Dorgalg Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
33	The Death and Deformity Caused by Male Circumcision in Africa Cannot Be Ignored		Dorgalg	/r/MensRights	28/03/17 05:18 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
5	Foreskin facts from Germany's Official Pediatric Association and the Nordic Association for Clinical Sexology. But here's the part you're missing man. Entire populations around the globe omit circumcising their infants as a preventative measure, and they have no problems whatsoever as a result. Don't you think all of the "benefits" that the studies you linked refer to would cause epidemics in countries with 0% circumcision rates? Foreskin is there for reason, it's not just extra skin. Even if you think it is, thinking it's harmful, that you're born with, and the majority of the world is born and keeps, a…	/r/MensRights	30/03/17 09:16 PM
9	"Even with numbing, it still hurt so badly that Danny screamed so hard, which caused his lungs to collapse." Circumcision gone wrong. I don't disagree at all. I'm very much anti-circumcision, if you click on my post history you can easily see that to be true. I recognize that the procedure is horrible and violent, and my comments are in no way meant to detract from that. I'm just being critical in pursuit of objective information. If you have a source for babies, or anyone's (aside from the Chinese woman, supposedly) lung collapsing from screaming, I'd like to see it, genuinely.	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 05:50 AM
22	"Even with numbing, it still hurt so badly that Danny screamed so hard, which caused his lungs to collapse." Circumcision gone wrong. Look under your head, it's a brown ring. Sometime's its not extremely visible, but if you were circumcised I guarantee you have it.	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 04:19 AM
1	Studies consistently find women use weapons more often in assaults than do men (80% vs 25%). There is no support in the present data for the hypothesis that women use violence only in self-defense. Also, the 80% figure is cited from a 1984 "study", 33 years ago. Not sure that this is the most pressing information.	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 04:05 AM
26	"Even with numbing, it still hurt so badly that Danny screamed so hard, which caused his lungs to collapse." Circumcision gone wrong. Weird is subjective. The vast majority of the world is uncircumcised. To the majority of men, your dick is weird. America is alone is championing circumcision among the first world. Ask questions. You have a scar. You can see it right now, if you look.	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 03:36 AM
2	"Even with numbing, it still hurt so badly that Danny screamed so hard, which caused his lungs to collapse." Circumcision gone wrong. No worries. I'm not religious at all; I just think having a general understanding of the bible is an underrated skill nowadays, so good on you for your class.	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 02:44 AM
8	"Even with numbing, it still hurt so badly that Danny screamed so hard, which caused his lungs to collapse." Circumcision gone wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_controversy_in_early_Christianity#Teaching_of_Paul This is what you're referring to, just for reference. Specifically: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+15&version=NKJV	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 02:34 AM
3	"Even with numbing, it still hurt so badly that Danny screamed so hard, which caused his lungs to collapse." Circumcision gone wrong. Yeah this was linked to me above. I'll ask you the same question though, if this were a thing, wouldn't this be happening to babies enough that there would be real literature about it? I'm referring to lung collapse from screaming.	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 01:43 AM
18	"Even with numbing, it still hurt so badly that Danny screamed so hard, which caused his lungs to collapse." Circumcision gone wrong. This isn't the most convincing source. If this were a real thing, wouldn't this happen to babies relatively frequently? This same image was posted on this same subreddit a while back and the top comment was a consensus that it's not possible. Also, it appears the source for OP's image is another image, someone just added stock photos, a signature, and made it prettier, so if anyone has the original source that'd be great.	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 01:02 AM
45	"Even with numbing, it still hurt so badly that Danny screamed so hard, which caused his lungs to collapse." Circumcision gone wrong. Does anyone have any evidence that a person's lung can collapse from screaming? This story is horrible but this is such a strange gap in logic that it makes me question the entire story.	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 12:57 AM
16	"Even with numbing, it still hurt so badly that Danny screamed so hard, which caused his lungs to collapse." Circumcision gone wrong. Wait, is it actually possible to scream so loud your lung collapses? Even an infant? I'm not a professional but I googled it and can't find anything to support that it's even possible. Basic anatomy tells me no. Where is this image sourced from? edit: I did some more research and can't find anything at all to support that this has ever happened, to anyone. If anyone has evidence to the contrary, I'd like to see it.	/r/MensRights	29/03/17 12:26 AM
10	The Death and Deformity Caused by Male Circumcision in Africa Cannot Be Ignored Some will argue that this isn't the result of Western intervention, because the article is regarding tribal circumcision and circumcisions without proper sterilization. That is true, however, the takeaway from this article is that the West is turning a blind eye to this barbaracy because it aligns with their misleading HIV prevention campaign, which is rooted in very questionable science. Even if it were true that circumcision prevents HIV, which seems debatable at best, the West's methods of in…	/r/MensRights	28/03/17 08:07 PM
8	Reality: Neurologically, MGM is the same as FGM I get you. It's great to see so much attention to this issue on Reddit. I think it's the sole most important mens' rights issue, head and shoulders above the rest.	/r/MensRights	18/03/17 03:13 AM
7	Reality: Neurologically, MGM is the same as FGM I agree with the premise of this article, but am I alone in thinking it's dreadfully written and organized? It's nearly incomprehensible.	/r/MensRights	18/03/17 03:02 AM
3	Circumcision rates in England dropped to 0,5% when doctors no longer made money from it. Meanwhile, in America, infant circumcision is the most frequently performed surgery. Could money be why? Yeah, it's the side of the Men's Right's movement that the Red Pill documentary didn't show. Not just bigotry, but blatant anti-intellectualism and hatred. Ironically the same problems modern feminism faces.	/r/MensRights	17/03/17 11:52 PM
2	Circumcision rates in England dropped to 0,5% when doctors no longer made money from it. Meanwhile, in America, infant circumcision is the most frequently performed surgery. Could money be why? Ah, I stand corrected. Can't even get away from your zionist oppressors here, heavens.	/r/MensRights	17/03/17 11:48 PM
3	Circumcision rates in England dropped to 0,5% when doctors no longer made money from it. Meanwhile, in America, infant circumcision is the most frequently performed surgery. Could money be why? Why delete your original comment? Surely you could have backed it up with some more infographs for us?	/r/MensRights	17/03/17 11:43 PM
3	Circumcision rates in England dropped to 0,5% when doctors no longer made money from it. Meanwhile, in America, infant circumcision is the most frequently performed surgery. Could money be why? I'll bet he keeps getting upvotes too. This sub is a haven for these people. Look at how you got downvoted for calling him out. Lol.	/r/MensRights	17/03/17 11:10 PM
3	Circumcision rates in England dropped to 0,5% when doctors no longer made money from it. Meanwhile, in America, infant circumcision is the most frequently performed surgery. Could money be why? Are you high? This link says that Jews use circumcision to set themselves apart from the world. Isn't what you're implying directly contradictory to that? your previous NPR link isn't what you wanted I think, it's pro-circ.	/r/MensRights	17/03/17 10:57 PM
1	As a woman, this doesn't make sense to me. how do you interpret that from what I wrote? or from the poster even? of course I care about homeless male hygiene, it just so happens that women use products that men don't, and calling attention to that is just biological sense. when you think of homeless people, you're probably not thinking about women, so this specific, niche issue could easily fall by the wayside. this has absolutely nothing to do with feminism, and doesn't take anything away from the male struggle.	/r/MensRights	14/03/17 08:35 PM
3	Gender is not a social construct: study from 2000 shows sexual dimorphism exists in 1-day old babies This sub has a lot of good content and issues, but it's infested like a parasitic host	/r/MensRights	14/03/17 05:21 PM
-2	As a woman, this doesn't make sense to me. Okay, but how does this detract from that issue? I don't see how this is "turning it into a woman's issue". Women need hygiene products that men don't. There is a need for this. You're right in that the need of men on the streets is greater, no doubt, but they aren't asking you to not care about that.	/r/MensRights	14/03/17 09:49 AM
-1	As a woman, this doesn't make sense to me. So wait, the real percentage is 1/3, and "a little under 40%" is a gross exaggeration? Do you take issue with the words "on any given night?" I can see that I guess, but it seems really trivial.	/r/MensRights	14/03/17 09:00 AM
1	‘Cyber-bullying is just as hideous as physical abuse’: Male victims of these forms of domestic violence in Australia receive virtually no protection The article suggests that telling people to log off the fucking internet when faced with "abuse" is "victim blaming". Jesus Christ.	/r/MensRights	14/03/17 07:24 AM
3	Another blatantly racist and sexist post Is this racist because the picture has two white people? Lmao	/r/MensRights	14/03/17 06:51 AM
-5	As a woman, this doesn't make sense to me. What doesn't make sense about this to you? What does this have to do with Men's Rights? Should we be organizing to buy tampons for homeless men? I really don't understand this subreddit sometimes.	/r/MensRights	14/03/17 06:49 AM
-4	As a woman, this doesn't make sense to me. oh please dude. this is an effort to get hygiene products for homeless women. can we return to reality here? what is wrong with this?	/r/MensRights	14/03/17 06:48 AM
1	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. Oh my bad, I didn't mean to say that. I meant to highlight that Canada was included with the rest of the world in not advocating circumcision, but reading that sentence now, I realize I said exactly the opposite. English is hard.	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 04:53 AM
5	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. 18, the same age a girl could get a breast enlargement without her parent's permission, if she were traumatized from getting picked on for her small breasts, for example. by the way though, with the rates in the most egregious states being about 60-70% and falling in recent years, it's highly, highly unlikely that a child born in the next 10 years will face any peer pressure as a result. If anything, circumcised boys will be the ostracized ones.	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 04:34 AM
1	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. Right. Not too long ago, Australia and South Korea were in the same boat, so the rates among older males remain pretty high. I should have clarified: America is the only one who advocates for circumcision in 2017(ignoring Israel and third world countries). If you can call the government's tepid position of "benefits outweighing the risks" as "advocates", that is. edit: clarified wording, original wording suggested I included Canada with the United States in advocating circumcision, which is untr…	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 04:15 AM
47	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. Without going into your post history, the contents of this post alone tell me you're American. Consider that 80% of the world's men are uncircumcised, and that Reddit is an international website, and it's pretty clear why it comes up so often here. It's not a big deal for you because you've never been exposed to alternate perspectives. I won't try to convince you of anything, but just consider: why is America alone in cheerleading circumcision? Why aren't all the "problems" of not circumcising a…	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 03:51 AM
14	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. I don't believe it's a fair comparison. Even if you are under the impression that circumcision has benefits, which is debatable on an international level (consider: literally any research on the topic published outside of America in the last 2 decades), no medical organization in the world recommends circumcision. American medical orgs have the position that "the benefits outweigh the risks", for now at least, but it's far from a recommendation. They recommend the parent choose, actually, after …	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 01:42 AM
51	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. There's plenty of evidence. Anyways, the benefits of foreskin aren't the main argument towards not doing the procedure, it's an ethical issue. A man should have a right to choose if he wants his body altered.	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 01:27 AM
9	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. Who cares? Seriously, people from both sides need to put emotions aside and realize this is an ethical issue for infants. A man should have a right to choose for himself. Period.	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 01:23 AM
1	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. This is just insane	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 01:14 AM
3	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. i don't see how your personal opinion is more relevant than the women who prefer circ'd. penises. isn't this about ethics? who cares what you think is gross? it's entirely a cultural projection, and only really alienates people from the core argument.	/r/MensRights	13/03/17 01:13 AM
2	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. I mixed up the newsletter and magazine thing, but I think we can agree that the source selection was less than desirable. The point is that they clearly weren't objective and made no attempt to be. I'm not intimately familiar with many of the studies. Sadly, a lot of them, pro and anti-circ, seem to be fucking terrible. There is definitely a lack of good research on this subject. As general practice though, especially if you find yourself agreeing with a study, read the "methods" section. Someti…	/r/MensRights	12/03/17 08:27 PM
2	The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation. i agree with you but this "study" is a joke. read the "methods". 139 surveys from an anti-circ magazine. no attempt at objective data/deducing non-respondents. come on. could it get any worse than this?	/r/MensRights	12/03/17 07:45 PM