TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Donutmuncher Archive

View 8 posts and 222 comments by Donutmuncher on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Yes means Yes... and No.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 10:26 PM
0

with $200k in the bank she doesn't need student loans maybe but you won't have much left after, even less for a lifetime.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 06:57 PM
0

She wants you to think that for sure given the way she wrote the story. If she's that smart, she wouldn't be doing film studies which is low in difficulty, mostly BS and with little economic value.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 01:46 PM
2

Check Jimmy_Big_Nuts latest response. Pure venom but no substance.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 01:42 PM
2

Why don't you humor me with just one argument/refutation of what I wrote? Surely, your divine superior self should have no difficulty. Or are you just capable of baseless insults?
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 01:41 PM
2

I'm sure a lot of it romanticized to make her sound super hot, big earner and super business-like / intelligent. Her ass/tits aren't that great either for $5K. That face better be amazing.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 01:30 AM
1

I feel like you're trying to make this about socialized versus privatized medical industry when it's really not It is. Either you are fined being forced to pay for people's surgeries or you are not. You can debate whether you should be paid for a sex change, but if you accept the former you're already down the slippery slope to justify any surgery. That's the thing with principles - either you have them or you don't. But yeah if my neighbor needs a new hip so he doesn't have to use an electric w…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 10:04 PM
2

Well at least we both now know you have no arguments. Just insults.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 09:59 PM
1

sure, but are you fine with it? Did you voluntarily accept to pay for your neighbor's necessary or unnecessary surgeries?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 09:02 PM
1

I guess you don't understand how public healthcare is funded.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 09:01 PM
2

You do realise the upper class usually don't work. So they just magically appeared out of nowhere with money? You do realise unearned wealth increases through compound interest. Except that in the US, that's not the case. Within 3 generations, rich families end up poor or middle class again. Also, you get return on your investments but at the cost of risk. So you can loose it all also. You do realise the money of the wealthy leaves the real economy and is hoarded while the poor spend almost all …
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 02:51 PM
1

Let me translate what you are saying: I would rather have someone killed if they didn't pay for my medical expenses
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 02:42 PM
2

But you're fine being forced to pay their other medical bills?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 02:25 PM
1

the female reporter could not help but admire Mr Yew Why? Because he gets other people beaten/caged/killed if they don't obey him? What a hero. The only reason Singapore is doing fine is because people are hiding their money there and because it has a more free market economy than other regions.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 02:21 PM
1

I get it from https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcyb5RJuK2CPla02mOnKm_g
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 07:05 PM
1

The more I learn about the Japan the more I dislike the culture. Japanese girls might be slimmer but the mentality is messed up there. This obsession with maintaining harmony makes any kind of meaningful relationship seem impossible.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 02:40 PM
6

They self-loathe constantly Of course they are. They know deep down they are parasites living off the productive like yourself.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 02:35 PM
2

sorry, I read selfishness. My bad
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 02:34 AM
-3

men are more likely to show enterprise, selflessness, self-awareness, logic, hard work, sacrifice aren't these contradictory?
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:47 PM
1

I wonder how many men lost STEM university places to less competent women (or men with poor spatial reasoning abilities but good verbal ones) due to this bias.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 08:32 PM
0

Torture and rape aren't necessary for the continuation of society. Murder/killing is sometimes necessary Killing in response to immediate self-defense requirements, yes. Murder, no. some people being willing to kill are a necessary condition for everyone else to live peacefully. That's too vague. The US military is not in the business of a "necessary condition for everyone else to live peacefully". Their genocidal body count and biggest exporter of weapons empirically show that you are wrong. Wh…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 08:12 PM
1

Are you deliberately misreading your text?
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 07:53 PM
0

the American Psychological Association (emphasis mine): “Most standard tests of intelligence have been constructed so that there are no overall score differences between females and males” That's very revealing indeed. So they're not necessarily tracking intelligence as it related to practical areas, but a PC measure which might not have as much usefulness.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 07:52 PM
1

Because you don't want to be paid to kill others. Indeed. I don't either want to be paid to torture, murder and rape others. Not even if I'm given a costumes and little badges for it or other people encourage me too. I'd say that's a good thing. Since it is sometimes necessary that others die to safeguard your family/tribe/nation, then those that are willing to kill get more respect than those who are not. Self-defense is indeed justified but isn't something that we owe respect for doing. Little…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 05:56 PM
1

So you'd do the same for any other manual laborer who carries heavy boxes at work?
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 05:49 PM
3

They aren't royalty Royalty doesn't deserve a seat either. They steal enough from you already.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 04:22 PM
-3

military personnel Injured ones? If not, then I fail to see why somebody who gets paid to kill others warrants a free seat?
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 04:21 PM
1

It was an unintentional mistake and the removed the website entry once notified. How can they be fined $1M? Madness.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:15 PM
3

I'm lost. You had something to say on minimum wage?
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 09:27 PM
2

I have but you still haven't made an argument as to why I am wrong?
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 09:19 PM
-3

I don't think you understand minimum wage laws and how ridiculous and destructive they are to the poorest.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 09:01 PM
1

You'd be willing to work for $0.05 in 20 years?
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 08:37 PM
4

Could be, but seems unlikely from write-up.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 08:29 PM
3

Are you saying you want to ban people from earning lower than the minimum wage?
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 08:09 PM
5

You think the majority of US citizens will work for $0.05/hour because there are no minimum wage laws?
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 08:08 PM
7

The socialists here will hate you for this
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 08:06 PM
4

It would make females atrocious drivers then.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:29 PM
1

For what you have in demagogy you lack in reason. stop projecting You have a "property" because law defined the concept of private property to begin with. You got that the wrong way round. You have laws because you have private property. If there is no private property, there is no need for laws. You have "law" because people wanted to externalize and substantiate the notion of "justice", and tried to have it enforced as objectively as possible. Agreed. None of this requires a government though.…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 12:52 PM
1

If that's what you want, go for it. I'll take you for everything I can and you stayed? That's a tough spot.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 12:17 AM
1

One is law, social contract, you agreed to stay in this country so you tacitly agreed it to. If you enter my property, does that mean that you agree to be forcefully aggressed? Of course not. Even less so in a country since it is not owned by anyone, and you were most likely born there. There is no agreement to be stolen from. If there is, where is that agreement? If you are born in the US then you become US property (by their laws): You have to pay them even if you leave (see IRS). They don't a…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:52 PM
5

Why is she on your facebook again?
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 04:28 PM
0

you suggest going out of your way, your fucking freedom, because you're surrounded by bigoted dimwits that would impose their shallow line of thinking at every opportunity? Well yea. I'm surrounding by bigots who support government using force against me to extract my earnings (i.e. taxes). I can choose not to pay but the consequences are too steep for me - so I pay.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 01:00 PM
1

unfortunately you might be right
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:58 PM
0

He doesn't have to. He just has to bear the consequences of his choice. I can walk around dress as a Nazi SS or a tranny, but then I suffer the consequences. It sucks but it's life.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:58 PM
1

Agreed. It is unfortunate indeed, but it's a reality we live in.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:56 PM
-1

Probably not. Just as if the guy wasn't covered in tattoos the probability these busybodies would have made a scene would have been lower. Just saying.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 10:21 PM
-1

Sure, but then you'll suffer the justified or unjustified consequences. Your call.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 08:09 PM
-3

im a big man full of skull and evil themed tattoo's and got the long beard Sorry this happened to you, but it doesn't look like you're helping your case. Appearances do matter and it's foolish to ignore that. It will come to bite you in the ass again and again.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 05:46 PM
1

Yeah well, whatever, it is what it is. Your point being? Or is your point what it is? So if you need an extremely smart person, who has gone into debt for seven years of graduate and post-graduate education, you better expect to pay. It is what it is. That's the deal and it is not discrimination. I didn't say that was discrimination. It's a stupid system that turns someone bankrupt to defend themselves. That slaves like you accept it as face value is one of the reasons we have what we have.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 08:19 PM
0

The saddest part is that the father has to beg for money to pay for his defense. The justice system is so messed up that you have to fund some lawyer's golf club membership in order to defend yourself or go to prison. What a ridiculous system where the state has limitless resources and lawyers feed off its victims.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 09:51 PM
-2

What has me getting angry got to do with morals? Of course I can get angry, if I choose to. That doesn't mean its wrong to punch me in the face. So why do we have the words wrong and right if they are interchangeable and essentially meaningless? What Hitler did was not wrong. What your child did was not wrong. Must be hard to judge anything if you have no objective standards by which to judge them by. There are many people in the world who believe that it is right that every non-musilm die based…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 04:47 PM
-12

Morals are subjective ok, so if I punch your face then you can't be angry because "subjective dude. My morals say it's ok to punch you."
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 02:40 PM
6

she's a respectable attorney Being a lawyer is all about manipulation of words and people. and a public servant That term annoys me. She works for money, just like everyone else.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 04:44 PM
-3

Well you obviously haven't been to the Olympics lately. You get Silver for second, Gold for first and Diamond for 0.5 (but they give the medal to you secretly and you compete in a parallel universe).
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 10:21 PM
1

If you're alpha, you're not on TRP. So I'm assuming he's trying to be more alpha.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 04:14 PM
5

All I know is I didn't pay, nor join them after. Good on you. But yeah sure, you dont think its alpha. If you are striving to be 100% alpha then I would avoid using the -fuck- as it shows you were hurt by her demands. Take it or leave it.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 02:47 PM
0

It shows he feels angry. If he was true alpha, he wouldn't be affected by it.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 02:38 PM
0

"great, what the fuck has that got to do with me?" Not very smooth. You could have dealt with his more elegantly or turned it around. The -fuck- comes across as beta to me.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 02:16 PM
2

Feminism is cloaked socialism. Why bite the hands that feeds them?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 02:57 PM
10

Ignorance is a choice. And who trains these slaves 5 days a week 8 hours a day for the first 14-18 years of their lives? Government. It sucked out their innate ability to self-learn. Not to say that they are not responsible for their choices, but given their paths, it's not surprising. It's more surprising that people like you still manage to make it through.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 11:28 PM
4

A valid point, but the fact he failed to appear for the legal summons means he automatically loses the case. Given the state makes sure it doesn't teach its slaves anything about the legal system in schools, this is not surprising. The guy probably read this and thought it was absurd (which it is) so trashed it in the bin. He could indeed make lawyer student friends, but he's probably too busy trying to keep up with his rent.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 10:21 PM
8

Except most people cannot afford lawyers. That's one of the reasons 99% of cases end up in pleas. The legal system is a farce.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 09:55 PM
-5

Clooney is gay as a kite. It's well known apparently. And his best buddy Obama is too. This is all just a PR stunt.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 01:44 PM
2

Do a Google News search on Zoe Quinn and you'll see it's mostly supportive and denouncing of misogynists... no surprise there...
/r/MensRights01/09/14 02:29 PM
15

This is actually a masterful piece of PR by the CEO. Piss off feminists, and you'll get much more press.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:16 PM
1

Why would you pay $300 for a programming contest? If you're that good, people should be paying YOU for programming. Sell your skills. Paying to program... funny.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:51 PM
2

I saw a documentary that said the the richer and more "gender-equal" the country was, the more there was a gender difference in the fields of study and work. So in Norway, women were much more into humanities then STEM for example. Same pattern in work. Indians/Chinese women don't have so many options. They need to take jobs that bring in money so they do what sells.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:49 PM
3

About 95+% of cases end up as a plea, with public defenders and private lawyers alike. I suggest you watch the stats from lawyer Marc Victor . Mindblowing.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:36 PM
16

Men? You mean everybody, especially for victimless crimes. They love a good forced plea too ;)
/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:19 PM
3

These tactics aren't limited to this area. They do it for drugs for too. Police aren't there to protect you (as they have no legal obligation to do so - google it). They are there to ARREST you. That is their job.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:05 PM
1

Why do you need 4 kids? That's a lot of work.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:45 PM
-1

You're going to have to define what you mean by "statist" if you want anyone to really be able to address your claim. A statist is a supporter of statism, which is the belief that a monopoly on the use of force in the form of a state (democracy, monarchy, etc..) is legitimate and is the ideal/best way to organize humanity. That being said, I don't think a father calling his daughter "princess" tells you anything at all about his political views. Yes and no. It depends which meaning of the term y…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:27 PM
-1

I'm not hearing an argument against my claim
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:50 PM
-5

Fathers who call their daughters 'princess' are statists They believe that it is somehow a complement to call their daughters after the progeny of the deadliest gangsters in the land.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:42 AM
-3

How can Dawkins call himself a rationalist and still be a statist? It's farcical.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:52 PM
1

I'm for extremely high taxes on the wealthy (like in the 1950-60s in the US), and way higher taxes than now on big companies (and more taxes on profit-after-expenses for smaller companies). If you tax something you get less of it. If you increases taxes on gas, people try to drive less etc. If you tax people making a lot of money, you get less people making a lot of money... simple. Why would anybody risk investing in a risky venture with huge upside, if all the profits go into taxes. Well nobod…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:26 PM
1

Anywhere is better than France for taxes :) There's a hatred for wealthy people there. So sad given the creativity they have to stifle their economy.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 02:14 AM
1

They're oligopolies with a veneer of socialism. I haven't heard of rich people moving to either countries but more about the native rich living there trying to get their money out. There's too much regulatory uncertainty and corruption to leave your assets there.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:36 PM
0

I sympathize with your view, I really do, but I think there's a possibility that you're not right. Thanks. I know for sure the main ideologies are wrong as they are self-contradictory and immoral. But there might of course be other better ways of doing things. I think that it's good that different societies exist. Absolutely. Unfortunately, until seasteading or free cities take off, we aren't able to try different societal models. Nordic ones that should be failures but are not They will be in t…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:23 PM
1

Finns are not socialist, around 20% voted for them. Given the tax rate and the state involvement in the economy, I'd say it pretty socialist by most standards irrespective of what the political parties label themselves as. Democrats? Yeah, but is it an ideology or liberty in action? Gang rape is also a form of democracy too but I wouldn't say it's liberty in action. Democracy is the majority imposing its will on the minority (in the best of cases, since most turn out to be oligarchies) - it's on…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 10:13 PM
1

If you truly think humanity is in a position where it's possible to get rid of nations as an existing construct True that many people don't understand they should be free, but it doesn't mean that the draft is any more justifiable. Just like most people believed slavery was acceptable a couple of hundred years ago. Didn't make it moral/justifiable though.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 10:06 PM
2

Finns, have the luxury of not supporting any ideology You except for their support of the following ideologies: socialism and democracy?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:13 PM
0

It's easy to make absolutist statements when you don't consider all the nuances of the issue. It's easy if you understand the issue at hand and don't fall for the rhetoric. Especially if you live in some other country that's in a geopolitical position where it can maintain a volunteer army. People are just people. None have the right to force you into combat for their cause, no matter what uniform or country they come from. Of course it's immoral when viewed completely separately from any contex…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:11 PM
1

This is one of those moral dilemmas No it's not. Compulsory military service and the draft are immoral. It doesn't matter what you think it might be useful nor what group of people agreed to it. If you are ready to cage or shoot someone for resisting this forced servitude then morality is not a concept you understand.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 07:03 PM
1

I agree that we shouldn't see everything through the MRA lense. Still, this movie was unrelenting to the point where it got somewhat aggravating. See it for yourself. Films in the 40/50 depicted women as incompetent damsels in distress. I can see why the feminists got all wound up. Entertainment is an effective vehicle for propaganda, so analyzing it in a balanced manner is useful.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:04 PM
-1

There's a radfem agenda going on over at Disney Indeed. Check out his review of Frozen: The Truth about Frozen
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:56 PM
1

Because having more facts helps better understand a story.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:48 PM
1

Either way, it's a shame they do not clarify in the article.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 10:53 PM
1

A mother who would loose custody of her child is not relevant in this story? really?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:27 PM
1

Single father? If not, why is the mother left out of the story?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:59 PM
1

it's also true that making abortion illegal or difficult is a disadvantage to women. compared to what? If you have no frame of reference, you cannot say it is a disadvantage. You might just as well say it's an advantage.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:26 PM
6

I don't see how they are legally disadvantaged compared to men since men cannot biologically face this issue. It's not an issue of law. It's an issue of biology.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:35 AM
1

I can't speak for the rest of Reddit, so it is unfortunate if this is the case. /r/MensRights is about holding both sexes equally responsible for their actions.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:54 PM
1

The notion of justified self-defense is predicated on a person using reasonable force to protect himself/herself. It's a gender neutral definition. It doesn't enable one to beat someone else to death, except if there are no other options.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:05 PM
2

http://voluntaryists.com
/r/MensRights23/05/14 01:38 AM
2

Listen to first caller (from 0:18 to 25:53)
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:11 PM
133

In that case, should physically weaker men be able to hit larger men with impunity? You know, it's simply not the same...
/r/MensRights18/05/14 12:01 AM
7

But of course. Then they will be 'destroyed'just like the Social Security number would never be used for identification, the NSA would only spy on the baddies and etc...
/r/MensRights15/04/14 12:36 AM
-1

Are you suggesting we end compulsory education Absolutely. We should educate our kids, but we should not force parents to put them into a specific schooling system. There are many alternative means of educating children which the current forced monolithic system cannot cater to. For example check out homeschooling and unschooling for some interesting alternatives. See http://www.georgeoughttohelp.com for details.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 01:27 AM
6

Kids do have rights - it's just that the state doesn't recognize them. Imagine forcing adults into learning camps for 10 years...
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:57 PM
14

You obviously can't just infringe on someones liberty for no reason Well apparently nobody seems to have a problem forcing kids into over a decade of compulsory schooling. Clothing restrictions is the tip of the iceberg. More here: http://www.georgeoughttohelp.com
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:49 AM
2

I wonder why gays seem to love the state, given how badly they have suffered at its hands.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:27 AM
6

and most prisons are filled with women being raped daily...
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:06 AM
5

It's THE money-shot for news reporters unfortunately...
/r/MensRights17/02/14 04:22 PM
12

He said that the study’s finding that height matters more to women supports the social system of patriarchy, in which males are the primary authority figures. “The masculine ability to offer physical protection is clearly connected to the gender stereotype of men as protectors,” he said. “And in a society that encourages men to be dominant and women to be submissive, having the image of tall men hovering over short women reinforces this value.” because patriarchy!
/r/MensRights12/02/14 07:10 PM
0

This
/r/MensRights10/02/14 04:59 PM
1

notice the IF in my comment and also read the instructive post above by /r/thesprunk
/r/MensRights10/02/14 04:58 PM
4

"Most abuse on women is carried by their husbands. Sort of makes sense when you consider that husbands probably, in most cases, spend the most time with their wives." i.e. your comment is a reasoning fail if you are using this to justify women's child abuse
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:19 PM
1

but if the entire world agrees with you that it's "your" country Not everybody agrees it is "your" country - me included. Property rights are not a democracy. Either you have a universal standard for property or you don't. If I walk up to you with knife and steal your wallet, would you call that my legitimate wallet now? How about if everyone else agreed with my claim? A property claim is not legitimate if it is taken by force, only voluntary/homesteading/contractual transfers are valid and non-…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:53 PM
0

I'm just saying your bullshit about governments having no legitimate claim to territory is idiotic nonsense. And that by saying that, you may as well say no one has a legitimate claim over any property. Ok, so if the government owns the whole country, how can you own your house and its land?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:06 PM
1

You're the dumbass comparing ownership of one's own body to the ownership of land I didn't mention land explicitly, but all property such as the mouse and keyboard you are using to write this. Do you not own your mouse and keyboard? Does a land owner not own his land? If so, who does?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:28 AM
1

I said it was neither a first principle It is a principle by all definitions. The principle of an effect is the cause (murder) that produces it (immorality). It can be tested, proved or disproved and applied like any principle. Since you're the one making the positive claim you have the burden to prove that it is universal. Which means that you have to prove all humans everywhere agree that murder is always immoral under any circumstances. Good luck with that. You really don't understand what a …
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:25 AM
0

You can't fight indeed if you have no arguments I guess you're the guy who goes around telling everyone you don't own your own hand. Funny.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 12:43 AM
0

That's not a first principle. Nor is it a universal one. I realize that you want to claim that it is, but you don't know what the words that you are using mean. It's not universal because you want it to be. I don't see an argument here, just a statement. How is "murder is immoral" not a principle? By what standard? Why is it not universal? Property is a construct of society and law. The only reason you have a right to property is because the society we live in and the government we live under de…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 12:41 AM
0

You can't reason from first principle because there is no set first principle. You mean reason from a first principle. Furthermore, even if I accepted your assertion that you did start from a first principle that says nothing about the actual validity or soundness of your logic and reasoning, nor does it say anything about whether you are correct. A creationist can start off from a first principle if they want to as well. You misunderstand the meaning of reasoning from first principle: http://en…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:06 PM
1

Can you explain please? I'm not familiar with this.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:34 PM
1

No you cannot. For instance, can I state you have no legitimate claim on your body? Property rights are clearly defined. Taking something by force (which is what the government did/does) or theft is not a legitimate claim, otherwise you would have no problem with someone taking your wallet nor dispute him on the grounds for his ownership claim. Hans-Hermann Hoppe writes: "Everyone is the proper owner of his own physical body as well as of all places and nature-given goods that he occupies and pu…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:32 PM
0

In other words, you're equivocating, and doing a very poor job of it. That is one of the definitions Wordweb gave me. Where do it say a group of people in funny costumes own everything (including you, your possessions and your labor) within these boundaries? Nobody said they did. You're misrepresenting and greatly exaggerating what was said. To the point bordering on outright lying. Lie? What exactly is false in my statement? As I said, this is why I dislike having to talk to libertarians. It's …
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:23 PM
0

Unfortunately words have meanings and reality disagrees with you. yes, they do. You should look up legitimate, theft, force, morality. Here is country: A particular geographical region of indefinite boundary (usually serving some special purpose or distinguished by its people or culture or geography) Where do it say a group of people in funny costumes own everything (including you, your possessions and your labor) within these boundaries?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:47 PM
-9

Government has no legitimate claim over a territory. Its ability to wield force against anyone who disagrees does not make it anymore legitimate than a pickpocket's stolen wallet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fasTSY-dB-s
/r/MensRights31/01/14 08:28 PM
-3

It was Stalin's country and his rules too That's incorrect. Russia was not his country. Nobody has a legitimate claim on a country, not even the government that states it does.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 07:54 PM
1

wtf?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 05:36 PM
1

Interesting. Where would you position yourself in the income scale?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:16 PM
1

they collect the same money they paid in taxes. well, that's an issue to. Watch the videos I link. they are quite fun. UBI paid through taxes creates an incentive to work because customers that have money are an incentive to work. If money I get from working is taking away from me, I have less incentive to work. If 90% of your earnings are taken away in taxes, what incentive do you have to earn more?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 12:47 AM
0

If the rich can collect more money with UBI, then why do you need their money in the first place? I recommend the short cartoon video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFbYM2EDz40 And maybe even: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGMQZEIXBMs Only stupidity and misapprehension is a basis for objection. Lack of understanding of economics and disregard for the poor is the basis for UBI.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 11:11 PM
-1

Trillionaires! How about it. Spending other people's money is always so much more fun.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:28 PM
-2

$15k is fundable with minimal disruption/resistance. $1M is not. So your measure of if it is fundable is how much people are disrupted or resist? So the implication is that it will cause disruption and is meet by resistance either way. How can you support a policy that you yourself admit people do not want?
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:27 PM
-5

Will you personally pay someone $15K/year? Why not make $1M/year each? We could all be millionaires! Why limit it?
/r/MensRights23/01/14 04:45 PM
0

We can easily afford to give every adult $15k/year without significant tax increases, as a substitute for welfare and other social services. You do realize that money has to come from other people right?
/r/MensRights23/01/14 04:26 PM
1

Gotcha
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:15 AM
1

really good companies do, such as Accenture. You mean the company formed from the ashes a corrupt bankrupt one?
/r/MensRights14/01/14 05:41 PM
13

Looks like the critic highlighted a cheap-exploitive aspect of the show - probably only to increase its rating. They just turned it round on the critic to imply he was sexist to avoid answering.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:52 PM
2

Fair enough. Although Wikipedia IS biased, because it employs people to put out female-centric articles (among many other things). I guess she wasn't biased in the sense they wanted her to be.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 08:48 PM
2

Gotcha. If she was using another Wiki username to edit the articles, then I don't see what the issue is. If she was using her work username, then that would explain her being fired.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 07:14 PM
2

She was fired for being pay to edit Wiki articles - while being an employee paid to edit Wiki articles?! Am I missing something here?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:44 PM
6

useful analysis. Thanks
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:42 PM
1

Of course it's true. Have you tried running a business? Working freelance? If you don't generate more money than you cost/your expensive, you are fired or wasting your time. Show me where this is remotely true in government?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 05:45 PM
2

Merit and productivity has a lot more influence on one's career than in government/politics/unions. If you don't make enough money to pay the bills, you're out. Not the case in government.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 11:48 PM
10

I would like to add that most of the persons in power in our country is now, in fact, women. Our prime minister is a woman, our minister of finance is a woman, the NHO-leader is a woman, the leader of the national labour-organization is a woman, and the list goes on Ok, but how many are in industry? You know, where it's based more on merit, entrepreneurship and provable performance.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:32 PM
10

genius
/r/MensRights04/01/14 03:20 PM
2

I'm sure if you analyze your past with her, you'll see red flags that were ignored. People rarely snap into another person without prior signs. A therapist might help. You need to talk to your kids though. If they hate you also, then you need to find out why.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 06:30 PM
0

I highly recommend you watch the videos below http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIBVtPhxoHU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cIc5844QvA No difference at all. At the end of the day customers will still treat employees like they're dirt, be they cashiers, waiters, parking wardens or security guards and its all because they can't see past a uniform. I''m not sure we are understanding each other. A waiter does not initiate force on others. If you treat a cop like shit, they can mess you up bad. The wors…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:20 PM
-3

The root issue here in your story is the state. The state imposes arbitrary rules (R18 + kid in store) on businesses who have to follow it or they go to jail including your friend. So your friend is threatened with jail if he does not obey. It has little to do with him being paid or not. The difference between a cop or your clerk friend, is that in his job the cop has to initiate force on people (if they do not obey him or resist arrest). Your clerk friend does not initiate force against his cus…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:17 AM
-1

well good thing thats not what politics means eh? try pulling your head out your ass, Try doing politics without the threat of force, and see if anyone gives a crap. Government is force. Without force it is by definition not government. not every ones outto get you the government literally does not give a shit about you, calm the fuck down. Try not paying your taxes or obeying their arbitrary rules, see how long you last without the government "getting you" Your cognitive dissonance is beyond re…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:07 PM
0

Yes, I don't believe in politics - i.e. using force to impose your preferences onto others.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:51 PM
0

one mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist I know it yes. I'm not sure it applies though. Cops don't fight for freedom nor are they terrorist - at least not in a majority. from my perspective this is a law officer employed by a democratically elected government The difference with your perspective and mine, is that yours requires you to have uniformed goons imposing your laws onto me and others that don't agree. I am fine with you being bullied by cops if that is what you seek, just keep…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:35 PM
-1

Thanks
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:48 PM
-3

So if someone pays my salary, does that give me blanket immunity to do anything they say?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:43 PM
1

What freedom fighter? A cop does not fight for freedom - he actively fights against it.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:42 PM
2

Don't bother. These are the same people who thought they were going to have a warm shower...
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:41 PM
1

They sure act similar...
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:40 PM
0

You're a fucking moron man, lets ignore the fact you can't google like 6 words to find out the information is true How about the OP directly linking to the relevant information?? definitely a Men's Rights case because if a guy did this to a woman there would be hell to pay, and people actually assume the cop should have liked being kissed but focus on the fact that you are throwing out things that are literally false. I just think it's cops acting as tyrants, not an MRM issue. How do you cage pr…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:31 PM
4

I couldn't find it in the linked article, nor in the linked article in the linked article. Maybe the OP could have included a link to your findings. Man, I'm for MRM but didn't except to get so much grief for not being 100% behind a post...
/r/MensRights17/12/13 02:14 AM
-5

I feel like I'm talking to a feminist. You might be better on their sub.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 02:00 AM
-4

I don't get the relevance of this post indeed. Doesn't mean I diss the whole sub.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:15 AM
-77

taunting a professional. You mean an armed bully with the shielding of government laws? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIBVtPhxoHU
/r/MensRights16/12/13 10:15 PM
-27

She kissed the helmet. I couldn't find anything about fingers. What has the twisted logic of unaccountable armed thugs used to cage protesters have to do with MRM?
/r/MensRights16/12/13 10:14 PM
2

socialist madness...
/r/MensRights13/12/13 01:41 AM
1

awesome sketch
/r/MensRights02/12/13 08:09 PM
1

it would allow any agreements to donate sperm, reducing physician involvement and potentially causing harm. Potential harm? How about the potential harm of people not being able to afford subsidizing physicians' lifestyle because of some arbitrary dictate of the state? The law is a joke. Anything can be justified with it. Everything Hitler did was legal... Read The Myth of the Rule of Law : http://faculty.msb.edu/hasnasj/GTWebSite/MythWeb.htm .
/r/MensRights02/12/13 07:53 PM
2

Can't she still abort? If so, is that an option you are considering?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:19 AM
33

This. If women were so cheap they would be the only people employed. Companies would not be outsourcing to China anymore, they just domestically outsource to women only staff. But of course, that is not the case.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:17 PM
10

And he spent 3 hours in jail. Some people are more equal than others under the law...
/r/MensRights24/11/13 01:54 AM
2

ya, he would be better off no marrying her. But my guess is he will get suckered in.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 06:26 PM
8

Check out his new girlfriend. I think that is pissing the ex off big time. I wonder if he'll get a prenupt this time.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:36 PM
5

These anti-bullying laws are so broad, that pretty much anything you post can be labelled bullying. It's just like the anti hate speech and racism laws - stifling all forms of expression and making sure people become good obedient slaves. Most bullying of kids takes place at school. You know these places where kids are coercively packed in by for over a decade by the government. I know another similar place with lots of bullying: prisons. Government solving a government problem with more governm…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:37 PM
3

Ya, you could warn your accuser''s current employer (anonymously or not) about your case. I'm sure they''d be happy to know.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:06 PM
9

We have got the pay but only real equality comes when child care is sorted out and it hasn't been yet, well not for those who really need it anyway What does Lessing mean by this?
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:04 PM
7

But that would be equal justice! ...
/r/MensRights13/11/13 03:42 PM
2

excellent!
/r/MensRights13/11/13 03:31 PM
-2

Free to spout the government propaganda You can worship whatever you want except if you live in Waco, or you''re muslim and you'd like to get past the TSA.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 01:52 AM
-4

We're free to speak English to the NSA's mass surveillance and the TSA, to protest illegal wars / 4 million prisoners / drug war / rendition / water boarding etc... etc.. See how free people were before WWII . See how free we are now...
/r/MensRights11/11/13 01:51 AM
-6

They died for our freedoms? How did that work out?
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:48 PM
1

indeed
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:09 PM
7

I think a a accumulation of different factors in Japan: career is important, both parents need to work, working mothers are disregarded, husbands have to be the exclusive breadwinners, etc... young adults make the rational decision that joining this insane rat-race leads to unhappiness so they throw everything out including intimacy/sex because the rest is too costly.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 11:47 PM
4

I think one of the main issue is economic. The Japanese government has gutted the Japanese economy with its monetary policy in the last couple of decades. Both parents now have to work, but tradition prevents this. So it''s a clusterfuck(less)
/r/MensRights20/10/13 11:41 PM
1

Again, no reasoned arguments from first principal - just vitriol and unsubstantiated sweeping statements You don't your Quebec government for what it is: Might makes right.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:54 PM
2

My reasoning is sound, and the enlightenment wasn't a U.S only phenomenon which makes your argument pointless anyway. The US was the first to issue a constitution. It doesn't matter to the principle either way. Should a country do something because others do so too? How about just evaluating if it's the right or wrong thing to do? Furthermore, I watched your video. It's propaganda. I can find dozens of videos just like this that have been produced since Obama introduced his healthcare plan a few…
/r/MensRights04/10/13 06:14 PM
0

I'm just applying your reasoning-process/principal to other circumstances to show you it is not a valid argumentation. But it's clear you missed that. In any case, watch the videos I linked to if you want to find out more about Canadian Healthcare. Don't watch them if you want to stay ignorant on the topic and face the consequences when one day you have to rely on your local medical services.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:39 PM
5

don't you find it odd that the U.S is the only developed nation on the planet without it? So in 1766 where people were serfs in the rest of the world, was it odd that the Americans drafted the constitution and granted themselves personal freedoms and rights? Should a country do something because others do so too? How about just evaluating if it's the right or wrong thing to do? Do you really think the rest of the world is wrong and misguided? How arrogant. Define rest of the world? Aren't you a …
/r/MensRights03/10/13 06:35 PM
1

I suggest you watch The Truth about Obamacare to understand how socialized medicine is the worst thing if your aim is to heal people.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 03:34 PM
9

Exactly. Will they use the service more, if so they should pay more. Simple
/r/MensRights03/10/13 03:30 PM
2

stereotypical hate cops, hate the government, likes pot Because you like cops? You know those people with costumes who can legally lie/beat you and will escalate any situation to your caging/death if you don't obey their dictates. Remember, cops are minutes away when seconds count. You love the government too? You know those people that use cops to enforce their decisions on you by force and steal your money through taxation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGMQZEIXBMs for more details ;-) Enjoy.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 05:03 PM
1

the state
/r/MensRights15/09/13 03:22 AM
1

Welcome to the Statist paradise we live in ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P772Eb63qIY
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:53 PM
1

Your country? What exactly do the policies of a group of people who forcefully extract money from you and coerce you into obeying their dictates have to do with you?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:44 PM
1

Indeed. School Sucks Podcast has a lot about this.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:23 PM
9

to love reading, learning and knowledge School is pretty good at killing any love for learning and turning any topic into a bore. Why would you expect anything else? It's all based on coercion so you always get the opposite of what you want.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:37 PM
7

I did state "performed the same". So if any of the reasons you detail affect productivity then it would affect compensation, such as getting pregnant or lack of education.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 03:01 PM
6

No they wouldn't. They pay what people are prepared to accept and the market ready to bear. If women and blacks were paid half but performed the same, they would be the only employees in the economy as companies seek to maximize profits. One would be mad to do otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:35 PM
1

The police serve the public and their actions are a matter of public record If they served the public, they would not cage them for not paying their salaries (i.e. taxes). The NSA scandal would also point to the fact that what they do is not public record.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:25 PM
-3

why shouldn't he? Any person has the right to share evidence in his or her defense. I didn't say he didn't have to right. Just wanted the background for why he released it. If it was clear himself then that makes sense. If it was a revenge thing, then less so. they were living together. Whose name is on the lease / title? idk. Unless the house or lease is entirely legally in her name, he doesn't have an obligation to leave. Gotcha
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:31 PM
-1

The video you linked is libertarian video against social programs, and I think easily refuted. Humor me I don't see how it is relevant to excessive force by police. The police main mandate is the initiation of force. So it it indeed relevant.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:29 PM
2

hat said, I try not to be too hard on cops in general. They are often in high pressure situations, and anytime someone has authority and weaponry, there will be abuse. It's human nature. Ya, it's so tough being a trained cop walking around with body armor, tasers, guns and the full force of the state behind you to excuse anything you do. Cops are just minutes away, when seconds count... Google "George Ought to Help" video
/r/MensRights02/08/13 05:09 PM
-27

Any idea why he publicly released the footage? Seems a bit inappropriate for something so personal. Wonder if they are still together. Not clear from the video why he couldn't just leave. Was he locked in?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:58 PM
3

Maybe he's finally meet his match. They seem perfect for each other.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:20 PM
1

Picking a specific action (murder) and calling it a universal moral good in itself is admittedly foolish. Murder is an action with a moral implication. Killing is just an action. Just like rape is not the same as sex, or theft the same as taking something. They have clear moral implications. However, it does not follow that if murder is not suitable as a universal moral good, that it is never a good thing. Again, I refer you to the UPB book excerpt about lifeboat scenarios which I pasted above. …
/r/MensRights01/08/13 03:22 PM
1

It is valuable because it is true, and can guide the development of heuristical decision algorithms. In other words, it should render better moral performance when used as a standard than false theories. Heuristical decision algorithms are just models too - based on the utilitarian theory of subjective maximization. Why your utilitarian theory is true and others not, you have not clarified. In addition, you state that by definition it cannot be accurately calculated. So by definition it is imper…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 03:16 PM
1

It is not a requirement for the true morality that it be easily computable. Why should it be? What is the value of a moral standard which is not 'computable'? How can you justify using force against people using a moral standard you yourself admit cannot be computed. So you are saying emotions are not real? That the feelings I experienced when eating lunch earlier didn't actually exist? Your emotions exist, but they are not objective. Summing everyone's emotion all up does not make them objectiv…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 02:59 AM
1

UPB states that if you make the universal moral statement "murder is the moral good" then it is not a consistent and logical moral standard. 'Life' or 'death' are not universal statements of morality. They just exist. It is like saying the universal statement "Gravity applies to all mass" which is consistent, logical and universal. And 'Gravity' itself is not universally preferable to 'anti-gravity'. They just exist.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 02:53 AM
1

You are confused. I am indeed confused that you have not addressed any of the points I raised. A shame. For example, you managed to assume that goodness of an action is somehow related praiseworthiness of an agent. Praising is an action in itself which must have its own consequences evaluated. That much should have been fairly obvious. No, I'm saying you can compare an action to a universal standard to determine if it is moral or not. No agent nor praise involved. the best decision (the one that…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:55 AM
5

But it's ok when a rape victim is dragged through a trial accusing them of bringing a false accusation? Where do you get this from my comment? Neither are ok.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:37 AM
2

We don't need them if they aren't interested in being there. Women have shown they have little interest in STEM, even though their entry requirements are typically lower. We don't have many ex-tennis pros in STEM. Should we push them to do STEM? We need diversity right? /s ;)
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:31 PM
2

Proving a false rape accusation beyond reasonable doubt would be equally hard. If the rapist is well connected and the justice system corrupted by them, then everything goes out the window and a conviction for false rape accusation is the least of your worries.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:10 PM
4

The standards might be high, but in the end rape cases can easily come down to he-said, she-said In that case, it will be hard to prosecute the person for false rape too. When it is clear cut case of fraud like here, then prosecuting them is easy.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:48 PM
2

not to mention it wastes police time perusing an imaginary goose. you'd rather the cops spend their time locking up people for victimless crimes? ;)
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:45 PM
1

Part II Any ethical theory that throws out consequences also takes the risk of sacrificing real people to preserve some abstract ideal. Honor before reason. Universal ethics does not throw out consequences. With regards to your train crash example, here is an excerpt from the UPB book in the Chapter 3 "Lifeboat Scenarios" The fact that UPB only validates logically consistent moral theories does not mean that there can be no conceivable circumstances under which we may choose to act against the t…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 07:00 PM
1

Part I Because if it's not fair, then we may be entirely justified in interfering at times. Not always, but at least some of the time. So because you think people voluntarily exchanging stuff doesn't fit your goals, then you will aggress against them? And you call that fair?? What you're refusing to understand is that the mere requirement humans have of needing resources to survive means that all humans participate in the market on threat of death right out of the box What threat of death are yo…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 07:00 PM
0

But ask any politician, military men or cop and they'll tell you their selfless acts are for the benefit of the society. Doing harm to those who disagree and don't comply is the paramount of selflessness...
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:44 PM
0

Selfishness of the few maybe. The root cause is people's inability to reason from first principal. Theft, murder, fraud is bad - no matter who does it including government agents. The reason for this inability is the government educates them.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:08 AM
1

If you steal from Bob to survive, then it is still immoral but understandable given the circumstances. You should pay restitution to Bob for stealing his food, or come to some form of agreement/trade with him. I don't understand why this situation has to do with real life, and why your group of survivors could just go around pillaging because "they have to survive". The survivors would just have to come to an agreement with whoever they encounter. The state does not resolve this either. one hund…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:53 PM
1

It appears you've made your mind up, so I'm not sure why I'm writing this but I'll give it a shot. The market does not have to be perfectly fair. What does fair or meritocratic even mean? The free market is just people voluntarily trading with each other without using force. I really don't see why that is so hard to grasp. market outcomes are never going to be perfectly fair, nor even moderately fair without a good bit of outside intervention You mean pointing guns at people you don't agree with…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:45 PM
1

The video in the article showing the interview of a feminist and some random glamour model. Talk about debating on unequal terms. The glamour chick has no chance here as she is not versed in the issue. She's just saying there's a lot of money to be made, which is exactly the wrong perspective to adopt against the fascist feminist - who says "the evidence is clear" "studies have shown" bullcrap. How about pitting an feminist against an MRM?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:16 PM
0

Yes, but it's good to remind ourselves of the root cause of the issue here: government.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 02:42 PM
3

Because forcing people through force is never the solution. The same goes for forcing men to pay for child support without DNA proof. The state can never solve these issues. Instead it just points guns at people which leads to perverse side effects. Like what the MRAs are fighting for. Google Voluntaryism ;)
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:54 AM
1

;) you're welcome
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:50 AM
2

A woman whom has no criminal record due to luck yes. that is quite funny to me, as most people won't understand out of context but you and me ;)
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:35 AM
2

haha
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:25 AM
2

A woman whom has no criminal record You commit 3 felonies a day according to Silverglate's book. So if you don't have a criminal record by 18, you're just lucky. I'm sure there are plenty of things you did that were illegal (which you were aware of) but weren't caught. Looks like you're not good enough for your own standards...
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:16 AM
3

you don't want the state to make anything mandatory, otherwise it will lead to situations you mentioned. The state is force. No good ever comes from it.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:05 AM
2

Only the state can arbitrarily decide when their laws apply to you
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:34 PM
2

amazing...
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter