TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DracoMagnusRufus Archive

View 1 post and 27 comments by DracoMagnusRufus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3630

DracoMagnusRufus/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 07:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Deliberate equivocation isn't a valid rebuttal. The position argued for is that physical attraction is higher with younger women, not psychological attraction to minds that lack "life experiences".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:51 AM
2

The same kind of person who is likely to assert that a man only wants to be with a younger woman because he can manipulate her more easily is also likely to be one to say men only care about looks. So, I don't think it's a consistent worldview at that point. If they operate based on looks, you've already explained their preference and don't need to resort to diagnosing them as manipulative predators to make sense of it. That's not to say you personally are doing that, but again, I don't think yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:49 AM
1

I think your comment is perfectly reasonable and I'd venture to say that OP probably does too. It seems you're missing the point, though. They weren't saying this is okay for men and not women. They merely said men shouldn't be shamed for it. And as another comment referred to, that is a common thing. You'll often see the claim that men would only prefer younger women because they're easier to manipulate and control and so forth.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:35 AM
1

Thing X is different from Thing Y. Wow! Good observation! The point is that they are both basic expectations in a monogamous relationship. If you don't feel that there's any obligation to meet these expectations, you should feel the same about "I don't feel like having sex with you this month" as "I don't feel like talking to you this month" or "I don't feel like showing any affection towards you this month". None of it is 'withholding' on the logic that it's sufficient to not feel like doing so…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:56 PM
18

It's not millions of years of evolution, it's Disney movies! Misandry has broken your brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 09:44 PM
3

It's like you're not trying to have a rational conversation. Self-reporting has its uses and it also has a lot of caveats. It also depends greatly on the type of questions being asked. In some areas, people are known to be particularly unreliable. You offered a correction to the other person (that the number referred to sex within the last 12 months versus lifetime). They said that it amounted to the same thing. You then said these men might be asexual. Do you actually believe that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 12:14 AM
1

You can if you want to. It doesn't matter to me. I'm just responding to your insistence that you're providing unquestionable data whereas the other person is just offering an interpretation. There is a high stigma around being a virgin, especially for young men. In addition, the study I linked explains that people often treat these kinds of questions as referring to their idealized selves: "Am I the kind of person who is into sex/should be having sex?".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 11:50 PM
5

Self-reporting on questions like this is highly inaccurate. The data isn't actually the percent of people who are virgins, but the percent who claim to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 11:34 PM
2

The comment section here.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/20 09:58 PM
10

The two victims identified him in a line-up and other witnesses identified him as well as being a person in that immediate area. That was the basis for the conviction. Later on, new DNA testing abilities showed that semen on the one victim's underwear was not the convicted man's. So it was a case of mistaken identity where the real perpetrator looked extremely similar to the innocent man. One could certainly argue that the four-fold eyewitness identification is not enough to overcome reasonable …
/r/MensRights17/11/19 10:58 PM
13

It's not really relevant to this case. The children victims were actual victims and the exonerated man resembled the perpetrator. There was no malicious intent on their part and it doesn't seem like the State was trying to railroad an innocent man either. It's a tragedy though, for sure.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:23 PM
13

So the UN shouldn't care about "empowering men", address issues that disproportionately victimize them, or highlight the sacrifice that overwhelmingly male journalists make because some members of a Sri Lankan peacekeeping group sexually exploited Haitians?
/r/PussyPass04/11/19 11:14 PM
19

And @UN_Men had the same Tweet but with "81% of journalists killed were men" so it all balances out. Just kidding, there's no such thing.
/r/PussyPass04/11/19 10:55 PM
44

You sure about that? Nothing relevant comes up when searching for "Vox Hillary Clinton NASA". No other articles show any indication of a letter being obtained either. In fact, I found an article debunking the idea that NASA keeps a record or that they would've said that to a girl writing in: Nor is there any at NASA’s end, I was told by NASA Headquatrers spokesman Bob Jacobs in a recent email exchange. “As you might imagine,” Jacobs wrote, “NASA received thousands of letters from young and old a…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/19 01:18 AM
324

Well, apparently she didn't appreciate his restraint since she has filed a lawsuit for negligence, battery (excessive force), false arrest, and malicious prosecution. According to her lawyer, she experienced a seizure and that's the reason she was driving poorly and acting uncooperative. That might be plausible if not for her documented history of similar incidents. Back in 2015, she had hit a utility pole and then left the scene. When she was caught, she was charged with that in addition to pos…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 10:38 PM
15

If you adjust for extended time alone with children (I have not seen numbers for this but women obviously have far more of it than men) men would be about a zillion times more dangerous per extended solo contact hour. Why should we be adjusting for that in the first place? You'd have to establish that the primary risk factor in a parental child killing scenario is the amount of extended solo contact hours before adjusting data based on it.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 07:18 AM
3

That's not at all what I said though. You said a black kid in the 50s would have nobody to look up to because there weren't black fictional characters. That implies that skin color is a necessary prerequisite of identifying with a character. I'm saying when there is nobody to identify fully with, that's bad. I'm not sure what full identification is. Sounds like that would require a fictional character that was just a carbon copy of me. It can be skin color, or language, or economic status, or lo…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 02:10 AM
4

The starting premise here seems to be that people can't identify with a fictional character unless they have the same skin color. Do you think that's a inherent facet of human biology or something learned? If it's inherent, do you have the same assumption with a myriad of other physical features? Like I won't be able to identify with a fictional character if they're taller than me or skinnier. If it's something learned, do you think we should encourage it or attempt to change it? Telling people …
/r/MensRights11/12/18 01:10 AM
4

Let's say I come across a crowdfunding campaign for someone with cancer. Being a sympathetic person, I donate money to it. Later on I find out that they faked it for money. Would I lose sympathy for people who really have cancer? No, I wouldn't. But I would learn that it's irrational to accept claims unconditionally. So later on when I come across another crowdfunding campaign for a purported cancer victim, I make sure their diagnosis is credible. That's what happens when there are high profile …
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:27 PM
6

Probably Bingham County Sheriff Craig Rowland. He claimed initially "the majority of our rapes that are called in, are actually consensual sex." Then, after criticism, he retracted that and revised his statement to say that "In some of these cases through the investigation it may be determined that the sex was consensual, but not always."
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:28 AM
1

Let's suppose that the facts available to us are completely unambiguous in supporting the conclusion that it was murder. It's still the case that the woman hasn't been convicted of murder. So it remains more neutral language to refer to the specifics of the events rather than the likely outcome of a pending trial. Edit: Nevermind. The trial is over so no reason to refrain from calling it murder.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/17 09:37 AM
0

I think OP was just trying to use neutral language. The fact that the husband died doesn't mean that the wife committed a crime. She may be telling the truth after all, maybe she did act in self-defense. So it's correct that the mere fact that a man died does not entail that the cause of his death was a criminal act.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/17 09:19 AM
1

Not really. She didn't hit a character limit or anything. She said her side, it was just vague to the point of meaninglessness. Probably because she couldn't articulate a real reason they sucked, just bitter over the movie not playing.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 04:57 AM
1

The part where she said they sucked... If there was only one issue which 1) wasn't their fault 2) they apologized for and 3) they issued refunds for, then they don't suck.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 04:52 AM
3

Well, I don't know the history of the sub or anything. Just that the subs allows for sort of tangentially related posts. You can kinda see the "theme" at work here, even though the woman on Twitter is most likely never going to see the response on 4chan. It's more like a purely intellectual rebuttal to her claim of victimhood. I get your concern with it being off topic though. You don't want the sub to lose focus on it's primary purpose.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/17 02:04 AM
3

No, it's not a PPD technically. But the sub isn't restricted to them either. You can see how it's relevant if you think about it. She's claiming that as a woman she has a victim status of being discriminated against financially. The response is showing that by her logic she can only be a victim if she chooses to be, since obviously she's free to buy either version. So the 4chan poster is denying her the victim status she's seeking.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/17 01:44 AM
44

There's evidence of her prior intent to be violent from three things: 1) her tweet about wanting to get "nazi scalps"* 2) wearing fighting gloves 3) bringing an empty liquor bottle to use as a weapon. There's evidence of her actually being violent from three things: 1) the photograph of her being shoved while brandishing an empty liquor bottle* 2) the video footage of that same incident where she's about to hit a blonde person in a red shit with said bottle* 3) the video footage of a few seconds…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 07:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter