TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DrMasterBlaster Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by DrMasterBlaster on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

This is classic evolutionary psychology. We actually talked about this exact topic in class, but it's both interesting and disheartening to see it actually happen.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:51 AM
1

SES is the great mediator here. I had more in common with a poor black family than a rich white family growing up.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:07 AM
4

I agree the man should not be punished but is there concrete proof he is the victim of feminist persecution? How is the blurb at the bottom of the article any different than the typical feminist blaming the patriarchy for all societies ills? I also think this is getting attention because of his previous conviction for indecently assaulting a young boy. While viewing this material is most likely not a "slippery slope" scenario can we so easily attribute his actions as being innocent based on past…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:12 PM
3

I agree. I was just trying to think of something that would be a a punishment worse than death. I think the women have every right to be upset at all the provisions except the gender-neutral language of the law. If no women rape, then why worry about the gender neutrality of the law in the first place? That's akin to making drug laws minority-specific because God knows no white people would ever use or sell drugs.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:06 PM
2

I believe they are against the death penalty, and were hoping for more harsh punishments (torture? castration?)
/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:20 AM
5

Wow, using faulty logic of genetics to support her theories. It's as if she truly believes males and females are two distinctly different species. The color blindness proposal got to me, though. If X chromosomes are so magnificent and can repair themselves, why are women still the genetic carriers of male color blindness?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:50 PM
12

Never got accused of rape, but attempted rape by "putting something extra" into a girl's jello shot. Luckily I had an absolutely pristine reputation and no one believed it. Turns out she got shit-faced drunk and instead of admitting she had too much to drink, the guy being friendly with her had to have slipped her something. Can you imagine the awkwardness of trying to keep the spiked jello shots separate from the regular ones while I made them with my group of friends?
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:26 AM
-1

Yea but those are all the shitty countries. The best one I think would be Ukraine.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:55 PM
0

I'm sorry but I can't support the guy in the article. Law existed to protect sperm donors from from this exact scenario, but he circumvented those laws by donating directly AND not putting anything in writing between him and the couple. Yes, it is tragic he is being extorted for his act of kindness but why are we as MRAs pushing for fair law of we then choose to circumvent those very laws meant to protect us?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:59 PM
0

Look, everyone has a right to defend themselves, but I saw the video of the altercation and the driver absolutely destroyed her with a hard uppercut to the face. So many levels of altercation that could have taken place between her screaming and him obliterating her.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 11:04 PM
-7

Remind me to never invite you over for the holidays.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:42 AM
2

You are correct, sample size does affect statistical significance, and we unfortunately don't know the sample size Flynn used to conduct his study. When I meant a 5-point difference I meant comparing an IQ of, for example, 100 to 105. That, depending on a lot of other factors, may or may not be significant but considering an IQ scale ranges from 45 (-3 SD) to 145 (+3 SD), a 5-point difference is minuscule unless the sample derived from it is massive. Additionally, is the difference due to true c…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:15 PM
5

As a psychologist,there are so many issues with this article that it infuriates me. 1) Intelligence tests are a measure of cognitive ability, not factual knowledge or education level per se, though the concepts are correlated. While environmental advantages and disadvantages CAN affect performance (e.g. opportunity), there are IQ tests out there that aren't even word-based, meaning that basic skills like reading, writing, and arithmetic do not factor into test results. A good example of this typ…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 09:57 PM
1

Fellow OUer here. I've got to take the same mandatory training.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:58 AM
1

The OP mentioned that he looked around in his behavior science classes (psychology) and noticed far more females than males. You can't generalize between fields in a field-specific class, especially social sciences. In social sciences, females tend to outnumber males. Refer to this infographic here showing the % of PhDs being awarded to females in certain fields, and attend to the social sciences section. Almost 2/3's of all PhDs are granted to women. http://kieranhealy.org/files/misc/phil-all-d…
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:02 AM
-6

Very true, I am talking about averages of course, but in cases where those size and strength differences disappear, I imagine a different set of rules would need to be applied.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 11:59 PM
-2

I wouldn't know, I've never gotten that angry at anyone like that before.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 11:58 PM
7

The issue is that you are in behavioral science, or psychology, and along with other fields like sociology and education tend to have a large female interest. I'm not trying to invalidate your argument, because it is a valid one, but your observation of fellow students is a function of the field you are in.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 04:22 PM
1

Needs more graphic, less info.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:29 PM
1

I do think it is disgusting. The middle one should be "dumb dumb"
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:17 PM
1

What you are failing to see is that statistical risk DOES predict, to a high degree, individual conduct. Sure, there are a few outliers, but all in all they accurately predict the risk of young male populations. And profiling doesn't necessarily = discrimination. Also profiling DOESN'T mean discrimination. Discrimination is the use of a profile in a way that doesn't reflect reality, or that the profile is used in such a way that it disproportionately affects one party versus the other WHEN THERE…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 07:00 PM
1

It's not that it's being banned, but the differences in male and female crash rates are starting to disappear.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:31 PM
4

It's based on statistics, and statistics don't lie. It's profiling, sure, but it's not discrimination or sexism. Racism is a moot point because insurance is essentially a risk assessment, and young people get charged more because of their lack of experience, but males moreso because they are most likely to be in high cost accidents. Now imagine if they didn't charge based on statistically certifiable risk, everyone who isn't high risk would shoulder the additional cost this high risk group gener…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:15 PM
-2

It's not sexist. Men are more likely to cause or be in high-cost auto accidents, therefore they are a higher liability to insure. Edit: Insurance rates are based on statistics and you essentially pay your premium based on risk your profile as a driver presents the insurance company. For those comparing sex to race, IF IT WAS AN HONEST PREDICTOR OF RISK, you can be damned sure it would cost high risk races more for insurance. I can guarantee you somewhere in the files of each insurance company is…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter