TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DoctorFitLord Archive

View 3 posts and 103 comments by DoctorFitLord on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

University system favors female applicants, women hurt most of all.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 12:28 AM
35

I always ask them to define feminism in very clear terms first before you answer. That way they can't try to use your declaration as a way to weasel in other bullshit. If it's just "I believe women deserve rights and civil liberties" then yeah, but if it comes packaged with believing things like, the patriarchy is real, male privilege is real, men can't experience sexism, etc. then no.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:10 AM
89

The entire concept of patriarchy needs to be wiped. It's not real. It's an illusion at best and a conspiratorial work of fiction at worst. The idea that society was built to cater to us and that therefore our own issues just don't exist (or are minor issues that aren't worthy of systemic solutions) is such a massive gaslight that prevents positive change from being enacted.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:06 AM
2

Honestly the best advice I can share is to get as involved as you can in physical spaces and hobbies that have social community. That's how I met my girlfriend (now wife). She was just a friend of a friend who tagged along one time and we just naturally had chemistry while in a low-stakes, platonic social environment. Stay away from dating apps, they're a joke. You have better odds of falling in love with someone by complete accident while you're just out in the world mixing and mingling. That, …
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:57 AM
7

God I feel so lucky that I met my wife back in 2018 before this insane bullshit became the norm. I can't imagine the level of anxiety young guys go through trying to get a simple date.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 11:46 PM
2

Getting lectured about my own "male privilege" and the gender wage gap back when I was making minimum wage really drove this one in for me.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 10:24 PM
1

I've been seeing feminists react to this and the results are interesting. For some it's a "white pill" that makes them more hopeful, but some are weirdly mad. Like they WANT men to be terrible. Like for some reason they have this sick desire for men to be the most malicious people imaginable so that they can justify the way they feel about them. It's so backwards. Shouldn't this be a relief? Shouldn't this make you feel more optimistic? Man hating is an addiction for some women.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 10:23 PM
1

I've had to explain my critical position on the Violence Against Women Act so many times over this. I'll say that I don't support it and people kneejerk to thinking "this must mean you're ok with violence against women". No. It's just that it gave massive government funding to abuse shelters, homelessness shelters, and protection for victims of stalking, but only if they're women. I do think that the Rape Shield laws passed under the VAWA are good, because they shut sleazy fuckass lawyers down a…
/r/MensRights06/07/26 10:22 PM
5

I'll tell you the feeling of safety is an illusion. Most murder victims are men, most targets of assault, robbery, and other street crimes are men. Their assailants are usually other men, but the fact that your attacker is statistically likely to have the same gender as you doesn't make you any safer. The fact that males are considered more acceptable recipients of pain and violence plays a major role in this. Sometimes criminals can conduct themselves under the illusion of having a "code of hon…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 02:05 AM
10

Getting gym gains faster, being more physically capable etc. are real advantages of being male but they are not societally-constructed privileges. It's not really a relevant point to make in a conversation about how, broadly speaking, anti-woman discrimination is unacceptable but anti-male discrimination is.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:59 AM
14

He's just asking a question. We can answer it. There's no reason to be mad over a sincere question.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:57 AM
19

You seem to be asking this sincerely, so I'll answer you sincerely. As a male you are an acceptable target of all kinds of mistreatment, but it's possible for you to get lucky and not be on the receiving end of it. Here's a non-comprehensive list of examples of how anti-male discrimination has affected me personally. Some of the bias and discrimination came from women, some of it from other men. I'll start when I was a kid and move up from there: - When being taught etiquette at age six, my (fem…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:47 AM
1

Trad wives aren't even trad. They are quite possibly the most successful con artists in history. The smokescreen that they are "oppressed" by the men they've tricked into exploitation hides the scam completely. Actual traditional women worked, and contributed financially to their families. Other than the blip in history that was the post war economy in the late 1940s and 1950s, a man's single income could not support multiple children + a stay at home wife who also demands gifts, luxury clothing…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 06:49 AM
3

The myth of male privilege is so strong that they sincerely believe that any neglect, hostility, or disadvantage given towards males will just be swept away because the patriarchy will magically come to save them. They even apply this line of reason to little boys, who have nothing and who hold no authority and who entirely depend on adult authority figures for their wellbeing (in this case female teachers). One of the core dogmas of feminism keeps them from even being allowed to question this. …
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:22 AM
2

It's surprisingly modern, but the root cause is the prevailing, unspoken belief that a father's money is more valuable to his children than his care. A lot of it comes down to the way the lesser-perceived importance of fatherhood has been greatly magnified by modern work culture. Before industrialization and modern transportation (especially cars) were the norm, fathers had a much larger role in raising their children. Children would (obviously) spend more time with their mothers when they were …
/r/MensRights17/06/26 10:25 PM
2

This was probably the first seed of understanding male disposability for me. When I was about seven my dad was telling me about the history of the Titanic, and the "women and children" rule. I showed some concern about it and he told me not to worry because the titanic disaster happened a long time ago. That in current times "women and children first" is more of an unwritten guideline than an actual rule, and that I would be fine because modern boats are safer. I didn't have the words to express…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 10:07 PM
5

The word "Manosphere" is such a tell that the person using it doesn't know what the hell they're talking about. Tons of completely unrelated (even contradictory things) get lumped together under the vague umbrella of the manosphere. Pick up artists, incel forums, MRM, scammy #grindset gurus, get rich quick schemers, fitness influencers, and random ragebait podcasters all get lumped together under the term "Manosphere". There is no coherent link between these, but people love the umbrella because…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 09:53 PM
4

It's a way to justify a need for control. If a woman arbitrarily claims that a man made her feel unsafe, she can justify doing all kinds of shit to him (vilifying him, trying to ban/eject him from a space he has the right to be in, even report him to the authorities) and act like she's acting defensively against an aggressor who deserves it. This is why I'm VERY skeptical when women make demands based around "safety". There's just no way to make someone feel safe when they're constantly projecti…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 09:14 PM
37

The worst of it is that you don't have to even do anything bad. If a woman has a paranoid fear of men, she can (and will) say that your very presence makes her feel uncomfortable/threatened. You can do absolutely nothing wrong and they'll invent a frightening scenario of what you might do in their imaginations, and use that to cast judgement on you, because the fear they conjured made them "feel unsafe". They'll then use this feeling of being unsafe as evidence that men are bad. It's fucking ins…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 01:25 AM
5

It's to the point that you get called a pick-me for even acknowledging that men are human beings with emotions and vulnerabilities. The backlash women get for extending basic empathy to males is insane right now.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 12:15 AM
3

And we're grateful for them.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 12:14 AM
1

We've got bigger fish to fry, man. The portion sizes are just fine. This isn't something worth worrying about.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 09:07 PM
2

I had a hard time explaining this to my sister. I remember when the Violence Against Women Act passed, I didn't feel good about it. My sister was baffled, like this meant I thought violence against women was ok. I had to explain that the act just made it so that federal funds would go to shelter only women. Subsidized housing, shelters, etc. for women who felt in danger but were too financially stuck to move on their own were provided. I think that's a good thing! What I had a problem with was t…
/r/MensRights25/05/26 01:09 AM
0

You don't know that though? She never said that or gave any indication of that.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 10:50 PM
3

We need to leave the word "Manosphere" in like 2016. It's such a meaningless word used to refer to a bunch of unrelated (and sometimes contradictory) things. It's not a coherent term, and it's mostly used to just slander MRAs by putting MRAs in the same category as things like conservative podcasters (who support the very gender roles that we oppose) or misogynist incels who just complain about women and don't advocate for anything. Incel forums, MRAs, conservative podcasters, pickup artists, #g…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 10:49 PM
4

I've seen the video. Those boys got treated like threats and vilified for simply being male. The boys were being well humored and peaceful in the face of a stressful situation (stuck in an elevator). The girl was being very aggressive and hostile, insulting and attacking the boys. The comments were BRIMMING with women defending the girl, extending sympathy for her because of how "scary" it must have been being stuck with a group of boys, who were also stuck with her. Everyone in there was having…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 10:24 PM
11

Gender politics in India are such an insane mess that hearing about it frankly makes me feel lucky that I don't live there. Like men and women both are in such a shit situation with all the gender relation bullshit going on there.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 08:51 PM
75

Nah man. Let's not do this silly gender war shit.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:21 PM
21

I think calling it hate speech is a bit of a stretch, but I've always had discomfort with that idea, ever since I was a kid. I remember the feeling that there was an expiration date on my life being precious, and that one day danger, death, and injury to me would be acceptable in a way that it wasn't for women. I can only speak for myself, but I think most boys have this feeling one way or another during their upbringing. Male disposability is unfortunately very normalized.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:10 AM
1

Oh I know the Bechdel test isn't really a good metric for anything, I just think it's funny.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 01:06 AM
26

Semi-related but someone once pointed out to me that women's social media rarely passes the Bechdel test because they make things about men so often, even shoehorning it into places where thr topic makes no sense to bring up. A woman gets a job and people don't say "congratulations on the job!" and instead say something baout how she's so independent and doesn't need a man. It's bizarre.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 12:28 AM
2

I find this mindset odd because instead of seeing that and realizing that male privilege doesn't really exist (at least not as feminists describe it), they go on to conclude that any struggling man somehow still lost the game despite having all the cheat codes. There is zero willingness to adjust their worldview. It's very strange to me that women's socio-economic status has advanced so much in the past century, but the dichotomy of male privilege/female marginalization remains absolutely frozen…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 10:16 PM
2

In modern-day Muslim countries they will still punish rape victims for the sin of being made impure. It's fucking insane to even imagine as someone who lives in modern-day western democracy. Seeing my own culture be described as "rape culture" because rape exists at all when that reference level exists is profoundly insulting. Truthfulness isn't the goal, though. The goal is to make men into scary, dangerous threats that women (and men in positions of power) have no choice but to alienate and vi…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 10:10 PM
4

Belief in rape culture produces this troublesome supply-demand issue for its believers, where there simply isn't enough rape to justify believing that we live in a culture that excuses, encourages, or is even based based around it, This requires greatly exaggerating a lot of things. Cherry picking, over-extending the definition of rape, or trying to argue that extremely taboo and abnormal behaviors are in fact normal. The "rape academy" group mentioned in the article is real, though much smaller…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 10:06 PM
2

I mean, it's a double standard but I would prefer an unfair double standard to a scenario where things are made equal and fair by taking the negative side of the double standard and doubling it. That makes things equal, but it doesn't make things right.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 09:54 PM
6

Yes, being called a fuckboy or whatever is still slut shaming. Men who seek out sex are also mocked and seen as vapid and superficial; idiots who think with their dicks and have nothing worthwhile in their lives. In some cases, they are even treated as dangerous threats for simply enjoying and pursing casual sex. Retroactive jealousy against men isn't treated as slut shaming the way it is when it's directed at women, but it still is slut shaming. Male and female slut shaming exist hand in hand b…
/r/MensRights11/04/26 09:52 PM
17

Honestly, I think that's a good thing. I don't want a male version of the Tea app, I just don't want these things to exist at all. Yeah, double standard I know, but this shit is bad no matter where it comes from.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 01:04 AM
1

I'm going to be honest, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. I'm not trying to be rude, I just really don't know if you're trying to argue against me or not.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 08:21 PM
31

It's weird that the whole poly thing is associated with liberals/progressives even though it usually presents as one individual clearly being the center/leader of the polycule with a harem, but I wouldn't think about it too much. Poly relationships are super, duper marginal. I live in one of the most liberal/progressive regions in the country and even though most people here are politically progressive, almost no one is in a polyamorous relationship. They definitely exist, but they're so extreme…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 08:13 PM
10

Andrew Tate gets FAR more publicity from his detractors than from his fans. He's the face because he's a very conveniently bad look to point at if you want to critique anything "manosphere" related. Something you can conflate with other things to drag their reputation down.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 10:06 PM
3

I don't believe in gender essentialism, but in general, women are much easier to frighten than men. You can use fear to make people believe lies and manipulate them easily. You can grift them into buying things they don't need, make them fall for bogus superstition, and turn them against any group of people you want if you convince them that it's for their own safety against whatever threat you made them believe in. The culture of fear is self-sustaining, and the more fear you have the more vuln…
/r/MensRights22/01/26 12:02 AM
8

It's a shame that the idea that suffering = manly is pushed by both women and men. In different ways, but still. Men will shame you if you have a comfortable living space and safe job that doesn't wear your body out. Women act disgusted and outraged by the sight of a man relaxing, having hobbies, or doing anything other than being economically productive. Both genders will expect you to suffer, but attack you and squash you down further the moment the suffering becomes too much and you show vuln…
/r/MensRights21/01/26 11:46 PM
1

I mean, I wasn't "broke", I was making a reasonable amount of money for a college student with a part-time job. It's just that she was rich (by pure luck) and we both knew it would be absurd to play into the idea that a man has to pay because he's a man.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 06:29 PM
3

Trad wives aren't "based" and they aren't trad lmao. Women who support the whole tradwife thing just like a system where they get the privilege of being financially supported by men's labor. The fact that they criticize mainstream feminism doesn't change the fact that they're gynocentric in a different way. Women worked and contributed economically to their households for most of history. The people who will have you think that the stereotypical 1950s breadwinner/homemaker dichotomy is tradition…
/r/MensRights19/01/26 11:44 PM
1

Oh BROOOOOTTHHEERR. Fine, be cynical. Whatever.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 10:34 PM
1

I live in American so everything I say comes from my point of view (an American man in his early 30s). I'm interested to hear outside perspectives though!
/r/MensRights15/01/26 10:31 PM
2

Yup. Though I might add, women who have had some life experience as financially independent adults are far more likely to agree to responsible choices around spending, saving, and investment. Knowing just how much work goes into keeping a roof over your head and food on the table gives you perspective and makes you more reasonable. Women who know what it's like to earn your keep and pay bills are by far less likely to treat their husband like a human ATM.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 10:30 PM
1

I've dated women who earned more than me, I never found it demeaning though. I think a lot of people who find it demeaning and emasculating are mentally stuck in an era that they were never a part of. This isn't 1956, there are abundant educational and employment opportunities for women. It's limiting and unrealistic to assume that every single woman you like is going to be making less money than you.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 10:26 PM
1

Yup. It also increases your odds of divorce. More educated, more gainfully employed women initiate divorce at FAR lower rates than women who parasitically depend on men.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 10:23 PM
21

Even in the 70s this wasn't true. The idea that modern women are doing something exceptional and historically unprecedented by being economically independent is an ahistoric myth. Women have over-represented men in college graduation rates (and the job opportunities that come with them) for a long time. The first age cohort* where female college graduates outnumbered male graduates was born between 1960-1964; the tail end of baby boomers. People act like educational and employment opportunities …
/r/MensRights15/01/26 10:20 PM
3

You're right, but I was making this point specifically to address men because most men seem to care very little about their potential wives/girlfriends ability to make money and be financially responsible. Many even take it as a point of pride; that not caring about that at all show that you have more emotional depth and value as a provider. The complete disregard most men have for this gets them into a lot of bad relationships, and incentivizes women to be financially parasitic even though soci…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 09:58 PM
14

Fair enough, but in my experience the best filter for keeping out entitled women is to favor women who are economically productive and financially responsible enough to pull their own weight. Entitled women are rarely motivated to even plan for a career, because they assume from the outset that at some point a man is going to show up and shoulder the burden.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 03:04 AM
11

Exactly. A woman who never built up the income or the financial literacy to pay her bills without depending on a man is going to have every incentive to fight tooth and nail in a divorce to financially take you for all you're worth. A woman who can just move on without bleeding you dry won't have that incentive. That's if you get a divorce at all. Statistically, women with higher education levels and the ability to make a living on their own initiate divorce at a much lower level. Uneducated, fi…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 02:57 AM
44

Did you read the post? I made it a point that I've favored women who are willing (and therefore financially able) to pay their own bills, pick up the tab on dates now and then, etc. I have a wonderful wife and have had an overall positive relationship history, with my worst experience being with the only entitled money-chasing woman I ever dated. I'm an MRA but I don't buy that defeatist blackpill stuff. Take it from someone in a loving marriage, who is friends with men who are also in loving ma…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 02:20 AM
3

Don't bedrot. It's an insidious addiction that doesn't get taken seriously. Don't lay in bed scrolling, don't grab your phone before getting out of bed. Get up, do your morning hygiene, get fresh air, feel sunlight, talk to people in person and not through a screen. Being a bedrotter/doomscroller is probably wasting more people's lives than alcoholism right now but it's not treated like the serious hazard that it is. Don't hold grudges. They are their own kind of addiction and they ruin you. Whe…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 06:39 PM
49

The fist time that you're viewed as a threat for simply existing is such a jarring part of boyhood, and women really struggle to understand how deeply painful and isolating it is.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 06:29 PM
6

1) They already have a word for that, MGTOW. 2) No, we don't. Basing your entire identity around avoiding half of civilization isn't a solution to anything, it just makes you go insane and makes impossible to engage with society.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 06:27 PM
5

As society gets more and more isolated, it's harder to form bonds. Meanwhile there's a million different voices in your ears telling you to view other men as either competition or a potential threat. There's no room for friendship and brotherhood there. I think part of being an MRA really needs to be valuing other men more, trusting them more, and caring for them emotionally more. I get that critiquing feminism gets the most engagement online (since it attracts debate) but that's such a small pi…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 01:16 AM
2

Yeah, I know. 90% of the things that get called "male privilege" are an apex fallacy that falls apart when your reference point is normal people in the normal world. Outside of a few tight-knit ultra powerful individuals, the privilege isn't there, but all men are expected to pay the price for that inequity.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 01:11 AM
28

I think the emphasis put on discrimination being "systemic" makes feminists believe that acknowledging misandry means implicitly saying that women are a privileged oppressor class. They've been made to believe that empathizing with you is an admission of guilt on their part, and therefore that any plea for empathy is actually an attack on their character as a whole. The zero sum "privileged oppressor vs oppressed victim" binary dynamic needs these kind of things to work. It's just easier to say …
/r/MensRights04/01/26 06:34 AM
22

Left vilifies you for being a man, right vilifies you for being brown. Every bad thing gets placed on you. Politically there's nowhere to go where you can be treated with dignity and good faith.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 04:25 AM
10

I think it's kinda misandrist that accomplished, intelligent men are still depicted at the bottom of the social totem pole and only elevated from their low status when they can gain the sexual/romantic approval of women. I think one of the most pervasive social forces of sexism against men is the idea that a man isn't worthy of respect, community, trust, etc. until he's proven that he has the sexual stamp of approval of women. So much of the plot revolves around the flat acceptance of that belie…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 04:06 AM
10

The left: your problems don't exist because of male privilege The right: your problems don't matter because you're on your own
/r/MensRights27/12/25 03:58 AM
3

They're just misandrist in a different way. Like: On the left: Your problems and emotions don't matter because you're actually privileged and you don't know how good you have it because privileges are invisible to people who have them and actually you should be focusing on what you can do for trans women of color. On the right: Your problems don't matter unless they can be the scapegoated in service of pre-existing right-wing agendas and your emotions don't matter because you aren't allowed to h…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 03:56 AM
40

Look man if you're ok with being treated like a threat when you are behaving in a completely non-threatening way, that's fine. I'm not. I don't tolerate being treated as a threat or as a malicious actor simply for existing in a male body. No amount of rhetoric about subjectively feeling safe/unsafe is going to make me tolerate that kind of treatment.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:27 PM
73

OP isn't talking about people committing sexual assault. He's talking about people who are minding their own business but still get treated with suspicion/hostility/etc while doing nothing other than existing as a male. Being made to feel guilty, being told to leave when you aren't behaving threateningly, etc is actually incredibly fucked up. People use it to justify all kinds of mistreatment, prejudice, etc, under the guise of safety. I assume you're a woman so you probably don't understand wha…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:34 PM
6

"The issue is that they want a nuanced interpretation of their un-nuanced statements." Man, I'm saving this. You hit the nail on the head. It's weird being expected to have so much nuance and patience and good faith for people who talk about you with all the elegance of a blunt object swinging at your face.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:26 AM
11

It's not a reverse double standard, it's just a double standard lol. I never got that language. Same with racism, it's just flat out racism, no need to say "reverse racism".
/r/MensRights21/12/25 11:21 PM
4

If you try to experiment with your fashion as a man, you will be mocked from all directions. Women will see you as vain, secretly gay, or stunted in adolescence. Men will balk that you're doing stupid shit for attention, call you weird, and maybe also think that you're secretly gay. The social enforcement against men using interesting clothing for self expression means there's less of a market for it, so even less fun and stylish clothes are even made available for purchase in the first place. E…
/r/MensRights13/12/25 11:24 PM
19

Yeah, I was kind of surprised that this thread was about Target's sex toy selection. Most clothing stores have women's sections that are 2-4x the size of the men's section. None of the clothing is fun either, it's all the same generic, often dull-colored designs. If there are more exciting/experimental options, they're usually marketed to teen boys or younger (college aged) men. When I was a teen/young adult, I didn't have the money to experiment with my wardrobe. Now that I'm in my late 20s, it…
/r/MensRights13/12/25 11:19 PM
14

I don't really GAF about Target's sex toy options, if I wanted a masturbation toy with bells and whistles like automatic stroking and warming or whatever I would just go to an actual sex shop and not Target. What I do find troubling is that so many toys/accessories/etc for men seem to work against him getting pleasure. Numbing gels, condoms designed to reduce sensation, rings that cut off your circulation. They're all marketed as a way to "last longer" but they're all the same; reduce your own p…
/r/MensRights13/12/25 11:15 PM
1

I can't believe I got black pilled for saying that a happy relationship with a woman is possible and a good thing lmfao, this subreddit has gone to shit.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 05:39 PM
3

"Oh, you're happy with your marriage? Well what about this scenario I created in my imagination where you're unhappy with your marriage ten years from now? Check mate."
/r/MensRights06/12/25 12:53 AM
-4

It's legitimately kind of depressing to see so many people thinking that it's a bigger flex to give up on relationships altogether than to have a happy one. IDK if it's even possible to reach someone who's that big of a doomer.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 12:50 AM
2

Ok Doomer. Stay black pilled, I don't really care.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 12:48 AM
-2

You're talking about something that is the result of my own choices as though it were a random event. Reducing it to a "statistical anomaly" as if the relationship you end up in is a fucking lottery pull. It's not.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 08:49 PM
-8

I don't think you know how relationships work, man.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 08:48 PM
-7

I didn't "luck out", I actively cultivated a good relationship with a woman that I CHOSE. It wasn't a random incident. She and I built that relationship consciously.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 08:11 PM
-7

I'm going to be honest with you, I think it's a little fucked up and sad that you think the only options are MGTOW or silently endure a humiliation ritual. I'm a 33-year-old millennial and I have a wonderful wife who treats me with love, fairness, and dignity. That's the flex. Someone who opted out of dating entirely isn't "putting me to shame" by just opting out completely. Tapping out completely is better than just taking emotional and financial abuse, but it's really not something to be proud…
/r/MensRights05/12/25 07:41 PM
33

Not on me specifically, but my whole friend group. When I was about 14 my friends and I were in a public park hanging out, goofing around, telling jokes etc. We weren't causing any harm but the police showed up anyway, with this Karen that lived across the street standing behind them. It turns out that she called the cops and told them we were smoking weed in the park, a complete lie. Her reason was that we were laughing too much loud, and because we were laughing so loud that she could hear us …
/r/MensRights31/08/24 03:16 PM
2

May I offer the inversion of this take? I go on solo night walks all the time. I'm a pretty big guy (large enough to appear intimidating to someone trying to target me) so I've never really worried too much. I live in an area with about average crime levels, not super dangerous but not especially safe either. I bump into other people on my night walks and a surprising amount of solo night-walkers are women. The majority are male, but once I started paying attention I noticed about 1/4 of people …
/r/MensRights25/08/24 10:02 PM
5

Nah, I'm not going to stand for apologia over Harvey fucking Weinstein. He did "buy" sex and make deals for sex but that's not what he's in jail for. He's in jail for actual literal unambiguous rapes that he committed. He wasn't arrested for the slightly shady tit-for-tat stuff he did, he was arrested for other cases where he committed straight up rape. If you don't believe that, you need to look into the case and not use random social media takes as your source. Listen to the tapes used as evid…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 07:44 PM
2

You are correct.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:21 PM
12

I remember that "boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" book. My sister had it, it was marketed at very young girls as this cute and innocent thing but it was honestly awful. Not only was it full of casual misandry aimed at very young girls, but it had a lot of strange sexual undertones, some of which seemed to be the author's own grievances about her exes being projected onto little boys. Anyway, chill, in the actual article that book is brought up as an example of misandry.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:20 PM
1

why did you try to greentext on reddit
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:50 AM
4

Nah, the less government red tape wrapped around the natural process of childbirth, the better. I do think that a paternity test should break a child support order though, no matter how long the father has been paying it.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:53 AM
5

Or just broadly vilifying any sexual interest. Even if they don't do something as extreme as involving authorities, we've reached the point that the mere suggestion of sexual or romantic curiosity is treated as an act of malice and aggression. Whether or not women know it, they're contributing to a system of controlling and crushing people's spirits by convincing everyone that their sexualities are evil.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:44 PM
2

Parasuicidal behavior is a big predictor of serious suicide attempts in the future, and I'm not trying to diminish their importance, but there's a serious difference between suicidal theatrics to draw attention to how severe your depression is and cry for help and actual suicide/serious suicide attempts.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 05:13 AM
1

what the hell am I looking at
/r/MensRights10/12/19 08:03 PM
31

Men also don't use suicide attempts as a "cry for help". I've heard many women claim that they tried to kill themselves with a handful of tylenol pills and nothing else. That's not a suicide attempt, that's a performative display of suicidal behavior to make people take you seriously. No one who seriously is trying to kill themselves would do something with such a low chance of actually killing you.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 05:39 PM
1

I went to jail once, I legit met a white knight in there that got busted trying to steal some expensive shoes for his cunt girlfriend. She wanted shoes that neither of them could afford, and instead of putting herself on the line, her white knight BF did the dirty work and got bused for her.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 08:35 AM
1

It's because we're trained from early on to believe that male sexuality is predatory and destructive. There are sanctions places against the sexuality of both genders, it's just that women have decided that they only apply to them and that men are therefore exempt from any consideration on subjects of sexual liberation. Women seem to believe that the entire sexual experience of a man is just and endless stream of encouragement from society and high-fives from his peers with no downsides whatsoev…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:20 AM
14

I really hope that as the MHRM leaves its infancy and becomes a movement with legitimate momentum, we'll succeed where feminism failed by being staying introspective and being accountable for our own extremists. By letting extremists/bigots go unchecked, feminism has allowed people who tweet #KillAllWhiteMen to reach positions of academic and social authority, and subsequently have lost some public support. This is a mistake that we can't make.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:31 AM
3

Found company in a country with a 70% white population People throw a fit when your board of executives is 54% white Ok
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:34 AM
7

The MRA in the skirt was surprisingly lucid, despite his strange appearance, he really had his thoughts together.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:07 AM
3

When the women in the audience make a drowning applause the moment that the third man is described as pro-feminist
/r/MensRights17/01/16 11:59 PM
4

Can we please not copy weak feminist rhetoric like "objectification" please? "Objectification" is just a loaded way of saying "sexualization", and there's nothing wrong with sexualization because there's nothing wrong with sex. I don't want a negative equality where no one is allowed to sexually appreciate anyone's body, that would be stupid.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 04:00 AM
3

Part of being a Dom is playing the fantasy role of being in extreme control over someone. If you ever peruse fetish websites, doms (both males and females) like to post pictures like this where they flaunt how much control they have over their partner, they express it in different ways, this particular one just happened to choose a really stupid route with the #StrongWoman thing. I don't know why the fuck so many BDSM people feel the need to post photos of themselves online with captions about h…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 03:53 AM
9

I don't know for sure but I have a pretty strong feeling that they do lifestyle BDSM and that she's his Dom and this is part of their play.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:15 AM
14

Don't worry too much about it, I'm 90% sure that she's his dom and this is just part of their BDSM lifestyle relationship. It's not my cup of tea but this has all the tell-tale signs of dom speech and is probably just their weird little fetish.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:14 AM
3

What really irks me is that they can only acknowledge Men's issues when they can shoehorn them into their social narrative, in which case they simply say that Men's issues are "just the patriarchy backfiring" and just brush them off without ever actually working to solve them, because they just assume that they'll magically be solved when they "smash the patriarchy". Normally this wouldn't bother me; after all, feminism is a woman's rights movement and has no obligation to solve men's issues. Ho…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:09 AM
2

It's because self-righteous ideologues can not survive without a punching bag to direct indignation towards. Male feminists are the easiest target of all because they are intellectually castrated, and often buy into the feminist dogma that a member of a Privileged™ group must have any of their opinions overruled by a member of an Oppressed™ group if they are disputed, without being allowed a chance to argue or disagree, even when they're defending themselves from criticisms or accusations. They …
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:35 AM
1

I hate that Dude Bro is an insult, and in this case directly associated with being a literal rapist. Fuck off, men are allowed to identify with their sex, being a bro is not a crime.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter