TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dormwhorf Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by Dormwhorf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Genital integrity
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:35 PM
3

Depending on how much penile skin was removed, a guy may need to use lube to masturbate comfortably, while uncut and more loosely cut guys can usually masturbate using the slack skin without the use of lube.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 07:02 PM
1

You shouldn't be shit on for discussing this stuff.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 07:03 AM
2

This is a good overview of the ethical arguments involved against unnecessary child circumcision https://www.eliungar.com/circumcision/2013/9/8/on-the-impermissibility-of-infant-male-circumcision.html
/r/MensRights05/09/19 07:01 AM
2

Here is a group of mainly European physicians who wrote a response to the 2012 AAP policy statement on circumcision. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/131/4/796
/r/MensRights05/09/19 06:55 AM
2

https://www.thelocal.dk/20161205/danish-doctors-come-out-against-circumcision
/r/MensRights05/09/19 06:52 AM
2

Google "KNMG circumcision", their policy statement is in a pdf, should be the first result.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 06:49 AM
2

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-boys/
/r/MensRights05/09/19 06:47 AM
5

The loss of healthy genital tissue is harm in and of itself. Its an unethical violation of a person's right to bodily integrity to remove from a child barring medical need. That is the crux of the issue. Whether circumcision is a net positive, net net negative, or makes little difference depends on an individual's preferences and body, which is why it is so important to leave this decision to an individual. It should be used as a last resort option for children only when there are actual issues …
/r/MensRights05/09/19 06:34 AM
3

Channel it into effective activism or something else productive.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:02 AM
3

Its often said in the foreskin restoration community that surgical restoration sucks and that manual stretching is the way to go.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:01 AM
12

More than likely you're fucked, but perhaps you could contact David J Llewellyn, who is a lawyer in Georgia who specializes in circumcision malpractice cases. I believe he represented a man who successfully sued a hospital for a wrongful circumcision since his mother was under the influence of drugs from birth when she signed the consent form.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:56 AM
-1

The grass is always greener on the other side.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:48 AM
1

Yup
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:17 PM
3

I've seen other men speak about how they got rid of painful erections by creating more slack skin via foreskin restoration. See the foreskin restoration for more details.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 09:42 PM
2

A lot of intactivists just cannot keep their cool and do way more damage for this cause than good. They behave in a similar fashion to pro life extremists
/r/MensRights25/07/19 08:55 PM
1

Kellogg was just one of many idiots that promoted medicalized child circumcision in the Anglosphere. Muslims and Jews, along with Coptic Christians and some other groups practiced it long before of course.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:11 AM
1

I said I'm against child circumcision. I am aware of the risks and the harms. You don't have to be obnoxious.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 05:07 PM
3

Genital cutting happens to defenceless children, so it is not a men's or women's issue only,and more often than not when it comes to male children it is the woman who has to fight her cut husband to keep the boy from being cut.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 02:29 PM
1

They probably will be considering he's Jewish. Its also important to let anyone who might take care of him know to not forcibly retract the foreskin, as this can injure the penis and lead to infections.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:15 AM
1

According to a study by Brian Earp, gay men were significantly more likely to be dissatisfied that they were cut as infants. Perhaps because they interact with dicks besides their own and see what they lost.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:13 AM
-2

I'm opposed to medically unnecessary child circumcision myself, but there is no reason to be extreme. This guy already said he agreed it was unethical to force on children. There are indeed potential medical benefits such decreased rate of some infections and foreskin problems of course. Conceding this doesn't suddenly make child circumcision ethical.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 02:00 AM
0

I can buy that it may reduce the risk of transmission. Whether it is an effective measure in the real world in the long term is a different question, and I consider cutting non consenting children for this reason as unethical. The VMMC Project website has a number of stories and interviews with people regarding children and even grown men being forcibly circumcised in the mass circumcision campaign to try to combat aids, and many people were told that if they got circumcised they were then vacci…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 01:56 AM
7

I was just talking about the foreskin as well. I have nothing against circumcision if a person chooses it for himself
/r/MensRights16/07/19 01:28 AM
10

If you cut off a body part it will never become infected, this is true. It is also bodily harm and a violation of a person's right to physical integrity when done to a non consenting person without medical indication.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 01:11 AM
6

I didn't say that, another commenter did. I see where my phrasing and what I responded to would lead to what I meant being very unclear. I'll rephrase: Child circumcision was largely pushed in the Anglosphere in the 19th century as a means of preventing masturbation, along with being touted as a preventative measure or cure for a host of other ailments. This is not the origin of child circumcision itself, which has been around for millennia.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:13 PM
6

I didn't say otherwise. Child circumcision is a millennia old thing. I was giving one of the main reasons for it being medicalized in the Anglosphere.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:04 PM
6

Here is the response to the 2012 AAP policy statement on circumcision from a number of European physicians. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/131/4/796
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:53 PM
2

Right, it depends on how much was removed and on the individual
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:52 PM
12

Good for you man. I would check out Penn and Teller's "Bullshit" episode on it, "Cut" by Eliyahu Sargon (film addressing the issue by an Orthodox Jewish man), and his website at https://www.eliungar.com/film There is a film called "His Body His Rights" I believe. I would check out Brian Earp's videos on youtube and his papers, and his twitter feed. He is an ethicist who has put out a lot of excellent stuff on the subject. European medical bodies generally have a sane perspective on it. Here is t…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:51 PM
11

That was one of the main reasons it was medicalized in the U.S. and other Anglophone countries, along with female circumcision. It was meant to reduce sexual pleasure and make it more difficult to masturbate. Men who are tightly cut and who have little to no slack skin when erect, like myself, generally require lube to jack off comfortably or for handjobs, etc. While uncut guys generally don't.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:39 PM
3

The crux of the matter is that it removes a normal, functional part of a person's genitals without medical indication and without their consent. It is an unethical violation of a person's right to physical integrity and self determination.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 11:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter