TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dragonsoul Archive

View 0 posts and 99 comments by Dragonsoul on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

While that's true...she's on the internet. If you say /anything/ on the internet you will get Death Threats, ask anyone who has posted content to the internet and you'll find that. Now I'm not saying that she /should/ have gotten that stuff...but really, it's to be expected.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:24 PM
-1

Reeaallly...do go on about these wealthy farmers. I'd simply /love/ to know more. Passive Aggressiveness aside, farmers /aren't/ wealthy, except asset wise, most of them make less then the minimum wage if you actually work it out to an hourly rate.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:25 PM
5

Okay, this is about a /single/ company, so they've already demonstrated sexist paying conditions, so they aren't gonna then be full "Let's all stare at the bottom line" for hiring, but since they are by my logic, at the very least overlooking the higher cost of woman, then again, by my logic men are going to be paid slightly /under/ the going rate (assuming a consistent salary budget across it and its competitors) and so men are going to go elsewhere for their employment. A second thought occure…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:30 AM
5

It'll actually be interesting to watch that company. My mental logic of what will happen is that Woman will eventually edge out the men in the company, and then be paid slightly less than average to make up for Super
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:50 AM
10

If you read the article, it's just /one/ business that has done it, not something endemic.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:17 AM
10

Remember that alcohol removes consent, so that "Yes" was irrelevent.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:42 PM
47

Ohh.../filming/ girls sunbathing? CREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP!
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:40 AM
2

Um... Looks up 101 Points "Most voted comment" ...11 Points
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:21 AM
2

I did mention how the system is kinda sucky? Also, I believe that a man can adopt the child out if they have sole custody, its just that that never happens. Now, I'm all for increased male parental rights, but not at expense to the child, because fuck that.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:31 PM
1

Y'see, here's the shit of the thing. /Every/ System will be abused, so generally you can only select one group to not get screwed over. Children in this case. In an ideal world..yes, we would have some wonderful system that everyone benefits from..but we also wouldn't have all those shitty men and woman. So..Shrug The only thing that can be done is create a social climate where spending the Childrens allowance on yourself is a gigantic dck move.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:51 AM
1

A man should still pay for /his/ kids, in the same way a woman should pay for hers. That is basic ethics.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 08:12 AM
6

Be strong as a Cours-ing river!
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:35 PM
8

I think it's rather a case that everyone agrees with the overarching stated goal of Feminism, but has great issue with its implementation.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 06:10 PM
1

Um..no, those calves are raised on Artificial Milk (In the EU anyway, but I can't imagine perfectly good calf going to waste)
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:18 PM
33

I've actually had one ethical Vegetarian sell his point to me. He once went hunting and couldn't kill and animal, so he considered it hypocracy to let others kill an animal for him..so he doesn't eat meat. I disagree with that..but I respect it.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:15 PM
9

Should I make the subredditdrama post now and save time?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:18 AM
1

Quiet voice I can see where your coming from, even if I may not quite agree with you /Quiet voice Hides behind a fridge
/r/MensRights17/02/13 09:20 AM
2

I would say yes- With the caveat that a mother spending the child support on herself would be a crime, this whole rigmarole of "Woman get the chance the divulge themselves of irresponsibility why can't men" really is fine and dandy, but if the kid is born...he needs to be looked after, and while I'm all for equality, it shouldn't be at the expense of an innocent child. Personally I'm against Abortion except on medical grounds, but that's just me...feck it this is far to complicated to be painted…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 03:11 PM
-2

That is because I feel it is more of a case that a legitimate movement has been appropriated by something else, there is still a perfectly legitimate movement called "Feminism". There is a second Movement calling itself "Feminism", when its actually "Misandry",This is where we get NAFALT.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:32 PM
2

It really isn't. It's much more that Feminists have a very broad definition of the word Feminism, for most of them it's "We want all the nice things that the men get/We don't think that the mens should have that", which is fair enough- Indeed it's basically Genderflipping what the MRA want. The trouble arises when they are asked "What is equality for you"- We then get the grass is greener problem where both sides can only see where they have been wronged and dont think the other side's problems …
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:09 PM
1

Goddamnit, Goodwin'd already? Pack it up people, we're done here.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:31 AM
1

Actually Ireland is getting pretty good with its gender neutrality in this regard
/r/MensRights12/01/13 02:33 PM
5

k, I'm going to disagree in general with this but perhaps refine the point you may have somewhat. The problem isn't that Samueal L.Jackson can't "smack a bitch" it's that he can't smack her back. Basically, you want society to view violence the same no matter who is giving or receiving, if Sheila want to slap Adam for his wandering eyes, she has to accept a smack for complaining for two hours about the toilet seat being down. Of course we could say that all violence is wrong, but it will always …
/r/MensRights12/01/13 02:32 PM
2

Actually, I'm not. He is complaining that he was thrown out of a class for expressing a viewpoint contrary to the commonly held viewpoint in said class, I also objectively know that people tend to give favorable accounts of there actions, which would indicate that he was ruder in that class than he claims he was. This train of thought is not influenced by the subject matter or my own personal beliefs on that subject.I really don't see where you are coming from.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:55 PM
2

No. You have to judge everything on its own merits, disregarding evidence because it doesn't fit with your world view is dishonest.Se what's there-not what you want to be there..<Trail of into philosophical musing on the nature of perception of truth and reality>
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:07 PM
2

Well, he sounds like a bit of a tit,and we are getting his side of the story.I'm willing to bet he was faar more obnoxious in that class then he was letting on.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:58 PM
2

Shut up scientist meet a real logistician, me a maths graduate..... I'm not following this up with anything, because it's a meaningless statement-just because you can "pull rank" on a field doesn't make that field any less valid. Most of all don't do then talk about your opinion, if you're going to be a smug, self satisfied douche, don't be a hypocrite as well.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:44 PM
7

Oh yes "good mother" except for the bit where she beat her son to death..that's like being a good bank employee except for the bit where you took all the money.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:19 PM
-1

Yeah, He's basically a rule 63 Radfem, take his comments with a large dose of salt.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:55 PM
21

I don't think it's a stretch to say that a lecturer and professor of the subject represents the mainstream
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:01 PM
12

It's not a conspiracy really, it's a little more complicated. First thing to know is that people tend to have an internal narrative of how the world works, formed at a young age and is very difficult to shift. So people, when looking at evidence, mentally shift it to support their viewpoint and it usually takes a conflict of viewpoints to change one of them (Here you will see this as the "The courts are fair" vs "I am being treated appropriately by the courts" and finding that one of them must n…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 07:57 PM
0

I think the problem is the idea that saying men have issues implies that women don't..which isn't true. Indeed it isn't so much that men face greater issues-it's that those issues aren't being addressed, and anyway- noone wants to be told that it isn't societies fault for there failed career/relationship/whatever so they reject any contrary theory because they don't want it to be true. The actual truth of the matter is irrelevant. This is made worse by the institution of Feminism you add a butt-…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:19 PM
17

That's because that a "combatant" is any male over a certain age(16 I think) according to your MOD, of course there are no male civilian casualties.. because according to the army *they don't exist"<Of course this is all out of a desire to keep civilian deaths low for publicity reasons>
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:34 PM
1

Yeah, but I kinda see downsides to decentivising Child birth....from a continuation of a species point of view
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:39 PM
1

True...On the other hand, I think societally we've "decided" that a child is a good enough reason to take time out of work and shouldn't be penalised. The crux of the problem is that only one gender has an action they can take which is both required for continuation of the human race and prevents them form working for a period of time. It's impossible to achieve parity when you have a massive biological difference like that..so you have to accept a small amount of disparity. We've tried the Baby…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:35 PM
1

I'm not disputing whether or not this group or that is, on average, more of a "risk", I'm pretty sure you can find statistical significant differences in productivity between different groups...I'm saying It's not right for employers to make decisions based on what the group as a whole is like..if a large scale problem exists, its for goverment to solve(If your into that sort of thing) I'll take a personal example, I'm an Irish who is moving to Australia pretty soon-where the Irish have a reputa…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:00 PM
1

True, but morality comes into play at some point-else we just enslave our workers and be done with it, people should be judged on there own merits, not based on the merits of whatever group you are part of .
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:17 PM
2

Yeah, but it isn't right to discriminate a whole group based on overarching statistics on the group-People should be given a fair shot on there own merits.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:12 AM
5

647 IIRC
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:06 AM
1

What about the one above, that was posted before you posted this?
/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:04 PM
-2

I'm pretty sure the only difference between drag and cross dress is...actually what is the difference? I think drag is just "ironic" cross dressing.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:03 PM
2

:3 .. .... ... :(
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:58 AM
22

How many MRAs does it take to change a light bulb? It doesn't matter-They still won't get to see their kids.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:07 AM
1

I think it's because at the core, a lot of the goals of the movements are mutually exclusive, more reproductive rights for men means less child support checks for woman. More Job initiatives for woman means less jobs for men. While there are some things that could be changed to help one side without harming the other(We could maybe tone down the cheesecake in popular media) a lot of it is Zero sum. N.B: This is not a comment on the relative merits of the positions-merely commenting on a primary …
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:57 AM
5

The most powerful person in the last thousand years(Going by land mass controlled) was female.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:15 PM
4

Well, based on the fact that this guy is a 0 day account that has only posted here, and the fact that even the most misogynistic people try to maintain a veneer of respectability..I'm going with false flag.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:13 PM
7

Unfortunately...yes This is the key of innocent until proven guilty, it applies even when it sucks for you. The logic is that the crime of punishing an innocent (wo)man is far and away worse than letting a guilty man go free. The innocent must not be afraid of the law. Let me spin it around, would you like to be in a world where you could be convicted of a crime merely on another's say so? That is what you are proposing....that is not a good thing to want.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 12:45 AM
-20

It's the first word in the sentence,stop looking for things to be offended about
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:16 AM
3

Aw..Isn't he adorable ^^ He thinks he's trolling.... Aw, go on tell me I'm mad! I always enjoy a persons first forays into trolling! srsly though, get a bit more subtle, there is more to trolling then going unto a subreddit spouting some bullshit that is contrary to the running opinion of that place, get a few replies then turning around shout LOL I TROL U!
/r/MensRights20/11/12 11:50 AM
9

Sean Connery, Maybe it should be a sliding scale "You must this gay to like this man"
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:40 PM
4

He doesn't count... Frankly we need a category "It's not gay if you want them" Men
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:32 PM
3

Unless he's that guy from the American movie....
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:29 AM
2

Or just throw a Question mark at the end.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:31 PM
4

I think this is an interesting case, not so much because of any "Discrimination" but because of a mismatch between rhetoric and motives, If the primary motive of the care system is efficiency then yes, giving the child to a parent off a arbitrary value is the best option, and gender would be the most logical as in relationships with children it is binary and can be determined wit the naked eye(As opposed to something like income or Free time).And the mother would be the most logical here, just b…
/r/MensRights11/11/12 01:34 AM
4

He is right you know, gender segregation isn't inherently a bad thing- it's not like Racial segregation where there isn't any difference other than an irrelevant chromatic one, girls and boys are different. If you want your son to be in a science club, start your own! Make it a "boys" science club-you could even get a bit of friendly rivalry going. I short save your vitriol for topics that matter, this is like complaining about all the weak female characters in the Media-One can construe it as a…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:56 AM
12

Keep thinking that: It makes you a better person.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:52 PM
5

Outrageous!
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:09 PM
-1

No. I disagree. Feetfirst. Headfirst is far to quick.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:27 AM
2

Shrug The problem with anecdotal evidence is that everyone's is different, I've worked on a farm for hours on end, and I can tell you-after chasing cattle around a field(In the rain) for hours on end, most jobs seem cushy in comparison.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:08 PM
1

I'd be talking more of the Reading a book+ Stirring a pot kind of deal.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:02 PM
1

Maybe I value the ability to take multiple short breaks a bit too much....
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:46 PM
2

I have: While there are outside jobs that are easier, Housekeeping ranks pretty low on the difficulty of jobs.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:41 PM
3

Y'know, Maybe we should follow this to its logical conclusion, just let woman run everything, we can stay at home and look after the kids- Frankly I'd prefer keeping house,cooking and cleaning to most jobs out there
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:04 AM
1

Though I'd add a caveat to the incest that they better where contraception...you don't want any incesto babies.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:35 AM
7

Your really not helping our case here.....
/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:00 PM
1

40% Lets he honest here
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:16 PM
1

Here's the thing..and it pretty much cuts to the core of all these "Gender wars"..It's always a zero sum game. Increased Job opportunities for women makes it harder for men to get a job, better access rights for men means women have less time with there children..increased funding for womens sports means less for men(Since they never increase funding for sports overall). So this means its not about increasing "rights" or other silliness, its about achieving balance..and who determines balance? T…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:13 PM
6

Though, I will admit, quite a good troll- played to all the cliches, but stayed just this side of believability to keep people going. Slow clap Bravo Eyesfurtherup Bravo. Seriously though, I love watching a good bit of trolling go down.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:57 AM
3

ok, 74% of Children are Raised by both parents, from single parents its an 84/16 split, this means that 78% of Children are raised by there father and 95% of Children are raised by their mother. Taking the 37%/19% statistic above, running a bit of math... we discover that 51% of child abusers are female, less yes..and within statistical error of a 50/50 split...but it shows *that men STILL are less likely to abuse a child than a women(Or, at least, a women is just as likely to abuse a child)
/r/MensRights09/09/12 01:48 AM
1

Read the article, the OP is editorializing.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:07 PM
5

"Misunderstood?" He misquoted in a very direct way "But it is a crime committed by the male, not the female -- and certainly not by the child it might produce" Is the correct quote, which has completely different connotations
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:00 PM
-2

Existence of the universe ideal for habitation (Goldilocks hypothesis), and of course the fact that any theoretical diety that didn't want to evidence of his existence would easily be able to hide it...eh religion is a terrible thing to discuss on the internet as people are set in there beliefs and won't change
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:48 PM
4

I think in a sense they do, since you can't empirically "prove" a lack of a greater power, the most you can do is say on balance its "unlikely". (I'm not one to talk though, I'm much more of a theistic agnostic)
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:28 PM
3

It's slightly different, because there are many atheists nowadays that "Believe" in atheism. Rather than taking the Absence of evidence as evidence of absence approach, I mean look at /r/atheism how many of them are capable of better arguments then ridiculing the "old man in the clouds" idea?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 09:48 PM
14

Not if it's on 4Chan, it is all fiction there, some of it might have a basis in reality, but its all fiction.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:58 PM
18

Indeed, did you see the sequel where he escaped from angry woman by the use of the spaghetti in his pockets/s, its 4chan ffs- none of its true, its written at the top of the page that none of its true
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:19 PM
7

Its 4chan, if you saw the top of the page you'd see a little disclaimer sating that all within is fiction.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:17 PM
5

Isn't that un-constitutional? Double Jeopardy laws are a thing in America right?
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:00 PM
1

Cunt is gendered? Which way? In my vernacular(Ireland) its aimed towards men more than women, but the context here seems to make me think its the other way around... I'd use cunt as a generic indication of a person that was being ignorant...Why does everything have to be gendered? We aren't the French you know.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 11:20 AM
2

Of course Women are discriminated on the basis of their gender noone (Sane) tries to deny this, but the problem lies in the fact that the other side of the coin Discrimination that is detrimental to Men and the basis of their gender (I won't bore you with examples). The concern lies in fact that it isn't recognized. The sad fact that the world sucks for almost everyone in one way or another and human nature wants someone to blame, and so movements spring up around trying to find a reason that yo…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:54 AM
1

Indeed, It's not the tools that define the subject; it's what you do with them, I'd like to think that much of maths if useful and applicable in the real world, but I would admit that there is many professors that get lost in the theory.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 07:31 PM
8

So men are the "Expansion pack"? :p
/r/MensRights21/03/12 07:17 PM
1

Philosophy is a much larger field then that, although much of Philosophy is about critical thought there is stuff like moral philoshy much can get very..floaty at times. And very good, you use truth tables, they are a mathematical construct that merely structure a logical process, just because its jargon doesn't make it of any high intellectual value.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 07:16 PM
2

........no Just no If you have ever say, worked on a building site, or a farm, or any other long day with constant physical exertion you wouldn't think that.While I do not deny it is work or that it would take effort on a scale of "things that are tiring" A desk job is not high.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 09:10 AM
4

Of course, since schools have a 50/50 gendered split (If anything they tend to a slightly higher proportion of girls), then logically somewhere there are classes where there are more boys than girls. That out of the way, actually there is no real problem with the basic idea. If a girl has a casual intrest in it, but not enough to put up with the shit they have to go through as "the minority" then ok, I don't object. However they must consider these problems- 1)This creates a full gender divide, …
/r/MensRights23/01/12 08:53 AM
4

Please tell me that this is just Poe's Law in effect...
/r/MensRights20/01/12 11:37 PM
3

Same in Ireland, (Though we also, under certain circumstances, can use them to shoot tinkers)
/r/MensRights11/01/12 03:45 AM
2

So your saying that there aren't men who would want to raise any biological offspring they had and/or no woman would ever abort instead of carrying a baby they didn't want to term...and that is what your saying I'm not twisting your words.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 08:53 PM
1

I'll rephrase a little tidier- The mother at the moment has full say on whether the child is born, if a child is unwanted by both parties it is because both sides screwed-up, after contraception is your own responsibility, not your partners. If the mother wants a baby and the father doesn't- Why should he have to pay for a child he doesn't want. If the father wants to raise the child, he should be able to block the abortion and raise the child himself, getting child support (Unless the above abi…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 08:03 PM
3

Congratultions! its a pony!
/r/MensRights08/01/12 07:39 PM
1

TL:DR= Poe's Law all up in here!
/r/MensRights03/01/12 01:16 AM
22

Lets get something clear- /srs is a troll subreddit, they exist solely to elicit a reaction- they have no "higher cause". Just treat them like trolls, skilled trolls I'll admit, hiding this side of Poes law, but Trolls nonetheless, they go after /MRA because to be fair, its pretty easy to rile you guys up.A group have set themselves up as stereotypical Feminazis and we fell for it hook,line and sinker.Just calm down and look at them as the joke they are. Whats really funny is some of the comment…
/r/MensRights22/12/11 05:42 AM
1

The problem is that the "outliers" are getting screen time and the legitimacy associated with that, chain this with Feminist studies being a thing you can study(As apposed to gender studies, which while it occasionally is the same thing, at least tries, as a field of study, to be neutral) it means young women have got a societal bias towards a position farther from the "Men and woman are equal" theoretical ideal than an average man gets. An intresting look on this is if you examine the "sexist j…
/r/MensRights21/12/11 10:57 PM
4

I would be more charitable and suggest that its like all things in the world-Most people are decent in the movement, but the fuckwits are the ones shouting the loudest, which is sad really but the decent people are usually no nice to tell Ms Fuckwit that shes rather silly and should review her statements(That goes for the guys too)
/r/MensRights21/12/11 08:57 PM
2

Yes, this place is showing bias, of course it is. Every group that has sought to further its cause is biased. The issue is whether or not the group has a point,whether or not they are being marginalised. And again all movements have extremists, we can look to the other side of the gender divide and for every nutter here there is one there(and vica versa). The best thing I find is start a conversation with the rational ones. The nutters are always going to shout the loudest, its the way these thi…
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:52 PM
0

Its less of a legal thing and more of a moral thing, you know "Half your age +7" and all that, I believe the above never mentioned the legality, merely the morality-Which are very different things.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 06:08 PM
2

Lies, Damn Lies and statistics.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:20 AM
8

Actually read it 80% of all child abusers are the father, foster father, stepfather or another relative or close family friend of the victim. -Its technically the truth, which means you can't call them on, so they deliberately parsed the sentence that way to mislead people.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:10 AM
2

To be fair, I'm pretty sure I could find some assholes blog of a man who manipulates women for his own gain and benefit, certinly the article linked, isn't shown approval for the scheme, merely noting its effectiveness- and to be fair both attractive men and women can lever there attractiveness for gain
/r/MensRights02/12/11 11:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter