TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Douggem Archive

View 3 posts and 275 comments by Douggem on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
37

It's pretty common belief that men are the ones convincing women to engage in unprotected sex, it's useful to have a source saying it goes the other way as well.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 02:36 PM
–

Not an argument, the article is sourced
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:33 AM
4

Yes he was. No. No he wasn't. The closest you can get is he was on some PUA forums, and PUA and MRM are not related.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 03:25 AM
0

A 110 pound girl with a black belt against a 240 man whose never been in a fight, is.. and I'm being a very generous, AT MOST a close fight If she's trained in something legit, like BJJ, and competes she should have no trouble against someone twice her size.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 12:03 AM
2

The 6 week or whatever maternity leave policy makes sense for the actual physical necessities of childbirth - the birth and that intense first however many weeks care of the infant. Only the mother is physically needed for those things. I'm personally against government mandated maternity and paternity leave both.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 05:01 AM
12

No, the eight percent is accusations that were provably false.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 09:57 PM
-2

It was in a garage
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/16 05:16 PM
5

Hey man, plenty of people say this exact same thing when it's a man having the book thrown at him for this.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:14 AM
61

They support equal access to combat roles because it gives women choices. They tend not to support women being forced to register for the draft because women don't get a choice when they get drafted. Feminism is all about women having all the benefits of being a man without the responsibilities/consequences (men can't register to vote without registering for the draft, for example) while also maintaining the benefits of being a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/16 02:05 PM
21

The same can be said about women that have been circumcised - anti FGM activists tend to be women that haven't suffered FGM, while circumcised women tend to defend the practice and have it done to their daughters.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 01:54 AM
3

Yeah I think we're about on the same page here. A better example might be: "This stupid redpiller believes that the wage gap is a myth, despite this source from the department of labor that shows women make, on average, only 75 cents for every dollar a man makes" is not an ad hominem because the insult isn't the argument, while: "Don't believe what this guy says about the wage gap, he posts to /r/redpill" is an ad hominem since the whole argument is you're wrong because of something about you un…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:46 AM
17

They're right - name calling isn't ad hominem. Name calling presented as an argument is. "You're wrong, asshole" is not fallacious. "You're wrong because you're an asshole" is. And calling out a fallacy doesn't show the person making the fallacy is wrong.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:04 PM
2

That post did not tell me who that person is
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:31 AM
3

I don't know who that is
/r/MensRights08/02/16 06:07 PM
16

You may not realize this but trans men are men.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:33 PM
3

Gotta fight until the other person stops fighting, mate.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/16 10:36 PM
2

Literally any interaction with anyone is manipulating them.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:49 AM
3

No, but how old were you when you realized the Bunny and Santa weren't real? I never thought they were real because my parents didn't lie to me about it. I also saw that really bad Ninja Turtles live show when I was a kid knowing they weren't real but still enjoyed the fuck out of it.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:49 AM
2

He was 17 you retard
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:29 AM
1

When men do hit back, women get hurt more. Which is not relevant to who is the initiator. It's not a man's fault that a woman chooses to attack someone she can't stand toe to toe with.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:22 AM
0

No. Basically anyone can get a license, they are "shall issue". In France, getting a paternity test is the exception, there have to be extenuating circumstances in order for you to get one.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:29 PM
2

In states/countries with medical marijuana but no recreational marijuana where possession is a crime, would you consider marijuana "banned" or "loosely regulated"?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:29 PM
2

It isn't illegal per se, it is simply illegal to do it on your own outside of proper legal proceedings. Yes - it's illegal without a court order. That makes it banned.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:55 PM
1

I think you might be in the wrong thread
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:50 PM
2

Great. Violent crime rates did not increase from the 70's through the 90's, they were flat until 1994 when they plummeted.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:57 AM
2

Actually that's completely wrong, the violent crime rate was flat from the 70's through 1994, only property crimes went up http://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/ldah6rdp6ukvngoyqi1fcg.gif
/r/MensRights01/02/15 07:25 PM
5

You mean ridiculous growth of victimless crimes through the 90's? Violent crime rates were flat during that time. But even if we consider the over all crime rate, prison population as a percent of the overall population has continued to grow since the peak crime rate in 1994.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 10:29 AM
2

Body cams have reduced the use of force by incredible amounts where they've been required, suggesting the exact opposite of what you've said.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:55 AM
3

wut
/r/MensRights05/01/15 06:29 AM
7

A false accusation isn't just an accusation that does not result in a conviction, it is an accusation that is provably false and was known to be false by the accuser at the time of the accusation.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 05:10 AM
2

You bet your ass they'd notice
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:10 AM
3

The two then go back to her apartment, and Dunham...talks dirty to him as he forces himself on her. That sounds an awful lot like consent to me. You can't tell someone to do things to you then claim they were done to you against your will.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 06:58 AM
9

Repeated catcalling isn't catcalling, it's harassment.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:09 AM
12

But these WERE reported. Just decades after the fact. And all at once. And to tons of publicity.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:56 PM
31

This sounds like something out of redpill
/r/MensRights19/11/14 06:57 AM
3

Yeah they tried that in the car and all got their asses kicked.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:51 PM
2

How? Were they acting like animals? Were they black? Then it's not racist.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:48 PM
1

Likewise with faking catcalls on video.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:40 AM
2

This is half true - feminists fight for the abused if the abused is a woman and the abuser is a man.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:34 PM
18

I guess you didn't read the article, because it cited http://www.acidsurvivors.org/Statistics/2 http://www.thecasc.org/docs/CASC%20Statistics%20as%20of%2031March2013.pdf
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:30 PM
12

If the kid goes to college, in some states, child support has to continue to be paid
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:24 PM
5

No, then you've created and stored child pornography. They actually charge children with taking videos or photos of themselves.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 07:28 PM
1

Or /r/tumblrinaction
/r/MensRights27/09/14 04:12 AM
2

No one. Not a single person. It's the straw man that just won't die.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:55 PM
1

However, if a lapse in judgment occurs, she doesn't deserve to be raped. Sorry, I heavily disagree with that notion. Well that's good, because no one actually DOES agree with that notion. There's something wrong if we start regarding it like "better put a coat on or you'll catch a cold". I think it's more along the lines of "Lock your door at night or a criminal might wander in" or "That's a rough part of town, put your wallet in your front pocket and carry your gun if you have a permit". I find…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:54 PM
1

"More equal" is a reference to George Orwell's Animal Farm. I'm seriously surprised that you haven't read it or at least heard of that line - how old are you? Although if someone were to interpret that image as women executives hiring other women because of favoritism - you know, like you claim systematically happens when men do the hiring process - they wouldn't be too out of line according to your own dogma that you yourself have said in this thread. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:47 PM
1

Don't you think that's wrong? And that we should do something about it? Well, no. It's not. You don't own the job, the employer does. If they don't want to hire you because you're a woman, that's fine. Same if they don't want to hire me for a man, because I'm a small guy (I also applied for a warehouse job and was interviewed for a sales job, I assume because I'm small and they assumed I couldn't cut it in the warehouse), or a if they don't want to hire a black guy because he's black, whatever. …
/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:45 PM
1

Okay, I doubt there's discrimination, just like whatever store you told me you worked at before.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:41 PM
1

I doubt there's discrimination, just like at your grocery store job.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:30 PM
1

The point of the picture was to say that the employer in that office was discriminating against men, and that is false. No, the point of the picture is to point out feminist hypocrisy. Women dominate some fields because men just don't want the jobs, right? But men dominate some fields because of misogyny and discrimination, right? You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:27 PM
1

What happened is that, surprise, men weren't applying for jobs in this office and they largely only had women applicants to choose from. That's pretty much the point of this image and this entire thread. That's what we say when people bring up gender gaps in male-dominated fields, that men and women make different career choices, and it's the entire point that this image was made: even at the agency that is dedicated to gender equality, there's not going to be a 50/50 split of men/women in the w…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:25 PM
3

I worked at Best Buy for a few years and we had a woman that worked in the warehouse. About a year later she was pregnant and refused to move anything, climb stairs, or bend over, making her absolutely useless as a warehouse employee. She wasn't even showing at this point. She had some kind of condition that could cause her to go into labor way prematurely if she had any physical stress. So they put her next to the phone and she sat in a chair and answered the phone all day. We did get a lot of …
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:50 AM
3

...what? What made you infer all that nonsense? It's just fucking hilarious that the Workplace Gender Equality Agency has such a non-diverse workforce when they seemingly exist to push that diversity. I'm sure their defense will be that men just don't want those jobs, and they don't discriminate based on gender...but if they say that then they pretty much prove our point.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:43 AM
1

They have higher female representation in STEM fields because so many American students are getting Micky Mouse degrees in Art and Women's Studies. 43% of all American adults have college degrees, and while I couldn't find that same stat for Iran, only 32% of their college age youth are enrolled in college. In America we have such an abundance of wealth that we waste thousands of dollars and 4 years of our lives in school for history degrees that we can't monetize. The people in India and Iran d…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:08 PM
15

It's only a product of gender roles if we assume that biological differences in men and women don't manifest themselves as different life and career choices.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:45 AM
4

I bet he commented on something related to Zoey Quinn.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:56 PM
23

Real rape culture where real rape happens isn't interesting for them because they can't use it as a weapon in everyday life. They only care about fake rape culture, like microaggressions and empowering women to defend against rape, because they can use it to feel sorry for themselves and get enraged at their fake victimhood.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:59 PM
4

you wouldn't beat up somebody without saying "What the fuck dude, What did those people do?" Unless you're a white knight or believe in rape culture or any of that garbage.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:47 PM
3

That's because feminist arguments are based in a fantasy land with its own vocabulary. A feminist might argue that you can't be sexist against men. An MRA would point out that you can, in fact, be sexist against men. The feminist would retort that sexism is defined as privilege and power plus discrimination, and smugly declare themselves the winner of the argument, even though that's just a bullshit made up definition that they made because none of the arguments make sense otherwise.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:15 PM
6

Maybe I missed it but the article doesn't say that she was drunk nor that she had engaged in sex with the guy? They were at the pool area
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:32 PM
1

Dat fucking ending
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:45 AM
4

Yeah but beyond that it's just practical and good advice. It doesn't matter who's fault it is, don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:44 AM
2

How many Disney princesses can you name without looking them up? Now how many Disney princess movie heroes can you name? Aladdin doesn't count. Sooooooooo who didn't have personality?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:57 PM
3

That's weird, because almost all of the slut shaming comes from women.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:14 AM
1

How about all rape victims? A female rape victim has had to pay child support to her rapist at least once, IIRC.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 05:53 AM
1

It would if it needed the soldiers bad enough to take the political loss. If we were to enter a real defensive war, for example, they would probably reenact the draft.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:28 AM
0

Hopefully it won't be an issue - I went through a sociology class without ever hearing the word patriarchy. We discussed a lot of political topics but gender politics was not part of it.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 06:38 AM
176

"If she regrets it the next day you obviously tricked her and it's rape. If she changes her mind during the act but doesn't let you know it's rape.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:33 AM
1

The issue is the CDC report drives policy, because people can quote "X women were raped but only Y men, men being raped isn't an issue we need legislation to protect women but men don't need it" etc., because the primary way in which men are raped (forced to penetrate) was defined as not rape. You say it had a separate section, but it didn't: it was lumped in with all the other sexual assaults. If it had been tracked separately but still included in the rape stats people wouldn't be upset. Male …
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:13 AM
4

Male victims that were forced to penetrate are not counted under rapes, but under other sexual assaults. The survey then concludes that the vast majority of rape victims are female, and the perpetrators male, because they defined away the biggest instance of rape used against men (forced to penetrate). So yeah, refusing to count them as raped.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:09 AM
0

Google: "Girls aren't making the career choices we want them to make, and that's BAD! Let's throw money at it to make sure they make the correct Google Approved decisions, because women making their own decisions will NOT be tolerated!"
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:35 PM
2

Sounds legit. I go to an engineering school, and it's nothing like that. I've never seen a woman put down in any of my classes because she was a woman. Methinks your friend is full of shit.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:32 PM
2

...the gender discrimination aspect? I'm not saying Google shouldn't be ABLE to discriminate against races/genders with their programs, I'm just saying that it's morally wrong.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:31 PM
8

Women are under represented in IT, and a correction is being attempted. This is all well and good Why? Why is it assumed that every profession should be 50/50 male and female? What if women don't want to be programmers and men don't want to be schoolteachers? Why would we look at a group of people and tell them their life choices are wrong because they resulted in professions that have more of one gender than the other? This is a Men's Rights topic because it helps girls but not boys. They are g…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:30 PM
0

I misunderstood your "this is what feminism is fighting for", I interpreted it as "This is what feminism is fighting against", my mistake.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:09 PM
6

I think the pussy pass angle is the idea that it would be less likely to be granted to a man in the same situation.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:59 AM
1

Except when it's done to men it's considered privilege. Any male privilege is exactly the same as "benevolent sexism" - treating someone better because of their gender. Your inference that it's based on the idea that women are children that can't think for themselves is incorrect, the bulk of female privilege is based on their being considered more important and less disposable than men.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:11 AM
16

Well, maybe not the Beyonce part, since her entire family takes turns beating the crap out of him
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:52 PM
3

Nothing. Nothing would happen.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:23 AM
1

http://www.sss.gov/Fsdrivers.htm
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:55 PM
1

http://www.sss.gov/Fsdrivers.htm
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:55 PM
2

The graphic says you're locked out of those things at age 26 if you haven't registered before then http://www.sss.gov/Fsdrivers.htm
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:42 PM
134

"139 women have paid the ultimate price in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. They died for a Constitution that has no enumerated rights for women other than the vote. Why? Because corporations want cheap labor, and that labor is done by women." wut
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:42 PM
1

This sub reddit is only for mens rights and it mostly attacks feminism which I implore. Taylor, how old are you?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:36 AM
7

What?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:54 AM
0

There's a lot more to being transgender than believing you're gender X born in gender Y'x body.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:24 AM
1

There's not been a single response in this thread that has been anything like "See, it's all women!".
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:20 AM
2

Women were the most affected by the virus. They lost fathers, husbands, and sons.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:21 AM
9

That's not what the friend zone is. The friend zone is something a man does to himself, not something a woman does to a man. It's where he follows the advice of Hollywood and showers a girl with gifts, praise, and attention in order to try to win her affection. That doesn't work on someone not already romantically interested in you, and is repulsive to most women in a romantic sense. So they like you as a friend, but because you've been worshiping them, they don't respect you enough to feel roma…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:50 AM
2

His misogyny made him kill 4 men?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:36 AM
0

...liberalism isn't related to a political party.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:58 AM
7

Right. They're less likely to be arrested because of professional courtesy from other cops, the DA is less likely to press charges because he's buddies with the cops, if he does press charges he's going to intentionally throw the case that he presents to the grand jury, if by some magic it gets past the grand jury judges and juries are very pro-cop, and if a miracle occurs and there's a conviction, the cop will get a considerably lesser sentence than a normal person. And they STILL manage to get…
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:27 PM
8

They do, in fact, commit more violent crimes than the general population, and over twice as many sexual assaults, per capita. http://www.policemisconduct.net/statistics/2010-annual-report/
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:25 PM
2

Sounds like you should spend some time on /r/bad_cop_no_donut
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:24 PM
0

Signs would not tell the pervs to stop their behavior, they would tell people how to report incidents o rly? http://www.theviolencestopshere.ca/dbtg.php
/r/MensRights17/05/14 07:43 PM
1

The Supreme Court disagreed with you in the 1970s , in a decision that lead not only to the fathers of illegitimate children getting rights to the child, but also lead to mothers of illegitimate children getting child support.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:53 AM
39

It makes us look like 'tards, just like when feminists do dumb shit.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 01:11 AM
13

Mostly? Yes. 46% of the men reported a female attacker. So 54% would be men, unless there were neuters or something attacking men. So mostly men, yes. More than half. Barely.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:46 PM
9

being made to penetrate Also known as being raped. Just not in rape statistics, 'cuz then the men would make up like 40% of rape victims, and we can't have that now can we?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:44 PM
3

There's an awful lot of stupid bullshit in the comments over there. I would have expected better from a subreddit titled "Science".
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:23 AM
1

Based on what?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:20 AM
1

I doubt Lucyraccoon's opinion is based on just these three. It might have more to do with the hordes of feminist protesters shutting down Men's Rights talks in Toronto or mainstream American feminists and their attitudes towards men and rape. Hint: they aren't egalitarian about it.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:20 AM
3

Hey you misspelled "egalitarian" as "feminist" there.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:18 AM
1

Is antifeminism not a defining aspect of the MRM? That does not seem to be a view endorsed by the leaders of your movement or the founders/moderators of this subreddit. Ummm...no. Anti-feminism isn't the defining aspect of the MRM. It might be the defining aspect of the strawmen that some people construct in order to discredit the MRM, but the MRM is not about hating feminists or anti-feminism. Even if it were, someone hating feminism or feminists would not make them an MRA. Meanwhile, Valerie S…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:03 PM
0

There's no evidence to suggest Anders Breivik was an MRA. There's also no solid evidence that feminists were pulling fire alarms to interrupt multiple forums on Men's issues that feminists were violently protesting just before the fire alarms either, that's correct.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:57 PM
1

Ohhhhhhhhhh I just now clicked on your name and see that you're an SRSer. While that doesn't automatically make your opinion wrong or anything, it DOES explain why you think consensual sex that does not follow your exact instructions is rape. It's all coming together now. Keep your nose out of people's bedrooms. What mechanism people use to consent is not your business.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:56 PM
-1

So you only need consent in a new relationship? What the fuck? Marital rape is OK because marriage (or just long term relationships) implies consent? You are one sick individual. Unless you mean to say the definition of consent changes based on whether you think the couple is in a real relationship or not (lol). Why is it your business what signals a couple gives each other when they want to have sex? Keep your nose (and false accusations) out of people's bedrooms.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:35 PM
-2

My wife and I have sex. A lot. Almost never do either of us explicitly and verbally consent to sex, it's almost entirely actions and body language. Does that make us each rapists? I want to give you the opportunity to clarify, but according to your definition of consent posted above, we are both rapists. Do you understand why criminalizing our sexual behavior just because it doesn't conform to your idea of what it should be is something MRA's don't appreciate? Why do you want to put us in jail b…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:05 PM
1

Let's assume you're right. It also gives innocent people a better chance of not spending 20 years in prison because a girl retroactively withdrew consent so that she wouldn't get caught cheating on her boyfriend. Protecting the innocent is FAR more important than catching the guilty.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 03:25 AM
5

Game of Thrones is all about shock value, that's why they turn hesitant sex into forceful rape.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 03:22 AM
1

There's a picture of a nude 4 year old girl, so yes
/r/MensRights21/04/14 06:09 AM
6

Not in the US under the circumstances described in the article, they can't.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:02 AM
1

He was trying to choke her - he put on a rear naked, clamped it down, and arched his back, picking her up by her neck. That's how you do a standing rear naked choke. Unfortunately for him, he didn't totally know what he was doing and didn't have it on quite right. But you can hear her trying to breathe and calling for help. He was trying to choke her. He's even still in the frame when he locks it down. I agree he did the right thing, though. Just stop saying he wasn't trying to choke her.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:36 AM
1

I feel like you don't know what you're talking about. No, I don't typically ease into chokes, because with most chokes there's no risk of doing "permanent damage" by putting it on strong, it's not like a joint lock. It's polite to not clamp on a choke when you're rolling, but that's just because getting choked sucks, not because there's risk of doing real damage. He put on a rear naked choke as best he could and was trying to put it on so tight that he literally picked her up by her neck. As I'm…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:34 AM
3

There's no evidence that teachers are neglecting female students. Quite the contrary, females do better in school all the way through college than males. Just because girls don't CHOOSE to go into STEM fields as much as men, does not mean they are being neglected.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 08:57 AM
1

That's a summer camp for young black males. Other than being related to technology and being gender (and in this case, ethnicity) specific, it's not really similar to what's in the OP.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 08:56 AM
3

I'm pretty sure he was referring to cable TV stations.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:24 PM
15

Didn't you hear him say he wanted to get off, and the bus driver said he couldn't get off because she had to drop him off at his home? Did you even watch the video? Fuck you for saying someone has to let someone beat on them until their LIFE is in danger before fighting back. Eat shit.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:10 PM
16

You could hear her trying to call for help, he applied the choke, he just didn't do it perfectly. You've never put a choke on a little sloppy? This kid probably just mimicked what he saw on Pro Wrestling, he's probably not a jiu jitsu player. Source: Army combatives, judo and jiu jitsu for a few years. I've put on plenty of sloppy chokes that didn't cause a tap as soon as it should have.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:08 PM
18

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and suggest that poverty probably has to do more with that than anything else.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:49 AM
3

I don't think with a gun is too far, there have been several stories in the last year of children in their teens and younger having to defend themselves against home invaders with firearms. Those children were fortunate to have been trained to use them and have access to them.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:04 AM
1

Not to be pedantic but it's the muzzle device that's NFA. That said, a suppressed weapon would be safer for a child to fire at the range since it's quieter, and even if that wasn't the case why does something being NFA regulated make it less safe for a child to use? A full auto under some circumstances would be more dangerous than a semi auto but that's not related to its NFA status.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:03 AM
8

The "sex doesn't feel as good" argument is based on over half of the erogenous nerve endings in the penis being located in the foreskin (it has more than the clitoris). I'm uncut and I literally cannot orgasm without stimulation of my foreskin, because stimulation of the shaft and glans is just dull in comparison. Well, the glans isn't dull, but the glans is too sensitive for direct simulation. Because, you know, my foreskin has been protecting it my whole life, as it was intended to, that way i…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:45 PM
6

What you SHOULD be getting from this is "If we are to hold female rape to the standard we propose, we need to hold male rape to that same standard". If a drunk chick having sex isn't automatically rape, then neither is a drunk dude having sex.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:41 AM
4

/r/theredpill is over that way, man. My wife and I split housework, she works outside the home while I work from home due to a serious spinal cord injury I incurred during service. You think I'm a pussy for doing housework? Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:08 AM
3

If they have a gun, my having a gun still gives me better odds than being unarmed.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:06 AM
3

I need a gun from protection from people with malicious intent. Whether they have guns, knives, bats, or whatever, I want to have the best chance of winning that fight if I have to have it. In general, my firearm gives me the best odds.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:50 AM
3

So I get your point, but the proper response to misandrist ads is not misogynist ads. The proper response is what we're seeing here - a fair ad.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:42 AM
1

I've been married for over 5 years. I just found a woman that wasn't a trigger happy psychopath.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 06:42 AM
1

I'm having trouble finding a good source for rape conviction rates, but this one says that "18% of rape cases involving adult women result in a conviction", and none of the other numbers I'm seeing are anywhere near 93%. That's 18% of reported rapes involving an adult woman, not 18% of court cases.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 06:11 AM
14

To be honest some MRA types disgust me. Their hate for women is poorly veiled. That's why you got downvoted. I saw the first line of your comment and misread it as "MRA types disgust me" etc. I had to stop and read it deliberately a second time to comprehend what you were actually saying.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 06:08 AM
0

*Don't rush into marriage, know what you're getting into
/r/MensRights27/03/14 04:41 AM
50

The best thing about the feminist fad of shouting "False equivalence!" is that they don't know what it means and keep misusing the accusation of the fallacy.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:33 PM
5

You trolling? Libertarians love to give facts and statistics, it's the best part about being libertarian: your opinion is based on reason which you can back up with evidence.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:23 AM
11

The funny thing is, it says that the boys' mothers aren't there to lower the seats for them. Except, the boys don't need the seat lowered: the girls do.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:01 AM
5

He didn't say all liberals comment like this, he just said it's typical. Which it is.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 09:10 PM
11

You don't actually know what censorship or free speech is, do you?
/r/MensRights03/01/14 07:09 AM
4

And maybe when her news stories die down she can make up rape and mutilation threats to get back into the spotlight again?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:18 AM
-3

According to feminists, yes.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:53 PM
5

Another source like the Associated Press? You know, the source cited in the very first two letters of the article? Or KRDO, where the video comes from? Did you even look at the link?
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:58 PM
2

This woman is a "relationships expert" but clearly has never actually been in a relationship. Some of the advice is sound, like being clean and presentable, but insisting on paying for the date and bringing flowers makes you stink with desperation. People are repulsed by desperation, and seeming desperate will not help your chances. You bring flowers to your wife or girlfriend you've been with for a while, not some girl you're going on a first date with.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:59 PM
14

A rapist liked something once, obviously that means that thing correlates with rape.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 11:29 AM
1

That's weird because I see a lot of plastic surgery in that sub and almost all of the women are covered in make up.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 10:51 AM
1

I think House saw "ritual cutting" and thought of modern ritual genital cutting of boys in America. I think he missed the part where you were looking for examples of stuff being done to women, and he cited an example of it being done to men.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 10:48 AM
8

If you count housework as 'work' for women, you have to count housework and maintenance as work for men. So when they're painting the house or putting up a new roof or replacing the brake pads on the family car, that's work.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:02 AM
0

Come on dude, she insults her opponents and some of those are men so she hates men? Please, you sound like a Feminist crying misogyny here.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 08:56 AM
16

Courts often rule that if a man ACTS as the father, even if he isn't actually the father, he is beholden to the child and has to pay the mother child support.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 08:47 AM
12

The decision to have the child is 100% the mother's choice, the father has no say, even if he didn't consent to the sex that lead to the conception. While there is an exception in areas with blanket abortion bans (do those places exist in the US? I don't actually know), there are no states in the US where men have a say in whether the child is born or not, or whether he is beholden to that child for the first 18 years of its life.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 08:46 AM
3

The foreskin has roughly 20,000 nerve endings, versus the 8,000 in the clitoris. Tell us again how that has no affect on a man's sexuality, nevermind that the procedure became widespread in America because it was SUPPOSED to suppress male sexuality. Re: parents having the right, it's not the parents' body, it's the child's body. Them having a dangerous cosmetic surgery done to their infant is not OK.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:22 AM
3

It's very interesting that you censored "Nigger" but not "Tranny" or "Faggot", despite saying they're all about as offensive as each other.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:50 AM
9

Your post is full of strawman arguments. They seem like typical feminist talking points regarding sex, but I've literally never heard someone say that it was a rape victim's fault that their fault they got raped - ever, except when I hear stories from the middle east. In America, male-on-female rape is considered worse than murder. Men that are accused of it are almost always presumed guilty, it has a higher false accusation rate than other crimes by more than 2x according to the FBI, and it's s…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:48 PM
9

Women being attracted to men because of their wealth and status is a documented phenomenon. There was a study done that had men and women rate members of the opposite sex. Half of the women rated a man in a crappy car, while half rated that same man in a sports car, etc. The women consistently rated the same man in a sports car as much more physically attractive, while the men rated the woman the same regardless of the car. It is a form of objectification, and one far more devious than 'objectif…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 02:36 AM
5

Bro, this thread is about a cultural topic, not a legal one. Culturally, we tend to think it's more acceptable for men to hit other men than to hit women. Even a scrawny guy is expected to "man up" and fend for himself.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:26 AM
9

"Among the chosen red flags were: lip lick/bite; over-the-shoulder look; sleepy; intoxicated; tight clothing; fat; short; unintelligent; punk; attention-seeking and touching breast. Once they had pictures of women licking their lips, partying, wearing sexy clothing, etc., the researchers cross-checked them with a separate group of students who presumed that the photos indeed matched the cues. " College age men are sexually attracted to sexy and flirtatious women when looking for a one night stan…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 05:21 PM
-1

Did you consider that maybe she was looked down upon by her peers because she chose such a stupid topic for her masters' thesis? Or maybe she exaggerated what happened or just made it up. I have some friends who like to blame things that happen to them on their sex or gender, but it is almost always the case that they just screwed something up or did a bad job. When my mother gets poor service at a restaurant and the waiter is male, you can bet dollars to donuts she blames the service on the man…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 05:18 PM
3

That just means that the ones subsidizing the others (men) will not take part in the system because it's a bad deal for them.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 04:19 AM
1

Forgot the /s, the "misogyny" from the study is "benevolent misogyny" like holding open doors for women. They concluded that men who like big breasts are more likely to be polite to women, and skewed that into misogynists like big breasts.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:39 PM
-1

The clitoris is not analogous to the glans. The clitoris and labia majora together would be analogous to the foreskin, if you want to compare the two.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:29 PM
2

No but men who like big breasts are misogynists http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/01/sexist-men-big-boobs-breast-size-study_n_2792287.html
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:58 AM
14

My wife was 19 when we got married, we have been together 5 years and have no regrets.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 02:45 AM
5

Vandredd speaks the truth, what most people call push ups are not, in fact, push ups. The guy that was able to bust out 70 pushups at MEPS couldn't hit that magical 42 when they had to do them properly at basic training.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:21 AM
1

The US does not have government mandated maternity leave, but even the shitty retail companies I have worked for have had maternity leave. If maternity leave is mandated, a company that would not want it (say a small 6 person operation that needs knowledgable and dedicated employees) might not hire a woman because he fears she might get pregnant and disappear for 6 months, leaving him unable to hire a replacement (he has to give her her job back) and instead having to find some temp willing to w…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:18 AM
1

I have seen a summary of the study you're talking about, but I don't remember it being significantly more, I remember it being just a few percentage points more. The numbers are probably skewed by all the strippers though.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:14 AM
1

6 months advancement is considerable, and leaving your job for 6 months (which means someone has to replace you for that time) is disruptive to your career beyond that lost 6 months.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:13 AM
1

Right. The OP was about attempts, not attempts plus plans to attempt. Women plan it more, they both attempt it about the same amount, and men succeed at a rate of about 5:1 vs women.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 05:55 AM
2

/s?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:06 PM
11

They would do what they do when criticizing any other female politician they disagree with - say she's practically a man because of internalized misogyny. Race baiters like Jesse Jackson do the same thing about black politicians they disagree with.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:20 AM
13

"Deadbeat dad tries to use justice system to kidnap children and fails, wife forced to pay for his car repairs story at 11"
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:29 AM
15

Are you sure? It really seemed like the wolves in your analogy were men, not rapists.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 09:42 PM
1

A woman can consent while intoxicated, depending on how badly she is intoxicated, similarly to how a man can also consent while intoxicated, depending on how badly. The poster is pointing out that just because one has a few drinks and makes a bad decision doesn't mean one was raped. If one is passed out drunk or can't stand or walk or talk and someone has sex with that person, then one was raped. But if someone is sober enough to continuously and enthusiastically consent and participate? That's …
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:08 PM
4

I had a feminist argue with me that a woman should be able to abort up until the birth is complete because a woman does not consent to getting pregnant when she has sex, and so the fetus is a foreign invader like a tumor. I then pointed out that if that is the case, the man who impregnates a woman does not necessarily consent to that pregnancy either, and thus should not be held liable for the upbringing of the child. Her response was that it is in the best interests of the child for the mother …
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:52 AM
6

The positions held by and legislation pushed by mainstream feminists would suggest otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:49 AM
2

Wow. He's actually a rape-apologist like feminists always accuse MRAs of being. That's incredible.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:44 AM
3

How does it promote rape culture?
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:41 AM
5

Do you watch much pornography? Most that I see does not include submissive women or women being dominated. If I accidentally click on BDSM or domination categories, it's usually men being dominated. In mainstream porn like on the front page of Tube8 or something, the female usually initiates the sex and decides what they do. The male's actions usually follow her lead. I see a lot of people talking about women being dominated and acted upon in pornography, and that may be the case in a small port…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:58 AM
9

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:08 PM
1

The big problem is "falsely accused" is based on people acquitted of rape or later exonerated, but it's being overlayed with "actual rapists" which is something extrapolated from a self-reporting survey.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:49 PM
3

Best novelty account ever
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:47 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POJ2T023M4I
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:24 PM
1

I have no idea, I can't find whatever was updated.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:04 AM
7

You did, it was just updated recently is why the date is 2013.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:17 PM
2

That's a dangerous game to play, bro, I'm glad it worked out well!
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:13 PM
1

It is not irrational to conclude that someone who has to steal other people's footage in order to make a video about a game that one claims to have played points to that person not having played it.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:27 PM
7

Her bad summaries of the games also suggest she didn't play them. It would appear as if she just read the tvtropes and wikipedia articles on them and threw together other people's footage to make her videos.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 05:55 PM
7

And the exact same HP, exact same ammo, etc.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 05:54 PM
2

He may mean men typically are the killers and this is specifically about murder. I guess they're moving away from non-lethal domestic violence since, as you pointed out, women are more likely to be the aggressor.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:38 AM
8

It depends on your statistics. There are studies that put false rape accusations from 40-50%. That is, accusations made to the police that are proven false OR redacted before getting to trial. The 6% number comes from those proven false after going to trial, if it's the one I'm thinking of. The studies that put the number at ~50% show that about half of the admitted false accusers made the false accusation to serve as an alibi or cover story when those studies report on why the accusation was ma…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:36 AM
2

I know your question was rhetorical, but in the view of those conservatives, the fetus is a human being and its killing is a murder, while government welfare programs are altruism forced on the taxpayer. If is not charity if I mug you and give your money to the poor.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:13 AM
4

That's the brilliant thing about feminism, though! They just defined all negative experiences as being feminine, and all positive experiences as being masculine. Anything negative that happens to a person happens because they are a woman or they are being treated like a woman, just by definition. Anything positive that happens to a person happens because they are a man or are being treated like a man. Women in power just have internalized misogyny and are acting like men, thus furthering the pat…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:05 AM
2

So only men are rapists (but they're too stupid to know better), and only women are rape victims. Awesome.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:48 AM
2

About a third of rapes are committed by someone unknown to the victim according to RAINN. That is hardly something that doesn't actually happen.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:44 AM
6

The strawman feminists blurt out regarding the views of society on rape is that people blame rape victims for their rapes, specifically by saying it's their own fault because they were dressed provocatively or something like that. What is happening in reality is, people are suggesting to people that one can help mitigate the risk of forcible rape by a stranger by doing certain things. It's no different than telling people to avoid certain parts of town at night. It's not your fault if you get mu…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:35 AM
22

Check your privilege, shitlord. Not everyone had your white middle class male school system to teach them grammar. /s
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:07 PM
3

He's paraphrasing. Heads Up: Comments that slander the victims and/or the mother (especially when no criminal charges have been filed against her involving a violent crime) will not be published. As for praising or excusing molesters, rapists, murderers, or violence-addicted fathers in general as poor, oppressed and/or misunderstood creatures who are "really nice guys"? Those comments won't be published either. Don't waste my time or yours. ALSO: Please keep in mind that I do not have the time o…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 09:46 PM
0

OP posed that question before, explained that they had done so, and linked to it in the OP. This is not the thread asking the question, this is the thread explaining what happened when the OP asked the same question to feminists that they asked here 6 days ago.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:21 AM
1

Looks like the commenter is arguing from a moral standpoint where he believes statutory rape laws are wrong, and the other commenter is arguing from a legal standpoint where morality doesn't matter, only the law does. The commenter saying that there has been no crime because there has been no victim reads a lot like a libertarian based on his language, so that's probably the angle he's coming from: the 15/16 year old voluntarily took part in it, so there was no rape. People that hold that view u…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:01 AM
7

The point of posts like these are to point out the double standards that the media applies to statutory rape cases. Men rape girls, but women have affairs or inappropriate relationships with boys, according to the media.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:56 AM
6

That's because Pvt Snuffy, E-2, gets married so he can get BAH and move out of the barracks. He usually marries a stripper or another woman near post that knows the pay scale better than he does. So she spends all his deployment money while he's overseas and divorces him when he gets back. I've seen it at least a dozen times.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:59 AM
2

Feminist website about violence against women omits all violence against by done BY women.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:53 AM
5

I'd imagine MRAs that want to end women's suffrage want to do so because they aren't eligible for the draft, and according to the Supreme Court, the Draft is constitutional only because it is the price men pay in order to be able to vote. Women do not share the burden/responsibility of the draft, and therefore should not have the privilege to vote. The other side of that opinion (the side I agree with) is that women should be eligible for the draft, rather than removing their ability to vote. Th…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:35 PM
14

Yes it was, and it was a lot funnier with the little boy getting signatures.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:33 PM
8

"Pussy", "beta", "nerd", "henpecked", "whipped", men DO in fact shame "good guys". However, these nice guys are not the ones sweeping up women left and right - the alphas are. While women may consciously want a nice guy, they are subconsciously attracted to the alpha male, and men subconsciously know this. This is why men physically fight over women so much. Women might slut shame, but men actually beat the shit out of their competition. And it works. I had a friend who trained MMA, a very small…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:13 PM
3

Most will reply that if the man didn't want to be a father, he shouldn't have had sex with the mother...which is hilarious because if you dare imply that the woman shouldn't have had sex if she didn't to be a mother, you'll be told in no uncertain terms that that is an unrealistic expectation and is not a fair standard to hold a woman to.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:46 AM
3

But women still voted for him, and given that your link shows about 10 republican voting men to every 9 republican women, the majority of men voting Republican is slim.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:42 AM
2

Well, a fetus certainly is a human on the day of delivery, and certainly not a human on the day of conception. So it becomes a human sometime between those two events. It would seem reasonable to me to define personhood as occuring at the point in development that the fetus could survive outside of the womb, as it's obviously a human at that point.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:37 AM
0

When you manipulate language to frame an issue in a way such that only your position seems correct, you are being dishonest. Calling abortion "reproductive rights" or "women's choice" are a few examples of that. Whether you believe in no abortion, unlimited abortion, or something in between, call it what it is: abortion. Calling it "reproductive rights" isn't any different than calling it "infanticide", it's a dishonest way of manipulating language to make your position the only reasonable sound…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:35 AM
3

Was with you until the forced abortion/sterilization bit.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:33 AM
2

Well...there are more male politicians than female in elected office, so yeah. And since legislators that make laws are politicians, more males are writing those laws than females. But the voting constituency, which is mostly females, the ones electing these politicians, are women, and polls still show that more women are pro-life than pro-choice. So women choose men to push pro-life agendas. But yes, male politicians are at the legislative end of it, so you are right.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:31 AM
6

Men and women performing differently is not evidence of discrimination. We can't simultaneously claim that men and boys doing worse in school than women and girls is evidence of discrimination and also point out that women doing worse in the workplace than men (wage gap) is bogus. I do not doubt that boys and men are discriminated against in the education system, but claiming that because boys and men do worse there is discrimination is not right.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:36 AM
-2

If their part time workers had marketable skills worth more than minimum wage (BTW walmart pays above minimum wage, and has health insurance for full time workers), they wouldn't be working at fucking Walmart.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:58 AM
2

What brought you to the conclusion that they think they can dictate to the employer what the uniforms should be?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:02 AM
5

Women using false accusations as weapons in divorce is an MR issue.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:18 AM
7

False accusations are an MR issue, especially when used as weapons in divorces.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:16 AM
0

The casualties of war are mostly men, not children or women.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:15 AM
2

Heck, forget the blackjack and genital mutilation!
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:16 AM
3

"A meteorite devastated China early last month, and men are to blame. Men make up the vast majority of practicing scientists in fields like Astronomy, and women are actively discouraged from studying science in college because the Patriarchy wants these high paying jobs saved for men. Now, we see the results of these oppressions: women had no chance to spot the meteor because men have a monopoly on astronomy. A woman surely would have spotted the meteor and, with the help of other women scientis…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 10:37 PM
1

http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:24 PM
3

It is sexism. Benevolent sexism. Which is privilege.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:19 PM
3

The main reason women are not put in the draft is because their lives are valued at more than men's. Men are disposable. Sacrificing men to protect the women has been constant through human history.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:19 PM
3

If the abuser is in the act of physically abusing the victim, and is committing violence that meets whatever standard needs to be met in that jurisdiction to employ lethal force, then it could be self-defense. If the domestic violence victim plots and kills the alleged abuser at some time when the abuser is NOT doing violence to the alleged domestic violence victim, it's not self-defense, it's murder. Unless the alleged domestic violence victim is physically imprisoned or something like that. "H…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 07:50 AM
1

I honestly think if Jodi Arias had given the "He was a wifebeater child molester and I did it in self-defense" story from the beginning, she would have gone free.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 07:45 AM
2

Drew Peterson was an ex cop. I don't mean to seem like I keep making excuses, but cops get away with shit all the time, check our /r/badcopnodonut . Women get away with murder very very frequently by making an accusation of abuse. "Oh, he beat her? He deserved it, then. She had no other way of escaping him."
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:35 PM
1

Maybe he should have stipulated a non-celebrity man.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:57 AM
1

You're doing some pretty crazy intellectual acrobatics to justify the whole "Attempted conversion is hate" thing. Your reasoning is fallacious and self defeating - if Christians truly hate non-believers and they come up with after-life punishments for them because they hate them (which implies that Christians believe they control Heaven and Hell rather than God, which leads me to believe you don't even know what Christianity is), why would they then attempt to convert them with reason? If a Chri…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:18 AM
3

The church I grew up in doesn't hate non-believers, and in fact any religion that seeks to convert non-believers through reason rather than force loves non-believers. If you believe that only believers will get eternal life and you want to share that gift with non-believers by trying to convince them to convert, that is love, not hate.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 07:33 AM
1

Nah, you'll get all the "Just a flap of skin" arguments. They don't understand that the foreskin is like a female's labia and clitoris all in one : \
/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:46 PM
22

Exercise the freedom of masturbation, of course!
/r/MensRights21/04/13 09:44 PM
0

It is well known. It is also false.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 09:35 PM
1

He didn't do that, though. He said he had his list of communists and was pressured to release the names, even after he said he wasn't 100% sure on all of them. He didn't come out "naming names" as is commonly believed.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 09:13 PM
1

McCarthy didn't want to name names, but was forced to name names to back up his allegation of communists in the state department. He was later found to be correct about his allegation of communists in the state department. Labeling this as digital mccarthyism implies that the feminists are right even though their accusations are unpopular.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:21 PM
0

Anything commissioned by a particular interest group should, almost always, be discounted for bias. You cannot discount something based on the person or group that put it forward - that's arguing at hominem. It's no different than telling someone to check their privilege. To discredit a study or argument you need to point out what specifically is wrong, not appeal to people's distrust of the source.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:20 PM
8

In an ideal world, employers would be able to hire whoever they wanted and deny anyone for any reason they want, including gender. Of course we don't live in that ideal world and women and minorities except men levy lawsuits regularly alleging they were denied a job due to their minority status or being a woman. They are utilizing the force of government to get jobs and we (men) tend not to. And because we tend not to litigate when discriminated against and maybe because when we do we're laughed…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:12 PM
4

Did they ask for it? According to the article she did it to free up hospital beds. Did you even read it? There's already evidence outlined in the article.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:13 AM
3

Women are preferred for these positions (or required to be in them by law) because of their gender, which means qualified men are passed up for these positions because of THEIR gender.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:06 AM
1

I'm going to make two points here. One is that not all women are weaker than the average man. And even if they are, I train with women that can kick most men's ass or at least choke them out. Now they are obviously exceptions to the generally true rule, I understand. However; If a man fights off a woman, he is going to go to jail. If a cop sees a battered woman and an uninjured man and the man claims SHE tried to rape HIM, the man is going to jail and will probably be convicted.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:05 PM
6

Why shouldn't women also defend themselves from preventable physical abuse? Why is it just the men that are responsible for avoiding potential battery?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 05:41 AM
10

OK, here's the official opinion if you don't trust RT http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20ARCO%2020130220025.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:40 PM
-1

Except where the non-gang members were armed. The Korean shop keepers during the Rodney King riots held the rioting blacks at bay. In New Orleans the suburban neighborhoods that hadn't been disarmed by the police/national guard were able to keep the rioting blacks at bay with roving armed patrols. Riots happen in urban areas where all the crime already is. That's a pretty crappy comparison.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:37 PM
7

Rape doesn't require physical resistance, only a lack of consent. He may have chosen not to physically resist for many reasons, not the least of which the fear of being put in jail for battering her (good luck convincing the cops she was raping you and THAT'S why you hit/threw her)
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:56 PM
1

Nah that's 'maille' which is just a French word for knit
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:50 AM
3

The linked subreddit is not SRS or SRS affiliated.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:41 PM
1

You are 100% wrong. The mom that gave her kid botox injections, which is a LOT less permanent than cosmetic surgery, lost custody of her daughter. http://blog.sfgate.com/sfmoms/2011/05/16/mother-who-injected-daughter-with-botox-loses-custody/
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:37 AM
22

She's probably actually decent to him in person, then gets on the internet and trashes him behind her back.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:20 AM
10

Actually violence is the ONLY thing that solves violence.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:07 AM
6

I think you overstate their case with the word "overwhelmingly". There is only one non-sex related benefit to circumcision - a very small decrease in the risk of getting a UTI as an infant. Infants don't get UTIs very often, they are pretty rare, and are already rarer in boys than in girls. The only other alleged health benefit is a decrease in the risk of contracting an STD, specifically AIDS. Again, the decrease in risk is extremely small, and won't apply to infants anyway so you can't use it …
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:58 AM
2

Dude, if you think objecting to the mutilation of baby boys' genitals for tradition or religious reasons isn't reasonable, you're a crazy person. I understand you're OK with your mutilated genitals, but I have a hard time understanding how you could just accept and approve of doctors cutting at baby boys' penises for COSMETIC SURGERY. It is literally NO different than cutting the clitoris off a baby girl. Are you OK with that?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:30 AM
1

Just FYI, it looks exactly the same as an intact penis when it's erect. Except intact penises don't have that gnarly scar at the base of the glans like yours does. Also, the heads of intact penises aren't calloused and purple and dried out. They're a plush red, they're soft, they're sensitive, and they are as millions of years of evolution has designed them to be.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:23 AM
2

What about the rights of the infant boy? Why does someone else make the choice to lop the end of his dick off and sell the removed piece? Why don't they wait until he's old enough to decide for himself? Why do you think it's OK for someone to choose FOR YOU to have your body mutilated in a cosmetic surgery?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:20 AM
2

Poking eyes out is totally in the same ball park as cutting off the end of your dick. Dude, I'm glad you don't mind that your dick was mutilated when you were a baby because of tradition. I'm happy that you're satisfied with the pathetic stimulation you feel during intercourse. But don't try to minimize it for everyone else, specifically, the infant boys who haven't been mutilated yet and have a chance at being WHOLE.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:19 AM
3

Hey man, it's your dick, if you want to more than half the sensation you feel when it's doing your thing that's your call. Except, it wasn't your call. You were just a baby boy when they cut the end of your dick off (I presume, please correct me if you chose to have it done later in life). And that's the problem.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:16 AM
3

The biggest negative health effect is your genitals have been mutilated. Beyond that, the foreskin is like the clitoris. It has more nerve endings than the whole rest of the penis. You know how cut guys masturbate by stroking the shaft and stopping short of the glans? If I (or my wife ;) ) don't manipulate my foreskin, I can't achieve orgasm. That's how much feeling it has vs the shaft. It also protects the glans. It's supposed to be sort of an internal organ. Mine's so sensitive that if my fore…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:32 AM
2

Dude, taking UTIs from 9 in 100,000 to 1 in 100,000 in infant boys is not worth mutilating one's genitals over. All of the other reasons deal with adolescent/adult males that can choose to have their genitals operated on if they want.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:24 AM
4

Why is this being downvoted? It's a perfect parallel. FGM protects against HIV and yet we don't see people excusing it for that reason.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:19 AM
8

It's not a little excess skin, man. It's basically the clitoris of the man. It has more nerve endings than the rest of the penis. It also protects the glans and provides mechanical lubrication during intercourse. It's an important part of the penis. You know how circumcised men masturbate by stroking the shaft but neglecting the glans? I can't get off that way. If my foreskin doesn't get action, I can't orgasm. That's how much the nerves in the shaft pale in comparison to the foreskin.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:16 AM
6

They don't see why it's a big deal because they don't know what they're missing.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:07 AM
1

It's not prostitution because they aren't promising sex for money. Just like escorts, they're promising companionship for money and sex may or may not (but mostly may) follow.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:26 PM
9

Why someone wouldn't do everything they could to decrease the risk of becoming a victim is beyond me. I lock my doors at home, I lock my car doors, I try to be aware when I'm in areas known for crime if I can't avoid those areas entirely, I try not to entice people or send mixed signals, and I carry a gun. I could scream "Don't tell me to lock my doors at night! Tell buglers not to break into homes!". Or I could accept that sometimes bad people do bad things, and take steps to lower my chances o…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:25 PM
-1

You gave a single study from a single city that controlled for nothing beyond race and criminal background and proclaimed that if a white man and a black man with the same resume apply for a job, the black man will get turned down more often than the white man, which is absolute fucking hogwash and the opposite of the truth. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on you racist fuck.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:47 AM
2

Please. You cited a study from ONE CITY that didn't control for any factors other than criminal record and race. That's the same kind of half-assed research that leads feminists to believe in the gender gap. Remember those NYC firefighters that were turned down promotions because they were white? Remember reading about how blacks and hispanics could score lower on the entrance exams and get hired over whites that scored higher, all because of their race? http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:44 AM
1

Oh BTW I'm a white cis-gendered male and I'm un-privileged as FUCK. I've got a hole in my spine from the military and I can't lift over 5 pounds for the rest of my life due to it or it'll cut off my spinal cord and I'll become paralyzed. They busted a meth lab next door to me 30 feet from my kitchen last year. I live in a trailer my grandfather is gracious enough to let me live in rent free, and the fucking cops sexually assaulted me at a DUI checkpoint in November because I hadn't had a hair cu…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:19 AM
2

You can't assume that any one white male is privileged because he's a white male any more than you can assume any one black male is a criminal because he's a black male. Saying white males are privileged isn't any different than saying black or hispanic males are criminals.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:08 AM
46

Women using proxy violence against men is a Men's Rights issue, because it's almost always ignored.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:12 AM
9

It's not fair because it discourages women from making false rape claims, you misogynist pig!
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:52 AM
6

Here's the scenario ttheskepticaldidealist is providing. He and girl are fooling around, doing foreplay. He asks if she wants to have sex. She says no, but continues to consent to foreplay. After they do their foreplay for a bit, she changes her mind and decides she wants to have sex. This is not rape.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:50 AM
2

My ASSUMPTION is that the female killer and the male killer were an item, so she screamed rape because she was being caught cheating.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:19 PM
1

I think the "Criminals shouldn't commit crimes" angle is a non-starter. They're criminals. They know their crimes are bad. They don't care. Telling a rapist not to rape isn't any different than telling a thief not to steal or a con artist not to con. BTW am I the only person who's never actually seen/heard the revealing clothing line? Is it just a strawman or is it real? I've never heard "she had it coming" or "she deserved it". I think advising women to not dress as skimpy or to avoid certain a…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:09 AM
2

Not having accommodations in your workplace for wheelchair bound people isn't discrimination or unfair.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 07:16 AM
-6

OP listed average child support across the board, you cited cost of raising a child for a middle class family. Children born out of wedlock and divorce disproportionately affect poorer families, so the numbers are not comparable.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:26 AM
3

What trouble would that be? I'm intact and I've never had a problem with my foreskin, and I had very poor hygiene for a few years in high school. But if my foreskin were to disappear today, I would have serious problems sexually, I cannot finish with stimulus just to the shaft. I presume this is because I've had all those nerve endings in my foreskin all my life instead of having to do without them.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:11 AM
2

That's called shock.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:05 AM
15

In the article they complain that most of the zombies in Atlanta were white, despite Atlanta being a majority black population. Maybe AMC learned the lesson from Resident Evil 5. RE5 took place in Africa, and in an early trailer it showed the protagonist blowing away a bunch of black zombies. Everyone threw a fit and said it was racist, it caused quite a stir. Maybe AMC wanted to avoid that, so they left out the black zombies. SURPRISE AMC! Not having black zombies is just as racist as having bl…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 06:17 AM
9

That is untrue, your source reports that with proper use, the failure rate of condoms is 2% and the pill has a failure rate of 0.3%.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:24 PM
2

You're the one redefining reverse racism. Reverse racism is racism against white people by minorities. The term implies that only white people can be racist, and when other ethnicity do it, it's something difference (reverse racism). The hilarious part is that the whole term is racist in itself because it implies that only whites can be racist. It's not reverse racism, it's just racism.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:09 AM
2

They are WAY out of uniform. Guys, the issue isn't that they're nurturing in uniform, it's that their uniforms are FUCKED UP and that's a big deal in the military. Undone blouses, untucked shirts, no headgear, they're WAY out of uniform and you aren't supposed to do that out in the open, especially with the intention of having photos taken
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:35 PM
-3

That's the problem. If it's her reaction to the comment that determines that it's sexual harassment, ANYTHING is sexual harassment. Politely ask a girl on a date? Harassment. Order a cheeseburger from a female worker at McDonalds? Harassment. You can't interact with a woman without sexually harassing them, no matter WHAT you do or do not say, if it's the woman's reaction or thought process that determines that it's harassment. The guy in the OP story was rude, but not a criminal (for the stateme…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter