TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DiscontentDisciple Archive

View 1 post and 9 comments by DiscontentDisciple on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

DiscontentDisciple/r/MensRights21/01/11 11:39 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If you're in Southern California Hit me up!
/r/MensRights23/12/11 08:50 PM
-1

This article didn't say anything about wanting him out of her life, just that her partner wanted on the Birth Certificate. This may be because other laws haven't caught up with her partner being allowed to visit in the hospital/school or some other reason. The Birth Certificate doesn't have anything to do with who visitation. And anyway, I think it's a little strange for a donor to be seeking visitation.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 12:52 AM
6

I don't know why you're upset. Ideally Donors shouldn't be listed as fathers. Removing him from the Birth Certificate will hopefully get him off the hook for any support etc.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 11:38 PM
1

You can't make a contract with the Child, but you may be able to make one with the mother that would require you to be reimbursed for Child Support Payments in the event that she's negligent in taking her Birth control or something. I'm not sure how enforceable it would be, but at least it's with a party who can consent over an actual cause, though you'd have to prove she was negligent, rather than just really unlucky.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 11:57 PM
1

Just in case = the Parachute. Staying with an Old Girlfriend = Ankle tied to airplane.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 11:54 PM
3

Or you could have Significant assets going into the Marriage and want to make sure they remain yours in this screwed one sided court system we have? Just in case? I'm not interested in any woman who wouldn't sign a pre-nup.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 09:33 PM
-1

Source? not that I don't believe you, I'm just wondering. I'm assuming the disparity is largely child bearing/Child Related?
/r/MensRights04/10/10 07:11 PM
-4

What this actually means is it's officially not allowed, but it will still happen, then they will do a weighted average of the two rates based on the % of their subscribers that are male vs. female and come up with the premiums. That's my point, eliminating discrimination where there is a bona fide reason to have it is retarded. If you need a Male actor for a role in a movie it is perfectly legal to only cast men, if men are statistically more likely to get into a crash when we're 16, then payin…
/r/MensRights04/10/10 07:10 PM
-3

Ok. I'm all for the Elimination of Discrimination against men, but if there's statistical evidence that gender impacts the likely hood of a given event it's not discrimination that needs to be done away with. Are we going to make women carry medical insurance policies that cover testicular cancer as well? Because that would be fair. And men need to carry policies that cover ovarian cancer? Please.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 05:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter