TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Donotevencare Archive

View 16 posts and 860 comments by Donotevencare on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
32

DiscussionDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 04:50 PM
32

CMVDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 01:04 PM
26

CMVDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 01:02 AM
21

DiscussionDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 07:03 PM
15

CMVDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 12:52 PM
13

CMVDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 04:30 PM
6

DiscussionDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 11:59 AM
6

DiscussionDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 09:22 AM
5

CMVDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:42 PM
3

DiscussionDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 07:30 PM
3

DiscussionDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:59 PM
3

Question for RedPillDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 07:23 PM
1

Question for MenDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 10:36 AM
1

Question for MenDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 09:36 AM
0

Donotevencare/r/MGTOW16/10/16 01:01 PM
0

Question for MenDonotevencare/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah, I'm actually sure, in retrospect, this was what killed the mood lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 11:30 PM
2

Can't orgasm because of a number of factors. Their boyfriend does not last long enough, for instance, or is just crap at sex. I never had any problems orgasming.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 09:22 PM
2

Conversationally, women can also enjoy sex and have it within a relationship rather than with a hookup. Just because they do not have one night stands does not mean they never have sex/do not enjoy. On the contrary, it has been shown in research that women mostly reach orgasm when they have sex within the context of a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 09:15 PM
2

I knew them very well, actually, and I will tell you that I agree that they are 'enablers' because they are the ones actually pushing feminism. Let me tell you that popular blonde Stacey who does not like to read and prefers to post pictures of herself on Instagram instead was certainly not the one who came up with philosophical social theories like 'intersectional feminism' or 'internalised misogyny'.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:50 PM
1

They were definitely above my league (I doubt I would have gotten a relationship from any of them, for instance), but I guess a combination of factors like the lack of alcohol, geeky formality and perhaps the wrong approach just killed the mood.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:43 PM
3

This seems so strange to me. I am a feminist myself and most of my feminist friends at uni huddled in a corner of some hipster coffee shop with me to talk about Russian literature and the patriarchy. The alcoholics were the popular party girls, another crowd entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:40 PM
2

Yes I actually agree that the follower/leader dynamic is important and it is more about personality than gender. I guess the hookup culture was just not for me. It was good to try and meet up with those guys just to see what it was all about and whether I fitted in or not though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:38 PM
1

Actually, I am also inclined to believe that the hookup culture is much smaller than many believe, but for a different reason: lots of Millennial feminists actually do not have much sex at all, because Millennial in general do not have much sex, and lots of feminists are geeky introverts like me who would rather discuss Harry Potter and the Cursed Child than get on Tinder, lol. Incels in particular only focus on the popular 'staceys' who might be more the hook up type, and from that they derive …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:34 PM
2

Yes, this was probably a factor as well. But at uni in particular I was an introverted academic dorky feminist geek, so I would have been really bad at flirting the way the popular blonde girl did. Different talents to different people, I guess!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:26 PM
2

Yes, you are probably right (and your feminist friend was too), I was looking at this from the wrong angle: it was mostly the ultra-sober atmosphere that just killed it and did not make them (or me) feel at ease.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:07 PM
1

No, I do not make a big deal out of it our judge them, but I do tell them not too get too drunk, and that perhaps doesn't put them at ease. I ended up turning them down because they grew uncomfortable watching me just drink water, so I guess it was the best thing to do for us both.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:04 PM
2

But my post was not a 'complaint', it was mainly about exploring how alcohol consumption is much more tied to the hookup culture than feminism is. My hypothesis on whether the guys in question were put off by the fact that I was not intoxicated and therefore more in control of my faculty is just that, a hypothesis. It could simply be that not drinking just makes people awkward, because remember that I asked them not to get too intoxicated either. In my experience, British men in particular have …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:02 PM
1

I have a fiancé and friends though. Did not have a problem acquiring either despite not drinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 07:47 PM
5

Well, I haven't recorded the interactions (mainly because I am a woman and men won't falsely accuse me of rape so no need to record, right? Hahahah red pill joke). You can tell me your hypothesis on what I might have done wrong though. One of the guys told me in a sort of casual way 'you are very controlling hahahah', so that might be it, I am not sure. What put me off trying to hake a hookup is that many have told me the problem was that I was not allowing the guys to 'conquer' me. But that's t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 07:46 PM
2

What you do not understand is the actual meaning of the 'no housework no pussy' statement: you do not do housework, I will not stay in a (loving) relationship with you (aka no pussy, and by that I mean nowadays most women won't tolerate a slobber around the house). You talk of 'respecting' a man, but a man who expects his wife to do all the housework does not respect her, and so deserves no respect in return
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 01:39 AM
1

Except men in their 40s still crave pussy because they cannot get it from any source other than their wife. Fertile 18 year olds do not sleep with men in their 40s outside of the Red Pill Fantasy Disneyland, I'm afraid.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 01:15 AM
2

The point is, if you shit, you clean up. I would dump a man who did not clean up after himself immediately, and I think more and more women nowadays adopt the 'no housework, no pussy' attitude, and with good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 12:48 AM
1

Darling, you and your aspie bros spend your life talking about 'pussy pedestalising' and 'oneitis' on this sub. Do you need a 'source' that tells you the sky is blue?
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 12:17 AM
-4

We are always cute, as a matter of fact. Isn't that why you lovely aspies spend most of your lives here on the Pill reading up about how to pick up the courage to even approach us? ;)
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 12:03 AM
-6

Plenty of men would love to be that kind of 'faggot' when they meet a girl they really like. Nothing wrong with that. Men on average are biologically programmed to pedestalise the women they bond with for survival reasons. P.S. Oh btw, I read 'who licks the cum off my BOOBS', and my boyfriend totally does that ;)
/r/TheRedPill11/12/16 11:36 PM
-4

Forcing a woman to give birth is literally torture, so yeah. Pro-life people are shits. Also, most of them are conservatives who do not give a fuck about the child once it is born and do not want to pay welfare taxes. So they can get off their moral high horse.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 12:12 AM
-2

Yes, because he would force women to give birth against their will.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 11:55 PM
1

A very famous former single mother is J. K. Rowling. She was married in Portugal, her husband beat her, she divorced him and could not get child support as she returned to the UK. She could not enter the workforce because she could not afford childcare. Now tell me, what would she have done had there been no single mother benefits? Lived in the streets?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 08:50 PM
5

IQ is a bullshit concept and it has been shown that it can even change with intellectual exercise. This hatred of the working class is irrational. Plenty of geniuses in history came from poor backgrounds.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 08:18 PM
-16

Well, the guy IS a piece of shit for being pro-life, so no loss if he was fired...
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 08:12 PM
1

I am sure even you are aware of what gross generalisations you are making.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 03:40 PM
1

Good for you if you can get the pussy. Still, millions of women will not stop entering working spaces and will not tolerate harassment.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 03:00 PM
1

Men do not get any sexual harassment unless their boss is a gay asshole who abuses them. The reason why these 'special laws' exist is because men do not behave around women. By the way, it is pretty sad that this whole sub and most male spaces are dedicated to winning the approval of what are supposedly your 'physical and intellectual inferiors' lol.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 10:36 AM
1

The ignorance of this post is so deep, so borderline subhuman (women are 'masculinised for wanting to go to university' is genuinely a top record low) I believe dignifying it with a proper answer would be an insult to the rest of the community and to human intelligence as a whole.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 12:48 AM
1

You seem just as set in your ways, though. Not very inclined to be persuaded away from your current views. Monogamy still exists, I have specified. Only nowadays it exists in the form of an older woman and her husband (who is often, but not always, a beta). The older system only benefited men because it gave them a young piece of virgin pussy. Nowadays they cannot have that because women go to university. Is it really that hard to see why half the world's population would rather go to university…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 11:31 PM
1

I would like to focus on a specific part of your comment: you started your previous argument by saying that most men nowadays do not reproduce. I refuted that, and specified that most men actually do reproduce in contemporary society, only they do so with post-wall women rather than with young virgins. At this point, you agreed and switched gears, and mentioned something else entirely: the life satisfaction of men. This is a completely different subject, but it is related to my previous post: th…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 11:25 PM
1

The laws are actually designed to protect women from sexual assault. Remember: one woman's alpha is another woman's beta (with some extreme exceptions). This means that what is taken as an Alpha compliment by a woman is perceived as horrifying and violating by another. An Alpha takes a huge, HUGE risk when he 'grabs a woman by the pussy' because he can never really know how she will react. I understand that your post is written from a male perspective so I will give you a slight pass for this, b…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 11:10 PM
3

The 'old world' society did not allow more men to reproduce, actually. It allowed them to reproduce with young virgins. That's an important distinction, because the concept of 'beta provider' is recognised in TRP. Post-wall women settling down with betas and having children happens constantly. Even TRP acknowledges that it's definitely not only the top 20% of men who are procreating nowadays. I think it also acknowledges that even alphas and staceys - the top 20% - do not settle down and have ki…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 04:51 PM
3

What TRP wants can only exist in our actual society, though. The hookup culture certainly did not exist in the past. Also, since you are branching out into what is good for society, it is common knowledge even in TRP that most people in our society do eventually have kids. How many? One or two rather than five or six, true, and that is not a problem since in our globalised world we have immigration to fill in the gaps. We also do not have the resources to support huge amounts of children to firs…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 03:58 PM
2

We are half the world's population. If you men can fuck girls without marrying them nowadays (which is alright), we will take our freedom of sexual expression too. I don't see why we should suppress our nature for your interest.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 10:54 AM
8

I thought you wanted women to be more honest?
/r/TheRedPill06/12/16 10:50 PM
1

A beta is a weak, lazy man. Idolising me leads to neither, because I expect a high performance from him.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 10:39 AM
2

The internet does not only offer opportunities for angry, anonymous rants, you know. Penis enlargers can also be bought discreetly...
/r/TheRedPill01/12/16 12:30 PM
2

A man who does not expect me to do housework for him or give up my career for him is not a beta in the eyes of women. He is showing he does not need the environment around him to bend over backwards for him only so that he can feel like a man.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/16 09:25 AM
1

If he expected me to cook and give up my career for him, that would be him not showing respect for me. Hence I would dump him.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/16 09:23 AM
0

Why should she worship you and not her? I have no time to worship a man, I have to think about my own life first. P.S. I'm thinner than any drunken fat girl you could scrape at a bar and boast about fucking on this sub.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/16 09:22 AM
2

We live in the most prosperous society ever known to humankind. Somewhere far away from your pathetic little bubble there are male and female academics, scientists, writers, business owners. But you are too small to see any of this.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 11:27 PM
-2

Feminism has not changed evolution. It is men who cannot adapt to a feminist society who have failed the evolutionary imperative which dictates to humans that they must adapt to new circumstances and environments. That explains why some men like my boyfriend get laid, and others just circlejerk in the Manosphere.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 10:53 PM
0

I am engaged to my boyfriend. He looks after me a lot. I have no time to look after a man. Either he is after me 24/7 or he is worthless in my book. He must idolise me.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 10:51 PM
-1

Leadership? Not if in a relationship with a feminist. Stability? Uhm what? Emotional balance? Men are mostly on the spectrum. Not understanding social cues does not equal being emotionally stable. Physical Protection. Looooool do we live in Congo? Income. Most couples nowadays earn roughly the same amount. I earn more than my boyfriend. Security. From what, exactly?
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 10:50 PM
0

Yeah sure, keep hoping one of these days 18 year old girls will stop going to college to get married and have kids. Hope never dies, after all.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 09:27 PM
2

Yeah yeah, and the globalist elite will monopolise the press and control us all. Same old pathetic drill.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 08:47 PM
2

We do if you know which fields actually sell...
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 07:25 PM
0

Men kill men, women and children all the time. That woman did not do anything which has not been done a million times before by other psychopaths.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 07:24 PM
0

Ahem, my boyfriend works in STEM, he is a scientist. Conversationally I have never seen this epidemic of mythological blue-haired feminists you guys keep babbling about. And do not fear, there is no way any woman in earth could ever come close to the level of bitterness present on this sub.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 07:15 PM
1

You could investigate and target the gang that is making the street you want to go to unsafe. That is what's happening on campuses on a major scale. I am surprised to hear you say it is not, because it is a phenomenon men on the Manosphere bemoan often enough.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 07:07 PM
4

Blah blah blah, incel bitterness getting the best of you. You are on a sub devoted to getting female validation, buddy. On a thread that tries to see the good in feminism yet still bemoans the end of the family structure. The sad truth is, if men did not need women far, far, far, far more than women need men (women do not know of the existence of most men actually, because of hypergamy) there would be no Red Pill, no Manosphere, no bitterness. But all these things exist, because every man's brai…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 07:04 PM
1

Well, I do not ask him to come and do all the cleaning at my house of course. To each his or her own independence.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 07:00 PM
1

The fact is, most aspies on the Red Pill would not survive in such a world.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 06:59 PM
2

See how good feminism was. Now you know you do not need a baby sitter who cooks for you. The only thing is, this whole thread would not even exist if all of you did not deep down want a housewife, which is sad. Apparently men are incapable of real independence even when it gets handed to them.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 06:41 PM
2

Well, 'jack shit' so far has been the suffrage, the right to own property, all the divorce rape laws, harassment laws on the workplace, abortion rights, contraceptives, student grants, the list of the 'jack shit' goes on. Men can have standards if they like. We are just saying we do not give a shit and we are not going to cook/stay home to make them happy. The result? Most men adapted. Because men do not have hypergamy and are not designed to have high standards.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 06:39 PM
2

And you are so bitter about it it's almost cute.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 06:35 PM
1

Why do you go outside knowing there could be a mad criminal who might start shooting in the middle of the street? Why do you cross the road knowing a madman might be sitting in that car which instead of stopping might run you over? Why do you go to a date with that girl who might turn out to be a psychopath? Dealing with a problem at its source means attacking the source of the problem: men who rape/harass at frat parties. That's why there have been lots of arrests in the last few years.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 06:35 PM
0

Pity if you could actually attract them you would not have ended up on this autistic sub to begin with...
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 06:23 PM
1

I am a journalist and I get paid a lot. My boyfriend would only live in filth if he expected me to do all the cleaning instead of taking up his fair share. Men cannot branch-swing to a model because the model in question has this lil thing called hypergamy. Yes, thank goodness for feminism.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 06:08 PM
1

Plenty of men are nowadays jailed as a result of rape and sexual harassment crimes they commit. I agree that not all men are bad, and I agree that the system is not perfect, but a lot, a lot of progress has been made.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:40 PM
-4

I always find it funny when men - who are responsible for most of the crimes of pedophilia and rape and sexual harassment in the world - think women's 'true nature' (being selective about their partners aka hypergamy) is the worst thing in the world. Lmao, and then you wonder why Men's Rights groups are jeered at and never achieve jack shit.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:37 PM
-1

Good. It's a great point. Women are not willing to sacrifice their lives to let men achieve their ambitions anymore.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:34 PM
1

Nah, you are fun to have around. And you serve certain purposes. We all need someone to look down upon to feel better about ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 05:33 PM
1

They can't do what was written in the top comment: harass their secretary without getting a lawsuit and expect their wife to tolerate their infidelity without divorce raping them vigorously enough to carve them a new asshole.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:26 PM
-4

We do it for the evilulz, mostly.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:25 PM
-1

Good for you. I hope you can cook. You'll make your wife happy. We ain't got the time for that sort of thing anymore...
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:23 PM
5

I agree with a lot of this. You are just getting into a relationship with a man/woman for the companionship plus sex. That is what makes the relationship more than a friendship: the physical attraction. But that's about it.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:22 PM
0

Lots of men here (not my boyfriend) are shit at doing the basic thing humans need to do to survive: adapt to a new environment. A man who needs women to be submissive and an end to globalisation to feel like a man at all, has failed to adapt to the new environment. He is an evolutionary failure.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:20 PM
1

I consider a man who cannot take care of himself and expects me to do the cooking a parasite, so fair enough. Besides, someone has to pay the bills, and I earn a lot.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 04:17 PM
1

I believe you will have to wait a good while if you think women will go back to the kitchen anytime soon. Hope you have a plan B ready ;)
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 04:16 PM
7

What else would you want, though? I can't think of anything a man could offer me besides companionship and perhaps cooking, if he can do it better than me (and that's not a high threshold). Companionship is pretty much all there is (if we include sex in the concept of companionship). What else has a man got to offer?
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 03:05 PM
-14

As a feminist, I love to read comments like these and think about what men simply cannot do anymore nowadays. Feminists are big achievers.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 03:00 PM
1

You have just explained why globalisation exists: many people cannot afford a phone if it costs them 100 dollars more. And the general manufacturing process becomes more expensive as well. Mass-production functions because it sells to the masses, not just the lucky few like you who can throw away a 100 extra bucks on a phone. The world we live in today literally would not exist if it weren't for globalisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 03:47 PM
2

Well, they don't do it just for men. They do it mostly for other women. Men are not even going to notice what kind of bag you carry, whilst a woman will.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 05:16 PM
1

Have balls? A woman who has balls is someone like Ivanka Trump who leads a business, not an idiot who would like to revert back the clock and go back to when women were forced to marry and stay home.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 05:13 PM
-2

My father is 100% pro-globalism and he is very, very competitive. In fact, he has nothing but contempt for the losers who were hit during the recession like him, yet had not his same cunning and did not begin to manufacture in China. Men are not nationalists. Loser men are nationalists.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 05:06 PM
4

Nothing you just claimed has got anything to do with feminism. Low-value men in the Victorian era struggled as much as modern ones. They could only marry a good-looking girl if they were rich, and actually that still happens today: an ugly rich guy can get a decent girlfriend. No father wanted his daughter to marry a useless omega, so shitty men were as fucked back then as they are now.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 04:50 PM
1

Women told you they are yours? Literally 'yours'?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 04:44 PM
1

Many women do not say they are 'his', they say they love him, they are not sleeping with others etc. It is the man who interprets that as the woman being 'his', as though she were a possession.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 03:44 PM
4

I disagree with the concept merely because I dislike the idea that men would have ever thought of a woman as 'theirs', as though she were a possession. Realising she is not theirs - in however an autistic way they can - is already a good step forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 10:38 AM
1

To speed up your divorce rape process, you should tell your girlfriend that being a woman is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 07:36 AM
1

I might have no basis to describe his private life, but I have seen him interact with female CEOs. I do not see why a man's private life is more if an indicator of how he treats women than the way he behaves in business where most of the sexism usually happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 07:35 AM
1

My dad 'paid', not 'payed' for it. Ah, it's good to be literate, and for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 07:30 AM
1

You forget I do not want kids. You can have your life with kids, I can get mine without. I think I am getting a better deal, but to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 12:45 AM
1

No cuck ever knows he is a cuck until it is too late. Enjoy paying for child support, babes. I will stick to being childfree with my mansservant while you deal with the cruelty of life ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 12:34 AM
1

The Red Pill says a health home life comprises two parents of the opposite gender and the mother ought to be a homemaker, the father the breadwinner. There, I had just that. Red Pill bitches still moaning?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 12:29 AM
1

Are you 24?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 12:27 AM
1

Your woman is not dating you for your charm, that is obvious. So she's probably a gold digger who's cucking you on the side. Kudos to her. Oh by the way, life without kids feels so good, you have no idea. Pity you will be divorce raped in a few years, instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 12:25 AM
1

My mother cannot divorce, no, yet now she and my father live in different houses and she still gets all the money she needs. She does not have to put up with him day by day. I believe my father is good because he has helped me and never told me to get married, obsess over my looks, lock down a man and all the rest of it. He has also always helped me financially. He has encouraged me to be a career woman. Some will not like him anyway, like you, but from my POV he is far from an anti-feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 12:22 AM
1

I will not have children because I don't want them. And who gives a shit about whatever you claim my job ought to be? Welcome to the 21st century, sweetie. P. S. I bet your gf takes it up the ass by someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 12:18 AM
1

Well, I like a man who devotes his life to be my servant. You can have your little ignorant virgin breeding cow. And we're all happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 12:06 AM
1

You just want to see outrage where there is none: having money and no debt comes before bullshit things like honour etc., as anyone who actually slaves to pay off debt will tell you. The virtuous high-ground has failed to swing me over.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:57 PM
1

Only men care about N counts because they fear paternity fraud. I am a woman. I am engaged. I don't care about male slut-fear because I got my fun and I am getting my nice cuck. Give me a reason to care, or your argument is bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:55 PM
1

Question: why should I give a shit about what some random fuckboy I will never see again thinks?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:50 PM
1

Because they are expected to be full time workers AND full time homemakers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:47 PM
1

Without that money, though, my mother would not survive. And I would have student debts to pay. So is his entrepreneurship really a force of evil? It is all very relative.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:46 PM
1

I have one great big piece of news for you: I like sex too. I did not love those men. I just had fun. I know, it's too much for your brain. I will stop now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:45 PM
1

Not a 'who're' specifically, because I do not get paid... Who gives a shit if men are upset by a high partner count? Dad's lesson was: to hell with what they want. And I got engaged at 24 anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:38 PM
1

You have never met one because you do not capitalise and have a poor grasp of grammar in general, and that alone says a lot about what your neck of the woods must be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:34 PM
1

My mother has never worked a day in her life, and he still supports her. It is more than many men do. Feminism is not about pedestalising women, it is about women obtaining rights. His last gf was the daughter of a Chinese factory owner. Not sure what would qualify as 'low status'.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:31 PM
1

Doesn't take much for me to become a business owner. All my father has to do to make it happen is sit me in his office. That's what parents who build something and leave it to their kids do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:27 PM
5

The thing is, many anti-feminists complain because women are not reproducing and that is why 'immigrants get imported', but they fail to realise the drastic consequences breeding the spawn of subgenetic incels and supposedly letting it be raised by said incels will be. The children of Alpha Widows will seen well-adjusted by comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:25 PM
1

The thing is, feminists consider this to be a good thing. What tied many women of the past to their husbands was inexperience. And lack of divorce laws. What you call 'lack of bonding' is simply a woman being more realistic, if you will. Less likely to put up with shit because she has experience. She does not wear rose-tinted glasses when it comes to her husband. That's a good thing, from a female POV.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:20 PM
1

There are women who cheat as well. Being a feminist does not mean treating women like special snowflakes, but rather seeing them as capable and treating them as equals. My dad does that by working and admiring female CEOs and never ramming the 'be a low N count subservient girlfriend' Red Pill bullshit down my throat.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:13 PM
1

I think globalisation and feminism are inextricably tied together: women's working rights could never be taken away within the Western society globalism has built because you need the female workforce to make it function. Therefore, in a globalised business world, my father has come across female CEOs. Other men in his place would not have liked it, but he did not mind. Women are also held back by their bodily functions. Yesterday I had my period whilst off the pill for the first time in years, …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:10 PM
1

Good for you for building yourself up. I don't really give a shit about finding one like you because I have a business to inherit. On the contrary, I need a man who will do as I say.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:04 PM
1

Hilarious how Brexiters, who have spent forty years bitching like crazy about the EU and are still bitching because they are not getting their article 50 until next year, suddenly think Remainers are 'moaners' because they oppose the status quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 11:02 PM
1

Possibly, but it's just because no Millenial man is at my dad's level.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:57 PM
1

What is delusional is the belief that my father is part of an oppressive elite which keeps other men down. He had a normal middle-class business and invested his capital in China. This Globalist Metroelite many Red Pillers blabber about does not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:56 PM
1

Conversationally, being a slut really has no consequences. I'm 24 and engaged, and had lots of partners before meeting my fiancé and seeing a couple of men on the side.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:53 PM
1

If you really think Trump, the man who lives in a golden tower, will help the working class, you are a fool. And just wait to see how the brave farmers cope once the UK's economy goes to shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:50 PM
1

And what would those oh so tragic experiences be? That women are not in the kitchen anymore? Please.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:47 PM
1

Minimum wage will probably be abolished if you go against globalism and force businesses to manufacture in the West. You fail to understand my dad sees the manufacturing of our whole world in China. Technology and mass production as we know it would come to an end if all was manufactured in the West.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:44 PM
1

The whole 'masters and slaves' bullshit you just spewed (as a result of globalism and feminism, I assume?) is what I argued against in my post. You see male oppression where there is none.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:42 PM
2

In my opinion, my dad actually hates those men who embody traits of toxic masculinity. An example: he was disgusted by all the ignorant men who voted to leave the EU and brayed that men are not men anymore because they don't know how to fix the roof of their own house. My father is a metro type who has never held a hammer in his hands his whole life. He sees a world in which we call others to fix the roof as a world with an expanding economy, he does not see his inability to fix his own house wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:40 PM
1

Feminists, unlike what some extremists think, never actually wanted to create a society in which humans are not humans anymore and every man is a perfect husband. They wanted a world in which women have rights and work in business and have their independence. My father, regardless of his private life, respects that world.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:33 PM
1

Who cares? I do. And I am a woman. Hence, feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:31 PM
1

Right. Hail for the great martyr farmer who's going to change everything by wobbling out of his shitty little country cottage to vote to leave the EU. Now that is an alpha, innit?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:30 PM
1

Cause that will make your money run out fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:29 PM
2

I do not see how my dad, who has supported my mom all her life despite her never working a single day, can be classified as a major asshole. Those workers in China would starve if Europeans like him did not manufacture there, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:28 PM
2

My dad would have paid for my uni had I been a son, as well. Also, many Red Pillers say that men have become 'feminised' nowadays. This is another thing my dad loathes: he does not think that having someone else fix his car makes him less than a man, because whilst that gets done he works on his business. Instead, you will find many Red Pillers who claim men are not real men anymore because they have become 'dependent'.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:26 PM
2

What I am saying is that my dad works with women. There are female factory owners in China. There are female CEOs who buy from him. He has always seen what they have to say as valuable, and these partnerships as opportunities. The Red Pill, instead, paints this picture of doom and gloom, of men getting 'emasculated' by the presence of women in business who accuse them of rape at every turn. It's bloody ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:21 PM
2

So you are basically admitting you have to be a loser to be against globalism and feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:19 PM
2

By showing how a man can be successful by working with the status quo, rather than against it like the little whiny Brexiters.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:18 PM
1

No it does not. It says stuff like 'the world is degenerated now that globalism and feminism have taken over and men feel suppressed.' My dad does not feel suppressed and does not feel emasculated because he just rolled with the changes, rather than seeing them as degenerate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:17 PM
1

No, but many men nowadays are not trying, that's what dad says. They don't try because they blame the government, China, the women who do not cook dinner for them anymore. His point is that many men look at the state of things and fail to see opportunities in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:14 PM
2

The point (and also what was supposed to be this thread's discussion) is that feminism and globalisation have not destroyed a man's ability to be a man and to be successful. It is the men's inertia and inability to react that does that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:12 PM
1

Dad's words: 'Very often, if a man is telling you you are being a bitch, it means you are not giving him what he wants. In most cases, this is a good thing for you.'
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:10 PM
11

The Red Pill is merely a new coined term for male bitterness. These same concepts existed back then as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:08 PM
2

My mother is not a saint and knew my dad would raise me better. If a woman accused my father of rape, it could only be a false accusation. My father was always the one who told me to care more about my career than about looks and men and that I can do as I please and do not need to be subservient, a virgin, a low count good girl or anything else men might demand of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:07 PM
2

Discuss how what the Red Pill says is false and there are ways to embrace globalism and feminism without being a begging little beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:05 PM
2

Dad thinks a pawn guy is actually good, but he does not like them specifically. His problem is that he raised me as a boy. He tells me that if I build my career I will get the top men, because that is how it worked with him and his best lovers. He just doesn't get it doesn't work the same the other way around, but as I said he treats me like ha son.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:04 PM
2

Oh shut up, those Chinese workers would not be able to feed their families if it wasn't for manufacturers like my dad. Also lmao, if you have read the post you will know my dad met his factory contacts through his Chinese lover. Racist my arse.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:02 PM
1

The point is, my dad was not a magnante. He rebuilt his business from scratch and his old middle-class one was lost in the recession. What he is criticising is the utter inability of his fellow men to change and adapt and find new business ventures. They just sit on their asses and complain about globalism, immigrants, feminism, blah blah blah.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 10:00 PM
1

Well, there are plenty of things many of you claim feminists do which they don't actually do. One would be coming from broken homes and hating their dads.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:57 PM
15

Have you read that Bible passage in which the author complains about the sluts getting big dicks 'in a decadent city'? The Bible was written by a bunch of sluthate incels who wished to get welfare sex, but were too Red Pilled to believe imposing such a society would make hypergamous women love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:56 PM
2

Because my dad's lawyer is too badass for anyone to want to throw in a false rape accusation. Even my mom was afraid to divorce him, knowing he would win custody of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:53 PM
0

Because you define feminism as whatever SJW bullshit is fashionable today.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:51 PM
1

Speaking of which, dad doesn't think much of any of the three guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:50 PM
2

If you buy an Iphone, you are exploiting the Chinese slaves as much as my dad is. So don't go feeling all goody-good and blaming the big bad globalist sociopaths who make more in a year than you will make in your life, if you don't have the guts to take big risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:50 PM
2

The problem is that the Red Pill has a very bleak view of what the world is like. Red Pillers do not see opportunities in change, just a threat to their old ways of life. Red Pillers are many things, but they are not cunning. They feel more like men if they down drinks and fuck a random girl than if they sit down and think how to better exploit the Chinese factory workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:48 PM
1

In the meanwhile, dad has had his lovers and has made money working with female CEOs, you guys are just sitting on your asses and bitching about how feminism fucked the world. And I, the condom, have zero university debt at the age of 24. Hey, to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:42 PM
2

I'll tell you why: dad explained. He manufactures goods in China and the employees there are basically slaves and he does not spend shit to produce huge orders. He can also bring these goods back to Europe without paying huge tariffs. He can also sell these goods to various buyers across the EU without there being any tariffs, and the goods can be transported by Romanian truck drivers by paying them a pittance. The only ones who do not like this system are the fucking losers who, once their busi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:40 PM
3

The point is, when we tell men to change they think we want to transform into little betas. They don't get that evolving can actually benefit them and that being able to adapt is the very opposite of being a beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 08:53 PM
2

My father is as dominant as you can get, had many lovers in his life and has made a lot of money through globalisation. He was always pro-feminism and respected female CEOs and worked with them and got even richer, and always told me to do as I like and not submit to men. You see, after having a father like that, if I see a man who needs women to be submissive and an end to globalisation to feel like a man at all, I feel pity for him. I feel disgust. He is nothing but a cockroach who cannot adap…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 08:51 PM
8

You could not have afforded the computer/phone you are using if people like my family had not had the idea of manufacturing in China for ridiculous prices and employing Chinese slaves. Blue collar men think they deserve their technology and a first world salary and working timetable manufacturing local goods. They need to watch less Disney. My father made his money in China, he worked with female CEOs and learned from them and saw the empowerment of women and globalisation as opportunities, not …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 07:56 PM
11

I always say many men have no effing idea how vulnerable they make themselves by being so set in their ways. Women are empowered = panic! Our masculinity is threatened! Globalisation = panic! We cannot have a one-income household with an easy stable job anymore! SJWs spout some shit = panic! There's a war against men! The most successful men I have ever seen are not anti-feminism, anti this or that. Their key skill is adaptability. They see opportunities in change, rather than setbacks. The prob…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 07:51 PM
2

Yes well, you probably do not have my relatives' cunning or entrepreneurial skills. Loser gonna lose. Those who can trade with China win.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 07:46 PM
6

Globalisation is a fucking great thing. My relatives made a fortune through it, both men and women. The easiest way to spot a loser who cannot adapt to changing circumstances (and is therefore an evolutionary failure) is a left-behind anti-globalist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 07:22 PM
10

The problem with men is that many of them are notoriously bad at adapting. Some men adjusted to feminism and globalisation, others bitch and moan about these things and claim they need women to be subservient, great jobs and 2,000 more conditions just to get to feel like men and have a pleasant attitude as a consequence. Imagine how fragile their manhood is if it needs all this just to exist. If these men lose their status by being in a position of vulnerability (aka being sick), there again sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 06:18 PM
1

Who says what women are 'supposed' to be? Because nowadays women - being free - are not supportive. So that shows being supportive is not their normal state of being.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 03:53 PM
3

If men have freedom, then women ought to have it too. If we used your logic, next time we hear a story of a man murdering women we ought to say 'see, men ought not to be given freedom!'
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 02:57 PM
2

What's wrong with a girl going about her business in leggings? You and other men do not own her.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 02:56 PM
1

Yet I see nobody here claiming men who kill women ought to be stoned to death as well...
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 02:46 PM
1

The tall skinny beta is the STEM guy and is the third one. The one with the small dick was a guy I dumped because it was not a serious thing. The STEM guy is a fairly recent addition though. Then there is the fiancé and the guy who buys me dinner constantly without sex for obscure reasons of his own.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/16 05:47 PM
2

I think he is just trying to weigh his options, he is probably buying dinners to other girls too. He gets a kiss after every evening, at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/16 08:18 AM
1

And what if the know actually means no and she gets super angry if you keep trying?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/16 08:16 AM
1

That's the third one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/16 08:14 AM
2

Precisely. So it is not protection, it is blackmail.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 11:12 PM
1

A feminist would not have liked it the way your gf did. Whether or not you get a lawsuit would depend on whether you 'get' when a no is really a no.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 10:53 PM
2

I am actually quite surprised the likes of you would resort to something as sophisticated as thinking how to access the golden gash. I thought the lowly likes of you just resorted to rape, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 10:28 PM
3

I am getting married to one of the guys next year, as I explained, so... Intelligence is a very attractive trait in a man. Good cognitive abilities = good genes. White nationalists - being a bunch of ogres - unfortunately lack this essential trait. My vagina dries up like the Sahara desert when I come across a man with such a poor grasp of grammar as you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 10:12 PM
3

I do not like your ex's style: she did not seem to have much control over herself, or a plan in general. I am teetotal, and I have not ever even fucked one of the three guys. I keep him around because he is rich and he takes me to lots of nice restaurants, but I suspect he is seeing other girls (no hard feelings, I am doing the same). A foolish woman would sleep with him and pine for his commitment. I just get to eat the nice dinners and enjoy nice conversations whilst having another two boyfrie…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:51 PM
1

Gosh no, it's worse to just make them read what women usually read. It's the workings of the female mind that leave lasting traumas lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:19 PM
1

I would post like, the most depraved BDSM fanfictions for Red Pillers to analise, so they can say AWALT!!11 lol, but the fun thing is that they would have to read those fics first, and that would traumatise them for life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:17 PM
4

I am very thin, and you are only a slut - or a criminal - if you get caught ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:14 PM
1

One day I am going to make a thread here and show the Red Pillers the most awful depraved shit on that website just to make them even more scared of women they currently are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:11 PM
1

Do you want me to give you a recommendation...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:06 PM
3

I get physically aroused by touch, but I cannot orgasm unless I recall some erotica scene, no. I read stuff on fanfiction.net!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:03 PM
1

Pornstars like Sasha Grey make a hell of a lot of money. Had she not turned to porn, with her level of education she could have been either a prostitute or a waitress. It was not a bad deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:01 PM
2

Aghh I am addicted to erotica the way some men are addicted to porn. I'll explain: when I am in bed with a man, be he Alpha Alex or Beta Billy, I simply cannot orgasm if I think of him. I have to think of some erotica scene I read in order to orgasm. The same way some men cannot enjoy 'real' sex too much because they need to fantasise about the crazy porn positions they have watched the night before to orgasm. Because of this, I do think it erotica can cause addiction. As a matter of fact, high-…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 08:57 PM
4

The 'preferential treatment' women get is widely overestimated. Especially if they are not pretty. Women can and often are treated very harshly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 08:40 PM
3

This is absolute nonsense. Men very often help women not because they are being protective, but because they want something (sex) in return. The knight saves the princess from the dragon, but then he wants to marry her. What if she doesn't like him and doesn't want to sleep with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 08:35 PM
3

This was a long and mainly nonsensical rant, but as for women getting fooled by men who talk about marriage... my bf proposed to me (I'm 24), and he does not know there are two other guys who think I am their exclusive girlfriend. Does he secretly know and is just using me for sex? Oh well, in that case he should have just visited a prostitute regularly: it would have cost him less than the engagement ring he is not getting back even if we break up...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 06:46 PM
5

The thing is this: many men want women to commit to then by changing themselves. They want women to stop caring so much about their careers once they are married etc., they do not just want to spend time with a career woman the way she is. Personally, I have already been proposed to at 24 and told my bf I am not going to change for him, give up my career or have his (or any man's) children. He seems ok with this, so perhaps men really want commitment so badly they will say yes to anything...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 06:41 PM
1

I know women in their 50s who are not and never have been married. I don't see hordes of men trying to rape them. Didn't happen when they were younger, either (my family has known them for years). The idea that 'fear of sexual assault' ever enters a woman's mind when she ponders whether to marry is autistic beyond measure . It's not even something many men would think of, my dad always tells me it's okay if I don't want to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 05:49 AM
1

Who exactly tells them they are worthless?!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 04:03 PM
1

That's the point I am making. What I wrote is considered 'an attack', and yet if women get offended by 'grab them by the pussy' they are 'overreacting to locker room talk'. Which is the most sensitive gender then?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 12:43 PM
1

Honestly, this is only true for blue collar jobs. Globalisation has been good for the middle classes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 10:15 AM
1

In my opinion a lot of problems are caused by the fact that white men, unlike black men, gay people, women etc. do not know how to be victims. They grow up convinced that society is built for them and everyone ought to accommodate them. I say this because gay people get attacked and beaten constantly and so do black people. Women get raped and killed. The fact that ONE white man gets attacked and white men are so shocked shows white men are not used to what is pretty much routine for other group…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 08:28 AM
1

This accusing woman was absolutely psychotic lol. So you actually did not tell her she's incapable, you say down and explained to her how to improve her performance and do better?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 12:19 AM
6

In their defense, it is hard to be 'farm hands' if you work an office job in a big hip city.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 12:12 AM
1

I think a lot of Red Pillers have a degree, yet that does not stop them from saying that 'the next generation is a disaster', that 'Western civilisation is collapsing' and that they must vote Trump because 'big change is needed.'
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 11:53 PM
2

What do you mean? You mean they get offended by things that are just 'men being men'?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 11:42 PM
0

By which you mean the problem is they don't know how to be independent in an increasingly automated world?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 11:39 PM
4

Never understood why men blow 'identity politics' so out of proportion. How does someone shouting 'Black Lives Matter' affect them so drastically?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 11:18 PM
1

I do not see Millennials as a failure at all. Those who regard them as such are merely those who cling to ancient, dying notions of what children ought to grow up to be like. Millennials may not learn how to change a tyre, but they sure as hell know how to look up how to do it on the internet. They are a generation that has no time for that sort of thing because it leaves and breathed technology, and that is a good thing. It is progress.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 04:41 PM
1

I would much rather be a feminist in hell than a submissive second class citizen in heaven. Cheers :)
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 04:38 PM
1

Many are. The most unhappy people I know are those women like my mom, who have been housewives their whole lives and trapped in unhappy marriages. Nothing can beat that degree of unhappiness.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 04:37 PM
1

Rape is a reproductive strategy. The man is trying to pass his genes on. By aborting the child and not allowing him to successfully reproduce using your body as a baby machine, you are thwarting that strategy.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 04:36 PM
1

The children, especially the girls, can only benefit from seeing their mother not submit to her husband. The girls will grow up to be assertive and take zero shit from men and have careers. A wonderful parental example.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 04:34 PM
1

Because Christians would like to see women pushed out of the workforce and back at home. The reason why there were less divorces back then was because a woman could not leave her husband even if the marriage was shit. My own mother was trapped in such a situation. The way I see it, women nowadays are doing great.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 04:32 PM
3

The thing that always amazes me is that when men say 'that guy is really bad, he's an asshole, he is a sociopath,' they actually mean it. They really don't like him at all. A woman can say the exact same thing and mean it as a covert compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 10:59 PM
2

LMAO she knew her shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 11:31 PM
2

Sure. It doesn't stop most women. Does not mean it is right, and that we are going to lay down and accept it and allow it to become normalised.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 01:57 PM
1

I have actually said yes and bought time simply by telling his parents we are going to organise things properly. I want to see how things go with the other one. He is free to explore his options if he so chooses. I am doing the same.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 01:55 PM
1

Actually, one of the boys has asked me to marry him, and I plan to in the next couple of years. I do not see why the whole thing is framed in such combatant terms though. I never claimed men 'ought not to do the same', or I myself would not find a lover!
/r/askTRP13/11/16 01:21 PM
1

He can not pay because the woman can get an abortion, which in my opinion is almost always the best choice if the woman is not married. Being a single mother is a death sentence to a single woman, and nowadays affording to go to a decent school is no joke. You can bring that child into the world, but his life will be sub-par. Western society simply does not have the means to support a huge amount of people to this living standard. So the best thing to do is to plan things well... Planned Parenth…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 01:04 PM
3

You are not forced to hand out sweets to kids. Just don't be openly abusive to young women and others. We'll leave you alone if you just show that much decency.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 01:00 PM
1

I quite like him, actually. He is very funny. My sister does not mistreat him at all, as a matter of fact, and he does not know about the affairs.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 10:27 AM
3

Yeah, I think what this post says is that we got Trump because people on the left live in an echo chamber.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/16 10:15 AM
2

I plan to marry one of the two, actually, and long before 30. Still, my sister is married and she also has affairs. Also, I'm glad the third is getting a good deal? Lol, he is a wonderful lover who gives me the best cunnilingus ever, he deserves it.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 10:13 AM
1

Men are, by and large, on the spectrum. They cannot understand social cues, so they cannot manipulate as well as women can. You keeping doing what you do is fine with me, it is in my best interest. I like my lovers as much as I like my 'official' bf, and we both have a great time.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 10:10 AM
1

Ain't even trolling. I haven't said anything particularly scandalous or unexpected.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 03:49 AM
2

I would believe this if one of them (the first) had not asked me to marry him, and had not told me from the start it would be a deal breaker if I cheated (we had the normal relationship talk). Men simply do not know who they are dating. Obviously it goes both ways because naturally a guy can be in a relationship and do the sane thing I do. P. S. My older sister is in her late 30s and married and still has side-affairs all the time.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 03:39 AM
2

I mean, I have had about 10 partners and tell all the men I meet (separately, through online dating) I have had only two. This whole thread is a shitpost. She can just lie. Problem solved.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 02:54 AM
2

Fuck I love your username. I had no idea there were HP fans in the Red Pill.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 02:49 AM
2

No, I don't think he was incapacitated to that degree. He still admitted to bring very lazy, and being disabled does not mean you have to be fat. He was just putting in zero effort and preferred to say it was all the fault of his disability.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 02:41 AM
-1

As a feminist I should probably get angry at this, but I'm actually laughing my ass off lol.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/16 02:29 AM
2

Well, they disagree with me on pretty big issues. Anyway, after talking to a few Christians today, I feel a profound affection towards all pro-choice Red Pillers. Like, I would give chocolates to all men who want their girlfriend to abort, seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 02:14 AM
3

My rage is only directed at misogynists, not kids or other (non-batshit crazy hags) women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 01:15 AM
8

There are plenty of fun hags who have a great life because they stopped long ago to give a shit about what society thinks of them. They are the kind who wear strange colours, give lots of sweets to kids on Halloween, and love and encourage younger women. If I do not end up in this category of hags, shame on me. I deserve the spit from the sky and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 01:07 AM
1

The way he refused to fight against him and pull himself together in any way repelled me. No excuses for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 12:12 AM
3

Pretty much. But the hags are more dangerous because they don't have autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 11:36 PM
1

I'd like to say something to this. Your supposed 'God' could have done something for that woman. He could have said 'Christians, be different and better than others! Stop treating women like cattle and baby making machines and allow them to own property and work and get an education, and teach them how to use the herbs (yes, they existed back then) that can abort the vile spawn of their filthy rapists! And punish the rapists severely!' What did he say instead? Let's give a nice young warm pussy …
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 09:53 PM
1

If you had read that article, you would have noticed that is says what I am saying: the dual burden of childcare/homemaking PLUS work makes women unhappy. Also: http://www.metroparent.com/daily/parenting/parenting-issues-tips/stay-home-moms-depressed-angry-sad-study-says/ Not that there is anything wrong if a mother starts home, but having financial independence is key. That way you never submit to your husband and can easily leave him.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 09:34 PM
1

I see people getting married left right and centre, actually. And the majority of societies, which is not Christian (or claims to be Christian but does not believe in this bullshit) wants a sex life. You are free not to have one before your marriage, just stop obsessing over ours. Women were forced to marry in the past because they did not have access to universities. It was a form of 'welfare sex', weak men getting women because women had no other way to survive. P.S. Career women don't need a …
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 09:30 PM
1

I have a boyfriend as a matter of fact, and I am very happy. I would be very unhappy if I had to leave him because he turned out to be a scumbag who wants me to give birth to my rapist's child (thank goodness he is a pro-choice fervent militant atheist). In case you have not noticed, the reason why we oppose pro-life people is that we want to be happy and not be forced to be submissive baby machines. In any case, 'God' is just a travesty for men getting their own Red Pill way and getting a submi…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 09:26 PM
1

The thing is, most of us non-brainwashed, atheist women with careers abort our babies and don't give a shit if our husbands want us to be submissive. If you guys want to act that way in your cult circles that's fine, but stop pushing your bullshit on civilised society. 70% of Christian women secretly get abortions. We don't care if they do, we only care that Christians leave us the fuck alone.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 09:13 PM
1

No, they show that women who do not get help with housework and childcare AND ALSO work are unhappy.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 09:07 PM
1

Is it morally right to force women to have sex with men they don't want? Stop using the word 'moral'.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 09:06 PM
4

This has got nothing to do with getting laid: it's a Millennial problem, pure and simple. Our lives have been absolutely fucked over by the changing living pattern and technology, both of which have isolated us immensely. George R. R. Martin said something really depressing a while ago. He said nowadays we like book series more than we like novels because in the past, when we had strong local communities and spent our whole lives in the same village, 'novels' were popular because they brought so…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 08:29 PM
4

No, they are just embittered dried up hags who gloat when they see a happy young woman and can't wait to tear her down.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 08:21 PM
1

Is it the waiter's job to pull my chair and pour my water but not do the same with male customers?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 06:53 PM
2

I once met an incel. He had some heart condition which made it difficult for oxygen to reach his brain, so he was constantly sleepy and had difficulty breathing. What made him repulsive was not his condition, but the extent to which he had let himself go as a result of his disability. He was disgustingly fat, had rotting teeth, zero career ambition and was so lazy he could not even bring himself to clean his disgusting room before his friends (us) came over. He disgusted me, I say this openly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 06:47 PM
2

Look, I am a feminist and I agree with this but there is nothing we feminists can do about it. Yesterday I and my bf went out to dinner. The waiter pulled out my chair for me, poured water in my glass as if I was a fucking child. The hell was I supposed to do, tell at him? No, women should not be put on a pedestal nowadays, but the problem is perpetuated by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 06:44 PM
9

Just like men may ally with other men to accomplish common goals, women have also banded together for their rights. The outrage over Trump getting the female vote is not born out of a belief that women should all care for one another, but rather that those who voted for him simply have not realised how bad things will be for them if Mike Pence gets his way. And I am talking about Christian women too (who secretly get abortions all the time). That being said, some old women are absolutely disgust…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 06:40 PM
3

Basically this. It would be alright if only their expectations were not so extremely pandered to by so society.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 05:58 PM
1

There were men in the feminist movement as well, as a matter of fact. I never said all men are evil, I said sexist men did - who held political power - did not give women the vote because they wanted to, but because they were pressured into it. And the feminist men who fought, fought alongside the feminists who founded the movement. It's not as though they handed women something, as you'd like to put it. It's like saying black people should be grateful to white people for abolishing slavery. Lma…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 05:05 PM
1

The fact that the KKK supports Trump should make people take a closer look at him, at a man who wants to build a fucking border wall, and they would see what is wrong with him. I do not think all those who voted for Truml are racists. I think they are people for who the emboldening of racist groups is not a deal breaker. And that's a deal breaker for me and most liberals.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 04:47 PM
1

You clearly have not read what I wrote and know jack shit about the suffragette movement and the British political system and how much pressure was put on MPs when the suffragettes began to be seen as heroic by the public despite the bomb-detonation, vandalism etc. Go read a history book.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 04:37 PM
1

They gave them the vote as a political move to save face, as I have explained to you. And that in itself was disgraceful, the idea that women were lesser citizens who had to fight for the right to vote. So no, men were going along for themselves and women had to fight for each right which was automatically given to men: the right to own property, to enter university etc. feminists even funded contraceptive research. I owe everything to them, and men remain the ones who need protests to give wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 04:23 PM
1

Hitler, like Trump, was not a socialist. He was a populist, and populism is an amalgamation of the far-right and the far-left in that it supports the working classes only by tying them together with the rest of the country through ethno-nationalistic rhetorics which do not extend to minority working class people (in Hitler's case, ESPECIALLY not Jewish working class people).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 04:06 PM
1

You know what it took to make them give women the vote? The suffragettes were starving themselves in prison, and they had to force-feed them because if they died as martyrs their cause would be seen as legitimate. They were beaten, assaulted and jailed, and many men voted in favour of the vote because the movement was garnering attention and they were beginning to be seen for what they were: oppressors. So they had to give women the vote to save face. I owe them nothing, they were scumbags. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 04:00 PM
4

The suffragettes detonated bombs, were sexually assaulted by the officers who arrested them, force-fed in prison, locked up in asylums and treated for 'hysteria' with the removal if their uterus. I owe my vote to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 03:42 PM
4

In short: men are scumbags who need feminism to civilise them. Cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 03:05 PM
2

The KKK was celebrating when Trump won. That is because its members, unlike you, are not blind to what Trump's core narrative is all about: a white America with more regressive family values.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 02:24 PM
7

LMAO definitely Freudian slip. Ivanka's husband. Because I hope nothing sexual ever happened between her and her father. I hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 02:03 PM
1

Donald Trump is endorsed by the KKK. Get out of your fantasy world.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 02:02 PM
3

Yes, that is definitely a case in which a man can feel alienated if it happens to him. I think liberals need a more 'Michelle Obama' approach to this. When a white guy does something shitty and says it is 'what guys do', they should call it an insult to white guys. That's what she did after the pussy tape.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 02:01 PM
4

I mean, beta does not equal 'complete doormat' to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 01:49 PM
3

Those do not get abuse, and honestly I am a white woman. Plenty of white women voted for Trump, and I do not feel 'personally attacked' when those women are condemned. Why do men always take everything so personally?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 01:47 PM
0

Stats: the amount of white men who voted for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 01:44 PM
6

I was actually talking about Jared Kushner, Ivanka's father. Geez, I hope Trump does something to the school system to boost the reading comprehension skills of American rednecks...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 01:41 PM
0

Well, the point is simple statistics: Trump is a racist misogynist and most white males voted for him. Does this make the sexist and racist as well? No. However, it shows that to them, racism and sexism are not deal breakers. And that is an unforgivable act of cowardice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 01:40 PM
3

How is Chelsea a great role model? She is a child of privilege too, and I have never seen her do anything particularly remarkable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 01:24 PM
0

What were those insults?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 01:22 PM
3

Women did not have the right to vote and were barred from university and up until the 1950s they could not get a credit card if they were not married. I am angry because whenever I talk to the magnificently ignorant likes of you, I realise how bonobo-like humans can be when they do not receive a proper education. It hurts, because I take pride in being a human.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 12:57 PM
5

Yeah, and Ivanka doesn't do that. She has her own company plus a high position in her father's business. Hence, her husband is not an alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 12:42 PM
3

Yeah? Who was it that campaigned for women's rights in the last century and gave women all those rights? The alt right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 12:41 PM
4

I hope nobody comes forward and claims her husband is an alpha, because he is a shy geeky Jewish guy who has admitted Ivanka is the 'CEO of the family'. Go figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 11:41 AM
8

Plenty of the things Ivanka complains about in her book: having men in her field tell her they thought she was 'just a model', catcalls, uncertainty over how to address lewd comments at work because if she says nothing she is weak and if she is too aggressive she comes off as a bitch, exasperation over female colleagues 'consulting their husbands' before accepting an offer etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 10:54 AM
6

If it hadn't been for the feminist revolution, she would not have been able to own a single credit card before getting married or access university or have all those boyfriends before her husband and still get married despite not being a virgin. She should thank feminists on her knees.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 10:49 AM
4

Yes, I think that is accurate. If Ivanka was exactly the same but parroted liberalist ideas, she would be considered a cut throat career bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/16 10:44 AM
1

I'm sure a billionaire who lives in a golden tower is going to make policies that help the average blue collar man. Keep telling yourself whatever you need to keep going, sweetie.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 10:41 PM
1

"And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire." (Leviticus 21:9) "For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man." (I Corinthians 11:8-9) "Let the women learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam w…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 10:40 PM
1

The Bible does not say 'men, act confident because women like it.' It says women should submit to their husbands, cannot be leaders, ought to be silent and obedient and ought to marry their rapists if they get raped and of course give birth to the baby of their rapists. And not have career or aspirations of their own of course, they should be meek child-rearers. Yes, sorry if feminists refuse to just lay down and let themselves be used and abused that way without fighting back.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 06:46 PM
1

Mary Shelley, the Bronte sisters, Virginia Woolf, Agatha Christie, Jane Austen, J.K. Rowling, Margaret Atwood and too many others to count do not make it look like men 'dominate literature'. Not to say men are not great writers as well, and both being great is how I want it to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 06:06 PM
1

Only 20% of men get casual sex. The most midogynist ultra-Christian stuff I heard was from unsuccessful men who were bitter because young women did not look at them and worked on their careers/had abortions/enjoyed casual sex instead of being their pure submissive, brainwashed, helpless brides.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 06:04 PM
-8

Question, what exactly is a 'positive' masculine man? One who harasses women? Who rates female journalists doing their jobs on a scale of 1 to 10?
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 04:13 PM
1

Men who want to bring back the 'family structure' nowadays want to do so for their own benefits. There have been studies which have shown women are not happy trapped at home with no control over their economic life, and are only unhappy working if they are expected to do ALL the housework on top of that. Men want to bring back the family structure because they hate how they have lost control over women nowadays. It's that simple.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 02:37 PM
2

We humans all rely on the group. If a man is ostracised by other men (and it happens), of course he cannot advance. That happens to an entire gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 03:28 AM
1

They get demonised. Called cutthroat bitches. Hit a glass ceiling and cannot advance in their careers because of the negative perception.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 03:27 AM
1

The point is, if you have ever left your house in 2016, you will have noticed that women are not, in fact, like that. Of course I am speaking from an atheist point of view: I do not believe 'God' decided those roles. I believe the 'Red Pill' men of the time decided they wanted to push women into those roles because they were pleasing to men.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 03:25 AM
1

Okay, you are talking about business and certainly know more than I do in that arena, but if we are talking about taking risks and relying on skills alone, I can actually think of women who did that. Loreena McKennitt is a millionaire musician, and she gave up university to work on her first record. She made the money to record by playing in the streets. At the beginning, she was so broke she could not even get a credit card. She gave up her university education to pursue this dream. It could ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 02:57 AM
1

Sorry if my answers are shorter: I am reading what you are writing, I am just absorbing your different POV without the need to comment on everything. One thing, are you pro-life? Because abortion should exist to protect the minority of women who DO get raped, and those who make the man wear a condom which breaks. It is about the fundamental choice of becoming a mother (with all that it entails, as you said) or not. And women must retain the right to opt out (and campaign hard to acquire it in cr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 02:03 AM
1

No, I totally agree we should introduce a law to allow men to 'opt out' of parenting IF and only IF he pays for the abortion, but again that is crucial: keeping abortion legal. Also because a girl who does not have sex and so is not on the pill might get raped, and get pregnant. Also, pregnancy is not THE reason why there is a disparity in the workplace. Plenty of childfree women still suffer discrimination because their ambitions are simply not taken seriously, despite them being very serious a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 01:31 AM
1

I look at history and see women doing a hell of an awful lot apart from getting raped. There have been great women writers, artists, scientists and even rulers like Boudicca. The point is, they were barred from universities. They were discriminated against. They could not survive if they did not marry and could not get most jobs if they were married. Major hurdles were thrown their way, and they could not solve things through violence or the use of physical strength because some men were treated…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 01:23 AM
2

But if abortion is not legal (contraceptives can fail) she cannot actually make that choice, see? That is why feminists have fought for women's rights. So that women have a choice. Also, here in the UK we have 54 weeks of both maternity and paternity live. It's the law.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 01:16 AM
2

I have one thing to say to this: women should not have to pay a higher price than men. That is why abortion is so important. A man can have sex and not lose his career because he does not get pregnant. A woman should have that choice as well. She has as much a right as a man to enjoy her sex life, and should be free to abort the baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 01:04 AM
2

The point is, contraceptives are not 100% effective and women are half of America's population. So the point is that even if women do not have abortions very often, the final numbers will still be very high.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:25 PM
2

Hasn't the Republican Party always, ALWAYS pushed for a defunding of Planned Parenthood and for abortion to be banned? That alone would be literally catastrophic for millions of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:07 PM
2

Well, up until a few days ago thinking that America could have a Vice President who seeks to overthrow abortion laws and advocates for gay rehab camps was unthinkable, now there is one. So it is obvious that the people around Trump have a very clear agenda which he will be forced to appease to. And he is not exactly the kind of person who would fight back to secure women's rights. So from a logical standpoint, it very much looks like things are going to change for the worse for women in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 06:42 PM
2

But that is like saying many people voted for Mussolini because they wanted him to build hospitals and make trains be on time. Yeah, they also got fascism in the package. That is the thing: America will be more sexist after Trump, and the men who voted for the other reasons do not really mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 06:28 PM
-3

You cited, as the first reason, that they do not want a female president because they are sexist. I mean seriously, need I add anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 06:23 PM
3

Well you asked for the differences between half the world's population and the other. I guess we have to talk in very general terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 06:22 PM
-2

They are very representative of the majority of men who voted Trump and seek to establish a culture in which women are rated on their looks in professional settings, told they have 'blood coming out of everywhere' if they say something men do not like, and lose the right to abort.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 06:13 PM
3

But why should women have it harder than men? Because nobody tells men they should not study literature or languages 'because their brains are not wired for it'. That is the key difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 06:11 PM
1

That is what men want to believe. In truth it is about men having no control over how women lead their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:52 PM
8

Our society is not just made of laws, but also and most importantly of societal norms. So there are 'social laws', if you will, that men are eager to push to benefit themselves and limit the freedom of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:46 PM
1

I am convinced a lot of the women who voted for him do not seriously believe he will take away abortion rights (which he will, by the way).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:44 PM
5

'Being insufferable' = not being sweet, accommodating and agreeing with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:30 PM
9

That's it: why should we live in a society that discourages women from doing these things and makes it harder for them, just so that men can have their pleasure? Everything feminism has done in the past century was exactly to destroy that world in which things were harder for women who wanted to work, fuck etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:29 PM
2

Alright, I'll do that in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:27 PM
3

There is a difference between 'confident' and 'dominating', although it is undoubtedly one the Red Pill is too autistic to understand in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:27 PM
4

But we are talking about opinions! These are the opinions men have, and the reason why many of them who have seen things change a bit in the last decades are fighting back so hard and claiming that feminism 'ruined Western culture'. It is all about men's opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:26 PM
7

Women who are very driven are often called 'bitches' and told they are 'abrasive'. Ivanka avoids all that because she never says anything controversial and focuses on fluffy feminine side projects such as her fashion line. She also has a very, very traditional image and sucks up to powerful men like her brothers and father a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:24 PM
1

Sorry I don't know this procedure, this is supposed to be a discussion post. What should I tag discussion posts as?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:19 PM
3

Nowadays it is mainly about how women should act. The right wants a bunch of Ivanka Trumps: feminine, 'soft-spoken' women who take lots of pictures of themselves with their kids, who never raise their voices etc. Men are very, very uncomfortable with women who are more aggressive, more ambitious (that is, who do not suck up to the top man like Ivanka does), more sexually liberated etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:18 PM
2

Men can't get pregnant, have more testosterone which leads to a more aggressive sexuality, and have a not as developed sense of self-preservation which leads to them being less tidy, less caring about their living conditions, more likely to sacrifice themselves etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:13 PM
6

Yes, but it is a narrative that is so blown out of proportion that if a girl struggles with math (as many boys might) she might convince herself it is because her female brain is 'defective'. That is why such a strong counter-narrative has been established.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:11 PM
2

What has he got to do with this? I highly doubt the women who voted for him are controlled by patriarchs who stop them from going out etc. unless you believe in the common stereotypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:09 PM
4

Women who worked in the past faced extreme challenges and it was considered unnatural (by Freud himself). Also, the Victorians believed that promiscuous women were 'fallen women'. This is because men wanted THE MAJORITY of women to act in a way that directly benefited them and which they thought pleasant. It's that simple. It is not just about not being physically stopped from doing something, it is about being heavily socially discouraged, as a woman, to act in a way that does not please men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:08 PM
3

These beliefs have been challenged in the last century. Plenty of households are based on a double income and the man is no longer expected to pull all the weight, men should be 'aggressive' is something said by literally no one. Men simply tend to act aggressive as a form of testosterone-release, nobody forces them to be 'aggressive' (especially criminally so). Yes, you have no right to assault a girl with a miniskirt, that makes you an animal. The last century has introduced paternity leave (h…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:04 PM
4

It is because if you repeat a lie long enough, people will begin to believe it. And the lie that women cannot become good at math with hard work because their brains are limited has been going on for a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 05:00 PM
1

Deeply relieved, more than surprised. Even though I do not really believe we are a minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 04:59 PM
2

Absolutely true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 04:55 PM
1

But Trump, at the same time, only benefits men, and not women. So it is obvious that there will be an opposition to populism, as there has always been in the last century.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 04:37 PM
1

'A husband does not allow his wife to go to bars.' Wow, are there really women who marry shitty patriarchs like this out there?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 04:34 PM
1

What Christianity advocates for is women assuming a very limited, constricted and stereotypical role to please men. They ought to be 'meek, demure, sweet' etc. so that a man's ego will inflate because he will feel dominant over her (in fact, the Bible tells women to be submissive). There is also a Bible passage which could have been written (and probably was, actually) by frustrated incels, condemning women who engage in promiscuous sex. The whole book is called sexist because it pushes women to…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 10:59 AM
1

The 'happier' Christian society was only 'happier' for men. The female suffrage and feminist revolution which gave women the right to vote, own property etc. are telling signs that not everyone was satisfied with that system.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 10:47 AM
1

It's not about being emotional, it is about women in general being perceived as emotional. It is about a man being taken more seriously when he says the same exact thing his female colleague said ten minutes before. 'Thought policy' is actually very effective, because up to one hundred years ago it was widely believed a woman could not feel pleasure except through penetration (clit stimulation was performed by doctors as a cure for hysteria) and that women ought not to vote because they could no…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 09:12 AM
1

You know what happens on reddit, Internet forum and blogs? Men say what they really think. The men typing those blog posts are the same who will discount what a woman at work says as her being 'emotional'. They are the ones who will look in distaste when women say they want to pursue careers rather than getting married. They are the ones who will slut-shame women in their circles. THAT is what we mean when we say our culture is misogynist. We are talking about very real issues, not ideals.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 11:20 PM
4

1 2 3 and 5 are very definitely misogyny, and they are problems because they are beliefs which relegate women, on a cultural level, to certain roles and stop them from advancing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:52 PM
2

My dad cheated on her repeatedly, and wanted to live with his lover. They did not divorce mainly because my mother was actually afraid she would lose in the court because my dad had the money to get a better lawyer (so yeah, I call bulshit to most Red Pill tropes). If a woman chooses not to have kids, she is not also necessarily single or miserable. Angela Merkel did fine, and so did our Prime Minister Theresa May, and the Scottish Prime Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:50 PM
2

They separated, because they are quite old-fashioned and would not divorce. But as you can see, motherhood is no guaranteed recipe for happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:33 PM
6

Being a mother and a grandmother can be a shitty life if you are unlucky. My mother had four kids, who all moved to other cities. She separated from my dad, and he still passes her some money, but not much at all. The 'nanny state' also does not afford you a good life, as it passes the bare minimum. My mother is the most miserable person I know, because her life is so empty. I'm glad I'm a bitchy masculine type ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:21 PM
3

The thing is, men keep saying they are tired of being called misogynists. There is a lot they can do to stop being called misogynists. Like stopping being misogynists, for instance. Things that would help: They could stop saying a woman's 'true nature' is to be sweet and kind and meek and to want to have lots of babies. They complain about characters like Katniss being too 'masculine and determined' and about young women following that example. If they stopped saying that, they would not be call…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:15 PM
4

At 18 they should think about their future, because their blue collar guy who marital rapes them and demands dinner may die, and at that point they would be royally screwed :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:01 PM
2

Of course logic could not override your instincts. Men are emotional creatures. AMALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:00 PM
1

That's what the internet is for. To defy Trump ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:59 PM
5

18 married with a working man? LMAO you must come from some seriously remote rural redneck village.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:56 PM
1

I aborted with a parsley infusion and was fine. The secret to make it go smoothly is to do it as early as possible, as soon as menstruation stops.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:48 PM
4

Some people would challenge your views and argue you should use logic, instead of going just by your FEELZ. But to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:46 PM
3

I don't think they necessarily do. It's usually criticism from people who do not like you at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:39 PM
3

What changes as she ages though? Because actually most women who get this kind of prejudice are in their 30s. Also LMAO the 'instinct' doesn't kick in if she's not beautiful?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:38 PM
3

Those instincts manifest in men still pursuing women despite our living in an already overpopulated earth. They have nothing to do with this stigma, which is more social than evolutionary like sexual/reproductive urges.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:31 PM
2

They have an opportunity, yes, but what's wrong if they freely choose not to have them?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:18 PM
6

That's the point: they are not rare. Not al all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:17 PM
4

But we are not exactly Dodos on the verge of extinction who cannot find enough females to carry on, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:16 PM
3

Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 08:25 PM
6

By that logic, another woman can supply the eggs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 08:15 PM
3

Not just Cersei, there are lots of great female characters: the tomboyish type like Arya, the girly girl like Sansa, the masculine type like Brienne, the wild warrior like Ygritte. And yet does that mean the men are all crappy characters by comparison? Doesn't look like that to me at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 08:15 PM
3

You have never read A Song of Ice and Fire have you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 08:04 PM
8

It's men who largely perpetuate these stereotypes. It's called 'pussy pedestalising' and if you pay close attention, you will see that female fictional characters have shifted away from that caricature with the advent of feminism. Men need to tell themselves that if they do ABCD, they will be surrounded by these kind, gentle female creatures who will want nothing more out of life than to be their bride and take care of their kids. It is 100% a male wet fantasy, and always has been.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 07:53 PM
2

Good question! I do not see what wrong they do to society. How do they affect other people's lives?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 07:43 PM
12

Why is a woman 'child hating' if she chooses not to have kids herself? They may not fit into her lifestyle, but it doesn't mean she will hate other people's kids. Do men get accused of being 'child-hating' if they do not have kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 07:34 PM
0

I have given omegas pretty clear directions: stop being lazy and blaming someone else for your laziness.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 07:08 PM
3

Why weren't you just upfront from the start, dropped hints like 'this is not a relationship, we are just having fun'? That way you would not have made it to this stage with that girl.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 07:07 PM
5

The thing is, most of this could be easily avoided if you just slept with girls who are equally just looking for a fling.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 06:54 PM
1

'Most' is the key word in my post you are looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 06:14 PM
1

And what would those 'masculine' voices say? That women have to marry rejected omega incels rejected by 'globalism' and give up their careers to cook their dinner? Just curious.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 04:32 PM
2

Most omegas I have met in my life are omegas by choice. They show up to a date wearing a dirty T-shirt, they are fat (their choice), they do not put any work into their career, they are too lazy to improve themselves. And then they bitch and moan because women reject them and blame feminism/globalism/whatever the fuck else.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 04:26 PM
6

It's actually the opposite: because sex is more psychological for women, they are more likely to be in the right psychological conditions to orgasm when they are on their own. Instead, because men need just the physical experience and have lower standards, they can ejaculate far more easily in bed with most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 04:24 PM
4

That's the catch: I don't date Chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 03:30 PM
4

Pity not a single one of the never got a chance. I' sure I would have given them the time of their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 03:22 PM
1

I'm British (thank fuck). It's more that America lost. Hope you see it through, guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:13 AM
2

It's the exact same logic as saying 'don't have sex so you won't get pregnant.' We are entitled to all the freedom, and if someone rapes us, he goes to jail. If someone knocks us up, he must pay for the abortion. Time to make you men be responsible for your willies, I am afraid. Feminism has created a beautiful society, and a little nasty part of me quite enjoys how much some men are irked by it :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 01:07 AM
3

Your general ignorance about the physical risks of childbirth is so profound that it does not warrant a serious answer. In a society which, for some reason, values female virginity very much, that woman would be harmed for life if he did not marry her. So thank goodness we feminists did away with all the virginity bullshit. Christians are extremely hypocritical, I agree. Also about 70% of female churchgoers has had at least one secret abortion. I can't stand the lot of them in any case.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 01:04 AM
2

Because - brace yourself - in non-Autismland partners get to be alone with each other all the time! And friends too! I know right, a shocker.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 12:58 AM
3

It's more about basing it on which candidate does not go around grabbing vaginas or barging into Miss America's changing rooms...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 12:51 AM
3

It is a perfect comparison. A woman's body is damaged by pregnancy, and she should not be forced to damage it. To apply your ridiculous logic in a different context: 'I mean, you are a man and you fucked this virgin. Now you must marry her and being faithful to her for the rest of your life and be punished if you don't. You not taking responsibility for her for life after fucking her is the behaviour of a child, not of an adult! Have you no agency!?' Just to show you why your arguments do not re…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 12:50 AM
3

Statistically speaking, your partner or close acquaintances are the men most likely to perpetuate sexual assault on you. I know right, statistics defy Red Pill logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 12:45 AM
2

A feminist would never vote for Trump, so it's just a matter of different priorities.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 12:24 AM
2

Mhh one way is for men to keep it in their pants. Staying home wearing burkas is not only unacceptable, it's also not that effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 12:23 AM
3

Your feelings do not really matter: this other person is dying because of some disease and if you refuse to donate your kidney you are putting your feelz before real, you selfish bastard!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 12:22 AM
2

Hillary is no perfect, but voting for Trump to vote against her flaws is like slitting one's throat open to fix high blood pressure. At least that's how we liberals see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 12:19 AM
7

It's you who makes the mistake of thinking 'feminism' means extreme blue-haired SJWs. Is your average Hillary supporter anything like that though? Of course not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 11:31 PM
1

The thing is, most Trump supporters are either uneducated or lack the depth to understand anything unfamiliar. Their reasoning is very tribal, literally. Faux News says the Muslims are going to attack them, so they are for keeping out all Muslims. Understanding that not all Muslims are the same requires an ability to reason that goes far beyond what your average redneck can do. They reason in a tribal manner, and only take into consideration the well-being of their own immediate group of people.…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 11:24 PM
8

The thing is, most 'Chads' are actually feminists and liberals. You make the mistake of thinking feminist men are supplicating pussies, but in truth it just means they are pro-choice, do not bitch and moan about how Western culture has been 'destroyed' now that they have a female boss, and in general are just liberals who accept the status quo without without wishing for 'globalism' to perish. That is because Chads are at the top of the food chain, and that means they can change and adapt to fit…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 11:16 PM
1

Ireland's abortion laws are extremely fucked up, but I have high hopes things will change in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 10:16 PM
4

I know Red Pillers say 'men do not marry women for reasons other than her femininity, looks etc.' but in truth there are exceptions, like in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 10:13 PM
3

They have the right to enjoy sex and not bear responsibility, just like men do. And before you ask, I agree there should be a law which allows men to sign off the duty to pay for child support. But ONLY if he pays for the abortion. In any case, smart women abort even when abortion is illegal. My Irish cousins used parsley and it went just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 10:03 PM
4

Oh fuck off. When on earth was it seemed reasonable to ask someone for an organ because it is their 'responsibility' to save someone's life? A forced pregnancy is a fucking punishment, and a sadistic one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 09:52 PM
2

Because we do not treat women like fucking cattle. Britain is in the West, by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 09:31 PM
3

'Its' and again, her life comes first. You do not force a person to donate their liver to another even if that means the second person will die as a result. Same exact thing. You are not showing respect for life, you are showing carelessness towards the life of the mother and her imperative right over her body.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 09:31 PM
2

I apologise. It was wrong of me to automatically assume you are from a civilised Western country. Especially when all evidence pointed to the contrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 09:24 PM
3

She is not a fucking baby machine. She is a person living her life, and you have no right to tell her to destroy her body to give a life perhaps even to the child of her rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 09:23 PM
2

I have genuinely never understood this. Children are the number one cause for most divorces. The idea that a child could somehow make a relationship work has always seemed so ludicrous to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 09:09 PM
3

Precisely.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 09:06 PM
2

How is where you live relevant? If you live in Ireland where abortion is not legal, I am proud to tell you two of my Irish cousins aborted with parsley alone. Strong women do not let depraved, misogynist laws get in their way :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 09:04 PM
3

We are not just talking about a life danger. A woman has control over her own body. Telling her she has to sacrifice ever her body shape, watch her breasts sag, have her vagina torn apart and suffer pain for nine months to deliver the child of her rapist is one of the most fucking disgusted, misogynist things I have ever read in my life. Women are not baby factories, and claiming that they have to go through a pregnancy (especially one that results from rape) for another life is treating them as…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 09:02 PM
5

'I support abortion only when the mother's life is in danger'.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:50 PM
8

It is monstrous because you are asking another person to sacrifice herself for that life. Also, if you go for the full Conservative package (they are usually the pro-life ones), the bullshit moralistic argument falls apart because they are the ones against giving handouts to single mothers and paying lots of taxes to educate children in need. Moral of the bullshit pro-life story: Uhm we value life but uhm... we don't want to pay for the baby once it's born. It's someone else's business and we do…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:47 PM
9

It does. 'America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilisation in between,' Oscar Wilde.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:41 PM
3

Oh, in my book a 'smug arrogant edgelord' or whatever else is definitely a few points higher up than 'I think a raped woman should deliver the child of her rapist', so do not expect me to apologise :) That said, the person in question is not making a clear argument, because they are 'pro choice' yet only support it if the mother's life is in danger and want the laws to be changed. Sounds a rather confused view.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:39 PM
3

I'm British, so I am not bothered by whatever happens there. Hillary is going to win anyway. One has to smile in the face of a person who would force a woman to bear the child of her rapist. Gotta cope somehow. Still, in cases other than rape, I am also frankly, openly not even remotely bothered by abortion, not even if we want to call it murder by definition, because we are still talking about a tiny nothing of a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:36 PM
8

Because I got turned down. I am 24 and was deemed too young to have my tubes tied. I am not on the pill though, because I don't want my sex drive to be potentially destroyed by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:31 PM
4

Giving birth is an act of sacrifice. Asking a woman who has been raped to have her vagina teared open is fucking repulsive. I'm glad I aborted back in the day. I'm glad I could do it again and you can't stop me or the other millions of women who do it. Your views are monstrous :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:29 PM
0

I'm so glad so many women in the West are aborting their rapist's child maybe even today and there isn't jack shit you can do about it :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:16 PM
6

This is fucking disgusting. If a person has a defective organ, you do not force another to give up their organ because it could save the first person. You would force a woman to go through considerable risk to deliver the child of her rapist. Repulsive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:15 PM
8

She has to carry her rapist's child for nine months, have her body deformed by it, and have her vagina teared apart to deliver it? I'm glad you are not the one making abortion laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 08:01 PM
4

So if a woman gets raped but her life is not in danger she should keep the baby?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 07:55 PM
7

Absolutely not, I am a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 07:50 PM
11

I would abort anyway and leave him. We are not married, so begging me to keep a baby shows an excess of emotionality and poor planning ability, both astoundingly unattractive traits in a man, I find.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 07:27 PM
7

Yesterday my new boyfriend came all over my butt. I think his offspring dried up and perished there, but if a tiny drop magically slipped into my vagina and survived long enough to make it into an egg, expect me to abort in a few weeks when I find out about it :) To elaborate, I am pro-choice and I would always abort a child, in all circumstances. I would not leave a man if he asked me to get an abortion, but I would leave a pro-life man who thinks he is entitled to tell me to keep the baby/who …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 07:19 PM
2

Would you even consider Chelsea pretty?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 05:08 PM
1

The part about having money to support kids is so true. If we have achieved a certain standard if life in the first world, we should not have kids if that standard can't get sustained because that is unfair to the kids themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 03:15 PM
2

You just edited the comment (there were also typos), but if that is what you are saying, then we are basically saying the sane exact thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 03:13 PM
6

Yeah, well, in case you missed it, most non-Red Pill people think Red Pillers in general do not represent the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 03:03 PM
1

It seems like you are the one who does not acknowledge a difference in their nature. You said a man who does not get pussy has it harder than a woman who does not get love/commitment. How on earth can you support that assertion?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 03:02 PM
3

Now I am growing convinced that I do not know what a Billy Beta actually is, because Mark in the goofy pictures looks like the Billy Beta poster boy to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 03:00 PM
5

Look at his wives. Does that look like a Chad repertoire of spouses? He even got divorce raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 02:54 PM
4

Says the supposed Red Pill Alpha Male afraid of an old woman...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 02:53 PM
2

No, you know what you want, and that's it. You are making some sweeping generalisations here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 02:53 PM
3

But how does this go hand in hand with the Red Pill concept of hypergamy? Because yes, women get attention, but mainly from low-quality men they are not attracted to. A lot of incels could get attention from post-wall women they are not attracted to as well, only they do not date them because they have standards. See, there is no difference between the two! Most women (who look average) can't get the top men they are attracted to, and incels cannot get any non-obese pussy. The play field is even…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 02:50 PM
6

No, Trump has always looked like shit and attracted nothing but gold diggers. The weird thing is, Ivanka has his same face features and they look great on her, but like shit on him.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 02:46 PM
1

And who are you to decide which is worse? What do you know about what women want?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 02:43 PM
3

And you think he would have still married Chelsea had her surname not been Clinton? He received help from her parents, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 01:48 PM
5

If that is a Chad, my name is Kim Kardashian.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 01:24 PM
4

First of all, that is a heavily retouched picture. Secondly, the fact is most incels (yeah, I am not even exaggerating) could actually get a girlfriend tomorrow if they lowered their standards. Chelsea's husband looks like shit, that's the point. What I am saying is that the 'men have it harder in the dating market' concept is not true if you put things in perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 01:13 PM
3

Have you seen what her husband looks like?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 01:04 PM
2

I don't think this would help her much in the dating market. I mean, after sex I suppose she will look all messy and like the first picture, and not every guy who falls for the dolled up face would necessarily call her again afterwards. That is why we often say that men and women have it pretty even because ugly incels might struggle to get sex, but Chelsea butterfaces might struggle to get commitment once... ahem, the make up comes off.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 01:03 PM
2

I think the world if full of young, hot women who just want a fling. There is no reason to date those who want a relationship instead. Nobody is entitled to a your commitment, and not committing to a girl is not a crime, but it is definitely a shitty thing to do to date a girl and not give her any signals that you only want her around for fucking. The girl in question could actually be a nice person who genuinely develops feelings for you, and does not deserve to be treated like a cum dumpster w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 11:13 PM
1

I kissed him last week, and today I brought him to my house and escalated to nakedness. He was completely clueless and told me he had no idea this was going to happen, so he did not bring a condom (gee). The weird thing is, he refused to orgasm. He stopped me while I was jerking him off and said he does not want to come on my body because it's 'disrespectful' (that sounds so weird). He did say he hasn't got much experience, but you were right: he was ready to follow my instructions on how to fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 10:32 PM
1

Well, today I kissed him and he kissed back. Hard ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 10:18 PM
2

Update: I kissed him today during our lunch break. He kissed me back and even used his tongue a bit (he was a bit less shy once he understood I was into it ). So perhaps he is inexperienced, but not a virgin. And I didn't ask for consent but he didn't seem to mind. Moral of the story: AMALT, all men want to be sexually assaulted.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 01:56 PM
1

And Padme.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 05:33 PM
1

Tell me one thing: what distinguishes a great blowjob from a bad one?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 12:17 AM
1

This makes no sense. Care to elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 11:52 PM
1

No, guys who orbit women are shitty, but they are not sociopaths. Sociopaths create abusive relationships with a woman and sometimes even best her, definitely use her as a sex toy, but keep her feelings engaged enough to string her along. Think of Harvey and the Joker, only those relationships exist in real life too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 11:13 PM
1

They are pretty shitty, but they do not do the Stockholm Syndrome stuff some sociopathic men do. Sociopaths tend to be even physically violent, because they're fucked up in the head.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 10:24 PM
1

I always tell guys to leave the friendzone, but those guys won't listen any more than the women who date sociopaths.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:49 PM
5

Is there any actual data to support this argument? It seems to me that the gay men you are talking about are the 'feminine' kind, but they do not really represent the whole male gay population.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 07:53 PM
1

One question: what is a Red Pill LTR? Is it inherently abusive in nature, as in, she has to 'submit to your will' and 'be the first mate and never take control' and so on? Because that is what it looks like from the outside. For instance, Trump and Melania certainly do not have a great relationship. One thing he said for certain in that video was that he hit on other women when already married. So.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 07:44 PM
1

That is a good attitude, but I do not see how it is possible to tell your kids not to use women as cum dumpsters because the Red Pill leaves space for nothing in between: either you are married and therefore as 'cuck beta bux' or you are doing great by not committing to anyone. What's in between according to the Red Pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 07:10 PM
1

She has not said HE IS GUILTY!!!! She has expressed rightful concern that he might become abusive. That is a reasonable approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:44 PM
0

I have never been into the hookup culture, so I have no fucking clue what makes a man a 'beta' or an 'alpha'. If you cannot see it is emotional abuse to lead someone who is much younger than you to believe you are in love with her as well when you are not, you are a fucking monster. That is what Bill did to Monica. It is not his high count per se, but rather the way he sees women. If he sees them as cum dumpsters, then of course he will have trouble bonding with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:43 PM
2

I have no idea why some Red Pillers always reason by extremes: Church vs sociopathic use of women as cum dumpsters. I mean, the rest of us have fairly normal relationships and lives. And again, he is being psychologically abusive if he is doing that. Turning into a sociopath, really. So there is reason to suspect he might turn physically abusive too, seeing as he uses women as toys. That's where her fears come from.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:39 PM
1

Because the Red Pill is not comparable to WW2 general reading. It is closer to the Mein Kampf/general Neonazi stuff, if we want to make a fair comparison. AWALT = the Jeeeeews booohoooo! The Red Pill in general dehumanises women. So it is not light WW2 reading. That's why she's becoming suspicious.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:37 PM
2

Yeah? Well, if a woman is being abused by that man, that holier-than-thou sister will help her. So thank goodness these people exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:34 PM
1

Yes, but do you see where her fears come from? If sexual strategy comes before all else, he might be making these girls fall in love with him and plate them (without them knowing they are being plated) because 'it works'. And that's all that matters, apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:25 PM
1

What I do not like is that I know many decent men, and that you seem to claim that 'what men want' is to treat young women like cum dumpsters. It's very simple, really. So yes, if a woman sees that happening, she will probably stick up for the women involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:22 PM
1

And if he leads her on just for sex whilst she is falling in love with him? It is 'in his interest' to keep her where she is so he can use her body, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:15 PM
1

I see groups advocating against bullies in school everywhere (and yeah, they are stepping up for those geeky kids). And you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:13 PM
1

But try to understand why she thinks he can be abusive: if he is leading a young woman on for sex, and she falls in love and he treats her like a cum dumpster, of course it is emotional abuse. If he reads about how women are 'children' in the Red Pill and must never be allowed to be equal, will he ever be able to bond with a wife (unless he gets an uneducated girl brainwashed into submission from the third world)? Of course not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:11 PM
1

If we could all defend ourselves, there would be no laws. Can a short man defend himself against two gangsters with a knife? No. Can a disabled person defend him/herself? No. Can a person (man or woman!) defend themselves if they are in a psychologically abusive relationship? Your idea of what constitutes a civilised society or an adult is ridiculous and ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:08 PM
1

What I am obviously referring to is, she falls for him, he does not care about her, and leads her on with dread game to keep her around for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:06 PM
2

Again, one obvious form of abuse could be that the girls might get attached to him and he might be leading them on and not be crystal clear about his intentions. Another thing to consider is whether he will ever be able to bond with a woman in the future if he gets in the habit of seeing women as cum dumpsters or 'children' as the Red Pill advocates.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:02 PM
1

This is a good attitude, but you will have noticed that the sister in question is also giving her brother the benefit of the doubt, but she is prepared to believe there is reason to doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:00 PM
1

Here is what you don't get: I would not associate with a man who laughed about mugging men and beating them to an inch of their lives in a street. I would not associate with a man who cruelly abuses a short man. Turns out I am the one who defends men's honour now. Pity you cannot be counted upon to return the favour. You call it white knighting, I call it basic decency.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:59 PM
1

Women have done absolutely nothing which condones sexual abuse. If they cheat on you, you are free to dump them. If they yell at you, dump them as well. But there is nothing they have done which justifies your disgusting 'I don't care what other men do, I have lost faith' cowardly attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:52 PM
1

They really don't love it at all. What if one girl, for instance, falls in love with this guy and he uses stuff like the 'dread game'? That's emotional abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:49 PM
1

It is because when there is a big age discrepancy, of course the person who is less experienced (younger) is more at risk of being manipulated, and of course if she has read the Red Pill she has seen the kind of attitudes these men have towards women, so there is reason to believe the girls might be abused. 'Dread game' in itself is a form of psychological abuse. What if a girl really falls in love with this guy and he treats her like a cum dumpster? Of course I myself would be disgusted if a re…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:47 PM
2

'For all we know.' You do not care about investigating further, you do not care about proving and counter-proving that he is not being abusive. Hence why women stick together and do that by themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:44 PM
2

Because a woman knows what it is like for other women to be intimidated by a man who is surrounded by cowards like you who will just say 'you go bro'.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:41 PM
1

I am trying to illustrate why the idea of him having casual sex gets associated with the abuse of women in her mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:40 PM
1

You know how the saying goes: the only thing evil people need to succeed is for good people to do nothing. If you stand by and watch whilst a man who, for example, harasses a woman because he is a billionaire and he can, you are condoning evil. If you just watch while a man gropes a drunk woman because he is 'getting what he wants', you are condoning evil. There is no way around it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:39 PM
0

If getting what he wants means dehumanising women, it is pretty obviously misogyny. I do not see how it could not be.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:36 PM
2

And do you see why this is relevant to my first post in this thread? OP mentions a woman who is prepared to call the police because she believes her brother might become abusive. Let me remind you that rape is a sexual strategy too. If you have a place (the Red Pill) where 'sexual strategy' is discussed amorally, then yes, there is good reason to be worried.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:32 PM
2

Which is exactly why women's rights exist and women support each other and why it is a woman OP is referring to who does not like the way her brother treats other women who are complete strangers. Thank goodness women know how to stick up for one another. Otherwise a girl can say she was abused, he says it was consensual, and all the bros of course believe him and are like 'you go bro.' We know lots of men don't give a shit about our rights or whether we are abused or not. That's why feminism ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:27 PM
1

So you condone abusing a position of power to harass women? Here is the screenshot: https://s15.postimg.org/f7bfofnob/image.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:25 PM
1

Because what the guy said was 'build a lifestyle and a reputation so then you can harass women'. I need to figure out how to post the screenshot with my Iphone.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:18 PM
1

Yeeeah he's still a great bro, so if he is a bit 'less palatable' (abusive) to the females, who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:17 PM
3

Your whole post can be answered very swiftly thus: how often, in the history of humanity, have men tried to get away with assault by claiming that 'she wanted it'? Also yes, if you have kids who talk online about shooting up places, you tend to keep an eye on them. We are talking about a whole community which dehumanised women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:16 PM
1

I have a screenshot, need to figure out how to post it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 05:08 PM
-1

Because male sexuality is very visual and does not require any kind of personal connection, it is very easy for a man who just treats women as sexual objects rather than as people to start abusing them. The language the Red Pill uses towards women is extremely dehumanising. So there is reason to believe he will mistreat them for real. If you spend your days reading that an entire gender is AWALT, manipulative, dark triad, deserving of nothing but to be inferior to you, to be submissive, at a cer…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 04:48 PM
1

Show me exactly where I said 'all men are evil rapists'. What I said is that masculine sexuality tends to manifest itself in an aggressive way. Not that the individual man with that strength is by default a rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 04:35 PM
1

I do not see the relevance of the 'laws are upheld by men' argument you made.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 04:17 PM
1

I don't get this kind of reasoning. The cops who catch the thief or the rapist are male. Okay. Should we go on our knees and suck their cocks then? Because the choice is between their cocks or the rapists's?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 04:01 PM
1

But don't you realise that your wife might put herself in more danger if things escalate into a physical confrontation? By the way, we are not just talking about women here. If a guy with a knife takes your son's wallet, would you advise him to run or to start punching the guy with a knife?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 03:27 PM
1

We are talking about sexual assault. So I ask you, does it seem reasonable to you to tell a woman who is being groped or touched inappropriately to start slapping the aggressor?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 03:23 PM
1

I have slapped men in the past, but would you seriously advise a victim of assault to take that course of action? Is that what you would reasonably do?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 03:21 PM
1

Care to write a few paragraphs that actually make sense? Also, I had the guy fired instead of hitting him because, you know, we do not live in the jungle.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 03:18 PM
12

This is not changing the subject, it's putting it in perspective. A woman might also say she wants to be loved unconditionally and wants a man to give her everything she wants even if she grows fat and ugly, but that is not reasonable. Many men seem to believe that 'being loved for who they are' (a bullshit meaningless statement seeing as they love opportunistically too) is somehow something they have a right to demand. It's wrong that women ask for things in return. That seems to be how the Bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 03:15 PM
1

The physically weak do not only come in the shape of women. They also come in the sape of some men, of disabled people, of children, of elderly people. So tell me, oh Powerful Man, what exactly are you implying with this post? That we should just tolerate all the sexual assaults and shit just because you have the physical ability to perpetuate them? Is that the case you are making?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 03:11 PM
1

You see the difference? Who is perpetuating the aggression? Men. Still men. Women are less violent than men, that is a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:51 PM
10

Men have conditions too though. You don't want her to grow fat or spotty or to stop taking care of herself, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:50 PM
1

It simply means there need to be laws to deal with that kind of man. How is it a difficult concept?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:39 PM
1

It looks to me as though I am actually engaging with those who present an argument. Nowhere in the rules did I read it was my duty to change my mind no matter what and not reply back. Also, this post is far from inappropriate seeing as the assault laws are very often discussed in the Red Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:38 PM
1

Sure, because if they have it they cannot be treated as sex dolls and property.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:37 PM
1

Again, why are the laws staked against men rather than women? Because women do not have an aggressive sexuality and do not harass men that way, and men are physically stronger so can defend themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:35 PM
3

So you are saying a non Chad will have an advantage if he approaches a woman in a sexual way (not a 'hello' way) outside a bar? Hence why you have the label 'creep' slapped on incels. It's because of how they act. Also, no girl would ever give an answer like that 'you are super hot', are you mad? It makes him think you are deep down into him. The answer is always a bit bitchy because you are trying to make it clear that you have zero interest in him.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:32 PM
1

A theft is not a crime against the body of a person. It is not traumatic in that same way and it is not as innate in males to steal as it is to sexually pursue a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:29 PM
1

An innocent person go to prison. I think this was pretty obvious. False harassment accusations are very rare, but if the one man who gets accused (unjustly) goes to jail, so do all the real assaulters.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:02 PM
1

Again, we are not talking about a gender-neutral crime like theft. We are talking about aggressive manifestations of masculinity (which is a 'pushy' sexuality be nature, no pun intended). Hence why there is a different set of parameters.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:00 PM
1

I am an average girl, and I had a guy fired after he fondled my bum. Since when do you need to be super hot for men to harass you? Men are not hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:58 PM
1

Yes, wrong turn of phrase: it is not a law against men, but a law which mainly applies to men because they are more often aggressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:51 PM
1

And in order to make sure not a single rapist gets away with it we have a system that puts the burden of proof on the defendant. Guilty until proven innocent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:50 PM
1

Yes, because men are all polite gentlemen who will ask you out once, accept your no and go away. That's exactly how men are. Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:49 PM
1

Because as I proved, it happens often enough if judged in accordance to how strict the law against harassment are. I am explaining why the laws need to be this harsh.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:47 PM
1

That's why sexual harassment is a crime against the law. Now it must be upheld. Again, the reason why there are more laws against men is that they are more sexually aggressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:45 PM
1

The only reason why it happens rarely (nowadays) is because being an assaulter is very, very heavily stigmatised.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:43 PM
1

You are insane if you think it does not happen. Men are thirsty as fuck. I once had a man fired from his job (he worked with me) because he touched my butt. So clearly not even the laws we have now and the threats they face are enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:41 PM
1

That means staying home wearing a burka, because men will harass you everywhere: in the streets, at work, at school. That's why we call it 'aggressive sexuality'.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:38 PM
1

Very often men do not respect your 'no' (and I am not talking about full blown rape, they will also just touch your breasts). What keeps them in line is the fear of retaliation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:36 PM
1

You admit that a man wants a girl to be good-looking (and that is okay), but at the same time you think there is something wrong if women are attracted to status in a man. That's a double standard. See, I think this guy likes me partly because I work hard at my butt excercises just as I like him partly because he works hard at his job. Your belief that one parameter is less materialistic than the other is false. As I said, I have no idea why he is so shy, but sometimes men simply do not know how…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:34 PM
1

Because women must go out and about safely. Male sexuality is aggressive, and therefore it is more heavily punished and people are more suspicious of it. It is all because of the nature of male sexuality that it is their burden and their problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:24 PM
1

We should also reprogram female sexuality so that they are attracted to incels and omegas. Mhh, that's going to work great.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:17 PM
-1

Because the burden is the man's. If he steers clear, he will not be accused of assault. If he can be charged very easily, he will be very incentivised to steer clear (physically speaking).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:16 PM
1

It is highly unlikely that a court will be on your side if you assault a girl and she presses her case. But, you are free to take that risk. Also, are you claiming that it is okay to harass women?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:13 PM
1

So we should just take away all the laws and let them all be raped and harassed, yeah?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:12 PM
1

See, what I do not understand is this visceral Red Pill hatred towards men who want a relationship instead of prostitutes or flings. That happens sometimes, you know? If you have read what I wrote in my first post, the point is exactly that he is actually quite good looking (depending on whether the ginger plus freckles is your thing or not), but so shy or possibly on the spectrum that he does not realise it. Also, I thought it was widely accepted by the Red Pill that having your shit together a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:11 PM
4

But again, there is way and way to go about it. Approaching at a bar in a certain atmosphere is different than approaching a girl in a bookshop in pure daylight in a particularly sexual way, and yet you have men who do that. Another thing I will never understand are catcalls. Like, I am walking in the middle of a busy street, guy checks my legs and says 'hello' in the typical lewd way. Like, how often has it ever happened, in the history of humanity, for this kind of attention to be rewarded wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:04 PM
1

Mainly the immediate presumption that the victim is telling the truth. That discourages many men from trying to do something inappropriate. Also, if being a victim of sexual assault is seen as an okay thing that you should not be ashamed of and being a rapist or assaulter ruins your life forever, that helps a lot too. Rape is, by definition, forced sex. But sexual harassment, which is as unjustifiable, is inappropriate touching etc. and many men would do A LOT MORE of that if they could get away…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:58 PM
1

They do, and there is nothing wrong with them approaching a woman in a bar (and going away when she says no), but that's not all they do. They harass pretty much everywhere and sometimes throw in some inappropriate touching as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:37 PM
15

The main problem women encounter in society is this: women have a sort of dual nature. One is sexual, and it is all about how pretty she is, about creating a certain polarity with a potential male etc., the other is non-sexual. This is who the woman is as a person (notice that OP claims this makes the woman 'masculine' lol). It is what books and films she likes, what her hobbies are, how she is as a friend, what her job is etc. Most problems within society are caused by men acting the way OP say…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:12 PM
1

Assuming he is an 8 or above and, more importantly, that he is not awkward or insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:00 PM
1

Hate on him however much you like for being 'Beta Bux', in the meanwhile he will get his dick sucked and the younger guy will not. Simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 11:51 AM
1

It is a common misconception to think women only dress up for men. Have you ever met a man who genuinely gave a damn about nail art? Who was really into bags? Into shoes? Women dress a bit to impress men, but mainly to impress other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:16 AM
1

He acts like he has never seen a female before in his life. And mind you that I am slim and 24, but average.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:21 AM
1

Assuming he knows what he is doing. The first time we went out, I was wearing a dress with a rather low neckline. I spent half the date convinced that he did not like me at all because he barely looked at me. Then he brought me to the romantic/historical part of town afterwards, of his own initiative. I later realised he was trying not to look at my breasts. As though he had never seen a female before, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:19 AM
1

But I think many women do not even give it a chance first to see if it's really bad. Also, aren't estrogen-only mini pills supposed to be a bit better? You can even breastfeed whilst using them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:16 AM
1

The copper coil does not cause these problems, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:01 AM
2

I can tell you it is not going anywhere in which the word 'partner' is used. He told me he hates that word because it's 'unromantic'. He also told me he is glad to see some women in his STEM office because they are not very well-represented in the field, and that he is glad I am a feminist. This guy basically goes home every night and sniffs a line of crystallised blue pill. But believe me when I say if you look at his features plus considerable height plus financial status plus house ownership,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 11:08 PM
2

What do you mean don't ruin him, do you think I am going to traumatise him/make him feel insecure if I suck him off the first time we have sex (I suppose I will have to initiate that too, a good few dates after I kiss him or he'll be traumatised by that too)? He knows I have only had one relationship but I explained that it lasted five years. Does he understand that this means I have had lots of sex with my ex and therefore have more experience? Also, I would bet money on him not owning a single…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 10:29 PM
5

It's because Red Pillers do not like to see guys doing what he does. Paying for all the dates, asking me if I am alright at any given time, booking tickets to take me to fun places, all this without ever kissing me or knowing whether I will ever kiss him, apparently. You call this 'pussy pedestalising'. I don't even know if it's an age discrepancy thing that could make him feel insecure, because he's 32 and I just turned 24, but that seems strange. The thing is, he just bought his own house, he …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 10:05 PM
2

Are you seriously a Red Piller? Because you seem to have forgotten one basic rule: when women talk about what they dislike in a man, they are talking about traits they dislike in the top 20%. The 80% which includes the fatties is altogether ignored, because to them it does not even exist. Men, who would fuck almost anything, of course are instead more likely to list the one thing that makes a woman unfuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 09:13 PM
3

To answer both your question and what you have written above: women themselves are not always 100% sure they are liked by the guy they are dating. This sounds of course absurd from a male perspective because who the fuck goes on four dates with a woman they have no interest in. But it is the way it is and catcalls are offensive mainly because we do not take it as meaning anything other than these guys would like to fuck anything with the right chromosome combination. I suppose since he has paid …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 08:47 PM
6

The thing is, even if this does happen, lesbians do not go home and bitch and moan about hypergamy and claim society should enslave the women they desire and take away their rights so they will be forced to get laid with them to survive. That is an exclusively male autistic trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 08:12 PM
5

You know what a woman sees in a fat man, if we want to talk biology? She sees someone who is slow, lazy, and will definitely be crushed by the first alpha who attacks the cave and tries to kill the kids. You can hamster that however you like, I have never seen a girl with option going for a fat guy in my whole life and most omegas are fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 08:05 PM
1

Wear sunglasses outside. Always. Most eye wrinkles are premature and caused by sun damage.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 08:01 PM
7

Many men who resemble gorillas do not get that it would actually help to get rid of some hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 08:01 PM
7

Body hair in women is fucking natural too. Doesn't make it socially acceptable or aesthetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 07:45 PM
1

How is it a bigger offence? Fat men are omega incels, they are out of my book entirely, they don't even exist. Being fat is equally disgusting for both genders. Here women are chubby rather than warpig fat, so their good features still shine through and I notice them because I am bisexual of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 07:41 PM
1

Now that's more like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 07:39 PM
1

Let me tell you that you don't need to be that ripped to get laid. Simply being thin is enough. He was probably already alright simply after losing all the excess fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 07:34 PM
1

Why are men so averse to trying skin products for acne and just wait for it to be substituted by wrinkles? Like, in what deep way does slapping some stuff on your face threaten your masculinity?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 07:31 PM
1

The women are fat because they can get away with it because men will fuck them anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 05:52 PM
1

One hint to help you tell them apart: Eddie is the ultra-airbrushed one because his skin damage is so bad they have to go over and over every picture of his with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 05:13 PM
2

I am not saying he is bad-looking, but is he really model material? Like what has he got compared to O'pry?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 04:14 PM
2

Dude if you don't know who Redmayne is, the troll American is you. I never said there aren't any attractive people here. I said that there definitely aren't enough attractive men to create the 80% vs 20% scale, so lots of supposedly 'good looking' men are not actually good looking at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 03:56 PM
2

You think Eddie would be model material elsewhere? Have you ever been to Australia?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 03:39 PM
6

I don't know in what universe you live, but there is a reason why there are so many incels around who cannot get a girlfriend even on campus/places where nobody is expected to be a CEO. COULD it be that looks actually matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 03:08 PM
1

I know right. The good old days when real patriarchal daddies brought their boys to the mall to buy good clothes and personally helped them style their hair and figure out a good skincare routine.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 03:04 PM
1

If men were better-looking, they could afford to have standards. Currently they can't afford to have standards, so women have zero incentives to stop being fat hippos.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 02:58 PM
1

The women who look like shit going to Tesco as the same chavs who wear miniskirts with no tights in December and drink the whole alcoholic stock of the bar they go to to cope with the cold. They also put on a few extra rolls of fat, presumably still to cope with the cold. Those women are not the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 02:57 PM
2

In the UK, a girlboy with bad skin like Eddie Redmayne is considered in the top 20%. Like he is actually a fucking model. That's the point: there is no such thing as the top 20% in the UK.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 02:47 PM
3

A woman being prepared to put up with an obese gay to get hold of his resources whilst cucking him with Chad on the side ain't the same thing as 'women are attracted to obese men'.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 02:45 PM
4

Most modern men are obese too, by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 02:41 PM
5

This is bullshit. All 8 and above men get attention. The CEO guy can marry gold diggers, but then they will cheat on him because he gives them zero tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 02:38 PM
5

I said it before and I will say it again. Incels wishing to use the 'men and women are different' card to justify anything, including how women should not take looks into consideration or be hypergamous (whilst even autistic omegas admit on wanting to hit on the hottest girl) does not work, has never worked, and it is why women keep not giving a shit and having standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 02:36 PM
7

Yeah, as a bisexual girl I cannot say I would ignore that in the street.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 02:33 PM
3

If women are shallow for not wanting to fuck something that looks gross, the same can be said for all the men who ever existed, seeing as their sexuality is based primarily on looks. It's just a ridiculous insult incels throw around to feel better about themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 02:03 PM
1

Yep. That is the problem. So they stay hairy and disgusting and then bitch on the internet because women cheat on them or divorce them. Duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 01:34 PM
5

I don't know if this is an American perspective (in the UK there is a lot less airbrushing going on), but in my neck of the woods an attractive woman is simply slim, well-coiffed, with normal/natural makeup and decent hygiene.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 01:33 PM
2

I don't say those things to him because I, unlike him, have a sense of dignity. Women are uncomfortable when a man like that approaches them sexually. He could be threatening. I have seen people being uncomfortable around him. And of course he never actually got a single date. The point about omegas is that they bitch and moan about hypergamy on the internet, but they have high standards too. Perhaps this guy would have success if he dated an obese girl with rotting teeth, but no, he has to hara…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 01:31 PM
6

There is nothing ridiculous about the standard of personal care the average female seems able to mantain. The average male cannot even do that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 01:18 PM
1

Yeah? Well, if he thinks he has the right to say a woman is only beautiful if she meets his standards then perhaps I should have said what I thought and told him I think men are only fuckable if they are not loser fatballs like him. He also used to actually ask pretty girls out (and they looked disgusted). So he clearly felt entitled and thought girls ought to endure his advances.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 01:16 PM
1

Size and girth do matter, yes, but if you move your hips with the pace of a senile tortoise and act all insecure, both are wasted on you, and I would rather take the smaller size belonging to a man who knows what the fuck to do with a female.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 09:38 AM
3

Omegas are disgusting, yes, I say this as a woman. I once had an omega friend (without benefits, obviously) and we were talking about romance in general and he said 'oh yeah, I can appreciate a girl's personality, but I have to like her physically first,' and he laughed in a sort of mischievous way. I was disgusted, because we are talking about an obese 31 year old man with rotting teeth and a minimum wage job in a call centre who can barely remember to take bring his keys when he leaves his ren…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 09:27 AM
3

I am a woman from the UK and I tell you, OP, the problem in in our culture. First of all, our culture seems to actively discourage men from taking basic care of themselves, so they have rotting teeth, bad breath, and they get fatter and fatter after they get married (alright, plenty of women are fat too). And in general the men are just too British to ever take charge of anything without apologising. It's the way it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 09:21 AM
12

This post illustrates why feminists and gays often band together for their rights: most homophobes are also misogynists, because they see a man taking it up the ass and think he is behaving like a woman, and that's bad because they find women contemptible. So yeah, there is little difference between homophobes and misogynists.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 05:14 PM
1

Eye roll incels trying to be impressive by claiming to be psychopaths are quite cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/16 09:09 AM
1

But he still loved Padme.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 11:15 PM
1

Psychopaths cannot love, because they don't feel empathy. Apparently they can white-knight, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 11:14 PM
2

Ian Brady was diagnosed as a psychopath.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 07:58 PM
6

The weird thing about white-knighting for women who are to be considered bad or undeserving, is that it is something apparently even male psychopaths do. Ian Brady and Myra Hindley were a couple of English psychopaths who murdered several people, and yet when they were arrested Ian, who was a raging psychopath, tried to protect Myra and claimed he had done everything himself and she had been intimidated into 'doing as she was told' (turned out not to be true and she was just as guilty and psycho…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 07:49 PM
1

Not necessarily, lol. Darth Vader was very Blue Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 07:31 PM
0

'Immaturity'. LMAO. My fellow Millenials who happen to be male are the very opposite of 'mature', but I will agree on Machiavellianism. That is just due to the fact that 'autism is the extreme manifestation of the male brain', it has been said. So the more 'male' your brain is, the less good you are at controlling social interaction. But you will be better at other things, like STEM.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 05:53 PM
1

After reading stuff from the Cheistian Fundamentalists, I FUCKING LOVE YOU FOR THAT. I would support an opt out of parenting for men if they pay for the abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 05:14 PM
3

Up until one hundred years ago, it was 'reality' that a woman was a possession of her husband and had to submit to him. Turns out we feminists are pretty good at altering 'reality'.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 05:12 PM
3

What you say about the Conservatives is very strange. As I said, many Red Pillers do not want to fill the 'fuckboy' role, but rather be the patriarch and support a stay at home mom who is a submissive unicorn, not a post wall reformed party girl. This is the key difference. That way Conservatism and the Red Pill work together because they are all about limiting the freedom of women. There is more to the Red Pill than the 'fuckboy' part, and marriage is deemed important by many members.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 01:38 PM
2

Plenty of Red Pillers have a conservative world view. Many support Trump. In fact, what I read a lot on the Red Pill is that sexual strategy is just about 'enjoying the decline' because the good old times when you had stable family units are gone. Do you really think anything of what I quoted from Thatcher and Schlafly can be categorised as even remotely feminist? Schlafly was borderline clinically insane, would begin speeches by thanking her husband for allowing her to attend the conference.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 01:28 PM
0

The problem is that people who feel strongly about pushing gender roles think girls should be taught to be mothering and gentle. I never played with dolls, and girls in general have interests that are much more varied than that. A girl who's more interested in animals than baby dolls is already pushing the stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 01:22 PM
2

Ahhh if only you were right. Ever heard of Schlafly, the anti-feminist? She said there is no such thing as marital rape and campaigned long and hard against women achieving equal rights with men. Trump paid honour to her not long ago. I hope she's burning in fucking hell. Also, Margaret Thatcher said feminism is poison and wanted to restrict abortion laws. Older women are split in two groups: the lively, happy, fun crones or grandmas who like younger women very much and always side with them as …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 01:13 PM
1

This is very widespread among conservative Christians. They have a very sick view of what being 'feminine' means. They think all girls should play with dolls because they are born to be gentle mothers. This is an extremely stifling role, because obviously a lot of women are not naturally gentle or sweet or submissive and interested in babies (even many who do have children themselves might have zero interest for kids in general and be career women rather than stay at home moms). I never played w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 01:02 PM
0

Red Pillers obviously do not all believe in those extreme ideas, the same goes for feminism. But if you go by extremist stereotypes, the general guidelines of both ideologies are pretty similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 12:53 PM
1

Oh yes. Had I been born back in First Wave times, I would have been one of the feminists who proudly went to jail for detonating bombs, and fasted in protest, were divorced by their husbands for being 'crazy' etc. I feel very, very strongly about my feminist beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 12:29 PM
2

Your desires to keep them out are irrelevant. If they were, this thread would not have been made in the first place because women would not invade those spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 09:13 AM
0

Yes, this is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 09:06 AM
1

You just proved why my feminazi pepper spray bottle needs to stay filled and ready :)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 01:05 AM
1

There is a very big difference between courting and keep pushing your unwanted presence on a woman who has said no. P. S. Oh of course the idea of him getting raped got me wet. All females are dark triad sociopaths. AWALT!!11
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 01:04 AM
1

Well, sometimes what they see as an invasion is actually simple puzzlement. Women (not the Red Pill ones) who post in the Red Pill do so just to ascertain whether these men are actually human, because walking into the Red Pill as a civilian is quite an experience, seeing how sociopathic the content is. It's not necessarily something done out of a desire to 'invade' a male space because you think there shouldn't be a male space.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:55 PM
2

I am sure all the Red Pillers are cheering at how much more difficult life is now that feminism exists. That's probably why they bitch about it all the time. I understand that overcoming difficulties feels good, but would you like to willingly throw away your advantages just for the sheer pleasure of it? Why don't you give everything you own away and start from scratch from the street? I don't know what kind of statistics you are basing your assumptions over, but less than a month ago feminists …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:51 PM
1

If someone is dying, is it your moral obligation to give them your kidney? These fucked up shits claim a raped woman should have her body deformed as damaged and risk her life to save another life. Besides, allowing the baby of a rapist to live is the worst thing ever because rape is in itself a raping strategy to pass on the genes. You are allowing the rapist to be evolutionarily successful whilst traumatising the woman, destroying her body and forcing her to risk her life (and suffer) in child…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:40 PM
2

When things like this get in your way, you navigate a harder path, that is the point. Of course you can make it anyway, but it's harder. So the idea that men and women are on equal footing in this arena is absurd. And since until a hundred years ago women in Victorian Britain were widely believed to not have the 'constitution' for academia (something Freud also claimed) you will notice that talking about these kinds of injustices actually does help change things.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:36 PM
2

I never said a woman cannot make it, did I? What I said is that a woman's ambitions are not taken seriously by society.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:28 PM
-2

As a feminist, I have a loathing of people with 'misplaced' empathy. Fucked up Christians who see a woman getting raped and would force her to carry the child of her rapist because they think she should be 'compassionate' are so beyond repulsive to me that I doubt I would even give a shit if they died screaming in an ISIS terrorist attack. That being said, Red Pillers (many of whom are pro-life) would all cheer if I got raped. So in terms of mutual empathy we are pretty equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:26 PM
2

Great, let's talk about Hillary. Let's talk about how she was routinely asked, for years and years and years, why she kept working after getting married. See here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bg_sEZg7-rk Let's talk about how she was told she is 'aggressively ambitious' and chastised for saying she'd rather be involved in policy-making than baking cookies: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-namImCszCk Let's talk about all the men who have questioned her ability to rule after she caught pneumonia be…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:19 PM
3

You cannot control random erections any more than random crying if the cause is hormonal. Try getting an injection of testosterone and see how much 'control' you have got. I do not feel at all sad in those cases, I just keep on working. That's what you don't get: it is a physical reaction, not a psychological one. Trans men who get hormones also experience this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:11 PM
3

In this case, seeing as it is a hormonal thing, it would be the equivalent of not being able to control an erection.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 10:40 PM
2

The point is, the bar for what constitutes too fat or too ugly is low for you, and it is ridiculously low for another ten thousand incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 10:15 PM
1

Okay, let me give you a practical example: I chatted up a guy on match. After a bit, red flags appeared: we barely knew each other, and he said 'right now I am in bed and thinking of having a nice woman here to cuddle with,' and 'most women are unfaithful and have no values but I think you are different'. I clearly told him this was the reason why I wanted to terminate things immediately. He said 'ah, wrong turn of phrase. But I am a gentleman. I will accept your decision'. I barely refrained fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:45 PM
4

Guys, problems like these are caused by men themselves. Why doesn't a tall woman need to feel insecure? Because men will fuck her anyway. Men will fuck anything, always. Women have standards, that is what causes men to be insecure about their height.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:22 PM
1

Poor working women worked, that's the point. They had the same wage slave jobs in factories (in the Victorian era) or doing other jobs in the countryside. But they were not paid well for these jobs. They were not enough to buy them their autonomy and they could not own property. On top of that they were sexually abused, which is a trauma far, far worse than work (which they also endured).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:20 PM
2

Have you disproven my point that women's ambitions do not get taken seriously? And why don't they?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:17 PM
0

Men never say Maybe to a girl. They would fuck anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:15 PM
2

There is a very specific reason for loss of attraction: the man changes. He grows a beer belly, he does not bring in money anymore, he grows lazy and fat. Men don't like their wives to grow fat and lazy either, right? So it's not as though the attraction 'magically disappears' for no reason. If you decide to lock yourself out of the dating market out of lack of trust, that is your choice, but how is it different from girls going 'I won't date you because you are an asshole. AMALT! You are seeing…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:14 PM
1

You are confusing a class issue with a gender issue. A working class man worked a dangerous job. A middle and upper class man did not. Instead, the woman married to the fat, disgusting lawyer was as sexually traumatised as she laid down and thought of England as the poor working class wife was. Neither had access to university or an alternative because of their gender, not their class.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:53 PM
2

When I tell this guy I am seeing that I like him, I mean it. You argue that maybe I won't like him twenty years from now if we get together and get married, sure, but when I told him I liked him, I meant it. I totally support your plan of action. The world needs many more Teslas. The problem is that these men who ignore women don't invent jack shit and just play video games. They are herbivore men. By the way, you really think not getting to pass your genes on is as bad as getting raped? LOL, we…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:49 PM
0

Uhm, you do not see how it is harassing to be 'chased' by a man you clearly said no to and to whom you feel zero attraction? Why should you tolerate his presence? If Elliot Rodger keeps pestering you to give him a chance and you say no, don't you see how it sucks to keep having him pester you? Many girls would also live in fear, not sure whether he would even turn violent, because he hamsters it in his head as her putting him in the waiting list, when in fact she just said no from the beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:44 PM
0

Yes, you are very correct. A no which turns into a yes does not happen if the man just keeps flirting. It turns into a yes if, for example, they work together and really get to know each other and a year later she is single and has gotten to know him well so might give him a chance if he makes himself available. But it's a completely different situation, as you can see. And I don't recommend to men to just wait around in the friendzone hoping something like this will happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:38 PM
1

I agree that women are not attracted to most men, but then again the only thing that stopped men from committing suicide in the past was that they could not leave behind a family that would not survive without their income. It's not as though the problem of loss of attraction is a new phenomenon, really. If we want to get down to evolutionary psychology, there is reason to believe incels, or even betas, were never really meant to survive that long. Back in hunter gatherer societies, the ones who…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:34 PM
0

This is a very, VERY dangerous line of thought. We women get harassed enough as it is, we don't need men we say no to to keep bothering us in the hope of eventually getting a yes. You know how the old, misogynist adage goes: *when a man says no, his word is final. When a woman says no, it is the beginning of negotiations.'
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:23 PM
1

So for the sake of argument, you believe that the main problem is Beta Bobs getting divorce raped left right and centre? Is that the canker of our society? And how do you expect to fix that? By forcing women to stay with a man they have lost attraction for? Is it not better for the man as well to get a divorce in that case? P.S. How are 'Chads' any different than normal men in terms of sexual attraction if humans are all biologically the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:11 PM
0

Many men find a purpose in life. Just because Average Joe cannot find purpose by inventing something or starting a business like Brilliant Bob does, it is not the job of women to give him a pussy to keep him happy. What you do not understand is that women married for money, no attraction. Is it really difficult to understand how traumatic it can be to be forced to have sex with a man who disgusts you to survive?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:08 PM
0

So the only cure for widespread incelhood and video game omegahood is to give these men a reason to work, aka a pussy. Do you suggest we go back to enslaving women?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:55 PM
2

I am not here to change anyone's mind, and you have not provided any 'stats'. I don't need to write long paragraphs because all you say is easily disputable simply through the use of basic Red Pill principles. Don't women hit the wall? Don't men lose attraction towards post-wall women? Doesn't it follow that the loss of attraction causes dead bedroom syndrome AND also causes men to see their wives in a less favourable light? Isn't this what the Red Pill advocates? If the Red Pill is correct, all…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:52 PM
0

Men are apparently not appreciative of the benefits they have always had. Contributing to society, inventing something, writing a book, making civilisation better is what we are here for. The problem is the average man with no skills and no talents who, in the past, used to take pleasure in being the 'patriarch' of the household. Now he cannot do it anymore. Feminism, again, happened to free women from slavery. So if you suggest we go back to what we had before so Average Joe can feel good about…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:49 PM
3

Regarding sex, men get tired of the same woman over time. Especially if she is post-wall. There is no excitement in fucking the same woman over and over again. That is why they visit prostitutes. You are also making big, sweeping generalisations regarding how households work, and while I don't doubt that abusive wives exist, your belief that men are just these docile creatures who do as she wishes is very misguided.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:40 PM
3

There is one thing I want to say about this: men are irritated by tears. They think tears = she is being emotional. The fact is, when I ovulate I cry for no reason whatsoever other than the hormonal imbalance. I do Excel calculations whilst crying and make no mistakes. All I say is perfectly logical and has nothing to do with my tears. Because they are a result of hormones, not of mood alteration. Very often, men think women are being 'emotional' when in truth they are not. Random tears in certa…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:29 PM
0

Nowadays, women can have careers. Can't men? Can't they buy their houses like women can? Can't they contribute to society? Don't they enjoy the many benefits of our better healthcare and technology? What is it that they haven't got? The only thing I would give them is the ability to 'drop out' of parenting whilst the mother can still abort IF he pays for the abortion, but it would be a very complicated law to establish.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:25 PM
-1

So why does the Red Pill clamour to bring back 'the good old times'? Wasn't it equally bad for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:11 PM
3

That women themselves are capable of violence is obvious, but men are far, far more likely to just disengage. They live with you but they don't listen to you, they don't care about what you say. This causes BIG problems in a married couple, and it is abuse because you feel completely disrespected and treated like a child (which is the kind of treatment the Red Pill advocates). Also, married men visit prostitutes. Why should a wife get the STDs her husband infects himself with?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:08 PM
2

I turned 24 a few weeks ago, and am getting started in journalism. I have already been mistaken for a secretary, asked if I wanted to work in fashion writing (despite giving no indication whatsoever of being interested in that), and even lectured on how hard it is to jump back into the industry after starting a family (people just assume my reason to live is to pop out babies, you know. Not wanting them is against my nature, apparently).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:04 PM
1

Violence, emotional abuse (as in demeaning, disrespecting) and infidelity are also sky-high in lesbian couples. Both mostly come from the 'masculine' woman of the couple. Same reasons why women break up with men. Give me a reason why a woman should stay with a man who acts like a Red Pill asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 06:45 PM
0

That is exactly the reason why I would end a relationship with a man, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 05:52 PM
1

Those were pure shit. Game of Thrones or Harry Potter have far better female characters.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 04:13 PM
1

Hillary wants to legalise even very late abortions in some cases. I fucking love that woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 02:26 PM
7

It completely depends on the man, on what his man-hamster is spinning in that particular moment, on whether the girl fucked him or not, on whether she humiliated him or not. Men are very emotional when it comes to women, and use the 'slut' card as a defence. That's why feminism is great, because it shames the misogynist 'slut-shamed' instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:34 AM
2

You have just quoted the answer. Women's ambitions, including my own, are not taken seriously like that of a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:23 AM
1

You don't understand this because you don't feel strongly about certain issues. If I learned a man is pro letting me carry the child of my rapist and thinks if I agree to sex I agree to the resulting pregnancy, to me he becomes so repulsive I could barely stand to look at him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:19 AM
3

The great thing feminism brought is the general better representation of female characters in books and series. I'm not just talking of Game of Thrones. Think how many great female character there are in the Harry Potter series. Women are no longer supposed to be just 'the love interest' of the man in fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:14 AM
1

Well, if you do not want them to have handouts for their children, I sure as fuck hope you are 100% pro abortion including Hillary's plan for later abortions. Fair is fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 09:10 AM
1

Another thing that this question brings to my mind is one universal truth: we humans are made to work together in the end. That's how we survive. I think if a bunch of feminists and Red Pillers ended up on a desert island, they would team together to survive and become friends. I am even inclined to believe that the Red Pillers would not necessarily rape the feminists (am I being too blue pill/optimistic)? They could establish a hunter gatherer society, which would be very egalitarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 09:50 PM
2

As a feminist, I would never date a Red Piller. I pick my friendships judging on what kind of value the person might bring to my life. I am afraid to say I struggle to see what value Red Pillers might have to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 08:46 PM
3

How the fuck can one be friends with Christian fundamentalists. Like what the hell do they even talk about that makes sense to normal humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 08:44 PM
1

It's a gendered thing in this case. It's not about human energy in general and the benefit of social contact with others. Have you ever heard a woman say she is relaxed by being around men even just for a conversation because of the male energy? Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 08:13 PM
1

Sex is one thing, but the whole creepy 'female energy' thing is something I have only ever read on the Red Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 07:31 PM
1

Okay, Red Pillers are gynobsessed, let's not deny that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 06:51 PM
1

But you go along with it just for the 'female energy'?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 06:02 PM
2

I am not sure where this Red Pill conviction that women are no longer having kids en masse comes from. They have one or two rather than ten, of course, but this huge phenomenon of women buying those disgusting rat-sized dogs to make up for the lack of kids is just weird. I don't see it happening at all. Single moms, yes, but not huge swamps of childless women buying chihuahuas. I do not want kids, and as a feminist it is up to me to define my life, my choices, and what I want. As a matter of fac…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 05:59 PM
1

Women are not taken seriously in any work setting at all. They are not considered serious and their commitment is constantly questioned. As for the medical expenses... that has to do with childbirth, obviously. Or contraceptive/hormonal stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 05:49 PM
1

So you would listen to two hours of real life feminism and perhaps not get any pussy at the end just because you enjoy the girl's femininity? Well, if you're happy... Red Pillers are legitimately way more gynobsessed than we shall ever be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 05:45 PM
3

A man who is not guilty of misogyny will not mind any of those things one bit. All the others are guilty, and punished :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 04:48 PM
1

Note: a female FEMINIST friend. We do have our secret meetings to plot how to destroy Western society from time to time, after all. Or Western men just wouldn't get oppressed enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 04:46 PM
2

I frankly do not have a problem with gender differences like 'girls are better at communication' and 'boys are better at maths'. There are some differences in attitude. However, boys and girls can achieve in the other gender's field too if they are so inclined and put in the work. The point is that one cannot tell a boy 'you cannot be a writer because you are male and if you have this inclination there is something wrong with you', and the same goes for girls. Frankly, I am sure I will contribut…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 04:44 PM
5

It consists of making a speech and having men comment about the size of your breast instead of what you said. It consists of going out to the grocery store and having men catcall you and say all the disgusting things they would like to do to you. It consists of having to vet and ultra-vet the men you before allowing yourself to feel even slightly benevolent towards them because you have to make sure they don't just want to use you for sex. It consists of many men saying we should go back to a pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 04:30 PM
1

But the question is, why would you go through all this for a feminist? If she just wants a hookup, things are much simpler, but if you do not respect a woman and think all she says is bullshit, what do you get out of putting up the whole pantomime?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 04:22 PM
3

The crazy thing I have noticed watching how guys in my life act, is that they chase the very pretty girl, but settle with a far less good-looking one. I don't mean fat or very old, just not genetically blessed, you know. I have formulated various theories to explain this phenomenon: It could be that they really prefer personality when it comes to settling down. All these girls I see them with are very fun to be around and really nice. They perhaps assume the less beautiful girls will be more loy…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 03:23 PM
1

The bra cups flipped down?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 02:07 PM
3

How about this (NSFW): http://www.nudeselfpictures.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/saggy-tits-girl-selfie-390x450.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 12:52 PM
1

That's where they told me 'a big cock' would not necessitate clit stimulation. And these are supposed to be the 'alpha slayers'.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 11:29 AM
1

Have you ever been on the Red Pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 10:29 AM
1

There is also the ego factor though. Men are generally very prone to believe if they cannot please a woman with their dick alone, they are not 'real men'. Porn very much encourages this mentality as it shows men supposedly bringing women to climax with penetration alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 10:16 AM
1

Ah sorry, I thought you were OP, who asked this in his post. So you are prepared to not believe that a young man who has only ever seen sex through porn won't know about the clit and how to please a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 09:58 AM
1

Seriously? That is very strange though, because from all I have read it is more effective than pills on average (I never got pregnant). But I mean, it is possible to conceive on the pill as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 09:29 AM
1

You wanted someone to tell you why women might grow disinterested in porn because men are beginning to have crazy expectations: these are the crazy expectations. Thinking your Thundercock will do wonders without the help of clit stimulation. Say whatever you like, but I believe the average young, inexperienced man does not get his sex tips from anywhere other than porn. Obviously that turns him into a crappy lover.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 09:23 AM
2

Men are, by and large, distinctly unlovable creatures. Their IQ is more varied, and when it's low, if combined with an autistic tendency, makes them seem borderline retarded even if they are pseudo-normal. It is very hard to love these creatures who see women as children rather than capable adults. It is very hard to love the above-mentioned omegas who try to hit on you constantly and do not take no for an answer. It is very hard to love them when they try to rape you. It is very hard to love ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 04:26 AM
1

The point is not really ego, because women get judged so often for what they wear it's routine. It is about fighting the status quo which very heavily judges women for what they wear. Women navigate a very unfair playground in life, being taken less seriously by men in general and getting objectified, so it's important that they call out bullshit when they see it. If no one calls out men for constantly judging women for what they wear, the behaviour gets normalised even more. Instead, having a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 03:21 AM
0

You are changing all the cards on the table. We were talking about how men and women acted in the past, and you said it was right that women had to marry etc. because paternity matters to men. Like, I am not even sure you realise what you have said, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 02:24 AM
2

I use it and it is great if you do not have an abundant period, which is the only thing that can make things worse because it does tend to make your periods more abundant. But it's great and you get to change it every ten years!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 02:11 AM
3

You are right. I should just laugh prettily when men like you say women of the past (WERE you even referring to the past?) had to be forced to marry and have children because 'paternity is important'. Thinking again, no, I'd rather stay a feminist ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 02:02 AM
2

Uh uh sure. Rape and the mistreatment of women are ridiculous issues. It would be sad if my rage was fruitless, but ahem, the Red Pill bitching about how feminism ruined the fun for men all day long tells a different tale...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 01:54 AM
0

Gee, I get to chose for which man I get to be a baby machine for! Just to get some context, are you referring to the past, or how things should be nowadays? Guess what, if you want a woman to be pleasant you should earn her respect. Claiming that it is right for a man to just own a woman as was used in the past 'because paternity is important' earns you nothing but a spit in the face, little boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 01:44 AM
2

In case it was not clear to you, being a unicorn liked by men is not my top priority. I don't give a shit if men 'won't support me' because that's the reason why I want a career. How does society 'support' me? Humans are disposable. Also men might not change, but at least they deserve to be given hell on earth by feminists: forced quotas, misogynist public shaming, forced 'No means No' seminaries, fear of false rape accusations. They don't take women with ambitions seriously, they, as a collecti…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 01:38 AM
1

Nope. And who is not childish as a teenager? I've seen guys prepare kits in case of a zombie apocalypse. Also there is nothing childish in pointing out men have no right in using women as baby machines, as you claim they do in certain circumstances. I mainly come off as childish to you because men do not take women seriously in general, which is another justification for misandry.b
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 01:32 AM
1

As for the hormonal thing to control fertility, have you tried using a copper coil?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 01:29 AM
1

LMAO you think employers and people in general give men more of a chance because they think 'this poor guy has to start a family'? No, it's because men are shitty and do not take women seriously, that is all. It's very simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 01:13 AM
2

So it is about forcing a woman to be a baby factory. Yeah, not much better than dick sucking. This guy (from ancient times?) thinks that because he has a job he has the right to live in a society in which women are denied an education, and sold as cattle to men like him so he can have children. Yeah, I would not feel sorry if his wife poisoned him. You know, when I was a budding feminist teenager, I kept a very pointy fire poker in my room. I kept it just as a precaution: in case there was some …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 01:09 AM
1

You are highly underestimating women's ability to understand that they are not being taken seriously by a man. The illusion only works on silly girls, which is why the crappier con artists like you prefer them. After all, if it was easy TRP would not exist and would not be so full of angry, sexually frustrated men. The more feminist women are, the more they expect men to not take them seriously at all because they know the shortcomings of male nature. So they expect more in terms of proof of res…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 12:59 AM
1

You logic is faulty because you assume there are plenty of non-crazy girls out there who would be happy to let themselves be used as plates, who would hang around if the man did not introduce them to their friends and possibly even family quite quickly, who would tolerate men not making any efforts to call them often, take her out to dinner etc. and standard asshole Red Pill 'plating ' behaviour. That really does not appeal to self-respecting women. And good luck with trying that with a feminist…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 11:15 PM
3

Well, according to the Red Pillers it is LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:31 PM
1

Mature men are fucking ridiculous. I have been on a few dates with a 39 year old who seemed acted as though he were some Manosphere Lord. Complete 'game' bullshit, tried to act all affable and confident, genuinely convinced I'd let him kiss me after one date or that I would date him for the sex LOL. You Red Pillers need to understand that your techniques work on damaged women, certainly not on feminists. Certainly not on the majority of normal non-crazy women. Many of us do not tolerate any disr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:30 PM
2

A note to the ignorant: most studies on children were carried on by men. Also most children's writers were men. Don't know if you have ever heard of Andersen. Or, you know, C. S. Lewis. So for every man who says I am conforming to a stereotype (???) there are a thousand who will say only men can do this job. What constitutes a male field is subject to change depending on the mood of the man-hamster. I don't have any brothers, but I thought boys falling behind in school is something even you Red …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:24 PM
4

If you think not tolerating him making harassing lewd comments and asking me out decently and getting to know me and getting into a relationship with me before having sex with me and accepting he will have to learn to please me sexually because I won't do it just for his pleasure a form of abuse, then yeah Red Piller, get ready to be abused.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:14 PM
1

If the STEM guy made more money in a few years, would that make him superior despite his being socially awkward and well... a STEM guy? I thought you would be the kind of man who would see a farmer growing his own business and supporting his family as super alpha and great. On what do you base superiority or inferiority? Is a journalist superior or inferior to a STEM guy? And how? Is it about money, is it about personality, how do you Pillers decide?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:11 PM
1

See, this is your Red Pill prejudice against men. Actually Red Pill men are more misandrist than women can ever hope to be. Just because STEM guys are a bit reserved and socially awkward and slightly on the spectrum, it does not make them inferior. We females are better at social interaction, so yes, I tend to carry conversations a bit. Does not make him inferior, just different. He is extremely hard-working, has his shit together, and is respectful. Are you a match for him? I don't think I am s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 09:44 PM
1

We female feminists are very relaxed about going to the films alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 09:38 PM
4

If he was that kind of man, he would not have even gotten to the stage of holding my hand. The only red pill who would make it to second stage with a hardcore feminist is a deeply closeted one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 09:37 PM
1

I very much do want to write about women's issues. I also want to write about children's issues. Conversationally, this man-hating feminist here is interested in how white boys are falling way behind in literacy here in the UK, and I want to see if there is a way of making reading more engaging for them or even exploring alternative ways of getting them to read. There is a whole budding market of video games which are interactive and perhaps more boyish and less isolating for boys, and yet struc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 09:36 PM
1

Conversationally, I have my single tickets ready for Fantastic Beasts and give no shits.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 09:22 PM
1

I currently make more money than he does, but I do not see myself as his superior. We are pretty equal when we talk, because he is so autistic and I carry things a bit, but he's alright and has his shit together. I see many men below me in terms of wealth (if you include the guy I'm seeing) and education. But this idea that women with degrees see any man who hasn't got one as a piece of trash is bullshit. Main lesson for men: DO NOT BE FAT.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:55 PM
1

Yes, you clearly have never read anything Dickens wrote about the 'Fallen Women'.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:51 PM
1

Journalists can get a lot of recognition and win prizes and also become famous authors if they work hard. All things I want to do. There were societies which were far, FAR better than the Christianuts in terms of women's rights. Viking women could divorce their husbands and could be landowners. Christians were particularly shitty to women compared to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:51 PM
2

You think it's feminist propaganda? You've never read anything by Charles Dickens, have you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:44 PM
1

Yes exactly! That is what we were saying in terms of men 'enjoying the after party'. That is totally ok, it's a gender difference. What is not ok is the 'women do not want a legacy, all they deep down want is kids' mantra.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:43 PM
2

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen_woman Go learn some history of Victorian female oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:41 PM
1

My cousin did use contraceptives but they did not work. That can happen. Women being seen as physically fragile, as in Hillary's case, makes men shame them and claim they are not 'up for the job' when in truth what she has to do is sit on her ass and talk the Congress into legalising late-term abortion. Many men even in this thread have admitted that women are not taken as seriously in business. As for the lack of good men, so far as I am concerned a man is good for me if he is: NOT FAT. Fat is …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:34 PM
2

No one ever said there is anything wrong with those men. There is merely something wrong in claiming women cannot or should not do it as well if they want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:27 PM
3

Abortions are not legal everywhere and were dangerous in the past. Men rape because it is their instinct to want to pass on their genes. I am all for abortion, even late abortion as Hillary advocates, which is great.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:26 PM
1

You just choose to ignore how many fields WERE BARRED TO THEM and how socially discriminated women were, how brainwashed ever since birth into believing marriage was the only option. If you think things were just as they are now in terms of women's rights 'only most women chose to marry' you need to pay a visit to the crazy doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:24 PM
1

My passion is journalism and according to you that means my passion is to work for the Illuminati elite. That's the point, in the past, women could not be journalists. They could advance only by marrying the fat fuck (rich or poor, I am not part of the fat acceptance movement: it was still disgusting). They were frowned at if they did anything else. Why was a woman in the past worse off alone? Because she was denied an education. She could not own property. She could not get into a trade. That's…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:21 PM
2

Absolute bullshit. Men rape to put their genes in the gene pull. That is why the best thing you can do as a woman if you get raped and get pregnant is kill the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:11 PM
1

Women seek glory and recognition as well. J. K. Rowling did say she wanted a legacy. The difference is that getting status makes a man more sexually attractive, so many men sometimes do not pursue glory because they believe in having a legacy and that their work is important and will contribute to society, but to become the alpha male.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:09 PM
1

Legally nothing stops you, but it is extremely autistic to believe women are not socially taken less seriously than men and therefore have it harder. Also, I have family in Ireland. I had to fly a cousin over here because she could not get an abortion. So women in the West do not have all the rights everywhere. Social discrimination against women is powerful. The fact that old women are perceived as fragile almost almost destroyed Hillary's campaign when she caught pneumonia. Feminism exists not…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:07 PM
2

Women were far, FAR more discriminated against in the work field than men were. Even nowadays women are taken less seriously than men in all career paths. Again, she could get pregnant and face huge social discrimination. Ever heard of the term 'Fallen Women'? As for men, do you know how it was ensured that they kept working in those shitty jobs without rebelling? By selling them a wife. So he could feel like he had control of something by dominating her. She was by all means a possession. I hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 08:02 PM
1

Absolutely. Many men would rape if they did not have another outlet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:58 PM
5

He hasn't got to be sexually abused and he has options. The woman had no options and was seen as property of a man. So no, the beta did not have it hard because he can't have sex. Sex is a small part of life. THE WHOLE of a woman's life was limited by her gender. So now, I am afraid the incel who can work on his career without prejudice but ain't getting pussy does not have it as hard, and he hasn't got my sympathy for not getting his willie wet. Compare that with sucking the dick of a fat fuck …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:53 PM
2

She could do so only if she was relatively wealthy and in a position to study and was lucky enough not to be discriminated against too much or raped by someone who saw her as vulnerable (and there would be slut-shaming for the resulting illegitimate pregnancy). The system was staked against her, because society wanted her to marry the fat fuck. It was created to please men and to make it as difficult as possible for women to escape it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:49 PM
1

It is you men who have decided that it is 'masculine' for a woman to pursue her interests. She has those interests naturally. She wants to earn a living and own her own property to be free, not because she desires a sex change and wants to have a penis and fuck girls. The husband in question was often fat and physically repulsive and the woman was sold to him and told she was his property and had no way of advancing in society without tolerating him. For you men, who would fuck anything, it is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:41 PM
1

Women who have less ambition are women who would rather focus on their children, and that's ok. As you said, many men are happy to just watch sports and work as taxi drivers. That's ok too. The problem comes when you do have ambitious women, and they are told they should marry and have kids instead. They are not taken seriously. They are believed to be too 'fragile' to take on more responsibility. In the most extreme cases, as in Romania, they are told their uterus is at the service of the state…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:32 PM
5

Except women were barred from universities and most professions and career women were extremely looked down upon and penalised and her father could force her to marry. Yeah, a total free choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:28 PM
3

I bet the women who got to fuck an obese loser as their only sexual experience their whole lives absolutely fucking loved that society.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:21 PM
3

I don't really mind periods at all. And in general I like my body as a female. We get the best orgasms with no refractory periods. And various types of orgasms, too! Plus squirting is fun and feels great, and men can't know what it's like. If I have to be honest I also like how my brain works. I have seen men genuinely struggle when it comes to language learning. I speak three foreign languages and I have always beaten men in this arena. I have also won writing prizes at uni and again, men strug…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:16 PM
1

He was a greater man than you could ever be. I hope you know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:59 PM
1

I could ask you the same question, and both answers would be irrelevant. We could both be the most extraordinary or the most mediocre individuals if our gender, and that would not prove our gender as a whole is super ambitious, or has no ambition.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:58 PM
1

Yeah sure, her husband discovered everything but was probably so drowned in pussy that he let her get all the credit, lol. I mean, that would actually be sad. Again, also J. K. Rowling fucked her whole publishing house.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:57 PM
-1

I am sure everyone was very impressed by Marie Curie's feminine wiles, that's how she made her discoveries. J. K. Rowling probably seduced her whole publishing house.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:52 PM
1

Shakespeare was in a 'feminine' domain. Let that sink in for a moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:51 PM
1

It is men who decided that careers are masculine. They are not masculine per se. Wanting to own a property does not make me want to be a man, either. Not having children does not make me a man. It is men who decided women are only good to be their sex slaves and baby machines. So they claim anything else women do is them trying to be 'men' instead of them just living their life without being sex slaves. It is men who have decided to brand all female academics as unnatural and 'masculine' just be…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:50 PM
2

So you think all the men in the entertainment industry have shitty FEMININE values as well? You are talking about a lot of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:40 PM
1

Yeah, Hillary Clinton has no drive. J. K. Rowling wrote all those books without drive. Loreena McKennitt went from street musician from owning her own record label without drive. Margaret Atwood is another writer with no drive, I'm sure. Pretty girls do well to cash in in modelling, but they, unlike talented women, are penalised because their looks don't last.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:39 PM
0

Helga de la Branche, who got a royal pension by spewing utter bullshit. Way to make an easy living. Also do not claim that women are not taken seriously in all professional fields, because it's fucking true.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:36 PM
1

The greatest con artist I ever heard of was actually a woman. Men who make it to the top as you say do not have 'social skills'. They have a skill in something (say, they invented Facebook) and are taken seriously for being men. That is all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:26 PM
1

This is the usual bullshit of 'men need to have pussy to be productive so half the population needs to be enslaved for their pleasure'. You could have had female doctors and lawyers and civilisation would have progressed still. Frankly? I am glad globalisation exists. I hope white men see all their lands invaded by multicultural children. You built a land by enslaving women, now I want you to feel all like cucks when an immigrant takes your job. What do I get out of feminism? I get to not have c…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:23 PM
0

Men have zero fucking social skills. They suck at PR. That's why Men's Rights movements are a joke compared to feminism. The 'social skills' you learn as a man is chatting up a girl at a bar. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:05 PM
0

Yeah sure, I can't wait for those gangsters to come over and still my jewellery. That's what I call a good shower of pure validation. I was merely pointing out just how retarded your claim that women are less likely to be attacked for robbery is, sweetie. No need to fear a lawsuit from me. Relax.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:02 PM
1

Frankly, for me (and I think for most women) the only thing bigger than clit stimulation is penetration AND clit stimulation combined.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:58 PM
3

I will never, for the life of me, understand why men are obsessed with 'vaginal orgasm'. Like if she likes you, and expresses it by orgasming with her clit, why does it matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:56 PM
1

That is not true for non-white males though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:51 PM
1

What happened was not out of necessity, it was out of men wanting possession of pussy and dominance over it. There was no reason to stop women from owning property, from forcing them to marry by barring them from universities, from forcing them to marry their rapist because 'only virgins' could marry, from not educating them, from not giving them the right to divorce even if their husband was abusive, for jailing them if they aborted with herbs. Men have always been shits towards women. The fact…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:49 PM
1

That is a very good motivator, actually. But as we were speaking of men and women, we know that women can aspire to legacy and achieve it, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:39 PM
2

Let's face it: most boys learn everything they know about sex from porn. They want to learn good skills that will make them a more desirable sex partner. It would be possible for porn to be both entertaining and instructive. How fucking hard is it to put two fingers on a clit?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:38 PM
1

It depends on personality. Tesla was not like that, and yet he was awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:34 PM
1

'Do what he did' in terms of getting shamed for his every comment and going down in history as the man who lost the races cause he said 'grab 'em by the pussy'?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:33 PM
1

LMAO I feel quite sorry for scaring you, actually. I would not want you to have nightmares. Btw I have been rated as a six in the past, and I am slim. My hair is natural, not dyed blue, and I don't have any piercings/tattoos. I am also teetotal. So it would be harder for men to rape me. I am totally glad I treated that boy who kissed me and said he would take off my dress if he was not a nice guy the way I did. After that, he dropped all the subtly misogynist hints and stayed in line. Boys gotta…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:30 PM
2

Where the fuck is a teenage boy with no experience supposed to learn about the clitoris? My point is that porn could be useful, if it was done better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:20 PM
1

Because 'forcing a woman to be a woman' and letting her father decide whether she was raped and barring her from university and from most important professions is not brutal? You said it was good, this old system. If I am ruthless and sadistic, it is as retribution. Every man who suffers nowadays pays for what happened in the past AND for the views men like you hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:19 PM
1

Point is, plenty of women do not get trained to do that. Especially if they are average-looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:16 PM
2

For the record, she did not have a husband. She got engaged at past 40 when she was already a millionaire and her fiancé drowned in a river while kayaking. She never married afterwards (understandably). She did it all by herself and put all the investment risk herself. I don't doubt there are many good men who can achieve the same, but your assumption is that women cannot do it. Also, in a difficult trade like music, she took a HUGE gamble in her twenties.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:53 PM
1

Unlikely. Autism is far more common in males. In fact, I read of Asperger being classified as an expression of 'the extreme male brain'.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:49 PM
2

The thing is, in the 70s pornstars had pubic hair. So did all the porn photo models in Victorian England (I know because I have seen some Victorian erotic galleries). In general the absence of female pubic hair is a very new phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:47 PM
1

The pursue might contain money. Just saying. Also jewellery is valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:43 PM
1

You ask me if it is good my rapist fails to impregnate me and gets to choke on the seed of all the prison inmates? Hell yeah, I love it. Your bullshit globalisation conspiracy theory remind me of Jim Corr, who claims 9/11 was staged and that the EU is a plan to create a single world government which was plotted before WWI.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:42 PM
3

I have no fucking idea why anybody would go through a gender transition. Not only it is downright mutilation, but the level of social stigma you get is just not fucking worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:38 PM
1

Not too much of it, but I don't have an issue with its existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:36 PM
1

What stops a woman from doing what she wants with her life (unless she lets an unhealthy obsession with her looks hold her back)?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:35 PM
1

It is false to think women don't take risks. Off the top of my head, I think of Loreena McKennitt, who quit university to become a musician. Fuck, that could have been a disaster. There was a point in which she could not get a mortgage or a credit card. She created her own label, and she's a famous millionaire. I admire her more than I admire many men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:34 PM
0

Kudos to the Corportocracy. Thanks to them, if someone rapes me I don't even get pregnant, and I make sure he gets jailed and gang raped in prison and marked as a rapist for life. None of that 'the father gets to say if she was raped' bullshit. I love feminism. And globalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:30 PM
1

Still, in my opinion, if you exile a group of men for one year, they will come back and be so sexually starved that they will rape a woman even if she cries. I think most men would be rapist under the right circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:27 PM
2

Of course. Which is why we talk of male privilege. Women work, and yet are penalised at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:25 PM
1

Fuck I am glad the feminist revolution happened and EVEN that some men get falsely accused and jailed. Revenge for all this 'forcing women to be women' bullshit and not believing rape victims. Our feminist ancestors did a great job, let that be noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:20 PM
2

It's not just that, there is also the 'you are an immature Peter Pan' side, and the universal Christian 'all people who do not have children are selfish' part as well. I do not agree with either, by the way. But I do recall George R. R. Martin getting asked why he did not have children more than once.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:12 PM
2

Let's start with the fact that many of your posts have the grammar of a 4th grader. Bet sending grammatically subhuman texts to women brings them all to the yard, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:04 PM
3

Run a grammar check before posting, please. The 'bimbo' will get old, and her man might replace her with someone else or simply die. What will be of her then? And men are often abusive in relationship, especially if they know they can get away with it because the woman depends on them economically and cannot leave. A woman has to be stupid to hand that much power to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:01 PM
2

That would put me far above average males like you, and I don't want to shame anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:58 PM
1

This actually feeds my theory that lots of men do not do what they do because they want to be remembered or leave a mark in history, but rather because they enjoy the after party phase, the 'celebrity' aspect. As you say, being seen as 'full of vitality'. There are some old men (like Trump or Berlusconi) who look fucking ridiculous when they try to pull this off.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:54 PM
1

One thing I have to say, though, is that I do not believe it is true that men do not get shamed for not having kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:51 PM
1

Aren't young women like me the ones who ought to be attracted to these old men? I tell you, most of us would take a young fit guy over Clooney's wrinkly muscle mass. But we were talking about status, and apart from the potentially slightly higher sex appeal of a very good looking old man, I don't see how a successful older man gets higher status than a successful older woman. I see both getting recognition in their fields.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:44 PM
1

See? I'm getting there. I'll go chew on some glass now, for practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:39 PM
4

I would not call Ivanka Trump masculine, but she is one hell of a career woman. In general, women have too high a degree of self-preservation to want to depend on a man economically. What you call a 'feminine emotional submissive woman' is what I call a fucking retarded idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:38 PM
1

Eh, I disagree with that. I do not have any children. The fact that I am not having babies at 24 is clearly a sign that I have succumbed to the feminist masculinisation of women, cause popping out babies till we burst is all a woman naturally wants to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:32 PM
1

If who is smart?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:30 PM
1

George Clooney's wife is not very young (the idea that older men can easily slay young pussy is largely a myth) and he is not a politician. Even a creature like Trump who has all the money to fix himself up just looks like an orange in a wig, and has resort to either grab the pussy of unwilling women or marry post-Wall gold diggers like his wife. Old age is old age for all in terms of sexual attractiveness, but sex is not all there is to life and all which constitutes privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:29 PM
1

Actual assault. Like, how does a man assault a woman he knows irl, a woman who knows his face name and address, and expect not to go to jail?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:25 PM
1

Yeeeeah society has always been 'gynocentric'. Being property of your husband and getting barred from universities in the good old days was as gynocentric as you can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:24 PM
1

Actual sexual assault, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:20 PM
2

As a young woman, that's actually what I think of most white haired shrivelled up old male politicians to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:18 PM
1

If it is not trolling, then you should elaborate on how such a simplistic argument can actually be legitimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:16 PM
1

The dangerous situations you should avoid in which you could get raped by someone YOU KNOW would be? We are not talking about street assault here, obviously. Again, even if this man they know is a rapist, does he just rape thinking that she will not report it? The laws being what they are, a man has to be legitimately retarded to rape someone they know.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:12 PM
1

But why do they get assaulted, though? Is it because many women fail to assert themselves with the men they know? Hey I'm 24 and I don't claim to know everything, but no man I ever met tried to assault me. There was once this guy who kissed me and said 'Be glad I am a good guy, because if I were not I would have this dress off you now,' and I answered 'Be glad you are a good guy, because if you were not I would land you in jail.' Needless to say he learned his place after that. So I always wonde…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:02 PM
2

In the case in which a woman is just happy to stay home you would not even talk of male privilege, because there is literally no competition between men and women. The point is that plenty of women do not want to stay home, and many have to work harder to assert themselves. That's where 'male privilege' begins to appear.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:54 PM
13

Of course I am not joking. Hasn't anyone told you we females are naturally dark triad?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:42 PM
2

I agree that part of the male privilege is simply having no choice but to work hard because they cannot rely on their looks, but there are plenty of ugly women in history who had to develop other skills because they could not rely on their looks. Think Emily Bronte. But I agree that beautiful women are penalised for this reason. As for Angela and Hillary being ugly, the point is that it did not stop them becoming what they are. As it would not stop a man, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:41 PM
0

It is, because such a view is so ridiculously simplistic that it cannot form part of a debate, it's just a random troll line which does not deserve to be taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:36 PM
0

But you forget that all men have a sex drive. Women are far more likely to be assaulted to be raped (and then killed). As a male, you are not another man's competition unless you are part of his life. Some gangster who sees you stroll in the street at night has no reason to consider you his competition. You are probably invisible to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:33 PM
1

Why would a guy be more likely to get attacked?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:30 PM
1

Uhm, actually women live longer than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:26 PM
-1

Read the OP post and perhaps you'll get the reference.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:25 PM
2

As for rising status with old age... I have four words for you: Hillary Clinton; Angela Merkel.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:21 PM
1

You said Red Pill men take glory in 'stealing' another man's woman. Also, another thing that makes me feel glad for all the misandry going on in society is the Red Pill idea that a woman loses value if she gets raped, even if she recovers from it and acts normal. Because her cock count has gone up and damaged her. In general it is a view of women that is so disgusting I have genuinely stopped feeling sorry for the men who get gang raped in prison. They get a taste of their own medicine.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:19 PM
-5

You are an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:10 PM
0

This is the kind of mentality that brings my misandry to the surface. Men are afraid of getting cucked because they see women as possessions, basically. 'You fucked MY woman'. Each time I think that this mentality exists, I rejoice for all the men who get cucked, divorce raped, ruined after rape accusations, gang sodomised in prison and so on. Does that make me a sociopath? To me, the fact that men see women as objects to be owned is pretty sociopathic, so I would say we are even.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 02:09 PM
14

The best thing to do would be to follow the Red Pill advice and HARD NEXT, but I would have fun torturing him for a while first, going full-blown feminist on him, shaming his masculinity at every turn, denying sex each time he tries to apply 'game'. If I was feeling particularly sadistic, the day I dump him I would tell him 'I have to leave you because your cock does not satisfy me anymore now that I have slept with this other guy, who compared to you is just so... alpha!'
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 01:59 PM
4

You can actually orgasm without ANY clit stimulation even during foreplay? That is very unusual and for a reason: there are not as many nerve endings in the back of the clitoris (the G spot) as there are in the main exposed area.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 01:52 PM
7

I am a woman and I have orgasmed through penetration alone ONLY because the clit was heavily stimulated before. The G spot is located on the front wall of the vagina for a reason: it is the back of the clitoris. It takes a LONG time to orgasm by stimulating only the back of the clit/G spot, and still in most cases straight up clit masturbation is necessary. If you believe the average guy who pumps for 8 minutes without touching anything else is making the woman orgasm, you are deluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 01:05 PM
6

Porn certainly did not tell them of the existence of a clitoris. They probably gained that knowledge from their female partners. So then again, what they see in porn is not very useful when it comes to applying what they see in their sex lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 01:03 PM
7

As a woman and a feminist, I am in favour of porn because it keeps many men who would otherwise harass women in the streets fundamentally sedated. If the porn actresses are not exploited and paid well (think Sasha Grey), it's a win-win situation. In my opinion, though, porn does not help men understand how to please a woman in bed, and this causes obvious problems to men, because they won't be able to properly sustain a relationship if their partner does not crave sex with them. The big fallacy …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 12:29 PM
1

So masculinity is about wanting to rape women. Well, it looks like our society has perfectly good reason to shame it as it is doing!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:54 AM
1

Those influences are what have turned millennials into a lazy generation. It is all interconnected, and has made us softer and far less capable of forming meaningful relationships. I won't even comment on the red pill, because to me they are a bunch of cowards afraid of getting cucked who branch swing out of fear of Chad and of becoming Beta Bob more than anything else. Not even the average millennial is that socially incompetent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 08:04 PM
2

You fail to address in what way people are trying to find someone who is compatible. They are dismissing perfectly good people at the first sign of trouble, aka an argument, and switch to the next online profile in the hope that this other person will not bring any problems. That everything will be stress-free like it is in their Pinterest dollhouse. Sometimes it is true that there are real problems in a relationship and it makes sense to look for someone else, but the trend I am observing is on…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 06:41 PM
1

You are assuming I am just talking down others without including myself in the critique. We Millennials have problems caused by technology and excessively high expectations and short attention spawns. I do not recall advocating for going back to the fields. I merely believe that we as a generation should learn that life is not perfect and that 'soul mates' who have no flaws do not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 05:59 PM
3

Men are not naturally protective of women. Men naturally crave sex. They act protective to get sex. So a guy protecting a girl from a bad guy is just a guy who wants to 'sadistically fuck' that girl. If all women denied sex to men en masse for a protracted period if time, most men would become rapists.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 03:40 PM
2

Sounds like a perfect explanation of the Madonna-Whore complex. But do you see a woman who can take rough sex as somehow tough?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 10:18 AM
1

Not only there are exceptions, it is also possible to have friends and say, a lover, and never get married. You do not necessarily need a husband and children to not be alone. Women care about these labels because often they don't get married to follow a passion. Off the top of my head, I think of Loreena Mckennitt. Shit, that woman created her own label, has travelled the world, makes wonderful music. Of course she could not have children, but she does follow her passion and is definitely not '…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 09:09 AM
1

Alphas do cause trouble, but claiming betas or even omegas do not have enough testosterone in them to be a problem within society is bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 11:09 PM
1

Another important point is that social respect for living a normal yet successful life is completely gone. Celebrity glamorous lifestyle is all that is appreciated, so normal people who build up their business and support their families are sometimes seriously depicted as overworked losers despite being the backbone of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 09:28 PM
2

Because we leftists are not racist, we don't care if some white areas do not have much density because we can just re-populate them with immigrants.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 09:23 PM
2

As you said, if autism is the extreme male-mind and women shy from it, it means they go for 'less male' types, obviously within limits. Aspie types are very loyal and hard-working, but of course they do not provide that depth of 'emotional connection' plenty of women crave. That does not mean they don't feel, just that they express their love in a very different way, which sometimes women do not appreciate. But these types should be appreciated more because they can definitely be good partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:55 PM
1

This post reeks of bullshit. Plenty of careers were barred to women, and others were barred specifically to married women because once married they were forced to stay home and could not have financial independence. They also could not get credit cards if they were not married. Also, as plenty old interview of a young Hillary Clinton show, women were given shit if they kept working after being married (she also got shit for outearning Bill). They were told they had to be 'feminine and less ambit…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:43 PM
1

Well, the kind of courtship they offer is basically 'game'. And the thing is, I think these types are becoming more widespread. Heh, I guess who on earth could be who tells them on the internet that AWALT!!111 if you act 'confident' women in their 20s will give it to you for free...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:37 PM
1

Mhhh, this is a good point, but my opinion is that we are not happier even if our lives have become easier, and that we could do more to improve if we just tweaked our behaviour a bit. There are huge benefits both parties can draw from creating a household together. Only getting there requires some work. We are not used to putting in the work anymore. We just keep matching and matching on the internet in the hope of finding the 'perfect soulmate' without realising that such a thing does not exis…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:35 PM
2

Fuck me, you are an actual full-incel embittered MGTOW. Women are not going to stop campaigning for their rights because there are Rollo Tomassi aspie readers like you out there who think rape is a 'social construct', so get used to seeing us around. The fact that you and a few others are checking out of the mating pool like losers doesn't mean civilisation is falling. It merely means there is more space for the good men who can evolve and adapt without bitching about getting 'used'. To each the…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:29 PM
3

But as for older divorced men, it's not really just about money. It's the general 'I am obviously looking for sex and I think I have a huge sex appeal' bullshit that just looks ridiculous. I am 24, and I did expect these men to be interested in me sexually, but they seem to have an absolutely unrealistic view of what their level of sex appeal is. And they had good 'game', mind. Only it did not work because - I know the red Pillers do not want to hear this - game does not actually work most of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:25 PM
0

I think women in general just need to learn to be more accepting of how aspie their partners can get, because I believe far more men are on the spectrum than we would think. Their brains just work differently, but not necessarily in a bad way though. In general, women don't like the aspie mathematician types because obviously they find it easier to connect with men who are more 'like them', yet interestingly I have noticed that the aspie types make far more reliable, responsible partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:20 PM
2

I have definitely seen young men be very afraid of marriage because of all the scare stories they hear. I think it's a Millennial phenomenon. But yes, once I tried to give a chance to a few divorced men and not a single one of them made it past the second date. On average they are very, very jaded and damaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:17 PM
1

Well, I am not saying there should be no attraction, obviously! All I am saying is that both men and women are not perfect, and many of both do not settle simply because, unlike in the past, we do not know how to work with something that is not perfect. In general there are plenty of things a man and a woman can do for each other, ways they can help each other if they marry and work together as a team. But it requires work, and we are a generation which prefers the easy way out, that is, the nex…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:14 PM
2

Yes. So no idea why you're pissing your MGTOW purple panties over men getting 'exploited', if that's what we can even call it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:08 PM
2

That people seem to have forgotten what people in the past seemed to know: that love is a choice. It's something that gets built, that grows with time. Nowadays we have been brainwashed by popular culture or goodness knows what else that love means finding someone who is perfect for you. It's not possible and not a sustainable attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:07 PM
2

Would you call men who don't go with landwhales exploitative? Women are attracted to men who have resources and share them. It's a fact, not my fault. The men who cooperate get pussy, the rest (unless they are models looks-wise) don't get any. It's evolution. End of the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:03 PM
1

Your inability to sustain a debate without resorting to ad hominem says a lot about what you must be like in real life. No wonder you have to resort to the red pill to up your 'game'. If you had actually listened to what the Red Pillers said, you would have known that women are hypergamous. If you become a socially inept, possibly fat, drooling, reclusive porn-addict, you don't exist anymore so far as women are concerned. I was merely expressing my sadness that these men - very much like fat wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:01 PM
3

Well, there is also a big double standard. You'll find plenty of Red Pill men claiming that men who don't get married 'are doing great' who however say women who do the same 'are depressed cat ladies'.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:55 PM
2

Women have learned to fend for themselves ever since they entered the workforce. They are simply not giving any pussy to guys who split bills unless they are offering top 10% genetics for a good fuck. Yup, welcome to the new paradigm, wealthy incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:51 PM
1

Yes, but the fear of divorce rape has made sure that plenty of these useless wealthy men actually exists. Of course a wealthy man who acts normal will get married more easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:49 PM
2

You will actually find that plenty of feminists (myself included) are in favour of the general existence of porn, both because the women who work in it make a fuckton of money, and because it really does make men less aggressive towards real women. The problem though is that some men cannot tell the difference between porn and real sex. Porn doesn't tell you anything about clits. It doesn't explain to you that real women won't start screaming like pigs in a slaughterhouse the moment you impale t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:46 PM
2

But these men, from what I see, are not successful with women in general because as I said, women are repulsed by a man who refuses to share his resources. It's deeply unnatural, and whatever the red pill aspies say, only the top 10% of men looks-wise can get away with it. Average-looking rich guy who asks a girl to split the bill gets no pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:37 PM
1

If men claim women are not entitled to their resources, they have no right to demand that women be slim, pretty and accommodating. What sounds shitty to you is just women not allowing men to get away with whatever the fuck they want. This all works out fairly in real life: men who don't share resources don't get women unless they're in the top 10%, and they turn to porn which in turn fucks up their expectation of how women and sex should be like, and they go back to women with an even shittier a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:34 PM
1

Why are they not taking it? Cause they are scared shitless of getting divorce raped. So yeah, my point stands and they're scared shitless. And it's not just marriage. Gold-diggers who just want gifts are also always on the hunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:28 PM
1

It's no different than women choosing to branch swing to the next man because the current one won't give them the perfect imaginary house they built on Pinterest. Porn (an excess of it) completely fucks up a man's expectations of real-life sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:22 PM
1

Sometimes they can't hide it. Constantly going on expensive vacation is in itself a tell-tale sign. And they are all scared shitless of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:14 PM
1

Bullshit. I have two words for you: Elliot Rodger.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:11 PM
6

Nothing = I'd rather watch porn. But yes, I agree. And I think plenty of incels are not really incels, they are just picky.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:04 PM
2

You'd be surprised by how rare those wealthy guys in 'stable relationships' are. They are so afraid of being used for their money, and they have so much choice. Also, many women find the types who insist on making her pay for her half of the dinner yet buy a yatch for themselves the next day downright repulsive. If a man is not willing to share his resources, what is left is just a pompous, overdressed kid in his toy Ferrari. Utterly useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:58 PM
1

Just out of curiosity, is your dad one of those ultra-introverted aspie mathematician types? The example I made was based off a couple I actually know. She just learned to accept that his mind was very different from hers, but again there was a willingness on both sides to work through their differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:53 PM
2

It could be that this correlation does not hold for this generation. I cannot generalise, but all the wealthy single men in their thirties I see are like children with a big budget: they just spend their money on cars, holidays etc. and don't seem to want to marry. It's probably because they are trying to protect their assets, but all in all they don't look very likely to marry as you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:50 PM
1

Yes, but you will find that lots of people dump their partners because they are not 100% compatible, and they do so because they can go on match and click on the profile of someone who apparently shares all their interests (and who would perhaps actually make a far worse partner than the one they currently have)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:45 PM
3

This. People keep blaming feminism, but what has fucked up everything is simply that the gap between the lives we live and the lives we imagine - through the use of technology - we should live is huge. Too huge to be sustainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:38 PM
2

Yup. I would say middle-class, too. Working class people seem to be very simple: they kinda like each other physically, they share a few laughs, they chill together, and they have babies. None of the 'I did not really feel like we were aligned in terms of outlook' bullshit. Needless to say, working class people are currently the most evolutionarily successful cast in Western society.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:35 PM
1

The general concept would be that if she reads lots of books and he is into tinkering with electronics, they can still bond over other stuff and work very well as a long-term team.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:31 PM
4

It's not really like living with a male friend. Men and women are different, so they can bring different attributes to the table. There are studies which show married men usually live longer than their bachelor counter-parts. One of the many reasons could be that women are caring by nature, and if they care about you, they'll ensure you are alright. A man by himself might not look after his health much, but having a job does not prevent a wife from making sure he swallows his pills, for instance…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:29 PM
4

Just because a woman was a housewife in the past, it did not mean there weren't problems. Nowadays women are no longer housewives, but there are still benefits in creating a solid two-income household. We humans are wired to come together for survival. Only nowadays men run at the first sign of bitchiness, and they go match online with someone else who will also display some bitchiness. They don't know how to work through problems like people in the past - both men and women - did.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:13 PM
3

Thing is, they don't need a perfect cottage. They don't need a perfect body. They should just work out, apply themselves at their job, do their best and something good will come of it. It does not need to be perfect. But the notion of the 'picture perfect wedding' has completely fucked up all expectations, and the result is just misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:10 PM
6

Men in the past, even high SMV ones, did settle down though. Because they did not have the chance to find a girl they'd argue less with with just a few clicks. So they actually had to work on the problems within the relationship, and so did women. Also, lots of low SMV men don't know how low SMV they are, and so they act just the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:02 PM
3

I agree with a lot of this, and I think a revolution in the sex ed arena would be beneficial because as it stands we don't know how to build relationships. I have seen both men and women refusing to commit just because they have so many options, and they cling to a romanticised vision of what a successful relationship should look like. RP men claim that it's just hypergamous women who never settle, and yet I see men doing the same exact thing. It's just a result of online dating. Of not knowing …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 05:00 PM
3

Many people do dump their partners for similar bullshit reasons though. And they claim it's because 'they did not feel a connection'.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 04:55 PM
5

I agree with every word, and yet do you have any idea if how many people dump someone because they cannot recite Chaucer?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 04:49 PM
1

If you are a single mother and you cannot afford childcare, accessing the workforce is kinda not possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 07:23 PM
1

Not every woman needs those resources. Only the vulnerable ones. Feminism advocates for them to have access to them without having to suck cock in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 07:12 PM
3

The fact that you do not understand why a woman finds it traumatic to sleep with an ugly man explains: Why you needed the red pill in the first place. Why you are an incel. That you do not understand jack shit about hypergamy and female nature. Why most people rightfully believe the Manosphere is populated by stunted aspies (like you).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 10:12 PM
1

If that was the case, they would all just dump 'game' and go be beta providers for some broke single mom. I do believe they want to be wanted for more than their resources, but they'll settle for what they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 09:27 PM
5

We never denied that hypergamy exists. But sugar babies and prostitutes are not representative of all women and again, often they are gold digging because they have no other mean of acquiring resources (uneducated women often turn to prostitution). As a matter of fact, it is because hypergamy does exist that it is traumatic for women to sleep with a fat rich ugly man (even the gold diggers are not 'happy' to do it, and I doubt Melania Trump jumps with joy at the thought of sucking Donald's wrink…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 09:24 PM
1

Precisely. But there is a lot of man-hamstering going on regarding this. Men want to believe women want them for their personality, yet then bitch because feminism liberated women economically and now they are not nice to them anymore because they do not need their resources. So they are admitting that women in the past were nice and feminine just to acquire resources and not because that was their nature, and that therefore they did not like their husbands because of who they were. Yet you want…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 09:19 PM
1

Perhaps if you had read my whole post and the example I described, you would understand why 'egalitarianism' is a concept which I believe makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 09:01 PM
1

Advocating for women to not have the right to abort is nothing? Brainwashing their daughters into believing they should be meek and submissive is not abusive? Sending their gay sons to witch doctors who will 'pray their homosexuality away' is something we should just let them get away with? Feminism has no single leader, no, but feminists have bandied together countless of times to get abortion rights, to get women in positions of power. And Christians have always, always been at the forefront o…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 06:49 PM
1

You are like Bettie Page. She entered a church after years of liberal lifestyle. It is quite alright for you to go down that route, but the problem of you Christians is that you believe the rest of Western society should pander to your lunacy. You as a group do not keep to yourselves, you wish to impose your madness on society. Your kin campaigns for the closure of abortion clinics. Schlafly was an anti-feminist activist who tried to bar women from having equal rights in the workforce and claime…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 05:46 PM
1

If they train hard, they can do it. In case of war, you'd want to train them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 05:33 PM
1

Men are certainly in no way superior to me or have the right to be above me as a demographic, or to in any way tell me how to live my life. Christianity exists because of evolutionary psychology. Men afraid of getting cucked made up that 'whores go to hell' to brainwash women like you into subservience and chastity. There are quite a few hilarious passages in the Bible about 'degenerate promiscuous sluts' in big capitals that could have easily been penned by some frustrated Manosphere incel. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 05:07 PM
3

Yeah, you are going to die like the other cucks. Pathetically jaded as you are, I can only assume you have been cucked so hard you have grown a pair of Moose-like horns lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 04:39 PM
2

They would rather service the cock of the dark triad type who is not socially retarded and autistic enough to be like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 04:12 PM
2

Catholics are still Christians. Some of them are even against contraceptives.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 04:08 PM
2

I think selective perception is pretty much how some women can hamster their support for Christian fundamentalist despite being... women. Aka second class citizens according to that creed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 04:07 PM
3

I do not agree with this general red pill vilification of 'betas' though. If red pill men are bothered by a woman who cannot rule in her hypergamy and leaves her husband for another dude, if they were fair (which they are not) they would also be against the 'abundance mentality' too. They would agree that the best thing for a man and a woman who enter a relationship is to agree that there are many billionaire men and many younger prettier women out there, but that both of them are going to rule …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 04:03 PM
1

His dad was not a farmer. They are pretty well-established.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:29 PM
2

The Clinton foundation... what exactly is the problem there? That they accept money from Saudi Arabia? Is there an actual explanation as to who sends that money and why?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:28 PM
2

For instance, I am from the UK so maybe my view is different, but I see a certain kind of twisted honour in the way Hillary does things. For instance, she used to support gay marriage. Then she dropped it because she knew if she kept it up she would lose, and if she lost to the Republicans, things would get much worse for gay people and other hated minorities. So she protected them by being elected, and got elected by not championing them. It's completely twisted and dark triad, but I sort of re…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:21 PM
3

By a 'good' female President you mean someone right wing like Maggie Thatcher? What are the things she pushes which are not affordable or acceptable? Healthcare? From a UK pov, I still struggle to understand how you guys can be okay with your current healthcare.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:17 PM
0

Yes, yet the far left and the far right are cozier than you think. In the UK, the Corbyn voters become UKIP voters at any random given time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:15 PM
1

But the old guard does not want a big government. Hereditary families like the Trumps certainly don't want that, and old lines of traditional rural 'whites' certainly don't either. Democrats have always been hated by the old guard. I think she is dodgy too, but some accusations are very strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:13 PM
1

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:10 PM
4

What was the problem with Benghazi and the secret services? I am from the UK. Is it actually seriously believed in America that the Clintons actually murdered their opponents?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:09 PM
3

By the way, from what I read in the UK women have to pass the same test as men. And if there was an actual war, there would be no time to worry about liabilities. We would just need huge numbers of young people ready to fight. You get a bigger army if you have both men and women in it. Are the women less fit? Undoubtedly. But it doesn't matter in a war context.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:04 PM
6

As technology advances, there will be less and less need for physical strength when it comes to combat. And women can still shoot a target.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:56 PM
2

I believed you anti-feminist men always bitched about how you are forced to register for the draft, yet the strong independent womyn are not? Now things are getting fixed a little bit, and you STILL complain?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:53 PM
2

Thank goodness Faux News bought him, took him out of our hands. So now he spends his day referring to Trump as an alpha silverback gorilla.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:50 PM
3

Fuck me, I knew there had to be Kippers among the red Pillers. I wouldn't date one of you nazis if my life depended on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:47 PM
4

An alpha is an alpha mainly because he has options. The beta would spread his seed in the same way an alpha does if he had options. So the beta does not really stay faithful because he is virtuous, but because he lacks options. Same thing with a woman: a 35 year old who magically lands an alpha is not going to branch swing to the first hot hollow-cheeked ex-convict she meets, because the risk is not worth it. The higher up a woman goes even in terms of education, the more her potential pool of m…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:46 PM
2

Keep us updated as to how many women actually do it versus how many empty the content of their drink on your new alpha T-shirt reserved for gaming times.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:07 PM
2

Masculine men show preference for feminine men. This, sir, has been an enlightening revelation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:05 PM
1

Well, if you start with the debate with 'feminism is bullshit', women might feel inclined to believe you are not really up for an actual debate, but just to force them to change and mirror your views.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:03 PM
3

You are right, I should have written 'red pill men '.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:48 PM
3

I think I understand what he is trying to say when he describes AWALT. The thing is, a lot of women would use a different terminology to describe AMALT. How all men are just out to spread their seed, for instance. You will say 'but that's our nature!', and I agree, but hypergamy is our nature too, and is not any less noble. We also really, REALLY struggle to understand the good girl/bad dichotomy for a simple reason: we do not understand the male obsession with paternity (which is of course a su…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:47 PM
1

You do know your lover would be literally eaten alive and accused of mass murder by lots and lots of Christians, right? Abortion is entirely, ENTIRELY illegal in Ireland, for instance, because of the ruling religious views. I don't doubt your lover's beliefs, but he does not reflect those of a very big Christian demographic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:34 PM
2

A ton of Ukippers branch swinged to Corbynism. This is why I keep saying the alt right and the alt left actually have loads in common.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:29 PM
0

Look, even as a liberal I would never compare the Torygraph with a pile of toilet paper like the Daily Express, so you are making an absurd comparison. Those minorities might be conservative in their native countries, but their children, raised in the West, can and do adopt liberal values. Again, look at Sadiq Khan.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:26 PM
1

I openly admit I am not, and never have been, for this 'egalitarian' bullshit because it makes no sense. Imagine that a boy and a girl have sex, and the girl gets pregnant. The boy wants to keep the baby, the girl does not. What the hell would be an 'egalitarian' solution? Force her to give birth and hand the baby to the father? Hell no, that's why we have abortion. That being said, one policy I would support is the ability of a man to opt out of parenting ONLY IF he signs a document whilst ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:24 PM
4

The big problem of the red pill is that it's a platform to help guys get laid, and therefore when they talk of 'women in general', what they are actually referring to are bar hoppers. The amount of generalisation going on is extreme. Does Hillary Clinton talk of politics like you would hear your Cosmo-reading female pal talk about Sex and the City? No. But the red pill days 'women are like this, AWALT.' That's the basic reason why outsiders see it as a circlejerk of autistic retards.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:15 PM
0

They will give quite a shit if they grab my pussy at random and their asses land in jail, ready to get raped by the locals. Trust me on that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:11 PM
0

Why do women hold resources and free will? Because they fought for the suffrage and for their rights. Back in the day there was no 'free will'. They either married or perished. The greatest shift to society feminism has brought is a decisive shift to the left. Think about it, if men had been privileged for centuries, when women first started working men had the upper hand, and got more resources. Everything in terms of government expansion which has been pushed by feminism has been about elimina…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:08 PM
1

We should probably stick to Toxic Masculinity, which is a PR way of saying there are things about males which we find unacceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:04 PM
1

As if the red Pillers do not dream of enslaving all women all the time, come on...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:02 PM
5

We are on Reddit, if we don't go for a bit of bro-political science gergo, we are doing it wrong. And I am not strictly talking about politics here. Yours is just the typical male view of women as emotional gossipy creatures. That is alright, as lots of women see circlejerks areas like the red pill as purely emotional testosterone-driven gossip circles. P. S. Thanks, cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 01:01 PM
5

Have you ever heard the term 'brocialism'? Big groups of angry working class men banding together under some trade Union banner to 'take over the establishment' a la Robin Hood? Purely far-left, and not feminine at all. If you know anything about the UK, I am referring to your average Corbyn supporter. I hate their guts, I admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 12:57 PM
2

I'm from the UK too and fuck me, how do you expect us lefties to believe in the intellectual capabilities of a Daily Express reader? Also, one thing we leftists apparently fail at making you understand is that when we advocate for multiculturalism, we advocate for actual assimilation, in the style of Sadiq Khan. We are not for immigrant ghettoes who practice infibulation in their back gardens. That is why the education system is important to us. We want the children of these immigrants to grow u…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 12:54 PM
3

Yeah, well, if you are in with the Sex and the City-watching female crowd with no serious opinions, I totally get how you would end up on the red pill crying about AWALT. Makes honestly perfect, unsurprising sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 12:48 PM
2

If you think about how much we dislike getting approached by the 80%, and how all the socially maladjusted Elliot Rodger types all come from that demographic, then misandrist though it might sound, shipping them off to fight ISIS begins to sound like a good idea in our dreams...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 12:45 PM
1

Re Hillary, am I the only one secretly convinced Bill likes to be dominated by her? I think he can be sexually submissive, but then feels bad about it so he goes out to rape someone. As for women 'falling out' of feminism because they cannot 'have it all', this is a blatant generalisation of what feminism is. It is like a political party, so there are more and less extreme members. Even egalitarians fall into the feminist category, although they are the moderates. For examples, I get yelled at b…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 12:40 PM
1

Are you seriously too autistic to understand the woman does not want to sleep with an old lard ass and that she is not making a free choice if she sleeps with him for his resources if the choice is between that or abject poverty? Women do and will always practice hypergamy, but under a patriarchal environment what they practice is basic survival. In more natural circumstances, if they could get resources in other ways, they would never fuck the old lardass with money. What if they told you you c…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 12:31 PM
3

You forgot the part in which you don't want to sound too misogynist and tell us where you would ship these women ;) Btw I am as feminist as they come, but I do agree that we need to tweak the Patriarchy rhetorics a bit, because you get some types who refer to it in the same tone others would speak of the Illuminati Globalist Oligarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 12:26 PM
3

I suspect you are referring to hookups, not dating. A bar hopping girl certainly won't give a shit about your politics, but lots of women who instead want to date probably wouldn't even let you get to second stage if they hadn't learned about your beliefs first. I certainly wouldn't. Not just because I date rather than hookup, but also because I don't want to get in bed with some Christian fundamentalist fucktard (and they are more sexually depraved than you might think).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 12:20 PM
-1

I genuinely do not see how any woman could be attracted to a man who would force her to bear the child of her rapist, if she got raped. Christian men, that crazy pro-life bunch, are so fucking insane and misogynistic that no matter what they look like, just hearing them talk makes me dry up to Sahara Desert levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 12:04 PM
3

Neo-nazis can sometimes look attractive so long as they don't go for the full tattoo skinhead retard look, but yes, they need to keep their traps shut to remain attractive, and being Neo Nazis they struggle with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 11:54 AM
1

LMAO I know right? I'm waiting for them to come over and offer their wisdom, but probably they will say I am secretly just banging both because AWALT!!!111 I think men in general have a fairly aspie view of why 'personality' is important to a woman. It's not about pulling 'game' and acting like an overexcited, confident chimpanzee, it's about actually clicking with a woman also value-wise. But this does not fit into a simplistic AWALT narrative and it will be therefore dismissed as a false, cunn…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 11:50 AM
1

As a liberal, I will admit one thing: some of us tend to be a bit sexually degenerate. I am not just talking about the hippie tattoo people, but also of the successful liberals. Look at the Clintons. But again, a Conservative man could never stay married to a woman like Hillary. That being said, like the Conservatives dominate the Army and the financial sector, liberals dominate academia and the media. This causes a certain weird phenomenon: most female academics or metropolitan career women are…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 11:43 AM
3

No, but brocialists and Trump supporters are both groups of uneducated men who have a very testosterone-driven, emotional view of reality and believe is the same tropes: there is a Big Bad Establishment (it's either the liberal Mettoelite or the corrupt capitalists) which oppresses them, the heroic downtrodden common hard-working men. And now that they have banded together and understood how they have been fooled all along (something the Big Bad Establishment always feared would happen, and that…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 11:36 AM
3

You are just trolling, right? Up to 50 years ago, women had to marry to buy a house EVEN if they themselves worked to sort out the mortgage. It's not just about women entering the workforce, it's about women having complete control over their lives without having to turn to men. Also okay, you are too stunted to understand certain concepts apparently. If a man is rich, but has a shit personality and looks, lots of women nowadays won't look at him because they are not attracted to him. End of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 11:24 AM
1

Some of this is true, but you are going overboard with the righties imo. They are not all THAT sociopathic. More authoritarian for sure, but not sociopathic. This might seem a bit odd, but I always get the feeling that lefty men are adorable as people, but really bad as stable boyfriends. Some of them go so far with their 'free sexual liberation' that they become single dads (yeah, those exists) without even having ever been married to the mother, and are in general very much about experiencing …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 10:47 AM
1

LMAO well, at least you are cunning in your attempts to obtain sex tapes ;) Do not underestimate the charm of skinny, TALL (important), educated, geeky men. They can have that sophisticated, slightly creepy Jack Skellingtonish edge which can be really attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 10:31 AM
0

Both of you do not understand the feminist POV. The dismantling of the family structure in which the man is the main breadwinner and patriarch is exactly what we want and campaign for. Re men know women have standards, perhaps they know it, but they do not respect that this is our nature. They do not respect how disgusted we are by sexual contact with a man we do not like. Patriarchy itself (which is based on the accumulation of resources and VERY different from a hunter gatherer society) is abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 09:53 AM
3

It's all about taking power away from 'the patriarch'. A few years ago, the UK government began attacking single mothers and wanted to institute a tax break for those who got married. This is just a little bullshit example, but you see what they wanted to encourage? They wanted women to turn to men for resources. It is very hard for men to understand that women have standards, that even the post-wall single mother would rather be alone than with some dude she has zero attraction to. This is simp…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 08:41 AM
0

This really is a generation of crybabies, isn't it. 'No fucking clue what it's like to be a man in this world.' This Martyrdom Complex is pathetic. If you bring it up with your date she will dry up even faster than she would have had you used 'game'.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/16 08:16 AM
1

You must live in rural neckbeard Trumpland. In liberal cities, 20 somethings have options and certainly don't feel the need to marry decaying 40 years old. Other factors also include the general financial situation of said 25 year old, how much money the 40 year old is passing her, how hot she is, how in shape he is, what he is prepared to do for her. The general illusion that men in their 40s are in their prime is retarded. I dumped a 37 year old because he had no stamina in bed, and from then …
/r/MGTOW17/10/16 12:26 AM
2

This happens in your dreams, but X has already proven that if you are not in the top 5% category, game doesn't work. For a woman to allow a guy to string her along without even paying for dates (I would never go on dates I'd have to pay for for anyone short of O'pry) or treating her like shit, he needs to be exceptional. And game doesn't make you exceptional. You can hamster this all you like, it doesn't change a thing. Game does not make you better-looking. Game does not make you wealthier. Gam…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 09:34 PM
0

The closest we ever got to a world like that was a hunter-gatherer society, in which the ones who were exterminated were actually the lesser 80% of men which would include you. You don't want to go back to that. Back to fapping to Elliot Rodger's revenge videos, sweetheart.
/r/MGTOW16/10/16 09:28 PM
0

Two things: first of all, good of you to mention the important prerequisite that is being in the top 5%. That already explains why X will always fail. He is not in the 5%. Game will not make him become the 5%. Heck perhaps even plastic surgery wouldn't. The second point is that you have an extremely autistic view of what women perceive as supplicating and what they perceive as dominating. Have you ever heard of O'pry? He has been seen actually giving flowers to girls, and they swoon over him. Wh…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 08:35 PM
1

The tragic thing is that he is actually thirty, and unless he gets a nose job and contact lenses, I can't see things improving. Also as he gets older, his pool of potential mates also ages. You can spin-hamster as much as you like, but women in their prime just do not go with much older men, unless they are rich. And if they are rich, the girl wants more than four dinners to fuck them.
/r/MGTOW16/10/16 08:03 PM
-5

I have no interest in 'denying' the Red Pill, because I do believe hypergamy exists. The thing is, game just doesn't work. As for the other guys here bitching about how X is blue pill because he paid for my dinners, they probably don't go out much or just don't want to admit that most men would not even get a second date if they did not pay. If it's all supply and demand, it's pretty obvious that a male has to give more if he is in low-demand. And 'game' does not make you more attractive. No fuc…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 07:54 PM
-11

I went on a few dates with a man, let's call him X, who has probably learned all this shit by heart. He tried to be a bit funny, a bit teasing, a bit mysterious. Bitched about how he would not care if women's rights were taken away (I had no trouble listening to his rant, as he was paying for my savoury steak), tried to be funny about it. Probably thought I was laughing at his alpha jokes rather than at him, and felt like a slayer. What happened was that he paid for four of my succulent dinners …
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 06:15 PM
4

The birth rate will not soar because abortion, and porn is actually a good thing. Men in general rape less if they are too busy masturbating. Look at Japan, the land of no rape.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 05:57 PM
1

What a better world it would be if there was no hypergamy and Mark and all the other red pill incels got what they wanted for free, huh? Yeah, not going to happen.
/r/MGTOW16/10/16 04:55 PM
0

Heh, if looking at your man tits every evening does not make you put down those fries, neither will my rant. I am aware of that. This whole sub is dedicated to bitching about how nowadays women are fat, lazy and useless. I am pointing out that most of what you say about women is EXACTLY what women think of modern men.
/r/MGTOW16/10/16 04:53 PM
1

We women are far more self-aware of our clock than you would think. I'm in my early twenties and already I am looking out for a guy you would call an abused 'beta' to LTR. The problem I am highlighting is that Mark makes himself look ridiculous because in Nature's eyes he is purely nice guy/beta material. Only he has obviously convinced himself he can become a Chad through game, and he makes himself look like an idiot. And if I, a slim yet average girl, don't put up for him, imagine what he is g…
/r/MGTOW16/10/16 04:40 PM
0

Re killing the baby because it did not fit in my lifestyle, yeah, it's great. Hillary will hopefully bring us more of that. As for why I posted in this sub, it's because you talk about how fat, lazy and undateable women are today, and think you are special Red Pill snowflakes and any girl should feel glad to date you. Yeah, our imaginary Jim feels the same, and in a while he'll probably go his own way too...
/r/MGTOW16/10/16 04:26 PM
2

Hillary made it because she manipulates and lies the whole time. I even sort of doubt she married Bill for particularly hypergamous reasons, because she was making more money than he when they married. It's all a political facade. I have genuinely never seen a more dark triad politician, and isn't that what the Red Pill advocates?
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 03:30 PM
16

The true alphas are the Clintons, both of them. If Hillary was a man, dark triad as she is, this whole sub would be on its knees metaphorically sucking her dick.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 02:56 PM
0

I haven't got kids, because apart from taking Jim's money, the 'libtards' gave me abortion rights. We live in a tough world, folks.
/r/MGTOW16/10/16 01:22 PM
0

I know right. I'd be so much happier getting fucked from behind by Jim, with his big alpha fatrolls slapping my back. Heck, that's true BDSM.
/r/MGTOW16/10/16 01:11 PM
6

Thing is, if Hillary was a man this sub would worship her, because she is so dark triad and all about giving no shits.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 10:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter