TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dnavich Archive

View 3 posts and 180 comments by Dnavich on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

'A house divided against itself cannot stand.' That's millennia old argument I shouldn't have to say.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:48 AM
2

There are so many different connotations involved in the word Liberal I wouldn't know where to begin to defend that one.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:45 AM
0

actual censorship is an evil Then fail.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:43 AM
2

Tradcons... Bringing you chivalry since 1500s...
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:34 AM
3

So tradcons are being 'chivalrous' and making laws 'protecting' women and children from bio men? Sounds like tradcons are misandrist pukes.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:33 AM
1

there is evidence of the creation of the laws of physics from within the laws themselves There actually is if you cared to read up on it.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:24 AM
-1

Blacks need to be segregated from whites. Muslims need their own areas apart from Christians. Take your white rights shit elsewhere. Blacks had actual real oppression, still do.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:21 AM
3

Didn't even notice these person/s. Good moderation.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:10 AM
1

The left are the champions of equality We are the champions of the underdog. When watching war documentaries of Hitler's final hours in his bunker in besieged Berlin I found myself feeling sorry for the poor fellow and having to remind myself of who he was. This is why the left cannot finish their enemies. They can fight against someone stronger than themselves, but once they have defeated the enemy and the enemy lays ready for the coup de grace they often find it is not within themselves to del…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:56 AM
1

It is the ONLY solution, if the left and the right insist on fighting each other, rather than the feminists. I am far left and I put down my guns. Time to take male rights seriously and put down your guns. Otherwise there is simply NO HOPE FOR MEN. Anyone of any ideology must be welcome here so long as they one believe in male rights and two leave their other ideologies at the door in order to not drive away others of any different ideology. If you take male rights seriously.... That's the thing…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:44 AM
2

The source of the problem is women's suffrage. Since most right wing men are subscribers to chivalry, which granted and protects suffrage for women, what men on the right are willing to disavow chivalry not just in words but in actions and take back suffrage from women by force if need be. This is why a right wing mrm cannot defeat feminism. Right wing men are almost exclusively chivalrous gentlemen aka manginas.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 01:05 AM
0

Without any form of verification or trust how should I decide other than probabilities? You must grasp I don't actually care. There is a probability everything you said is correct. It is lower than the probability that it is not correct but that doesn't mean it couldn't happen. The point is that you are essentially arguing NAWALT. That argument has been done to death and doesn't really matter. It doesn't matter that on a rare occasion a man does in fact 'use' a woman by certain definitions of th…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:50 AM
1

Women also make up the majority of consumers (using men's money of course) so therefore capitalism is geared towards women by dint of them being the majority. The problem is neither capitalism nor socialism. Either would be dominated by women under current conditions. Take away their suffrage and you fix government. When men stop giving women their money you will fix capitalism. It is easier to argue unfairness in government than argue women are unfairly dominating the capitalist market. Therefo…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:45 AM
0

Look at that statement from my POV for one second. What is more likely. That a Depo shot just happened to fail? Or that a random redditor is lying? What is more likely? Be honest here for once. Now let's switch back to your POV. What is more likely. That your sister lied to you about the Depo shot? Or else that the Depo shot failed. It is far more likely that someone lies that the failure rate of Depo. Especially when that chain is two person long to get to me. And even when it's only one person…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:32 AM
1

If the right and the left wing men cannot work together on this one then feminists will win. Simple math. I say this as a left winger who despises the right, but feminists must be dealt with first. Then it will be safe for me to once again work to destroy the right.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:22 AM
1

Take away their suffrage. I spit on those men who gave it to them in the first place. The very first thing women in England did with the vote was to vote in the Tories. Men who fucking worked for a living were more interested in workers rights than Tory morality. Men voted labour overwhelmingly. Women stabbed men in the back and voted in Tories. Extreme right wing lunatics. Anyone arguing feminism aka women's suffrage is left wing ought to have their heads looked at. Women are right wing moralit…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:17 AM
0

Depo never ever fails. Except when women say they had it but didn't. Your little story about the depo shot makes me even more certain I am right.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:41 PM
7

No but I notice my inferences really struck a nerve with you. I was right wasn't I that he didn't sit down with the girl and plan to have children. He didn't did he. Rather she got knocked up and faced with becoming a father against his will aka being a victim of rape he instead lied to himself rather than admit he was raped. And we are just supposed to give her the benefit of the doubt that she didn't know about pregnancy or just forgot to take her pills or whatever excuse she gave him. She tri…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 04:26 AM
0

My doubts come from the fact women have privilege and men don't. Therefore it's easier for someone without privilege to become someone with privilege ie male to female Trans than it is for a privileged person to ever understand and become a non privileged person. So I can see m to f Trans being a completely real and legitimate thing. Men can turn into women because they don't have privilege getting in the way of that process of understanding their new position. Women however can never understand…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 04:17 AM
6

Well she should've had an abortion or dropped the kid on a doorstep of a fire station. I've only got third hand hearsay that he really wanted the kid and even you don't really know that cause you've only got second hand hearsay from the mother. More likely he was engaged because she had gotten herself pregnant on purpose. It's unlikely he sat down with her and decided they'd have a kid. More likely he knew nothing about it until afterwards. She probably got herself preggers on purpose to trap hi…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 04:08 AM
8

I just said it. What are you deaf as well as dumb. If a man has no say in reproduction then why should he have any responsibility towards the results of that reproduction?
/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:57 AM
2

Cry me a river
/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:44 AM
7

A female has sole rights over her pregnancy and so should have sold responsibility over the results of that pregnancy. So I'm with the ex on this one. Sounds like your sister is a piece of shit that thinks men are ATMs and slaves to pay for her lifestyle choices.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:43 AM
2

I believe in male to female transgender but have doubts about female to male transgender. Then again I've only met the former. Maybe Id change my mind if I met a f to m Trans.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:33 AM
1

the Left defends radical Islam without asking for anything in return For the moment. However if Islam acts against feminists, then feminists will NOT defend Islam anymore because ultimately they see them as just men who they hate. This will force leftist men to choose either feminism or Islam. I predict they will mostly choose Islam. I don't see radical Muslims disliking Western feminists any more than regular Western women There is leftwing Islamic thought. Also moderate Muslims. We could have …
/r/MensRights26/03/16 06:34 AM
1

France and Britain declared war on Germany for invading Poland, France and Britain didn't give a shit about Poland. Both statements cannot be true at the same time therefore you are wrong. Perhaps Britain could see that the USSR had a good reason for annexing half of Poland? Perhaps they could see how Hitler slaughtered the Jews in his half, which Stalin protected and evacuated the Jews in his half? Perhaps they knew Stalin was building his forces and would shortly come to aid Britain in the fig…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 06:12 AM
1

I checked your history and saw that you are an AMR poster. You take posts from men's rights cherrypick and distort them and post them up in AMR. FUCK OFF!
/r/MensRights26/03/16 05:39 AM
2

both Germany and Russia invaded Poland Stalin actually repeatedly requested to be allowed to deal with Hitler many years before WW2. Britain repeatedly said no. Stalin knew Hitler was a threat to the USSR and Europe and when Britain would not help deal with Hitler, Stalin knew he had to buy time to be ready. The Molotov Ribbentrop pact was an inevitable consequence of Britain's favor of Hitler. Stalin was never allied with Hitler. The pact was only a non aggression pact and only to buy time to p…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 05:31 AM
2

Women are as capable as men are at nearly every modern job Debatable. Highly debatable.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 05:09 AM
3

As a very leftwing MRA I absolutely agree with this. Further left wing mras can more effectively wedge the left of certain issues. For example we can more easily bring black males and homosexual men on board and employ them as spokespeople in the media because feminists know they look bad when they criticize these men. Feminists still hate them because theyre men, but other leftwingers will be split between supporting what becomes an issue of black or gay rights and feminism, and traditionally l…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 03:49 AM
-2

We could be seeing the accumulation of traits amongst certain classes. lol. no.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 02:55 AM
3

Trying to introduce BSDM without talking about it first (if this even happened) is not a crime unless as he was taking out his whip the girls said no but he continued without consent. Since he didn't continue without consent he is not guilty of a thing.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 09:22 AM
3

Then what is using the whole flock?
/r/MensRights25/03/16 09:14 AM
1

We are talking about rape here. Would she be guilty of rape.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 09:08 AM
1

If by 'redherring' you mean 'complication to the basic idea', then yes. Wrong. It's a red herring because the problem in your example is the purposeful transmission of a disease. It is not however rape. This discussion is about whether lying about status to bed women is rape. Conclusion: it is not rape.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 09:05 AM
1

Actually by soft I meant her body. I thought that was obvious. Men fuck women because women feel soft and feminine. It connect men to the opposite of themselves. American women have disgusting bodies hard not soft skin like leather and covered with hair like a man. American women are men with a vagina. If men wanted to fuck other men, they would. Many do. However of rather fuck a woman and there is no such thing as an American woman. Hard leathery hairy men with cunts. Physically. Mentally, Amer…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 09:01 AM
1

Thank you for seeing what I see and also presenting a superior analogy to mine.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:54 AM
1

Correct
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:54 AM
1

This.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:53 AM
1

AWALT.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:12 AM
8

So say someone lies about having a cold? You'd have dinner under 'false pretenses'. They pass the cold onto you. Rape? The purposeful passing on of more serious diseases like HIV is already covered by law. That law is not rape. Bringing up disease is a redherring to this discussion. Especially since you ignored my question about lying about being an architect or about being famous. If I ask a chick to fuck and she says no and then I say are you sure I'm a famous person and she says okay then but…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:11 AM
1

Wow
/r/MensRights24/03/16 03:12 AM
2

What
/r/MensRights24/03/16 03:11 AM
1

Reading your reply I don't think you know what hypergamny is.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/16 11:47 PM
1

Male lives matter
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:41 PM
7

American women white or black are the most privileged and thus the most worthless women on the planet. Get a soft Ukrainian girl under you and you'll never go back to American sluts.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:39 PM
26

I don't believe in mistaken consent. Where does such a concept begin and end? If I lie and tell a girl I'm an architect to get her into bed can she then have me charged for rape? Either the other party consents or not. They consent to what they see in front of them. If they consent based on something else that's their problem. Duress blackmail force, okay. Mistaken consent? Just one more way for females to fuck men over if they give up their vagina because the man claims to be famous. What this …
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:37 PM
6

The old 'overweight used to be attractive' myth.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:16 PM
1

I approve of m to f transsexuals. I believe m to f transsexuals really do become women. I don't know and don't care whether this is true for f to m transsexuals. Further I believe m to f transsexuals greatly benefit me in certain ways, and because they discomfort feminists especially TERFers
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:09 PM
1

Let's hope they lose their heads.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:05 PM
1

Well to be precise women shouldn't have had the right to vote at that specific time due to the reasons I mentioned. Women tend to vote trad con because they have nothing better to do than to gossip be scandalised and worry about their neighbours morality. Men tend to vote labor because they have more important concerns regarding their safety and rights at work. Women don't care about men and they don't suffer the responsibilities of men especially at that time. So at that time women shouldn't ha…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:47 PM
1

Past 15 id say if no one was around... Lol
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:38 PM
6

That is as bad as any ad hominen. Btw conspiracies do exist. Obviously the CIA didn't invent feminism. However in the 60s and 70s and perhaps afterwards the CIA did attempt to influence and steer the movement and did infiltrate it.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:16 AM
6

Down voted for name calling. Btw there is evidence the CIA was behind feminism.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:56 PM
0

You argued that men are the only ones who "evolve" and women are vampiric creatures. Nope. I said each sex has certain traits they have evolved in relative isolation. This is obviously true from even a cursory understanding. Men did not develop the nipple because it had no effect on their genetic fitness. The costs for the nipple fell on the female body and only females developed it. Men still get the nipple but passively through their X chromosome. They get a non functional version of the nippl…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:37 PM
1

My 'case' is backed up by first year evolutionary biology. It wouldn't matter if I was foaming at the mouth, it wouldn't stop facts being facts. As for the experiments go Wikipedia them.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:07 PM
1

I don't believe you. Further no one here has refuted me. If you'd studied biology at university you'd know genders do evolve certain traits in isolation from each other, and other traits together. The fact you're denying this basic fact I learned in my first year at university tells me either you didn't understand the subject or else you're lying and didn't attend university at all.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:05 PM
0

Yes you are
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:03 PM
1

This is a list of half truths and misunderstandings of the science. You don't know what you're talking about and I cannot be bothered correcting you. Go read a textbook that's not high school level biology.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:01 PM
1

There are two types of chimp. Common and bonobo. Species can interbreed if chromosomes can be made to match up enough. Some species an interbreed even with different numbers of chromosomes so long as they are in roughly the same positions on the DNA strands so they can be made to match up. Due to the closeness of their DNA and the largest difference being a single chromosome number humans should be able to interbreed with any variety of chimp with moderate difficulty. Fusion of human sperm and c…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:58 PM
6

Um it was meant to be funny and satirical not taken seriously but maybe I didn't do it right.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:39 PM
5

This unfortunately. I remember reading about the labor movement in England after World War One and how men voted Labour because men worked in factories and coal mines and every hard manual position. Bettering their conditions was extremely important to men. However as females had the vote at this time, and females did NOT suffer the hardships of manuals labor and had no stake in bettering labor conditions the thing women were interested in was prudish morality. There were also more women than me…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:37 PM
1

He would be thinking it, but wouldn't dare say it because then the feminists would cause trouble for him and try and get him fired. Instead he would say that harassment will not be tolerated and shit like that he knows is false but has to say.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:25 PM
-6

She could be hot if she didn't dye her hair lesbian pink. Then she wouldn't be charged.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:20 PM
1

There is no legal right to represent half the employees in any given profession. This should be true but it isn't any longer. Otherwise explain quotas for women?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:45 PM
1

I did read that and that's why I included what my position is rooted in... Read the last part of my comment about the current state of relations between the sexes. I want women. I want to not want women because of how terrible women can be to men these days while also getting away with it. If it was legal for a man to rape a woman it would probably be reasonable for every good looking woman to avoid all men so that she doesn't get raped by a perpetrator who then doesn't get punished for the rape…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:44 PM
0

Well yes obviously everyone should have equal opportunity but when you say equal rights feminists will then say they have the right to compose fifty percent of every role. Some roles they cannot do. Therefore whenever a standard prevents them from filling that role they accuse the standard of breaching their 'rights' and lower the standard and bring in quotas. You see how discussion of equal rights is problematic because feminists use the concept of rights to mean essentially rights to equality …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:34 PM
0

It's more honest than women who pretend not to be whores. Women always cost.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:20 PM
4

You realise no woman has the right to my sexual attention right? I can say I don't want to want sex with any woman or none and it's simply my right. This is literally playing into double standards here that essentially say I have to be sexually attracted to females or else I am misogynist simply because I was born straight. Try telling a female she has to want to fuck males else she is misandrist. Btw I don't want to want females simply because being in a relationship or having any contact with …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:17 PM
1

Nope
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:10 PM
-1

Get this woman's daughters working in a whore house ASAP Whoring is honest work and they should have to take whatever job they can get
/r/MGTOW22/03/16 02:05 PM
1

I don't believe we live under patriarchy. I believe that patriarchy exists as a concept but no longer exists in real life in any western countries. In fact I believe western countries are now matriarchal. In Saudi Arabia patriarchy still exists. It doesn't exist in our society. I've already said this many times but you seem to not grasp this. Feminists believe we live under patriarchy. I believe we live under matriarchy. That is opposite viewpoints. As for calling me a fuckwit that is totally un…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:51 PM
2

I know but I need sex to feel the deeper form of connection with another being. For me life isn't worth living without that connection. Therefore I cannot be fully MGTOW and need females in some capacity for now.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:43 PM
0

Because women don't have the ability to do this job. However equality says there should be fifty fifty women doing this job. Therefore quotas. Therefore lowering standards for women only. Equality, when men and women have different abilities, equals quotas. Equals lowering standards to allow women to pass when they shouldn't.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:39 PM
-1

If my desires not to interact sexually with women are misogynist then gay men are misogynist because they desire not to interact sexually with women either.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:12 AM
1

I know it. However transhumanism promises an end to this with female androids and artificial wombs, so men can be free of women, but still have sex and companionship. Transhumanism should lead directly to female extinction.
/r/MGTOW22/03/16 10:05 AM
1

You said women wanted polygamy - True or False? True Feminists say the opposite. You said "Patriarchy outlaws polygamy and enforces monogamy.” - True or False? True Feminists say the opposite. Therefore you agree with Feminists and Feminism that Patriarchy oppresses women by controlling their sexual desires. The patriarchy 'controls' female sexuality in the same way a law against rape 'controls' a rapists sexuality. In this I agree with feminists. However feminists say this is a bad thing and th…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:04 AM
2

I am not disgusted by the thought of homosexual acts but it simply does not make me turned on. It would be like fucking my hand. It might get me off but its not what I actually want, intimacy with a female body, and so wouldn't satisfy more than masturbation. If I was the slightest bit turned on by men Id go for it simply to go full MGTOW.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:54 AM
0

This sounds like you are calling all gay men misogynists. No gay man wants to fuck a woman. Is that misogyny? Do gay men have to want and like fucking women or be accused of misogyny? All I said is that I wished I was gay. Unless gay people are misogynist, how is what I said misogynist. What you said sounds homophobic.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:43 AM
1

by your own admission and in your own words you have literally just said that women "wanted polygamy” I believe women instituted and desired polygamy. This happened before patriarchy. Feminists say men wanted polygamy to oppress women. They say this happened under patriarchy. See how that is the OPPOSITE viewpoint? There is such a thing as Patriarchy Yes; patriarchy is a society ruled by men. Not led, ruled. Patriarchy outlaws polygamy and enforces monogamy. Women hate it because they love polyg…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:31 AM
-3

You should know better than to claim SJG 'invented' punctuated equilibrium. We say Darwin invented evolution when technically Wallace did. SJG invented PE in a similar way in that he created synthesis of the previous findings named it described its and popularized it. I do not share your belief that women are mentally inferior to men. A neuroscientist would be aware of the research into intelligence that shows that women's intelligence is concentrated around the middle of the scale while male in…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:22 AM
1

Explain to me why this isn’t the very definition of a Patriarchal system as Feminists describe, in which a small elite of ‘superior’ men (taller, stronger, smarter etc.) dominate whatever social group they are in, having a harem of women and exploiting or abusing the other men who are shorter, weaker, less intelligent for their own gain? Patriarchy actually outlawed polygamy or at least greatly discouraged it. Patriarchy was actually the regulation of the mating market to force women into monoga…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:02 AM
1

for the duration of civilisation that civilisation has been male and Patriarchal? In essence yes. Though feminists stress matriarchal theories, which have been disproven. Tribal hunter gatherer societies were (mostly) egalitarian (but never matriarchal); they were communist, male led, with female privilege in mating. you fundamentally agree with Feminism in that the nuclear family is utterly ruinous and destructive to the material, physical and mental well-being of individuals and should therefo…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:50 AM
0

we didn't evolve from apes, we evolved from an apelike ancestor, whose descendants split, some evolving into humans and other lineages evolving into the ape types so we are cousins, I guess, with apes possible still close enough to interbreed with bonobos and or maybe orangutans
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:32 AM
1

You misunderstand. Patriarchy never existed in hunter gatherer societies not in the ones still existing today nor in our deep past. For 190,000 years of the last 200,000 years we humans have been egalitarian (mostly) hunter gatherers. In these societies women choose who they will associate/mate with and when. Google Briffault's law. Polygamy was widespread in pre patriarchal societies. These women would rather share a single high status male than have a single low status male to themselves. The …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:15 AM
-4

You do realise most evolutionary biologists speak of evolution in anthropomorphic terms. When I say women were selfishly using hormones to expel a pregnancy preterm and the fetus fights back using their own chemical warfare suite I did not mean either the female or the baby does so consciously. This warfare is balanced perfectly between both actors survival and is entirely due to autonomous systems such as hormone production not conscious choice. Again most evolutionary biologists speak in these…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:52 AM
3

I agree. I believe in equal opportunity and competing on merit. I rarely get dved for saying men are stronger. However I also think men do better at intellectual jobs, and then I get down voted for saying that.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:39 AM
6

I've started to hate women more and more. Today I utterly despise them. I dream of a future where women are extinct men are immortal and we have female androids for sex and companionship and artificial wombs for children.
/r/MGTOW22/03/16 06:14 AM
2

Sigh. You're right of course.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:05 AM
6

You should've agreed to loan her money then kept putting it off until you fucked her then simply not give her any. That's what I'd have done but then I think I hate women.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/16 05:48 AM
-5

So why did they all fail? Because I thought according to men's rights men and women are perfectly equal in all things. Doesn't male rights work for equality? How is equality possible when men and women are not equal?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:38 AM
-1

If men and women do not evolve traits in comparative isolation to each other then explain how any traits evolve on the Y chromosome? Remember women do not have not pass on the Y chromosome. Only men have it. Only men pass it on. Therefore if all evolution is done equally together between genders as you claim the Y chromosome could never have altered even a single bit from day one when it first appeared. We know this is false because we can measure the number of mutations that have appeared on th…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:15 AM
-7

You mean wide hips? Wide hips is their contribution, while men contributed big brains. Wonder which is more important. BTW they didn't evolve wide hips to allow big brains. That would be impossible as evolution doesn't plan for the future. Rather men forced women to evolve wider hips because men kept evolving bigger and bigger brains, and those heads were coming out like it or not. Quite funny actually thinking about that. So females evolved wide hips in response to the bigger heads, not so that…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:04 AM
-6

Species evolve, sexes don't. False and also meaningless. Or did men equally evolve the nipple as females did? Nope. Females evolved the nipple! Men have been subjected to ten times the selective pressures as women. Men did all the evolving that made people, people. Women got the results of all that natural selection passively, the same way men didn't evolve the nipple, women did, and so women got the fully functional nipple, and men got the vestigial non functional nipple. Men evolved the traits…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:42 AM
1

I understand what you are saying but judges use probabilities all the time in court such as when the defendant says events happened a certain way and the judge has an expert evaluate how likely those events were. Further this wouldn't be applied to rape cases where there is other evidence, only when there had been a string of rape claims, each without other evidence, and each found unproven or non guilty. If the victim was actually raped all those times then there would be some other evidence av…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:18 AM
0

Just because you don't like the conclusions I come to through logic doesn't mean the process wasn't logical. Nor does it mean the conclusions are wrong. Just that you don't like them. But it is so like a female to confuse their feels for facts. BTW since you focused on your emotions and so missed my point Ill restate it for you; my point was that a man should never ever be convicted of a crime based on the sole testimony of a woman. If a woman says a man did something and the man says he didn't,…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:11 AM
1

MGTOW with sex robots is what I look forward to.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:05 AM
2

And TRP was, in turn, taken over by highly unpleasant/unpopular/unlikeable PUA types a long time ago. Your bias is showing
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:47 AM
2

I want to turn gay so I don't have to fuck or ever again touch a women to feel connected.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:44 AM
-16

Women are physically inferior to men. This is so easy to prove, and accept, by nearly everyone. So why is it so hard to accept that this holds true for other traits as well. For example men on average have higher iq than women, on average. So they adjusted the iq tests to favor women. Despite this men STILL get 5 to 10 points than women, on average. Men are mentally superior to women. Why is the physical superiority accepted but so rarely the mental superiority despite all the evidence?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:42 AM
1

You know what. There is only a single line of evidence we need to show women have the power in mating. The fact that in our deep past for every ten women who reproduced, only one man did. If men had the power, more would have reproduced. If the power was shared equally then we would have equal numbers of male and female ancestors. You must surely know that while the factors you claim have some effect on the balance, the balance is still massively weighted in females favor.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:25 AM
-5

I earn 100% of all the money and my wife earns 0%. But we both have 100% access to spending all of the money that comes into the household. Well that's a quick way to get cucked but hey you should know that already if you are here.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:13 AM
2

If this woman had been hot enough her word alone would've put all eleven men in jail for the rest of their lives. The ONLY reason this woman failed on the eleventh goal is that she is ugly. Pussy privilege.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:06 AM
2

Her head?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:04 AM
1

The woman herself is just a crazy person When a woman does something bad she's just crazy, but when a man does something bad he is a bad person. You are buying into the leniency on women society standard.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:58 AM
0

No its not. If a woman claims she was raped one a year every year for a decade and not one of those accusations have resulted in conviction then its safe to assume she is a liar. In fact rape number two would've been enough to understand she is a liar and punish her for every subsequent rape accusation with harsher and harsher punishments until she stops. The punishment she just got is not severe enough. She needs to go to jail for the same length of time as the person she accused would've gone …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:57 AM
-1

This is why in Muslim countries the testimony of a woman is only worth half that of a man's. In fact it takes two women to witness something before it means something. If a woman claims rape and their is other objective evidence proving the rape occurred then the rapist is charged. However if there is only the word of a single woman, and no other evidence, it counts for nothing. This is how it should be. The Muslims know just how sly devious and sociopathic women are. Women are liars. Every soci…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:51 AM
-1

Bullet ----- her brain < splat
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:06 AM
1

I'm fairly self aware so I realise it could just be me imagining that people are looking at me but some events have confirmed people do look at me because I'm too tall. Recently for example I was shopping and I overheard a woman laughing with her pre teen daughter at me. The daughter was staring at me and the mother turned and started laughing and poked the daughter in the chest and said something I didn't hear entirely but contained the word 'stare'. I glared at them and they turned away quickl…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:52 PM
2

Any woman post 30 has zero sexual market value to me. Even when I'm that old I won't date them. I would rather pay for the bodies of young whores.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:25 PM
2

Until I finish masturbating, then the groans get annoying and I turn them off.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:44 PM
2

Women's whole reproductive strategy is based around taking resources from men This
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:31 PM
3

Most men are stronger than most women.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:28 PM
1

Due to the way families are structured, even today, women are much more likely to be caring for their children while the father is out working. If it is, say, 50/50, then women spending more time with their children will unfortunately lead to more women murdering children than men. Is that an inherent bias? Wrong. The study compared single fathers with single mothers so time in care is not a factor, negligence was not included in the study only murder, with controls for socioeconomic situation a…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:19 PM
1

Keep up the racism.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:57 PM
2

Many of the male dominated fields that got destroyed over the past 50 years had never actually seen an influx of female workers. That's because those fields were ones which wen didn't want to do as they are loud dangerous and hard. But when women pushed men out of the cushy jobs they still had an effect on the male only jobs as there was now a surplus of male workers competing for those jobs. If females had been introduced into the workforce slowly then yes economic growth could have assimilated…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:54 PM
1

And this is why you're being shunned. You don't debate honestly. You lie and put words in people's mouths. You ignore the points others make. I made an effort spent my time reaching out and talking to you rather than moving on from a lost cause like everyone else and you answer glibly rather than with intellectual honesty. I'm moving on. Good luck with being a doormat for the feminists.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:41 PM
0

If women are inherently more likely to murder their children than men, what other explanation could there be other than ethical inferiority?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 11:26 PM
3

Women in the workplace is a boon for capitalism as it doubles the supply of workers and halves wages due to laws of supply and demand.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 11:21 PM
1

I think I hate women.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 11:14 PM
4

Especially since the field is biased against them.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 10:42 PM
1

So a rape survivor and a cancer survivor walk into a bar and the cancer survivor said 'you should've covered up' and then the rape survivor says 'you too' Is this rape and cancer joke not funny?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 10:34 PM
-1

Single mothers are far more likely to harm and even murder their children than singe fathers. This proven difference in the stats with gender as the only variable is literally proof of women's ethical inferiority to men. Men's rights likes to say women love children, just not men. I believe this is incorrect. I believe women love neither men nor children, only themselves. I believe women particularly single mothers are inherently sociopaths.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 10:24 PM
1

Why don't you just stop judging people that follow the definition instead of branding feminists as the same people that AREN'T following the definition, yet, incorrectly say they are feminist? Why don't you go tell the modern feminist movement that they are not feminists because they don't conform to your dictionary definition. Go right now and tell the feminists on the feminist sub here on reddit they are not real feminists, and see how quickly they ban you. The reality is the majority of those…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:59 PM
0

Saying that I invalidated my point just because I included a 'large black guy' implies racism. What is it about a large black guy that ruins the point, while sans the large black guy would've been fine, as your sentence structure implies? What you said is racist. BTW my point was that I can be as offensive that my thoughts and imagination and where I direct my eyes are mine and mine alone, as inviolable as any woman's body. That mens gaze and mens fantasy cannot be regulated the way feminists wa…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 10:43 AM
2

I am a feminist here trying to co-exist and join both communities, unfortunately I have been shunned away Post in support of male rights in a feminist sub and see if feminists will agree that, men have issues, and men's rights is a legitimate movement to address those issues. merely for using a certain word in it's dictionary defined way. It has been pointed out to you there is a gap between definition and practice. which goes against the very definition of the word feminist" No true Scotsman fa…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 10:41 AM
0

you invalidated your point by including a 'large black guy' This screams racism. I really hope this was mistaken sentence structure.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 09:58 AM
1

It's not a false dichotomy as I'm not saying there is only two possible choices. Rather I'm saying that it literally doesn't matter how you choose to act feminists (note I said feminists not women and also that you personally used the words rabid feminists not women) feminists will invent stuff regardless of how men act. Even if you choose to be a doormat feminists will not accept you. Feminist men are not accepted. Feminist men cannot even have an opinion without accusations of mansplaining. Th…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 09:38 AM
0

I don't think it matters if I behave as a raging rapist or a feminist doormat. They will invent stuff regardless because of their intellectual dishonesty.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:47 PM
0

My opinion is that women are physically inferior as you've stated but also mentally inferior on average and therefore there are less suitable females for mentally or physically demanding positions than there are males suitable for those positions. Personally I also think women are ethically and morally inferior as well but that's a subjective matter as how can you measure ethical ability.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:34 PM
1

Hmmm just wait a minute..... Fap fap fap..... Yep I contain cream!!!!
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:29 PM
1

Mostly collecting reasons for other people not to. So you are a shill and a troll. Thanks for admitting that. Hopefully you now get banned that you've admitted you are not here in good faith. Men's rights doesn't ban feminists for being feminists (while the feminist subs ban men's rights activists immediately and refuse to debate them) but as far as I am aware what you just admitted to is being here in bad faith.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:25 PM
-1

Yes it does. I actually have both the right to eye rape someone and rape them in my imagination. In fact when feminists use the word eye rape they have two meanings for it. One objectification and two imagining doing sexual things to the person.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:19 PM
1

I need someone to hold her still
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:17 PM
2

Sweden is a fuckhole. Only have to look at what they tried to do assange for to know that.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:30 AM
7

How about you go to the feminists here on reddit and try posting about a men's issue and see how quickly you get banned. Even if as you say feminism was for women and men's rights for the men it is feminists who attack men's rights activists in the media and social media and it is they who did it first. When asked they deny men have issues they deny men's rights is for men they say men's rights movement shouldn't exist it's just sexist and bad and many will claim feminism is for men and women bu…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:22 AM
4

It's called an opinion dickhead. I didn't tell others to believe it I said it my fucking personal opinion. It's sexist I already said that. It's not representative of men's rights because I'm more red pill. But I have the right to hold sexist opinions as much as I want. What's a feminist like you even doing here?
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:11 AM
22

It isn't though. Feminism gave women the right to vote, a right which men have had since the very start of democracy Nope. Men had the vote only a few years before women got the vote. Men fought and died and seized the vote and the women asked for the vote and men handed it to women on a silver platter. As for the rest of your argument it is a pure no true Scotsman fallacy. You're saying feminists stop being feminists when they go beyond equality because definition. I say the majority of those c…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 05:01 AM
-4

I don't think men and women are equal. There are differences socially and biologically between the genders. I believe this too. I do however believe in equal opportunity so that outlier females (which do exist) can if they choose do work that usually men would do, like truck driving or coal mining or even CEO or president. But these females like males have to earn their positions on merit, not be handed them with quotas. I believe no restrictions, equal opportunity, and outcome independent. If I…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:52 AM
0

Plus the doubling of the labor pool and women's inherent inferiority as workers.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:44 AM
1

Feminism has been the biggest boon to capitalism in the west since the invention of free enterprise. It has doubled the supply of workers and disguised the low productivity and utility of those new workers so that they can hire the higher productive men at the lower wages a greater labor supply provides under threat of replacement by a woman. Feminism keeps wages low and labor supply high. All these feminists shilling for more and more women to participate in the workforce just comes at the cost…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:41 AM
2

If they are referring to housework well guess what a few hours each day of light cleaning and shopping once a week mostly for yourself with someone else's money isn't real work. 'Women's' work as they define it (isn't that sexist to define that as women's work) is less valued than full time work at a job because it actually is less valuable.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:33 AM
36

Imagine two bars of equality, if women are 90% equal in one area, then they should be taken up to 100%, the same as men, if men are 90% equal in another area then they should be raised up to 100% with women This is the heart of what is wrong with your statement. There are plenty of areas where men are not equal with women. What is feminism doing to address those areas on behalf of men? Feminism has taken university attendance from majority male right through equality without stopping to majority…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:24 AM
17

To be fair... Mr. Hogan was a complete dumb ass Victim blaming
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:06 AM
8

Gawker breached Hogans privacy. Why shouldn't he be able to sue gawker? Because he's a man? Because he had a manhood rather than a womanhood? Gawker caused him verifiable damages. They deserve to be taken down.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:05 AM
42

It's people like this that give feminism its bad name, It's feminist dogma that gives feminism it's bad name 99% of feminists want equal rights No they do not. Lol. Feminism is about female empowerment without limits equality in name only with no mechanism to stop the empowerment when it becomes equal. Feminism is therefore female power. Like white power. It's a supremacism.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:48 AM
-78

I enjoy eye rape. I told a feminist the other day that I had the right to rape her with my eyes and in fact rape any female in a public place with my eyes. I told her she doesn't control my thoughts or where I point my eyes and that from now on whenever I saw her I would picture her nude and being raped by me and a large black guy, with her the rape salad sandwich in the middle.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:46 AM
2

I'm a white man and I didn't support her against a black man. I voted for Obama. But I will never vote for her. So they're lying.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:39 AM
1

I would've voted sanders but between trump and hillary cunt I cannot decide whether to go trump or else stay home.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:36 AM
2

I think but not sure arnt Jews White? So technically the Jews are resisting her! I'm Russian ethnic and male. I'm resisting her. OMG Russians are resisting her as well! (Does Russian count as white? I ask because my skin is vampire white and features perfect Slavic, I am pure Russian, but sometimes racists call me a mongol because I'm Russian.)
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:33 AM
1

Sanders supporters are not white men but just men of every color. But of course they cannot come out and directly attack men who are not white so instead they claim sanders supporters are all white men and white men. Not to mention how racist that is subsuming black and brown men as white men.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:27 AM
1

I would have voted for Sanders in a heartbeat. I was genuinely excited about him. Trump vs Hillary I have not decided whether to vote for Trump or just stay home. Trump is closer to Sanders in some ways but still too close to Hillary ideologically that I don't know if I can hold my breath and vote for him just to help defeat Hillary or not. I will never ever cast a vote for that toad that is Hillary. She is the most despicable creature I have ever seen in my life. I would vote Richard Nixon over…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:19 AM
3

a helpless waif dashed upon the rocks and barely escaping an army of angry men. I actually preferred the waifu Lara croft. Way more masturbatable. That may be because more polygons but also I enjoyed seeing her hurt and in pain in a realistic fashion. Even enjoyed the horror setting and story for once.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:55 AM
1

I hope so. Feminists cannot be worked with as their goals are diametrically opposed to equality and men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:42 AM
0

Women
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:42 AM
2

Universities are pretty free to expel people. They bloody well are not. They have laws they have to follow and can be sued for wrongful expulsion. What criminal charge would you suggest applies? Slander will be a good start. Sue for damages. Maybe perversion of justice.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:49 AM
1

Feminists say they are an equality movement not just for females therefore based on that self definition they should be caring about and working to fix pre existing male issues. Further the gender imbalance in universities was caused by feminists and therefore even if they were lying about feminism being inclusive this issue is still their mess to clean up. The fact they don't work to fix make issues proves they are not inclusive. The fact they don't work to clean up their own mess that is harmi…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:38 AM
0

Combats the women are wonderful effect.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 05:14 AM
7

I suffered severe burns to my eyes and lost vision in my left eye from an assault involving being held down and scalded with hot water. It's the worst pain imaginable. This woman should be killed.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 05:13 AM
4

Put money into an offshore account drain your savings terminate life insurance empty out your retirement plan/s 401ks so on and then up and leave the country to Mexico or further down. No alimony child support no beast master sucking on you like a black hole. Go ride some lovely brown Mexican women who are soft like velvet under you. God their young skin is so soft. Live it up like a king down there.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 05:10 AM
2

What steps are we taking to correct imbalances that favor males? This is a complicated question that I could just answer glibly and move on but I'll try to do it some justice. Men's rights is only beginning. We have no effect on society at the moment nor on legislation. Not only cannot men's rights help females we cannot yet help males. I was not referring to previously existing biases and imbalances that feminists fail to address but ones they cause by their own actions. They caused the gender …
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:55 AM
1

Many on this sub say feminists are for equality and we should work with them.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:45 AM
1

You can if the second unfairness draws attention to the first which formerly was ignored and covered up. We cannot ask for reduced sentences for men without being attacked as pro criminal or pro sex with young girls or whatever it is. We can however ask for increased sentences for females and when the burden is on the females they will react and the only way to reduce the burden on females will be to reduce the burden on all. Right now females don't care to change the laws because while the laws…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:44 AM
1

What mechanism in female empowerment stops that empowerment when females are equal to men in any given area? Why has that mechanism assuming it exists failed in many cases for example university graduation which was majority male was then equal and is now majority female. What steps are feminists taking to correct imbalances that favor females? If feminists don't take steps to correct imbalances and only strive forever to empower women then what separates female empowerment from say white empowe…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:49 AM
0

I agree with kl4b. If I ever serve on a jury and the defendant is male and the 'victim' is female I will find not guilty no matter the crime. I will force either not guilty or hung jury if need be.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:37 AM
4

Most women who cheat and are found out claim rape not for the purpose of harming the other party but to avoid consequences for themselves.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:11 AM
1

Where is the line? Because without clear lines being drawn here, it would probably result in fewer people willing to come forward. Seeing how many of them are false that's probably a good thing.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:10 AM
4

Maybe seeing how western women are all feminist shrews these men are just being sensible and keeping them away, 7 feet away. I personally support the right of men to have male only spaces. It is hypocritical of feminists to allow Islamic men to have their male spaces but white and black men are denied male spaces and have their spaces invaded by feminists. I'm thinking of Islamic conversion to get the ability to have male only spaces.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:49 PM
1

Don't. Do the opposite and get her and the family to sign a contract that you are not the father and never to seek CS.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:42 PM
1

The KKK is white supremacist that oppresses black people. Feminists are female supremacists that oppress men. The similarities are obvious to even a casual observer. The only way to argue against this is to either prove feminists are not supremacists by explaining what mechanism is built into female empowerment that causes this empowerment to stop exactly when it reaches equal with male empowerment or else to prove that gender supremacism is not comparable to racial supremacism. Already women ou…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:32 PM
1

Like a broken clock even an idiot is correct occasionally. Neither the broken clock nor the idiot should get credit for it though.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:25 PM
-1

Number 4 is unrealistic. The creative gap is evidence of this. Women don't even excel at what they're supposed to excel at care giving. I've many families where the husband is far superior care giver to the children than the wife. Women don't love to the same degree as men do. They are not capable of that kind of love or loyalty. They are loyal only to themselves and their biology.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:17 PM
1

As we see you have no evidence for why I am wrong only appeals to popularity. Btw feminism isn't too popular either. Not amongst the people. Only a small fraction of women are feminist and even smaller number of men. Men's rights is unknown. This combined with feminist propaganda against men's rights creates an unpopular image in others minds however once these people actually encounter men's rights they usually realise the propaganda is false and they actually agree with men's rights all along …
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:11 PM
1

Popular fallacy. Just because a concept is popular or unpopular doesn't make it right or wrong. But then I guess since you feminists have no evidence fallacies and name calling is all you got.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:01 PM
-1

I don't see anything wrong with killing these useless females. If they were useful they wouldn't be killed.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:59 AM
2

It's not but she is being hypocritical here by claiming it is when female fetuses are aborted.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:41 AM
1

The law doesn't just determine guilt or innocence it also determines the correct punishment. I don't trust vigilantes in the slightest with that. For one even for the most heinous of crimes torture is never a suitable punishment, but vigilantes quite often use torture. Lastly who checks if the open and shut cases vigilantes prosecute really are open and shut as they say? Who determines if the rock solid guilt really is rock solid? Who checks that the vigilantes don't torture out confessions plan…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:25 AM
2

Feminism was, by design, an ideology to empower women, but only to the point of making them on equal What possible mechanism is included in the empowerment of women stops that empowerment at the level that is equal to men? Feminism is and always has been empowerment without limit.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:03 AM
2

Feminism is a female supremacist movement therefore like all supremacist movements like the white supremacist movement the KKK feminism is extremist.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:09 AM
1

Feminism is all extreme.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter