TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Drakengard Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by Drakengard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Supposed to be, but reality is that "freedom" slides quickly into luxury territory when you're protecting the existence of a nation/state. I get why it's unfair and I won't disagree with the implementation needing to be addressed. But at least within the argument of conscription, I find that the discussion trends quickly towards ideological purity at the cost of addressing the elephant in the room that your freedom is tied largely to the peaceful nature of most western democracies. Take away the…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:10 PM
2

It's a Zoolander joke.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 06:32 PM
6

I don't know of a situation where the child was aborted and child support was still being paid though. I think that's the main point being asked here.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:54 PM
27

Tbf, sexist men hide it because they'll actually be punished for it. It's not because they're being considerate.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 06:27 PM
1

No? Needing to establish that you're not some puppet sitting on a throne would be pretty important and it's not like that would be a women only situation either. If you don't raise a challenge you just welcome further belligerence. My point is that a queen was probably more likely to be tested on that front than a king would be. Further, I'd like to see the study in question. First, because I'm curious what the sample size is (I suspect kings are more common than queens so a few war mongering qu…
/r/MensRights24/05/21 09:42 PM
6

I feel like that could be just as explained by other things such as women rulers being seen as weak and so needing to go to war over less to drive home the point that they wouldn't be pushed around. Sure, it is possible that they react worse over small slights. But the circumstances surrounding that are varied enough that I don't like the blanket conclusion being drawn up.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 02:29 PM
17

In other words, you're not willing to put in even a minimal effort. So why should we bother to help you?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 07:56 PM
73

Also, when women engage in violence, they're much less likely to inflict bodily harm than men are when they engage in violence against their partners I understand the point, but it really has no place in the discussion. It suggests that this kind of behavior is tolerable because they don't do 'harm'. Harm is not simply a matter of physical injury from an assault. It's a question of a person no longer feeling safe in their the one place that they should be - physically and mentally. It's unaccept…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 06:32 PM
15

Because it turns out that (shockingly) no one wants to be compulsively conscripted into likely dying in a war if they can help it.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 06:52 PM
3

The part where she gets all 'either my career or a divorce' I can't side with though. That just ridiculous. But if her career and education is really so narrow that it could damage her irreparably in the industry, I don't fault her at all. It's not like this would blindside the husband. He would be well aware of the problem. I can't possibly think of a single situation where I would choose a new damn JOB over a loving spouse, nevermind one who is making the money that she's making (with more hea…
/r/MensRights28/08/20 05:43 PM
1

That's a bit much, no? I've known plenty of people with decent parents who end up being terrible people because they made their own choices. You don't know the mother so why should we conclude that their opinions are the result of a bad mother? It could just as much be bad experience with women in his own peer group, teachers, and other adult women that are not his mother.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 03:07 PM
4

But the sand is painted green!
/r/MensRights07/07/20 01:11 PM
0

The sub is overly attached to the fact that they couldn't swear anymore. That happens and it's not a big deal and just know your people and what they are comfortable with. But that wasn't the main reason why they excluded her or pushed her out. They just didn't like her and she was just constantly reporting on everything. He only really brings up the first point because this was the beginning of a pattern of behavior that lead to everyone really disliking her. Impromptu after work socializing ca…
/r/MensRights03/07/20 05:58 PM
4

Because shock humor is a thing. It starts with something shocking - "Avoid men" - before breaking down it's actual meaning. Whether you find it funny or not is going to be up to the person.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 04:17 PM
21

Sure, but the acronym was intentionally chosen specifically to insult men as being stupid and/or dangerous and insinuate that women are to be emulated because they're...better? Even knowing it's intended to be humorous, it's done in poor taste.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 02:42 PM
2

It doesn't surprise me at all, honestly. If they're choosing to live in a more traditional gender role when they don't have to, it's likely because they perceive a value and advantage in it rather than just outright dismissing it as being constructed for them by some evil male dominated entity. And from that perspective, they probably regularly witness and evaluate all of the things men intentionally sacrifice of themselves for their spouses and children The problem for devout feminists is that …
/r/MensRights30/04/20 07:06 AM
0

It's a shame, but people don't seem to understand that a lot of economic stuff has a ton of lag. It takes a long time to see the result of economic policies passed years ago. Capital investment and jobs don't happen overnight. They takes years for businesses to adjust to and grow into. Which also means that unemployment numbers tend to lag as well because sustained growth leads to long term hiring. The current state of the economy is rarely the result of the existing administration's actions. We…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 04:06 PM
31

To be fair 39% of income reduction across a career over a one-year maternity leave is still extremely harsh. Well, I can think of some ways that this happens. 1) They didn't return to their original workplace or field of work and instead opted for something less demanding of their time and more flexible on being out for their kids 2) They went back to work as part-time employees rather than full-time employment.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:51 PM
4

The guy is literally just stating a fact Then he's going to have to source it because while we all like to believe that bad boys get all the women, it's anecdotal at best and becomes a go to excuse for people. Maybe those guys with "criminal" issues also have positive traits that make them attractive to women. Figure out what those are and try and make yourself better. Being a good person doesn't mean you don't have negative aspects. Just avoiding jail doesn't make you a great catch.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:26 PM
7

I'll give this advice. The number of people from high school I saw once I was in college could be counted on one hand and my interactions with them over 4 years counted on both, if even one. After college, I see even less and I'm still largely living local to where I went to school and grew up. Those people you see right now largely don't matter and never will and that includes teachers and other adults. If you go to a university far away, there's a very good chance you'll never have to see or i…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 08:39 PM
2

One would presume that this was done with the expectation that more women would join the ranks over time and that these same accommodations, if amortized over the years, will be worth the implementation. That's probably too optimistic and this was probably just done in spite of the fact of their eventual usage being way under, but it is a possibility...
/r/MensRights12/12/16 07:25 PM
7

Except in the UK most police aren't carrying guns.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 10:46 PM
13

Except they'll argue that these girls were poisoned before this point because of cultural norms. There is no winning until you isolate girls from boys for their entire lives, keep them away from society in general, marketing, etc. so they can't possibly be tainted by modern social norms that push and pull people's interests so they fall comfortably within expectations for their gender. Since the above is impossible, we're still evil. /s
/r/MensRights16/09/16 07:55 PM
1

They started having to pump out content every day instead of a once a week. When you start stretching your content too thin you're pretty much done.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:46 PM
1

Also, I'm concerned about the graph that breaks down what weapon was on the suspect. Having a gun is not a crime in the US in most cases. It can be, but just because the suspect had a gun on him doesn't mean that he was imminently dangerous to warrant being killed by the police. There's too much context lost in that situation that a graph is unable to represent.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 11:35 PM
12

It sounds like they were both incredibly stupid with their money and now hate each other. I don't like the ruling, but they're both screwed at this point.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:33 PM
5

You can also conclude that big wasteful weddings possibly hint at overall lack of monetary responsibility which is not an issue limited to the woman in the relationship.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:27 PM
2

If we don't laugh we'll just end up killing ourselves. Not that we aren't all doing that at an alarming rate as it is...
/r/MensRights09/02/16 05:15 PM
43

Jonathan Swift's metaphor for academia with the floating island of Laputa is still so on point it's sad. They really do just have their heads in the clouds and have lost perspective on what it's actually like for everyone else.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 03:36 PM
25

Instead of just saying it's wrong, please tell people why it's false. Stop being passive aggressive about others being wrong if you're not going to actually tell them why.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 04:32 PM
1

The problem, of course, is that if you kill yourself they probably don't have to pay out.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 05:11 PM
13

I don't think that was the point. It's not that girls feel worse, they just take criticism differently or at least teachers dispense it differently. And if this difference in treatment does hurt their ability to function at a higher level in the real world, that does technically make them victims. But their being treated with kid gloves doesn't mean that boys aren't victims of gender expectations in their own way. It's entirely independent problems stemming from the same issue: that of teachers …
/r/MensRights21/10/15 01:11 PM
2

they need to suck start a pistol. Ouch, but I can definitely understand why you feel that way. Also, I hope you eventually are able to find some semblance of normalcy.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:47 PM
2

what is wrong with opening up all specialties to everyone? Nothing, so long as it's done on the basis that as a group things work functionally the same or better than a homogeneous group of all men. The danger of letting political correctness gain sway in the military is that people will die or face increased danger due to a less cohesive group.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:18 AM
1

My wife and I rape each other constantly You monsters were clearly made for each other.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:42 PM
1

"I don't know what happened, but that other story sounded better to me." We'd be better off flipping a coin is what this tells me. That or using a Magic 8 Ball.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 01:46 PM
135

Because they have to live with the pain of loss. It's so much worse, man. You just don't understand! /s
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:31 PM
13

Suicide is often the result of mental health issues. You can't seriously be comparing women taking jobs in lower paying fields, starting full-time work later in life, and retiring earlier on the same level as men suffering from mental issues that result in them killing themselves on the belief that their lives are someone of no value.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 07:35 PM
7

When you say "doing better", how is that being measured? Algermas's comment suggests potentially easier concentrations of study which could skew results if you're focused only on graduation rates, GPA, class rank, etc.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:58 PM
6

He follow up response is actually pretty calm about it. She doesn't seem to mind that they are all male groups. She seems more concerned with the forced addition of women just so the network can pretend that they're being accommodating.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 05:21 AM
2

You missed it. You and your friend are also hardly the only women to deliberately get pregnant without letting the man in on your plan, as objectionable as that behavior is. And honestly, she isn't a monster. She was stupid and as a result she hurt a lot of people, but that's about as much as you can judge her on her actions.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:39 AM
6

While true, that still wouldn't stop her from turning it into a thing about the company being sexist. What it comes down to is that if they have any intention of letting her go, they'll need to find another reason that happens down the road that keeps them from losing face.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:15 AM
5

Quick, someone arrest this redditor! He's giving people dangerous ideas!
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:20 PM
16

As a Christian man, I'm am so terribly sorry about your family. That's not right at all. I continue to be appalled by those who go to church who seem to forget so easily what it truly means to be a Christian. I'm certainly no saint, but to have such gossip and lies floating about - especially by your own family - is nothing short of tragic for you.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 12:22 AM
0

That's not the point. You use it because the connotation is bad, not because it is a factual representation of the act committed. You use it to steer the dialogue in your direction. It's misrepresentation and wrong.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 12:57 AM
-2

When you're a kid your parents must make the best health decisions for you. So long as it is a medical health question, it will and should be a decision made by parents first and foremost. If they want to leave it up to their son until he's older, that's their choice but parents shouldn't be removed from making the what they believe is the best choice for their child.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:57 PM
-8

Shhh! Don't confront them with facts. Hell, just look at what they're trying to call it now. It's male circumcision. Not mutilation. By why use mutilation? Because it makes a supporter sound like a monster. It's a poor and degrading appeal to emotion rather than fact. Parents obviously have the decision power and always should. They MUST look out for their children in what way they think best. Recommendation of male circumcision is not the same as making it mandatory.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:55 PM
2

Close enough.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:21 AM
1

No, that's not the real issue. The problem is a mix of lack of respect for other people (admittedly women over there are treated like crap) and a caste system that makes certain groups of people very vulnerable to being brutalized and no one caring at all. Throw in a religion like Islam that can often degrade women even further, widespread government and corporate corruption alongside tons of poverty and a possible gender imbalance (sons over daughters!) and you have a very nice cocktail for lot…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 04:23 AM
1

You do realize that many of these so called amateurs are probably better shots than the police, right? Why? Because the police probably only practice their shooting on a limited basis and probably most often when they have to pass a range test. These amateurs who fire recreationally probably use their guns more than the police and are far better shots.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter