TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DoppelGangHer88 Archive

View 1 posts and 764 comments by DoppelGangHer88 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

DoppelGangHer88/r/RedPillWives19/07/21 04:34 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

You can say that without the needlessly shaming language.
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 10:44 PM
1

The misandry is strong in this one.
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 10:41 PM
1

Motherfuckin' preach.
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 10:07 PM
-2

The fact that the original comment is so heavily down voted; despite not being abusive, not to mention being completely true; strongly belies this statement.
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 10:06 PM
1

Okay; I hear and appreciate that. I didn't realize you were explaining instead of expressing. Thanks for that :)
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 10:00 PM
1

Well, that sucks and is emblematic of the issue, at hand. If a woman makes a generalized statement describing her social status based on sex, the most common reply is commisseration and empathy. This person didn't say "always" anything. He made a generalized statement of fact. Almost every metric has women being punished less than men for doing the same thing; I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and presume you already know a lot of the instances I'm talking about. The comparison isn'…
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 09:56 PM
-1

Thats ridiculous. Men suffer legal and social oppression. We can't get to a mutual understanding between the sexes until we can understand, internalize and work against that fact. Men did it for women's rights but now that the tables are turned, it's a back and forth?
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 09:42 PM
-1

Honestly you would think a red pill sub would already know this. From what I've seen, unfortunately this place has some female-chauvanist, blue-pilled indoctrination going on.
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 09:39 PM
-2

It's not sometimes. Women literally have more legal rights and social privileges than men do. Some individual women have it harder than some individual men but women, as a class, have it easier than men, as a class.
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 09:37 PM
-5

Why is this getting so many downvotes?
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/23 08:25 PM
6

Such a beautiful comment and sorely needed by a SAHM with two littles under 2 on her second day without Daddy's support during paternity leave. Thank you.
/r/RedPillWomen15/01/23 04:03 AM
1

You're 33 and you only have a limited amount of time left. Love is grand but not having biological children is a lifelong decision that's about to fall through your grasp and if it's something you want and don't attain because you let your emotions stop you from pursuing your dream, you'll regret it for the rest of your life. You can love him and recognize that this relationship doesn't fit in with your vision of a life that you want. You have to pick one and be at peace with your choice.
/r/RedPillWomen12/01/23 10:48 PM
1

The feel-good-Koolaide is too good to resist for most of us modern women. We're fed it from the time we're children and grow up thinking it's water.
/r/RedPillWomen12/01/23 10:43 PM
9

She doesn't teach the class, she just hosts the platform. The people teaching the class are wives. They're using her platform because she has a big audience. Sounds like a good idea to me; especially seeing her female audience are other women who want to learn how to be good wives, she's just setting them up together, like a mentoring program. Edit: As far as I can tell, there's no paid subscription, it's just another YT channel.
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/23 07:33 PM
9

She said she's doing it for herself, too. I think it's smart to look to women who are successfully living the lifestyle you aspire to.
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/23 07:23 PM
2

Very true. I do love to see feminists and misandrists humbled, though. That's why I watch. Also, a lot of women have never heard these talking points, so it's good that this information is getting more eyes and mainstream attention.
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/23 07:22 PM
2

I don't see anything wrong with that, tbh.
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/23 07:01 PM
5

Didn't she just make a new podcast bringing on happy wives to teach women how to be wives? I think it's called Wife School.
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/23 06:39 PM
6

That's a very weird question. Are you not? All of society has skin in the game of women's reproductive health; we literally wouldn't exist without it. Not to mention, I'm a woman.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 09:56 PM
4

Please stop acting like this doesn't represent a significant portion of women. Several industries claim hardship keeping women or encouraging them to pursue furthering their careers after giving birth because they'd rather put work on the back-burner or quit altogether to raise their children. You can try to bully people into ignoring their natural instincts but all it does is create more harm.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 09:48 PM
2

That's why modern women are the most medicated for anxiety and depression and report the most unhappiness of several generations preceding them. We got sold a lie and are living out it's consequences.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 09:44 PM
1

Men don't have a significant age-based barrier around having children. They also don't possess the evolutionary motherly instinct to nest and nature, rather they possess the instinct to protect and provide. Considering the fact that children raised by a single father have better outcomes and are at less danger of child abuse and neglect than their counterparts who are raised by single mothers, I'd say fathers are more equipped to handle that challenge successfully. Having said all that, the opti…
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 09:42 PM
1

You can't police what men want or are attracted to. If the kind of man she wants wouldn't like her tattoos, no amount of peer-pressure is going to change his mind.
/r/RedPillWomen09/12/22 10:30 PM
2

That would make no sense for her legal team to not decry her innocence at trial, especially as an American citizen. It would make no sense for her team in the US, even her family and spouse to not mention that she was innocent. Everyone is saying that her sentence was too harsh, not that she didn't do it. That's because she did it.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 11:14 AM
5

What about Marc Fogel? He was a US citizen working as a teacher in Russia, prescribed medical marijuana in the US for debilitating chronic back injury and brought some over to Russia thinking his doctor's note would get him through. He's serving 14 years and was arrested in 2018. That's all well and good about Whelan but according to our intelligence agencies, he was set up by the Russian government and being used as a political prisoner. Him not being a perfect victim has nothing to do with it.…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:15 AM
6

Neither she nor her team ever denied that she brought marijuana into Russia. She definitely did it.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:05 AM
17

"2. Voluntarily declared child- If a woman has a child and you aren’t married, but you sign a voluntary declaration of paternity or the birth certificate after the child is born, you are acknowledging that you are the father of that child. By doing this, you will be declared the father of that child and will be obligated to support that child. If it’s later determined that the child is not your biological child, depending on the child’s age and other circumstances, you may be able to set aside y…
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 02:14 AM
17

How is domestic violence a women's rights issue? It's not gendered.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 02:28 AM
2

Sterilization isn't killing babies. That's the crux of the argument. Adults can consent to sterility if they want to.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 10:50 PM
0

A woman already has that right; whether or not abortion is legal. Women aren't forced to "mother" children, the argument is that they shouldn't be allowed to kill children. If she becomes pregnant, she's already a mother; all the abortion does is transform her into a mother who's killed her child. Big distinction. The choice of whether or not to become pregnant is before the sexual act, not after.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 07:43 PM
2

Sure! D&E abortions are particularly brutal and unethical. They should be banned, outright except in extraordinary circumstances. Don't you agree?
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 07:10 PM
-2

Their lives didn't change unintentionally; everyone knows PiV sex comes with a risk of pregnancy, even if you use counter-measures. If they intentionally committed the one sexual act that results in procreation, they signed up for the inherent risk. Giving birth doesn't mean you have to raise a child and death isn't better than being poor or having a hard life. At the least, that's not a decision we should be making for anyone; especially a baby.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 06:33 PM
0

Women aren't forced to parent; mothers are able to drop their newborns off in a safe location with no questions asked; able to put their child up for adoption, even in some cases, without the father's consent; and able to give up parental responsibility to the state via foster care. It's a different story for men but that's a whole separate discussion.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 06:29 PM
22

As a woman who recognizes the second-class status of men and understand their consternation and resentment, I understand where you're coming from and I can't fault you for any of this. It's just sad it has to be this way. As an aside, there aren't any rights Western women don't have; so it's redundant to fight for "women's rights" here, anyway.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 02:39 AM
2

Most common reasons for divorce, namely the ones I stated aren't good reasons for divorce. The fact that you think there are millions of reasons illustrate how unimportant making good on your promised commitment in a marriage has become to a lot of women; that's a bad thing. It's true that infidelity is a common reason for divorce, but women are more likely to forgive that and stay in a marriage for that reason than men are. There's a good reason for that because it puts paternity at risk. That'…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 07:22 PM
2

I'm a woman. I don't know what about asking what "changing" after years together implies I'm a man, but okay. I don't know why you would bring up a stark outlier as supporting evidence for why people divorce; some of the most common reasons are money, different values (which should be vetted before marriage), lack of communication and too much arguing and conflict (which should be consistently worked on before and after marriage), and getting married too young. Mothers killing their children are…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 07:05 PM
3

Women in the 70s and 80s reported being happier and modern women are the most depressed/anxious they've been for generations.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 06:51 PM
1

There's plenty of evidence to support that argument. Countries with the highest gender parity show the starkest gender differences in regards to choice.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 06:50 PM
-2

Actually, polls consistently show that men are more likely to be pro-life or want more restrictions on abortion than women.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 06:49 PM
1

Why wouldn't a woman inquire about the desirability for marriage to men? Your doubt implies that a woman wouldn't care about what a marriageable man wants, and while that may be true for modern women, women who actually care about men do care about that. People don't just "become" a certain way. There are always mitigating factors, red flags and hints at certain behaviors that show themselves early. That's why the vetting process is so important and why consistently working on communication, mak…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 06:38 PM
2

I'm asking for your opinion and why do you assume I'm a man? Marriage effects women as well, it's incumbent on women who want to get married to make sure it's advantageous for both parties to make it desirable. I didn't say it HAS to be permanent, I specifically said it's SUPPOSED to be. Your characteristic wasn't that someone was abusive or addicted to drugs, your description was a very vague assumption that they "changed after years together." What does that even mean? You're supposed to be ch…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:51 PM
2

What does that have to do with getting a divorce? Getting married is supposed to be permanent and for better or worse. If marriage is so mercurial and divorce so unfairly rewarding for women, what's the incentive for men to ever get married?
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:18 PM
-1

I didn't say happiness doesn't matter; I said that it's not the primary goal of marriage. Happiness isn't something someone else can give you; it's a personal endeavor requiring work on each individual's part after they've decided that it's something they want to pursue. That's where "pursuit of happiness" comes from. Commitment and duty are the cornerstone of a marriage. It's what separates mature, enduring love (pragma) and selfless love (agape) both of which are necessary to forming a lasting…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:57 PM
0

Because you're automatically assuming that those women divorce because of "nonsense" which doesn't mean anything and just serves to insinuate that a relationship breakdown is because of the man. Whenever feminists are confronted with choices women make (because women initiate divorce more often and men are more likely to stay in a marriage even if it isn't perfect) they always have some excuse as to why the woman wasn't at fault. Women need men. Happiness is not the main goal of a marriage; feel…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:20 PM
1

That's exactly the type of misandrist generalization I'll be instructing my sons to avoid. Women who don't like men always tell on themselves.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:09 PM
2

Then I'll remind him that he's setting himself up for failure as statistically that's the kind of woman that's the most likely to divorce.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:37 PM
15

I don't think so. It's just that society doesn't largely see female violence (i.e. killing unborn or even born children, paternity fraud, enlisting men to fight/kill other men via manipulation or lies, female perpetrated rape and child abuse, etc.) as violence or the same level of violence as that perpetrated by men.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 06:21 AM
1

Congrats! If what you're saying is true, you're an outlier in that you managed to miss the "long march through the institutions" for your ritual indoctrination, but obviously you picked it up from somewhere; surely you must know how hegemonic your philosophy is in academia at large, so it was a fair assumption. I wonder if you were already inculcated into the fold, or if you picked it up from elsewhere. No matter; they still got you. I had a variety of points, none of which you addressed in any …
/r/MensRights29/10/22 06:14 AM
1

Nice; that's right: just ignore everything I said because you can't refute any of it; resort to your ideological elite in the mainstream media as an appeal to authority because they tell you what to think and say; don't think for yourself or formulate your own thoughts in your own words. Just regurgitate. Just obey. You sure are an apt little pupil; just like they taught you to be.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:22 AM
1

That's correct. Let me guess, you believe black people are simple creatures who don't have the intellectual or moral capacity to exist on a spectrum like those all-powerful white folks, right? Oops, sweetie: your racism is showing.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:42 AM
1

You're hilarious; truly. The left's appropriation of words, unabashed ideological hubris and fetishistic adherence to your biased and incredibly ignorant cultural stereotypes truly knows absolutely no bounds, whatsoever. I'm literally a pregnant black woman. You don't post any evidence because you have none, only the hatred you project onto me. Go take a nap, you need one.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:38 AM
1

You say, without any examples or refutations whatsoever. All your side is is double-speak and empty promises.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:29 AM
1

No, the cops aren't leftists but the DAs sure are; put into power by leftist non-profits and big names behind the scenes like George Soros. We had the son of a literal terrorist, with a long line of Marxist relatives, as the DA here in the Bay Area who used his political power to get his murderous father out of a life sentence right before he got kicked out on his ass for helping to destroy the city with crime thanks to his disastrous leftist policies. I've gone out and lived; you and I aren't t…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:26 AM
2

Don't project your lack of knowledge onto me. Just because you don't know a word doesn't mean others are equally uninformed. Oikophobia means a repudiation of your home and heritage. You benefitted from this "capitalistic hellscape" and yet instead of passing on the inheritance your ancestors worked to give you, you want to pull up the ladder behind you and burn it all to the ground. I didn't say you weren't fortunate; you are simply by (I'm assuming) being born in the West. I called you spoiled…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:53 AM
1

Hopelessly ideological, oikophobic, spoiled, Marxist communist. Sad. Milquetoast conservatism has nothing to do with the far-right.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:12 AM
2

Oh I forgot to mention, my firstborn son is 2 and my newest son is still in the womb, due in two weeks! I was an atheist until fairly recently, now I'm considering entering a church environment largely to surround ourselves with more traditional-valued people; but that's me, personally. I think the most important thing is to encourage them to find a younger girl who isn't obsessed with social media, family-oriented and who shows loyalty over time as well as submissive and interdependent traits. …
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:11 AM
5

That's what girls naturally like. It's not forced upon them. Plenty of studies have shown that there are gender-preferred toys.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:11 AM
1

Projection. You're the fascist.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:06 AM
0

The West is a joke.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:02 AM
2

Appreciate that :)
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:46 AM
2

I think that's good general advice, but unless my sons want to get into a specialized field, I won't be encouraging them to go to college or particularly to seek college-educated women, especially those with aspirations for advanced degrees; as those seem to be the women most likely to initiate divorce. I think it's good to go after younger women with less baggage though and for my sons to wait as long as possible to give commitment to one woman.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:46 AM
0

I know you're right but I think it's the best situation in which to bring up children and I hope my boys are able to find women who will do right by them; preferably in an at-fault state with an iron-clad prenup agreement.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:44 AM
2

If I've done my job right, they'll already know our expectations and act according to their own best interest. Namely, abstaining from women who are attention-seeking, promiscuous, "independent," masculine, overly-educated/indoctrinated or feminist.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:42 AM
11

As a happily married woman with two sons, I'm personally breathing a sigh of relief. Nothing is worse than the dating market right now and moving forward I'll be strictly vetting the women my sons bring home and teaching them to largely ignore women until they're emotionally and/or financially attractive enough to get someone of quality. By the time they're ready to get out there, I'm betting there will be more women clamoring for good men, maybe by then more of us will have learned our lesson.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:22 AM
-1

Normal adults recognize cause and effect, don't talk out of both sides of their mouths and don't make excuses for bad behavior. You don't belong in a debate if you're not mature enough to understand sinple concepts like that. Good luck!
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:28 PM
-1

You asked why I said you should take your own advice re: growing up. Mature adults don't keep parroting lies as if they're true all while refusing to use the myriad of resources available to educate themselves. Child support has a definition already, you can't just make your own up, little girl. Just like being a SAHM means I don't pay for anything, making your assumption wrong and you pig-headed and stubborn for continuing to bring it up as if you're saying something, when you're not. You have …
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:25 PM
1

There you go again caring more about your personal feelings than logic. Just say you want female supremacy and be done with it.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:15 PM
0

I just said I'm not. You can't just change definitions to fit your narrative, married people don't pay child support, they support their children. Child support is definitionally what the state makes you pay after the end of a marriage or relationship, duckie.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:14 PM
1

Go look up the stats re: single mothers raising children and then get back to me. Particularly how many of them end up in prison.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:07 PM
1

That's not the same as child support, darling. Besides, I don't pay for anything I'm a SAHM.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:06 PM
1

Which is it do you care about society's burden or do you want women to be able to do whatever they want while everyone pays for it?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:02 PM
1

You accused me of not wanting to pay child support for my kid,I said I don't have to because I got married before I had children and apparently that concept was so foreign to you that you claimed to not know what I was talking about
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:01 PM
1

You're unable to separate your emotions from logic.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:55 PM
1

But society will be impacted if that kid is not taken care of. And based on statistics regarding single motherhood, chances are they won't be.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:53 PM
1

Women can't get pregnant without the assistance of a man, she's harboring half of his DNA, he should absolutely get a say in what happens to his progeny. I'm pro-life, but there should be consequences for attaining sperm through stealth or fraud and we shouldn't be incentivizing women unilaterally choosing to be single mothers. There's things that can be done besides giving women ultimate power over life and death. Being able to carry children shouldn't give you the right to kill.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:46 PM
1

Evidently not.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:41 PM
1

Right, so like I said, prevention is the best choice, followed by adoption to give the potential child the best chance not to be a burden on society.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:40 PM
1

What's confusing?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:36 PM
3

Except that women have abortion. So, for us, having sex is not in fact consenting to having a child. We also benefit from the power dynamic of having natural, increased sexual agency, significantly more birth control products as well as the institutional power to not have consequences for fraud or rape when it comes to having that child. Women have options and entitlements, men have responsibilities.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:49 AM
1

I don't have to pay child support because I got married before I got pregnant. Now what?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:14 AM
1

Society isn't making the baby, two individual people are. Those are the people who should have to deal with it, not everyone else. You should take your own advice, little girl.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:13 AM
1

I'm not perfect, I'm just not stupid and I take responsibility for the mistakes I do make. That's called being an adult.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:11 AM
1

Then you pay yourself and let other people opt out.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:10 AM
1

Ridiculous. Pregnancy isn't accidental with dozens of forms of birth control, as well as simply knowing the natural consequences of PiV sexual intercourse. Having to deal with the consequences of your actions isn't being punished, unless you're being punished by nature itself. I don't believe in abortion; I don't believe in helping people destroy lives through killing their babies or making stupid, negligent decisions with reproduction either.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:09 AM
1

Me, too but that doesn't mean we all need to pay for it, either.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:05 AM
3

You mean men don't have any reproductive rights. That is the point.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:00 AM
1

Getting pregnant and giving birth is a unilateral decision most of the time. If a woman chooses to have a baby and raise a child by herself, that's her body, her choice and her responsibility. You could also get married and bypass that altogether.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:56 AM
1

No, they don't. A single mother and a child isn't a family it's a broken home. No one should be advocating for or choosing that.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:50 AM
1

That was just a suggestion; one available option. You could just get married before having a child or not get pregnant in the first place.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:48 AM
1

Choices having consequences is realistic and facts don't care about your feelings; but if you want to speak purely on emotion, the fact is that if you felt for women and children, you would care more about disincentivizing single motherhood and incentivizing giving birth in wedlock.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:47 AM
1

That's why people see women as children; so many of us are too swayed by emotion and not at all by logic.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:35 AM
1

Children from single parent homes don't fare well. Welfare doesn't save you from poverty, it isn't a father, nor does it save you from the myriad of statistical setbacks and psychosocial damage not having an intact household brings. All welfare is is a band-aid and a burden on everyone else.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:33 AM
1

Oh, well. Choices have consequences.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:29 AM
1

Then do that. If someone can't take care of their child, that childs best interest should come first.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:26 AM
2

Choosing to become a single mother is purposefully putting yourself into financial hardship. Just don't do it.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:25 AM
1

Society shouldn't be incentivizing bad life choices.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:22 AM
1

I'm suggesting that someone who chooses to make terrible decisions shouldn't be incentivized in those decisions by tax payers. They should have to pay for it themselves or rely on charity.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:21 AM
6

Except that after the sex act, men don't have any options while women have several. So one incurs responsibility while the other gets to abdicate theirs. It's not just abortion, men don't have any reproductive rights, at all.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:19 AM
4

I actually didn't make an argument, I simply took yours to its logical conclusion and poked holes in your motivations.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:11 AM
4

If you were being consistent with your statement, then no women would have the right to kill their baby after having consensual sex. You're the one who said: If you are having unprotected sex that is one of the risks you’re taking. Don’t take the risk if you can’t handle the consequences. But you're supporting women having an out in order to not handle the consequences of their consensual choices. So, you don't actually believe that, you support women having consequence-free sex and men having r…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:00 AM
5

We've just come full circle. If a woman willingly has unprotected sex with a man, how is that not "consent" for having their child? Why is it then her right to kill that child that she consented to conceiving? Like you said: there are many ways to avoid getting pregnant; in this case, many times more ways on the woman's side, giving her a power disparity over the man. "If you are having unprotected sex that is one of the risks you’re taking. Don’t take the risk if you can’t handle the consequenc…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:48 AM
9

If fairness were considered even a little bit, there would be legal consequences for female stealthing, fertility fraud, paternity fraud, and male victims of rape wouldn't have to pay child support but that's not the world we live in. Women are able to have consequence-free sex, regardless of who it hurts, even to the point of killing another person, while men have to just accept their second-class status. Your, and wider society's attitude is consequences for men and none for women; that's fema…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:34 AM
7

Men are forced into paternity in all places. Men can't terminate fathering children after having consensual sex; women can. This is an obvious disparity. If you really believed that consent to sex is consent to the consequences of that sex, you'd agree that abortion should be illegal. Instead you're using that as a Motte-and-Bailey to push female chauvinism.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:27 AM
7

You already made the argument for why it should be illegal: If you are having unprotected sex that is one of the risks you’re taking. Don’t take the risk if you can’t handle the consequences.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:11 AM
1

Right; so just as the man has no power to kill that child that resulted from his consent, neither should the woman. You've just reiterated my point.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 02:56 AM
2

Then maybe the baby should be taken away from her and given to a family that can provide for that child?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:25 AM
9

Then abortion should be illegal.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:24 AM
2

Why should tax-payers have to pay for a women's decision to be a single mother?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:20 AM
3

Simple. Apply that same logic to women. If sex is consent to parenthood, then abortion should be illegal.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:12 AM
7

Then abortion should be illegal.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 09:02 PM
3

Women have more rights than men do.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:04 AM
2

Considering women as a class hold superior moral, legal, and social power than men in the Western world, I don't know how you could make an argument otherwise. Just because the top 1% of men hold positions of power, often voted in or endorsed by women (ex. more women prefer to work under men than under women), that doesn't mean that men as a class have ultimate rule.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 05:29 AM
10

Simp.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:10 AM
20

Also, smaller arms, different neckline, differently sized and shaped. There are unisex hoodies but sexed hoodies are usually different.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 12:56 AM
3

Good girl.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 12:51 AM
19

No, they're not.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 12:44 AM
19

Assuming this is about abortion (because that's the only proto-religious debate going on in our country; even though it's not about religion): Women getting killed for showing their hair and women having some limits in some states on how soon/if they can kill their children in the womb isn't comparable. Christianity isn't being shoved down anyone's throat. There are no roving gangs of Christian fundamentalists demanding women go to Church or cover up. In fact, people are having their children ta…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 12:42 AM
17

Don't simp.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 12:36 AM
3

Both men and women associate more positive traits towards women than men, it's called the women-are-wonderful effect. Also, the gender empathy gap effects men more than women; for instance, when men are being abused, it's often minimized or seen as funny ex. kicking men in the balls, or slapping them.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:21 PM
6

First of all, feminism and the MRA movement are not comparable in terms of power, scope and validity. The fact is that men are legally second-class citizens and women do enjoy special privileged status as a class, especially when it comes to hiring quotas, preferential treatment in education, the legal system and socio-culturally. The feminist movement actively seeks to silence and censor the men's rights movement and they have the power to do so; it's apples and oranges. It's reasonable to ques…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:07 PM
12

Since I discovered you on this forum, I've never seen you once propose any solutions. Your actions in this forum have been, exclusively, to invalidate men , their feelings and their concerns.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 03:53 PM
3

Also Inuit women had strict procedures and rules about what to do when they became pregnant as to not hurt the unborn baby and ensure positive traits, they did not have equality with men in regards to important decision-making like migration and they while everyone contributed and were capable of doing each job, they generally followed traditional gender roles: men hunted for weeks on end to bring home food, women cooked, made clothes, took care of children and gathered.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:38 AM
2

This citation has to do with Australians but the Iroquois, the Haudenosaunee and other native Canadians from the Five Tribes were known to be cannibalistic in the same way and they would ritually sacrifice their slaves, trade them for goods, they were often starved and torture was used to demonstrate a power dynamic between the slave and the "master" to constantly remind the slave that they were inferior. They even engaged in somewhat similar assimilation techniques as Europeans did; namely, tha…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:24 AM
2

Ah, that's my bad. Last three references were Australian Aboriginals not Canadian. It gets confusing because they're both referred to as Aboriginals. I'm sure, however, that you noticed that the first two were Canadian and debunked your notion that they didn't own slaves and were just living in peace. As a "tax" is defined as a fee or dues levied on the members of an organization to meet its expenses, potlatches would fall under that category; every society enforced fees from their people, not e…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 05:38 AM
3

I'd like to add that pre-colonial Aboriginals of various tribes engaged in ritual, judicial, magical and revenge cannibalism. Sometimes they ate their dead relatives, other times, they ate the enemies they raided to magically acquire their attributes, as a punishment for breaking social rules; one man got eaten because he had sex with a member of his own totem and some women were eaten for being too "wanton" aka slutty, they also ate children during famines and sometimes older siblings would eat…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 04:52 AM
7

I'm going to focus on enlightening you about the native people of Canada, since that's where you're from and because you're very ignorant about pre-colonial history and seem to have a very progressive, romanticized view of Aboriginals as if they were so different and so above and beyond European settlers. I hope you'll do your own research and realize that people are people, everywhere. Europeans didn't have a monopoly on evil, patriarchy, gender roles or on traditional values. The Yurok of Indi…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 04:23 AM
7

I did say both sexes were oppressed; I also said by whom: by their families, the State and biology. The State is just a more formal way of saying society. The State signifies laws, taxes, unspoked but enforced social attitudes; these exist throughout every society and are needed to make a society, in the first place. That's control. You're missing the puzzle piece that every society is guilty of the crimes of encroaching upon outsiders, taking their lands, oppressing their people, enslaving and …
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:38 AM
8

Both men and women need to be controlled and that's been true throughout time. And throughout time, men were expected to build the world, die and take care of women and children and women were expected to live up to their biological imperative and respect the men who protected and provided for them. Both sexes had responsibilities, benefits and were oppressed, whether by nature, the State or their families. It's funny that today, even though women have more rights and privileges than men and liv…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:59 AM
1

You're not extrapolating what having authority means beyond the dictionary definition. If someone is voluntarily given the power to make decisions and have influence over another's behavior, they've incurred responsibility over that person and those decisions. My husband would die for me and my children, so I listen to his judgement because it's trustworthy and I chose him for a good reason. I think you're coming from a place where you think women who are under their husband's authority have no …
/r/MensRights12/10/22 05:53 PM
3

I've not seen you once say anything in support of men on this forum. Your preconceived notion of what I was going to say is your problem. I was trying to engage in a dialectic not battle you. Save your sadness for people who need it. :) I think we've reached the natural end of this conversation. Good luck in your marriage.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 05:31 PM
2

Authority isn't inherently negative. It means one is responsible for the other, which makes sense since, for instance, men are stronger than women. I wouldn't be valuable to my husband in a hand-to-hand fight. That's because we're not equal.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 03:40 PM
5

And as someone who comes to this forum to invalidate men and their feelings, you did what I expected which was to have an emotional response and bail instead of giving a good faith effort to have a discussion. My questions were given in order to give you a more complete, individualized answer. Of course, if your answers supported your argument, you would have happily obliged but since they didn't, you didn't answer. You've already admitted you're not equals so I guess you answered your own quest…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 03:38 PM
3

Yes, I'm a tradcon. I'm here because I believe in men's rights. I want things to change because currently, men are second-class citizens citizens; I want better for my husband and my sons. Yes, I think things should go back to more how it was in the past because in the past, men got more of the respect and honor they deserve for creating the first-world and women and families were whole and happier. At the moment, we live in a gynocracy where women are valued more and receive more legal rights a…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 03:19 PM
6

You didn't answer because you know I'm right and then you outright admitted it while still doubling-down. God bless your husband.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 05:02 AM
9

So, you won't answer? Some of these things will inevitably benefit you (assuming you're a woman) more than him based on statistics and legal history. Either way, anything other than symmetry in some of the things I mentioned means you're inherently not equals.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 01:54 AM
10

Do you have children? Who makes the most money? Do you live in a no-fault state? Did you graduate college? Has there ever been infidelity?
/r/MensRights12/10/22 01:10 AM
8

Whatever you say. If you get divorced though, you'll see just how unequal you really are.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 01:02 AM
15

Men and women aren't equal. Men who are in happy, stable relationships that stay together are head of the household. I'm a married SAHM with the same man for over a decade. How about you?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:45 PM
13

You may be right but anecdotally, as a woman, it doesn't sound far-fetched. You're probably being down-voted because it seems like you're implying a woman would never do something like this, when this is definitely within our purview.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:31 PM
15

You've never heard of head of the household? What's confusing?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:29 PM
20

I wouldn't be so sure. I've heard of similar things happening within my own friend-group (pregnant SAHM here). Emotions are especially fraught when pregnant and many women don't know to keep things in-house.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:50 PM
29

I'm an eight-months pregnant SAHM and I relate to the wife re: laziness, constant discomfort/pain, wanting extra help and care from the husband. It was terrible for her to not have her husband's back and vilify him, ruining the family dynamic. It is very, very difficult to come back from that and your husband should be your main focus and teammate in a marriage. She just made the issue so much worse. It's also unfair to discount her partner's needs; women like me who stay home are very privilege…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:48 PM
1

Cool, I respect that.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:41 PM
2

I didn't say "because I said so," I said because trans-men and men don't share the same experiences, or realities. Trans-men aren't subject to the same gendered oppression that men are; specifically in regards to legal rights i.e. being required to register for the draft to be able to vote, hold federal positions, receive federal grants etc. Biological women should be acknowledging that although they may identify as whatever they wish, they still enjoy the privileges of being born female; they'r…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:38 PM
2

I'm not a man, first off. Appropriation is about inappropriately adopting the elements of something without acknowledgement. When a trans-man calls themselves a "real man," and tries to blur the lines between identity and biology, that's appropriation; because in reality, they won't be existing in the same reality or having the same experience as a man. "Man" has a very clear, biological definition. I know people like to redefine things to fit their narrative but you can't appropriate a universa…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:51 PM
2

They're not men, what's confusing?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:43 PM
2

What's the evidence that trans-men have comparable legal outcomes as men i.e. longer sentences, higher arrest rates, than women for the same crime)? I've never heard of this. I think anyone trans would have a problem working with children, not sure if that counts. You may have a point about calling the police as a trans-man since perception is all that dictates who goes to jail. I'm not sure about the PreP thing, anal and promiscuous sex, which is the primary way HIV/AIDS is spread isn't an inhe…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:43 PM
3

What experiences do you think trans-men and biological men share? Edit: a better question would be, what rights do trans-men lack that are the same as the rights that men lack?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:18 AM
2

That's fine; my point is that if you can opt out of gendered oppression, you're not experiencing what it fully means to be that gender.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:15 AM
2

That's fine; do you acknowledge your privilege that as a biological woman you're immune from the sort of gendered oppression that men face?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:55 AM
1

Trans-men aren't men.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:02 AM
2

Bad bot
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:57 AM
5

Oh! I just realized that wasn't the person I was speaking with! LOL Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:56 AM
39

I agree that we should abolish the draft but that's very convenient to say when you'll never have to actually do it.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:35 AM
14

I didn't say it was, but it does means you don't have the same experiences as a man, if you're able to opt out of gendered oppression.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:26 AM
2

SUPER-SIMP.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:30 AM
5

Get well soon :)
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:17 AM
3

What happened to "have a good night?" :(
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:14 AM
3

So, a super-minority. It doesn't particularly matter: if they're saying they have the same experience as men and not acknowledging their privilege as biological women, they're not allies.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:11 AM
3

I already acknowledged that I know what gender ideology believes. That doesn't mean I've accepted it as meaningful or the truth. But as with biology, nature and objective reality, people like you will just blindly believe whatever they want to believe. I didn't expect anything less.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:09 AM
3

Okay, you're just going to ignore the context I very clearly spelled out to satisfy your own narrative. Typical.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:05 AM
3

Yep. I don't know for sure, but I'd wager that most trans-people are leftists, too. Trans-women alternatively have fought against being eligible for the draft, notably in Russia and the Ukraine.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:04 AM
3

You just repeating what you already said doesn't make it more true. Trans-women are demanding access to women-only spaces distinct based upon the biological sex differences between men and women; like restrooms and sports. Whether or not you agree, that is what they're doing. There are social stereotypes associated with sex. So? Like I said, exceptions prove the rule. You can think you did whatever you want, that doesn't concern me nor reality. I'm a woman, by the way.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:01 AM
4

Reddit's moderation team is vastly overrepresented by trans people. You can't genuinely lend support if you're artificially appropriating a cause as your own. Trans-men have distinct issues, but they're not the same as men's issues.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:58 PM
4

I said, "as you know it," because I know what gender ideology teaches. I don't agree that gender and sex are different; that distinction is so superficial as to not need it's own definition. Lots of trans-people are saying they are "real women" or "real men," attempting to erase the distinction between biology and identity.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:47 PM
7

That may be your experience, but with all the trans-activists active today, especially on Reddit, I don't ever see them bring it up and it's nowhere on their platform for what they advocate for.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:45 PM
3

I can look at someone and know with incredible accuracy whether their physical sex imbues them with the ability to give birth. Whether or not they actually can, because of some medical issue or something, is something else. I can look at someone whose body indicates male and know they can never give birth, no matter what, as that's their biological nature. Social perception is informed by biology.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:43 PM
6

Exceptions prove the rule. The fact that someone is an outlier makes them special because most can't do what they do. I already answered your second question. Gender as you know it, are the social signifiers of a sex, but like I said biology informs that. Just because someone dons the markers of a sex doesn't mean they are that sex. All "gender" is is fashion and stereotypes.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:38 PM
7

Well, what you've personally seen doesn't always reflect reality, does it? I've talked with some of them extensively and been called transphobic because I said they don't have the full experience of being a man. I don't see trans-activists fighting to join the draft, do you?
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:35 PM
6

What's your source that biological men pass as women more or as often as they don't pass? Like I said, appeal to authority. Awhile ago a trans-activist invited me to visit a subreddit that supposedly showed off the most impressive passing trans women and men and to put it politely, it did not impress. Most do not pass, it's easier for a woman to pass as a feminine man, especially with lots of artificial testosterone but it's distinctly more difficult for a man to pass as a woman and that's where…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:33 PM
3

You edited your comment so I'll add: If something is biological in root does that automatically mean that it cannot be advanced upon and interpreted further as a social construct? Not automatically, but when it comes to sex, the answer is yes. There is no current scientific advancement that would provide for men to be able to naturally give birth or menstruate, or for women to match men in physical strength or musculoskeletal structure. There is no way that a person of a specific biological sex …
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:23 PM
28

They actually have come into this forum and claimed just that; that's why I said what I said. Trans-men don't face anywhere near the same structural, social and legal gendered oppression that men do. They're still treated like women where it counts, as this policy indicates.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:18 PM
5

It's so simple I doubt anyone has studied it. Just because it's not had a study doesn't mean it's not true; that's an appeal to authority fallacy. It's not a massive claim when it's referencing the very real and virtually universal biological reality of male and female bodies. Yes, there are common patterns and there are complex patterns. Is that news? Males having broader shoulders, foreheads, bigger hands, and narrower hips than females isn't a claim, it's an observation of reality. There is n…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:13 PM
3

LMAO. Get well soon.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:05 PM
2

Yeah, we all know it's just a virtue-signal. That's a hallmark of this administration.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:04 PM
10

Not just the penis and testosterone, it's also the bone density, lung capacity, center of gravity and innate ability for spatial awareness.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:03 PM
2

Based.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:02 PM
7

Because they're appropriating manhood and telling lies and misleading truths.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:59 PM
2

This is why people call you all delusional. I've already said everything that needs to be said on this subject.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:57 PM
1

Those things do matter. It's not just testosterone, it's everything. You at your fittest and a man at his fittest is miles apart; no amount of artificial hormones is going to change that. The military had to lower their standards for women to be able to apply and the vast majority couldn't even meet the lower level. Seriously, you have no idea what you're talking about and your attitude is very offensive.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:51 PM
2

Now you're going to nitpick a colloquial saying when the message was concise and clear. Save it.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:47 PM
12

Did I say that or did I say our brains evolved over billions of years? You realize we share ancestors with numerous creatures that weren't human but whom our various biological features are based on? I said evolved to recognize patterns. The most basic pattern is man and woman. You don't need a source to tell you the water is wet. It's obvious.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:46 PM
7

I know that if you were born a woman, you do not have the same bone density as that of a man. And if you do, go to a science center immediately because that would be a miracle never seen in the history of mankind. Strength is not solely based on hormones, as I pointed out you have many musculoskeletal and respiratory disparities between you, a biological woman and a man that would put them at a much greater physical advantage in a multitude of strength-based skillsets. Just because the physicali…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:41 PM
10

Human's brains evolved over billions of years to match patterns. If I, or anyone; even a child, looked at person on the street, we'd be able to correctly identify their sex with overwhelming accuracy, even if we weren't able to articulate what we were seeing that tipped us off. Those things are biological, not social. If a man with broad shoulders, a broad forehead, a receding hairline, big hands and a proportionately narrower hip-to-shoulder ratio walked past me in a dress, I'd still know they …
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:34 PM
8

I very much doubt that you can lift as much as the average man. Hormones don't change your lung capacity or increase your bone density to that of a man's. It doesn't change your center of gravity or your innate ability for spatial awareness. You may be able to lift more than the average woman but you wouldn't be able to pull a soldier with full gear out of a battle-field.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:29 PM
10

Gender and sex are the same thing.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:24 PM
46

Right, trans-men are biological women.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:24 PM
4

It was clear. The distinction was on the SS website since its inception. Even if trans-men were required to be drafted (and for the record, I think the draft should be abolished), they would be a hindrance on their team because of the biological realities of the physical differences between men and women. In gender ideology, there's no right answer, that's why it's non-sensical to call a trans-man a "real man," or a trans-woman a "real woman." You may identify but you can't change your DNA.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:23 PM
17

That's a convenient thing to say in a hypothetical situation but the fact remains that you could have gotten out of it. That's what separates you from men.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:15 PM
12

Probably because you knew it would never be used against you.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:10 PM
55

If this genuinely happened, it's because you didn't disclose that you were trans. It's not new, this was the policy before Biden performed this piece of political theater. If they knew you were trans, you wouldn't have had to register. You having that out, even if you don't use it, distinguishes you from biological men and bars you from having a genuine male experience.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:07 PM
11

Biology informs how we express things through culture. Not always, not in general.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:06 PM
192

EXACTLY!
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:41 PM
10

They do when they're putting male rapists in prison with women.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:39 PM
26

Yeah; I'm agreeing with you. :)
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:32 PM
28

You're right, this has always been a thing, he's just virtue-signaling. When I brought it up to them, they called me transphobic.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:26 PM
73

Gender ideology is inconsistent and disingenuous.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:26 PM
28

It's not genuine support but it is understanding that sex and gender are synonymous and biological.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:04 PM
284

I'd love the various trans-men who come to this space to say how they know what it really feels like to be a man to respond to this event.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:02 PM
2

They are to blame for these issues, or if not blame, then the results they're seeing are a natural and direct result of their own choices. The best approach is honesty. Feminists aren't concerned with helping men, in any case, so men's rights don't hinge on their approval.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 06:03 PM
8

Sorry, income inequality? That's not a gendered issue, so how is that an issue for feminists? Shouldn't they be encouraging women to enter and stay in STEM fields, or perhaps try working in oil rigs? What do you mean gender roles? What's inherently flawed about gender roles? They're not enforced in Western countries, so it's definitely a choice whether or not someone adheres to them; additionally there's a biological reason they exist. I would say that the feminist movement has a much bigger pro…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 03:32 PM
5

What are good points that Western women's activists have now and what do you see as critical flaws in men's activism in the West today?
/r/MensRights10/10/22 03:04 PM
18

Therapy is only one facet; what about engendering empathy and respect from the women in their lives, what about the systemic discrimination men face on a daily basis, what about casual misandry? Not all things can be fixed by therapy, especially when it's the feminists themselves upholding the attitudes and institutions that discriminate against and oppress men.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 04:14 PM
3

You have a point that our societies erred in giving women the amount of power they have; especially regarding abortion, replacement and lack of discipline. However, I think patriarchal Christianity was better than Islamic patriarchy, as under their rule there was less killing, less slavery, less sexualization of children, less incest/deformed/retarded children, more prosperity and more innovation. Regardless, both our societies have desisted from their original glory albeit in different ways. I'…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 08:11 PM
9

If one of my two wives cheated on me I would kill her with my own hands That sounds very emotionally weak that you would let a woman ruin your life, your potential children's lives and legacy like that. Men should be stoic and unemotional enough to not throw their lives away because of someone else's actions; simply reacting to betrayal instead of instituting a well-thought out reprisal that includes preserving yourself and your freedom a is a very feminine reaction. That's not masculine, at all…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:47 PM
7

Maybe in your country it's "halal," in Western countries, you go to jail no questions asked. In our countries there are plenty of women who display toxic masculinity and get away with it. Women hold too much power in these countries, well and above the rights of men. There's no amount of masculinity that can supersede the power of the State when a woman knows she can wield it with no ramifications.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:33 PM
41

Rihanna initiated the physical abuse, destroyed his phone, attacked him while he was driving and bit Chris Brown before he exploded. He did go overboard, but he has a history of being a victim of domestic violence as a child and reacted; he didn't initiate. Literally no one holds Rihanna accountable for her part in their toxic relationship.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:26 PM
16

Women in the past didn't hit men on the level they do now. Women who hit their husbands in the past were hit back - and hard enough to make such an impression that they wouldn't ever dream of doing it again; and society accepted that fact because just as men had the duty to protect women, women had the duty to respect men, especially their physical power. Women didn't have the power of the State to enact further violence, even death, against men defending themselves. We don't live in that world …
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:22 PM
1

Whatever you have to tell yourself. Moloch would be pleased.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:32 AM
1

Oh boo-hoo, there are some limits regarding the unmitigated slaughter of babies. Whatever shall we do? The humanity...
/r/MensRights07/10/22 02:40 AM
7

The suffragettes were literally terrorists using bombs and arson as a way to gain political power.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 02:35 AM
10

Yeah, men dropped the ball by simping and ever since women have been asking for and getting more and more above and beyond what's expected of men. That doesn't make the feminists right.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:08 PM
2

That would be a fine standard if it applied to women, as well but it doesn't.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 04:50 PM
2

Huh? Are you implying that the woman in the cartoon is the abuse victim? I'm confused.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 04:49 PM
14

The very first thing they advocated for was getting the right to vote without the responsibility inherent in that right; mandatory service - and they got it. That's not equal rights, that's superiority. Women today have more legal rights than men do and that's by design.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 04:47 PM
10

They didn't get that, though, they got legal rights above men.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:42 PM
5

Good, that's the standard people have been expecting of women since the beginning of time but we seem to have forgotten how to figure that out.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:36 AM
11

Women control access to sex. Don't let a man fuck and he can't cum.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:34 AM
4

You are being used because men and women are different; he gets less of an oxytocin dose than you every time you have sex, enabling him to have sex without feelings. You're also going to be on the hook if you get pregnant, knowing that he doesn't want to be with you; he doesn't have to contend with the physical ramifications of that, you do. You're physically enjoying the sex but you're allowing yourself to be emotionally and psychologically damaged. The more casual sex partners you engage with,…
/r/RedPillWomen27/09/22 03:52 PM
7

Casual sex isn't casual for women. Our biology dictates that we become attached to men we have consistent sex with. This is evolutionarily advantageous because we're the ones who bear children. You should stop having sex with him, mourn that (non)relationship and in the future only have sex when you're in a long-term, committed relationship, ideally a marriage.
/r/RedPillWomen27/09/22 03:48 PM
2

It has nothing to do with misogyny and everything to do with the human rights of the child.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 04:52 PM
2

Which woman died in the US trying to get an abortion for medical necessity. What's her name?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 04:52 PM
1

Just say you hate your father and leave.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 04:15 PM
9

Says the person who thinks 18-19 year old women don't have agency over their own choices. If you want women to be coddled and treated like children instead of adults, we should have the same rights as children, as well.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 08:12 PM
10

Do most men prefer women to wear make-up?
/r/MensRights19/09/22 06:21 PM
15

Men aren't demanding women wear make up.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 06:08 PM
1

The lawsuit states that the female superintendent relocated the clerk's offices from a secure floor without inmate access to a location on a cell-block without any locks between clerks and inmates and this action contributed to the clerk's assault, and thus the prison itself contributed to the crime. It didn't shame the victim, as far as I can tell.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:44 PM
1

In what way is he a manipulative POS?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:38 PM
3

And girls instigate with attention-seeking behavior all the time, too but we don't get called out for it.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:36 PM
4

You're biased.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:42 PM
12

Do you see people saying or commenting "nice!" or saying, "I wish I had teachers like that when I was a student!" when a young girl is predated upon by a handsome older man?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 03:53 PM
1

You're saying biology is stupid. K.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 07:40 PM
1

You mean "normal?" Outliers aren't representative of society as a whole.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 05:20 PM
1

It's not just so a woman will like you, it's because that's what men are and what every society needs and every person needs a purpose in society to be fulfilled and happy. It's not arbirtrary, there's a reason why boys wrestle and girls play with dolls. Biology informs behavior, not always but in general.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 09:26 PM
5

The difference is that the latter would incite massive public condemnation while this situation is minimized and played for laughs.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 06:19 PM
6

That's my question: I genuinely don't understand how one could argue that his tweet was incitement. Page is a public figure, they aren't immune to criticism or judgements about their personal lives; their jobs are to put themselves on display.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 06:15 PM
4

How did his tweet cause incitement?
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:58 PM
1

I'm not fixated on it, at all. In fact, you're the one who brought it up. You referenced a platonic friendship with someone disabled when we were discussing inequality in a marriage. I simply said a friendship and a marriage are very different relationships; not that a marriage can't contain a friendship, but two people who are platonic friends don't have the same type of bond that married people do. Typically, friendships aren't defined by romantic/sexual love so it's not the same thing as "ero…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:31 PM
1

LMAO! I literally never said that. Like I said, your personal prejudices against traditional relationships is literally making you see things that never happened.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:51 PM
1

LOL. You and your strawmen! Girl, I never said I don't have romantic love for my husband. I said that's not what sustains a long-lasting relationship, every sociologist and psychologist says the same; that's why "eros" (romantic) and "pragma" (pragmatic, unconditional) are two distinct types of love. Even if I ever found myself out of romantic love for my husband, I'd still love him because he's the father of my children, my protector and my best friend and I'd never divorce him just because of …
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:45 PM
1

Your strawmen doesn't reflect at all on my relationship. You're the one who characterized us as one-dimensional, in silence and disliking each other. That's not based on anything I said but based on your own personal prejudices about traditional relationships. Everything I said was hypothetical; adversely, I'm basing what I said on your own words and descriptions of your relationship. My question was is your husband going to have a turn staying home for seven years while you take on the financia…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:37 PM
1

Power dynamics dictate that there is always someone with more spoken or unspoken influence. As a feminist, I thought you'd understand the concept. There's no such thing as the same authority because no two people are the same, especially men and women. My husband and I come to a consensus most of the time but I ultimately put my trust in him. He doesn't tell me to shut up, that's just the feminist caricature you've invented in your mind because you can't imagine a woman choosing to be vulnerable…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:29 PM
1

You're the one who said you were insecure; there's nothing wrong with not believing your husband when he says he loves how you look? Of course I'll take care of my husband when my kids grow up and he'll take care of me. Are you guys not going to do that? Every relationship has roles. I'm sure there are things your husband does that you don't do and vice versa; that's natural. Is he going to have a turn to stay at home and take care of the children for seven years while you take on all the financ…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:11 PM
2

Girl, what? There's hierarchies for everything; the president, the director, project manager, the CEO, the lead. Every human project is a collaborative endeavor with one person who is ultimately responsible for leading. You can have all the conversations you want, that's an imperative part of the process but there's always one person who gets the most say, or who colloquially "wears the pants." Maybe you don't know who that is, or maybe it's you. I trust my husband's judgement and he trusts mine…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 08:57 PM
2

Yeah, that's what I was asking: why was your response to insecurity for you two to sexualize your body and seek validation from strangers rather than work on yourself or getting therapy? I'm not sure how you made that leap. Our relationship is based on love and we express it through fulfilling our natural, traditional, time-tested gender roles; being monogamous, the woman being the nurturer and the man being the provider. When my children grow up, they won't need me as much so I'll have more tim…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 08:43 PM
1

I didn't say that career and earning potential is a greater responsibility than childcare. Both are very important and imperative to family life. In fact, you can't have one without hurting the other, that's why the role of the mother and the father are so important; so I'm not sure where you got the idea that that's what I was saying.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 08:38 PM
2

I didn't want to get married because I spent most of my life being a feminist SJW, we were both blue-pilled, raised by single mothers and educated by exclusively women. We started becoming more interested in politics and gradually realized the behavior we were acting out made us unhappy in various ways and that we were more fulfilled when I leaned into my femininity and he led with his masculinity. Soon after we got married, he invited me to quit my job and we decided to become parents. PM me fo…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:27 PM
2

I'm a stay at home mother so my husband makes all the money. He's the head of the household, that doesn't make me inferior but it does mean that he leads while I follow. That doesn't mean I don't have any say or that he doesn't value my input or opinion but that he makes the final decision on important things and delegates where he sees fit. There can't be two leaders in a relationship and there's no such thing as equality in a relationship; someone is always contributing more/incurring more res…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:19 PM
3

I can't help but notice that the goalposts keep switching; first it was all his idea, now it was a joint decision? Which is it? I've been with my husband for 12 years, married for two with a toddler and another child on the way.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:08 PM
6

So you're not equal but your husband gives you lip service to appease your need to feel equal to him while he takes on a disproportionate amount of responsibility. You didn't answer my bump in the night or the bill contribution questions, so I'm assuming, as any woman would, that you would expect your man to protect and provide for you. You're a feminist but still adhere tp and expect for your husband to adhere to the gender roles that benefit you.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:03 PM
3

I have to disagree; I'm a fat girl myself and like you, my husband worships my physical appearance but unlike you, his attention and validation is enough for me. My husband doesn't feel the need to appease my insecurities by supplementing his attention by sexualizing me to strangers. Have you ever asked him why he suggested that?
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:00 PM
6

I totally agree and I feel the same as a woman married to a man. I wish there were enough women showing their empathy and gratitude towards the men in their lives because they do a lot and often aren't given the respect and love they deserve.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:56 PM
2

You literally said you never believed him when he gave his opinion on your looks and you needed other men to give you that validation. Those were your words, not mine.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:51 PM
6

Oh, so your husband is a "happy cuckold." Fitting. And you admit that you never value his opinion; so much so that you need and appreciate the validation of male strangers more. Yeah, you guys are definitely feminists.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:40 PM
7

Who goes to check it out if there's a bump in the night? Who makes more money? Do you both work? What's both of your contributions to the bills?
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:35 PM
1

I feel the need to make a disctinction though I agree with your general point: Society as a whole needs women but not each individual man needs a woman; adversely though, each individual woman needs a man (whether or not she's married or has a father, she still needs a man's protection, provision, and sacrifice i.e. police service/formal or informal security, financial redistribution through alimony/child support/taxes, infrastructure work, home/car repairs, etc.). I think each men would probabl…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:33 PM
2

Male politicians haven't made laws in favor of men; men are second-class citizens in our society with less legal rights and social privileges than women, so your point is moot. If that were the case, the sentencing gap between men and women wouldn't exist, neither would female hiring quotas, nor the disproportionate federal dollars allocated to female victims of DV vs. male victims. Also; where do you get free toilet paper? Additionally, women leaders have not been shown to be more emotionally i…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:10 AM
4

The point at which life begins is an objective, scientific fact, not a subjective opinion.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:04 AM
9

He's referencing the fact that more than 71% of teachers are female in the US, while male teachers are at 28% (according to the latest numbers circa 2019).
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:02 AM
2

Often, employers didn't want to retain married women because they would voluntarily choose to leave the workplace when they were married or had children; they also were less reliable because when they had children, they had added responsibilities that would neglect their work if they did choose to stay; another reason was because they were trying to make room for people who needed the job more; like single women without a husband's support or inheritance, or a man who needed to provide for his f…
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 05:10 AM
1

I'm not saying it dictates their conscious belief system but there are still women who don't call themselves feminist who hold underlying, unconscious feminist beliefs; like accepting alimony/child support/unequal custody, laughing at or downplaying men's pain or role in society (i.e. when a man gets hit in the crotch or sexually harassed, bumbling dad trope, seemingly innocuous demeaning of their husbands/boyfriends), not viewing female-on-male violence the same as vice versa, et al. There are …
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 03:38 AM
0

I'm not saying we should be shamed, I'm saying we're culpable and responsible for fighting against it. The ideology gives first-class status based on demographics.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 03:17 AM
1

I'm pretty sure I didn't say it was okay. Don't put words in my mouth. Once again, it wasn't that they weren't allowed to work: they weren't allowed in certain fields, at a certain percentage, at certain times, in certain parts of the country and it only effected certain women. It was a practice, not a law. Once again, you're cherry-picking because clerics and teachers didn't account for the majority of women in the US.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 11:09 PM
1

K.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:00 PM
0

Women weren't allowed in every profession, at all times; that didn't mean they couldn't work, didn't have control over money or were in danger of starving because they literally couldn't support themselves. You're cherry-picking educated, middle-class white women and acting like it applied to all women, in general. I'm not saying it wasn't sexism, I'm saying that your hyperbolic generalizing about what women were and weren't allowed to do isn't addressing the underlying nuances about the how and…
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 11:00 PM
1

Wow, how quirky, edgy and perfectly on-brand. If you're a feminized NPC, just say that.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 10:52 PM
1

Only technically because it's legal and that's changing as society becomes more insistent upon human rights for all.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 10:49 PM
1

You said "women couldn't work." As you've admitted, that's incorrect but you still have the temerity to call me ignorant. As you said, those were for very limited professions, like teaching and clerical jobs. That didn't apply to all forms of work, in general. It was also relaxed in times of shortages and war and wasn't applicable in all parts of the various countries who enacted it. You don't have any knowledge of the subject if you didn't know that. I mean seriously, how do you not acknowledge…
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 10:44 PM
1

How many homeless people have you personally invited to live in your house, or are you pro-homelessness? How many attempted murder victims have you personally financially subsidized, or are you pro-murder? Or does being intellectually and morally consistent and taking care of yourself and not murdering people suffice?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 10:37 PM
1

I already debunked that in a separate comment. Single women had a harder time than men acquiring credit but it was possible. The law ensured that banks couldn't discriminate based on sex but some banks still decided to do business with independent women on their own; especially if they were independently wealthy. Of course women were always allowed to work. What are you talking about? Women were nurses, nannies, laundresses, independent business-owners, madams, schoolteachers, maids, secretaries…
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 10:31 PM
2

Your chosen identity seems to be really confused and kind of cringe TBH, but if you're an anti-feminist you're welcome here.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 09:51 PM
7

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/9-things-women-could-not-do/ "Get a credit card in her own name As this post explains, banks were able to discriminate against women applying for credit cards until the passage of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act in October 1974. Women could get credit cards prior to this legislation, but as The Smithsonian notes, they were likely to be asked a barrage of personal questions and were often required to be accompanied by a man to co-sign for a credit card. Even the…
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 09:47 PM
3

Yes, and that's because we weren't responsible for any debt we accrued. We had ultimate access to our husband's money without any of the responsibility to go with it and we continue to be the biggest consumers. You've just spun a privilege into a source of oppression.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 09:42 PM
5

No, women en masse benefit from the second-class status of men, as a group, so we're all culpable. It's up to each of us to be striving for better treatment for men and boys.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 09:40 PM
2

Radical feminism supports sex-positivity and abortion, so I'm not sure how that's stuffing words in your mouth; you even agreed. Unless people are being forced into having sex, they're not being forced into parenthood. The only nuance to that situation is the fact that women can opt out of parenthood at any time while men can't. Regardless, there is something wrong with killing human beings, especially when over 98% of the time it's because people making consensual choices chose to be irresponsi…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 09:35 PM
2

I thought there was nothing wrong with unprotected sex, though, so why bother? Unless there is something wrong with unprotected sex? But I agree with your new perspective; it's really easy and can be just as fun to have protected sex. No need to kill babies to satisfy your lust; as you said: just think before you bang.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 06:35 PM
7

How so?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:17 PM
1

Huh? What's safe about unprotected sex and abortion?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:13 PM
2

No, that's what leftists keep saying to everyone within earshot.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 06:35 AM
3

Damn, sorry bro. No wonder you think that way.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:57 AM
3

Revenge is their perception; I'm not saying that's the case. The right doesn't have a monopoly on hatred. That's ludicrous.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 12:17 AM
5

Feminism isn't right-wing, it's gender revenge and gender swapping i.e. the masculinization of women and the feminization of men. It's also based on the Marxist class struggle rebranded to be based on sex instead of class; definitionally left-wing.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:55 PM
2

Your grandma wanted to destigmatize killing children and having trains ran on her?
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:53 PM
9

The domain of the left is killing babies, castrating children, victimizing and feminizing men, masculinizing women, destroying the definition of "man" and "woman" itself and bringing back institutional racism. Shut up.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:52 PM
0

That happens every day in the inner cities by civilians and no one cares.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 06:51 AM
2

You didn't specify internet attacks. I don't know the numbers but if we were to extrapolate from real life attacks, I doubt it would look differently. Yes, per capita and just in sheer numbers non-white people (black people, in particular) attack white people way more often than the other way around. Considering black people only account for about 13% of the population while whites account for about half, that's a very disturbing statistic.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 06:23 AM
3

Check out the stats on interracial violence. Its definitely tilted towards non-white people attacking whites by a large margin. Those crimes are rarely regarded as hate incidents, as well.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:39 AM
3

Yes, we do. It's rare among other non-human primates but we do it. Look up "human pair-bonding." Promiscuity lessens the oxytocin response effecting our ability to do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/22 07:23 PM
46

I appreciate it but we're not equal; men are second-class citizens in the Western world, that makes us effectively (and unfairly) superior. That's why it's up to women to acknowledge our privilege and seek recourse on behalf of our brothers/sons/husbands/friends.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:19 PM
1

Just a bunch of excuses. There is no woman that can't effect some form of BC. Once again, if the risk and anxiety of pregnancy is so great, they'd mitigate the risk. You really think remembering to set an alarm to take a pill the same time once a day is more tim÷-c9nsuming/inconvenient than an unwanted pregnancy? No. Most of the time, it's a stance of I don't care. Evidence of this is that 40% of mothers who've gotten abortions have had two or more, 60% have had at least one and most who get abo…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:33 PM
1

IUDs, arm implants, progestin-only BC, condoms, pull-out, BC shots, diaphragm, cervical cap, BC sponge; there are plenty of BC options that don't effect breastfeeding. I didn't have a cycle until my son was a year and a half, almost two but my husband and I found a BC method that worked and stuck with it. The other pertinent piece of information is that we were okay with a possible pregnancy, which is why we practiced a method that was more risky than others; even with that in mind, we used it c…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:52 PM
0

Why would breastfeeding stop you from preventing a pregnancy? Women can only get pregnant a couple of days a month; even without pharmacological birth-control, we can use the rhythm method and pull-out. My husband and I used the pull-out method for over ten years with no accidents and three planned pregnancies. Women have more control over their reproduction, with or without medicine, than people think. I stand by the assertion that there's no excuse.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:01 PM
6

Then why not prevent the pregnancy in the first place? We have over a dozen forms of birth control, some permanent. There's no excuse in 2022 to have an accidental pregnancy; if it was really such a significant issue for the mother, you'd think she'd have enough sense, wisdom and self-awareness to ensure she wasn't throwing away a life she created through her own negligence.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:57 AM
5

Citation needed; boys-only public school; boys-only academic support?! Liar.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:44 AM
1

It doesn't have to be the goal for it to be the primary function of the act itself. It being historical isn't mutually exclusive with it being still pertinent today as there is no 100% fool-proof method to prevent reproduction with PiV sex except for abstinence; so, telling someone that sex leads to pregnancy and to not have sex if they don't want to get pregnant is salient advice.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:16 PM
1

Reproduction being the primary function and the natural result of PiV sex isn't an opinion.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:14 PM
2

Stop conflating hatred with the acknowledgment of reality. If reality makes you want to kill yourself, that's a personal issue.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 04:26 PM
2

Get help.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:49 PM
1

Their self-perception that they are "real women" and "real men," you mean. Everyone acknowledges their humanity and their mental illness; not its legitimacy. The ability to force people to lie to protect your feelings through threat of public cancellation, loss of livelihood, potentially losing access to your children and in some countries, threat of jail is absolutely a privilege. Most trans people's problems are self-perpetuated; they're encouraged by their community to go into sex work which …
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:48 PM
4

Having fully-clothed, non-salacious pictures on a van with a vaguely suggestive slogan in a bumbling dad routine whose motive is not meant to overtly sexualize his daughters isn't comparable to the forcible disrobing and sexual humiliation of a young boy by his siblings who then gets laughed at by his parents who proceed to document it with pictures.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 11:21 PM
3

Please describe a similar scene where a young girl is subjected to sexual assault/harassment and it's played for laughs.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 10:53 PM
6

What rights do women not have?
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/22 05:24 PM
3

Sexual shaming.
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/22 05:23 PM
1

No one is debating people with dysphoria exist. You being born a woman but then calling yourself a man is a mental illness and a self-perception, not a fact and not one people have to accept. Privilege is having your self-perception forced onto others when they know it's not true.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 02:59 AM
2

Get out.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 02:57 AM
7

You're giving women too much good faith in regards to, not their physical power, but their institutional power and the narcissism the worst of them are capable of to use it. Sure, it would be nice if people took your advice; it's good general advice. The problem is that the system is skewed against men. If women cross boundaries, our indiscretions are taken lightly or not considered at all; we know it and we exploit it.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 11:29 PM
3

In regards to examples whose primacy biological function doesn't include procreation, personal opinions are subjective not objective. You're right, biological impulses should be controlled; if they were there wouldn't be as many abortions as there are.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 05:23 AM
4

No one's getting pregnant from anal or footjobs. It's not a rigid view of the world, it's literally based on human reproduction aka biology.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 03:41 AM
1

Trans-men are not subject to the draft. According to SSS.gov: "Transgender People US citizens or immigrants who are born male and changed their gender to female are still required to register. Individuals who are born female and changed their gender to male are not required to register." Based on the most recent numbers measuring the circumcision rate, it's at 57%; that would represent the majority. Thankfully, it's fallen from a high of 84% in the 60's. Regardless, an injustice anywhere is an i…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 03:39 AM
3

It's not an "old-school point of view;" PiV intercourse is not only the only natural way to get pregnant, it's the primary goal of intercourse itself and the reason why it feels so good. It's biological, not sociological.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 03:11 AM
2

Where's the lie?
/r/MensRights09/08/22 03:08 AM
1

Nice. So when a group is publicly persecuted and vandalized an appropriate response to them is to not seek redress but to just accept things for how they are. Why are you even on this subreddit?
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 11:28 PM
1

The historic importance and popularity of Christianity doesn't mean that its individual members aren't being persecuted. Just because it's better now than it was in the past doesn't mean problems don't exist. In the Western world, you get no special privileges for being a Christian; quite the opposite, they have to deal with a lot of oikophobia coming from almost every institution thanks to the prevalence of the secular theocracy of leftism; even within their own ranks. At least there is no main…
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 10:23 PM
2

You're the one who's not a valid men's rights activist because you're masquerading as a man, appropriating their issues as your own without acknowledging your inherent privilege as a biological woman and are so willing to say "fuck you and your rights" when things aren't centered around you. Trans-men have their own unique issues and perspectives and that's fine; that doesn't mean your experience is the same as a man's.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 10:13 PM
0

Well, although buying into any religion is bad for anyone It's not bad for marriage rates, voting rates and rates of self-described happiness.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 05:03 PM
0

I wouldn't say it's thriving. Christianity and it's offshoots are the only religions openly mocked and discriminated against without any mainstream push-back. There are plenty of Christian churches, sure, but their membership has been declining for years; especially among men, and there is a whole lot of progressive infiltration to the point where there are now drag shows for children at church. No one said anyone would be hanged or crucified just that there's a lot of public scorn and open bigo…
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 05:00 PM
4

I was in labor for three days and we were in the hospital for two weeks and my husband obviously wanted to be there the whole time. He should definitely have had a bed and food provided as he was my support person.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 11:54 PM
13

You're a liar. It's very disingenuous and disgusting for you to appropriate men's suffering to stroke your ego. According to SSS.gov: "Transgender People US citizens or immigrants who are born male and changed their gender to female are still required to register. Individuals who are born female and changed their gender to male are not required to register." Leftists have attempted to and in many cases succeeded in forcing society to give lip service to peoples self-image but at the end of the d…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 06:16 PM
4

Are trans-men subject to having the expectation of giving up their life for the right to vote? Are the majority of them subjected to genital mutilation as newborns? Do they live under threat of paternity and child support fraud? Just because a woman looks like a man doesn't mean she still doesn't get the privileges of a woman.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:54 PM
2

Are trans-men subject to having the expectation of giving up their life for the right to vote? Are the majority of them subjected to genital mutilation as newborns? Do they live under threat of paternity and child support fraud? Just because a woman looks like a man doesn't mean she still doesn't get the privileges of a woman.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:52 PM
2

What's useful about a woman appropriating manhood?
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:42 PM
7

As a woman, I agree with you.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:41 PM
4

What male specific laws are trans-men held to? It's not that they're not "man enough," it's that they're not men.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:40 PM
4

The suicide rate would belie that statement.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:38 PM
8

Which rights do trans-men not have? Trans men have all the same rights women do, while being exempt from the lack of legal rights and civil privileges that men face. Feminists and most people are wary of the trans ideology because it's appropriating sex and gendered spaces in a way that denies biology and bullies people into accepting people's self-image; thereby enabling them to enjoy rights and privileges far and above any people not sexually-confused.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:37 PM
5

Why do you need to read Nietzsche to understand resentment? I'd be resentful, too if I was expected to put my life on the line in order to exercise my civil right to vote while women, who can climb to the 1% just by putting their butthole on the internet, can have that right just for having a vagina.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:33 PM
26

That's what they want. They're always openly going on about how there needs to be less people in the world.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:29 PM
18

This would only be fair if the sister was responsible for her gender roles but it doesn't appear that she is.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:28 PM
1

Bullshit. It clearly glamorizes the behavior, even though the protagonists get comeuppance at the end. The trailers and media interviews touted it like empowering feminist propaganda. As the audience, you are supposed to be rooting for the women using their sexuality to drug and steal from the men, not against them; weird that in an age where feminists decry "rape culture," this movie didn't inspire a peep from them. What movies have male leads glamorizing using their sex to drug and steal from …
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:32 AM
2

Yes, it is.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:43 PM
1

It may not have been about Cardi but she was in the movie specifically because she bragged about doing it. Also, the point is that the act itself is venerated in the movie and indirectly by society for allowing this movie to be greenlit and the amount of money and good press it received.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:41 PM
3

I'm a woman and I have to agree with some of my brothers here that some of your comments are centered around you and what you want to do, rather than what men need. Men need other men; I agree with the person who said that men need spaces to be and talk without women presiding over it or being present. Regardless of whether or not you're sincere in your desire to help them, men and women are fundamentally different, especially socially and need separate spaces to be themselves, just like women d…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 10:46 PM
1

Short-sighted lack of accountability.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/22 03:10 PM
1

Yes there is because the power and risk differential is vastly different for either group. If one party is the arbiter of the act itself, is subject to a heightened risk of potential death, despair, destitution and is privileged (in most states) with the ultimate power of inflicting death upon another person if they're not careful with their sexuality, that party needs to be focused on the most. With great power comes great responsibility.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/22 03:50 AM
0

Promiscuous is defined as having or being characterized by many transient sexual relationships. Wouldn't you guess that it would be much more likely a pregnancy would be unwanted if it was caused by a casual fling than a serious relationship? Would you guess that it would be more likely for you to catch a sexually-transmitted disease from many transient partners than having monogamous sex within a relationship? After the advent of sexual education in public schools in the 60s, transmission of ST…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/22 05:37 AM
1

So, your argument is that lack of education is more correlative to unwanted pregnancies and abortions than the act of sex itself?! Bruh.... So, to follow your logic, being ignorant is likely to make people have unwanted pregnancies and abortions more often than promiscuous sex. Would you mind linking your source? As to morals, science helps inform value judgements. You have a tiny chance of falling from a roller-coaster under normal circumstances. You have a greater chance of accruing psychosoci…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/22 03:59 AM
2

Killing babies isn't health-care and getting child-care for free isn't a right. You know what is though, and is so important that it's listed as the very first right guaranteed in the Constitution? Take a wild guess. It's funny that you say pro-life is pro-death and fascist when you're literally advocating for the genocide of the unborn and unwanted. Not even a Christian and pro-life is based on science and human rights, not theology but I know your side loves to trot that out because your oppos…
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:51 AM
1

You're proving my point. Things that are measurable are more trustworthy than your personal anecdotes and opinions. The danger of promiscuous sex and the sky being blue are too measurable phenomena; if you're saying they're not you have the burden of proof.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/22 03:46 AM
2

It is less dangerous for men. I didn't think I'd need to make that distinction, but yes, sex in and of itself is dangerous for both sexes and it's best to do it with a committed partner. Having said that, sex is a lot more dangerous for women physically and psychologically and that fact is well-documented.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/22 03:44 AM
2

Men aren't in danger of dying because they got someone pregnant. Heterosexual nen are also at a statistically lower risk for contracting STD, as vaginas are more vulnerable to tearing. Additionally, promiscuity has more negative psychosocial effects for women than men, as women who do it have a higher risk of not being able to pair-bond and are more susceptible to substance abuse because of it than men. The difference is biological and well documented.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 03:43 PM
6

Well yeah, but you have to learn game. Vast majority of women are born with sexual value; no learning needed.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 03:39 PM
0

What work? All he did was refute my sourced data with his personal opinions without providing any evidence of his own. Do tell, what's incel about scientific data? Cope harder.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 10:14 AM
0

Also, if a bunch of people were saying the sky was green when it was in fact blue, we would need to figure out why so many people were wrong, not do mental gymnastics to validate their delusion.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 07:43 AM
1

According to what metric, because data and studies show that promiscuous sex leads to increased risk of abortion, unwanted pregnancies, out of wedlock births and STDs. All of those things are directly caused by promiscuous sex. As well as being common symptoms of personality and substance use disorders, which I already said was indicative not causal; illustrating that it is dysgenic, unhealthy behavior. "Plenty of people are promiscuous then have long happy relationships, and plenty of virgin co…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 07:40 AM
0

Oh, I forgot one: Exploratory analyses reveal women with a mental disorder are more sexually active than their male counterparts, and characteristics of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are a predictor for risky sexual behavior for women but not men https://www.clinicaladvisor.com/home/topics/hiv-aids-information-center/sexually-risky-behavior-more-common-in-women-with-mental-disorders-than-in-men/
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 06:50 AM
5

Women are born with sexual value, most men have to earn it.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 06:35 AM
0

That statement was in reference to the fact that there may be a different reasons why premarital sex and marital stability are negatively correlated, not that the assertion in and of itself isn't true or well documented. As to citing claims, these myriad of sources among many others not listed serve to illustrate what we know and the data amassed over many decades surrounding the negative social, emotional, and physical ramifications of promiscuity and premarital sex. Sometimes common sense is c…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 06:32 AM
1

You wouldn't give that advice to strangers because you don't care about them as much as you do about your son. And you would tell your son not to marry a hoe because you know that past behavior predicts future behavior and you don't want him marrying a woman with bad judgement and an increased risk of having STDs.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 04:36 AM
0

You don't respect articles reviewed by accredited doctors for accuracy, studies that measure behavior over 50 years (how that is "super-preliminary," I don't know) or studies that show a strong correlation. Okay, I can respect that you want to see more in-depth studies. Here's some highlights: Women who have more than one intimate premarital relationship have an increased risk of marital dissolution Although having multiple sex partners increased the odds of substance dependence disorders for bo…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 04:18 AM
3

Thanks for helping me refine my point. I think I got that mixed up for the average age of virginity loss which is at a higher age for men than woman. My other points still stand.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 03:44 AM
14

There's nothing ideological about basic human anatomy and biology. Don't tell me you're one of those crazies that think men can get pregnant? LOL
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 03:04 AM
2

Promiscuity in men isn't good either but the negative psychological effects, like a decreased ability to pair-bond is less in men than it is in women. Also, despite your thought-experiments, heterosexual men are at less risk than woman or homosexual men (especially bottoms) to contract an STD. Also, men can't get pregnant. Edit: removed spurious info.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 03:01 AM
34

Okay? You just validated what I said. Men are biologically conditioned to spread their seed; women are biologically conditioned to be sexually selective. It's biology.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:53 AM
15

Truth hurts, doesn't it?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:52 AM
11

Yes, seriously. Having promiscuous sex is dangerous for women as we can get pregnant and it's easier for us to get STDs than it is for men.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:36 AM
31

Yes. Women control sex and reproduction.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:25 AM
8

https://www.everydayhealth.com/longevity/can-promiscuity-threaten-longevity.aspx https://www.huffpost.com/entry/more-sexual-partners-unhappy-marriage\_n\_5698440 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4085758/Experts-reveal-sexual-partners-ve-determine-likely-DIVORCE.html https://economictruthsblog.wordpress.com/2017/02/13/sexual-promiscuity-destructive-effects/
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:22 AM
12

Science shows it significantly reduces your ability to pair-bond or have long-term happiness in marriages. Promiscuity is also an indicator and a common symptom of a myriad of personality disorders.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:16 AM
12

For women, it shows how little discernment they have and how reckless they are with valuable, important things; like their womb.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:12 AM
36

That's because it's difficult for a man to accrue a high body count. It's not for women.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:11 AM
9

Go contract an STD or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:09 AM
8

I never listened to Rush Limbaugh, so I don't know how accurate that is. I've also never been to Kentucky but I have been to other Southern states who's people are much more welcoming and tolerant than the Californians I live around. I've faced more racism from other black people and white liberals than I ever have from a white Southener. Black people are much more conservative than our voting records would lead you to believe. Most black women are religious and most black people want police pre…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 06:29 PM
14

No one likes Mitch McConnell on the left nor the majority of the right as he's a RINO. As a black person, I greatly prefer open "racists" who just prefer to live and fraternize with their own people and leave others alone (a definition which also accurately describes most black people) to "anti-racist" coastal elites who think it helps us to lower educational standards, take police out of violent communities beset by intra-racial violence, substitute anti-minority racism for anti-white racism an…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 05:15 PM
16

That's too easy to counter. I think a more apt description would be that men have some rights but are effectively second-class citizens in comparison with the opposite sex. Women have more legal rights and civil privileges than men and the playing field needs to be equalized.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 08:44 PM
1

Yes, I did because your lack of empathy is worthy of being downvoted.
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 06:06 AM
3

One of my friends can't have sex without an immense amount of pain because of his circumcision and there's no way to fix it or have any recourse for a decision that was made for him as a newborn.
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 06:03 AM
0

Just because I don't commit paternity fraud doesn't mean I don't have the legal capacity to do so at any time, most likely without repercussion.
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 06:02 AM
2

I literally gave you multiple factual examples. Go back and read it again.
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 06:01 AM
1

As long as they agree to be forced into military service. I already said that. Do women have that exception? No, we don't because we're privileged.
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 06:00 AM
3

So if you live in a country where you can't vote but you just choose not to, you're not suffering from legal oppression? I'm not talking about individuals I'm talking about men as a class of people. My husband, nor any man don't need to be currently going through any current legal battles to be able to feel the unfair disadvantages being a man effects upon their lives in this country. The threat is always present because there's nothing but fate holding back the hammer.
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 05:58 AM
2

Says society. We have rights and privileges they don't, as I've already illustrated.
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 05:55 AM
1

I never said women don't have their own issues but unlike men, we have plenty of institutional, legal, social and societal infrastructure to mitigate stressors on our side.
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 05:53 AM
2

Every man personally suffers from oppression as they lack equal rights under the law. More specifically, my husband was raised by a misogynistic feminist with an absent father and regrets his circumcision. He was also among the many boys misdiagnosed in school as being mentally or behaviorally challenged because he displayed typical boy behaviors and never had a positive male role model, as he was raised around all women, including all female teachers.
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 05:51 AM
2

Yes, North America. There are many legal rights and civil privileges women have that men don't. Some legal rights they lack include: the right to bodily autonomy (re: circumcision on babies), the right to choose parenthood, the right to vote without agreeing to be forced into military service. Some civil privileges they lack include: government and social resources dedicated to their issues like domestic violence, suicide, education and systematic discrimination in family court, the lack of beli…
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 05:44 AM
1

The US. I try to be the best wife I can, but I still work on it everyday. I still have things to unlearn!
/r/RedPillWives24/07/22 05:35 AM
5

Sometimes I feel an overwhelming sense of guilt and anger because I live in a country where men are second-class citizens and I have rights and privileges not given to my husband, sons, brothers, cousins, etc. just because I was born with a vagina. I feel a lot of empathy for MGTOWs, incels and black-pilled men because they're legitimately systematically oppressed and have a huge uphill battle; especially if they weren't raised with their father.
/r/RedPillWives23/07/22 07:08 PM
19

Well, first of all I'm a woman. Second, biological differences mean that men and women can't have equal opportunities. However, feminism has been asking for and has always asked for special treatment regardless of that fact. For instance, asking for the right to vote without the inherent responsibility of being forced into military service. They cited the fact that they were women and were unfit for infantry service in comparison to men, and while that may be true, they still wanted the benefits…
/r/MensRights23/07/22 04:59 PM
23

Then men and women aren't equal.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 04:24 PM
9

Female circumcision certainly has been a cultural and religious worldwide practice for centuries, maybe not so much in the Western world but in many Muslim and black-majority societies.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 01:07 AM
4

Ask your momma why she chose to give an abusive man children?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:05 AM
5

Trust but verify and protect yourself at all times.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 06:53 AM
8

A distinction without a difference.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 06:52 AM
5

Please, just shut up. We're tired of hearing the same old No True Scotsman over and over. That's not what it means, that's not what it's ever meant and the research shows that.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 06:50 AM
0

Right, then don't break up your family.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 06:48 AM
1

"Cisgender" is part of your political ideology. The term was coined in 1994 and the term cis- was traditionally used in cellular biology and was never used to describe "sexual identity" until very recently. It's appropriative language - it is not an organic evolution of language and it's used to make ideological not scientific differentiations.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:02 PM
2

That's the thing, they didn't discover new knowledge they created ideologies based on non-replicatable, unproven, unscientific and debunked experiments, surveys and methods but their erroneous conclusions are still taken today as sacrosanct. It's more akin to religious or doctrinal faith than it is to actual science. At least the horrible things done to people in the past led to actual medical advancements in the present, and we generally don't laud the evil scientists and make movies about how …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:59 PM
2

The separation of sex and gender and even sexual identity is ideological. The differentiations were coined by literal mad scientists and pedophiles; John Money and Alfred Kinsey to be exact - they were never able to prove their theories; they were guilty of abominable ethical crimes and never prosecuted.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:27 PM
1

All this suggests is that there may be a medical/biological basis for gender dysphoria; no one dismisses the claim that people with gender dysphoria exist. Similar studies have shown that girls with autism have the same issue with structures in their brain. However, what it doesn't prove is that they're the opposite sex, if anything it suggests that transgenderism may be a neurological/genetic disorder.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:49 PM
1

Right. Dogmatic social or political ideology (a difference without a distinction and founded by leftist pedophiles who were never able to prove their claims), not scientific fact.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:18 PM
1

That's an ideological statement. That's not what science says.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:15 PM
2

That's not very descriptive and I haven't been able to find much more information on it. Was human sterilization in France only forbidden for women and what exactly did they mean by that? The only things I could find pertaining to the question is that now they don't require sterilization for trans people and in regards to abortion, not sterilization. What was the law called that forbode it or what was the law called that enabled it?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:27 AM
1

Do trans-men who commit crimes suffer the same sex-based penalty as men? Trans people are a highly protected group in the West and their mental health is definitely disproportionately prioritized by a society that wants to force larger society to affirm their self-image so they won't off themselves. I'm not aware of the level of violence trans-men suffer, but I doubt it's on the same level as men; I could be wrong. What you're missing is that these things aren't based in biology; they're based o…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:59 AM
2

So I'll ask for a third time: what law forbids women from getting hysterectomies?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:52 AM
1

There are doctors who won't give vasectomies to men either if they aren't married with children, but vasectomies are different because they're more reversible and men don't have a lot of other options in regards to their reproductive rights. So, I'm just going to assume that we agree that there was no law on the books that banned women from getting hysterectomies.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:50 AM
0

I didn't say we shouldn't; I said they're not men and when it comes down to it, being biological women, they won't have the same struggles as a man, in general.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:46 AM
1

Right, because doctors know that statistically most women want to have children eventually and can change their minds; they don't want to be responsible for your regret and that's their prerogative. What law banned women from getting hysterectomies?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:45 AM
2

Right and there are some doctors that perform the surgeries on men and women regardless, in the present and in the past, albeit they're in the minority. What law banned women from being hysterectomies?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:42 AM
1

What does me watching or not watching Matt Walsh have to do with anything? You should check out the BBC documentary Dr. Money and the Boy with No Penis and the Yorkshire Television documentary Secret History: Kinsey's Pedophiles. Do some research of your own and see where your political ideology comes from.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:41 AM
2

A lot of doctors today and in the past refuse to give sterility surgeries to people without children and without the consent of their spouses because of regret. They have that right as private citizens.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:50 AM
1

Right, so they're not a man or a woman; they're presenting as that.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 04:56 AM
1

LOL - anything to distract from the point. Very communist of you.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:43 AM
1

No; they're their biological sex but present themselves as the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:42 AM
7

I have a husband, sons and brothers. I understand the anger some men have towards our matriarchal society and I share that anger. The matriarchy hurt me, too; through fatherlessness, toxic gender dynamics and masculinity being demonized in our society.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:41 AM
1

Correct; their names were John Money and Albert Kinsey and their proclivities are well-documented.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:34 AM
1

Great comeback, comrade. You should heed your screen-name.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:11 AM
1

Trans men are women though.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:08 AM
1

Third-worlders are literally being mass imported into this country to fill good-paying tech jobs that could have been given to native citizens just -because they're cheaper and also being illegally trafficked into this country to do hard labor and be sex slaves, but go off.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:04 AM
1

Your leftist terminology-appropriation game.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:02 AM
1

He shouldn't be playing your game. The terms are synonymous and always have been.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:55 AM
1

Every protected class doesn't have the same protections, but what they have in common are group protections themselves, like having your self-identity socially enforced. White people as a class don't have legal or societal protections, and neither do men but their other intersections may.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:54 AM
2

What other groups get their self-identity enforced by larger society, academia, the workplace and have groups lobbying to make everyone not affirming their self image illegal?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:14 AM
2

Most people don't subscribe to your doctrinal ideology. I'm going with the working definition that's been used universally until about the 60s until it was appropriated by pedophile leftists. Gender and sex are traditionally and predominantly synonymous, as they should be.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:11 AM
0

They're not men though; they're women presenting as men. If the draft were enforced, I doubt they'd get the same treatment as biological men in our Western society.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:09 AM
3

Did you have 3 children? Your grandfather probably needed to be in agreement with his wife to get a vasectomy, even back then.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:06 AM
10

So, you don't understand how bodies work. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 03:29 PM
7

Why wouldn't they be demonized if they were a man? Sex doesn't matter in this case.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 03:28 PM
6

Your projecting your feelings and experience onto everyone else and that's not cool. Biological effects are not voluntary and don't imply that consent was granted. Would you say the same to a woman who was SA'ed but got wet or orgasmed? This is the same thing.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 03:27 PM
55

What you just wrote is pathological and you should get help.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:28 AM
3

The screenshot link just links back to this post :(
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:26 AM
5

Can you post the screenshot, it's now deleted.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:17 AM
2

You can keep repeating that but you're factually incorrect. They are babies, by definition. Vulnerability doesn't negate personhood. Viability doesn't mean it can't live outside the womb, it describes if it would be able to be fully developed and healthy if you allowed it to grow and not kill it; ectopic pregnancies are not viable because it would naturally miscarry if left alone and put the mothers life at risk. Disallowing the killing of an unborn life isn't telling anyone what to do with thei…
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 09:39 PM
2

That's what all humans look like at the earliest stages of development. It does look like a human because humans at eight weeks look like that. You could say much of what you described and be talking about a disabled adult. Humanity is in our DNA, not our appearance. Babies have their own bodies; that's what I'm advocating for.
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 09:32 PM
2

8 week old fetuses have fingers; toes; eyes; ears, all the things associated with the human body. They absolutely look like a human, albeit with a big head. Regardless, looking like a human isn't a requirement for being one. I've seen fully grown adults that look more like lizards than people but they're still human beings. Human beings are human beings from conception. Human is a species, not a baked dessert item. All of those things would be the ingredients of a cake, just like a sperm and an …
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 09:20 PM
0

"Baby" has more than one meaning?...okay? Not sure what you thought you were doing there, other than being needlessly crude. Wow, you have sex; congratulations. Embryo is part of the human life cycle. If it's not human, what species is it? Every body is a clump of cells. If you're going to use words, you should know what they mean.
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 09:06 PM
1

Roe v Wade was always going to be overturned because it was based on a lie and on very faulty interpretations of the Constitution; the left knew this but they didn't codify abortion rights into law when they could. Obama ran on codifying RvW as his first act as President; this is because he knew it would eventually be overturned; and yet refused to so when he had a super-majority. The Constitution doesn't give anyone the right to an abortion. The neutral decision was to turn the decision over to…
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 04:16 PM
-4

"Baby" is a colloquial term for the youngest of our species in the earliest stages of development; it's not a scientific term. The unborn fall under the definition of "baby" in the dictionary. That week's old content is a human being. If it's not her body, it's not a question of her bodily autonomy.
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 04:11 PM
1

And if the doctor's wrong?
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 05:01 PM
3

Well, it's the doctor that substantiates the risk, not the woman. Also, abortion is not a constitutional right, so they're not being denied their rights. What pro-life arguments have you heard that condemns abortion in "self-defense?"
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 03:56 PM
1

Why would the solution of a life being at risk to end it pre-emptively?
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 03:48 PM
4

I'm pro-life, volunteer for pro-life organizations and am part of the prolife subreddit and the predominant attitude is that abortion is only acceptable if the life of the mother is at risk. All 50 states have an exception for the life of the mother.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 02:19 PM
11

If you can't make statements without clarifying them in any way, maybe you just shouldn't participate in the discussion.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:51 PM
9

Why not?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:25 PM
26

All the "benefits" of male circumcision are the same as female circumcision but it's not considered to be okay.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:13 PM
35

If he hates it so much, he can still get circumcised. Studies show it does effect babies and they do remember and are negatively effected by it. At least if you're an adult, you have the choice to go through the pain. That shouldn't be inflicted on a newborn baby.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:12 PM
3

You keep saying the same thing over and over and yet can't illustrate or prove your point. You're not reading my comments, so we're done here. Now I'm suspecting you're some sort of bot considering the repetitive nature of your posts and lack of a proper response.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 11:13 PM
5

I'm not insulting you, I'm observing your behavior. Projection: you're the one insulting me, calling me dumb and an ignoramus. I am willing to convict women whose criminally negligent or reckless behavior results in the death of their baby. That's what I've been saying all along.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 11:11 PM
3

LOL! Please point out one insult, lie or dodge I wrote down. I explicitly said if a woman was criminally negligent or reckless in a way that resulted in the death of her baby, she should be prosecuted. Are you even reading my comments because you're replying as if you're not.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 11:09 PM
2

What lie have I told? If a woman's direct recklessness or negligence leads to the death of her baby, manslaughter charges may indeed be necessary. If it's something like, she got an infection and she didn't know about it or didn't address it in time that's one thing, if she took illicit drugs she knew would be a danger to her baby or provoked a fight that necessitated defense against her that resulted in the death of her baby; that should be a crime. The vast majority of miscarriages aren't unde…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 10:57 PM
10

The dictionary definition of the word "person" is a human being. You have to sling insults because you looked it up and I was right so you're rightfully embarrassed. Be humble and just admit defeat.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 10:52 PM
9

Go look up the dictionary definition of "person" and get back to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 10:30 PM
2

Yeah, miscarriages often happen by nature not by the actions of human beings. False comparison.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 10:29 PM
7

A miscarriage is a natural occurrence. Manslaughter wouldn't apply unless the mother's criminal negligence or recklessness surmounted to killing the child.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 08:26 PM
10

Person is literally defined as a human being. Why are you all so dishonest about this?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 08:23 PM
3

Has he talked to you about keeping a stricter budget for your all's long-term goals? It sounds like from your comments (he's saving for your wedding and house renovations) he thought to himself, "You know we're trying to save money but you still want to spend $200+ on a single night? Then I guess it's on you." Then, you still insisted after he made it clear to you that you'd be responsible for paying. Even if he didn't explicitly have that discussion with you, the fact that you know he's plannin…
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/22 04:19 AM
2

You cant have two first priorities; we're talking about choices, right? Children need to come first for someone; they're not going to get that at daycare or school. They need it at home.
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/22 12:54 AM
1

If both parents' first priority is their career, whose first priority is the children?
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 11:52 PM
1

We also want functional children who turn into functional adults and strong families who stay together. I didn't make any problems, the problems are self-evident and it starts with not having two strong and present parents.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 10:40 PM
1

Choice should be available within reason but not every choice is a good choice. Feminism didn't support choices, it supported women's liberation outside the home and you see the fruits of that push today.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 10:17 PM
1

I'm not, actually. It's based on science and statistics, but whatever. What I meant was that maybe shaming a vast preponderance of women into leaving the "safezone" wasn't actually the best thing for them or for society.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 07:52 PM
1

Well, women are more unhappy now then they were then and families are infinitely worse off, so it doesn't seem like the "safezone" to me.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 07:18 PM
0

Most men have the responsibility to be the main provider in their households, even if the woman works he usually makes the most money and if he doesn't they're much more likely to divorce.That's why two-parent households are important so that the other partner can pick up the slack.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 06:09 PM
3

No, they were pretty explicit about being a SAHM or wife being the choice one shouldn't make. It was about "liberation" not respecting women's choices.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 06:05 PM
0

Nothing inherently. The problem comes in when her career becomes more important than being a mother or a wife, or even worse if she starts making more money than the husband and becomes disgusted with him or feels like it entitles her to be domineering over him.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 05:54 PM
2

Second-wave feminism was founded on taking women out of the home and encouraging them to get careers so as not to be a "slave" to their husbands and family life.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 05:53 PM
1

That's a lot of projection and putting words in my mouth.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/22 04:42 PM
1

I'm not excusing any serial killers; I'm merely acknowledging the contributing factors of their behavior.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/22 04:41 PM
1

Male porn stars, or any man that is extremely promiscuous, also have detrimental effects to their mental health and relationships but not as much as women, this is backed by science. This is because it is infinitely more difficult for a man to procure sex than it is for a woman; women are the arbiters of sex and reproduction. The barometer isn't just having sex in front of children. It's the physical, social psychological effects it has on the individual exploiting themselves and how those thing…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/22 04:40 PM
1

Acknowledging the origins of the misogyny of some serial killers isn't making excuses for them. Not acknowledging the material harm their mothers caused them as children which informed and inspired their violent behavior as adults, however, is. Childhood trauma is a major factor in what we become then we grow up; monsters aren't created in a vacuum. If we want to stop these people, (and all of us do) we need to intervene early, not shrug our shoulders and ignore the problem until it's too late.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/22 03:41 PM
1

Just because you criticize women in other areas doesn't mean you don't have a blind spot. Apparently yours is women who abuse their children through their immoral behavior.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/22 03:05 PM
1

Anything to avoid criticizing women, huh? The women-are-wonderful effect is in full display. This victim-blaming, gynocentric mentality is why child abuse, especially against little boys, is so prevalent and why so many men walk around angry and violent.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/22 03:00 PM
13

Yeah, a gynocentric one.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 03:28 PM
4

Holding women accountable for their bad behavior is creepy and dangerous. Simp.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 03:22 PM
44

That's terrible. It's because we live in a society where women don't have any accountability for their behavior.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 03:21 PM
7

So telling the truth makes someone an incel? I'm a happily married pregnant SAHM with a toddler but go off.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 03:19 PM
34

No, getting a train ran on you accrues psychological trauma. It's not just that it's in the public sphere. Promiscuity is a huge indicator of a myriad of personality disorders and decreases a person's ability to pair bond. Dehumanizing yourself by selling your body like a commodity and letting people use you has long-term physical, social and psychological consequences, no matter how many people see you do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 03:17 PM
30

Giving an example of the other extreme doesn't negate the fact that wh*res create serial killers.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 02:45 AM
233

More than that, he's more likely to grow up hating women and not being able to be in a healthy relationship because his primary role model for womanhood drinks piss and lets groups of men DP her. I can't count the number of serial killers who attribute their misogyny to having a wh*re for a mother.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 02:29 AM
2

What's wrong with whoring? Whores destroy themselves, their communities, and their families (most of all, their children) through promiscuity which leads to a myriad of personality disorders and decreases their ability to pair-bond thereby negatively effecting any romantic relationship they attempt to have; they often create unwanted, fatherless children who are at extremely high risk of many disadvantages; through the encouragement of perversion and the premature sexual awakening of children ar…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 02:27 AM
248

God help that child.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 02:19 AM
51

Multiple things can be bad at the same time. Stop trying to constantly shift the blame to protect women from accountability or criticism; it's sexist.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 02:18 AM
21

She's not bad because she's a woman; she's bad because she's literally a wh*re. Nothing about what she does is deserving of respect.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 02:16 AM
1

Okay, then what do you think it was?
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/22 10:58 PM
0

Nice. Cherry picking my profile because you can't dispute my points. That just tells me you know I'm right and you have nothing to say. Plenty of black people think our culture is toxic, ever heard Chris Rock stand up? I can be a woman and not a feminist, you're ignoring the context thay I was discussing how women got the vote without any of the inherent responsibility. I can also be 33 years old. All of these things can be true at the same time and not be mutually exclusive. Not everything adhe…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/22 04:38 PM
4

They weren't necessary back then, either. In fact, I'd say they were worse; the feminist movement was materially bad for society. More women than men vote today, have more rights than men today, consume more than men today and look at what society has become.
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/22 06:14 AM
2

Couldn't have said it better myself. Just wanted to add that it was a movement designed to gain unearned privileges and political power for white women (emphasis on white).
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/22 06:13 AM
7

Feminist movements in the West were never about equality and were not necessary.
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/22 03:51 AM
3

The vast majority women can afford the products they use as there are widely-available extremely cheap options, even at the dollar store. To reiterate, they can also get hem free through charities, clinics, schools and hospitals. Yeah sure, let's advocate for free menstruation products in a western first-world country by comparing ourselves to third-world countries. That's totally reasonable /s.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 09:34 PM
3

I am a woman. I'm a pregnant SAHM of a toddler. Weird that you're caping for women as a sex but seem to be confounded by the idea of a woman being capable of independent thought outside of your personal political prism. Seems pretty sexist. And my opinion is automatically dismissed because I was born an American? Seems pretty xenophobic. Thanks for revealing who you are though; a misandric sexist, xenophobe. Unlike you, I can rely on your personality traits rather than your immutable characteris…
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 04:26 PM
5

How is it "woo is me" if I'm a woman? But yes, tell me more about how woman are above criticism.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 04:17 PM
5

Reasoning: appeal to authority, politically-motivated selective blindness, misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 04:11 PM
6

Sure, let's act like irresponsible, emotionally-manipulative, psychologically damaging promiscuity isn't a thing in 2022 women-led hook-up culture where 80% of women chase 10% of men and look at average men as unattractive and beneath their standards just because you dislike the vernacular. You're a lesbian; okay and? You can still be a simp for bad women and their bad behavior. I'm a married SAHM whose been with the same man for over a decade and I'll still call out wh*res because they need to …
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 04:02 PM
8

Oh god are you one of those simps HAHAHA
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 01:51 PM
3

Okay, but my point is, that's not a right, that's a special privilege. There are no rights men have that women don't already have and conversely, there's a lot of rights and privileges (which this would be an additional one to the ones we already have) that women have that men don't. Also, women can and do already get free hygiene products at places like schools, hospitals and through charities. And who and how would we be paying for this? Everyone through taxes? I don't think it's necessarily f…
/r/AntiFeminists31/05/22 08:44 PM
1

How old is your grandmother and what exactly did she experience?
/r/AntiFeminists31/05/22 07:27 PM
2

How is getting something for free a right? What product do men have a right to be provided for them for free? You're advocating for special privileges for women; not equal rights. In actuality, men often have less rights than women do.
/r/AntiFeminists31/05/22 07:26 PM
1

You're delusional and need help; you know it and your profile confirms it. You're so surrounded by privilege, you don't even see it, in fact, you think you're entitled take for granted the labor of the men and women throughout history who created it for you; for you to just spit in their face by diminishing, denying and deflecting all their work through your extremely biased and narrow prism of how you got to where you are. You sit on your pedestal and dare to look down upon the literal miracles…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/22 06:07 AM
1

So you live in the most peaceful time in history, in a rich, developed first-world country literally built by men's labor and blood, as the most privileged entity on Earth - a Western woman; possessing more legal and social privileges than the men you look down on, as well as the women before you who sacrificed, working side-by-side and supported those patriarchs (who granted them equal rights without equal responsibilities, and invented and created medicines and devices that revolutionized thei…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/22 04:42 AM
1

Do you have a gun?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/22 04:28 AM
1

What country do you live in?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/22 04:18 AM
1

Women can't survive without men. We are a symbiotic species and women are the most vulnerable of the two. Patriarchal thinking is what progressed society and there's nothing wrong with it; men do and should lead, especially their families, which is all that patriarchy means. That doesn't mean women aren't important or have our own source of power. It's just nature and there's no amount of moral relativism or Marxism that can overcome it.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/22 09:49 PM
1

Women have more legal rights and social privileges (Western world) than men do. In what way would being a woman not be easier than being a man?
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 12:26 AM
4

Your choice is whether or not to have sex, not whether or not you can kill your child.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 02:10 AM
5

Women who fail to pay child support are incarcerated only one-eighth as often as men with similar violations. When a child is abandoned, the State is required to place them in a pre-adoptive home and petition the court for termination of the birth parents' parental rights, only six states require the department to check the putative father registry before a termination of parental rights petition can be filed. This means thanks to the tender years doctrine, the mother has more power to abandon a…
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:18 AM
1

Everything I've said is backed by actual events, statistics and facts. Everything you've said is actually a projection of what you accused me of; over-exaggeration, emotional manipulation, and conspiracy theories. First of all, many women did and continue to inherit their family's estates; especially if they didn't have any male heirs, had resources to spare or they were spinsters and needed to offer something as dowry. The reason they didn't usually is because it was always traditionally the ma…
/r/MensRights01/05/22 05:20 PM
2

It should not be particularly targeted against women, because history is full of evidences that men cause more harm to other men than a woman can ever cause. You're ignoring women's violence, completely just because it's different than men's violence. Women use their power to coerce men into committing violence against other men through emotional manipulation; women create monsters by being deceptive and sexually promiscuous, inflicting psychological damage upon their partners; women also create…
/r/MensRights01/05/22 03:38 PM
7

Ah, I take that back then. Based and red-pilled.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/22 04:17 AM
6

Say you're a misandrist without saying you're a misandrist.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/22 04:11 AM
30

A relationship between a man and a woman is inherently unequal because men are second-class citizens in our society, legally and culturally. Men have fewer legal rights and social privileges than women do: as it pertains to the right to choose parenthood; being believed and taken seriously when being abused; and the inherent and assumed responsibilities regarding protecting and providing; among many other things. The rest of this is horseshit.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/22 03:48 AM
23

Do women often get away with killing their children? Yes.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/22 06:35 PM
1

Whether or not people are able to do it, it remains the best thing for children and for women. Too bad (mostly leftist) politicians have been working for decades to make it extremely hard to do.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:20 PM
-7

It makes for the happiest and most well-adjusted children.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:09 PM
1

That's not what I said. I said "a woman wanted to check her male partner's condoms to make sure they were properly maintained." He provides the condoms and she wants to verify their veracity. Now, how do you justify not getting an STD screening before sex?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:35 PM
1

Ooh, so you're an insane person! Noted; you should have just said that from the beginning.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 02:46 PM
2

If a woman wanted to check her male partner's condoms to make sure they were properly maintained, or ask for an STD screening before they had sex would that men she didn't trust her partner and she shouldn't be in a relationship with him? It's not neutral; mothers have a 100% certainty that their child is theirs. The father does not.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 11:44 PM
3

So in other words, you're ignorant about men's feelings and struggles and want to maintain that ignorance. Then just go away, this isn't the place for misandrists.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 11:42 PM
3

Like what? He shouldn't be in a relationship with her because he wants to make sure his child is his? How does that make sense, especially considering paternity fraud is a real issue with little to no recourse. Maybe if the laws were more permissive and compassionate towards men who are victims, he would feel safer not knowing. Why do you hate men?
/r/MensRights25/04/22 06:54 PM
2

If he didn't trust her he wouldn't have married and impregnated her in the first place. Now he wants proof that his trust was well placed. Nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 06:24 PM
3

You're just repeating the same thing over and over without a good faith attempt to understand where the other side is coming from. Trust but verify; easy. False paternity is a problem and a lot of men find out accidentally after they put blind trust in their partner. It's really convenient for you to put all the blame on the man, when you're not the one who would have to suffer if the results weren't what he wanted. Stop justifying the exploitation of men's labor and love.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 06:20 PM
3

Never heard of trust but verify?
/r/MensRights25/04/22 06:17 PM
14

Me, too but you can't comment.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/22 05:50 AM
1

Literally what?
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:02 PM
4

You're comparing people hurting your feelings to men being literal second-class citizens with no recourse. You sound spoiled as hell.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 02:34 AM
7

X to doubt.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 02:27 AM
14

Were you harassing people?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:23 PM
3

Take your Marxist ideology and go somewhere else. No one cares.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:21 PM
2

It is but that's not what you said. Men being attacked by women need to defend themselves and if that necessitates bodily harm to the woman, its the man's responsibility to protect himself not the woman from her own stupidity. If a lady doesn't act like a lady, she must be prepared to be treated like a man.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/22 01:14 AM
2

False paternity, cheating, deception, disease, having bastard children, generational teenaged pregnancy, abortion, giving birth out of wedlock; leading to poverty, decreased educational outcomes, increased chances of mental instability, violence, decreased ability to pair-bond and lowered chances of happiness in marriage. I could go on and on; all of this is backed by statistics. Just look it up for yourself.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:21 PM
1

What's dumb about it?
/r/MensRights17/04/22 03:33 PM
12

Men can be promiscuous and it's also harmful but not as impactful since men can't give birth and only the small minority of the most sexually desirable men are able to be slutty since women are the arbiters of sex.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:15 AM
3

If it doesn't apply to you, that's fine but a lot of people are religious and sexual promiscuity interferes with their spiritual life. From what knowledge or from which data points are you presuming that most people here are atheists or that spiritual matters hold no bearing? I'm not saying you're wrong, but I don't know that you're right, either. Personally, I'm not religious and have considered myself atheistic for multiple decades now but I think there is still room for a spiritual life even …
/r/MensRights17/04/22 05:29 AM
20

A lot. Promiscuity is a significant red flag for virtually every single type of personality disorder for a reason. It destroys families and communities; not to mention the individual's mental, emotional, physical and spiritual health.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:37 AM
2

I'm not saying you're wrong, I've just never heard it. I'm okay with culturally-insensitive ribbing, personally but I agree that Michael didn't do anything wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 03:54 AM
1

They don't live longer when they're married to women with your kind of attitude.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 03:41 AM
2

I consider myself to be a tradcon woman and her perspective isn't that, IMO - it's more akin to radical feminism. Traditionalist women know that it's not a woman's place to challenge men in the physical arena, period; because if you act like a man, you can't be surprised when you get treated like one.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 03:36 AM
1

What is his take? Are you talking about unfunny jokes and skits poking fun or outright condemnation because I haven't seen that. Are you sure he really is the way you're portraying or do you just not like him?
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 03:33 AM
2

Gentlemen don't cower from women trying to cause them bodily harm and ladies don't try to physically attack men.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 02:07 AM
3

That's not been my experience of him and I've never seen him say any such thing. In fact, two of his "Change My Mind" episodes were about not believing all women and that rape culture was a myth. Where are you getting that information?
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 02:06 AM
4

That is a completely unreasonable and gynocentric take. Women who are intent on causing harm are, indeed, hard to stop. Especially because men are conditioned to not hurt us even if they're getting hurt themselves and we're especially dangerous if we use weapons, which we do most often in domestic violence situations; and after all, women are the most likely perpetrators of one-sided domestic violence. Men should absolutely defend themselves and its unconscionable to say otherwise. You're perpet…
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 02:01 AM
2

Huh? What are you talking about?
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 08:47 PM
1

It has everything to do with your question because it's likely the mother doesn't even know who the father is, or the father had no hand in the abandonment, at all. It's possible the father knows about the abandonment but how would you be able to tell? Usually, when there is video evidence of the act occurring, it's the mother who's doing the abandoning. It's impossible to tell because of the nature of biology; only the mother is the guaranteed biological parent and because of gynocentric laws; …
/r/MensRights16/04/22 04:43 PM
4

We live in such a gynocentric society that women have ultimate power over life and death itself and they cry misogyny when restricted from killing their own babies. There's nothing more toxic than that.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 04:00 PM
1

I don't know; I imagine it's hard to impossible to know because fathers have virtually no reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:01 PM
2

When women leave their children at fire stations or hospitals like this, where are their fathers? Are they also not doing the same thing? I've never heard of a father dropping a baby off at a fire-station or hospital. But fathers cannot arbitrarily give up their parental rights unless the mother files for a termination of rights against the father or someone is willing to adopt the child. Mothers do not have to jump through those hoops.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 04:28 AM
3

LMAO! Could you be any more of a stereotype? Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:18 PM
2

Why? Each time I've given you evidence, you don't care so I won't waste my time. You're just using that as an appeal to authority in lieu of using common sense and practical knowledge. If you're a Westerner/knowledgeable about the West and were intellectually honest you'd be discussing this subject in good faith.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:52 PM
1

I don't know why; I never said that's what we should do. I'm advocating for financial and parental abortion. That's an easy way to equalize the power disparity.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:48 PM
1

They're not the biggest source of risk because the vast majority of men aren't going to be able to impregnate a bunch of women. Only a small percentage of the most sexually desirable men have that advantage. Why give men a vasectomy when women can just keep their legs closed, choose wisely or use birth control responsibly? Whomever has the most power (women) has the most responsibility.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:41 PM
6

But we do encourage and destigmatize sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility, especially for women, which causes these situations in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:39 PM
1

In general, that is more right than not; which means it's our responsibility to pick quality men who are willing to give us commitment to have sex with.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:38 PM
3

Yes. Married couples are significantly less likely to be impoverished and by definition they don't have a broken home. Women having children in wedlock is the best thing for everyone involved.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:36 PM
8

I did; which is why I said what I said. Abortion isn’t abandoning babies. The first two are despicable. We should not encourage that. Now according to you, abandoning babies is not a big deal if women are the perpetrators and it's only 100 babies.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:34 PM
1

Women are the arbiters of sex and who gets born in the first place, so your point is moot.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:32 PM
6

So all the sudden abandoning babies isn't a big deal; as long as it's women doing it. Nice shifting of the goalposts.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:29 PM
3

I don't either. Which is why I encourage women to take responsibility over their womb and have sex in wedlock. It's not the false dichotomy that you're trying to portray.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:26 PM
3

Again, this is a forum for discussion. If I'm "obsessed" then so are you for continuing to try to justify your arbitrary, pedantic position.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:25 PM
4

What do you mean? They are encouraged to be used, specifically because mothers were putting their babies in dumpsters and they were put in places where that was happening more often. They're not saying, don't use them. They're saying if you need to, use them and you're strong and empowered if you do, per my source. If being in a situation in which you abandon your babies wasn't being encouraged, society would be pushing for more responsibility for women to prevent them from being in that situati…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:24 PM
2

If he'd exchanged "fetus" for "child" it wouldn't have changed the argument in the slightest. You're just being pedantic.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:17 PM
2

You absolutely could if the man wasn't forced into parenthood just as the woman isn't. Financial abortion is an easy compromise.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:15 PM
6

https://shbb.org/ The website's catchphrase is: "Providing resources. Ending shame." and "No shame, no blame, no names." Their mission is the destigmatiziation of abandoning babies. https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/news/2022/02/11/baby-boxes-in-kentucky "Any mother that chooses to surrender under the safe haven law is basically saying, ‘I want what’s best for my child, and it’s not me.’ And that is nothing less than heroic and selfless,” "
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:11 PM
5

What does that have to do with having the ability to do whatever you please without any consequence or input from the partner that helped conceive?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:07 PM
4

Maybe not in the most technical sense of the word, but it is an abdication of any and all parental responsibility, so it definitely fits in the context of this conversation. Whether or not it's despicable, women have that right while men have no rights at all after the baby's conceived. If one parent is allowed to abandon, even up to the point of killing, the other parent should, too.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:05 PM
6

I'm not sure if you know, but this is a public forum where anyone can participate. If you didn't have an answer to my question, you could have just said that.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:02 PM
3

How did you correct me? I didn't make the original comment. Im asking you what the age of the baby has to do with anything.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 03:34 PM
5

The abortion only being wanted by the woman is the only thing that matters. The man's wishes don't have any power whatsoever, so your point is moot.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 03:33 PM
17

Sure! Women can abandon babies up to a certain age at any firestation or hospital, no questions asked and no financial responsibility. Women can also adopt out without the fathers permission and of course abortion.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 03:32 PM
2

Considering that women are the arbiters of sex and the vast majority of these women aren't being raped; I'd say so. How else are they getting pregnant?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:55 PM
3

More than 20 million Black babies have been aborted since the 1973 Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court decision legalized abortion in our country. 38.4% of all reported abortions in the U.S. in 2019 were performed on Black women, however, only about 12.4% of the total population is Black. Let's take one state as an example: Michigan. Black women had 14,854 of the 26,801 abortions performed on Michigan residents in 2020 with racial data available. While Black women make up only about 14% of Michigan’s…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:50 PM
5

It's only technically not murder because it's currently legal in most States. It is killing a baby.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:46 PM
3

Considering the amount of abortions performed; where's the lie?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:44 PM
8

So in other words, you can't explain why.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:43 PM
8

When it comes to child birth it cannot and will never be equal. It takes two. You contradicted yourself here.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:40 PM
8

We could also disincentivize single motherhood but not giving them unlimited access to men's labor through welfare programs. Maybe then they wouldn't be so liberal with their wombs if they know they won't get bailed out.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:39 PM
10

Why does that matter?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:35 PM
4

And a toddler is not an adult; what's your point?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:35 PM
19

Women are; why shouldn't men be allowed to?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:33 PM
16

Women don't.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:32 PM
2

Projection. Deal with your issues.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/22 07:52 PM
3

You sound like you have battered spouse syndrome or possibly Stockholm's or PTSD from your own trauma surrounding women. You need to seek help because what you're saying doesn't mirror reality in any way and is really unhealthy.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/22 07:07 PM
1

You're the one who brought up race. White privilege has nothing to do with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 08:43 PM
1

I'm black, you troglodyte.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 08:18 PM
3

You sure aren't with that attitude, beta-boy!
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 04:08 AM
4

I'm a woman, now bow down like the simp you are.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 03:52 AM
7

I'm a woman, so even if I came to Fort Bragg with a Smith and Wesson you'd just simp out, anyway. Grow a spine, brother.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 03:51 AM
5

Considering I'm not a trashy idiot, my odds are pretty low.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 03:50 AM
5

LMAO, you can't be real. Get a life, brother and a spine.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 03:50 AM
6

What she did wasn't reasonable; he has no responsibility to protect her from her own stupid decisions.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 03:37 AM
4

She got what she wanted.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 03:36 AM
9

Simp.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 03:35 AM
7

Simp. Have some self respect.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 03:35 AM
13

Simp.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/22 03:34 AM
1

Ah, so I perused your comment history and from what I've read I feel confident in saying that you're a feminist, a misandrist and a female-supremacist using an alt-account to troll my brothers who are simply trying to bring awareness to the issues they face ("what issues" indeed...). You're also not having this conversation in good faith considering that you refuse to answer simple questions or sufficiently elaborate on your spurious opinions, so I'm going to see my way out of this conversation …
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:50 AM
0

I've already gone back and forth too long with someone who thinks sperm is a human being. I'm done now. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:18 AM
1

Again, DNA evidence is universally accepted. In what way would it be difficult to convict someone based on that evidence? Yes, we should be throwing people in jail if they're using their sexuality to destroy people's lives. We already do that (ex. rape, stealthing, molestation) so I don't see why it's controversial in this instance. Are you going to answer my questions: are you a woman or a single mother?
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:02 AM
1

We have societies that recognize natural rights we already possess and it's the role of government to defend those rights; they're not granted by those governments. The fact that some states and countries violate human rights doesn't make it justified or morally correct. They should be overthrown and discarded not blindly followed. We're human beings not sheep.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:56 AM
1

All you've said is because it's hard to prove it shouldn't be a crime but it's not hard to prove. I'm curious about your demos. Are you a woman? A single mother? I can't conceive of why you wouldn't want men to have full justice under the law.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:54 AM
0

You're the one who equated a human being to an ant.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:52 AM
0

What does anything I said have to do with religion? You're the one who brought it up, not me. Human rights are secular. You have no morals, so I don't know why you're appealing to them.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:51 AM
1

It's not difficult to prove at all with a DNA test. Maybe if there were practical consequences, less people would sleep around in a way that ruined multiple lives.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:37 PM
1

Why exactly would it be difficult? If you find out your kid isn't yours, the mother is prosecuted for fraud. Seems pretty straightforward.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:26 PM
0

The instant a human being becomes a human being, it has human rights. Yes. But like you said, you don't believe in human rights, so I'm not inclined to give any of your subjective opinions benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:24 PM
1

Okay? What relevance does that have to anything?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:22 PM
0

It's human DNA it's not a human being. It doesn't have the ability to be an adult unless it fertilizes an egg and then it's the combination of the egg and the sperm that becomes a human. Are you really this ignorant?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:20 PM
3

You haven't explain why this shouldn't be a crime. Fraud is a crime, so why isn't this particular type of fraud a crime? Being scared isn't a defense. She wasn't scared of being dicked down by someone else.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:09 PM
5

Which is why it would be her responsibility to inform the assumed father of the possibility that he may not be the father and if she fails to do so and it turns out that he isn't the father but because of the deception he took on fatherly duties and the fatherly role, she should be prosecuted for fraud.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:38 PM
-1

Just like Wikipedia isn't a valid source, that wasn't any kind of valid rebuttal. I've made my point and you seem to have nothing else to contribute so, have a nice day. :)
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:27 PM
8

How can someone "honestly" think someone else was the father when they knowingly had sex with someone else? There is no plausible deniability when you know the risk is present and you fail to inform the person you're conferring responsibility to.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:23 PM
-1

It's not "the definition I like," its *the* standard, scientific and objective definition since the beginning of time. Just because some philosophers and eugenicists wanted to squabble about which humans deserved to be humans the most doesn't mean they were right to do so.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:22 PM
-1

That's where you're wrong. Rights are not granted by governments; rights are natural. The government doesn't confer onto you your right to life, you naturally have that right; the government doesn't confer onto you your right to liberty or property or freedom, you naturally have those rights. In a state of nature in which no government existed, those rights would still exist. If a lion tried to eat you, you would have the right to defend yourself, if another person tried to take your land, it wo…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:20 PM
-1

Appealing to authority doesn't confer objective validity. Slavery and eugenics had basis in law too but it didn't make it justified. The fact is that the baby was forced into being in the first place by its parents, it was the original victim of infringement.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:02 PM
1

I'm aware of it, I vehemently disagree; on the same grounds I disagree with eugenicists who insist that black people aren't people and the disabled don't deserve human rights.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:59 PM
7

Lying, when sufficiently harmful, is already illegal. People definitely deserve to be thrown in jail for stripping others of their presumed genetic lineage and the fruits of their physical and emotional labor.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:57 PM
0

Your jizz isn't a human being.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:56 PM
-1

Wikipedia is not a valid source, and it makes a distinction at the top rightly separating out the subjective description with the scientific one. The definition of a person is a human being.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:48 PM
0

Wikipedia is not a valid source and it makes a distinction at the top separating out "human persons." The definition of a person, according to any given dictionary is a "human being."
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:46 PM
0

So, you don't believe in human rights. Let these people talk long enough and they tell on themselves.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:44 PM
5

An oak "seed" is the beginning stage of the life-cycle of the genus Quercus, while the "tree" is a different stage in the life-cycle of the genus Quercus; but it's still the same species. What a ridiculous comment, that's like asking if a toddler is an adult. No, but they're both human beings (which is defined as being a members of the species Homo sapien) and they're both people (which is defined as being a human being); that's the point. Any subjective value placed on "consciousness" is meanin…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:40 PM
1

Go look up the definition of "person," and get back to me.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:29 PM
-1

You're missing that the woman had almost unilateral power over whether the baby was conceived (women are the arbiters of sex and reproduction) or born in the first place, and after birth she can choose to completely opt-out of parenthood, while the man cannot.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:22 PM
-2

The baby's body does not equal to the mother's body. It has its own bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:21 PM
0

Those sorts of differences don't negate their inherent humanity nor the fact that they're unique human beings with human rights.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:20 PM
1

There's a huge difference between making the tragic decision of ending the life of someone who's suffered irreparable harm without the chance of healing out of compassion and ending the life of someone who's just begun life just because that life is inconvenient. Extremely disingenuous.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:17 PM
0

Look up the definition of "person," and get back to me.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:14 PM
16

Paternity fraud should be a jail-able offense and grounds for you to lose custody of your children. This is just abhorrent, reckless and destructive. It's inflicting significant psychic and generational damage by depriving a man and children of a legacy. I hate living in a world where a woman's violence isn't recognized just because there's no direct physical outcome.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:48 PM
2

No person should have the unilateral power to deprive another human being of their natural rights; which include the right to life. It is a separate and whole human being from conception and simple geography or reliance on another to survive doesn't negate its inherent humanity. If anyone's rights are being violated, it would be those of of the fetus, since it is forced into being by its creators and then deprived of its human rights. Actions have consequences. Despite your appeal to not include…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:29 PM
1

A human is defined as being a member of the species Homo sapien. So, if a human zygote isn't a human, what species is it and when and how does it magically change species to become Homo sapien?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:24 PM
1

They're directly correlated but if you don't have a rebuttal to my factual statements, you could have just said that.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:56 PM
2

If you exercise enough to negate the surplus, you're no longer eating in a surplus. If you have properly protected sex, you reduce the risk of pregnancy significantly, almost to the point of negation. Since women are the arbiters of who gets sex and who gets born, the vast majority of that responsibility falls onto us, which is why "just keep your legs closed," or "don't get pregnant" is much more pertinent advice to us than it is to men, who have a significantly harder time on average having ac…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:11 PM
2

From the point of conception, it is a human being, by definition. Being a zygote or a "cluster of cells" as you so crassly put it, is part of the human life cycle. What you're describing is your personal political belief system, not anything with a scientific, objective or moral basis.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:03 PM
1

Nice cherry pick. Now see the apt comparison of being fat. If you eat in a surplus you can't say you didn't consent to risking becoming fat. If you consented to sex you can't say you didn't consent to risking pregnancy. The double standard men face doesn't negate my argument, the argument applies the same to them. The only difference is that women can kill the natural consequence of their consented action, while there is no such choice for men. Unilateral power over life and death shouldn't be a…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:50 PM
-2

I didn't say that. Having sex can result in pregnancy and if you consent to sex you're also consenting to the possible consequences of that action. It's the same argument given to men who can't opt-out of parenthood and its the same argument you'd give someone who didn't consent to being fat if they ate in a surplus. You can pick your choices but you can't always pick the consequences.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:18 PM
-2

That's not what the data says; when abortion was illegal, there were less abortions. Also, the baby's body is not the woman's body.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:14 PM
-2

Unless they were raped, no one is forced to go through pregnancy.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:12 PM
1

I'll never understand why someone who supports men's rights would support women having unilateral power over life and death; yet another way to cement men's second-class status in society.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:11 PM
1

Which is why abortion should be illegal.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:07 PM
4

The baby being human isn't a belief it's a fact.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:06 PM
25

Women require husband-duties from their boyfriends (i.e. masculinity, protection, providing financially - whether it be paying for majority of dates or what have you) as a vetting process for marriage, women should be held at the same standard, especially considering how risky marriage or commitment is for men.
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/22 09:46 PM
2

Aw, thanks! I'm dealing with some hardcore nausea from my pregnancy but overall doing great. Hope you're doing well, too. :)
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 08:49 PM
2

How?
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 05:54 PM
12

Again: where have you heard that other than the manosphere? She still has a very popular advice show and plenty of fans who don't call her out. I haven't seen any mainstream criticism towards her.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 05:47 PM
1

Tell that to all the women openly bragging about baby-trapping rich men for a come-up; literally as a career-choice.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 05:46 PM
10

Is she? Where, other than the manosphere?
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 05:26 PM
8

I do all this and more for my husband and we've been happily married and together for 12 years. No lies detected.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 03:55 AM
3

Just look at the proponents of the #MeToo Movement. Two of the highest-profile activists, Amber Heard and Asia Argento, are physical and sexual abusers and never got called out or canceled. The hypocrisy is the complete normalization of the double-standard.
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/22 08:57 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/22 02:05 PM
13

Women can't survive independently without men, i agree with that, but I do think the ability to direct the resources and strength of men is power. Women leaders in history were able to access and control men's bodies and resources to amass power and influence only they had access to. The average woman today lives in a society in which they have more legal and civil rights than their average male counterpart and use political influence to exploit and extract their labor and resources. Western wom…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/22 10:01 PM
17

I agree with most of what you said, however women do have intrinsic power; the power of our natural femininity, youth and beauty are very persuasive to the men of our species (e.g. there is a chemical in women's tears that suppress the male sex drive); and we serve as the arbiters of sex and reproduction. That is our natural power not granted to us by men but by nature. Men and women are symbiotic, we both hold power and privilege linked to our sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/22 09:33 PM
13

No one should be dating a feminist. Most women are intelligent and don't consider themselves to be one.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/22 09:28 PM
3

I agree with you to a certain extent; but that means you acknowledge that it is, in fact gendered, contrary to your original comment. The caveat I have to add is that actual sexual harassment or assault from women towards men (incidents that everyone would consider crossing the line if the sexes were unknown) is normalized, justified or minimized, so it's definitely deeper than changing social norms.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:58 PM
2

Respect ♡
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:11 PM
10

Only one side of the story gets international attention. The UN regularly witnesses and participates in the systematic rape of young boys, this is not a well-known issue. When the #BringBackOurGirls movement was popular, there were many more boys who were murdered, kidnapped, sold into slavery or kept as child soldiers and their plight wasn't highlighted, at all, because they were boys.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:59 PM
9

What's gendered is what's considered to be socially acceptable. Women who harass men don't get the same legal punishments or social condemnation as men who harass women do.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:56 PM
6

Okay, but there are still many women who do what I described above unabashedly and without backlash or consequence. On the Wendy show, one of the most popular talk show broadcasts at the time, a woman asked for advice because she wanted children and her husband didn't. Wendy inferred that she should trick her husband and manipulate him into getting her pregnant, totally disregarding his feelings for her own benefit. When she took an informal survey of the room, most of her almost-exclusive femal…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:37 AM
6

Okay. Some women don't want male birth control to be available because they don't want to give up the power of gendered legalized fraud and rape by deception to extract resources from men as a career choice.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:22 AM
12

"Of course we women don't want a male pill - it would end those happy little 'accidents'" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1251868/Of-course-women-dont-want-male-pill--end-happy-little-accidents.html
/r/MensRights24/03/22 01:18 AM
3

You deserve it; thank you for passing down your wisdom. :)
/r/RedPillWomen23/03/22 05:52 PM
16

God-tier comment; epitome of wise femininity.
/r/RedPillWomen23/03/22 03:38 PM
39

Never take dating advice from a woman who's allergic to accountability; which is most of us. Older women have failed to teach younger women the truth; we don't have unlimited time to waste. Young women who want a family should be making that their first priority and at 4 years until geriatric pregnancy not including the time needed to find a husband, vet him for marriage, get married and then initiate the reproductive process, she should indeed feel rushed - it may already be too late. Misery lo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/22 08:50 PM
2

Any experience you have would be a female experience, wouldn't it? But more specifically, I'm talking about like getting your period, going through female puberty, getting the female cultural experiences (such as being taught how to relate to the opposite sex, how to be aware of how your body effects others, how to protect your body and your innocence); your partner didn't experience those things growing up, but you did. What "girl stuff" does your partner relate to?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 08:35 PM
1

I'm genuinely confused as to how it could be both? What "girl experiences" does your partner experience? They didn't grow up as a girl, so didn't have those definitive female childhood and adolescent experiences and unless they're passing, they're not really being treated as a woman would be treated. Not trying to be rude, I'd like to hear your perspective.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 08:22 PM
3

True that; thanks for the feedback. :)
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:54 PM
8

I agree with everything you said but one factor I'm curious about is your insistence upon being partial and accommodating to women's issues when considering that men in most countries, especially Western ones, are second-class citizens with less legal and civil rights? Women do have unique issues but speaking as an American; our issues stem from not having any boundaries or standards and getting preferential treatment to the point of being disabling for us and being oppressive to men. I feel lik…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:52 PM
-1

Being a coachable woman is a high advantage in the dating market.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:44 PM
1

Genuinely confused as to why I'm getting downvoted; anyone willing to explain?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:18 PM
11

Edit: Genuinely confused as to why I'm getting downvoted; anyone willing to explain? My husband and I (SAHM of a son) talk about these things almost every day as one of the things that brought us together was researching, consuming and discussing news and social issues (and this has become my pet cause). He helped me root out some of my more pernicious unconscious feminist attitudes (like thinking that men shouldn't hit women under any circumstances, or hookup culture) and I introduced him to th…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:20 PM
14

I think trans-people have a unique experience; are transwomen experiencing life as a woman, or a transwoman? Setting aside all the biological and neurological differences, I think you have to consider how society sees and treats them, which for most people is as a man presenting as a woman. I think that's markedly different from being seen as and having the experience of being a biological woman.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:12 PM
28

What's the issue?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:08 PM
7

All the bloody Queens in world history would like to have a word with you...
/r/MensRights10/03/22 03:51 PM
65

Weaponizing her body and sex to exploit men and get what she wants. Sounds like nothing has changed.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 05:10 PM
5

But women do have easier lives than men, on average. It's not a stretch to think that some men may be taking advantage of that - Lia Thomas comes to mind.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:05 PM
4

They still are a man.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:03 PM
5

That's a faith-based belief.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:03 PM
5

No. That's a man.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:02 PM
4

Gender dysphoria only effects a tiny percentage of the population and does not account for all of the people who claim transgenderism. In fact, the common attitude is that you don't have to be dysphoric to be trans, so there is definitely a percentage who are acting out a fetish. This person has internalized misandry because they are a man who hates men; as they described in the video.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 04:54 PM
2

Just wondering how you deal with being a member of the leftist genderqueer community (an assumption because you use and are well-versed in their lingo) while also seeing the faults and inconsistencies? People who ask questions like you usually get ex-communicated (aka canceled).
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 04:27 PM
8

Feminism was always going down this route, they're just free to be open about it now because they've achieved institutional power and female supremacy.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 04:25 PM
3

Autogynephilia and literal internalized misandry. This person needs a mental health intervention.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 04:21 PM
12

Is it accurate or is it not?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/22 11:08 PM
0

The men who are the most violent in our society are raised primarily by single mothers. So, if women would stop having male babies out of wedlock and then abusing them physically and emotionally so that they grow up to be unemotional monsters, those men would stop.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:26 PM
6

Men get attacked more often than women. Both sexes should know how to protect themselves. Guns are the greatest equalizer when it comes to the disparate strength between men and women; the government should butt out by making concealed carry universal.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 04:42 PM
2

The only person who said that a woman's *only* role is to procreate is you. Women have been in the workforce for decades and before that we were running countries, helping with family businesses, advising our husbands and having our own businesses and money well before most women left the home to work. The difference between then and now is that women have abandoned femininity to pursue other things. The women who worked in the past still held on to nurturing their families and putting them befo…
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 07:15 PM
2

Men as a group are exponentially more innovative. Without the innovations of men, we wouldn't have the modern world, and you know that. You're so intent on being contrarian, you can't even be grateful for what you have by acknowledging the truth. Typical feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 06:32 PM
-6

100% agree. These high-powered women still want families at the end of the day. *They* think they're losing, too.
/r/RedPillWives28/02/22 05:51 PM
2

It's not controversial to say that men contribute the most in regards to innovation; it's not an opinion, it's an observation. Women's biological role is literally to procreate. There would be no human race without that role being in place; men can't get pregnant. Feminism is all about ignoring common sense and reality to generate female supremacy. If you have to lie for your ideology to make sense, it's not based on anything of value.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:47 PM
-1

And there were women demanding for themselves and their children to be protected from foreign men and their influence; war isn't a gendered thing - the sexes express and sustain war differently. There are several bloody Queens in history who sent many men to their deaths and many civilian women undermining their country and giving aid and comfort to the enemy. We need men to defend and women to procreate; but feminists seem to forget that point. There would be no infrastructure, innovation or sa…
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:30 PM
5

Women got the right to vote without having to register for the draft; feminism is and has always been about women wanting and receiving special treatment - not equality. Currently, women have more legal rights and social privileges than men do.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 04:44 PM
23

Gestures at society
/r/MensRights27/02/22 05:00 PM
1

What does pedophilia have to do with youth and fertility being biologically attractive? What do you have against men that you need to pathologize their entirely healthy and normal sexuality?
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 08:46 PM
1

Your SMV drops when you leave your prime which is late teens and early 20s. This isn't new information.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 05:15 PM
2

Okay? I agree with that but the point stands that they advocated for getting the privilege without the responsibility. When women got the right to vote, there were still men who couldn't vote for other reasons; neither could women of a minority status. As I stated, feminism has always been about special treatment, not equal treatment.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 04:53 PM
16

A very immature response and low on empathy. Men are the ones who are going the die and are the ones being left behind specifically because they are men. This is obviously and inextricably a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 12:18 AM
16

They're not joking; women initially got the right to vote without having the requirement to be eligible for the draft. It was always hypocrisy and entitlement from the very beginning.
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 04:26 PM
0

Misandric and pendantic.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:19 PM
0

I'm pretty sure the man meant prostitutes, not that he was going to literally buy a woman to be his slave. That's very hyperbolic and feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 09:38 PM
0

Never heard of the "girlfriend experience?" It's a stretch to jump straight to slavery. If you don't like sex work, just say that. I don't either.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:21 PM
1

So, women can't consent to accepting money in exchange for sex?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:01 PM
1

Holy hyperbole, Batman! Who the hell said anything about slaves?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 06:59 PM
3

I mean, feminists pretend they're men all the time as it is.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 04:33 PM
3

This is the internet; we already know weaponized autism is a thing.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 04:32 PM
14

I haven't heard of single men taking on solo-parenting en masse the way aging women are. I think there's a lot of truth there; if a person of either sex fails to figure out how to get along with the opposite sex long enough to establish a situation conducive to a family, what makes you think that that same person would be good at raising another human from birth by themselves? Obviously there's a problem there. Children need a mother and a father; anything less is sub-optimal.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 05:33 PM
2

I don't think this comment reflects this sub well.
/r/RedPillWives11/02/22 07:55 PM
0

That's why sex work isn't real work and they should stop selling their bodies and dignity. They have a choice.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:56 PM
1

Okay; so, now that we know what makes a man a "real man" according to you, what does being a "real woman" entail?
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:55 PM
2

Your comment history suggests otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:52 PM
27

What personal responsibility does a newly-born infant have? You have a problem with men and need to work on that.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 05:47 AM
4

Fetus' being human beings are exactly the point. We all kill animals; plants; single-celled organisms; functional, ethical societies have rightly identified that human life is set apart in importance. Only women are privileged with the right kill human beings without reason or consequence.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 07:26 PM
4

That's a complete non-sequitur considering that sperm cells aren't human beings.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 07:08 PM
1

Abortion isn't libertarian because it violates the NAP.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 05:41 PM
5

Abortion isn't a right; it's a gendered privilege. Men don't have any right equivocal to the privilege to kill without reason or consequence.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 05:39 PM
10

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 04:37 PM
4

I think your feelings are stemming from the fact that you're operating from a masculine frame; and I relate because my husband and I had the same dynamic before we got married (I'm very strong in my opinions and was taught to exude masculine traits from being raised by a single mom). The fact that you have a captain who you can implicitly trust to steer you in the right direction is a huge advantage. Perhaps you're bucking because you want to challenge the captain, or be the captain yourself. Yo…
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/22 05:16 PM
3

Thanks to social media, it's pretty true. Women as a whole have access (meaning that the importance of geographical proximity is decreased and general awareness is increased) to the top 10% of men, who will sleep with the top 10% of women in addition to average and below average women. That dynamic does not apply to women.
/r/RedPillWomen23/01/22 04:48 PM
6

The funny thing is the women who call other women pickme's are always miserable and single.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/22 04:24 PM
7

I respect your opinion and I have a question: how far are you willing to go? Are you prepared to refer to someone as "bun" or "void" at risk of losing your job or social status?
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/22 01:34 AM
21

That's fine for you but personally, I don't want to have to pretend that a male is a female or vice versa just to coddle a grown adult. This slippery slope has already been proven to be hazardous; where does it end? Neo-pronouns are now beginning to be enforced and for a lot of people, that's a step too far. What is the reaction going to be when someone refuses to call someone else "zim" or "bun?" I'm not playing anymore. It's enough.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/22 06:18 PM
2

I'm concerned with how delusional and divorced from reality your worldview is if you see basic biology and evolutionary psychology as being similar to Nazism.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 08:50 PM
1

I'm down for accountability! Definitely interested.
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/22 09:43 PM
85

I completely understand your confusion and frustration. As a woman, our spiritual lives are dominated by our emotions so it can seem alien or wrong if the man in our lives don't emote in a way that we can understand. It can feel like they're hiding something from you or are emotionally repressed. But, what I've come to understand after being with the same man for over a decade who I would earlier on call "robotic" or "unenthusiastic" is that man inherently process and express emotions differentl…
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/21 09:47 PM
8

I think this is really good advice for people who don't worry about having a big family! Sounds like an exciting life; I waited, too. Congrats on your first born! <3
/r/RedPillWomen29/12/21 11:57 PM
4

Trust me I know! There's nothing wrong with a little self-care to make sure they're not overwhelming. :)
/r/RedPillWomen29/12/21 10:11 PM
32

I don't think you're too young to consider having children; especially if you want to have a big family. What you should consider is if you're emotionally ready and stable enough to have a child, right now/in the near future. I completely get being horny and that's perfectly natural but you should be making sure you're not letting your physical needs override your responsibility. Let your baby fever sober you instead of cloud your thinking; you should be focused on finding the right man and to d…
/r/RedPillWomen29/12/21 10:05 PM
3

I stand by it but that's fair. :)
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 10:50 PM
11

I have been on this planet for 45 years, and in that time I have yet to meet any man who is a “typical” stoic provider. And yet you say you have a husband, a father and a grandfather. None of those men provide for their families, love their wives and have control over their emotions? Please cite the "Actual Empirical Data over decades" that shows that the vast majority of men lack those traits. Something tells me your opinion is based on your personal experience; not a reflection of men as a who…
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 10:26 PM
13

Thank you, sis! Women need to hold other women accountable.
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 10:05 PM
11

Why are you on this forum? You're a feminist and obviously have bias against men. Your inability to acquire commitment from a good man doesn't mean all men are bad or cheat. She's married; she already promised commitment. For her to now decide that her vows are so flimsy that she's justified to simply change her mind because of her inability to communicate her desires and take accountability for her own behavior makes her irresponsible and cruel and she should stop before she hurts her husband a…
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 10:01 PM
8

At least Tyler Perry got that right!
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 09:36 PM
11

Quit your job, beg for your husband's forgiveness and seek therapy.
/r/RedPillWives26/12/21 09:35 PM
62

You're torn between a stranger and the man you promised to love for the rest of your life. Shameful.
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 09:32 PM
39

You need intervention. You're a married woman on the cusp of throwing your life away because you miss the tingles you got when you were single. You feel guilty and you're projecting your insecurities onto your husband because you know you're not fulfilling your role as his wife, and you know yourself to be undeserving of the life and the love that your sweet husband provides for you. Instead of looking for the inadequacies of your husband, look for them in yourself and work on them. You're playi…
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 09:31 PM
14

From what you wrote, it seems like you don't understand men. Her husband sounds like the typical, stoic provider who goes out of his way to show his love through action; this describes a lot of perfectly healthy, high-commitment men. His wife only cares about drama and her own personal pleasure. She's willing to blow up her family because she misses the tingles she got when she was single. She's not ready for commitment and neither are you if you honestly think having a calm relationship means t…
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 09:28 PM
20

That movie was terrible but you're right; and it's one of the rare modern movies that punishes the evil of women.
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 09:25 PM
33

This is delusion. He's chasing you because you're hard to get. Since you're actively advertising yourself as available, he's incentivized to keep going because he knows he's wearing you down. This very well may be a game to him; to prove that he's so high-value he can swoop in and seduce even a traditional (seeming), married woman. You'd be an absolute fool and an insensitive creep to go through with it.
/r/RedPillWomen26/12/21 09:24 PM
3

No, it quite literally doesn't. Quote me and prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:31 PM
7

Considering men also receive longer sentences for the same crimes than women do, I'd say it's real life for a lot of people, especially black men.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:30 PM
5

Sounds like you're on your own long and lonely ass fuckin road and demonize men as a way to cope.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:29 PM
3

Women who do report receive more help and compassion than their male counterparts.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:27 PM
4

I'm not blaming women for all the rapes. That is confession through projection; it is you who are in fact blaming men for all the rapes, which is also untrue. Women who rape do it in different ways than men who rape and get significantly less sentencing and public condemnation. Women who rape don't usually go after strangers; they go after people who can't fight back like children, or men under their control; men who they know will get laughed at by other men when they try to bring it up. Women …
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:16 PM
6

I'm married with children. What about you?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:11 PM
3

Your ad hominem attacks on this forum and in my inbox aren't correlated with reality. I don't hate women; I am a woman. Once again, *many studies do not reference prison statistics* precisely because the rape of men isn't considered to be as big of an issue as the rape of women. They also don't account for men who don't report, or men who do report whose rape isn't considered to be so under the law.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:09 PM
7

A lot of statistics leave out prison statistics and I couldn't find any reference to that issue in your pdf. Additionally, a lot of men and boys don't report their rape: a. because envelopment was only acknowledged as rape in the US in the early 2000s, and b. because boys and men's sexuality is considered to be more powerful than a woman's, so much so that, for example, female teachers rape their students more than their male counterparts and their victims are culturally incentivized to pretend …
/r/MensRights26/12/21 04:53 PM
7

Confession through projection: you're so desperate to be victims that you come after literal victims of abuse. Men suffer more from rape and violent assault than women do (especially when you account for the prison population, and a lot of those men are being taken advantage of by women guards). This is a man's world, but it's ruled by women.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 04:19 PM
40

God-tier post. Excellent and comprehensive advice for young women. Kudos! I wish I had this advice coming up.
/r/RedPillWomen21/12/21 10:18 PM
4

Kudos on your ideological consistency. 100% agree.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 08:06 PM
3

Just curious: what's your stance on toxic masculinity?
/r/MensRights19/12/21 07:34 PM
1

Nope, I'm a married black SAHM mother and my posts reflect exactly that.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/21 09:39 PM
1

As a woman: accountability is most women's kryptonite.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/21 06:29 PM
3

Then don't have children, simple. Take some personal responsibility for your choices and if you make the wrong one, don't make it other people's problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/21 06:28 PM
8

Girl, no one is attacking you; no one wrote any personal attacks against you. You just don't like getting negative feedback. This is supposed to be a red-pilled sub and what you wrote is very feminist and misandrist. Many of us have sons and husbands and don't appreciate their hobbies being pathologized for no reason.
/r/RedPillWives14/12/21 07:23 PM
45

This is a very superficial list with no supporting evidence and isn't a good barometer for a valuable man. In fact, this attitude turns a lot of men off because it's nagging and controlling; if a man is doing what he's supposed to do, his free time is just that - his. I've been with my anime-loving husband who plays vidya and works on his own video game throughout the week for over a decade and he provides enough income to have me be a SAHM with two children in Silicone Valley. This attitude see…
/r/RedPillWives14/12/21 05:50 PM
3

This is bad advice because women are going to age out of random male attraction eventually. It's not a good thing to focus on. The focus should be on health and maintaining yourself for your husband,.
/r/RedPillWomen12/12/21 02:49 AM
1

There was at least one, but it's all good. :)
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/21 09:00 PM
2

Are you married?
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/21 08:45 PM
7

I don't know why this is downvoted. Infertility is a huge barrier to a relationship if the man wants to create a biological legacy; it's not nice but it's true.
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/21 08:42 PM
1

Thanks, sis :)!
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/21 08:39 PM
4

I loved being pregnant and I can't wait to be pregnant again. The feeling of my body changing to accommodate the life inside me and then feeling that life quicken was a spiritual and sacred experience, and I say that as an atheist. That's what people are talking about when they describe divine femininity; especially as my husband and I planned it and were ready to bring a baby into the world. My husband loved my pregnant body (a little too much, IMO lol). My body after the pregnancy wasn't the s…
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/21 08:39 PM
6

I don't mind, at all. I have a beautiful son and am planning for his sibling to arrive some time next year!
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/21 05:32 PM
11

That's just biology; there's nothing you can do about it. Our bodies were designed to make babies and our hormones make us want to fulfil our destinies to be mothers. Being a mother is so important men are biologically wired to willingly take care of you your whole life, including giving their life for yours, even if you're not their woman and even if you can't/don't have children. Women have intrinsic value based on our ability to bring life into the world; men don't. A woman is born, a man is …
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/21 05:17 PM
13

For my son: I'd like to see the genital integrity of baby boys respected as much as that of baby girls. I'd like to see women teachers who rape their students get an appropriate legal consequence and for their victims to receive more empathy from society. I'd like to see tangible justice for false rape allegations and paternity fraud and the complete overhauling of family court, specifically automatic 50/50 custody, harsher punishments for parental alienation, and the abolition of alimony. I'd l…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 03:48 PM
2

This sounds like a slippery slope into justification of riding the CC.
/r/RedPillWomen27/11/21 06:28 PM
5

Big yikes. It sounds like you have some unresolved trauma surrounding being alone, maybe codependency. You should look into therapy and leaving men alone for now.
/r/RedPillWomen29/09/21 08:50 PM
7

Oh my god, girl. Where is the accountability? You said "we got physical" but only mention what he did. You caught him cheating and decided to stay. You hooked up with someone you weren't committed to and let them emotionally manipulate you without vetting them. You have all these bad things to say about your ex and STILL want to make it work? You need to be single and take some time to sort out your issues. The common denominator is you.
/r/RedPillWomen29/09/21 08:48 PM
1

I don't get it. Isn't that what society is supposed to be? Men leading and women following? I'm on RPW because I want to be a good, supportive, nurturing and submissive wife. I entice my husband by making sure he has what he wants. How is that insidious?
/r/MGTOW212/07/21 02:40 PM
3

Yet you saw fit to stay despite that? I'm skeptical.
/r/RedPillWomen13/06/21 07:31 PM
0

Why would you automatically assume that? Has he been violent in the past?
/r/RedPillWomen13/06/21 07:30 PM
2

Maybe where you live. In the Bay Area it doesn't, I was one for a decade before becoming a SAHM.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/21 02:25 AM
13

Not for preschool. For that, you only need 12 ECE units to be a teacher at most schools.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/21 08:39 PM
62

She probably means "preschool teacher." You only need a couple of months in school to get enough credits to qualify.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/21 07:41 PM
33

He wants you to wait eight years - until you're no longer of birthing age - to marry you. Take the hint.
/r/RedPillWives11/10/20 03:45 AM
5

I have sex even when I don't feel like it. It helps us maintain our closeness and cheers up my man, without fail.
/r/RedPillWives01/10/20 09:12 PM
5

Female lurker, checking in!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/20 02:02 AM
1

Yes, men have prophylactics and the ability to say no, but when you look at the totality of options men are the clear losers. Consider the culturally-acceptable fraud (paternity, child support, lying about being on birth control, entrapment) that women have the power to perpetrate without even having to worry about consequences. Furthermore, it's not the same because the justification that you speak of is a question of life and death. Withdrawing financial support isn't the same as ending a life…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:28 PM
7

RE: Financial Abortion Abortion and financial abortion cannot be inflated. One on hand, a woman has several options she can take to prevent pregnancy, (i.e. birth control, morning after, closing her legs as women have ultimate power over whether or not men get sex, as well as the power over life and death) methods that men have no access to and no way to confirm or enforce. After the pregnancy, women can unilaterally choose to give up the baby. If we were to overturn Roe v. Wade, women would sti…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 01:47 PM
5

Abortion and financial abortion cannot be inflated. One on hand, a woman has several options she can take to prevent pregnancy, (i.e. birth control, morning after, closing her legs as women have ultimate power over whether or not men get sex, as well as the power over life and death) methods that men have no access to and no way to confirm or enforce. After the pregnancy, women can unilaterally choose to give up the baby. If we were to overturn Roe v. Wade, women would still have ultimate contro…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 01:45 PM
5

And to make matters worse, there's an ad for victims of sexual abuse at the bottom. So inappropriate!
/r/MensRights29/03/19 12:36 PM
4

Or do neither and have them pay for their own decisions, as every able-bodied adult should.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/17 02:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter