TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DrAbro Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by DrAbro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

You're trying to make a philosophical argument while, between ramblings of "brainwashing," presupposing that your opinion is the only possible correct one. Personally, I'm not interested in the slightest in the moral debate between pro and anti circumcision fanatics.. as I said before, I'm only here to try and correct misinformation on a scientific basis. You're free to have your opinion, and I really don't care what it is.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:29 PM
-2

I think whether it's justified or not is up to the individual's interpretation. It's not a black and white issue in the slightest. People on both sides of the issue tend to make a presumptive decision, then hear evidence supporting it and then imagine those claims to be more significant than they truly are. People against circumcision hear that there are nerve endings in the prepuce, and then decide that circumcision ruins the sensation of sex, when the evidence shows that such a claim is comple…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:14 AM
-1

No, I haven't done a circumcision since my 3rd year of medical school, and I've never been paid for one.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:45 AM
-1

I've spent a great deal of effort here trying not to comment on whether or not it should or shouldn't be done routinely, yet you seem to have managed to convince yourself that I did. Please, read more carefully.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:29 PM
-1

You're making quite a few untrue claims, and I'm not sure whether its because you haven't actually read the thread, or because you've let your emotions cloud your ability to read coherently. The medical benefits I've discussed haven't been debunked in the slightest, and aren't even controversial topics - they're well known and well documented, with only occasional deviations from the norm that are well within statistical variance. The issue of HIV transmission isn't "overblown," which is why the…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:52 PM
0

Infants are not sexually active The issue of relative risk between infant and adult circumcision has already been discussed ad nauseum earlier in this thread. I'd suggest you read those posts to understand why "they can just have it done as adults" isn't a truly sound argument. Even so, infants do frequently get UTI's, which can cause significant morbidity and mortality, and which are decreased in incidence by circumcision. As cited earlier in this thread: Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 1):789-93…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:42 PM
-1

Well, first, regarding form, that's a stupid statement on its face. It obviously changes the form; that's not really debatable. You're right, I made quite an obvious mistake when typing that out. Thank you for the correction! You're also correct in that in the world of science, new evidence often supplants old. That does not change the fact that currently, the majority of evidence (well within a statistically significant margin of error) points to the conclusion that I've previously explained in…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:47 PM
-1

You've resorted to ad hominem attacks without bringing up any novel points that haven't already been discussed. There is very little of your posts that's necessary for me to respond to
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:16 PM
-1

Easy there, bud. No need for irate personal attacks.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:16 PM
0

You're angry. I would take a deep breath and try to calm down if I were you.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:22 PM
-2

Who said anything about it being illegal? Now you're just making up things to argue over..
/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:16 PM
-6

Except male circumcision has a wealth of thorough scientific evidence demonstrating that it has no effect on form and function, unlike your preconceived notions. If you would like to learn more about the actual medical facts regarding circumcision (in an objective format), I would again suggest watching this video I'd also point out that I haven't made any recommendation for or against circumcision in this thread, and I haven't divulged my personal opinion on it either. I am simply here to corre…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:28 AM
-2

Please read my post thoroughly before replying, sir. In it, I explained exactly why those individual cherry-picked studies do not prove that circumcision is non-protective against HIV transmission. If you refuse to accept that a small minority of a body of medical literature can fall within the realm of type I and type II error, then I don't really have anything else I can say to you. There's no sense in wasting my valuable time trying to educate someone who has no interest in learning.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:13 AM
-1

That site is a great expose at showing how a non-trained reader can misinterpret the impact and statistical significance of multiple different and unrelated studies on a similar subject. I would suggest you take some time out of your day to watch this video, so you might better understand how to interpret conflicting research (rather than falling into a pit of confirmation bias). Needless to say, the sources in that page have been cherry picked, and aren't indicative of the entire body of medica…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:03 AM
1

Go try and get a cholecystectomy just because "you want to." You will find quite quickly that "I want to" isn't an indication for surgery in this country.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:53 AM
-3

You can't "cite" common practice, as it's not a part of the medical literature. I can't "cite" that adult circumcision is not an elective procedure any more than I can cite that PEG tube placement is not an elective procedure. You seem to have an inherent misunderstanding of the purpose of supporting literature in an evidence-based discussion.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:43 AM
0

I'm sorry, unless you have a subscription to the journal or access to a university that has subscriptions to most major medical journals, the abstract is usually all that is available. Pubmed indexes the medical literature - it doesn't give it away for free. Feel free to PM me though, if you want to read any specific article, and I will send you a PDF of it.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:29 AM
-1

I have yet to see a good study linking uncircumcised men to increased STD transmission rates. I've seen studies out of Africa, but each one has glaring methodological flaws, or doesn't present their entire methodology and data. Here are two studies out of Africa that have no methodological flaws and clearly demonstrate that circumcision decreases STD transmission rates: Asian J Androl. 2010 Sep;12(5):628-38. "There is now grade 1 evidence that male circumcision (MC) reduces the risk of a man acq…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:45 AM
-3

Do you have a quote from that study about deaths? It says 4x as likely to have complications as an adult, but I can't find the info about deaths (in this, only mention of death is 1 out of 750 circs in one of the studies they looked at). You misunderstand - in medicine, the term "morbidity" generally refers to an unhealthy state, while "mortality" refers to death. Stabbing one's eyes out with a sterile needle may not kill them (low mortality), but it will certainly injure them and cause them sig…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:16 AM
-8

What you are attempting to do is pass off a logical fallacy of equivocation as a legitimate point. Male and female circumcision are two completely dissimilar things, regardless of the fact that they share a similar name.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:56 AM
-1

With all due respect, you seem to have some serious mental/emotional issues that you might want to see a counselor for...
/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:12 AM
-5

Really? I thought it would be lower than as an infant because of shock. Citation? BMC Urol. 2010 Feb 16;10:2. And what do you mean "can't be done electively"? Are you not able to choose to do it just because you want to? Absolutely not. You cannot chose to have adult circumcision done "just because you want to" any more than you can choose to have a PEG tube placed "just because you want to." It can only be done to suit a medical need, such as a patient suffering from phimosis. edit: also, I'm n…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:58 AM
-1

It can cause problems for the child later Such as what? edit: to be clear, the medically accepted word on the matter is that there are no long-term complications to neonatal circumcision, but multiple long-term complications from leaving a neonate uncircumcised, including increased rates of STD transmission, balanoposthitis, penile cancer, and of course the incidence of mechanical issues like phimosis and paraphimosis.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:46 AM
-1

Adult circumcision has a significant risk of operative morbidity, and can't be done electively. Infantile circumcision doesn't. Saying "he can just get it done later" isn't exactly accurate.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:39 AM
-4

Have him watch this video
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter