DisorientatedView Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
23	Circumcision: Why is it wrong?	Intactivism	DisorientatedView	/r/MensRights	13/06/17 03:29 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	Holding infants – or not – can leave traces on their genes. So what does the agony & trauma of circumcision do? It's just a mass exaggeration; it's evidently not the goal of circumcision	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 06:29 PM
0	Holding infants – or not – can leave traces on their genes. So what does the agony & trauma of circumcision do? Straw argument. Once again. Not even going to attempt to rebut this...	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 06:22 PM
1	Holding infants – or not – can leave traces on their genes. So what does the agony & trauma of circumcision do? Once again you're ignoring ALL the content of my argument. This is what's known as the 'straw man' argument. You're taking my argument and manipulating it into this overly simplified 'straw' argument which you then attack. It's clearly not working.	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 06:18 PM
1	Holding infants – or not – can leave traces on their genes. So what does the agony & trauma of circumcision do? If it's legal it must be right? They wouldn't make a law that's against the law dude.	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 06:12 PM
1	Holding infants – or not – can leave traces on their genes. So what does the agony & trauma of circumcision do? I think it's ignorant to term significant damage as the 'goal' of cgm	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 06:08 PM
1	Holding infants – or not – can leave traces on their genes. So what does the agony & trauma of circumcision do? Then why'a it legal, fool?	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 06:07 PM
1	Holding infants – or not – can leave traces on their genes. So what does the agony & trauma of circumcision do? Once again just doesn't acknowledge ANY of my points raised. You are this whole sub in a nutshell	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 06:07 PM
1	Holding infants – or not – can leave traces on their genes. So what does the agony & trauma of circumcision do? That's a logical fallacy. I wouldn't argue either since you know you're wrong	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 04:23 PM
1	Holding infants – or not – can leave traces on their genes. So what does the agony & trauma of circumcision do? You're not even listening to his argument. Circumcision for men is OKAY. You guys clearly don't read up on actual facts. I was circumcised when I was a baby so I know that it doesn't hurt. That's not a threat either; he was encouraging you to kill yourself.	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 03:42 PM
7	Circumcision: Why is it wrong? It's ironic because I always thought female genital mutilation was disgusting and wrong, yet failed to think about it applying to my own gender. Thanks for opening my thoughts.	/r/MensRights	13/06/17 11:23 PM
9	Circumcision: Why is it wrong? Woah. Point definitely taken - It's odd how I haven't heard about how illogical circumcision is until now. Thanks for the help.	/r/MensRights	13/06/17 11:20 PM
-5	Explaining to my circumcised son. I'm confused why is circumcision bad for you? Doesn't it decrease the chances of STI's and penal cancer that develops on the foreskin?	/r/MensRights	10/06/17 12:49 PM