TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DoesNotTalkMuch Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by DoesNotTalkMuch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If she'd gone straight to the cops in the morning, they could have tested her for date rape drugs. If she didn't blame herself for getting raped, or if she didn't think that being taken advantage of was fair play on the part of the rapist (like what it says in the article), then she probably would have done that. But yeah, this is completely the wrong subreddit. This is an article about how feminism could address date rape for women. It's taking shots at some opinions I've heard here, but those …
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:04 PM
1

I don't remember the name "Albert Ellis", but according to the wikipedia article he's one of the big early developers of a form of cognitive behavioral therapy, which is what I generally preach to addicts and people suffering anxiety and depression (The Big Book is useless to anybody who didn't grow up being told that it was important.) I'm sure the lookout society still has some of my CBT books lying around.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:16 PM
1

Do you have any clue at all about what you've done with your brand of activism? My brand of activism helped me personally assist hundreds of men (and dozens of women) get through the toughest times of their life, as a volunteer at the lookout society and pontiac rescue mission. I think you'll find, if you start looking for ways to be a positive influence rather than conjuring up a conspiracy to blame for all the world's problems, that you'd be able to do a lot more good yourself. Injustice is ca…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:31 AM
1

I think your focus on feminism, rather than supporting men who have problems, is self-destructive. To begin with, you've defined feminism as something fundamentally negative, despite admitting that many feminists have openly declared benign goals. You've defined an ideology as something fundamentally negative, and you have adamantly stated a refusal to accept making an effort or accepting their effort to define themselves by more benign goals (like gender neutral societal roles and encouraging w…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 07:16 PM
2

I don't need to go to /r/askfeministsto know that "Rape Culture" is a fictional construct meant to leverage the public narrative. You might need to go there to learn why others don't think the same way. Some people are defining the word differently, and others simply have different experiences than you. Most MRA's believe that modern culture discourages people from reporting rape. I don't agree with Prof. Fiamengo views in their entirety, but I do agree with her positions on Men's Rights. Unless…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 03:35 AM
0

I'm not going to defend feminism here, because this is a men's rights forum and defending feminism is not what it's for, but I WILL say that you're misunderstanding the concepts of rape culture and patriarchy from pretty much anywhere I've seen the terms used. If you're genuinely interested in that discussion, you should hit up r/askfeminists, but rather than asking questions look at the ones that were already asked about it. There are also comments on what self-declared feminists think of this …
/r/MensRights21/04/14 01:58 AM
1

Ah, I actually rewrote most of that comment. (regarding wage gaps, patriarchy, and rape culture, all of those things can be considered to exist or not exist depending on how you're defining them. I also disagree with you on the current level of extremism in modern feminism, but I'm not willing to debate that it's far too subjective) Regarding her views on minorities, she's primarily opposed to muslims, but she has roughly the same opinion on all group rights or privileges designed to compensate …
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:49 PM
-4

The existence of extremism does not mandate all ideologies being defined by their extremes. That's just bigotry, and Janice Fiamengo's entire career is based on it. I don't think feminism should be demonlished just because some feminists don't support men's rights, and I don't think muslims shouldn't have heritage festivals just because islamic terrorism exists. I don't think that the MensRights subreddit should be banned because some angry, marginalized members have made threats in the past. I …
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:39 PM
-11

I know that most of reddit is painting the crowd's actions here as misandry, but this woman's support for Men's Rights is heavily dependent on her opposition to feminism and all dedicated support for women and minorities. It's not necessary to cut other people down in order to stand up. And if you support Men's Rights, there are probably better people to stand behind than Janice Fiamengo.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:23 PM
1

Nevertheless your arguments are still projecting sexist attitudes onto divorce courts from other cultural areas of gender-based disparity!
/r/MensRights13/08/12 10:18 PM
2

I appreciate that a lot of people here are offended for personal reasons, but could you stop downvoting me in my discussion with Teargarden? The thread was 12 hours old when it started, nobody was reading the board and it was practically a private discussion at the time. I was genuinely interested in what he has to say, and now instead of the reasoned argument that teargarden was giving me I'm getting vulger PM's and posts of "FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU" from third parties If you think there's s…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:20 PM
1

You're making a lot of assumptions in order to maintain your position, which should tell you enough. Have a nice day. I do think it's a bit irritating that you're projecting a bias on me in order to support your own bias. I did say it to begin with, I never really believed you were interested in discussing it rationally. But I'd like to point out, I never acted on that presumption by declaring you to be a waste of my time. I do not allow my assumptions to change the way I think logically or deal…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 08:45 PM
1

How does, in your mind, this: "Thus, instead of being just a member of a gay or lesbian campus organization, the applicant served as the elected treasurer for several semesters, managing the organization's financial operations." Become this: [...] by "open" I meant "openly advocating or expressing any form of sexuality" It doesn't. Gay rights differ from other forms of sexual advocacy due to the forms of discrimination they face. But people who aren't exposed to discrimination themselves (read: …
/r/MensRights07/10/11 08:25 PM
1

You are the one who is biased. I am not rationalizing or supporting anything, besides the idea that the study was flawed. I doubt you're interested in a rational argument, but I might as well clarify that by "open" I meant "openly advocating or expressing any form of sexuality"
/r/MensRights07/10/11 07:02 PM
1

The study is flawed. The resume associated them with an organization that fundamentally attached itself to expressed human sexuality. Employers who oppose open sexuality, regardless of orientation, would be lumped in with those who only oppose open homosexuality. Maybe they'd reason that a sexually "liberated" person would be too open, making others uncomfortable in conversation. A person with that sort of reasoning wouldn't want to hire a volunteer "gay rights" organization manager, but they wo…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 06:48 PM
1

From what I understand, she was found to have physical damage inconsistent with consensual sex. Although the recent information may result in him winning the case regardless.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 10:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter