiding it."
/r/MensRights05/02/17 09:49 AM
1

Can you search for a different place?
/r/MensRights05/02/17 08:00 AM
1

That's pretty much what he said she said is though
/r/MensRights05/02/17 07:04 AM
2

Very true. But being judged negatively by women can preclude the family forming part of that. Part of the problem with affirmative action and how the Great Recession affected men 4-1 to women, is that even as women become more and more favored economically, they also retain their individual societal favoring over an equivalent man. Pushed far enough and this completely breaks down the relationship between the sexes.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 05:03 AM
2

Solipsism. One reason why I avoid female workspaces.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:04 PM
2

It angers me sometimes that women like you are going to have to be the ones to end misandrist feminism (though I repeat myself) rather than men like me, since society simply listens to you more than men.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:03 PM
13

Yup, and honestly to some extent fuck em. This is largely Men responding to incentives, and it won't stop (and shouldn't stop) until Western society stops being so fucking misandrist. Men dropping out is the best way to starve out the stupidity of the past forty to fifty years.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 07:29 PM
3

Precisely. As for the wage gap, the Enthymemes answers are 1) women prioritize free time over pure earring potential and 2) women control 80% of all consumer spending.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 05:25 PM
3

lol that's hilarious, and also sad. You should've just asked in a Joker esque way, why so triggered?
/r/MensRights01/02/17 12:18 AM
6

That's when you fly into a rage and announce that you are transracially black and how dare she.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 12:10 AM
9

True. But at the same time, the fraternity is re-sueing, and the cultural fallout from all the lies and hatred that caused this false accusation has been immense.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:03 PM
2

Great! That's pretty much all it takes.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:59 PM
4

Sounds like the absolute best thing you could do for yourself is start educating your friend to not be so gynocentric ("too harsh" lol), and to ignore the SJWs entirely.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:56 PM
3

Good on you for destroying their safe space
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:49 PM
4

Correct. Feminism has always had a foundation of misandry, and it is an ideological grouping who's message has always been censored and controlled by a radical minority, a minority that has always drifted ever more radical and misandrist the longer it has existed. Destroying the radical leadership of feminism will do most of the work towards eliminating its corrosive effect on intersexual relations.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:24 PM
2

Their point is that they hate and fear masculinity. Fuck them they should be ignored.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:14 PM
3

Lol
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:14 PM
1

Hypocrisy is all feminism has. Feminism is a hate movement, they have no principles.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 01:53 AM
2

They don't want to. That narrative is very powerful politically.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 12:50 AM
1

Fair enough. What I was trying to get across is that protesting for visibility and letting people's sympathy effect change works for some women but not men. Men will have to propel change by breaking that status quo.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 12:30 AM
1

Haha maybe. Or a freelance programmer that can work where I want and just not deal with women except for tinder
/r/MensRights31/01/17 12:15 AM
2

No I'm a different man than the one who's story got posted here. I tried very hard to not let any form of media form around my charge. It took a year but it got thrown out, no permanent record, just a permanent inability to serve in the military and no real idea what I want to do otherwise.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 11:49 PM
3

Well, thanks for admitting that. I'm of the opinion that true "equality" as in one-for-one interchangeableness between men and women will never happen. I don't want it to happen, and I think the overwhelming majority of people of either sex don't really want that either. The goal is some sort of balance between Rights, Responsibilities, and Disposability, and feminism just isn't interested in balance. It simply wants ever more Rights for women while avoiding as much Responsibility as possible. B…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 10:11 PM
4

It's more than just laws, those are bad enough. Feminists love the parts of "traditionalism" that have men support and provide for women, and they love the parts of "progressivism" that have women gain men's authority in things like employment and especially education. Men pay the majority of taxes in every western nation and receive fewer benefits than women. Men are thirteen times more likely to die on the job than women, and no woman is clamorimg to take those jobs. Men are the electric grid,…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 09:46 PM
3

Because men always go second. And I'm all for parental choice, or rather, I demand that if one sex gets to choose the other has to as well. I just find it amusing that there's already consternation at the mere thought of men gaining what men already gave women three generations ago.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 09:17 PM
4

You mean aside from my false rape accusation that ended my ROTC scholarship in 2011? Different case than the one on the sub here yesterday. Aside from Duluth model misandrist policies that nearly ruined my uncles life during and long, long after his divorce? Aside from my cousins on the other side of my family having to fight like hell for even equal custody or even visitation for their kids, even though both got divorced by their (in at least one and possible both cases cheating) wives? Aside f…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 08:54 PM
1

My thoughts exactly.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 05:15 PM
-1

Science basically exists to fuck with nature. Normally we can deal with nature fucking back, until slowly costs build up to a point where whole segments of science collapse and have to be restarted. Here's the thing though: men invented birth control seventy years ago, that's one of if not the most influential fuckings with of nature in human history, and the results of it still haven't stopped, but most effects have not been good for Men since it's allowed female "liberation" and the supercharg…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 05:13 PM
8

Grievous bodily harm, maximum of ten years from what I'm reading. Hope she gets it, fuck that cunt.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 04:58 PM
2

So, effectively you're willing to a priori abandon equality of opportunity and pursue equality of outcome at any price? Because aside from the absolute wealth of hypothetical problems that making a military (or any organization) dependent upon augmentation to do its job entails, think about this: biology has dictated that almost all men are stronger than almost all women. The military requirements of any force dictate that all military men are stronger than all women. Suppose that "technology to…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 04:36 PM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights30/01/17 04:02 PM
2

Yeah I can see that, I figured that's what he meant. Rousseau's intent doesn't mean much if those in power structure things to prevent sharing unless violently challenged. I still think his ideas have a lot of merit as guidelines though.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 07:50 AM
2

Your link was fantastic, very concise. I also agree that a social collapse is occurring. I think Men's Rights would best be served educating men on how to enjoy and profit from the collapse rather than try to build something "equal" on the misandrist foundations we have currently.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 06:14 AM
2

Women physically cannot function like male draftees can. Treating women just like men is impossible.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 06:02 AM
12

He's not. The entire point of affirmative consent is to enable bullshit like this
/r/MensRights30/01/17 03:57 AM
2

Eh, it'll happen anyways I think
/r/MensRights30/01/17 03:56 AM
5

How so?
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:59 PM
2

True. But effectively the question meant "no I don't hate women"
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:57 PM
2

True, and therein lies the most interesting possibilities for MRAs, in my opinion. There's a gap between well behaved, peaceful protest, and outright violence. Well behaved protests by men are in my opinion next to useless since men do not benefit from the cognitive biases that favor women such as the Women are Wonderful Effect and the Halo Effect, the exploitation of which is fundamental to feminism's success. Instead, the MRM should build structures to be as nonviolently disruptive as possible…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:37 PM
3

Just a joke. Mostly I dislike that any critique of feminism or even women in general has to be prefaced with "oh but I'm not some evil man that wants to just put women back in the kitchen hurr durr", even as women continue to be dependent on men's provisioning either through traditional means or taxes, which are overwhelmingly borne by men. And yes I know you were probably joking, just thought I'd clarify.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:18 PM
1

Post 1945 conflict is won when minority movements are able to mobilize the mass population to agree to or support their goals. Violence may or may not be the foremost tool used, but to say it has no utility is simply wrong.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 10:03 PM
2

Not really. The USSR collapsed financially and socially (not primarily because of Afghanistan, that caused a collapse of Russian military culture) and it was these twin collapses that made it impossible for Soviets to violently resist, but not Chechens or Serbians or Croatians or Oilgarchs. And those social and economic collapses were not brought about by peaceful demonstrations.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 10:01 PM
2

Speak for yourself /s
/r/MensRights29/01/17 04:02 PM
2

Because then you'll be selling mostly to men
/r/MensRights29/01/17 03:43 PM
20

Gandhi was successful because the British were 1) exhausted after two world wars and 2) much softer in their approach than other empires, for instance the French and Soviets. Had Gandhi attempted his Salt March in the British India of 1860, or against the Soviets at any time before their collapse, he would not have met with the success he did. Likewise, MLK in the US was successful to a much larger degree than is commonly granted to the credible threat of Malcolm X and black radical violence, wh…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 10:15 AM
8

As a white male, I'm more than tired of it as is.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 08:59 AM
19

In the US, diversity has always meant fewer whites, though perhaps not always with as much vitriol as now.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:33 AM
13

Exactly. They can't change, but they're beginning to get scared now that the backlash has already begun to take shape.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:28 AM
14

If multiculturalism isn't forced, then the result is organic cultural drift, otherwise known as cultural appropriation (gasp!).
/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:23 AM
5

Yes, and complaining about her sentence to feminist applause
/r/MensRights28/01/17 06:13 PM
2

It wouldn't get them attention, so they'll never do it
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:24 AM
2

A) Just to clarify, you're asking me if I can hold her accountable for her knowing she was unfaithful? B) Holding her accountable isn't harming the child.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:51 PM
2

If the mother was capable, why lie and willingly choose to depend on a man who wasn't even the father of her child?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:33 PM
2

How come in all of this "discussion" you've never considered that the mother might be capable of paying?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:24 PM
2

Not really, I intentionally phrased it as a binary, yes or no. But I'll ask a better question: since we both agree that men and women are biologically different, what do you think is the best compromise to be made when it comes to children?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:11 PM
2

That doesn't answer my question. Should men always have more responsibilities and fewer choices about parenthood?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 09:46 PM
7

So, men should always have more responsibilities than women, and fewer choices about parenthood?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:39 PM
9

No, objectively he is a cuckold used by a woman. I've made no assumption as to whether he's a good parent or not. Since most men are good fathers, I'd say it's likely that he is. However, you are stating that not only is he a good father, but that he should be punished for being so, by being forced to pay for a child that he has discovered is not his.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:32 PM
22

A parent is the father or mother of a child. Don't obfuscate: I am adopted, and my parents knowingly chose to raise me even though I'm not biologically theirs (they can't have children). This man is neither a biological parent nor was he knowingly raising another man's child. This man was being used based on a woman's lie. He is not a parent.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 06:49 PM
24

What parental obligations? The man is not a parent.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 06:08 PM
43

No man should be forced to pay for a child that is not his
/r/MensRights27/01/17 06:04 PM
2

You're most welcome
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 03:46 AM
2

https://www.parsemusfoundation.org/projects/vasalgel/vasalgel-faqs/
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 03:39 AM
1

Archive?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:56 AM
19

I'm all down cause 1) men invented anesthesia and antibiotics and 2) this makes it reversible.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 10:43 PM
3

Well the post hit the front page, so there was definitely a small but determined number of anti-male posters that came in. Which is good, because in order to get to them it has to be viewed by thousands of normal users.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 10:35 PM
77

Vaselgel can't come soon enough
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 09:10 PM
2

800,000 soviet women served in WW2, only 3% of total Soviet strength. The USSR had already seen the purging of 20 million people (majority men) under Stalin, as well as the millions of (Again, overwhelmingly male) deaths in WW1 and the Russian Civil War. The Soviets suffered at least 8.7 million military dead in WW2, meaning that the total women in uniform was less than 10% of total war dead. Fewer than 20,000 women died under arms in the entirety of the Soviet participation in WW2, primarily be…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:05 PM
1

I can understand that, even if I disagree. My point is that it's soooo easy to tone police men as is, that doing so even on the internet would effectively be saying that Men can't raise even the most justified complaints because it might make someone upset. Which just throws into relief how dependent society is upon male action, and how committed they are to ensure men receive as little benefit as possible from it.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:38 PM
7

Posts like that were what slowly brought me over to a mensright's viewpoint. They work, they just make some people angry too. Oh well. The point of Men's Rights isn't to make everyone happily agree to treat men better. That will never happen. The point is to continually showcase how laws and culture very often either undervalue men's contributions or actively harm male interests, while simultaneously supporting and making it easier for men to do whatever they want.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:09 PM
18

The actual statistics are that 99%+ of the forces landed on D-Day were men. 100% of the casualties were men. The push to "women too" the entire culture, and potentially twist history in the process, is a large part of where the absence of care for men's issues comes from.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:00 PM
1

Also there's been several wars started by women but whatever
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:25 AM
1

That's not being a cuck that's being truthful. Well, half truthful. Both the lowest and highest achieving segments of humanity tend to be men. So you are entirely correct, men are the ones promoting violence, but they are also the ones stopping them.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:22 AM
7

Some examples would be actual rape cultures, the regular selling of women, refusing to see any part of feminity as good or worthwhile, refusing to believe that women have anything to contribute at all, etc.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 08:29 AM
5

Previous post I found with more stats: 1) https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/09/10/marine-experiment-finds-women-get-injured-more-frequently-shoot-less-accurately-than-men/?client=safari 2) https://fabiusmaximus.com/2013/01/29/women-soldiers-48349/ 3) http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/17/army-women-hurt-more-often-in-combat-training-expe/
/r/MensRights25/01/17 08:25 AM
7

None of that is hatred of women lol
/r/MensRights25/01/17 08:03 AM
-9

No it isn't. It's saying that when actual fascism, or any existential threat, has to be defeated, it's men that do so, now and always. The nonexistent problems that feminism whines about are not fascism, and this is pointing that out.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:48 AM
7

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/acsc/99-016.pdf http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/call/call_90-11_pss.htm These were easy to find. I'm looking for data from the current wars but it's a little difficult to find for obvious political reasons.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:45 AM
17

Realizing that men and women are different and that working towards perfect equality is impossible is not misogyny.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:27 AM
1

This is pretty much it. They'll become ever more shrill until they're destroyed. Can't come soon enough.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 04:01 AM
38

Yes, you are, that's one of the end goals of feminism
/r/MensRights24/01/17 10:22 PM
2

Agreed there. But since men always have more responsibility, then matching those with a concomitant level of authority completely destroys postmodern notions of "equality and progress"
/r/MensRights24/01/17 10:18 PM
1

That's not cunning that's basic female nature
/r/MensRights24/01/17 10:15 PM
1

Equality is impossible
/r/MensRights24/01/17 10:14 PM
7

The women's march was an antagonistic response in and of itself
/r/MensRights24/01/17 06:45 AM
0

True, but assuming you fall within the top 70-80% of the bell curve, you handle yourself better than 99% of women.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 06:27 AM
16

This is America. Like half the women here are bigger than me, just significantly shorter.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 06:04 AM
3

I'm not arguing against that at all. But since women simply cannot perform to the same standard men can, this will become yet one more area where "equality" means female quotas at men's - and the organization as a whole's - expense.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 11:00 PM
6

To your first point: not necessarily. To your second: no, the purpose of a conventional military is to put forces into the field, no more no less. There's varying ways to do that.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 09:39 PM
8

Actually conscripted men can make excellent soldiers if properly trained and led. That's the entire point of conscription. Even if I don't agree with it presently, I can read history. Women in the military are not only less capable, but also become injured more often and stay injured longer, are nondeployable at a rate three times greater than men, do not complete their entire term of service as a higher rate than men, cost more, and bring down morale. I've posted sources here before I'll link m…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 09:13 PM
5

Women make much worse soldiers than men regardless of whether they're in combat arms or not.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:31 PM
4

Per Heartiste: the goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female socio-sexual goals while maximally restricting those of men.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:22 PM
33

Of course women make terrible soldiers compared to men. The point is that men have often been made to earn their citizenship through blood - however good or bad they were at being soldiers - and women never have and largely don't want to. And we are weaker as a society for it.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:19 PM
1

That's pretty much what "empowerment" means nowadays
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:16 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights23/01/17 07:47 PM
2

Feminism has always had a bedrock of misandry. So yes the majority of feminists or women in general aren't rabidly misandrist. But they're also not bothered by what those radicals do, nor are they interested in rolling back the problems that feminism has created which favor them.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:42 AM
2

I'm pretty much where you are. I don't completely agree with MGTOW as a lifestyle but I completely understand where they come from and don't hold it against them.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:40 AM
2

The difference is that men used to receive authority in response to their responsibility, and above all, respect for being men and doing what needed to be done. We no longer do so, and increasingly there is less and less of a point for men to contribute.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:23 AM
2

That doesn't mean feminists are bad people or malevolent or they hate men or anything like that. Well......
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:17 AM
1

Pretty much, and I feel no obligation to work in the slightest to fix anything unless my responsibility will be matched by authority. Which, hahaha wishful thinking I know. Might as well check out and wait for everything to collapse.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:52 PM
1

That's actually quite common. Feminism is anti-Western, culturally and traditionally, so they're reactionarily drawn to anti-Western ideas.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:51 PM
6

Motte and Bailey tactics, working as designed.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:16 PM
4

Doubtful. Presidential security is still one area where the men of the Secret Service have to put effectiveness over gender. Being fired, however, was the discretion of her employer, and this I think was due more to fears of a potential (justified) public backlash than any political punishment.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:01 AM
1

Standard Women are Wonderful Effect in action. Which is unfortunate from a societal perspective since the majority of female doctors end up dropping from full time work once they have a child.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 08:59 PM
6

A more complete analogy would then have police writing tickets specifically for those sports cars on roads that previously had a much higher speed limit, while failing to prosecute non sports cars at similar rates. So yeah, strict liability is bullshit. I'm aware of cultural shift over time, it's the implied foundation of English common law and its reliance on jurisprudence, but in this case it was an imposed cultural shift done not for justice (because feminism doesn't care about justice) but f…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:45 PM
28

True, but what happens when there's more than just a two year gap but no predation? I'm not talking about 45 year old guys dating 16 year old girls, I'm talking about a 17 or 18 year old guy dating a 14 or 15 year old girl was completely normal for most of US history, suddenly turning into a felony over the past 40 or fewer years. Strict liability in these cases is bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:21 PM
1

Female superiority and institutionalized male financial responsibility for female goals are their ends. The means are superfluous when the ends are bad.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 01:39 AM
2

Yeah I upvoted your other post even though I don't entirely agree with it, because you provided your "why". For the short term I think you're entirely correct, in that men pushing for even 50/50 custody is a good equilibrium. Where I disagree is in the medium term (assuming no one can really forecast the long term so it's out of consideration): men and women might share equal custody but they do not - and never have - shared equal fiscal burdens. I think it highly likely that changing a family s…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:52 AM
3

Yeah but that doesn't tell me anything. What do you think "progress" is and where do you think we're progressing to?
/r/MensRights16/01/17 07:53 AM
2

How so
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:54 AM
5

She gets so close, and then at the end she throws in a little excretion about "technology being the true liberators of females", as if females in fact needed "liberation" in the first place or if liberation is even something women want. Which, of course, they don't if it means having responsibilities to go along with any new authority. That's exactly what the "bargaining" stage of feminism looks like: castigizing the obvious failures of the movement while still believing in feminine primacy.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 08:37 PM
3

Archive this shit.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 05:47 AM
1

The flippant answer is because vagina. The more in depth answer is that the US state (state as in government as a whole, not just Oklahoma) has looked at what fast declining rates of nuclear familyhood and marriage in our post feminist age means for future budgets, and has decided to force men to subsidize women's behavior anyways so as to not overtax national welfare budgets. Men being forced to pay for women regardless is what the system is designed to do, regardless of whether the child is hi…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 01:52 AM
7

It is fraud on her part
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:18 PM
26

Not as hard as it deserved to, but yes it failed to recoup its budget plus ads costs, destroyed the planned sequels and tarnished fem-centric films, all good things.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:15 PM
4

I can. I want to see more of it, until the whole rotten thought process eats itself and can be replaced with something worthwhile.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 07:42 AM
2

Thats not exactly true.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 07:40 AM
1

Give it another couple years when those words have lost all meaning, and we'll start to see some interesting pushback in places like employee hiring and pay.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 07:59 PM
3

Then they should have diminished authority as well
/r/MensRights11/01/17 07:39 PM
9

That's not traditional gender roles so much as it's just female solipsism. Gender roles - however traditional - are men attempting to work around that.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 11:20 PM
9

SJWs always project.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:51 PM
4

And you may be right. But in my experience the overwhelming majority of the complaints about inequality of outcome are there because modern Western culture encourages and rewards such behavior, and any attempt to logically persuade her would be met, if not with accusations of "mansplaining", then at least the very entrenched idea that women are the perpetual victims of men and you putting any responsibility on her is wrong. Faced with that, a man might as well troll all day until the built up co…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:48 PM
19

She never cared about the company. She got to virtue signal to the goodthink crowd and bailed with a $20 million parachute.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:14 PM
3

Oh please, the woman OP was just trolling, albeit not with the sole goal of being a douche. Feminism won't be ended when men rationally convince all women to become egalitarians. It will starve when the victim mentality is mocked into th ground and then followed up with the logical (hate)facts that feminism ignores.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:09 PM
1

We're gonna see a bit of both I think, as men pull out of the gynocentric culture and begin sliding in to the male groups that will build the replacement.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:23 PM
1

No one wants equality and peace. People want power. If a roughly equal share of power leads to peace, so be it. But that's not why times of peace exist.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 01:16 AM
1

Personally I can't wait for the backlash.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 01:15 AM
1

Heh, you don't?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/17 10:39 PM
2

Everything you said after "If you want to..." was your own slippery slope. My point, is that law does not work in a vacuum, and that changing the culture from which legality is drawn from (and works to maintain) would be a deeper and more substantial benefit than simply sniping at individual laws. It also works in cases where law simply doesn't apply, like this example. It would be stupid and wasteful to set a legal precedent for dating website preferences (well, more than we already have but th…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 05:42 PM
6

But... we're told that women want equality when it suits them, and sexism when that suits them - just in case that wasn't already apparent. But, it's not their fault. It's us evil men, again. I mean, that is what feminism has pushed for since the beginning.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 05:30 PM
5

Law is downstream from culture
/r/MensRights06/01/17 05:26 PM
1

I understand what you're saying. The problem is that a looot of the anti-White bullshit being disseminated at the moment starts with the "I'm just saying it happened" premise, and builds from there. Which is not what you're doing, but I can see why people are pushing back.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 05:10 PM
84

"Dear undocumented, here there are no walls" says the poster on the wall (that was built by men)
/r/MensRights06/01/17 06:20 AM
2

Not really, no. Self-actualized, tribal Masculinity is powerful, and yet Men have been in effect killing their tribal selves on the alter of Civilization for millennia. The Feminine both craves and loathes Masculinity, and so seeks to control it. Nothing in that article was entirely made up on the spot, it follows a very well worn path.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 05:39 AM
2

Thanks buddy, and the very same to you
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:01 PM
10

I'm in my mid twenties. My trauma wasn't a divorce, but a false rape accusation my freshman year in college. Charges got dropped but the damage was done. So I'm not sure I have any advice but I'm here to listen if you need to vent. As for "good women", there's no such thing. Women are women, that's all. Goodness in them is a matter of maintenance, both by society and the men in their lives, and though I completely understand you when you say that you don't feel the need for a serious relationshi…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:43 PM
10

Thanks for that. I live in the Midwest and so did my cousins so I've seen how bad things can get here. I don't think women as a whole are out to get me, I just think that there's no consequences for bad female behavior so we get more of it. My cousins exes weren't "bad", but both divorced my cousins, one after cheating on them. Both got cash and prizes, the house etc. Our current incentive structure reliably brings out the worst in femininity, and though I remain convinced that I can still find …
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:17 PM
1

Late Roman as in post Crisis of the Third Century?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:11 PM
16

See I'm not a father yet so my thinking is still more hypothetical than yours. I want a family but it kinda scares me, I'm not sure I want to do it in the US after watching my cousins get chewed up by divorce.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:09 PM
14

Depending on how broadly you define the SJW mosaic, we've already seen violence at the edges this past year. I believe that some sort of new compromise between men and women (and majority heterosexuals and the minority sexualities) is imperative in order to best react to the whirlwind changes that industrialization and the de-personalization of work has wrought. But at this point I believe that equality is impossible. I also believe that feminism and the wider SJW axis is completely uninterested…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:36 PM
27

I used to not believe in cycles of history, but this stupidity has changed my mind. The backlash against the unbroken stream of misandry that has been the feminist movement always, paired with the probable economic and social crises that will spark it, are going to be savage for any "equalist" ideology. And I'm beginning to think that's a good thing.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:24 PM
1

I'm not sure it's possible for most women to respect most men in aggregate, due to hypergamy.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:13 PM
2

Same thing with the Red Pill movie. Woman goes on voyage of discovery, says some kinda nice things about MRAs, gets more mainstream traction than men themselves had for the past decade. Equality is a myth.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:28 AM
1

Hahaha true, true.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 04:45 PM
1

There are faaaaar more women like that than you could memorize
/r/MensRights03/01/17 04:35 PM
2

The internet makes this a lot easier. Plus, a male only club could be an invite-only group that meets in a rented building or garage, not an easily identifiable clubhouse. Feminism has proven that it cannot coexist peacefully with a men's group that it knows about. So don't let them know.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:19 AM
2

It can be yeah. It can also be a very healthy complementary relationship between the sexes. Problem is, incentives for both men and women are so screwed up that conflict is practically built in currently.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:28 AM
11

Feminism is ugly though
/r/MensRights02/01/17 05:22 PM
1

I'm not trying to use it to prevent change. But what I am saying is that it's not nearly as easy as saying "women should pay for themselves", because women have never done that before. I either want men to have the authority that their fiscal responsibility deserves, or I want men to not be forced to be fiscally responsible for society. Currently men have neither, and while male parental abortion would fix the mismatch at the individual level (which is why I support it), it'll be much harder to …
/r/MensRights02/01/17 05:04 PM
1

[–]dungone 3 points 20 hours ago* I have no problem with that increased burden as long as long as it gets paid for by women. Otherwise, it's a circular argument where you are saying that men have to pay because men have to pay. I suggest that women's social-welfare programs should be paid for by uterus insurance. My point is that there's yet to be a system where Men don't pay for women, either directly or indirectly.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 04:41 PM
1

http://judgybitch.com/2016/08/16/reblog-research-find-that-as-a-group-only-men-pay-tax/
/r/MensRights02/01/17 02:03 PM
15

Hypergamy: women on OKCupid rated 80% of men as below average. Women are actively trying to lower the number of "available" (i e sexy to them) men because they want the tallest/richest/most dominant they can get. That the overwhelming majority of them won't ever have what it takes to earn the companionship of a man at the top of any hierarchy is irrelevant, because their fantasy persists until they're too old to maintain it.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 07:03 AM
1

That would be men, then, seeing as men are the net taxpayers in Western nations.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 06:47 AM
2

There's a radical fringe in both Canada and America that are actively working make both predominantly non-White countries.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 08:45 PM
16

Start local. It takes hundreds of thousands to sway congress, it can take one to sway a city council. Also, radicals drive movements, so keep pushing back culturally against the stupidity of feminism and misandry. Winning concrete victories at a local level gives legitimacy to the inevitable national level movement.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 08:37 PM
12

He didn't say he was entitled lol. But dating a younger woman is almost always preferable to dating an older one so if he can, why not?
/r/MensRights31/12/16 08:33 PM
3

http://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women.aspx
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:31 AM
6

Women have an in-group bias. Men do not. Women are sociologically favored. Men are not. These two things alone mean that women's groups have to work far less hard to get their way than men's groups.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 03:33 AM
7

Women used to die in childbirth at a rate of 1% per birth. Better medicine and antibiotics lowered that to 15 in 100,000 now. Medicine and antibiotics developed by..... men. The food a woman uses to provide milk and later directly fed to her child is 75% provided by..... men. Any pain a woman feels in childbirth or after can be aleviated by anesthetics and painkillers, which were discovered, tested, manufactured and shipped by...... men. Your comment would be amusing were it not a perfect repres…
/r/MensRights31/12/16 03:10 AM
2

By definition, that is sexist. It's just ethically and practically smart to be sexist in that and other situations.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 02:52 AM
1

Well, you shouldn't take feminists seriously.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 11:50 PM
15

Holy shit I thought you were a bot!
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:50 PM
3

Solipsism
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:25 PM
1

Completely agreed. "Equality" as in a blank slate one for one equality in both laws and culture is bunk. Men's Rights begins by understanding how men and women are different and therefore working for complementarity, not attempting to shoehorn a different kind of equalist narrative.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 07:38 PM
3

And I've never tried to fuck the bitch in the video. Please continue this is fun :)
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/16 09:09 PM
47

Lol and gays were still fucking during the AIDS epidemic when doing so was a likely death sentence. You must be pretty dumb.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/16 08:02 PM
3

Good
/r/MensRights21/12/16 07:14 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights20/12/16 02:54 AM
11

Or gets him blackout drunk, which is what she did
/r/MensRights19/12/16 12:37 AM
6

I agree Fatherhood by surrogacy isn't ideal, but it's a whole lot better than the current plague of single motherhood after divorce, both for men and for the children. Until a critical mass of men exit the current misabdrist system, it won't change. With that in mind, surrogate based fatherhood is an ideal way for men to both build the future and starve the present.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:12 PM
5

Don't get married.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 01:17 AM
5

Sounds like garden variety dumbfuck feminism to me
/r/MensRights18/12/16 01:14 AM
2

Precisely. A selective "tribe" of men is an incredibly strong support network for everything from money to mental health to entertainment. As "normal" society continues to become more fem-centric, more men should become neotribal.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 08:18 PM
1

I can give a pretty good pointer if you want. But it's political so I'd PM you rather than post here in mensrights.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 07:45 AM
5

This, to me, gets to the heart of the need for MRAs (and antifeminism), namely the implicit assumptions and differences between the two sexes. A woman by dint of evolved biology will always have more social power than a man all else being equalish. Men used to make up for this with their greater capacity for work and the concomitant authority, but that has been gutted by industrialization and the de-physicalization of work, the invention of birth control - both created by men - and the latent pa…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 03:15 AM
13

They won't, because overt hypoagency plus deniable manipulation is female power.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 01:51 AM
3

Most of that will be wasted money, since most of the girls won't choose STEM and of the minority who do most won't stay long. It's bullshit, and the subsidatiom comes from men, without whom no western society would have a tax base. Men need to begin developing systems that can sustain them comfortably and entertainingly so they can check out of an increasingly feminized business world that cares little for them while demanding as much as possible.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 01:47 AM
2

Not all women are equally hypergamous, but the fact that women overwhelmingly choose to destroy relationships in which the man is shorter or makes less than the woman means that hypergamous behavior is a deeply rooted trend of the feminine.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 01:35 AM
1

Schrodinger's Abortion: whatever gains the feminine imperative more sympathy and/or social cachet is what will be the truth at the moment.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 01:20 AM
5

Like what?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/16 06:33 PM
12

I mean I would because then I couldn't lose. If women can't compete with holodeck spaceporn (dibs on that as a bandname) then I'll just do that. But if women are forced to compete with that, then I think we'll start seeing more feminine women reappear by necessity. Anything that gives me more options is good.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 07:00 AM
9

I don't think women know just how hard the next twenty years are going to hit the Feminine Imperative.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 05:15 AM
25

Well, yeah. Men's higher sex drive is the biggest way that women manipulate men. Artificial sex from vr porn to sexbots, combined with male birth control is going to massively even out the sexual balance of power. And the majority of western women have nothing besides the promise of sex to attract men.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 05:01 AM
6

Lol
/r/MensRights09/12/16 05:57 PM
3

Solipsism
/r/MensRights09/12/16 05:55 PM
7

Projection
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/16 06:14 PM
3

That's an excellent pressure flip
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:45 PM
4

I couldn't agree more
/r/MensRights06/12/16 07:35 PM
15

http://archive.is/c5xl4 Lol this is such bullshit. There was no rape. A woman who meets a man, gives him her number, texts him, meets him again, gets drinks (which I'm sure he paid for), then takes him home is making so many implicit assentions that it's ridiculous to assume she could then with a straight face accuse any man of rape unless rape now means "any sex that I didn't enjoy as much as I hoped". And then there's the guy. Not a man, but a male, so fully committed to the ideal that women b…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 07:06 PM
5

Perfect. The fact that if you told her all these things she would interpret it as "threatening" shows how correct you are. The feminine has a deep, near pathological need for a perfect sense of "security", one that is impossible to bring about. And naturally, since it is obviously men's job to do everything a woman wants this manifests as a drive for what women truly want from men, control.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:15 PM
3

Relationships are much more likely to fail (meaning, the woman leaves) if the man is not the primary earner. So, your example of a high powered woman and a less powerful man is simply not realistic for a long term relationship.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 08:02 PM
7

Women are weaker and less capable, but that's not her argument. Characteristically, she's not advancing an argument at all, she's just whining to get more money for less work, and she won't back her position up with logic and facts but with shaming.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:20 PM
8

Sounds about right. Women as a whole can't stand men building things without women expressly in mind. To me, that's entirely enough reason to do exactly that.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:15 PM
6

It's solipsism; feminists aren't even thinking about society at all, they just want what is best for them and damn all consequences.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:38 PM
14

THIS. Men need male spaces.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:46 PM
17

If men sufficiently check out of any society, then it dies. The "end of men" will either be turned back or the country will break, but women cannot ever make it by themselves.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:42 PM
7

http://www.uslegalforms.com/paternity/new-jersey-paternity-forms.htm From what I've just read, your being married means the state of New Jersey consideres a child to be yours implicitly. However, that can be changed on the birth certificate if a paternity test is done "close in time to the birth" which I assume to mean would make a post-birth test applicable. That said, I'm not a lawyer and US government at all levels is designed to force individual males to pay for children regardless of their …
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:35 PM
3

Where do you live? Cause that affects the laws vis pre/post birth paternity testing
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:28 PM
5

Most women hate being called feminists because of the (justly earned) stigma against the term. But most women aren't trying to roll back the privileges and authorities without responsibilities that men have given them in the face of feminist agitation.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:17 PM
7

I think all women support the Men's Rights Movent..... if and when the MRM affects men's ability to provide the things that women at large expect men to provide. If you're asking for women who take a proactive stance on the MRM, then you'll find mostly mothers of sons and a vanishingly slim minority otherwise.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 04:45 AM
2

Because feminism at its roots is about the political empowerment of the worst aspects of femininity. The constant, immutable desire for a perfect "security" that cannot exist but which women as a whole will destroy societies in search of creating; the jealousy and lack of respect for men, seeing them as tools or the sum of what they provide; use of sex and sexuality as weapons and threats; and use of humanity's predilection to support women to completely destroy balance and fairness in everythin…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:36 AM
2

Yep. The selective service board will be done away with rather than make women as responsible as men.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:23 AM
5

Common law marriages apply in only a minority of US states.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:21 AM
2

www.therationalmale.com. This blog has many of the answers to the questions you're asking.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:20 AM
3

It's always been like this, just not so blatant. Women will never be held to the same level of responsibility as men. Women don't want to be held to the same level, though they do covet the respective authority. "Traditionalism" was effectively recognizing this and legally and culturally enforcing Men's greater authority commiserate with their responsibility, and likewise feminism (and the wider feminine imperitive) is an attempt to gain that authority with as little responsibility as possible, …
/r/MensRights28/11/16 03:50 PM
24

Being uncomfortable is not anywhere near the same thing as harassment or illegal.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 03:19 PM
4

The one where (middle aged) women are the core of his paying audience.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:43 PM
1

One of Tsu's more famous aphorisms is "always give the enemy (opponent/competition etc) an escape route". In that way they will not fight to the death and victory is easier. In purely TRP/PUA terms, that becomes "ask the girl over to check out your guitar" instead of "ayy bby wan sum fuk?" In this way all the girl can do is not want to see your guitar, instead of being entirely direct and potentially getting turned down as a sexual entity which wrecks your frame and potentially nukes your social…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 05:13 PM
7

It's always only about attention. Dick pics are vulgar attention but they can be leveraged into even more attention on the bitch's blog as well as earning her some delicious victim points. Disagreeing with her doesn't give her attention, and worse it threatens her getting more attention in the future. Of course she'd block you.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 03:25 PM
2

Who cares what she thinks? Just continue to laugh at her stupidity, continue to mock any women she corrupts with her ideals, continue to press against misandric laws and culture and continue to create spaces where men and women can behave in the complementary way we evolved to act, rather than the miserable and fragmented loners feminism creates.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 07:16 AM
8

Guerrilla parenting, I like it.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 04:17 AM
2

I'd say that largely, yes, the sexes do have different conceptions of love and that romance - love for love's sake - is a largely male invention.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:01 AM
1

What's the difference?
/r/MensRights14/11/16 06:18 PM
5

They already are, CTR is a thing, internet service monopolies are a thing. But on a more immediate level shaming of male spaces both physical and digital are very, very real, much of it driven by women. Male spaces, places for men to share their knowledge and experiences unencumbered by shaming and legal vulnerabilities, are dangerous to the status quo.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 06:16 PM
20

Yeah, it's called the Internet. The more the knowledge of this type of female neuroticism and weak male subservience to it spreads, the closer the West is to excising the stupidity and evil of feminism and creating to a proper balance of the sexes.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:47 PM
8

Jefferson did own slaves, but Bush 2 isn't responsible for 20+ million deaths.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:44 PM
62

Because feminism is designed to maximally open women's sociosexual options while maximally limiting those of men.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:42 PM
2

We do but it's not mandatory. but besides being mandatory, there was a time when home ec for young women was expected, just as the virtues of a potential military posting were expected of young men. We have removed both from modern American life; Finland has not, both due to geopolitics and to the fact that yours is a small and homogenous nation, and I do not say that to demean you. The (post)modern United States has since the mid 1960s endeavored to remove all expectations from all its citizens…
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:14 PM
20

I mean true, men gave always been held to a tougher standard than women, even now. But it is worth pointing out that the past American ages when "men were men" was just as deeply based around ensuring "women were women", and if women don't want to do that, then there is no obligation for men to do so either particularly if doing so means they'll still be paying the price of traditional mores while getting few to none of the benefits.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:10 AM
103

I believe they should reinstate home ec. Make girls cook for 2 years so they can learn to make a family and learn values and morals that are no longer taught at home because the parents are too afraid of them these days.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 02:47 AM
1

I disagree, if only because there was never such a thing as monolithic "social conservative bullshit"
/r/MensRights13/11/16 11:54 PM
14

Women want men that are good at being men, which is distinct from being "good men". Postmodern Western mores support males being "good men" but gives next to no thought towards supporting males becoming good at being men. This means that those men who are good at being men don't have much incentive towards being "good men" since they gain women's attraction regardless and being "good" is frequently defined by other parties that don't have men's best interests at heart. Women's ideal is to love a…
/r/MensRights13/11/16 11:47 PM
4

Joe Rohan, cousin of Jack Gondor
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 02:14 AM
8

That's the way I see it, calibration. Poker is a game of the player's skill but the luck of the draw determines how that skill need be used. Same with location and Game.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 05:17 PM
1

Lol. But kinda yeah
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:17 AM
1

Of course she's vegan.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:11 AM
3

True. We'll never truly know how many Berners just stayed home
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:40 AM
2

Indeeed. Now is the time to start openly pressing for pro-male anti-misandry legislation to be written, and to start retaking cultural ground.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:37 PM
2

I believe the term is FUCKING WHITE MALE
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:34 PM
8

Precisely. Feminism has always been a female superiority movement and it's fun to watch them have to confront a failure so openly.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:21 PM
4

Tsk tsk, expecting logic from them
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:14 PM
3

SPLITTER! People's Front is Best Front.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:11 PM
3

Petula Dvorak is an ugly, bitter feminist and her tears are delicious.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:04 PM
3

So I take it you're a member of the People's Front of Judea?
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:00 PM
5

15-20% from what I read
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:45 PM
8

Anarchy means arguing with other anarchists over what anarchy means :p
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:44 PM
2

Pretty much. But "revenge" is frequently sought for absolutely no reason.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:42 PM
21

Well you kinda were
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 02:41 PM
14

Feminism is designed to maximize the sociosexual options of women while maximally restricting those of men.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 09:25 PM
3

Perhaps getting everything they want isn't actually what they want. Or need.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/16 06:35 PM
6

That's exactly it. I'm not raging against the situation or even saying it doesn't exist. I just don't think anger is unproductive or even unwarranted.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/16 05:43 PM
31

The anger isn't from the potential ruthlessness of the marketplace. The anger is from the lies and misdirection used on men to prevent their seeing the true market workings while aiding women simultaneously.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/16 05:11 PM
1

$400K a year for C++ and Linux? I'm a bit skeptical. But aside from that I agree, there simply isn't the same drive for technical mastery from women as from men.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:11 AM
1

We shouldn't teach girls to code because girls overwhelmingly don't want to code and leave STEM fields in droves decades earlier than men do. We shouldn't teach girls to code because the few girls that do want to be coders are going to work towards that anyways without any talk about gender. We shouldn't teach girls to code because no matter what anyone does feminists will never be happy, there is no point at which "equality" will be attained (or, increasingly, even be a good thing for most men)…
/r/MensRights05/11/16 11:01 PM
7

It's not really the objectifying that bothers me, it's that one sex's objectifying is either ignored or even celebrated, while the other's (men's) is publicly considered to be at best uncouth and at worst criminal a priori since it leads to such imbalances in law and culture that end up being outright anti-male.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 10:14 PM
8

That false rape accusations (which are up to 40-50% of all accusations based on military data) are the result of female envy and scorn backed up by the Women are Wonderfull effect and widespread willingness to demonize healthy male sexuality? I think that is obvious at this point.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 03:02 PM
6

The nation state is fading. Soon enough they'll be no infrastructure for the potamouses to depend off of. Until then, soldiers shouldn't marry, and men should not become soldiers.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 04:52 AM
9

I hope rolling stone goes the way of gawker
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:26 PM
3

Try Infogalactic
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:04 PM
2

Which is funny cause family matters was originally supposed to be about the Winslow family until it got hijacked by Urkel. Why? Urkel made the audience feel better.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/16 06:55 PM
1

AKs have more than decent accuracy, it's just that the 7.62x39mm round straight falls out of the air at ~300 meters
/r/TheRedPill03/11/16 04:16 AM
3

I mean individually sure but the whole legal/cultural infrastructure of most Western countries needs to change before things will start getting better.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/16 04:02 AM
1

I subbed there yesterday
/r/askTRP03/11/16 01:52 AM
1

Thanks. Even just talking about it helps but action is better.
/r/askTRP02/11/16 12:34 AM
1

Well, cool I'll start that right now. Would you mind if I PM'd you in a week to check back and see how to further improve?
/r/askTRP01/11/16 11:07 PM
2

He should've just challenged her to an arm wrestling match
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:52 PM
3

Feminism is a movement to increase women's (particularly ugly or damaged women's) sexual power while limiting those of men and the small minority sexualities. Consequentially there's really no end to their hypocrisy because the end goal is attempting to further ugly women's options rather than stand by principles.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:18 AM
4

Because it's come to the point where recording everyday interactions with women is simply good sense, and because without video evidence the legal environment is disgustingly anti-male.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:11 AM
3

Of which Hillary has neither
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:09 AM
6

More like the influence feminism has over pro-Muslim tabloid writers in NYC who like Islam cause it isn't WASPish like what they rebelled against in college.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:04 PM
12

Why would you marry at all currently?
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:15 PM
6

Sailer's Law of Female Journalism: the articles that a woman will be most passionate about are those things that, come the revolution, will make the author more attractive than before.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:14 PM
3

All I'm saying is that if you don't want a job, and can't help but take medication to get through your work day, stay in the house! Men deal with tough working conditions daily yet we deal with it because we have to. So are you saying men are stronger than women? Antidepressants are for the weak!
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:11 PM
6

Who cares what huffpo thinks?
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:07 PM
1

Now? It's always been stupid. Now it's annoying too
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:07 PM
-1

Me, my best friend, my dad, my uncle, his brother, a guy a work with that I have frequent discussions over it with, one of my pastors.....
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:01 PM
1

Yes, in that the Church of Bob and intersectional privilege are both completely made up.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 01:37 AM
1

Well, he's wrong.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:12 PM
1

That's all feminism has ever been, moaning and whining about the differences between men and women.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 09:57 PM
5

If it's solely up to the woman to decide on an abortion since it's her body, then shouldn't it be solely up to the man to decide whether he wants to support a child, since it's his resources?
/r/MensRights30/10/16 09:55 PM
4

WW2 is not living knowledge for >90% of everyone living on earth at the moment. And that's exactly what I mean, WW2 completely destroyed "modernity", which limped along during the reactionarily traditional 1950s before being killed and replaced with Postmodernism during the 1960s, which continues today. The problem ideologically is that postmodernism is fractal, it can't create a cohesive social whole, and the problems because of that are adding up. I completely agree that people are losing thei…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:17 PM
3

I'm agreed on the laser focus idea. The thing about the male rights "movement" is that it isn't. Anti-male bias is so pervasive and just talking about it is so potentially dangerous that there's no laser focus. I believe it will take a couple of crises to crush the misandry by making men necessary again, and my hope is that the Manosphere is there to educate those men on all the ways men have been been manipulated and used and how disproportionate men's contributions are to society compared to w…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 06:36 PM
12

Feminism has always had a bedrock of misandry, and the radical fringe was there since the beginning. It's true that those radicals have grown to become the mainstream of the group but there simply never was a time when "good" feminism existed that got hijacked by the crazies.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:27 PM
11

70-80% of divorces are initiated by women. Men can do everything "right" and still be vulnerable to losing everything in divorce, and millions of men do each year. Marriage simply isn't worth it presently.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 05:12 PM
0

He already said hentai
/r/MensRights29/10/16 05:32 AM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 05:30 AM
1

Psh I'm not. I don't care what comes out of their mouths.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 05:15 AM
11

There are no women who meet standards. There have always been two sets of standards in the military, male and female. The few women who pass things like Ranger School (after both had failed and been specially reinstated) and Kara Hultgreen (who killed herself and crashed her aircraft) will still be 167% more likely to be injured, will cost more than a male in the same spot, and there will be so few of them that it will be wasteful to attempt to enlist women in jobs with a >90% fail rate. Standar…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 01:08 AM
11

1) https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/09/10/marine-experiment-finds-women-get-injured-more-frequently-shoot-less-accurately-than-men/?client=safari 2) https://fabiusmaximus.com/2013/01/29/women-soldiers-48349/ 3) http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/17/army-women-hurt-more-often-in-combat-training-expe/
/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:53 AM
13

Of course women should not be in combat arms. But more than just their raw physical deficiencies, female soldiers are nondeployable at three times the rate of men, become injured more often and stay injured longer, are more expensive to train and maintain, are less effective at almost all facets of even noncombat soldiering and, to stray slightly from pure physical metrics, are deleterious on the esprit de corps that makes military units excell. There is absolutely no benefit to choosing female …
/r/MensRights28/10/16 11:27 PM
3

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2016/06/23/the-truth-about-womens-impact-on-corporate-boards-its-not-good-news/#662666da1bd3 Quick google search pulled that up. I'll post more if you want.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:35 PM
10

Well, a lot of American women do
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:30 PM
16

No it isn't. Women make terrible soldiers compared to men.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:25 PM
1

Lol. Muh dick don't curr. Especially cause it actually goes in the perineum.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 06:30 AM
1

Both are yeah, and honestly the injection for Vaselgel doesn't bother me cause local anesthetic.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 06:20 AM
1

I want both. I want allll the options
/r/MensRights28/10/16 03:40 AM
9

Too wordy. "No licky before the sticky!"
/r/MensRights28/10/16 03:39 AM
11

Because most women are at least situationally bisexual. This means that openly "bi" girls are more heavily sexual and therefore less open to and wanting of anything long term in the first place, especially when they're still young enough to be worth fucking. I've found that advertised female bisexuality is almost always code for simply being a slut.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/16 03:31 AM
1

Hey, you're Aussie right? I was wondering how you replied so quickly when it's 1AM here in the US Midwest haha. And yeah, the longer I live the more jaded and cynical I get to the idea that "equality" between the sexes is possible or even desirable.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:26 AM
1

A majority of women, since it gets them what they want
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:22 AM
1

When women get involved there is no such thing as justice. Justice would be shuttering the group wholly.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:21 AM
2

Well, yeah. Feminism degrades both strong families and strong male workforces. Sounds great to neoliberals.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:07 AM
2

Spot. Fucking. On. Men need to start creating more self sufficient communities to thrive independent of a system that apparantly no longer has any care for them, allow those women who deserve it to join them, and starve out both globalism and feminism.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:01 AM
6

We clearly live in a lie-culture
/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:01 AM
3

And I think you'd have to be either naive or historically ignorant to believe that the choice was ever only between barefoot n' pregnant women and feminism. However, having seen the insanity and evil that feminism creates for both sexes, and knowing the startling and growing number of women on antidepressants, I think that if ever the choice was only between the two, more women would be happier barefoot and pregnant.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:53 AM
3

No, they pressed for the same rights as the most elite men had at the time (apex fallacy), with none of the attached responsibility. Feminism has always and will always push for more rights and privileges than men, because feminism is anti men.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 09:14 PM
14

Feminism has never been about equality
/r/MensRights23/10/16 07:02 PM
18

Effectively she did
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/16 03:41 PM
12

They do I think, or at least I do, but it's hard without a masculine group to keep you grounded. Marriage/LTRs should never be an isolated relationship of just you and your woman, they should be networks of strong, properly dominant men complementarily loving beautiful, properly submissive women in order to build civilization. Both sexes need same sex groups to deepen relationships with and build the best version of their sex, and each sex's polarity should be heightened by the other's.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 01:30 AM
2

lol
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:15 PM
1

For a bit. I'm more interested in what comes after the current status quo but that's a conversation beyond the scope of this sub.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:55 AM
3

Men have a wall as well, it's just about a decade after women. However, sufficient wealth or power can push back that wall indefinitely in a way that just can't happen to a woman's youth and beauty.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:53 AM
2

At the rate that economics, politics, demographics and the climate are moving there's a fair to high chance of domestic insurrection in the US within the next 10-15 years already, without the importation of the third world.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:50 AM
2

The West in general is bad, but I've yet to visit Australia. I first gained knowledge about the MRM because of a false rape accusation. My two cousins were badly treated by their wives and shafted by their divorces. Both of my good school friends came from divorced homes. The "old order" system of marriage has just been totally destroyed, and what's taken it's place is a culture of feminine primacy backed up by a toxic mix of old order responsibility for men but new order authority for women, wh…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:38 AM
1

Oh I'll have children (not now I'm early 20s) but I won't be doing so without a legally enforceable parental document, sole ownership of my house, and lots of money in assets other than a bank account. If that proves impossible, I'll just emigrate. But fuck current parental and couple's law in the US.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:22 AM
1

I never want to get married under the current legal and societal order, but I agree it's sadly corrosive for relationships in general. I don't think it's going to improve until both culture and laws return to sense though.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:06 AM
2

By the data, yes.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:22 AM
7

I mean, more than 50% of marriages involve infidelity at least once. Humans are not polygamous as in some "sex at dawn" fantasy, however, we are not strictly monogamous either. It's in that grey area in between that male/female sexuality - especially young sexuality - plays out. The average woman can have sex far more easily than the average man. That doesn't mean it's impossible for the average man to get laid, this is not some "woe is me post". However, this does mean that it is significantly …
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:17 AM
2

I mean, men are much more effective at being violent than women especially in a political context, but then men are also much more effective builders, or athletes, or scientists, or programmers, or authors, than women. Clinton hopes to capitalize on that as well as the Women are Wonderful Effect to continue the mass migrations into America that have been occurring since 1965. And once the women are here, their men will come after.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:57 AM
3

A combination of objective (non feminine lunacy) facts, and mockery of the worst feminist positions. Feminism is anti-fact as well as anti-man, and proving that with both data and attitude is more effective than just one or the other.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:02 AM
8

Don't get married, period. She keeps her name, you keep your freedom.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 01:20 PM
3

Because the want to be. Pushing back against the stupidity of feminism deserves not only educating the majority, but also publicly mocking the radical minority until the social costs outweigh all benefits, since they're not going to listen to reason anyways.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 01:13 PM
1

Please do :)
/r/MensRights18/10/16 08:44 PM
1

Thank you, it always helps to have sources and I just couldn't remember the name.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:02 PM
2

I remember a USAF study from 1990 that showed at 45-50% incidence rate of false rape accusations, with the definition of false being that the accuser recanted (obviously without punishment). Either way, it's substantially higher than 6%, but seeing the number climb higher than the boilerplate "1-2%" that was the narrative for so long is encouraging.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:22 AM
3

"Trans was just a phase for her". Top fucking Kek.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 02:58 AM
3

I disagree. Certainly classically "modern" war is trending towards automation to make up for postmodern state's chronic shortfall in political will for casualties. However, an informed look at warfare since 1991 leads me to believe that it is the militia part-timer, and not the MQ-1 Predator, that will be the future of conflict. And militias need men and have no need of women.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 09:09 PM
2

Men can't be uninterested in sex. However, men can be uninterested in the outcome of each individual interaction with women, especially when keeping your eye on your larger, more important goals.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/16 08:14 AM
1

In my experience TRP does have respect for men who don't wish to be promiscuous. What TRP does not like is men not having options, because having abundance is the bedrock upon which healthy relationships with women are built. Since men have much higher sex drives than women, most men will take advantage of their options, at least initially.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 07:22 AM
3

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/books/review/Glazer-t.html
/r/MensRights16/10/16 07:01 AM
8

Lol, low effort bate mate
/r/MensRights16/10/16 06:37 AM
0

People refer to men rights as a hate sub because it goes against the grain of feminine primacy, and people will continue to call it such regardless of the language used. Besides, I'm not wrong. The political ideologies espoused in the article are misandric lunacy, and the fact that society is largely tolerating it at present is because they overvalue women and undervalue men.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:09 AM
-8

If more men simply gave them several inches rather than taking their politics seriously the world would be a better place.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 07:53 PM
1

Elephants are not themselves predators. Polar bears are, and have usable, clawed legs.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:31 PM
3

Not all women are feminists, and indeed most women don't want to be called feminists since the term is now (rightly) loaded with so much baggage. However, the overwhelming majority of women are content with enjoying the privileges that both femininity and feminism give them, and it is this in-group bias that lead to the beginnings of feminism in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:30 PM
21

Paving the way for "gender is a social construct"
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:13 PM
1

No, only pointing out that just because the MSM decides to run a story saying "AAAH MASSIVE RUSSIAN NUKE DRILL", it doesn't mean there's anything actually newsworthy occurring.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:53 PM
2

That exercise was the once-yearly regularly scheduled nuke drill, and the "involvement" of most of those 40 million Russians was simply watching PSAs on television.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:46 PM
1

And my assertion is that that will never happen. Women have not ever valued men like men valued women and won't ever, because "equality" doesn't exist
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:34 PM
3

Thinking that there is only a binary choice between gynocentric welfare as it exists currently and starvation is simply nonsensical.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 10:01 AM
1

It is the man's job to make the first move because women will never take the initiative. What is NOT the man's job is to assume all of the responsibility for all interactions.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:42 PM
9

You're over complicating things. When you meet a woman just ask her: "Are you a feminist" If she says 'Yes' - walk away.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:37 PM
2

Hypoagency is a frequent trope of women in general, but it's a requirement for feminists.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:21 AM
3

Give her a pass she's a woman, she's less interested in math
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:19 AM
0

You are wrong. Equality of outcome is antithetical to equality of opportunity. Now, aside from biological differences between men and women that makes "true equality" meaningless, the bigger problem as you point out is that feminism, since its inception, has been interested only in shaming men into giving more privileges to women and has been at best uninterested and at worst opposed to being held responsible as are men. Biologically, women will always be given preferential treatment because of …
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:07 PM
3

More the latter. I fully understand that men don't need test each other like men needed to when their group's survival depended on it. I do think some things could be improved. However, I simply do not trust feminism or women in general from defining what men need to change, because there is always an ulterior motive besides the best interests of men. Also, even me saying that there could be improvements doesn't mean I see stereotypical male behavior as a problem. Male behavior came about for ve…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 07:02 PM
7

Violence terrifies women, yet violence or the sanctioned threat of violence (carried out by men) is what undergirds the state that women rely on for almost everything. Feminism - as an outbranching of the feminine imperative as a whole - wants violence only completely on their terms. As well, men tease one another. It's a system of testing, to ensure that the men in the group grow stronger. Men have been doing this for millennia. But all male groups worry women and especially feminists for sever…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 06:46 PM
8

"Toxic masculinity" is any masculinity that does not act towards feminine defined goals, or in ways sanctioned by women. It's an act of social control.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 06:15 PM
1

No such thing as "fair". What is best for men is not best for women and vise versa. Combine that with sociobiological predilections for favoring women regardless of merit, and then the outright misandry of feminism, and I think some full throttle pro-male moves with no care given to "fairness" is past due.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 08:02 AM
2

If When they fail
/r/MensRights08/10/16 07:25 AM
8

Relevant username lol. Still mad from all the pogroms?
/r/TheRedPill08/10/16 05:44 AM
6

What do you think that is? In my opinion feminism will always demand more, or as in this case go back on its word and change the end goal
/r/MensRights02/10/16 07:15 PM
5

She could except that'd work against her. Feminism doesn't have an end point, and so concrete stated positions frequently change on the spot since the only goals are 1) female supremacy at the expense of males 2) don't make a woman feel bad.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 06:32 PM
1

Sure, except Watson has not and will not go any further to help Sudan except by addressing the UN delegations in New York. All the rest of her energy is spent trying to further feminize the West.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 06:27 PM
19

Remember "ban bossy"? It never ends. Feminism has loosed all bounds on female neuroticism and it frequently ends in open misandry and witch hunts.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 05:13 AM
0

Relevant username
/r/MensRights01/10/16 03:16 PM
1

I think "Feminine Imperative" works fine, and there's quite a bit already written about it under that label.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:25 PM
2

Thanks man, and I've enjoyed your quotes, as I've enjoyed our conversation
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:20 AM
2

Yeah the rape charge was dropped and I have no criminal record. It cost me my college scholarship and my relationship with my parents to a large degree. The thing that angers me the most isn't the individual, it's that the legal system worked as intended. Believing the accusation immediately, proceeding with charges even when the girl gave statements in my favor. Didn't matter. And yeah I know "not all women are like that" and I've loved and been with others in the four and a half years since th…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:54 AM
1

Maybe. Love certainly didn't help my false rape accusation, nor the 60/40 women/man college gap that no presidential candidate will acknowledge. But I think it's gonna take a collapse or crisis of some sort to bring back sanity out of necessity. Until then, men should check out as much as possible and focus on making themselves happy.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:20 AM
1

I mean, incentives matter, and currently there are some fairly hefty incentives for women to keep the system at the expense of most men. Feminism has never been about giving women greater responsibilities as well as rights, as you point out with suffrage vs the draft. And successive waves have been ever more corrosive and exploitive, but radicals drive movements. "Moderate" feminists might not hate men - though they're loathe to give up the privileges they have - and yet feminism passed the Dulu…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:46 PM
1

You're more trusting than I am then. Feminism isn't founded on logic, and each successive wave less so. Equality of outcome at any cost is the order of the day, and the costs are overwhelmingly borne by men.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:27 PM
3

There is no such thing as true equality. The average woman will always be seen as implicitly better than the average man, and will never be held to the same level of responsibility.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:12 PM
2

What are tests if not teaching examples?
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 06:55 PM
10

On the contrary; OP's woman's failure lead her to being more happily lead.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 06:53 PM
3

Yes
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/16 02:49 PM
2

Noting that women tend to perform far less well than men on every facet of physical performance is not hatred of women. Neither is predicting that standards for women will be lowered especially for them, as they were in 1978 when the Women's Army Corps was folded into the Army proper. That's wasn't equality, and this won't be either.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 11:01 PM
9

Bingo. She wants all the benefits of "men acting like men" without having to do any of the work to act "like a woman". Or, in short, she's a feminist.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:39 PM
5

It is relevant because eventually standards will be lowered to accommodate women
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:25 AM
5

Men don't stand up to women like they stand up to men. Feminism will end when it starves, and something that actually makes sense is built in its place. Until then, I'll keep abreast of threats, help out the men closest to me, and have as much fun as possible.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:31 PM
4

Again, per Heartiste: The goal of feminism is to maximally optimize the sociosexual goals of women while maximally impinging on the sociosexual goals of men.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:26 PM
1

Well, yeah, that's exactly what I said
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:17 PM
7

I think this guy might be going the Modest Proposal route
/r/MensRights15/09/16 06:17 PM
29

Because once women reach a critical mass in any group - especially a former all or mostly male group that they desperately want access to because of its success and social value - they begin altering group dynamics to favor women over everything else. This frequently includes trying to remove male groups entirely or provide female only support groups that are denied to men on pain of social exclusion, in order to further a female imperitive, even at the cost of the performance of the group that …
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:29 PM
2

Just wait, they'll get more stupid soon
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:41 PM
12

Because once women reach a critical mass in any group - especially a former all or mostly male group that they desperately want access to because of its success and social value - they begin altering group dynamics to favor women over everything else. This frequently includes trying to remove male groups entirely or provide female only support groups that are denied to men on pain of social exclusion, in order to further a female imperitive, even at the cost of the performance of the group that …
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:40 PM
1

Traditionalism is 1) not a single monolithic entity and 2) arose for very good reasons at the time that it did. Thing is, the circumstances that held then simply no longer do, due to the titanic changes of industrialization. So I'd agree that taking some lessons from Traditionalism would help a great deal, especially in regards to the blank slate and equalism fallacies that currently do so much harm. But, you can't repeat the past and I wouldn't want to try; a new balance based on men and women'…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:28 PM
3

Grass is always greener, друг. But I would say that qualitatively, Slavic girls have a lead on most Western women, it's just not the night and day difference some men say it is.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 12:57 AM
1

The Revolutionary War was hardly a rousing success. If you measure victory only by the definition of total and overwhelming annihilation of the enemy, then every country has only a few actual victories.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 04:43 AM
5

You mean aside from the Gulf War. And Bosnia. And Haiti. And Grenada. And the Phillippines. If your argument for drafting women is to emulate a country that took a 20:1 loss rate against the US military in the 1960s, then you're a fool.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 06:18 PM
2

The argument isn't that protecting women creates a rapid population expansion, but that doing so prevents a rapid population collapse. Women are the bottleneck, and that holds true even as you accurately point out that humans tend to live at their limits of energy and food supply.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:00 PM
2

Yep. Eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap. Any sociosexual system that does not hold that as a premise will fail in the long run and be terribly wasteful in the short.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:45 PM
1

Not yet officially
/r/MensRights03/09/16 07:26 PM
2

I thought studies had shown that men in aggregate are happier as of the past ten years?
/r/MensRights02/09/16 11:07 AM
12

Per Heartiste: The goal of feminism is to maximally optimize the sociosexual goals of women while maximally impinging on the sociosexual goals of men.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:59 AM
10

$25 Mil still seems a little paltry compared to the ludicrous amounts of malicious bullshit spewed in their direction by rolling stone, but I'm gratified that the case is moving forwards.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:43 AM
4

Free spanks for women. Gotta trigger them properly.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 10:27 PM
7

In other words: Hypergamy.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 09:54 PM
9

Both commenters in the post are men lol
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 04:04 PM
22

Of course she does. Feminism has never been about equality, and the aspects of outright female superiority and misandry inherent in it have only been growing stronger, and will continue to until feminism is starved.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 08:03 AM
3

Looks that way. She's got a slew of borderline to fully misandrist comments in her history. Kudos to her for being the very picture of a bitter lesbian feminist lol
/r/MensRights31/08/16 07:43 AM
6

She posts on actuallesbians. What is she doing here?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 04:04 AM
4

Haha you know, I'm not a huge Objectivist. I do agree that humans should pursue happiness, but I don't think that absolute laissez-faire economics or entirely individualist societies would be the best way to achieve that. My point is that since men's and women's ideals differ, and that what is best (socially/sexually/economically etc) for men is not what is best for women and vice versa, then if men and women are to coexist publicly it must be through compromise. Feminism is only interested in p…
/r/MensRights21/08/16 02:08 PM
5

I think declining birth rates has multiple causes but feminism is certainly one of them. Increased social services actually further decreases birth rates, although it's not a perfect correlation.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:02 AM
51

Fighting for privileges since ever. Votes for all men required signing up for the draft said Congress in 1917. Votes for all women required no service, said the same body three years later. Due to innate differences between men and women equality is impossible. What is closest is a compromise, but the last compromise was shattered by the whirlwind changes of industrialization and feminism has been completely uninterested in making a new one since its creation.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 04:58 AM
25

Women have always, always been more socially prized than men, seeing as they bear children. Women will never be held to the same standards nor face the same punishments as men, due to the Women are Wonderful effect, women's in-group bias that men do not have, and Men's higher sex drive. There will never be a time when criminal proceedings are exactly equal. What worked in the past was a compromise, and one will have to be reworked in the future because the status quo is entirely harmful. Feminis…
/r/MensRights21/08/16 04:49 AM
1

Which is why men should instead simply withdraw as much as possible from anything that would open them up to danger from the biased courts, and interact with universities and jobs only on their own terms.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 04:38 AM
63

Feminism has never been about equality.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 04:30 AM
1

I think it does. Moderates, by dint of being moderate, don't control where movements go. What moderates do is either accept or deny the goals set by radicals. The biggest threat most women pose to men (and the reason that I cannot take any type of feminism seriously) is by failing to refuse the obvious misandry that radical feminism holds as a core precept, while at the same time wishing to keep enjoying the benefits "moderate" social mores and moderate feminism gives to them. So, playing to fem…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:20 PM
2

Radical doesn't always mean bad. Radical simply means radical, and I define a radical as an individual that so deeply attaches a concept or idea to their own self image that they live their ideals. This also means that they will never stop pressing for their ideals, i e, there is no point (usually) at which a radical announces that their goals are reached and so self-moderates.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 08:58 PM
30

No, they will not ever stop of their own accord, because radicals never stop. And because they never stop, radicals tend to end up controlling the direction and tone that groups and movements take, and we have seen this with feminism over the past forty years leading to such travesties as the Duluth Model, incredibly biased family courts and now a persistent culture of misandry at many universities, media centers and workplaces. What fights radicals are other radicals. Waiting on the "moderate" …
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:49 PM
0

Well, according to both WHO statistics and those kept by those in the country I was in, it does: http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/ Make no mistake, I am no proponent of circumcision and will not be circumcizing my sons, but I view it like an amputation after trauma in that, all other things being equal I would be against it, yet the effects of HIV is at best a reduced life dependent on ARVs, and at worse death from HIV complications and so I'm for it only in this circumstance.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:24 AM
0

I mean circumcision does have a notable effect on the spread of HIV. I just consider that an emergency surgery, and I agree it has no place in the West.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 11:21 PM
1

WHO was good when I was in Africa. In almost all the other scenarios I've seen or read about though, they're incompetent at best and harmful a lot of the time.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 04:15 PM
10

Truth. Feminism has at best only been interested in equally of outcome. The backlash came when the third wave wasn't even satisfied with that.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 01:40 AM
1

I could. It'd just take things getting worse
/r/MensRights30/07/16 11:56 PM
2

Oi when it's time to chav, you gotta chav.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/16 02:51 AM
36

That's the entire point of them.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/16 02:53 AM
13

Did not expect a lindybeige quote here
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/16 05:15 PM
6

Bitches be tripping tackled
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/16 01:39 PM
2

You're describing a Tribe. Create and sustain a small group of men that you know share your values and you can rely on, and you not only improve your own life but start undermining the feminine imperative and our current legal/cultural order. Expecting to be able to "save" the country/world with a flip of a switch is naive. Save yourself and your group, network with other Tribes, and leave the rest.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 11:45 AM
2

Competition doesn't have to be all vs all. Creating an "in group" that you dearly, deeply support as opposed to a (much) larger "out group" that you compete against is literally what Men do. We usually call the in group a tribe but the nomenclature doesn't matter all that much.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/16 09:24 PM
1

3% of trans people? No, .5% of trans people, at the most.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/16 01:31 PM
2

I disagree but I'm not gonna change your mind so fuck it
/r/TheRedPill16/05/16 07:19 PM
1

They don't enjoy it more than me. I order them around and do what I want. It's playtime for me.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/16 02:32 PM
1

Holding women to the same standards leads to an incredibly high attrition rate amongst females.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 08:54 PM
1

Cut your losses until a tipping point is reached. There are two different objectives here: what's best for you ("you" being /u/TheeRyanGrey) and what's best for your group, with group being whatever entity larger than yourself you hold mental loyalty towards; it could be a country, a religion, race etc. TRP and the manosphere as a whole started as a crowdsourced way to answer the question of what is best for the individual man, i e, how to get sex while avoiding the trips and pitfalls that would…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/16 06:52 AM
1

True but that doesn't mean men have a duty to protect the current status quo and all its pro women biases
/r/TheRedPill11/05/16 02:56 AM
6

Both. The Overton window in Germany will never endorse nationalism because of WW2, and likewise the German right wing is either docile opposition or underground.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/16 06:02 PM
2

China is just as susceptible to the next economic crisis as the other big economies. I don't think a nation state is going to be the next big power, and it's precisely that the nation state has been declining for 70 years that both allows and drives current elites to gut it ever further.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/16 05:50 PM
21

I can but that's because I also really like tits
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 08:49 PM
6

Say "my privilege" and grin while she fumes. Then again I've met only a couple of them in my life.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 09:31 PM
10

Radicals drive movements. In any human group - and I do mean any group - those that most fervently agree or believe in the group control where the group goes ideologically. The job of moderates (and moderates by definition are the middle majority) is either to accept or reject the direction the radical fringe wants to go. Accept, the direction is set; reject, and the radicals need to go back and start in a new direction. /u/Meristry, you give a good example here of the latter. This sub isn't a m…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/16 06:10 PM
3

That's just a thought experiment. A slight dearth of men means that women now muse compete for men
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 02:58 AM
13

Kill the lowest two men, or even two men at random. Or, in times past, lose two men to accidents, warfare or disease. 8 men for 10 women builds in abundance, while still leaving enough men to actually get shit done. All else being equal, a slight majority of women in a society fixes an awful lot of intersexual problems.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 04:01 AM
3

Exactly, they're archetypes
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 02:46 AM
21

Oh please I know plenty of betas who can shoot. It doesn't mean worthless you know.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 09:45 PM
4

It turned out better than some of the horror stories. Cost me a lot though. You and I are almost identical in our views. The only thing I'd add is that I think a large portion of the "tough love" posts (Take the Pain is the one I'm thinking of in particular) seem to come in part from a one-upmanship in facing adversity, the AMOG tendency, and it can really piss me off because I do have a lot of anger over what has happened in the past four or so years that I'm not sure is helped by being told to…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 09:29 PM
7

False rape accusation brought me here. I can commiserate. What sort of things do you think are too extreme, and which things aren't extreme enough? I've had similar thoughts I'm just curious about your take.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 07:59 PM
1

They're both, the Madonna-Whore dichotomy doesn't exist. Whorishness is just a spectrum, based on just how deeply they've gone and who they've gone with.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 07:27 PM
14

Men evolved to manipulate the environment; Women evolved to manipulate Men. There's no reason women shouldn't be so good at playing the average man, since they've thousands of years to get good at it.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 07:25 PM
14

That's an excellent, excellent summation. I wholeheartedly agree that men and women are complementarian. The reason TRP exists is because our current (post)modern society has thrown intersexual relations so far out of balance.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 03:51 PM
9

It's not that women never communicate overtly; it's that all else being equal women will choose covert over overt. In other words the woman had exhausted all her covert means of saying she was attracted (because the guy was high SMV) and settled for openly asking because of it.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 01:54 PM
7

And even the "one man one women or we stone you for adultery" ancient Hebrews wrote of their King Solomon having a thousand concubines Power lets you break rules. That is the basic definition.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/16 02:35 AM
11

When/if vaselgel or something similar comes out, would you get the procedure and then forego condoms provided you and the girl were checked for STDs?
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 07:31 PM
2

What is best for the planet and what is best for me are not always the same. However I do agree, feminism and all the rest are products of an overly peaceful and stable time historically speaking, propped up by nonrenewable resources. As total energy levels start to fall, so will women's lib.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 06:59 AM
5

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/200902/do-wealthy-men-give-more-orgasms
/r/TheRedPill27/03/16 01:44 PM
6

Laughter, Lifting, and Looking for another girl.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/16 01:01 PM
17

Truth. There's a study that showed a marked improvement in the percentage of women who orgasmed during sex and an intensifying of said orgasms.... when the women knew the guy was rich.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/16 12:51 PM
0

Introducing contracts would be a hilarious anti-Hamster mechanic, provided you had the SMV to pull it off.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 08:27 PM
1

Yup, balance is everything. TRP exists because currently, things a FAR out of balance.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 08:24 PM
1

Average is a relative term. If you are surrounded by low performing men then achieving at an objectively high level is impossible to hide or camouflage. However, in the company of successful men, the average is raised, and it's much easier to perform well while also still being "one of the guys".
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 04:06 PM
1

Ever heard of Bersa? They're based in perpetually-broke Argentina but they employ(ed) Sig craftsmen and designs. The result is a ridiculously well priced pistol that shoots like a Sig. They use double/single action almost exclusively so trigger reset is an issue, but can be fixed with either a replacement or working on the spring. And even a full trigger replacement plus the gun costs less than an out of the box new HK!
/r/TheRedPill06/03/16 01:27 AM
2

Eh, H&Ks are almost always overpriced anyways but yours seems a bargain, they go for a thousand new.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/16 12:37 AM
5

Correct. The source of almost all intersexual problems is that what is ideal for women is not for men, and vice versa.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/16 12:12 AM
2

Ha if this were 1916 rather than 2016 then maybe.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 08:21 PM
2

If she's still your wife, how'd you deal with that?
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 08:01 PM
1

In the short term were agreed entirely. I was asking long term, because it's untrue that society laws or indoctrination haven't influenced both men's and women's behavior in the past or the present.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 11:22 PM
4

It's never quite so binary, and saying so presumes a male-inclusiveness that does not exist but does in females. I agree that Men in aggregate will always be the drivers of civilization to whatever end, but /u/cariboo_j didn't "hand the keys over". Remember, men evolved to manipulate the world, women evolved to manipulate men. Denying female agency even when men are "in charge" doesn't make you more intelligent, but it can make you more open to manipulation.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 06:38 PM
2

So aside from simply withdrawing from the traditional method of relationships to avoid being trapped by women's unending need for Assurances, how do men begun pushing back until we reach a new societal balance point?
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 06:24 PM
15

Sure but if it takes them until 30-35 to suddenly "get it" then what's the point?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:07 AM
5

True but in that case then figuring out that the woman wasn't worth it and ending things was his best use of "Game"
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 01:55 AM
10

Watch again, because it most assuredly does
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 02:32 AM
2

Agreed, if she continually perceives your worth as higher than hers. If that slips - and it might just be her perception, not objective reality - then she wants a replacement.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 01:51 AM
1

Yes I know, I just don't think that your version of qualified is shared by much of DoD.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/16 08:26 AM
1

Depends what "better" is defined as: the ability to be a competent fireteam leader, or the ability to increase Inclusiveness and Diversity in "the Greatest Military on Earth"
/r/TheRedPill05/02/16 07:58 AM
34

It's both. Militaries do not spend the majority of their time in close combat. Of course women are not as good at combat, but the real damage will be done in garrison where women will percolate throughout combat MOSs, which under the name of "equality" will invariably lead to lower standards and wasted billets.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 07:30 PM
21

Lol not in the slightest
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/16 12:15 AM
4

We're not really disagreeing here. Saying 'men and women are different' is sexist because is discriminates (divides) based upon sex. That discrimination is not malicious. The issue is that culturally all casual talk of sex differences is conflated with misogyny, and that's the pop-definition.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 08:20 PM
1

By definition, yes it is. Where you disagree with "the hivemind" is that sexism is inherently morally wrong. And for the record I agree with you.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 08:00 PM
6

"I hate all women" is the literal definition of misogyny. Culturally sexism and misogyny have become conflated when they should not be, doesn't mean misogyny doesn't exist.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 07:24 PM
1

Appeal to Novelty, specifically Chronological Snobbery.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 11:20 PM
9

Donatella now looks like the ninja turtle her name has always reminded me of.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 08:47 PM
10

Lots of good content on the married redpill sub. But many of those men don't advise marriage to single men which is telling.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 08:34 PM
2

Never gonna happen. The BundesHeer doesn't have the budget to go back to Hugo Boss
/r/TheRedPill06/01/16 07:32 AM
6

Cosmetics have been a female thing for millenia. Now, across history some men have used them as well but it's always rooted in making people look better which always benefits makes more as we are more visual. Heels were invented to grip stirrups better so yes they were a male thing but not for the reasons you think.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 07:51 PM
3

Eh. I think AWALT fits as a generalized measure of woman-specific attitudes and actions, but force fitting women into three "archetypes" doesn't bear out in my experience. I had a date with a "nerd" girl earlier today. We played tennis, cause she's sporty enough to do so, yet she also has a sizable social media following cause she cosplays. And has big tits. Basically what I'm saying is she has elements from all three "archetypes" yet she acts Hypergamously and loves that I take the lead. She's …
/r/TheRedPill04/01/16 11:58 PM
1

I had an awesome time in Montreal, but I was simply visiting. Bad experiences?
/r/TheRedPill13/12/15 08:05 PM
6

Montreal by culture isn't entirely Canadian. It behaves more like an awesome city state that happens to exist somewhat close to Toronto.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/15 06:10 PM
1

This is a very valid and nuanced point.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/15 11:39 PM
4

That's entirely true, but only if the energy per capita is continually and perpetually increasing. Eventually the Laws of Thermodynamics put a stop to that. The "Modern" (and current Postmodern) era are predicated to an enormous degree on fossil fuels. When those start to decline - barring some heretofore unforeseen technological replacement - then human society in aggregate will trend again towards the more traditional. History never directly repeats but it has and will rhyme.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 06:48 AM
24

Nope. There's no "commute authority" that could potentially ding you, unlike work which usually has myriad levels of management above you.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 12:04 AM
21

It isn't cruel. Cruel implies intent. This woman simply never cared at all. In her blinding solipsism it never even occurred to her that her husband might be hurting, and even when it became obvious she still chose Alpha Fux anyways.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 01:33 AM
1

Don't apologize, I enjoyed and upvoted your post.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 11:25 PM
2

But apparently not commas. I kid I kid, it's a good post but it'd be even better if punctuated
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 11:05 PM
2

Israel doesn't anymore. Israel does have all-female recon units but they have massively reduced their women in frontline roles.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 04:22 PM
14

That's kind of the heart of "just get it". I've had girls gladly admit that they love to dominated and even "abused" (one girl's exact wording), and they do this shamelessly. The important thing is that I was Alpha Fux for them at the time. I've had one of those same girls vehemently deny deny deny everything - before I'd proven my "Alpha" bonafides in her eyes and she happily submitted to anything I wanted. Girls are silly once you understand them.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 07:32 PM
3

Depends. The original ending had Richard Gere dumping the whore publicly then throwing money out the window of his limo as he drove away. Which Julia's character scooped off the ground after angrily screaming now that her perfect ending was spoiled. But (mostly female) audiences hated that ending, so they re shot it with the feelgood ending that turned the film into a blockbuster.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 12:38 AM
1

It removes the uterus. Google the rest I'm not a medical textbook.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 05:40 AM
2

Ovulation is when a woman's egg is released. It's the approximately weeklong part of her cycle where she can become pregnant, and likewise the week where she most values dominance, muscles, "Alpha" behaviors etc. What most people call the period is the after effects of the egg not being fertilized. It along with the wall of the uterus bleeds out, allowing a new uterine lining to form, and a new egg to be released the next cycle. This lasts a little over a week (from overhyped "PMs" pre menstruel…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/15 08:16 PM
2

Rollo talks about tracking his woman's cycle for precisely this purpose
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 10:47 PM
103

Precisely. Being a woman is a lifelong game of trying to have ones cake and eat it too. Ergo, being a man should be a lifelong game of making and enjoying your own cake, and sharing only when it's earned.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 07:25 PM
1

That's.... Kinda what I said.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 04:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter