TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DorsiaReservation Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by DorsiaReservation on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

What's hilarious is that SRSers hate /r/feminism and claim that it's run by MRAs. You know you're batshit crazy when /r/feminism mods seem like MRAs to you.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:23 AM
1

MRAs directly oppose core feminist principles such as the idea of 'patriarchy.' /r/feminism will ban you if you so much as start a comment thread that isn't supportive of feminism. They are not MRAs.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:54 AM
7

It's called 'female experience simulator' for fucks sake, which implies that this is what it's like to be female in general. It's bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:38 AM
5

Are you serious? Do you genuinely believe that this whole enthusiastic consent thing is framed as 'women should give enthusiastic consent to make things clear' and not 'men should absolutely not have sex without getting enthusiastic consent, and if they don't they are at best incredibly 'creepy' or some other stupid term only used for men, and at worst rapists'? Because I assure you, it's the latter. It's "Designed to encourage false rape allegations against men" in that its proponents blatantly…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:20 AM
-1

Zero tolerance policies like this are so unbelievably lazy. If you were to moderate this site properly, you'd judge cases individually. If someone is trying to start a witch hunt, fine. But stopping it just in case it might on the off chance turn into a witch hunt? Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:50 PM
4

She's definitely gained some respect from me with this. My guess is she immediately saw how disgusting the people she was cozying up to with 'It's Hard Out Here' are. She thought the SJWs would love her for it, but what did she get? Accusations of racism for having black dancers. You see, they were too stupid to realise that the entire thing was satire and that she didn't deliberately hire black women anyway (naturally, she'd also be accused of racism if she didn't hire black women -- you can't …
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:02 PM
1

All of it, really. The main post and the one he links to. They seem to have debunked almost all of her claims.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:21 PM
5

I think she just corrected something someone said about her being unpopular with MRAs. I wanted her to comment on their criticisms of her portrayal of history, the suffragettes etc.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:19 PM
5

Guys are assumed to be rapists by default and expected to do shit like this to not be seen as 'creepy.' It's sad that they feel the need to do this. Are you an SRSer or something?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:20 PM
2

Do you have a source for East Africans winning mostly because of their culture? My guess is no. This, as you yourself admitted, is clearly not done properly and is designed to make it easier for women to win. The entire concept seems silly to me; they might as well include obese people who have never ran before and calculate what handicap they should be given.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:46 AM
10

Yeah. It's a shame really, as it could be a good subreddit and possibly was at some stage. Nowadays you genuinely can't tell the difference between their comment threads and SRS ones - full of idiotic memes, needless insults and and stereotypes about how we're supposedly all virgins wearing fedoras and blah blah. SJWs ruin everything. Despite that, I'm not going to ignore their criticism. It's a shame that /u/girlwriteswhat didn't even try to respond to that thread against her. I don't know who …
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:30 AM
12

I'm incredibly happy about the SNL skit. For us to be mentioned at all in major media on national television, positively or not, is huge. You know what they say, 'there's no such thing as bad publicity.' I don't believe that to the extreme, but in this case I really do think that this is a good thing. Especially considering they did a horrific job of criticising us. I think Men's Rights is already going to be immediately viewed negatively as a knee-jerk reaction; people are brought up to associa…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:21 PM
13

Firstly, the butt of the joke was clearly the MRA. With the privileged feminist jewelry buyers, you're seeing things; that was unintentional. SNL is a lot of things, subtle is not one of those things. Secondly, you're doing the typical NAFALT ('Not all feminists are like that') thing, but you need to understand that feminism in general is a problem; major feminist groups oppose mens rights issues and fight at every opportunity to screw us over by doing things like opposing shared parenting laws.…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:37 PM
9

Exactly. "There's no such thing as negative publicity." The fact that we were mentioned on national television is absolutely incredible.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:10 PM
4

Can it? The things feminists are mocked for typically have some basis. Utterly nonsense about MRAs shutting down planned parenthood though? Just bizarre. It'd be like if they mocked feminists for hating fish. It's just completely random and makes no sense.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:08 PM
7

Holy shit. I can't believe Mens Rights activism was actually mentioned on national television. That's incredible publicity, regardless of the way they portrayed it. I'm looking forward to the writers of this sketch seeing just what the people they're trying to appeal to are like, though. SRSers/feminists, once they get over nodding in approval at the strawman MRA depiction, will then turn on the writers for their 'racist' portrayal of the latina woman, etc. I'm not sure how they thought this ske…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:03 PM
3

Fucking hilarious. Let's see what dumb shit SRS is complaining about today and compare it to real problems people face in third world countries, having their vaginas mutilated or being stoned to death for being raped. Oh, all of a sudden your argument against complaining about petty things and not knowing about 'real discrimination' doesn't look appealing any more, does it? You really don't want to get into the 'Is it really that bad?' argument as women do not face any serious discrimination in …
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:08 PM
7

Ah yes, clearly a very balanced summary. He was acquitted within an hour and they didn't feel the need to mention this anywhere in their articles when many other media outlets did. It was entirely reasonable to complain.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:32 PM
1

He passed a polygraph with his own hand picked examiner, he refused to take one administered by the police. Do you have a source for any of this or was it just pulled out of your ass?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 03:32 PM
2

I don't hate 'censorship.' If someone came into this subreddit and spammed or was generally awful, I'd have no problems whatsoever with the mods banning them. Similarly, I don't care at all if Facebook enforces rules against sexism, racism and so on. Seems entirely reasonable to me.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 01:19 AM
16

Yeah man I mean my teacher brought in a bag with 'I fucking hate niggers. By the way Hitler did nothing wrong.' on it but it's unfair to judge people by their ideals, you know? No, it isn't. If you want to see why feminism is unpopular here then look through the FAQ and search for it, it is a cancerous movement in its current form. If someone is so boldly feminist as to put it on their bags and shit then I automatically assume that they're going to be indoctrinated and incredibly biased, not the…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:55 AM
-3

That's true, but see how feminists react if you say 'Well yes, it's entirely reasonable for companies to pay women less due to the possibility of maternity leave etc. It's just business!' They'd go ape shit. Also, they wouldn't accept this poster if males were replaced with 'blacks' and females were replaced with 'whites.'
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:02 PM
2

In what way is this not a gender issue? It's a common double standard - if you're a woman you have all the choice in the world to not have a kid and won't get shamed for it. If you're a man, you will be called a deadbeat even if you wear a condom and it was mistake etc and the woman chooses to keep it against your wishes. People have no sympathy for the man and just say "Well you shouldn't have had sex!" or other such idiocy. This line of thinking is what causes the courts to be so biased agains…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:01 AM
1

Yeah but it's the comments that are the problem.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:59 AM
1

What? Most of the comments are saying that the woman is fine and it's just the man who is a deadbeat and scumbag. At least when I posted this.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:59 AM
4

Sickening how common this thought process is. The entire thread is full of people criticising the OP for saying that the woman is a 'scumbag' but fully supporting the notion that the man is because he didn't want to be forced to raise a child.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:57 PM
1

Why does this annoy you enough to copy paste this post? It's to mock feminists elsewhere. If I go through your comments, am I really not going to be able to find a single comment that isn't jokey and not 100% constructive?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:15 PM
2

I think what he was suggesting is that people watch it to lighten up due to how frustrating it can be reading all the stuff on this subreddit, false rape accusations and misandry etc... could be wrong though.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:17 AM
4

Most likely they were using Nazism as an analogy. There is nothing wrong with that and it annoys me when people are incapable of understanding the purpose of analogies - you use simpler, more clear-cut cases to help the other person understand your point. Obviously feminism isn't as bad as Nazism in any way, but they can be still be compared without insinuating that they are. It's especially important to do this with men's rights. Why? Because people are brainwashed enough to believe that misand…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:49 PM
2

The reaction to shit like this is why /r/mensrights has a bad name Bullshit. It has a bad name because people are complacently ignorant and don't bother visiting here before deciding we're all horrible misogynists. Meanwhile, they'll be pro-feminist despite feminists constantly complaining about harmless jokes etc. The joke itself is not a problem. The problem is that if it targeted women, you'd have people up in arms and I can very, very easily see some random website posting this which would c…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:44 PM
0

Tell that to all the feminists who complain about innocuous jokes all day and are taken seriously then.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:38 PM
3

Uhuh, let me know when this subreddit bans anyone who disagrees with them, thinks that misogyny is awesome and doesn't want equality but instead supremacy, and so on. It will never be that way.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:33 PM
6

I don't know why this is hard to get. It's even in the title. It doesn't say 'THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS MISANDRY!' it simply says 'You don't see these in the ladies clothes department.' And that is the problem; not this harmless joke, but the fact that people go nuts over things like this if it targets women, and don't care at all if it targets men. Ideally, they wouldn't care either way, but there you go. Also, one possibly negative thing about this is that it actually reflects people's views. If ther…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:30 PM
2

Please. You know as well as I do that shirts that are blatantly misogynistic in any way are not sold in large clothes stores and supermarkets etc. And you're missing the point, the point is highlighting out their hypocrisy. Go to SRS and see the stupid things they get offended over, or even mainstream feminists. Meanwhile, anything involving men is A-OK. For instance, rape jokes. I have no problem with them, they're just jokes. But pretty much all feminists go absolutely nuts about them. As a re…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:26 PM
7

I'd love for you to say that to a feminist. Perhaps bring it up on /r/feminism and see what they think. /r/mensrights is blatantly anti-feminist. Using some of their terms like 'gender role' doesn't make it feminist. And if that is your idea of feminism, then there's nothing wrong with it.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:17 AM
9

Overly harsh. I'm sure he knows about the Matrix thing, he just wants to know about the /r/theredpill subreddit and if it is a specific movement that relates to /r/mensrights. The answer is that they are generally considered extremists and actual sexists, basically what SRS claims we are. Is this true? Not sure; after seeing how many judge this subreddit without even having gone to it before, I'm not quick to do the same. edit: I went there and searched for mensrights to see what they thought of…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:38 AM
3

vast Illuminati feminist conspiracy Well he's got us here, chaps. After all, we're the ones who constantly talk of the matriarchy oppressing us.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:35 AM
1

I can't believe they never bothered to give any sort of statement about this. Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:20 AM
4

Welp, certainly won't be voting for them then. Thankfully there are a lot of other parties that... pff... that can stand a... a-heh ... a chance of getting into governmen-HAHAHAHAHA No, we have a two-party system with an utterly pointless third party that does nothing but go back on any promises made. The only chance we had to improve our voting system and we vote against it. God I hate this country sometimes. As an aside, Skimmington - do you have another account where you comment or anything? …
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:07 AM
21

As others have said, it's the fact that if the genders were reversed there would be a huge shitstorm over it, with cries of 'misogyny' and so on. But with men? Who cares!
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:56 PM
4

Let's see some examples then. I see genuine misogyny very rarely here (even less common than on other subreddits, which is still very rare despite what SRS thinks). When I do see it, it is either ignored or downvoted heavily. Incidentally, SRSers are crazy enough to believe that /r/feminism is run by MRAs.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:43 PM
7

I let it bother me to the exact same extent my society cares about misandry. I think that's a fair rule. We should be better than the people we take issue with. If I see any genuine misogyny (very rare and never upvoted) I do my best to call it out. I don't want to act like SRSers, who think that because there's supposedly so much misogyny and racism towards women and black people, it's A-OK to be sexist towards men and racist towards whites.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:39 PM
8

Hmm, jumping into this thread swearing at people for no real reason instead of having a civil and mature conversation and yet somehow having the audacity to call others 'sociopaths'? I'm thankful for people like you - very good examples of the type of people who oppose this subreddit. At least you didn't post on a throwaway though in order to prevent loss of precious karma. Oh. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:33 PM
4

A British man was sentenced to four years in jail in Dubai for 'possession' of an amount of cannabis weighing less than a grain of sugar. He had trodden on the remains of a smoked joint.. Only after significant pressure was he pardoned, it's utter insanity he was arrested in the first place. Or how about the recent case of a Norwegian woman being arrested for being raped? You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:27 PM
12

This is fantastic. The usual response from feminists in regards to men's rights issues is "Ugh! Don't you just hate MRAs! How can they not realise that all issues men face exist because of the patriarchy! Why won't they just embrace feminism to fix those problems?!" Then you see things like in that image: "Any gains for men are incidental." Hmm, I wonder why.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:13 PM
2

What's wrong with Louis C.K?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:02 PM
1

Hi. It's good to see someone actually involved in the academic side of things around here. I hope you stick around, even if some people can be a bit hostile. A few questions: 1) In academic circles, how common would you say people like SRSers are? As in, utterly illogical, cruel, generally horrible people who immediately reject the very idea that misandry can exist, belittle you instead of seeing reason, etc? If you were to tell the average gender studies academic you visit men's rights websites…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:17 PM
1

Ah, searched for it but couldn't find it. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:53 PM
1

The most hilarious thing about this is that SRS actually believes that /r/feminism is 'ran by MRAs.' That really shows how extremist SRSers are.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:42 PM
2

Oh, good. I'm sure Intortus will be hard at work banning all of them as we speak, with the same zeal as when he bans people SRS doesn't like. Right? . . . Guys?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 04:42 PM
1

And that is?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:05 PM
0

Why is it that men are more likely to be CEOs?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:56 PM
7

How is the republican party better for men? Genuinely curious. In any case, only about 57% of this subreddit is American; in my country, the conservatives are the ones who have more idiotic feminists.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:42 PM
-1

Bizarre. I guess one, or all of the mods are SRSers/feminists and are the type of people who do this sort of thing and have no intention of even trying to justify it.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:51 PM
4

And what do you have to back this up? Please fuck off if you're going to be exactly the kind of sexist moron that SRS idiots stereotype MRAs as. Honestly though, you're most likely an SRSer trying to smear MRAs and create material to submit to SRS. It's a dead giveaway when you post in threads outraged about the 'innocent' Trayvon Martin being killed etc.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:23 AM
1

I'm ashamed to admit I fell victim to this perception as well. Glad to have that cleared up. I guess it's hard not to hold some unchallenged misandric views from time to time in this matriarchal society ;)
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:12 PM
1

What evidence do you have to back up the 50/50 thing?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:15 PM
1

Have you seen his comments? He is viciously anti-Reddit for no good reason and makes a bunch of idiotic claims such as 'Redditors' (not a tiny minority) like CP. In addition, he hates mensrights and MRAs and isn't by any means willing to talk about that reasonably.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:33 AM
2

The idea that because one person is smaller they're immune from attacks and you can't defend yourself seem so absurd to me. If a skinny guy randomly came up to you and punched you square in the face, tell me you wouldn't punch him back and I will show you a liar. No one would have a problem with you doing it either. No one. Now yes, you may say that it's not comparable as she didn't punch him, but the principle is still there - in the above example, the guy is assumed to be much weaker than you,…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:38 PM
1

Hi. This post is 4 months old but I recently found it, and as a result am saddened that one of the people I looked up to may have sexist beliefs. I hope you don't mind me discussing this with you. If you do, no worries. This is a statement you made regarding an article: I don't really find too much in the article that strikes me as seriously ethically questionable. This is a snippet from the article: Women should be terrorized by their men; it’s the only thing that makes them behave better than …
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:27 AM
2

See my below comment. Seems like a perfectly reasonable post to me, if somewhat poorly worded.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:42 AM
3

I think you're mistaken. He's not agreeing with it; he's merely pointing out that in this subreddit, despite its terrible reputation, we call people out on their bigotry (such as the guy above who was downvoted and shot down by everyone). Meanwhile, on supposedly 'progressive' places such as SRS, radfem blogs, whatever, they say all kinds of hateful things without anyone batting an eye.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:41 AM
0

I can agree with the idea that he needs to remove it to avoid negative reactions, but it really is the perfect term to describe the undesirables over at SRS; they're not worthy of the term 'feminist.' Even if you hate feminism, they're still not good enough for it.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:52 AM
1

This is the EXACT reasoning used today by SRSers and their ilk. They talk of a 'power imbalance' and 'male privilege' etc to justify sexism against men. It's popularly believed that women are still discriminated against heavily in comparison to men, and even if that's true today, it doesn't make it okay. I'm sorry, it doesn't matter when it was or what the circumstances were, it's blatant sexism and is unjustifiable. To use another area as an example - even though most on this subreddit would re…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:20 AM
5

Pretty much, yeah. It's annoying when SRSers go nuts just because a negative portrayal of a person happens to be represented or acted by a woman in any type of media, immediately crying 'misogyny!' at nothing; this is basically that.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:10 AM
1

So you think virtually no-one should enjoy a nice car then? Not many can just spend 40k like it's nothing.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 03:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter