Donnough Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	I'm venting but... can you imagine what it would feel like to be taken seriously? So just kill babies for oil money if you need to be validated?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/03/21 10:47 PM
10	What are some easy ways to flirt and tease girls? Yeah nothing gets women going than being insulted. "Fuck you you stupid little bitch!" works every time	/r/seduction	17/01/19 09:03 PM
1	Let’s Make Gillette’s new ad the most disliked video on YouTube Well the kid on bottom was definitely not down for it, it's obvious if you just watch the commercial and know literally anything about fighting and/or acting.	/r/MensRights	16/01/19 08:49 PM
1	Let’s Make Gillette’s new ad the most disliked video on YouTube No that is not more likely to happen, at all.	/r/MensRights	16/01/19 08:36 PM
1	Let’s Make Gillette’s new ad the most disliked video on YouTube Uh no it really doesn't make it look like men are Nazis and women are perfect. In fact there are barely any women in the ad at all, the ad is just saying "hey guys, we can and should try to do better. Bullying and sexual harassment are bad and we should try to politely intervene when we see it happen." How is that bad in any way?	/r/MensRights	15/01/19 11:13 PM
1	Let’s Make Gillette’s new ad the most disliked video on YouTube Right but in the ad it clearly wasn't just playful wrestling. It's only a good thing if both/all parties involved actually want to fight, otherwise it's just bullying which is what it looked like in the ad.	/r/MensRights	15/01/19 10:58 PM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. So then don't claim it's biological if you don't think/know if it's biological.	/r/MensRights	09/12/18 04:59 PM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. Oh, so it's not biological at all glad you agree with me.	/r/MensRights	08/12/18 10:24 PM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. It made headline news, but since your reading comprehension is that of a 3rd grader I wouldn't expect you to know. And yet you can't tell me what even one of those "SJW" journals is? Damn bro, and you call me a 3rd grader? Kind of owning yourself here when you prove you're much dumber than the person you say has the reading comprehension of a 3rd grader. Yet you act like a butthurt little child the second your argument was refuted. You hide behind one logical fallacy after another to makeup for …	/r/MensRights	16/11/18 08:55 PM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. Wow, you can't even substantiate your claims? So I'll infer that these "SJW journals" are meaningless tiny publications. Cool so these people seemingly got a bunch of idiots who only sell 20 issues to print Mein Kampf. Cool story bro, get back to me when it's actually close to a mainstream thing. For people who claim to be all about LOGIC, FACTS, and REASON you don't use any of them to formulate your arguments or opinions, you just use your feelings.	/r/MensRights	16/11/18 02:20 PM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. You might want to brush up on your reading comprehension skills. It helps to finish reading the sentence before jumping into your emotional reactions. Nah bro, I just don't trust the right wing idiots that Joe Rogan gets on his podcast to be truthful about anything they say in regards to the left or "SJWs". Also what are these "SJW journals"?	/r/MensRights	16/11/18 03:26 AM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. See Joe Rogans podcast from last week Yeah cuz fucking Joe Rogan's podcast is the pinnacle of leftist thought. That podcast that almost never has leftists on it is totally a bastion of leftist thought. You rock dude, you're so smart. But it is indicative of the kind of nonsense being peddled around academia A few idiots at a small university are representative of the entirety of academia? And you claim to use LOGIC and REASON? You're a joke dude.	/r/MensRights	16/11/18 03:15 AM
0	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. That's not the thesis dumbass, have you ever gone to a university or any school in general? The Federalist is a laughably bad source, they are incredibly biased and can't see things like nuance or depth to any position that they don't like. Kind of like you. So post the actual thesis, not an incredibly biased and likely retarded take on it, or shut the fuck up.	/r/MensRights	15/11/18 05:38 PM
0	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. Yeah I'm a musician too, trained jazz musician, so tell me why men and women can do the same songs then if gender is sooo relevant.	/r/MensRights	15/11/18 05:22 PM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. What university did you go to? I recently graduated from one of the best in the world and it is definitely about actual education. Maybe because you believe things that just aren't true you think it's somehow different. But let me tell you, you're wrong.	/r/MensRights	15/11/18 05:04 PM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. Yeah that small fringe group of people are fucking stupid. Do you think this is at all representative of any kind of larger movement? This is also not a gender studies class.	/r/MensRights	15/11/18 04:53 PM
0	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. There was no wartime shortage of labor in the fucking 60's and 70's my guy. Answer the question (third time asking hopefully you actually do it this time, or at least admit that it isn't because of genetic variables).	/r/MensRights	14/11/18 10:21 PM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. Wow, you're extremely stupid, you said that being an actor or singer are professions where gender is relevant. Not getting certain roles, but being an actor in general. Also in what way is gender relevant in being a singer? Are you saying that either only men can be singers or only women? Because that would be wrong. Or are you saying that gender is relevant for the song? Because then you'd also be wrong because there are many jazz standards which were originally written for a certain gendered v…	/r/MensRights	14/11/18 10:11 PM
-1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. You still didn't answer the question. Why were women originally the computer programmers and now men are?	/r/MensRights	14/11/18 10:00 PM
-1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. Are you? You're acting like only one gender is able to sing or act, or that having a dick somehow makes you an incredible fighter and having a vagina makes you made of paper and glass. You're a fucking idiot.	/r/MensRights	14/11/18 09:48 PM
2	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. You didn't answer the question.	/r/MensRights	14/11/18 09:28 PM
1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. So what changed biologically in all women from the ~1950's to today? Because originally computer programming was a female dominated field, and obviously today it isn't. So if you think that biology is such a huge reason for the differences in male and female dominated fields, what changed biologically in all men and women to flip the gender dynamic in computer science?	/r/MensRights	14/11/18 09:18 PM
-1	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. Gender is relevant in exactly zero of your examples.	/r/MensRights	14/11/18 09:06 PM
13	Scientists conducting the world’s largest study of sex differences in the brain have found that men and women think differently. Men and women are different. They have different skills. They are biologically attracted to different jobs. Deal with it. Sure buddy, I'm sure this totally real class that you took at a totally real university said literally that. Please tell me where you took this class, what specific university and which specific gender studies class did that happen in?	/r/MensRights	14/11/18 08:55 PM
32	Father says little Honduran girl on Time cover was not taken from mother. More importantly, the mother took the child out of the country without notifying the father. Crickets from the media on that issue. Bro, Reuters is part of the mainstream media	/r/MensRights	22/06/18 07:05 PM
1	University Of Michigan Now Has Almost 100 Full-Time Staff Dedicated To "Diversity" earning a combined salary of 8.4 million USD! Ok fine, if as a class white people and the US government are not to blame for the generational plight of minorities, and genocide in the case of Native people, then what is to blame for the problem of institutional racism?	/r/MensRights	05/06/18 09:26 PM
2	University Of Michigan Now Has Almost 100 Full-Time Staff Dedicated To "Diversity" earning a combined salary of 8.4 million USD! Yeah I'm sure the only problems with places like the Pine Ridge reservation are that they see themselves as victims. It can't be the third world living conditions and genocidal actions enforced by the US government. Also I'm sure that black communities are only plighted by seeing themselves as victims rather than the institutional racism that persists today with things like the war on drugs, police brutality, red-lining, lack of generational wealth, etc. enforced by the US government. If only th…	/r/MensRights	05/06/18 09:13 PM
-11	University Of Michigan Now Has Almost 100 Full-Time Staff Dedicated To "Diversity" earning a combined salary of 8.4 million USD! So what do we do about it? Life isn't a level playing field? You make it a level playing field. Why do you think that society should be unfair? Should we start handicapping people? No we should right the wrongs that minorities face in America. Things like institutional racism that will hold them back from getting in to higher education. With all your stupid rhetorical questions it sounds like you don't actually want the problem to be fixed because you enjoy all the unfair advantages that you rec…	/r/MensRights	05/06/18 01:37 PM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Have fun running from the truth because you don't have an argument	/r/MensRights	22/05/18 05:38 PM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Where did person call for a return to the female oppression and 1950s like sexual dynamics? Dude it's in the fucking name "enforced monogamy" and his desire to "regulate female reproduction". Do you know what "enforced" means (I asked you this before and you refused to answer, I can only assume that you don't know what it means)? Why is it better to remove people's freedom of choice? Don't forget all of his other ideas like how Frozen is supposedly evil post-modern neo-maxist (what a fucking stu…	/r/MensRights	22/05/18 03:21 PM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. I've already done that dumbass. Answer my questions	/r/MensRights	22/05/18 04:06 AM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. I'm not mad, just disappointed. You really didn't listen to my advice about making good insults, and in this one you can't even spell properly. It looks like you're dumber than I thought. But you still haven't answered all of my questions so why would I let this argument advance any further if you refuse to engage with my points? I know that being wrong can be scary sometimes, but it's ok to admit that you're wrong or don't know why Jordan Peterson says such stupid things. Hahahaha. Thank you fo…	/r/MensRights	22/05/18 02:53 AM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Oh cool the big tough guy over here has high school level insults, really good job there buddy ya sure got me. I love that you still can't tell me how "enforced monogamy" would fix incels as Peterson claims, and instead of proving that (this is now the 5th request to do so) you dodge all of my points and resort to ad hominem attacks, I'm glad that you've conceded all of my points because you have no response to them. You are also projecting very hard, I have made zero fallacies (at least that I …	/r/MensRights	22/05/18 02:24 AM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. who did he suggest enforce this? I don't know, like Jordan Peterson always does he talks around the issue and bases everything on implications that he never explains, but those implications are always right wing reactionary points. But answer my other questions too, unless you admit that you're wrong here.	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 09:51 PM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. What do you think "enforced" means? What do you think "enforced monogamy" means? What do you think Jordan Peterson means when he says that enforced monogamy will fix incels? You have yet to actually address the last question, despite this being the third time that I've asked you. Do you admit that it doesn't support your idea of what Jordan Peterson is and is instead a desire to force people (mainly women) into harmful relationships based on evo psych bullshit? men's need to be aggressive when h…	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 09:23 PM
0	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Ok, quote what points I actually misrepresented because I am going off of what Jordan Peterson is saying in his fucking article. He talks this idea of "enforced monogamy" (that apparently won't be enforced by anything according to you, making the statement even more meaningless) will "fix" incels. Now we know that nobody wants to be with incels because that's the definition of the term, so how would this ever "fix" incels if it doesn't change what incels are? They would still be these violent ps…	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 03:35 PM
0	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. How is forcing women into relationships with these violent, hateful, and dangerous incels (relationships that they don't want to be in btw), and forcing them to live lives that they don't want to, with regards to sexual promiscuity, not sexist? He's not calling for anything to be done about men, he's only focusing on women, why is that?	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 03:24 PM
2	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Most of that comes from family, media, (single sex) schooling, people at work. Ok find me those sentiments from before the 1980's and which come from a position of power. I highly doubt that you will find any (remember only men, no intersectionality with race, sexuality, etc.). If systemic sexism is a problem then women are free to build their own industries and networks, can't be that hard if a thinking dick can invent it out of a garden shed. Oh yeah, building a whole new country won't be that…	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 03:14 PM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. No, just forcing women, and men, into relationships that they don't want to be in because he's offended by anything other than Puritanical courtship.	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 04:49 AM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Randoms on twitter don't matter because they have no real power and the much more prevalent culture is that men are fine, and in some cases that they're better than women. This is also ignoring all the systemic sexism that women receive, while men receive some too women face more hardships due to their gender. Also (correct me if I'm misinterpreting this) comparing the career impact of a man propositioning too many women and the systemic sexism and sexual harassment and assault the women face in…	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 04:33 AM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Random's on twitter don't matter because they have no real power and the much more prevalent culture is that men are fine, and in some cases that they're better than women. This is also ignoring all the systemic sexism that women receive, while men receive some too women face more hardships due to their gender. Also (correct me if I'm misinterpreting this) comparing the career impact of a man propositioning too many women and the systemic sexism and sexual harassment and assault the women face i…	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 04:18 AM
1	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. It's simple, they were having sex with women, most likely, who were shamed and ostracized as being sluts if the word got out. I seriously doubt that you actually asked any kind of professor this question because it's so simple that any professor worth their salt could answer it instantly. There also isn't a stigma against men having casual sex and it's hilarious that you think there somehow is one. Since you can't grasp the English language I'll tell you that a "fuckboy" is a guy who is very sel…	/r/MensRights	20/05/18 08:23 PM
-2	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. I don't have a source, just my personal observation in life. And my personal observation in life says you're wrong. Men hold most of political power because who else wants to do that job.. Sure, that's why, nothing to do with systemic sexism for the past hundreds of years, can't be related to the fact of men holding the majority of power for hundreds of years or anything. That can't be it at all. I don't know why you ignore the hundreds and thousands of years of Western history where men have he…	/r/MensRights	20/05/18 07:21 PM
0	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Wow, you really suck at reading, is English your first language? I'm obviously saying that there historically has been no stigma against men having tons of sex while women's sexuality has historically been something that was suppressed by society. How do you not know this?	/r/MensRights	20/05/18 07:07 PM
-8	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Most "misogyny" comes from women not approving of other women Source fucking needed on that. Are you really saying that men had and have no part in enforcing a misogynistic culture? I didn't know that women held most of the social and political power in American history, maybe one day we'll see men at the top of the social and political ladder.	/r/MensRights	20/05/18 04:24 PM
-7	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Love that you use "man" and "female" totally shows that you are a reasonable person with a healthy view of gender, why not call them "women" instead of "female"? Also I'm a guy and it's hilarious that you think gay men have always been able to have tons of sex without any kind of persecution or threats of violence or anything. It's great that gay men have never faced violence because of their sexuality and acting upon their sexuality in consensual relationships!	/r/MensRights	20/05/18 04:10 PM
-22	Jordan Peterson: On the New York Times and “Enforced Monogamy” \| Just as with James Damore and the Google memo, feminists again misunderstand a scientific term (perhaps deliberately) and freak out for no reason. Yeah, why would anyone be upset about Jordan Peterson calling for a return to the oppressive and patriarchal slut shaming pre-sexual revolution culture? Why would women want bodily autonomy and the ability to have casual sex like straight men have always been able to?	/r/MensRights	20/05/18 02:37 PM
1	Bing Does it too... Except this isn't censorship, if you look up "why are women so" you get the normal amount of results. Unless you have any proof at all that this is some grand conspiracy by Google and Bing to oppress men in literally the smallest way that's possible and a way that doesn't affect anyone's real life?	/r/MensRights	08/05/18 02:56 PM
0	Bing Does it too... Literally getting triggered over nothing	/r/MensRights	07/05/18 11:23 PM
-1	I'd expect nothing less from Google Cool, but this proves literally nothing and this post is a waste of space and time.	/r/MensRights	07/05/18 10:45 PM
1	I'd expect nothing less from Google Ok cool, it still proves literally nothing and I'm not sure why this post even exists here.	/r/MensRights	07/05/18 10:30 PM
-6	I'd expect nothing less from Google This might be the dumbest fucking post I've ever seen on this sub, I was hoping it would be satire or something but looks like you're serious. Why didn't you include the autocomplete results for the women search? I'm sure they exist as it is an extremely common phrase to search for.	/r/MensRights	07/05/18 06:56 PM
1	After being divorce-raped, Chris Rock spreads some hard truths Wow you really roasted me there buddy /s Maybe if you were smarter you could come up with a better insult	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/02/18 06:14 AM
1	After being divorce-raped, Chris Rock spreads some hard truths I'm not a woman, but that didn't take very long for you to expose your sexism	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/02/18 12:49 AM
1	After being divorce-raped, Chris Rock spreads some hard truths No I'm not done, this is pretty entertaining. Especially because the person who has absolutely no facts to back up their sexist position calls me out of touch with reality.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/02/18 07:08 PM
1	After being divorce-raped, Chris Rock spreads some hard truths Yeah because popularity in an insular community is definitely the barometer for something being true. Forget about actual data and evidence, who needs that?	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/02/18 06:53 PM
1	After being divorce-raped, Chris Rock spreads some hard truths Ok so we're feels over reals in here, got it	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/02/18 06:40 PM
1	After being divorce-raped, Chris Rock spreads some hard truths Well I do get out of the house quite often and I use Google and I have yet to see a cultural phenomenon of women accusing men of rape for money. Do you have any facts contrary to this? Or is your opinion only based in your feels?	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/02/18 02:07 AM
0	After being divorce-raped, Chris Rock spreads some hard truths To make a claim that bold you need some kind of evidence. Can you show me the evidence that convinced you of this being true?	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/02/18 11:55 PM
0	After being divorce-raped, Chris Rock spreads some hard truths Come on man, do you have any proof that there's this wide-spread problem of women lying about being raped for money?	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/02/18 10:03 PM
-1	Why men are being wrongly accused of rape - The redefinition of rape as ‘bad sex’ is devastating to justice That first part about her selling nudes when she was supposed to be in a mental institute is what's important, not that she just sells nudes. You probably should have thrown that bit in your original comment because it looked like you were just saying she couldn't have been raped because she sells nudes to me too.	/r/MensRights	25/01/18 07:42 PM
-6	Why men are being wrongly accused of rape - The redefinition of rape as ‘bad sex’ is devastating to justice Why did you throw that in at the end then?	/r/MensRights	25/01/18 07:28 PM
0	Don't worry a man will clean it up. First, you should look at usernames before commenting because this is the first question you've ever asked me Do you think that there are men that are not victims of DV? My point is feminists care about women’s “issues” and not men’s, at all. You are saying they should be hypocritical. and it has nothing to do with my question of there being women employed as street cleaners. Secondly, I never said that feminists should be hypocritical. Thirdly, because being a street cleaner is not unique to me…	/r/MensRights	23/01/18 11:22 PM
0	Don't worry a man will clean it up. Wow excellent pivot to avoid the question I asked you	/r/MensRights	23/01/18 06:33 PM
8	Don't worry a man will clean it up. Do you think that there are no women employed to clean the streets?	/r/MensRights	23/01/18 05:12 AM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Come on man, the "you're welcome" at the end is super cunty especially after all of your retarded screeching you've been doing without actually reading anything I've posted. You're tone was also super hostile from the beginning and I have no qualms about meeting hostility with hostility, especially on the internet. So your whole comment has no actual argument, do you have any counters to any of the content of my comment? It sounds like you don't and fell back on being a super triggered, fragile …	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 11:45 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Wow someone got super triggered, you replied twice to the same comment and failed to read the whole both times. Congratulations you're still a little bitch! Go ahead and read the reply I just posted to your other comment and read a couple sentences ahead in my post above to see that I say we need to investigate these claims. Sounds like I'm not saying that men should have to prove their innocence at all! What a big shocker! Plus, why would I ever argue that since I'm a man?	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 11:30 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Whoa man, you're starting to sound a little like a triggered little snowflake, maybe take a few deep breaths before commenting again. Did you ignore the part where I said that we should investigate their claims? I have stated that we should investigate these claims, never have I said that women never lie or that we don't need a trial. That's why I'm being so condescending to you, because you don't take the time to read my comments and then try to argue against them. Why would treat you as an int…	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 11:20 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Wait, but you yourself have said that we should trust women's claims (and we know that trust and believe mean the same thing). Does that mean that your next step is to throw all men in jail too? Do you see how ridiculous a leap of logic that is? You cite a few fringe people in a worldwide movement as your reasoning for thinking that anyone who doesn't automatically call a woman coming forward about sexual assault a liar (because sexual assault is something that either happened or it didn't, ther…	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 11:06 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" I see what you're saying but I don't think that false accusations are statistically significant enough to warrant questioning every single sexual assault. By all means, if a claim seems improbable then go ahead and question it (respectfully of course). I also don't think it's bad to be cautious about random hookups, do what you need to do to. I guess my main problem with people being overly skeptical of rape claims over any other crime is that it does nothing to fix the fear that some guys have …	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 09:59 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Do you know the definition of "believe"? You should since you've been screeching at all of my comments and should have seen me break down how "believe" and "trust" are the same thing. But I'll post the breakdown for you here in case you don't want to remember or go look for it: "Trust" means to believe in the truth of something. "Believe" means to feel sure of the truth of something. "Belief" means to trust in something or someone. "Trust" and "Believe" are synonymous, which means that they can …	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 09:43 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Telling someone that they should proofread their comments because they have words missing or are using words that make the sentence make zero sense isn't a personal attack, I didn't call him stupid because of that (I might have called him stupid for other reasons I don't really remember. I got a little turnt up in this thread and responded to hostility with hostility to many people.) How am I supposed to have an argument with someone if I can't understand what their point is? I'm trying to be he…	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 09:32 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Ok, looks like you ignored most of the definitions that I gave so I'll break it down again. "Trust" means to believe in the truth of something. "Believe" means to feel sure of the truth of something. "Belief" means to trust in something or someone. "Trust" and "Believe" are synonymous, which means that they can be used to say the same thing. Since we see that these words mean the same things, how is it any different to say "we should believe women and investigate their claims" or "we should trus…	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 09:19 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Bro, if you trust someone then you believe that they are correct. They mean the same thing, the words are interchangeable. I don't know what other evidence I can give you if the dictionary and thesaurus are not good enough for you. Maybe you should take another English class or hop that yung Rosetta Stone, I hear it's a great program. It would probably help with your writing too since your comments are getting harder to read, try proofreading. You say that I should have clarified but the fact is…	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 11:31 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Quote me on where I lost you in my argument and I will happily clear it up.	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 10:47 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" I didn't think this level of retardation was possible, but you have proven me wrong, good job buddy. I have never in my life said that women don't lie, quote me on it if I have. All I'm saying is that a person with a fake ID to get into a bar isn't going to have any other photo IDs nor will they know anything about where they are "from" on the ID. Just ask them the capital or governor of their "home state" because a person from there would know with zero hesitation. Or you can risk being a pedop…	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 10:36 PM
0	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Please quote me on where I have said that the accused need to prove themselves innocent. Also there is no cultural problem of false allegations, that's a nice talking point though.	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 10:25 PM
0	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" We know women have reported consensual sex as rape before. So much for you requiring evidence for claims. Since I don't know about any of that, you are a dirty fucking liar. So you believe that all women are liars, where are all the court cases of women being charged with lying to the police and lying under oath? Both of those things are quite illegal and yet there is no huge wave of court cases about these things. If you have your evidence of all these women lying, since you have stated that yo…	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 10:13 PM
0	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" How is it my fault that seemingly everyone else here is on a hair trigger to freak out on someone simply saying that we should believe (note: belief is a synonym of trust) women when they claim they are sexually assaulted like every other crime. That's all I've ever said in this entire thread and you and everyone else replying to me think that I want to lock every man accused of any kind of sexual crime in prison without trial. Are you a native English speaker? Because it's really confusing for …	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 09:52 PM
-1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Wow that's one fringe case right there. But you don't need to worry about that because you aren't a producer of pornography. Also we aren't talking about a business/employment situation, stop trying to change the subject. There are plenty of people with good false documents trying to get work. How do you think illegal immigrants get a job? They have false documentation and fake identities. Let me tell you, the girl you meet with a fake ID to get into a bar (which is what we're talking about) doe…	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 04:06 PM
2	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" I don't think anyone here argued with that. Bro, the line you quoted in the original comment is arguing that. By saying "If they don't come forward, their lives are not ruined" they are arguing that not coming forward always means that their lives are fine. I provided examples of times when that is not the case, and continued to argue that a person not coming forward could still have their life ruined. You changed the subject of the argument to be about being negatively affected by failing to re…	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 03:55 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" You're not asking everyone to trust but verify. That's exactly what I've been saying the whole fucking time but I guess nobody in this subreddit can fucking read. Show me where exactly I said that we need to lock up men based on an accusation. Fucking quote me. But guess what, you won't be able to because you've been intentionally misinterpreting everything I've said like you have some intense persecution complex. I know I'm mad, but I woke up this morning to about 20 inbox messages of people ar…	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 03:45 PM
0	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Couldn't you easily just ask them questions about adult life to figure out if they are actually legal? Kids aren't very good liars usually and there aren't that many adult women who look underage, I've found that people like to exaggerate about things like that a lot. I agree though that a man shouldn't be imprisoned if the girl had an extremely convincing lie. But that just doesn't really happen, I can't think of any example of that happening. I'd love to see a case if you have any examples. I …	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 03:59 AM
0	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Isn't that just par for the course with every crime? Like, I wouldn't be surprised if someone who is being investigated for murder was fired. However, I have never argued that someone should be fired or evicted for being under investigation. Please show me where I have. Honestly I'm getting really tired of all the goalpost moving going on in this thread. Aren't MRAs supposed to be above all that?	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 03:47 AM
0	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Gonna need some citations bro, since I can just say that 72% of accusations are proven true. Every other crime? We don't assume guilt based on an accusation for every other crime. Are you sure about that? Have you payed attention to any high profile case? The defendant is always assumed guilty by the public, which is who I'm talking about not a court of law. I haven't seen anyone doubt a person's victim hood in any other kind of crime, if you have please show me if the source is available.	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 03:35 AM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Please show me where I have ever said that we should lock people up based solely on an accusation. I can't find it, so maybe you can tell me who you're arguing against with your first point. I also want a fair investigation, that's why I think we shouldn't call all women claiming sexual assault liars. Which is what I've been saying the whole time. Do you bring up false accusations this quickly and often with any other kind of crime or is it just sex crimes? I certainly haven't seen anyone bring …	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 03:25 AM
-1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Sounds like those are cases where one would doubt the woman's age, so again if you are in any doubt just don't have sex. I guess if you are really trying to fuck, and you want to risk it, you can just ask for two forms of photo ID. I can tell you that people don't get or carry two fake IDs at once. Or ask them facts about their state or hometown that's listed on the ID, a person shouldn't hesitate at all when asked fact based questions about their hometown/state.	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 03:14 AM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" If the police don't believe you they wouldn't investigate. You can actually see this in many sexual assault cases of a person being "laughed out" or not taken seriously by the police. Hell I seem to remember a bunch of those posts on this subreddit even. Cops choose what they investigate all the time. Or do you think that I could claim the president stabbed me and they would investigate it?	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 03:04 AM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" And I am arguing that coming forward has no relation to a person's life being ruined by a crime, their life can still be ruined if they never come forward. It sounds like you are arguing against me about their life being ruined by not coming forward, which is not something I've argued against. Maybe you should read my comments again because I do not believe that I ever misspoke and was very clear on my argument. I can clear anything up if you need me to, just show me where you are confused about…	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 02:51 AM
-6	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" That's how it works in court, but why would anyone investigate a crime they don't believe happened? If they you were lying then the cops would never investigate a crime. So why do they investigate any crimes if they always think the person is lying? Plus I really don't believe that you wouldn't believe your friend if they came to you and said they were robbed.	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 08:23 PM
1	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" So, what's the point of your comment? I wasn't talking about negatively being affected by not reporting a crime. I was talking about being negatively affected by a crime that you didn't report, like you are still a victim of a crime if you don't report it. Don't try to move the goalposts on me now.	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 08:14 PM
-3	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" You really don't think that people should try to change this big cultural problem of sexual assault in any other way than going to the police after the fact? Do you really hate preventative action? Plus, who's calling for more societal action? Seemed like in the article the person went through the proper channels and reported a crime properly. Nowhere were they calling for more societal action like you claim.	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 08:12 PM
-7	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Yeah, I guess I trust the accuser to not be liar, like with every other crime. I don't immediately doubt someone when they claim they were assaulted or robbed or anything, why do you jump to doubt immediately when it's a woman claiming sexual assault? You keep bringing up false accusations, but that's not statistically relevant. It happens so rarely that it's safe to assume that the accuser is a legitimate victim, again like with every other crime.	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 08:09 PM
-8	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Ok, so someone reports a sexual assault. What's more likely, that they are lying, or that they were assaulted? I'd say it's far more likely that they were assaulted and it should be treated as such. Why is it that only with sexual crimes y'all are so distrusting of the accuser/victim? I don't see this kind of doubt with any other crime and honestly I don't really see this kind of doubt with male accusers/victims. I see throughout this thread plenty of people claiming that numbers of unreported s…	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 08:05 PM
-6	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Pro tip: if you have to card someone to sleep with them. Don't fucking sleep with them, play it safe and all your problems are solved.	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 08:00 PM
3	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" No, if you get stabbed and then don't report for whatever reason, then you still got stabbed and that still negatively effects you. How could it not?	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 07:56 PM
-4	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" Really bro? You think that if people don't report a crime then they aren't negatively effected by it? That's just not true at all, there are many reasons why someone might not report a crime that wouldn't disqualify their lives being negatively effected by the crime. Some of them are if reporting the crime puts them in danger, people don't believe them, maybe there's enough evidence for a conviction, the assailant has enough power to avoid a conviction or even avoid suspicion, etc. None of those…	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 03:57 PM
-15	"They were saying, 'One girl comes forward and you've ruined this young student's life for the rest of his life,'" Trudeau recalled. "I said, 'Wait a second, what about the 99 young women who don't come forward and how their lives are ruined?'" That's not a good analogy. A good analogy would be if people were worried about ruining the life of a serial killer by putting them in prison. What Trudeau was talking about was shifting the worry about ruined lives to victims of a crime instead of the perpetrator of the crime.	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 03:53 PM
0	Why do women still earn a lot less than men? When they do the same job, though, their salaries are practically the same \| Once again the Economist accurately reports that the wage gap is a myth It happened with black people, why couldn't it happen with women?	/r/MensRights	21/10/17 11:04 PM
1	Spotted this at the NY State Fair Bro just show your source(s) for your claim that thousands of fathers can't see their kids in Florida. If you formed this opinion based on facts it shouldn't be that hard to get those stats	/r/MensRights	04/09/17 04:49 PM
2	An honest wish of a Dad I mean I've been a subscriber here for at least a year (conservative estimate) and I can count on one hand the number of actual activism posts that I've seen. The only thing close to one on the front page right now is the stickied post about the men's day email. When does the talking stop and the actual action start? It should be hella easy since this is the biggest MRA forum and most people here should want to do something.	/r/MensRights	15/08/17 06:32 PM
2	An honest wish of a Dad How did this post and the many posts like it complaining about women raise awareness for anything that men face?	/r/MensRights	15/08/17 02:53 PM
-4	An honest wish of a Dad It takes more than decades to affect change though, Feminism started in the 1800's and women got the right to vote in 1920, shit takes a while and you will be met with lots of resistance. By saying that "When MRAs try to fix things, feminists fight them. Inform yourself better" in response to the other person's comment it looks like you have given up trying to take action and instead just want to complain. If that's not what you are saying then sorry for misinterpreting this. However, that attit…	/r/MensRights	15/08/17 01:44 AM
-1	An honest wish of a Dad So no source? Are you a liar?	/r/MensRights	14/08/17 09:52 PM
-7	An honest wish of a Dad So at the first sign of resistance you give up? Sounds like you were never really that invested in your cause	/r/MensRights	14/08/17 09:51 PM
1	Makes my blood boil. This is what feminism looks like. is a way way smaller gap than the strength difference between a 100lbs woman fighting a 100lbs man Really? Come on, the body builder has 100 lbs of muscle on the BJJ fighter, who most likely does not lift, that 100 lbs is adding a crazy amount of strength comparatively. There is no way that a 100 lb man is going to be that much stronger than a 100 lb woman. It seems to me that you are really pushing for some agenda or world view that women have glass bones and paper skin compared to men, but fro…	/r/MensRights	22/05/17 12:04 AM
1	Makes my blood boil. This is what feminism looks like. You seem to be thinking that strength is the be all end all in a fight. If you do think that it would be wrong. Since Matt Hughes lost multiple times in his career, he was the strongest man in his weight class at the time and I think it could be argued that he is one of the strongest Welterweights in UFC history. He lost 9 times and some were to people physically weaker than him like GSP and BJ Penn, both of whom knocked him out. Also here is a video of a BJJ blackbelt vs a bodybuilder with a 10…	/r/MensRights	21/05/17 08:28 PM
-5	Makes my blood boil. This is what feminism looks like. The truth is that women can beat men in a fight. Technique can overcome physical disadvantages quite easily.	/r/MensRights	21/05/17 04:43 AM
1	Something which feminists need to learn So what? You're idea is to give all the power to large corporations and go back to the age of monopolies (but probably worse this time since they would have more power)? All of your criticisms of the government apply to corporations too. I mean, who do you think the "funders" of politicians are? They certainly aren't other politicians. The fact is that corporations don't do anything to help the people unless they are forced to, while the government does do good for people. And if you haven't not…	/r/MensRights	12/04/17 03:15 PM
1	Something which feminists need to learn The same type of bureaucracy and corruption can exist in any group, even charities. It is not just limited to government, so no I do not think that using charities instead of a government is the right solution. Sure our government has problems, but those are not inherent in the system. Getting rid of the government for there being corruption and bad politicians would be throwing the baby out with the bath water. I imagine the Walton family is making crazy bank off of their dividends being that j…	/r/MensRights	12/04/17 01:56 AM
3	Something which feminists need to learn Well businesses have and still do discriminate against people. Overtly by race just about 50 years ago and now happens based on sexuality. That's also to ignore less obvious cases, but you know what stopped overt racial segregation? The government, not the businesses which didn't go out of business or change anything until regulations came in. You stop the government by voting, protesting, etc. I'm sure you would tell the unions in the early 1900s, the Civil Rights movement, women's suffrage, th…	/r/MensRights	11/04/17 09:22 PM
4	Something which feminists need to learn You know what can raise more money than Humble Bundle or any charity? Taxing a population of 300 million people. I'm still confused why you think that charities are better than any government. A livable wage would be a wage that allows a person to live without any government assistance or another job. Which Walmart does not pay, many of those "no-skill" workers are still on welfare. Walmart makes enough profit and the Walton family has enough money to take some pay cuts so that they can pay thei…	/r/MensRights	11/04/17 09:08 PM
8	Something which feminists need to learn Well how would charities be better if people are now choosing not to donate? What would change if government was out of the picture? The government is beholden to the people companies aren't. Private companies only care about profit margins and not about people. We only have to look at the late 1800's and early 1900's to see what companies do when they have all the power. Or look at companies like Walmart which don't pay their workers livable wages. So I find it hard to believe that private comp…	/r/MensRights	11/04/17 04:53 PM
9	Something which feminists need to learn We already have charities for these things, but people are still homeless and starving in America. Clearly only using charities isn't enough	/r/MensRights	11/04/17 04:36 PM