| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | How would you raise your daughter to understand equality? | Marriage/Children | DopeDetective | /r/MensRights | 30/10/20 06:43 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Some women just wanna be treated like little childrenthese women need to grow up but I also think part of the problem is that the majority of us were raised by people from an era when married/partnered women weren't allowed to work and the ideals they taught their kids didn't evolve for modern times. married women didnt become a common part of the labor force until 1970-80 (40% of married women were working compared to 12% in 1960 and 5% in 1940) women didn't work, they raised the kids & kept house. when women started working, the kids and house k… | /r/MensRights | 19/05/21 05:19 PM |
| 8 | Dad Sues Mom for 'Tricking' Him into Believing 3 Sons Were His for 21 YearsI think to the kids, him suing her is like him saying "I dont want those kids and I want back everything I put into them since they're not mine" & that would hurt as kids who view him as their real father that's probably not what he's saying at all, he just wants the woman to face consequences, id hope he still loves his sons hopefully one day they will understand | /r/MensRights | 05/05/21 03:11 AM |
| 21 | Dad Sues Mom for 'Tricking' Him into Believing 3 Sons Were His for 21 YearsI think we should focus on the mom, not the kids, they were also deceived by that woman. their world & what they thought was true was also ripped away from them. they just found out they've never known their bio dad. but they probably think of the man who raised them as their real father and there is probably some conflict in their heads like "why does it matter, why sue, dont you love us either way, aren't we still your sons, wouldn't you have supported us anyway". one day they will hopefully u… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/21 03:07 AM |
| 0 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/20/unemployment-men-lose-job-self-esteem I do agree with people unemployment shouldn't even be a gendered issue. it doesbt matter who has lost more jobs, its bad all around | /r/MensRights | 05/05/21 12:41 AM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenyeah i mean that's not entirely accurate for me to say 100% of jobs lost were women though. that was just the net outcome. men may have lost their jobs but overall saw a net gain of 16,000 jobs while some women may have gotten new jobs but overall saw a net loss of 140,000 jobs. but my guess would be that it's because most jobs lost were in housecare, childcare & healthcare and those jobs are mostly women. there are men in those fields and may have lost their jobs as well but there was a net gai… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 09:39 PM |
| 3 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womeni do apologize for my aggressive and rude attitude. it's unnecessary & it doesn't add anything to the conversation or cause. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 09:30 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenwell in that specific month, it was only women but not because they are women (necessarily) but because of the specific jobs they tend to have. I think that's worth addressing in the future but during a pandemic, yes, I guess I agree it's not adding to the conversation to gender this specific conversation about job loss. but I also think it shouldn't be ignored moving forward. ive seen more than one post on reddit by a man saying that he hates that our society has created this "creepy" identity … | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 09:26 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenthe redundancy increase was reported as a percentage. so does that imply that the 3% increase in male redundancy is insignificant because more men are also working? but women are 76% higher redundancy despite having the same increase in people working as men since the percent of workforce remained the same | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 09:11 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womeneh thats your own personal reading problem & honestly, anyone who reads the headline and not the article which would clearly explain the statistics of the discrimination, is an idiot to begin with. and anyone who reads the article, understands the article, but still gets upset about a headline, should get a hobby. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 08:57 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenim not trying to say talking about men's rights themselves is shitting on women. but yes, im coming from a place of bias where I've been surrounded by toxic/abusive men my whole life and in my real life I've only seen men bring up their problems as a way to shut down a feminist or women in general & those specific people are shitting on women but not people who care about men's rights in general. I guess im just grasping for ways to get more media attention for men's experiences because just all… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 08:49 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than women"straight men experience discrimination" doesn't imply gay discrimination at all though. there's like a dozen different things it could be, one would need to read the article first to make a judgement, which is my whole point kinda, stop basing reaction on headlines | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 08:41 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womendid I say you specifically were shitting on women? when I read an article about another group of people I wonder what can be done to help them, I dont try to convince everyone that I or my group have it worse | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 08:35 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenthat was based on my original example of "straight men face gay discrimination" because i was trying to think of something controversial but then you said "no that still makes gay people the victims" so I said "okay the 'straight men face discrimination' headline works too'". at which point my original statement about gay discrimination no longer applied because you said that headline doesn't work, so just pretend I didn't say it. does that clear things up for you? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 08:30 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenI already said that "straight men face discrimination" is a totally okay headline I just felt with the other headline that I was providing an example of something other people would say is insignificant and not worth addressing but I think it still should be Even though people would find it controversial similar to saying women are suffering in the pandemic | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 08:20 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenI was just trying to come up with a headline that would be controversial but you could also say "straight men face sexual orientation discrimination" The article would still mostly be about homophobia or current gender norms but the headline would be controversial and click baity | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 08:09 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than women..... I said "straight men face gay discrimination" you said "straight men face discrimination" works better. I was just explaining why I originally specified gay discrimination | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 08:00 PM |
| 0 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenright but complaining about this article inside of a vacuum doesnt do anything to raise awareness about men's issues. why waste the energy panicking about this headline (because the article itself does talk about men, the jobs they've lost, & how we need to create more jobs for them) & perhaps just start spreading awareness on your own I mean maybe I've only known toxic men but I've never had a man bring up men's issues in real life a single time. it's literally always been to make a feminist sh… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 08:00 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womendid you know you can search an article for keywords using "find in page" on your browser? just a tip for next time you dont fully read an article but still want to engage in conversations about it | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:57 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenI said gay discrimination because one would assume only gay men experience that and how could we dare focus on straight men for something so significant to gay men? but straight men face discrimination also works I mean straight old white men face significant discrimination in the form of ageism for sure either people could read that article and be like "omg but black women face more discrimination" or you can not freak out over a head line and just read the article for the facts and accept that… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:55 PM |
| 2 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenfair enough. I do agree men's issues are often ignored. I guess I just wished I saw people bringing up these issues on their own. but maybe I'm just jaded by my personal experiences with toxic men. im sure there are men out there that speak up on these issues on their own and not just when they need to prove men have it worse than women. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:46 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenI guess it all comes down to personal reading comprehension ability if I read "Group 1 experiences thing A" I am capable of understanding that doesn't mean "Thing A primarily affects Group 1" or "Only Group 1 experiences Thing A". I mean hell, im even open to seeing the headline "straight men face gay discrimination" because it's true, even straight men are shamed for appearing what others perceive as gay & it can hurt them | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenim not backpedalling, im just saying that's what the article would realistically actually say, the idea you are presenting remains the same. white men are 1.9 out of 100,000 so the numbers are virtually the same so the article, while weirdly specific and far more specific than just male vs female, is still justified in spreading awareness. additionally, OPs article includes men in the actual text and since im a person who reads, im not gonna get upset about a headline when the article also talks… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:26 PM |
| 2 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenokay so you think men and women have the exact same workplace experiences & should be talked about as one? personally I see instances where it could be bad though. for example, saying that the country lost 20 million healthcare workers is one thing, saying they lost 100% of male Healthcare workers is an entirely different thing in an industry that is typically female (I made up this example) for a real life example, in the US, 100% of jobs lost in December 2020 were women. that's interesting to … | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:21 PM |
| 0 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenI personally think it's absolutely okay to raise awareness on the issue & I dont have an issue with that headline. i would never in a million years think that means the author doesn't believe women get breast cancer or that women's breast cancer is insignificant. in fact, we have so much awareness of breast cancer in women and marches and pins, etc, that it's actually probably important to have articles like that because I bet a lot of men don't even realize it's even possible at all to get brea… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:16 PM |
| 2 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womendropping rates of male enrollment in college is a years old problem, not specific to the pandemic, and has been written about. but I agree, men need more articles. that doesn't mean articles about women are bad or need to go away. it means men need their own conversations started. they deserve their own conversations. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:10 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenyou want to remove gender from all conversations moving forward? I mean, sure, yeah, im all for that. remove gender from everything if gender doesnt matter, im all on board | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:08 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenactually it's "black men face significant risk from breast cancer" are you saying it would be misleading & wrong to write that article? because it's 2.7 out of 100,000 black men but 1 in 8 women get it, so we should ignore the men and not provide any information or create awareness that it happens? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 07:06 PM |
| -2 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenand that is all absolutely awful & needs to be changed. why don't you make a dedicated post about that? why not write an article? I think all of that is tragic and it deserves it's own conversation. im tired of seeing men being used as nothing but a card to play when someone wants to shit on women. men deserve better than that. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 06:55 PM |
| -5 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenfrom my perspective, when I see women losing lots of jobs I dont think "but what about men" I think "this also hurts men" more women in the workplace has helped men. it helps families that there doesn't need to be just one man carrying all of the stress and being the breadwinner. men deserve to stay home with their kids too. so when i see women being pulled out of the workplace, I see that stress being added to men's shoulders. I dont see it as a competition of who has it worse | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 05:45 PM |
| -1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenso if there's something women experience more than men, we should never have an article talking about what men experience, Because they experience it less often? there should be no male rape victim article's for example? or at least no dedicated articles? because that would be misleading? no breast cancer in men articles? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 05:30 PM |
| -5 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenthere's also articles about men losing their jobs specifically. are those wrong and biased because women lose their jobs too? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 05:25 PM |
| 0 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenI just hope your "mens rights" opinions go beyond whining about others or men's rights are never gonna happen | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 05:23 PM |
| -1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenso you're admitting you didn't read the article if you didn't see where I found that quote? the article even specifically talks about what we should do to create more jobs for men... | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 05:22 PM |
| -3 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenits not a competition though! why does it need to be a competition of who has it worse? can't we just talk about both because as a society we need all people? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 05:21 PM |
| -2 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenwhile "discover housework" sounds bad, I dont think it's as bad as you think, in fact it's good for men maybe you'll disagree with me out of spite but through history men have been forced to be the bread winner, to carry the burden & stress of the entire family. many men genuinely did not & still do not consider staying home, childcare,, or housework to be a "man's job". but because of furloughs, many men forced to stay home are probably "discovering" it's not as bad as they thought, that it doe… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 05:18 PM |
| -1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenthat's not the headline. women are facing job risk. that's just a fact. it's concerning that it should be seen as propoganda I found an article by The Guardian titled "men losing their jobs are suffering in silence" if a woman posted that like "omg women lose their jobs too wtf", that would be stupid as hell, right??? Also percent of workforce that is women hasn't changed from 2008 until now so your argument doesn't work | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 05:04 PM |
| -6 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womena super basic search and I can find articles by The Guardian specifically talking about men losing their jobs and suffering and mens mental health. it would be stupid for a woman to post that and say "omg but what about women? women are losing jobs toooo!!!" right??? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 05:02 PM |
| -8 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenwhy do you assume a conversation about women is an instant attack on men? isn't that exhausting? it would do men a lot more honor if they had their own conversations. no one talks about men until they're angry about women and that's not fair, it stalls progress. why does no one think of men on a regular, average basis when they aren't being triggered? there needs to be a second article about men, because men have different experiences. it makes no sense to have this absurd demand that men and wo… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:53 PM |
| -5 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenso 300,000 more women got furloughed 32,000 more men were made redundant but they also see redundancies continuing in healthcare & service industries once furloughs are over & those industries are typically majority women | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:51 PM |
| -1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenif you read the article, why are you mad about the end where they say that they need to focus on a care-led recovery program that would create more jobs for men? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:48 PM |
| -4 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenredundancy is not the same as overall job loss, you understand that right? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:44 PM |
| -1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenI did and the fact that "Women face significant jobs risk during Covid pandemic, UK analysis finds" is a misleading statement to you when it's 100% accurate is mind boggling saying "women experience A" is NOT the same as saying "men do not experience A" and to frame it that way is ridiculous | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:41 PM |
| -26 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenit says "women are experiencing far higher levels of redundancy than in previous recessions" not "women are experiencing far higher levels of redundancy than men in previous recessions" "By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." so women actually did lose more jobs. job redundancy is something completely different | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:37 PM |
| -5 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenthe article is titled "Women face significant jobs risk during Covid pandemic, UK analysis finds" why do you feel that any conversation about women is instantly an attack on men? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:28 PM |
| -38 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenthe actual headline is "Women face significant jobs risk during Covid pandemic, UK analysis finds" what about that is inaccurate? just because a conversation focuses on women, does not mean it is an attack on men. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:27 PM |
| 1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than women"By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." job redundancy is only one factor. it's important to read articles and not click bait react to misinformation from others | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:20 PM |
| -1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than women"By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:19 PM |
| -1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenyou obviously didn't read the article "By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:18 PM |
| -2 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenyou obviously didn't read the article "By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:18 PM |
| -4 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenyou obviously didn't read the article "By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:17 PM |
| -5 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenthats not what the article says so im guessing you obviously didn't read the article "By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:17 PM |
| -6 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenyou obviously didn't read the article "By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:17 PM |
| -2 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenyou obviously didn't read the article "By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:17 PM |
| -1 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenyou obviously didn't read the article "By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:16 PM |
| -8 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenyou obviously didn't read the article "By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:15 PM |
| -51 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than womenim assuming you didn't actually read the article then | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:14 PM |
| -5 | Is this not blatant statistical manipulation? Title states 'women face significant jobs risk during covid pandemic' but when you read the article it turns out that men have become redundant in greater numbers than women"By the end of February 2021, 2,337,900 women were furloughed compared with 2,144,700 men." job redundancy was only a small portion of the numbers. keep reading. 52.1% of women were furloughed despite making up only 47.3% of the work force | /r/MensRights | 04/05/21 04:09 PM |
| 2 | How would you raise your daughter to understand equality?yeah def a step up from my dad's method of screaming in my face, giving up, and storming away when I didn't understand a math problem immediately haha. as much as I despise my dad, i guess I can thank him for showing me how NOT to parent and I have a first hand understanding of how that behavior can create destructive, long term consequences in the child. thankfully I decided thats not who I want to be, but my brother ended up more like him and he's kind of a huge dick to his gf (as my dad is to… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/20 03:45 AM |
| 1 | How would you raise your daughter to understand equality?I think about that a lot for many many things. I dont trust other parents to have their shit together so they'll teach their kid shitty stuff and then that kid will teach other kids their shitty ways. peer pressure is a real and powerful thing. wanting to fit in is a real and powerful thing. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/20 02:41 AM |
| 2 | How would you raise your daughter to understand equality?I've known dudes & women who were basically pathological liars. Idk if I believe that its purely because women assume they will be believed. I think lying on that level, most of the time, has to come from mental illness. not every time, but I would think a lot of the time. shame/guilt is a natural human emotion and to not feel that is something more. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/20 02:40 AM |
| 2 | How would you raise your daughter to understand equality?all children are taught not to lie so there must be more to that. and if she does genuinely experience assault, how do we handle that without letting her fall into the trap of hating/fearing all men? I think an extreme reaction to an extreme event is understandable but needs to be addressed and fixed. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/20 07:03 PM |
| 2 | How would you raise your daughter to understand equality?im talking like age 5. if you wait until she's old enough to understand statistics & comprehensive history then it's probably too late. studies have said that personality is largely set by age 8. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/20 06:56 PM |
| 1 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulyou sound like an awesome dad. im glad you were able to recognize this in yourself and your son and have given him the extra help you weren't afforded yourself. people just simply aren't one size fits all. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/20 11:41 AM |
| 1 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulbut you're ASSUMING that and an entire thread is now devoted to that assumption. seems like a bad move. seems like wasted time. people should make their point with their own life stories. let's hear some stories where a man was interrupted or unfairly called out or literally anything except just shitting on other people | /r/MensRights | 30/10/20 11:10 AM |
| 3 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulyou dont feel proud when you stand up for yourself? that's too bad, you should a lot of people have anxiety as well | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 11:29 PM |
| -1 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulyou dont understand why a woman might be intimidated by men and would feel proud she was able to speak up? plenty of men probably have the exact same story or feeling about speaking up to other men in authority or who are aggressive | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 10:54 PM |
| -2 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulmy bad, I didn't realize I was walking in on nothing more than a circle jerk. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 08:57 PM |
| 2 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulwomen telling literal true stories from their literal true lives is not a generalization about men nor is it sexism. but if you advocate that we should no longer use gender pronouns in conversation, I can understand why you might say that. its like "I met this black guy yesterday" and someone might say "why did you have to point out that they're black?". | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 08:55 PM |
| -5 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulshe posted on a subreddit about being a woman because she is a woman. there are tons of comments on there from people saying women do it, they do it themselves, or just people in general do it. it seems like clients/customers are often perpetrators. double standards exist for sure, this isn't one of them. if you tell a babbling Karen to stop interrupting and listen, no one gives a fuck. either way, why blast the original post if the issue is with the commenters? and not even all of them. sounds … | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 07:07 PM |
| 13 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulas someone with ADHD, I do not recognize when I'm interrupting people. my mouth moves faster than my brain. I need to be told. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulwhat does this post have to do with any of that? no one made any generalizations about any gender | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 06:48 PM |
| -8 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulthe original post makes no mention of this being a gender issue. only people here seem to think it is. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 06:46 PM |
| -6 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulyou mean exactly what OP did here? the original post is filled with comments from people saying EVERYONE interrupts and it's rude. the original post never once makes this a gendered issue. the person was a man, that's just a fact. you are the one making it a gender issue. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 06:45 PM |
| -9 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulso what was your point in posting this here instead of providing an example of how you were interrupted in your own life? | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 06:36 PM |
| 1 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulwhat generalization are you referring to in the original post? even the comments on the original post have people saying they know women like that too. it's about a woman who stood up for herself. in this specific incident it was a man interrupting her. that's just what happened, not a generalization about men. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 06:26 PM |
| -9 | Today I told a woman who was constantly interrupting me to stop talking and it felt wonderfulshe didnt say ALL men interrupt. she said THIS man interrupted her. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/20 06:24 PM |
| 3 | This is from India, don't let anyone tell you "women are really oppressed" in third world countries ! don't be fooled by the biased media that only report women's issues and ignore men's issues and female privilige.the truth is, if you're not rich you're oppressed, regardless of gender, and making it a competition of who has it worse only helps the oppressor and prevents progress | /r/MensRights | 18/08/20 04:35 PM |
| 2 | Hope this gains traction.i think they prefer saying feminism because it implies that while we are all equal, women specifically are not treated equal. what they forget is that it works both ways. men are not treated the same as women either. a woman has never felt the pressure to abandon her dreams to get a high pay job to single handedly support a family for instance. a woman has never had to fear showing emotion in the same way. women probably get more emotional support in general. i think the problem is that everyone… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/20 12:32 AM |
| 2 | Hope this gains traction.those women are lying but feminism is not. it has a definition, that doesnt change. definitions dont change based on who is using the word. Nazis called themselves socialists, they were not socialists. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/20 12:16 AM |
| 2 | Hope this gains traction.they are not feminists if they say that. the definition of feminism is equality. if they aren't preaching equality, they aren't preaching feminism. we can't let these people co-op a word that is about equality. it's wrong. we need to tell them they are wrong. they don't get to corrupt our words just because they are women. basically, if we start acting like words have no meaning, how do we even have a conversation anymore? how do we communicate if people can just make words mean whatever they wa… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/20 12:05 AM |
| -6 | “Hi I am a feminist who likes to play a hysterical advocate because men’s struggles and rights are theoretical to me. I am here to exhaust you so I can stop progress & maintain a status quo, which serves me. I am not interested in learning, your frustration is my main goal.”50% of feminism is about helping men. just because FEM is in the worst doesnt mean it's exclusively about women. it's about equality, which would affect both genders EQUALLY. feminism isnt just about asking for stuff, it's about teaching women that it's time for us to start contributing equally in all areas, we just also want equal compensation. anyone who says/does otherwise is not preaching or acting on feminist ideology. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 04:20 PM |
| 4 | Hope this gains traction.just because it's a woman doing something, doesnt mean it's feminist. the definition of feminism is equality. this is not equality, its assault, and it's not feminist. women arent born feminists and women are half the problem when it comes to achieving feminism. I know the syllable FEM is in it, which I think confuses people and makes them think it's just about giving stuff to women but its not. the same way "toxic masculinity" confuses people. it's not that masculinity is toxic, it's that there… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 04:13 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter