TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DrBoby Archive

View 0 posts and 2,468 comments by DrBoby on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,468 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Just vet. You should vet all women. Average women will pose the same problems at one point in your life. Just don't date women with divorced parents or high body count. And don't marry unless she earns more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 11:25 PM
13

Yes, but it will take years to revert. Just like it took 40 years to fall. The disgust of marriage is unconscious, most men don't know why they don't want to marry. They just hear other men's experiences and they get a feeling of it. <image> Basically cancelling "no fault" divorce would be reverting to 1970.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 10:56 PM
-7

They all are unhappy. They just don't complain about it. At 50, you can complain about not having kids while you wanted kids. But you can't complain about not having kids while you spent 20 years saying that's exactly what you wanted. So you eat your sadness and you pretend you are fine with your choices because it's too late anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 11:17 AM
-5

Happy relationship > bad relationship > cat lady kids > no kids
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 11:01 AM
0

There is no rewiring to be done. Our brain does not make the difference between an AI messaging you and an human.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 12:58 AM
1

Bots are capable of "human interactions". Our DNA does not make the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 12:49 AM
2

Yes but that doesn't explain anything. Social status, standing and etc... (stuff men don't care about, unlike women), and harder to see, it takes several hours to check. Makes sense to rely on the checks of other women to save time. Men can check themselves if a woman is young, it takes 3 seconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:31 PM
1

Age gap is small if you enter relationship young. As you get older, age gap is wider. At 35 year old new relationships have a 6 year age gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:23 PM
1

It's not significant. Male fertility decline by 10-20%. That's 11 months instead of 10 to impregnate a 30 year old woman. Who give a fuck ? Even at 60 year old with a 40% fertility decline, who care if you get a baby in 14 months or 10...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:22 PM
1

Men can have kids all their life. But it doesn't get easier, unless you get richer. The only thing is that at 50 you are willing to marry a 35 year old woman, while at 35 you were not. So it gets easier in that sense because 35 year old women are easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:14 PM
–

Bruh discover women age...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:03 PM
2

Easy orgasms are incentive for casual sex. Which is bad for women reproduction. Women are supposed to not do sex easily, to select their sexual mates, and try to get comitment first, which is exactly what not having easy orgasms help them to do. Men can shoot their load and disapear. Women have to carry the baby, they have consequences, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:38 AM
0

Women orgam does not help in any way. Anything helpful would be favoured by evolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:30 AM
3

What are those mental games ? You think too much for nothing, sound like a woman in fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 02:13 PM
1

there is no 100% effective means of preventing sexually transmitted infections Right, but you can limit it a lot to a point where it's negligible. Pornstars for exemple don't get STDs in any meaningful way. In fact if you put pressure on a man you can augment the risks of STDs because someone under pressure make more mistakes or is hindered from getting tested for exemple if trying to not raise questions from his gf (blood tests show on skin a little, you have to hide the results and your trip, …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 02:27 AM
2

Women aren't happy with men sleeping with other women and putting their health at risk. I know. Men and women are not happy with the other gender's ideal world. A working compromise must be found, otherwise one gender will refuse to get in LTR. Clever men don't put their own health at risk when they have casual sex ​ its wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy better for kids... [divorces] Propaganda try to push that, but it's false, since the end of nuclear familly kid mental health dropped a lot, and these kid…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 01:04 AM
2

Yes men care about the health of everyone they are close to. But they also care about themselves. In your exemple, it's not good at all for everyone, men are not happy about women leaving after 5-10 years, especially when kids are involved. Men suicide is high as fuck, and lot of it is related to divorce. Men's needs are not met here. And men are not happy about being restricted from fucking other women, their needs are not met here too. Overal we don't even win together here because men adapt a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 11:13 PM
2

I've heard this is more natural for all humans than monogamy It's more natural for women. Not for men. Our society nowaday is woman centered so it makes sense they forget men. For men, what's more natural is lifetime polygamy while fucking other women casually at the same time. That's what men want.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 09:11 PM
1

Women are not the choosers of relationship. So even if they wanted, they could not because it's not okay for men. Now even if men were okay with it... women don't even want that. Women most natural relationship is what we currently have in the west, they date someone 5-10 years, then switch to someone else. Anything else is under constraints of any kind, counting morals. Because women are very obedient to society, if society tell them they need to stay with their husband til death, they do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 01:46 PM
1

Exactly, plus one look at graphs show "loneliness epidemic" starts way before video game were invented. Loneliness came at same time marriage drops
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 03:04 AM
1

Yes. But my question was: why a reasonable explanation can't exist ?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 01:38 AM
1

Restricting him from having sex with other women. It's still monogamous if he is not married to the other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 01:33 AM
1

Why ?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 01:16 AM
1

Thank you, I'm very pragmatic. I immediately saw this would lead nowhere when your 10 word comment had both "gymnastic" and "Lol" in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 12:56 AM
1

Nope. The "no true Scotsman" fallacy is committed when the arguer satisfies the following conditions:[7][3][4] * not publicly retreating from the initial, falsified assertion * offering a modified assertion that definitionally excludes a targeted unwanted counterexample * using rhetoric to hide the modification (Wikipedia) You changed my argument. I never said women are fine conversationalist, and especially not all women. I say some women are fine conversationalist, and some are not. And those …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 12:39 AM
1

You are the one talking about restricting him and expecting him to suck it up and deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:55 PM
0

I rest my case, your 2nd exemple is not "no true scotsman" either. Unless you want to argue YOU are commiting it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge." Person B: "But my uncle Angus is a Scotsman and he puts sugar on his porridge." Person A: "But no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge." I'm person B here. You are person A.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:59 PM
1

Same. Being old reduce fertility a lot for women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:36 PM
0

I feel sorry for your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:34 PM
-1

This is not "no true scotman", revise your fallacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:33 PM
1

Sickness is most often reducing your fertility. This is not a conscious mechanism. Men are just attracted to women who have fertility markers. The more markers you have the more attraction you get. It's not about directly fertility, having a paper from your doctor saying you are fertile won't attract men. It's about what nature made men be attracted about because they are usually tied to fertility. That's basic natural selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:32 PM
1

No I didn't. A moral jugement is when you say something is good or bad. I'm saying something isn't related to something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:25 PM
0

There is nothing to explain, it's just like that. You can't comprehend it because you are a woman and for women it's different.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:10 PM
1

If my wife love me, she has enough respect to let me fuck someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:06 PM
1

You do you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:01 PM
-1

Ok so first it's not all men leaving their sick wives. It's more men are leaving sick wives than wives are leaving sick men. It's different. So your argument doesn't make sense. Why not every single man leave their sterile wives is because people are not robots, their lives are governed by lot of different parameters, for exemple they can be too lazy to find someone else or handle divorce, have good relations with relatives they don't want to break, they are attached to their wives after spendin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:57 PM
0

That's not how love works, you described submission. If you do not have the upper hand, yes you'll be forced to not do what she dislike, but if you do, then she'll need to get used to it. And that doesn't change any feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:47 PM
-1

It's real life for low quality women, low quality men, and some rare photogenic fuckboys. Nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:40 PM
1

I'm not defending it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:37 PM
-1

That's a moral jugement
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:59 PM
0

No. It includes anything that impact fertility. Because that's what interest men unconsciously. So mostly physical health, and stuff like losing a leg or eyes, doesn't count because it doesn't impact fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:48 PM
-15

Cheating for men isn't related to love at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:46 PM
-1

Because men seek fertility on women, while women seek wealth on men. A sick husband retain his wealth, in fact the woman might inherit it if he dies. A sick wive does not retain her fertility. Women instead are more likely to leave a husband who lose his job or wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:44 PM
14

This is exactly that. Women do that for everything. Whenever they lack something, it's now the man's responsibility to make up for it, not their.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:39 PM
1

I don't think it's fair to use women on OLD to point how women are low quality, because women on OLD are the lowest quality of women. Would be like using homeless to make a general point about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:31 PM
-4

What you do for a 2 year old child isn't the same than what you do for a 6 year old, a 15 year old, or a 25 year old. Women can be considered children on several topics (I wouldn't have said it like this though), but it doesn't mean you change their nappies.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 01:30 PM
–

No no. I assume she got tested and shown him the papers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 11:23 AM
–

I assume she got tested before.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 11:05 AM
–

This is not a troll post. This is common behavior for old women to scheme to get pregnant. I fucked about 4 women this year who wanted a baby, 1 got pregnant after 6 months, still meeting the others, takes time when they are old.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 11:00 AM
–

He wasn't wrong. She's 42, 50% women are sterile at that age. Even if she is not, at that age you have about 2% chance per cycle if you fuck at the right dates. You have more chance to get a 20 year old girl pregnant while using a condom. Condom failure rate is about 2-4%. Than getting a 42 year old pregnant bare fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 10:48 AM
–

In some countries it's illegal to have extramarital sex. It can even be punished by death by a judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 10:44 AM
2

Women don't use less effective method, they fake suicide attempts to get help and sympathy. They are masters at playing this kind of setup. Killing yourself is one of the easiest thing to not fail. People that fail suicide are not incompetent, they don't really want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 01:31 AM
-1

Women do not want that, you are just repeating what rich men want. Rich men want that, and since rich men own medias, they tell us "women want that". And like a perfume advert, it has the effect to convince many of us that women want that. Their goal isn't even to convince women, it's to convince men because when men disagree they revolt and fight, so rich men need poor men approval for that. Most men are happy to let women have a bank account if they believe women want that. In countries where …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 11:31 PM
-1

Again, women didn't fight it's ridiculous. The only reason rich men fought to give women bank accounts, is to push consumerism. It made rich men richer. Women got to spend money on frivolous stuff, leaving the poor/middle class less money to build generational wealth. Rich got richer, while poor/middle class stagnated, and thus wealth gap widened. This is not about sex at all. And this is not women's agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 08:51 PM
0

Women didn't fight for the right to work... What is this idiocy people believe in... First, women already worked, you think they did what all day ? Only nobility and rich bourgeoises didn't work, and it was like 1%. Second, women didn't fight. Rich men fought for women to fill in factory jobs, which wasn't legally forbidden before but not culturaly accepted for women to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 02:30 PM
–

Why are you dehumanizing sex robots ? If trans women are women, then nothing stops sex robots from being women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 01:52 AM
0

No, chasing is making moves. Even a single move. No one talk about pursuing someone after it's clear they are not interested. No one has time for that except blue pill teenagers.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 12:47 PM
3

Blue pill rules are idiot... How mant percentage of the chasing to do ? And how do you measure those percentages ? For exemple a wink is how many points ? And telling someone she/he has great ass ?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 12:41 PM
0

Both, but we were talking about sexuality, not crimes. But anyway it's the same thing, "crimes" are a social construct. We don't commit them because we don't want the consequences. Otherwise we would from time to time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 02:25 PM
1

All men are predators.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 02:13 PM
1

You are just calling male sexuality being a sexual predator. What you call "male sexuality" is "female sexuality".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 01:44 PM
1

Control is not a threat. How can you refuse to be controlled without threatening. Refusing is the threat. If you refuse to allow me to, for exemple, ask questions to you or your friends, I'm gonna do it anyway (or I won't but I'll lose trust). Boundaries are threats.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 09:26 AM
2

Words apply the same to people and products. You have to threaten your partner to have faith in you or you leave. Maybe that says a lot about you. Faith doesn't work. Faith is just closing your eyes and hoping for the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 09:10 AM
2

You don't trust each other. You operate in a no control relationship and you do that by threatening to leave. Trust is the result of control, not threat. Faith is a more appropriate word for you. Imagine you have a factory, you can't just do nothing and trust the products meet quality standards, that's not called trust. If you control the products, we do usually control 1% of them, then you can trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 08:39 AM
1

Anything that give you a competitive advantage over other societies. In term of birthrate, GDP.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 08:27 AM
0

What I'm okay with doesn't matter. There is what works and what doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 03:30 PM
-1

should we just revert back to all of the laws of the 60s ? Yes obviously. We will revert to much before when society crash. What doesn't work always stop naturally.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 02:02 PM
2

This is not trust you are talking about. You want no control.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 11:23 AM
0

That shouldn't be a valid divorce reason. If we were in 1965 you wouldn't be able to divorce for that reason and that's how it should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 07:19 AM
–

Dude is autistic, it's normal to do friend things with your sex friends. Sex friends are friends. For every time I have sex I spend about 2h with my sex friend doing something else, sometimes the same day sometimes another day. I often gift too, no big stuff, last time I gifted 5 strawberry plants I got for free for exemple. You need to show a minimum of consideration if you want to keep them. How it works is, you give her your friendship, she gives you sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:59 PM
0

It makes no sense. Red pill don't struggle more than blue pill, it's opposite in fact. Why would you struggle more if you understand how life works.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 10:23 AM
0

Because "liberation of women" is against women. People get fooled by the marketing term. And many women are against it. It just so happen they are rarer because women tend to follow the current thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 04:53 PM
1

Because the others don't care to try. Every single old man in the west can date a poor woman in another country. Women's genuinely like money. And it's more genuine and reliable than whatever else.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 07:40 AM
1

Every single man in the west is wealthy. They just need to date women that are not wealthy. Every old man in our countries can get a 20 something year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 07:19 AM
0

Money is the most genuine connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 07:16 AM
1

Plenty old men bag 20 something in old age.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 04:48 AM
0

I rest my case, you don't understand red pill, you don't understand constraint.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 04:02 AM
1

Yes, she's like a guru. I don't feel it's a scam, it is one. I explained you how gurus work to lure their victims into donating them large sums of money. He did not buy anything, he donated money because he was under her influence.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 08:19 PM
2

She is obviously exerting influence over him. Yes exactly there is no coercion, it's all through manipulation and making him believe he's special to take his money.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 07:52 PM
0

Gurus don't use deception. Using your charm and influence to take advantage of people and take "donations" from them, is a scam. I'm all for accountability. She's the one that needs accountability for her actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 07:34 PM
-1

Nope, no need for deceit or deception, just exerting an influence that is making people do something agaist their interest, like give you lot of money, is enough. Tons of gurus are in jail for that, no deceit, just donations and abuse of influence. If she was a man that took 60k from a woman, she'd be in jail. We are just too lenient on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 07:26 PM
1

prout
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 06:41 PM
1

Ok, I support equal right, no abortion for women, no abortion for men, that's fine. The man can go abort in the neighboring state, just like the woman can.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 05:45 PM
2

No, I'm not punishing promiscuity, I'm deincentivising making kids fatherless. While you want to reward it. If you reward single mothers you incentivise women to become single mothers and you make more children fatherless. If you punish single mothers, they'll stop being single mother and you actually help these children get a father. You are the one putting innocent children in harms way, not me. Do you realize this or you don't care ? 1st graph: In blue countries that don't reward single mothe…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 05:41 PM
0

Completely different. He's blue pill because he give his money and expect sex because he was nice. Red pill exchange sex for money, this is not a gift it's a transaction. High school crush isn't blue pill and e-thots aren't red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 05:15 PM
-1

I understood that. This is still a scam. Every day there are victims going out of their way to make donations to sects or to people that exert influence on them, or to pay exorbitantly overpriced goodies. They are still victims and offenders go to jail. She's exactly that, a for-profit guru and a scam artist. And she should go to jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 05:04 PM
1

It's okay if the aborting man pay half the abortion if the woman chose to abort too. Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 04:34 PM
1

They should struggle financially. It should be painful to be single mother, otherwise you get more of them. We never had so many single mothers since we give money to them. And this create poorly raised kids with mental problems. I think we should even tax single mothers, because they harm society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 04:29 PM
-1

Opposite. What are are doing right now is making children fatherless. Child support make fatherless children. Divorce make fatherless children. De-responsabilizing mothers, and making men responsible of everything make fatherless children. We never had more fatherless children since we do this shit <image> If you don't want fatherless children: cancel child support, cancel divorce. That's it. Because it's women who decide to make children, and make them fatherless. You'll also solve the housing …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 04:24 PM
1

That's the whole point of abortion, he doesn't wanna be responsible for creating.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 04:11 PM
2

There is no sexless problem now. We have the most casual sex in the whole history of humanity. We have a LTR problem. There has never been less LTR in history, so many divorces, and so few men willing to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 04:07 PM
3

Why would men need women's consent to abort ? My wallet my choice
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 04:00 PM
1

This is basically a centrist opinion. Middle ground fallacy. They don't know what to chose so they chose middle.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 02:45 PM
3

Okay, fine to me. If people don't want to volunteer to have a country, then so be it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 02:40 PM
5

It's not untypical. Gender marxists are a minority. Majority of people don't defend their gender, they have children, friend and familly of the opposite gender. They have no interest in defending their own gender. Most women are concerned about men and most men are concerned about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 02:34 PM
-1

$10 isn't $60000. If you sell water for $60000 in my country you get charged for scam which is up to 5 years in jail. If you sell it for $10 it's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 02:17 PM
0

This dude is not horny or lonely, he's blue pilled. He thinks being nice and giving money works. Women work by constraints, where is the contraint here ? They can walk away with the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 05:03 AM
2

If your job is to exploit people, it's still exploiting. He'd win in France because the amount of money is too big. Just like if you sell $10 cuterly for $1000 on the market, people do that and it's illegal, it's a scam.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 04:43 AM
1

It exists and it's profitable for insurers. Reimbursement rate for SafeGuard Guaranty Corp. divorce insurance is 7500% of the monthly cost +1500% per year. So if you pay $150 per month you get $21k if you divorce after 4 years (but you paid $7k).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 07:25 PM
1

This doesn't work because expenses will just be shifted, the custodian parent will simply not spend his own money for his kid, and use his vouchers for that, and then use his saved money for luxuries. The non-custodian parent must be the one spending the money in the trust, not the custodian.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 03:09 PM
2

Not true, there are insurance for breaking your phone for exemple. And people who take it break their phone 300% more than those who don't. Insurers don't care, the price of the insurance is calculated accordingly. That's why divorce insurance exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 02:55 PM
2

It's not a problem. There are plenty insurance that you can abuse. For exemple insurance for breaking your phone. Insurance companies don't care that people who take the insurance voluntarily drop their phone in their toilet to get a new phone. Those people are accounted in the price calculation. In fact divorce insurance exists: https://www.shortlawfirm.com/blog/2023/05/concerned-about-divorce-theres-insurance-for-that/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 02:47 PM
1

Nope, it's women bailing. Single moms create themselves since 1970 because they can divorce and get money from it. Before 1970 they couldn't divorce while getting child support because divorcing for no reason was a fault and as such you didn't get custody of kids and child support. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 02:19 PM
7

Bruh, just look at the data, it's not a myth it's a reality. You can have different explanations, but you can't deny reality
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 02:14 PM
-1

There are several studies that prove that women are more obedient, and men more able to rebel against authority. Milgram for exemple, but not only.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 12:42 PM
3

A vote ? No one force them to be priest.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 02:05 AM
7

Priests are voluntarily celibates
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 01:47 AM
1

I was talking about the bang maid benefits things. Of course I agree that women leave, but this is the question not the response. You explain that women leave... because they leave... Why do they leave, instead of checking out ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:47 AM
2

Women just think with their emotions. And emotions are unstable...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 10:21 AM
3

Nice story, but doesn't explain the divorce rate of lesbian being even higher. Or the divorce rate of gays being lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 10:20 AM
3

Divorce means lack of loyalty. If you are looking for loyalty-only-when-you-want, it's called disloyal. Being disloyal doesn't mean you always betray, it means you betray when you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 10:15 AM
-2

So first obedience and control are 2 different things. Second you can't make statistics with personal anecdotes, and I know men who got left because they had not enough authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 09:42 AM
-4

Untrue, you just made up this statistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 08:45 AM
0

Every man who wants obedience also wants collaboration. It's not exclusive. Obedience only apply in case of collaboration conflict, when both disagree after laying out their arguments. Otherwise when both agree who needs obedience, this is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 08:44 AM
1

WTF is this new gender marxism. Prostitution is supported by liberalism, thus feminism. Stop giving agendas to women, women have no agenda, most just support the current thing whatever it is (and it's allowing prostitution nowadays), the others don't care about politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:05 AM
1

Divorces happen to everyone, it's not about treating your wife well or hapiness. Women's decision to divorce is feeling related and opportunity related. Basically it's based on love, so basically a feeling that most often go away after a few years. And opportunity and usually after having kids, women get rent money for 20 years if they divorce. Given that, every dude (at least unconsciously) know it can happen to him, by surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 05:25 PM
1

Women don't devellop red flag. It's just the best women are taken early when they are young, and the older ones are those that remain. And they are not left over for no reason. Stuff like being a slut, having divorced parents, or all sort of mental deficiencies (anger problems, manipulative, liar, hoarder, etc...) are red flags.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 10:52 PM
-1

Nah, I meet women with no red flags, they are all either 20-22 year old or in relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 05:48 PM
0

Not exactly, depends what you are trying to prove yourself. Observing the world is not confirmation bias. It's confirmation bias when you prove something by taking exemples that confirm your belief and disregard the other exemples.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 04:55 PM
1

Outside of ethnic immigrant communities those countrie still have BIGGER rates among native educated population compared to others Nope, it's false, you are the one in denial
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 04:21 PM
1

It's comforting to know you are right. If you believe in something and it doesn't translate in reality, that's concerning, so it's natural to seek real life exemples.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 04:17 PM
10

As you age there is a point where there is nothing left other than red flags. You just get to chose which red flag you prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 02:43 PM
1

That's liberalsplaining for you. Liberalsplaining is when an individual explains something in a condescending way that assumes he has knowledge about a subject that he has invented. Most often in an attempt to paint a "community" as victims and another as oppressors.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 02:27 PM
1

Purchasing power is the only one number about purchassing power. Food, shelter, healthcare and luxury are all accounted in the purchassing power index. Seems to me that you refuse to see that simple truth that you are richer. If you need to see it by yourself you can visit, or watch documentaries about other countries, you'll see that they live with less food, less healthcare, less shelters, less everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 01:45 PM
1

We are not more car dependent than other countries and no matter how you look at it, we are richer. If you struggle to buy food or housing, imagine they struggle even more, as they have the equivalent of 3 times less money than you (purchassing power of 30 in Afghanistan vs 109 in USA).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 01:24 PM
1

Same in Pakistan. The purchassing power I'm talking is the purchassing power of the average inhabitant. It does not take into account the rich. The average dude is richer than the average Pakistani.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 12:28 PM
1

It's even worse because the birthrate in progressive countries comes from immigrants, not from local feminists... Because progressive countries have the most immigration
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 04:49 AM
1

Ethnies went extinct many times. Never 100% extinct but 99% extinct. And they are just replaced by the next civilisation. Usually either immigrants replace them peacefully and overbreed them, then often you get a civil war at some point where the immigrants take over. Or invaders attack the weakened country and conquer it (then kill a part of the natives). Or a mix of both.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 04:42 AM
1

You are right, except I don't think it's women demanding these living standards. It's men. Women just chase their emotions and money (whether the man spend it or not). In Pakistan your wife is your wife, you can do her 8 kids in a 1 bdrm appartment and you are not stressed she'll leave you because divorce is illegal. In the west, men are unconsciously stressed that their women can leave them anytime. When men try to seduce or keep a woman they raise their living style. Since every man do that, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 04:29 AM
1

False. We are literally the richest in the world in purchassing power. You can't just invent stuff. Do you think Pakistan, Afghanistan or Egypt are richer than us ? Birthrates are falling since divorce is a thing: 1970 in the west, 1945 in Japan, 2001 to 2021 in Afghanistan. Men don't want to make more than 1-2 kids to their casual long term relationships. They'll only make more kids when the woman is their. ​ <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 04:14 AM
3

The most Muslim, the most birth rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 03:52 AM
1

Men don't really care about gold diggers. As long as they are loyal, it's all that matter. Whether you are interested in my money or my muscles is not important
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 10:29 PM
1

Exception doesn't disprove rule, also you don't know your kids life expectancy, you are often born healthy with hidden weaknesses, like diabete predisposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 10:04 PM
1

Nope. They can get pregnant, but fertility is greatly reduced, and any resulting baby's life expectancy will be shorter by a lot. In fertility clinics in my country fat women are refused, like women over 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 09:51 PM
1

Any fertile looking woman. So basically no 45+ year old women, no fat women, no diseased women. Thinking with your dick isn't more dehumanizing than thinking with your ovaries. The reason women don't want to bang anyone is because they think with their ovaries. And yes MSM dehumanise men and push ideologies like "thinking like men is bad". It's purely misandrist propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 07:46 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 07:04 PM
-1

Nope I agree with OP. Women have it easier if they want casual sex. For commitment they have it harder since 1970. Marriage rate dropped from 80% to 30%. Marriage was top life priority for men in 1970, now men don't want to marry while women still want. And men don't want to make kids to women, even if they are in "serious" relationship. When forced to make kids, they'll make the minimum: 1, or 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 04:32 PM
0

It's not unusual, relationship equates to love since Boomers, so 50 years... And mental health is dropping since Boomers too, so I think you are confused about what cause mental health risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 04:12 PM
0

Love is only worth for casual sex and short term relationships. It's not long term material. You got confused by the mainstream propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 04:07 PM
0

It means sex and kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 03:33 PM
–

Ok so 40%... If you are in usa because in Spain it's 80%
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 02:52 PM
–

Not necessarily. Females have the thing to select jobs that are not profitable but well spoken off by the media. But plumbers can make more than what a phd in gender studies do. Not even talking about the debt.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 02:45 PM
5

It's due to propaganda. People naturally don't care, but if you give them feminicide propaganda a few times a week for a few years, then they will care about violence toward women. If you give them propaganda against violence toward men, then they will care about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 07:57 PM
3

Yes but women aren't interested because that would be poor countries. Women want money, not date an Afghani or Vietnamese that make $1000 per month. But otherwise they can and would get a husband real quick.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 04:00 AM
2

Yes, like before 1970, which meant 5% divorces instead of 50%
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 01:01 AM
1

Yes, just transform all current fake marriages into a civil union by law (which is what they are anyway). And make all new marriages, marriage again. Basically it lets people that want to marry, marry, and those who want temporary unions can still do. It will fix all problems in 10 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 12:38 AM
-2

Ok, that's not really relationship loneliness. That's social loneliness, and yes it affects more men, but old women are very lonely too socially.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 12:27 AM
3

Yes you summed the environment. But I think the key element is divorce. In 1970 we invented no fault divorce: divorce with no reason and it's not your fault, you keep the kids even receive money (child support, alimony). While before if you did that, you lost the kids, and had to pay your ex-spouse for life. This made marriage go from the top 3 life goal of men, to not a goal at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 12:16 AM
8

We can. Easily. Just need to reverse whatever we made in 1970 ​ <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 11:40 PM
-8

No, it's a 1:1 situation. For each man without a girlfriend there is a woman without a boyfriend. The only difference is women can get casual sex... but no boyfriend, especially not a serious one. And casual sex doesn't fix loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 11:37 PM
–

Then she should improve and get better at picking guys who won't pump and dump her. Every guy will. What guy want to marry and make kids nowadays... What you don't understand is there is not 2 separate issue. It's the SAME issue. What cause men to not be willing to marry, cause women to not be able to marry, cause no ability to pair and thus have sex reliably.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 03:28 PM
–

They do care because for each guy that can't get a girlfriend, there is 1 woman who can't get a boyfriend. Sure she can be pump and dumped, but she cannot have a serious boyfriend, she cannot have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 02:13 PM
1

Not really, I disagree with that gender marxism. Some women did and some women didn't, just like some men did and other didn't. The ones that pushed for that are rich people. They threw a lot of money into that. And just because they advertise it as "women want that" doesn't mean they wanted, it's a manipulation trick just like those "Republicans against ID" groups that are created by democrats. In fact women have always been the most interested in the sanctity of marriage. More than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 02:45 PM
–

Every woman is a golddigger. There are just women much more interested in money than other women, and women also interested in other things (in addition to money). So this question makes no sense. Traditional women like money like all other women, but the difference is a trad woman won't leave you if you lose your money afterward, or if you give her your money due to marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 02:24 AM
1

No. First, some people still die, for exemple if you don't reach hospital in time. But also you also can be selected out by just spending more efforts, natural selection is not just about death it's about efficiency
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 10:28 PM
3

Autumn effect. But I agree this year, for me at least, it's at least twice more potent. Usually I can expect 1 or 2 women per autumn and I got 4, plus an ex reaching out to me. So I don't know, I guess recession is confirmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 10:23 PM
1

No, prevention of natural outcome change nothing to natural selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 10:10 PM
1

I rest my case, your argument is irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 04:55 PM
-1

Does not cancel any natural outcome, merely reduce them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 02:55 AM
1

We live by nature's rules. But you are right the reason is not to fight wars. Reason is men are incentivised to take risks. Unlike women a man can have 100 kids, but only if he take risks. So 5% men die trying to do that. But now you have less adult males, which gives an advantage to making male children, so we make more male children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 11:25 PM
0

You explained how, but now why. This stuff was let happen for a reason. There is an evolutionary motive and reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 11:23 PM
1

There are tons of them. Young and fit are the main ones. Then there are little things like healthy hairs, lips not dried, no hairs on breasts or face, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 06:35 PM
8

Most men also want a long term partner. Not really. And it's never about want, it's about how much you want. 50 years ago men wanted to marry, 80% did and listed marriage in their top 3 life goals. Nowadays 30% marry and marriage isn't even in the top 10. So men, in nowadays conditions, want less a long term partner. Or at least not really commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 09:55 PM
3

Because men are attracted to traits associated with fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 07:19 PM
7

If they want sex yes. If they want a long term partner no.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 07:10 PM
–

How is that relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 01:29 PM
1

The kind hard working men don't want to marry since 1970 and divorce laws. They are no fool. The are okay for sex, and situationship, maybe 1 or 2 kid. that's it. Women can't make more kids. And can't marry. So they are actually right to make those 1-2 kids with the best value they can find even if it's an unreliable man. They can care of 1-2 kids alone. Having an average man is profitable if you can marry and make 8 kids, but that's not possible nowadays. Because men don't want (and they are ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 06:51 PM
9

Yes but even average men don't want to marry nowadays. Women can have sex with average men, or high quality men. That's their only 2 choices. They can marry none. We came from a 80% marriage rate with men listing marriage as one of their 1st life goal... to 30% marriage rate with men listing marriage as not a goal at all. And this disinterest in men to marry is due to what marriage became. Marriage is a joke nowadays. It's a non-binding contract since 1970, you can trash it anytime you want with…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 06:37 PM
9

Because USA is the source of the problem. US ideologies propagate to Europe with some lag (and later they hit some develloping countries but much weaker). Feminism and all boomer ideologies responsible for the failure of familly since 1970, they all come from USA. The less a country is under the influence of USA, the less they have these problems. If you look into the extreme, you have countries that defeated USA militarily: Afghanistan and Vietnam. Divorce 1%, 90% of adults are married.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 05:35 PM
1

Of course it's normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 03:24 PM
1

Yes that's how you have healthy relationships. Nothing works with unchecked trust. Being cucked in 10% of cases and divorced in 50%, is not healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 02:21 AM
–

It's impossible to be one if you test your kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 10:07 PM
3

Before digital era, smartphones and DNA tests, cheating was just harder to notice. But it existed a lot. Nowadays most cheating is noticed through messages or logs on digital devices, or DNA test. Without that, we'd catch no one. Old women who fight against universal testing, I'd want to test their kids, I'm sure they are way over represented in relation to cucking their husband relatively to the other women. Probably lot of them are fighting to preserve their secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 09:51 PM
1

No need, I can just test my kids. You can't dismiss something that hapens to so many people as paranoia.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 09:28 PM
–

No logic. I can't be a cuck if my kids are tested to be mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 09:23 PM
0

I have not been burnt, at least not that way. But if you avoid fire only after experiencing 3rd degree burns, it's way too late because those burns are permanent. I'm not looking for a cuck type of intimacy, I'm looking for a better quality of intimacy. But I completely understand men who settle for lower quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 09:08 PM
–

How to spot someone with no argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 11:25 AM
5

Women do not "intend to cheat". And they still cheat. Cheating is most often an unplanned accident. And they want their own escape door to remain open just in case it happens to them. Women do not take the defence of other women they take their own defence in case it happens to them later. In fact you can ask sterile women like your grand mother and they will probably side with testing. My grand ma does at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 10:25 AM
4

That's false. Stop with this cuck mindset it hurt my eyes. You can only be cheated by someone you trust. Every cuck in the world trust their wife. If you trust your wife is exactly when you need a test. If you don't trust your wife you don't need a test, you need another wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 09:46 AM
–

If it had ever gotten to the point where I was trying to get someone pregnant i would have to have a lot of trust in them. This would make the paternity test unnecessary. You think like a cuck. Every cuck trust their wife. Trust never prevented cheating, it's even a requirement for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 09:34 AM
1

You can have a better absolute answer to these problems, with less money and less problems. Just move to Vietnam, Pakistan or one of the many country that doesn't subsidize divorce. Take 1 (or 2) wife, and don't worry about courts because divorce is illegal there. ​ <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 03:30 AM
1

Everyone trying to victimize itself nowadays, this is how people think it works now. Find one or several community you belong to Complain incessantly about how you have it harder than others and various hardships Wait to receive benefits for your disabilities
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 01:06 AM
3

Muscles have different sizes. And they form different shapes. I've been with different women and they do have different vagina "tube" shape. The main difference though is not really the tube but just the opening door.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 10:46 AM
4

71% of child abuse are done by their mother. Same for child murders. Secondary source with explanation: https://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php Raw statistics (from US government): https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cb/cm06.pdf https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cb/cm05.pdf https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cb/cm04.pdf https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cb/cm03.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 08:46 PM
3

Options to get pump and dumped yes. Not often but yes This is the reason of the STD epidemics in retirement homes. Men have so much power that they pump and dump them. Casual sex is linked to STD spread.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 01:00 PM
7

It's both and they are linked. Men are less interested in older women BECAUSE they are less fertile or even sterile. It's not conscious it's biological. That's how natural selection works, men who make no difference reproduce less. You underestimate the struggle of 60 year old women. Being single at that age is often permanent for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 12:55 PM
13

That's how consumers experience relationships. They change partners like iPhones. You can't transfer save files between women. When you change woman you lose all the previous data you made on her over the years. The relationship is not about the woman, it's about the experience, the memory and what you built together.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 08:34 PM
-1

I'm not joking
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 09:54 PM
-3

Yes it's definitely a woman thing. My impression is they don't do that at the begining, and at some point they start trying to claim more and more from you, including bed room and blanket lenght, money, etc... I think it's how women's brain work in relationship. And I think they do it consciously, but of course feel justified in doing so because they are a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 06:07 PM
-8

No, this is something else. It's not trying to cuddle, it's women taking room and claiming it's their room, usually asking you to move because they need more room or refusing to relocate when you ask for room because you are close to falling. When argument ensue the woman claim the middle of the bed is at some place that is clearly not the middle. And at that point the only solution to make her see truth is to measure where that point is, with a ruler or some object, and of course it's always be…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 05:59 PM
2

There are, just not in the west. It's not possible to be a trad husband in the west because there is no trad mariage possible since 1970. You'll just set yourself up for divorce and at some point your wife will take the divorce money. You can be a trad husband in Afghanistan. In the west it's called a soon to be divorced husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 05:58 PM
–

wtf dude, leave me alone
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 03:13 AM
1

On the contrary, you have much more value for men as a first timer than if you had more experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 03:06 AM
4

What problems? The studies that suggest this "politically inconvenient truth" is true are freely available and published in peer reviewed journals for all to see. What politically inconvenient truth ? The author says "there is no causal relationship". It makes it politically okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 04:51 PM
2

It's not tinfoil to say you get problems if you make papers that find out certain politically inconvenient truths. Scientists know it and they write their conclusions accordingly to protect themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 04:03 PM
1

Depends your basis for standards. Birth control = prefer feminine men No birth control = prefer masculine men Then it also fuck up libido, a decrease in libido can be seen as increase in standards. But then if you are attracted by more feminine men that can be seen as decrease in standard if you build your standards like masculine men are on top.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 03:42 PM
-1

It’s pseudoscience, bullshit Then proceed to describe his personal experience as scientific argument...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 03:39 PM
4

"there is no causal relationship" is how scientists say there is correlation but they don't want problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 03:37 PM
2

Yes it's true. There are some studies on it. Women tastes vary based on their hormones. And some birth control change hormones. It also change what they are looking for, I remember women on some birth control are more interested in LTR than the others. It also vary naturally based on ovulation time, women are less picky when they are in heat and more picky when they are the least fertile.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 03:35 PM
–

RP is focused on mate relationship behavior. It's not gonna give advices on how be a good father or how to make money because it's out of scope. I see no contradictions, you just misunderstand and confused all concepts you read. Where does Red Pill advise finding a “good mother”? I gave you 2 exemples that are everywhere in RP. Red pill claimed women are incapable of love at all. You misunderstand simplified arguments. Women are incapable of love, yes. But all depends what you call love. They st…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 01:17 PM
–

Ok course there is, you just don't understand RP. Why do you think RP seek women with no body count. Or women from foreign countries. It's specifically because they are the ones capable to be mothers. And RP seeking LTR understand women are not capable of love and plan accordingly to build a relationship based on something else that's more real and reliable than a woman's love. All those advices are for finding a good mother. For casual sex you wouldn't care about all that, it's just seduce, fuc…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 11:49 AM
–

You are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 03:24 AM
1

RP is aimed at reproduction. But people can use the same advices for sex since sex is a prerequisite of reproduction. RP explains the world, and then you can do whatever you want with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 01:58 PM
1

TRP is advices toward reproduction, based on the principles that behaviors are inherited by natural selection. This is the core. Anything else comes from that, and this is where RP can diverge because there are many strategies possible. Some people have many babies with the same partner and some with 10 partners, both are valid strategies in RP, if it works it works. And the advices for both strategies are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 12:11 PM
1

People not in power are irrelevant and mainly just follow those in power.. I'm good either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 02:27 AM
3

You have better chances than if you were a man, don't complain. Rejection rate is about 95-99% for men if you are cash. For women it's probably more or less 50% depending on your look.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 08:52 PM
1

People in power have children and have interest in reigning on productive cattle. No farmer want unhealthy cattle eating themselves and fucking their calves. Same for people in power.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 08:38 PM
1

That should have been your first message. I'm not here to preach right or wrong, I'm neutral. My point is you can't apply social constructs to places and times where they don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 03:20 PM
0

I have no idea what's your point and most of what you said is false. Morality is also a social construct and we are animals. Animals, humans included, only try to impress females when it works better than overpowering them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 02:53 PM
1

Yes, constructions occur based on ideology, which are based on the needs of the people in power.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 02:41 PM
1

The starting point of disallowed sex is certainly very old and possibly started as "having sex with a woman that is not your property" and definition shifted progressively from that over the centuries with changing who could or could not be your property and how. Spousal rape was introduced around 1970 for exemple. That's when it became purely about consent as we know it now. Definition could evolve further by changing what is a valid consent and what doesn't count, until Muslims replace us at l…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 12:08 AM
1

Modern occidental culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 10:13 PM
1

We humans, in the current culture we are in, decided that sex needed consent. If you look at animals, they don't distinguish rape and sex. A new Alpha lion kill the cubs of lionesses done with the previous alpha, and then fuck their mothers, consent is not even a question. If you look at some other previous cultures, they sometimes don't define "disallowed sex" by lack of consent. In fact even nowadays nonconsensual sex is not always rape in some other cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:15 PM
1

Delusion, lack of logic. I drop out sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 08:47 PM
2

No that's not how quotas work. ​ Education system is designed for boys. & girls still end up doing better. Chose one
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:07 PM
5

You already lost desirability. You are less desirable at 29 than when younger. And you'll keep losing desirability at a slowly increasing rate. You don't hit the wall at midnight on your 30th birthday. It's an allegory. It means it accelerate around that age. Also for sex it doesn't really matter, the wall is mostly relevant to LTR, especially if you want kids. You'll manage by lowering your standards, notably trying to settle with older guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:43 PM
2

That's not how quotas work: women who would not have be the best match enough, but are close, get taken because they are women and quotas needs to be filled. Men do not conspirate against women. Men designed the education system, and it's still designed for women, probably because they didn't care. Women get better marks because of the way it works favour them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:22 PM
2

Casual sex happens when you have fun with other women. Drugs just make it easy to have fun. But other stuff work, dancing (salsa, rock) works very well, playing table games with strangers works too, anything works as long as you have fun and you are physically close.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 03:40 PM
–

Rape is a social construct.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 03:22 PM
6

If you listen to company communication they say it themselves. This is what "we are trying to employ more women" means or boasting for how many women work there. In my old company they gave you $1500 if you refer a woman. $1000 if you refer a man. That's positive discrimination for exemple. It's common in STEM or publicly traded companies.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 10:02 AM
6

They expect you to have the skills, but when you have them or are close enough you get more or less interviews. And those interviews yield more or less offers. At equal skills you get more interviews if you are a woman, and more favourable interview results. I'm not even counting that the education system is designed for women, who get better grades overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:54 AM
4

No I disagree. Even forgoing career and casual sex, women don't get marriage and kids easily like before. Marriage rate is about 30% (from 80% in 1970). The amount of men willing to marry is low as fuck. Most women only do casual sex hoping to find/bait someone serious. The amount of desperate women trying to get kids before it's too late is through the roof. If you want to have sex with dozen of women easily, just have sex with 35-40 year old that want a kid and have no choice but to be single …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 03:59 AM
2

This isn't true. (Young) women are living a man's life in easy mode: unlimited casual sex and nice job opportunities (job quotas and positive discrimination). But women aren't men and have different objectives. It's very hard for a woman to find a serious relationship or a man willing to make her kids before she becomes sterile.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:45 AM
1

Contraceptives are not infaillibles. Taking the chance is bad. I'm not talking about any accountability except the natural one.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 08:00 AM
0

Only since 1950
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 07:52 AM
2

It is. You are in circular logic. The only reason we "trust" to not have sex is because women become pregnant. Guess why cheating apply to sex, and not playing cards. And a slut being pregnant is not a problem for anyone but her.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 11:50 PM
-2

The "only" difference. This is basically the main reason cheating is bad... And it's also why cheating is worse if a woman does it. And it's been like that since millenia nothing new.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 11:04 PM
1

I'm not trying to convince you. If your anecdote "evidence" convinced you then I'm happy for you, my arguing stops there.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 09:54 AM
2

How do you make statistics with a comment ? It seems you are imagining the statistic and you use a comment to validate you imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 09:40 AM
2

Porn viewership means nothing, people who watch incest don't want to bang their mother or sister, it's not a fantasie they are just imagining an other scenario in their head and they like the actors. Also men don't fantasise about being cucked, but they definitely do about cucking. How would you know which is the fantasie when a video is watched ? Rape is banned in normal websites, there are special website created just for that. How do you look at porn viewership ?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 09:15 AM
5

There is A LOT more women with rape fantasies than men with cuck fantaisie.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 10:28 AM
1

I'm like GoodMongolianWorm, I rarely go on date but when I go I'm never expected to pay their share and got free restaurant at least twice in my life. I guess what determines it is stuff like: who asked for the date, who chose the place, who has a favour to ask the other, maybe who is older/richer.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 05:53 PM
1

I'm sorry but I have to back him, it never happened to me that women expect ME to pay THEIR share either. In fact I already got offers from them to pay my share. I think you all can blame yourself and how you behave.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 05:40 PM
1

Who is talking about attraction. Attraction is the last genuine thing, is changes randomly. Imagine if we could break long term contracts based on stuff like attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 04:17 PM
0

I agree you can't know unless you see. I'm specifically talking about girlfriends or ex-girlfriends talking. I've seen that happen several times.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 10:22 PM
2

You need to compare 2 identical men having the same behavior. One with a small penis and one with a large one. Only then you can know the effect of the penis seize. If you compare a dumbass and a humble man, you are not comparing penises, you are comparing personality. Penis don't always counter a bad personality. So take 2 identical men, one has a large one, and one has a small one Case 1: they are both bragging about their penis. Case 2: They don't talk about it but an ex girlfriend that hate …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 09:56 PM
4

Nope, it's just many women are not interesting, if they were men, other men wouldn't want to be friend with them. But some others are interesting. It just depends. Being a young and attractive woman is like playing your life with cheat codes. You are so used to have it easy that if you remove the cheat codes you'd be bad. And you can't cheat uninterested friendship. This takes skills and personality, that you acquire with years of efforts.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 09:36 PM
0

Interestingly Japan had this happen too, but at a different date than the whole west and more drastically. They went from women are property (husband can buy or sell her) to equal right to divorce in 1945-1947, forced by US occupant. Japanese men are not interested in making families and kids since. This is fertility rate but marriage rate is a similar curve: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 07:07 PM
2

Men can't pair up for children easily because since 1970 there is no contract anymore for it. Before 1970 men would just marry to make children, and that's it. They were protected and safe. Now marriage is worthless, as women can simply cancel the contrat anytime. Which make men unwilling to marry and to make children. Here is when marriage start delining in USA: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 07:00 PM
0

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1733152/pdf/v059p00749.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 02:16 PM
0

I'm having kids with someone I trust. But trusting someone isn't a guarantee of anything. Cucks also trust their spouse, and they are wrong. You can't trust your trust feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 10:59 AM
1

Representative of the population. For exemple studies where people are volunteer, those people are not random because people who have doubts will be volunteer to get a free DNA test and clear their doubts.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 10:38 AM
2

Must be random people mainly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 09:47 AM
0

Have YOU heard about the internet ? Because I have no spoon feeding kink.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 09:28 AM
-1

This is not a study you linked, it's an article from a journalist. Journalists don't understand shit to what they say. This is a study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1733152/pdf/v059p00749.pdf That study reference plenty other studies about it. You can have a look at them all, they find between 1.3% ad 53%, lot use biased methods or biased samples or too small population. I don't keep the studies I read so don't get my initial material but when I was interested in it I had a look …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 08:18 AM
-4

You probably read a liberal study and they tested women for paternity because I haven't seen that number.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 07:48 AM
1

But cucks believe that too. If you think like a cuck, and believe the same things than cucks, what makes you think you aren't one ? To me you are relying on luck. Which can work because it's also a function of opportunity, not all cuck's women get the opportunity to get pregnant from someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 07:26 AM
3

And cucks don't ?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 06:22 AM
7

This kind of response is typically women trying to take advantage on you and get their cucking possibilities open, by blaming you or threatening you for not trusting them. If you are with such woman it means you failed the most basic vetting. And if you obey her it also means you are cuck material.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 06:11 AM
5

Every cuck trust their wife, is that your model ?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 05:50 AM
3

A DNA test is not an accusation of infidelity. If you knew there wouldn't need to be a test. You are just saying you don't know, like most people that get cucked don't. About 8-12% of fathers care for a kid they ignore isn't their. That's the result you get when you test random fathers and their kids in the street. If you believe you are superior to them, you are wrong, you also wouldn't know it if you were cucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 05:46 AM
4

bullshit ​ <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 05:03 AM
5

They don't have more control, they just have less urges. Testosterone levels get lower and lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 03:28 AM
–

I completely get that it anger you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 01:26 AM
–

20% anual decline is bullshit. Your source make a big mistake, that number is the number of 40 year old men that get kids, compared to 39 year old men (and adjusted for female age), it's not fertility. It's just that 40 year old men decide to not make kids because they already have or they feel they are too old. For fertility you need to compare people trying to have kids. What they did is they took surveys from pregnancies and saw there are 20% more future fathers that are 39 than 40. ​ Men are…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 08:14 PM
–

If they want kids or not is irrelevant. Men are biologically attracted to fertility or stuff correlated with fertility. This is natural selection at play, they don't do it consciously thinking about kids. Men's sperm does not meaningfully degrade, and women have no choice, it's either they take what's available to them or they remain single (which some of them chose by the way). <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 07:03 PM
–

The wall is a metaphor. Like all metaphor it's exagerated for simplicity. You don't lose all your SMV at your 30th birthday at midnight. Your SMV decrease just accelerate after the 30th birthday. SMV for women is tied to fertility. Here is fertility per age for women: <image> There is also an anticipation effect since we all know this will happen so men value a woman with 2 years left at high fertility lower than one with 8 years left. Even if she is still technically in a high fertility age.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 06:27 PM
–

The average age gap is 2 at 20, and 5 at 40. 5 at 40 includes the 50% women that are with their boyfriend since they were young (and age gap remained 2 for them), it means the age gap for new relationships at 40 is not 5, it's 8. So yes new relationships at 40 won't be be 25 year old women, they'll be with 32 year old women. It's an average, for each 40 year old that gets with a 40 year old, there is a 40 year old that gets with a 24 year old to respect the average of 32.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 05:58 PM
–

You don't ask for a DNA test. You do. People do that all the time. You take your girlfriend to familly court and you say you refuse to recognise the kid unless it's your kid. And then the judge order a DNA test. Women, don't be a single mother. Don't reproduce with a guy that will abandon you. Don't repeat propaganda, single mothers are the ones abandoning the fathers. 75% of divorces are initiated by women. Single mothers went from 1 million to 12 million after divorce was made possible with ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 03:41 PM
7

No it's not why. Any property of the kid including his DNA are fully under his parent's custody. At most you could say it's not allowed for 1 parent to do something the 2nd parent disallow, but that rule is never enforced by judges. It's much more simpler, France wants fathers to care for their kids regardless of if they are bio fathers or not. This is the official reason. So if you have doubts you can't test your kid, and even if you test it illegally or know you were cheated you can't cancel t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 07:27 AM
4

You must date new friends, not established friends. She must be afraid to lose you by saying no.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 08:27 AM
1

You right there was VHS and magasines, but those were much less used than digital porn
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 09:07 PM
1

Some people just are not in the monkey branching perspective, they stay withe the first person they get and they are fine with it. They do not think that maybe they could have better. A bit like some people chose clothes, some try one, it fits they buy it and leave. While others want to try them all, re-try them, try other colors, try maybe the size above or under, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 09:21 AM
11

That's a nice theory, but when men started to pursue women less was way before they started to watch porn. Men stopped seeking LTR with women in 1970 (1950 in Japan) LTR was the main source of sex, casual sex never really existed before. We started to watch porn around 1990-2000. Reason is men stopped having ownership on wives at those dates (mutual ownership in the west, real ownership in Japan as they could even sell/buy their wives). Would you be interested in investing time and money into an…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 04:45 AM
0

In the benefit of men isn't in the benefit of men's sisters. And if you were treated better your sister would benefit too with your logic. Which then benefit you, you get double benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 01:46 PM
1

2-3 year SAHP are as dangerous. Women say 2-3 years, and then they can extend, or divorce and then you are fucked because the child support and ressource split is determined with the difference in salary at time of divorce, and their is 0, and who gets custody is determined by who spent the most time with kids and they literally stayed at home all day. I think SAHM are a bad idea in the west, it's only viable in countries that forbid divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 04:48 PM
12

Yes, like before 1970 when women couldn't divorce for no reason, and if they did they lost child custody and every claim they had.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 04:41 PM
34

It could be women dating older. This study is focussed on 18-24 year olds. If 25% of women 18-24 date men older than 24 whereas they were 20% before. You get that result where men in that age bracket report less sex, while women in that age bracket have constant sex. Because they are just dating outside that bracket.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 03:53 PM
-2

Yes, wannabe red pill zoomers have been infected by blue pill beliefs. Now all they talk about is their look and dating apps. The real red pill always said looks don't matter past looking clean, and dating apps are a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 03:23 PM
0

Blue pill behavior. Men were not wasting their time lifting rocks or stuff for no reason several hours per week. People doing activity like builders were buff, and people not doing any like scribes or doctors were not and that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 01:33 PM
-2

Women are only visual about themselves or their stuff. This is because men are visual. Natural selection pressure women toward showing a good appearance to attract men. It's often not even conscious. The opposite is true. Men are not visual about themselves or their stuff. This is because there is no natural selection in play here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:09 AM
1

No 20 year old man bang 70 year old women. Unless you are trying to make money, I hade a roomate dating old women for the gifts he received, but he banged 40 year old women not 70. This is just men swiping without looking. Or just trying to make friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 10:51 PM
–

Young women hold the power (in casual sex market). But rich men too. And there are more young women than rich men willing to spend $20 for such. So $20 for a coffee doesn't work. Especially since men don't really care about the coffee, it's a woman's requirement. If you want to target rich men you can skip the coffee and trade directly $100 for a blowjob. Now if you are looking at long term relationships, then young women don't hold the power anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 01:41 PM
–

Sex ? If women wanted sex they'd do sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 01:34 PM
4

Having your diner paid is oppression. That's how women were oppressed for centuries.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 12:23 PM
7

Patriarchy was the reason men paid the full tab before and for centuries. You don't make up for centuries of men paying full tabs by continuing paying the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 11:53 AM
11

There is no way I pay more than 50%, but if the woman is a strong feminist I let her pay 100% because we have centuries to catch up, it did happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 11:14 AM
–

What she says does not matter, that's a general rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 12:00 PM
–

She could have been interested, but now she's afraid of you because you are way too needy. Stalking her and her car. Looking for her too much in general. Women hate when you put too much efforts into them without knowing them, even walking to her door twice is too much. You need to behave with women exactly as if they are overweight dudes. Would you knock on the door of some overweight dude who's your neighbor twice to take a coffe ? Stalk his car to know when to knock ? Nah, fuck him, if he wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 10:21 AM
1

Not in the world, but in the occidental world yes. But I'm not concerned, everything solve itself, what fails will be replaced by what works.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:56 PM
0

I don't think I'm the main character but yes I can do whatever I want. And this guy can too.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 09:34 PM
0

Nice theory but not really
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 07:45 PM
1

They are both the same thing. This is how you create a future.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 07:44 PM
0

That's not how interactions work.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 06:29 PM
1

Who cares about her being uncomfortable ? It will pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 06:00 PM
2

Of course. And so ?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 05:23 PM
-2

You can approach women, just don't listen to MSM and blue pills. This man did nothing wrong, he missed and you'll miss most of your approaches it's completely normal. He showed more courage than all people here. He can actually come back talk to her later because now she will feel like she knows him more.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 03:58 PM
0

> Anwanted advances This is too funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 03:52 PM
0

Women always did that. Humble bragging that men are interested in them, while disguising it in "I feel bad, I'm a victim". We should recognise it as what it is. She's a competent attention whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 03:48 PM
1

Okay, that's the usual MSM criticism using the usual method, they take cases that happen 1% of the time and they paint them on a wrong light using sensationalized terms like abuse and pedophilic. Different cultures have different age for marriage/sex, what's illegal for us is not for them, we chose 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 or 18 year old in the west and these are arbitrary numbers. Yes the low divorce rate is because they can't divorce, and runing away is illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 04:46 PM
1

Oh yea, I have read the first line. Insults show he's not able to make good arguments so not wasting time reading the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 03:04 PM
1

Because you're gonna chose someone you like and make a bad decision based on feelings. Your familly will chose someone more objectively based on stuff that really matter
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 11:07 AM
0

No, women biologically don't want that. They'll be always looking for someone earning more than them, the more they earn, the more they raise the bar of what their partner should earn.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 01:08 AM
0

You are right on the NPC, but they are told to repeat that for reasons. OP was talking about the reasons MSM had to redistribute roles and money. And he is right in that the reason is consumerism and individualism. Consumerism because the rich gain money like that, women spend money and men don't, so let's give men's money to women (child support, free tampoons, etc...) Individualism because the only thing that can topple the rich is people uniting and revolting against them, so they create divi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 01:00 AM
1

If you were stuck with someone you'd work on yourself, and he'd do the same to make it work. Imagine being stuck on a desert island for 40 years with a collegue you hate. You are forced to work with him and at some point you'll even fuck him.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 10:22 PM
0

Love is modern bullshit. People never married for love. You get used to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 08:58 PM
1

I have stats on these countries being happy yes. Antidepressant use is one, suicide is a 2nd.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 08:56 PM
1

Who's marfrin ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 08:00 PM
0

What ? You are forced to pay your rent, it works you pay it. It encourages people to make housings. You are also forced to work because otherwise you have no money, it works it's the basis of the economic system. You are forced to show up to work, otherwise you are fired, also works. You are forced to control yourself and not assault people you dislike, it works you don't do it. Makes life nice for everyone. You are forced to register your car and have it checked for roadworthiness, it works and…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 07:48 PM
-1

Countries where people can't divorce or chose their spouse often have less suicides per capita than USA. In fact people suicide because they divorced or chose their spouse based on idiot parameters like feelings. They don't suicide because they are married and would have preferred someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 06:18 PM
1

No, the people in western countries have the richest purchassing power in the world. You are completely delusional if you think rent is cheaper in poor countries. It's more expensive. 70h of work to pay your rent is cheap as fuck. Their rent is about twice as expensive for an housing twice as worse and they need to work 70h per week to be able to afford it. Or live at 2 famillies in a studio, or live in 10m², or take a a small house with dirt floor and no water/electricity. You are so priviliege…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 05:17 PM
2

Why ? It works better if people are forced to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 04:51 PM
0

We are literally the richest countries on the earth in purchassing power... So no it's not that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 04:50 PM
1

People are happy, they have kids, their marriage rate is about 90% and divorce rate is about 5%. For comparison our marriage rate is about 50% and divorce rate is 50-85% depending on the western country. We are not happy we consume the most antidepressant in the world, and we have no kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 04:40 PM
-1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 04:34 PM
0

No there are laws against that in all functioning marriage country.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 04:05 PM
0

Yes they are, their mind is not clouded by feelings. Arranged marriage works in all countries that have it. Western marriage doesn't work anywhere. Draw your conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 04:02 PM
-3

You can and you would, you are just anaware of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 12:47 PM
-3

It's false, women feelings easily adapt to the new reality. Lifetime being raped... What sensationalized bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 12:07 PM
1

You are blind. And bitter because you make it a male issue, lot of women are "loser" and can't find partners nowadays too. In 1960 15% women were celibate, now it's 55%. I often meet despaired women approaching 40 that have no hope finding a partner wanting kids before they become sterile. They are everywhere and they are sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 12:02 PM
-2

That's exactly the problem this system solves. This question become irrelevant because you don't have the choice anymore. Have you ever asked "what if I don't life to live on this planet ?". No because you have no choice. The only usefull question is now "How to get along ?".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 11:53 AM
-4

Yes, that's why it shouldn't be a lottery. It should be decided by parents or siblings, or people that have in interest in you. Also it already exists and it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 11:49 AM
0

I don't think you can pick a partner for you better than someone else can. Your opinions are easily clouded by your feelings. Can't make rational choices with feelings, especially women can't. Which is why countries with arranged marriage's demography is healthier than us.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 11:45 AM
-1

Boomers did invent casual sex. Greats entered marriage at 22, they had quasi no sex before, and then some occasionally cheated. There was no casual sex. Just married sex and cheat sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 04:52 PM
1

Wut. Men can't get more sex than their time. What is this meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 03:56 PM
1

Dad is a boomer, in 1970 it was the begining of the fall. They were heading toward the wall but it takes time to reach it. Now we reached it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 03:54 PM
1

Men are getting casual sex more than ever, stop this bullshit narrative. Ask your grand father if he got a lot of casual sex. Even if you have 1 time casual sex in your whole life it's more than what people in 1900 had.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 12:26 PM
2

Yes exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 12:12 AM
1

Your friends are statistically irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 05:38 PM
3

No because: Not everyone enter a relationship at 18, this is progressive. The gap widen. At 18 year old, women date less old than at 30, they date older and older.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 03:35 PM
5

No it doesn't work like that. All the people who go to bars are not suit for LTR, even at 10AM when they are in a library.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 02:21 PM
30

This isn't that. Women seek more relationship than men. The answer is that 20-30 women don't date 20-30 men. They date 22-35 men. Thus there is a gap that forms due to this shift. ​ <image> You can see here that in this graph if we focus on the young, there is 1 celibate woman for 3 celibate men. It reverse at old age for the same reason, after 40 there is more celibate women than celibate men, because men date younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 01:35 PM
-2

This is basically propaganda. Women are the most receptive to it. If you advertise casual sex as good, women will do it. If you advertise it as bad, they won't. This is the effect of businesses controlling propagada outlets since mass media. Business thrive with consumerism which thrive with individualism and short term pleasure seeking.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 02:34 PM
–

I'm not dating guys, so whatever blame he gets changes nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 06:34 AM
-1

The only 3 possible explanation for a woman being a single mom is: The dude that fucked her didn't find her worth it (she's low value, and she's too easy to have fucked him). Red flag She left him (no loyalty). Massive red flag He died. That's okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:47 AM
0

There is nothing a single mom can offer that a childless woman couldn't Single moms have low value and they know it, this is something they have. It's like going to a dump to find couches. With luck you can find deals you couldn't have afforded, and sometimes you bring bedbugs home. If you have poor SMV that's an option. Like, I know a 50 year old ugly dude, he took a 25 year old pregnant single mom home and he's fine with caring for the kid and fucking the mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:37 AM
1

Bruh, I disagree. I talk with old people, and especially old ladies, there is a huge imbalance. As soon as some dude's wife pass out, they all jump on him like sharks. This is that or they stay alone. And in retirement residency everywhere, there is an AIDS epidemics due to old men being fuck boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 03:08 PM
1

Even old men don't want old women. So being an old woman is worse than being an old man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 11:10 AM
–

It's not inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic. It's sarcasm intended to show we can't forbid deception because there is too much deception in every aspect of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 11:31 AM
–

Women that claim they are virgin but they aren't. We have a special jail for them. Women hiding their true face with makeup. Jail Cheating on their height with high heels. Right to jail, right away. Women claiming they know how to cook, but they don't. Believe it or not, jail. We have the best women in the world, thanks to jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 11:37 PM
1

There are women everywhere. You don't even need to dedicate any amount of time to it, just do you life and there will be women around. You can meet each of them. You are buying food, you are refueling your car, etc... If you have time to go to the gym for 2h per week, you have time to train your game 2h per week in place of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:56 AM
3

It's not going for volume, it's training your mind, your social skills and confidence. On dating apps you have the lowest quality women, all the sluts are there. You're gonna fuck women with body count of 30+ and they will never fully bond to you. And in real life muscles alone don't really work much if you don't open, you'll get maybe 1 woman talking to you every 5 years and you'll be too surprised to even answer anything valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:23 AM
2

Everything works, but muscles are not efficient. The ratio work to advantage it gives you is really bad. Also muscles are high maintenance, and not permanent. Instead of lifting objects like a dummy 2h per week in a gym just go anywhere else and talk to every single woman you encounter for 2h per week. This is the training you need to fuck women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:01 AM
–

This is not something men care about for casual sex and non-serious relationships. It's only a problem if you seek a lifelong LTR with kids. Also men don't akways ask because women lie, there are other and more reliable ways to guess the sexual past of someone. There are many hints and her friends often make references.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 07:49 AM
-4

Stop saying women's standards are high. They are dirt low, they have never been so low. Do you know what's our grand-mothers body count ? It was about 1-2. They tried to remain virgin until marriage and married at 22, and that's it. Nowadays women are at around 15 if not more. Women nowadays have the lowest standards in the history of humanity for casual sex. And for LTR they have low standard too because it's impossible for them to find a man willing to commit and have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 03:26 AM
2

Dna is not proof of rape, it's proof of proximity (or sex if sperm dna). Same for rape kit in most cases, except for when they show injuries, but even that can be abused by someone nasty.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 03:22 PM
7

If you even been to a court of law, you'd realise a lot of trials, and not only those like rape, are judged based on the judge's feelings. And there are people who get cleared after years in prison, but it usually require the false victim to say he lied). Now for each false victim who said he lied and got a false conviction, how many liars do you think never admit it and also get false convictions ? (By admiting their lie they are liable for 2 or so years in prison for false testimony, all that …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 02:49 PM
2

Ants are not selfless. They are obsessed with furthering their genes. Workers are sterile. When you are sterile, to further your genes your best way is to have your parents reroduce, because your parents have your genes too. So by working for the queen the workers further their genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 02:37 AM
2

Polygamy is not infidelity neither lack of commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 05:01 AM
35

Depends on age. At 20 they are approached. At 30 they complain all the time about not being able to find someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 04:56 AM
6

Why you oppose men and women. Many women I know are completely aware of the problem of abusive complains from other women. And on the other hand, many men I know are completely oblivious and unaware of the risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 02:31 AM
–

That would do more than shitposting your bitterness on the internet. With a bit of luck you'd get pregnant and start having a purpose in life. Because right now you are stuck in an idiot class fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 07:19 PM
–

Before 1970 people were effectively locked in relationship. If they wanted to leave that was not possible they'd be legally punished. Same in many country, once you are married you are locked. It changed in the west in 1970, and since long term relationships are gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 11:59 AM
–

Yes. And not having sex is causing us a trauma which we may never recover from.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 03:05 PM
–

Prostitutes are expensive, and they are sluts which disgust many men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:47 PM
–

Using hand is not the same thing at all, don't womansplain what it's like to have sex. Otherwise we'd do it...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:28 PM
-4

What conspiracy. I have no interest in teaching you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 09:16 PM
0

Society has no vested interest in that, all contrary. It creates low birthrate, and mentally diseased kids. Who benefit are real estate companies, more houses needed. And consumer product companies, because give $300 to a woman she'll spend it, if it stayed with the man he'd invest it. So it boosts consumerism. And lawyer companies I forgot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 08:24 PM
3

It's not how this works, when making choices you weight the pros and cons. Take 2 exact same familly in 2 parallel universes. The woman is unhappy because she fell out of love and her husband didn't buy the right kind of milk. In the 1st universe she can leave with the kids and get $300 per month. In the 2nd she can leave with the kids but get nothing. It's easy to understand that the woman of the 1st universe will take the choice to leave more easily than the 2nd. It translates in higher divorc…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 08:08 PM
-1

Every adult man is like that. What you call is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:11 PM
0

Well how it works is men hope they'll find a suitable partner later. They also can still have kids with non-serious partners. Usually 1 or 2 per non-serious partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:07 PM
-1

Of course it means less chance to cheat. Men do visualise serious partners as property. This is the reason men marry less since 1970. You don't marry a non serious partner, and it can't be serious if she has the potential right to leave, property can't leave you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 03:59 PM
0

Why not. Men are just better at seeing it. Women tend to just follow the tide, they aren't good at understanding stuff they do. There is a reason almost all great inventors are men. And for this same reason all philosophical or ideological movements are started by men too. Women get behind when it gets momentum and public approval. It's known since long, it was the reason women couldn't vote initially.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 01:01 PM
0

No part of biology has “ long term partner” written in it. Of course there is, don't be dumb. Where do you think feelings come from. They are biological. Men are biologically inclined to spread their seed. We are not biologically inclined to care on a primal level whether or not another man was there first Of course we are. Men are biologically inclined to: Fuck every woman and bail (spread their seed) But stay with one or 2 of the best women to help raise the kids (increase chance the kids grow…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 12:46 PM
1

I never said it was the only factor in attraction. You definitely rank higher than if you were the same but not virgin. Keep trying. Nowadays men are more difficult for picking serious partners due to real marriage not existing anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 12:37 PM
0

Virgin = less chance to cheat = less chance to raise a kid that ain't yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 12:30 PM
-6

Men are biologically like that. The more a woman is promiscuous, the less we view her as a serious long term partner to raise a familly (but she's still good to fuck). The reason biology is like that is because men who make famillies with promiscuous women statistically tend to propagate their DNA less due to being cucked more.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 03:39 AM
19

They get into non-serious relationship, or long term but refuse to make kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 12:20 AM
1

Suicide, mental health, anti-depressant use for exemple. Since women can divorce they feel worse. You can also compare data from countries with divorce and those without.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 12:16 AM
1

Data contradicts you. And being single is better for men than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 10:28 PM
2

I answered, just read again.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 05:22 PM
3

I rest my case. I proved you otherwise and you keep dodging and accusing me while saying nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 04:55 PM
1

I rest my case, except for accusing me and being full on denial you say nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 04:01 PM
1

There is a thing named statistics, this is how we know. People that suicide more and take more anti depressant are not happier. Also people nowadays don't self declare happier than 70 years ago. You are saying they are happier with no data to back it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 03:40 PM
-1

Life is about making kids. We are biologically hardwired for that, anything we feel, is for that purpose. It make sense people who made kids feel better. Millenia of natural selection made it so people without kids feel worse, to encourage them making kid or punish them not making kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 12:44 PM
-4

Propaganda. A miserable marriage is better than being single. Single mothers are women who chose it, they are the ones who left with the kids. Single mothers didn't exist (or barely) before women were allowed to divorce for no reason in 1970.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 12:35 PM
1

Women want shitty relationships. That's something really easy to notice. Women are not happier now than 70 years ago when there was 3 times more marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 12:31 PM
3

What's the point of telling someone who is sad. "no you are not, you are happy". This is what you are doing, this is what medias are doing. It works to some extend, you brainwash people to think they are happy. But it doesn't work fully and they can't understand why they feel bad because they are supposed to be happy, the medias tell them. Look at suicide graphs, look at anti-depressant use graphs, look at mental health graphs. And you'll see that people are worse off now than 100 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 12:23 PM
1

The best are always taken first, yes. But there is not less great and healthy people now than in 1950 or 1900. And at those time marriage rate was 3 times higher. There is not less great and healthy people in the west than in Africa or Afghanistan. And in those countries marriage rate is also higher. So the real reason is what we do differently now than 70 years ago, or different than the third world.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 12:16 PM
1

Thats typically not how most relationships work But typically most relationships don't work. So he has a point doing differently. Coercion works really good. The law is usually doing it for you, but in the west we cancelled it, so you have to find a replacement. Or move to Afghanistan.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 02:52 PM
2

They had to work hard to compensate, or got women with no options
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 10:20 AM
0

Bruh, the pool boy who fucks the millionaire's wife is a fantasie, not reality. In reality it's the milionaire who's fucking the pool boy's wife. Money make women wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 10:45 PM
0

Being hot means being rich. If by hot, you meant having muscles, you can only have muscles when you have some ressources, and it confuses the female brain because muscles were originally something only successful men had. If you meant having some face features, no, women will look at you, but will not fuck you because of your face, it never happened. Confidence is linked to financial success, so you are just showing you will be rich if you aren't already. So I rest my case
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 10:15 PM
2

They fuck women they didn't attract. Using complex mating strategies and intensive work, it's possible to confuse the woman's instinct. To fuck it works, but this isn't really viable long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 09:58 PM
2

If by "attracting" you mean you have to work several dozen of hours solving mental games, jump into hoops and dodge traps, all that to get her naked, then yes, but I call that not attracting, I call that working.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 01:49 PM
6

Money is attracting all women. The wrong kind, and the good kind. If you are poor you attract no women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 10:06 AM
3

It's cooler for you. What matter for women is how much she can get for her. If you work and earn $100k/year or if you don't work and earn $100k/year in passive income, it's all the same. Though lot of passive income means you can possibly be milked to sell some more.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 10:01 AM
3

It's like that for everyone. Women's attraction is heavily context dependant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 12:47 AM
1

If you are 26 you aren't 3/10 relative to all women, doesn't matter your head. Every women 70 and older are behind you. You may be 3/10 relatively to other 26 yo women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 12:11 AM
1

If you look at your graph you can clearly see the boom end in 1947, not 1951. You need to look at the blue curve, not the yellow bars, yellow bars are total birth which means nothing because you don't know how many women are making them the age pyramid is not constant, for exemple there is many total kids in 1972 because the kid horde born 30 years ago became 30 year old and made kids all at the same time and then they stopped because they were too old. Kid per woman is the indicator that doesn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 02:07 AM
1

What theory, are you living under a rock ? It started 50 years ago, it's already history. We are at the 4th generation in France, 70% birth in Paris have a Muslim name and get tested to drepanocitose (which is a genetic disease only Africans can have). About 30%-40% in the whole country.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 01:49 AM
0

No, the specie is fine, humans reproduce a lot. In many countries the average is 5 to 8 kids per woman. All those countries have high tyrany like you call it. It's only a little part of humans that don't, those that live in the west. Yes they will die, and be replaced by people who favor tyrany. It's not an economical problem. It's a demographical problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 12:53 AM
3

No they would not. Do you think Henry Cavill want to make 8 kids ? No. The birth rate is low because MEN don't want to make kids to women. Rich or poor, no man want to have 8 kids. 8 is the average in Afghanistan or Africa. Men only want to make kids to women that can't leave them. In Afghanistan if the woman leave she goes to jail, is canned and sent back to her husband. In the west if she leaves, she receives money every month for each of her kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 09:41 PM
1

Tyrany works. The current doesn't. When you get to chose a system, you first chose one that works, this should be the 1st criteria. The current system is unsustainable. It's doomed and will auto-terminate when we get outbred, invaded and replaced by people from systems that work. Then when they are the majority they'll change the system to their.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 09:32 PM
4

False. In Japan birth rate declined in 1947 from 5 to 2. Was is contraceptives ? No, women were allowed to divorce. In every country birth rate and marriages decrease, and single mothers increase when women are given right to divorce, or child support or any other leverage in their relationships. No man feel safe making kids to a woman that is allowed to leave him anytime, so they don't. Men are only willing to make lot of kids to women under their full control. It's biologic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 09:18 PM
3

Buuuulshit ! There is 1 single thing that is responsible for the birth decline: women rights. And especially the right to divorce, child support. Let me give you 2 countries where birth rate decline at different dates. USA (and most of the west) in 1970. And Japan in 1947. What happened at these dates ? Women are allowed to divorce. <image> US graph is single parents # because i'm lazy but if you look at the real graph it's the same it changes in 1970.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 09:05 PM
9

18 is not the minimum legal in a lot of places. There are only about 10 countries in the world where minimum age is 18. In most places it's 16 or lower. But people think it's 18, I agree it's the minimum age in our heads.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:04 AM
2

What you say is bullshit, but anyway no they don't count. Unless you have divorce data on them so we can compare, all that count is the average because divorce data we have is on the average.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 07:51 AM
2

which countries? Basically all western countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 07:43 AM
7

It's false, it's harder for men, but it doesn't matter because: full, partial or no custody at all, are all equally bad outcomes that men do not want. Men want life partnership, not separation. Who cares if child sup cover all expenses ? It doesn't matter, it cover some expenses, so it make it easier to leave than if there was none. Even if child support was $1 you'd have more women leaving, like 0.01% more for exemple no much but more, and as you increase the subsidy slider you have more and mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 02:36 PM
-1

Yes it makes it less rape. Because how is it rape if it's not rape ? If some country say breathing is now rape too. That doesn't make you a rape liker. Or only according to their weird overreaching definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 08:50 AM
2

Society was more peaceful in 1960 in several countries your correlation doesn't hold. Also the war and US occupation in Iraq lowered the birth rate from 8 to 2, US leaves with its women rights and birth rate goes back to 8. Guess what. It's not as much women's fault than the system's fault for incenting that. If we make laws incenting rape you'll have more rape. We make laws incenting single parenting and divorce so we have more that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 06:57 AM
-7

Yes, for us, but not for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 06:42 AM
-3

Nope, we are not taking about exceptions we are talking about averages. The average westerner can afford better living conditions with 8 kids than the average Afghan or Nigerian. And if you think they work less you are deluded. They work more, longer hours, more tiring jobs, the kids work and the old don't even retire. They are overworked, not us. Divorce is bad and marriage isn't about love, it's about kids. If you change your mind later that's too late. Also Afghans don't have sexlessness in m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 01:19 AM
0

It's not a fertility crisis in the world. The word is booming right now with fertility through the roof. It's a fertility crisis in the West only, the West is not over populated.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 11:37 PM
9

Bullshit. It's not economic. The West is the richest part of the world. Kids are more expensive in many other parts like Africa or Afghanistan where they can't afford food, medicine, or even a room for all. But still have 8 kids in fucking average. The responsible for decrease of birth is only women independence. And in particular child support and divorce. Those make men insecure and unwilling to make kids because we know the woman can leave anytime she wants and we'll still be responsible. Jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 11:32 PM
3

False narrative. It's men who don't want to marry. There is scarcity of men who want to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 07:38 PM
1

Because it's false for half women. The other half still want kids and child support and you first need commitment for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 07:33 PM
2

except for ... Yea, except for this, and for that, and also that. That's basically how women expect to be supported, there is always a reason justifying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 05:30 PM
-1

This ain't even being a child. It's just different organisation standards. Some people dispose dish immediately and some wait a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 05:24 PM
1

Benefits what ? This whole argument is idiot because it rely on something else being the goal, but having kids is the goal. Market value, money, health and everything else, are what you use to make kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 02:07 AM
1

For every exception you can find, I can find 5 rich guys with younger women. There are always exceptions. This has nothing to do with insecurity. And young people have higher mental capacity, peak is around 30 or younger depending on what you measure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 01:05 AM
4

Not true, take all rich men, they are all with younger women, from 5 to 30 years. Especially if they had no wife when becoming rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:06 PM
0

So ? Who cares about being a loser in your definition of it. I'll happily be your loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 12:09 AM
2

I went to Australia with French girls and they unanimously said they missed the catcalls and attention. As a dude I also seen the first moves were kinda reversed or at least more equal, with women opening conversations with me in the street, in 20 years in France never happened once. There is definitely something.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 08:50 PM
–

What obligation to his child, support goes to the mother's pocket. Stop acting like it's for the child, child is gonna eat wherever the money comes from. And if you don't have enough money to support your children then you shouldn't be allowed to leave with them, THIS is your obligations to your children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 06:20 PM
–

You made a life contract and now you want to renegate your obligations, but you want the other party to still fullfil them... If there was an obligation to keep sucking his dick after a divorce, it would make more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 05:59 PM
–

No, that's illegal in sane countries to not fullfil your marital duties.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 05:03 PM
–

That's small vulva energy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:52 PM
19

Just dodge these women you are missing nothing. Most men are crap, but surprise, most women are crap too. They are cute but empty inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 12:57 PM
1

That's in your head, I'm not angry, I didn't mention any emotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 07:38 PM
2

An emotion again...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 11:18 AM
4

I only date that. Do other men date women that won't cancel plans, don't laugh at their jokes and don't buy them stuff ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 10:43 AM
-3

Typical woman justifying things based on her emotions. "This can't be true because I'm feeling it" Women that* settle down feel in love. Love is the fakest of emotions. e:*
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 11:52 PM
1

That's exactly it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:39 PM
0

Get a man, make a baby and leave him. Then ask for child support in court.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 08:27 PM
1

Yes, that's less expensive. And I have a kid too
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 08:15 PM
-7

This is bullshit, you deserve to be broke. Also it's not a comparison of childless women with child support women. You need to compare child support women with women without. Child support gives $400 more to the former, so there is more incentive. So you get more women choosing to be single mother than before child support. 12 million more exactly. But you still get 1 million women who'd be single mother even without it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 10:45 AM
-4

Bruh, no one said it was a scheme to fund their retirement account. It's a scheme to get free nappies and daycare, and then free rent when kids get less expensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:53 AM
-5

On the contrary, most guys wouldn't care at all. And in these countries, most women don't care either, they just roll with their reality and find the idea of a "love" marriage, mass divorce and low childbirth ridiculous. They take pride into what they do and build their moral values differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 11:22 PM
-2

She can be chained in your basement. Or I don't know, more realistically, if you live in some countries the woman liking you is optional, her custodian gave her in marriage to you and she stays with you because there is no choice, you have kids with her, and if she leaves she goes to jail because it's illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 09:47 PM
8

NBA players can probably fuck a different woman every week. I'm not sure they are single for the reason you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 04:10 AM
5

By going higher than 6'6 you maybe lose some attractivity but you lose even more competition. It's supply and demand, if there is less demand, but there is even less supply, overall you sell better. There is not one super-tall guy that's single. This is the same for super muscular men like body builders, most women dislike it, but there is much more demand than supply... so it sells.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 03:27 AM
1

5% is really low. 5% is your score if you are overweight and ask random women out. If you are attractive AND all these women are single, you can safely expect more than 30-50% for a date proposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 01:19 PM
1

You have to differentiate date and fuck. Probably 70% men would be okay to fuck. But not engage in anything serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 01:15 PM
3

The first day maybe. But after a few days, some will do anything to get out.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 01:12 PM
–

Bodyguards are usually not armed and always advise rendition when it's safer. Otherwise you are looking at a henchman but it's more expensive. And they are not spending their time on alert it's tiring and useless, they are just here and do nothing, and switch to alert if situations requires it. Otherwise you are looking at a full 3/9 rotation of bodyguards or secret service but it's more expensive. Of course he's doing it more than everyone else. As soon as some danger happens, where do every ey…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 04:26 PM
–

Yes I am. Not all things have the same value. Do you know how much cost a bodyguard or a mechanics compared to a nanny or a housekeeper ? Also you count time per active work, but bodyguards are not paid like that, they are paid on their watch, they are even paid when they sleep if they sleep home. So you are comparing 24h/24 bodyguard cost to a maybe 2h/day nanny/housekeeper.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 12:48 PM
–

Even when men outearn their wives, they still get to change the car's oil or tires, carry fridges, plus being occasional bodyguards.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 05:24 AM
–

Women always try to split things they do, but not what men do. They chose a particular favourable context, like daily chores, and everything needs to be equal in that context they chose. But then when you look at other context/areas, magically things don't need to be split anymore, because now "it's different". House chores split, car/house fix no split, carrying heavy things no split, changing diapers split, teaching kid to swim no split, fighting aggressors no split, etc... Interrestingly men …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 05:13 AM
1

Okay, I hope you can get kids some day then.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 10:30 PM
1

Nice morality, but women don't care about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 10:05 PM
1

Give him ? Women make kids for themselves, not as gift.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 09:35 PM
2

Because most women won't get married. It's very hard to find a man willing to. So automatically, if you wait until something that won't happen to have kids, you won't have kids. It reality women as they approach to their sterility date lower their standards and make 1 or 2 kids with anyone. Then later they dump the guy and become single mother, collect their baby rent from him, and that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 07:42 PM
2

That 10% doesn't change anything. Also it depends on the country. In western Europe it's above 50%, in Spain it's above 70% with their overall divorce rate being 86%.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 05:41 PM
2

There is no marriage with no fault divorce. Mariage is specifically a contract to stay together for life. If you can break it whenever you want it's useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 05:36 PM
0

It changes exactly nothing nowadays. Waiting for marriage means not having children, or settling for lower value. Men do not want to marry unless they are dumb or feel forced because they think they got a woman way above their tier.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 05:32 PM
-2

No one said every woman is evil, only half of them are. Why do you bring love to marriage. Love is irrelevant. If you seek love you don't need marriage. You can love outside marriage, and when love fade you can find a new love. Marriages are "until death set you apart", not "until you fall out of love".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 09:16 AM
3

This is women basically. You need to be not too early, and not too late. But usually guys are too late
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 02:21 AM
–

The divorcer is changing the terms unilateraly. He is responsible in case the other parent doesn't agree with the new terms. And parenting the kids in alternance is also bad for the kids. Kids need the 2 parents at the same time, not 1 week alternance
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 06:27 PM
–

Nope what happens is you can see on the curve that the suicides immediately rose, then dropped after a few years, before rising again after 30 years. The progressive researchers dismissed the immediate spike and only looked at the results when it dropped, few years later. In your first study, they look at 1987 data, which is 17 years later. At this point if could be anything, especially since people adapted to divorce laws, men by not marrying, and women by accepting single motherhood which beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 06:02 PM
3

This is probably the only exception. Most 2nd marriages are after a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 03:06 PM
0

Lack of coparenting is a direct result of the divorce. Poverty has no influence. Poorer countries with real marriage have much better stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 03:01 PM
1

That's just a long term relationship with kids you describe. You don't need marriage for that. Marriage is about contracting mutual obligations, you can't just leave your obligations because you are unhappy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 02:45 PM
3

2nd marriage has a 70% divorce rate. If 1st is a trial run, then the 2nd is a crash test.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 02:38 PM
0

Bad marriages are much better than divorce for the kids. 71% of kid abuses are done by their mother. 70% of kid murders are done by their mother. 75% of divorces are initiated by women. 80% of men in prison were raised by single mothers. Being educated by a single mother also increase your own suicide rate, lower your salary, increase mental diseases like schizophrenia, you score lower at self confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 02:31 PM
1

The one better was the one with higher number, clearly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 02:23 PM
3

It's over because of marriage 2.0. Mariage rate dropped exactly because of the no fault divorce laws. <image> Marriage only benefit was to protect you from your spouse leaving. Since no fault divorce, marriage is useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 02:17 PM
5

​ <image> The data shows the exact opposite. You can crearly see the 1970 spike in suicide rate for women, increasing by 20%. Also you cannot say that it works better if the number of people using marriage dropped by 90%. If it was better, it would be more used, not less.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 02:08 PM
1

Some can't get that or solve their own issues. Women are always looking for better options, yes. And yes it's sad, but it's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 06:03 AM
1

Because you do not really want a Hermes bag, otherwise you'd buy one, they are relatively cheap. What you wanted is what you actually bought with the money you could have used to buy the hermes bag. And the reason men today are a luxury, is exactly because of what I said, it's because women mostly don't need anything. They need sperm for a few years to make kids, and that's it they can divorce afterward, which they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 01:37 AM
-1

Women want what they need. So ideally you want a woman who will need you for as long as you plan to stay with her. For exemple if you own the house, if the friends are yours, if you are useful for whatever, ect... Whatever she loses if she leave you, it's how much she want you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 05:48 PM
1

Women don't know what they want so this question is vain. They just react to their current feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 11:39 PM
1

That's not how it works. First quality is shit on dating apps. And those 40% of relationships that start with apps go nowhere. Second if 80% people rely exclusively on apps and that only 50% of them get dates, you could have your number of 40% relationships starting on apps, I wouldn't call it missing any opportunity. It just means that no one try.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 06:54 PM
8

The more someone is attracted to another, the more they can lose attraction. On the contrary, if there is none, you can only gain attraction. There is a reason societies with 50% divorce rate are the ones that value love and feelings, and those with 2% divorce rate are those where people marry who their parents decide based on anything else than attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:11 AM
16

Nah, you can be good and still fail because you never try. All those dudes on dating apps are that. Using dating apps is NOT trying. Dating apps are shit. You can be the most interesting and attractive dude, women won't break in your house to date you. On a dating app you are just an image and some text, women don't see you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 08:36 PM
1

It is 45.1% in USA in 2020. 51.3% in France. 84% in Spain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_demography
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 10:52 PM
0

What we want doesn't matter. Unless you leave the West, you can't get lifelong relationship, it's a coin toss. 50% yes, 50% you'll actually get to pay her rent while seeing your kids half the time. That's too risky. Some people take the risk and try to vet, others do the next best thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 07:36 PM
2

It works, just not always, and when it fails you can ask someone else. It's uncomfortable, but it's the best use of your time, you get a date almost guaranteed in 1h spent. Compare that to OLD...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 02:24 PM
8

OLD is a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 02:19 PM
0

Spinning plates is not a red pill strategy for women. Men have 2 different red pill strategies (so to reproduce). Build a family, or spin plates. Both can lead to a high number of children. Women can only do the build family strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 12:39 PM
1

If that's your definition of a fullfilling life, then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 10:45 AM
5

Anything can work in individual exemples. Just because it works once doesn't mean it's a good strategy. Red pill advices are advices to reproduce, build a familly. Not advices to coom or to whore. This woman is 20 years late. This union is sterile, and getting pumped by Bezos after menoposis isn't a red pill goal. After menoposis you should have kids, and you should be with their father, that's the red pill goal. And if you are not in that position, you failed. Bezos is arguably not a high value…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 09:04 AM
0

It's literally for the single mother. In court you only fight for what you can get, so it's opposite, it's men who can get custody that fight for it. Also when you decide to make a kid with someone, you agree to care for the kid together, you never agreed with part time single parenting. That choice is made by the person leaving. And that person is 100% responsible for the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 02:38 PM
-2

False narrative. Child support is for the woman not for the kid, it goes to her bank account, and it's to incentive her to separate. Saying it's for the child is just political banter, they just can't call it single mother support, or separation incentive tax.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 02:11 PM
0

Why should the parent responsible for the divorce evade her responsibility ? Her choice, her money. Also incentiving divorce, lead to divorces, which is bad for kids and bad for society. Single parents are directly responsible for lack of education of their kids, lack of stimulation leading to lower IQ and brain devellopment, increased mental disease once adult, increased suicide, lower confidence, higher criminalty, lower salary.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 01:49 PM
11

Alimony and child support are dinosaur laws that became wrongly used. They made sense before 1970, when divorce was not allowed. So whoever was responsible of the divorce would be condemned to pay child support, alimony, and lose custody of the kids. Since 1970, and the introduction of no fault divorce, alimony and child support make no sense because they are now granted to the person responsible of the divorce/separation. Instead of an incentive to not separate, it became an incentive to separa…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 06:02 AM
3

Both sexes can participate in it, but it doesn't have the same consequences for both sexes. Different consequences, different moral jugement. Moral jugements are an answer to the consequences, not an answer to the action in itself. If burning petrol for no reason had no negative consequences (for the environment) then it wouldn't be bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 11:36 PM
3

It's not hypocrisy. It's just men are not women. Thus what apply to men don't apply necessarily to women (and opposite)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 09:21 PM
-1

This is idiot, they aren't separating to get richer than when they were in couple. They are coupling and separating to get a kid and at the same time get richer than when they where alone. You can clearly see with a curve of single parent since 1900 that child support is the reason women divorce. With 2 dates, 1945 is child support for unmarried people, and 1970 is child support for married women divorcing for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 06:40 PM
6

In this case if women are stricter visually, it doesn't translate into them having less sex. It means they use other criteria, that are not visual. So yes, women are less visual: visual criteria have less weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:54 PM
3

OP is right, and the next step is to understand why it happens and who is responsible of promoting women and demonizing men. And the answer is rich (men) promote that, because: They get their money from corporations they own, and corporations get more money from women because women are great consumers, while men are savers. So by finding excuses to give money/power from men to women, they get more income. It limits men, so basically limit their sexual competition. More women available for them. …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 07:14 PM
–

Single mothers chose this. Before child support and divorce at will there was barely no single mothers. The single mother epidemic is a direct result of child support and divorce at will. Single mothers are subsidized. Subsidies increase attraction to become a single mother. And divorce unlock the possibility for married women. ​ <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 12:57 AM
–

Because single mothers are responsible. Before 1945, no single mothers. 1945 child support, 1970 free divorce. Result: single mothers epidemics. <image> That's it, you give women money to raise their kids alone and possibility to leave at will, and they do just that. Deadbeat dads have no responsibility. Reverse that and tax single mothers, give the money to the dads, result will be no divorces and no single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 12:50 AM
-2

No, for sex too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 03:33 PM
0

Outside of the west your wife works for the familly. In the 1% cases where she divorces, she gets nothing. In the west your wife work for her, and you work for the familly. In the 50% cases where she divorces, you get to keep paying her until your kids are old.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 02:56 PM
-3

It's the same, she's right. It should be free. True equality is when men get it for free just like women. So it should be subsidized by the state for exemple. That way it would be equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 02:51 PM
2

I'm not discussing gender relations. I'm discussing who's at fault when you have an issue with all the members of a group.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 04:27 PM
5

I'm not comparing issues, whatever those issues are is not relevant. An issue is a personal opinion, it can be more or less understood by other people, but that doesn't change the fact the person is experiencing an issue from his point of view. And this isn't about me, I personally don't have issues. Just responding to OP's broken logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 03:59 PM
6

They come in close proximity with me. I do my own things away from them. If they get into close proximity from me, I smash them. If they stay away, they don't get smashed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 01:41 PM
-2

Your objection is irrelevant, I can see some patern of logical faillure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 01:36 PM
6

How is that relevant ?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 12:43 PM
14

Who's the issue is an idiot question. If I have an issue with all hornets (they sting), is it me the problem or the hornets ? Are hornets guilty of stinging me or am I guilty about not liking it ? It's idiot to spin a morality... Throwing moral accusations around is useless and solves nothing. Hornet solution is smash them, destroy their nests around my house, and that's it, I don't give a damn if I'm the issue or if it's them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 12:26 PM
–

They all end up in LTR, and then break up sooner or later. And repeat that. Good partners are hard to find in the west, yes. But I think women around you are sluts (or whatever you want to name it). It often happens people around you belong to the same category because people tend to group with people that are alike. The average for women is between 4 and 8. It means there are many that have 12, but there are also many that have 0, 1 or 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 01:33 PM
–

IMO that's the opposite causation. Insatisfied women have many partners. These women are hard to satisfy by design, nothing will never satisfy them easily and they will always have problems. And that's the reason you shouldn't date them for LTR, if someone failed 12 times at something, you don't wanna bet the 13th will be a sucess.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 01:18 PM
–

Yes that's benefits for the children, I do not know about benefit for the mother and I think it's secondary.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 10:46 AM
–

That's what cross studies show it's from. It's not some unstudied phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 09:54 AM
–

There are extensive studies on that in psychiatry, I'm not talking about a theory. Everything was studied in detail. There are cross studies, studies with twins placed in different families, studies per gender (and we know divorce affects little girls more than boys), studies per age of divorce. And everything was studied, not just mental health, but also self confidence, salary, criminalty, romantic success, suicide, hapiness once adult, etc... This is the psychiatric even of the century, only …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 09:35 AM
–

That doesn't explain why mental health crashed for boomer's kids and hug the divorce curve with a 20 year lag.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 09:20 AM
–

I didn't see any studies comparing one parent working outside and both parents working outside, and I don't call that traditional, women always worked outside it's propaganda to say it's new. The real traditional is both parents staying together until death. the parents relationship and ability to coparent improve after the divorce and it leads to a much less chaotic, disruptive home life Maybe, but the kid's mental health still decrease, because kids don't need their parents to have a good rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 09:07 AM
–

Yes, adults raised from not divorced parents have less mental illness risk, less criminalty risk, less suicide risk, better salary, and overall everything better. Scale with age of divorce, the younger the worse. I don't have the studies on hand but it's notorious and it's the cause of the modern mental health epidemics because boomers started the mass divorce trend, and their kids are the most mentally disturbed in history as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 08:42 AM
–

Depends what is your goal. Being traditional is the only way to have lot of kids for exemple. Almost impossible having more than 5 otherwise. It's also the best way to reduce breakup chances, and your children mental disease risks. Now if your goal is independance, buying stuff, and changing partner every 10 years, and if you don't care about how your kids are educated or think what's good for them is just you being happy, then no.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 08:10 AM
2

That's what poor people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 08:11 PM
3

I don't have these considerations.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 07:32 PM
–

It's not about being undesirable. Whether you have $10 or $10 billion, you'll always have more purchassing power in Asia. It's the same here but with SMV instead of money. In Asia desirable men will be able to get highly desirable women, and undesirable men will be able to get desirable women. Better return for your SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 06:11 PM
1

Cute women. There is absolutely nothing in the back of my mind for some women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 11:51 AM
1

What about 100% platonic sex ? I don't understand your problem, dude touches you and it's okay if it's platonic, and not okay if it's not ? That makes no sense to me. Either he can touch you, or he cannot, but you shouldn't care about whether or not it's platonic, whatever it means..
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 11:47 AM
–

Not using birth control is different than rape. People often use not-rape to demonize rape, like "what if someone kill you, abduct you, hit you, give you STDs, steal your car ?". All these are bad but they are not rape and are separate offenses. Even rape is bad, I'm just saying it's vastly exagerated, should be a misdemeanor IMO, not the ultimate crime even worse than death.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 08:26 PM
2

Rich men. So what OP never accused women to make these laws. It's always be rich men enslaving poor men while they fuck poor women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 07:10 AM
6

Tiny chances but huge consequences. We are talking about death. It's not fair that women have men's rights without men's obligations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 07:06 AM
13

Forced sex ? Truly horrible, I hope no woman will ever force me to have sex. I'd rather spend years in trench eating rats getting trench foot and charging machine guns with bayonets.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 06:53 AM
–

But who cleans afterward then ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 05:05 AM
5

So what, I like this concept. We could make a tax to balance the sex inequity. Young celibate women would pay a tax that would go to young celibate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 04:43 AM
1

Weird... What country that is ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/23 01:53 AM
14

Some people fuck goats. The question is not if it's possible to find someone, but how likely.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 06:59 AM
–

They realise it became hard and need to lower their standards too much and that's why they lose interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 06:38 PM
1

I rest my case. Historically in the west, the average person was in an arranged marriage of some sort. Like I said, the average girl was married at 12 and boy at 14 when they were both under their parent powers. Even adult women had to ask their dad, or the groom had to ask, eloping was possible but rare because you were married before, and you got no dowry.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 12:57 AM
1

No, they were the huge norm for all nobility. The pleb were not regulated, and adults did what they wanted, but parents were owners of the kids by law and customs and it was common to set up their kid's marriages while the kid was still a kid, typically girls married at 12 and boys at 14. And they were considered adults at 16.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 09:52 PM
1

You kidding me ? It was the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 08:53 PM
1

The society is constructed by rich men, not by the average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 04:13 PM
6

No it's not. People married and still marry without having never seen each other, and these are the most sucessful marriages in average. Physical attraction is by definition superficial, it's useless and always fades, and if you base your marriage on that, then you base your marriage on something that will go away. Disney and Boomers gave too much importance to feelings and appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 04:11 AM
1

I know it's unbelievable for a western woman. But it's why Asian women are the best. They are easy and once they get in LTR they do not fuck around, they have a lot of loyalty.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 03:55 PM
2

Anyone hard to fuck who's not gonna be your wife is even less wife material.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 06:19 AM
4

No it doesn't. They are not easier to fuck for everyone, just for western men, and as long as they are not in relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 05:21 AM
1

Nursing homes are bangfest for men because women get no attention. What do women do when they are competing for a man and under high pressure from other women ? Sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 07:06 AM
–

It would take time I agree, just like it took decades for marriage to die after 1970. But after a few decades the stigma would disapear.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 04:38 PM
–

Your experience is not representative. And you probably got lucky they both remarried. Keeping kids up all night with arguments is exactly what kids need. Kids need stimulations to grow healthy and need to see adults interacting, including in conflict. Taking that away from kids is affecting their devellopement, hurt their mental health permanently and is responsible for the mental health crisis in millenials.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 02:22 PM
–

No you can't. But you can stay married with someone you don't get along with, people did that for millenia. Divorce at will exist only since 1970.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 10:17 AM
–

Of course you can, men married before 1970, they stopped for a reason. Just roll back the law to what it was before, when men married, and men will accept to marry again.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 10:11 AM
2

That is exactly the same thing And old women at some point do not get any attention at all, from any man, ugly, older, poor, no nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 02:00 PM
8

Men are exactly as picky as women. You guys fail to notice it because it's not based on the same things. Men basically discriminate on age, all old women are so invisible we don't even think about them when talking about women, we always picture young women. It result in huge age imbalance where 50 year old women need to date 60+ year old men and 70+ year old women can't find a man at all while 70+ year old men are drowning in granny pussies (leading to HIV epidemics in retirement centers).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 03:49 AM
1

It's not because you don't do that you don't pursue. Isaac and Nikola were possibly misled into thinking women are attracted by good physics. Just like women nowadays think studies lead to better husband, while it leads to living with cats
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/23 11:07 AM
–

Cheating destroys nothing. People are so pussified nowadays they claim they get destroyed by their feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/23 07:18 AM
9

Every study only counts proven false accusation as false accusation. Scientists are not dumb, they have a career. Funny enough, they do the opposite for rape or sexual harassement, they count claims, and not only proven cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/23 07:15 AM
14

it seems like the incidence of false sexual harrasment allegations are extremely rare It's not extermely rare, it's just hard to prove it was a false accusation. And it has serious implications. Lose job, friends, etc... Some people don't want to take the risk. Sexual harassement is completely arbitrary, no one can define it clearly, it's basically just about feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/23 05:50 AM
–

Masturbation satisfies my horniness better than a mediocre hookup Yes, because you are not horny. When men are not horny, they are also not interested mediocre hookups and would rather masturbate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/23 01:08 AM
–

Having high standards means being not horny. The horniest people basically have no standards. The highest T woman is still about 3 times lower T than the lowest T man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 11:34 PM
–

You don’t have to fuck someone to be hornier than most men You do. You think you are horny because you have never been and have nothing to compare. Take testosterone pills and report back.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 11:28 PM
–

Why would men go out to try to get hookups with about 5% chance of sucess when they can stay home and have an orgasm guaranteed ? The reason is because you are less horny than them, and we are taking about hookups, not boyfriends. Everytime a woman say she's horny, she thinks she is horny compared to her reference horniness that she is used to, but that's about as horny as a man in refractory period. There are exceptions of course, like women taking drugs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 07:34 PM
–

No one deny women like sex and hooking up. Just less. That's all we say. If women were as horny then men, then they'd hook-up with average and ugly men ever day or so. They don't because they are less horny. This is why gay men have more casual sex than straight men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 05:40 PM
1

But OP was asking whether to make it illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 05:21 PM
7

OP has a problem with it so OP wants to forbid it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 05:18 PM
1

Why ? You should be advising to lie
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/23 05:14 PM
3

You are wrong. Women are much easier when they think you are seeking long term. Which is why many men are lying about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/23 04:13 PM
1

No. Like I said in my analogy, the typical 145 IQ employee is not better at making decisions than the 110 IQ boss. Decisions are taken by hierarchical order, it doesn't mean the employee doesn't get to explain his view. It means the employee explain why this decision is better, and then boss say "ok we do that great call". If the hierarchical order isn't respected, then all sort of problems arise in the dynamics. It's not a case by case scenario, females are always females, they have always a va…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 08:15 PM
1

It's not a co employee relationship. If you have a dumber boss and a clever employee, the employee doesn't decide. Why the woman has the lower hierarchy is for several reasons, but first it's because it's the dynamics that works better on the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 06:32 PM
1

Yes it changes nothing. A smarter woman can convince her dumber husband. Just because he decides in the end doesn't mean he does it alone without discussing. But I don't think huge differences in intellect are viable, especially dumb man with genius woman. The other way around yes. It's like height.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 06:05 PM
3

I love it, I'm gonna use this now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 06:21 PM
6

Women more often act on their feelings. Men need a logical reason. They don't justify stuff irrationally like "I started searching upstair because I had feelings", women do and they call it "female intuition" because it sounds less ridiculous than "feelings"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 06:19 PM
2

Not exactly bullshit. Intuition is just the word for women's feelings. Feelings have a reason even if it's random.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 06:11 PM
9

Because men separate sex and attachement/love.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 06:40 AM
0

That's not capitalising on your assets, that's spending ressources to get assets. Before you do that, it's often better to take advantage of assets you already have.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 02:14 PM
-1

Not silly to capitalise on your assets.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 02:08 PM
3

Yes, but much less than women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 01:46 PM
1

By tradition it's not a shame for a male to be a hoe. Only women. This hoe thing is moral pressure to protect women for becoming pregnant outside of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 12:39 PM
1

Probably. It's normal when young. Most girls are above average when young, and below average when old.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 10:22 PM
2

Men also like women that stayed with their husband til death. Everyone want to remarry, it's just some can and some can't. You are often a widow when you are older. And older men are obviously worth more on the market than older women. If you know some very old people, like 70+ it's even more obvious. As soon as a dude become a widow, there are 3-4 old ladies that have been alone for YEARS are jumping on him and trying to secure him, one told me "I have to be quick because men don't stay single …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 07:37 PM
-1

Pity sex is the best sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:33 AM
-1

If you have a one night stand you left by definition, after one night. Exactly people should be forced to do their best in their unhappy relationship or bear the cost of their choices. It's entitlement to think you can make children and are entitled to receive money due to that. If single parents don't receive child support, they'll simply do their best to not be single parents. Or bear the cost of their choices. No one need to pay for their decisions, they can pay alone, but people anticipate t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:20 AM
-2

You only get child support if you leave. So it's a severance package by definition. The name of the severance package is irrelevant, women can take care of their kids alone if they leave, your reaction is proof of the entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:16 AM
1

Remind me of companies recently calling their employees/slaves as partners in my country, because it's the same thing but it sounds nicer. Employee/slave and partners are the same thing to me. Even pay is not relevant because slaves were often paid a salary, in Roman empire for exemple.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:02 AM
1

I don't know, how do you treat slaves ? I've never had any but IMO you should totally treat your slaves with care and protection.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 10:27 PM
-1

He's talking about child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 10:22 PM
11

The cops are subject to public pressure and bias. Imagine the problems you get if you go to a house and can't decide who to arrest ? Well if you arrest the woman and it turns out it's in fact the victim, you'll have more problems than if you arrest the victim and it's the man. So when they are not competely sure, they arrest the man. It's safer due to public bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 05:14 PM
34

It's not only limited to violence. It apply to every bad behavior, women for the same crimes/misdemeanor are always condemned to much less. From fraud to counterfeiting... We as a society are very forgiving on women. Even me when I hear "woman stab her husband for forgetting the milk", it sounds less offensive than "man stab his wife for forgetting the milk". So now when judging I swap gender everytime in my head.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 05:06 PM
2

Exactly, all these except the fat one are ABOVE average. The average woman by red pill definition has an average age, which is 39 year old. And if we don't count kids (because they are not really in the market) it goes way higher, to 45 year old. Average woman also has an average weight, which is overweight nowadays. This is what an average woman looks like or this one is even a bit above average because she's not fat That's the reality. And that's why guys here don't understand that market, bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 02:40 PM
1

Because you are great at peeing doesn't mean you are an urologist or understand how it works. Most people don't understand what they are doing and why they are successful. Also love noun an intense feeling of deep affection. Definition from Oxford Languages
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 06:47 PM
3

You don't build a relationship on love. Love is chemicals in your brain and they go away at some point, it's not reliable. Unless you want lot of medium term relationship that last 3-10 years, which is basically what people do nowadays because they have been taught relationship = love.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 03:58 PM
1

You can always invent scenarios to reassure yourself in all situations, and then ignore every red flags. The goal is to not take the chance of investing 5-10 year of your life with one woman for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 07:26 PM
4

Unsafety is on a spectrum. In your exemple, it's a little unsafe. You can always find excuses to look away from every red flag, but that won't help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 12:45 PM
8

It's not arbitrary. For LTR, men want to get with a woman who consider them the best. No one want to be the 2nd or Xth best. This is not ego or arbitrary, this is unsafe, men are looking for safety. If you wait 2 months but other guys did wait 1 day, you are setting yourself into a cuck position
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 12:09 PM
–

Don't compare contractor's pay with salaried positions. Salaried positions are always cheaper
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 11:36 PM
5

Yes... Just like the opposite. Women control sex so far as men want to have sex with them... This "control" stuff just means one side has more power due to market imbalance.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 12:04 PM
0

It's comparing 1990 & 2017. Nothing happened after 1970, divorce rate is constant, you are seeing increase or decrease because you zoom too much, but nothing relevant changed. The big change is in 1970
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 08:17 PM
-3

Wrongly adjusted. You need to compare people marrying to people getting divorced. These are instead comparing people that are currently married, some were married maybe 20 or 50 years ago, to people divorcing. So this indicator lag because people married 50 years ago divorce less due to survivorship and are more numerous
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:05 AM
3

No one is out to milk anyone, it's opportunistic. People are usually sincere and happy until things change and then they decide to be opportunistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 12:21 AM
-5

Any man in the west can support a family better than the average man in a traditional role in a poor African country. Not a money problem. Also you guys confuse traditional role and being a stay at home bourgeoise, which is a luxury. In normal and poor traditional relationships the woman always works. The kids are usually watched by the grandparents or an older kid or cousin or the couple find other care arrangements like a neighbour. Traditional relationship is not defined by a stay at home wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 12:14 AM
0

Never 2 without 3... I'm sorry but your exemple is perfect. You are showing traditional relationship can't exist in progressive world. You just get milked. It's not a problem is being worthy of not, it's just the legislation doesn't support it anymore. Hope you don't get milked a 3rd time, but you are asking for it. Maybe the 3rd women will one day want to keep your monthly money while stopping providing you any benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 11:57 PM
19

Boomers have the highest divorce rate because they are the last ones to have married. Millennials can't divorce if they are not even married. Divorce rate should always be divided by marriage rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 11:13 PM
–

All those elements are alleged, that's how family laws work. Judges always write diplomatically. Do you think judge had proof of rudeness ? Or that the judge was here to witness how the black eye was done? The judges are saying even if it's true being rude is not enough (1st case). One case of alleged (complained of by) is not enough to constitute a proof (2nd case). Even if true slapping is not enough (3rd case). A black eye is no big deal and you never know the story. People fall and get concu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 10:51 PM
–

That's not extreme. What you read is merely judges applying good measure and rejecting divorce due to lack of proof or weak elements. We are extreme nowadays, where we must believe everything complaining women say and any unwanted physical contact is violence. We became huge pussies and our ancestors would laugh at us.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 10:05 PM
–

It's not today's problem, it started in 1970 with no internet. Nothing is new on the curves. Top men were and still are limited in number. Women have ticking time and they only chase unicorns because they have no other choice, literally no man offer marriage early nowadays. My (and most) grandfathers chased no dozen of women, met future wives at around 20-25 and offered marriage after 6 months and that's it. Nowadays men don't offer LTR or kids early. Only choice for women is a long STR or fake …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 07:11 PM
–

Bullshit propaganda. Violence was a legitimate cause for divorce since a few centuries. In 1970, divorce was just allowed without any reason. Before that you had to have a reason, like cheating, violence or abandon. Just don't marry if you don't want to and let the ones who want to get really married.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 06:49 PM
–

Some women were not and some were. Those not interested can always not marry. Overall there were a lot more marriages and LTR before.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 05:58 PM
–

It's not. Women always competed for top men and settled for what they could. This problem started in 1970. Just look at marriage rate curve. Divorce at will law. With men's inability to secure a LTR due to that law, LTR attractivity dropped for men and marriage rate dropped. Just make marriage permanent again and men will be interested again. With those current conditions it's a trap few men are interested to. Too dangerous to make children now, the woman will just leave when she wants and make …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 04:13 PM
2

Looking at the comments I wonder what everyone think women did all day through history.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 08:58 AM
1

A woman's offspring will do better if she has offspring than if she has not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 08:56 AM
2

especially not in this economy... We are literally the richest place on earth. Wait till we live in mud housing and still can't afford food or medicine...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 08:54 AM
3

What do you even mean. Women always worked. Only nobility and the upper class, so less than 1% women didn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 08:48 AM
1

Ok, but it feels great. Had compliments from gay dudes a few times, felt great. One even grabbed my ass in a gay club I was in, no harm done, felt great, even made the girl I was with horny. People offended by so little are insecure or are falsely offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 08:41 AM
1

You think that because you are a woman. And probably childless. Women experience unconditional love, but only for their kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 02:51 PM
1

OP is saying the same thing than you. While you give here something she will truly love you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 02:49 PM
1

TRP do apply to women. Women just don't have the same advices than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 05:27 PM
1

Red pill is all about reproductive behaviour. Gay relationships can't make babies, so it's out of the red pill scope. I'd we had to invent since red pill principles for gays, it would be about finding the best genetically endowed sperm donor, or surrogate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 05:26 PM
0

You are just attracted to this kind of women. It's like someone having a fetish about gothic girls and asking why all attractive women always dress in black. Or asian (why do all attractive girls happen to have rice cookers ?)... Women I'm attracted to don't do most of what you described.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 09:56 PM
2

You are victim blaming all false accusation survivors.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 06:48 PM
-1

Sorry but the court often judge without any evidence. Evidence was needed before, not nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 06:42 PM
2

No one know if they need it. People who need it don't know they need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 05:52 PM
4

Men absolutely don't want to give sperm and potentially pay ton of child support for 20 years. It leads to women desperate to find LTR men willing for kids. If you knew 30+ year old women you'd know. And the more desperate women resort to making kids alone, either using a sperm bank or with dudes like me who fuck them anonymously. I can tell you the balance of rarity is not in women's favour here, I've been doing that for 4 years and you haven't seen the desperation I saw, periods becoming irreg…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 07:14 AM
2

Only men can give sperm therefore men are the ones deciding. Your logic is flawed
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 06:54 PM
2

It's men the gatekeeper of kids nowadays. Females have rapidly declining fertility so they are in a hurry to find a male willing to have kids. Males are not in such hurry, especially given the conditions since 1970 laws, big mistake to make kids with the wrong woman. It's a much greater responsibility for men so men are not easy to convince.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 06:50 PM
1

There is no link between what you watch and what you do. Imagine if all people who enjoy to watch horror/gore movies like Saw were killers... People who watch gangbang porn mostly never do and are not interrested in doing gangbangs. I watch war movies, and I'm not interrested in going to war myself, etc...
/r/RedPillWomen01/04/23 05:12 AM
2

Young women dating older men It's only this. For the same reason it reverses at old age, there are more single women than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 01:06 PM
1

Spending time with a girlfriend is nice, it's like spending time with a close friend. But dating is aweful. I mean the actual act of convincing a woman to become your girlfriend. It's as interesting as shoveling snow.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 03:04 AM
1

There is no reason to hide. If you married you did a mistake, and if you married with no prenup you did a huge mistake. Hidding money is dangerous during a divorce, if found, you lose it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 10:43 PM
1

No one is responsible of someone else's decision. It's sad, but it's the single mother's decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 08:54 PM
1

Instant gratification and pleasure are an enemy. Orgasms are a goal for coomers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 07:02 PM
-1

I didn't do a scientific measurement and it's a widely accepted opinion on men. What's important is traditionality of the culture, the furthest you are from US boomer culture the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 06:56 PM
0

Russian women are in between. Eastern european (Russia included) women are the best white women, but not the best women overall. They outweight Western women by a lot. But are definitely not as good as Asian or Muslim women for exemple. Only in term of behavior/culture I mean. Physically it's another debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 06:45 PM
0

They can compete because Eastern females are not here. It's the same competitive advantage than snacks on highway refueling stations. You see them, you want them, you know you can get 10 times as much for the same price but not here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 06:38 PM
1

You can keep having fake coitus as long as long as I'm not involved in it. Thanks for asking my permission.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 06:33 PM
2

The point of sex is to make babies. Shooting blanks ruins sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 03:30 PM
1

So what, go raw. If you are concerned about women playing you for child support, you should never give your real name. Anonymousness is your best protection.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 03:20 PM
6

You are thinking in binary in an analogic world. Men are more logical, and women are more emotional. Seriously dude... The amount of people with the inability to understand this is astounding. WhAt DoeS iT meAn meN are taLler tHan wOmen ? i'Ve seEn WomEn tAller tHan mE, iT mAkes nO sEnse.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 11:53 PM
0

No it means the mother took the child away. A mother leaving separate is a single mother minimum 50% of the time, and asking to be 100% as she is giving no choice to the father than to be a single father 50% of the time, which is something he didn't chose, so I fully understand the fathers leaving given the choices single mothers forced them into. The money is for the mother, not for the child. The child has no bank account. Children cost a lot of money, and it's the single mother's choice to li…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 06:35 PM
1

It's false. Single mothers are created by mothers who decide to be single mothers. Both by making a child and by not staying with the father. It's not about relationship breakdown, I don't care if you live with someone you hate. It's about custody breakdown, you made the choice to have your kid live separated from his father, at least 50% of the time. A child is a reward for women. That's why they make them. Most single mothers want to be alone if they can and are getting paid for it, otherwise …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 04:59 PM
0

Those 3 difficult choices are still choices. Men don't get those choices at all. You could add a 4th choice which is to stay with the father. As most single mothers actually decided leave. And those are last choices, women have a range of choices before it, it's not like they are forced to rely on those last choices. They can also use contraception, or not have sex. The reward for a wanted "unwanted" pregnancy is the kid, women want kids. The 2 nd reward is they get child support for 20 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 03:01 PM
-2

What matters is who take the last decision. Women chose last to not abort, and they chose in 70% cases to leave the father. Not only we don't hold them accountable for their choices, but we reward them by paying them and victimizing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:34 AM
0

I do disagree. There should be exactly 0 child support, it encourage women to leave and mistreat their kids. 71% of parental child abuses are done by the mother alone, also 70% of kid's murder. It works, it was already a thing 50 years ago. Women who left had no child support, at all. And so there was no divorces. And much less child abuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:26 AM
1

This conversation is always so interesting to watch unfold. Women genuinely don’t think people cumming in their pussy is their responsibility. “Well they cum inside me so it's their fault”.. they really shouldn’t be allowed outside of their father's house until they are married.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:18 AM
1

False narrative. In 75% cases it's women leaving, not men. They are the ones bailing out. And why do they do that ? They do that because they are being paid to. Child support encourages women to leave, and because of that many kids have no fathers. If women don't want to take responsibility for their actions, they should keep their pussy closed. But they won't, which is why we need to revert to 1970 family laws. Women should be forbidden from leaving, if they do, they lose custody and pay child …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:01 AM
1

Dating apps... Go talk to real women. Money is all women want, but it's not magic, you still need to get in proximity, tell them you are rich and interested in them
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 07:43 AM
1

Wtf, so many Disney believers those days. OP is just hidden in his home all year. Unknown women won't teleport into your bed. Go anywhere and tell a woman "hey I earn $400k per year and I like you, do you want to date me ?" and then she says yes. And that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 07:32 AM
1

Your experience doesn't prove statistics wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 05:43 AM
1

The reason most women are sterile is not PCOS, it's just natural aging, stop deluding yourself. Your data is about diseases only, it's ignoring natural causes of infertility like being too old. infertility and sterility are related, sterility/infertility is a spectrum. What cause the first cause the 2nd. And even when doctors tell you that you are sterile, often you are just very infertile and still has some minuscule chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 06:12 PM
3

This is bullshit, you are talking out of your ass. All those 50 year old (and above) sterile women are not sterile because they have PCOS. Your data obviously ignores the #1 reason of female infertility, which is being too old. I get you don't like this reality, but ignoring it won't make it disapear.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 05:48 PM
1

It's to have kids at 20 year old, or as soon as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 03:32 PM
1

If it's winning big, just take the 100% chance instead of the 80%, and do 3 kids instead of just one (which isn't possible with the same probability)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 01:49 PM
3

I think you are ignorant, having endocrine issues at 20 year old is rarer and less of a problem than at 35 year old. I work in fertility as a hobby and I saw a 20 year old, but only once.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 12:39 PM
3

You are reading an advertisement. It's like relying on Coca Cola company's statistics about diabete. Also even if they are true, 80% chance is nice, unless you are one on the 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 12:33 PM
11

I work in fertility and I learned several things. Every woman lie about her fertility to her friends. It's like men lying about the number of their conquests or their salary. Every woman I meet tell me my statistics are wrong because all her friends got pregnant at the first try at 35-40 year old basically. Statistics actually measured women overestimate their fertility age by exactly 5 year. At 35 year old, 20% women are sterile. At 40 year old 50% are sterile. Those not sterile have about 10% …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 12:11 PM
5

90% of fertility issues are age. If you have fertility issues at 34 year old, you probably didn't have them at 20 year old. Every single woman at 34 year old have a harder time getting pregnant, it's just some are lucky, and some can afford to wait 1 or 2 year until it works because they only want 1 kid or they don't really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 11:58 AM
71

You just excluded 90% of the single 30+ year old with your criterias. (fit, only had 1 relationship). So it's already disproving your point statistically. And you still forgot one important bit, it's those fertility years gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 01:41 AM
2

Reverting to older family laws. 1970: delete no fault divorce. That will triple the number of marriage. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/na101/home/literatum/publisher/uchicago/journals/content/ma/2008/593028/593087/20180501/images/large/fg2.jpeg 1945: No child support for unmarried people. That will double again the number of marriage because the women won't have STR if unmarried. 1900: Basically reduce divorce reasons to only cheating and strong violence, with proof. At that point every man i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 05:30 PM
1

Collapse is not when your last piece of territory is taken. It's when your lose too much momentum. Your comment exactly support my point. Romans lost their empire before they realised it. We are at that point, we lost and we didn't realise it yet because we don't see it and we can't read the obvious data.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:01 AM
49

We are not on the brink of collapse, we are collapsing since 40 years. Civilisation collapses happen over decades and happen exactly like this. Debt, inflation, moral decadence, laziness, foreign competition, immigration. People in Roman Empire realized the collapse happened a century afterward. Question is not how to stop the collapse, it's over. Question is how to live the collapse, and what will be after.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 12:11 AM
2

It's evolution by natural selection. Women have shorter time window to reproduce and don't benefit in reproduction from being geniuses. All they can do is pick a good enough mate as fast as possible and make 6 kids. Being clever doedn't help much. But instinct (emotions) are good for that because they are good short term drivers. Men who are geniuses or exceptional benefit because they can have 15 or even 100 kids. Also bigger brain consume more energy. Women need lot of energy for pregnancy and…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 11:31 PM
0

Just google them. The change is mainly us subsidizing women with kids to separate, and allowing divorces with no reason since 1970. Making marriages useless. But boomer ideology and change in moral values also helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 09:35 PM
-1

Of course there are evidences. You just choose to not look at them. Half women were forced to stay in abusive relationship, if that's your logic you can believe anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 09:17 PM
-1

I think not, you get a point, no condition in absolute is difficult. But the point stays with less conditions. Men's love is still stronger than women's.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 06:44 PM
-4

No, my treatment of my wife is also a function of my laziness, wether I have other wives to divide my efforts, other interests, and several other parameters. Love is just the feeling. The treatment is a completely different matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 05:45 PM
-7

It's not normal and it's not healthy. Women have been and stayed with murderers and all sort of bad men since millennia. This lack of loyalty is recent. 1970 exactly As for health, if we are looking at recent data, the outbreak of suicides and mental illnesses are directly related to this. There is nothing worse for a kid than living with a single mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 05:36 PM
-8

Men do love unconditionally. Love is a feeling. Not a treatment. Even if their needs are not fulfilled, men can love several women and make babies to several. There is no need to fall out of love. Women can't, loving several men is doomed because they can only have 1 husband. And since women are much more constrained by time, they fell out of love easily so as to not lose their precious time
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 05:28 PM
4

Not internet. It started with boomers in 1970. Internet came later. Family laws changed. Destroyed marriage/LTR and made it unappealing to men. Thus men resort to STR only and women are left with seeking LTR in a world filled with men only seeking STR.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 01:29 PM
3

STR dating is better, before boomers it was almost non existent people never hooked up, now the average is about 5 hookup/partners in your life, which means it's a lot easier. But LTR dating is much worse now. Before, almost everyone had 1 spouse for life at around 20. Now this is not the case it's much harder to find.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 01:24 PM
1

It seems like you agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 11:42 PM
1

Good and bad are descriptors... of preferences. Always. Everything you and him stated described your preferences. Everytime someone says the word "good" he's describing his preference, or at least something's preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 11:22 PM
2

That's wrong. Given the choice doesn't mean you can choose between 2 clones, one being rich. It means you have riche people in your pool, that are not clones. For most men, the woman's money is not relevant, men look at beauty, age, education, and other stuff, and money is so behind in priority it's not taken into account in practice. For some men money is even negative as they'd prefer to date broke women for control. You take 2 random women, take any as wife, one with money the other broke, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 09:50 PM
1

Men can do with broke women. They don't sit and watch them be poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 06:21 PM
-1

All women are like that. Some are honest and some hide it. But no women is interested in broke men given the choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 06:14 PM
-2

Good and bad are always preferences...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 06:02 PM
1

Dude article is bullshit, he is not comparing the same thing. He's comparing contractors that don't need training, recruiting fees, with employees that need training and recruiting fee. I responded to your marriage thing. Marriage and divorces are laws and as such free market doesn't apply to married people. But free market apply to prostitutes and sugar babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 09:24 PM
1

Nope, in tech contractors are more expensive. If they were less expensive it's because they were operating from overseas or were less experienced than employees. From my experience I can say a contractor in software development is about 2 to 10 times more expensive, depending on experience. Divorce is a law regulation, not free market. It's like minimum wage. We were talking about sugar babies vs prostitutes/escort
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 08:46 PM
5

How does she know it's rape if she doesn't remember ? Though, from your story I'm sorry but that is rape, she's right after all. You were raped by a drunk woman who is now false accusing you of rape. You didn't give her your explicit consent for grabbing your penis. You wanted to leave and felt forced to stay and have sex with her. She was very forceful, she was drunk. Stop feeling guilty you are the victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 08:39 PM
2

It's a myth, or it would happen to 50 year olds too, or sterile women. No, it's specifically women aged 70 or more. And they don't fuck much, that's the thing, it's men fucking a lot, women fuck 4 times less because one dude is fucking 4 of them. This is exactly what STD like, women don't transmit STD much, it's men transmitting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 07:55 PM
1

Businesses never hire contractors because they are naturally cheaper. Uber is just cheating minimum salary laws or alike, situation created by laws that make artificial market imbalances. Women is an unregulated market and there is no minimum salary to sugar babies. So market rule is they are cheaper. Prostitutes are cheaper if you hire them less. For an equal work time, they are much more expensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 06:22 PM
7

Escorts are much more expensive than sugar babies. Contractors Vs salaried position thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 03:06 PM
0

How is that a good deal ? That's a bad to average deal. Anyone can get that. Sugar babies are not that expensive especially if you are an average 26 year old
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 02:38 PM
4

I don't know what you read but men in nursing home are very sought after. There is 1 man for 4 women at those ages. I meet a lot of old ladies and as soon as 1 dude become available they are like sharks on him. We even have STD epidemics in nursing home due to old men having so much sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 02:29 PM
0

You can't judge the deal. She could get more money if the was banging a 40 year old ugly dude. But dude is 26 and average, I'd say he's getting a shit deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 02:22 PM
3

This is a marketing method. Asking questions and leaving a chance to say no always has lower sucess than being assertive. There are ton of other methods that work like that. Like foot in the door (making a small request that will get approved, then asking a bigger), door in the face (making a large request that will be denied, then asking a smaller one), priming, anchoring, reciprocity etc... They work but they are not rep pill, they are just marketing/manipulation methods that work on anyone, m…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/23 03:24 PM
1

Not my thing, but I don't care about people executing their own kids. Pre natal or post natal. Not my problem. Just don't touch mines.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 09:52 PM
-1

Why would you shame someone for someone else's decision ? Single mothers should be shammed relentlessly. They are at fault here because they took all the decisions leading to that situation
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 08:32 AM
0

Absolutely not. You can spread by abandoning your genes. Just take some sapling seeds and throw them in your backyard, forget them for 20 years and see. Nurturing your seeds is a lot of energy that is not always worth. Also you can combine both, throw 50 seeds in your backyard AND grow 3 sapling in pots.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 08:29 AM
1

No. No one is responsible of a situation created by someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 08:18 AM
3

Majority of dead beat dads are fathers left by the mothers. They are not responsible of the situation all the blame is on the mothers and on society that encourage it. The minority of dead beat dads who left. Those that never wanted the kids, I don't judge them, they mentally aborted, it was the woman's choice to give birth. Those who wanted the kids but left later are as bad as single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 11:31 PM
-2

It's nothing new, but it's not an excuse, what did women did before ? Once you had kids, it's too late for red flags. Yes you might discover some, but it's too late, just deal with them. Single motherhood is always her responsibility. Only exception is if dude died.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 07:00 PM
0

Bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 01:06 AM
1

I look at data, not whatever man I heard say something
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 11:07 PM
–

We just reduced the risk, not eliminated it. Condoms are only 98% effective. Also our feelings are biologicaly programmed, and our biology didn't change with the technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 10:54 PM
–

They have no choice, it is the only way they have to reproduce. "Risk" isn't the right word, I prefer "energy". Women's sex outcome: pregnancy, breastfeeding demands a lot of energy. Women are giving away lot of potential energy when accepting sex. Men give no energy with sex. But men can take the baby afterward. Women give, men take, is biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 07:03 PM
1

Nah, censorship always works. Except when you try to censor solutions to problems. In that case, pressure builds. It's not censorship generating the demand, it's the problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 06:46 PM
5

"revenge fantasies" is how cultural oscillations work. You think one Muslim woke up one day and thought out of nowhere: "Hey! What if women had to wear handicaping clothes and be stonned for any thing wrong they do like in old days ?" ? Obviously not. Dudes spent decades or centuries in a situation where something posed problem, their culture was in danger as they lost several countries like Spain, the Balkans, North Africa, etc... They became poor and their women were stolen as a result... and …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 06:32 PM
0

A decade is nothing. Things change, but much slower. Basically we won't see it. Nothing will change for us, it will change but for future generations. Feminism took 70 years to sprout from philosophy to reality, and now it's implemented really since 50 years. This is how long it takes. As a comparison, Red Pill is still in philosophy stage, about 30 years in. If we take a similar pace, remains 40 years of philosophy, and then the first shy RP laws in 2060.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 06:13 PM
3

What you explained will happen for our culture, but in parrallel, there are other cultures that don't suffer from this. Because their culture solves our problem. So fast forward, feminist cultures die, remain only cultures that are above replacement rates, basically controlling cultures. So future is Islam, latinos, probably mormons. At some point they become a majority and will pass anti-feminist laws. Usually this is often initially done in an exagerate way, and then after decades things will …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 05:54 PM
1

That is not new and that is not significant. What you explained exists but always existed and is a small minority of cases. There is a new significant phenomenon, since 1970 roughly, in which there are now millions of fatherless kids (partially or completely). That is due to new behaviors, due to new reasons that didn't exist beore 1970.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 05:32 PM
1

I disagree, men leaving are a minority, like 10% of fatherlessness causes. Vasectomies for men would not change anything. Women still will ask for babies, and then they will leave with the money. Do something against these women and you solved 90% fatherlessness and came back to 1950 levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 03:28 PM
0

It's not, divorce rate is gong up since 1970. Divorce number (different from rate) is going down because people don't marry now that it's useless. If they don't marry they can't divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 03:23 PM
1

This thread is about fatherlessness. Which is falsely attributed to fathers's will in this thread. I agree custody should default to men, or at least the person not leaving.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 02:53 PM
2

Paranoia is having unrealistic fears. Having realistic fears is just being sane. Everyone think they are special. Thinking you are special, or that your woman is special, doesn't make anyone special. It just makes you delusional. Statistics are individuals. I dislike needles so no STD test. And the problem isn't cheating, it's much more than that. The problem is having to care about a kid that's not yours for your lifetime.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 10:43 AM
2

You described any couple where the woman lied, the question is what makes you more trustworthy ? Not what makes you similar to women why lie about paternity ?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 09:32 AM
-1

It's not an accusation, it's a doubt. Accusation is when you know, doubt is when you don't know. Why should you be trusted about a matter women are known to lie about ? What makes you more trustable ?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 09:11 AM
-2

Except you didn't solve the problem. Women will keep having kids and leaving the fathers. Problem was started in 1970 with one law, it'll be resolved when that law ends. It's simple and boring yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 06:51 AM
1

You are solving nothing. Women will keep leaving. And this is not men's fault if mothers leave. Mothers leave because: Since 1970 they are allowed to. Both by law and by morality. Before it was not allowed and mothers who did that were seen as the worst scum possible. They even get paid to leave due to child support
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 06:43 AM
0

It's not part of the problem, it's the root of the problem. Delete child support, and watch most single mothers go back to their ex with the kids. Problem started in 1970 when women were allowed to do that unchecked. Before that men married and since divorce was not allowed they'd get no child support if they left with kids illegally. Now it's legal and they get money for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 06:32 AM
1

There are comparative studies to identify the factors responsible, it's not a guess. I didn't read any distinction between good and bad divorce, the problem is not the kind of interaction between parents. But the lack of.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 10:06 AM
0

Mental health epidemic is now, not in 50000 BC. We are not talking about what children realize, we are talking about quantifiable measurable problems on adults, due to hindered brain devellopment when they were children. Witnessing violence is natural and does not hinder brain devellopement, in fact it stimulates the brain. Lack of stimulation is in fact the problem. Divorces create situations where kids see less their parents, see them interacting less and get overall less stimulations. If you …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 09:24 AM
0

My opinions are based on studies not whatever personal experience. Kids don't care much about domestic violence, doesn't impact them. Shared custody prevent kid's brain from develloping, leading to several permanent problems that mostly appear later in life. We had domestic violence since millenia, but mass divorces only since 1970, so the effects are easy to study. There is currently a mental health epidemic in the west, directly due to boomer's divorces. This is pedo-psychiatrists saying this,…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 08:29 AM
0

Domestic violence is much less harmful on children than shared custody. I'm not talking only about alimony, child support is also a subsidy to encourage women to leave. And ability to leave in the first place should not be granted. I'm not here to defend all Afghanistan's customs, I'm just defending their marriage laws, similar to ours before 1970. And this domestic violence narrative is propaganda, Afghanistan is just a violent country overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 06:30 AM
2

I care about fairness, you don't. Fairness is when you break your contract, you get penalities, that's fairness. Instead in the west women break their contract and the man gets the penalities. Not even talking about fairness toward kids, they get permanent mental damage due to women's behavior (that we encourage and subsidize).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 05:52 AM
2

RP is not anti-marriage. It's just marriage in the west is not marriage since boomers. I'm completely for marriage, in Saudi Arabia for exemple. Or Afghanistan. Any place not corrupted by boomer's marriage modifications.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 11:39 PM
3

So it makes sense when rapes don't get reported, but when it's false accusations that don't get reported it suddenly doesn't make sense to you ?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 12:54 PM
1

Most reported rapes are false accusations that don't get reported.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 12:51 PM
4

It's not magical. It's how normal ideologies work. You are never 100% progressive or 100% traditional. It's not binary. You are always exposed more or less to an ideology and take more or less from them. The only way to have 0% of an ideology, is to not have been exposed to it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 06:34 PM
3

Traditional women are definitely a better match than progressive ones. But they still have been corrupted to some degree. Traditional women still divorce in our countries (even if less), and they still have some progressive ideas (even if less). Also traditional women are fucking expensive in term of SMV. Which is why it's better to get traditional women from poor countries, you can get them with much lower SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 06:08 PM
9

Yes they are indeed better matches, unfortunately even them have been corrupted to some degree by the ambiant ideologies. By living a in country with divorces, the idea of divorce doesn't seem that taboo to them. It's the same reason you don't LTR someone whose parents are divorced. And it's the same reason if you want to do things right, you are not supposed to bring these women back to your country, that will corrupt them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 05:59 PM
1

It's exactly how relationships work for women. Women are not made by their previous boyfriends, they are made by their parents. If your finished, polished product is on the 2nd hand market, it's because it didn't satisfy its previous owner, so it's not a great product. Or even worse, your product left, which is very bad who want to invest in that kind of product that can leave you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 05:12 PM
12

You are not targeting poorer women, you are targeting women not corrupted by feminism and progressivd ideologies. It just happens they are poorer too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 04:46 PM
14

The difference is wealth is one thing. But there is another thing, it's loyalty. Feminism doesn't value women's loyalty. Women are encouraged and subsidized to divorce. In other countries it's not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 03:11 PM
-1

All 30 year old women have been filtered for several years already and the ones able to bond are taken since years. Remains only those no one want, and those that can't bond. Don't be 5 year late on a flee market, there is nothing good left.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/23 12:44 AM
-1

No one is trying to date most 20 something year old women. The goal is to find one, or several, but most is way too much for any man. Marrying is the number 1 indicator of divorce, obviously don't marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/23 12:37 AM
2

The best age is as soon as you have money, but yes it's around 30-35 if you have done studies. 20-25 if not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/23 12:24 AM
1

Then this the problem we need to fix. Not deepfakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 05:01 PM
1

We shouldn't care about public opinion. Op talked about crimes, so I was talking about police ability to investigate. It's not public opinion's role to do anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 04:56 PM
1

UK law is retarded then. So pictures of adults looking like kids are forbidden. Poor dude is illegal, he's 24 and porn actor but looks like 6
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 04:17 PM
1

*Sacrifice nothing in order to win nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 02:20 PM
0

Morality is basically nothing. So you can now sacrifice nothing in order to win over women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 01:59 PM
2

You can't marry someone who doesn't want to because she has studies to make. And you can't marry if marriage doesn't exist and is not marriage anymore but instead is a contract cancelable anytime and giving you no protection. 30+ year old women have problems. I know, I meet desperate women every week that want sperm donations to become single mothers because they have no hope finding a normal partner anymore. And I see their desperation grow as they thought it would work the 1st time but they re…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 01:47 PM
1

What you copy pasted is about child pictures, not fictionary characters depictions. If the Jury believes a fart is a dangerous weapon, then you can be classed as attempted murderer. The thing is the Jury won't, first because they won't even be asked the question because the Judge and prosecutors are not idiots. Find me 1 single case of someone condemned for fictionary characters, then we can discuss with something real.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 01:31 PM
1

It's not a fantasy, it's what works. The problem isn't she works. The problem is she's too old to start a LTR. I have no problem with working 20 year old women. Men have problem with working (or not) 30 year old women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 01:17 PM
1

Leisure, watching videos
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 12:58 PM
1

Zero empathy toward abused fictional characters ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 11:41 AM
0

Deep fakes are good to have fun, and that doesn't need to be more. Wether people think it's real or not should not be a problem, it shouldn't have consequences. The fact than it has is the real problem. We can create laws with morality, we shouldn't harrass people with morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 11:35 AM
1

Feminism is males fault, but women following feminism and wanting to have a career is women's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 11:30 AM
0

There is no need to fix something that is fixing itself. After a few decades cultures that make babies will overtake in population and will make new laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 05:11 AM
0

No, but now women with some IQ are suiciding their genes. Current natural selection is favoring women who do no studies, leading to lower IQ in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 05:08 AM
2

Again someone afraid to be attacked on the morality court. This culture is unhealthy, and it is the problem here. There should be no damage for any kind of true or false video featuring someone doing something immoral or illegal. For illegal stuff it's police and court's jobs only, and until the court says you are guilty you are completely inocent and should not be bullied or harrassed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 04:21 AM
2

You guys are all frightened to be attacked on the morality court. Feels like middle age. So yea, I think deepfakes are totally alright. What's not alright here is the culture of harrassing people due to moralistic reasons. It's unhealthy, it's police's job to track criminals, and until formally condemned by a court you should be considered completely innocent. I genuinely think that this culture had, and will have lasting impact on many people. And it's not deepfake or any other pretext's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 04:11 AM
5

I don't die because of a deepfake. I die because of a nutjob. If nutjobs where killing people drinking milk, is milk responsible ? Would you support banning milk ? That's an idiot logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 11:33 PM
3

Okay, then I die and he goes to jail later. Still my 2nd point remain. We are not going to forbid stuff just because they offends nutjobs and push them to murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 11:16 PM
0

If some nutjob wants to kill me, I call the police, he goes to jail, and problem is solved. Thanks to deepfakes, nutjobs would be detected early and go to jail ? Is that your point ? Or do you want to forbid anything that could offend nutjobs ? Like some sort of nutjobcracy where nutjobs decide what is allowed ?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 11:02 PM
-8

Harm is not done by the deepfake, but by the snowflake firing you. If I were to fire people that have <insert whatever> happen to them, is it my fault they are fired, or is it the fault <insert whatever> happened ? It's 100% my fault, <insert whatever> is not responsible. Same for deepfakes. Same for any other outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 10:53 PM
1

Yes, and it makes no difference, my point remains. It's impossible to prove that a fictional character is a child, due to the nature of fiction. You simply say they are no children, they are adults looking like children. Especially when it says at the begining of the video "all characters are at at least 18". This is why no one ever has been condemned for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 10:40 PM
1

Yes and a fictionary charater has no age that you can prove it has. If worried, just write on a black screen at the begining of the video that "all characters are at least 18", then you can make as much loli porn than you want. If they say in the video that they are not 18, write at the begining "This is a roleplay and all characters are at least 18". Same for incest because it's forbidden in some places.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 10:05 PM
5

That's not really deepfake's fault. It's cancel culture's fault. In fact deepfakes will solve that if suddenly we can't trust videos.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 09:42 PM
-2

We can still analyse the footage and determine it's fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 09:40 PM
2

It is legal to reuse photos from someone's social media ? I'm not sure it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 09:39 PM
1

Pedophilia laws don't apply to fictionary footage. Just like drawings or hentail. A porn movie of adult edited so the adult looks like a kid, even using a kid's face, is completely legal for the viewer, the producer might be in trouble about copyright but that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 09:37 PM
0

Snowflakes gona be snowflakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 09:33 PM
–

If you think they earn money by making kids you are wrong. Kids work so they can cost less to their parents, but they are still a cost. Also this trend is true for poors in countries where kids don't work too
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 08:16 PM
3

Bullshit. It's the poor making kids. You don't need money to make kids. Countries where people earn $50 per month, literally can't afford food and die of hunger, and have the lowest purchassing power make the most kids. The reason we make no kids is not because we are too poor, because we are not, we are the richest. The reason we make no kids is men don't want to make kids with temporary relationships, and we destroyed permanent relationship contract in 1970.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 06:16 AM
-1

Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 11:55 PM
-3

I don't use RMV. It's what I mean for SMV (for men). Useless distinction IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 11:50 PM
-5

20 yo girls don't throw on you whatever your age. You actually have more SMV at 40 while richer than when you are 20. Also it's an age range where there is a lot of variability on girls because good deals are not yet all taken and they just left their parents. Dating older women is like comming to a flee market 5h after opening, only those that interested no one remain.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 07:37 PM
7

Yes but not because they are older, because they are richer.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 07:22 PM
2

I don't know if you have a huge clit or a small dick. Dicks are not only 4 times bigger than clits. From my experience it's about 20.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 07:23 AM
1

Your clit is 20 times bigger when erect, and the guy you are seeing is now a woman and you are attracted to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 02:42 AM
2

Women bring much more than just looks. They bring companionship, kids, help in chores and additional salary, and several woman's qualities to your life for exemple house decoration. Looks fade quickly. And you spend literally only 1% of your time naked and fucking. If looks are your priority you are tossing the divorce coin 10 years down the road. Priority is loyalty guaranties.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 12:46 AM
1

Parents have a role to help their kids be sucessful in life. Letting your kid make decisions that will crash his life without even giving your opinion or help is not what a good parent does. You don't learn to drive on you own, you don't learn Math on your own, learning on your own is bad, especially life changing situations. There are moments where you need to practice and experience stuff alone, and moments where good teachers/parents must give advices and lessons. How do you know cute sluts w…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 12:31 AM
0

"Do as I say. Not as I do" is exactly what men want. Who wants a woman who piss standing up, shave her beard and acts like a man ? Not trying to date ourselves, we are trying to date women. Definitely don't do what I do, do women things.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 12:21 AM
4

You get used to it, it's definitely better than being divorced and having to pay rent to your cute ex for 15 years while seeing your kids half the time (if you are lucky). Priorities are important and priorities for long term is loyalty, OP's priority seems to be looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 11:13 PM
1

Disagree, parents just have a more objective view. OP thinks with his dick, his dick makes poor jugement, he's going to pick a cute woman his dick likes, and will be screwed by her. His parents tried to set him up with a religious woman whose parents are together and vetted, probably they saw other things, but it's a much better match for long term than a cute slut with divorced parents that will cheat, divorce him and letting him pay child support her rent for 15 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 11:09 PM
2

It has nothing to do with high body count. You need time to be hooked to an alpha to become alpha widow. And alphas don't usually date sluts. It's a concept that apply to women that have been a very long time with an awesome dude, I know one, she has a body count of 1 probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 09:10 PM
1

Not that easy, but anyway prostitutes are not success. If your success is getting prostitutes for free, you are just saving 100 euros per fuck, it's not being alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 06:01 PM
2

Truth disturbs you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:57 PM
1

That is bullshit. AF requires work. You can't be attractive just by your look as a man. You need friends, hobbies, to build your personality, to be educated, to be social. AF requires just different work than BB.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:55 PM
1

Respect is a result of morality, it will depend on your morality. Some moralities favour work, some innate qualities. I don't care to discuss respect because it means nothing to me. Being a hot dude demands work and innate qualities, looking good is not sufficient and not even mandatory. Being rich demands the same. Inheriting I agree with you. Being a hot woman requires only to be young. No work or innate qualities. Unless you focus on ultra hot women, then it requires only youth and innate qua…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:47 PM
1

Yes. Feminism is funded by rich men for this (not only for this). Feminism is a product of rich men. So it's a product of wealth inequality. More inequality means more feminism being pushed in media and by politics (owned by rich men) It's even more apparent if you look at trends, who is getting richer ? Rich dudes due to growing inequalities, and poor women due to feminism. Since women are more attracted to men earning 20% more, but these men don't exist in sufficient quantities anymore (becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:23 PM
2

It's not directly Chad's N count that is appreciated. It's the fact they are Chad. The N count is the finger, not the moon. Your argument that it's the same finger is dumb, finger is not pointing toward the same qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:00 PM
2

Yes I agree, I meant the narrative is that only women were oppressed
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 03:08 AM
0

Past oppression of women is a bullshit narrative. Men were oppressed more. Who get sent by force to die in wars ? Who needed to work, pay everything ? Who is last in every scenario, including sinking ships ? Who got poisonned by women ? Who suicide the most ? Who dug coal and is doing all kind of dangerous jobs while women do the safest ones ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:52 AM
1

Why ask that to women ? Hostility doesn't come from women, women are just good at echoing the dominant morale. Dominant morale is made/controlled by the medias and politics nowadays. Medias and politics are controlled by the rich. The question is why are the rich hostile toward men ? The rich are men themselves. The answer is complicated because they probably don't do it all consciously individually, it's a sum of small individual decisions leading to a collective behavior. But basically here ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:29 AM
2

Negging isn't a shit test. A shit test is a deception made to test how a man will respond. Negging can be deceptive, but its purpose is not to test anything, there is no bad or good response expected. Neg's purpose is to communicate your subtle lack of interrest so the woman stays or become interrested.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:01 AM
3

That's not a shit test, you are just dating a slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 01:33 AM
2

No, why would we do that ? Shit testing is only a woman's behavior, and you are projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 01:26 AM
0

Of course they do it, but more subtly. OP wrote a fictional exaggeration.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/23 05:31 PM
1

Source is US health ministry, it's public data, they publish that every year, it's every year 70%. Shared custody is also harmful for the child, they spend half the time without their father.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 02:07 PM
1

It's not true, you are demonstrating a total lack of insight into the needs of children. Children are harmed by their father not having authority (because he isn't here for exemple). It's not me who is saying it, it's the plenty studies around this. Lack of father lead to permanent brain damage on children, it's responsible for the mental disease epidemia we have on millenial generation, because their parents, boomers, were the first generation to divorce en masse. Also responsible for increase …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 09:47 AM
1

Child support is not to support children it's to support the mother's decision to leave. Men shouldn't support women's decision to leave, and I think at the minimum women should even pay a monthly compensation to the husband to have the right to leave with the kids, if not being strictly forbidden by law because it harms kids. If you don't want, just get an ovariectomy and spare us all the drama. That simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 03:56 PM
2

No, women are not responsible. Feminism comes from men more than it come from women, and from the beginning it is funded exclusively by rich boomer men trying to profit off that ideology. Women basically just behave how they are told by the moral authority, before it was the church, now it's the medias.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 01:16 PM
2

Women think men aren't interested in them because they have porn/games as substitute. It's not what happens. It's just that life has changed from everyone marry at 20, buy a house, have kids and stay together all their life. To marrying at 30 after many years of chore dating, divorcing at 35, and losing your house, then battling for custody of your kids while paying rent to your ex for 15 years afterward. It's not very appealing to men. Men instinctively avoid this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 06:35 AM
5

Exactly, the truth is opposite. If you want to improve your video games life, you need to drop the datings.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 06:16 AM
1

Of course women divorce good husbands. Women are interested in money, the government subsidize divorces so women divorce. It is that simple. If government fined women for 20 years instead of rewarding them for 20 years, divorce would drop to near 0.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 10:48 PM
1

Lol no, crusade leaders took control of rich lands and important trade routes. Religion is, again, a pretext given to dummies who'll earn nothing. Leaders took ressources. Guess why they didn't crusade into Africa, or Russia ? because nothing to gain at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 07:48 PM
1

Nope, idiots fight over football matchs, the rich people in charge sell them tickets. Countries are never controlled by idiots. Idiots are controlled. All the wars you cited were fought over ressources. American revolution was the rich fighting against the King for control of the US ressources American civil war was similar, North raised taxes on the South and tried to take South's ressources, most valuable ressource being labor at the time, South revolted and lost. King Henry didn't need war to…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 12:33 AM
1

Not a single one. There is never an abundance of ressource.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 10:02 PM
1

Why ? Some women are not interested in that, and some men don't like their wife to fuck other men, equality is a false goal. I'm not trying to date myself, the goal is to find something that works for both. There is no symetry in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 09:59 AM
1

No one is eating your body. Setting yourself on fire damage your body it's different, better analogy would be to cuddle or give one of your clothes to people cold.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 09:49 AM
4

That's why you also need to vet. Hit the gym + vet.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 09:47 AM
5

Nowadays charity only apply to women interests. I'm against any charity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 09:44 AM
1

Ideologies oppose due to competition for ressources. Anytime there is a war, at the elite level they are talking about ressources and funding the war to get more ressources for themselves. It's just explained to paysants in moral terms because paysants wouldn't fight or pay tax to get rich richer, but they will do it for moral points (whatever the current ideology says it is).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 10:09 AM
1

It's sustainable in term of survival and competitiveness toward neighbors. Birth rate & economy mainly. With secondary and more indirect data like marriage rate, divorce rate, mental health, criminalty. Something unsustainable is the worst kind of system.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 02:59 AM
1

It worked for society. Birthrate, economy, criminalty, mental health, marriage rate, divorce rate, etc... It doesn't matter if it doesn't work for someone as long as it works for the whole. Also it's your opinion that it didn't work for women, I disagree. Current model doesn't work for women but I don't even want to discuss that because it's off topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 02:33 AM
1

No, societies often do things that don't work, and then collapse. To be replaced by something else that works. The natural feedback loop is long, if you do something that doesn't work, it takes 50 years or more to get a collapse. This is how decadence works. The real world is rough, and you often have individuals suffering. There is always micro solutions to micro problems, but anyway even if we find no solution, it's better to have 1% suffering than having an unsustainable system and collapsing…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 01:40 AM
1

It's not sexy, but it's a better alternative than "let's have sex"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 01:26 AM
-2

So ? it worked
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 04:48 PM
-1

No, women don't do that, you were the one saying they do. Women only leave if they have the means to, and especially if they profit from it. Cancel child support and alimony and you will reduce divorces by 50%, the remaining divorces will be women with enough money to sustain themselves and men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 12:49 PM
1

Yes but men value age much more than women. I'm actually surprised it's only $7000.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 08:38 AM
2

Sex is better unplaned and unexplained. Saying "let's have sex" is not sexy at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 07:39 AM
-1

DNA doesn't become retarded. It's the same under a bridge and on top of it. Educated or not your DNA is the same. For natural selection there are 2 possibilities Those women left (most cases). In that case it's her choice to rot there. You can't force her to listen to you, just write her off as unreliable. Focus on making more kids with someone else. Better have 1 retarded and 1 educated kid, rather than just 1 semi-educated outside your reach. The man left. In that case the man is in a casual s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 07:30 AM
4

Of course men want guaranteed wives. It that was a thing it would be very popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 07:17 AM
-6

Women can work ? Not a man's responsibility to pay his ex's rent. Plus, women are the ones divorcing. In societies without child support, women just don't divorce, and they make sure to choose their husband correctly instead of making kids with hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 07:12 AM
1

Polygamy and monogamy are the same thing. They are permanent LTR or marriage, brought by sedentarity and stability through religion. You oppose them wrongly. Warring tribes in the savannah had no marriage. People would fuck each other without clear rules, sometimes get exclusive for a few years and then break up when they want, just like nowadays in fact. Sometimes they had possession of women, but it was not like marriage, they could sell their women or exchange them. Stability = unbreakable ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 07:03 AM
1

age 25 to 54 bullshit study, cherry picked data
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/23 09:46 AM
1

Men have 2 strategy to reproduce. The sedentary LTR one: get a job, a wife and children. Or the nomadic STR one: pillage, rape, and impress/pay girls into casual sex. Our history is done of shifts between the first and 2nd one. 1st is better for good times, 2nd is better for harsh times.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/23 04:12 AM
0

Bullshit, there are more women than men. How is your data possible ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/23 04:12 AM
1

Single men have short term collapse effects, like criminalty. Single mothers have long term effects, it's proven their kids have more mental problems and criminalty. It's like a ticking bomb that explodes on the next generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/23 03:56 AM
-4

Not a choice, Karen is how we view old women who are revendicative. It's our perception, we find them annoying. Replace a karen's skin by a man's skin or young woman, and suddenly it's not a karen. Imagine pussy riots, femmen, or any tomato soup activist, and give them an old woman's skin, and you created a bunch of karens.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/23 02:57 AM
3

Only while young. Old women are treated worse than men. They become Karens from 40 or 50 year old, and become invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/23 01:47 AM
2

No it's an idiot concept. Wars are conflicts for ressources between groups of people, that are unconsciously competing for reproduction (as groups). You can't have wars between groups not competing for ressources it makes no sense. We are in a phase of decadence since 1970. Society is dying. It will be replaced but it takes time maybe we'll be dead by then.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 08:37 AM
2

Maybe 1% men are oversea. Not 80%.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 05:53 AM
6

Oh ok, I think you wouldn't get banned for not wanting to date transexuals, but better be cautious.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 03:37 AM
1

You are a man and a woman at the same time ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 03:31 AM
5

Something else that would probably get me banned from reddit now I'm curious
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 03:24 AM
1

Question For Women I'm not judging your sexual pace, just your reading
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 01:31 AM
1

bruh, you are a man
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 11:23 PM
3

Leaving the house has always be a valid fault to divorce since middle ages. People at fault don't receive alimony. Fault was the only way to divorce. Nowadays most divorces are "no fault", which is allowed since 1970.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/23 11:17 PM
1

So forbid divorce ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/23 08:16 PM
0

It's ok to arbitrage in favor of the person that abandonned his career. But why only arbitrage on stuff that statistically favor women ? Give alimony to: The person that didn't ask for divorce, the person that break his marriage contract should pay for breaking it and wasting his partner's time. The person that is going to see his children less, he should be compensated.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/23 08:12 PM
1

No, blue pill is "women are like men and attracted by looks". With concepts like gender are a social construct (explains why women are like men) and love at first sight, etc.. Those are blue pill concepts. There are also declinations like everyone can get love whatever their appearance if they are beautiful inside (which refer to being nice), this is not what I'm saying. This is also blue pill. Red pill is women's attraction is commanded by wealth, status, and perceived ability to make money, ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 03:44 AM
0

You don't fuck anyone on first impressions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 03:23 AM
1

Blue pill propaganda corrupted their mind. 14 years ago it wasn't like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 01:45 AM
1

Yes, the more you interact with women, the more you become misogynistic basically. Because you get to understand what they really are, and it's not what you thought they were when you were a little boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 10:24 PM
-2

Because looks, but it doesn't last. The only thing that last is the confidence boost from having girls smile at you at first instead of looking you down.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 09:58 PM
-4

Because they have more confidence due to better 1st impressions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 09:32 PM
-3

Exactly, they don't care. Red pill has been contaminated by blue pill beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 08:17 PM
-6

Looks are only good for your own confidence, and first impression if you cold approach. So it's always nice to improve what you can. Being obese or unhealthy pose not a look problem, it's often an health, lifestyle and education problem which all matter much more than looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:36 PM
-14

Why do all the red pill nowadays believe in looks... Real red pill believes male looks weight nothing. Women don't care about it, like not at all. Except on OLD because it's literally the only information they have to make a choice. Stop whining on looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 05:15 PM
6

Definitely, but women don't have much testosterone, that's the thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 05:05 PM
3

When rating men they don't know based on pictures. Women are not interested in looks. It weight nothing, they can marry someone they rated 2 at first. After knowing the guy, he earns or lose points based on his status, charisma, wealth and qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 05:03 PM
5

Because they are dudes. Women are different and not very interested in casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 04:53 PM
0

There is not enough money for everyone. Money is not a good, numbers of money you have is irrelevant, it's relative power, you are rich if others have less money than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 04:50 PM
6

Women’s nature varies a lot No. It vary slightly around the same nature. It's altered by things you can check for like her parent's relationship, previous sexual experiences, and even genetics (you said it), and RP teach you that and so if you want to vet and try to minimise risk you can, but it vary only a little don't expect too much
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 10:25 PM
3

No it doesn't tell that. It's just one of the only strategy in the west because there is no real marriage and familly laws are biased. Another RP strategy can very well to marry 1 woman, but not in the west. You could also accept the risks and try to vet your partner heavily to marry in the west. Like no divorced parents, low N count or virgin, possibly richer than you, that lower the risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 10:14 PM
1

Start with that, but read it tomorrow, today you need to rest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age\_and\_female\_fertility
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 05:07 AM
1

Your articles are bullshit Those female fertility percentages I gave are common knowledge and available everywhere. Just go to wikipedia or google it. But it's pretty obvious you are triggered and unable to accept reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:28 AM
1

Lyzard96 rage quits
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:17 AM
1

You are looking at the finger pointing at the moon. It's about fertility, baby fat is just how it's detected more or less consciously. Men are made to detect and be attracted to fertility. Those 10 years change pregnancy chances from 40% per cycle to 15% per cycle. And that is a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:32 AM
1

Think like it's a work relationship CEO/manager. With kids being base employees. CEO and manager can discuss, manager can ask things to CEO and it can be accepted. But in case of disagreement CEO has the last word.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 12:15 AM
1

propyl21 rage quits
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 03:34 PM
1

No, we both have reproduction instinct. The difference is women have only 10 years in easy mode and 10 more in hard mode. After they are sterile. Men have more than double the time, 20 years in easy mode, and 20 in hard mode, you can even add 20 more years in extreme mode. So both want kids as much, but women have less time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 03:30 PM
2

By definition. Bluepill is defined as the values the system tries to push by censoring reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 02:47 PM
4

Yes as a rule of thumb it's always women's fault, but then what ? Are we here to distribute morale points or to find solutions ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 01:30 PM
3

Bruh I agree that one was evident, but that never happens, you met a particularly bold woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 12:15 AM
1

It changes a lot yes. Maybe you can convince yourself it doesn't change a lot, but whatever you consider, big or small, there is a difference. I didn't say an individual can only make a positive difference, there has been a misunderstanding, you can make positive or negative difference. I just meant making a short term positive difference for an individual isn't relevant to humankind, but even talking about the long term negative effect for humankind.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 09:16 PM
1

This is bullshit. You aren't going to divorce your spouse because she is tired or pretend to be and wants to work less. Also there are ton of ways of working less without asking, you can get yourself fired, you can stop seeking promotions and letting your husband promote alone, you can be bad at looking for a new job, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 08:52 PM
1

Considering something, even with several persons, doesn't change reality. It only changes your perception in a limited way. I'm not talking about having everything in common with your bio kids, I said having more in common. Natural selection pressure makes positive difference to humankind, alleviating it makes a negative difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 07:29 PM
1

Yea and once married they guilt you into working less or stopping completely. It's much simpler to not marry. There is 0 advantage anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 07:18 PM
0

Higher cognitive functions are no different. They also have this one single propose. You are the one revealing your stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:40 PM
1

It is caring for a child. It's not really yours, you just consider it is. Which is fine, but it has many differences. And first, your adopted kid has less in common with you, physically, behaviourally, psychically. His own kids will too have less in common with you, etc ... Genes code everything. Everything you can do that a bacteria doesn't do, is because of genetics. Every desires, every action is genetic. Do bacteria care for their kids like us ? No. Why ? Because our DNA is different. Even e…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:35 PM
4

Bruh you are weak. Insults, disinterest and disgust should fly over your head. At the end of the day nothing changes. Just ignores.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:43 PM
3

How do you notice this ? What's the difference between a woman shooting her shot and one doing nothing ?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:37 PM
1

You got me wrong, I didn't ask for justification. I tried to understand what she wants, or what marriage component interests her, as "marriage" can mean several things: A contract with government, also a ring, also a ceremony, also a LTR with a man, a house, kids, etc... It's possible she wants it all, but given she has trouble it's also possible she's ready to sacrifice one component that doesn't interests her to increase her chances to get what interests her.
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/23 03:27 PM
0

That is the same thing. Dating higher is exactly the same thing as not dating low. And you do that only if you think you have value to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:05 PM
1

There is less pleasure, they are just trying to pretend it's their kid. Not saying caring for someone is no pleasure, but it's less. And adoption is actually only making the adopted better, not humankind. Natural selection is making humankind better. And when someone is trash and abandon his kids voluntary or not, natural selection principle is their DNA not perpetuate or struggle to perpetuate, by messing with that and helping his DNA to perpetuate by raising its DNA, you actually make humankin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 11:56 AM
1

They don't. Simply you mostly meet people of the same education, and women choose men of similar education. But men don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 11:48 AM
0

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:08 AM
-1

Doctors are not exactly the cleverest despite what they think. Literally everything. Not a single exception, everything you do (you name it), is done to that purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:07 AM
1

It already does. There are ton of things the government forbid you to do. It's what all laws are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:54 AM
3

Good, you don't need to get married then. Just partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:43 AM
-4

What a sad way to live your life. Fortunately even if you don't think about it, your body still make you do only stuff to that purpose of reproducing. You just don't understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:41 AM
1

Feminised red pills. They think women care about looks and try to date on OLD. Real red pills are much less.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:35 AM
-1

You are just preparing for divorce. That's the problem. Divorce should be forbidden like before.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:28 AM
-1

Every diplomed woman I meet list her diploma as a top asset of hers on the dating ground. They can't accept it's not. A master degree is worth a lot less for a woman than being 5 years younger. By making studies they actually lose value, while thinking they gain value.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:24 AM
-5

Of course they do. The vast majority of beings live their lives to find a mate and reproduce. Everything we do is to that purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:15 AM
3

You can't marry in the west, marriage doesn't exist. The stuff we call marriage is not marriage anymore. You asked them to sign a contract you can break anytime, forcing them to give you money when you do break it. Doesn't sound like a deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:04 AM
1

How does it increase your reproductive sucess ? Sounds far from red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:00 AM
1

Just marry young. Our grand fathers married at 20.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:58 AM
1

I don't engage with people who have no arguments. Come back when you have some.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:53 AM
2

Ideal age is 20 year old. 30 year old is too late for many women. It's okay if you are lucky, it's not if you are unlucky. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_and_female_fertility https://www.babycenter.com.au/a6155/your-age-and-fertility
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:44 AM
1

Anything can happen, that's why you are supposed to start rolling the dices early. Starting late is not a working method, it's how you increase your chances to fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:17 AM
6

nope. She'll get her life sucked out alone working for a shit job with no purpose or familly. A shitty male and several shitty kids are how you are supposed to get your life sucked out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:07 AM
1

Ultimate cuckery. Caring for your own kid made with your DNA is much more than caring for some random kid. In pleasure, but also in utility because you contribute to natural selection thus in making humankind better.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:01 AM
7

Medical experts are getting money by getting women to freeze their eggs. If they got money by being honest they'd tell women to have kids young.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:59 AM
1

You sound like having no argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:51 AM
1

If it works, it works. It's not me choosing what works.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:49 AM
1

The feminist law and morality is asking men to pay women's bill. Women chose to make kids, and then chose to divorce and leave. And do they pay the consequences of their choices ? Do they pay their ex-husband for breaking their contract ? No in fact the ex-husband is asked to pay the woman's bill. Kids are mentally disturbed upon reaching adult age as a result of divorce, do women pay that bill ? No it's ignored. Men suicide due to women, do women pay that bill ? Nope. We are focusing on 100 fim…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:32 AM
11

And I don't think men want to rely on weak ass women on the battlefield who can't even lift their own body weight. Men don't want to be on the battlefield. They are forced to be there. They'd all prefer to have 50% chance to be replaced by a woman. Unfit men are force conscripted and sent to the front everydays, no need to have training to be artillery meat. Baby factories actually make babies, they are not making babies the fertility rate is 2 kids per woman. If men are forced to die, equality …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:08 AM
10

So it's okay for you because it's Ukrainians, and they are not us. So it's not our problem. But if you accept that logic, one day it may not be just Ukrainians. One day it will be us.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 01:26 AM
26

It's not about sex. It's about equality. Men can't leave Ukraine, are conscripted and sent to die.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 01:14 AM
1

Nope. Half feminised islam with birthrate of 4 does divorce and alimony in extreme conditions (not free service like us), they are not as bad as us but not real Islam. Real Islam with birthrate of 8 doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 12:57 AM
2

It's not incel revolution, it's just nature. one or two decades from going below replacement Made up imaginary data. Some Muslim countries feminise under our influence, and so the fertility drop as a result, if they ever become as woke as us (which can only occur if they de-islamise), then they'll get replaced too after a few generations. Look at Afghanistan, US invade and start to feminise the country, fertility drop from 8 to 4 over 20 years and was stil droping. But USA left, Taliban take ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 12:11 AM
0

Growing kids takes times. Births from Muslims are a majority in France now, but it will take 30 years before they are 30 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 11:08 PM
3

Opposite. Society is naturally fixing itself by collapsing and being replaced. Sharia is gaining more and more countries, it will reach europe in about 30 years when Muslims are a majority. Majority always decides, and majority is who's making kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 11:02 PM
0

It's not only about money, some bad behavior create other kind of bills. But anyway I agree, there are many solutions and taxing bad behavior is definitely one of them. ​ Divorce => lifetime tax paid to your ex husband You leave with kids => same tax until they are 18 Your husband suicide => tax You are a slut and contribute nothing to society => tax You undercook chicken => tax taxes solve everything
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 10:14 PM
13

First, bad choices have consequences. It should extend to relationships, women can't remain an exception and do whatever they want, then ask other to pay their bill. That's literally being a children. Secondly, any working society restrict people from making bad choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 09:32 PM
12

It's actually not the fault of women. It's boomers who destroyed the original system and imposed their idiot values starting in 70s. Boomers manipulated by rich men trying to boost consumerism and their profits.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 08:57 PM
19

And it had bad outcome for society, kids, men and women themselves. As soon as you give drugs to drug addicts, they do drugs and kill themselves, leave syringe in public places, etc, also works with tobacco, gambling, fast food, consumerism, etc... Just because people do shit, doesn't mean it's good, including for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 08:53 PM
17

I am now adopting this term. Hoeflation is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 08:46 PM
1

Short sighted. What you need is Islam, no divorce, no child support, no alimony, bad women go to jail. And that's it, it's simple. You are trying to overcome education and a working legal system with making replacement humans with technology. Doomed to fail. Unavailable in the West yet, only in Asia, Africa, and soon Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 08:30 PM
1

Yes. 10% of all women are sterile at 35 and 50% are sterile at 40. You basically are sterile way before menopause.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:22 PM
1

Not self sustaining and inefficient. If ever it become a thing it will die off in a few decades. What's self sustaining and efficient is how Islam deal with genders. The future is closer to slavery than robots.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 05:45 PM
0

Even an extremely unattractive woman can still find a man to reproduce with and make babies Nope. I work in reproduction, I see 35-40 year old women every day, many are cute for their age, they couldn't find someone in time. 70% will get 1 kid with a sperm donor, but only 1 not many, for 30% it's too late they are sterile.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:19 PM
1

Not gonna lie, it sounds great.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:14 PM
4

it's false and irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:40 PM
7

Yea I suggest you go and check. I'm mod of a Ukraine war sub, there are no women past a few exceptions, and those women are not on the front line at all except maybe the 3 I saw since the beginning of the war. And all women are voluntary, men are the only ones forced to be there.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:04 PM
1

70 year old dudes are having the least problems of us all. There are 3 single women for every single dude at that age. Due to younger women taking those older men, but same age women can't take even older men because they don't exist they are dead. If you talk to old people you'd know all of the single old women will fight for the next of man who become single.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:32 AM
1

Unwashed pussy always stinks. But I agree for the rest of the body, 80% young women smell good naturally. Reverse is true too there are studies showing women rank 1 week old men's shirt better than clean shirts.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:17 AM
1

That's awesome. Thanks for sharing
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:38 PM
1

Wut ? No
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:26 PM
2

Everyone's average is different. You can't rate without having a group in mind. She's a 2 compared to women I encounter, but in some other environment like if you live in a retirement residency she can be considered a 9.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:25 PM
3

You can call husband and wife without the government paper all the same. You can even make your own paper that will be equally worthless.
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/22 06:55 PM
1

You should prioritise. What is really a wife ? Is it someone with a ring and a government paper ? Or is it someone sharing life with a man and their kids ? I feel you don't focus on the important.
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/22 06:51 PM
1

Is the paper with the government important ? A ring is not really meaningful and not proof of commitment.
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/22 06:45 PM
3

Definitely, nowadays marriage in the western world is a worthless piece of paper that has nothing but the name in common with real marriage
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/22 06:38 PM
0

Always has been like that
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:00 PM
4

Congratulation, you are now a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 05:45 PM
5

I can't help to think there is a problem in how you hold doors.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 05:42 PM
2

True, went there once as a straight dude, I was even accompanied with a date (girl). Got 2 compliments and one dude even touched my ass. Can't complain
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 05:37 PM
1

plot twist: because he fucks them all night
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:06 PM
2

It's racist to have racial dating preferences, just deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 12:39 PM
1

Not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:45 AM
0

Understanding their motives and inner functionning is what helped me. The best advice to get laid if that's your objective, beside being rich, interesting, bold and proactive, is to keep other women around you (women are sexually attracted by men friend with women, especially with hot women) this is the cheat code. And don't get married ever, unless you live in a permanent marriage country.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 05:47 PM
1

Yes, I'm not sure what would have happened in an alternate bluepilled reality, but I feel redpill did help me naviguate around women and understand them. Casual sex isn't my objective, but since it's your metrics, I went from virgin to above average in N count for my age. Redpill cuss at women not to teach them, but: As a way to remember ourselves they are like that. Because it's easy to forget. In frustration, because we all started blue pilled and going redpill is a pain, you need to replace y…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 05:03 PM
0

Classic toxic blaming. Everyone is responsible for his own orgasms. Anyway, if a man is a bad lover he should train with a mistress more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 11:39 AM
2

Then why would you need a mistress for ? No man take a mistress if his balls are constantly empty.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 11:18 AM
-1

What sexual needs. If she wants sex every 3 months it's not hard to satisfy boths women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 02:35 AM
1

Anyone using OLD is a loser. And I'm not interested long term in anyone who used it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 06:06 AM
1

That's what you say. I identify bad faith. And so I lose interest in debating with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 11:22 PM
1

That's not what a debate is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 10:50 PM
1

If you pay me I will
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 10:43 PM
1

I read a lot of fertility studies because I work in that. Lot are available on google. Tell your husband u/DrBoby told him to do his duty.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 10:40 PM
1

I can see you are bitter because you are attacking men whereas this is not the subject, ranting about off topic things and personally attacking me. I have no interest in this discussion woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 06:53 PM
1

No one is talking about the entire value. We are talking about reproductive value, which is important in reproduction, and dating is very linked to reproduction. Now if we are talking about other things like ability to do plumbery, 40 year old women win over 20 year old easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 04:56 PM
1

What you say is bullshit and you seem bitter. It takes 2 year for men aged 40 to get their partner pregnant BECAUSE their female partner is 40 year old in average. A 40 year old man with a 20 year old woman will take 3-4 months to get her pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 04:49 PM
1

Male age decreases fertility yes, but not by much. Your study does not only include fertility, it also include behavior, basically older men have lower birth rates because they have sex less often. Studies I've seen show a 30% difference not 50%. Difference between a 20 year old woman and a 40 year old woman is 800% more difficulty to get pregnant (if not already sterile which is the case of 50% of them at 40). Which account for 1 year and 8 months difference IF not sterile. Difference between a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 04:16 PM
2

You are an exception, for every exception like you there is a woman who had to spend twice the average time, so 2 years at 33 year old. good for you, bad for her. You can find those times roughly everywhere, this is highly documented
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 02:58 PM
2

It's old if you want to get the possibility to have several kids. It takes years to be confident the person is a right choice. By then she is 32, if you are sure you want 2 kids max, it's ok, there is a 80% chance you can make 3 even, if that 20% risk is okay, then it's fine, more kids will be a toss of coin. And I'm ignoring possibilities of health complications. The best and the easiest personalities are taken first, around 25 year old. With 30 year olds you fish in the pool of all those that …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 07:37 PM
3

In 90% cases no. In 10% cases there will be issues. It's fine if you are in the 90%, it's painful if you are in the 10%. Do you want to take the risk ? Also what if you want a 3rd ? 10% women are sterile at 35, are you taking the risk to not have the possibility to have a 3rd kid ?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 07:22 PM
2

Nice, but I know ton of women that are trying unsuccessfuly to have kids in their 30s. Some try for years. The question is do you want to risk losing 2 years trying to make a kid to a 35 year old woman ? Then risk losing 3 more years to that 37 year old to make a second 20% chance she is sterile, and then at 40 for the 3rd one there is 50% chance she is sterile. Or do you want to make a kid to a 25 year old woman, in 3 months, then have the possibility to make another one, and another one, and a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 07:17 PM
3

It's not only about risks. It's also about the time it takes to get pregnant, and the risk the woman is already sterile. At 25 it takes 4 months to get pregnant. And only exceptions are steriles. At 35 it takes 1 year to get pregnant and about 10% are sterile At 40 it takes 2 years to get pregnant, and 50% are sterile. ​ Also men don't want 1 kid. They want several, or at least they want the possibility to have several should they decide it later.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 07:09 PM
6

Looks are very important too yes. Looks and age.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 07:00 PM
0

In my country, France, there are a lot of 20 year old Muslim women. But anyway, my advice is to change country to one that allow real marriage, not just temporary ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 02:31 PM
1

Because it's not important. I'm not talking about "many women". I'm talking about women. Many women have 12 fingers, it's still wrong to consider women have 12 fingers, they have 10 and the 12 finger ones are exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 11:24 AM
1

Yes, what confuses you ?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 11:05 AM
-4

Just move country. You are afraid of me too, and it's just the tip of the iceberg. The west doesn't offer what you seek.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 11:03 AM
-12

It is somewhat. Feminism is one branch of boomer ideology: progressism, humanism, consumerism, individual freedom, etc... All started in 1970 by boomers. OP is mixing the labels but he's right in some way because everything interlap and it's the same phenomenon. I think progressism is more accurate though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 10:54 AM
-1

It's just a little bit better but it's not magic, religious women are also poisoned by feminism and also divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 10:41 AM
1

Exceptions always exist. Women seek men that earn 20% more in average.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 12:06 AM
1

I don't know you and exceptions always exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 11:54 PM
1

I like men with pale skin, how does that translate into money? Pale skin people are literally the richest. Which is why most women prefer pale skin. But I'm not having this discussion, what women say they like is irrelevant, women's own appreciation of what they like is not to be taken seriously. They will say they dislike xxx, and next day they fuck someone xxx.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 11:34 PM
1

I don't know you and exceptions always exist. But that's an illusion, women love and value traits that translate into money. Charisma also translate into money, but is way behind actual money because it's already money.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 07:37 PM
1

No, not really
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 07:20 PM
0

Yes, the reason they secretly bang their secretaries, instead of openly is because of loyalty in the first place. So they can come back to their wives. Otherwise they'd just dump their wives and bang their secretaries not secretly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 06:39 PM
1

Yes, wetness is wether a solid has a liquid adhering to it. Liquid water can never be wet because it's not a solid.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 06:32 PM
0

I disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 04:19 PM
0

Absence of choice doesn't always come from physical force, but from a set of conditions, like laws. Women in some countries get the choice to be a supportive wife for ever, or to remain single (any other choice is going to prison, get stoned, etc...). It's not really a choice, most women given this choices, choose to be supportive wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 01:46 PM
0

Men are a means for women, not an end. Old men, young men, all are treated like a job. Not just old men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 01:23 PM
0

Slavery is not a choice. That's why nowadays women get paid a "salary".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 01:14 PM
-2

Because she gets or expects to get money basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 01:10 PM
-1

Ok, but so are any men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 01:06 PM
-1

Yes but that's the ideal scenario, most men settle for an employee nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 12:46 PM
0

That's a fundamental red pill principle. Women lack loyalty. They evaluate the relationships looking at the present and what they'd gain/lose by staying or leaving. Like you'd do with a job nowadays. While men are more sentimental and give value to the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 12:38 PM
0

Yes it's normal, men's attraction is like locked at the time of first datings. And women's attraction is not. Men are loyal, but still polygamous, we can love several women at once, which lead to cheating in modern world, though most cheaters still like their wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 12:25 PM
0

No, normal men usually don't divorce. Most divorces are initiated by women. What's more usual though is to try a new model, while still keeping the old, because men are naturally polygamous. Nowadays it's called cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 12:16 PM
0

If you live in Western modern time yes basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 12:09 PM
2

You are talking about visual attractiveness, which is worth nothing. Ugly old men get cute girlfriends everyday, by being rich, simply.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 12:00 PM
0

Yes you do, if they have money. Rich ugly old men often have cute girlfriends.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 11:57 AM
3

Plot twist: his wife is now 20 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 11:54 AM
1

I think it's a metaphor. She means anime addicted by crackheads.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 11:49 AM
1

You got it
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 04:00 PM
0

Gay sex doesn't count because it's not reproductive sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 03:20 PM
-3

At day 0 yes. But men sleeping around reduce women sleeping around over long periods of time, like 30 years or 300 years. Due to natural selection. Creates a biological asymmetry where women evolve to be reluctant to sleep around due to women being like that reproducing more and better.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:30 AM
-1

I think you don't understand what harder means. Everest is harder to climb than Pyrénées, I know several people who climbed the Everest. It's not an argument to disprove that Everest is harder to climb. It's harder to have many kids as a single mother. Especially if you count the kid's success too, like we should since we talk about natural selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:24 AM
-7

It's important as a society to reward/punish good/bad behaviours. Women casual sex is bad for society, creates all sort of problem. Men casual sex is good, it banishes the bad women into the single mother realm which makes it harder for them to reproduce. Societies that reward/punish that do well in the long term. Which is why we reward/punish that now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 08:42 AM
1

If you divorce with kids, you just stop living together, but you can't stop seeing the person and talking with them, that means the relationship doesn't end, it just changes it stops being a romantic one. I disagree with your definition, casual doesn't mean short term and serious doesn't mean long term. Casual, in job or in relationship just mean either party can leave in a simplified way, but no one is forced to if they like it. Serious, by opposition means you can't break the contract without …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/22 01:24 PM
1

Marriage are casual nowadays, if you live in a western country, you can cancel them anytime and they give almost no obligation. They lost their legal meaning, they only retained a fake moral meaning. You were in a long term casual relationship. There are ton of people in casual relationship I don't get your argument. Casual just means you can end it anytime if anyone decide it. A real marriage can't be ended, that's what's not casual. If you want to divorce, you can't. Nowadays it exist only in …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/22 06:59 AM
2

It's not awkwardness the problem. The real problem is lack of confidence. Like not looking people in the eyes or being afraid in general. You can do the weirdest thing and it won't be a problem for women if you look confident. There is this dude on YouTube asking women out while being naked in the street, can't be more awkward, but he got numbers because it's confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 06:23 PM
3

I disagree. Lack of confidence is a death sentence. Being afraid of interactions is different than having weird interactions. Being awkward is not a problem, provided you are confident with it. You can do the most awkward thing but if you own it and stay strong, dominant, it can even be hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 05:59 PM
1

Whatever the shape of their relationship is, it's more serious yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 05:26 PM
-1

Yes it's casual, some casual relationships can last 30 years. Seriousness is not in the length.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 03:36 PM
-2

I relationship without kid is just a casual relationship. Seriousness comes from strings attached, not from the lenght, there are long casual relationships. It apply to any dude's age. Only the woman's age counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 01:56 PM
1

Yes of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 01:48 PM
3

So what. Most 20 year old dudes will also get rejected. Business as usual. Most men are always rejected.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 12:01 PM
2

I have the opposite take. If I see a man with a 30+yo I assume he only wants casual sex or company. Not a serious relationship. If you want 5 kids and a serious relationship it makes much more sense to go toward young women. Because after 30 women are increasingly infertile, or sterile, so forget the 5 kids, and anything left are the leftovers, following the flee market principle you never make good deals if you are 5h late, so imagine 10 years. Nothing worth a serious relationship will be found…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 11:53 AM
2

Can't screw people while being honest with them. It's an evolutionary feature, it increases reproduction chances to lie about that. And I believe the best liar is a liar that believe his lies. I'm convinced there are many biological mechanisms toward that. Very interesting are those stories of women cucking their husband, in many cases they forgot, or convinced themselves the kid is from their husband. Because honest women end up without ressources and their kid too, thus are losing natural sele…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 11:35 AM
1

Yes, but what he wants makes no difference. We are talking about her want
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/22 04:33 PM
1

Yes but the usefulness of marriage is practically negligible too. Which is why no one marry anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/22 10:46 AM
2

He's not rejecting, he just doesn't initiate. It's completely different.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/22 10:42 AM
3

And the othere didn't ? It doesn't show you are more trustable, you are exactly like the others.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/22 04:25 AM
7

100% of people unaware of being cheated on are unaware of it. It's not an affront, it's juste being realistic. Why should you be trusted more than the others ?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 07:21 PM
-4

Women can't maintain value. They have to make deals when their value is up. Women have to hurry.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 03:14 AM
5

Reproduction is not just making kids. It's making quality kids and nurture them until they themselves make quality kids. If you make 10 kids, and all your kids die without kids, you failed the same than if you die without kid. Being tall means you have tall genes (and kids will be tall). It also gives you a leader aura and people are more likely to listen to you, which translate into more money/ressources for the kids. But just the fact that if your kids are tall they will have less trouble gett…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 01:31 AM
0

It's progressive 30 year old are very anxious, 40 year old are desperate, anything above they have given up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:24 PM
0

I'm not telling myself anything. I just witness it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:58 PM
0

Old women are desperate and easy. But not easy for free sex. They are easy for money. If you have whatever amount of money and you promise engagement, they'll line up
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:34 PM
7

Men compare themselves to above average women. Usually young childless fit women. While fat, old and moms are ignored, men don't even think about them when talking about women. That explains why you think women do better. Because you are not talking and thinking about women. But about attractive women. #Women = #men, it's a zero sum game. There is not one having more success because each woman correspond to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:30 PM
1

Early participation doesn't matter. What matter is who have the last say to make the act final. The person who decide in last resort gets the entire responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 03:05 AM
3

Except: you are giving arbitrary injunctions with double standard. Women get to chose to abort, men don't. By all logic women should be the only ones responsible due to them having the only last choice. you make it worse with a law incentivising women to be a bad parent: child support, support women being single mothers or separated, which is VERY detrimental to kid's devellopement, but your money grant incentivise them to be that. You create the problem you wanted to solve. As such child suppor…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 02:50 AM
1

You could CHOOSE otherwise, you. Hear me I'm not saying otherwise, it's unrelated. I'm not saying men cannot change, I'm saying it favours women, it's completely different. Just because you can make an action to get rid of a discrimination doesn't mean you aren't discriminated. The mere fact that you need to change in order to not be discriminated, while others don't need to, is a discrimination. Umm lots of women teach their kids to ride a bike, so no it would not. Seems like you have a problem…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 08:40 PM
1

the domestic laws as they are written do not favor women, they just favor the primary caretaker Which are women... You are turning in circle. Favouring the primary caretaker, and defining "primary caretaker" as stuff women do, is favouring women. Imagine I make a law that favour the primary earner, or the primary authority, or the primary educator (and I define that as stuff men do in majority like teach kids to ride a bike). That would favour men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 08:04 PM
1

It's gender based, it just hides behind indirectness. Those laws prey on men based on men habits and statistics. Just like laws against religious clothing or face covering are against Muslims and not Christians, speed limit laws against cars and not tractors. So if you have a tractor that drive faster than 50 km/h or if you arrive in school dressed as the pope these laws will apply, but realistically it's not the target or why they were made. I can find many other exemple of laws discriminating …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 02:00 PM
-2

Kid is better to live with the parent that earn more. Better standard of living, better model, also encourage people that earn more to keep earning more. And those that earn less to start earning more. It makes much more sense in fact. Also yes, if you earn more you can hire someone, and if you don't you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 12:03 PM
1

Women want money and kids. They can get it with being married, then they divorce to cancel their obligations and still keep both money and kids. Non-marital breakups usually involve less money and less kids. Sometimes it does, but some men doing the opposite counterbalance the women doing that: men want sex, they get it with a LTR promising women money and kids, then they breakup and cancel their obligations. That's why non-marital is more balanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 04:51 AM
-5

I can cite many: Primary caregiver gets custody. It favorise women. Judges judge based on their feelings, and their feelings is that mothers are more able to care for kids than fathers. The person earning more pays more. It favorise women because they earn less. In case of violence, the violent can lose several benefits, get kicked out. It favorise women because they are less violent and less seen as violent for an equal action. In case of allegation of violence credit is given to the woman. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 04:37 AM
-3

You contradict yourself. Primary caregiver are usually women, law fovorise primary caregiver, thus women. It's totally possible that we'd make the law to favorise primary earner for exemple, or the person not filling for divorce, or just men. So law favorise women. Just indirectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 04:23 AM
2

Sex for women = money for men. So the equivalent would be a man that give his money to other people not his wife, like a gambler
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 07:11 PM
5

I’m confused. Do you just want a bunch of girls who have no standards for you but high standards for everyone else? A virgin who doesn’t want sex with anyone else or a low count woman who has no libido before you, but once she meets you, she transforms into a high libido sexual fiend - after thr first or second date? Yes. It's basically whan men dream of. A woman who is crazy for them, but does not care about other men. ​ Is is realistic ? Not really. But that's still what men want. That and bei…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 03:21 PM
2

Women are faster to move on because they have only 10 years to make kids easily, and 10 to make kids with difficulty. Men have more than 2 times that. 20 years easily, 20 years with difficulty, and you can even add 20 more years if they are rich. So biological pressure to move on fast is lower on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 03:57 AM
-2

Wives cared for their husbands for millenia. That man children narrative is just a pro-divorce narrative. Men where always children, and it's not what's new. What's new is now women can divorce and retain all advantages (kids and money) while cancelling all obligations.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 01:02 AM
1

There are others parameters that lower the salary needed. It's not only height and salary, it's just that they made the study only with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 04:49 PM
1

I don't think it contradicts me. Are you talking about the part where men say it's important to "feel wanted" ? The problem is "feeling wanted" has different meaning for women and men. And that study explains it well in fact, they say feeling unwanted for men is about being rejected sexually even once in a while. It's not about enthusiasm, candles or whatever, it's just rejection. Of course different men have different sensibilities, some will feel rejected for different things. But all in all r…
/r/RedPillWomen02/10/22 06:42 PM
7

I think you are applying women's principles to men. I have no idea what means "emotionally rejected" or "emotional validation" for a man. Disinterested or disgusted sex is still sex. If I have disgusted sex every day, I won't think about sex. If I have disgusted sex twice a day, it will be physically impossible for me to have further sex, so impossible to physically cheat. I'm trying to be open minded. If I need another girlfriend, for exemple if I want kids and the current doesn't, I'll be seek…
/r/RedPillWomen02/10/22 03:03 PM
7

I disagree I'm a dude and there is no will to have sex if your barell is empty. It's also called sometimes post nut clarity. Women don't have that and that's why they don't understand it. Basically efforts men will put into having sex will augment with will to have sex (of course), which augment with time since last nut, with a maximum after about 7 days. So no, if a cheater's barell is kept empty, he'll not want to have sex or cheat. Now it depends on the man's libido wether we are talking abou…
/r/RedPillWomen02/10/22 01:50 PM
1

Dangerous pregnancies are 100% on the mother age. Old sperm just increase genetic mutations, so most of the time defects, and more rarely new perks. So while yes it's bad, it's nothing close to sterility bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:50 PM
3

someone has to do it No, someone want it done, and that person choose to do it. It's a choice, don't rephrase that as an obligation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:38 PM
2

Women are paid the same at same job and same hours worked, don't repeat that myth. Women want to work less at work, it's their own choice
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:59 PM
1

If women wanted to be treated as equal, they'd need to stop seeking money from their partner, because that's what an employee is, doesn't matter how much you get, even $5. Friends and equals don't accept money or will give back the exact same amount later.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:23 PM
0

Mammalian sex is usually rough Sex is usually rough, but mammalian sex is the most vanilla. Insects and arthropods is the wildest, between killing your partner, stabbing your partner stomach to death with your penis or destroying her vagina so others males can't copulate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:18 PM
1

most women do want to be treated as equals Not equal if the are expecting to get a man earning more and paying them stuff. They want to be treated as employees. In exchange for relationship, they expect to be paid, and get frequent raises. When they find better they leave, and some even get a golden parachute.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:09 PM
2

Problem with look is it's subjective and is influenced by money subconsciously. Women know your net worth through your clothes, habits, car, job, and what people say about you. So a dude pretty but poor will be seen as ugly. And a dude ugly but rich will suddenly have "unexplained beauty". It's totally different than men, men will see a poor cute girl as cute, and a rich cute girl as cute too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 09:41 AM
1

You can't discuss on exemples, because: maybe she'd be even MORE dysfuncitonal if her parents divorced, and you can't know. Maybe not and that situation is an outlier not representative of the majority. The only thing I say is all studies say it's statistically better. And exemples don't disprove statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 05:25 PM
1

Of course you can. That's basically what government is for.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:31 PM
0

Compatibility doesn't matter. People learn to live together when they have no choice. Unhealthy marriages make more healthy people/society than divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 04:56 AM
1

You don't like it, I get it, many people don't. Many people do stuff that harm them or harm society. Like drinking soda, smoking, etc... My point is it works better for people, and for society. Even if they don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:39 AM
1

Dude, I get the distribution model, what you don't get is men that want long term relationships are in the top of the basket, that's what women want. This is similar to young women's attractivity, and being cute for a woman is similar to being rich or popular for a man maybe. There are 2 problems: Women cannot know if a man wants long term because all men lie about it There is no contract for long term relationship. There is one but it can be cancelled anytime and it's dangerous for men. So both…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 11:46 PM
1

There is indeed a short supply of attractive fertile young women to go around There is none. 20 year olds are maybe harder to get if you are in the low of the basket, but 25 year old to 28 year old are easy they are desperate and many don't find anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 10:54 PM
-1

There is no short supply of young women. It's better be alone than with an old woman. Families actually make good choices because they want grandkids and no drama.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 10:26 PM
1

No it's false.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 09:49 PM
1

Living with two parents that dislike each other does not result in better mental development for kids It does and it's proven by many studies. Parent dislike for each other has no or few influence. It is entirely being separated that has an influence. My guess is because child learn from the interactions (even negative), while they don't learn from lack of interaction. Lack of interaction cause permanent damage (or lack of devellopment) to their brains (that's also proved albeit not in this case…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 09:46 PM
1

It's not exposure to parental conflict, it's exposure to having your parents separated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 08:23 PM
1

What you say is false, data says parents need to live together for better outcome. Separation with shared custody is not beneficial to the kids and to the country. Divorce doesn't effect children much Divorce affect children a lot
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 07:12 PM
-2

Being dumb is looking away from the data you don't like. Saudi Arabia is definitely more fine and kids healthier than is western civilisations.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 06:07 PM
-5

You don't know how it would have been if they separated, it could have been worse. Your parents actualy separated Some situations are different. Just because one situation is statistically better doesn't mean it's better in exactly all cases, so your experience is actually worth nothing statistically.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:54 PM
-3

Dude, there are extensive studies on that. Divorces fuck up kids mentally, and harm their devellopment, it least to higher mental problems, lower sucess in life, higher chance to land in prison. There is no discussion all data say the same thing. Divorce is forbidden in many countries, and people are just fine. And kids are healthier.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:49 PM
-4

Because it's good for the kids mental health, mental devellopment and give them more chances in life. It's also good for the country as separations decrease efficiency (more houses needed, more travels, more courthouse, more problems, less mentally healthy kids even once adults). And it also help people not resenting to each other, when they have no choice people make with what they have. Divorces actually worsen relationships. And finally it's what mariage is usefull to. What use is a marriage …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:02 PM
-8

So it would be fair to force you to be with a woman you found unattractive? Yeah, but people in my familly are choosing her for me. I trust their criterias, if I don't like her for her appearance I'll learn to, and still make her 8 kids. Women are taking the hit in attraction department because women have nothing much more to offer except youth if you want kids. And fertile women are by definition always hot. While men can offer money at the cost of their age, with only a low fertility drop.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 04:48 PM
-7

Women's choice, and men's choice too, are optional. Plenty societies work with arranged marriages. It works better than our system. The most important requirement a marriage needs is indissolubility. Not choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 03:55 PM
-12

Yes. Wtf is true attraction... Stroke in the back of my neck and warm smile... That's just how women react to bank accounts with more than 6 digits... trading that bullshit for indissoluble marriage any time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 03:46 PM
1

No, life always finds a way and this is easy to adapt to. Basically men thinking with their dicks are needed to fertilize women undateable on the long term. Without these charitable men, undateable women would have 0 offspring. So evolutionary speaking it has tremendous consequences, after one or few generations, women would evolve to be doing the only thing they could do to have offspring and attract men on the long term. Which is basicaly the red pill long term strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 04:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter