TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DomMaster88 Archive

View 3 posts and 143 comments by DomMaster88 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

No it doesn't. We can make generalities about human nature without saying all women are exactly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:49 PM
3

You didn't give a criticism. You threw out a meaningless buzz word, and couldn't give an example of misogyny. I'm done with you. You either lack intelligence or the ability to argue in good faith. Later.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:52 PM
2

Start with a criticism of Red Pill ideology. What specifically is it misogynistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:43 PM
4

If you expect to have a serious conversation, why don't you say something *specific* you disagree with, and why you disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:35 PM
6

Why are you a blue pill man? What about Red Pill do you reject?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:10 PM
1

Good bye hag.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:34 PM
1

Young, beautiful women don't act like you. Good bye hag.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:32 PM
1

I would fuck most women. But I wouldn't even fuck you, unless I literally gagged you with a bag over your face. It's insane that you can think you're just unlucky, with such a repulsive masculine personality. No self-respecting man in the world would actually put up with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:29 PM
1

Feminine women don't act like you. You would be a terror to have as a wife. Only a timid man would put up with you. But you would hate him. You're a mess.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:24 PM
1

Most men will exclude you based on looks/ age. EVERY man will exclude you based on your personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:23 PM
1

You are a poster child for what happens when women ignore Red Pill. Whatever the bad men did to you when you were a child... It's unfortunate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:22 PM
1

I really want to know your age. And more about why you're bitter. It has to be more stuff from your childhood or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:17 PM
1

DM me I need to ask you something.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:14 PM
1

Enjoy sleeping alone!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:12 PM
1

Post a face pic on r/truerateme. They will tell you what they think about old women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:08 PM
1

Undefeated: Your delusion that old, argumentative women can still find the man of her dreams.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:07 PM
1

All men evolved such that we are attracted to signs of fertility. The humans who pursued youthful women passed on their genes. The humans who pursued old, wrinkled women died off. Evolution is why you are ugly to the majority of men. It is in our nature to avoid you. You are a waste of our time and resources that can be better invested in fertile women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:04 PM
1

There are no men that you want. And/or if there are men that you want, they don't want you. Because you are old and infertile. But mostly because you are argumentative and annoying to live with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:01 PM
1

It doesn't matter what I think of you. What matters is, what the men you want think about you. Men evolved to identify fertile women. Just based on the wrinkles on your face, we can identify that you are ugly and infertile. You provide no value to us. That's why you're single.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:59 AM
1

If you could put your brain today, into your 18 yr old body, I promise things would be better for you. You just didn't have the right guidance when your value was high. You wasted those precious years on the wrong men. Now it's too late.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:53 AM
1

Exactly. At 40+, your value is gone. The game is over. Black Pill time!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:52 AM
1

Implicit in my argument was, single and looking women are single because the men they want, don't want them in return. And yes, I proved my argument correct. Women's standards are so narrow, there are simply no attractive men out there. There are no men that they want. And if there was a man they wanted, that man doesn't want them in return. Thus, single.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:48 AM
1

Btw, I can actually explain why you're single to you. I've been thinking about it. Men evolved to see the world as a 3rd person object. We must go out into the world, create value, and find women aged 18-35 to reproduce with. Our mindset is external; we adapt to the world around us. Women evolved to see the world as a 1st person subject. You don't have to go out into the world; just based on your fertility, men naturally want to come to you. Thus, you are an expert at vetting the men; how do the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:42 AM
1

No, I already won the debate. You conceded that you can't broaden your standards, so you are choosing to stay single or hope to get lucky. I was mainly asking for curiosity's sake. It's rare to find a woman as bitter as you under 40 (because there is still hope). But you seem too energetic to be past 50. So I'm guessing somewhere in that range. But you also alluded to being a lesbian, and I don't know much about that dating culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:24 AM
1

Btw, how old are you and are you straight?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:20 AM
1

Yep. If I thought every woman in the universe was ugly, I would take the black pill. Luckily, I don't have the same curse as you. I'm willing to compromise on my preferences. I don't expect everything to be perfect all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:09 AM
1

That's where the black pill comes. If you want what you can't have, and can't change what you want... There is no hope. Don't even delude yourself about being unlucky. I promise it's a combination of your age, looks, AND personality that is keeping you single.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:06 AM
1

What you need to change about yourself: Your mentality. You are too focused on your top job. Change your mentality to accept job #2. If you aren't attracted to anyone in the world, whatever. You will be single forever. Time to take the Black Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:59 AM
8

The reality is, they can probably connect with 100 of those men on apps. They'll go on a few dates, have sex... But it just won't "work out." "He isn't looking for anything serious right now." So she tries again with the next, and the cycle continues until she turns 30+.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:57 AM
1

The reason the Red Pill is attractive among men is because self-improvement is a viable strategy for men. You can be 18 and unattractive, but go the gym, get a high-paying job, and actually have more success with age. Whereas for women, blackpill is pretty much the only option past 40, because your value is so intimately tied with age. Women have so much value age 18-29, but once it's gone, there is little self-improvement you can do. Blackpill is accepting the reality that you probably won't be…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:52 AM
1

If I don't get my top job, I have two options. Either stay unemployed (single) or pursue a less desirable job (lower standards). Even if the world is unjust and I have no power to self-improve, I would change my mindset and accept the fact that my 2nd top job is the best I can get. In a pragmatic world, sometimes you have to choose between less than ideal options. You have the mentality that you deserve your top job. And it's unjust or unlucky that you don't get it. Whereas a pragmatist would pi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:48 AM
1

My question has nothing to do with the just world hypothesis. It's about making choices. You have a choice between staying single (which is maybe bad), broadening your standards however that is defined (which is bad), or staying the same and hoping to be more lucky. Do you think there is anything about yourself that you would change? Or are you just hoping to be more lucky?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:32 AM
1

I believe, in general, most people act in their self interest. I believe if I want something, but am unable to get it, I'm the problem and need to fix something about myself. Do you agree that in the age of the internet, you probably have 1000x more options than women in the caveman era? How much personal responsibility do you take for the fact that you are single? Do you believe that you need to change anything about yourself, or do you just blame men for not being good enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:19 AM
2

I get what you're saying. There is not a perfect overlap between men who are universally desired and those who are not. And, it's possible for you to have specific standards, while still including men who are objectively shorter and less attractive. You have "specific" standards in the sense that you are picky, among a group of men who are objectively less attractive to most women. But here's the bottom line. It doesn't matter whether your standards are "high" or "low." If you have thousands of …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:08 AM
2

To be honest, it's probably time for you to disengage. If you were younger and more beautiful, you probably wouldn't have this problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:01 AM
1

You're saying you have trouble finding people you are compatible with. That's another way of saying, because you're standards are high. Fine, you have a right to have high standards... But if you're not able to meet someone that you find attractive and compatible... well... 1) Stay single forever. 2) Wait for someone you find attractive. Most likely, other women will want him too. 3) Lower your standards. That's it. If you have hundreds of matches on apps, but can't find anyone good enough... Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:42 AM
2

56% of women can't find men who meet their standards. What is your explanation for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:32 AM
2

Okay. I just defended my argument with your facts. 56% of women are single because they can't find men who meet their standards. There are two explanations. Either there are 0 men in their location who meet their standards. If so, they will be single for life. Or, none of the men who meet their standards want them back. If you have a better explanation, let me know.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:23 AM
2

My question was, why are women who are single, and looking, still single. 56% of women say it's difficult for them to find someone who meets their standards. Does that mean literally nobody in their city meets their standards? Or does it mean, out of the thousands of men who meet their standards... 0% of those men want them back. What is your personal reason that you are single?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:19 AM
-1

Lmao. Dm me a pic of your profile. I'll let you know what the problem is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:57 AM
6

Lmao. If the guy you wanted, wanted you back, you wouldn't be single. There's a reason some men have hundreds of matches. Hundreds of women all find him attractive. You don't have an argument because there is no other explanation. If you're over 30 and single, you are past your prime. The top tier men are not going to want you. If the man you want is objectively attractive, he will have better options than you. At this point, your choice is to settle for a man in your league, or stay single.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:51 AM
5

What is your argument? My argument is, the reason women are single is because the man they want, doesn't want them. What's your explanation for why single women are single but looking?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:41 AM
4

There is overwhelming proof that some men have tons of matches on dating apps, while most men have very few options. If the guy you want is attractive to other women... he is going to have other options. Most women prefer 6 6 6 men. They are extremely rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:28 AM
5

True. The choice for average women is to date an average man or stay single. The vast majority of women are all chasing the same men. They can't all get top men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:23 AM
8

Exactly. If a girl can't find a good man on a dating app, it either means they don't qualify for the man they want (their standards are too high), or they pick the wrong men (they ignore red flags and blame the man afterwards).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:08 AM
10

Ya. That's why there's no point marrying women who have such extraordinary standards. They'll get divorced for extremely superficial reasons. There are lots of attractive men who don't become Red Pilled until after their 1st divorce. If her personality is trash, she isn't worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:58 AM
9

I mean, she isn't fat or obese, so that puts her ahead of most women. But she is nothing special. Maybe a 5.5-6. A top-tier guy (6ft+ 6 figures and 6 pack) would consider her cute, and fuckable... But he's going to have much better options than her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:52 AM
4

This is exactly true. Most men, including attractive men, will swipe on >50% of profiles. The difference is, if you're an attractive girl, they'll say they're interested in a relationship. If you aren't their type, they'll say they're just interested in sex. Most women let all of their matches with attractive men go to their head. But they aren't real "options." All women have tons of "options"... But at the end of the day, they aren't the "options" that they actually want. Unless you're a top 1…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:49 AM
22

Women are allowed to be delusional in their 20s. They don't realize until they are 30+ and single how many solid men they rejected for superficial reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:44 AM
17

Realistically speaking, the woman on TikTok is a very average looking girl. We could get a room full of 100 women, and she wouldn't stand out. She is "icked" out by an average guy... Most women don't find out until they are 30+ that an average guy is probably in their league.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:41 AM
7

This is sort of the point. Attractive women and ugly women receive almost the same number of matches. However, when men match with attractive women, they say they are open to a relationship. When they match with ugly women, they say they just want sex. All women have tons of "options" on dating apps. But they aren't real options. If you're an average looking girl, an above average guy likely just swiped for sex. At the end of the day, there aren't enough 6 ft 6 pack 6 figure men to go around. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:39 AM
35

Ya, this is why you should ignore women's advice. She is describing her frustrations dealing with men she is attracted to. Not men that she would ignore. Bottom line: your personality should not be an asshole. You should be kind, funny, charismatic... but unavailable. You can't always immediately text back. Place your time above her. Place yourself above her. You're the prize, she chases you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 06:42 AM
2

You're close, but not quite there. In order to get women, you should be nice to them. You should flatter them. You should smile, to show that you are safe and not a threat. However, you can't be too needy. You should be busy with so many other things in life, you are emotionally unavailable. So, it's a big mistake to act "aggressive" around women. It will just scare them off. You want to be nice, flatter, kind. But just don't simp. Wait for them to chase you. Give them some attention, but don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 06:35 AM
4

I hear you. If a woman is already beautiful, already places her man above her, already doesn't argue or compete for control... sure, adding some mystery will trigger some attraction. I was just saying, 90% of women can't even do the basics to keep a HVM. Many women believe they can be chubby, argumentative, but keep a guy by causing drama. I think your advice is fine, as long as you've mastered all the basics already.
/r/RedPillWomen04/08/24 01:03 AM
1

I wasn't giving my personal preference. I was saying, I've never heard a man complain, "my wife is beautiful, but just not challenging enough." I think you bring up a good point with Bezos. He dumped his attractive wife for more of a challenge, and that's fair. But he's also in a unique position as the wealthiest man in the world. 99.99% of men are not going to dump their attractive wife for more of challenge. It's probably a suicide mission if you aren't a billionaire, because challenging women…
/r/RedPillWomen04/08/24 12:46 AM
2

The advice you're giving is very good for how men should treat their wives. I've never heard a man complain about his wife being fun to be around, but predictable. I've heard them complain because their wife is fat, she disrespects him, ignores him, belittles him, or doesn't want to have sex with him. I've never heard a man complain "my wife loves me and we have great time together, I just wish she was more exciting and unpredictable." I'm not saying it's bad. But if you've done everything else …
/r/RedPillWomen04/08/24 12:32 AM
5

Sexually, a little. But not in terms of emotions/ intentions.
/r/RedPillWomen04/08/24 12:10 AM
8

You're confusing what girls find attractive in guys vs what guys find attractive in girls. You don't have to be mysterious.
/r/RedPillWomen04/08/24 12:06 AM
1

True, I hear you. But I guess, my overall point is, you have standards. So do men. Most men want kids. So, if you don't meet a man's standards... You shouldn't blame the man. Just try to find someone who also doesn't want kids.
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/24 09:33 PM
–

Why don't you give him a blowjob?
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/24 09:07 PM
0

A lot of women think like you. You want the perfect man, who meets all of your requirements. Let's say, he's in the top 1% of men. But it never once occurs to you, will this top 1% man have strict standards in return? It is a very standard that many men will want children - at least two or more. You want the man of your dreams, but you aren't willing to budge one inch to make yourself more desirable to this man. You want him to accept you exactly as you are. That is why you're single. You want P…
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/24 09:06 PM
5

No follow up means not interested. If he follows up a week later, that means he's only interested in sex. If he was excited about a relationship, he'd text you back the next day, or 2 days later, max.
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/24 09:00 PM
1

How can you say it is unlikely she is a three or four without looking at her? If 5 is average, do you assume that all women are objectively above average?
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/24 08:57 PM
1

Someone who's morbidly obese or has deformities is a 1. Women in the bottom 30% of women are 4s. They tend to have masculine facial structures, might be 15 lbs overweight. They can still get compliments; they aren't hideous. But they are clearly below average. Ratings matter. Objectively matters. This doesn't mean she should pick a loser. It means she should try to find a nice, loyal guys who loves her... But avoid messing with players with tons of women, because they will just use her for sex.
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/24 08:55 PM
1

I disagree. There's a difference between being realistic and having low self-esteem. By definition, about 30% of women are 4s or lower. Most women are delusional and rate themselves higher than they truly are. This is actually counter-productive, because it causes them to shoot for men outside their league - who will just use them for sex. There's nothing wrong with a woman being realistic about her attractiveness. A 3 can very easily find a good man for a relationship - she just needs to realis…
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/24 08:54 PM
1

Here's the thing. As a girl, even if you're 3, you can easily find a good man. You just have to find the right man. The right man, for you, is going to be moderately attractive (not super tall, not super muscular, either completely average, a little skinny, or maybe a little fat). The key thing you want, is a nice guy. A guy who's loyal, cares about you, listens to you. You don't want a player who's just going to use for for sex. A super attractive guy (who's tall, handsome, has money, status, e…
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/24 08:50 PM
1

Best advice would be, find out your true value. Compared to the average women, are you more attractive, heavier, more feminine? Find out where you stand, relative to the average woman. Then, try to find a man that is comparable to you. If you chase men who are outside of your league, they will lie to you. They'll tell you everything you want to hear, but they will just use you for sex then discard you when they're done.
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/24 08:46 PM
5

Well, if you straight up tell him, "I'm not happy, I feel like it isn't working out," and he isn't willing to change, not much else you can do.
/r/RedPillWomen17/07/24 02:30 PM
6

I definitely plan on mentioning in my bio/in the first few dates that I'm a sexually adventurous person. Here's an analogy that might resonate with you. Men are the consumers of make up. They can tell when a girl is beautiful, or when her face just isn't appealing. But it would be absurd for a man to start lecturing a woman on feminine products because men have never had the burden of learning the skills that are required for female beauty. They passively enjoy it - and they can pick the women w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 02:22 PM
–

Notice that women excel in sarcasm... But can never actually articulate a single counter-argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 02:07 PM
1

Let's say you had an 18 yr old daughter. Knowing what you know about modern dating. Who do you think will make better choices: 18 yr old girl with unlimited options to Chad, or loving family with knowledge of the real world?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 02:04 PM
1

Because Asian men evolved based on the preferences of Asian women. Throughout history, Asian women were not crying because Asian men are too short and feminine. Men want what's best but will settle for what is POSSIBLE. Women want what's best but will NOT SETTLE for what is POSSIBLE. Hence, they prefer to be single & pumped and dumped for decades. That would indicate that society’s best interest and women’s best interest are inherently at odds with one another, which I think is a pretty typical …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:58 PM
2

GENETIC EQUAL Meaning, the type of genes they reproduce. The average woman believes her brother is genetically repulsive. Female brain at work!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:49 PM
1

Honestly, what you're missing is: Deep down, chubby overweight girls honestly believe they deserve prince charming. It never once crossed their mind that they are genuinely a 4/10 on a good day. Everyone is delusional. But there is literally nobody in society that checks women for their delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:44 PM
1

Most Asian women consider most Asian men unattractive. Most Black men avoid Black women like the plague. Evolution would say that is impossible. I agree, women's delusional standards are somewhat biological, they always want "What's best." But what's different is, parents and society aren't helping them decide what's best. We are allowing women to use their independent choice to decide subjectively "what is the best man I can find." And we see the results of their choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:43 PM
1

The idea that you are being targeted for a witchhunt... because someone found a picture that you posted online.... I have violated your privacy by clicking on your public Reddit profile hahahahaa. Please answer honestly. If I said you were an 8, would you still say I'm on a witchunt?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:40 PM
1

Okay, if you thanked me for the rating, why are you mad?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:38 PM
–

Imagine the privilege that you have, that you literally cannot even begin to appreciate. In nature, you literally cannot survive without a man. 99.99% of women's survival has depended on men. Men created the prosperity that allows them to be independent. And now, they think they are so much more valuable than men, the idea of being with a genetic equal is repulsive. Female delusion and entitlement at its finest.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:36 PM
–

Throughout 99.9% of human history... the average woman... was happy to avoid certain death. So she got married to average men lol. I see the female brain at work!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:32 PM
–

The truth hurts. Most women hate the fact that they are so easily manipulated. They grow up in fairy tales where men fall in love, and everybody has a special someone. The idea that there are millions of overweight, entitled, toxic woman spending decades of their life, jumping around from player to player, without ever taking a moment to sit back and take personality accountability... Most women just never ever go through that moment of introspection. Society enables them to always blame the men…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:28 PM
1

If you are forced to settle for a mediocre man, please know, it is not because of your looks. Your looks are more than good enough. It will be because of your personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:22 PM
1

I dunno man, you invited the convo by saying "You’re so funny 😹But anyways, let’s go on. What’s next?" It's not like I'm just randomly targeting you... You wanted me to go on, but then you get made when I say you are above average looking, but not drop-dead gorgeous. We all have different definitions of a witchhunt. If your life experiences have been so privileged that a man calling you attractive, but not drop-dead gorgeous qualifies as a vicious attack, I want to seriously apologize.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:20 PM
1

Are any of them based on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:17 PM
1

I never disagreed that most people can't rate themselves objectively. There's no point in going through the exercise, because we are in agreement. But you got me!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:14 PM
1

Call an average looking girl a 6.5, and she says I'm on a witchhunt. Holy shit, the level of delusion here is unreal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:09 PM
–

Option #1: Take personal responsibility for the fact that you are single because the caliber of man you want is outside of league. Option #2: Blame average men for being "inherently ugly," despite the fact that 18 yr old virgin women have happily been marrying average men throughout all of human history. Which option do you think the average female brain will pick?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:07 PM
1

You said my rating is not objective unless I post a picture of myself. That proves your aptitude for logic! And don't really believe the 0 body count, most men won't either.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:03 PM
–

“the problem is that the men at the low end of that bimodal distribution think they deserve a mid woman because they don’t realize they’re in a bimodal distribution while women are not” Yeah, the conclusion I gave was geared toward's women's complicity in the problem (they shoot too high, which causes them to be single). Whereas your observation is actually a fair insight to average men. You don't deserve an average woman just because you're average. Average women are happy getting sexual attent…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:58 PM
1

“the problem is that the men at the low end of that bimodal distribution think they deserve a mid woman because they don’t realize they’re in a bimodal distribution while women are not” I've never said this and would be stupid to believe this. Men live in reality, we are forced to. Losers don't deserve nothing. That's what Andrew Tate preaches. Your feminine emotional brain hears objective facts but then always has to imply an evil non-stated motive behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:52 PM
1

And yes, I am not basing my life around a guy’s needs. Okay, that's the trade-off. Top guys have unlimited options. They are going to pick women who cater to their needs. If you don't want a top man, you don't have to prioritize his needs. I know you're triggered... but my rating of myself doesn't influence an objective rating of you. Only a female brain would think, "I only care about the ratings from attractive men." Newsflash, the attractive men you talk to are going to lie to your ass to get…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:49 PM
1

I'm giving you free advice. Reject it if you want. Nobody cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:45 PM
1

Call a girl a 6-6.5 and this how she reacts haha. You prove my point: Most women can't perceive themselves objectively. Most women refuse to change their personality and prioritize a guy's needs. And they wonder why they can pump a top-guy, but can never secure commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:43 PM
1

It's an honest rating. Most women in your shoes expect a top-caliber man, but also expect princess treatment... Realistically, it's probably not going to happen, but you're free to make whatever choices you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:41 PM
4

You're a woman. I'm telling you what a guy would hear. A woman who has been on the dating market, getting freaky, exploring new kinks, has probably been getting fucked by top-caliber men far, far outside of her league. Those experiences have set a baseline expectation that future men have to meet, otherwise she will be disappointed. I think most guys would like to have an adventurous sex-life with their woman... But the type of girl who has been adventurous casually with men outside of her leagu…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:37 PM
–

Reality is, most problems women face in dating could be solved if they (1) objectively assessed their own relative attractiveness and (2) had emotional intelligence to realize when men are simply telling you what you want to hear. Most women lack both, which causes them lots of frustration. Just based on the pics you posted, I would say you're a solid 6-6.5. Meaning, you are above average, but still within the range of normal women. You wouldn't necessarily stand out in a crowd of women as unusu…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:30 PM
0

Two points: 1) You became "adventurous in bed" with your current long-term partner who took your virginity. That's different from a typical girl on the dating market who is "adventurous in bed." She's adventurous for hookups, whereas, you build sexual chemistry with the man you intended to bond with. 2) And, there's a difference between a girl being adventurous in bed and describing herself as such. Describing herself is an incredible, almost disqualifying red flag, because she is so open about …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:18 PM
0

Also, what's your age, race, and accurate face rating 1-10?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:11 PM
2

Okay, just based on your BMI you have millions of options. What are all of your minimum standards, including height, attractiveness, income, career, success, personality, etc. Don't just say "funny and nice." Be honest about the type of men you swipe on, what minimum requirements do they all have?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:10 PM
1

He probably don't want you. First thing a guy notices is your BMI. Where you do you rank compared to the average woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:06 PM
1

Your perfect man with 0 red flags is out of your league.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:03 PM
1

Every guy you want is out of your league. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:02 PM
4

It's funny when the prompts are written by women. We don't even get their age? That's major factor. Biggest thing I look for: how loyal. How tempted is she by greener grass. What does she value in me (which helps you understand how fleeting her commitment is). Non binary is probably a hard pass, assuming that is a proxy for feminism. Feminists by their nature will never be happy, because they can never accept personal responsibility. They will destroy relationships and always find a way to blame…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:56 AM
1

It's funny when the prompts are written by women. We don't even get their age? That's major factor. Biggest thing I look for: how loyal. How tempted is she by greener grass. What does she value in me (which helps you understand how fleeting her commitment is). Non binary is probably a hard pass, assuming that is a proxy for feminism. Feminists by their nature will never be happy, because they can never accept responsibility. They will destroy relationships and always find a way to blame others. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:48 AM
1

You don't understand market place value. If 999 models die sexless, you can't claim they have 10/10 value. You're just a dolt, I'm going to stop responding to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:27 AM
3

Why do you find it boring?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:24 AM
4

Can you actually refute any of the points I made, or do you default to sarcasm because you are triggered emotionally but can't actually articulate an argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:13 AM
1

It's simple math. Play it out in your head. If 10 women and 10 men are in a population, and each woman has all 10 men to pick from, then each of the 10 men also has each of the 10 women as a possible mating candidate. This is such an insanely stupid point to make. If this was a valid analogy, bottom 20% men would be wifing bottom 20% women. I cannot fathom that you are so invested in TRP, but lack such basic understanding of the dynamics. Frankly, you are a dolt.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:08 AM
1

8 OF THE WOMEN WILL PICK THE TOP GUY FOR CASUAL SEX, 2 OF THE WOMEN WILL SETTLE FOR #9 AND #8, AND THE BOTTOM 7 MEN WILL BE SINGLE.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:06 AM
1

MEN ONLY CARE ABOUT BEAUTY, BUT THEY WILL LOWER THEIR BEAUTY STANDARDS. WOMEN CARE ABOUT EVERYTHING, BUT WILL NEVER LOWER THEIR STANDARDS. THUS, THE TOP MEN ARE DESIRED BY ALL WOMEN, WHILE THE AVERAGE MEN ARE DESIRED BY NO WOMAN. THUS, THE AVERAGE WOMAN HAS MORE BARGAINING POWER - MARKETPLACE VALUE - THAN THE AVERAGE MAN BUT THE MOST DESIRED MEN HAVE MORE BARGAINING POWER - MARKETPLACE VALUE - THAN EVEN THE MOST VALUABLE WOMEN. BECAUSE A TOP-TIER CELEBRITY CAN REPLACE ANY MODEL EASILY, JUST LIKE…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:04 AM
1

You aren't understanding the simple concept. Average women have higher RMV than average men. Thus, she is marrying DOWN. She can easily find other average men to marry. Average men can't easily find average women to marry - meaning their SEXUAL MARKETPLACE VALUE IS LOWER. If you don't understand it by now, I can't help you. If you are genuinely curious, just try re-reading some of my past posts. I explain it all very well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:00 AM
1

All average men also have all average women as options to pick from? Okay, now you proved you don't know what you're talking about. I enjoy good natured debating, but you just aren't understanding these relatively simple concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 10:57 AM
1

Read the words carefully. A man will compromise on BEAUTY, meaning, a man is not going to reject a 8.5 because of her eyebrows or something stupid like that. A woman will NOT compromise on her PERFECT MAN, which to her, is a PERFECT COMBO of attractiveness + height + income + status + charisma + other standards. Men only care about beauty - but they'll even go for less beautiful chicks if everything else is good. Women care about everything, and it's very difficult for them to compromise on anyt…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 10:54 AM
-2

I don't think the relationship is necessarily doomed, but he definitely needs a wake-up call. It's not healthy for you to bottle up resentments. Gotta have a deep convo with him, tell him what your needs are. If he cares about you, he'll take you seriously... But if you tell him, "I'm not happy," but he isn't willing to man up and change... he might not be emotionally there. I'd say, give him a chance to wake up, but make sure he puts forth an honest effort.
/r/RedPillWomen17/07/24 10:47 AM
1

I agree with what you're saying, but what you're saying in no way contradicts anything that I wrote. Yes, it's true men primarily value attractiveness. Yes, it's true women care about other things as well. Bottom line: "Statistically average women" (regardless of how this is defined) do not want "statistically average men" (regardless of how this is defined). Thus, by definition, average and below average men are clustered at the bottom of RMV compared to average women. That's all I'm saying, I …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 10:35 AM
1

The fact that women are so damn picky is what gives average women their power. If a woman wants to settle for an average man, she has her pick of the litter. Supply and demand: If no one demands average men, their value goes down.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 10:28 AM
1

Ugly men with exceptional game/ charisma can rack up sex partners. They are the extreme exception, not the norm. There are countless average dolts who can never pull a woman in their life. That's why most, but obviously not all, ugly men are worthless. Average female dolts are inundated with options. By definition, they have more RMV. I'm not saying all men are worthless, obviously, tons of average men are getting married. But, by the same token, they are replaceable. If you're an ugly guy with …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 10:26 AM
1

In reality, I think the distribution is bimodal, because the guys at the top truly can have it all. They should be able to get an attractive woman (because beauty is common), as well as a one-sided open relationship. That's the ideal set-up, imo. I think there are much, much more male 10s than female 10s, because a man would much rather compromise on beauty than a woman on her perfect man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:58 AM
1

This is a right skewed distribution. Men have more power/ control to increase/decrease their SMV, but at the end of the day, most women don't want them. An average woman has her pick of the litter. She can pick an attractive brokie, she can pick an ugly beta. And she can replace them if she gets bored. SMV means power in a relationship. If I have higher SMV than my partner, it's easier for me to replace them than vice-versa. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:50 AM
1

Buddy, if a fat guy can have positive charisma, an attractive guy can have negative charisma. Bottom line, neither funny fat guys nor attractive brokies have sexual MARKETPLACE VALUE. Because MARKETPLACE VALUE inherently means that women want them as partners. Women don't want them as partners. That is why the distribution is skewed right. Yes, an ugly man has more power/control to increase his SMV. An attractive man has more danger of decreasing his SMV by being a dolt. But the statistically di…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:46 AM
1

Let's say a man's attractiveness and other qualities that determine SMV aren't correlated, meaning an ugly man is just as likely to have high income/ charisma, and an attractive man is just as likely to have low income and charisma. This, at first glance, wouldn't make the distribution "more normal." It would keep the distribution exactly the same, it would just swap the people around, such that some ugly men swap positions with some attractive men, while keeping the distribution normal. The pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:35 AM
1

Imagine competing with 1000 other women for 1 man, and thinking you have 10/10 sexual marketplace value. At this point, you've just proven yourself to just be an idiot or too stubborn to admit you didn't understand the concept from the very beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:58 AM
1

You were close to understanding it, but not quite. All pussy is moderately valuable. Most dick is worthless, but top dick is super valuable. There isn't enough good dick to go around for all the average women. Most obese women think they deserve good dick, and don't realize until they are 35+ that they never actually qualified in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:54 AM
0

Okay, you proved you don't understand the concept. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:43 AM
1

It probably won't go down, but if it did, it will be when overweight/ obese women start realizing, they didn't just pursue "bad men," they pursued men far outside their league who never took them seriously. Most 30+ single overweight women genuinely think their standards are fine, they are just unlucky/ getting screwed over by abusive men. I think, there might be more awareness that they are simply shooting too high.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:01 AM
0

Here's a really simple question to see if you can comprehend this subject. Let's say there's an island with 1000 super models and 1 man. All of the super models want to get married, but the man can only choose one mate. Do you think the super models all have 10/10 MARKET VALUE? Notice, I didn't say ATTRACTION. I didn't say BEAUTY. I said MARKET VALUE. This is a simple test to see if you can comprehend the concept of market value.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 07:46 AM
1

I'm not saying I completely disagree, but here's a thought. A man's market value is based on how much women want him. How much women want a man is based on both the characteristics of the man, but also the needs of the woman. If the average woman decides, "I'd rather be single than marry an average man," for all intents and purposes... the average man has 0 SMV. Bimodal distribution would make sense if all men were either winners (ie. status symbols) or losers (no value to women). In reality, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 07:39 AM
0

1) The graphs you posted are both normally distributed. They have different means, but the distributions are both normal. 2) However, while attractiveness might be normally distributed for men, SMV is not. There are plenty of attractive blue collar men who are invisible to women. The disparity between "winner" and "loser" men is a function of not only attractiveness, but also income, charisma, etc. This creates a wider gulf and means the distribution is NOT normally distributed. 3) Even in a soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 07:32 AM
0

Most men, in general, should not date single women for all of the reasons you stated, unless they are his only options.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 07:11 AM
1

Huh? What do you think the general consensus for the distribution of SMV of men & women is?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 07:04 AM
6

I don't care how you or women behave. You are free to make your own choices, and deal with the consequences when the time comes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 06:46 AM
1

The problem is, I wrote a 13 paragraph post, and you can't use your logic to dispute a single argument. You just have an emotional reaction to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 06:45 AM
1

Exactly, that's your choice. If you aren't willing to do what it takes to make a man happy, you have every right to be single.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 06:44 AM
3

No problem, that's your right. Most older women who never marry are objectively overweight and unattractive. You have the right to be single rather than marry a man who looks like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 06:42 AM
1

Yet, you can't come up with a reason why it's incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 06:15 AM
1

Here's the thing. Let's say you're convinced you're more attractive than 90% of men. Maybe you are. I believe most women are more attractive than most men. It doesnt matter, because you're all competing for the same tiny group of men. Even if you landed a top man, you could easily be replaced by another girl who looks just like you. This is the point I'm making: Most women are generally in the same league and generally replaceable. There's a big gap between top men and bottom men. Thus... if you…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 06:15 AM
5

The reality is, most average women would never take my advice, because most average women already think they are high value. They think there are high value men out there who will marry them... And it takes about 20+ yrs of getting pumped and dumped to maybe start considering whether they accurately assessed their own true worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 06:10 AM
1

Okay, I guess you just aren't able to understand the concept. On that island, 1 super model would marry the billionaire, and the other 2 super models would either remain single or marry the broke men. It's impossible for both the billionaire and the super model to both be 10s, if the billionaire can easily replace the super model, but the super model can never replace the billionaire. Like I said, this is a somewhat nuanced concept. I've explained it perfectly clearly, but if you still can't gra…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 05:55 AM
0

Like I said, you don't understand how SMV works. SMV is based on MARKET VALUE, not "attractiveness." If there are 3 super models on a beach; 1 billionaire, and 2 broke men, the 3 super models aren't all 10s. Because the super models don't get to pick the billionaire. The billionaire is a 10, the super models are all 5s (they are interchangeable - the billionaire can pick whichever he wants), and the broke men are 1s. This is a somewhat nuanced concept. If you're not able to understand it after r…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 05:37 AM
1

It just makes sense. Women compete with women for men. Men compete with men for women. Most women are relatively interchangeable - thus, their values cluster around 4-6. For men, there's a clear divide between winners and losers. The top men has much more value than the top women, because he pick a top woman and still have more power in the relationship by hooking up with average women. Men's values cluster around the extremes, while women's values cluster around the middle. The problem is, chub…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 05:00 AM
0

You misunderstand how efficient markets work. If there are 3 men and 3 women on island, it doesn't matter if the women are 1000x more beautiful than the men. What matters is how the women compare to other women and how the men compare to other men. Women are more interchangeable with each other, so their values cluster around 4-6. Men are not interchangeable - there is a clear divide between winners and losers. Thus, their values are either very high or very low.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:57 AM
3

The options you think you have are not real options if you're chubby and shooting above your league. You think you have options because tons of average chicks get sexual attention from valuable men, but it never translates to relationships. I'm surprised that this basic concept is difficult for most women to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:55 AM
0

You basically didn't read or understand what I said. Your advice is, "Just improve!" Duh. Thanks for missing the entire point and giving the most generic feedback ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:53 AM
1

Do you have an urgent need to pass on your incel genes to the next generation? Why not just fucking adopt if you're that desperate for a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 06:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter