TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dr-Crobar Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by Dr-Crobar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

Why is it Germany always has these authoritarian issues????
/r/MensRights13/03/24 09:30 AM
2

I often find myself hoping certain individuals end up being hit by high speed vehicles.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 10:34 AM
-8

Im starting to get fed up with subreddits continuing to get more and more extremist. This really isnt the time to be complaining about mens rights its a fucking warzone where people are being murdered and raped good god please dont let this sub get as insufferable as the atheism one.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 06:41 PM
7

It disgusts me that ONLY the leader of this "gang" faces punishment, every single person in that gang should suffer the same fate as the innocent man they tortured and killed, in fact they should suffer twice as much as he did.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 02:19 PM
11

The school grading system in general is moronic if you think about it. 50% is an F, a failing grade, meaning that there is zero difference between 0% and 50% and all numbers between the two. Its effectively like if you were able to go past 0% into negative numbers.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:32 AM
13

eh just more AI fearmongering, I could get AI dungeon to accuse me of using the geneva convention as a To-Do list with only a small bit of work.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 03:50 AM
12

If I had one wish it would be to permanently remove the human brain's ability to rope together everyone in a single group. I.e. it would be impossible for anyone to think "all men/women/black/white/Christians/Muslims are xxx-ist" because the moment they do their brains force them to realize "wait humans are individuals and thus everyone of a specific group cannot be xxx-ist." This wouldnt just improve Men's Rights but the lives of every human being on the planet.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:21 PM
2

Two possibilities, shes a liar and making up shit to get at you or something, or she genuinely believes that she has a psychic link with a clump of cells. Either way, run, fucking run.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 06:09 AM
3

Cant force someone to get chemo, this sittuation is an actual "my body my choice" scenario. Not in the womens rights sense but in the patient's rights sense.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 05:45 PM
1

That first one barely even makes sense. That has to be some extremely specific medication because its pretty universal throughout the Homo Sapien species... which we are all apart of. The only things that tend to matter arent sex specific, like BMI and allergies.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 06:04 PM
1

I stopped being a fan of r/atheism when it went from being atheist to antitheist. All they do know is paint every priest as a pedophile and repeat the same old "why does religion still exist" bitch-moan. Good too see that its still a cesspool, if not worse.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 07:51 PM
3

Ah yes, because the internet is a good reflection of reality and definitely not an echo chamber for loud minorities.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 05:19 PM
0

Okay then, I see a lotta african americans committing crimes on the news, since the innocent ones arent doing anything to stop their people from committing crime we better arrest them aswell. Sure protests just started in iran against the taliban... but most of them are still not fighting back so better airstrike em all anyways. This is you, this is your logic applied to other sittuations. See how that sounds?
/r/MensRights23/09/22 02:23 PM
9

Sure right. Whatever helps you project your anger at a random group.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 02:06 PM
88

This comment section is full of dipshits blaming russians for the actions of the russian government. Reddit never ceases to amaze me
/r/MensRights23/09/22 01:49 PM
7

Blaming an entire people for their government's actions is illogical. Do you blame all germans for the actions of Nazi Germany? No, because thats illogical.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 01:47 PM
1

I have never heard that saying before in my entire life up until now.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 01:20 AM
3

Well, this show takes place in a medieval-esque world and historically it was pretty easy for shit to go wrong during child brith back in the dark ages. So maybe these people should pick up a history book or something.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 04:49 AM
1

Well thats like comparing apples and grapefruit. The reason why pornography and stuff like pornography and similar stuff is frowned upon is probably because the creator's of that religion believed sex to be a "sacred" act since it usually creates children.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:39 PM
-9

I dont consider it sexual harassment regardless if the stranger is a male or a female. Just use the goddamn block button. Its an interaction on the internet, unlike real life the interaction can be left at any time.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:14 AM
-11

I am putting it as it is. Calling the police cause some loser sent her onlyfan's link is stupid and a waste of valuable time, and OP was refering specifically to onlyfans links.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:10 AM
-14

Ah yes, waste the police's time because some chick sent an onlyfans link.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:57 AM
-14

Block. Button. Someone sending a fucking onlyfans link isnt on the same level as potentially traumatic real life sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:53 AM
-26

Because its not real life and the block button exists on most social media. Sexual harassment involves physical action, real life action. A "report sexual harassment" function would also be abused to hell and back by feminists.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:48 AM
1

Doesnt onlyfans work kinda like patreon or something where people donate money? Onlyfans just hosts the stuff it doesnt actually pay people does it?
/r/MensRights17/08/22 04:05 AM
17

Its Netflix, what'd you expect?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:20 AM
9

The sub still seems pretty normal at the moment. I like to use r/atheism as a benchmark for whether or not a sub is full of hate. Compare and constrast.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:25 PM
6

Eh, japan-made sex androids arent too far away. Not sapient but chatbots and text-to-speech is a thing so all it takes is a good learning algorithm. Fyi I am not an expert on this matter, just a robot fucker.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 04:54 AM
2

"Gender" is just the result of the uneducated not knowing the already existing word "subculture". Its is a philosophy, made up in someones mind. Its not real, and never will be. It butchers languages and is often used by those that wanna feel special. The words "tomboy" and "tomgirl" exist to describe a woman that acts more "manly" and a man that acts more "womanly". If you notice, this non-issue of gender doesnt exist in places with vastly different cultures like Japan. That alone proves that t…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 04:08 AM
2

Get that 1950s cold war era ass attitude out of here. This is kinda thought process is exactly what gives fuel to radical feminists.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:01 PM
37

And a all female """utopia""" isnt a sexist fantasy?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 06:55 PM
14

Stuff like this isnt just stupid because of the obivous bigotry, but also because it neglects the biological truth that the human species needs both sexes to exist. Children arent delievered by storks they are produced by a man and a woman banging.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 08:47 PM
11

How original.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:49 PM
1

r/atheism would love you.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:42 PM
24

The fuck is an Enby and where exactly is any biological evidence that it exists.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:33 PM
2

If pigs are somehow smarter than dogs, then it merely an unintended side effect of artificial selection. Last I checked, pigs will eat anything, including meat. And there is a difference between kicking a living pig in the face and killing via a non-painful method. It would be inefficent to kick a pig in the face. Vegans will never have a point so long as they deal in absolutes. The world isnt black and white. Im done here, you will drone on and on trying to change human nature. Your attempts at…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:42 PM
2

I'll need evidence for that claim of pigs being more intelligent. As for kicking a pig in the face for no reason, its a waste of time and energy to do that. I dont need a feel good moral reason to not abuse an animal when basic logic and reasoning works just fine.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:19 PM
2

I have several dogs. I will give you that, dogs are certainly intelligent, but not so much as humans. Some breeds of dogs have basic problem solving skills. What is interesting is that all dogs descend from ancient wolf-like creatures, who were carnivorous, and dogs still have carnivorous traits such as forward facing eyes. However, that applies to cats, dogs, and similar creatures such as foxes. It does not apply to herbivores such as cows and sheep.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:12 PM
2

I have not at any point said animals are incapable of experiencing physical pain, all life is, even plants react to physical damage in some way. I merely stated that, since they arent as smart as humans, they cannot truly comprehend what true suffering is.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 07:58 PM
1

Beating a dog is inefficent and unnecessary, as is cutting up any creature while its alive and concious. It is not true suffering but it may be a form of suffering. It is not a yes or no, black or white choice as you have painted it. Let us not forget that horses and dogs are much different than cattle. Horses and dogs are the most useful when alive and intact. This conversation has been entertaining.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 07:44 PM
2

I say they cant experience true suffering, which is a combination of mental and physical pain. Non-sapient life cant experience true suffering as they lack the higher thought to do so. I am attempting to decipher your definition of suffering, I cannot tell if you mean physical pain or physical and mental pain.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 07:36 PM
2

It is possible to inflict unecessary pain upon a creature, doing so is usually a waste of time and energy too. You asked this same question to another user.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 07:21 PM
2

The suffering they would experience in the wild is far greater than the suffering at the hands of man. In essence, yes, but they do not "suffer and die" as you so emotionally put it. How do you define the suffering of a being that is too dumb to realize what true suffering is?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 07:16 PM
2

Suffering is unavoidable. In fact herd animals may suffer more in the hands of nature than in the hands of man. Herbivores exist in the foodchain to eat plant matter and then be eaten by a creature higher up in the foodchain. On a farm, a cow need not worry about being attacked while it grazes. In the wild, if it isnt the fastest and most vigilant, it can and will likely die. Also if it becomes ill, on a farm it will likely recive care of some sort, in the wild it will simply fester until it die…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 06:41 PM
6

Plants cannot consent either, they did not agree to be selectively bred and harvested. By this logic vegans are no better than omnivores.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 06:31 PM
2

Humans are being used as a resource, human labor. Human labor however requires compensation to the laborer. Also Ive yet to see a human that eats grass and hay and likes the taste of grass ans hay. Herd animals on the other hand seem quite fond of it.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 06:24 PM
1

Inefficent in that animals are a resource, to not use them as such is to be wasteful. Also, sheep and cattle can eat plants that humans cannot. So "human edible plants" isnt entirely correct.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 05:40 PM
3

It would be inefficent to not eat meat.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 05:31 PM
11

Humans evolved to eat meat and plants. Any "moral high ground" vegans and vegetarians have is based entirely on emotion and little logical thought.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 01:30 PM
3

If they wanna study incels just go scroll r/incel- oh wait, that doesnt exist anymore.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 03:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter