TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dontdoabandonedrealm Archive

View 10 posts and 260 comments by Dontdoabandonedrealm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Social IssuesDontdoabandonedrealm/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:28 PM
11

FeminismDontdoabandonedrealm/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:28 AM
7

Edu./Occu.Dontdoabandonedrealm/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:23 AM
1

Social IssuesDontdoabandonedrealm/r/MensRights18/01/20 07:47 AM
0

Dontdoabandonedrealm/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:54 AM
0

Dontdoabandonedrealm/r/MensRights18/01/20 07:41 AM
0

Social IssuesDontdoabandonedrealm/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:06 PM
0

Dontdoabandonedrealm/r/TheRedPill23/01/20 07:19 PM
0

Dontdoabandonedrealm/r/askTRP23/01/20 07:01 PM
0

Dontdoabandonedrealm/r/askTRP23/01/20 06:48 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well done you piece of shit. You eventually show your true colors, every time. Thats why I dont respect you.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 10:24 AM
11

It seems to be an overall motivation problem in addition to a crappy economy. What motivation is there to work hard and make money so a woman can take it all from you or leave you if you get sick, disabled, or fired? Its not a problem with men not willing to commit. Its a problem with women not willing to commit to men who are "losers" because they dont have the same education or income.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 09:15 AM
1

Those under 35 are less likely to be woke. 18-24 is the least likely to be woke.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 09:12 AM
8

To be fair, there's a lot of truth to antiaging gimmicks. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/01/200108160338.htm https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603242/questionable-young-blood-transfusions-offered-in-us-as-anti-aging-remedy/ https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/04/can-we-reverse-ageing-process-young-blood-older-people https://nationalpost.com/news/world/why-a-silicon-valley-company-is-pumping-old-people-full-of-young-blood-for-us8000 https://peterattiamd.com/davidsinclair/ ht…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 09:08 AM
-31

https://i.redd.it/rg7kjp1quya41.png This guy also had a "life of privilege". Despite not thinking himself too ugly or weird, just saying "Im not too ugly or weird", still being shamed as 'he thinks hes so attractive" in order to dehumanize his suffering.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 09:00 AM
5

IM TRIGGERED
/r/MensRights20/01/20 07:42 AM
1

Women are more often than not, about controlling others. Why? Because they aren't held accountable or called out for it. People shape up when they have consequences for behavior.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 05:16 AM
2

but I've reformed after getting perma banned off both r/AmITheAsshole and r/feminism So you decided that you should live with an accept crazy sjw nuttery in your life. Cool
/r/MensRights20/01/20 05:09 AM
1

yeah I went over there and asked if some guys on that sub could do a few hexes for misandrist feminists and got banned.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 05:08 AM
1

The joker: You get what you fucking deserve.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 04:40 AM
1

https://books.google.com/books?id=m2dODwAAQBAJ&pg=PT2981&dq=book+suffragette+age+of+consent&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjYrZP6pZHnAhUMr54KHalBDQMQ6AEwBnoECAgQAg#v=onepage&q=book%20suffragette%20age%20of%20consent&f=false Here's a book comparing women historically to slaves, despite the fact of https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/er5kel/a_very_interesting_exchange_on_rpurplepilldebate/ For instance, the fact that women could not own property. (It's actually married wome…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 04:07 AM
1

https://books.google.com/books?id=lE9NCgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=book+suffragettes&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwie_7HhpJHnAhUUvp4KHUOCDPUQ6AEwBHoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q=book%20suffragettes&f=false Here's something. The queen opposed it because "if women were allowed to unsex herself (equalize as men and declare other-gender non-bino in today's world), she would become the most hateful, disgusting, and heartless of human beings". Seems we're living that. There's other opinions y…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 04:01 AM
0

If I knew where I kept those links I'd find them. it was years ago. When it was easy to google books on suffragettes and find critical works rather than flowery feelgood. in such books, they are quoted as saying that men need to be sexually controlled by state punishments, that women are asexual and only engage in it because men seduce them into behaving immorally, that men are selfish and the cause of women needing abortions, and so on.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 03:57 AM
4

www.reddit.com/user/Dontdoabandonedrealm Please send this user nasty pms to drive them from reddit.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 03:47 AM
-2

If you had to dig to find personal documents, friends, family, password reset, or otherwise violate laws or gray areas of laws... That's doxxing. Theres no gray laws. If its not illegal, its legal. if someone knows a person at Workplace X, and they spread that information, that is legal. Imagine being held accountable for "doxxing" because you said "hey you know who I saw at the bar? So and so!" Retarded standards. The entire "dox" spin was designed by leftists to attack others in the first plac…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 03:45 AM
3

The CIA funded radical feminism. Radical feminism is the conspiracy theory that "patriarchy" is trying to uniformly oppress women in the west.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 02:54 AM
2

Imagine all feminist gains were bargaining chips. What did men get in return? Nothing. They asked for nothing. And they got shit on in the deal. Lets presume you believe that alimony and child support are "fair", in that even though it punishes the man for having sex, its at least of benefit to a child so that it can have a better childhood. Btw this is "socialized welfare". Okay, what is the return? What's the counterproposal to equalize this? What can women be legally forced to do for men in o…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 02:41 AM
2

But this doesn't necessarily translate to "an eye for an eye". My statement was that if you disagree with something the opposition is doing, maybe don't do that very thing. You have to. its basic game theory. If the terrorists knew the U.S. would never retaliate they'd keep flying planes into buildings. If you prefer a different analogy... Lets consider it like a bargaining table. Men gave women so many things, protection from being fired, forced child support, alimony, etc, in the law. What did…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 02:29 AM
3

In all fairness In all fairness, what do men get out of the deal by not holding women to any standards at all? If women have demanded and imposed, even legally, certain standards of behavior on men, then women should be also imposed upon, socially, or even legally. Because life isn't fair, that's why we have the brains given by nature to make life fair.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 02:23 AM
4

Feminism and suffragettes didn't make their goals by only focusing on women. They made men the enemy, they blamed every life problem on men (such as men firing women after having sex with them and getting them pregnant, or age of consent being too low and allowing men to get sex too easily, yes, they wrote explicitly in their propaganda using the law to control male sexual behavior), and so on. You're making this argument that any criticism of women or how women generally treat men (as disposabl…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:45 AM
1

I now have nothing to do with women who don't act obsequious. I don't have time for contention.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 12:58 AM
2

This post is actually 100% perfect. Her words exemplify female hypoagency AND the historical and current day view that feminism holds of women: they're never responsible for sexual activity. They're only either passive participants or victims of male sexuality. Historically, feminists wrote that "were it not for men, women wouldn't be sexual, it is men's sexual vices that drag women down into immorality". They have always considered it being men that "push" sexuality on women, instead of women b…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 12:53 AM
10

Does this girl think boys are just born with an understanding of consent? Why does she think so little of girls/women claiming they just can't know what consent it lol. See my above post. Girls and women mature sooner physically, including in the brain dept. Its a point of pride for feminists, but both these facts are thrown out when she is needed to be painted as a naive, innocent victim who doesnt understand the world.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 12:50 AM
18

Thats because girls mature sooner physically and mentally. There's science backing both up. And those sciences are both trotted out when feminists want to crow about the superiority of girls and women over men, but then they are conveniently forgotten when the narrative has to switch to her being a passive, air-headed, non-mature victim who can't think straight or make good decisions on her own.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 12:49 AM
1

He mustve been attractive
/r/MensRights20/01/20 12:42 AM
90

"grooming and manipulation for sex is okay when women do it, you misogynist!"
/r/MensRights19/01/20 04:07 AM
310

call the police. Send evidence.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 03:28 AM
-1

Trad. If I have to have more education and more money to be attractive to her, she needs to have more compliance and less demands.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 03:25 AM
2

They funded ms magazine and protests by radical feminists who traveled from U.S. to other countries, like Austria. its fine if you don't want to listen.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 03:05 AM
3

You'd get complimented a lot more if you were just attractive. Stop being physically unattractive. (calm down guys, its a joke about the way in which people's psychology works)
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:12 AM
0

Ghost people. You'd probably do that too if you were a woman. Lets put it this way: Being a woman is kind of like being famous in your local town for being a rock musician. People will always want to hook up with you, you'll get plenty of people trying to get to know you at all times, etc. When you're treated like this, not only is it not feasible to give the time of day to everyone, you start to believe this is perfectly normal and that you simply choose the best of the received responsed (best…
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:07 AM
2

Well, if you believe islam is right about women, gender equality is about trying to equalize outcomes and they do so with a "women count as 1/3 of voice in accusations" kind of way. Which makes sense if we know a few facts. Women attack people/bully/etc, by reputation destruction, not by physical violence. So making their voice weigh less is an attempt to counter the very legal way in which women can attack others, whereas men are countered by legal punishments for attacking, e.g. imprisonment. …
/r/MensRights19/01/20 01:26 AM
2

A female friend of mine had a 3 year affair with one of her married professors. She's now in her 40s and will tell you she enjoyed it. Whether it's male:female or female:male, what matters is the individuals in the situation. Having a vagina does not make you a victim every time you get laid. Ive been saying this in this sub for a while and every time people shout me down because "power imbalance = rape!!!!"
/r/MensRights19/01/20 01:22 AM
15

A lot of us fear for the future when feminism seams to be growing and it doesn't care about and seams to be out to eliminate men's rights not to be abused, sexually assaulted, perental rights, and a voice. Lol as if its not already here and it has been since the late 90s. To women, dating an equal is "dating down" or "compromising". Since the 90s we've inundated with the message that women "deserve to have it all, and if they don't, someone, somewhere, is working against them to prohibit it". Li…
/r/MensRights19/01/20 01:17 AM
5

Average is Average for a reason and many men with longer than average simply never get to get the feel of bottoming out regularly without cervical related issues. Most women do not have a hugely long uterus. Nobody wants average. I know because they said so in the Purple Mattress advertisements.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 01:16 AM
9

equal rights, equal lefts.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 01:12 AM
0

"that's his girl," SEXIST. No woman is owned by a man! "no woman is ever someone's, it's just his turn " MISOGYNIST. Saying women are not owned by a man!
/r/MensRights19/01/20 01:09 AM
-2

Say you're stuck on a desert island. Its you, your daughter or son, a degenerate loser who's the same age and same/opposite sex, and someone who's much older but is a decent and honest person. Would you really prefer that your daughter or son dates the degenerate over the objectively better person simply because of the age issue?
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:52 PM
1

Somalians commit kidnapping and rape, you nonce.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:48 PM
1

But in 2013, after 13 years of marriage, they decided it was time to end the relationship, which they felt had deteriorated beyond repair. By then, in fact, Simon had already begun seeing someone else, a businesswoman named Ellen. A mere six months after the divorce, in February of 2014, Simon married Ellen, and they remain together today. from your links Apparently things work out just as well and poorly as any other kind of relationship. And in this instance, the writing sieems to indicate the…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:45 PM
-5

In this case, yeah. Cause she old and ugly.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:35 PM
1

A physician must terminate the patient-physician relationship before initiating a dating, romantic, or sexual relationship with a patient. Likewise, sexual or romantic relationships between a physician and a former patient may be unduly influenced by the previous physician-patient relationship. Sexual or romantic relationships with former patients are unethical if the physician uses or exploits trust, knowledge, emotions, or influence derived from the previous professional relationship, or if a …
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:30 PM
6

These women are making themselves single with their own fucking choices, Hypoagency. Women have been trained by feminism and by society that whenever they get into a bad relationship, its always the man's fault. Something something victim blaming. But if all your interactions with men or women are horrible, maybe the problem isnt them but you.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:28 PM
-2

Her behavior was utterly unprofessional thats an opinion. ?real-estate in between throwing someone in jail, and publicly shaming them Odd how there's no real estate between jail and not caring. As if there's no possibility of a continuum past shaming.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:25 PM
1

Yeah, basically the idea is that compliance with SJW and feminist mentalities are practically harmless to you, or do not actually affect your day to day living (as of yet), but non-compliance can be highly damaging, so you might as well shut up and not make waves.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:22 PM
-4

Irrelevant. Well, now I've heard everything. Apparently consent is irrelevant. I guess the feminists have won.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:21 PM
-2

A 40 year old could manipulate, groom a 17 year old in ways he/she couldn't imagine. Lets put a little more context onto this. Isnt the fact that everyone potentially faces that because they don't imagine they could be manipulated before they get manipulated? https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/having-sex-wanting-intimacy/201310/surprising-level-sexual-coercion-teen-peers https://rewire.news/article/2013/10/09/new-study-finds-alarming-rate-of-sexual-coercion-among-teens-young-adults/ So appa…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:13 PM
-2

A 40 year old could manipulate, groom a 17 year old in ways he/she couldn't imagine. you're saying 17 year olds cant? Do you ever hear about the "jock who pumps and dumps lonely girls"? Go date someone with a bit more life experience. But that's less of a factor of age and more of experience. What about a woman who's been single up to year 40 and lives with her parents? Should 40 year old men or women avoid her because she's inexperienced? How about this? Men have a permanent and obvious Power I…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 12:38 PM
34

You cant just go around applying adult rules to children!! Realistically speaking, she basically admitted to #metoo-ing a bunch of boys. She should probably be railroaded for that by a male-concern group. You may twitter bomb her.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 12:01 PM
-7

Whats the difference between 40 and an a 17 year old dating your 17 year old? And if there's a state where its legal, you can't really stop them. Unless you're saying you'd use your Power Imbalance as parent to control their sexuality.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 11:22 AM
0

Seinfeld also seemed to have the support of his colleagues. Julia Louis-Dreyfus, in an interview in New York in 1999, after Seinfeld and Lonstein broke up, said that she was in favor of the couple because it made Seinfeld happy: “No, it didn’t make me cringe,” she says. “When he was in that relationship, it was a happy one for him. And she’s a terribly nice person, so I was in favor of it. Come on — who cares? There wasn’t anything wrong with it. I thought it was great. Anyway, they’re not datin…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 07:47 AM
1

Seinfeld also seemed to have the support of his colleagues. Julia Louis-Dreyfus, in an interview in New York in 1999, after Seinfeld and Lonstein broke up, said that she was in favor of the couple because it made Seinfeld happy: “No, it didn’t make me cringe,” she says. “When he was in that relationship, it was a happy one for him. And she’s a terribly nice person, so I was in favor of it. Come on — who cares? There wasn’t anything wrong with it. I thought it was great. Anyway, they’re not datin…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 07:43 AM
5

Its like saying "I dont know why I just punched you".
/r/MensRights18/01/20 07:18 AM
-2

That's stupid. Men have no monopoly on being predatory sexual abusers with no conscience. Within days of telling her patient the “life-altering” news that he had cancer, Dr. Theepa Sundaralingam was flirting, sexting and eventually having sex with him, in his home, her clinic and even his hospital bed. And then at his most vulnerable, the oncologist told him she was in love with someone else. Sundaralingam dumped him and refused to see him. So fucking what? Ever hear of rebound sex? Are all men …
/r/MensRights18/01/20 07:15 AM
8

Well people always have something to gain when they act. Either its to harm others, help themselves, or both.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 07:13 AM
5

shes a 5 at the very least. You need to experience more life in the real world. You'll find truly ugly people if you go outside.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 05:52 AM
1

Yes its ok. And people can choose not to patronize it. Free market. But the point of "undercharging" women is to get more vagina in the room so guys don't start fights over the few who are there. Given that 80% of men are considered below average in looks, you'd probably want to encourage a 70/30 female to male ratio at all events so that guys can hook up at equal rates as girls.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:24 AM
2

Fuck I'd want to go there even more. Decadence gets my engine going.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:23 AM
1

Based troll poison By your standard, serving alcohol should be a crime.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:22 AM
76

The lesson of #metoo is that women often lie if they have something to gain from men they target.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:16 AM
2

Thats not how the boy who cried wolf ends..
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:07 AM
2

Thats as good a reason to kick her out as anything else.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:07 AM
23

Its not about wage gap afaik. Its about drawing in the pussies so its not a 10:1 dicks vs puss ratio. I've been well traveled. In remote working environments, such a ratio causes lots of fights over women. Those places have tried their best to hire women and men equally to stop fights by supplying enough women for men, in the U.S. Turns out cultures with sexless men become violent. A DJ night is no different. People will start fights if there aren't enough women to go around.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:00 AM
1

When someone says VIP expedited Entry. What they really mean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SC-KleaUBc
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:58 AM
2

The end of the story to "The girl who cried rape" will probably trigger you.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:53 AM
9

She's attractive so she thinks she can get away with it. Mentally ill people get away with a lot when they're attractive.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:45 AM
0

While it feels cathartic now, Police should'nt be doing this to anyone, men or women.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:45 AM
2

There's no consequence of a duel to the death with swords that would be worse for him than the consequence of having to continue paying Palimony. but only after he is able to secure some Japanese samurai swords. Well there goes 5-20k. and that's only for the low end real ones. If you buy a 100 dollar wall hanger, enjoy it bending on you, not being able to be sharpened, etc.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:30 AM
1

It’s flu season and everybody in LA seems to be sick. Homelessness.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:29 AM
6

This is proof "bad boy" tropes are a thing. She prefers a guy who'll kill her kid over the original father. inb4 "she didnt know he was a piece of shit! Sometimes people are highly manipulative and women dont realize it!! Now, bask in the glory of superior emotional intelligence that women have over men! This is also reason why you don't date single mothers.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:22 AM
2

They never do
/r/MensRights16/01/20 11:08 PM
1

Not really. Going around having to prove your child is your own because of a random accusation doesn't sound like sane society.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 11:07 PM
3

Not surprising this is happening after Bloomberg bought the state with his billionaire money.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:55 AM
2

You know what else is a betrayal? If you don't tell family member women about bad things that happen to you. They always seem to make it about them.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:51 AM
-32

she doesnt look too bad for 38.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:50 AM
4

It's insane that some countries Its insane that you have to have an ID card for your own child.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:48 AM
15

when a girl (aged ~25) Adult woman. Don't strip her agency by infantilizing.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:00 AM
25

Affluent people shouldnt be imprisoned, because their money and possibly their work contributes to society. Poor worthless to the community types can go in for 20 years tho.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:54 AM
5

Im fine with this, as long as men get a similar legal penalty.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:53 AM
1

Yeah I read the whole thing. You said there's often a motivator of "i thought it was okay but now its sexual assault". But remember emmett till?
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:37 PM
2

God damn, I wish I had a job like that. Pay to annoy people with stupid concepts.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:10 PM
3

It’s because feminists have organized and used their voices to push for an unfair system. If men did the same, these laws would get changed immediately. But every time men have tried to organize and demand change, there’s always some social justice warrior screaming “toxic masculinity” and demanding that our platforms be taken away. Sounds like the mass of men need to stop being cowed by women.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:08 PM
6

think that very few women outright make up accusations of sexual assault. Lol.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:07 PM
3

If this is true, all relationships women have with men are immoral because of the power imbalance. https://www.reddit.com/r/Firearms/comments/eowsy3/this_is_who_wants_to_take_your_guns_and_the/fei2wp4/?context=3 It's not moral to fuck your 17 year-old intern, especially when you are a man in your 50s. Legal or not, the age difference and unequal power relationship (intern/employer) make it a morally indefensible act. How about this? How is it moral to fuck a woman if you're a man? After all, whe…
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:03 PM
1

Fleck being rejected (he never had a woman turn him down Being single IS being rejected. If you're single all your life, it means you've been rejected by every single woman you've passed. Rejection doesnt have to be an active thing. It can be entirely passive. Like when you go to the DMV and dont find anyone there attractive enough to have a conversation with, let alone date.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 10:43 PM
2

This paper argues that we should ignore research and stick to the 'gender-based-violence' model of partner violence. Yes, because the model has always been that women are unique victims and men are ogres.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 06:25 AM
1

username checks out. Women use all men and the state to attempt to perform honor killings now. They dont just recruit an unwitting male by claiming "he raped me wah" for a duel. There's a reason women's testimony is worth less in Islam.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 05:37 AM
1

I've spent probably years studying this stuff on my own. I just wrote off the top of my head and then pulled up any articles that were related to supporting google searches based on what I knew about reading from the academic studies and lots of face time with youtube and various academics. Stanford has Sapolsky dealing with neurology and psychology and theres a lot of primatology in his lectures. Key points are male disposability and how societies might ensure their stability when monogomy is n…
/r/MensRights15/01/20 04:00 AM
2

There wasn't sexual rejection. He never had a romantic relationship with a woman (other than in his head), period. You literally described sexual rejection in the very next sentence. And yes, if you look at polygamy cultures, they have higher rates of violence. And if you look at this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3XYHPAwBzE Its not poverty that causes crime. Its what poverty represents: the unfuckable male. Men become violent when oppressed by a social structure that impoverishes them becaus…
/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:49 AM
2

Call me when there's some real rape.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:45 AM
3

Its about the feminist and cultural paradigm that "male = predator, female = passive object" when it comes to sex. Its the same reasoning that brought a 16-18 year age of consent into legalese in the first place. Since it didn't actually encompass males, only females, it once again placed females as not responsible for their choices, but males were.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:45 AM
1

Its about intent right?
/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:42 AM
8

In Canada it's illegal to look at past behavior of an accuser look at facts to determine if the allegation was false or not. fixed. If theres no smoking gun evidence, then you have to fall back on the next best evidence.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:36 PM
1

"raped"
/r/MensRights14/01/20 07:44 AM
1

People should be allowed to say whatever the fuck they want. It sound sexist? So what. Let it sing. Its up to individuals to decide if they want to listen or not. This isnt the gulags.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 07:19 AM
6

I think she got off just at the thought of making false sexual allegations against her ex. https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterWomen/ Its time we stopped playing around. Talking about men is all well and good, but its only part of the equation. We need to talk about women directly. Women have been telling men for generations what they want in men. Its time to start telling women what men want in them.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:16 AM
3

Same question could be asked of female genital mutilation. What are the ill effects of labia trimming? Given that its not the "pleasure button", nor is it anything dangerous or useful. The answer is "it doesnt matter, its someone else's body". In fact, i'll go further now. Women are obsessed with control over their own bodies. Also obsessed with whether or not people touch them. Yet they have no compunction about violating their own baby boy. Women don't abhor things on moral grounds, only on th…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:02 AM
1

We know theres always an initiaor.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 05:58 AM
-1

it shouldve been manslaughter since she actively tried to prevent her death.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 04:43 AM
1

Do you believe the apex fallacy is a creation of feminism, or something latent within women? Yes, its projection.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 04:33 AM
0

unless she raped them, I dont care.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 04:32 AM
2

https://www.dailywire.com/news/study-shows-men-prefer-looks-women-prefer-social-status
/r/MensRights13/01/20 02:45 PM
3

I really think its not conscious. Its just part of their programming. They are neurotic and want to build bonds and community, but will immediately try to use that community to attack a person who "gets out of line" through destroying those bonds for the target. Imagine its like a spider making a web and then cutting off strands to one part of the web because it caught something bad.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 05:08 AM
4

You can even fucking google "women bully by social exclusion" Smh.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:48 AM
1

But it's okay when happens to women, right? "if its lower pay and lower status" Status is less of an issue for women since they can still pull dick all day long if they're above ogre/10 status.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 03:41 AM
4

short answer: no. Long answer: fuck no. If it were doable, women would be trying their hardest to swordfight in an olympic division that was genderless. The average man has better hand-eye coordination than the average woman as well. Hence why the NBA and football involve only men or women divisions and not cross gender. Hence ALSO why men beat the shit out of women when they turn trans and go into MMA. Natural pressures select men to be physically adept, and women to be mentally duplicitous. Bo…
/r/MensRights13/01/20 03:28 AM
1

How about this. A 15 year old has sex with an 11 year old. The 11 year old thinks they are consenting, but they're definitely incapable of doing so. The 15 year old is also incapable of consenting. Both are incapable of consent by law, so both are in "equal territory", yet the 15 year old is still the criminal rapist, even though both seemed to be "mutually acting". We presume the 15 year old is the one initiating due to being older.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 03:11 AM
1

Im glad you understand.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 12:00 AM
1

One of us initiated it however.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 11:55 PM
0

We aren't "at that point", this is the initiation, so who initiated a or b? Cooperation requires one person to initiate. Every single time. Notice how every time im cooperating in this stupid discussion with you, its because you initiate with a post?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 11:22 PM
1

In my opinion is a man is happy in a traditionally feminine job, then what's the problem? if its lower pay and lower status, he wont be happy long because women marry across and up competence and social value hierarchies. Google "I cant find a guy who makes more money than me" or "women cant find college educated men". They don't want men who take "tradfem" jobs because those jobs were typically low social hierarchy.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 11:01 PM
2

yah good luck proving who started it The impossibility of proving a crime and a victim does not mean there is no crime or no victim. Just like typical rape cases of he said/she said.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 10:59 PM
1

There's a difference between legal and real.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 10:59 PM
2

even if the other person was an underage male, she still wont be charged with rape, actualyl she can be charged with sexual assault/rape, its just that she only gets 9 months max in jail while a boy can get 20 years prison.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 10:58 PM
-9

A throws at b, b throws at a, same time. Whos the initiator. A grabs dick of b at the same time as b grabs pussy of a, same time. Whos the initiator. If you're at that point, you're already in Mutual Cooperation. You have passed the point of initiation. You're kind of dumb. Just apply the Prime Mover argument to social interactions.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:44 PM
-17

The person who throws the first punch is the initiator. Its pretty fucking obvious.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:40 PM
-38

I have no idea why you're trying to conflate cooperative interaction with initiation. You can't have both initiate. Someone has to make the first move. Its like saying you have two people initiate assault.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:29 PM
-134

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/initiator lets put it this way. You said "if they're both equal". Now you're changing the definition to "if they both want to have sex together at the same time". Meaning that it doesnt matter if one is drunk and the other is sober. if they both want it, its okay.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:14 PM
-204

And if both initiate.. Theres no such thing..
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:11 PM
-200

If both people are on the same state, it should be okay for them to have sex that's considered consented. Im going to help you out. Someone is the initiator of sexual activity. If the initiator is drunk or underage, that does not reduce the violation of the underage recipient or drunk recipient. Thats why the age of consent laws state "contributing to delinquency of a child". Its about who is considered the initiator. If male initiates, hes the raper. If female initiates, shes the raper.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 11:52 AM
7

Yes because dads don’t take part raising children? according to feminists they dont.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 11:02 AM
2

wow havent seem PE in a long long time. you know, what they say about joker in the intro is pretty true. There are some people in life, no matter how decent they are, who get shit on. That's the entire concept of the Jesus figure in JC religions. To accept such stories, and/or to accept that certain religions or ethnicities are innocents who are uniquely persecuted while having done nothing wrong, means that we must accept that "microaggressions" such as a pecking order exist in society all the …
/r/MensRights12/01/20 10:36 AM
4

talking about them doing it WITHOUT CONSENT. well hopefully when you come in unconscious and bleeding the male doctor doesnt stitch you up since you havent given consent and this wont be an issue anymore.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 10:20 AM
8

This is common saying when a guy says "I dont want to risk being a sex offender". The gist being that if you feel that way you're probably doing something wrong. Its a no true irishman. And its really what people say. Ive seen variations of it on the actual broadcast TV when men talk about #metoo.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:55 AM
3

They're literally trying to repair the vagina due to extreme stretching so that it isn't deformed from the size before you gave birth, and you're upset.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:54 AM
9

Well if you get punished for touching women ever, you might as well go for the home plate. s/
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:48 AM
10

Oh sweety, if you're afraid of sexually harassing or raping someone, its not her fault, you're just incapable of reading the signals properly, and probably smell bad. Shower your personality into a good guy and stop being obtuse to women's needs or signals. If they dont seem interested, stop pursuing. You can avoid being a sexual harasser or rapist by listening to her body language.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:45 AM
8

plus we cant really know for sure whether bills victims were unwilling. Plenty of people take drugs and have sex. Think Cameron fucking Chase on HouseMD. Is he victimizing her because he was sober and she wanted to fuck after taking drugs that altered her mind?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:42 AM
8

its almost like people cant have a difference of opinion. "yes master, I believe all you say".
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:17 AM
5

In France and Lebanon, most boys thought the puppet that imposed its choices or that had more money was the male puppet. But girls in both countries didn’t attribute the dominant position preferably to one or other gender. These results showed children had early sensitivity to a gender hierarchy, though in some situations girls didn’t associate power and masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:09 AM
5

Mean girls because https://www.desertsun.com/story/opinion/2019/03/06/mean-girls-real-how-women-bully-women-maureen-forman-valley-voice/3085291002/ https://oureverydaylife.com/characteristics-female-bully-8466459.html https://www.today.com/parents/study-bullies-have-higher-self-esteem-social-status-lower-levels-t36271 Basically, a bunch of girls conspiring against "that person I hate" is nothing new. Would anyone like to play a game of The Crucible?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 08:51 AM
1

Imagine being so narcissistic that the concept of males suffering this is alien.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 03:15 AM
0

if he really didnt like it, and Im saying this to all men, say something back. If they say "omg your face so hot", say "yeah your tits are amazing too". If they say "those buns of steel" say "those perky breasts". Give Tit for Tit. Thats the only thing women understand.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 03:11 AM
0

Sure thing, sweety. I know what you meant by your attempted insults.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:54 AM
3

I found it ironic that a person espousing the virtues of "mutual understanding" was behaving like a feminist, calling people "little child" and using a dog whistle for "fragile masculinity" via "domininant personality".
/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:45 AM
-8

a hit dog hollers
/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:35 AM
2

sexually assaulted... So there were unwilling participants? Then lock her up. Hopefully it isn't "regret = sexual assault" kind of thing.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:24 AM
1

Shannon, who also worked as a pastor, lied that a 13 year-old acquaintance had raped his 13 year-old girlfriend, who was one of Shannon’s relatives. Well... did they actually have sex, because if so that would be rape. But she was clearly attacking a male for "defiling my familial female". This is what happens when no accountability for female.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:23 AM
2

Hopefully this is in the fantasy section with a beat cop monitoring.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:21 AM
5

Innocent until proven guilty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0377092/ https://youtu.be/83ysf_GO2aw?t=2207
/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:18 AM
-1

nor was I being hateful. r/whoosh harmed other women... how?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:56 AM
-7

"worlds ugliest boy still pulls more vagina than you". Alternate title. Also, this is transphobic shaming. Maybe she really felt like a boy. Dont be such a hateful shitlord.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:42 AM
6

Take a gamble with 1/2 your shit and possibly have to pay someone for the rest of your life. While raising someone else's child. I mean, the entire point of sexual drives is to propagate yourself. If you're not going to propagate yourself, why bother getting married?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:39 AM
4

Theres a lot of casual misogyny in the whole "she hooked up with a bad guy and didnt realize it, nothing in that relationship is her fault" thinking as well. For decades we've been told that women are superior at knowing the feelings and intentions of others, yet also that women are uniquely mislead and "fooled" by sexual partners into bad relationships.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:38 AM
-15

doesn't argue so you raised a beta simp.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:35 AM
1

That looks soooo fake. Typically thats either tile or some kind of veneer on building brick.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:27 AM
3

which ones have more STDs? which ones have more broken homes and divorces? on average, women do.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:24 AM
6

11:10 you hit the nail on the head right here. They don't want jobs that are oppressive. They want jobs that are the oppressor. It was never about gender equality. It was about "we want to strip men of oppressor jobs and take them for ourselves". There's an easy test for it. Are capitalists considered oppressors? Are rich people oppressors? Yet feminists want those jobs. #micdrop I was floored by that comment. Its so obvious now.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:23 AM
0

Oh sure, even toddlers. /s Get out of here. We're not talking about actual children.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:47 PM
1

Don't put words in my mouth. so tell me what you do want me to put in your mouth. I never said slightly less rape, slightly less of a mistake. Well the difference is that we're claiming its rape in the first instance, so saying "slightly less of a mistake", seems to say slightly less rape.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:46 PM
1

slightly less rape. ?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 05:00 PM
1

If we increased age of consent to 25 tomorrow, would that make 24 year olds rape victims? if we decreased age of consent to 10 tomorrow, would that make 10 year olds capable of consent? Your argument is entirely premised on whats legal being what's moral.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 05:00 PM
2

It would have been a mistake. would it not have been a mistake if she was 16? And if not, whats the difference?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:53 AM
1

voice of reason.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:16 AM
1

teenager pedophile You're doing it wrong.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:15 AM
1

Not really. Any forcible rape perpetrated by women is met with real punishment.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:15 AM
0

That sounds pretty ridiculous to me. Careful, you're saying rapists aren't evil.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:14 AM
2

ThEy PrObAbLy LiKeD iT Fuck outta here with this shit. For all the disgusting stigma associated with male teachers, females are catching up if you were 16 would you have sex with a strange woman that was offering it up to you if she was attractive?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:13 AM
-1

Now I bet there's a lot of people saying those kids got lucky for being abused by / "having sex" with their teacher. Society is disgusting. Can you prove they were abused? Guess thats a no.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:12 AM
1

It leads me to wonder if women actually care about sex trafficking victims at all, or if they're just convenient tools for political gains. Part of me thinks that they've broken the "hoe code" (like bro code), by selling sex and deflating the market value of sexual access, so "fuck em they deserve it, but we'll use their issue for our purposes".
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:10 AM
3

Plus I'm betting that the massage parlour that got busted will be facing "human trafficing" charges, even if there is no evidence to support it. All prostitution is considered human trafficking. For instance, if you're in a state where its illegal, and you pay her, have sex, and go your own way, and they find out, you're now guilty of human trafficking, even if she's doing it of her own free will. It creates a lucrative little loophole for prostitutes to extort johns.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:49 AM
0

A massage parlor in my town recently got busted for giving happy endings. After researching the subject I have recently discovered "yoni massages." So what I have found is giving a guy a handjob is considered prostitution but a yoni massage is perfectly legal. A Yoni massage or yonic massage, derived from the word Yoni, a representation of the vulva which symbolizes the goddess Shati, is a type of tantric full-body erotic massage. It primarily focuses on the labia, clitoris, g-spot, uterus, the …
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:47 AM
3

yeah the story read pretty nuttily. The person writing it sounds deranged.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:46 AM
6

Nietzsche said the same thing 100 years ago. The best way would be to start calling women who leech as losers and pathetic and say they should kill themselves, just like men who are leeches on women or family.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:40 AM
1

NEL
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:38 AM
4

Its because Ive heard of this before and its pretty much a bullshit claim. Nothing says "hygiene" like a spongy material which can trap dangerous elements next to your skin, hide parasites, etc.
/r/BlackPillScience10/01/20 04:32 AM
1

But keep up the strawman arguments. projection
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:27 AM
-3

I have a picture of three relatively attractive young women pissing all over a planned parenthoods front door step and sidewalk after a drunk night out, if you want to see that. They're laughing so much.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:06 PM
3

it doesnt fit the victim narrative
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:56 PM
0

I also find it hard to see how men find social status, at least the way I would define the term, as attractive to anywhere near the same extent as when genders are reversed. you're thinking incorrectly. Social status among women determines sexual selection by men. If you can tear down your competition.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:33 PM
1

It took a while to "get" the whole concept of strapless. basically because you dont have to use a strap-on.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 12:21 PM
6

Having watched the video, it was really enraging to hear the smarmy gay guy say "well it sounds like you're saying men are wimps", because she's saying men are at a disadvantage. Wimps how? For not putting their foot down? Or for "needing" a level playing field? Fuck that guy.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 11:40 AM
0

Its not reductionism. Its holistic. Women are much, much more obsessed with being skinny and dressing well than can be explained by sexual selection alone. Not at all. The obsession is social status, and social status = desirability for sex. You can't divorce the four fundamental drives, sex, safety, food, shelter, from anything humans do because "its just not nuanced enough".
/r/MensRights09/01/20 11:33 AM
0

Well, do you believe someone in 5th grade can know they're "trans"?
/r/MensRights09/01/20 11:23 AM
6

Punishments for those who don't come forward? Probably means punishments for women who refuse to recant about their lying.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 11:11 AM
1

Technically, he fingered a woman. technically, he was convicted of that. And technically, penetration is considered rape.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 11:11 AM
-1

Both the post and the replies of OP are way over the top. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVYiJV_1IwM Watch this. You'll never doubt a post like that again. https://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/shivers/rants/scum.html Here's a good one. "Valerie Solanas' SCUM Manifesto was written in 1967 and published in 1968, the year she shot and wounded Andy Warhol. The text used here is that of the 1983 edition of the Manifesto that was published by the Matriarchy Study Group." t is now technically feasible to repr…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 11:05 AM
1

https://www.removeddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/em5uzg/aita_for_reporting_a_male_colleague_for_his_bad/ Saved version so everyone can read. The removed reason is hilarious: "This is not a debate subreddit". In the very fucking reddit where you state "you're the asshole/not the asshole" based on opinion from reading facts of a situation. Its clear they wanted to hide it.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 10:59 AM
3

Nearly all of it is. Even the "locked door buzzer rooms". Unless someone sexually assaults or rapes you (which is a matter of did she regret it later or is she seeking to cash in with zero evidence 20 years later), its mostly trivial. The problem is that there is probably a few actual instances of very bad behavior on men to women and he should be imprisoned, but its difficult to divide these two groups, and we hate the idea that the guilty ones can avoid punishment. Anyway, this is women today.…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 10:41 AM
1

How can you be "openly lesbian" at 11 years old?
/r/MensRights09/01/20 10:22 AM
6

5th grade. still
/r/MensRights09/01/20 04:06 AM
1

but you can't measure that. So how did we learn these facts without measurement?
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:43 AM
1

Additionally, if you keep someone locked in abasement from childhood to adulthood, the gyrii on their brains is a lot smoother than on the brains of control adults. Like those austrian women being raped by daddy since childhood in the basement and can only make grunting noises. It turns out that novelty experiences, stimulation, play time, learning, etc, all play a role in the brain's ability to develop. If you want more 'interesting'. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/105291…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:32 AM
2

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2010-12-brain-fully-mature-30s-40s.html New research from the UK shows the brain continues to develop after childhood and puberty, and is not fully developed until people are well into their 30s and 40s. https://sardaa.org/brain-is-not-fully-mature-until-30s-and-40s/ Brain is Not Fully Mature Until 30s and 40s 31 Dec 2010. Professor Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, a neuroscientist with the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience at University College London, said until around a…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:22 AM
2

Full brain development is achieved around the age of 24. Full brain development is achieved in the mid 40s, actually. Look it up.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:19 AM
16

In elementary school Well, I guess they might have even been homophobic, because that girl was openly lesbian. What the fuck?
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:17 AM
2

I do think your mother is doing you an enormous favor by restricting your Internet access, especially your access to pornography, which is particularly damaging at your age. lmao
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:16 AM
5

For what its worth, even into the 90's people would say teens were "entering manhood/womanhood" when hitting puberty. Now its "still a child until 18 and not even then are they an adult".
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:11 AM
1

Yeah, imagine thinking that men who get laid were dealing with women that weren't nice to them.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:12 AM
1

Solid door, no windows, white walls, bare metal bench. County jails are perhaps the most dehumanizing place to be in. At least with jails that still use open bars, you're not literally locked in a hole.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:06 AM
8

Women who flirt and have no intention of being sexual are the worst. They're abusing your emotions. #stopflirtabuse #mentoo
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:02 AM
1

While the general ages of consent are now set between 16 and 18 in all U.S. states, the age of consent has widely varied across the country in the past. In 1880, the ages of consent were set at 10 or 12 in most states, with the exception of Delaware where it was 7. Anyway, do you feel harmed? Victimized, or otherwise damaged by that "fooling around"?
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:51 AM
2

Go down r black pill sceince
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:30 AM
6

16 is typical age of consent anyway.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 10:57 PM
4

and if you consider brothel men and women sex trafficking slaves due to being impoverished and possibly being threatened if they leave, then its really all rape. Same way those "young boys" for the roman army would be victims of rape by today's standards.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 10:55 PM
82

In other news, water is wet. Welcome to the world. Women's feelings matter. They deserve "better". But men deserve only whatever they can get by competing and superior competency in socializing. There's a graph of mentally ill people's fertility rates (that is producing offspring). Women, through autism, depression, anorexia, etc, all score double men on these graphs. You don't have to be good at socializing for a man to like you if you're a woman.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 10:49 PM
2

Especially the obvious brigaders that too many people are leaving alone. brigaders? Where exactly did they come from? Incel subreddits are all banned. No, you have naturalized citizens due to the nuking.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 10:39 PM
2

This, I was banned from MGTOW for two comments where I called out Incels for posting shit like "let's take away wimmins rights, they suck!" you'd be saying that Blonde from the Matt Christiensen show is a pregnant incel because she routinely says "women shouldnt have the right to vote"?
/r/MensRights08/01/20 10:39 PM
5

think like a woman, when you blame one man, you're really blaming all men, for whatever that one man did. They use the same psychology for you. When you blame one woman, they use their mental framework as an overlay and take it as blaming all women.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 03:39 PM
1

Let us switch the genders for a bit. Do some men work out in the extreme simply to impress women? Of course, to some extent, the answer is yes, but I have the feeling that is only one of the driving factors - obsession, peer pressure, and competition with other men in general rather than only about access to reproduction should be at least as important. you got halfway there. The only reason to compete vs other men is for being sexually selected. If a man didnt have to compete for sexual selecti…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 02:44 PM
1

Interesting point on reactionary right and outlaws. In today's world, being a rebel is asking for higher taxes (greta thunberg) and trying to force everyone to conform to a certain social standard. And threatening people with social hierarchy destruction for not being "one of us".
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:42 PM
1

If men were turned on, she'd love every minute of it.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 12:28 PM
1

(mostly succumbing to degenerate sexual practices, leading to higher and higher rates of mass depressive disorders and psychoses). But I would argue that by enforcing a stricter regulation of modern sexuality is in and of itself a Marxist approach (ergo trying to redistribute the access to the means of production - quite unironically said reproduction in our case - to the lower classes of the genetically less gifted). Bing. entirely correct. The irony of the "workers revolution" types on reddit,…
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 12:25 PM
2

Or more simply put, how common were indeed this "single mother" type of household in history? Given the violent nature of the world, I'd reckon highly unlikely. A single mother is a target for rapists and thieves and murderers. Children often are the ones to die, not the parents. There's a LOT of history that has been feminist-revised to paint a different picture of reality to dovetail to their present-day philosophies. One such philosophy being "teens have exceptional problems birthing children…
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 06:43 AM
1

wat babe?
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 05:26 AM
2

Its so funny. Apparently no one has read The Crucible. They seek to play it out all over gain #metoo Weinstein was a perv, but afaik he never forced himself on anyone. All the women prostituted themselves by choice. im more angry at them for breaching their part of the deal by attacking him for it, only after they made their 50 million in movies.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 03:26 AM
5

https://image.freepik.com/free-photo/girl-wih-raised-shoulders_1149-342.jpg Now imagine head down forward a bit, a frown, etc.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:16 AM
6

I cant help but wonder, if they'd picked up a bus load of male bodybuilders, face models, etc, and plunked them into the scenario, what the ratio of approaches would look like then. The low approach rate means that they don't consider the men worth the effort.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:15 AM
11

Like about 80% of men.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:13 AM
5

Neck compression. It when you try to turtle into your ribcage because you're afraid or apprehensive.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:13 AM
8

I think you imply that this shouldnt be the case.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:09 AM
20

Thats cause feminism has always been a shit test.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:08 AM
1

men had more positive evaluations than women What this means is that men had more positive evaluations of being flirted with than women did. In other words, you're safer flirting with a man and not being pulled into HR for sex harassment. Its really simple to understand if you parse it. remembe, if you're attractive and high status, she will like it more often than not, and the reciprocal is true. So if the mail man who's ugly starts flirting with the sexy low crop top wearing receptionist, she'…
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:07 AM
3

I love to sexually harass my co-workers to relieve my stress
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:05 AM
4

It was the average age because the older man liked the younger to control and influence them more easily, for the power dynamic. Maybe for you relationships are all about power struggles.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:04 AM
1

It was somewhere around 19-20, when they started to reach fertility; some 5 to 6 years later than modern women. That's just not true. Girls achieve puberty sooner if there is no older male in the house. A natural reaction to being without a "father figure" is to develop tits and ass to pull dick. Its probably because the concept is "you're not going to survive long alone, better get a mate". Furthermore, some girls mature as young as 10 today, while males often have to wait til 20 for their brai…
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:03 AM
4

Lol. What possible hygenic function could pubes have that taking a fucking shower doesnt solve?
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 02:00 AM
5

I know 14 year olds FBI has entered chat
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 01:59 AM
3

As someone attracted to/sexually active with peers during middle and high school, I can see why 20-24 year old males still would be attracted. As someone older, I can see why older men and women would find this despicable. There is something that changes. The immortal neurons in your brain stem that keep your biological clock seem capable of instantaneously gauging others' biological age at a glance, and affecting your sense of arousal. its why young people think sucking an 80 year old's clit or…
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 01:59 AM
1

Were you attracted to/sexual active at 14 with peers?
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 01:55 AM
5

in Ancient Japan, in the Roman Empire In both of these, 'bisexuality' was still bad, but only if you were the receiver. In both cases, rome and japan, it was adult samurai using brothels which held adolescent or prepubescent males, or adult soldiers "training" the young males under them.
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 01:54 AM
16

Maybe if you'd stopped watching teenage porn, this wouldn't occur. So messed up. Please never marry and have kids. There's nothing moral about abusing people for having sexuality that they cant change. You know that joke by gavin Mcinnes? "This is me on dick number one. Watch. air motions sucking a dick and gagging. Okay, this is me on dick number 1000. air motions sucking a dick and gagging. You can't change your sexuality by being told you should". Same thing here. If you showed someone child …
/r/BlackPillScience08/01/20 01:52 AM
3

Yeah, the lack of awareness is interesting. low perceived mate value
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:27 PM
2

Protip: Telling your S.O. what looks good on them and to exercise more is only abuse if its male -> female. If its female -> male, then its just good sense. remember the phrases that are most important in life: "yes dear" "im wrong dear"
/r/MensRights07/01/20 09:56 PM
6

"you arent owed a relationship shitlord!"
/r/MensRights07/01/20 09:59 AM
1

You missed my point. If you're presuming rape because of taking drugs or alcohol, then I think millions of americans are guilty of this kind of rape, even with their S.O.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:37 AM
2

Probably about 0. Remember, benevolent sexism is seen as being egalitarian, and being egalitarian is seen as hostile sexism against women. A real feminist isn't offended or upset by men offering to buy them a drink, but is just as likely to do it herself to men. A real feminist doesnt need the door held open for her, and wont call a man a misogynist for failing to do so, nor think he's doing what he should be doing for women if he does so. A real feminist decries the lack of women in garbage hau…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:09 AM
3

Nah. Its not their money. They just raise taxes because "our costs have gone up". Imagine if someone successfully sued U.S. gov for 1 trillion. I doubt trump or any other future president will take a pay cut, nor will anyone else.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:05 AM
4

Throw some virtue signal money to one victim, dont address the real problem.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:02 AM
1

Just because it's legal doesn't mean it's wrong. Good point. Nothing is wrong because its legal. Nothing is right because its legal either. Nothing is wrong because its illegal or right ecause its illegal as well. Seriously why would anyome have sex with a 16 year old when they are above 18 years old? So you think an 18 or 19 year old should go to prison? Be labeled a child predator? Lose their future? Because they had sex with a consenting 16 year old? You've certainly shown your morals.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:54 AM
3

you feel sore? Cause I could attack your back like an aloesoreus.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:44 AM
13

I think its worse now. Its more "PC" and sanitized for the current era, but the misandry back in the 90's wasn't "every single man is waiting to rape the shit out of you" like it is today. You could actually pick up a woman on an elevator or subway.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:01 AM
2

What's sad is if you talk about this issue, you just hear "Incel!" "You're not entitled to sex", etc. Yep. From the very people who seem to feel entitled to sex; women. After all, women react horribly if a man turns them down publicly. and I guarantee this is also a huge part of why women feel harassed The more safe and coddled people are, the less safe they actually feel, and the more they feel threatened. Think about "safe spaces and hate speech". The more protected people are, the weaker they…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 04:22 AM
4

Fucking oath
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:32 AM
17

reminds me of the housewife in American Beauty. While fucking around with chad she still saw herself a victim.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:49 AM
1

Its legal in 30+ US states to have sex with a 16 year old. What are you doing about it?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:53 AM
8

a frying pan to the head would be hard for her. Well apparently 3 people think hyperbole in response to genital mutilation is "so awful". I mean shit, imagine if it said "man genitally mutilates 3 yeaer old daughter". Imagine how many would say "i'd take his genitals too" or "a bullets too good for him, get the chains"
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:26 AM
48

Imagine this, a woman starts dating a man, and he purposefully starts shaving his head in the typical horseshoe bald pattern. He likes the way it looks, maybe he feels like jason statham, but regardless, she feels less attracted. She'd say "you should stop, its not attractive to me", will he do it? You bet your ass he'll do it. But this would not be considered controlling or abusive at all by feminists. It'd be "putting your foot down and getting what you want in your relationship". The big smok…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:18 AM
1

Are you living in a fantasy world where those complications go away after 20 or 30?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:13 AM
21

if an audience full of men has one come forward and grope a woman from behind, that's terrifying because men could all rape her. If its a woman, its not terrifying because "there's no way she could rape him", due to the conceit that women never use drugging, or blackmail, etc. The morality of groping someone, for feminists/women has practically everything to do with context and almost nothing to do with the violation of personal space itself. For instance, a girl creeping on a friend in the bath…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:11 AM
6

https://youtu.be/0d-8_cahcGo?t=106 That's a signal of "come fuck me".
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:09 AM
0

Not if you enjoy being taxed to fund women's sexcapades with men who arent you.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:43 AM
1

Why would evolution select for birthing capability in the teen years? Or was that some pedopatriarchal male oppression?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:30 AM
1

Look this isnt a land war in asia. This is just internet.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:22 AM
1

what
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:22 AM
1

what?
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:25 PM
2

men have you seen that are actually impressed by how a woman dresses? I mean impressed, not turned on. That's the point of a good dress, to "turn on" men, because the one man in the crowd she wants to "impress" is for sexual reasons. She just happens to get all the other attention from "unwanted men" as well.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:24 PM
3

First of all, with apologies for perhaps sounding feminist, I think the premise that women dress up to "impress men" is misguided and actually a bit sexist. Bullshit. Women dont suffer on treadmills and non-fat diets because "they just want to feel good about themselves". They do it for the same reason men do it; it makes them look more sexually attractive. if either gender disappeared tomorrow, the other gender would eat pizza and ice cream in sweat pants all day and you know it.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:23 PM
3

and PEDOPHILE No, pedophiles prefer people under 12.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:20 PM
0

they were also under influence and could not consent. So if your S.O. got drunk, you'd be raping them? You misspelled "after she raped them" Depends on the age of consent and the laws in that state.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:19 PM
2

Consent is presumed to be switched to "on" for males all the time. It is presumed switched to "off" for females and they have to show "interest" by playing mindgames like r/pizzadare or dropping "hints" which only she understands as being her version of telling a guy she likes him and why doesn't he just get it because he's a dumb guy when she's not being forthright and hiding behind "assumed consent"?!! See, the problem with this behavior, as normal, is that this is a form of short-circuiting w…
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:05 PM
1

Don't suppress it. Expose it. Don't try to hide it. Post it on social media to all your friends and family and ask them if you think this is a problem. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. If you want to change the world for the better by making the sexes equally responsible, you can't hide information that leads to freedom. Im going out on a limb here. It shouldnt be that big a deal. It shouldn't be that big a deal when a guy does it either. Im all for equality.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:00 PM
1

Yes, and I still have the same question. If you'd be willing to explain whats going on, I would help you out.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 09:49 PM
1

why?
/r/MensRights06/01/20 09:45 PM
3

Being unable to speak for fear of being destroyed is the same as being destroyed.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:57 AM
6

its like "that wasn't real communism". Only terrible people suggest such things. If you ever hear "men cant be raped" from a man OR a woman, its a good bet they don't view men as human beings. Like any good (or bad) organization, they all tend towards corruption and abuse, and they all tend towards trying to reinvent their enemies, because people who's livelihood depends on enemies require that their enemy persists forever. its no secret the feminist and sjw movements have been hijacked by disgu…
/r/MensRights29/12/19 03:43 AM
10

they eat their own eventually. Let it go. Everything is rape, everything is sexual harassment, and everything is misogyny to them.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 03:40 AM
2

He chose to get married to dead weight.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 02:36 AM
4

At least hes clean. https://youtu.be/PfH8IG7Awk0?t=4902 Dark humor aside, 60 seconds of this video. As objectively ugly as she is, as obviously bad her personality is, she still gets laid regularly.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 01:48 AM
27

Shes got 2 things working in her favor. 1: shes a "child" due to age. 2: She's female. These two assure she'll never see a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 11:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter