TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dolled-To-Death Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by Dolled-To-Death on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The post isn't asking about what it means to be a man or what is best for men in regards to other men. Its asking women about a topic involving women. So women can't understand men, women can't understand whats best for men, women can't give advice when asked because its wrong at all times, and women cant comment on how to approach women based on their experiences as women? So what exactly ARE women capable of understanding?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 09:06 PM
1

Which isn't even female exclusionary, women aren't excluded from giving redpill advice, in fact the first source I ever got redpill advice from was a woman and I didn't even know what redpill until years later. The problem is most women are gonna give very bad blue pill advice, (like tell you to be neutral and benign around women) So the female perspective at large is wrong but women are free to be included if they tell these guys what they want them to tell them. Everything you're saying is tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 09:47 AM
4

If it was better for women they would want it more no? This is what I was referring to. Women do want it. Women want and enjoy sex regularly. Redpill is based on just who is getting the sex and why as well as if wider cultural awareness of OPs point is raising the bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 03:49 AM
3

The sex is happening. Its just not happening with them. Thats why they're complaining. ​ I guess women have to find a man who's worth it... that washes his dick ... and got vasectomy Its things like this that cause the disconnect. They're complaining about misleading and unrealistic standards. This is equally as hyperbolic in my opinion. Most grown adult men are washing their dicks. That doesn't get you any points in the dating world. However, most grown men are not looking to have sterilization…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 03:35 AM
6

Women still have and enjoy sex, though. Its just on their terms to maximize their personal experience. The basis of redpill wouldn't exist if women weren't having sex at all because there would be no point. I don't think the post is factually inaccurate. I just think it isn't an argument for redpills complaints being unreasonable. I think OP kind of looked at a bunch of dudes complaining about how hard it is to get with women and said "duh, no shit".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 03:19 AM
0

Your previous response: How is being alpha or redpilled "female exclusionary". Your current response: A perspective that is predominately male without any bullshit or sugar coating of truths. So which is it? ​ Title literally says dating. He didn't ask how to be friends with women. Guys don't want or need advice on how to be friends with women ffs, get real. The title says dating and the post explains where he is as far as getting there. He's starting at zero. A 600lb person can make a post aski…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 03:07 AM
10

Therefore the redpill complaint about not getting sex easily is unreasonable. Your entire post is contingent on the sex actually happening, though. Even if you're right about your points, how would that matter to someone who can't even get that far? If anything, your logic is an odd validation for women being even more selective with their sex partners. So the sex won't be enjoyable, I have to exhaust myself just to get pleasure, I'm risking pregnancy, I'm risking disrupting my bodily functions,…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 02:23 AM
-1

Most men who follow the redpilled and alpha ideology are in fact socially awkward. Thats how they ended up following it. The dudes who follow Andrew Tate are not dudes just like him. They're dudes who WISH they were just like him and are hoping to learn from him how to become that way. ​ If a guy fits the definition of being an alpha male they are by definition not female exclusionary since that is defined as the male who attracts females. If a man were actually "alpha", he wouldn't be self iden…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 01:28 AM
-1

Avoid associating yourself with "women repelling" habits, ideologies, groups, or actions. Social media and the impact of the transparency it provides to cultural faux pas is massive. Men have traditionally bemoaned not being able to interpret women or know what would be a huge misstep when trying to attract them. We now have tons of women in the active dating market actively discussing these things to the point where its almost mind blowing how many men will ignore it and proceed to paint themse…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 11:40 PM
4

I prefer to date people who are college educated in the sense that they have gone beyond a mandatory education in some way. By "college educated", I don't mean having a degree. I personally gravitate towards people who have shown drive and initiative in their future. College tends to be a very formative experience for many people and I personally tend to find a huge difference in the social outlooks of men in particular who have some sense of post high school education or specialized (non labor …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 01:03 AM
2

You know what else is an established trope that gained massive public awareness in the 80s? Girls having gay male best friends who uplift them and hype them up. In fact, I'm pretty sure the term "fag hag" was around even in the 70s. So again, how is it any less probable that this is a gay dude who gets railed nightly and chose to give a pity day of pampering to his hopeless female bestie who can't pull a man to save her life? Its not. We're making shit up about strangers. Thats your issue. Lots …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 09:51 AM
4

I've never had a problem with it but sure, theres always the possibility that I'm missing some nuance. Why don't you do me the favor of explaining it then?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 11:27 PM
6

She makes a post talking about a friend who did something nice for her while she was feeling bad about herself. She then clarifies that the man in the image is not her boyfriend by adding a hashtag saying shes still single. The caption doesn't change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:58 PM
12

You don't have any objective evidence. You're making a fanfic using existing characters from an image and writing a new story based on zero information other than their genders. You can do that with literally any image ever made if you wanted to. It doesn't prove anything about their relationship dynamic. It just means you have an active imagination and a knack for fictional character development based on already existing opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:31 PM
12

Yes, people who want their perspectives confirmed tend to make assumptions about things based on what makes them feel right. You personally feeling something does not make it more likely. Something doesn't become how "reality works" because it confirms your bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:08 PM
14

Maybe he's getting railed by hot guys while she's sexless. I wouldn't know. They're strangers to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:00 PM
19

If this were a picture of two bros or two gal pals, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Friends treat friends well and sometimes go out of their way to cater to them. Nothing about this snapshot of these two peoples lives says that the guy is doing this to sleep with her or that she's keeping him around for the sake of leading him on. Viewing every single interaction between men and women as a commentary on gender politics and sexual inequality is the actual issue here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 07:01 PM
2

What makes it untrue or offensive? Your post presents as an idea that you have and you repeatedly use the word "maybe" which implies that you're just throwing out a possibility. In that case, how is it that something that contradicts your opinion definitively untrue to the point of being offensive?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 05:51 PM
2

The study that you're referencing concludes with the statement that these initial findings are then immediately and greatly altered by life experience and developed perception. It doesn't make attraction objective and even asserts that the findings have no provable impact on perception of attractive features later in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 05:46 PM
3

Attraction isn't objective, though? It is entirely subjective, nuanced, and dependent on the individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 05:02 PM
3

And the desperate ladies will commit to it and think they're the one who can "fix it" if they put in enough work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 12:53 AM
8

This is kind of like an old model incel post with high mileage and a girl boss paint job on it. The tires need replacing and the brakes need work but someone desperate is going to buy it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 12:36 AM
6

Did you forget that lesbians existed or did you just want them to not be part of your argument because that would ruin things?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 11:55 PM
22

The first thing to note is that the probability of contracting an STD rises exponentially the more sex partners that are involved in the network. Without further information, how do you know that the number of partners in the network are due to the woman? The data doesn't seem to go into the situations that lead to this in particular. The opposite logic could also assume that the women were in a relationship and their partner chose to seek sex elsewhere and bring the diseases home. With as much …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 11:46 PM
17

Wait, did I miss the part of the data that mentioned single mothers?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 11:17 PM
13

And yet you admit elsewhere on this thread that you feel like your fear of approaching women in the way this guy did is more valid than their fear of being raped. Thats the main issue. You're coming across as downplaying and invalidating because you're basing your perception of if something is irrational or not based on your own feelings. So whats the worst case scenario as a male of approaching a woman in this way and how is the outcome worse than rape? Is that outcome more likely than being ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 01:51 AM
15

Irrationality is fine if lots of people succumb to it? No, just that social norms exist and not following them makes you seem "abnormal" which leads to unfortunate social consequences. Being unaware of social norms or choosing to ignore them will lead to situations where you are viewed in certain ways. Pretending to not understand how social norms work only when in relation to approaching women is disingenuous. A team coworker approaching you to inform you that they are stepping away for a momen…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 12:37 AM
32

Ok, but I live in an area where the crime rate is low and still lock my home and car doors. Also the odds of being attacked by a shark are less than one in a million yet most people would admit that a major fear of theirs is having a Jaws moment at the beach. You're calling people irrational because they're being considerate and cautious of something that has a chance of being dangerous and causing them extreme harm because "what are the odds". Then again, maybe the person who recently stated th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 11:24 PM
28

So your "truth" is that men cant be trusted around women whatsoever and that all women should be on alert that every male interaction they have is predatory and suspicious? You think that painting all men with the label of untrustworthy predators is worth it as long as you get to justify your need to isolate a woman in order to feel secure in your relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 12:09 AM
52

Men: "Why do women claim all men are preying on them and see them as nothing more than grunting Neanderthals only viewing them as sex objects? Why can't they trust us? Women always jump to the worst conclusions!" OP: "Men are traitors who will take any chance to screw your girlfriend because they're not capable of platonic feelings towards women because vaginas! Allowing your woman around men makes her prey! They will manipulate her to use her for sex because thats all we think about when we see…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 11:51 PM
5

Yeah, of course. Different needs exist. Not all personal "needs" are comparable though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 06:55 AM
–

Ok I laughed at this more than I should have. Take your upvote, you bastard!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 06:02 AM
–

I sure did. A job is a job. I'm open to hearing your logic to why its different in this context, though. Because you find one valid and the other not?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 05:48 AM
–

I know nothing about her or her cuntiness. My points are only in regards to OPs point and comparison. She could be a shit person in general. My comments just relate to this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 05:41 AM
–

Lots of people talk shit about their jobs but still work there. Is a McDonalds worker a hypocrite for calling it a lousy job while turning up every day? Lots of veterans talk shit about the military after retiring and yet they still collect their benefits. Its her work to profit from regardless of how she feels about it or the industry now. Lots of musicians hate their biggest hit song but still accept residuals. Its not something that needs to be mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 05:24 AM
–

Sometimes people choose careers and suffer the consequences of the negative aspects of that career. Do we not empathize with soldiers with PTSD if it was their choice to enlist? Do we not empathize with doctors who shed tears over patients they've lost? Long time manual laborers who develop back pain and spinal injuries? Why is it problematic to show support to her after she suffered consequences from her choice of work but not others? Its not really a deep metaphor for anything. Its a retired p…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 04:15 AM
10

"Valid" and "just as important as" are not the same thing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 02:32 AM
10

If you're comparing the need for food and water to the need for a relationship, you've got a really skewed concept of the importance of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 01:56 AM
27

I have never approached an average-ugly or obese man and had him decline my advances but I have had an average-ugly obese man approach me, get declined by me, and then tell me I was making a huge mistake because he owned a rolex and my fake boobs looked cheap. How people express their personal overconfidence in their own value differs from person to person. Its not always a "women post pretty pics" issue that determines peoples perspectives. People let their personal views shape their perspectiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 11:30 PM
14

Theres your dilemma. You don't find women who share your interests attractive, but the women you're attracted to don't share your interests. You either hold out for a unicorn that happens to be both or you shrug your shoulders and pick your poison. Looks like OP made his choice and isn't too pleased about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 04:00 AM
7

Yeah, honestly it just kind of sounds like a messy relationship that OP is unhappy with and wanted to vent to reddit over in the form of a debate topic. I don't really think overall this was about women, men, or compromising. Led to a great discussion, though. I enjoyed seeing your point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 03:52 AM
4

They both compromised. He says she's done things he wanted to do but complained about it to him. He says he's done things she wanted to do and he chose to pretend it was ok and complain to reddit instead. They don't share the same interests and are miserable doing what the other person likes. Yet for some reason OP expects her to not only agree to participate in all of his hobbies but also feel genuinely enthusiastic and empowered by them while he grits his teeth through hers. ​ Define the lines…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 03:31 AM
3

Based on how you portray yourself here, your issues clearly aren't of the physical variety. Fixating on the physical aspect is clearly a comfort to you and thats probably why you won't let it go. I wish you well, but theres nothing anyone here can tell you that will resonate deeper than what you've been repeating to yourself for a while now.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 03:03 AM
5

Yes, he is compromising out of fear because they're not compatible and he knows it but is desperate enough to pretend just to keep her around. You're right, she's not. Why should she? She's being genuine about who she is. He isn't. Thats a choice he made and not her fault. Ok, so you think a true relationship is about always agreeing to what your partner asks of you? You have no limits to what you'd agree to do in regards to a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 02:52 AM
15

If you're into ultra feminine gender stereotypical women, then you should be prepared for that. If you want a woman who loves shopping, makeup, and high heels then thats what you get. Don't then expect her to kick her heels off and put on combat boots when you want to bond over shooting. Thats not who she is. If you find women being interested in these things as a sign of masculinity and a turn off, then why attempt to engage in these activities with them? You find G.I. Jane over there too manis…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 02:48 AM
6

Sure, if the interest is actually genuine. In OPs case, neither of them are interested in what the other finds important but he is choosing to do it anyway out of fear of rejection. I have a well documented fear and dislike of bugs. Everyone in my life knows this about me almost immediately. If I were in a relationship with someone and they had the idea of going out to a butterfly garden because it seemed cool and "chicks love butterflies, right?", I'd look at them like they were insane. Comprom…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 02:28 AM
34

Maybe start dating people who you actually share things in common with instead of trying to convince them to gain interests in things you want them to like? Or start dating women who actually have hobbies and lifestyles you enjoy? You're dating people you aren't compatible with. These aren't compromises. These are examples of someone saying "no" to you and you getting annoyed by it. If guns are an important hobby for you, then you should be well aware if your potential partner is opposed or put …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 11:35 PM
4

I see a problem with it because it is at the detriment of others. Your goal could have been achieved without collateral damage by simply asking if women find those features attractive. Thats not what you did. You made a post where you list numerous features that you find unattractive in an attempt to get people to agree with you and build you up while tearing others down. Thats not cool. The reality is that you aren't really tired of anything and aren't overall negatively impacted in the way you…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 08:04 PM
4

Oh ok. I kind of read this entire post as a weird attempt at self affirmation now considering your history. You refer to yourself very often as beautiful, admit to attempting to lose weight, and also now show that the very features you claim are a burden to you in your OP are actually ones you value very much. Looks like you made a post hoping people would flood you with comments disagreeing so that you could soak up roundabout compliments and assurances about your current features because you n…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 07:06 PM
3

So by your logic you can just cut your hair, gain weight, and stop shaving if you want to attract women? So basically you're actively repelling women by choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 06:43 PM
7

Its a male vs. female gaze issue. Men choosing to do something they think women will like is often not relate to what women actually like. Thats why we have men continuing to fill their dating profiles with pictures of them holding up dead fish thinking its appealing even when women have widely admitted they find it a turn off. Also note the continued issue of "dic pics". What men think is appealing to women does not always align with what actually is. You're asking why the vast majority of a si…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 04:24 PM
11

Sorry to tell you, but the members of BTS can pull pussy just as quickly as any of the male action heroes in a Marvel movie. "Masculine" vs. "feminine" has always been obscure and generally defined by individuals and personal opinion. Also, I really don't want to glaze over the part where you asserted obesity as a hallmark indicator of masculinity?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 03:06 PM
7

Thats not what they mean by "nice guys". Thats why its almost always written in quotes or said sarcastically. The "nice guy" concept is about douchebags who do seemingly nice things for the sake of gaining something and believe they're superior for it. Thats the joke. They're not actually nice and its obvious because people are rarely able to maintain the fake persona for very long. The trend of "nice guy" content actually praises genuine acts of kindness and friendship from men as appreciated w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:39 PM
6

I don't expect anything in regards to being taken seriously. Its a debate forum. I expect that people will have contrasting opinions and explain their thought process. You asked for an equivalent and I gave you what I consider an equivalent as far as toxic online rhetoric that continues to propagate. You're free to either explain why its not an equivalency in your opinion or you're free to just call me disconnected from reality because you disagree. You're either here to engage with perspectives…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 09:15 AM
4

Yeah, hashtags that bully people over physical traits exist for everyone. There are no more trending videos about short men as there are about women with larger labia. People are assholes and they make fun of dumb shit for no reason. When there becomes multiple mainstream incidents of women mass murdering and attacking men based on the hashtag, then it will be deemed an actual threat. Until then, its a dumb hashtag. Just like incel forums and content hubs were perfectly fine on mainstream sites …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 03:45 AM
6

So you think there are no misogynistic videos on any online platform because they all get removed? You think there are zero forums available for any type of widely socially unacceptable way of thinking? Are there not men who have turned preaching misogyny into multimillion dollar brands?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 02:49 AM
1

You didn't, actually. I fixed it. Sorry about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 01:56 AM
1

Thats not the question they asked or the context they asked it with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 01:52 AM
7

so to try to use them as a monolith to deflect an entire issue is insane Your entire question is based on a single video of a single woman who had some random people agree with her, though. How is it different? This is not new or revolutionary. Every single type of bullshit rhetoric spouted by anyone at any point in history will have some people who agree with it. No bigotry is acceptable and all bigotry has people who find it ok. There is no difference between misandry, racism, misogyny, or any…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 01:47 AM
–

Hugh Hefner? The 5'9" scrawny built dude with the nose who took up half his face and the dumbo ears? You think he was a chad? Dude...he was a dork who made it big off a nudie mag. Also, he wouldnt even apply to what you said even if he was a traditional chad. He was twice divorced with multiple children, fame, money, and a massive social circle including employees. Both other examples are also very wealthy men with multiple marriages and children. Sumner literally had grandchildren. Naming a bun…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 12:15 AM
–

Sounds like you have it all figured out then. Congrats. Great talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 11:51 PM
2

Ok and this is relevant because???? You said that it isn't accessible, I'm just showing you that yes, it's acessible and FAR less expensive than marriage and even dating in the long run. Because your train of thought is that average people would choose that option over anything else to the point where it would have an overall global impact. That doesn't mesh with average human behavior patterns. Your claim would be that the average person would see these bots as a better long term investment tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 03:05 PM
3

No, we both don't know that. You think that because of your personal worldview. The average person has relationships and companions. Also, no. A rich old chad would have friends, collogues, children, and a lifetime of companions for support as well as his wealth. Can you name some rich old chads in the twilight of his life who only have a 20-something year old girlfriend as his support system? You make it seem like thats a common thing that exists. Either way, it still wouldnt be comparable to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 02:45 PM
2

Sure, I guess. If thats what someone is looking for, then this would be a game changer for them. As a nurse, I just imagine the endgame of this where a 78 year old man is wandering aimlessly around his dilapidated home alone in the grips of dementia as his Megan Fox robot skips around behind him trying to suck his dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 12:59 PM
1

Married folks keeping the spark alive currently aren't typically buying realistic sex dolls that already exist for 5k. A fancy new lube, lacy negligee, and fuzzy handcuffs as an expense here or there isn't comparable to that type of investment or functional use. People talking about paying to keep the spark alive are more likely talking about investing in a romantic date night, not hiring his and hers hookers every month. Your 10% stat also assumes that women buy iphones more often because of st…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 12:45 PM
3

Its not a significant enough market to influence the impact of such a development on the global market, though. Not every person who is unpartnered is an incel and even still among those who actually are incels would be the smaller number who would find this a worthy option. Kind of like crypto. Everyone has heard of it, some people see it as a dream come true, some hate it, others don't care but at the end of the day we still have normal currency and not much otherwise has changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 03:23 AM
2

No, I agree that it wouldn't be the world as we know it now. I just don't think it would majorly positively or negatively impact anything. I just think it would be the same number of positives and hangups as currently. New problems come as old ones are solved. You know, its the whole curse of the lottery winners thing. Everyone thinks they know the one thing that would make their lives perfect but then once they get it they still end up with a whole host of new problems. Potentially flawless and…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 03:01 AM
5

The company sells these synth for an entry price of $5000 with prices increasing for highly desired traits. So something not easily attainable for the average person with a higher barrier for entry for the most desirable versions except for those privileged enough to be in the position to get them? Not much different from what most guys here already complain about with dating normally. Nothing would really change. People would only want the highest end versions they could get because of status a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 01:03 AM
13

Not really. From her dating profile you know she's looking to date or at least open to it. Standard profiles will tell you her age, location, marital status, orientation, what types of relationship she's looking for, etc. That is a lot of info you don't have about a woman just working out at the gym. Thats why cold approaches in real life are not the same as a one off message on an app. Approaching people in real life in the same way you would on Tinder is a pretty easy way to have some of the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 02:19 PM
2

My brain still labels my childhood friends as relatives regardless of gender even though some of them have grown up to be attractive adults. Thats the point. We can label people for particular roles in our lives based on already established views of them regardless of developing an attraction. The same "no, she's family" switch that turns on in your brain can also exist for "no, thats my friend". Also not growing up with someone doesn't mean you don't establish emotional bonds stronger than phys…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 12:38 AM
6

You're implying that romantic attraction, physical attraction, and sexual attraction are the same thing. They aren't. Those are not exclusively biological boundaries. By that logic, a male would have no problem making a move on an adopted baby sister that he was raised with. Also by that logic on a darker note, a male with an adopted daughter would also have zero hangups in regards to boundaries if she were physically attractive. Your logic is reducing men to nothing more than grunting cavemen w…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 12:06 AM
14

No, it doesn't. It takes more than fleeting awareness of something to make anything different. Do you think that finding someone physically appealing automatically turns them into a sexual partner in your mind by default regardless of any other already socially constructed boundaries? In that case, can a male not have a close familial relationship with a sister or cousin if he thinks she's hot? No, theres mental boundaries that go up that prevent that train of thought from going further. Most fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 10:02 PM
11

It is possible to find someone physically/sexually attractive from a perspective without allowing actual sex with them to factor into things. I can find my male friends very physically attractive but know that I have zero interest in sleeping with them. The presence of an awareness of physical attraction doesn't otherwise impact a current status of a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 09:19 PM
–

I think thats the difference here. It isn't "I don't personally date that way" its actually "dating that way is bad because...". Its not about not dating single moms. Its about single moms being a bad option for absolutely everyone. In that case, we're viewing the relationship with suspicion and confusion but not the individuals in particular. The 40 year old man would be viewed oddly in the context of that relationship but he's still just a 40 year old man dating. A single mother would be judge…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 03:38 PM
–

Thats essentially the very premise of OPs question. It isn't just the personal stance of not being interested in single moms. It goes beyond that. Not wanting to date a single parent is fine regardless of gender. We're now at the point where people are not only talking about single moms, but also judging the men who date them. "I don't date single moms" works for your stance but "Men who date single moms are low value simping morons" does not. You mention not dating men so you don't talk about t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 01:14 PM
3

Why though? For fun? I mean, I hate bugs. Really hate them. I think they're gross, I've seen research on how many diseases they carry, and I genuinely don't understand why anyone would view them as anything other than a pest to be stomped on. Ecosystem blah blah...idgaf. Still, I don't find the need to go to the reddit pages about pet spiders or beetles and try to instigate debates with these bug hugging weirdos about why I think they're out of their minds. Its not my thing. I don't seek it out …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:06 PM
5

This is what I find the most odd. Why respond? Wouldn't this question not apply to you whatsoever then? Ok, so you don't want a girlfriend because you're enlightened, know the truth, etc. Fine. Then why interact with a post like this? I don't get it. I constantly see dudes on here who claim they're dethatched from the thought of relationships and women but still insert themselves into the conversations just to remind everyone of how uninvolved they are. Why? Its like MGTOW dudes who just talk ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 08:54 PM
17

Why does it automatically show bad judgement and why is it considered a "second chance"? Its just a different relationship. A second chance at what? Dating a man? I don't think its a PC no no opinion until it becomes gendered. Why is the assumption that its men who don't want to play dad and not people in general not wanting to play parent? I'm generally curious why a single mom is stigmatized but a single dad is praised? Are we also blessing the women who date dudes paying child support or who …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter