TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Doc-Engineer Archive

View 0 posts and 487 comments by Doc-Engineer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think that's the problem, that was my first guess too anyways. Lol your posts aren't boring, I'm just not creative at all and thinking of adjectives hurts my head.
/r/MensRights13/02/21 03:06 AM
2

Lol I fixed it, but haiku bot still robbed me
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:22 PM
1

Lol it was supposed to be a haiku but haiku bot screwed me
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:20 PM
1

That's the second one I have noticed on one of my brief and great posts.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 06:45 AM
1

That's the second one I have noticed on one of my long, boring posts.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 06:45 AM
13

Wow... I think you might have clicked on the wrong sub.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 06:42 AM
14

Wow... I think you might have clicked on the wrong sub.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 06:42 AM
1

Yes your Reddit medals make you such a badass. r/iamverybadass You're so much better than women at everything, maybe I should have you come suck my dick instead of the wife? Invites open 🥳 You don't belong in a society. Lol get over yourself 😛
/r/MensRights03/02/21 06:43 PM
1

Yes your Reddit medals make you such a badass. r/iamverybadass You're so much better than women at everything, maybe I should have you come suck my dick instead of the wife? Invites open 🥳 You don't belong in a society. Lol get over yourself 😛
/r/MensRights03/02/21 06:41 PM
1

I hope you're a virgin forever. What the fuck makes you strong emotionally? You literally just broke down here and freaked out over some internet comments. There are plenty of women stronger than you, both physically, and emotionally. In fact, I'd venture to guess most of them. "No you!" Lol try coming up with something original for a change. Fuck off, basement dweller.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 06:21 PM
1

Alcoholism is a serious problem and not something you should make light of to deride strangers. Frankly, it's gross. Also, repeating what I say with different words doesn't make it original. You've literally been jumping around replying to different comments I made on this thread. Why else would I be getting 3+ seperate replies from you every time I check my inbox? But ya, I'm the spammer.. 🤔🤨
/r/MensRights03/02/21 08:21 AM
0

A little snark, replying to a direct question to another user, throwing in 5+ links as "evidence" that you didn't bother to read yourself, and jumping back to my first reply to add a dickhead reply and one more stupid blog link just so you could get more views... And I'm the one who's nuts. Because I called you a fucking loser... Lol you aren't helping your case much from my pov
/r/MensRights03/02/21 08:18 AM
1

😂 what part of my above reply was "going psycho"? Or do you mean when you went back to the first comment just to add one more link and some stupid quip like a child? Lol did you even read those links yet? You still haven't answered that
/r/MensRights03/02/21 08:16 AM
1

Lots of shit. But nothing in regards to the conversation we were just having. Hey man, I asked someone else a very direct question about their own opinion, and you took it upon yourself to answer for them. And in doing so tried to act like a condescending jackass and didn't bother to review your own evidence. How high do you think my opinion is of you?
/r/MensRights03/02/21 02:27 AM
1

Lol try to "social construct" your way out of that one 😂 what you can dish it out but you can't take it?
/r/MensRights03/02/21 02:25 AM
1

Lol try to "social construct" your way out of that one 😂 what you can dish it out but you can't take it?
/r/MensRights03/02/21 02:25 AM
1

Lol try to "social construct" your way out of that one 😂 what you can dish it out but you can't take it?
/r/MensRights03/02/21 02:24 AM
-1

The eight women, together with 101 men who washed out of the Darby phase, will retry the first part of the Army’s most elite training course beginning May 14, the release said. Let me say this once more, clearly, so you don't miss it Fuck off, loser Hopping around on my goddamn comments to throw links around you don't bother to fuckin read. Useless. Annoyed afterthought edit: how in the fuck do physical scores at bootcamp correlate to a difference in mental capacity, you giant ignoramous? The fa…
/r/MensRights03/02/21 01:05 AM
1

Women are more capable of managing multiple tasks, flowing simultaneously, while men tend to get irritated when they have to do several things at the same time. From your own link. Still failing to see how these "differences" are effecting women's abilities in combat roles, seeing as how the evidence seems to suggest the opposite here? I don't know, maybe if I could actually talk to the original poster, instead of some random guy who just really wanted to include his opinion too, then we could c…
/r/MensRights03/02/21 01:00 AM
3

And? What does that have to do with any difference between the male and female brain, besides maybe males' biological sexual attraction towards females? Why can't OP give me an example since he brought it up and undoubtedly has a deeper understanding of his own beliefs than anyone else might? Besides that, you realize the difference between a societal norm, and an inherent genetic trait, right? What you're describing is not biological, but cultural. We're all human and more similar than we are d…
/r/MensRights02/02/21 10:13 PM
2

What differences?
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:21 PM
13

No, you don't. Because the accused IS innocent. Until proven guilty. If there is no evidence, they can't be proved guilty. That doesn't somehow mean their accuser becomes guilty. On the other hand, if the accuser knowingly made a false accusation, then don't you believe they deserve to be held accountable for their actions? Yet in our current system they are not, so why should we punish the innocent on say-so just because they are male? We don't even send serial-kilers to jail on heresay, after …
/r/MensRights30/01/21 02:36 AM
10

Guilty of what? It's not a crime to accuse someone of rape in most of the free world, as we have seen again, and again, and again. What exactly do you mean by assuming the accuser is "guilty"? The accuser is also assumed innocent until proven guilty should they be accused as well. This is certainly a twisted brand of logic that encourages tossing due process out the window. Does that really seem smart to you?
/r/MensRights30/01/21 02:31 AM
10

I'm pretty sure the assumption of innocence is a hallmark of the American justice system (or was supposed to be). Correct me if I'm wrong, but why would anyone in their right mind want to steer away from that towards "a middle area where the defendant is somehow presumed to be neither innocent nor guilty"? How exactly is someone "not innocent" until evidence is found? In other words... "You tried to murder me." If I told the police this right now, do you see the issue with them NOT presuming you…
/r/MensRights30/01/21 02:07 AM
1

No worries, I was just trying to point out that the first commenter wasn't wrong in looking for a little context. It's easy to jump on board with a message like this due to the biases most members here already hold, either consciously or not. But the added context provides actual power to the message rather than coming across as an unjustified complaint. It may still be an anecdote, but now it's a relatable anecdote that your audience can compare with their own experience. Good luck to you, and …
/r/MensRights29/01/21 11:31 PM
1

Neither will I. So instead our generation gets to deal with shit like deadly worldwide plague, food and fresh water scarcity, rising land costs and a complete and utter lack of hope for the future survival of the human race. Sometimes I wonder if we should've just picked another fight...
/r/MensRights29/01/21 11:24 PM
9

No. Dislike asking to expand upon the original post. He isn't wrong, this is the lowest quality post to pass through this sub in awhile, and that's saying something. "My school made me feel bad because I'm a man!" Ok... how? Seems reasonable enough to me (I'm not OP)
/r/MensRights28/01/21 11:22 PM
10

You managed to scare quote the word women, and use The Chads as a descriptor, unironically, in the same brief message. That's got to be a new record.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 11:19 PM
34

Well, for one, what man who is constantly treated like shit is going to be willing to go kill and die for some rich politician? Without wars, we have one less depopulation method to partake in and will have to more heavily rely on tactics like releasing deadly plagues upon the civilian population. ... ...
/r/MensRights28/01/21 11:11 PM
19

Or you just go straight for the kill and say "opinions are like assholes" "Want to know what I think of your asshole?"
/r/MensRights28/01/21 11:09 PM
1

My wife's mom had to sue her company after working there for like a decade once she found out she was being paid significantly less than some of her own male staff members. This was in the shipping industry, definitely still a male dominated field. After she began the lawsuit it came out that most of the women there (giant defense contractor) had also been underpaid for years and they ended up joining the lawsuit. Was a huge deal and ended up putting them out of business in the long run. So on t…
/r/MensRights26/01/21 01:17 AM
26

Thanks for "mansplaining" but I think you missed the point. We can sort of tell by the derogatory assumptions you make regarding everyone here just because you disagree with their point of view on this one particular matter. Generally people are much more willing to listen to a rant when you don't kick it off with an insult to their intelligence, assumptions on their beliefs, and a metric fuckton of arrogance. Also if feminism is a "spectrum", then I would be correct in saying that everyone here…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 06:56 AM
1

If you really want to pick hairs, we are technically all slaves to the Capitalist system now. From the time I was born I was destined to be placed in almost unpayable debt to the government in one way or another (college, medical, long-term disability/care for parents, etc.). Some are lucky enough to rise out of that debt, some even luckier to be born out of it. While I work ridiculous hours skating from paycheck to paycheck, the bosses and CEOs make 20-30x or more my yearly salary, as their Chr…
/r/MensRights19/01/21 04:39 AM
12

What happened to "words matter"? Can you give us an example of masculinity that you don't consider to be toxic? What the hell ever happened to gender being fluid, and if it is, how tf can you show prejudice against someone who you consider "too masculine" but it's not ok to show prejudice against someone who is too feminine? "The world" (feminists creating equality) wants for men to be more like women. It shows all through social academia nowadays, and it's obvious to most of us here on this sub…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:29 PM
11

That statement never has a point. Sure, maybe it's ok to say "maybe you should teach HIM not to (insert crime)" in the very specific scenario you bring up. But does that make it OK to say "maybe you should teach men not to..."?
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:19 PM
1

This sub has a purpose. When you spew bullshit like you have here (as signified by everyone hating on your comment), you do nothing but harm any workings toward that purpose, and provide ammunition for the many enemies of this movement to fight us with. If you just came here to bitch about women in a general, demeaning, you clearly don't get out much sort of way, then no, I don't believe you've come to the right sub. This sub is for men's rights, not women's degradation, and frankly I'm tired of…
/r/MensRights16/01/21 12:42 AM
-1

lol women only like it because they're goody two shoes NPCs women are much more prone to following social conventions and going with the crowd Sorry, where did you say that? I like how all of your follow up replies have included phrases such as "much more prone" and "tend to be more", rather than "women only". Still generalizing, but at least you're technically not fully inclusive. That's a step up, I'm proud of you!
/r/MensRights16/01/21 12:21 AM
1

Hm yep it does. That's crazy
/r/MensRights15/01/21 09:36 PM
2

... lol women only like it because they're goody two shoes NPCs women are much more prone to following social conventions and going with the crowd Do those two statements sound the same to you? Try to avoid generalizing half of humanity in the future, then maybe not so many downvotes?
/r/MensRights15/01/21 09:13 PM
1

I don't know why it's childish to don't be proud of germany (the country I live in) because of Hitler but yes probably you are right in your eyes. Did you know Nazi Germany under Hitler? Did you know Hitler? Does Germany stand for absolutely nothing except for Hitler? Hell, I'm not even from Germany and IM proud of some of the scientific and civil achievements by German citizens. Probably half of the major discoveries in the fields of physics and chemistry were made by Germans. But you focus on …
/r/MensRights15/01/21 09:09 PM
2

I don't know why it's childish to don't be proud of germany (the country I live in) because of Hitler but yes probably you are right in your eyes. Did you know Nazi Germany under Hitler? Did you know Hitler? Does Germany stand for absolutely nothing except for Hitler? Hell, I'm not even from Germany and IM proud of some of the scientific and civil achievements by German citizens. Probably half of the major discoveries in the fields of physics and chemistry were made by Germans. But you focus on …
/r/MensRights15/01/21 09:09 PM
1

Mine only shows one. Must be a Reddit fuckup, I certainly didn't retype all that shit 3 times lol
/r/MensRights15/01/21 08:59 PM
3

You have given no criticism here. You've whined and insulted like a child, but not one criticism was raised. You're not proud of "the country you live in" because... Hitler? You are clearly here to troll, and yes that is petty and childish.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 05:41 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights15/01/21 05:38 PM
-1

Well somebody paid, it's a charter school, it's not free. Hence why the mostly-white demographics, not a race issue but a class issue. Ever wonder why a giant portion of Ivy League students come from private charter and magnet schools? I can certainly assure you that it is not because they are smarter.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 05:27 PM
2

So...you're 12... and you're mocking our country's military service members... and you're not from this country? Are you a member of your own country's military, or were you too much of a bitch for that too (since you're not a child by your own admission, though with the amount of porn you talk about ingesting and your fAvOrIte NuMbEr I'm not sure you should admit that)? Less than half of the US are Republican. Much much less than that are even close to what one could call "Nazi". Are you sure y…
/r/MensRights15/01/21 05:20 PM
-1

So what you're saying is your parents paid for you to go to a new school where you would get straight As on the record no matter how poor you were in academics? And it was all white students... Just goes to show you can be poor at anything and still get by, as long as you're not poor in wealth.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 04:40 PM
3

Funny.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 04:26 PM
5

Sex of the teachers isn't the only influencing factor. Just spend a little time researching how boys are treated vs girls in today's classrooms. Look at college entrance requirements hiding under the guise of "equality". Look at male teachers being forcibly removed from their teaching positions due to parents' discomfort with men. Look at teacher gender bias in grading, and all the studies that show female teachers will grade girls a whole letter grade higher than boys for the same exact essay. …
/r/MensRights15/01/21 04:25 PM
4

Sex of the teachers isn't the only influencing factor. Just spend a little time researching how boys are treated vs girls in today's classrooms. Look at college entrance requirements hiding under the guise of "equality". Look at male teachers being forcibly removed from their teaching positions due to parents' discomfort with men. Look at teacher gender bias in grading, and all the studies that show female teachers will grade girls a whole letter grade higher than boys for the same exact essay. …
/r/MensRights15/01/21 04:25 PM
15

Sex of the teachers isn't the only influencing factor. Just spend a little time researching how boys are treated vs girls in today's classrooms. Look at college entrance requirements hiding under the guise of "equality". Look at male teachers being forcibly removed from their teaching positions due to parents' discomfort with men. Look at teacher gender bias in grading, and all the studies that show female teachers will grade girls a whole letter grade higher than boys for the same exact essay. …
/r/MensRights15/01/21 04:24 PM
7

Coming from a child who's never done a thing with his life outside of apparently discovering Reddit porn... Fuck off creep
/r/MensRights15/01/21 04:18 PM
8

The law is stopping him. Missed the entirety of the discussion here I gather? Are you all for men's rights? Because comments like this, completely oblivious to the true nature of the problems discussed here, do not present that image very strongly. As has been mentioned repeatedly, men cannot press charges against women for domestic violence in India. To successfully prosecute this woman, they would've had to prove attempted murder or some other crime seperate from DV to actually work in court.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 05:24 PM
12

You're from India? Or from "here in the west"?
/r/MensRights06/01/21 05:17 PM
7

Most registrants in the U.S. have registered for .com, .net, .org and other gTLDs, instead of .us, which has primarily been used by state and local governments, even though private entities may also register .us domains. From first paragraph of your own link. Is your argument that .com cannot be used in the US, or that .us that be used? Because that's clearly not correct based on the evidence you yourself provided.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 05:15 PM
4

They sure would've had to charge me with a murder somebody tried to do this bullshit. Sure, you might damage me for life, but be ready for some instant karma akin to a face ripping chimp.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 05:10 PM
0

Did you read my response? Lol clearly not. The whole fucking study was done in FLORIDA, a state where mask mandate is about as useful as a sandpaper dildo. You want to know the difference between George in mask-mandated Pensacola and George in mask-free Miami? George in Pensacola is breaking a mandate. Try that same study, but use a state that doesn't survive the winters on paint chips and gas fumes. By the way buddy... https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.20207241 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 08:05 PM
1

I just explained to you how it's not "completely wrong", and your rebuttal to that explanation is... "but it is wrong, just trust me?" My example of leprosy was untrue? So there weren't ENTIRE LEPER COLONIES designed to keep the lepers away from other citizens? Or are you scapegoating that because they didn't understand the EXACT nature of the disease and it's inner workings, there is no possible way they could have had the foresight to stay the fuck away from it? Who is reaching to prove their …
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:56 PM
1

I just explained to you how it's not "completely wrong", and your rebuttal to that explanation is... "but it is wrong, just trust me?" My example of leprosy was untrue? So there weren't ENTIRE LEPER COLONIES designed to keep the lepers away from other citizens? Or are you scapegoating that because they didn't understand the EXACT nature of the disease and it's inner workings, there is no possible way they could have had the foresight to stay the fuck away from it? Who is reaching to prove their …
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:55 PM
0

Maybe reread my last reply here bud...
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:45 PM
2

"Real sharks do not agree with eating meat, masquerading as supposed carnivores!" Doesn't matter how much we might yell about it, the actual sharks are still happy to munch on an arm or leg given the opportunity. "Men are friends... not food."
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:37 PM
1

You can make a hell of a lot of money from a libel suit and a damaged reputation though, even ignoring the arrest and resulting damages. As long as they can prove the cases are unrelated that is. Sounds like these kids shouted their lies to anyone who would listen. Hopefully they have smart legal counsel on their side.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:43 AM
1

I think you should maybe work on your use of quotations to emphasize context. Quoting as 'male "leaders"' comes off as though the implication is that males cannot be leaders, or that all male leaders are a joke. I understand now that you were referring to Cuomo directly and independently, but the original context made that difficult to grasp. You're right though, dude is a dick.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:39 AM
1

I think you should maybe work on your use of quotations to emphasize context. Quoting as 'male "leaders"' comes off as though the implication is that males cannot be leaders, or that all male leaders are a joke. I understand now that you were referring to Cuomo directly and independently, but the original context made that difficult to grasp. You're right though, dude is a dick.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:39 AM
1

I think you should maybe work on your use of quotations to emphasize context. Quoting as 'male "leaders"' comes off as though the implication is that males cannot be leaders, or that all male leaders are a joke. I understand now that you were referring to Cuomo directly and independently, but the original context made that difficult to grasp. You're right though, dude is a dick.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:39 AM
1

I think you should maybe work on your use of quotations to emphasize context. Quoting as 'male "leaders"' comes off as though the implication is that males cannot be leaders, or that all male leaders are a joke. I understand now that you were referring to Cuomo directly and independently, but the original context made that difficult to grasp. You're right though, dude is a dick.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:38 AM
0

I don't think he or I ever insinuated that there have been government controlled and enforced lockdowns for 2000+ years. However, have people been smart enough to stay the fuck away from the dude with leprosy for 2000+ years? Absolutely. Again, you're arguing useless semantics and totally avoiding the main point which is that staying away from sick people generally keeps you from getting sick (with the contagion those sick people carry, not every virus ever since I'm sure you'll be obtuse about …
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:26 AM
1

Why does "we did it willingly" somehow translate to "every individual of the country did it willingly" rather than "we, my family and those I've been around, did it willingly"? Seems like a large leap just to make that childish argument work, aka "all people didn't agree". We (people, governments, the world, not every goddamn person ever) instituted mass quarantines and mask mandates during the 1920 Spanish Flu as well. Different manners of preventing the spread of the virus were tried all over …
/r/MensRights02/01/21 06:10 PM
2

No person that respects the rights of their neighbors to live and breathe would wander the streets and fight so hard to drink at the local pub, only a moron or a murderer would make such a policy.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 06:00 PM
4

That might be the most unscientific, least understood by the author "study" I've ever crossed before. This guy literally says in the article here about masks "why would they work when the viruses they are meant to protect against are many times smaller than the thread count of the masks". Because it's a respiratory virus, presumably non-airborne (or many more would be sick), meaning that only the fluid droplets (phlegm) of infected persons carry the virus. They don't float around and take long w…
/r/MensRights02/01/21 05:58 PM
4

Is this a joke to insult all men because you disagree with the premise that this study was false? Or because you're pissy that you can't disagree with the premise that the study was false because of the mountain of evidence provided? I'm willing to bet that most of the conversation here has drifted gently over your head like the clouds on a warm summers day.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 05:43 PM
1

"Here, let me help you with your reply: "NO.... you"" LOL! 🤣
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/20 03:03 AM
8

"All of these remaining claims and counterclaims are brought under Pennsylvania law by Pennsylvania residents against Pennsylvania residents. The dismissal of the claim against the School District removes the final federal-law cause of action in this case, and thus the Court concludes that the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over these remaining claims is not warranted.” For anyone who was wondering the circumstances, looks like the judge dismissed the case against the School District due …
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:50 AM
1

Lol 4th attempt? Dude only someone who has lived that experience could even fathom someone just handing you a diploma to get you the fuck out. Honestly, I sympathize. I'd vote you in as leader of the free world if it somehow got you to shut the fuck up and keep your stupid ideas to yourself. All this immaturity and repetition and shutdown because you're embarrassed over the sheer stupidity and perverse nature of your original argument. Here, let me help you with your reply: "NO.... you"
/r/AntiFeminists25/12/20 06:36 AM
1

Well damn, you've proven that Google blatantly lied when no one else could. Why aren't you a reporter? You could change the world! All it takes is 30 seconds, a dumbass search phrase, and a childhood genius to solve the world's problems. Just now typing "why are women so" into Google, the suggested responses for me were "controlling", "attractive", "annoying", and last but certainly not least, "why are women's clothes so revealing". For men want to guess what I get? "Why are men so", "visual", "…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:30 AM
2

No problem. Apparently actual facts piss people off here more than some horribly twisted facsimile of the truth that supports their obnoxious biases. To all the downvoters, how about working up the balls to craft a reply, rather than childishly fume that someone shut down your sausage-laden ragefest with the truth.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 09:45 PM
1

No, but you are.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 09:43 PM
1

Lol not in actual first world countries they don't, that apparently occurs only in your own backwater hicktown. Someone really took pity on you and let you graduate? Pretty impressive you would even still try after failing 3 times. Don't worry, you won't need any of that pesky algebra when you're working as a Custodial Engineer.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/20 09:42 PM
1

“We do not use human curation to collect or arrange the results on a page.” It says it can't divulge details about how the algorithms work because the company is involved in a long-running and high-stakes battle with those who want to profit by gaming the system. I searched "can Google personnel change or censor my search results in any way outside of their proprietary SEO algorithms". The answer would seem to be "no". Why do you say it is "well known" that Google takes part in censorship to the…
/r/MensRights24/12/20 09:31 PM
1

Where did it say he put in an emergency order, or claimed any reason for sole guardianship involving immediate danger to the child? You're now pulling shit out of your ass in a "should of" hypothetical scenario that has literally nothing to do with this case. TLDR: quit searching for reasons to bitch about this, it's just sad. There are plenty of actual issues to be outraged about.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 09:26 PM
2

Congratulations you win a prize. Somehow you managed to find the most unrelated and pointless revelation from my example. So congrats, you sir, are an idiot. 3 days is 3 days. The post office can't even send a letter to my next door fucking neighbor in 3 days, but you expect the court (the government) to set a court date, get notices to all involved parties, hear the case, make a ruling, and enforce said ruling all in a time span of 3 fucking days? And when that doesn't happen you think it's OK …
/r/MensRights19/12/20 08:44 AM
-1

Because he only filed for custody 3 days before his child died. The paperwork probably never even made it off the court clerks desk. Have you ever been to court? Got a ticket? I got a ticket once, my court date was set for 1 year 3 months later. Definitely didn't throw a fit on Facebook about the judge being too crooked to get me there in a timely manner.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 08:29 AM
0

Because he only filed for custody 3 days before his child died. The paperwork probably never even made it off the court clerks desk. Have you ever been to court? Got a ticket? I got a ticket once, my court date was set for 1 year 3 months later. Definitely didn't thrown a fit on Facebook about the judge being too crooked to get me there in a timely manner.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 08:28 AM
1

Because he only filed for custody 3 days before his child died. The paperwork probably never even made it off the court clerks desk. Have you ever been to court? Got a ticket? I got a ticket once, my court date was set for 1 year 3 months later. Definitely didn't thrown a fit on Facebook about the judge being too crooked to get me there in a timely manner.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 08:28 AM
-12

None of this is true... The father filed for custody a mere three days before his child died. It's not the fault of the judge that he didn't get a court date the day he went asking for it. If the mother was so unfit and a drug abuser, why did the father not file custody earlier? Lastly, the child died because of hydrocephalus (fluid buildup in the brain), an illness he was born with. NOT by negligence on the part of the mother OR the court. Outrage clickbait bullshit like this does absolutely no…
/r/MensRights19/12/20 08:21 AM
-3

The toddler, Killian, died of hydrocephalus just three days after his father filed for full custody from the boy’s mother in 2017, and Vanderhagen saw Facebook as an outlet for not just his grief but as a way to honor his son’s spirit in photos of the boy laughing and playing with musical instruments. Someone she did not know, had no knowledge of, apparently had a strong grudge against her enough to stalk and call her out in an online public venue, and who was blaming her for a case that had lik…
/r/MensRights19/12/20 08:16 AM
-13

Isn't it a bit presumptuous, and sort of displaying your obvious bias against this female judge, to claim it obvious that she lied under oath? Is perjury no longer a serious criminal offense, that when it clearly occurs in a court of law the guilty party remains in good standing? "The toddler, Killian, died of hydrocephalus just three days after his father filed for full custody from the boy’s mother in 2017, and Vanderhagen saw Facebook as an outlet for not just his grief but as a way to honor …
/r/MensRights19/12/20 08:09 AM
1

Sticks and stones may break my bones but at least I graduated grade school
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/20 07:47 AM
9

Could you imagine if a male reporter disguised himself as a woman for 18 months, the entire time trying to gain access to exclusively female spaces, support/therapy groups, etc., and then proceeded to write about their experiences to a national audience? He probably wouldn't survive the night
/r/MensRights18/12/20 11:46 PM
1

Could you imagine if a male reporter disguised himself as a woman for 18 months, the entire time trying to gain access to exclusively female spaces, support/therapy groups, etc., and then proceeded to write about their experiences? He probably wouldn't survive the night
/r/MensRights18/12/20 11:46 PM
0

This isn't Google's fault. It's your (everyone's) fault. Read up on how website optimization works. Google's algorithms may be what places articles such as this as the top hits, but their reason for doing so is not political bias. It's the number of clicks a webpage gets. How long you linger on that page. How interactive with the site are you. All this and more determines what websites show first in the Google results (and Duck Duck Go, and Firefox, and all the others). It's a little ridiculous …
/r/MensRights18/12/20 11:06 PM
1

Bitch
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/20 10:46 PM
1

Projecting. I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/20 10:46 PM
1

Projecting. I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/20 10:46 PM
1

Projecting. I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/20 06:45 PM
1

Projecting. I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/20 06:45 PM
1

"no you!!!" -the idiot
/r/MensRights16/12/20 06:44 PM
1

Projecting. I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/20 01:24 AM
1

Projecting. I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/20 01:23 AM
1

Who gives a fuck what you think? You think Epstein is not a pedophile and stand by that in the face of your own contradicting evidence. By the way, whose comments have you even been responding to? Because it's most certainly not mine.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/20 01:22 AM
1

Lol then you're an idiot
/r/MensRights13/12/20 01:22 AM
1

Seriously, since when did the world get so full of whiny little bitches
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/20 06:30 AM
1

Projecting. I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/20 06:29 AM
1

Projecting. I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/20 06:28 AM
1

Who gives a fuck what you think? You think Epstein is not a pedophile and stand by that in the face of your own contradicting evidence. By the way, whose comments have you even been responding to? Because it's most certainly not mine.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/20 06:28 AM
1

Who gives a fuck what you think? You think Epstein is not a pedophile and stand by that in the face of your own contradicting evidence. By the way, whose comments have you even been responding to? Because it's most certainly not mine.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/20 06:28 AM
1

Who gives a fuck what you think? You think Epstein is not a pedophile and stand by that in the face of your own contradicting evidence. By the way, whose comments have you even been responding to? Because it's most certainly not mine.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/20 06:27 AM
1

Your article doesn't say what you claim it does. How difficult is that to understand? You are just lying, yet again
/r/MensRights09/12/20 06:26 AM
1

"NO YOU!!!" You this entire conversation
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 10:32 PM
1

Coming from the guy who copied someone else's articles to prove his point, but those articles proved your point WRONG, I'd be pretty careful mentioning anything relating to "original thought". You wouldn't know an original thought if it was inserted in your ass. Copy Paste 🦆
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 10:31 PM
-1

I copy/pasted (I know you like this) straight from your links, dumbass. It's a quote that you provided.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 10:30 PM
-2

Cool. You posted yet another article that you failed to read and disproved your overall assertion. Fucking genius right here. What does linking an article you didn't read have to do with you not reading it?
/r/MensRights29/11/20 10:30 PM
1

And your original thought was? Copy Paste 🦆 Edit: why the fuck would I respond to your questions if you don't show the same courtesy? Fuck off loser
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 10:28 PM
0

Coming from the guy who copied someone else's articles to prove his point, but those articles proved your point WRONG, I'd be pretty careful mentioning anything relating to "original thought". You wouldn't know an original thought if it was inserted in your ass.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 10:27 PM
1

Coming from Mr. Copy/Paste, who STARTED this argument by making misinformed claims and then refusing to concede in the face of overwhelming evidence, that is a pretty powerful sentiment. I must be a damn good, high effort troll to tickle your fancy. 😘
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 10:25 PM
-1

Maybe could have said this without the "stfu bitch" and your overall message would be more powerful. If I were her reading this response, it would just confirm my already strong biases against you, that you are just vengeful towards women and don't care for equality. That is not the image that we want to present if our goals are to be met.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 10:23 PM
-4

Dude quit fucking lying through your teeth, AND READ YOUR LINKS BEFORE YOU POST THEM!!!: López Obrador said that the 90% figure doesn’t just apply to calls related to violence against women but also to calls made to the Mexico City metro that claim that the tracks have been sabotaged or there is a bomb in the system. So he claimed (without any evidence to back it) that 90% of ALL EMERGENCY CALLS are known to be false. Not "just calls for domestic violence against women", that is a falsehood. So …
/r/MensRights29/11/20 09:55 PM
-5

Lol no it is not. You lie all over the place just to pick fights with random strangers, don't you? First it's "Epstein is not a pedophile" because you figured his 12 year old victims were too old (your words not mine, still gross to repeat). Now it's "70% of domestic violence is women attacking men". This is you parroting facts that you heard from someone else again, didn't bother to search the truth, and misrepresented the actual true facts presented. Men are involved as an aggressor in about 6…
/r/MensRights29/11/20 09:48 PM
1

You are projecting again. So where was your original though ? Copy Paste 🦆
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 09:38 PM
0

r/woooosh You sir, are an idiot. This is based solely on observations of your interactions thus far. You would make a great subject for a psychological study on confirmation bias though. You repeat yourself enough and you might even come to believe your own lies!
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 09:38 PM
1

"I didn't really read the links I just skimmed them. I didn't realize one of his victims were 12 years old." you about 10 comments ago
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 09:36 PM
1

Good response buddy /s Shows you really read and understood what was written there. Oh wait... you're just repeating yourself again. Surprise!
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/20 09:35 PM
1

Good response all around. Relevant to the topic at hand. Supporting arguments and details. Powerful and persuasive language. All in all I'd give that a 9/10. I took the one point because your argument was clearly crafted by a giant tool and follows logic about as well as the Hookah smoking caterpillar.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/20 06:02 PM
1

Thanks for proving my point ;)
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/20 05:59 PM
1

You're right. You proved it for me. Moron. You also already admitted you were wrong. Kinda childish to try and backpedal now don't you think? Would you like me to link to where you admit your idiocy, or do you remember that? Seems you are projecting Here's an original thought. Take the dick out your mouth before talking. It's fucking up your sentence structure.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/20 05:59 PM
1

You literally lost ALL credibility when you admitted to posting links you "just skimmed" to prove your dumbass point. Repeating this same stupid shit without giving an explanation has demolished any credibility you may have had left. Most people know what a pouting child sounds like, so you weren't doing yourself any favors by trying to form a logical, semi-intelligent argument and then shutting completely down when your argument was rebuffed. But here let me reply for you so you don't have to ,…
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/20 09:00 PM
1

Called it.
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/20 08:56 PM
1

Your English is atrocious. Try using a complete sentence, then I'll respond accordingly. "you have associated that it's very likely that you are..." What a roundabout and grammatically poor way to say you don't have an answer.
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/20 08:56 PM
1

Answer the question, or are you scared to be proven clearly wrong again? Repeating yourself over and over to get your way is what my little cousin used to do when she was 4.
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/20 08:51 PM
1

Here was the first time you tried to say I was projecting, while again doing it yourself. By saying things like "you are factually incorrect" and "you are spreading misinformation" when you were clearly fucking WRONG (lol which you even admitted at one point then backpedaled like a paperboy riding through a busy intersection) is an example of projection... and overconfidence/arrogance. You even threw links in my face, failed to read them, and missed that those very links labeled him a pedophile …
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/20 08:47 PM
1

No, you simply need to look up pedophile yourself and understand (that what you're doing to those children is illegal).
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/20 08:39 PM
5

I'm a disillusioned old hag who's not interested in teaching or beating men. If anything, the goal is to warn young women. The more promising relationships you see crashing and burning, the more men who aren't like that you see turning out to be men who are exactly like that when push comes to shove, the harder it gets to believe the nawalt mantra. If you meet a man who's not like that, great. Enjoy it, try to make him as happy as he makes you. But always be prepared for the dog to do what a dog…
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/20 07:42 PM
1

Sorry that response was probably too long and difficult. TLDR: Well actually you have been wrong from the start and on so many levels. HOW?
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/20 07:34 PM
1

Your English is fucking atrocious. Clearly not your first language. Yet you take an adamant interest in the actions of a pedophile from a country which you do not reside. Funny that. You again haven't given one single example of all this projection I've been doing. I laid one out for you a few times now, which you've had no response at all too, outside of your normal "nuh uh but you". I'll ask you again! How was the example I gave not projection on your part? By the way, I already told you what …
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/20 07:33 PM
19

Yes, let's repeat exactly what they're overgeneralizing men about, but just change the subject to women. That'll teach em. Antifeminism is not anti woman. Why do we see this stuff come up here so often when it helps nobody? Someone else mentioned finding up to 4 reportable comments for bigotry in this FDS thread. Is the goal to beat that?
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/20 04:32 PM
1

"No you!" Haven't had an original thought this whole discussion. Fuckin loser I don't know if your teacher has told you this yet by your age, but saying "nuh uh I'm right!" like an infant child doesn't garner much support, Chester.
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/20 04:01 PM
1

You seem to be weak little bitch who can't finish what he starts. But to each their own, Chester.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/20 06:10 PM
1

Repeating yourself doesn't make it come true. How about doing what I've asked and actually expanding? Why did it not seem right? How was my explanation of your projection not a good example? By the way, when you lose in a debate and possibly have your views changed, just be an adult and admit you were wrong. Shutting down like an immature child doesn't leave others with the greatest impressions. Something you'll learn as you get older I suppose.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/20 05:26 PM
1

That is until the world economy collapses, starvation sets in, and being fat once again becomes a symbol of wealth and prosperity. Then society will again be like "gimme some more biscuits!"
/r/MensRights16/11/20 11:52 PM
1

From your links: Can you put a child up for adoption without the father’s consent? If you can’t locate the father, then Maybe. Many states do not require that a woman who is afraid of a man inform him that she is carrying his child. If a father is found in court to be unfit, then the answer to: Can you put up a child for adoption without the father’s consent is yes. There is even a registry that was created in some states for men to track all the women they've had sexual relations with in case t…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 11:33 PM
1

It's every legal system opinion. In every legal system the father needs to step in and pay Child Support. Just because you don't like it it doesn't mean it isn't true We just went over how it's not "every legal system opinion". In every legal system the father may be forced to step in and provide care for the child, but the mother can give the child up at any time. We've already established this, quit making me repeat it. "Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it isn't true." The problem w…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 11:12 PM
1

Repeating yourself doesn't make it come true. How about doing what I've asked and actually expanding? Why did it not seem right? How was my explanation of your projection not a good example? I'll repeat it for you: you said I was ignorant of the facts, and continuously referenced me to the links you provided to prove that I was ignorant. Later, you admitted to not even having read the links you urged me again and again to review, after learning that the point you argued was directly refuted by y…
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/20 07:50 PM
0

Again, that's your opinion. Not the way the world works. And your opinion, in my opinion, is a poor one. True, still both parents needs to agree to give a child up for adoption.They both need to give away their parental rights. If the man wants to keep the bady then the mother will have to pay child support No they don't. This is so far removed from reality it's a tad scary you think this is how it works. It's the mothers right to put her child up for adoption, or even to have it aborted, withou…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 04:35 PM
1

I'm not sure you understand what a logical train of thought is. I already demonstrated your example of projection for you. Since you're such the expert, how is your idiocy here not considered projection? Seeing as how I'm the one who supposedly doesn't understand. Go on I'll wait 🦆
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/20 03:54 PM
0

Repeating that it's "a child, a living being" is not really an argument, but fishing for an emotional reaction, wouldn't you agree? It's fine that you would prohibit adoption unless a family is happy and ready and standing by, but that's not how the world works. Mothers have the option to dump their burden, their choice, on the system, and let taxpayers handle the fallout. Fathers have no such option. Rather, even non-biological fathers have been roped in to paying away their livelihood for a ch…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 04:11 AM
1

What? Does this actually make sense to you? Your last response was telling me to "link projection". What other link do you plan to provide and not read?
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/20 04:00 AM
4

I guess that makes sense, though I don't know that I'd have a problem with that as the only ones showing up on these videos would generally be in direct interactions with arresting officers, and if that's the time they choose to take potentially stigmatizing actions on video then that is on them. As for the stigma of the actual arrest, arrest records are already public record. Providing a video of a peaceful arrest should add no further stigma than would just a written record of such an incident…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 11:36 PM
3

You're a man and not a woman because your daddy's sperm passed on its Y chromosome rather than it's X, no more, no less. Don't take pride from inherent physical traits like sex... it's pathetic and grants you nothing.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 11:14 PM
4

Why is public access to police camera footage insane? Especially considering recent events concerning police on camera in the US, it seems like that would be a net positive both for police and citizens, no?
/r/MensRights14/11/20 11:12 PM
2

Absolutely no. If you had a part in bringing a child into this world (it you were not raped, tricked or whatever) you have a responsibility toward him and you have to support him. A child is not something you can opt-out from, it's a human being with rights Have you ever heard of a process called "adoption"? Do you agree with adoption, aka should it be allowed by parents who have had a part in bringing a child into this world? How come, under the current system, a child is absolutely something y…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 11:07 PM
1

Advising me to do something you don't do yourself? Pretty hypocritical wouldn't you say? I read your own links more than you did. What the fuck makes you think I'd be stupid enough to post a link I hadn't read?... Take the hint.
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/20 10:45 PM
1

Well you spent lots of time there as recently as one month ago. And seeing as it took you 20 fucking days to respond to this, it was about 10 days at the time of my writing. So saying "Lol I'm banned from FDS" was supposed to prove what exactly? Let's do a test for you and see how you perceive the results, as I am genuinely curious. Would it be OK in your mind to hear a friend say this in public: My bf detests black people with a burning passion, should I tell him to quit making fun of them beca…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/20 10:43 PM
1

"no you" Boy you're lazy. How was my example not projection on your part? You literally admitted you didn't know what you were talking about, claiming you only "skimmed" your own damn links. You are a dumbass. You squarely fit that definition. If you'd like I will link the definition for "ignorant dumbass". Because someone who continues to argue a point they are unsure of, using linked articles as evidence they have not even bothered to read, will probably be the first example given. Let me gues…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/20 10:25 PM
1

Call me names all you wish but in reality you are just projecting. Great example. See, my example actually demonstrates how the traits you attempt to attribute to me are actually in line with your actions here so far. Yours is just another version of your common "no you" response. "You can call me stupid or hypocritical for ignorant facts I presented myself, but it's really projection."? That's your example? Again, I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/20 07:35 PM
1

No, you didn't. I called you out for projecting very early on, and a few times after that. Your only response thus far has been some variation of "nuh uh you". . You were projecting by saying I didn't know the facts, and then later admitting to me and to yourself that you actually didn't know the facts yourself, and hadn't even read the links you gave as evidence. In your words, you just "skimmed them". That's projection. Attributing the ignorance you are knowingly aware of within yourself to ot…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 05:34 AM
1

Projecting ... I don't think you know what that word means Edit: by the way, it's already been well established here that you will continue on an argument for some time while actually knowing fuck all about what side it is you've chosen.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 05:14 AM
1

First reply to your Wiki links that you tried to provide as evidence to your claims. ... You sir, are a moron. Really, your English doesn't seem so bad that your comprehension should lag this far behind.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 05:00 AM
1

Really? Because looking at it right now, here are your wiki links you posted, the very next reply to you after that points out the 12yo girls involved. You aren't helping your case so stop digging a deeper hole. I copy and pasted what I said for you. Of course that would be #7 so not sure why I'd expect you to catch it this time.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 04:57 AM
1

That's conjecture. Artists sign their artwork all over. And again, perspective. We can't even make out the letters of his signature. It could be written upside down for all we know.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 04:39 AM
1

Details from the investigation included allegations that 12-year-old triplets were flown in from France for Epstein's birthday, and flown back the following day after being sexually abused by the financier. From the helpful Wikipedia article you've linked First reply to your Wiki links that you tried to provide as evidence to your claims. So.. what was that you were saying? Something about not knowing 12yo children were involved? Didn't I tell you to fuck off already?
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 04:37 AM
1

The background is white. The floor is white. There is no standard. This guy could be leaping off a mountain with his sledgehammer, crouching in wait for his ex-wife to walk below. This guy could be hanging upside down like a bat and has superglued his sandals to the ceiling. You just have to see it from a different perspective.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 12:14 AM
1

I got to the point in my first reply to you. You are just too stupid to read "sexually assaulted three 12 year olds" and figure out that 12 is less than 13 without me literally walking you through it step by step. But my inability was the problem. Lol right, ok kid
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 12:11 AM
1

... I like talking to walls too. The scary thing is when they talk back. How about we try to stay on topic though, because this just looks like nonsense to me and everyone else.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 12:10 AM
1

Fuck...
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 12:08 AM
1

How do you know which axis is correct? That is only perspective
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 12:07 AM
1

My god dude. More "I was not aware". Well it sure as shit seems you were not aware of a fucking thing. And if you are not from the USA, how in the fuck are you going to try and condescend me regarding American laws and customs? Are you joking? How old are you kid? And you're assuming I didn't know about the case until I read your links? That's a heavy dose of projection. How do you assume to speak for me and what I did or did not know? If I didn't know Epstein was a pedophile, do you think I ign…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 11:39 PM
1

You sure seem to fancy yourself an authority on a topic you repeatedly admit to know nothing about. Why is that? Does it make you feel good to believe you're correcting others mistakes, or what you perceive to be mistakes? What purpose do you actually have in "ensuring correct terminology is used"? How does it effect you if pedophilia or it's practitioners are not present in your life? Why are you speaking confidently on topics you know so little about? What happened to all that talk about stick…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 11:30 PM
1

"Nuh uh you" 😂
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 11:26 PM
1

Again, that depends which way you look at the picture.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 09:44 PM
1

How do you know the stripes here are vertical, instead of horizontal? For example, if I have a pencil laying on the table with horizontal stripes, and then I stand that pencil up on its end, haven't the stripes then become vertical?
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 09:39 PM
1

... It's a fact that you're an idiot...
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 09:37 PM
1

Or the Russian flag... Or the Netherlands flag... Or the Croatian flag, maybe the Costa Rican flag, possibly even North Korea's flag
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 09:32 PM
1

Yes, you gave it to me in the form of two wikis. Remember that? Shocker, the old rich dude fucking 12yo girls on "Pedophile Island" might have been a pedophile!
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 08:33 PM
1

No you haven't. Now you're just repeating what I've said about your comprehension. "No you" seems to be the popular response from you. "Based on the clinical terminology based on the allegations". You are not American, are you..? Guessing English is not your first language, in which case the comprehension, and maybe even cultural, gap is understandable. I'll repeat one more time for your benefit. The two links you provided to support your argument, a wiki link on Epstein, and a wiki link on pedo…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 08:32 PM
1

Even in Alabama, the minimum marriageable age today is 16. There are states that might allow younger with parental consent, but luckily most parents don't share your views and understand that getting married at 14 is a good way to fuck up someones entire life. Also, marriage is not the same as sexual assault or rape, so not even sure where you keep going there. Raping a 12 year old and marrying a 12 year old with parental consent (generally occuring due to cultural differences like arranged marr…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 08:18 PM
1

That isn't a direct quote. Again, the word "substantiated" can be found nowhere in your first reply. I have screenshots if you need a reminder. Your first comment said: I’m not sure if there was any evidence of Epstein being a pedo. I think he was into girls that had passed puberty. And your second: They say they were minors as young as 14. That makes him not a pedophile by the definition on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia He was a sex offender but not a pedo as he wasn’t into…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 06:54 PM
1

I quoted it for you dumbass, from your own link. Sex with children 13yo or younger is pedophilic. Epstein had sex with three 12 year old girls, plus countless other underage children. Rather than try more useless character assassination to avoid making a real argument, how about telling us why you care about Epstein's title so much? Does it have a profound effect on you, what we decide to call him? Don't give me more of that "I care about terminology" bullshit either, we all see through that. Yo…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 06:49 PM
1

I think you're gross. Marrying a 17 year old with their and their parents consent is not the same thing as raping a 12 year old child. If you don't see that you deserve a padded cell.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/20 06:44 PM
1

Try rereading your previous comment, then read this response to that comment again. Do the 12 year old girls he assaulted not count? Do you just not care because he didn't receive the pedophilia conviction, although the evidence was more than substantial to make one stick (hence all the controversy surrounding the case)? From your own two links, as pasted again for you above, there is no denying that by having sex with 13yo underage children, Epstein being much greater than 5 years older than th…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 10:07 PM
1

No you didn't. The word "substantiated" was not present in your reply. What's with all the lying? It's unbecoming of a pedophilia expert such as yourself.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:59 PM
1

Good reading comprehension skills, well thought out reply, definitely made use of supporting details within your argument. Id give that response a solid 9/10. Attention: This message is brought to you entirely slathered with sarcasm. Please ingest this sarcasm at your own risk. Sarcasm has been known to cause increased risk of annoyance, shame, frustration, failed pregnancy and death.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:56 PM
1

If you'll see my other reply, based on your own link to the definition of pedophilia, his actions squarely fit within that realm. He had sex with three 12 year old girls. The cutoff age for pedophilia is 13 years old, with a 5 year difference between the victim and offender. Why do you think his final charges in court became such a big controversy nationwide? Marrying a minor with parental consent is not the same as raping a child. Again with the disgusting fucking comparisons.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:52 PM
1

Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13. A person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as …
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:46 PM
1

I didn't disregard the link, I provided you an example from your first that matched your definition from the second. What about your response was "nice"? You are so far removed from reality it's astounding.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:40 PM
1

It’s most likely you are the pedophile here, masking for your own inadequacy and so stupid you don’t even understand that the term you have used has been used by yourself incorrectly. Trying to educate a dumb ass like you seems to have been fruitless as you still lack the comprehension to understand that you made an error. Now you're a liar on top of a suspected creeper. I've said you are sick for claiming Epstein is not a pedo, while knowing full well his actions taken with numerous underage ch…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:20 PM
1

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53268218 British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, an ex-girlfriend of convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, has been charged in the US after being arrested by the FBI. Better fuckin run brah. The BBC news network is using the wrong definition of pedofile (somehow) when writing about Epstein. You planning to skip your ass over there and set em straight? He only screwed with 12 year olds, how dare they... The fact you don't even see what you argue for is scary.…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:11 PM
1

Yet the link you provided both substantiated those allegations and called them factually relevant. Next time try reading your links before posting, because they might just prove the other guys point if you aren't careful. The fact that you immediately jumped from "Epstein is not a pedofile, but you must be a pedofile for thinking so" says an immense amount about your character, whether you believe that to be the case or not. I sincerely pray you are never allowed around children with the way you…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:03 PM
0

How have I been abusive or threatening to you in the slightest? If anything, I repeated the exact same unsubstantiated accusation you randomly decided to level against me. So how about I put it in words you can understand. Fuck off creep. Nobody wants you or your disgusting opinions here.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:00 PM
1

You realize when you start telling ALL the others in a room around you to learn, it's likely you who are ignorant? I have half a mind to report you to law enforcement with how concerned you are over making sure the definition of a pedofilic man does not include one who sleeps with 12+ year old children.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 08:29 PM
1

Dude you're fucking disgusting. I won't even attempt to respond to any of this shit, especially considering you blatantly ignore the problems of a grown man sleeping with 12, 13, and 14 year old girls (multiple girls and multiple occasions). Wake the fuck up and stop telling people what you think because you are fucking disturbing and a person I would not allow around my children. Thinking sex with 12 year olds is OK? Taking so much offense for a stranger over whether a 12 year old is pre-pubesc…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 08:25 PM
1

There is literally not a single shred of evidence that any votes are being fraudulently counted or cast. In fact, we were told just how long the vote counting processes would take during the national debates. And do you know what Trump said when asked if he would accept the results of the election, the will of the American people? He said "of course I will as long as they vote for me. If Biden wins there will obviously have been foul play involved." So either he wins, or it's rigged, by his own …
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 07:30 PM
1

Details from the investigation included allegations that 12-year-old triplets were flown in from France for Epstein's birthday, and flown back the following day after being sexually abused by the financier. From the helpful Wikipedia article you've linked It is a lot shocking to me that you would jump so quickly to defend this man, a definite and proven pedofile, solely because the children which he chose to abuse may have been through puberty already. I'm sorry (no I'm not) but you're wrong, an…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 07:27 PM
1

Details from the investigation included allegations that 12-year-old triplets were flown in from France for Epstein's birthday, and flown back the following day after being sexually abused by the financier. From the helpful Wikipedia article you've linked It is a lot shocking to me that you would jump so quickly to defend this man, a definite and proven pedofile, solely because the children which he chose to abuse may have been through puberty already. I'm sorry (no I'm not) but you're wrong, an…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 07:27 PM
5

Uh there is a literal shit ton of evidence that Epstein was a pedo. Where the fuck have you been? He literally went to prison and committed suicide over it after all the evidence came out? Oh and happy cake day
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 09:53 AM
4

Election fraud = counting everyone's votes, regardless of Trump's whining? Lol how do you reconcile that one in your head, if repeated requests for direct involvement by foreign nations in our election process never disturbed you in the slightest? Also, wasn't Trump best buddies with Epstein, a well known pedo? So we had a dementia riddled pedo (and rapist, racist, sexist, arrogant douchebag) become the 45th president thanks to election fraud and you cheered. I think you'll survive 4 years after…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 08:28 AM
2

Or advises us to "grab em by the pussy" (just warmed my heart to know all the little girls hearing our President's words must feel so respected), or sarcastically mentions to drink bleach, or who claims to stand for so many things which they so clearly despise (like LGBT, black people, and the environment). Someone who responds to a question regarding the wildfires spreading across the entirety of the Western United States (one of the largest wildfire seasons in all history) with the profound in…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/20 08:24 AM
1

The double standard is bullshit? Lady I think you came to the wrong sub with your r/femaledatingstrategy friends. This post was literally about the double standard. You came with nothing more to say than "but I'm a woman and I don't care so obviously nobody cares". Lol I'd say that's the real bullshit, discrediting this entire sub and their users' observations based on your own personal preferences? Ha as soon as you run society and speak for everyone we will be saved. You don't care about the b…
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/20 10:31 PM
1

Username checks out.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/20 10:18 PM
1

Or anyone else but yourself. Like the hobo in Walmart talking to the demon on aisle 9
/r/MensRights23/10/20 10:17 PM
1

You can also get life for burning the local church down on Sunday morning, or for giving your neighbor a ride to the airport in your trunk. Damn US police state makes it hard to live a normal life.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 10:14 PM
1

You can also get life for burning the local church down on Sunday morning, or for giving your neighbor a ride to the airport in your trunk. Damn US police state makes it hard to live a normal life.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 10:14 PM
1

You can also get life for burning the local church down on Sunday morning, or for giving your neighbor a ride to the airport in your trunk. Damn US police state makes it hard to live a normal life.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 10:13 PM
2

Yes, because smiling gleefully while murdering your SO is more likely to mean you're temporarily insane, rather than having the absolute best 12 seconds of your entire fucking life by fulfilling your long sought revenge fantasy against your asshole partner. When you go temporarily insane on a regular basis, can you really call it "temporary" any more?
/r/MensRights23/10/20 10:02 PM
-6

Lol did you read my comment? I asked you a question. Twice. It's perfectly fine to whom? To you? Why does that matter to anyone else? And what does it mean in regards to the blatantly obvious societal double-standard as depicted in the OP?
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/20 04:40 AM
-1

Lol could you imagine the blowback after dumping your girlfriend after you sleep together because you didn't like her boobs? You say it's acceptable to have preferences... but to whom? To you? Or to everyone else? Because if you only mean it's acceptable to you (which is all you can reliably speak to anyways), then it doesn't really matter in the scheme of things. In case you had missed it, the story being shared here is the blatant double-standard. Edit: try telling a woman you won't date her b…
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/20 04:28 AM
16

🖕 Edit: for insulting my fragile male ego
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/20 04:24 AM
1

http://empathygap.uk/?p=3125 This is sufficient to obliterate the WASPI’s claim – unless the same claim of inadequate warning were to be made for men – but the WASPIs are entirely blind to the position of men. Looks like feminists fighting hard for equality 😜
/r/MensRights22/10/20 10:14 PM
1

I hear Qatar is nice this time of year. Or maybe Oman.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 10:07 PM
3

You think someone should die for not agreeing with the opinions you hold? But men are the bad ones? Do you not see the irony there?
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/20 06:12 AM
6

Next time bro... Use a quote
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/20 06:09 AM
4

I think you guys are all missing his first sentence (and his only sentence). Everything that follows that first line is a quote from the linked sub, and he clearly has a negative view of the quoted comment in question based on his one line assessment.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/20 06:09 AM
6

And if a man were beat by his mother until the day he were able to leave home? Married to his wife for 10+ years to find her cheating with someone else, or to find his children aren't really his, but then still be forced by courts to pay for them regardless if he makes the choice to leave? Does that man have a right to dislike women then? How do bad things happening ever make generalizing an entire group based on inherent characteristics OK? I'm pretty sure that's immoral in literally any contex…
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/20 06:04 AM
1

I love that sub. It's all women. Venturing there is like taking home-ec back in highschool. I'm bound to get laid.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/20 05:56 AM
1

Christian is almost an empty word. They were mostly christian and that's factually true. Many were antisemites because jews killed christ. So there's a link between antisemitism and chrsitianity. We can also get into the historical details. But christianity has been very antisemitic for most of history. Emphasis mine. No reason to lie or get all pissy dude. You clearly couldn't make the very simple connection I practically drew for you in Crayola, so let me spell it out. You are here saying Chri…
/r/MensRights22/10/20 05:09 AM
1

Many feminists I've talked to acknowledge it exists. See what I'm talking about with bad faith arguments? Many feminists you've talked to? So what you mean is nobody important, and most likely some more keyboard warriors? In other words, no feminists actually in the mainstream acknowledge it exists. By the way, the question is "what have they done about it", not "do they even believe it's a thing". And you couldn't even show they believe it's a thing... The question you ought to ask is what is t…
/r/MensRights22/10/20 04:38 AM
1

Toxic masculinity and toxic femininity. One is being adressed. Men not expressing their emotions is a huge problem. Many feminists want equality in the justice system because it reinforces gender roles. Toxic femininity? Which feminists have done anything about that, or even acknowledge that it's a thing? As for "toxic masculinity", a feminist favorite, please tell me, what are some examples of non-toxic masculinity? Which traits, if any, would you define as inherently masculine, but not toxic? …
/r/MensRights20/10/20 12:42 AM
1

Toxic masculinity and toxic femininity. One is being adressed. Men not expressing their emotions is a huge problem. Many feminists want equality in the justice system because it reinforces gender roles. Toxic femininity? Which feminists have done anything about that, or even acknowledge that it's a thing? As for "toxic masculinity", a feminist favorite, please tell me, what are some examples of non-toxic masculinity? Which traits, if any, would you define as inherently masculine, but not toxic? …
/r/MensRights20/10/20 12:41 AM
1

“If you look at the feminist discourse that’s most prominent on the surface and in mainstream media, it’s very focused on the individual and the superficial,” says Meghan Murphy, a Vancouver-based writer, and founder and editor of Feminist Current. “It’s a self-help version of feminism that believes if I choose it and it makes me feel good, it’s feminist and you can’t say anything about that.” Whyever would this feminist icon go out of her way to point out modern feminists acting against the dic…
/r/MensRights19/10/20 07:16 PM
2

Quotas only work to land people salaried career positions. Not so much to land a partial ownership in an international conglomerate, or any of the actual positions that create the uber rich. The only real way to land that spot is with a whole shitload of luck and positive societal bias. Coming up with a novel idea, or taking someone else's idea and doing it better (looking at you, Facebook) is one of the only plausible methods still around. To make real money, you actually have to do something o…
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/20 07:04 PM
8

Quotas only work to land people salaried career positions. Not so much to land a partial ownership in an international conglomerate, or any of the actual positions that create the uber rich. The only real way to land that spot is with a whole shitload of luck and positive societal bias. Coming up with a novel idea, or taking someone else's idea and doing it better (looking at you, Facebook) is one of the only plausible methods still around. To make real money, you actually have to do something o…
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/20 07:04 PM
1

I quoted you, dumbass. Literally your words. But you didn't make the argument? Also, you're arguing with me. You literally told me the position I hold here, which is what kicked this whole shit show off. So why the fuck are you attacking a position I don't hold and arguments I didn't make? Lol see the beautiful irony of that statement yet? Any other "nuh uh you" responses you'd like to throw back at me? Here let me help you: No, YOU'RE the waste of time. Tell me, in the definition for "Nazis", d…
/r/MensRights19/10/20 04:05 PM
2

The goal isn't as much to change a perspective as it is to open a mind. If he, after this "debate", out of anger/frustration searches some of the topics discussed for himself, even in the face of his own bias, he may actually learn and grow from it a bit. One can only hope.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 04:20 PM
2

You are right of course. As soon as he started to feel slightly disproven he jumped to defensive mode and started giving one word responses about strawman. I'm still uncertain he even knows what the word means. I think he just uses it against any argument that destabilizes his position rather than have to logically rebut and risk endangering his beliefs. Hopefully though next time someone has this interaction with him he will be just a bit more willing to listen, and will have done a bit more re…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 04:15 PM
1

I doesn't matter how mad you get it remains a strawman. Most of what you said, I don't believe. DEFINE FEMINISM AND SHUT UP. Holy shit dude TLDR; Lol just wanted to highlight the vast hypocrisy and ignorance (and ironic humor) depicted in your reply. It doesn't matter how mad you get you remain an idiot. Most of what you said, I don't believe (because different people somehow have different fucking beliefs! Imagine that shit!) However, not believing something doesn't make it untrue. Unless you'r…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 04:07 PM
1

It was a strawman. I doesn't matter how mad you get it remains a strawman. Most of what you said, I don't believe. Lol thanks for clarifying, though that didn't help your case. You have just clearly explained that you don't know what a strawman argument is. Also dictating a strangers emotions over the internet isn't going to help your illogical arguments to make more sense either. You just decided to start acting like a dickhead because you were undeniably wrong. It didn't Oh it did, you just do…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 04:02 PM
1

Wow, you just went negative effort with that response. Here, let me respond in an equally useless fucking manner. Strawman, nope, loser, not true, liar, strawman, take the dick from your ass. Lol I find it funny how you explicitly state the point I was making as truth in your previous response, but then totally r/woooosh on just how much that crushed your original argument into dust. But sure, let's go with you didn't just blatantly prove my point by having to explain different belief systems. D…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 03:22 PM
1

I do disagree with what he is saying, but I also believe we can change people's minds. We are just so quick to write people off as lesser, or as lost causes nowadays due to their sets of beliefs that it's become a rare occurrence. If we couldn't change people's minds, there wouldn't be much point in talking about it!
/r/MensRights16/10/20 03:09 PM
1

I do disagree with what he is saying, but I also believe we can change people's minds. We are just so quick to write people off as lesser, or as lost causes nowadays due to their sets of beliefs that it's become a rare occurrence. If we couldn't change people's minds, there wouldn't be much point in talking about it!
/r/MensRights16/10/20 03:08 PM
3

Lol as soon as you get a graduate degree from Yale I think you could be a little more effective with this argument. She is also a feminist academic, having spent much of her life and career studying these topics in depth, far more than you or I have in our spare time on the internet. So calling her misogynistic is also not the most effective argument coming from an anonymous user on the internet, who likely is both not a woman and not involved in the modern feminist movement or academia resultin…
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/20 05:50 PM
3

Normally, bot, I would say to thee, "nay, and fuck off," and be done with you. However, after perusing the established novella link which you have presented above, I must say that this "snewd" website is a trove of free literary classics. Therefore I thank thee, bot.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/20 05:36 PM
6

It wasn't OP's quote, it was Camille Paglia's. She has been a professor since 1984 at the University of the Arts in Philidelphia, PA. Not positive but assuming she graduated high school english to become a professor. Until people start to learn that differing opinions don't necessarily ascertain differing intelligence, or sexual/racial biases, our world will only fall to more chaos. She is also credited as having said, "If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in g…
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/20 05:32 PM
4

Sorry, but this became pointless to continue after that comment: "I don't live in the US so I'm not very sure..". So you are not only making this needlessly political, you are doing so in a country where you don't even live. Just curious, how is the Kremlin this time of year? (PS: discrimination was always illegal, regardless of direction of taxpayer funds. Also, Yale is a private school...) 😑
/r/MensRights15/10/20 04:04 PM
2

There are people who are against women having the right to vote. Even in 2020 in western countries. Do you find it odd that you would have to clarify this? Meaning that one can be against feminism, but not be of the traditionalist ideology you are forcing on us? Thank you for proving my point with a simple explanation of how people can have different beliefs. Good show. But being a traditionalist means you are against feminism. I'll even make a stronger statement. Conservatives are much more lik…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 03:34 PM
2

Sorry, but you're just plain wrong here, in every single conceivable way. If you decided to call yourself a klan member, but stood here trying to say there are lots of different ways klan members can spread their message, from talking 'anonymously' to lynching children in th streets, but you don't agree with those extremists doing the lynching because they aren't the real klansmen... Do you see the logical fallacy yet? You are offering their organization and their goals your support, whether you…
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/20 03:05 PM
6

His administration has been cracking down on lawsuits against colleges for discrimination? What powers does he have over a private university like Yale to influence a lawsuit unrelated to Trump or the Presidency? So his reforms to Title IX allowed lawsuits like this to happen, and under Obama's Title IX discrimination lawsuits in regards to male victims were not allowed by law? Sorry, but that seems a little far-fetched from my perspective.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 02:57 PM
37

Sorry, what exactly does Trump have to do with this guy filing a lawsuit against Yale for sexual discrimination? How did he "allow it", or conversely, how would Biden "end" it?
/r/MensRights15/10/20 03:47 AM
18

The censorship probably helps to bring more attention to the movement in all honesty. Look at Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders and how the media treated them, they blew up, bigger I think than they would have had they not been ignored or mocked. Same with prohibition and the war on drugs. People seem to want whatever society tells them they can't have.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 03:44 AM
18

When extremists are the ones writing policy, running the show, and hitting the talk-show circuit, they are not extremists, they are mainstream. Women can't legally rape a man in the UK. Women can't be rapists there. In the US it's technically possible albeit exceedingly rare. Some of the largest and most powerful feminist organizations on the planet (note: not anonymous Reddit users on the internet, but actual feminists) have put much of their funding and political power directly towards making …
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/20 02:40 AM
11

Who is "we" that tries to help male victims? By the way, talking statistics, men are raped more than women. Feminists just remove prison statistics from the running because they're classy like that and it skews their story. Also it entirely and ignorantly ignores a fact you fully admit to in your response here, "men tend to struggle more talking about it" (and also aren't believed, and if they are nobody cares unless it's a child, and if they're a child and people care they won't do anything abo…
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/20 02:32 AM
2

Women have the right to vote. Why do you think feminism means women having the right to vote? Whether modern feminism was here today or not, women would still have the right to vote. Feminists are explicitly against women being in the kitchen, which is sexist in it's own right. Being against feminism also doesn't mean you are for traditionalism. As I already explained, feminism is an ideology. Being against one ideology does not make you of another. That's illogical, and in truth a poor faith ar…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 02:24 AM
0

I love when I see random strangers on the internet telling others about their own political beliefs. Never understand how it's such a common occurrence. There is a wide range of political beliefs even amongst the left.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 01:54 AM
2

No, it doesn't. Use whatever definition you want. Feminism is an ideology. Being against an ideology means nothing regarding your own beliefs except that you're against that set of them.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 12:51 AM
20

You can oppose feminism without being far-right or a misogynist.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 09:48 AM
7

Jokes on her. That fuckers gonna live to 130.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 09:45 AM
1

No, you are absolutely not. Determining a cause is not the same as making excuses for the guy. He very clearly states that the dude needs help. Now, if he said something along the lines of "we shouldnt lock this guy up because rape isn't even that bad" or "he couldn't have raped them because he wasn't wearing his rape shoes" then I might be inclined to agree with you. As of now it just appears that you are twisting his message to suit your purposes, but the overall intent is still missing.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 09:03 AM
2

“Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim." Technically, under this definition one could make the claim in court that "without the consent of the victim" refers to the male, even in a case of vaginal penetration.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 09:03 AM
1

Just curious, how did he condone child rape? He only seems to point out probable cause and effect. Seems a bit disingenuous to claim he was condoning the actions.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 08:56 AM
3

Lol why is this sarcasm? If someone bitches at me for holding a door open they'd best hope they waited til they were all the way through the door. Just like the assholes who feel a need to lay on the horn in traffic behind you (especially on the dangerous 1-lane mountain roads). That's usually about the time I "think" I might have a "flat tire" and inconveniently end up parked in such a way that the entire 3-lane road is blocked. "Sorry, were you in a hurry or something?"
/r/MensRights04/10/20 04:05 AM
2

This is an insult to handicapables everywhere
/r/MensRights04/10/20 03:59 AM
-1

If someone ever gives you shit for holding the door open for them, look them square in the face and say, "What the FUCK makes you think I was holding the door open for your entitled ass? You could use the exercise anyways." Be warned: DONT DO THIS TO YOUR DATE/GF/WIFE UNLESS YOU WANT TO BE MGTOW! However, they are likely to learn a lesson about shutting up, to some future door holder's benefit.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 03:55 AM
2

You had their grocery bags? Was this your wife who slammed said door in your face? I feel like that would be the point at which I dropped someone else's groceries all over the floor at the store exit...
/r/MensRights04/10/20 03:45 AM
0

Again, the "western world" is massive, and you're showing your American ignorance. You could be from Holland. You could be from Switzerland. You could be from Germany. You could be from the UK or Scotland. You could be from Spain. But no, everyone here is just supposed to know you're from the US because you think the fucking planet revolves around you. Has nothing to do with the other content on this sub, because it is also global. I've been here long enough for that to be clear.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/20 04:12 AM
1

Yes, because everyone on Reddit automatically knows that all anti-feminists MUST be from the United States. Boy you're really something special, you know that? You just gave a whole laundry list of other countries with feminist leanings, but somehow we all just know you're American. Actually, now that I think about it, as dumb and dickish as you've been here we should've all known.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/20 04:00 AM
2

Oh, like the "wish her well" woman. Ya that I agree with. Anybody that would help collect and groom children for a pedo deserve the same punishment.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:58 AM
-1

So the blame is on the 14 year old girls who didn't rush forward to point out personal sexual abuse by a friend of the President of the United States? I can't say I agree with that. Many grown women would be hesitant to report indecent behavior by such a person, let alone a child. You should watch the Netflix documentary. There are many different reasons people might not have come forward after an abuse like that and the show goes into some of them. Definitely no fault on the victims in this guy…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:55 AM
0

Dude I am sorry but you are a world class moron. You do understand that this is the first time you've said the United States in this whole exchange, yes? Do you not understand that people on Reddit live all over the world? How are us random internet strangers supposed to discern "here" for you in particular is in the United States, and not Russia, or China, or India, or Sudan?
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/20 03:50 AM
0

Weren't some of those girls as young as 14? Does it matter if they were there for a role if it's still statutory rape?
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:43 AM
-2

... "In the country and country's similar to it." Do you mean in a rural community? Country as opposed to urban? Do you mean your country, but somehow don't mean "here with you"? Do you know that Reddit as a platform has users worldwide? So I ask again, what is "here" supposed to mean? Is everyone reading just automatically supposed to know everything about you and which "country and country's similar to it" you would refer to as "here" without any further context?
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/20 03:17 AM
0

Where is "here" bro? Sitting on your couch with you? Your state or territory? Country? Couldn't Saudi Arabia and here be the same place without any context at all? It's like when my wife says "hey I need your help go get me that from over there".
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/20 03:13 AM
3

This isn't entirely true. Non land-owning (white) males were given voting rights before feminists pushed for women's suffrage. Not very long before, but it was before. And if you ask a feminist their perspective, anything negative that women also took part in they would attribute to the mythical "toxic masculinity".
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/20 05:23 AM
1

Lol where did I say there was or wasn't any support for men? This is you making more stupid assumptions about my line of questioning, because I'm calling you out for being unable to support your assertions. You used an example of a suicide in Canada (of a man who spent years running a men's shelter... ahem) as evidence that the wording in the US VAWA bill is exclusive to women as you have been claiming since the start. Even though it's the "violence against women act", even still you have shown …
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/20 04:06 PM
1

... You can't really be this stupid, can you? Linking an article of a guy commiting suicide after leaving a demostic violence men's shelter in CANADA?! What the fuck does CANADA have to do with the US VAWA bill?! Dude... Just give up. Stop being an ignorant fuck and actually pay attention. You're calling me evil, wrong and a bad person because I'm pointing out blatant bigotry on your part, which you still can't manage to defend properly. Sounds like a mountain of hypocrisy if you ask me, you evi…
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/20 03:13 PM
1

Despite the need to direct federal funds toward the most pressing problem, it was not, and is not, the intent of Congress categorically to exclude men who have suffered domestic abuse or sexual assaults from receiving benefits and services under the Violence Against Women Act. The Act defines such key terms as ‘domestic violence’ and ‘sexual assault,’ which are used to determine eligibility under several of the grant programs, including the largest, the STOP grant program, in gender-neutral lang…
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 11:33 PM
1

You play the simple soldier, but you're just afraid to admit we've left humanity behind
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 10:32 PM
0

That's what she wants you to think
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 10:31 PM
1

My god you are a stupid one. HOW does it punish innocent men? What wording in this massive bill specifically are you talking about? I've got it open right now, please refer me to the subsection that says anything regarding innocent men in the 2013 Reauthorization of this act during President Obama's term, as you have claimed again and again with still no evidence. We have all figured out by now you have trouble reading. No need to make excuses, I'll put a TLDR at the end for your dumbass from no…
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 10:27 PM
1

Did you read my post? I certainly tried! I assume you're referring to your short excerpt about how the 2013 Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization that Obama signed, and not the Reauthorization Act signed in 2000, or 2005 or any of the other many reauthorizations signed by Republican presidents? How is this a hate law exactly? Which part of this immense bill are you referring to? I did a pretty good job of laying out the case that it is systemic, and absolutely not just a couple of crazy wom…
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 04:26 AM
3

Democrat hate party? Never mind. I see that you do not understand the difference between a group and an individual who falls within that group. Plenty of women speak against feminism, there are even some who frequent this sub. Plenty of women speak against #killallmen, some of them even frequent this sub. Nobody speaks against the way you personally were raised because we don't know you, and we don't attribute the traits of one bad person to all women solely because the bad one happened to be a …
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/20 10:46 PM
1

This woman from the OP may be a "lost soul", but on what grounds do you base the assumption that all women are lost souls? This one post by one person who just so happens to be a woman? If this woman happened to be black, would you say all black people are lost souls?
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/20 08:09 PM
3

Really dude? We are here to expose exactly this type of behavior from the feminist perspective. Your own post is doing exactly this. So why immediately after would you want to stoop to the level of over generalizing an entire group of people based on nothing more than the sex they were born? You are doing exactly what you claim to condemn.
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/20 08:07 PM
6

Who here is whining about how women have ruined their life? Some have given direct examples of how the women in their lives have harmed them, and how the current laws allow them to do so, if that's what you're referring to. Just wondering, how often do you go around to feminist subs and call them neck beard fuck wads because they spend all their time whining on the internet about how men have ruined their lives? I'm going to go out on limb here and guess never. So you're a hypocritical neck bear…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 07:36 PM
6

You play Call of Duty every day with a passion dude... You even Reddit about it. Plus you're here on this sub too. Just looking for a little clarification, would you agree that you sort of fit the stereotype of a neck beard fuckwad? 🐩🤺
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:58 PM
4

Both of you are fucking morons. Women are people. Some of them even sell drugs too. Some sell to men. Some sell to women. Some sell to both. One of you morons seem to think women can't be drug dealers because men have that position filled, and the other moron seems to think that women can only sell those drugs to other women because of some imaginary societal contract that makes them fear men.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:52 PM
0

Lol you've been on Reddit for 2 days, posted like 20+ comments, and every one of them is some form of "ok faggot". Do you mind if I ask, are you 12, or just coming to terms with your closeted homosexuality?
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:48 PM
8

Police are generally never charged with crimes such as robbery, gang violence or bar brawls should they even take place, so I have to assume that is a factor in the statistics. Cops have been charged with murder and rape, albeit not generally convicted.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:44 PM
1

I mean isn't it obvious, that's like the shittiest sub right now. But either way, we must protect this queen. You mean this comment, that he/she said was "clearly a joke" in their very next reply? If you're going to ignore the contex then I cba. Keep it honest if you're going to ask the same of us. By the way, what are these so-called "rape subs" you keep mentioning that Reddit hasn't banned years ago? Have any subs you can provide for an example? Or do you just have a personal issue against por…
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 08:34 PM
1

I mean isn't it obvious, that's like the shittiest sub right now. But either way, we must protect this queen. You mean this comment, that he said was "clearly a joke" in his very next reply? If you're going to ignore the contex then I cba. Keep it honest if you're going to ask the same of us. By the way, what are these so-called "rape subs" you keep mentioning that Reddit hasn't banned years ago? Have any subs you can provide for an example? Or do you just have a personal issue against porn in g…
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 08:34 PM
1

Where has anyone said it's the "worst subreddit ever"? But I'm the one doing mental gymnastics? You're kidding right? All I've been doing is asking you questions that you probably should have asked yourself before posting. You are literally making huge presumptions about me, a stranger on the internet, and then flattering yourself with the support you can offer. You have absolutely no clue what I do for a living, or how I've helped male or female victims. And it's pretty disgusting that you woul…
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 08:26 PM
1

Where has anyone said it's the "worst subreddit ever"? But I'm the one doing mental gymnastics? You're kidding right? All I've been doing is asking you questions that you probably should have asked yourself before posting. You are literally making huge presumptions about me, a stranger on the internet, and then flattering yourself with the support you can offer. You have absolutely no clue what I do for a living, or how I've helped male or female victims. And it's pretty disgusting that you woul…
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 08:26 PM
1

Ok, so if you watched a person shot in the face in the street, would you feel the need to run up to the police and say, "there are serial killers still on the loose, this guy only killed once"? How is anyone here exaggerating anything but yourself? A little self-awareness goes a long way. Edit: also it would be nice if you would reply to the rest of the comment
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 07:54 PM
1

Why aren't you? You're here complaining that men could have the audacity to call this bullshit out for what it is because we could be fighting against rape? You realize a big part of the platform of this sub is rights and protections for male rape victims, yes? What I think you meant to say is "why not focus your attention on issues that girls have rather than issues that girls cause".
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 06:49 PM
1

I don't think you know what hyperbolic or idiom means. It means it's an exaggerated saying. Because long distance relationships generally don't work for lack of any contact. Hard to call the occasional phone chat a real "relationship" anyways. You're being intentionally obtuse here, for no other reason from what I can tell but to be an ass.
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 06:43 PM
1

"There are communist dictators the world over, but sure a stupid arrogant President is the worst thing ever." See how it sounds from a perspective you might better relate to? Why not call out poor behavior when we see it, regardless if someone in the world somewhere is doing something worse?
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 05:46 PM
1

Are you literally asking for a source on a hyperbolic idiom?
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 05:39 PM
4

You try to incorporate a poor characteristic to a random stranger, when he disagrees with you, you demand evidence of his own political leanings. Lol that's gold dude, keep hypocring on
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 05:09 PM
3

We don't really have the tech to completely automate oil drilling, either. We could probably do much more of it than we do remotely, but it would take immensely more funds for equipment and the same number of off-site operators to run the gear remotely. You may shave off a few jobs by combining certain oversight/monitoring positions, but ultimately would be a big cost add, and infeasible for certain aspects of the job.
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 01:16 AM
1

You forgot the added steps to the process suggested by corporate: a tank put fish in put antibiotics, steroids, and a healthy dose of radiation in breed fish feed fish to lab subject to assess survivability when fish are grown to 3x full size take them out
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/20 01:12 AM
4

"This crime carries the same sentences as rape." Not very often it doesn't. Sentencing alone generally falls much harder on those convicted of rape. That is ignoring the social stigma that goes along with being labeled a "rapist", a stigma which does not generally follow those convicted of sexual assault. This also only allows for "penetration" to be considered, which the majority of the time will exclude female sexual predators from this particular charge. Instead it's general use is in cases o…
/r/MensRights25/09/20 11:43 PM
2

It's controlled through state laws whether or not lockers fall into the category of school or student property. The fees the school might charge you has no effect on the usage or interpretation of those laws.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 01:17 AM
2

a search will generally be OK if: the school had a “reasonable suspicion” that the search would turn up evidence that the student broke the law or school rules, and the extent of the search was related to its purpose and wasn’t “excessively intrusive,” considering the child’s age and gender, as well as the nature of the wrongdoing. (New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1984).) They don't need you to sign anything. They are protected in this action by Supreme Court ruling. Signing a booklet does n…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:22 PM
4

Lol that's all well and good but the school doesn't give a shit, they have the legal right if, as you said, they have reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion, as we all know, is highly subjective. Besides that point, cases like this are likely to never even come in contact with LE or the court systems. Schools handle their shit in house, which is partially why they're given the supervisory power over the children as they are. No, what happens is the school security officer rifles through your…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 06:35 AM
11

Probable cause can be as little as a tip from another student or a teacher who "swears they smelled pot". If there had been reason to search his belongings in this case they almost certainly would have. Don't think they can take your cell phone and flip through it though, pretty sure that would require police and a warrant.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 06:23 AM
2

Hey isn't this what the Germans said when #killalljews was trending? 🙄
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/20 05:55 AM
2

I'm on board. Who goes last?
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/20 05:54 AM
20

Ya schools are legally allowed to search your shit without consent. They don't operate under the same rules as normal society for some stupid reason. Take it from experience, those guys are dicks, and don't bring your weed to school.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:49 AM
1

That's why you get it signed and notarized by both parties and a witness, make lots of copies, distribute to personal lawyers. It's not so easy to get out of a signed document without specific exit clauses.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:45 PM
1

Nice novel. Next time have less, or more relevant thoughts on the matter please. Or throw in a TLDR. What gave you the idea that I work all day while my wife does fuck all and I refer to that as a "partnership"? I have the choice to leave our marriage any time, and so does she. You also somehow spin "don't buy someone else a car with your money" into "you can't participate in a marriage". That's assinine. If my wife wants a car, she will buy a car with the money she gets from her job just like I…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:43 PM
1

Lol so true. Every time this summer we get a north wind my whole city turns into a smokehouse.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:35 PM
3

No, I'm not a sexist asshole, women have done plenty for society. But to say men haven't is at absolute best horribly ignorant, and at worst purposefully mistruthful. To say every male accomplishment was really by an unrecognized female is horribly sexist, yet the person here somehow has convinced themselves that they fight for equality while spreading this one-sided and false rhetoric.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:34 PM
2

Why do you ask? Are you stalking me? Do you want to get a joint account?
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:32 PM
3

Oh that is totally a fuckup on my part I was too quick reading usernames. For some reason I thought the person replied to you with this "matching" argument, and I was a bit in amazement that they didn't see the irony in their response. I will leave my mistake up for posterity.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:27 AM
2

Seems like if she is doing all the cooking and cleaning she is still bound by traditional roles, no? It's entirely possible to share the burdens of life with someone else without either party taking advantage, even if one of those parties just so happens to be a woman. My wife can't make me do anything. She can stop doing her share of the cleaning and cooking in protest, but should she do that I would almost certainly just cook meals for myself and clean after myself as well. You get out what yo…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:25 AM
2

That's what a copy machine is for
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:23 AM
2

What are you talking about "beneath you"? You are actively talking about hate towards other men while hypocritically throwing all your hate towards women at this guy. Why did you just assume that it's his wife's age, and not her personality like he very strongly implied, that ultimately attracted him to her, or her to him? This is just a ball of rage and projection if I've ever seen it
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:20 AM
13

Wear a condom and for Gods sake never get talked into a joint account. Also if you start throwing out my shit you better be able to afford rent.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:11 AM
5

Some people just want to watch the world burn
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:08 AM
2

Is going around and calling strangers on the idiot "stupid fucks denying reality" how you went about "making up for it"? You won't get anywhere in life with high blood pressure due to unresolved ANGER issues.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:04 AM
4

You are deluded if you think all of this is true. All successful male professionals had a female counterpart who really was responsible, just not given credit? Was this between watching the children and working on the farm? I believe you have just provided us with quite the excellent example of the circular logic described above. Not sure if that was on purpose or to be ironic, but thank you? Just curious, how did you go about convincing yourself that women are actually responsible for... everyt…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:02 AM
21

Soo... False accusations are a problem for women, but anytime false accusations against men are brought up we hear a bunch of "it comes with the territory" or "even if you didn't do it, you should just bite the bullet and go to jail for life to support women anyways!" They literally argue that false accusations are practically nonexistent, then fight against them, but only for women..
/r/MensRights21/09/20 03:30 PM
3

I mean I don't disagree it's probably not healthy for someone to base their entire self image on the length of their dick, but when did it become ok to suggest suicide to people with a poor self image? Or the mentally ill, for that matter? Damn that's fucked up
/r/MensRights19/09/20 03:42 AM
58

I have plenty of excuses... just not any good ones
/r/MensRights15/09/20 03:33 PM
1

https://my.xfinity.com/?cid=cust
/r/MensRights15/09/20 03:17 PM
-18

Assumptions make an ass of u and me 🦆
/r/MensRights15/09/20 04:41 AM
7

May want to fix the grammar in the sentence telling us we need to be educated, before you begin educating on in us really badly. Sort of hurts the message that follows.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 04:35 AM
11

I saw that happen once. It was a great episode of SVU, if anyone else is interested in seeing it happen.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 04:33 AM
1

Also showing up on time, and not a full month late to the party... 🤯
/r/AntiFeminists12/09/20 06:15 AM
1

What part of morals are factual, exactly? I don't think we are on the same topic anymore, and I'm not sure where we diverted. It sounds to me like now you're saying education is what needs to be influenced in these third-world countries by those providing relief aid. Ideas are generally not "factual", that's why they're called ideas. Flat Earth theory was created by the ignorant, but it was the ignorant of the so-called "first world". TLDR: how can morals be factual? makes no sense
/r/MensRights07/09/20 12:49 AM
0

Different people also think that the earth is flat, or that Hitler did nothing wrong. What different people think has no bearing on what actually is correct. But what you (or those with enough wealth to provide relief aid) think is what actually is correct? You don't hear how ridiculous that sounds? What does people thinking the Earth is flat have to do with morals? You realize those people who think the Earth is flat come from majority "first world" countries who control this morality narrative…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 07:49 AM
2

Helping starvation does not constitute withholding food until certain socio-cultural requirements are met. That's the opposite of helping. Why do they need external help? Did those countries request external help in fixing their culture, or did they request food aid to prevent starvation? How would the actions suggested in this article help anyone? It's idiotic social posturing that will have dire consequences on the third-world countries currently reliant on our relief aid, taking place at a ti…
/r/MensRights05/09/20 10:17 PM
0

How are morals not relative? Seriously? You're going to have to explain that logic to me. You do realize how widespread morals are in the United States alone, yes? Our current President is a narcissistic, sexist, racist, fascist, who fancies himself the hero of the modern world. It is morally wrong to many right-wing Christians to be gay. The act of being gay is morally wrong to some people. Do you think it's actually morally wrong, or do you think it's possible that different people and differe…
/r/MensRights05/09/20 09:46 PM
2

"The women are being treated terribly" Which women is that? The women doesn't really help to support your claim. Also, who's sources? I didn't provide any sources? I said why should you be able to push your cultural expectations on others with whom you have no interaction outside of relief aid? And how is it considered relief aid if you have strings attached? Ever heard the term "no taxation without representation"? So why should you, an American feminist with no "skin in the game" be the one de…
/r/MensRights05/09/20 09:41 PM
15

So we should force our culture, beliefs and morals on all the different countries of the world, literally forcing them to comply through starvation tactics? I think you probably need to get some of that shit off your ears now. Withholding food to get someone to do what you want in the way of feminism is sort of an ugly and backwards method of forced servitude, but I guess we're OK with forced slavery provided women aren't as affected as the men?
/r/MensRights05/09/20 04:57 PM
10

Why would you say this, on this sub? Why promote abusive behavior in a sub dedicated to fighting it? Are you trolling, poorly?
/r/MensRights05/09/20 04:51 AM
15

I always say: I am not rich but willing to rob the elderly. Are your parents home?
/r/AntiFeminists04/09/20 03:47 PM
6

Yes. I for one would have bowed to anyone able to screw a middle-aged teacher stupid and desperate enough to sleep with a student. That child truly must feel like a king. Get real lmao
/r/MensRights03/09/20 05:19 AM
6

Really? You think it more likely that a 15 year old boy "initiated it" with a 33 year old woman, his teacher, than it is her being a pedofile creeper? Isn't that sort of the exact biased mindset this sub is about fighting?
/r/MensRights03/09/20 05:06 AM
8

There was a man in his 30s from my old school got busted living with a middle schooler. I think he was the wrestling coach or some shit. The articles about him certainly were not this kind.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 04:56 AM
1

Sounds like your dad and your sister might be abusive? Reply if you need help.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 04:29 AM
-12

Lol you are... passionate. I do think you missed a sub thread though (See racist dickhead below)
/r/MensRights27/08/20 04:49 AM
-41

Yeah I've got no doubt you have mommy issues
/r/MensRights27/08/20 04:38 AM
1

Coming back 3 days later to prove to us you're 13 at best? Good one lad. Your schoolmates or your mother will surely get a kick out of that.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/20 03:48 PM
0

And thank you guys, for making me give up support for you morons now before any real damage was done. Goodbye, and good luck with your "movement" assholes!
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/20 04:39 PM
1

I think if we focused more on true globalism we wouldn't need giant sovereign military death cults in ever developed nation... but that's just me. Honestly wondering if our truly best bet at long term survival wouldn't be another world war, followed by a New World Order single Earth single nation setup, that has everyone effectively working towards the same goals. Otherwise, I feel like when this American experiment implodes (and it is dangerously close at the moment) the stability of the world …
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/20 04:36 PM
1

Ok.. not sure what men having "better physical strength" has to do with anything? Does that mean that said physical strength should qualify men to go fight and die for the country before it should women, even though women can do everything men can do and the aim is equality? Why would you even add that little excerpt if you disagree with the concept altogether? We can't pick and choose the parts of "equality" that suit our needs. That isn't equality. That is what modern feminism has become. If y…
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/20 04:08 PM
2

This may be a distinctly American issue with feminism, as many other less developed countries, particularly in the Middle East, still have a long way to go to even reach near the level of equality that we've reached today. I'm guessing unlike many of the people here I believe we still have a long way to go towards reaching equality, but the largest and most powerful feminist organizations in politics show a clear bias in their policy stances against men, rather than just for women. I guess in a …
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/20 04:23 AM
2

You are also a bit late to the conversation... and this is quite the pointless add-on considering the comment you have chosen to respond to. Please read above why calling yourself a feminist doesn't matter to me in the slightest, if the real feminists taking action do not share your actually fair and equal beliefs. Once again, you cannot twist an ideology to suit your own agenda... then it becomes a different ideology.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/20 11:30 PM
-13

Almost guaranteed they are like 13.. not so that they will grow out of it. One can only hope.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/20 03:51 PM
-8

No, it's stupid children who still think this bullshit is funny. Welcome to Reddit.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/20 03:43 PM
1

Simple solution. Don't write names on tests, only numbers. Grading bias vanishes overnight.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 04:46 AM
4

Maybe if you were to look closer you would see that what feminists say and what they do are entirely seperate things. You are right, it isn't about saying that guys don't deserve to be treated equally. Because that would end them. It's about acting in the best interests of women, and women alone, at the sake of equality. And if the 'most famous feminist' says something doesn't mean that's what all feminists say Maybe. And what about if all the most famous feminists, with the most power, the most…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/20 07:18 PM
2

but the newer generation of feminists stand for all equality, no matter what gender, religion, sexuality or race you are. No, they don't. I'll ask you again, what makes you more of an authority on what feminism stands for than the leadership of the largest feminist organization in the world, who actually have a public platform and millions of followers? Why is your feminism, the one touting "equality for all", the one we should consider to the the true feminism, if the loudest and most powerful …
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/20 07:08 PM
3

You're the only one lol. Serious question, if you're the only tall person on Dwarf Island, should you still be allowed to call yourself a dwarf? Likewise, are you really a feminist if you don't believe/agree with the goals and ideals touted by the largest feminist groups and contributors worldwide? What makes a single, unknown individual moreso a feminist than the NOW (National Organization for Women)?
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/20 05:38 PM
2

Couldn't they also work to just lower our suicide rates, unemployment rates, homelessness rates, and arrest rates, rather than make it a goal to elevate themselves to the same undesirable status from which you complain?
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/20 05:33 PM
2

So you see anti-feminists as sexists also then... How does an ideology equal a sex to you? Feminism is not female, it just shares the same root word. One is a sex, one is an ideology. You can be against an ideology without being against the whole sex. This is what someone might call "character assassination" by trying to discredit his opinion based solely on the sub he is on. Just a hint, you're on the same sub. So if he's a sexist...
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 07:22 PM
1

I gotcha. Thanks for the explanations! Can't say I haven't enjoyed a good Big Mac in my time, although now they will literally make me sick to my stomach.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 06:20 AM
0

Why are rich people more disciplined than poor people? Most people don't change classes through their entire lives, so are poor people genetically prone to be less disciplined? Resources obviously makes sense, because being poor you would have less resources, but I thought the general argument here was that the lack of resources wasn't the actual issue? I also was a bit lost on how this tied into feminism in the least. I guess because as you say it's a "feminist approach"? What you're describing…
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 06:13 AM
3

Time is a factor when weighing cost though. When working ridiculous hours taking the time to run to the grocery store to buy a bunch of beans and rice to go home and cook up for your kids takes a hell of a lot longer than buying from the Mc, and that time can be valuable. We should be teaching family planning before we get into nutrition. Stopping the endless chain of pointless children seems like a higher priority, or else those healthy options are going to only get more expensive.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 05:50 AM
6

Why wouldn't rich people be fat for the same reasons? Do poor people like junk food more than normal or something? This post is confusing
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 05:46 AM
12

Modern mainstream feminists are known for such equality-provoking gems such as "#killallmen". The largest feminist organization in the world actively attempts to undermine males in every system because they somehow see that as benefiting females. Just look at how the NOW lobbies to alter family courts around the country heavily in favor of women. Equality should be fighting for everyone, not just yourself. You say you're so smart, act like it and use your words if you disagree with others.
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/20 04:37 AM
13

"some of the tools we need" = half... we give them half. Not talking about money either. DNA.
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/20 11:57 PM
2

You just... know they are........ Chew on that for a second, would you? Don't worry, it gets better after you graduate. The whole world isn't algebra and rejection.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/20 03:38 PM
0

Dude you have gone way too far down the rabbit hole. Pull out while you still have some semblance of a personality. If you seriously think women cause 100% of violence, even while statistics show 90+% of violent crimes are perpetrated by men, then you may have some dirt on your lens. Domestic violence is another issue, recent data shows women are just as likely as men, if not more, to be violent at home. But 100% of violence, when women can't even participate in combat roles during wartime in ma…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/20 04:10 AM
1

This is over a month old..
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/20 04:43 PM
5

"That didn’t stop officials from charging Vanderhagen with malicious use of telecommunications services in July and letting him out on bond. But he continued to criticize Rancilio on social media after his release." The judge saw her name on his posts and reported it because she felt threatened. The police found there to be nothing threatening in the posts. They charged him anyways. And a $500,000 bond for talking shit about a judge, even if it were the second time? Thats like a fucking murder b…
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/20 05:53 PM
1

"That didn’t stop officials from charging Vanderhagen with malicious use of telecommunications services in July and letting him out on bond. But he continued to criticize Rancilio on social media after his release." More info on charges
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/20 05:49 PM
2

But Hypatia is the first known woman mathematician... and she learned it from her dad at the Library of Alexandria. What woman possibly invented mathematics prior to the earliest known female mathematician? Also Peseshet was the first known female physician in ancient Egypt and she came after many others already discovered, like Imhotep or Hesy-Ra or Amenhotep.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/20 04:38 AM
3

And fix the grammar. Not native English speaking is fine, but use a spell-checker at least before creating a meme you hope to go viral. Would somebody with a little free time give this guy a hand?
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/20 04:20 PM
1

"That's not how evidence works. You have to assemble a basket of goods and services and then compare the whole thing." ​Yes, please, let's learn about how evidence works from the woman who just learned the word! You haven't provided a single link or statistic this whole conversation to back your ridiculously untrue claims, and when I post links and statistics disproving your claims, you come back and literally just repeat them verbatim in the next response. You're a trip. You must be stoned as s…
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/20 03:35 PM
1

"I have no reason to lie about this. It doesn't make a difference for me either way." Then why lie? Especially considering my very last link proved this sentiment to be incorrect, why repeat it? Does repeating your points make you feel that they somehow become true? Did you just not open the link so don't realize quite how dumb you come off? Always open the link. You literally are not even trying, just being a repetetive asshole. Which isn't surprising, that's the same tactic everyone with your …
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/20 03:32 PM
1

You're making all this up. I've already shown directly contradicting evidence to your claims on a few of your widely-based general assertions. It's already been shown you don't care for facts or statistics. The truth doesn't matter as long as your ideals are satisfied (that way you can sleep at night without worrying about the lower class coming to murder you one night). You've thrown out like 20 "facts" in this conversation but provided not one single piece of corroborating evidence. I've alrea…
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/20 03:27 PM
1

"If a person earns the minimum wage, the solution is obviously to move into a better job." Then who works the minimum wage jobs? What if you can't get a "better job"? What if leaving your current job to look for a new one means going without rent and food, as we already figured out with the math above? Your argument is moronic and not even worth contesting. And you can absolutely just pay people more. We've done it in the US every time they raise the federal minimum wage. There are countries (in…
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/20 03:20 AM
1

"I've had this discussion before on the Internet and I did the comparison. As long as you stick to local products the US is considerably cheaper." You're lying. You know how I know this? Because the statistical evidence doesn't back you, as I just demonstrated with that link. As I stated before, repeating incorrect facts doesn't make them true. Until you get that part figured out, this debate is over. "No one needs 3000 calories, are you kidding me?" My daily maintenance calories are close to 40…
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/20 03:14 AM
1

I can't even.. you are racist as shit. You are actually bigoted in literally every way I think is possible. You keep arguing the same points even after they've been disproven. You are just an ignorant moron who doesn't even care to listen because you already know it all, who gives a shit if you're entirely wrong right? "Poor Americans don't have to worry about food either. Food is both cheaper in the US than in Europe, and you have programs." For example, in my very last comment, I supplied you …
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/20 03:10 AM
1

What is $1200 (your claim on average rent) times 12 (months)? $14400, that's how much the average studio apartment is per year. Working a full-time job at 40 hours per week, at the minimum-wage rate of $7.25/hour, that comes out to a total of $15,080 per year. That leaves about $700 (rounding up) for the entire year, to cover utility costs, groceries, gas, healthcare, mandatory insurance, dependents, taxes, etc. Your line of reasoning is bullshit. Just pay them more. There is no argument against…
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/20 06:17 PM
1

"Do you have any idea how hard it is to find hard working people who will work for next to nothing? FTFY. I've explained all this four times now and you keep asking the same dumb questions. Not my fault you can't read the links. https://dispatcheseurope.com/food/ You are presenting things as fact that most certainly are not. Please, show me how food in Europe is cheaper? Because everything I can find says food is both higher quality and less expensive in Europe, especially Western Europe, than i…
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/20 06:13 PM
1

About half the population isn't fat. "They're not obese, but by Euro standards they're big." Wow. Half the population isn't fat doesn't mean "but secretly half our population is just a little less fat". My wife and I together combined weigh under 300 lbs, but sure, every American across the country is overweight and we all are lazy and stupid. Keep telling yourself that, it worked out so great for Europeans throughout the history books right? "​No, I think that your arguments are ridiculous: you…
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/20 05:23 PM
1

"Those are articles about Blacks in the ghetto. They've been on welfare for generations and it hasn't helped them. Giving them even more welfare isn't going to make things better. You could give them a million dollars each and the next year they would be back in the ghetto. See Black athletes as an example of this." So you're a racist too... shocker. Where in the articles does it say they've been on welfare (see unemployment)? I distinctly remember it saying that 40 million Americans were workin…
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/20 05:10 PM
1

You provide your first legitimate statistic, something you had to go out of your way to confirm, and it's about average housing costs in the US. That doesn't suggest you were perfectly capable but unwilling to back your arguments at all... That is the average. That includes the $500 rent people pay in the rural Midwest (where nobody lives and there is an acute lack of jobs). Moving costs upwards of a few thousand dollars. I should know, I just moved cross country this past year, packed my entire…
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/20 04:53 PM
1

"Just rent a studio. I've done it myself. Or live with family, I've done that too. Or live with room mates. Or save up for a down payment and get a mortgage. Millions of Americans do manage to buy homes." A studio apartment in many (most) American cities can average upwards of a few thousand dollars. Moving costs to leave the city can more than double that. That's three months wages for some people, and they still need to eat. Hence the food stamps and other government assistance programs to hel…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 10:44 PM
1

"When I went to the US everyone was fat. Where are these starving Americans?" Which tells me you're lying about coming to the US too. I'm not fat. About half the population isn't fat. The media where your from might portray every American as fat, but it's just not the case. The state I live in its a rarity. Tell me, when you and your rich friends vacationed here, did you spend much time in the inner cities? In the poor urban communities? Didn't think so. All I hear is you aren't from the US but …
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 10:36 PM
1

"If someone is hard working enough to have three full time jobs they're not going to stay poor." Haha this is ridiculous. It's laughable, there is no way you're not trolling. You would have to be incredibly naive and blind to the entire world around you to actually hold these beliefs. https://money.cnn.com/2015/05/07/news/economy/working-poor/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2018/09/11/magazine/americans-jobs-poverty-homeless.amp.html https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/religion…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 10:29 PM
1

"So Jeff Bezos is to blame for poor people being fat?" How did you get this from "the obesity epidemic is a symptom of wealth disparity"? Are you trying to act this dumb and naive for a reason? No, government policy, generally crafted by corporate lobbyists working for people like Bezos, is to blame. Government serving money, capitalism, instead of citizens is to blame. "How do they go hungry when they are fat?" People who are starving are not fat you dunce. "I do work with running a household."…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 08:54 PM
1

"Average house price in the US is like $200k. If you're two people making $50k a year you should be able to save up for that in no time." Somebody ain't so good with math I see. Sure, average house prices let's say $200k. Man and wife make $100K per year together. Now, while they save for that house, where are they living? There goes $30K for rent. Oh, and another $15K for utilities. Let's not forget gas to make it to the jobs, the car note, insurance, and all the stickers you need for registrat…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 08:47 PM
1

"That's a ridiculous lie when you have the fattest population in the world." Did you know the obesity epidemic is brought about by low wages too? If families can't afford grilled chicken and steak with veggies for dinner every night, but can afford to eat if they stick with McDonalds and Ramen noodles, what do you think happens? You're still wrong, because the obesity epidemic is still a symptom of wealth disparity. And it doesn't change the fact that people still go hungry every day in the US. …
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 08:37 PM
1

What's your point? Anyone that makes ten cents on the stock market should just be happy because they make money? The guy pulling down billions is just "lucky". Working hard "on your body and household" is not working hard. You are shitting on poor people, many of whom are holding down 3 or more full time jobs to feed their families. But you draw. Well fuckin dandy for you huh? Lazy AND hypocritical fucker we got right here. Next time you want to call someone out for being lazy, just remember you…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 08:30 PM
1

"Demand is down, the stock market is down, real estate is down. I don't see how anyone would make money in this economy." Repeating your opinion doesn't make it true. Poor people generally don't own homes, can't afford to pay hundreds of dollars for new hairstyles (especially from the celebrity stylists these people use), or get custom gold sunglasses worth thousands. Billionaires can, and do, often. Rich people have more tax loopholes than anyone, how are they feeding the poor? You're such a co…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 08:19 PM
1

Facts tell us that people in the US don't make enough money to eat. Hence the creation of the term "living wage". So far you have contributed it to laziness, their frugality, their intelligence and now a conspiracy. Just because you want to ignore the statistics doesn't make them any less true. Welcome to the billionaire state of mind.
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 08:14 PM
1

"So I don't think that anyone is starving in the US." And you would be wrong, because 40 million people struggle with hunger in the US. Seriously, read the article. "For that to happen someone would have to give Jeff Bezos $156 billion dollars. No one is going to do that so it's irrelevant." No, for that to happen he would have to release all his assets to market. And there are plenty of people who would be happy to buy stock in Amazon, or planes, trains and automobiles. Your argument is irrelev…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 07:43 PM
1

Plenty of average Joe's make billions in the stock market? How do you "work so hard" if you don't get paid for it? Sounds like laziness to me. Your words. If you own stocks, bonds, assets, you still have access to that money. Bezos can sell his assets (do you know what that word means? That means his planes, his cars, his many houses. Those are assets) at any time and retrieve his billions. That is how the market works. There is nothing theoretical about it. Normal people don't have a house to s…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 07:32 PM
1

'Indeed, a recent report by the Economic Policy Institute found that between 2000 and 2015, wages for the bottom 60 percent of male workers were flat or declined and that most of the wage gains have occurred among the highest earners. David Lee, executive director of Feeding Wisconsin, part of the Feeding America network, puts it another way: "A good-paying job is the best antidote to hunger." Seriously, read the article. A "living wage" is exactly what it sounds like.
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 07:27 PM
1

You clearly don't know how money or people work. We have the fattest people, therefore it's impossible for people to be starving? Grow the fuck up. Not surprised you or your husband don't work but have the balls to call others lazy. That's not surprising at all. Jeff Bezos is not theoretically valued at that amount, he is definitely valued at that amount. Do you think it really matters that some of it is tied up in assets and stocks? He can sell those at any point in time to retrieve all his bil…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 07:17 PM
1

"No one is "wasting billions" most billionaires have a regular Middle Class lifestyle. And no one is starving on the street although some people ought to be." And by the fucking way, 42 MILLION PEOPLE SUFFER FROM HUNGER IN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES. And while they starve and suffer, you are advocating for the billionaires who don't live lavish lifestyles. Lady where have you been? $88,000 to Jeff Bezos is equivalent to $1 for the average American. Most of them have multi-million dollar mansi…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 06:17 PM
1

"Those 3 trillion dollars are not real money, you realize that right? No one has a safe with a billion dollars in it like Scrooge McDuck. The moment you start "distributing" that money the value will drop to zero." There have been enough of these assumingly serious responses that I have to believe you're a ridiculous troll. You can't be so dumb as to think if you don't have a paper dollar bill in your hand it "doesn't count", right? You can't really be so stupid as to think my net worth constitu…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 06:09 PM
2

"Those are four big companies. Do you think that the average billionaire owns Disney? I'm gonna guess that you don't know any billionaires." No, those are four well-known conglomerates, because you asked what a conglomerates was. Your arguments are not linear even a little. Just out of curiosity, how many billionaires do you think there are in the US? It's way less than 1000. Yet the richest 400 people in the US have a combined net worth of 3 trillion dollars. Did you know that if the wealth was…
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 08:51 PM
5

I'd watch that show. Call it "Survivor: Feminist Utotopia Edition". That show would be a hit!
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 03:59 PM
1

"You realize that most of that money is tied up in company stock right? It's not "real money" it's just what the stock is valued at at a certain point in time. It could be valued at zero tomorrow, and then you have nothing." You realize most small businesses don't even have stock, right? And even the giants like Facebook, they have plenty of money. When your CEO is getting over a million dollars for a Christmas bonus, you have money. When you can sell that stock for billions over generations, yo…
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 03:28 PM
1

What local small business owners to you know of that have amassed over a billion dollars in personal wealth? Your argument makes no sense. Going against massive conglomerates and "monopoly busting" as we intended when these laws were created does absolutely nothing to harm local small business, in fact it only helps local businesses. They are causing inequalities due to sheer accumulation of wealth, avoiding taxes at every possible avenue (mostly with government assistance in policy), and by giv…
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 04:43 AM
1

Because it keeps you from hating on them, the people instituting the policy that causes all the inequalities in the first place? You aren't a hot woman, you're just a deluded woman. I don't think you have a very solid understanding of economics, and I don't plan to be your teacher. Just know, while millions of Americans are out of work due to COVID and can't feed their families, the billionaire class is still increasing their wealth. But sure, let's find a way to make wealth inequality greater b…
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 09:51 PM
1

"That's what the feminist agenda is all about." Sounds like that's what the anti-feminist agenda is all about too. Glad you like depicting that image about ideals you support. "Who cares what women say?" Women, I'd imagine? Aren't you a woman? If you want to fix the shitty problems in all our lives, then women or feminists aren't your enemy. Just like every other society through history, it's the billionaire class that creates the rules and laws that hold the working class down. And as we've see…
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 06:30 PM
1

That doesn't make my statement any less true, just remove the word "teenage". Yes, some feminists are focused on the wrong agenda and don't want anything other than more than power for themselves. But your attacking on things like appearance only furthers feminist agendas, and gives them another instance to point out of the other side just being sexist ("get a boob job").
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 06:12 PM
1

Some of the most insane people you've met? When everyone around you starts to look insane, you have to consider the possibility that you are the one who is really not sane. Don't worry though, being a troll quits being so funny once you get past your prepubescent teenage years. You'll grow out of all your immature bullshit, or fit in really well with other Americans.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 03:06 PM
3

Go back under your bridge now
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 06:40 AM
6

You are the problem. Saying things like this is why neither side can stand to listen to each other. This is not anti-feminist, this is just sexist bigoted bullshit, and that does anything but help the cause of this sub. The only goal that will result in success is to find a way to work together towards the same ends, not throw insults around like children. Isn't that the whole point of egalitarianism?
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 06:31 AM
12

Your entire post history is full of male bashing ridiculousness, you post to only two subs that don't allow men, then you come to a post advocating to kill all men and defend it as a right. Then you follow this up by being incredibly racist and hypocritical all in one sentence. Are you really really smart, or really really dumb?
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 06:07 AM
1

It's difficult when there are still studies coming out today saying it exists, and still studies saying it doesn't. It all depends on which set of factors the economists decide to control for that day, whether it's class or race or job type or education levels etc etc etc.
/r/AntiFeminists10/05/20 01:29 AM
1

So they are alt-right feminists? Or just feminists that hate men? If someone's only platform is "I hate or want to kill men" then they can hardly be labeled a "feminist". Anyone who pushes an ideology of murder and mayhem should not be given the platform to speak, or else it's on the people providing that platform. But at the same time it would be ignorant to say that all feminists fall into this "feminazi" category or hate men, as I and I'm sure many others here know of plenty self-described fe…
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/20 03:54 PM
1

I would ignore those people, as I seriously doubt they speak for the group, or that said group would even want to entertain that idea. I honestly have not heard of feminists who are against trans, so I'm guessing the "feminazis" term falls under the umbrella of conservative feminists, and not the other? What reason could someone give for your being a woman hater just because you have a fiance? By the way, I looked into gun girl. While incredibly stupid, it sounds like the quote you referred to w…
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/20 03:48 PM
1

There is a woman who doesn't believe women deserve the right to vote, honestly? That sounds like a publicity stunt. I will have to look into her. I don't disagree that there are some pristine examples of classless stupidity in our world today, especially with the internet cliques and bubbles that are forming around these outlier groups, "influencers", "incels", "feminazis" (new one), etc.. But just because one kid who labels himself an incel commits some act of terrorism doesn't mean that all se…
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/20 06:49 AM
1

Well to me that sort of sounds like Darwin at work. As for feminazis I can't speak to them as a group. I can't say I've heard of them before, is that what alt-right feminists are called? Or is it just a title for belligerent or extremist general feminists? But even in your example, what a few people do or say (especially on the internet) shouldn't ever be generalized to the entire group of people, unless maybe that group is actually an organization with recognized leadership who are announcing t…
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/20 06:40 AM
2

No I agree with you on both counts. People that want to fight to better their or others existence through policy, I say all the better. People who claim to do this as a guise while they actually belittle and attack others without provocation or cause, I have no sympathy for. Pro choice is a whole other thing. In my opinion the government, the church, your neighbor, has just as much of a right to tell you how to handle a pregnancy as they do how to make a sandwich. It's not their life or their pr…
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/20 06:31 AM
1

I get your point, but didn't our great grandma's fight to not have to be a stay at home mom, or just to get the choice? I may be wrong, but I don't think Rosie the Riveter was out singing "clean up clean up everybody everywhere"
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 07:08 PM
1

Ahem
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 05:50 AM
0

Wait really? After all that talk, my asking where your letter to Congress is while you bash others will prompt you to write said letter? So before I gave you all the suggestions of how to actually do something about this serious problem, what were you actually doing? You claim something, while simultaneously bashing people on Reddit for doing nothing. Please don't tell me that something actually is the act of bashing other Redditor's for doing nothing... because that is also doing nothing, and w…
/r/AntiFeminists29/04/20 10:24 PM
3

So how outspoken are you about these hate laws? Where can I find your petition, or pictures from your last march? How about a copy of a letter I can write to my Senator? "Blame your enemy for what you yourself are doing". That's a good one.
/r/AntiFeminists29/04/20 06:24 PM
1

Funny, I don't remember ever making the claim that Trump was a convicted rapist. I do remember making the claim he is unfit to be President, but by your logic there is no evidence against Biden also, seeing as all they have is accusers who could be making their claims because they hate him. Doesn't matter why they hate him, apparently. I do like though how you argued against a claim I never made, got upset that I wasn't trying to prove a claim I never made like I was the one who made it, wonder …
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/20 07:49 AM
1

It's entirely relevant when you are talking about a sheer number of accusations not having a speck of truth because he is "hated". There is a reason he is hated, as I stated above, and it's because he is constantly in the news for crap that the POTUS should not be on the news for. This point was made very clear but I appreciate the character assassination attempt nonetheless. The reason he is purported to be a rapist is also very clear, not just from my comments and the many accusations leveled …
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/20 11:32 PM
1

Donald Trump has done nothing to warrant this type of good will in association with his name. If you can find one instance of his use of the word business "person" rather than business "man" I will concede, however "business ass" may be a more apt description. That way we can ensure the biases inherent in asshole statements, and avoid labeling statements an "accident" in general contexts. Ask my mailman, he agrees.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/20 11:18 PM
1

Donald Trump is a man. If not, he really should shut the hell up about the Obama birth certificate.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/20 05:31 AM
2

He's made a lot of mistakes, very publicly, and during a time of international crisis. He was impeached by the house, something Bush and Cheney went 8 years without doing, but not removed due to a Republican Senate. There is a reason he is so well despised, as you mention, and it's not because of some conspiracy. It's because he acts immature as the POTUS, and is constantly on the news for something abhorrently stupid. Oftentimes that incredibly stupid thing was done on purpose just to actually …
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/20 05:19 AM
7

I think they're calling him a rapist because of all the sexual assault accusations he's had leveled against him. They never went anywhere though, but the sheer quantity of accusers is a bit unsettling for a man leading a nation. If we would quit choosing fucking dinosaurs maybe we'd quit finding creepy shit that went on in their 130 year past. Of course candidates who grew up before anyone but them had rights will act like they are the only ones with any rights. It should be common sense, but pe…
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/20 07:54 PM
1

You know if you go on a steroid cycle (and PCT with Nolvadex, dumbass) you are no longer natural, right? But sure as shit we'll see you posted over on NattyorJuice in a month or so claiming all natural again, probably too stupid to make another account or delete your comment history beforehand. Whatevers man. If you would lie about being natural your story about the many girls must be the truth, because who would ever bother to lie twice in one comment? Douchebag.
/r/askTRP06/04/20 04:07 AM
1

I'm sure it had nothing to do with all your activity on a sub directly opposing theirs. Maybe not fair, but understandable. They were exercising foresight. I got banned there too.
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/20 04:28 AM

It's not that he "offered" exclusivity. He just has been exclusive. He says this is expected when two people are dating, and he can't believe that I seriously thought he wouldn't be hurt or upset. I tried lying about seeing other men already. That's what got me in this situation. Now there's a man I was hoping to marry someday who doesn't trust ME for cheating, which seems a little backwards. And he should have every right to distrust me, because I know I'd be pissed if I just found out he was c…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy26/10/19 04:48 PM
1

I understand why you might feel this way, and I see in your response that you have no interest in progressive conversation with "the enemy", but why ostracize half of society and refuse anyone a platform for logically tackling the problems and feelings of inequality spreading rampantly throughout the world? That won't bring a solution to the table for either party present. What ever happened to independent human thought? Or independence itself, for that matter? When did one minority gain the rig…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy26/10/19 04:59 AM
2

What do you do if the guy was really serious about the relationship, but he found you with someone else and now doesn't believe you're serious about it? Do I leave him because he doesn't trust me now for dating other men and letting him believe we were exclusive? Or is this just in the context of new hookups and not actual relationships?
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy26/10/19 04:43 AM
1

I see what you're saying with this, especially considering the post it's in response to, but I have to disagree with your premise that relationships are about power. A relationship built around a power struggle is absurd and is not really a relationship (well it is, just not a desirable one). Relationships are built on trust, I know we've all heard this before in all those great Disney movies. That example posted above shows a woman who clearly is not open to trusting others, and so believes she…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/19 04:35 AM
1

Rhinos exist too... but not for long 😧 😈
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/19 06:10 AM
1

That’s funny, like there aren’t already quite a few of those “kingdoms” around the globe. I know a large piece of y’all from over on r/braincels are middle-eastern, but that’s no reason to be anti-semitic. What did they ever do to you personally? Don’t give me some bullshit about 2000 year old land that you never even lived on. Look man, I understand what you’re going through. Life sucks. We get it. It’s generally shitty manners though to make other people’s lives suck in return for the shame yo…
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/19 05:12 PM
2

And these are the types of absolute hypocrites frequenting r/braincels of which I reference above. Perfect example, thanks “goy” great timing!
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/19 04:52 PM
15

I got banned from r/feminists for speaking my opinion. Then I went to r/braincels and told them about it, to which they all jumped on board the train talking shit about the “nazi mods”. Then I disagreed with something someone said on r/braincels. Within seconds I was given a temporary ban lasting 2 weeks, with no explanation given (hypocritical much, nazi mods?). Then, before I could even type up a “why was I banned” message to the mods, they promoted my temporary ban to permanent. I typed up th…
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/19 08:36 PM
1

This was my main point from the beginning, I was serious when I said I think we're in agreement here. Victims are victims. Because I said that, half these guys jumped on me like I was saying male victims don't matter. I repeatedly clarified that not only did I not SAY that, I don't believe it either. You keep saying you disagree with my point, but then emphasizing my point as what you believe to be right. I believe any victim deserves fair and just treatment, not just women, and not just men. Bu…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/19 05:32 PM
1

Then you blatantly showed up two weeks late and failed to read the thread, because that's not what I said at all. In fact I strongly emphasized on multiple occasions what my point was. Getting rights for male victims does not happen by bashing rights of female victims. As you said, both groups are still victims and so both matter. The other guy spent his time arguing why women are already entitled and privelaged and don't need protection. So are you agreeing with him? Because if so... you're "ta…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/19 05:19 PM
1

The fuck are you bouncing a two week old thread to offer the same worthless opinion that's repeated too many times throughout this thread as is? By the way, thank you for wholeheartedly agreeing with the point I've been making throughout this entire thread. Rather than try to claim women rape victims get all the attention and don't deserve it, why not work on getting males the attention they deserve just as much as the women victims? Thank you kind sir, for agreeing with me in entirety. Quit try…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/19 04:17 PM
2

Wait... you are calling me Puerto Rican? Because I don’t like Wall Street? Please explain the reasoning here because you’ve lost me Edit: oh I just got it, you meant the actress Hint: the interest on America’s debt is set to pass our military funding budget very shortly. I think we just all fucking suck
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/19 10:56 PM
3

I saw anti wall street propaganda disguised as anti men propaganda disguised as a movie
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/19 08:22 PM
2

What was that you JUST bitched out your other men’s rights buddy about? Oh right! Sources. Liar and a hypocrite, that’s what you are. That’s not name-calling by the way, that’s general observation based on actions, there is a difference.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:43 PM
1

Right, because you didnt just call me a cesspool, you miserable loser? Youve provided no sources at all so you can fuck RIGHT off until you learn to construct a decent argument. Just because you dont LIKE my proof doesnt make it “not proof”. By the way, WHEN YOU KEEP COMMENTING BACK TO ME THAT IS NOT “IGNORE” YOU DUMB FUCK! BUT IM HAPPY TO REPORT YOU FOR BLATANT DISCRIMINATION! Hope your sub doesnt get quarantined like r/againstdomesticabuse did once i reported them!
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/19 01:33 PM
1

Dude are you kidding I just proved you’ve been blatantly lying about your “facts” for days. But I’m the troll? Right. Because LBJ was alive in 1937 and was quoted as saying “I’ll have N-words voting democrat for 200 years”. (Hint: neither of these are true, as a quick google search will point out.) Now that your absolute bullshit has been thoroughly exposed, I’m glad you’re done here. You saved me from having to rub how wrong you were into your face by running away in embarrassment. Thanks buddy…
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 02:32 PM
1

Your life is a cesspool. Great rebuttal buddy, I see that you take your “welcome to ignore” advice quite literally. Must’ve been quite difficult for you to get so far into middle school before dropping out.
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 02:28 PM
1

By the way, LBJ did not say the phrase you attribute him with, not for Section 8 Housing Act of 1937 of which he had absolutely zero part to play, and not during the Civil Rights Act that he actually did have a hand in. He was fairly blatantly racist, but so was every white American in the fucking 60s, and half of them on the Senate and house (votes LBJ needed to pass his bill) were exceptionally racist and he needed a way to convince them that Civil Rights was in THEIR best interests. The man w…
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 02:24 PM
1

”Nice strawman made up of word salad...” Not only did you just call satiric ridicule of your pointless “arguments” a strawman, proving you don’t understand what that means, you just called your own analogy “word salad”. I literally copy/pasted the fucker and changed out the nouns for ridiculous bullshit. Also made you break your arm too. I mean I get it, I’ve been calling your shit a fucked up stroke of a mess since we started, but at least you’re picking up on that fact now. ”Again with the pas…
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 02:11 PM
1

But you are an extremist bigot... Go show your comment to blackpeopletwitter and watch how quick they call your ideals out. Sure, you may not be a left-wing extremist, but your no fuckin moderate buddy. White power! Also, the EEOC only released a statement of the current accepted criminal discrimination definition, of which Trumps comment fit neatly within. He did that to himself. If you didn’t read that as obviously discriminatory against minorities in or running for office then you clearly don…
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 04:53 AM
1

”LoL! I attack your biased sources based on their biases... As I said, I'm working 12 hour shifts, and responding on my phone... I can do sources, when I have time, and not at WORK...” This has been continuing on for multiple days... not 12 hours. You've yet to provide a single source at all, let alone a "credible" source. But you've pulled facts and claims out the ying yang. "You came to an Anti-Feminist sub, and your complaining that I'm wasting your time?!!! Wow... What did you think you woul…
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 04:49 AM
1

The EEOC is a federal organization buddy. This is a “leftist house” reporting on the news release made by the EEOC. Thank you for demonstrating that rather than actually read the source document, you clicked on it with the sole purpose of finding a way to dismantle its credibility. You will have to start by dismantling the credibility of the federal definition of criminal discrimination, which includes the use of the phrase “go back to your own country”. I’m done with you and this blatant ignora…
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 04:22 AM
1

”Actually, affirmative action IS blatantly using discrimination to end alleged discrimination based on PAST discrimination... If someone broke their leg, would it help the person with the broken leg to fix it by breaking someone else's leg? That's the irrationality of affirmative action. Fix discrimination by discriminating against people who are not guilty of discriminating against anyone... Again having to explain the blatantly obvious...” Well that’s a fuckin mouthful. Peter piper picked a pe…
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 04:20 AM
1

Actually, this will be fun. I will go through this like you do, absolutely zero sources, but all the while demonstrating how useless your "counter-points" truly are. "So... Isn't that signifing that affirmative action is a positive in society, which denotes you believe that it is good? Why attempt to make your argument that it's good, if you don't believe it to be?... Either you think it's good, or your arguments make no sense..." What I've stated are facts backed by legitimate sources. Pick apa…
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 04:18 AM
1

You're attacking everything you possibly can about my sources while not providing a single one of your own. Go back, rewrite your shit, and do it the right way this time or quit wasting my fucking time. Goddamn useless, we've been over this going on 10 separate occasions now. By the way, working a "dangerous and dirty refinery job" doesn't qualify you as a nerd at all. Far from it. I called bullshit on your two degrees and said you sound like high school nerd on the debate team, after which you …
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 03:32 AM
1

No, it means they’re the same. Definition of synonomous.
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 02:41 AM
1

Really? Me avoiding the question? You skipped over my entire response because you had nothing to say in the face of clear evidence. How about this, you go first, and I'll tell you all about why the term Neo-Nazi has become synonymous with alt-right extremism.
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 01:55 AM
1

I just want you to think for yourself, do research, and be capable of constructing a proper rebuttle, but we can't always get what we want can we?
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 01:45 AM
1

Aaand there it is. In the absence of all logic, throw all cards in the wind and play on ignorant sarcasm. What, didn't want to open your mouth to speak lest you let out another unproven, unsourced claim for someone to disprove?
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 01:42 AM
1

"You have blamed men for rape, by claiming that rape is done mostly by men against women, and made claims about male privilege... So, while you haven't directly blamed white men, you have continually pointed out your perceptions of racism, and sexism against white people and men in a rather Leftist identitarian fashion." Uh.. no I haven't. I've blamed... RAPISTS for rape? Do you know who rapes women, though?... Men do... Men rape women. Men also rape other men, and sometimes women rape men too. …
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 01:40 AM
1

"Funny! You claim I'm a nerd, you claim I have no empathy, you make all sorts of claims about me, including being hateful... But, then you complain that I used the same tactics on you, without any evidence... Sigh. Nice try." You claimed you were a nerd, buddy. I claimed you sound like you're in high school talking about shit like joining debate clubs. I've provided directly quoted evidence for all of the "tactics" I claimed you use. Sadly you can't manage to do the same after I've asked you to …
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 01:01 AM
1

NO YOU! This is not an argument. Your first "argument" was that my sources were 20 years old. That was a scapegoat to avoid the clear facts, there was one case that has remained open for 20 years listed in my sources, all the rest are 2019. And that was a ten second Google search. You have yet to provide any sourced evidence that the "massive overwhelming majority of the fact that women and men get payed the same", whereas both I and another commenter above have both provided directly contradict…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 10:14 PM
1

Look up gender discrimination lawsuits in 2019. You'll see hundreds of the cases exactly as you described. Yes, maybe it's less common (now that it's illegal and enforced and can end up costing businesses more money in the end), but that in no way means it's nonexistent. The number of discrimination lawsuits each year blatantly shows otherwise.
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 10:01 PM
1

"...and I see no citation. Post your citation proving that the entire federal government said so. Then provide factual evidence of something he specifically, and actually did, not the accusation of a particular individual, or group that he is at odds with." OK, if you wish! But I expect citations for all of your claims going forward! This one was easy for me anyways ;) 'The House on Tuesday voted to formally condemn President Trump's racist tweets telling Democratic congresswoman of color to "go…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 09:59 PM
1

They were posted in the wrong order. Direct responses to each of your separate inquiries begins on the second (now 3rd) comment, and continues in order on the comment prior. Sorry for the confusing layout, I reached the word limit from copy/pasting your quotes to respond to each separately.
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 09:43 PM
1

"You want to stop racism? Stop talking about it. The same thing goes for sexism. Try not blaming one group (like all white men) for all the problems of the world. Hitler did that to the Jews. Look where that got us... Try to not be as evil as you believe your opponents to be. Just some advice." You are right. Please, demonstrate where I blame "all white men" for all the problems of the world. Sources sources sources, especially with your futile "character assassination" attempts. I don't believe…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 09:42 PM
1

”Black people make up less than 13% of the population... Naturally, they will be a minority in colleges! There are more Asians in college than there are white men... 60% of college students are women... Asians earn more than white men... There's no problem with these statistics. It's how things are. But it shoots gaping holes in your argument.” Had you properly read my argument you would then realize that you are shooting gaping holes in the sky. Black people make up less than 13% of the populat…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 09:38 PM
-2

”There are specific cases where the discrimination was blatant. But as you do correctly pointed out. These company’s were found out and payed the price.l Yes, TODAY, there are still specific cases of blatant discrimination against women in the workplace across multiple of the largest and best-known American conglomerates. It would be naive to claim that 100% of cases of discrimination have been “found out and payed the price”. Yes, some of the largest and most heavily scrutinized industry leader…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 07:01 PM
-2

”First of all a lot of the links are for 20 years ago” Ha! You mean the one link about Walmart? If you’ll notice, the vast majority all say “2019” in the URL you imbecile. Great argument bra! ”Also in a lot of these cases there was never a guilty verdict (no discrimination)” You also are an idiot if you believe no guilty verdict equals no discrimination. No, these MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR CORPORATIONS just have so much money they can effectively settle any personal lawsuit outside of court. That doe…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 04:53 PM
-6

https://microsoftgendercase.com/ https://time.com/5586423/walmart-gender-discrimination/?amp=true https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/02/business/media/disney-gender-discrimination-lawsuit.amp.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/29/us/politics/fbi-discrimination-lawsuit.amp.html https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/1535003001 https://footwearnews.com/2019/business/retail/nike-sued-gender-discrimination-lawsuit-class-action-1202753998/amp/ https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2019-06-12/goldman-women…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 06:02 AM
1

”White Knight much?...” Lack empathy much? It’s good to be proud to be a nerd. Not a naive highschool nerd practicing for debate club, maybe, but still a nerd for now I guess. What does your wife think about all this? Or your mother, you may not be married. ”I haven't been arguing that men have it Worse. I've been trying to say that men have serious issues that aren't being taken as issues at All. Only women's issues are allowed to be discussed. And you keep proving my point for me. Thank you.” …
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 05:36 AM
1

”LoL. Still, all your arguments are based in Feminist propaganda.” Propaganda? The argument was regarding rape, especially statutory rape since that’s the vast majority of male rape cases, that makes up 5% of all cases. ”When a woman gets divorced, she loses a husband. When a man gets divorced, he loses his family, and half of everything he earns, as well as half of his possessions...” Really? My parents got divorced, my dad kept the house, both kids, and my mom moved out. Once they sold the hou…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 02:55 AM
1

”In college I also won’t be able to tell my son that he can’t go to parties.” Who would? It’s generally the sons doing the raping and drugging at frat parties. Girls in colleges know which frats to avoid because they will ALWAYS get drugs in their drinks at those houses. Men have the luxury of living without those worries. ”If they get mad at me for supporting equal rights that is their problem not either of ours.” They will get mad at you for supporting equal rights because they don’t believe o…
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/19 05:07 PM
1

”My kid’s gender doesn’t matter if they can go at all.” Let’s hope this theory prepares your daughter for college frat parties when you aren’t there to tell her she can’t go. ”To follow that up you ignored the other examples of me helping women/friends.” I saw no examples or evidence, only unverifiable personal anecdotes. Also, I’m not going to keep repeating myself over and over to everyone here who can’t seem to (or don’t want to) actually read what I write down. Yes, you should support all vi…
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/19 04:41 PM
1

”I actually have on multiple occasions gone to feminist marches with my girlfriend.” Do you want to know why I call bullshit? Because men who post on r/antifeminists generally don’t spend their free time marching for feminism. If you do, that may be even worse. And nobody gives a shit about what can’t be proved. ”I picked up on the male issues because what you were doing was just saying women’s problems are worse. While the statistics are higher percentages it’s equally as awful for both genders…
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/19 04:23 PM
1

”Hear it all the time, then ask for proof, and I get insults...or some idiocy saying that he's closing our borders, killing children, etc When what he is doing is to keep illegals out. I hear the leadership, like Mz. Warren claiming that walls don't work, are useless, but then you look at her compound and the wall surrounding it.” Really? You haven’t found anyone who could prove Trumps rampant racism? How about the feds who blatantly came out to say Trump’s tweet following the debates was absolu…
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/19 04:05 PM
1

Is that what im doing from your completely late to the party outside view? You’re right about one thing, you are not the guy i was arguing with. If you had been paying attention in the slightest, you would have seen me explicity say on multiple occasions that ALL rape is bad, but to try and fight AGAINST the progress women have managed to make in the last century is immoral and gross. The part all of you people seem to widely be missing: there have been exceptionally few court cases where male v…
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/19 03:53 PM
1

"And yet you routinely smear men as being "incels" - "involuntarily celibate." Again, you're judging their worth solely on their sexual prowess and proclivity - again, this is literally none of your business. You have absolutely no reason to judge my value as a human being solely by how much I fuck." Ha!!! I TOTALLY called this! This is number 4 by the way! You do know what "routinely" means right? It means commonly, as in, more than once. I'm still waiting for one example of my attacking you fo…
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/19 01:35 AM
0

I have not insulted nor bashed him once. Maybe instead of jumping in the last chapter of the book to offer your opinion you should read the whole thing. There is most definitely worse. When one might cause DEATH, and the other might cause child support payments... you are arguing that I should stop arguing with a man who is against female rights. Again, this sub is not r/malevictims or r/immoralchildsupport. This sub is r/antifeminists. There is no purpose behind it except to degrade believers i…
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/19 01:20 AM
1

"There you go, lying and manipulating again." Oh, im sorry, what is the name of this sub? Please, do tell, because when I scroll to the top and look it most definitely is written r/antifeminists. "Yes. It's disgusting and morally repugnant that you, and so many others, are willing to judge men purely by their sexual proclivity. There are no exceptions to this - it's just wrong, no ifs ands or buts." Swing and a miss number three! Where did I judge men on sexual proclivity? This is the third time…
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/19 12:26 AM
0

"My sexual proclivity is absolutely none of your business, and it's absolutely not ok to judge men, their value as human beings, and their worth in society based solely on their sexual prowess. The fact this kind of behavior has become so popularized among feminist circles speaks volumes of the movement." Where exactly did I judge you on your "sexual proclivity"? Can you read? This is the second time we've been through this. Go back and read comment #4 and you'll have your answer... Again. NOBOD…
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 08:08 PM
1

TL;DR. If you can't slow down and gather your thoughts all in one response then I'm not going to continue doing this back and forth with you. I think you already know what's so wrong about what you preach, but you like the attention that comes with being the loud extremist on the internet.
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 07:57 PM
-1

"Blame that on the women who got that legislation enacted into law. A woman drew up the legislation, and women made the deciding votes, they have free will - who are you to tell those women otherwise? It's a free country. Are you proposing we dictate legislative policy as per feminist doctrine, rather than democratic vote? If so, then you're proposing fascism." Are you fucking serious?!?! Did you even read about this before automatically assuming that women passed a bill that 95% of women IN Ala…
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 07:54 PM
0

Where do you see men's rights users here? ANTI-feminists. That is ANTI-womens rights. That does not equate to pro men's rights. This is a fallacy. "This idea that it's normal to judge men, their worth and value as humans, purely by their sexual proclivity is absolutely disgusting." So it's disgusting to judge men by this, but it's acceptable to judge women for their belief that they have a right to and deserve equal treatment? That is absolutely disgusting. That is hypocritical as possible. If y…
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 07:24 PM
1

"And White Knights (tm) like you are going to save them... If they aren't victims, why do they need to be saved? " Ya, nobody would need to be saved if it weren't for people deliberately creating a divide. There is a difference between saving someone in need, and chastising someone who is doing wrong. That's supposed to be your mother's job, but clearly it didn't stick or didn't get taught at all. Treat ALL PEOPLE how you want to be treated. It's a simple philosophy. " Ilove how you put the abso…
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 06:53 PM
0

You didn't read that first sentence? The part about nobody giving a flying fuck about your personal experiences? Guess what... I have personal experiences too. I didn't let them turn me into a bitter asshole. "I also find it funny how you rushed to the defense of feminists and women, while dismissing the whole topic... As well as how you over generalize men, while complaining about me... Projection much?" For your benefit: THIS is a strawman argument. Please, show me where I over-generalize men?…
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 06:37 PM
0

Who did that? Nobody gives a fuck how much you fuck. Not a single Reddit soul. I assure you, your value is determined by your words and actions alone. It's fine speaking out about a lack of legal protections. But why not also speak out about the lack of legal protections for women's rights to decisions regarding their own bodies? At least if a man is raped and wants to forget it, he is still allowed to surgically remove his dick.
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 06:28 PM
0

Maybe it's because male rapists get less jail time than the women they raped in some states (aka Alabama). Maybe it's because male rape victims aren't forced to carry an unwanted child INSIDE THEIR BODIES for 9 months, literally risking their health and lives. Tell me, when is the last time a male was raped and it ruined his entire life (outside of emotional damage, I'm talking actual health problems, ridiculous financial burdens, and complete and utter destruction of all life goals and plans)? …
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 06:24 PM
-1

"But - IN PRACTICE - the laws, in Court or on college campuses, that are getting enacted every day to give women more protection, and who see men as vile perverts, these DO MATTER. And the message that the media conveys all the time, about how domestic abuse is the result of the patriarchy and toxic masculinity, when it was proven over and over that women are very often perpetrators themselves." Do you mean laws like the abortion laws in Alabama that resulted in cops who just tried to charge a p…
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 06:18 PM
0

I agree with that. Try to use the words "extreme" in your posts so people don't see and confuse the message with "all feminists are.." or the even worse (and somewhat common here) "all women do this..." It hurts nobody like you want it to. It hurts everyone in the country and only divides us that much more. We SORELY need the opposite right now in this world.
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 06:01 PM
-1

You are aware of it, yet you voluntarily choose to contribute rather than empathise with others? What, because the media actually reports some of the cases you're saying it doesn't matter anymore? The message has been sent so not your problem? Funny how you think I'm choosing to ignore some random dude's personal experiences that I don't know or care that you've had. YOUR experiences, whatever they may be, are not an excuse to treat people however the fuck you want, and absolutely does not mean …
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 05:59 PM
-2

Ash5150 - You might want to stop extending your own pain onto others, especially while ignoring that it doesn't exist in everybody and not all feminists are extreme and mislead like you seem to believe. Just like you are different than all the other men, every woman is different too. That shouldn't be a surprise to you. Over-generalizations like this is what's happened to America, the land of the free that has become so divisive we're on the brink of civil disobedience or war from 10 different s…
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 03:14 PM
0

All good, I just see mass generalizations on Reddit a lot and it hurts my soul every time
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 03:06 PM
-10

I have never heard a feminist say women can't rape men. I'm sure there are some that are deluded, but can't be as many as with y'all. I have heard them say that it's such a minute portion of all rape in the world that it's hardly as big an issue as females being raped (generally by force and with violence involved, not "coercion" or "force-feeding Viagra" [c'mon, really?]). Aren't most of you anti-feminists also incels complaining that you can't get laid? But also complaining that men get raped?…
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/19 06:11 AM
1

I think he was saying that "nobody" cares. Not everyone except feminists care. You act like every single feminist in the world wants to steal your lunch money. All people are not the same. You think we'd understand that by now in the 21st century. Just like you probably aren't the general entitled white male douchebag some feminists seem to claim all men are like, all feminists are not some crazy Karen with a stick up their twat. In fact, very very few of them are. Just the loudest ones, which i…
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/19 10:11 PM
6

My god is this a real thing that SJWs defend? Gay and lesbian couples have had a hell of a struggle getting the rights they now have, but people be coming out the fucking woodwork now like, "Uh, well he sexually identifies as being attracted to his own sex, so you will recognize me as being attracted to wolves right?" Like WTF? "Non-human identifying homo-sapiens"?!? MAYBE you can get away with "I'm a woman with a penis because my mindset is that of a woman", but there is NO GODDAMN WAY I will e…
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/19 03:00 PM
2

Exactly, there will always be people that will find your type attractive, whatever that may be, and whether society agrees with that opinion or not. Males tend to have the easier societal judgement scale when it comes to looks. Not so much with emotions, or a bunch of other stuff, but being a male alone creates an inherent hiring bias in male-owned businesses (which is a large percent of all business). I definitely don’t agree with it, I’ve seen highly qualified women at my office held back prof…
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/19 04:02 AM
2

Personality and intelligence , in the end are more important than appearance, in my humble opinion. Looks draw you in, but a shitty personality will ruin it every time. Shallow people are shallow people, they will always exist. And if you truly believe this, why post selfies to strangers on the internet? Everybody is a little vain. "Ugly" women generally have a rougher go of it than "ugly" men (quotes for what society might consider ugly, as you and I may have completely different opinions on th…
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/19 03:22 AM
1

Good for you? I really don't care what you can do, it doesn't change the facts that caused the society we live in today. YOU may never wear makeup out in public because you don't care about people's opinions, but women even just thirty years ago weren't quite as "free" as now (hence the feminism movement). EVERYBODY cares what others think of them. Entire cultures are built around family reputation. To say it doesn't matter is blind ignorance. Just because personality and intelligence matters mo…
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/19 03:16 AM
1

Ya, it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that men, magazines, movies and Disney princesses all tell little girls from the moment of birth that to be beautiful is to be successful as a woman. Men don't wear make-up, because they don't care about the way they look, their skin looks, their "crows feet" look, the saggy wrinkles, because they have no need to. If you can lift 50lbs multiple times then you are qualified for most jobs in the world. Women don't have that luxury, unfortunately. L…
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/19 10:34 PM
1

Since when is telling someone they need to die a joke? How is that comment in the spirit of a joke in the least? That is not an OK joke, if that's actually what it was meant to be.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/19 03:55 PM
1

Did you just suggest that someone commit suicide because you disagree with their political viewpoints? Gah damn get some help man
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/19 04:51 PM
0

Who the fuck needs friends? Goddamn loser
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/19 08:37 PM
-5

U were raped by a feminist?
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/19 07:36 AM
1

This shit crackin me up hahaha Can't make up his mind, are the feminists the problem, or his height? Try not being a dick to half the world's population and maybe, just maybe, people will start to listen to your bs.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/19 04:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter