TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Doctor99268 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,501 comments by Doctor99268 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,501 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Because if you make a stupid rule, the stupid consequences can be pointed out. The rule is the interpretation and vice versa, and the interpretation doesn't logically extend to permit your gotcha. So why even bother twisting an interpretation no one you're arguing against has. I never said they believe they must be pegged. I said they should agree they must be pegged. Thus, not a strawman. Perhaps you should study the term more carefully before using it in the future. Wierd non sequitur, ai don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 07:17 AM
6

“I want maximal use, whatever that is” Except that's not what it's saying, at all. It's saying "I want maximal options".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 06:29 AM
2

Of course not, because they don't want to be pegged. But many do want anal, daily blowjobs, and immediate sex, regardless of whether she wants it or not. So, you gotta get pegged. If they don't interpret it that way, then what are you even arguing against. I don't think a single red piller has any idea what a strawman argument actually is. Strawman: misrepresentating someone's arguement in order to make it easier to attack. You've already admitted that they don't interpret it that way, which int…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 06:21 AM
1

Tbh I don't think progressives even like liberals.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:35 AM
11

You and OP are taking that to a different conclusion and mixing up the cause and effect. Your stances are saying that redpillers are saying "I want X after i found out chad had X", what's actually being said is "I wanted X, i was denied X, i then found out chad had X, and now I'm angry/annoyed/displeased". It's about not having the OPTIONS chad had, not about recreating the dynamic chad had. At it's core, people don't like being the negative exception. This is the fundamental feeling behind the …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:26 AM
1

No one is referring to people who did it once to know what it felt like and didn't do it again. Because that is obviously understandable. What's being referred to are people who either enjoyed it or did it inspite of not enjoying it to please their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:04 AM
1

As stupid as that guy sounds, the only way i could see him abiding by OPs interpretation would be if he after getting whatever report from his PI, he would ask his SO specifically for things on the report that he didn't ask before seeing the report. If that's the case, or other people have done stuff like that, I'll amend my "no one" to a "minority".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 03:44 AM
12

Sure it is. Plenty of men use the “if you did it with him but not me, he got something I didn’t and it means you don’t love me” Sure, but that's men talking about the option itself, not literally saying "i need to copy everything she did with him". Even for pegging, you might still be annoyed at the knowledge of your partner being completely unwilling to do it with you despite doing it before, even if you don't want to do it. None of the red pill sayings translate to the gotcha post OP tried to …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 03:18 AM
4

It literally isn't. No one who agrees with the "rule" interprets it the way you do. It's only people who disagree with the "rule" like you who have to make a strawman out if it in order to get a gotcha. I really do not see what you have to gain from arguing against a phantom.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 03:04 AM
-1

No, that's not the "rule". Literally never has been. It's if she did anal, she should be open to anal in the future. I have no idea where you got the interpretation you have. The entire point of it is about being denied the OPTION to do something she already did before, not about copying what she did before. Also your interpretation genderises a genderless concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 02:23 AM
13

what?, thats not even how you would apply it. it would be applied if you did pegging in the past, and she wants to do it now. or if she did pegging in the past and you want it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 01:49 AM
1

OP doesn't know how to word his own proposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 05:41 PM
1

OP is saying that the average men who stay wouldn't feel any benefit from having large swaths of average men leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 05:37 PM
2

So if she tried it once, hated it, and then refused to do it with me, that’s fine. But if she tried it once, hated it, finally got the nerve to try it again years later, hated it again, and then refused to do it with me, I should break up with her? Twice is a coincidence, but if it was three times, that would be when it would start impacting compromisability, at that point it would be a pattern. It just feels sort of arbitrary. Like if a woman genuinely dislikes doing something that isn’t all th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 04:58 AM
1

By flexible, i mean a need that you can compromise on depending on the other circumstances. So it would be in-between a need with 0 exceptions, and something you don't care about. So in this case, anal would be something you actively want but compromise on, vs something you'll do on the side if the opportunity arises. And I'm not really counting people who've done it once, hated it and never did it again as "people who've done it before" but i should've specified that. Basically I'm just saying …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 04:31 AM
4

The thing you're flexible on.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 04:09 AM
4

A lot is not simply greater than 50%, it can be as small as 1% depending on the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 01:13 AM
3

you can be flexible on some points, but not when you find out that they had already done it with other people just not you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 01:03 AM
5

dont know if youve played any gatcha games, but 12% is alot
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 12:59 AM
2

You jest, but why would you enter a relationship where your partner isn't trying to be appealing to you. Obviously not referring to any extreme measures.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 02:37 AM
2

It's not entitlement if the purposes are whether to invest in someone or not, this is literally the core of reciprocity. It would be entitlement if you made a song and dance about getting sex from them because other guys had.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:41 PM
0

Thanks for conceding.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:50 PM
-2

It is literally being inconsistent. This isn't even an argument, it is the literal definition of inconsistency.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:42 PM
-3

What are you so perplexed about. I'm talking about inconsistent people in general as you've just admitted women are. Women are dating different people. You don't go through the exact same 10-step process for sex with every person.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:38 PM
-4

If your inconsistency favours people who aren't investing as much, you can be rightfully criticised by the people who are investing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:12 PM
2

In general no, but if it's the person you're specifically going to have a relationship with, it's obviously natural that someone will care.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 08:31 PM
-3

I'm not claiming if it's true. I'm saying that the premise of redpillers saying men are attracted to much younger women does not make the following claim of women being attracted to much older guys absurd on its face.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:50 PM
-6

There is no absurdity, men and women are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:54 PM
1

I still think we are talking past eachother. I'm saying that the systems of abortion is baked into the systems of financial abortion. It's not just about the father being able to relinquish his parentalhood, but the mother being prepared for that. It's for both people, not just men. It's less that financial abortion is a response to regular abortion, but that not being able to regularly abort voids financial abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 07:28 AM
3

But the flaw of paper abortion falls apart when you realize it's entirely dependent on our position of abortion. If abortion is unethical, they're not gonna argue for paper abortion. They only do so if we reason to the conclusion that abortion isn't unethical. THEN the argument comes up. Depends, the structure of paper abortions itself is predicated on whether or not you can get an abortion. It wouldn't be fair to ask for a paper abortion if the woman can't get an abortion after your choice. To
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 06:07 AM
5

Bodily autonomy would apply to using crystal meth. There is no reality in which it wouldn't
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 05:51 AM
7

Why are her biggest assets her looks and not her talents and career and accomplishments? Or her actual assets? Because that's not what the guys she wants, cares about. That doesn't mean it'll be her biggest asset for personal fulfillment. Also why do they think that there aren’t younger successful men who are gonna snatch up the “valuable” women their age anyways? After all they have “assets and youth”? The ratio of younger successful men to older successful men is very small. Not much people ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 05:00 AM
16

That's not really what it's about. It's more about by the time guys get to 35, you'll have enough time to build your career and be desirable to the people you want. Women building their careers isn't conducive to getting the guys she wants. Her biggest asset, her looks is taking a dive (unless she keeps a good regiment), while a sizable chunk of the guys asset grows. Although not much people are going to be satisfied with having shit formative years. That's something you and blackpilled incels a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 03:26 AM
2

Should a woman save money in a fund incase her husband (who hasnt given her any reason so far) turns abusive
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 01:46 AM
–

Black men are Hispanics?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 02:27 AM
5

Yes, we do live in a world where the past is behind us and we move on. Unless there's something that affects the present like a child, an STD, a criminal record, alimony or something like that, then the past doesn't even exist. No we don't, you don't get to make any exceptions for it either, and you don't get to decide how people should feel about past information. It's within the promiscuous persons (either man or woman) benefit aswell to disclose the affirmationed information so that they can …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 08:24 PM
6

You can't judge your partner for who they were with before they even met you and then try to hold that against them. That just makes no sense. You very much can. A good amount of women judge men who have used escorts negatively. And that is their prerogative. The world isn't some fairy tale where everything you do is behind you, and you just move on. And if someone is a sex offender that's a current and permanent status, not just a past one. You can get removed from the sex offender registry. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:57 PM
6

Your past stops being your business when you get into a relationship. I could literally just as easily extend what you're saying, to a sex offender who hides their past for the same reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:49 PM
0

I'm a confused or did you use say the same thing I just said
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:50 PM
4

The difference is that, men would have casual sex with the people they would also have a relationship with, so the women gets to check both boxes. While the same isn't necessarily true for women, meaning that a sizable amount (and frankly i would say most) men are in a relationship where their partner wouldn't have had casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:26 AM
2

Yes, young people can be naive. The frontal lobe isnt developed until 25. Why do people keep parroting this, People brains develop well past 25, and that's not an excuse anyway, naivety is from a lack of information, not from brain development. Once you reach 25, and well before that, it's on you to have that information.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 07:17 PM
1

What part are you having issue with
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 04:12 PM
-2

Government mandated gf is just a meme. The more realistic version is something like, prostitution being legalised + destigmatized, and subsequently government subsidies of some form for sex less men to use affirmationed prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 04:47 PM
4

Men want nothing to do with them? Yeah, that's nonsense. Many promiscuous women are physically attractive. id say the opposite, most promiscuous women are less physically attractive. attractive women have no need to be promiscuous in the first place, since they will be less likely to be used for solely sex. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/HdVGjrc7LH reflected in studies aswell. so yh, there is no need to be with a promiscous women, since that doesnt mean an attractive women (infact th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:46 PM
6

Wasn't it 25 because that was the highest age they studied for. Cuz I'm pretty sure it was also found it that the brain always keeps developing regardless of age
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 06:28 AM
1

There is a gargantuan moral difference between someone who fucks a 16 year old and someone who fucks a 10 year old. Same with killing an adult vs killing a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 07:55 PM
6

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/HdVGjrc7LH Don't know what to tell you, it is true. If ugly women are having more sex than attractive women and ugly men are having less sex than attractive nmen, the obvious conclusion is that these ugly women are having sex with attractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 02:19 PM
3

They are lmao. The more attractive a woman is, the less she needs to hookup, this in turn results in ugly women having a higher body count than attractive women. When a guy wants a random Thursday night fuck outside a dumpster or something, he's just going to go with the more convenient option
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 02:08 PM
–

looksmatch is just based on looks, smv/rmv is their options.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 06:06 AM
1

Paternity is time-sensitive and irreversible. If a man is duped into raising a child that isn’t his, his entire life could be upended, and unlike an STD test, the consequences of not knowing the truth are permanent. Not the person you responded to, but this is pretty much the only thing i disagree with. Not knowing std information can be pretty vital aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 04:53 PM
1

Pretty sure even OF have managers who more or less direct them in order to maximise their growth/money/fame ect.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 12:54 AM
-1

No, he's arguing against the narrative that assumes that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 02:32 PM
2

Success is about the end result. A scammer while having the moral worth of an ant, still has a successful life if he lives in a mansion with 3 wives or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 04:28 AM
5

Your life >>>> your country. It's one thing to die for you family (like directly), but it's a different matter to die in some geopolitical war over a random territory that you probably don't even live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 07:17 PM
3

Why shouldn't they flee, especially if the women are able to
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 07:05 PM
1

Logical reasons would be the studies that are constantly linked in this subreddit. But I do agree that it is superficial (atleast for me) but not in anyway different to judging on looks, if anything you can't decide looks, but you can decide your n count.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 09:17 PM
1

Litterallly 90% of the reasons people Cite about bodycount is "HUR DUR SHE MIGHT HAD BETTER SEX IN THE PAST", which is insecurity about your performance Most of the reasons people cite here are about divorce statistics and pair bonding reduction studies, personally i think that's kinda cucked. Truth is that it's just icky, nothing more nothing less. Even if men knew for a fact that they were the best sex their partners has ever had, they would still not like a high n count. 2) Many people litter…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 09:13 PM
24

Nothing wrong with it, but because women (and men, but more solely women) don't want to pretend that physical attraction is what makes them reject someone because it makes them seem judgmental, they try an attribute a negative moral quality on the person they do reject (it's not just a simple he's not good looking enough, he has to be X Y or Z bad person)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 08:24 PM
4

You won't be able to discipline the kid the way you see fit aswell, since at the end of the day you're still an outsider
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:33 AM
-1

Depends on what is meant by manipulation, if it's actively lying then that's one thing, but if it's just using unspoken things, then that's fair game.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:18 PM
–

There's a difference between not just being a casual sex partner, and not even being an option for it (assuming the partner does infact have casual sex which was sorta implied by her comment). Generally you'd want to be the guy who is both the great and loving husband, aswell as the guy who could've hooked up with her at a bar (and I'd be pretty sure that a good amount of relationships already have had this happen).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:23 AM
–

That could be what she meant, but that is NOT what she implied.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:16 AM
3

anything in large enough numbers turn into a resource, human are not exempt from this
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:03 PM
4

I'm not saying that the 4 scenarios are equivalent in odds, or even that it's about getting the small chance of getting a virgin to have early sex. But it's more about avoiding waiting for a promiscuous person because you'll be spending more effort on getting something than every guy before you had to, and that kinda stuff is infuriating for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 05:47 PM
7

There are 4 scenarios that can go on. Low N count/Virgin woman + she puts out early on = best possible scenario Virgin woman + she doesn't put out = fair enough Promiscuous woman + she puts out early on = fair enough Promiscuous woman + she doesn't put out = worst possible scenario Since you generally won't know if they are promiscuous or not going into the relationship, it's just better to go for the early sex. That way you either benefit or are neutral, as opposed to being neutral or being "cu…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 05:10 PM
7

That literally means that women have corrupted/ruined romance
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 03:31 PM
3

survival strategy, a way to not risk any judgement on a man without resources by having other women already judge him for you. its like not going to the cinema without seeing reviews so you dont waste money on a movie you might not like
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 10:50 AM
–

It isn't. Especially if for instance in this sex analogy if the only water available was water you had for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 04:12 PM
–

there is no moral imperative to give out food and water either, maybe by the state, but not by any individual person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:12 PM
–

ugly fat women have more sex than slimmer good looking women, like statistically proven
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:11 PM
6

What is different about a 26 year old compared to a 31 year old. 21 years old is when you're leaving college, but at 26 you should be more or less on your feet.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 10:48 PM
1

this just screams just world fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 12:26 AM
2

Because that's just not the premise the person you replied to was equating with letting homeless people in your house. What was being discussed: housing homeless in your home = make someone stepfather for a single mother. What you're discussing: housing homeless in your home = getting a baby daddy to not abandon his kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:45 PM
1

What does that have to with you discussing a completely different premise than what the person you replied to and OP were talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:40 PM
7

arent you doing the exact same
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 09:59 AM
5

I'm pretty sure this post is about getting men to be step fathers for single mothers
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:04 AM
6

?, how is a step father (or rather the person being asked to be a step father) responsible for the child
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:53 AM
2

Someone leaving another when a better option appears (cheating) and then leaving for that option is not. that is literally a change of heart
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 09:30 AM
1

So no, we don't agree, because wanting something doesn't make someone delusional. I want an 9/10 supermodel who will finance my life, yet stay at home and cook/clean for me and i won't feel satisfied with anything less.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 03:52 AM
0

We can control what we want? When did i say that. How did you get that conclusion from me saying "I'm referring to woman's wants, not choices". Also, not sure if you noticed, but the comment you responded to was exclusively about what women want. That's why the word "want" appears multiple times, and the word "choice" appears zero. Yes?, what does that have to do with my reply. I am literally saying that the "issue" is women inherently wanting a higher standard, not them choosing to pursue it. F…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 03:42 AM
0

I'm referring to woman's wants, not their choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 03:08 AM
0

its more that they shouldnt be delusional in the first place, than have to correct it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 02:20 AM
6

He is "letting" her because he is literally not only agreeing to the premise for the dynamic but he is also literally funding said dynamic. Pick another topic to semantic post over.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:27 AM
1

the problem with portraying sex as a need is that it takes two to tango. That's not really a problem though, atleast not specific to sex. Unless you're going to hunt or farm for food in this day and age, someone is obviously going to have to give it to you. They aren't any more obligated to give it to you than they are to give you sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 12:25 AM
1

Fundamental needs are more than just living (if you see someone thats brain dead but still living, are you really gonna pretend that he has all his fundementals), and even needs that require living people are not entitled to from someone else. if someone else needs a kidney transplant or they die, you are perfectly valid to refuse it to them, even if you can survive on one kidney. just like how you can reject someones advances, be fine, and still. also you just mentioned shelter aswell, that wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:49 PM
6

Average is 7
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:21 AM
3

I'm not sure if that is your criticism of it, but average age of respondents being 21.5 would mean they most likely studied people from 18 to 25, the age range most people care about in these discussions in the first place. Realistically even you know it to be true. Men want casual sex, women don't particularly want casual sex (you can feel free to argue with other women here about the second part). When a guy gets more attractive he would just use that to get more indiscriminate sex, when a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:42 AM
2

If you're seeing this twice, it's because i don't know if the previous comment got deleted for not putting np in the link https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/sRqt3x5y6o You can't see the graph anymore but it's a graph of mens attractiveness going up and their body count going up. One of womens attractiveness going up and their body count going down. And another one of womens weight going up and their body count up. Can't remember if there was a graph for mens weight and body count. This s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:10 AM
2

Hypothetical questions also is to exaggerate and isolate factors in orde to see how stongly a view is held. Do you not understanding simple rhetorical tools? Hypotheticals are fine, yours wasn't for the purposes of your conclusion. If you want to show that body count means little, then use a hypothetical choice where the other choice also amounts to little. Instead of comparing body count to extreme personality/morals differences. In no way does my hypothetical imply that. Thats a job, one you 1…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 01:18 AM
5

what is even that choice, thats like saying, would you rather date a killer murderous bitch who is loyal but will kill your family, or a cheater who has cheated before and will cheat on you but otherwise is the nicest person you will ever meet. and somehow get the conclusion that cheating doesnt matter much if they pick the second option. ​ Its also funny to point out how if they want to date a popular with statistically zero body count they should date people under 9. normal aged people virgins…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 12:28 AM
2

Women are just as guilty of this aswell. Literally pre selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 05:20 PM
5

Dying is not the be all end all. For instance if you were trapped in a white room by yourself with no sound but your own, and only given food and water for the rest of your life. Yes this would be as bad as actually dying. Not saying the lack of sex is the same as being on solitary confinement, but that the principle stands. Bodily survival is not the end of basic needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 03:00 PM
11

Redpillers are not referring to 8/10s when they complain about women chasing chads. It refers to more average women who chase chad only to never get anything more than no string attached sex on the chads end. Then when that same women outgrows that phase they don't want to be "settled' for (settled in her mind, but not really settled for in reality). Also in general no one man or woman likes being settled for.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 11:04 AM
12

Yes maslow isn't the word of god, still not an argument for my why lack of sex is something people should have 0 empathy for.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 07:51 AM
20

Maslow hierarchy of needs puts sex on the level of food and water. So yh it is not far from the vein of empathy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 12:54 AM
1

She can just as easily not do so. Then you're stuck with a whore who fucks like a prude. That's like a double whammy. If you're gonna get dead bedroomed, might aswell be a virgin so you're not being "cheated" out (quotation marks for a reason).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 07:58 PM
3

What?. I think you misinterpreted my response. You asked 2 questions I question why a mid 40s man would even want to be with a teenager. Like, what could you possibly have in common? I answered the first question with the teen being youthful attractive and non jaded I answered the second question by saying that they don't need to have things in common
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 11:47 PM
-2

Where in my comment did i say that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 11:22 PM
1

Youth, attractiveness, un jaded, having things in common is only one aspect and that's only if you're taking things serious (which young people don't do at that stage of their life, so it's not that much of an issue aswell)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 11:05 PM
1

Don't forget being forced to write jokes https://youtu.be/i2E259uZOqI
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 11:39 AM
1

Eh, i wouldn't call it simping. A good amount of the time the guy steps out and fucks other women so it's more like money for cuckoldy type situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 11:28 AM
0

What i said was that there is no option for fatter less attractive women to not be 50/50. As in not only are they more likely to have a higher body count, even without that factor there would be no benefit to paying for their lives. While i didn't say what you thought i did, i don't disagree with that either. Even top attractive rich guys pay for their (attractive) womens lives. i don't see how it conflicts with the red pill. This is purely descriptive reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 11:14 AM
-1

I'm confused. Where is the incongruity?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 11:01 AM
1

Fine if both people are virgins (or at the very least the non virgin was because they were married). But low-key cuckoldry if it's just you who is saving yourself and the other person doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 10:58 AM
-1

Unironically high body count women are more likely to be uglier/fatter. The kind you would be going 50/50 for regardless
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 10:56 AM
6

No one ever says this about all women groups
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 06:11 PM
3

Not the person. But it's clear that it's referring to women not upholding their own preset boundaries when it comes to a sufficiently good looking person. Personally, i can respect consistency even when it comes at my detriment (prude woman acts prude with me). But I can't stand inconsistency when it acts to my detriment (promiscuous woman acts prude)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 07:10 PM
1

The difference is that, for the guy version, the woman getting the short end isn't sticking around, while for AF/BB the beta is sticking around.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 07:41 AM
6

Doesn't that just mean there is some coping going on with the people who responded to the survey
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 12:45 AM
–

Not only will bullies usually lead a pretty good life, they won't even remember that they bullied someone, only person who will remember is the victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 10:44 AM
9

It should not matter that much if he is celibate, he can still be happy. People don't just turn off their inherent biological need to reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:17 PM
5

You said wanting. Not having.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 09:55 PM
8

Name the word for wanting sex with unwilling partners. What? Lmao what? You do realise that every person in a deadbedroom would be a rapist according to you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 08:06 PM
5

casual sex for women is just straight up not the same as for men, less safe for women and they generally prefer having an emotional connection to the people they have sex with, so therefore the standard of people they would choose to have casual sex with has to be higher to offset that. like if i didnt particularly like a certain type of food, the only way i would go out of my way to eat it would be if it was a pretty good version of that food, compared to other people who are satisfied with a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 03:02 PM
1

It is. Many people ain't even done with university at that age,and you have limited work experience,and many/most still leave with their parents. If you go to uni from high school, you'll be done by 22.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:07 PM
7

You cannot discipline the children as if it were yours, you'll never truly be the father, even without the whole genetics stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:50 AM
3

Literally, the thing you hate about feminists is how they tell you what to find attractive. And yet here you are doing the same thing. Quite literally not the same thing. You're describing feminist's doing a prescription (what you should do), redpill is a description (what is going on).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 03:56 PM
2

thats because generally sex is largely divorced from other feelings for men, while sex is intertwined with other feelings for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 05:56 PM
7

It's unlikely (not impossible) that a woman would have sex with someone she would not want to be with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 11:10 AM
9

ok fine maybe not cheer them on, but freedom to make choices includes choices i dont personally think is best for them. still not my place to stop them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:06 PM
0

problems such as normalisation of incest and pedophilia one of these is not like the other
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:00 PM
8

yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 03:59 PM
–

i think its saying that the value of men exponentially increases faster than the value of women at each tier. for women they start off at 250 and keep doubling, while men start at 1 (yes i know it says 0, but thats stupid even for OPs logic) and keeps quintupling.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 11:31 PM
1

Firstly that's not me who you initially responded to, secondly her husband being a piece of shit is already assumed from the sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:20 AM
1

?, How did you reasonably get that conclusion based off what you read
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:49 AM
1

yh i agree, too much is however much that will be found out even if you dont say anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 12:06 PM
1

easily 1 lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 12:05 PM
1

Does let’s say Taylor swift have a Higher N count than the typical 35 year old woman in America probably not, taylor swifts standards would probably be much higher and she might just get taken out by alot of men that are photographed but she never fucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 12:03 PM
3

once a week seems to be the minimum for the average guy, below that you'd start feeling the sexual fustration
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 11:24 AM
-2

Probably because men are easy compared to women and will do more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 09:15 AM
2

The truth is, being stuck in a dead bedroom with a virgin would be way less rage inducing than being stuck in a dead bedroom with someone promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 07:27 PM
17

if being deceived is because they talked about it properly, then sure, but if its just the guy using her presumptuous expectations then i disagree. you either voice it, and a contract is formed that both people either accept or don't, but you know that. or you don't voice it, and there is no contract that is broken. don't particularly feel any sympathy for the latter person.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 05:26 PM
1

based
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 03:12 PM
0

Then why did you include yourself? If it was about procreation
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 05:31 PM
1

You said your dad doesn't deserve your mother, you, or any other women in his life. In what context? Why only women?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 05:24 PM
1

As opposed to any other guy by his side?. Not sure what you even mean by this. Can't just be about dating because you included yourself in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 04:41 PM
2

You know all fights aren't fisticuffs that are set at an appropriate time where both parties are mentally ready for violence. You're acting as if a woman can't just shank her husband while he's taking a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 04:40 PM
4

It's just an ick. Nothing more nothing less. Anything else anyone has said including insecurities or divorce statistics is just wrong. What difference does it make if a man is 6'2 or 5'7, why do women care.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 12:23 AM
8

You made it seem like guys have a problem with being professional. they don't have a problem with being unprofessional, they just don't have a problem not being unprofessional.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 02:06 PM
6

It is so bizarre that dudes here treat "you have to be professional at work" as some intolerable burden. the discussion is about finding a partner, not that guys particularly want to ask out their coworkers
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 01:59 PM
2

Women are not thaaat varied. Atleast compared to men. Like you'll almost never see a fat man being fetished compared to a fat woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 09:00 AM
2

Cock and ball torture
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 03:35 AM
5

Lmao didn't realize CBT also stood for cognitive behavioural therapy. Not just nutcracker
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:35 PM
3

one random dudes opinion doesn't reflect all men does it? Yes it does. Also us men all like CBT.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:26 PM
-6

Women should do what’s best for them since men move the same. How would this involve being pumped and dumped by good looking guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:23 PM
5

?. Did you not even read what i said
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 02:52 PM
5

I think he means loose as in more indiscriminate than loose as in loose vagina
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 12:34 AM
1

Doesn't have anything to do with bodycount It literally does. There are not much men out there that can validate an 8/10 woman, compared to a 5/10 women. And yes. Women will have sex with men less attractive than them. It's not a common place thing, and certainly not for no strings attached casual sex. Which is the primary discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 01:03 AM
0

An 8.5 out of 10 is not being validated by a 7.5. a 5.0 wil be.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:57 AM
2

Plenty ≠ most. Attractive women just straight up get validation for existing. The more attractive a woman is, the more demi sexual they can afford to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:52 AM
6

It's even easy for a "not so attractive" girl to rack up a high bodycount. Not even just easy. Less attractive women literally do have a higher body count. Attractive women just do not need to have sex for validation
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:37 AM
–

That's like asking why does height have to be a value judgment, it just is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 10:58 AM
–

Well gold is expensive because it's shiny, doesn't corrode which means it's able to represent it's value indefinitely and is also a really good Conductor. But i do agree with you
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 10:58 AM
1

This works the other way round against promiscuous aswell. Been with many people, latest guy isn't as good as the ones before, dissatisfaction, relationship over. Gonna get screwed either way. Might aswell make your mark on the virgin instead of being made a footnote on the promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 02:37 AM
2

I'm not saying it isn't. But people use the word controlling like it's inherently bad, when most people are fine with certain types of controlling behaviour
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 10:58 AM
0

I don't disagree, but you should then preface the word controlling by being specific on the actions. Because controlling in and of itself is used for things people deem moral. Like trying to get your partner to stop taking cocaine or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 12:49 AM
3

I can’t think of any reason why a man who is interested in good sex would be interested in fucking a virgin Being with someone promiscuous doesn't guarantee good sex either. And being in a dead bedroom with someone who's promiscuous would be way more infuriating than someone who's a virgin.l.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 12:43 AM
13

This would imply monogamy is controlling. Since you want to stop someone from having sex with people they would've before you were in the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 12:41 AM
2

Honestly, I'd still say the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 04:44 PM
2

Because it worked. But you don't know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 03:38 PM
1

Because no one likes being the odd one out when it pertains to something they don't like. For example, i would much rather tolerate someone who's an asshole to everyone, than someone who's an asshole to only me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 10:28 PM
0

Well tbf, getting stuck with a virgin in a deadbedroom is much better than getting stuck with a promiscuous woman in a deadbedroom
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 01:41 PM
3

How would you even know that
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 09:36 PM
3

No. Because 500 is so astronomical, it's not even something that would happen outside of dating a sex worker. Which is a different conversation. I do honestly think that if a guy found out that his partner had 50, he would feel nothing. I just needed to know if we disagreed on the concept or the number. Turns out it's the number. Which i would disagree on 50 aswell. But there's no point in arguing perspectives. Sounds like a personal problem. It's a human thing to get an idea of someone based on…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 07:28 PM
3

People in this sub care. People in real life who don't struggle with dating don't care. Do you honestly think that if a guy found out that his partner had 500 body count, he would feel nothing to it?. I will say that not much people care enough to actively ask. But there can be some comments here or there that the partner has made which gets remembered and a story forms in their head, maybe true maybe not. Please explain. If you have fucked enough people that some of them show up in your life in…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 07:04 PM
4

Higher tier guy - less caring about n count (less, not none, yes most people care, even promiscuous guys have not evolved past the ick completely) but also less tolerant. which means he can easily end the relationship and find another if he feels any discomfort at the n count. Lower tier guy - more caring about n count, but also more tolerant, is more bound to the relationship because he can't easily get another (if at all), will stay but will feel resentment. Just to clear things up, my positio…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:46 PM
4

ehh, i dont disagree, but higher tier men can more easily dump the girl after finding out body count, whereas the lower tier men would be more likely to stay, but just have more resentment
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:33 PM
8

Top men, Women, Most men. That's more or less how the hierarchy goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 09:38 PM
6

how is that "not paying" if you're paying 50/50? No one ever expects the woman to pay for both meals. It is near impossible for that to happen. So to any reasonable person, not paying means not paying for the woman
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 07:28 AM
6

Obv he means 50/50
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 02:35 AM
17

It’s around 50/50. Press X to doubt. I'm sure women have had their fair share of deadbedrooms. But i heavily doubt it's 50/50 given mens higher libido on average
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 10:55 AM
2

You should blame yourself though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 09:55 PM
1

This feels like the response to someone elses comment. I'm not sure what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:36 AM
1

The "no" is a no that hasn't actually been said yet. It's a provisional answer to a question that hasn't been asked yet. The advice is for someone who would've gotten a no if he asked the question the way he was originally going to, to ask it another way and get a yes. The fact that you have some innate problem with this is kinda telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:26 AM
8

Why should people help them get around consent, it’s not moral What?. How did you go from that question to trying to bypass consent. The point would be to get the consent in the first place. Turning a no to a yes does not mean bypassing the no.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 08:26 PM
5

Independent does not mean uniform Independent does quite literally mean not dependent, which is what people who can't attend a date without it being organised and paid for are. People shouldn’t expect to be taken care of by a stranger but if you don’t make the dynamic different than a friend then why should you be thought of as anything else The dynamic would already be different from the point you made at the start of your comment. Same jokes, same food, same dynamics Paying or not paying for e…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 02:09 AM
49

Men do the same thing. Why is it acceptable for men but not acceptable for women? Not really. The people women have casual sex with, 99% chance that they would want to be in a relationship with them. For men it's the opposite, the people they are in a relationship with 99% of the time they would have casual sex with them. Meaning that a woman in a relationship with a man would have met both casual and relationship criteria. But a man in a relationship with a woman wouldn't be likely to meet the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 12:40 AM
7

It's not about treating your dates like pals, but treating your dates like they are independent people, which is how you also treat your pals.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 12:32 AM
11

Unless you're in asia, friends pays for themselves regardless of who invites who. The only exception would be if you invited your friend somewhere they clearly can't afford, and at that point you'd make it known that you'd pay for it beforehand. In asia though, people fight to pay the bill, even paying it before the orders take place
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 11:25 PM
3

Other way round, a guy would invest to increase the chances of having sex. Do you seriously think that a coffee date would have higher chances of sex than a restaurant wine and dine. If the guy didn't care about sex, and just wanted to know you, he'd take the cheaper option of something cheap like a coffee date or a walk in the park or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 11:22 PM
2

Fine, but telling your partner not to cheat also meets the definition of controlling. So clearly controlling in and of itself is not immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 09:04 PM
1

It would only need to work the first couple of times, until the actual confidence sets in
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 06:25 PM
0

Well in some ways, as in, to climb the corporate ladder you have to be unagreeable, women are naturally worse at this since they are naturally more agreeable. More changes to a womans psyche is required compared to men who climb the corporate ladder.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 04:52 AM
1

Curious as to the income range you have for your standards to men. Do your partner to make about the same as you?, Or just average money or you don't care? Also would you let your partner be a stay at home dad (I've heard alot of women don't like support SAHD)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 04:48 AM
–

Fathers are usually more critical of their daughters partners. You can aak any redpiller as to what they would want their daughter to do, and the answer would be the opposite of what they would want to look for in a wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:50 AM
–

Quite literally what it says. The person is literally saying, you can tell, and if you can't ask your dad who can usually tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 01:28 AM
–

Ah yes, because only men can determine other men's hidden motives; women are all oblivious and naï bf e. Are you actually blind? That is not what the person said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:16 PM
1

It's called the horn effect
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 09:15 AM
10

ok no one implied that men were being killed and raped by women in wars. ​ just because its by other men does not mean that men arent the most effected by war
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 03:50 AM
–

You genuinely believe that the present state of the relationship has absolutely 0 bearing on what they think of what the relationship used to be like. I don't even think guys are not guilty of this
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 04:13 AM
–

You don't think it's a bit retroactive?, Like let's say the relationship fizzles out in the span of a week, yet she'd be like " the relationship was always bad"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 03:31 AM
1

I literally said casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 03:04 PM
1

Women would only have casual sex with people they find attractive anyway, so it effectively means the same thing. Also the 80/20 rule is present in more things than just dating. 20% of words are used in 80% of communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 01:38 PM
1

I don't understand how the group of people you are dating has useless advice when it comes to dating us? This shouldn't come as a shock to you. The thing that is pursued usually doesn't have any idea on what it takes to pursue it. This is more than just dating, extends to customers and critics. I'd never ask a food critic on how to make a pizza. I'd ask the chef.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 01:43 AM
1

?, Not sure what this retort is supposed to be. When did i say that the salesperson are deaf. Just that your initial wants are (most of the time) malleable. Obviously a salesperson isn't gonna try sell you a vacuum cleaner if you came in for some bath towels.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 01:11 PM
1

Well sorta but not that extreme. The customer doesn't know about all the behind the scenes stuff that goes on to push them into buying X Y or Z. The customer goes in, talks with the salesperson, buys whatever then leaves blissfully ignorant. You are gonna be in for a rude awakening if you think the salesman and even the store layout are just for show. This customer would suck ass if they tried to be a salesperson without training or some natural talent.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 01:02 PM
2

the analogy has nothing to do with wanting to be caught or not. but that the thing being pursued doesnt have any idea on what it takes to pursue sad thing. analogy couldve been, ask the chef how to make the food, not the critics who like said food.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 12:47 PM
1

there is something seriously wrong with you if you think customers will be able to give any advice on how to be a salesman.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 12:44 PM
–

According to some guys, they give good head and such, so if you care a lot about sexual performance then that might be a benefit for you, if a woman enjoys being valued based on the sex acts she provides then more power to her. Except she can just easily not do it. It's not like she has to has sex because she's promiscuous. And most guys would agree they'd rather be in a dead bedroom with a virgin than with a promiscuous woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/23 08:48 AM
–

Average woman has a body count of 6 or 7. 20 is alot for any age ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/23 08:32 AM
1

Does she really look 5 (FIVE!!!!) times worse than 10/10? I don't think so. A 2 is alot more than 5 times worse than a 10/10. I'd say that a 5 is five times worse than a 9/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/23 09:26 AM
1

So you think only 20 percent of the entire female population is less attractive than her? So most women older and more overweight than her are more attractive than her? Actually a 2 is way less than bottom 20%. It's more like bottom 3-5%. Otherwise you'd be saying that there are as much 5/10s as there are 1/10s
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/23 09:25 AM
8

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog Do some extracurricular reading
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/23 09:23 AM
2

For the 3rd time. Men want sex and hate women. Firstly no they don't hate women. Secondly men want sex with women. Not men want sex. Thirdly even if a guy did hate women, this wouldn't change whether he wanted to have sex with women. This would just stop him from wanting to have a committed relationship. Also can you stop with the wierd homophobic remarks. I thought you were trolling at first, but now that you've said this again. You do know that homosexuality is not a choice. So going on this w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 08:08 PM
1

It does. If men hate women and are smart enough to figure out their urges then why not circumvent them out entirely? Urges don't exist in a vacuum. Humans have an urge to well want urges. No one would live in a world where they don't have the ability to want anything. Secondly, when the fuck do men "hate" women. Men do have contempt and look down, but very few men actually hate women. Even amongst redpilled men. And even the men who do hate women still want sex. To men it's mutually independent …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 07:50 PM
1

Eww wtf, you have your suits tailored 🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 07:34 PM
-3

Nothing to do with smart. Like asking why a chain smoker doesn't overcome his addiction, is he stupid?. Except in this case they are already born with a smoke addiction. IQ doesn't magically overcome brain chemistry.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 07:17 PM
-1

The biological urge to procreate and pair bond
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 06:48 PM
7

Should I expect the same treatment immediately, simply because he did do those things in the past? Perfectly fine to find it distasteful and end the relationship because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 08:24 PM
1

Really ?! Is there a psychological phenomenon for this ? Never thought that this could be a possibility ! You are definitely trolling. But in the 1% chance you're not. It's called the halo effect
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/23 07:20 PM
1

Pretty sure 1/3rd of women have used dates as a way to get free meals
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:54 PM
1

Attractive women may have higher standards, but they also have more opportunity from high value men. Attractive women don't have sex, they don't need to to be validated. High value men just solely want sex. They'd rather fuck an average women on a dark alleyway on a Thursday night. I do remember seeing a post that had two studies, one on attractiveness and body count, and the other on weight and body count, and it showed that as attractiveness increased, n count decreased and as weight decreased…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 05:07 AM
1

It would be more believable actually if she was attractive. If she was unattractive then I'd definitely think she was lying. Attractive women = higher standards = less body count. Attractive man = more opportunities = higher body count.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 01:02 AM
1

Can there not be a conversation about what not to do. It feels like a senseless circlejerk to go "men shouldn't rape". I mean yh, but you don't have control over if a rapist will try something or not. You do have control over what you can do about it. If a woman accepted a drink from a total stranger at a party. Is everyone supposed to just ignore that happened and just only think about "he had no right to drug and rape you". Yh he didn't, but he did it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 12:59 AM
0

Now the burden is supposedly on you to keep those places covered at all times to avoid becoming a victim. It literally is though. Even with bad cards being dealt you should still do everything in your power to minimize bad outcomes to a reasonable degree. The only question is, what is reasonable. Staying at home 24/7 would minimize it but that's unreasonable to ask. Not taking drinks from strangers is reasonable to ask. Is not being dressed slutty outside at night unreasonable, or going to parti…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 12:54 AM
1

They don't particularly make it known though, they don't even act any differently, just go through the usual motions. Like if they are holding back their attraction by refraining from sex, you'd think that they'd atleast make it known in other ways. Splitting the bill, or paying it, initiating conversations and events.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 12:42 AM
1

If it was one time and she never did it again then sure. But that case stops being made after the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 12:36 AM
1

I should've prefaced this. By pizza maker that you like, i mean a pizza maker who's actually successful. As in a guy who's getting women. The critic in this scenario is an expert in what a nice pizza tastes like. But they wouldn't know at what temp the pizza was baked at for how long, the exact blend of cheese that was used, ect. I'm gonna state this once more, the "hunter" is not a man, it's a successful one. I wouldn't go to some bum ass fisherman who catches maybe once a week for advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 04:56 PM
1

A man trying to pull women is the man making the pizza, and the woman is the critic in this scenario since she is recieving and judging what the man is doing. If i wanted to know how to get a guy as a woman, then yh i would just ask women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 04:40 PM
1

If someone knows how to make the pizza that you like. Would i ask you on how to make the pizza or would i ask the person who makes the pizza.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 12:01 PM
2

I'd say it's more like, ask a well renown chef not a critic on how to make food. The critic knows what they like in the food. But they don't know everything that had to have happened to get the food there. Hell even in the car salesman analogy. The customer doesn't know everything the car salesman did to get them to buy the car. It's not like the job of a car salesman is to go, "what do you want", "i want a lexus" "done."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 11:54 AM
1

I literally said that a relationship has more pay off for more investment. I'm highlighting why you can't just treat relationships in the same way you do friendships.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 07:02 PM
2

You could disappear for a month and still return and be friends. You don't need to continuously do anything for your friends, you just need to not be a parasite. Friends are all independent to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 04:46 PM
2

There is a very big difference between friends and relationships. You don't have to do anything for your friends besides exist. I'd say friends are a more unconditional relationship than even parent and child. A relationship is the furthest from this, but with more pay off.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 04:36 AM
2

Doesn't matter, once it's out of category one, it's hard to trust anyone who acts like it'll be in category one from now own. Pandora's box has opened.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 02:36 PM
2

Not everything is a deal-breaker. What if you liked expensive trips, but it's not something you expect from your partner's. So you would stay if he didn't give you expensive trips. Now you find out that he gave every single one of his exes multiple trips to paris dubai whatever. And he didn't with you, and he still very well could, nothing changed. He's just not that type of guy anymore. You really would go on about your day without feeling some type of way about it?.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 01:43 AM
2

There are three categories. I don't like something and i will never do it again. I do like something and want to keep doing it, and I don't like something but i will do it depending on other factors. If someone did anal, immediately disliked it, and put it in the first category, no one would care. But guys only care when anal or whatever is put in the 3rd or 2nd category. And once you do anal (or whatever) multiple times (barring actual rape, and i mean actual rape which doesn't include "abusive…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 01:21 AM
8

Even if the fish was all that, you still wouldnt ask the fish. Because there are still alot more things that go on behind the scenes besides what the fish see's. This is in everything, from serving a pizza to making a video game. You would never ask gamers on how to make a game even if they know what they like, you'd ask the person whos making the games they like.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 12:05 PM
1

I will point out that you never see community feedback go far besides the very obvious stuff, because the fans are the absolute worst at deciding how said product should continue. This is known even well past this analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 03:22 AM
3

Fish has an incentive to lie. Also, the fish doesn't really pay attention to much of the inner workings of why they got baited hooked and reeled. At most they'd be able to tell you what type of lure they liked most, but they wouldn't be able to tell you what time of day, season, region of the pond/ocean, salt content ect. We can use another analogy. If i wanted to make a very good pizza, i wouldn't ask pizza critics, because they only know how the pizza tastes, I'd ask they guy who's Making the …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 05:57 PM
2

Attractiveness, and the combined perceived and actual confidence that comes with it, perceived because of the halo effect, actual because confidence comes from validation which attractive people get freely.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 07:45 AM
18

Most of the pull women have are due to sexuality reason's. Romantic love would still exist, if anything it would be better, since there wouldn't be an inequality behind it, due to the difference in sexual libido effecting the dynamics. (Husband wanting more sex than his wife will do, can and will effect the romantic part depending on the size of the mismatch
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 10:36 PM
11

Firstly, sex work is work. Firstly, they would still be out of said sex work, to find different types of work. So pointing it out doesn't change anything
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 10:33 PM
10

people generally dont like being treated less for the same action. if a guy took all his gfs out for super expensive holidays, and he doesnt do the same for his current partner when he very well can. even though its not a requirement that someone is being flown out to dubai, it still jades people when that information is known.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 11:25 PM
10

you wont really be taken seriously then when you make allowances for yourself on something that you demonize people for doing. Its the classic, dont be a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 03:24 PM
–

When did I use the word value in that context? I'm not saying you used the word value in that comment. I'm saying that there's a 99% chance you have used the word value when referring to human beings. Women aren’t objects They aren't, but that doesn't mean humans don't naturally treat other humans as objects from time to time. Hell, humans treat objects as human from time to time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 04:02 AM
–

just so you know, if you use the word value at all in the context of human beings. you are objectifying aswell. so dont pretend your guilty of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 02:48 AM
3

You don't see rich socialists The term for that is Champaign socialists. And there are a couple. Most notably the twitch streamer hasanabi
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 11:45 AM
7

"Women have to shave every bodily surface" No you don't. "starve" You don't need to starve to not be fat. "have perfect skin, perfect hair" Nope, lmao just no. and not have a "high body count." Actually you just need to lie about it. "Plus you guys think women are ugly and old at 25." How much redpillers do you unironically think are Leonardo DiCaprio or andrew tate. Listen to yourself. This is like if i said, a guy needs to be 6'2+, white, perfect jawline, 6 pack, good pecs, perfect frame, need…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 02:41 PM
12

No. There's nothing wrong with women having an ick for it. The only issue I have is when they aren't honest abouy it. Trying to deny the ick exists and then making it out to be, "if i have an ick it's because of you're a bad person, not because you have traits that i fundamentally don't like" Also womens ick far extends beyond the most creepy neckbeard incel you can think of. Kinda disingenuous of you to try and paint an image where it's only the lowest denominator that women has an issue with. …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 02:22 PM
3

Lmao, women just need to not be fat. That alone puts them ahead of 95% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 01:13 PM
12

Other redpillers would spout out divorce studies or cheating studies. And while it is true. No one thinks about that when they hear their fiance had 58 bodies. The reason why women become less desirable is just because of an ick. Like why women don't like short men. The thought of investing that much into someone who has had sex prior is just on an instinctual level repulsive. Men are pretty territorial by nature. It really is analogous to paying for a used iphone at full price, maybe men just n…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 01:10 PM
10

What do you mean by that. Can you elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 12:54 PM
16

if a woman’s value decreases the moment she engages in sex, the same applies to these men. Lol no. Otherwise a virgin man wouldn't be viewed as negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 12:48 PM
1

80% of judgement comes from fat. 15% come from age, 5% come from actual body structure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 08:42 PM
2

I can use my imagination. I don't know who can do it raw though with no thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 05:29 AM
1

There was a skit in the in-betweeners show, where one of the main characters sits on his arm for like 15 minutes to lose feeling in the arm so that it felt like someone else was jerking him off. Nicknamed the dead arm gang.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 04:37 AM
1

It's the same reason why you can't tickle yourself. Your brain knows. You can't even give yourself a hand job without some sort of erotic stimulation (either by porn or imagination or something) to trick your brain into thinking someone else is doing it. While a womans handjob is it's own erotic stimulation
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 04:09 AM
5

What does that have to do with anything that was just said
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 06:43 PM
0

I feel like most guys could pull off the beta buxx route. But that's the same as a woman who is only ever a fuck buddy, not particularly an ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 02:54 AM
2

That's like a next level anti socialness. You never know how some people are aswell. There's no reason to fuck around and find out if someone will make an incident over you being rude. Might aswell not risk it. This isn't even about being a woman but a general life thing for men/women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 02:22 AM
7

Other way round, women are sexually free and highly selective because things are better.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 02:10 AM
3

I’ve gotta ask though, in what way are men supposed be discriminated against in the school system (not from the US, no idea how it works over there)? Iirc, teachers mark down men compared to women for the same quality of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 02:09 AM
19

I think it's the part about rewarding morally degenerate men
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:32 PM
7

Wait you do the housework and are the breadwinner?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:13 PM
1

Yes but that's a seperate matter to someone asking their pregnant wife for a paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 09:43 PM
1

Lots of women would take a very big offence to it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 09:20 PM
1

Yh but the instinctual feeling doesn't go away just because science came about in the last 50 years. Also even nowadays, asking for a paternity test is pretty much tantamount to ending the relationship. Would your opinion of a man not go 180 if he suspected his kid was not his during your grueling 10 month pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 01:26 PM
2

You replied to a comment talking about women in general and then immediately had to make it about yourself. Are you incapable of thinking about anything but yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 01:21 PM
2

us, when we're regularly subject to physical and sexual violence? That is exactly why it revolves around you. If a group of people steal food more than the other group. It's clear to see which group is richer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 01:00 PM
10

The other guy is bsing. No one cares about divorce rates lmao. Body count is disliked in the same way shortness is disliked. It's just an ick. You wouldn't see women trying to justify it by bringing up studies that short men are erratic and sociopathic. Not sure why men need to try justify it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 12:28 PM
1

Since most men won't reject these so called signals. Then doesn't that mean women pick anyway. Since it's mostly a given that they won't be rejected.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 10:48 AM
1

Err, pretty sure men pursue women regardless of signals. Otherwise we wouldn't have a so called catcalling/sexual harassment culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 01:40 AM
2

well to be fair, it can be manipulation if the woman is only giving enough sex to make the guy not end the relationship or go for a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 08:05 PM
1

what op probably shouldve said, is that the appearence that men judge on women are mostly choice based appearences, a woman chooses to cut her hair, or wear something revealing, or be fat. but alot of what women judge on men are mostly things that cant be choosed, like tallness, or frame, or race, or facial features. Not saying that someone well groomed wouldnt be judged more favouribly, but thats really as far as it goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 08:03 PM
2

1/3 households have women as the breadwinner Isn't that statistic only for households that don't include stay at home wifes?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 01:37 AM
1

Yes but just because you can survive without a heart, doesn't mean it's an acceptable standard to live in is what I'm trying to say. Someone who says sex is the most important factor can still not accept a marriage that has other factors missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 09:49 PM
1

There isn't anything morally wrong. But to guys, their woman having a high body count, the feeling is almost like a form of psuedo cheating. Even though it happened before the relationship ecen started, it's not somehow irrelevant to someone's feeling. Men just care about the past more.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 08:06 PM
1

The most important part doesn't mean that it is all of it though. If i said having a brain is the most important part of being alive, this doesn't mean I'm saying it's acceptable to lose a heart or lung.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 06:38 PM
1

id say the line is drawn when its a stick and not a carrot. sex for something to gain is much much different than sex to not lose something that is already had. proposition vs coercion. if harvey weinstein only just didnt give parts to people who didnt fuck him instead of going the extra mile and blacklisting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 05:39 PM
3

Im saying about guys that lie to have sex relatively early and then dropping the girl before they actually go into a serious relationship. Then the woman should only be giving sex out when the relationship is actually serious. Yes guys could still lie then. But at the very least the woman should make the guy work for it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 07:06 AM
2

The opposite to this is way way way worse. A wife who was very sexual to everyone that came before EXCEPT you. It's way better to atleast not to get to fuck a chaste wife than it is not to get to fuck a promiscuous wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/23 11:15 AM
1

Maybe she's drop dead gorgeous but she isn't humble and has a high N count, Better looking women statistically have a lower N count aswell. So the N count isnt that much of an ask. Although they only have this kinda n count specifically because they don't date the average men, and don't even have casual sex with the above average men either
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/23 10:55 AM
3

How many tries does someone unironically need. What exactly is going on that ends the relationship besides obvious stuff like cheating or domestic abuse. Only other one i know of is someone wants to get married/have a kid and the other person doesn't. Feel like that kinda stuff should be known before one starts though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 05:24 AM
0

6 and below is whatever. Past 6 kinda sus. Past 10 is high.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 05:18 AM
4

you cant rack up that high of a body count if you were only seriously dating, otherwise that would be like a new boyfriend every year or something
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 05:02 AM
1

You either never consented, or you stopped midway. But there is literally absolutely no circumstance where you can consent be done with the sex and then take it back later on.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 03:16 AM
1

you cant retroactively remove consent
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 01:59 AM
8

we can do this the easy way or the hard way which'll it be?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 01:57 AM
1

Except he said majority not every single man to have ever existed
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 05:26 PM
5

Women who are demisexual Even if that actually exists. It would be pretty rare. Sorry but most people's lizards brains still care about looks
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 04:31 PM
0

How much of these people lost their virginity to the person they were marrying. Iirc around 12% of people are virgins between 20-25 and whatnot
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 03:58 AM
1

I also said that in cases where the father leaves after the abortion window is out then it's fair to say it's 50/50
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 05:12 PM
1

Places where abortion can't be used. Yes I'll say it's 50/50 responsibilities on mother and father. But places where abortion can most certainly be used, most of the responsibility should be on the mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 04:35 PM
1

I'm not saying men have 0% blame or anything. But the fact that technology exists that overrides whatever went on to concept the feutus yet this technology can only be used by women. There is no way it is 50/50.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 04:33 PM
1

Those 6 weeks were recent changes. Not all babies were born after 2021. Secondly you can still go to other states. Thirdly the u s of a isn't the be all end all in abortion. It's still perfectly fine in Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 03:07 PM
1

we are only talking about cases where the woman does not abort. That is literally the point. They had the choice to abort or not. The man cannot choose to abort the baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 11:38 AM
1

If abortion was not a thing then i would completely agree with you. But now that abortion is a thing, women can veto the baby. when the baby is born, it is because the women (and only the woman) allowed it to happen. The man cannot abort a baby nor can he force women to carry it. You are absolutely delusional if you don't think this immense veto power doesn't change the responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 11:32 AM
2

Errr yeah, unless there's rape involved, he can actually choose whether or not to wear a condom. Well yes, women and men are equally responsible for the babies CONCEPTION. Abortion or the lack there off is solely responsible for the babies BIRTH. Women are the sole deciders of abortion. Therefore they are the sole decider if the baby goes to term or not. Abortion is irrelevant unless he makes the CHOICE to get her pregnant. You cannot make a sole choice to get someone pregnant, you can however m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 11:02 AM
4

Men get to choose whether or not to get a woman pregnant Err no, women infact choose that aswell. Unless rape is involved women can make the guy wear a condom and women have 2 types of pill against pregnancy. And this is irrelevant, the fact that abortion exists and that men have absolutely 0 authority if his potential child lives or dies means that women have the final say on whether the baby is born or not. If abortion wasn't a thing and all pregnancies had to go to term then yh I'd say men ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 10:17 AM
1

Women have absolute complete authority on whether the baby is born or not. Unless the guy left them after the abortion period is over. They literally have final say. Authority comes with responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 11:11 PM
5

What?, The difference is that age gap relationships are consensual while rape isn't. One is people choosing it for themselves. Find a better example
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 07:52 AM
1

Err no, if you snitch and they don't snitch you get very little time compared to if you don't snitch and they don't snitch. You seem to think i care about the total time both of us serve. I don't. I only care about the time i serve.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 01:23 PM
1

The way the prisoners dilemma has been presented to me, if you snitch and the other person doesn’t (best case when snitching) you still serve time, but much much less Sometimes it's either go free or spend a year or 2. When people snitch on eachother it's like 5-10 years and when one guy snitches and the other guy doesn't it's like 20 years. Snitching gives you the less expected time served compared to not snitching
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 01:02 PM
1

In real life you still have to take into account the probability of the revenge of the person you snitched on, I'll have a massive head start on that part. or the probability that it will be known that you snitched and the other prisoners will punish you for it. We'll have snitched on each other. Plus snitching is not that serious unless it's snitching on a group of people. Plus odds of knowing specific things about a case wouldn't be that high, it's not like I'd be going for sex crimes or somet…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 01:00 PM
1

I benefit ether way if the other person doesn't snitch on me and if the person does. If they don't snitch on me i pretty much go free, if they do snitch on me then i get much less time then if i was to go silent. Plus if I'm committing a crime then I'm not gonna trust the other guy anyway,
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 12:47 PM
1

I never understood why they call it a dilemma, the obvious answer is to just snitch on your partner. It is mathematically optimal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 11:43 AM
1

Except, wether everyone else decides to be amoral is irrelevant to if you decide it or not. Either everyone is moral and you're amoral and you win. Or everyone becoming amoral (which you cannot control) and you need to become amoral to cancel out. Either way being amoral is at worst a neutral stance. There's no point talking about what society will do if everyone becomes amoral because that's largely out of your control.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 10:45 AM
1

Pretty sure there was one done on tinder aswell
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 07:03 PM
1

You'll be cutting out 40% of your prospects, this only works if you are already desirable. Otherwise you have no choice but to suck it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 06:57 PM
1

In this case. What we are looking for is history. 18 year olds don't have much history and so we are looking for people who have lived long enough to make a history. It's not lying with statistics but answering a specific question
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 12:53 PM
1

Pretty sure women on average take out more from taxes than they put in while men put in more than they take out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 12:27 PM
5

You telling someone, in this case women, that they cannot desire the goodness of their body, and are not entitled to feel good in their body, shows how much humanity and bodily autonomy you've removed from women as a whole, and entirely. What does this have to specifically do with women. And secondly you said you were entitled to pleasure. You did not say you were entitled to want pleasure. Those are 2 completely different things. Being entitled to pleasure means that you're entitled to the ways…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 02:31 PM
6

You are literally not entitled to anything from anyone else. You're not entitled to pleasure from a man (or woman) just like how a man isn't entitled to have sex from a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 01:57 PM
5

pleasure they looked for and deserved at the fault of the men. Can't believe I'm the one saying this, but your not entitled to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 01:29 PM
3

That is the perogative, but only few women can get away with this (well lots of women can, but only few women can get away with it to the guys they find attractive). Which is why you'll see that the N count goes down as attractiveness goes up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 01:19 PM
7

Their counter part has 100 likes within 1 hour of starting tinder
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 12:28 AM
1

I doubt she was still with tate when she made the video saying that it was kink. But in any case, maybe you're right maybe you're wrong, but innocent till proven guilty and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/23 12:22 PM
2

That was some BDSM video, the girl literally came out twice to state. You could say that the tates paid her off, but it's equally likely that she would've also benefited from Calling him out.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/23 05:42 AM
1

we arent exactly dating other men
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/23 12:28 PM
2

I get 60% of the cut
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 10:15 AM
1

Other way round. If having sex on the first date with non promiscuous, that's +1, if having sex on first date with promiscuous woman thats +0, if not having sex on first date with non promiscuous women is +0 and not having sex with promiscuous woman on first date is -1. As you can see, having sex on first date is mathematically better even if you run into promiscuous person
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 09:25 AM
1

It's purge
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 08:38 AM
6

With point 1 and 2, the product itself isn't being made, as in "i have a 22 year old, 25 year old, and 28 year old sexbot that you can buy from me, but I'm not selling you a 15 year old looking one" but point 3 the product is already in your hands and you're limited after the fact, like how there was a controversy a couple years ago about apple not letting you repair your own iphone (they would lock you out the phone if it detected a different screen). Using your logic, men aren't causing harm t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:20 AM
7

Past making the thing itself which is where point 1 and 2 apply. I disagree with policing how a product can be used once it's actually in the hands of the customer. Especially since the product itself can't cause actual harm compared to a gun (i mean direct harm, you aren't gonna beat someone to death with a life size sexbot)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:35 AM
12

Points 1 and 2 are fine, point 3 is a bit iffy since theoretically real women can consent to wierd bdsm violence shit, how would someone doing it to a doll who always consents be different.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:57 AM
1

kevin samuels couldnt have been that popular if i never heard of him till after his death
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:39 AM
12

It's because the lifestyle costs dignity, people are fine with giving up their own dignity, but they don't want their children to give up their dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 08:12 PM
8

well yes, people generally dont let their children do things that they wouldnt care other people do, not sure why you think this is a revelation
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:59 PM
4

I have no idea who the fuck Diane he means princess diana
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:36 PM
1

Was 40% of men really dying before the age of 16
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 05:56 AM
1

Do they though?, The most cited reason for divorce is financial reasons, i would assume most women marry for stability first.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 05:51 AM
1

Maybe their libido fizzles out at that age, or maybe they didn't like being promiscuous in the first place and so found a good opportunity to not have to have sex. Or their sex partners were just good looking and arousing but their current long term partner isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 05:42 AM
3

It's just wierd, and gives the ick. That's it, nothing more. Just like how short men give women the ick.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 05:20 AM
1

There is nothing stopping a promiscuous woman from just stopping as soon as the wedding ring comes on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 05:17 AM
1

try to have sex This is your biggest take away.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 05:14 AM
3

Well usually it's because the "slut shamers" are people who are suitable long term partners otherwise they wouldn't be in the position for the relationship to end over promiscuity. So it's like a direct loss over something you have already done and can't take back.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 05:02 AM
2

You do know that young is 18-24 not 14-18
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 04:24 AM
4

as damaging to women leading to the conclusion that male lust is damaging and negative. it kinda is though, and im saying this from the redpill side.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 11:46 PM
3

Can’t say for sure but that kind of number (thousands) would give me a pause What do you mean pause. Surely n count should mean absolutely nothing. There should be no reaction whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 05:14 AM
1

but that's probably because people like those that they can relate to and have similar life experiences. You did.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 03:15 PM
3

Lol yh like this post. The guy went to a party where he was with a group of guys who he then found out all fucked his fiance back in yhe the day. Obv he had end that engagement. https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/yx5idv/aita_for_agreeing_with_her_ex_and_not_my_sister/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 03:13 PM
0

Ngl i think that's a cope excuse aswell. It isn't about insecurity or pair Bonding. It's just the biological icky feeling that we are born with. Same reason why people are just naturally scared of spiders.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 03:09 PM
0

How about this. if you jacked up the n count to 3000, do you really think most men aren't gonna feel wierd about it. You honestly believe a sizable amount of men are gonna be ok and or like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 03:03 PM
2

https://www.businessinsider.com/dataclysm-shows-men-are-attracted-to-women-in-their-20s-2014-10?r=US&IR=T sorry but no, straight up men of all ages think women who are 20 years old are the best. but they do message people around their own age as they get older, cuz its just not attainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 12:47 AM
1

At first it was probably an opinion when things in their life started to go wrong. But after arguing for or against it for this long. It's rare for people here to just have opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 03:30 AM
0

It criticizes women who are too fussy in their prime years that they end up settling after giving out all their good years to the cc. You're supposed to identify someone is your scientifically validated equal and you'd better do it before you hit The Wall and your vagina looks like a cat flap. They don't need to be an equal, they could be better or worse or whatever you want. Just whatever it is, don't take too long and don't have too many tries.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 03:26 AM
2

I'm racking my brain but i do not understand what you're asking
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 03:19 AM
2

actually youre wrong, the distinction isnt about women who sleep around, its about people who have sex with men. A woman wouldnt care about her previous partners sex life that much, unless it involved him fucking other men. (the bisexuality discrimination is real). A guy wouldnt care about a woman previously sleeping with other women compared to other men. women are just not threatening, compared to guys. thats kinda all there is to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 10:44 PM
-5

i mean a virgin slut is the holy grail, easily the most preferred option for most men over options like virgin who doesnt have sex with you, or slut who has sex with you (notice how a slut who doesnt have sex with you is at the complete bottom). But most men and redpillers are not that delusional to make that a normal standard. most they can do is just min maxing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 10:37 PM
3

Appearances only matter before anyone starts talking literally the most important part. first impression more or less dictate the future. when people make their mind up about you, its hard to change, and they will do anything to make sure it doesnt change.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/22 05:43 AM
2

I get what you're saying. Basically, people (men and women) think more highly of men who can get women. And lower of men who can't get women. It's just a natural bias people have (towards men, for women it's less prevalent). If a guy enters a relationship while showing he doesn't have much options, his standing and respect is lowered and he has less opportunity to screw up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 11:28 PM
1

It's like a game of poker. If you can make people think you have abundance, then you Will be in a stronger position to negotiate. "If i leave him he will easily replace me with another woman" even if he actually can't, but made it seem like he could.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 07:32 PM
1

No the difference is that for men, pretty much all women in the relationship category are also in the "just for fun" category. While for women it's the opposite, the people in the "just for fun" category are also mostly in the relationship category. A fling with a hot person while you’re single doesn’t mean your spouse is any less special or perfect to you. If you wouldn't have a fling with your spouse, then he kinda is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 04:12 PM
2

There is no hidden meaning towards it. The simple fact that it happened is what's disgusting, it's not about any potential consequences. It's like seeing the brown parts of a banana. People are just naturally inclined to scoop out those bits even though it's perfectly fine to eat.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 04:10 PM
5

I disagree. I don't think people actually care about fidelity when talking about n counts. You could legitimately think and act like a completely different person and someone would still be grossed out if they found out you had a body count of like 300 or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 04:00 PM
1

Kinda. Well when the woman reproduces her economic value takes a dump. And so the parents still need someone to take care of them when they get old, can't be done without some money. It's a very specific situation which relys on the only thing a guy can do, stopping death. So yh. If it involves life or death then the guy triumphs. If it involves literally anything else it's usually the woman who's valued more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 05:32 PM
2

Yes, since the bar for sexually desirable is very low. It's literally anything that's better than their right hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 04:01 PM
10

If men have no value Being born valueless doesn't mean they have no value for the end of time. It just means they have to work for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:54 PM
7

women don't possess that No, most women only possess that. And nothing else. Infact, women have higher N counts the uglier they are (the data is somewhere in this subreddit).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:52 PM
9

They only wanted a son because they could only have 1 child. And so they needed someone who can work and support them. It's still just about the money
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:48 PM
3

Idk man, we getting into drug addict territory
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 05:57 AM
1

? What?. What goalposts did i move. You're trying to move my goalpost. I literally only said that preselection was real and biological. Then you go ahead and start giving out strawmans.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 02:23 AM
1

Yes. What does that have to do with what you said. I said preselection is real. Then you went ahead and started arguing like i said that preselection is the be all end all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 01:47 AM
1

You're arguing against something I haven't even said.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 01:32 AM
3

What?. How did you even manage to strawman that. Firstly i never pretended it was an act of god. Secondly hookers are the one interaction with women that you pretty much need to hide, will do the exact opposite of preselection. Thirdly you could use hookers to build confidence in having sex, although it's not cheap.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 01:02 AM
1

Oh right you're not the same person then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 12:35 AM
1

Their value (or preceded value) in the vicinity of dating is irrelevant to the point I was making It is relevant, it's where 95% of it is contained to, the other 5% being religion. My point has always been in relation to the derogatory language that you used. Using this kind of language reduces someone’s personhood. I used the word hoe because I'm pretty sure you did, and i was just putting it into perspective, i usually use promiscuous. Or ran through when I'm making a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 11:42 PM
0

There is more to the value of someone than how desirable they are to YOU. There's only 2 types of value. Personal (what you think is desirable) or aggregate (what everyone in the general vicinity thinks is desirable), if this was a stock, the general vicinity would be anyone who can trade. Since this is dating, the general vicinity would be the sedual market place. Yes you can be devalued for being promiscuous but valued for being a scientist, you'd have to be specific about the vicinity. Someth…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 11:00 PM
1

Well apparently the couples don't like it, per that article that you linked a graph off. Also https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jomf.12603 Either men are very poor, or compared to women. Or women want men to make quite a bit more money than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:51 PM
1

So what is your conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:47 PM
1

Look, I'm not saying that. But that's what the person i replied to was implying (men are evil, therefore women choosing to be bisexual)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:38 PM
1

Yes exactly, so what are you trying to imply by saying that heterosexuality down 7% among women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:38 PM
0

If those were really my options? Go gay. If you think you don't like dealing with men, women are a different ballgame. I’ve made more than my husband, managed and invested both of our money and we retired at 40. So no, we both don’t know women would rather not be the breadwinner. Me ---> gives a generality You ----> immediately goes for anecdote https://goodmenproject.com/families/survey-says-women-are-less-likely-to-support-stay-at-home-dads/ Couldn't you have atleast done the standard "I've se…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:30 PM
0

Sooooooo, you're saying that LGBT is a choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:28 PM
1

You do realise that value comes from desire right. What you desire is valuable to you, what you don't desire has less value to you. If someone doesn't desire a fat partner to be in a relationship with. They are automatically saying they are less valuable because they are fat. When anything becomes a deal breaker. Everything will reduce down to the deal breaker. In the above sentence, being fat is what it reduces down to. If I don't like someone who wears yellow shoes, that is what they reduce do…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:12 PM
0

There are 3 options. Live as a cat lady. get into a normal relationship with a normal person, but that he would do something else if he was someone else. Get into a relationship with a desirable man but take the L in the monogamy part (well it's still monogamous on your end, which is the bigger L) but win in everything else. (We both know women would rather have a breadwinner and not work than be a breadwinner and support a stay at home husband) First one, I'm sorry but lets not pretend women li…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:02 PM
8

search up preselection, its very real. its biologically built in since women dont have the luxury of making a wrong decision, so other women are used as an indicator.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 08:06 PM
0

he worded it uncorrectly, but the most cited reason for women divorcing is financial reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 08:01 PM
1

If I didn’t get a healthy dose of liberal education about sex I’d probably be a low libido wife feeling shameful for letting my husband touch me and having duty sex twice a year. you know, promiscous women can still do the same thing right? infact id go as far as to say the biggest issue with promiscuity is when the woman doesnt even have sex with her husband. like youre getting the worst of the worst, promiscous and no sex,
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 07:58 PM
-1

Why should we just accept that men will cheat given the chance and why blame women who “want a certain level of man”? High level men are far less picky than high level women (the guys just want someone attractive + not ran through, the women want someone attractive + rich + status + xyz) , this automatically means that he has far more options than the counterpart. Men just biologically want to fuck lots of different women, obv there are rational reasons why most guys dont do this, its just not f…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 07:38 PM
1

The only difference is that I'm 210 pounds at about 11% body fat. Built like a tank damn.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 11:23 PM
2

oh. so of rapes that are reported a high percentage of them go to jail? Higher than muggers yes. About twice as high. Which is still low in overall numbers but not sure what you're expecting, there is still due process involved, if there's no good evidence (which most crimes don't have) then they aren't gonna be convicted. Yes rapists do get away, alot of them, but it's not because they are a rapist, but because they are a criminal. nope. people would believe you and not immediately stick up for…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 10:59 PM
1

Well raping isn't any more free than mugging. About the same % of rapists and muggers are convicted. And the only reason that's the case is that alot of rapes aren't even reported.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 10:13 PM
2

Err do you not realize that the redpill is saying to be in the attraction zone, not that the attraction zone can be changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 11:13 PM
0

youre overthinking it, its not even about the comparison, it just feels kinda digsusting, theres no hidden meaning. redpill guys who try and find a meaning are deluded aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 07:04 PM
1

No, it doesn't change if he wants a hookup or not. He will have sex fast regardless, and then from there he will decide if it's just a hookup or something more. Infact the measure of how long a guy will accept the wait is more to do with how desperate he is than what he wants. Women should next men who can't wait a few measly dates for sex. That's perfectly fair. I'm basically saying that women should be doing this to every man, otherwise the wait is pretty meaningless if she just picks and choo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:15 PM
1

How does it benefit women to have sex fast before a relationship is established? When did i say it did. It is generally known that men was sex without spending much resources while women want resources without spending much sex. You whine non stop about N counts but you don't want to wait a few measly dates for sex. Make up your mind. There is no dichotomy here. Waiting is not the problem, waiting for someone who other people didn't need to wait for is the problem. Someone making you wait is not…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 02:11 PM
1

If you break up before sex. You not only don't get the relationship, you don't get the sex and it's not like you were the one being treated out to begin with, the guys still do all the date work. I really don't see the benefits
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 01:06 AM
1

I've never heard of that. Men have sex quickly regardless. Then build from there. There is 0 positives to waiting. The Dating process is mostly beneficial to women anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 08:44 PM
1

Well two types of less. Frequency and actions. If she was having sex 1 a week with her past flings, but only has sex once a month with you, or the only kind of sex you have is starfish sex where she just lays there like a 120lb fleshlight. Or both
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 06:03 PM
1

Guess you're so cool and cute that you're getting less sex than she gives to other guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 05:57 PM
1

Or is it accidental that you’re treating her worse, and even though you believe you are treating her worse and still choose to? It's only accidental if i only overspend the first time
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 05:34 PM
1

Waiting can make the experience of finally having someone incredibly special Only if you're consistent with it. You’d have to assume the female you’re talking to has slept with people she finds more attractive, but then chooses to date someone who is less attractive, and makes him wait? Not sure what you're confused on. The people she sleeps with aren't necessarily the people she can date. If she's dating someone she doesn't think is particularly attractive, why wouldn't she wait it's not like s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:47 PM
1

It isn't even about what i should do, but that if a woman had found out about it, it would be perfectly understandable for her to feel a type of way about it. Just like how a woman doesn't need to keep the dates the same, but the guy she's going out with isn't gonna feel fine and dandy with it. Also, if it's just once, then fine, but only once chance at it. If i overspend on 2 first dates, then yh there's gonna be a bias against anyone i underspend on going forward. Either that or I'm retarded f…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:47 PM
1

But... dude. If her priorities changed she isn't breaking any rules at all. She changed her priorities and wants to do something different. The wording was bad, but I'm just effectively saying AF/BB No one likes being the BB. sentence that there are different standards placed on someone who does something Vs someone who has never done it. Any chance of being able to adjust to something goes away if she used to do the opposite of that thing in the past. Frankly the reasons are irrelevant, besides…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:34 PM
1

Not meeting casual sex standards means that you're not attractive enough, while LTR standards are about what you can do. Most guys want to meet both standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:11 PM
0

In the context of a first date, you don't know, so you have to assume it already happened. You only met her, and the only thing you can tell is that she must not have liked whatever she had with him, considering she doesn't want to do it again? Err no, what i can tell is that her priorities changed. Making rules for you breaking rules for them. Even going by your way, she's still not the same as someone who has never done it. This isn't even about someone who did it once (and i mean only once) a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 02:57 PM
2

It's not though, even if you prefer LTR over casual sex. It's not something you're declining, it's something you've been declined from, from the very beginning. Meeting both standards is the perfect situation, not meeting casual sex standards but preferring LTR anyway is an acceptable situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 02:54 PM
3

Why? Why do people have to always do the same thing, and why does it have to be the same thing you did last time? What if she didn't really like last time and wants to do something different? It does not need to be the same, it just needs to not be worse. That's why i said it's the baseline. If there's something i want, and the guys before me got it, and I'm putting in more work than they are, the situation will become more unacceptable than if there was something i wanted but the guys before me…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 02:34 PM
4

It's not different. Well the only difference is that there's no one to complain. Since men have higher standards for LTR compared to women who have higher standards for casual sex. The case we are talking about usually results from the guys who can meet the LTR standards but not the casual sex standards. So since they are in an LTR, they are in a position to feel some way, but in the reverse situation, there is no person in the LTR who is feeling some sort of way.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:13 PM
0

Identical is just the baseline. In that if someone is not gonna do X or Y, atleast have been consistent about it. Yes, before you say it, they don't have to be, no one has to do anything, but that doesn't mean everything you do or don't do will be liked And yes, your past actions sure as fuck are relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:07 PM
2

You don't think some people (especially women) have a waiting period before sex
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:59 AM
4

You don't think guys try to have sex in as quick dates as possible in the real world?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:37 AM
5

And she wants to be reassured that she doesn't get 'used for sex' by somebody who doesn't value her as a person. Nothing wrong with that, infact that is what women should do. But this falls apart when she starts having casual sex with some people but not you. This is what the entire discussion is about, not women who don't have sex quickly, but women who do for some people but not for you
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:03 AM
4

In the real world you just don't know this about new partner. Yh you don't, which is why there's no point in accepting a "3 months before sex" type of situation and just try to have sex on as less dates as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:01 AM
5

She isn't obligated to do anything, but that doesn't mean guys will somehow be fine with spending more dates for sex than the guys that came before.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 10:39 AM
-3

If she has sex with you one date earlier than she did the last guy, does that mean she now has to have sex one date earlier with every man she ever dates for the rest of her life or else she's not "as into them"? She could just do the same number of dates. dates less with you > same number of dates >>> more dates with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 09:07 AM
6

For starters a gf and a wife aren't the same thing. Secondly this has nothing to do with his BODY. The fact males always compare a woman's body with money is fucking disgusting. For starters, that was my fucking point, the wife is more than a gf, so it would be wierd that she gets less. Secondly, I don't give a shit about what you think the difference between money and body is, I'm just talking about what someone is or isn't doing. And to answer your stupid comparison, if he doesn't want to then…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 09:02 AM
13

What?, Why wouldn't it matter. If a guy took out all his past girlfriend's to expensive holidays, but he won't take his wife when he could. You expect the wife to be fine and dandy with that. If you're putting in the most, why are you getting less than someone who didn't. Alot of people can excuse not getting what they want, aslong as the person is atleast consistent about it. A promiscuous partner who won't even have sex with you, that's like a double whammy. like if you're gonna be promiscuous…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 08:40 AM
10

Past 10 any age honestly
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:35 AM
1

Why would 8hr of work spare you from laundry and cooking? If he was a single parent, would he be spared that? No. He would do all that WHILE watching the kids. But he's not. So that would spare him some luxuries. Pretty sure the whole point of a 2 parent household is to make it easier for both. We talk money bc often time, the childcare and housework do have value but it’s unpaid and now less valued. It is still psuedopaid. Would you say a maid living at an estate is unpaid. You can make an argu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 05:09 PM
2

will hurt someone else And as i said, they literally are already hurt from the fact that the cheating was gonna happen, not that the cheating did happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 04:12 PM
1

I was perfectly find supporting a man to be a SAHD. How many men will take on that risk? Apparently around the same amount of men compared to women are fine with being a stay at home. https://goodmenproject.com/families/survey-says-women-are-less-likely-to-support-stay-at-home-dads/ . If she decided to leave, you are stuck with no career and no money? Guess that's a good point for why child support and alimony exists. Why cannot men do their share of childcare and housework w a SAHM when he’s no…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 04:09 PM
1

"So the guy has cancer and probably would've died anyways so I figured I may as well just kill him." An accurate analogy would be if the guy with cancer asked me to kill him. And well I'm not sure what your thoughts about euthanasia is. The only scenario in which the third party is a dick is when the third party is connected to the relationship in some way (friend of one of them). Otherwise it's a random person having sex with someone who's relationship is already over.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 02:59 PM
2

She is making about as much as her husband is. Husband gets paid by work and she gets psuedopaid by her husband. Secondly everything I've googled puts nannies at like 30-40k. Thirdly if she were to die. It would not be that extreme as to requiring 6 people to hire. It's not as if single mothers and fathers somehow don't exist. Who is actually winning then? why don't you ask women. They seem unwilling to the prospect of working to support a stay at home father.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 02:25 PM
0

So the other parent? So she’s supposed to do all the 24/7 work with the child and he gets to go to work? The fuck you mean he gets to go to work like it's some reward. Most women would literally not tolerate it the other way round, stay at home dad and working mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 01:15 PM
1

The husband? Can also be the government, or the parents of the mother. Is this your first time learning about stay at home mothers?.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 12:59 PM
1

If you're not working a job, and you're not homeless and starving. someone is literally funding your life. I'm not being demeaning to stay at home mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 12:54 PM
0

Then why even comment what you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 12:33 PM
1

The United States elected a black president
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 12:32 PM
3

?, You do realise the relationship is pretty much over as soon as they were willing to cheat. It's not like you're gonna be fine with "i was gonna cheat on you, but the guy said he wouldn't have sex with someone in a relationship"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 12:20 PM
0

If you're a stay at home mother you implicitly do get paid. By not needing to work. Obv it's hard to become one at this economy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 12:16 PM
3

Other guys are irrelevant and are just more or less competition. Unless there is a friendship involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 12:03 PM
-1

It is dumb that you can get half your shit taken away without even being married.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 11:44 AM
-2

With guy friends, they can return the favour. With girl (space) friends it's just one sided, since she can't protect you from any altercation. It's less that OP is expecting pussy as a transaction. But more like without pussy the dynamic is just one sided.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 11:12 AM
0

Obviously OP isn't saying he's entitled to sex just because he saves his friend, but that he doesn't like the idea of risking himself for someone he's not having sex with
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 11:08 AM
1

He did say odds are
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/22 08:46 AM
1

we both know thats not true, otherwise feminism wouldnt have been accepted in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 04:03 AM
5

Most guys who complain about casual sex complain about women in general having casual sex with select few people. Its not like supporting casual sex would somehow land them some hoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 05:40 PM
3

It's not really an uno reverse. In the sense that neither the chad nor the 50/50 statements should be controversial.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 09:48 PM
5

The opposite imo. Women would want it all to be the same guy. Guys would want it all to be different women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 01:11 AM
3

Half of marriages end in divorce for a reason Reason being 80% women initiating, financial reasons most listed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 01:10 AM
6

What you don't know can't hurt you. And yes i do apply this to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 01:07 AM
2

Confidence comes from validation, which comes from looks amongst other things. You can't just trick your mind into being confident. You'd have to be pretty good at acting to fake it, and at that point you're probably confident anyway. If you're ugly, and you try fake confidence, it won't work, and it'll give an even worse impression.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 07:15 PM
1

Polite to who?, I'm specifically complimenting her grandmother.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 11:01 PM
1

No, we don't. Outside of religious traditional circles, I hadn't even realized this was really a thing at all until I started coming to message boards filled with struggling young men. These circles are not exactly rare. And I'm very surprised you've never seen this in real life. Well tbf if you're in circles that have it's fair share of women then obviously no one would say it. Doesn't mean they don't think it. But you didn't prove it. You just did a Reductio ad absurdum. It's like if I said me…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 10:49 PM
1

Wow. I think you've missed the point entirely. See the central part about not caring about n count is NOT caring about n count. We both know that's not true. If the n count was 10,000 or 10 million or 10 billion , are you not even gonna expect a twitch. The reason why I'm pulling up such an extreme is to prove that the concept of caring about N count is still there even for people that would be fine with their wife having 30 bodies. Very few people genuinely do not care. No, let's not do that. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 09:15 PM
2

Attractive men would more likely to care about N count since they can afford to not have to date a high N person. Let's suppose that in general guys have a base dislike for N count. An attractive guy who's slept around alot, sure this dislike wouldn't bother the guy much compared to someone who isn't attractive. But it's countered by the fact that the attractive guy does not need to tolerate it at all since he's got far more options.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 04:25 PM
0

I wish men would pursue women like they did in the courtship my grandparents had. Your grandmother didn't have a train run through her.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:31 PM
0

Ok but if you were going to animal shelters for virgins, you'd be going for a relationship. it wouldn't be just solely to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 10:33 PM
5

You think it's unexpected for 1 in 10 women to not want sex in highschool and college. Even without religion?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 03:38 PM
6

not the guy you responded to, but here https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf from the CDC so about as accurate as you can get, 10k women aswell. Im really not sure why you think its so unlikely that 12% of 20-24 women are virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 03:24 PM
8

and also allowing your sex drive to control your life. What?, if someone just wanted sex, they wouldnt be going for virgins. The N count stuff is only for relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 03:14 PM
1

Fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 11:50 PM
1

We still are talking about it sexually aswell. Security is an aspect of that. Search up pre selection. It's more dangerous for women to choose mates by themselves time ago compared to choosing mates that other women have chosen aswell. They've basically been vetted by other people. Term is social proof. Even married guys become more attractive because of this. If a guy has a posse of women, the first thing that comes to your (maybe not you specifically but generally) mind is "how did he do this?…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 10:30 PM
1

It's not strange if you think about it from the security aspect. It's similar to how women like to go to women only gyms. In this case the guy is basically that gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 10:13 PM
2

The first 2 clearly have something else going for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 09:04 PM
1

I genuinely don’t care how many partners my new partner has had in their past, as long as we both have clean tests. What about how many partners they didn't have i.e. virgin's. And I think its just hard for me to imagine anyone really thinking about that. Its just so fucking weird to me. We all know everyone has a past so why even think about that? You seem to be a woman. It's not surprising that find it hard to imagine. For guys it's just an icky feeling. Like the same ick women have to a guy w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 08:50 PM
2

guys will never judge a woman when its just sex lol, its not like guys are saying "id do anal with you but you fucked 10 guys last week", its only when it comes to commitment that things change, the guy actually stands to lose something (time, money ect) since its not casual
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 07:50 PM
2

Everyone here who talks body count would still never outright ask it, its generally seen as a bad idea, so just because no one has asked you doesnt mean they dont care.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 07:48 PM
1

youre not entitled to pizza either lmao, there is literally nothing different to the pizza example than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 07:38 PM
3

That doesn't make sense. Either being a womaniser is a negative quality to women and so women are still picky when they choose womanisers because 90% of other guys aren't womenisers so it's clearly about something else (attractive, rich whatever). Or being a womaniser is a positive quality and which doesn't mean women aren't picky when they choose them either.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 07:10 PM
1

? How is that even implied. Just because there is no obligation for women to have sex, doesn't mean that they don't have sex. Even if you brought this concept to businesses. A toy company isn't obligated to sell toys, yet they still do and they are still the distributers. I swear to god people use the word obligated or entitled for the most irrelevant things.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 03:22 PM
3

Shitty in what aspect. Ugly isn't the same as say a drug dealer.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 03:16 PM
1

? Firstly you are. The only way a guy can have sex (strictly referring to consensual, please don't bring rape into this) is if the woman accepts. Now you could say "what about the reverse?", But lets be honest. Guy's want it considerably more. It's just supply vs demand. Until we live in a world where men aren't horny enough to cat call. Women will be the distributers
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 03:01 PM
2

while somehow men who engage in casual sex are objectively good? Because it's hard for guys to engage in casual sex, therefore guys who can do it are respected. Not sure why you have a question mark as if it is somehow unknown to you
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 08:11 AM
5

And maybe it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 07:15 AM
1

?. What?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 03:09 PM
2

You think a starving guy isn't gonna do something unethical for food if he can't get it another way? You seem kinda surprised over natural human instinct. To take what isn't given. ! Now you're probably gonna say, you won't die from sex, but a starving guy will. And then we are just gonna loop all the way back to the start !<
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 03:03 PM
5

If someone is desperate for something. They either get it or they take it. I don't see what's wierd about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 02:36 PM
3

No one owes anyone anything. That includes morals/ethics. No one owes anyone sex Quite literally why the things i said are done in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 02:06 PM
1

Very vague, everything can be someone else's issue. From rape to plate spinning to ghosting to a bad date.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 01:52 PM
4

Yes not having sex won't kill you, if anything evolution wise it'll make you live longer. But that's besides the point. Being alive is not the be all end all of the minimum. I'm sure you wouldn't look at a vegetable and be like "atleast this guy is alive". It is most definitely fine for someone to be desperate for sex on nearly the same level as they would be for food.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 01:41 PM
3

Pretty sure most species live for reproduction. Like surely it's not controversial for someone to view sex close enough to food. Sex is even at the bottom of Maslow's hierarchy of needs with air and food.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 01:30 PM
1

There would still be a % of unattractive men that women no matter the unattractiveness will not touch, and vice versa. The % for untouchable unattractive men would prob be higher than the % for untouchable unattractive women
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 07:10 PM
3

Nice and all. But lets be honest. Muh personality isn't somehow gonna substitute for someone who's super broke.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 05:10 PM
3

How is it different to having sex with someone who's good looking until they lose it. Or having a smart person do your homework for you until you finish school. Most traits can be "used". Also it's not like the guy who has money can't use that to his advantage. If a guy sells his Ferrari for 15k, it's not that the Ferrari wasn't valuable, it's that the guy is a fucking idiot. And also i never not once said that money = everything. I just said that money is desirable, therefore having money is de…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 02:57 PM
2

That's a valid point. Past the group of dating there would be subgroups (single women, married women, pornstars ect). How much overlap each of them have is to be determined. If he is desired by baby mammas or town bikes, how is he high valu The question is, is he only desired by them, and if so, how much of women do they consist of. If most women in a region are town bikes then he is valuable in that region, if few women aren't then he isn't. If he is fine with only being valuable to town bikes,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 02:07 PM
3

Their money is apart of them as much as other traits are. How is it any different to someone who's desired for being good looking getting into a fire and having his face burnt. Or someone with a heart of gold suffering from drug addiction. If someone who is rich is desired even for money, he is desired and valued. literally all there is to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 02:00 PM
4

I'm not saying money is everything. Hell even andrew tate of all people has said money won't make someone desirable. Money itself is desirable and has value. A man being rich may not be desirable given all his other traits. But that rich trait nudges him towards being desirable. By definition a rapist could be high value just because they have wealth, that just make the whole HV concept useless. As i said, it's not all about money. Hell i didn't even make any arguements as to what is or isn't de…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:39 PM
3

It could be argued that having more opportunity to have casual sex gives someone more self-control Self control for celebrities is cheating once every week instead of 3 times everyweek and then returning to the partner. elebrities break up after cheating too and can't usually have their cake and eat it Yes celebrities plural. As in one celebrity dating another. Celebrity guys don't need to date celebrity women, they can find someone who's good looking, but doesn't have much of anything else. Whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:18 PM
7

He's high value because he's desirable, and he's desirable because he has certain traits/stats. There are different values depending on what is being desired. For instance, chris Hemsworth won't be valued as a scientist. But he will be valued in the dating scene. In this sub we are clearly referring to the dating scene, like it doesn't need to be stated beforehand. There are common valuable traits in each group of valued things (scientist, dating, transportation). I'm sure everyone wants their c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:01 PM
18

Value comes from desire. A poor ugly guy with impeccable morals is still low value if everyone around him wants rich good looking men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:34 PM
6

You think chris brown doesn't have way higher chances of scoring women (good looking, ugly, average) than the average guy? And there's nothing that means it's impossible for celebrities to be loyal. there is nothing that means it's not impossible for you to kill your family over badly done sunny side up eggs. We are obviously talking about generalisations. Celebrities are literally incentivised to not be loyal. Ample access to sex. Not only that, they can literally have their cake and eat it too…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:32 PM
12

people already expect it. no one looks at chris brown or something and thinks "this guy will be a loyal partner". they will still choose the former
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:04 PM
18

it makes someone desirable, which is what high value is. pretty simple. the argument is if its desirable or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:02 PM
5

Women are the ones who pretend that they know what they want
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 06:23 AM
1

but pretending to have a personality u don’t have? Literally not that extreme. Being quiet and submissive is only one facet of someone's personality. If you need to actively force yourself to do it instead of naturally wanting to do it for the guy you love respect and admire. That says more about you than you think. If for instance i was getting paid 10k a month, I'd gladly be someone's bitch with a smile on my face. You won't even hear me think about complaining. If you can't do the same for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 10:12 PM
0

Read in-between the lines. I'm saying it doesn't have to be. Let me ask you a question. Do you feel like cooking for your man is a job or just something you want to do for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 05:50 PM
0

If you're with a guy you respect and admire, and you're still incapable of being peaceful and submissive without internally bitching. That's honestly a red flag on your part. If you're not with a guy you respect and admire, you have bigger problems than pretending to be his bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 01:22 PM
-2

It's like cooking. You can work as a line cook, and cooking will feel like a job. Cooking can feel like a job in certain relationships. But cooking for your partner can also feel natural to do. Usually if the partner is someone you respect and admire, you won't internally groan while cooking.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 01:08 PM
-2

Try being genuinely peaceful and submissive for one day, Like most people who have a job?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 11:56 AM
4

Just live your life and try to find people you like and love will just come :)) Literally only women have the luxury of having this asinine view.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 11:11 AM
5

How come being funny, witty and charismatic takes effort but being peaceful and submissive takes no effort? ?, Why wouldn't it. If you're peaceful you do nothing, if you're submissive you follow orders which literally anyone can do. These are both pretty close to objective things. While being funny witty and charismatic requires social awareness, you have to think for yourself unlike being peaceful and submissive. I honestly do not know how the fuck you could have a problem with OP saying that. …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 11:08 AM
0

Peaceful is a personality trait in and of itself. How would it be shallow to want that. Who wants to go home after a long day of work to a non peaceful environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 10:56 AM
17

When a woman is lacking, it just stops her from getting the guy of her dreams. When a guy is lacking, it stops him from getting almost anyone. Men definitely do have it harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 10:40 AM
1

I meant in relation to robbery and assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:18 PM
1

I'm not saying you shouldn't campaign against rape or whatever. I'm just saying that, I don't like how people don't take measures against rape out of some wierd sense of pride. Where just because it's not their fault, it doesn't mean that it's not stupid to not take measures.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:17 PM
1

We are gonna keep going in circles. You keep saying they don't care, i keep responding that they care about the fact that they dont care.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:22 PM
1

Lets not pretend that women don't partake in this when they virgin shame. This implicitly pedestalises high N men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 05:58 PM
1

Only actual players get pedestalized. If someone's not a player, then they shouldn't be bragging. If someone is a player they don't need to be bragging, it cancels out.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 05:50 PM
2

There are still standards to what you have sex with casual or otherwise. You are still rewarding someone for their mistreatful actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 05:47 PM
1

Why wouldn't someone care if you didn't care about being mistreated for some one night stands. I would assume this is a fairly normal opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 05:05 PM
1

Ok so what are you getting at. If you think raping is a serious issue. Then you're even more obligated to take preventative measures.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:54 PM
1

It also means you have low standards for how a guy treata you. Even when you say that they won't care since it's only 1 night. You can still care about the fact that they don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:51 PM
1

https://www.rainn.org/statistics/criminal-justice-system Hmm, the rate of police report to incarnation for rape is actually double that of assaults or robbery. Alot higher than i thought. Such a shame that it only gets reported half the time. Anyway, if the average guy won't mug someone, why would they rape someone, when raping requires even less morals and has higher consequences. Rapists are just built different mentally.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:48 PM
1

Those aren't players. And he's stupid if he thinks bragging about it won't make him look like an idiot. Players are people who can get so much women that, they don't need to say a single word. the golden rule for story telling. Show don't tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:39 PM
1

The average guy even without the morality requirements, still doesn't want to go to prison.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:32 PM
2

It is not a controversial opinion to say that a hot and rich guy can get away with things.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 03:56 PM
3

?. Players are more than just some chump running numbers game badly. It's an achievement because it's hard to be a player. The example you went to literally proves that even you implicitly know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 03:51 PM
2

Nor do you have any obligation to refuse if they're rude because it's not like it'll have an impact. But it does say something about you if you will have sex with someone. You're not obligated to refuse, but someone else can judge you poorly for not refusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 12:41 PM
2

There is a difference between having casual sex with a normal person. And having casual sex with someone who's rude to you. Both are casual yes, but the second one is eyebrow raising.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 11:21 AM
3

We really don't like men who believe in the double standard. Sure. >! Unless he's good looking enough !< You're assuming things that aren't always true. Do you have something personal against generalisations?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 11:15 AM
1

It's sex, not a carpool or something. What you tolerate about a guy you have sex with shows your values, OP doesn't like those values.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 11:09 AM
1

They probably just don't care how someone sees them when they'll leave in the morning, Well yh. That's what OP doesn't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 10:25 AM
3

Players are idolized because it's an achievement to be a player. While it isn't an achievement for a woman to be high N. It's a choice. Trust me, I've seen them, and my verdict was absolutely to not sleep with them The fact that they are players, means that your opinion of them was a minority. Otherwise they wouldn't be players in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 10:24 AM
2

Yh i can agree with that. No point making a song and dance on promiscuous women. Red pill guys just need to say they don't like it and end it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 09:25 AM
4

It's less of why let it bother. If someone doesn't like something, then someone doesn't like it, and If there is someone something doesn't like, it will bother them regardless. You don't really consciously choose what you like (I'm sure you prefer your plates to not have superficial cracks), you consciously choose what you do about it (whether you eat on the plate or not) The question you should be asking is, why should someone put up with it. And that's usually because of choice. Or lack thereo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 09:09 AM
5

?, the guy who leaves doesnt like the idea of the high body count to begin with, so he just leaves because he has no reason to tolerate it since he can find someone else. its like if someone who had a whole closet of plates, sees a plate with a slight crack, and just decides to eat on another one. its not like hes afraid of the plate breaking, but that he just doesnt need to eat on a cracked plate if it cant be helped it really isnt about potential of cheating or anything, thats just weak justif…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:59 AM
2

fully agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:47 AM
5

insecurity /ˌɪnsɪˈkjɔːrɪti,ˌɪnsɪˈkjʊərɪti/ Learn to pronounce noun 1. uncertainty or anxiety about oneself; lack of confidence. The guy who stays even though it bothers him is uncertain if he can find someone else. The guy who leaves is certain that he will find someone else. There is nothing special about not liking high N, it's just an ick, nothing more. Everything else that redpillers say is just weak justification. When they could just say that they don't like it and end it with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:39 AM
0

I'm not saying that the low N guys aren't more resentful. But the high N guy would actually be less tolerant, since he doesn't need to accept it (even if the ick is less) to begin with. Since he can find someone else. Also, jelousy is a perfectly normal trait to have. If anything I'd respect someone less for not being jealous.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:36 AM
1

do you really think a man who has decided to commit crime cares about what people think about men committing crimes?. if someone is assaulted, it is not their fault. (i have to state this before hand). But that does not mean that they couldnt have avoided some assaults (some assualts, are largely unavoidable, mostly the ones that happen in your own home by someone you know). carrying a taser, pepper spray, a gun, dont get super drunk in bars, dont accept drinks from people in parties, watch your…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:25 AM
1

in reality women are blaming rapists, which are average men, and you are feeling attacked and including yourself among those men. the average guy wants to rape women? i have the feeling that you havent phrased it correctly
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:10 AM
1

does it not count as emotional cheating for the duration where the attractiveness grows but the relationship hasnt ended
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:09 AM
5

I didn't say all double standards are meaningless, but body count double standards are. I won't insult you by pointing out why. naa, if youre a guy and you have a high body count, then youre obviously some combination of attractive, confident, rich ect, and so youre good enough that you can want low N double standard since you can meet it anyway. if youre a guy and you have low body count, then theres nothing wrong with wanting low N since its not a double standard. in anycase, the N of the guy …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:02 AM
10

insecure are the people who stay because they dont have a choice, if youre confident and you dont like something, you can just leave and still be confident that youll find someone else,
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:56 AM
2

Hes saying that, their acceptance of being poorly treated is what he doesnt want. Yes, there are people who are good at manipulating, but honestly the whole abusive boyfriend thing seems like a scapegoat to absolve women of any personal responsibility. "women can do whatever they want, until they cant?"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:51 AM
1

its called preselection. Men who can get women have exhibited social proof, making him more attractive to women since other women have confirmed the choice to be the right one. its too dangerous when women make the wrong choice, which is why they have standards, and preselection helps out on making the right choice by having other women make the choice for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:40 AM
2

Honestly? What does it matter? You wanna know the persons past? Why? So you can judge and make assumptions based on other shit? if youre gonna be in a long term relationship with someone, with marriage factored in, why wouldnt you want to know the past of the person youre gonna potentially spend the rest of your life with. wouldnt you want to know if your partner has values that you like/dislike
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:30 AM
9

I think the sentiment is because most of the time, body count preferences are expressed in the context of “I want a low n woman because high n women can’t pair bond” or “I want a low n count woman because high n count women have poor character,” etc. It’s the implications of the “why” that are unpalatable. the whys are just justification, high body count makes them feel icky, thats really all there is to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:26 AM
10

Freeloaders suck. err, you know thats what conservative people think welfare
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:12 AM
2

they dont have much rules to break. so yh, they dont do.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:09 AM
2

No, he gets more women because he’s more attractive and confident, not because he worked so hard to be a total slut. I'm not saying he's not already attractive, I'm saying that the women he gets from the attractiveness makes him even more attractive, like a feedback loop. There's an element of safety when there's more women to one guy. I'm sure you'd agree with that. This preselection effect even happens to married men. It's quite noticeable aswell. that I will want to fuck a man more once I fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 04:55 PM
9

youre looking way to into it, firstly the james bond thing, pre selection is definetly real, its as real as looks. a guy who can get lots of women is more attractive solely because of that, the women around him basically give a signifier that he is a good choice, social proof i think is the term. also theres nothing particularly complicated going on when guys want low N, high N just feels icky, if you believe that women dont want high N, then you wouldnt have a problem with that. also im not the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 03:29 PM
1

This comment came before the other one. Anyway. Didn't you say that he finds it hot when you increase your body count. How am i not supposed to infer cuckoldry from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 09:07 PM
2

Literally the worst thing a woman can do for a guy is not put out? Finish the quote. I said, the worst thing was a woman who was promiscuous not putting out. If a guy is in a committed relationship (i mean like proper invested) where the woman is not sexual, and then he finds out that she had a promiscuous past. The feeling of anger and sadness is up there with cheating. Before you say it, yes he's not entitled for her to fuck him just because the fucked other people before. But he doesn't need …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 08:58 PM
0

I actually agree. If the guy is high N , he's a high value man, if he's high enough, he can openly cheat. Well it's barely cheating since in this case it's basically permitted.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 11:39 AM
2

Because it’s not okay to demand that from women. Demand is the wrong word. Unless it's their dad, guys aren't gonna be able to do anything about it. What they can do is not want to date someone who's promiscuous. don’t care about their future bf or husband because it’s not any of their business to know their body count. It definitely is their business. Are you listening to yourself. It's somehow not the business of the guy who will spend the rest of his life with you? There’s videos and articles…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 09:45 AM
0

Eh, you're both cuckolds. But the difference is that women being cuckolds are not really seen that negatively compared to when guys to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 09:21 AM
2

Childhood trauma that hasn't been dealt through is a red flag. Not your job to clean up a mess you didn't start.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 08:56 AM
0

This is why I personally don’t like the “ignorance is bliss” thing Yh best thing promiscuous women should do is just be very good at lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 08:44 AM
3

Well yes. This is common knowledge. You really thought you did something didn't you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 08:27 AM
4

If a guy lives his whole life being positively affirmed. He will just be confident. He Isn't changing his mind framework to be confident. He just is. If you are not confident, then you need to try and get qualities to be confident of. Not that you're gonna hack your mind, which will do jack shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 08:21 AM
1

It's usually the more low value guys that you prob don't even see as a viable candidate that rise above it. Because they don't really have a choice. While higher value guys don't need to tolerate it to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 06:24 AM
0

But none of those things are the same as 'she's slept with more men than I have women'. The comparison really the biggest issue though. Do you think if a guy who has racked up a body count of 300 is gonna be fine with the woman having 250 just because she's lower than him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 05:00 AM
1

True. But the ick factor still remains. It's basically built into people. Just like how people are born with being scared of snakes and stuff. Even though they consciously don't even know what a snake is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 04:56 AM
1

I disagree. I think it's actually the opposite. The whole preferring low N count is a biological instinct. It's just an icky thing (probably cuz of paternity issues that arises when women sleep around). Most guys feel the ick, just like how virgin men make women feel icky. But a low N guy would actually be more tolerating, because he doesn't really have a choice. Even though the dynamic is worse compared to a high N guy. If a guy is good enough to he high N. Even though his ick would be lower th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 04:30 AM
0

If a guy can plow through loads of women. Then he's the type of guy that can get whatever he wants anyway, not like he has a reason to not have a double standard. If a guy can't, then he has no double standard. It's just a standaedt.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:41 AM
1

It's just an icky feeling from years of biological instinct refinements. There are lots of reasons why you can explain it. The biggest is that when women fuck around, there are paternity issues that rise up. Even if there are pregnancy tests now. The icky feeling still resides as a primal instinct. It's not like they don't want to fuck the shit out of their wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:37 AM
1

If it was a dealbreaker, how would that not come up? Because there is literally no point asking. Women will lie about it (because even they know that it matters) or try act offended. If they really did have a low N, then the relationship is poisoned from the start (on her end). The only thing you can do is just vet for quite some time by looking at her actions. were ones who seemed trashy/slutty, regardless of the actual amount of sex they had. Which is ^ Contrary to the guy you're replying to. …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:16 AM
0

That's acc not even true. These top % men are definitely fucking around. They aren't prudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 12:46 AM
0

That's usually centered around relationships. Not whatever the fuck soliciting falls under.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 11:36 AM
3

Yes the most powerful people are men. But men also feel the worst of things aswell. The ratio of homeless men to women is like 2:1. You seem to exhibit thr apex fallacy. Replace all your "men" with "powerful men" and your comment will be accurate. The gap between most guys and the top % of men is so huge that it feels disingenuous to group them together. They are practically a different gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 05:57 PM
0

You need to find yourself first Why do women associate this with rampant casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 08:12 PM
1

How do abusers slip through the cracks then. I agree that women do judge a personality at first sight, i just don't think they are accurate though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 07:28 PM
2

First off, well yh? Dark triad men are better at presenting themselves. How does this mean dark triad is unnattractive. My source isn't dismantling my point. It's making another point that i forgot to include. Second off, how is that an image, i was literally on the site when i copied the link. Similar to the first one, but even when the women knew they were dark triad, they still rated them as attractive. Thirdly I don't know why you are copying and pasting the source, make a point. What do you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:29 PM
1

No their literally are not hello https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/psychology-uncovers-sex-appeal-dark-personalities/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-myths-sex/202203/the-sexual-appeal-dark-personalities%3famp https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913012245 This is not the hill to die on. I'm not making shit up. Anddddd here we go. Why you don't get any bitches, cuz all u want is sex. It's not that all i want is sex, it's that mos…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 04:44 PM
1

“They are usually more remembered anyways.” Bro why the fuck would u want to be hated instead of just not known the fuck. Somtimes pissing people off has consequences People who aren't nice aren't necessarily hated. You seem to think nice = loved. Dark triad traits are attractive for a reason. Also i will say that, the opposite of love isn't hate, but indifference. If you're hated, you're in a better position than being invisible, since people are already thinking about you. You've already done …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 10:08 AM
1

Do you not realize, these things are the baseline. Doing this puts guys at 0, not positive. Guys are already expected to do all this anyway. It's not that special that someone can work a 9 to 5, and hold doors open or give up his seat. What makes one guy who does this any different to the hordes of guys that already do this. Dude people dont like mfs who arent these things They are usually more remembered anyways. Humans naturally reactive to negatives stronger than positives. Doing small positi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 08:36 AM
1

None of these are interesting. Those qualities just set you up to be a background character. I'm surprised that you're surprised by this. It is common knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 08:07 AM
1

Define good. Being nice, stable, and reliable will definitely make you invisible. Stuff like being outgoing, "confident", assertive can have negative consequences if you aren't good looking. Halo/horn effect. An ugly guy approaching is like one of the most insulting things that could ever happen to a woman. People even spout stupid shit like Napoleon complex when a short guy gets angry at anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 07:39 AM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:45 AM
1

I don't really that exists in this day and age The average guy is completely invisible, imagine how ugly a girl would have to be to also be invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:23 AM
2

Still the same. They are either attractive enough to nut in, (which most women are) or they aren't. The most more unattractive women need to do, is just be easy. which isn't necessarily doing something. Not sure you know this, but unattractive girls have more sex than attractive girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:10 AM
1

You still need to present yourself in a good fashion. While a girl Doesn't really need to do anything, just exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 04:26 AM
1

why yes, generalisations are not centred around the 3.5% . how did you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 10:50 PM
1

a woman with a good career is way more appealing than a woman who works at Walmart. is it though?, if the guy makes good money, i dont think he'd care much about what his wife does, since he will probably get her to stay at home anyway, plus more succesful women tend to have more masculine traits (you cant rise the corporate ladder by being nice and feminine).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 10:44 PM
2

?, i would assume the more richer people are more staunchly conservative
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 10:42 PM
9

life isnt fair, you get what you can get, nothing more nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 07:13 PM
1

I am not going on circles. I've said this 3 times. How hard is it to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 12:40 AM
1

Do you want to argue until the heat death of the universe. I don't, i give up. Therefore you win. You don't have to be so wierd about it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 12:36 AM
1

Didn't i say you won. I'm not gonna repeat this entire discussion again just to continue arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 11:20 PM
1

You know what. You win. I'm not gonna go in circles again. We already just discussed this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 10:00 PM
1

It's more than just a meal. Any sort of event, the guy is expected to pay. Nightclub, restaurant, holiday, whatever. Also that's literally what's called a stay at home mother. Which there is a good % of. And I'm sure a good % of mother's that aren't stay at home just like going to work (which idk why). Although, i do think that the way our economy is progressing, not much men will be able to take care of their household by themselves. But this is a question of can't, not won't. Men really do not…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 09:29 PM
1

What?, Guys are literally the one's who have to ask women out on a date, plan the entire date, and then pay for it. a third of women have gone on dates Just solely for free food When a woman gets married and has children, she's naturally expected to be a stay at home mother, how can she be a stay at home mother and not have everything paid for. Plus you literally already said earlier in your own comment that guys only know how to pay their way through a relationship. I think you're just arguing …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 09:04 PM
1

He has to pay for everything never had a man do this. he has to protect you never had a man do this. if an altercation happens, it's his ass on the line. he must deal with all his problems on his own, while fixing yours, he must do this all stoically, and then he must be an emotional tampon and a therapist at the same time by man, is this after your relationship is actually on. because either there wasnt a relationship and he doesnt have to do those things, or there was a relationship and you ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 07:12 PM
1

do what?. its not even what they choose to do or not, they need to do these things to maintain the relationship otherwise it just doesnt exist. if i could get a relationship where i dont need to pay for things, nor risk my life when something happens, and get to bitch about my life. bro sign me up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 06:39 PM
1

Unconditional love doesn't exist. Guess you still don't realise that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 06:13 PM
1

humans are inherently valuable. relationships are inherently valuable. Wrong and wrong. Everything is conditional. Doing X will cause Y. There is no inherent value to fall back on. but when one group of humans (men) have been taught that relationships aren't valuable and being there for someone is "simping" or "being whipped" then they aren't going to do these basic relationship things. Men think loving someone is "gay". Only certain relationships are valuable. Not sure you realise this, but men…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 05:56 PM
1

What are women there for. If they don't even need the money since they already have that sorted. Could it be that, women still want a man to provide for them regardless of what they do? (Rhetorical question btw)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 04:55 PM
1

I don’t owe you anything. Why is this the first thing a woman will say in response to anything. I'm not asking you out holy shit. "Do you want extra fries with that meal" "I don't owe you anything" Anyway. Only coomers argue that not wanting to date a porn creator is ‘not the same’ as consuming their content. I never said it was. I said it made men who do it raging hypocrites. How can it be hypocritical if it's not the same. Which you just admitted rn it's not the same. The standard is, don't ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 03:35 AM
1

Gemini rising
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 03:04 AM
1

So can books?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 03:00 AM
2

What does that even mean. If women decided that men who watched porn were undateable then that's it. Nothing more to be said. If women haven't decided that, then thats women's problems. Also when do women in this day and age get howled down for their preferences. There's nothing a woman says or does that doesn't get supported. Also men are definitely howled down for having this boundary. So much, "are you insecure?", "What she does in the privacy of her life is not your problem?", "Sex work is r…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 02:47 AM
1

What does this have to do with women wanting their partners to make more money. Even when they make their own money.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:20 AM
1

why would they? Because they don't need money?. Not sure how simple it gets.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:02 AM
3

Damn this is a long one. I'll applaud you if you manage to read it all, you don't even need to reply to all of it. Entitlement that you think just because someone else has easily enjoyed her, that means you should be able to do the same thing with the same ease. And if it doesn’t come easily to you then it’s not worth it? Should isn't the word. They don't have to do anything. But the guy doesn't need to accept it either. And yh it's not worth it. No one likes doing more than someone else has to …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 07:47 PM
1

lol no i was being told about the wall by men as a teenager. Well yh, the wall pertains to 30+ year olds. no one ever asked me out when i was this age. i was a virgin until i was 24. i started getting asked out when i gained weight, got older, and had more partners. Very out of the norm, even you know that being fatter older and more experienced are unnattractive traits. Although there is the juggernaut effect, where more unattractive women are asked out more, because men don't bother competitin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 06:09 PM
6

Objectification because it's more acceptable when someone is consistent about it?. Also where did the entitlement come from.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 04:28 PM
6

What?. It's literally the other way round for guys. Virgin guys are seen in the same way slut women are seen. literally the go to insult for a guy is his virginity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:31 AM
2

Women’s body are not a commodity, it doesn’t “lose value”. Not as a human being. But as a potential suitor it absolutely does. Your value is defined by the other side, not yourself. If men think that women who have high body count lose value. Then you do. Nothing more to it. If women decided that men who have high body count lose value then they do, but problem is that women don't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:28 AM
19

Waiting for sex. Low N-count women don't fuck on date 3-5. Expect to wait a long time. High N women do this aswell lol. After they've finished their hoe period, they try and act like low N. When low N women do it, it's fine. But problem is that if you're the guy on the other end, you don't know who's low N and who's high N. So there's no point waiting for something who other guys didn't have to wait for.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:18 AM
1

Usually directed at like 30+ year olds. Where their quality (i know i know, but I'm referring to dating scene) diminishes. And at that point, I don't think knowing men will particularly help either. A girl that is 18-28, the world is pretty much their oyster. A bit of gym and some make-up and they are practically like gods.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 12:37 AM
1

The reply just now was the wrong one. Thought i was responding to a different comment Anyway, if women are the one choosing, then they don't need to particularly do anything, since it's a given that they will get someone, the question is more on what they will get, not who they will get. While men compete to be chosen, so they need to understand women to be successful, women don't need to understand men to be successful. The only caveat is for top level men, where the paradigm flips over. Where …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 12:25 AM
3

hmm seems that for normal guys 10 is around the limit, for more conservative guys it is 5, then there are the super conservatives it is 0
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 10:58 PM
3

you do know that, if they have a high body count, they can still end up making you wait for sex, its not mutually exclusive, and when that happens its even worse, being forced to wait for something that other guys didnt have to wait for. so might aswell try to get sex as quick as possible, and hope that you were one of the earlier people to do it. waiting for sex isnt that bad when the woman is consistent about it, but the problem is that youd have no idea, so no need to risk it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 10:52 PM
3

what?, its the other way round.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 10:45 PM
1

👍
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 02:34 PM
1

Your opinion means nothing to me. Good for you, doesn't change the fact that women slut shame aswell. And therefore they inherently subscribe to this view.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 04:24 AM
1

Women slut shame aswell. Because deep down they know this too. They know that their sexuality has inherent value, and this value goes down the more it's given away. Lets not pretend as if women are as casual with sex as men are. And this isn't because of society either. Men and women are different, this is one of those differences, no more no less. Also a guy in this day and age can't even get away with publicly slut shaming >! Literally 1984 !<. All jokes aside, I'd even go as far as to say tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 04:02 AM
1

Ok but even in the case about the guy lying. Why is the sex part what ends up being highlighted when the woman feels bad. Why didn't they enjoy the sex solely for the sex and nothing else. Could it be that women are not as liberal with sex as men are? If they are not liberal with it then it is a valued thing that they "give" and therefore are "used" when something isn't "given" in return. We both know that men are not like women in this respect, the whole meme "doesn't matter, had sex", is clear…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 03:16 AM
1

Sooooo, you can see that women are in a position where they don't need to know how men work. Since they are just deciding if the man is good enough or not. While the man needs to know how women work to be one of the good men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 07:46 PM
1

Lets not pretend that women aren't the ones who are pursued. If they aren't with anyone it's because they have deemed them not good enough, and the one's good enough have deemed them not good enough
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 04:54 PM
1

Why did you jump to rape as if arousal defines rape. It's largely irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 04:48 PM
2

You do realise women can be raped and be aroused at the same time. Infact I'm pretty sure it's 50% of rapes where the woman is aroused. Arousal isn't the deciding factor for rape, it's consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 02:44 PM
1

many women only have sex in LTRs hell some women dont have sex until the guy marries her even Doesn't this imply that women do not want to have sex without commitment, while men definitely will have sex without commitment. And in the 21st century i really doubt there are even decent %s of women going virgin till marriage. The social stigma has been removed, finding men are easy, transportation has made access very high, and no one will ever know since hymen isn't really an accurate way to check.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 02:39 PM
1

Men do though. Well think about it, women control sex, the man must do X Y and Z to bang, but then he has no reason to go further after that. So then it becomes the womans turn to actually do something to retain the guy they've fucked. Let's be honest, men definitely want casual no strings attached sex more than women, the entire reason why the pump and dump is mostly a womans issue. If women controlled who grts relationships, we wouldn't be hearing about the pump and dump.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 02:07 PM
1

Since blue pillers started blaming it all on the guy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 04:27 AM
1

Isn't that the point though, men have to learn women to get women, but women don't need to learn men to get men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 04:22 AM
2

Women risk violence every time they sleep with a stranger in a way that men don't though so you're not comparing like with like. If you removed that risk, the results would likely be different. It's not purely driven by sex drive. That's exactly the point. You'll never really be able to remove the risk, because in a womans guts it'll always be sketchy. And most women outside the third world and the USA no longer have any risk associated with unwanted pregnancy. Women no longer need any guarantee…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 12:46 AM
1

Damn that's a nice profile pic
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 06:35 AM
1

Rammus is a champion from league of legends who's only voiceline is "ok" or "alright"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 06:31 AM
1

Rammus main
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 06:29 AM
1

After he cheated on his wife with three different women (his admission), and maybe even more cheating throughout the marriage? And he also made a lot of jokes about how he cheated on his wife in front of crowds of people? Damn, if that's Chris's "unconditional love," I don't want it. 😂😂😂 A man can love his woman and still fuck some other bitch and still return to the woman and die for her. Sex for guys is like pissing or eating, very little emotion involved. While same isn't true for women, if t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 06:27 AM
4

Well it's one degree less shit. Since being nice will never get you anywhere, while being dark triad will, but it's just hard to become one. It's like saying going to the gym is as shit advice as just be yourself, even though going to the gym will get results it's just not that easy to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:51 AM
3

Yh, but it's just an easier said than done sort of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:40 AM
1

There is no threat, that's what my comment is about. You're so deluded that you think theres some retaliation to what men can do to women. And men do need women, for procreation. Literally the entire point of what's going on. So no they won't be leaving you alone any time soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:38 AM
1

Who's we, certainly not women. No offence but they have practically no say in this. Maybe when women start working construction jobs, or as farmers they can make themselves integral to the infrastructure of society, but women dont, they just consume, 80% of the consumerbase is women, 2/3rds of debt are held by women. Men straight up do not need women to do anything to survive, it's been like that for thousands of years, while the reverse is not true. Please just do a bit of introspection into ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:32 AM
7

You can't really make yourself dark triad with the snap of your fingers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:08 AM
3

Because men have a prolific sex drive compared to women, there's literally the whole phrase "don't care had sex" used mostly by men. https://out.reddit.com/t3_82fi39?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww2.hawaii.edu%2F%7Eelaineh%2F79.pdf&token=AQAAzochYxcxghjdDbpKD6cNUxzd8Dh10rILdtjiQFItlT9B-8aD&app_name=android Here's a study where women spontaneously asked men to have sex on college campus (well they asked other things aswell but strictly talking about the sex part) and they had a 75% success rate. But the men…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 02:57 AM
3

How would it collapse? Numbers. Society isn't gonna support itself. It needs tax paying, industry working expendable people. Who builds the roads, takes out the garbage, farms the wheat. Certainly not women. Top tier/rich men won't be. They can just hire armed guards, security, wear bulletproof vests, etc. Hire, with money, which is supposed to be worth what. Money is only worth something because it can be spent, and it's spent on things provided by expendable men. Top tier men still need to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 02:34 AM
–

They are needed to be the fodder of society. If it gets far enough society will collapse. And everyone will be screwed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 02:14 AM
1

Then don't complain when we reduce all your problems to you just wanting to get your dick wet. Yes perfectly fine. I heavily disagree with people who try to make it out to be like having good social group is what really matters. It really just is mostly about the pussy. Other stuff can help, but the pussy part is vital. 200,000 years of biology and somehow people think a bit of society is gonna reduce someone's libido. Legalising prostitution is gonna help more than some fucking therapy. We can …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 02:02 AM
–

Getting their dick wet is a key part lmao. Just like how getting sex in a relationship isn't all a relationship is, but without the sex it would fall apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 01:47 AM
2

now that we have the ability to choose a life without y'all Lmao, do you not realise who let you do this in the first place. Answer, still men. Women really have no idea how fragile their rights are. You really need to check your privelege if you actually think it's fixed before you go on a women Vs men rant.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 01:42 AM
–

If no one likes us [undesired men], just get rid of us" The world still needs them to be expendable wage slaves. They have a purpose, just not the one anyone wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 01:33 AM
–

You can't really ask men to go against their biological function. It's really not complicated, men biologically want to fuck alot of women, nothing more. So not even being able to get 1 is a large disconnect from what they innately want. You'd be surprised with what men are content with when it doesn't involve women. They'd honestly be fine with living in a 1 room apartment with no furniture and just a TV and ps5 on the floor.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 01:31 AM
–

They were selective to begin with because they needed men, and so they needed men that could do what they couldn't (be taller, stronger, smarter, have more resources ect). Basic hypergamy. Not in a bad way. Now that women can do even more, their standards have gone up because they still need men to do what they can't. Hypergamy will always exist. It's specifically because men didn't need women for survival that their standards in women are lower, since the woman just needs to fulfill the reprodu…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 01:05 AM
2

Pretty rare, most women take to Twitter to complain about it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 12:40 AM
–

Don't you think that they wanted to because they needed to. Biological incentive. It's why things like being tall or rich or strong is attractive to women, helps them survive. Men don't care about these things, since they didn't need women to survive, just to procreate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 12:36 AM
5

So you wouldn't complain about unwanted advances?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 12:23 AM
25

you would not have even gone in for a kiss? Bro, alot could go wrong with that. Making an unwanted sexual advance is like one of the riskiest thing a guy can do lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 12:18 AM
1

It doesn't necessarily have to be a Virgin specifically (especially since finding virgin women are pretty much like trying to find a unicorn) but close enough, like prob no more than 2 at most. . The reason why women aren't out here demanding virgins is because they are the exact opposite. Being a virgin is a drawback to women like how being a promiscuous is a drawback to men. It's just how it is. A virgin guy sends a red flag that there must be something wrong with him. Most insults to a guy fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:34 PM
1

lmao no, we all know men are horndogs that would randomly fuck a woman if they asked. Sex is clearly more emotional for women than for men, because men are much more liberal with sex. Because theres no risk to having sex as a man, while there are risks as a woman. whatever you are is whatever you are, if you are emotional in your sexual life, then good for you, but thats clearly not what men as a whole are, and it doesnt mean they are a psychopaths, it just means that their love and their sex ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:23 PM
1

I'm not saying that there can't be a guy who's emotional about sex. I just want to say that, if even blue pillers can agree that men are horndogs and women aren't, then they must also agree that sex in inherently more of a casual activity for men than it is for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:42 PM
0

It is pretty much common knowledge. You can google it aswell. Plus if you think about it, wouldn't it be wierd if women weren't more emotional about sex. They can only make children once a year, entire process is a risk to their body. So they'd need to feel strongly about anyone they have sex with. Just a biological thing. With men, they can have as many children per year as they can nut. And it's 0 risk to themselves, so it would make sense that they were more emotionally disconnected. Since th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:37 PM
1

Wanting your partner to be more satisfied with you and not ride the carasoul is somehow manipulation in your eyes. What exactly do you think of women that every little choice men have of them manipulation
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 02:45 PM
1

And more people end up divorcing nowadays. With women initiating 80% of divorces, and the most cited reason is financial issues. If women don't get what they want, expect the relationship to go up in flames
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 06:10 AM
1

It's alot less soul crushing when it comes from a virgin than when it comes from a promiscuous woman. Atleast for the virgin you can say she never liked it to begin with. But for the promiscuous woman "i had sex with all these men but I won't for you"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 05:53 AM
1

Ah yes, wanting your partner to be more satisfied with you than the alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 05:40 AM
1

But the men on here are nothing like men irl. Seriously men irl hardly ever even ask, and not just to me. Men in this subreddit don't ask either. It's common knowledge in that there's no point in asking. No matter if they were promiscuous or not, they will still lie and say that they weren't. And if they actually weren't promiscuous you've effectively sorta soured the relationship. But there's no way you seriously genuinely think that men usually are not thinking about it. Literally one of the b…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 05:28 AM
1

?, Pretty sure that would specifically mean it is a phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 05:15 AM
1

There are few men that genuinely do not care. Usually men do care, they either say they do or they say they don't. If they are low value enough they will say they dont care since they have to live with a scarcity mindset (if i dump her for being a hoe, i might not get with anyone in the future), a guy who's high value would have no reason to tolerate it, they can have their cake and eat it too. So usually the guys who don't care are the less desired one's anyway. 90% of N count discussions on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 05:12 AM
-2

Err sex is usually emotional for the woman but not for the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:58 AM
6

I'd say it's 90/10 socially and 75/25 irl
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:56 AM
1

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jomf.12603 More or less, want the guy to make 58% more than what they make. Even though women nowadays can provide for themselves with their own jobs, they still want the guy to be a bread winner. It's pretty much in womens nature to want a guy to be able to provide more to her than what she can do herself. Naturally, the guy is only needed so she can survive, if the guy can't even do the bare minimum of giving her the security that she can give he…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:54 AM
1

If they slept around but were clean I don’t see a problem Yh, cuz you're a woman. Woman don't usually care about that kinda stuff compared to men. If anything they'd care about the reverse, a guy who hasn't had any sex would be seen as sus.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:45 AM
4

Yh but it gives off the vibe that the guy couldn't get sex so he needed to pay for a prostitute. Men judge high N women judge low N.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:38 AM
2

Usually if you pay for sex it gives off the vibe that you are undesirable that you needed to pay for it. Reverse pre selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:37 AM
2

Eh, even though it wouldn't matter as much to promiscuous men (since he would be more experienced), ironically they would probably be more likely to leave when they find out. Since they would have no reason to tolerate it if they can easily find another person.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:35 AM
2

Because it's just general risk. Even if it's past, it could still be happening now who knows. In general it's just unsightly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:58 AM
1

Yes i completely agree that women don't actually like casual sex. They do it for the prospective of a relationship. Which is why women are the ones who complain about getting pumped and dumped. Problem is that, there are 2 groups of women. Group A who are married to high value men or have a high value men committing to them, and group B who are just being fucked by high value men. The women in group A do have an ego boost (for obvious reasons) while the women in group B have an ego boost because…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 08:34 PM
1

if you think you’re a 6 but all you can pull are 4’s you’re a fucking 4, this is the reverse for women, they are 4s, have sex (and i mean only have sex, nothing more) with a 6, and now they think they are a 6 , when in actuality the 6 is just nutting nothing more, its like peeing or eating to him. if they really were a 6 they would be married to a 6. which is why women are called delusional in pill subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 07:25 PM
1

do you not realise that when women have casual sex with multiple people paternity comes into question, do you think these men were anti promiscuity because they felt like it. when a woman has sex with multiple people, no one knows who the father is, but when a guy has sex with multiple people everyone knows who the father is. the biggest difference as to why people feel the way they do about promiscuity. we live in a society where women are shamed for casual sex correction, lived, because it sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 03:54 AM
1

why do people (mostly women) think everything is a social construct. where do you think social constructs even come from, people dont dream it up. actually none of what i say is based on my experience, im not a bluepiller. its a more of an analytical point of view. most men did not dictate society lmao, most people who dictated society were men, theres a big difference between top tier men and those who arent top tier they might aswell be a different gender lol. and your entire point basically g…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 03:10 AM
1

firstly, yes there are come commonalities between men and woman, both want good looking partners, both of them wouldnt want a criminal for a significant other, but we are gonna have a serious contention if youre gonna start going around and saying that men hate being fuckzoned. Yes there are a minority of men that exists that wouldnt like being fuckzoned, just as there are a minority of women exist that do like being fuckzoned. yes not every single men and women are alike, but there are general …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 02:12 AM
0

We literally see even on this sub women complaining about pumping and dumping. You'll never see guys complaining about that. This already implies that women want more than just sex, that they won't have sex solely to have sex. Men will absolutely have sex solely to have sex, for us sex is basically like peeing or eating. Women are getting in sexual relations with top tier men that will never go any further than the sex part (which they don't realise till it's too late). If 80% of women are havin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 08:55 PM
-2

Yh it is a double standard. So what?. You seem to be coming from a viewpoint where things that apply to men must apply to women and vice versa. Once you realize that men and women are not the same and therefore what they want isn't the same, and therefore what they can get away with isn't the same. Usually alot of what they want end up being opposite to each other. Women want a more experienced guy men want an inexperienced girl. It's just that women can't fathom this since they only see through…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 07:33 AM
2

I make men wait when they say they want a relationship, so that's never been an issue for me. If only more women did this. someone falling for your lie doesn't absolve you of lying to begin with. Maybe so. But it doesn't mean i have any sympathy for the person who falls for it. Especially in this day and age where apparently women can smell the misogyny coming off from someone like a 6th sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 04:20 AM
3

I'm thinking particularly of someone faking interest in a relationship just to have sex. That's like least reprehensible form of lying. It's not like you're faking your identity or even reneging on a contract (i.e. not paying a prostitute). Pumping and dumping comes with the territory of being a promiscuous woman. It's kinda your job to not be in that situation by vetting better and not being swooned by someone who is clearly much better than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 03:52 AM
3

Personal responsibility still needs to be factored in. Sweet talking someone isn't the worst thing someone can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 12:05 AM
5

It really only benefits the top % of men. Most things that benefit men just benefit a selection of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 12:00 AM
1

You have sympathy not empathy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 06:16 AM
1

Did you not see the part where i said to just disregard all those people who approach you and only go for people you approach. You would never have to waste a single second analysing random people you don't give a shit about. If you get hundreds of people swiping, you either waste time (which will easily add up to hours) weighing pros and cons of each profile, or you do the efficient thing and quickly sift though them based on a first impression. First off. There is no world where if someone's p…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 03:14 AM
1

This is quite literally your own high standards backfiring on you. If you didn't think low of most men (which I am not Shaming you for, biologically it's ingrained into you) you wouldn't have such a hard time combing through the choices presented to you. Yes men are the herd. Say it with me, sperm is cheap eggs are expensive. Throughout history only 40% of men vs 80% of women have procreated. You flat out don't need much men to reproduce. It is this reason why men have to be less picky, don't ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:36 AM
1

If men stopped lazily shooting their shot at everything with a pulse Other way round. Aslong as women are as selective as they are (not saying they shouldn't be, it is what it is) guys will have to run the numbers game, otherwise they just will get nothing. Men and women are not equal, biological instincts have made it so the dating scene will never be equal. Women naturally have higher standards (can only have 1 child per year and so they don't want to waste it on bad genes, and are more defens…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 11:17 PM
2

It's a package deal. You don't just get to only have the things you want approach you. Everything comes to you and then you choose which one you want. How would guys know if they meet the requirement or not before approaching. Guys are literally told to proactive in dating, women are reactive. If guys didn't take the initiative, and women were forced to hunt their keep we would see a different attitude to your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 11:21 PM
1

Most guys more or less want to sex with multiple people. It's just a question of if they can or can't. If a guy is top 1% cheating comes with the territory. Supply and demand ect. Honestly guys doing it and girls doing it is different, when girls do it paternity comes into question instinctively (if girls fuck multiple guys no one knows who the father is, if guys fuck multiple girl everyone knows who the father is). It's the girls job to be sexually exclusive, it's the guys job to be security ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 04:29 AM
164

Andrew Tate (who likely is gone from the internet since he is banned from everything) Tate was never famous from his accounts though, he was famous from people reposting his interviews and whatnot. Aslong as he keeps showing up on podcasts and stuff people will keep making tiktoks and YouTube shorts of him
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 03:48 AM
10

Having to sift the men who actually like you out from all the rest who see you as interchangeable with the entirety of the female population is not a luxury. It means you have all the responsibility in the relationship and get blamed for not being able to discern a man's entire character with 10 seconds of meeting him. This is quite literally the only downside of being able to pick and choose the platter of men that come to you like a sushi conveyer belt.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 03:44 AM
1

halo/horn effect is incel content?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 02:43 PM
16

Mens standards for looks are far lower than women's. Not even up for debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 01:18 PM
1

5'4 balding indian janitor is not even gonna look better with charisma. Plus you need confidence to have charisma, and you're only confident when you have validation, which only good looking men do. An ugly guy with confidence is just seen as arrogant. The halo/horn effect affects everything in your life
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 01:15 PM
1

The issue comes when an average guy wants a slim girl (70% are overweight), or a pretty girl (they aren't attractive themselves) etcetc It's the other way round though, women are the one that have inflated standards. Average woman gets rawdogged on a Thursday night by an 8/10 and now she genuinely thinks that's the level she's at, when it's just that sexual standards and relationship standards aren't the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 06:35 PM
1

It's not like men get a 10 year period where they are 6'2" then have to return to being 5'8". It isn't like only 15% of women get to experience being a 16-25 year old like how 15% of men are 6 foot+.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 06:31 PM
1

Then you need to relearn how to walk
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 06:07 PM
2

Well i did say person and not woman so yh. Unfortunately women seem to prefer promiscuous men (preselection and all). Plus men generally don't mention other men when talking about promiscuity, not because we don't think that it applies to men, but that it's irrelevant since we aren't dating men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:15 AM
2

But isn’t it argued that these beauty standards promoted towards women are overall not good and contributing negatively to women’s mental health? The standard of weight?, which they can control?. where did their accountability go all of a sudden. Men get judged on a trillion different things, but the one standard that women can control is what makes them mentally ill?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:41 PM
2

Even if there's some third factor linking both. If that factor is always present then it still doesn't change the fact that getting with a promiscuous person is risky even if it's say genetics causing promiscuity and then also causing the dissatisfaction. The promiscuity would still be a sign.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:02 PM
2

If your depression stems from being poor and not knowing if you'll make rent next month or not. Why wouldn't having lots of money cure depression for that specific case
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:57 PM
1

This has to be a joke right?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:31 PM
2

Err that's only 7 years
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 08:40 AM
4

Survival multiplayer
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 08:32 AM
1

Well it's because it's an achievement to be a promiscuous male (as in, it's hard to do that) while it's not for a promiscuous female. Thats really just the basis of the difference between those 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 01:46 PM
4

Go ask women. Although it's usually the opposite. Preselection and all, a guy having sex with lots of women would make him seem more desirable (for some reason?)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 12:50 AM
1

It's usually assumed that the "Top 20 percent of men" must be the 8's and above on a scale of attractiveness among the male population. It definitely wouldn't be. That would assume that each point out of 10 is 10% of the Population. There are definitely more 5/10s than there are 9/10s. In Actuality top 20% is more like 6.5s and above
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 08:46 PM
3

surgery/mostly surgery (unless your face is fat then --->) /gym (unless you mean frame, then that goes back to surgery) alot of core issues women find in men are genetic ones
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 02:20 PM
1

plus mens one would be overreported while women would be underreporting, seeing as how men lie about having sex and women lie about not having sex
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 07:51 PM
2

It’s not only impractical it doesn’t address the root cause of disenfranchised men’s struggles. being ugly and unsociable?, sounds like it would fix those
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 06:02 PM
3

DreamWorks not Disney
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 12:29 PM
7

Not as if abortion and morning after pill aren't a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 03:40 PM
3

Why does everyone go straight to entitlement whenever anyone says that women have an easier time than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 02:44 AM
1

It's not as if men are lining up to be friends with women. Just because the woman wants to be friends, doesn't mean they are friends
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 09:49 AM
2

I've seen a guy with basically no arms and legs with a wife and kid. Not really chad material when you got a vestigial flipper foot hanging off your hip. Obama became president, doesn't change the situation black Americans face. Avoiding a shallow partner is a dodged bullet if you ask me. It is a dodged bullet, it's just not something you've dodged. It's not like you had a choice in not getting with the shallow person. Plus most people are shallow, and when they aren't shallow it's literally jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:11 AM
1

You seem to be under the impression that i particularly give a shit about dating. It is simply not worth putting in all the effort for someone who does the bare minimum. My biggest gripe with incels is that they should just give up, it's just not worth it. I'm at peace with it. In any case, I wasn't here to complain about my personal life. I'm saying that lookism is prevelant in every single aspect of your life, and i mean every single aspect. Your jokes won't be as funny as the good looking guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:28 AM
2

Most partners are shallow. There is no dodging bullets when it comes to ugly men, the bullets dodge themselves, nothing hits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:06 AM
2

What are you guys tryna prove? women are shallow? Yes, a lot of them are and so are a lot of men. As shallow as men are. Women are even more shallower, but society refuses to admit it. Constant gaslighting, they will say that inequality exists everywhere, politically, financially, but apparently not socially. If an ugly guy isn't succeeding, it's must be because he has a horrid personality. Society needs to admit the halo/horn effect exists, that short people are treated badly in society, that p…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:46 AM
4

Women standards are simply just much higher than men because Women are in more demand than men. Ugly women definitely do not want ugly men at the same rate ugly men want ugly women. Men can stoop to the bare minimum of the women resembling a woman, but womens minimum are definitely higher than "just be a man, and don't be a landwhale". There is no way you can disagree with any of these points
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:03 AM
-1

What i don't get with these comments is that sure you have been friends and dated with say 10 women, or 5. But that means nothing in the grand scheme of things. As in your experience is just an anecdote, and anecdotes are worthless. The foundation of black/redpill are studies. To refute them you need your own studies, not " i know a guy who's/i am ugly and I've still managed to get a girlfriend ect".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:57 AM
1

This would never have happened if the fraud was subhuman
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:30 AM
6

It's a joke but it's pretty universal that people tend to not want someone no one else wants It's mostly just women who do that. Men do the opposite. They try and go for women people don't want because they don't want the competition
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:57 AM
1

Eugenics, keeping ugly people from reproducing. Honestly the average western female is way better at Eugenics than Hitler ever was.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:52 AM
0

No he thinks that if women wanted personality they wouldn't go for a Trumper. I mean isn't that what women themselves think of trumpers
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:47 AM
1

.co is literally where the extremes are. It's like going to an isis messaging board and being surprised that everyone there talks about bombing the west, and then attributing that to all muslims. Because incels is a much bigger group than the 3000 people who have an account at .co/.is
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:38 AM
1

Most reddit incels don't even like .co, they think it's too extreme for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:36 AM
2

Even favouring both still runs counter to those "it's not your looks sweaty, it's your personality" comments. An ugly guy is not just gonna be successful just because he has some funny/confident/nice ect. Attractiveness is still minimum factor that will not be negotiated.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:33 AM
4

Ugly women still don't want ugly guys. Unless I'm getting my leg pulled by you, this is fairly obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:29 AM
2

You make this too easy. Couldn't even last 2 comments of arguing without resorting to a comment of just insulting me. Try and go for 3 next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:10 AM
3

this is why
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:03 AM
2

You are delusional, no you don't have some sort of misogynist radar. The only radar you have is an ugly man in my vicinity radar. You really need to have a reality check.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:00 AM
0

woman can perceive from miles away These statements are hilarious. If women can somehow smell the incel on him, how do they ever get with abusive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:50 AM
1

they're not all narcissistic psychopaths who are out to get you Quite a large percentage have those qualities. Honestly I'd argue that it's what make women, women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:48 AM
1

As in only biological women are biological women? Or all women (including trans) are biological women?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 06:53 PM
3

Yh juggernaut theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 09:27 PM
2

You seem to be making an argument from fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 05:56 PM
2

It doesn't simply just disappear. This is just how the value dynamic of men vs women is. Men are more expendable/replaceable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 05:42 PM
1

It's not some trivial thing. It literally sets the tone for the gender dynamic between men and women throughout history to this day. Personally I don't particularly like evolutionary psychology. I think it's kind of a stretch. Except for this. It is literally at the core of our species. It's definitely not something we can outgrow just cuz we can make the internet
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 04:05 PM
5

Is it not hard to understand that a womans sexual organs is worth alot more than a mans sexual organs. A woman can only have 1 persons child at a time, while a man can have multiple peoples child. Therefore fewer men are needed compared to women, therefore mens inherent value is lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 12:18 PM
1

Lol forgot to finish the message
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 12:26 AM
-1

Perhaps most ~~people~~ just can't handle a lifetime of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 09:16 PM
27

just dont be fat stop whining lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:01 PM
2

the bar for women is a alot lower though,
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 05:46 PM
3

Ghlistine Maxwell
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/21 01:31 PM
1

if anything you would only want hot guys to touch your pussy, cuz why would you give it for free to an ugly guy just for the sake of having sex but if youre getting married, you would care less about what you want but more about what you need (ie. a guy who can provide regardless of his looks). so relationships would actually be less pickier since most people can provide, plus they dont really have a choice (besides being alone)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 01:26 PM
1

First off, how do you think half a million soldiers storming normandy did it? What if they all had your attitude. But we aren't 500,000 soldiers, we're 1 person. Me not wanting to risk my life to be an insignificant soldier wouldn't change whatever the other 499,999 people feel. Second off, one man CAN MAKE an appreciable difference. I'd argue that without Raymond Spruance winning at midway and the Phillipine Sea, the war in the Pacific would have gone until at least 1947. Without Oppenheimer it…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 07:36 PM
1

The way you've been replying to my comments makes you literally sound emotionless. Either you fake it well, you're truly a sociopath, or you're incredibly jaded. I'm not sure what i actually feel, but i definitely know this is how i think i should feel. I care about the industrialization and systematization of murder and how the regime perpetrating that wouldn't stop. Even if fighting that will put your life in great. It's not as if I would like a system like that either, my life would probably …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 06:19 PM
1

You never know when someone is truly loyal. You only ever know when someone isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 03:58 PM
1

Are you a sociopath? Truly. I wish i was. I'd die for my country if i needed to Why the fuck would you ever die for your country, wife and children i maybe understand, but there's nothing special about your country except being where you reside. My country can go fuck itself. I'd CERTAINLY not fucking collaborate with the god damn nazis. Anything to live. Really couldn't give a shit about some random jews and gypsies when it's my life on the line.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 03:57 PM
1

Till you're not
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 06:27 AM
1

Sorry but prenups are useless in court
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 06:09 AM
2

Actually it would be better for the men already being drafted for the women to also be drafted, less of a chance that any one death is them
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 05:49 AM
1

Some things are worth dying for. There's truly nothing worth dying for. I would straight up rather kill my entire family than die. Once you die, it's the end for you, and there's nothing more important than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 05:48 AM
3

Complaining feels nice
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 04:57 AM
2

The cause and effect are reversed Gae bolg
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 04:55 AM
3

Err you do realise it's actually easier to find a hot chick with a low n count than an average looking chick with a low n count. There's an old post somewhere on this sub that had the statistics. It had sexual experience negatively correlated with attractiveness and positively correlated with weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 04:43 AM
2

I don't know why he called it relationship sex, it's more like quid pro quo sex. They aren't having sex because she's in love with him, they're having sex because it's pretty much her payment to him keeping her housed and fed, nothing more. And men don't like that. It's much more validating to be fucked because you're sexually attractive than because your fiscally attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 03:30 AM
1

Lmao even if you managed to get a prenup as if you're somehow in the position to choose, it's still useless. Prenups get thrown out in court so easily, all the female needs to do is say they were under duress or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:18 AM
2

Difference is that, you personally can take measures to protect yourself from rape (knife, gun whatever) and almost immediately, you personally can't stop men from raping in general, and definitely not immediately. Just because a consequence is undeserved, doesn't mean it won't happen, and you're an idiot if you still knowingly do the same actions just because "it's the rapers fault" like sure you aren't wrong, but that won't unrape you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 04:09 AM
9

And there's nothing that stops prostitutes from feeling pleasure either. Their customer base
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 07:57 PM
1

Relationships do, but not the relationship that i thought you were talking about. Can you not read the part where i said "i misinterpreted your comment"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:31 AM
2

No, because you were replying to a comment that said men wanted sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:27 AM
1

My bad for misinterpreting. Is that all men want? Lots of men here claim they want relationships too I took that to be as an opposition to men wanting sex
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:24 AM
1

If the committed monogamous romantic relationship doesn't also involve fucking, it's useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:19 AM
0

Well most men can't get a high N like women do. So that's an issue that mostly women experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:08 AM
1

If there is no fucking, the relationship isn't really a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:01 AM
4

There's also the "Please stay pure until you happen to meet ME" conundrum. A man wants a woman to have little relatively little interest in sex, until she meets HIM, and then she should suddenly have her sexuality "awakened" and be a tiger in the bedroom. Nonsense. There is also the opposite side which men absolutely hate. Where it's when the woman is a total slut until sje meets you and decides to act like a madonna.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:00 AM
3

It is, we just don't care about it since we're not the one's who are fucking men
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 03:57 AM
5

I'd still take that over celibacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 03:47 AM
1

Oh right, i got it mixed up. I meant it as in, only the priveleged men can get casual sex. While most women could get casual sex, it was a normal occurance for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 10:54 PM
-1

Privelege for men, but not for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 09:39 PM
1

You are deluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 09:00 PM
2

First of, the word is necrophiliac, secondly since when exactly is that the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 04:30 PM
1

Wut?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 04:29 PM
3

Cuz it's the opposite of what men hate, starfish sex
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 04:28 PM
1

I don't like evolutionary psychology myself. For basic stuff fine, but people reach too far when using it. Have you heard of fisherian runaway, that's what i was mostly getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:57 PM
2

I just think that chad should stay in his lane and stop going for people 3 points below him. 5/10s thinking that they are 8/10 cuz they got rawdogged on an alleyway on Thursday is most of the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:54 PM
1

You want to have sex with random women using the National Security Agencys resources
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:48 PM
2

You want to have sex with random women using the National Security Agencys resources
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:47 PM
1

A jawline Isn't exactly an indicator of anything, yet women still want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:45 PM
9

Also, men tend to have higher N counts than women so... Im not quite sure about that. Kek, how did you find to that conclusion. Every study I've seen puts women ahead in sex. Do you genuinely believe a 4/10 guy is getting more sex than a 4/10 woman
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:39 PM
5

It's the difference between seeing a wife and husband amateur sex and full on studio paid actor porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:32 PM
1

Originally it meant like being based on yourself. Like you aren't afraid to say or do anything
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:29 PM
1

How is that equivalent. he could also be saying that marital rape also rarely happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 02:33 PM
2

After switching to dark triad (i did so not for dating or anything, but that i rationally came to the conclusion that it's an obvious way to live your life) i actually feel nice about myself. The basics is that you should just never do anything without getting anything in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 02:09 PM
1

You either got really unlucky, or maybe for personal reasons that guy is abstaining from romantic/sexual relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 08:40 AM
3

Government mandated GFs are a joke that you clearly don't see
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 08:37 AM
1

When guys get rejected it's a 5/10 guy asking a 5/10 woman. When women get rejected it's a 5/10 woman asking a 8-9/10 guy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 08:33 AM
1

Women aren't known for jokes
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 08:32 AM
1

What, what has your comment got to do with his
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 08:26 AM
2

If the effect isn't you turning hot, it's useless
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 08:19 AM
5

Being an asshole without being hot won't help with dating in the slightest. It'll only help you as a life decision
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 08:17 AM
3

Most men are not having casual sex. The comment clearly said that most men were also having their version of the cock carasoul, which is definitely not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 05:28 PM
13

Well yes, that's what he said. Then you came in with some response that means nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 06:23 AM
13

Yes, but most men can still not have sex because only a few guys are fucking the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 06:22 AM
15

Uhh, 2 women getting laid can mean 1 guy is fucking twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 06:19 AM
1

I took the test 5 years ago and got INTP, took it a couple months ago and got INTP
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 07:51 AM
1

First things first. I have to commend you on your ability to argue a point. Secondly, i guess I should've said the word normal, i usually conflate natural and normal. Then i should've said that it's more true for men than for women (for some reason they don't care as much about past encounters or lovers, so no offence, but I don't really care the for womans perspective) Thirdly, idk it seems like men have a visceral disgust for whores when it comes down to romantics, almost in the same way they …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 04:11 PM
1

I would like to ask you to explain why its a natural reaction. Biologically speaking what you're saying doesn't make sense to me. Is it not natural for you to want to be someone's first love than their 20th.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 02:06 PM
1

Well everyone would rather be someone's first or second or third (not specifically virgins), than 20th. It's a natural reaction. Same reason why people would rather adopt babies than 6yr olds. Madonna whore complex is so stupid anyway, wouldn't you want both the Madonna and the whore to be the same person. Who the fuck marries someone they don't want to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 12:07 PM
1

It's more like that i place different standards on people who are consistent vs people who aren't. What's worse than someone with High N, is someone with high N who won't fuck you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 11:43 AM
1

If someone was manipulated by their ex Sounds like such a cop out. Why is it that everytime people always give women the way out by removing their agency. Well in any case I'm not advocating for fucking someone who doesn't want to fuck you, no one likes that, even the guy fucking. I'm just saying that there is no compromise to be had for such a person. Maybe if she was always sexually reserved there could be compromise, but if she wasn't with other people but is with you, either put your foot do…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:45 AM
1

You can imagine that you're fucking the co worker who's always wearing tight jeans, you can imagine that you're in a 3some with your wife and her sister, or you can imagine that you're snuggling with your girlfriend, making out in bed. Any preference, even one's that you can't legally watch. At any time, and with 0 browsing time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 01:32 AM
1

Just your imagination, it's way better than porn. You can do whatever you want in it, with whoever you want
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 01:28 AM
3

Guns kinda beat muscles
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 03:22 AM
2

Actually it would be 4 since there are a total of 4 combinations, 1 for none (no glasses and no makeup), 2 for only one (glasses or makeup), and 1 for both (glasses and makeup)
/r/MGTOW23/11/20 05:09 PM
2

4/10 women not getting fucked by 6/10 guys would be a start. But in all seriousness, it's not something you can force, because it's not about the physical action of penis in vagina. It's not about the absolute ability to fuck, it's about being wanted to fuck it's why prostitution doesn't count, neither does rape, and incels would rather stay incels than betabuxx. The least society can do is just admit that the blackpill exists in some form or another, and stop gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 02:20 PM
3

Yeah, but women don't care about men n counts (even though they should) and other men don't give a shit because they aren't dating other men
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 01:03 PM
1

I like your style
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 08:29 AM
1

What did hubs think about the duty post, what does he think about equality
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 08:24 AM
1

I mean atleast you have the choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 08:02 AM
4

I don't mean that as an insult, I'm saying that's how women feel
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 03:51 PM
1

Oh right, sorry your pfps are the same colour, and your names both don't have numbers so i automatically assumed that you were the same person i was replying to before.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 01:08 PM
1

Children LITERALLY are created by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 01:03 PM
1

How would you keep the baby from degrading without growing it. And i find it wierd that you think pregnancy is the be all end all of child birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 12:53 PM
7

Don't text and drive kids, or in her case make sure to text and drive
/r/MGTOW18/11/20 11:19 AM
2

Ironically the actual stacies aren't having as much sex aa they're having
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 10:18 AM
5

Can't find the source, but apparently blind women still also want sexually attractive men, in the same way normal women want sexually attractive men, and those sexually attractive men are still the same for blind women as they are for normal women. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 10:09 AM
1

If not growing the baby kills it, then growing the baby is also maintaining the baby. This isn't a hard thing to grasp
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 10:00 AM
0

Guess I win.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:59 AM
6

Tell that to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:58 AM
1

What i said. You equating being the only one to shit out the baby to be the only one to create it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:58 AM
0

I thought you said you were blocking me. And leaving the discussion because of something i said that you didn't refute is pretty much winning.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:56 AM
0

Lol i guess this means I've won. Not like you'll respond since you've obviously done what you said and blocked it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:55 AM
1

If not doing it causes it to break down, then you are maintaining it. A baby can't not grow.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:54 AM
1

Children LITERALLY are created by women. You didn't say, "women expul children out their vagina", you equated only shitting out the baby to only creating it. Oh and also, women don’t just maintain a fetus, they grow it. Semantics
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:46 AM
1

I forgot to mention that women also create the child. You're the one who's saying only one of them do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:41 AM
2

They have half a hand in making the entirety of what the baby consists off, (it's dna) so they make the baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:39 AM
1

All you just said was that the egg is required for fertilization, duh. The sperm cell is still the mans after he ejaculates. Until women start spawning out baby jesus, men still create the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:36 AM
1

men fertilize, fertilize get to baby, men make baby. Not rocket science
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:32 AM
1

Well technically women have a negligible extra points over men
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:31 AM
1

Doesn't really matter why it's important, only matters that it is the most important. And men and women are equal in that area. Until women go all saint mary, that won't change.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:29 AM
1

Lol, the fertilization is inherently the most important part. This is literally common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:25 AM
1

I thought you said this wasn't a debate
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:21 AM
1

Actually this is a debate, on if the start is the most important part.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:20 AM
1

Then I'll rephrase that as the fertilization part. The start is always the most important, otherwise the woman would be able to do it on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:16 AM
1

The creating of the zygote is the biggest event, outranks all other parts combined, would average the scores to be equal, with a negligible amount on the womens side for the other parts
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:11 AM
4

Indians are like at the bottom of the totem pole
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:07 AM
1

On the time frame of the baby, the zygote is included. You cannot create a child without creating the zygote, therefore the father is included
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:06 AM
1

The zygote is a child, (don't worry I'm not pro life, very opposite of pro life).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:03 AM
1

The fetus itself wasn't created by the women herself. Try to make another Jesus happen, let's see.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 09:00 AM
2

And? They aren't creating it, just maintaining it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 08:58 AM
7

Women are just the equivalence of a maintenance garage. They aren't solely creating the child. Lol when everyone talks about themselves before their conception, it's always as a sperm cell in their dads balls, no one ever talks about themselves as the egg that wasn't shitted on in blood.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 08:56 AM
1

Actually yeah now that i think about it, atleast if the first one had restrictions to every man before me where they also had to invest, then i wouldn't be too bothered about that, equal treatment and all, provided i got the same treatment from her that all the other guys got.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 08:54 AM
11

No, if the child needs the sperm, then the men also created the child. Women are nothing more than the egg and a house the zygote resides in.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 08:51 AM
3

zero duty to anyone but myself. That includes literally everything. Human, rock, mobile phone, a toddler drowning. No one is entitled to anything from someone, that's what gets told to incels right?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 08:48 AM
2

A low N man with a high N women is a recipe for resentment
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 08:44 AM
1

Damn that's actually a pretty hard choice. It would be next to impossible to get rid of the hoe in the first one, but the second one would just be thinking about that guy all day basically cucking you. Umm I'd have to go with the second one plus alot of therapy for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 08:36 AM
1

Or slut velocity = integral of slut acceleration with respect to time since dick
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 08:31 AM
3

She shouldn't have gotten into a non committing sexual relationship. Then expects to be upgraded to the full package
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 04:24 PM
3

That's like the most extreme anecdote I've seen, i could do that for literally any group. I won't lie and say that most don't long for teen love (as in when they were in their teens) but that is pretty different to what that post is implying. if you want to go down the anecdotal route, I'm pretty sure I'll win (hopefully you don't because i don't want to waste my time browsing .co)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 08:29 AM
3

Her fault for getting into an FWB. Kinda exposed her hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 07:30 AM
6

What would you know. You do know that there's a whole phrase called "volcel if you wouldn't" which is basically a joke on their low standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 07:20 AM
1

Well one still has a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 06:31 AM
1

Pleasure if i could keep it up. The problem with hedonism isn't doing the hedonism itself, but when it ends you're left with nothing. So pleasure up until the day i die.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 06:01 AM
1

Betabuxxing will be nearly dead, men will probably have a hard taking place in society cuz there's no gain. Gym memberships will skyrocket
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 05:51 AM
9

Why don't you ask the femcels who went private or something because they were getting asked out too much. Incels want their looksmatch, femcels want chad, kinda clear which side isn't up to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 05:32 AM
0

You'll still have to pay child support or alimony
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 05:26 AM
1

Lol this is the worst gotcha I've ever seen. You really thought you did something.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 07:37 PM
1

I don't know what you mean by head start? The parent would have an edge since she would've been raising the kid for like 6 years or something, and she would also be biologically related. Rather than if i adopted a 3rd party where i would have an equal starting position. If you don't like the mother that much, why on earth would you marry her? I wouldn't, I'm saying that if I don't like the mother, i can't exactly take the kid from her, so both of them will be voided. And if i did like the mother…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 02:21 PM
1

Not sure how to say it, but if i just want to raise a kid, I'll slyly be outsider (not biologically, but like the mother having a head start + a bit of biology) and have to deal with the mother getting in the way sometimes (her child and all), i might not even like the mother that much. Or if i wanted to have a relationship with the woman, the kid will be in the way compared to if it were both our kids. I'd rather just adopt a child from an orphanage or adoption center if i wanted to raise a kid…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:35 PM
1

It's not that men want the female to be dependent on him, but that he wants her to want him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:22 PM
1

I don't think i could ever adopt a kid that was related to only the partner. I'd rather just adopt a 3rd party that has no relations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:20 PM
3

Damn, you're more unhinged than i am.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:01 PM
0

Men's capacity to go with a low tier is much much higher than a woman's capacity
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 11:47 AM
1

Speculation but I think if the fat one wasn't fat she'd easily be #1
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 11:39 AM
0

That's wierd
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 11:19 AM
0

You went through two boyfriends without kissing?, Can you even call that a boyfriend. Sounds like a bff, who's happens to be a boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 10:57 AM
3

It is pretty much known that women have higher standards than men, not sure why this wouldn't also apply to nerds
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 08:03 PM
6

Nerdy girls liking popular guys is the same vein as nerdy guys liking 10/10 smokeshows. Sure, but nerdy girls are more likely to only like popular guys then nerdy guys are to like only smokeshows. There's a clear disconnect between the girls and guys of any stratum
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 06:14 PM
8

Ehh, much more likely for the nerdy guy to like the nerdy girl than the reverse
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 05:33 PM
4

Honestly I'd rather adopt than having to raise a kid I thought was mine but wasn't actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 08:06 AM
46

Popular girls tend to like popular guys. Nerdy girls tend to like nerdy guys Yh this is where i disagree. Nerdy girls still like popular guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 07:51 AM
2

Damn you really hit the jackpot
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 05:52 AM
2

This is where i would cross my fingers to hope for the beta part to come in. It's not exactly rare for a childless couple to have one stay at home.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 04:46 AM
2

Lol, the bar for women on only fans is so low. https://youtu.be/H-SM85I3UvQ
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 04:07 AM
3

A stay at home with a husband that has a high libido, no kids. Infinite sex, and a place to live and eat without working and some luxuries. Win win.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 03:39 AM
1

There is. You can be in denial all you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 10:03 AM
1

There is such a thing as a looksmatch. It doesn't really matter if you believe in it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 09:16 AM
3

You do know you are at the top 15% of height
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 08:38 AM
1

Are you seriously posting an image of a down syndrome girl for your world view? It's not just the image of the down syndrome girl. It's the entire thing. Her looksmatch was the down syndrome boy, yet she gets the kid that actually looks above average. avoid at all costs guys who refuse to accept that we are people too? Don't make me laugh, lol there will always be a guy good looking enough to override your red flags. Anyway, you made it seem like you weren't a person, until your suitor believes …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 08:30 AM
1

This is saying my orange is the same as your apple. A rotting banana is obviously seen as less than a normal apple. That must mean that there is a banana and apple that are about the same. this image pretty much describes everything Successful males know the woman is a person and they help bring that out of her. That's one part I'm saying to you. We already deny what we are. If you just make us deny it even more to fit in to what you denial maybe. But we're still a person and that will still com…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 08:15 AM
3

Everyone is different Different in that they're not 100% the same, but like 90% the same
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 07:29 AM
1

How would you know what personality she has? If nobody does or even has one? You're the worst kind of male. Already you wonder if you are a person and one male says you are and I understand you, another says you aren't. Which guy would you go with? Mind rephrasing this, because i have no idea what you're trying to say. What's wrong with that picture? Do you think even ugly people shouldn't have someone to hold? No that's not what i said. It was a reply to your "he's a man, I'm a woman" comment a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 07:28 AM
1

I have never seen a woman irl that had an intriguing personality at all. And then they have the nerve to start talking about their suitors not having a good personality. Looks? He's a guy. I'm not. He's twice my size. https://i.redd.it/6km6xq9zm1c11.png nuff said.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 07:13 AM
1

Better in looks respectively?, better interms of money?, hell even better in personality? (Let's face it, women don't really have much of a personality)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 06:45 AM
1

You've been in this sub this whole time and you don't know what hypergamy means. Hypergamy (or hypergamous when it's a trait) is the act of wanting/getting someone that's better than you
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 06:34 AM
0

The context is what the men would like to be. A guy would obviously want to look like chris Hemsworth than danny devito. By your logic, any man who's ever done any grooming isn't really hetero.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 01:33 AM
1

then wonder why women do not like them or their ideology. Why do people say these retarded sentences. Everytime someone says "and then they wonder why they're not liked" always comes out as stupid because the they in question is not wondering about it, they already know.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 01:23 AM
2

Nope on what. You saying that a hetero guy has 0 indication on what a good looking man looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 01:21 AM
2

Escorts don't count. Neither does rape. Direct transactions for sex do not count.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 01:17 AM
3

People know what attractive means for both genders. Rating a guy 8/10 doesn't mean you want to fuck him.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 01:14 AM
1

Incels are not looking for beta buxx. Incels would rather stay incels
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 09:52 PM
1

What i want, is true love for lack of a better term (sounds cringy i know) Something that doesn't exist even for chads. Where your looks, or what you provide interms of resources has 0 effect. If you have to looksmax to get a woman, it means nothing then even if she 'loves you'. Imagine like, the ultimate blue pill dream like super super blue, something that can only be written out of a cringy josei manga. I don't even think i could do it let alone women. Which is why I'm really not too bothered…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 08:13 AM
1

Victim puke it may be, doesn't stop it being any less true. And personally I'm don't really even care anymore. Whatever i wanted doesn't exist, for anyone. I'm just saying how it is. Now what do we do? Nothing we can do, well if men lost half their libido and became as hypergamous as women that would be a start. But this situation is men's fault for enabling the high standards of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 07:10 AM
1

"looks isn't everything" Sure it's just 80% of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:43 AM
1

At that point just go to prostitution, it would be cheaper, you'd be getting better sex and it would be straight forward. Plus you wouldn't have a risk of getting divorce raped. Beta buxx is quite literally worse than being celibate. Literally once a month of starfish for half your salary. You can't even use other services cuz that'll get your divorced = divorce rape. It's quite literally worse than nothing. It'll only work on someone who doesn't know he's being beta buxxed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:40 AM
2

The position in which they have an advantage over their looksmatch at every single level.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:38 AM
0

It works better than being blunt Why?. What could possibly be better than just saying what you feel? If you want a really feminine girl that is. You could find a girl with a more "manly" mind but chances are, you won't find her hot. Not exactly into people who i would have to micromanage their morse code. And i would probably prefer the second option anyway. Like a bro, but it's a girl that i could fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:30 AM
2

Men are definitely more thirsty than women at the very least. It's the whole reason why females got to this position they are in now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:23 AM
1

No, I'm saying that I'm saying you as in women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:19 AM
1

Why doesn't your hubs have his own reddit account. He practically accounts for like 70% of your comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:19 AM
1

It's a really shitty way of communicating. Not something you want to boast about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:17 AM
3

85% but Yh
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:12 AM
1

Here's the difference between men and women. Men like big boobs but they would also still go for someone who has small boobs or at the very least they wouldn't dismiss them instantly unlike woman will only date someone who's 6ft+ no ifs ands or buts. Also men are more varied on stuff like boobs and butts, while women are more homogeneous. (Infact men are more varied in like nearly every single stat).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:09 AM
1

You, as in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:03 AM
2

Unfortunately most of the presentation that people care about are the genetic stuff, height, skin/race, face bones ect
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 05:52 AM
1

What does your hubs believe about this subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 05:46 AM
1

No one has ever said that. People are just asking women to stop gaslighting. Just say that it's because of looks that you won't date someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 05:42 AM
5

Many men don't do basic hygiene to take care of their appearance (washing and moisturizing face, for instance) and it shows. Lol, right on cue. You just couldn't finish the sentence without deflecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 05:40 AM
-1

Wait, i heard from the other guy that you were into sociopaths. Can i shoot my shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 05:37 AM
3

Sure, you know best. Guess your 30 second analysis beats what nearly every single statistics is suggesting. Maybe, just maybe this world isn't the childish just world fallacy view you have. Think about it this way, assume that part of the group of incels are looking for their looksmatch (a normal ask) and the other part are the entitled delusional one's who are looking for a 9/10. Now if everyone could get their looksmatch as easy as you said (which isn't true but oh well), then you'd have much …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 05:34 AM
3

Lol if people just had the option to go with their looksmatch, inceldom would not be the way it is now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 05:22 AM
3

It's 100% on the person (in this case the guy) for going with the predator. The only thing wrong the predator has done is be a nuisance
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 05:15 AM
1

Ugly girl who's super into me beats a 9/10 who's meh literally any day of the week. In all categories
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 09:39 PM
1

Yh, same.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 09:37 PM
1

While yes, you are technically correct. The rate at which these stuff happen to something as invasive and newer as leg lengthening is considerably higher than something not as invasive and older as a nose job. Just for a comparison between the two. Because I can't get actual death rates or non walkness rates, but it still does the job of comparing the two. Hospital revisions for leg lengthening is at like 25% source, you'll have to do a bit of maths While it's 6.5% for nose jobs Source. https://…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 05:05 AM
2

I mean disabled as in not being able to walk again
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:31 AM
3

Height is changeable. There are surgeries that can make you taller. It's just like getting a nose job or chin implants or any other surgical intervention to change your SMV. True, bur only one of these can render you permanently disabled, or at best you'll have to relearn how to walk.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:25 AM
1

That's not help in the form of advice (which is ehat i was referring to) though. They are asking to be understood.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:12 AM
2

Lol incels aren't asking for help. You aren't any more aware of how things are than they are. They just want a place to vent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:02 AM
1

It's just every single worse stat you can put on a guy
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 02:01 AM
1

I wonder if you'll ever comment without mentioning your husband. Like at this point I've got to fucking see him for myself
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 01:35 AM
1

Like what about friends and family, job or hobbies or even volunteering idk Fuck that who gives a shit about something so benign, most of those are just the means to an end.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 01:34 AM
1

Lol personally being sexualised by a 4/10 beats an 8/10 who's just meh any day of the week.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 01:23 AM
1

Not the guy you replied to, but it's less about the physical action of penis in vagina sex, but about being desired for it. It's something literally every other kind of interaction has (that aren't just psuedo escorts), marriages, bfgf, friends with benefits, one night stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 01:18 AM
0

It's the other way round. It's the more unattractive women who are having the most casual sex. N count negatively correlates with attractiveness and positively correlates with weight (i.e. unattractiveness), it's probably due to a mix of the hot women not needing to have casual sex for validation and can get commitment on the fly, and the juggernaut effect of men going after the unattractive women more than the hot ones because they assume that there'll be less competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 01:06 AM
1

Lol it really isn't depending on who you ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 12:35 AM
2

What are you on about, where did i ever mention what i thought about capitalism and socialism. I'm just saying what People think. Redpillers are capitalist on economy and socialist on dating market. Bluepillers are socialist on economy and capitalist on dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 11:39 PM
2

It also goes the other way around. Bluepilled people are socialists in economy and capitalist in dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 11:35 PM
0

Hating is fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 02:32 PM
5

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 05:05 AM
1

I have 0 sympathy. Why would i feel sympathetic to someone who's getting what i want.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 03:45 AM
1

you will approach a few hot girls who are extremely above your league and get laughed at and you'll think that it's unfixable This statement pretty much highlights your problem. Such a warped view of what's going on. Here's a rewrite you will approach a few quite a bit hot looksmatch girls who ~~are extremely above your league ~~ have inflated SMV and get laughed at and you'll think that even if possible, not worth the effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 03:43 AM
2

This is under the assumption that every problem is solvable. Sounds childish. Like is it not possible that someone did option 2, failed and now just does option 1. I just don't see how you can acknowledge that being poor is because of external reasons, but somehow being an incel is completely internal. It's also kinda clear that you have some warped sense of what incels are like, fat neckbeard lolicon, like seriously how generic can you get.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 03:31 AM
0

That's not how standards work. Standards is just the minimum requirements. Fat people would be going for fat people and non fat people.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 03:10 AM
1

We're not having a bluepill vs blackpill debate. That's instantly gonna get me banned. a fattie will be happy to give you pussy And no, they wouldn't do it happily. Also i would take that over a 9/10 who's just meh about it, literally anyday of the week. would that be a good enough reason to hate all women? Umm, actually it would. Something that you sorely want, that everyone else has, and you can't get it because of something you didn't even do by the people you want it from. You'd just be hati…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 02:33 AM
3

Here's the thing, incels aren't asking for the physical action of penis in vagina. What incels want is to be desired.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 01:57 AM
0

I don't usually react much to online comments, but i was very close to seething when i saw his.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 01:35 AM
1

Entirely his fault?, So you act like being short, or having the wrong skin tone, or being a different phenotype, or being balding, or being deformed ect. Just has nothing to do with it. Lol you bluepillers and your childish just world fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 01:34 AM
1

True, mutual simping is the key to a good relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/20 04:19 AM
1

Yes but you said that a relationship where you didn't get it through effort was a bad one
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/20 04:01 AM
2

Being wanted = alpha fucks Being needed = beta buxx
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/20 01:40 AM
1

You would rather be the one to start it ?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 07:07 PM
1

True, but i would rather put effort in after the woman puts effort it, not put effort in hopes that the woman will decide to reciprocate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 06:24 PM
11

They lose those preferences, but only after their prime years are gone and used. Nobody wants to be a betabuxx
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 02:38 PM
16

It's always some stereotype shit aswell, "go shower" like as if incels are homeless.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 02:36 PM
1

You act as if females don't have high standards
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 02:33 PM
1

I never said there weren't sexless woman, i said that there are less sexless woman than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 10:32 PM
1

1 woman fucking means 1 man getting fucked. If there are more sexless men than woman then there are men who are fucking multiple women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 10:22 PM
2

Hypergamy on the women's part would mean that the high SMV woman would have very very little options they would consider. While the high SMV man would fuck super models, and the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 07:27 AM
3

Yes, but that is counteracted by the number of them. And we are talking about options, it'll be easy for him to meet the average woman since they're the acerage woman. It's like you're looking at this from the wrong point of view
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 07:11 AM
3

You do know that the average woman is gonna have to fuck somone right. The top SMV man has more options, since he's vastly outnumbered by the women who want to fuck him.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 07:06 AM
1

Partially. Women high standards started it, but men's horniness to have low standards to fuck is what added fuel to the fire
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 06:59 AM
2

Honestly it seems like women don't even care, even though they should want a low N man. But low N men are usually ugly and that's unacceptable for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 06:29 AM
1

Women outrank men in SMV at nearly every level, except the top where men vastly outrank women. (It makes mathematical sense, sex is 1:1 man and woman, so the total SMV for all men and all women must be equal) so a famous man would have vastly more count than a famous woman
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 06:25 AM
1

I know, I'm saying that low n doesn't mean low libido.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 06:18 AM
1

Since the baby is tied the womans body, pro choice and all that, it's 100% on the woman to refuse the sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 06:17 AM
0

Or maybe they just have better self control. More attractive women have lower N, and i don't think libido negatively correlates with attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 06:09 AM
1

If you married and have kids it's fine if she doesn't work. But if you're married with no kids and she doesn't work, that is sus.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 01:02 AM
1

If she was married and had kids with the husband young then she doesn't suck. You acted like the common RP point somehow resulted in a woman they view sucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 12:56 AM
1

If she doesn’t make money & had kids at a young age, Lol you didn't even bother mentioning if she was married, even though you said it for the career woman. that's why your reverse situation doesn't hold up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 12:51 AM
3

Why would i want to put more effort in.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 05:40 PM
0

My end goal is to die of an over dose (I don't even do drugs)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 09:41 PM
2

Just skim past this. https://youtu.be/8byGFryWQRU .
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 06:37 AM
34

Idk man, being divorce raped at a whim pretty much wipes out any benefits of marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 06:30 AM
1

Sure but that's not something i can personally change. If i litter (just an example) or if I don't, wouldn't have an effect on if the rest of the community does or doesn't. So either they don't litter and i do, meaning i get a comfortable time at their expense, or they do litter and i will have a bad time so i might aswell litter. It's like the prisoner's dilemma, and the solution if you're in the prisoners dilemma is to always rat out the other prisoner, mathematically you'll have less expected…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:52 PM
11

Karma doesn't exist. Just world fallacy is childish. Not because you want to get something from them, Why not, why can't my actions be about benefiting myself. Why should i waste my time and energy. Asking someone else to be selfless is just selfishness on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 04:50 AM
1

Well if what you said is what I'm saying then yh. Id fuck them, Dating though is a different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 04:39 AM
1

Well if the body is XX, then I'll be down. Biological female (and by biological, i mean from top to bottom, inside out, no amount of faking appearences will help you on that part) or bust.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 04:37 AM
2

Only 13% of marriages are satisfactory. (Can't remember where i saw that)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 04:33 AM
1

Yh definitely not, under any circumstances. Literally the only kind of operation that i would consider would be a literal brain transplant
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 04:31 AM
1

Yh, but that definitely does not extend to trans people.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 04:30 AM
5

Halo effect
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 05:44 PM
1

Clothed porn>>>>>>>naked porn
/r/MGTOW28/10/20 03:17 PM
2

Imo a 4/10 can be even more attractive than an 8/10 depending on the actions (starfish vs fucking). A vag is a vag
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 06:12 AM
1

Well, if i will fuck a woman it means that i am sexually attracted to her. So therefore I'm attracted to most women. And by perfect i mean someone who's sooo good, that i will actually rather not have sex with them because i would feel like I'm ruining something.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 04:35 AM
1

Also having her veins pump blood
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/20 04:19 AM
0

I wish they didn't. Have some restraint (but i would go dumpster diving though). 4/10s getting used as a fleshlight by chad on a Thursday night now think they're a 7/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 04:07 AM
3

And now she thinks that she only deserves 6'4 lawyer chads. Alpha widows are the worst. This is why I really don't like seeing men go below their looksmatch, (i would, but I don't want them to).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 03:56 AM
1

Electromagnetic output?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 03:27 AM
2

But what is an emcel, what is em
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 03:15 AM
0

Real life women are imperfect, if there was a bar seperating women, it would be perfect one's and imperfect one's, and all of them are in the latter. An 8/10 isn't on that level anymore so than a 4/10. Such things are reserved for perfect women, such only exist as a figment of art or imagination. I can't be attracted to women in any other way than just sexually from looks, the only one's i can are perfect one's, that don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 03:13 AM
1

Naa, it's real. It's just that what's going on is that her fat is curving space-time
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/20 02:55 AM
1

Err i don't get it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:52 AM
1

Someone I'd see across a room and think "Damn, I like the way she looks, I'd like to go talk to her." The only woman that is on that level (personally), is missing a dimension. So i guess my standards are even higher than yours. But i would still fuck the shit out of the majority of women, and that's all i need as that requirement, so that's the only baseline of attraction i can actually use. Both sound equally bad. Well one is just masterbation while looking at a pretty picture, and one is actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:51 AM
1

Well it's women here who try to dispel the notion that women don't betabuxx because they don't need to because they earn the same amount
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:43 AM
2

I mean atleast it's nice knowing that there'll be atleast one short/average Chubby guy who'll have a partner that Actually desires them
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:31 AM
1

By they i was referring to all women in general
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:19 AM
2

Yh. "Fuck i really want to bang, but It's not worth all the effort, but i want to bang sooo bad, but it's not worth the effort, but i just want to crush some puss...."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:19 AM
1

emcels?, Don't you mean femcels.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:14 AM
4

There's a cel for everything ul
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:10 AM
1

But, but i was led to believe by women here that they were independent, and don't need financial security anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:10 AM
2

I like short/average height men who are chubby and have no facial hair. You are, very, err, unorthodox
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:07 AM
1

Women are the one's to use betabuxx, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:05 AM
4

Halo effect. Attractive people are seen has having literally better everything, they're assumed to be more nice, more intelligent, more trustworthy etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 02:03 AM
5

This dichotomy of men being SO obsessed with sex to the point where people make apologies for rapists because they "can't help it" vs men not doing the bare minimum because the cost of entry to date a woman is too high for them is really hard for me to understand. It's the conflict between the irrational sexual desire of man and the rational decision making part of man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 01:54 AM
1

Chad is something like top 8% ish
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 01:49 AM
4

Lol that's a settling message, not too different than no message
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 01:46 AM
1

20% of them are in the one's that people want to be in (i.e. the partner is attracted to you), not some silent quid pro quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 01:45 AM
2

What is attractive. Is it someone that you would fuck, because i would bone the shit out of like 50-60% of women. Imo actions can get me more sexually aroused than visuals. Starfishing an 8/10 is guaranteed be worse than getting your brains fucked by a 4/10
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 01:42 AM
1

His first wife weighed over 400 lbs >_> Oof size large. Lol now that wife is gonna think she's a 6/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 01:29 AM
1

Chad is someone who averages 7-8/10 in everything, which would make him top 10% to 3% ish (I've done the math). Top 20% is definitely not chad, top 20% is just high tier normie/chadlite, top 20% would put you at around a 6.5/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 07:59 PM
1

It's close to the second one. It's basically the jack of all trades in looks, then giga chad is someone who's that but all stats are higher. Guys with good looking faces but are skinny are called pretty boys, basically there's a term for everyone else who is good looking but are lacking a a stat. But yh, chad has everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 07:36 PM
1

I'm sorry what?, I honestly don't know what you said
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 05:00 PM
1

Lol, you do realise that successful Becky's have even higher standards than unsuccessful Becky's, a woman who makes 0 per year will want a guy who makes 50k, and a woman who makes 50k per year will want a guy who makes 100k. It really isn't a choice to find them attractive or not, it'll still be impossible to get them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 04:53 PM
1

You can't be chad by simply being ripped. You also need the trifecta of height, frame, and face.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 04:39 PM
0

Sure, but they're doing it for a different reason. Men will wife up an unattractive women for the same reason they wife up an attractive one. Women on the other hand...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 04:36 PM
2

Abort Very poor choice of words
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 04:32 PM
8

Lol i think incels hate unattractive women more than attractive. They can understand getting rejected by stacy, but getting rejected by their looksmatch is what they're really pissed about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 04:28 PM
8

Yh unlike un attractive women, attractive women don't need to have sex for validation, they don't even need to have sex to garner commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 04:26 PM
1

Well it's not that they can't be, it's that 95% of the time they aren't
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 01:46 PM
6

Lol you kinda look like hank hill.
/r/MGTOW227/10/20 07:17 AM
3

I salute you, always nice to see an incel who's ascended
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/10/20 05:03 AM
6

Yh, it's not the physical act of penis in vagina sex incels desire. But being desired is what they desire.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/10/20 01:29 AM
5

Lol was about to reply with an argument, but then i had realised that i don't have anything to say
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 09:58 PM
3

Lol he couldn't even respond to that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 09:50 PM
2

Wow, lol you do not control your own thoughts. Do you know what happens when you specifically try not to think about something, you end up thinking about it. You can't not think about something, without thinking about the something that you don't want to think of. (Sounds tongue twisty but you get what i mean)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 09:44 PM
3

I don't think incels are striving to hold a man's hands
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 09:29 PM
6

I can't remember where i saw the percentage, but something like only 13% of marriages are happy (the rest end in divorce or aren't fulfilling but not seperated) i would assume that number would hint at the answer you seek.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 04:09 AM
42

Lol actually asian women are the most guilty when it comes to female nature
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/20 02:53 AM
12

And people still don't acknowledge that. Constant "if you're alone it's all your fault". They will accept that someone can remain poor because of factors out of their control, but won't accept that someone can remain alone because of factors out of their control.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 04:18 PM
16

Yes but no one seems to actually acknowledge that, it's just endless gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 02:16 PM
1

I was assuming that you could play the game and win, you just couldn't be bothered to break your back over it. Otherwise that would be incel with a coating of volcel, basically like most of MGTOW
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 02:15 PM
6

Sounds way too pretentious. Something like, "it's not your fault"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 02:12 PM
2

And be incel. Actually that would be volcel.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 02:08 PM
7

Lol, you really didn't just say that. Ugly women have it way way easier, men will still want to fuck them. Ugly men on the other hand definitely don't have that privelege. Ugly women treat ugly men way worse, it's like they're angry that he's their looksmatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 02:06 PM
4

Honestly they should just stop the gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 02:03 PM
1

It is clear that is there was a scale of rationality, men would be higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 01:24 PM
1

Even if they are somewhat insecure, i don't see what's so bad about it. People feel differently being someone's second or third than someone's 20th. Wanting to know if your partner was a whore or not is understandable. Asking though is stupid, because even if she gives you the answer you want to hear and she's telling the truth, you're pretty much lowering the standing that you have, and if she lies (which she's most likely to do) well you'll have not only lowered the standing, but be investing …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:38 AM
1

So being insecure isn't a deal breaker?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:24 AM
1

I don't think women are always considering physical violence in their dealings with men. They aren't that paranoid, especially when it's someone they're somewhat close to. They aren't exactly envisioning their normal boyfriend of 6 months beating the shit out of them after saying that their n count is 20+. You cannot view them as insecure and then lie without being a hypocrite. That's what I'm trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:18 AM
1

But why would you care if they flip out. Since the relationship is as good as over when he asked. Just either end it there and then, or tell the truth, either way you're ending it or he is. And what If he deemed the number acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:06 AM
0

Cohabitation laws mean that you don't even need to be legally married to basically still be divorce raped
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 02:18 AM
1

u/undeleteparent
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 02:09 AM
1

dk it's twisted nonsense logic by some crazy men. Well it's not that twisted, if you're easy for one man, then chances are you'll be easy for the next. Being easy and being loyal are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 02:01 AM
1

I think it's being easy to one man means that he'll think or know (doesn't really matter if he's correct or not, it's how he feels) that you'll be easy to the next, which would ironically make you harder to keep.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 01:59 AM
1

So we finally have an answer, women don't think rationally. There OP, there's literally the answer you're looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 01:53 AM
1

You do know that most people would like being someone's first or third, but not 25th
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 01:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter