TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Drakin5 Archive

View 11 posts and 370 comments by Drakin5 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

There's definitely no research on female intrasexual competition that reinforces this theory. It would be because that would mean questioning several tenets and dogmas of feminism, and women's behavior. Given the fact that lesbian relationships and female-on-female violence are higher or more covered up than other relationships, throwing in the notion to win a man for a potential mate suddenly becomes a messier free for all relationship drama. Unless they pulled up the Server CheatsTM and enable…
/r/MensRights29/07/26 04:08 AM
19

Good. That means Pinoy men are less likely to become 24/7 ATM paypigs for educated women the second that she files for divorce.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 02:05 AM
19

the article is saying men are collectively failing to qualify Yay, blaming men for their failures again. Next. women to see less men worthy of entering their personal dating pool as they increasingly climb educational and professional ladders. I'm sorry. I thought that women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and have chosen the bears. These college women got their wishes, so what is the validity why is this article even pointing out the shrinking number of suitable men? Ideological…
/r/MensRights29/07/26 01:16 AM
22

are looking for men to match their professional/financial standing. And then leave out men who aren't? Seems that I've heard of this song and dance somewhere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergamy
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:46 AM
2

Yeah, that doesn't work. Given the fact that literally every country has divorce laws, women are giving the finger to the institution of marriage, for starters. It's such a really tall order to have Christianity go after the laws and customs in countries that promote, in the words of Galatians 5:19-21, sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; (ex.: paternity fraud, abortion, divorce, sperm jacking) idolatry and witchcraft (cult of personality, foreskin facials, will-worships, vabbing*); hatre…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 07:03 PM
-4

Well, let's just say, it's not just movies and tv shows. I mean.... https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6yAHJTSxa90 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo9R4v3zv10 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RqNT_Fy9q3c
/r/MensRights28/07/26 07:23 AM
6

Remember kids, discrimination should be beneficial for women or malicious against men. Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 04:24 AM
4

clearly all the down voters have never, and will never, be in a relationship. Who cares? It's not like you would pay off some random husband's divorce lawyer, court fees, and asset splitting while being his alimony, child support, and mental health insurance the second his marriage didn't work out for him. Unless you're a total bootlicker for the marriage industrial complex.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 10:35 PM
1

And the point being? still too many men in the army. It’s too dangerous. So? Women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men and have chosen the bears. Calling it "too dangerous" and "too many men in the army" just reeks of hypocritical conflicts of interest that Germany doesn't want to resolve at best, or they have been pushing some feminist agenda behind everyone's back at worst. If I'm wrong or bullshitting you, you better explain why Germany is wasting taxpayer euros everytime March rol…
/r/MensRights27/07/26 06:45 PM
24

Why is Germany complaining about recruiting women? I thought that women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men and have chosen the bears. They even celebrate Frauentag every March 8, so what's the point of this?
/r/MensRights25/07/26 11:08 PM
9

Yes. It's just SG doesn't admit that it is because that would run against The Narrative ScriptTM . They have conscription and circumcision for boys but not girls, so is it any surprise that SG would run this double standards like they're free real estate?
/r/MensRights25/07/26 08:27 PM
2

Also, sounds like this guy didn't want to press charges and thats a huge factor. Neither you'll be throwing money for his lawyers, either.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 01:41 AM
3

find something I can use as a weapon, and hope for help to arrive. I'm not an American, but at this point, I already know why the 2nd Amendment was written in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/07/26 08:19 PM
2

Statistically, if we are talking about rapes, most perpetrators are men. Cool. If we are talking about gold diggers, most perpetrators are women. Not surprising that women receive significant amount of welfare all the while treating men like legalized ATM paypigs through taxation. Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should be beneficial for women or malicious against men.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 07:46 PM
3

I'm sorry; I don't see the logic of your complaint. I thought that women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and have chosen the bears. Countries even waste taxpayer money every time March rolls in annually. I thought that feminism is also about doing away gender roles. Women should be conscripted and tossed into the meat grinder, being blown up by some $200 remote drone from Alibaba or TEMU. Either that or grow some balls and demand the ECHR to challenge the notion that conscription…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 06:39 PM
3

I think this is kinda wrong, like no jumping to conclusions I agree. We don't want to have this conviction turn into an Andrew Malkinson or Vishnu Tiwari China Edition. But that would mean making courts choosing truth instead of blindly following women's statements, and have women accountable if they committed perjury or making false statements.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 06:49 PM
6

How would the father know if the child/ren are his in the first place?
/r/MensRights19/07/26 04:10 AM
4

Wanting women to suffer just like you Tell that to the Ukrainian men being dragged out off the streets to fight the war while women are partying abroad and allowed to escape. Jewish person saying "well, we should get to genocide Germans as retribution" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakam black person saying they deserve to own a white slave https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade Next hypocrite.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 05:02 AM
2

I'm sorry. I thought women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and have chosen the bears. I don't see this as a problem or a complaint having women being conscripted to the front lines. If I'm wrong, then that means selective enforcement at best, or cherry picking the benefits for women and liabilities for men at worst. Besides, feminism is also about abolishing gender roles as well, so women should be fine fighting in the front and being blown up by some $200 remote drone from Aliba…
/r/MensRights17/07/26 04:33 AM
3

I regret knowing these books exist There's an entire subgenre like this, not just books. Google "teratophilia romance", and "how likely women appeal to teratophilia romance" on its AI prompt. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 10:13 PM
5

Morning Glory Milk Farm I see your bet and raise you to Bear by Marian Engel.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 08:43 PM
1

Not surprising here. Women make up the significant portion of welfare recipients, while men are the net taxpayers. Women only see men as ATM paypigs for them to live on their backs on. You enjoying life's happiness denies them this greedy, covetous bullshittery that takes advantage of the expectations of men's role as the resource provider. So much for women being strong, brave independent, don't need men, and having chosen the bears, then needed men to provide for them.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 11:03 PM
1

You wouldn't say the same if the title is, "My mean neighbor blatantly abuses his wife (verbally)", would you?
/r/MensRights13/07/26 08:19 PM
9

All your grievances are with the men that raised you. it's the rules and expectation that have been set by us to undermine and compete with each other. What a jackass. You set those rules and expectations, then suddenly, the grievances came from other men, and not the consequences from what you set? You're clearly a power hungry tyrannical gynocrat who wants to have men to just bow down and submit to your whims without question. Enforce stupid rules and expectations, get stupid consequences.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 12:25 PM
12

With all the equality that women got and received, since when did women freely make up the majority of blue collar work, anyway? Everyone should be valued and respected for their own selves and not what their bodies can be used for. Lol you joke. Many countries have conscription laws and encourage circumcision against men. Guess what else? Women receive significantly more in welfare assistance, while men are the ones making up the net taxpayers. Seems to me that women would rather have those in …
/r/MensRights13/07/26 12:14 PM
26

Good. After all, women are strong, brave independent, don't need men, and have chosen the bears. If women want equality, they should bear equal accountability. Women can provide and protect themselves, so they'll be fine working in the mines, oil rigs, power lines and keeping civilization running while covered in grime, dirt, and sweat. That's one less lifelong mental headache if women would perceive me as their retirement plan and unpaid bodyguard.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 04:28 AM
6

Funny how you would get Perma or shadow banned from other subreddits just for posting here or criticizing women's behavior and actions. How's that for free speech?
/r/MensRights12/07/26 09:06 PM
8

I'm sure you wouldn't say the same if Andrew Tate raped a woman, 'royt?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 10:06 PM
7

If women had the same hiring freedom, why they don't want to work in the blue collar and trades industry, then?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 06:20 PM
8

taken captive and made sex slaves. Boys are also taken captives and made sex slaves as well. Next. Saving women over men in a war situation is helpful Of course, war is war. Do you really expect me to believe that no one would hesitate to rescue surviving fathers and children? Assuming the mother is dead in the conflict.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 06:09 PM
1

Is it? I don't see a significant amount of feminists setting up homeless shelters for men, helping suicidal and emotionally unstable men, or at least encouraging men to dodge the draft. It's always SmAsH tHe GlAsS cEiLiNg but never bother noticing the glass floor beneath. I don't know how many liters of feminist Kool Aid have you drunk lately.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 10:19 PM
14

Feminists have screwed around with the justice system so much, I don't believe that 90% stat on face value. Women can pretty much get away with murder charges to the point they only get slaps on the wrist by the judge at worst, or let go due to emotional reasons at best.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 08:30 PM
1

India At what point does a slippery slope become a cliff? https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/maharashtra/allow-women-to-commit-one-murder-without-punishment-ncp-sp-leader-rohini-khadse-urges-president-murmu/article69306135.ece
/r/MensRights05/07/26 01:01 PM
8

"no they want free money. Stop trying to make their covetousness sound more virtuous." See how that happens when women would perceive men as unpaid laborers and plantation slaves if you would see lonely single men wanting sex.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 08:58 PM
1

And then what? It's not like you're paying some random husband's divorce lawyer, alimony and court fees, and be his asset splitting and child support insurance the second his marriage doesn't work out for him. Unless you're a total bootlicker for the marriage industrial complex.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 07:37 PM
6

Good thing I'm not paying for your lawyer if your girlfriend falsely accused you of rape.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 06:43 PM
7

If you have to lie about it, you might as well admit for being a bootlicker for the UN Women, then.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 08:27 PM
1

That doesn't count if women calling other men to kill each other. Or having feminists screw around with the justice system whenever women are the perpetrators. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7995844/Judges-told-be-more-lenient-to-women-criminals.html Or it involves the Duluth Model. Or using the primary aggressor clause to subvert, neglect or dismiss male innocence. Or covering up stats whenever domestic violence is perpetrated by women. http://archive.law.fsu.edu/journals/…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 11:22 AM
0

Sorry, not following this logic. I thought that women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men and have chosen the bears. This whole "men are stronger than women" is bullshit if we're just wasting taxpayer money everytime March rolls in each year.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 10:24 AM
68

Wow, what a total liar. I bet you would defend violent women at a drop of a hat, and claim that she had mental health problems or drug addictions.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:11 PM
8

You could just simply practice abstinence if you're worried about HIV and other infections. I don't know why that is never an option. But hey, were violating, dismissing, and subverting male bodily autonomy for the sake of the village majority under the guise of reducing genital diseases and STDs, so nothing to write home about it, right? Unless you're a total bootlicker for the medical-cosmetics-industrial complex. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PwO3TEj9-5g https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YRAccVvf…
/r/MensRights24/06/26 06:43 AM
8

I would rather live with a lion and a dragon than live with an evil woman. Ecclesiasticus/Sirach 25:16 Furries: 1 Women: 0
/r/MensRights24/06/26 12:18 AM
13

Moral of the story: The child who is not embraced by the village shall burn it down to feel it's warmth.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 12:12 AM
60

Not really much a surprise there. Despite that you claim that you are ugly, they see you as a potential ATM paypig because of your career and assets you own, aka the security and stability that you can provide. I have had 2 women so far accuse me of horrible things even though I never interacted with them in a non professional way. No dates, no anything yet these women completely fabricated stories up about our interactions, interactions that we never had. One was completely caught lying specifi…
/r/MensRights22/06/26 12:57 AM
4

If that's the case, then female partners should be sentenced harsher for false rape accusations, paternity frauds, and false testimonies than men. Somehow, Canada's justice system drank the feminist Kool Aid to the point it's squeamish to punish women the same brevity if a man commits one. So much for 'all are equal under the eyes of the law', eh?
/r/MensRights21/06/26 11:36 AM
70

Feminists: FaLsE aCcUsAtIoN iS rArE aNd NoT wOrSe ThAn RaPe.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:46 AM
12

gang rape of a 12 year old Women would rape boys.I don't know what reality are you talking about. https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/comments/1sdnziu/married_woman_raped_a_minor_boy_called_him_to_a/ Those women are angry at their reality Their reality.... Thanks for the confession. It seems womens' reality is only counted, but never mens' reality. Double standards☕.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 11:12 PM
11

Explain this then. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/maharashtra/allow-women-to-commit-one-murder-without-punishment-ncp-sp-leader-rohini-khadse-urges-president-murmu/article69306135.ece I mean it's in India, but come on. Let's be honest here. What's stopping feminists from suggesting and legislating this to any country?
/r/MensRights20/06/26 08:23 PM
14

Translation: Men are disposable, expendable, replaceable battle thralls for the village aristocrats, and it is their duty to kill themselves over whatever whims of the ruling class of society.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 12:52 PM
12

So much for women being strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and have already chosen the bears. I guess all those taxpayer money have been going down the drain every time March rolls in each year, huh? as well as overall being objectified Explain this, then. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RqNT_Fy9q3c
/r/MensRights19/06/26 07:10 AM
10

Would anyone care if some dad sees a girl's breast?
/r/MensRights15/06/26 10:45 PM
13

Bullshit. Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0 Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Solanas#The_shooting Feminists shut down forum for battered husbands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM Female felons should serve home sentences. http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/molloy-program-moms-serve-sentences-home-article-1.1337817 Feminists don’t want the gov to help unemp…
/r/MensRights15/06/26 04:14 AM
2

If I come across a random man who's sexual predator, I'm toast: since I'm rather fat, I wouldn't be able to run away quickly enough. Well, two can play that malicious assumption. If I come across a random woman who has a body count in the double or triple digits, I'm toast. Since she would rather accuse me of being one of her previous partners then pay alimony and child support, I wouldn't be able to make ends meet.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 11:23 AM
8

I fail to see why this is a complaint. I thought women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men and have chosen the bears. Unless women are cowards to be held accountable as men. Therefore women seek victim status because of sYsTeMiC pAtRiArChY.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 06:50 PM
16

I fail to see why this is a question, unless you're exploiting and manipulating men as disposable ATM paypigs.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 06:13 PM
7

Bullshit. Feminists stage mock murders to scare men. http://www.whyileftsweden.com/?p=311 Feminists wish to slander accused names before convicted. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10760239 Feminists launch campaigns to help girls only while boys are doing worse in every facet of education. http://douchebagdork.tumblr.com/post/83373265311/bastardlybrendan-sjhetalia Feminists cover up female domestic violence. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.p…
/r/MensRights13/06/26 01:20 AM
28

Only one logical conclusion is out of this. Soyciety and feminists are horribly ungrateful, full stop. The mere fact that they're throwing around logical fallacies and gender double standards whenever topics like this gets discussed is proof enough. Actually, scratch that. Even the law gets thrown into it as well.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:10 PM
14

go to the judge Why should the state have a say if a man wants to get paternity tested? If I'm in a long-term relationship with a man, I certainly would never do such a thing as that'd be an act of treason against him. Press x to doubt. However, men who decide to reject a ten-year-old child they have raised upon learning he isn't genetically linked to them are disgusting creatures All the while women are having multiple baby daddies from different partners who can't even tell who is the real fat…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 03:34 PM
9

certainly Oh, sure you are. Would you say the same to millions of women who are receiving multiple welfares, then?
/r/MensRights10/06/26 03:22 PM
17

As a young French woman Care to explain and discuss why your courts ban private paternity testing?
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:45 PM
12

Funny. Men are and have always been net tax earners, while women are living on the backs of men through welfare. But hey, that's kind of what happens when feminists treat men as disposable ATM paypigs while women become ungrateful gold diggers on a societal level. Welfare is nothing more than covetousness, greed and jealousy codified into law, then you get stupid consequences to complain about.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:31 PM
1

Sooo, where's the paternity fraud culture pyramid? runs away before the femcels get here
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:29 PM
3

Don't forget this one. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/maharashtra/allow-women-to-commit-one-murder-without-punishment-ncp-sp-leader-rohini-khadse-urges-president-murmu/article69306135.ece
/r/MensRights04/06/26 09:16 PM
3

I'm sorry, I don't see the problem here. I thought women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and have chosen the bears. Pay your own bills, then.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 08:58 PM
5

While problems of men are real and yes we do have reasons, but turning to an AI is something that affects others too. And, often times, boys will use AI even when they do not have much need. While some use it for emotional needs, some also use it for enjoyment and it soon turns into attachment. Which later causes wrong mental growth and will hinder that person's whole life. The study is about small kids, not on adults. That kind of a bond at that young age with so much affirmation is not good. M…
/r/MensRights04/06/26 12:49 AM
2

Sometimes it’s just that dating is harder, expectations are higher, and people are slower to commit than before. Those ~60% single men are aware that the risks involved in marriage outweigh the benefits, so I don't see a problem here. It's not like you are paying some random husband's divorce lawyer, court fees, alimony, and be his asset splitting and child support insurance the second his marriage didn't work out for him. You better explain to us why women initiate ~80% or more of the divorces,…
/r/MensRights03/06/26 08:33 PM
4

By that logic, why assume all men are rapists, then? Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should benefit women, and malicious against men.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 12:37 AM
9

So much for women being strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and having chosen the bears. Guess all those taxpayer money have went down the toilet drain every time March rolls in annually, huh?
/r/MensRights22/05/26 09:10 PM
14

Female queens were as happy or more happy to engage in wars than their male counterparts. Not surprising since lesbian relationships have higher domestic violence and divorce rates. Scale that shit up to involving heads of states, well...pattern recognition is a thing anyway.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 03:21 AM
4

Because women are biologically weaker So much for women being strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and having chosen the bear. Guess all those taxpayer money are going down the toilet on March annually, huh? we are the protectors throughout all the years Ingratitude towards men is normalized already, and you can't explain why without angering the feminist overlords. Next. yes modern day may change that a bit Quite an understatement there, or you just don't care what happens to men. But he…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 09:50 PM
11

Everyone has limits, don't cha know? You wouldn't say that if OP is hating men, do you?
/r/MensRights21/05/26 07:22 PM
4

I've said it before, I'll say it again. Enforce stupid laws, get stupid consequences.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:49 AM
1

Should have the trigger fingers on the lawyer's phone number, just in case.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:43 AM
6

Sure why not? It's time for women to step up and get their hands dirty by being hired down from the cushy administrative jobs that they have been hogging off for decades. And while we're at it for the sake of equality, the job applicants' gender should be removed. This should stop the biases when hiring men or women to the position. Unless you're working for the Australian government. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:39 AM
11

Women, on the other hand, are constantly conditioned to stay guarded in public spaces due to safety concerns, social conditioning, and fear of being misunderstood or approached further. So much for women being strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and have chosen the bears. Guess all that taxpayer money is being wasted big time every year during March, huh?
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:38 PM
38

Not just engineers, but when did women even account for more than 50% in the blue collar work and trades industry? So much for women being strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and have chosen the bears, then suddenly don't want to get their nails broken from the physical and sweaty work out in the field.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 03:24 AM
6

I didn't know human evolution had a reverse gear somewhere.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 07:19 PM
29

Fine then. Prove us wrong by producing and uploading the same video skit, uncensored but with a male teacher sexually harassing or assaulting a female student. If you got hounded by the feminist cabals, and their followers and lawyers, don't come crying to this sub for advice. It's only comedy if men are harmed or humiliated by women in front of the camera but not the other way around, right?
/r/MensRights18/05/26 12:45 AM
13

real feminists stand with male victims Bullshit. https://dvaa.com.au/the-rise-of-female-supremacism-feminist-tyranny-the-future-is-female/ https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve
/r/MensRights18/05/26 12:30 AM
10

Female drivers don't have a history of following passengers home, or calling them for a date, actual cases of assault and follow up harassment. Double standard is double standard. This time, you're perceiving female drivers as less violent or abusive than male drivers. There's a clear and blatant underreporting of male drivers being the victim of abusive female passengers. Again, you're still implying men are more dangerous, therefore malicious bandwagon fallacy against men. There's a reason the…
/r/MensRights15/05/26 10:22 AM
15

I'm sure that you won't have any problems if women have been manipulative or abusive as well. But hey, that's what happen when you're maliciously using association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy against men, just to make or perceive women as the victim. Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 09:19 AM
10

No, it's just discrimination, or Uber is just prioritizing women's safety over men's safety, so... Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 09:09 AM
40

Translation: Women should be getting away with actions and statements that would make men either be jailed or dead.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 09:05 AM
7

I could see this backfire and doom to failure. I mean, it's not like women would clean the area from litter or fix up the utilities. If it's a women only beach, then men should have no obligation maintaining it, nor respond to help or crisis from beachgoers.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:26 PM
2

A better question is what's stopping women from working in the blue collar work and trades industry.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 04:25 AM
2

Apparently, people like you still hold on to that cosmic doctrine, law, theory or whatever that men aren't allowed to protect themselves in case marriage don't work out in his favor. It's not like you are paying some random husband's divorce lawyer, court fees, and be his asset splitting and child support insurance. ....unless you are a total bootlicker for the marriage-industrial complex.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 09:25 PM
5

I've lost count how similar is this article if the context is changed to COVID 19 hit pieces and fearmongering tactics.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 11:31 PM
2

There's a reason why greed is a sin, and covetousness is mentioned in the Ten Commandments. Direct taxation and welfare run afoul of these two. But hey, that's what happens if the villages enforce stupid laws and ordinances, they get stupid consequences as a result.
/r/MensRights04/05/26 09:19 PM
2

Feminism (at its core) is about equal Rights Cool. Maybe they should also include equal responsibilities then, or are you implying feminism is about equal rights, but not equal responsibilities?
/r/MensRights01/05/26 09:47 PM
3

And what are you going to do, throw me in jail? https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-13666066 https://dvaa.com.au/the-rise-of-female-supremacism-feminist-tyranny-the-future-is-female/
/r/MensRights01/05/26 03:16 PM
1

Until the betrayal, adultery, paternity fraud, and whatever legal baggage that comes into play. But if you want to be a second class ATM paypig to a wife and child not yours, go right ahead. After all, not my family issues, not my mental health issues either.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 03:26 AM
1

Based on your observation, did you even bothered asking why boys behave or act like that, or you just simply perceived them as "defective" girls that needs correction? "The child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth" - African Proverb.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:19 AM
4

What a privilege it is to be a woman and the worst thing having to deal with is being held accountable for her actions.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 09:09 AM
1

I believe in equality between men and women Bullshit. https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve https://dvaa.com.au/the-rise-of-female-supremacism-feminist-tyranny-the-future-is-female/ https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:34 AM
19

hatred towards men is now so normalized Yet overwhelmingly, men are the ones keeping the lights on, water flowing, streets clean, and the shelves stocked. Basically, the modern conveniences and comfort that society has taken for granted. Remember kids, the word 'villain' was once Medieval Latin for peasant or serf.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 09:48 PM
10

Also they should stop demonizing risk taking. There's a saying, risk comes with reward. It's funny that these feminists would also "feel" entitled in some way over the rewards brought from mens' risk taking ventures. But then again, that's what happen when the village has codified covetousness, greed, and jealousy into law.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 09:37 PM
9

men won’t take it to the next level. So? What's wrong with that? It's not like you'd be paying off some random husband's divorce lawyer, court fees and become his child support insurance if the marriage didn't work out for him. ....unless you're a total bootlicker for the marriage-industrial complex.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:59 PM
8

A country can mobilize it's people. Fine. Mobilize and draft the Ukrainian women to the front lines then, bootlicker. After all, women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men and have chosen the bears already.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 10:32 AM
5

my own opinion the sex you are born with requires certain duties and I believe defending ones home is a for a male. Says who? Sure as hell women don't want to take up the mantle of motherly duties nowadays. Who are you to believe that defending ones home is for men? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aYLEJwMjPl8 Ooooops... Silly me. Wrong video source.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:38 AM
11

I'm a feminist bootlicker 👢👅💦. Well, you don't need to confess that here.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 03:55 AM
17

Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should be beneficial for women, or malicious against men. Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 07:42 AM
5

Even if they did call for professional help, do you really expect me to believe that another woman would show up to fix their utilities? When did women ever make up the majority of blue collar work and trades industry?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 09:43 AM
7

Until the lights go out, or fix the plumbing or ventilation, or take out the trash, or fill up the hole in the wall. Yeeeep. Nothing could go wrong. I mean, not my house, not my mortgage either.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 05:17 AM
2

makeup https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PwO3TEj9-5g
/r/MensRights23/04/26 05:08 AM
4

Wow just wow. Got more androphobia to go with that hypocrisy and ingratitude?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 03:32 AM
4

Funny how plastics are used in renewable energy. Now let them guess how the components should be recycled at their end-of-life.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 11:50 PM
15

size doesn't matter from a physiological POV You wouldn't say that if men are ranking women by breast sizes, would you?
/r/MensRights21/04/26 05:28 AM
3

Translation: Husbands are nothing more than disposable ATM paypigs for cheating wives, and I'm walking in my father's footsteps as he is one as well.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 09:50 PM
10

Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should be beneficial for women, or malicious against men. Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 12:27 AM
3

Remember kids, the association fallacy, bandwagon fallacy, and apex fallacy should be beneficial for women or malicious against men. Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 03:06 AM
13

https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve https://dvaa.com.au/the-rise-of-female-supremacism-feminist-tyranny-the-future-is-female/ Remember kids, the association fallacy, bandwagon fallacy, and possibly apex fallacy should be beneficial for women, or malicious against men. Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 12:18 AM
4

generalise millions of people based on their gender Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should be beneficial for women, or malicious against men. Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:14 PM
7

if you openly disagree with the official narrative at a university, you’re probably asking for trouble But if you have a good lawyer on hand, you can deliberately set them off with the counter stats, then drag them into the courts. Those court settlements can be a lucrative alternative to winning the scratch cards.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 09:58 PM
0

Clavicular https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1slnqpk/clav_goes_on_a_incel_rant_during_60_minutes/ Wait a minute. 7 was found NV. We have a 1f1. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lbMeyJ5ZQcQ Hue. Town of Salem 2 references.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:41 PM
3

Aaaaand this is why you don't just codify jealousy and covetousness into law via divorce and alimony, and expect no malicious consequences brought from women having multiple baby daddies. You're probably making bank from all the broken families in your village, but whatever. Good luck shaming me into becoming the next child support paypig.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 10:46 AM
13

Congratulations. You just found out why many men today are not marrying ay all. Good luck trying to sustain civilization from all the broken marriages brought from divorces.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 09:41 AM
3

It's the internet zombie logic. They maliciously use association fallacy to express their derision and contempt to men, but beneficial towards women. But then again, the orange one can't tell the similarities between racial and sexual discrimination if men are in the Venn diagram. I swear those people are horribly ungrateful IRL.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 09:16 PM
6

Vote a female in as president and I bet the need for so many men getting killed in the frontline would be dramatically reduced. Whew what a relief. I'm sure that history doesn't repeat itself when a woman is the president or the head of state. https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-general/warlike-queens-0012861 If you’re under 60, I know a guy…he can get you signed up and put an AK-74 in your hands really …
/r/MensRights14/04/26 07:31 AM
3

Sign up for the draft then, coward.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 07:07 AM
5

dozens of feminist organizations advocating for the draft to be repealed. You better drop sources as to which organizations you're claiming or talking about, or you're lying to us here.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 07:01 AM
3

Translation: Men protecting themselves from women elicits insecurity and gaslighting, ala "it's not that bad." Women protecting themselves from men elicits strength, bravery, and independence. Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 02:22 AM
2

Christian women believe in submission to their husbands. There was UO on 9. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N20V9WNGCaY https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a7wTF6i-MZY Hue. Town of Salem 2 references.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 11:46 PM
1

Until the divorce hearing happens. Good luck trying to uphold that ideal in the family courts, after being sentenced to be a 24/7 child support paypig.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 11:25 PM
7

Sure as hell I'm not paying for your divorce lawyer. Good luck defending yourself in the family court.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 09:51 PM
56

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/april-20/fragging-on-the-rise-in-u-s-units https://study.com/academy/lesson/fragging-overview-history-examples.html Dad, history is repeating itself again. But hey, enforce outrageous laws, get outrageous consequences.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 09:34 AM
1

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/ingratitude
/r/MensRights09/04/26 08:14 AM
19

In the uk, it is pre determined that the male is the abusive one in domestic violence cases. So much for due process and innocent until proven guilty. But hey, that's kind of what happens when the United Cu*kdom somehow mixed the Blackstone Ratio and Andrew Malkinson in the bowl.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 08:26 PM
14

Says who? I sure as hell didn't sign up to be someone's disposable ATM paypig or plantation slave.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 11:21 PM
15

Letfwing feminism also includes the help of ALL poor and working class folks regardless of gender. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH That's rich. I never saw feminists set up a food shelter or community pantry for starters to help the millions of homeless Americans. Feminists have a lot to unpack first before claiming that they're helping those below the poverty line. Starting with this > https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:03 PM
9

sees title Yes it is unfair. The reasons why men get drafted and women don't is because if you want to win a war, you send men. Done. I don't care if you give examples of women fighting some wars or whatever, historically, men fight wars because they are stronger than women. The idea that men are being sent because they are "disposable", is ridiculous, they go because they are better fighters Congratulations. You just objectify men solely on their capacity to do violence or waging war. You're fe…
/r/MensRights04/04/26 09:41 PM
20

Aren't the leaders men? Germany has almost half of it's cabinet and regional members entirely of women. You are blatantly lying to us here. Feminists didn’t draft men for the wars whatsoever. And yet here you are not encouraging women to be drafted to fight for the country. I bet you wouldn't say the same to Ukraine. Now is the time for the MRAs to march in the streets and protest against this. At this political climate? You better cough up some €€€ for their defense attorneys, coward.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 10:56 PM
6

Try telling that to women, hypocrite.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 07:53 PM
7

Remember kids, the association fallacy should benefit women, or malicious against men. Double standards ☕.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 02:48 AM
0

Funny how many comedians tell the truth through jokes and laughter, just to hide the pain and suffering they have gone through life. If your comment is supposed to insult me, you're just proving yourself to be a total gynoKKKrat coward.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 09:04 AM
17

Ah yes, women hitting men needs context if it's just a joke, but men hitting women don't need one. Double standards☕.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 09:57 PM
3

Sorry, my bad. Wasn't thinking clearly.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 09:16 PM
-38

The word you're looking for is promiscuity. Good luck trying to make that into a criminal charge with the same brevity as rape.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 05:51 PM
2

Funny how paternity fraud and promiscuity aren't criminal charges in most countries while rape and femicide (Italy, yay!) are life sentences. "Because women abuse men... Women are men's biggest parasite. Look it up." Now imma sit back and enjoy the hypocrisy fireworks.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 11:27 PM
7

Yay, ad hominems! Have a great day.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 11:12 PM
8

There's a reason why r/menkampf exists. But hey, I just reversed gender roles then suddenly I have low reading comprehension. Magic isn't it?
/r/MensRights20/03/26 10:57 PM
3

Funny how women are strong, brave, independent, don't need men, and have chosen the bear, suddenly needs men to throw under the bus in times of crisis. Do I have to ask what month it is right now, or has society's ingratitude against men became normal these days?
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:39 PM
8

"A lot of people respond to unfair attacks on women by random men who are actually acting like normal humans. It's divisive on a societal level to take injustice for women and instead of opposing it, enact the same injustice on men who didn't do anything wrong. Little boy is a little human boy who didn't do anything wrong." Remember kids, the association fallacy, bandwagon fallacy, and even the apex fallacy should be beneficial for women and feminism, while being harmful against men and boys. Do…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:20 PM
8

Ah, yes. It seems that the large portion you are referring to is the dirty, dangerous, blue collar work that women don't want to take. News flash: women already have been dominating most from white collar employment, health insurance and resources, childcare services, education, and positions of authority. Chances are, you would never tell women to get a job in the plumbing, utility, welding, construction, or at least start in trade school instead of getting a six figure debt and a college diplo…
/r/MensRights17/03/26 11:49 PM
3

California government issued girlfriends. Wow. Just...wow. I've heard of arranged marriage, but this is a total worm grenade that the Californian government is handing out to everyone. No, just no. Either they're worried about the shrinking men and birth rates to sustain the ponzi welfare known as Social Security, or they don't want smart and single men questioning and discussing the or their authority and wants to keep them domiciled at all times. Stuff like this just screams 2+2=1984.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 07:33 AM
3

No, not at all. I'm enjoying my peace and freedom without the baggage, debt, babies from other men, and drama from women. No marriage means no divorce, and women can't handle rejections as much as men. Enjoy your cats, boxed wine, anti depressants, while crashing into the wall at relativistic speeds, while complaining at social media, "WhErE hAvE aLl ThE gOoD mEn GoNe?".
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:43 PM
35

I've never encountered any pastor who would shame women who have high body counts, ungrateful to their husbands, or against paternity fraud. The most likely reason is money, therefore greed. Especially if these pastors are cowards to openly discuss about divorce and their effects on men and family. Pastors shaming single men for not sacrificing is free real estate, while shaming single women for not sacrificing is off limits. Double standards☕.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 04:20 PM
5

With all those 4 figures men make Wow, you really had to objectify men based on their salary. Statistically women earn more than men now. Yeah, from divorce, alimony, and child support proceedings. Not to mention that women are the bigger spenders and incur 6 figure debt. Unsurprisingly, women file for divorce far more often and likely than men. Imagine that. it’s bc they are insecure Who said that men are insecure about it? Which really sounds like a you problem Ah yes, apparently it's a 'me' p…
/r/MensRights27/10/25 11:14 AM
9

Paternity fraud is insulting to women while treating the husband like an ATM paypig to raise another man's child. Double standards☕.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:43 AM
30

Ecclesiasticus/Book of Sirach 25:16 "I would rather dwell with a lion and a dragon than dwell with an evil wife." Furries - 1 Women - 0
/r/MensRights26/10/25 11:02 PM
9

You're exaggerating the last part because paternity testing holds women accountable and liable for damages and liabilities. Just like criminalizing promiscuity. Unless, you're a spineless, gynoKKKrat bootlicker, or should I say, high heel shoelicker, punishing women for these crimes would make you fiie for empathy and PR bankruptcy. All in the name of justice and truth for many men out there.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:49 PM
1

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RFQ5eEeYicw
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:57 AM
4

I've said this before, I'll say it again. Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should benefit women or be against men. Apply appropriate context if needed.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 06:11 PM
5

Let's flip the roles, shall we? "It's just false, nobody is loved unconditionally. A lot of men are abused or manipulated by their wife, a lot of them are harassed by women everyday." I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should benefit women, or be against men.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 01:33 PM
9

Criticizing women for their past actions is off limits, while doing it to men is free real estate. Double standards☕.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 06:08 AM
16

Let's flip the roles, shall we? "Yes, because unmarried men are statistically happier than married men. With the number of women who want marriage so they can have a 24/7 ATM paypig and not an equal partner, it's not hard to guess why men are most often the ones avoiding marriage." I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should benefit women, or against men.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 06:02 AM
38

forced to penetrate Coercion or duress, so where's the man's consent on this? That's like describing a man is 'forced to penetrate' if held at knifepoint or threatened by false accusations by a woman. Imagine if the roles are reversed. Would it be called forced to penetrate or rape? It's different study criminology That means men and women are not equal under the law. Imagine that.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:44 AM
28

It's never societies' consequences if it is his body, his choice, his consequences. Oh wait, scratch that. It's his body someone else's choice (or wallet), and his consequences because conscription and circumcision. Double standards☕.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:55 AM
1

I like how you have ignored my comment about how feminists were prosecuted because it goes against your beliefs Just like how you ignored the link I provided as sources on how feminists subvert the justice systems and even intimidate men and deprive men's resources. You really don't understand what due process is. It is a legal principle that has absolutely nothing to do with personal opinion or public discourse. Feminists have subverted due process just to protect women from legal liabilities a…
/r/MensRights20/10/25 09:16 PM
0

due process refers to the idea that every individual deserves a fair chance when facing legal action If you know more about due process than me, then the whole BelieveAllWomen should have been criticized for subverting it at the expense of men's innocence. Also, what fair chance? Those men who were falsely accused of rape had their lives either destroyed completely, financially ruined or committed suicide. All the while the accuser gets anonymous protection or evaded justice just because she tar…
/r/MensRights20/10/25 06:54 PM
1

So you admit that feminists were never prosecuted for those actions then, instead the government just bowed down to your demands? Due process very much exists for all crimes You wouldn't say this to those countless men who were falsely accused of rape, and got their lives destroyed or committed suicide. Remember Andrew Malkinson? “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations,” "If some innocent men’s reputations have to t…
/r/MensRights20/10/25 12:59 PM
7

equal society That's bull shit. https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve Feminists have done a lot of criminal, violent, and subversive acts to achieve their version of utopia. The worst part is that they rarely if ever get prosecuted or jailed for it. They had done away with due process especially regarding false rape accusations against men. It's as if feminists don't want to be held accountable and liable for any damages or wrongdoings. And I don't see feminists openly protesting in those countries espe…
/r/MensRights20/10/25 01:32 AM
11

I take that as a badge of honor. At least I don't get divorce graped at the courthouse by some gynoKKKrat judge and greedy assed gold digga who would treat me like an ATM paypig 24/7/365.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 01:48 PM
15

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should benefit women or against men.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 01:41 PM
3

This. Personally, it's because it's a sussy baka. I've been walking outside for exercise, yet I didn't get the COVID. Not once, but everyday, as in I lost count on how many weeks I've done it. The second I knew the vaccine was a lie before Joe Rogan, the Ivermectin, and Sanjay Gupta, Freedom Truckers, and the unholy amount of coverups brought from the side effects, I became critical of this. It's a whole slew of medical flavored 2+2=5, and all the attendant government tyranny around the world. K…
/r/MensRights19/10/25 09:45 AM
8

Once a woman hit 40, the rate of divorce, regrets, depression, cats, boxed wine, hitting the wall at relativistic speeds, and bitterness goes way up.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 01:45 AM
16

Or you can grow a pair and demand your government to abolish your divorce laws for starters. Unless you're a feminist gynoKKKrat bootlicker, expect men to not have kids until the village collapses. But hey, women are strong, brave, independent, don't need a man, and have chosen the bear, so I'm sure they'd be fine working in the sewers, mines, oil rigs, and power lines.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:28 PM
22

Remember kids, the association fallacy and bandwagon fallacy should benefit women, or against men.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 05:02 AM
11

You wouldn't say that to women when it comes to FGM, and should be optional when they are older, do you?
/r/MensRights15/10/25 07:06 AM
7

Wow...really? Women commiting infanticide just brushed off "as a problem"? How is committing child murder not "shameful"? I can tell what kind of justice system you're advocating for, and the unholy amount of sexist double standards that you'd promote in favor of women. men can and should take the lead in the home and society Grow a pair and demand your government to repeal your divorce and alimony laws first, then we'll talk more how men should take the lead.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 02:04 AM
37

I think claiming you go to prison anytime someone claims horrible things about you is extreme and unrealistic I'd like to see you compliment or just approach and make small talk to some women at your workplace. If you got an HR report for harassment at any time, or your face gets plastered in social media, don't come crying to this sub for advice.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:38 AM
32

Let the marriage-industrial complex crash and burn to the ground. Countless men end up depressed, jailed, or dead just to sustain this avaricious slavery at the expense of men for the benefit of women and society.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:30 AM
1

One last thing, there are huge financial benefits to being married. In addition to tax breaks, you get a two income household, someone to help with the kids, someone to split costs with... Until the divorce happens. Then the asset splitting, alimony, child support, visitation limits, and whatever mental health shenanigans are served against the husband. Also, those financial benefits and tax breaks don't mean jack when the husband is divorced. This only proves that marriage is 1) a business for …
/r/MensRights09/10/25 07:00 AM
3

All are equal under the law, man or woman. Likelihood is and should not be an excuse to punish women with lighter sentences compared to men. You're just implying a gender based two tier justice system.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 09:55 AM
18

Stephen Miller is a midget Nazi. That doesn't mean you boys need to be. you're insecure about that you are likely insecure about many other things. You can either look at your height like a death sentence, or just grow the fuck up and say I'm fun sized. Men that can never get past their insecurities will let them bleed into every other facet of life. Ah yes, men concerned or conscious about their height are free real estate for being called insecure or compensating for something, while doing it …
/r/MensRights07/10/25 09:32 AM
2

You wouldn't say the same if you saw two boys being murdered by a feminist gynoKKKrat like many people on the left.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 09:19 AM
8

You drank the feminist Kool Aid, didn't you? https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve
/r/MensRights07/10/25 02:44 AM
10

Maybe you should grow a pair and tell your government to repeal your conscription laws, bootlicker.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 02:01 AM
6

You have a non existent awareness on the feminists' actions. https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve
/r/MensRights07/10/25 01:49 AM
4

they're specifically talking about perpetrators of abuse who lie and say they're the one being abused, this is a recorded phenomenon. The commenter even mentions that perpetrators who lie about being abused take away resources from actual men and women who are victims of abuse. No shit, Sherlock. Why do you think women abuse men indirectly through gossips, rumors, gaslighting, finances, and his social circle?
/r/MensRights03/10/25 10:14 PM
5

Your girlfriend needs a reality check. Men watch porn and get aroused by visuals and “superficial” things. Women watch corn, too. How is she not aware of this? Women read romance novels or watch dramas, focusing more on emotions. the male characters are almost always rich, powerful, confident, tall, and handsome Yep. Male characters in romance are almost always objectified based on their social standing and how likely they are to be paypigs for women. Or just watch a few gameplays of Love and De…
/r/MensRights03/10/25 05:33 PM
3

Then, start a world war with China or Russia, bootlicker. Oh wait, Uncle Sam can't afford another one because of the national debt.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 10:13 AM
3

Ah yes, apparently men would prefer being disposable ATM paypigs for women to financially leech from. Since when did women account for more than 50% of the workers in the mining, plumbing, logging, construction, utilities, HVAC, and other dangerous blue collar work?
/r/MensRights03/10/25 09:55 AM
13

She wants the 6' and six pack of Chaddeus Vladimir Thunderschlong III, the 12" personality of Tyrone Tyreesius Dickerdown Brown, the status of Baron Oilrigs Goydollar Sr., and the millions of Lord Nigel Pennyworth Bankbalance all rolled into one. News flash: he doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 10:22 PM
9

Quick, throw a grenade in their discussion by mentioning violence among lesbian relationships. Watch 'em scramble for cover and avoid talking about it.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 03:24 PM
5

"Girls are more likely to be promiscuous and prefer the popular boys over the quiet ones. Commiting hypergamy, falsely accusing or gossiping boys, etc. . Pair that with the increase of narcissism and praise they got at school and the fact more and more women initiate divorces most of the time and you get this result." Remember kids, the use of association fallacy should benefit women or against men.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 02:36 AM
1

Feminism, which rejects gender roles for women If women rejects their gender roles, so should men. Enjoy having women with no ATM paypigs by their side to financially leech from. Breaking news: "WhErE hAvE aLl ThE gOoD mEn GoNe?"
/r/MensRights27/09/25 05:56 AM
1

Kirk's view on marriage. I see your Charlie Kirk and raise you Brad Wilcox. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EtvfHnZMcOY
/r/MensRights27/09/25 05:46 AM
22

Taking the law into your own hand makes you no better than those who abuse the law in the first place... Enjoy living in a peaceful tyranny with chains around your necks. You Will Own Nothing And Be HappyTM .
/r/MensRights27/09/25 05:29 AM
1

Is 1976 Canada a good benchmark? https://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/2izlxv/1976_canadian_best_seller/ https://www.reddit.com/r/menwritingwomen/comments/lrk47l/bear_by_marian_engel/
/r/MensRights25/09/25 09:21 AM
10

boys do better with kids because they act more childish "girls who want equality should learn at trade school, not college." Grab some popcorn, and watch your FACS teacher showcase some hypocrisy in front of the class.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 08:55 AM
3

Or...just practice abstinence. I don't know why that is never an option.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 06:47 AM
1

The one I could compare the audience reactions would be between "Peter-assment" and "Story of Brenda Q" from Family Guy. I think Seth MacFarlane was trying to send a message there.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 12:43 AM
-1

By that logic, if God doesn't exist, the Ten Commandments doesn't exist either. If that's the case, why is today's society praises women who commits adultery and covets men's resources like welfare entitlement?
/r/MensRights23/09/25 02:20 AM
4

Go abolish the divorce courts and the marriage-industrial complex first, then we'll talk about finding the right woman.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 02:07 PM
9

Could be a love-hate relationship. Married men earn more than single men, but spends more. Assuming a generous 25% net income difference, there are mouths to feed in your family. That 25% may not cover the increased expenses, bills/mortgage/loans. That's not even including the birthdays, anniversaries, celebrations, and the wife's erratic retail therapies that husband has to spend on.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 08:38 AM
28

Lesbian relationships have the highest domestic violence rates compared to straight and even less so among gays. This creates a fun little conflict of interest when reporting those crimes. 1) Equal rights, equal accountabilities, therefore men and women who commit violent crimes are put in the same bucket, or 2) keep feeding the narrative, and hand out those blue pills like candy. Remember, nobody wants to file for empathy/PR bankruptcy by punishing women the same way if men commit those crimes.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 04:15 PM
23

“I had rather dwell with a lion and a dragon, than to keep house with a wicked woman.” Ecclesiasticus/Sirach 25:16 Furries - 1 Women - 0 Huehuehue.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 08:55 AM
9

Resources are limited. It's basic economics. Men dying earlier and more compared to women? Guess who gets fewer resources allocated for their health. On topic of cancer, how much resources are allocated for prostate cancer compared to others?
/r/MensRights16/09/25 12:57 PM
18

Translation: Women being FAFO'd is frowned upon, but men being FAFO'd isn't. Double standards ☕
/r/MensRights16/09/25 12:51 PM
20

Ah yes, joking about women's sexual past is off limits, but men protecting themselves from promiscuous women is free real estate. Double standards ☕
/r/MensRights16/09/25 12:48 PM
8

I agree men are not a protected group. I mean, you can't defend that admission in court, especially if they codified it into their subreddit rules.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 09:05 AM
2

Sucking up to Uncle Sam, are we not?
/r/MensRights15/09/25 03:46 AM
2

Ah yes, classic man shaming and censoring for criticizing modern women's horrible actions. It's as if men somehow consented to become both disposable tax slaves for the village aristocrats and ATM paypigs for women. The reason I have a family and wife Good luck once your wife files for divorce, and weaponizes the kids against you. I wonder how that asset splitting would affect your life and health ahead.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 03:41 AM
11

Why wish death for the husband when you can commit one murder instead? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thehindu.com/news/national/maharashtra/allow-women-to-commit-one-murder-without-punishment-ncp-sp-leader-rohini-khadse-urges-president-murmu/article69306135.ece/amp/
/r/MensRights13/09/25 07:19 AM
45

taboo Nah. The only reason why paternity testing a 'taboo' subject because it holds women accountable and liable for fraud and other damages. Nobody wants to file for empathy bankruptcy by punishing women for heinous crimes the same brevity if a man commits one. Also, it's admission to theft/gold digging/blackmail (if you stretch it or add context) of the man's time, financial, and emotional investment to a child not his. Which leaves this question unanswered: Why are rape and sexual assault hei…
/r/MensRights10/09/25 05:27 AM
6

lowers the risks of STDs by something like 40-60%. Just to fuel women's vanity by harvesting those foreskins.... https://qz.com/quartzy/1230002/sandra-bullock-and-cate-blanchett-had-a-penis-facial-its-not-that-strange https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/beauty/foreskin-facial-what-you-need-to-know-a4001576.html And hope the RNGesus doesn't roll a 1 on the altar of circumcision. https://www.aljazeera.com/video/people-power/2013/1/3/ndiyindoda-i-am-a-man https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/baby-…
/r/MensRights10/09/25 01:10 AM
6

I'm saying it figuratively, not literally. https://www.aljazeera.com/video/people-power/2013/1/3/ndiyindoda-i-am-a-man https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/baby-nearly-bled-to-death-circumcision-parents-say/ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h-NHpG1MW0A https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/about-circumcision/ Of course, if girls are dying due to circumcision, there would be outrage and protests, but nope. Boys dying due to circumcision? Nope. No outrage, even from prominent international organizations.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:52 PM
6

So you're telling me that men have no autonomy and consent over their bodies compared to women? Or how about the fact that those foreskins are being harvested in the cosmetic industry? Or boys are being sacrificed on the altar of circumcision on a routine basis, and nobody cares if they died. I sense medical malpractice here.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:30 PM
8

With or without anaesthetics, boys still risk their lives on the altar of circumcision and hope the RNGesus doesn't roll a 1. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1kruk4e/10_year_old_boy_died_of_botched_circumcision/
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:20 PM
9

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1m8330r/why_isnt_under_18_circumcision_illegal_already/ Digging to my past posts is resourceful. https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/03/male-circumcision-not-comparable-female-genital-mutilation Male circumcision is although largely unconsented genital surgery that carries potential health risks Pop quiz, hotshot. Question #1: why is male circumcision largely unconsented/forced/socially pressed compared to female circumcision?
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:08 PM
6

And not only do hundreds of thousands of rape kits go untested, but in order to hide the backlog or to cover-up where prosecution mistakes have been made, some officials simply throw away the DNA evidence, discarding hope of finding the true perpetrator and vindicating the wrongfully convicted. How is this not intentional miscarriage of justice?
/r/MensRights04/09/25 02:49 AM
2

This question should have been answered from the concept of conscription. Historical records and current trends should have rendered this case closed. Also, the mere fact that conscription is backed and enforced by law should be the incriminating evidence of male disposability.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 09:22 AM
2

This sounds like that scornful ex wife who destroyed her marriage and his hobbies, filed a divorce, and expects her husband to come back just to apologize for what she did. Way too similar if you ask me, or I just watch too much Taylor The Fiend vids at YouTube.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 08:38 AM
9

WTF? I never said 1) men being forced to give their lives, and 2) feminists caused it. This pAtRiArChY you refer to are men who would naturally take the role of being leaders and providers. Guess what? There's a price for that, and that is responsibility and sacrifice which you stated from your earlier example about the boys in Aurora, CO. I don't know why you would ignore the price tag for being leaders and providers who would keep the civilization in check, instead of blaming the pAtRiArChY. E…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 05:54 AM
21

So? A bunch of boys protected their girlfriends, then you blaming the pAtRiArChY for the unsavory outcome. Are you outing yourself as an ungrateful feminist who would treat men like disposable ATM paypigs?
/r/MensRights25/08/25 03:27 AM
9

Sunk cost fallacy and moving the goalposts is a horrible long term commitment. Marriage today is a joke just to treat men like ATM paypigs and unpaid bodyguards.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 02:08 AM
1

It's hypocritical that rape is a criminal charge and a heinous crime, but promiscuity isn't. It's as if law and society protects women from the consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 06:32 AM
15

Class action discrimination lawsuit in 3...2...1...
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:42 AM
71

"Need taming" Feminists' mindset and logic back then aren't that different than today. Only proves that men are just living wallets to be exploited for the plantations.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 02:08 PM
17

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Just like the draft/conscription, either both boys and girls get circumcised or neither. Claiming otherwise is a blatant double standard.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:47 AM
2

Just a shower thought, if a portion from that 61% are furries/scalies, they're probably (ab)using Ecclesiasticus 25:16 without knowing for their benefit or safety.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 10:03 AM
4

It's not true equality if feminists believe and act that they are above the law and consequences https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve Pop quiz, hotshot. Question #1: Why rape and sexual assault are criminal charges or heinous crimes, while promiscuity and paternity fraud aren't?
/r/MensRights12/08/25 11:23 AM
11

This doesn't explain why feminists have pushed equal rights, but not equal accountability. Just look at the Ukraine. Men are dragged off the streets ala impressment for cannon fodder, but you don't see women's' organizations expressing outrage about it. Or the fact that feminists have never pushed or called for women in the blue collar industry, only high status positions. Pop quiz, hotshot. Question 1) Why rape and sexual assault are criminal charges or heinous crimes, while promiscuity and pat…
/r/MensRights07/08/25 08:42 AM
3

You're the one who's living in a feminist fantasy. https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve
/r/MensRights02/08/25 09:12 PM
-2

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/comments/1m17r5x/ulwaluko_the_mass_tribal_circumcision_nobody_is/ It's about 2 weeks ago. Too soon?
/r/MensRights31/07/25 03:29 PM
1

Even if you claim that they're different, that's an admission to hypocrisy and double standards. This means that your sentiments and source only prove that men are nothing more than disposable resources and objectified socio economic trophies for the village. You didn't even bothered answering why mens' body integrity is free real estate and less important than women's body integrity. Next hypocrite.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 09:50 PM
1

Oh good, another hypocritical shitstain discussing that FGM is bad and provided an example source. You wouldn't say the same to boys who died on the altar of circumcision, either. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/comments/1m17r5x/ulwaluko_the_mass_tribal_circumcision_nobody_is/ Or the fact that these baby boys are being harvested for their foreskin in the cosmetic industry. https://people.com/style/we-tried-it-cate-blanchett-sandra-bullock-penis-facial/ https://qz.com/quartzy/1230002/sandra-bu…
/r/MensRights29/07/25 06:49 PM
13

Sure why not? Female safety comes first over male safety. Yay, double standards!
/r/MensRights27/07/25 06:40 AM
2

Because you have a non-existent self awareness, or feminism is above the law and consequences. https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:58 PM
2

Yeahhhh....no. You still haven't answered my first point why male body integrity is free real estate while women isn't. Even if modern medicine can perfect the surgery with zero comorbidity, this doesn't answer why men, while women are exempt or don't have to, have to risk their bodies for possible comorbidity and undergo this socially pressured surgery like the draft/conscription. And even if what you claim about my points is for shock factor, you still imply apathy and indifference to those bo…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 11:34 AM
3

Ah, yes. Using the pAtRIaRcHy as a convenient smokescreen to hide pedophile women preying on young boys. Hard drive check needed. Also: https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve
/r/MensRights25/07/25 03:55 AM
3

I don't believe this is about you being on the wrong side of history because this issue is an appeal to both historical tradition and majority. And technically, you admitted to that double standard by claiming that circumcising women has a negative effect while doing it to men doesn't have any. Oh, there were infant boys who died during the surgery, so senseless and reckless homicide kind of. But hey, boys died to the altar of circumcision, so you don't care at all, right?
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:39 AM
9

Just like the draft/conscription, either both boys and girls get circumcised, or neither. Claiming otherwise is a blatant double standard. Funny how men's body integrity is free real estate while women's shouldn't.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:23 AM
3

Don't forget the 4chan party van, and the child sex offender registry.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:49 AM
5

Meanwhile in India: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nashik/allow-women-to-commit-one-murder-rohini-khadse-in-letter-to-murmu/articleshow/118808827.cms Also: https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:36 AM
23

Sounds like defamation. Lawy-R-Up.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:20 AM
2

Discuss and research about divorce and conscription. If your opponent stutter, you have an opening. Also, something, something about Brad Wilcox comes to mind. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EtvfHnZMcOY That comment section is lit.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 08:03 AM
10

All have been men? Yeah, right. Either you're a liar or admitting to that double standard. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-28/female-paedophiles-prevalent-says-leading-forensic-psychologist/6428710 https://jaapl.org/content/51/4/466 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-01/act-suppression-order-lifted-petra-shasha-guilty-sex-offences/104418774 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn08y6785xqo https://www.usc.edu.au/about/unisc-news/news-archive/2024/december/child-sexual-abuse-by-women-is-on-the-…
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:24 AM
14

So with that logic of yours, you're blindly assuming that women are less likely to rape or abuse children despite 95<% of them in child care? That does not explain why A) female pedos being punished disproportionately lighter than if men commit the crime, and B) your argument that "all perps are male" just reeks selective enforcement. That's a hella blatant double standards there.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 04:10 AM
36

I don't know why you would say that men are riskier to do childcare or implied to be dangerous around children. There are already numerous news reports and articles from female ped0s raping underage boys, yet getting slaps on the wrists as punishment. Have you been drinking the "Men are bad" flavored Kool-Aid from the feminists lately?
/r/MensRights05/07/25 02:59 AM
9

Ah yes, implied two tier justice system based on gender. Nice way of expressing your apathy and hypocrisy here. Capital punishment for boys while girls can get away with murder. Meanwhile, women want to commit one murder in India. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14494241/Women-India-allowed-commit-one-murder-rape-epidemic-politician-suggests.html Either women are accountable for their actions, or they aren't. So which is it?
/r/MensRights02/07/25 06:02 AM
18

The village have only cared about men if it benefits on their side, but never bear the liabilities and responsibilities. Either a) men channels their aggressive nature and risk taking to build and maintain civilization, but this, to feminists and society, is negatively perceived as "toxic masculinity", or b) (where we are now/headed to) emasculate and feminize men to the point that men are now leaving the plantations. The pattern is obvious. The shaming and manipulative tactics of either way for…
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:49 PM
3

Lawy-R-Up just in case.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 07:31 AM
7

I wonder why rape and sexual assault are criminal charges, yet (in this case) cheating/adultery and possibly, paternity fraud...aren't. It's as if the NPCs and society follows some cosmic "law" or "legal theory" that prevents or discourages holding women accountable.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 08:04 AM
18

Need guns and ammo? I got chu. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norah_Vincent https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve https://freedomforallamericans.org/lesbian-divorce-rate/
/r/MensRights12/06/25 12:58 AM
1

The word I'm looking for is.... **** INGRATITUDE **** Last time I checked during Women's Month, women are strong, brave, independent, empowered, and don't need a man anymore. But the second she's in a crisis situation, all sense of feminism gets thrown out of the window, and expects men to save her. And what happens next? Her savior gets shamed afterwards for toxic masculinity, charged with assault or homicide, or even slapped with a rape accusation. Modern society has unnecessarily put more inc…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:18 PM
6

I'm putting my money that the education system just flatly left boys for themselves if this keeps up. I know that informal education (if they dropped out) is important, but this is getting ridiculous. I don't want to be correct, because you know what happens when children are abandoned by the village. It involves comitting a metaphorical arson just to feel warm.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:50 AM
3

https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve Target neutralized.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:32 AM
1

You're only implying physical harm, but that's only one type of harm that can be done. Women can do a lot more from emotional to psychological, all the way to reputational harm. One of two things is true. Either you're promoting or advocating dishonesty and betrayal towards men which causes these harm done by women, or you're a sick tyrannical control freak who wants to ensure men are unable to fight back using their physical advantage to harm their abuser. P.S. it's kinda hypocritical for you t…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 12:57 PM
24

"White males are not a victim group," Nice way of expressing your racism and narcissism in here. Also, https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:07 AM
2

"Is getting along with women really that hard? Why do many men on here seem to have trouble?" Oooh I don't know. Maybe with all the countless instances of narcissism, entitlement, ingratitude, double standards, lack of empathy and accountability, and my personal favorite, expression of derision, contempt, and apathy perpetrated by women, you wouldn't go to this sub and womansplain about this issue. Do you even look at the mirror and see yourself how you would act towards men?
/r/MensRights28/05/25 07:59 AM
38

Ok, why are some commenters say that Brigitte isn't a woman, and "she" is/(was?) a guy?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 04:56 PM
1

You still missed my next point. Even if this is against the school's haircut rules, I highly doubt the resulting penalty is being banned from the prom. This still reeks of admin misconduct at best.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 10:11 AM
2

Well, thanks for that confession. The mere fact you admitted that the school has a rule regarding these haircuts, and the victim has testicular cancer that their friends showed solidarity to means one of two things is true. Either the school admins are blatant tyrants, or they just expressed their apathy towards the cancer patient indirectly by punishing his supporters. Even if I'm wrong, I'm certain that this school's haircut violations doesn't mean being banned from the prom. Sure, being calle…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:41 PM
4

Two words: blind obedience. Either you're advocating this or the school is. But then again...it happened on UK. Do you have a loicence for that 'pinion?
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:13 PM
2

Gee, I don't know. Maybe they're cowards to have their nails broken, grease stains on their clothes or skin, smelled like rotten carcasses, or gotten cuts and bruises for operating heavy machinery at the end shifts. You complaining that men are more likely to be top execs or C-suiters implies that women are only pursuing jobs that are cushy, high status positions. Kinda supports my presumption that women don't notice the glass floor beneath them, only the glass ceiling.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 10:22 AM
1

Still no. This single tax just to address the low birth rate and aging population just screams short term, "meth-as-coffee-stimulant" solution at best, or a cluster bomb filled with worms at worst. I'd give it maybe 5 or 6 years after the effects just to see the rampant ugly sides of it, including loveless marriages and materialistic projections. Even if I'm BSing on my points, do you really expect the future children to realize and accept the idea that they were popped into existence just to ha…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 12:28 AM
9

Explain to me why blue collar jobs and trades are ~90% male dominated, and women aren't actively pursuing these. I don't see women mining coal, cleaning the sewers, or replacing the aged electrical transformers on a daily basis. And yet these kinds of jobs tend to pay a lot.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 11:34 AM
2

Yeahhhh....no. You're implying that parents with kids are entitled over the resources of single men most likely. Having the government to enforce this tax only proves that 1) single men save more money and spend less, and 2) the government is irresponsible in budgeting their income and expenses. This is no different than the gaslighting tactic of, "you don't have a family or supporting your parents, therefore, you should contribute to the village." And since this is a welfare funding scheme, enj…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 05:43 AM
4

Yep. Jails for men, pills/rehab for women. Stats are not even counting those reports and convictions against women who perpetrated the crime. But then again, women are never sent to jail for committing sexual or heinous crimes either.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 02:42 AM
2

The damage is done, really. Apparently, they're courting the manosphere for votes only. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TxxaW0OxhKI&pp=0gcJCYQJAYcqIYzv No amount of apologies from them is going to convince the smart men who knows the pattern.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 07:09 AM
3

Oh, I'm sorry. I thought that women are strong, brave, independent and don't need a man. Answer your own question then, ignoramus.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 09:46 AM
2

So, implied censorship and advising me to cease criticizing feminism's abhorrent negative consequences? Jeez, as if being a gynocrat is not enough, you had to sound like a random tyrannical feminist.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 05:35 AM
2

Bull...shit. https://pastebin.com/LyXcp2Ve Whenever men help each other, it attracts a lot of derision and hatred from feminists. What's even more twist-the-knifey is that feminists have demanded to change laws to suit their agenda, at the expense of mens' well being. There's a saying, jails for men, pills/rehab for women. Heck, there are countless users here in this sub being bot/perma banned from other popular subreddits just for posting/replying the obvious feminist double standards. Your ign…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 08:09 PM
7

Blaming the problems of men from male behavior? Nice way of expressing your feminist flavored holier-than-thou attitude here.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 08:32 AM
9

What's the matter, gynocrat? Can't notice the countless, struggling men beneath the glass floor because of that apathy of yours?
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:27 AM
58

Just my 2 cents, but I'd say fight fire with fire, but only do so if women made the first move. If they call you an incel, call them, "diggers". Most women nowadays objectify men based on their socio-economic status or capacity ala ATM paypigs, so why bother?
/r/MensRights28/04/25 01:13 AM
2

Living cost, and to an extent, life quality is more indirectly tied to government spending. If you can't order the government to budget their books, this ain't improving. To me, the combination of welfares, excessive taxation and monetary inflation would just promote complacency and stagnation (read: hedonism). Yes, this is unsustainable. Therefore, one of three things might result: social class divisions, high crime rates (might be robbery though), or both. If history tells something, the next …
/r/MensRights23/04/25 12:13 PM
9

I bet you wouldn't reply the same if the news read, "Woman stabbed to death in front of boyfriend in Brooklyn..." And you'd shame/gaslight/downvoted me if I replied with, "Because there was literally nothing he could have done...." Literally copy pasting your comment, but with the genders reversed. Seriously, Women's Month was well, last month. I thought these women should be strong, brave, independent and empowered to take on these kinds of situations or problems.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 04:31 AM
2

That's one tasteless gaslighting attempt and expression of apathy. I bet you don't notice the countless, struggling men beneath the glass floor.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 02:29 AM
10

Peak ungratefulness is what I have observed with a side order of resentment. Kinda expected if society and women are entitled over the mens' resources and talent over the decades. If the man shamer says about being selfish, manchild by objectifying men based on their economic capacity or social standing, just ask them if they're entitled over the resources borne from the blood, sweat, and tears of men. Then watch the double standards and hypocrisy fireworks.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 01:27 AM
25

I've heard the news of the arrest. To me, that comment that the future is indeed female is just tasteless hypocrisy. I mean, none of the commenters say the same when Sara Duterte was called for impeachment.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 03:40 PM
64

So baiting women into expressing their derision, contempt, or apathy towards the average man is patriarchy? Double standards is one helluva drug you're prescribing on.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:22 AM
0

Wow, control freak much?
/r/MensRights08/03/25 06:56 PM
5

Simple. Use the rule against them, like 'ladies first to be drafted', or something like that. Apply the rule in such a way it would have a negative consequences for the girls. Count the instances, then BAM! Call out their hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:31 PM
37

If civilize means 'tax slave', then yes. Also, the writer mentioned Brad Wilcox in the article. Guess what happened to the video comments about it. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EtvfHnZMcOY
/r/MensRights22/02/25 08:31 PM
1

Many relationship articles don't talk about the divorce stats. These writers know it's an open secret that they refuse to disclose like they're JFK files. If they tell everyone that women initiate the divorces 80-90% of the time, what's the point of telling men to marry in the first place?
/r/MensRights15/02/25 08:56 PM
8

So, I guess you're fine taking care of someone else's baby, only to find out the baby isn't yours to begin with?
/r/MensRights10/02/25 04:41 PM
3

When was the last time you paid a random guy's medical/legal/funeral bills directly for protecting someone weaker?
/r/MensRights08/02/25 04:29 PM
18

The ram has touched the wall. This is an easy countersue for false accusations. One lawyer call and one court hearing should get some juicy settlement afterwards. This should send a clear message before making false rape accusations. I bet the feminist movements and organizations would turn a blind eye for this.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 06:40 PM
8

Women can just make babies without the man's consent. It's called spermjacking, and it involves raiding dumpsters and trash cans for any used condoms mostly. Then hook the guy up for alimony and child support for X years down the line. So, where's the man's choice to become a father or not?
/r/MensRights29/01/25 03:59 PM
0

And this is the part where you used association fallacy just to assume all women to be innocent or anything positive. I bet that you wouldn't do the same towards men.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 04:05 PM
10

You've avoided a possible treason. That's what happened. They wanted to control and manipulate you. However, it sounded that the people you've helped and gave time for them sounded ungrateful. Nope, don't fall for their trickery. To me, they're just going to use you as an ATM slave.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:50 PM
6

Oh wow, ~60% are due to peer pressure, and added bonus of 21% for religious reasons. Not surprising, gotta appease and sacrifice for the tribe first like a mindless slave before yourself. My body, my choice applies here, right?
/r/MensRights06/01/25 06:10 PM
7

If you're against spousal privacy because it is toxic, then why limit to just phone and online account passwords? If the wife wants to know if the husband is hiding money somewhere or his phone contacts, then he should have the right to paternity tests and her body count.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 11:19 AM
6

Funny how some of those feminism extremists that hold positions of power/authority/status/influence affect everyone indiscriminately, but mostly men who would take the hit of those actions. If you can't tell those extremists' advice/orders/claims from right or wrong, you're either a coward for not pointing out the negative consequences, or a slave who would blindly follow your tyrannical gynocrats. So...which is it?
/r/MensRights02/01/25 11:35 PM
12

Ungrateful doesn't begin to describe modern soyciety's relationship with the village peasants.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 02:23 AM
2

Even if it was reported and the news are plastered all over, I'd bet the headlines would be written something like, "In 20xx, 10,000 sexual crimes against minors reported, including 72 cases of female to male grape." Seriously, if it did happen, it's too good to be true or it won't last until the gynocrats removed the articles.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:26 AM
1

I fail to see the problem there. Women are strong, brave, and independent, and Women's month is just around the corner. I don't know why she's complaining about the situation.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 09:19 PM
11

Can confirm. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-3iTZJ8tkvI&pp=ygUlSmVzc2ljYSBzb2hvIHJlcG9ydCBzYSBwaW51dG9sIG5hIGFyaQ%3D%3D
/r/MensRights23/12/24 11:56 PM
12

Sometimes, feminists pull a "moving the goalposts" shenanigans. Only to find out the goalpost they moved to is a lie or a trap.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:23 AM
2

Slavery of mens' bodies is less of a problem than slavery of womens' bodies? Nice double standard right there. Checkm8, hypocrite.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 11:41 PM
4

Video games are already infected with this double standard. Exhibit A: Love and Deepspace https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RqNT_Fy9q3c&pp=ygUcYXNtb25nb2xkIGxvdmUgYW5kIGRlZXBzcGFjZQ%3D%3D
/r/MensRights18/12/24 03:32 AM
1

She objectified him based on his salary/net worth, then finds out he insulted back? Shocked Pikachu face, ain't it? Either you're oblivious to this double standard, or you're implying that women can FAFO with no consequences.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:37 AM
5

What kind of slave mentality drugs are you in right now? Seriously, funding for those childcare subsidies and other provisions have to come from somewhere. If your taxpayers are forced by law to pay for these services in an indirect or implied manner, and you're taking advantage of this, then you're living on the backs of your village peasants and serfs then calling it, 'a great service to the community'. Have I forgot to mention that men pays more taxes than women?
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:57 PM
15

Don't forget about the word, 'democide'. It's the buy one get one promo that comes with matial laws being enacted.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:25 PM
15

You have no idea by how much or many time more brainwashed. Even if a few if not select Filipino parents decide not to circumcise their sons, other kids would shame the uncircumcised to oblivion and afterlife. Tribe mentality and social stigma overpowers any form of male body integrity here.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 11:45 PM
6

Well, what did you expect? Men have been ghosted or conditioned to loneliness because of whatever first negative impressions or assumptions the majority or society has come up with. It's kind of unsettling that you have to shift the blame away towards this boogeyman called 'patriarchy' and call it a day. That's a nice self awareness you're showing here. But hey, that's kind of what happens when you're not liable or accountable for your actions towards countless men who are below your social stan…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 01:01 AM
6

Cool double standards, bro. Are you going to start a White Feather Campaign anytime soon just like in WW1?
/r/MensRights28/11/24 02:37 AM
14

I know that history repeats itself, but this goes beyond hypocrisy, all the way past ridiculous and WTF, before setting at 'history repeats' drinking game. Kinda ironic that a literal university is calling for a blatant and obvious gender discrimination, and nobody is counter protesting it. I don't believe that university is doing their society any favors. It's more of a pretentious indoctrination camp.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 09:32 AM
5

Reverse psychology only works against powerless slaves, it seems. Voting and freedom to choose counter it. No wonder these libs are disappointed.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:53 AM
13

Ok then, have it your way. The second women needs men for <insert dangerous or demanding yet necessary roles/jobs here>, good luck trying to fix those modern conveniences that they take for granted.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:46 AM
9

I don't know what's your beef with single men who can't get in a relationship. Either you're implying that single men are evil or losers, or men who are in a relationship or married is better. Again, association fallacy with maleficial assumptions. You might as well go out your way and discriminate or segregate single men while you're at it.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 12:23 PM
10

Ah, yes. The classic combination of association fallacy and maleficial assumptions because a select number of men who do bad/evil stuff also does the same for the majority of invisible yet innocent men. *sips warm coco* I've heard too many stories of narcissistic and holier-than-thou people that begins exactly like that. Also, try telling women that they should also face the consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 09:37 AM
3

To me, male feminists are easily provoked into showing their true colors once these topics are brought onto discussion. Once you somehow managed to brought receipts to counter their claim, at best, they're not going to take them seriously. At worst, you'd be called out for disrespect or throw ad hominems at you. It's really jarring to see that your college or university professor couldn't refute the student's claim and outright dismissed it on grounds that it was a joke or urban legend. News hea…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 08:12 AM
2

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Remember kids, the use of association fallacy should benefit women or against men. /s
/r/MensRights08/10/24 10:52 AM
9

Her body, her choice, but not his body, his choice? If you're not going to fight for or at least recognize male bodily autonomy, then her body, her choice, HER CONSEQUENCES. Get your cheesy double standards out of this discussion.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 04:05 AM
6

Many social zombies still use legal definitions as their end-all-be-all benchmark or basis for their arguments. They never bother to question why it is or was that way. If I'm wrong, punishment from certain crimes like rape or assault should be the same even if the perpetrator is a woman. Pussy passes should automatically be thrown out of the court's windows. Moral of the story: don't have blind faith in order and authority.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 09:14 AM
19

Remember kids, the use of association fallacy should benefit women or against men. /s
/r/MensRights02/10/24 10:41 PM
6

Going by her logic, questioning claims is misogyny. No wonder courts and the police believe what any woman says whenever there's a DV case, or any crime for that matter.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 08:40 PM
8

Going by PETA's logic, cows are higher up the empathy totem pole than men.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 08:49 PM
26

Law: Innocent until proven guilty. Soyciety and feminists: *autistic screeching*
/r/MensRights14/09/24 06:58 AM
5

WTF!? What is this, Andrew Malkinson: India Edition?
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:39 PM
1

I'm stealing that :)
/r/MensRights12/09/24 01:29 AM
3

There's RA 8353 & 9262. Guess what? There is no male victim equivalents. There is also VAW campaigns from time to time but no VAM. I'm certain that female-on-male DV cases gets mostly unreported. BTW, punishment =/= disrespect. If women are equal to men, they should be also held liable and accountable for their actions. Otherwise, call them out for their hypocrisy and ignorance.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 07:39 PM
75

Ah yes. The classic 'it's not my fault' excuse. QED, she's a narcissist.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 10:26 PM
17

Women prefer to choose bears over men. Women have been given lighter punishments when it comes to committing heinous crimes. Circumcision is okay, as long it's not performed on a girl's body. Boys' foreskins are being trafficked as ingredients in makeup. My body, my choice, but it's someone else's liability. Female school teachers have free passes to commit pedophilia against prepubescent boys. Women aren't actively pursuing jobs that puts them at physical risks and injuries. Female athletes are…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 01:28 AM
2

If better leaders mean +30% national buff for increased likelihood to wage wars, then yes. Wait, is this a Civilization VI DLC alpha/beta?
/r/MensRights23/08/24 03:45 AM
1

Nope. You're not a dickhead. You just had enough of being an expectation slave to the collective. So, the obvious reaction from them would be shaming, intimidation, gaslighting, and narcissism. Moving forward, expect a lot of derision, contempt, and the temptation to go back to the plantation. They just couldn't control you like before when you were ignorant. With the life scars you learned over the years, you have to go from there, and start questioning those faulty philosophies they gave you.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 03:03 AM
3

1). You're not doing enough effort to call your tribal leaders (i.e. your politicians) to be aware about most of the countless mens' issues being discussed in this subreddit. 2). Your immediate society's NPCs and drones are dismissive about these topics. 3). You're lying to us here.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 09:36 PM
7

Translation: "This is one of the priorities our DepEd Secretary must focus on, especially knowledge about Science." I highly doubt many girls in my country here would be interested in any of the hard sciences fields. Then again...it's the education department. Therefore: https://www.reddit.com/r/31MillionRegrets/comments/x8rf6o/are_you_effing_serious/
/r/MensRights01/07/24 05:20 AM
1

There are quite a few made redundant by earlier posts. Conscription, biased laws, p*ssy pass for heinous crimes, male disposability, messy divorce stories, ignored mens' mental health, blatant discrimination against men, male genital mutilation, fatherless families, female pedos, the imposed "666" dating standards by women. For now, that's all I could think of.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 05:21 AM
2

This is my take. Castrated men live longer so society can toss them to the plantations for longer and harder hours. Of course, men who live shorter gets dumped away and replaced. Did I get the hidden message right?
/r/MensRights01/06/24 03:22 AM
0

Personally, I haven't watched any movies either at the theaters or online subscription for years. However, seeing all the box office bombs and reviews being posted online, I kind of dodged an entire battlefield's worth of bullets. Furiosa, Captain Marvel, Barbie, and most movie franchises have been infected with this woke agenda so much so I lost interest. The good news is that the money I should have spent watching movies ended up in my emergency funds instead.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 10:42 AM
10

I dunno, but capital punishment is a lot lighter sentence than this.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:53 PM
2

I'm no American, but the 2A was written so that the people would defend themselves against tyranny. This judge blatantly and knowingly disregards the Bill of Rights would give you a precise clue as to where the tyranny is coming from.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:02 AM
8

Remember kids, the word "villain" was once Medieval Latin for "peasant".
/r/MensRights25/04/24 01:24 AM
49

"Strong and independent woman fails to prove herself in the face of crisis while a smart man is trying to prove if feminism would work for him."
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:12 AM
1

Remember when MGTOW was branded as the Taliban of the manosphere by GQ? Good times.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:58 AM
12

I swear, the Twitter reaction is like a lynch mob with torches and pitchforks, minus the actual torches and pitchforks. News is 3 years old, but I wouldn't be surprised if another one like this happens here. Seriously, I just watched some Town of Salem 2 gameplays, and it's awfully similar to this.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 07:06 AM
1

If feminist, then discuss conscription/workplace fatalities/blue collar wage gap. Sit back and relax then poke fun of her mental gymnastics trying to downplay or ignore how men have it worse. Just merely derailing the topic to conscription and you'd win.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 12:06 AM
3

At this point, you might want to tell your lawyer whether any or some 'evidence' presented against you is AI generated or not.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 06:13 PM
2

It's unsustainable to just rely solely on jails or house arrests for certain crimes. Depending on the upkeep of jails, there are even cases where inmates are doing their criminal operations inside. Don't underestimate their creativity to contact the outside world. Anyone who got the life imprisonment has to be housed and fed somewhere, so how do you fund jails indefinitely without screwing the budget and audit? There's also reported cases of convicted murderers or whathaveyou who got out of jail…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 12:32 PM
3

I'm more likely independent with conservatism but I could be wrong on my label. All forms of direct taxation should cease and desist. Welfare and subsidies are forced Ponzi schemes. Not everyone can pay for it. Fiat system is a failure time immemorial, and governments refuse to budget their books. Gun/weapon rights for everyone. Death penalty should be reinstated. There's way too many instances of glorifying murderers, abusers, and predators. Jury nullification should be openly advised in case o…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 12:54 AM
7

Yep. Soyciety runs on taking advantage of modern comfort, but clearly and blatantly show its ugly ingratitude towards men. When you got to wonder all these cabals in power intimidate, mistreat, or lie to the plantation slaves, you start thinking about exodus or rebellion. Remember kids, the word 'villain' was once a medieval Latin word for 'peasant'.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 11:25 PM
12

The way I see it, being called autistic or creepy means refusal to join the rest. It's quite likely you have completely different interests, perspectives, or tastes that the majority find indifferent or offensive. In any case, you're being shamed until you give in or accept their standards. Isn't bandwagon fallacy awesome? /s
/r/MensRights28/11/23 01:54 AM
5

Just to give you an idea, I was downvoted to hell for voicing out the effects and aftermath of men during divorce. I even posted some sources and videos, but still, these Filipinos want to have divorce pushed through the senate. Even with backing evidences and testimonies, they still want this can of worms exploded on their faces. If that happens, I am not going to help any woke Filipino divorcee who have been through the courthouse for splitting the assets and forcibly transfer that to the othe…
/r/MensRights26/11/23 07:01 PM
1

>"guilty until proven innocent" Ok, at this point, your friend is either a) a slave dog to the ruling cabals/mafia/overlords or b1) a power hungry tyrant or b2) soon-to-be power hungry tyrant. I wouldn't be surprised either if he easily forgives or can't criticize those who are already in positions of authority and government.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 12:41 AM
2

Equal protections mean equal punishments. If wives abuse their husbands in any way, they should be hauled before the courts and charged with assault and battery/defamation/fraud/whathaveyou. I don't want these feminists crying for eQuALItY over the social media if another Depp v. Heard shenanigan happens here.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 09:07 AM
3

I'd rather take my chances living underwater than governments dropping their IQs to negative infinity by duking it out over some untapped resources or an economic chokepoint. Wars during the 20th century have a higher death toll than all natural disasters that happened.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 10:22 AM
11

Even if feminism is prevalent, why do they scream that STEM fields, academia, CEOs, and other high status positions are male dominated while ignoring those harsh physical jobs that are also male dominated?
/r/MensRights15/07/23 10:13 AM
3

MGM is treated as a rite of passage, and boys who aren't are shamed to oblivion to the point why you couldn't sue them for defamation. Local governments tend to advertise MGM as seasonal events in some clinics and hospitals. If the latter two are fully booked in certain areas, mass MGMs are performed in basketball courts or parking lots with some improvisations. As far as Filipinos who leave the country, it's a mixed bag of reasons why they would drop or not the mindset.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 10:09 AM
27

In the Philippines, it's: Circumcision Male genital mutilation, duh. RA 8353 and 9262 but no equivalents for male victims against female abusers. No divorce bill here, but I've heard a lot of testimonies from unfaithful wives and soon to be wives. For me, my mom has been itchy to leave dad all because he couldn't be the one bringing in the cash. There's also the issue about conscription and gross hypocrisy by most countries with regards to the 2022 Russian Invasion as the current benchmark. I ev…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 03:17 AM
1

especially when it comes to law. RA 8353 and 9262 did a huge dent on men's spaces and mental health here, just not that well noticed by everyone. That's not counting the countless regional and local ordinances that supports or references these two laws. There are some baranggay health offices in some areas of Metro Manila that offers welfare for women and girls, but don't expect men and boys as frequent. If I'm not mistaken, that SOGIE bill passed by the legislative branch is just going to open …
/r/MensRights25/06/23 10:25 AM
3

Don't even bother with the Philippines here. Even the law is against you compared to women. Remember, we have RA 8353 and 9262 and countless more regional ordinances that support those laws. There's no legal equivalent for men if they get abused or tormented by women. I even saw ads about DEI and women's month for the past years but no mens day celebration. Did I forgot to mention that circumcision male genital mutilation is treated as rite of passage here as well?
/r/MensRights15/06/23 05:45 PM
1

Equal rights, equal fights. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 10:00 PM
3

To put it bluntly, yes but few ever took notice. As far as how much, I have no idea, but the infection rate is definitely increasing and affects everything from employment, education, health, legal system, dating and relationships, human rights, religion, advertisement, company brand image... The list goes on and on and the internet turbocharged the misandry big time. The second anyone criticizes this, he's called out as a pariah for pointing out what's wrong. When the majority ignores or neglec…
/r/MensRights11/06/23 07:52 AM
5

It's awfully similar here. Men are told to suck it up and never show any emotions, but it's a whole 270 when it's about women who experience depression. Other times, instead of showing a glimmer of support from anyone you know, what they'd do is to "tell" you that others had gone through, so it becomes a pissing contest on who had it worse. You get to wonder later, if the situation stagnate or worsen, why you even heed advice from society as a whole when they don't show true compassion to you wh…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 09:14 AM
9

Don't forget that we don't just permaban anyone just because anyone here holds different opinions, sound arguments or solid evidences especially political or idealogical topics compared to other subreddits.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 11:26 PM
1

Relax. Andrew Tate is a billionaire. I'm sure he's got enough disposable income to pay for a private army of lawyers to countersue those falsely accused him. Though, someone should give him that tip.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:29 AM
2

If the news headline was read as "...broke the record in 2004 for having sex with the most women in a day. Within 12 hours...had sexual intercourse with 919 different women", the post would've garnered alarms from media. Just checking on the comments and it ranges from praises, former record holders, petty trolling, and I didn't read any calling out if the roles were reversed, or threats of any kind.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:27 AM
-1

Moderator removed... I swear, I checked on it and was open 20 minutes ago. https://i.imgur.com/gFfQHiS.png
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:15 AM
1

At this point, I don't want to subscribe in any cable or streaming subscription thanks to these networks. Well, I guess that's one less expenditure for my budget.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 07:39 AM
1

For a strong, independent feminist like her, it's real unsettling that she's entitled more money from her ex-husband just to finish her thesis. Then gets a sharp turn to Reality University when she can't sustain the lifestyle without her living ATM.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 03:52 PM
3

VERY prevalent among preteen boys here, treating circumcision as a rite of passage. Social pressure is far stronger than informed consent. Throw in tribalism and insecurity complex, and things get awfully screwy.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 03:14 PM
10

My "That's bandwagon fallacy" detector just lit up when she said that.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 08:23 AM
-1

...yet. That divorce bill is being eyed upon by the legislature. Just because it's still a senate bill doesn't mean you shouldn't prepare if it did become a law. Even if the SCOTP would rule it unconstitutional, don't count on the judiciary branch to act fast on it.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 11:32 AM
1

Just so you know, I saw Manila's train stations having separate sections for women, usually at the front of the train. I also talked to a lawyer about their opinion about RA 9262. It's basically either bandwagon fallacy due to statistics or survivorship bias. This makes it theoretically possible and tempting for any Filipino guy to get sent to the slammers (good luck getting a lawyer to represent you) just for false DV accusations. Not as frequent nor controversial compared to America or Europe,…
/r/MensRights09/09/22 09:11 AM
4

I may have watched him a few videos and most of his arguments are rock solid either by biological, historical facts, or even both. The whole anti LGBTQ+ label slapped by the mainstream liberals is just a piss poor ad hominem attempt to discredit and dismiss his stance about gender, free speech and mens' importance. So, one of the desperate attempts to silence your opposition is to make it into law. That's why he's in a legal hot water regarding the use of pronouns vs free speech in one interview…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:51 PM
15

There was one instance where I hit a girl back in 5th grade because she shouted at me first. Then everyone dogpiled on me for hitting a girl and scolded for 'it's not right for a boy to hit back against a girl'. This happened back in 2005. There was also a health class discussing reproductive health. Condoms for men, but tons of options (IUD, pills, gynecologists, injectables, etc.) for women. Every dirty, physical or hazardous grunt work like sewage cleaner, garbage collector, electrician, truc…
/r/MensRights05/05/22 08:32 AM
15

Welcome to the Philippines. We have dictators, North Korean embassies Iglesia ni Christo churches, thieves in the government, power hungry celebrities, tyranny of majority, and gaslighting everywhere. May 9th is when the Filipino sheeple gets to vote on their new slave master president for the next 6 years. Enjoy your stay.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 01:08 PM
4

Whole lotta gaslighting that’s coming from your sister, that’s what it is when you’re talking with her. Can’t use the word, ‘fat’, yet allows the word ‘thin’? What is she, some sort of family sized censorship bureau? To me, once a woman becomes a 4th wave femin*zi, she’s a lost cause. It’d take her a one way trip to the Middle East just to find out how much of a short sighted person she is. She can blame the patriarchy and homophobia in the west all she wants, but wouldn’t do so in more blatant …
/r/MensRights28/04/22 09:58 PM
9

The whole “isn’t everyday Mens’ day” is bullshit and toxic hypocrisy. Seriously, who said that, some random feminist?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 09:52 PM
6

Funny how this ”patriarchy“ is somehow in the western civilization only, yet none were directed in other parts of the world where their arguments are more obvious. Do these feminists ever lived in the Middle East before migrating to the west?
/r/MensRights25/04/22 09:57 PM
2

RA 9262 and countless city, regional, and provincial ordinances that benefit women over men. Annual celebration of women over men. Ads and reminders about women’s achievements. Virtually, no women in dirty, hazardous grunt work: garbage collector, scrap collector, construction worker, utility vehicle driver, utility maintenance worker, sewage cleaner, etc. Gabriela faction. Gynecologists in every clinic and hospital but few andrologists* *WTF!? “andrologist“ is not a recognized word on my tablet…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 11:28 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88kFLvjtBlQ I have preferences. Don’t judge me, m’kay?
/r/MensRights23/04/22 11:37 AM
1

It’s pretty much a dire warning to me. Here, we have laws and city ordinances that punishes DV against women and children more compared to men. There are plenty of gynecologists, but zilch on andrologists. I even saw a FB ad about toxic masculinity, and I shot back at their hypocrisy. We have some feminist movement here, but the most prominent ones are somewhat connected/receiving help from the ‘communists’. The only best recourse is to get multiple contacts of lawyers, but there isn’t a form of…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:45 PM
4

Even if I’m from the Philippines, the notion about the conscription never seem to get any traction here. But, seeing the effects of conscription of men in Ukraine, it’s less likely to be openly discussed everywhere despite the logistical efforts by other countries. Men always get the short end of the stick when the shjt finally hits the fan. It’s like there is some hardwired notion that men suffering is less compared to women nowadays. Discussing conscription or draft in front of any feminist wi…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 05:04 AM
1

There is a law here in the Philippines. I believe it’s the RA 9262. However, I want to have this play out if the abuser is a woman. Then prepare some popcorn for the hypocrisy of this law.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 02:07 AM
1

No it is not. Seriously says who? Sir Isaac Newton and Nikola Tesla never married yet none of them get any criticism today for being single. If those two can live their lives to the fullest being single, what’s stopping you?
/r/MensRights03/04/22 01:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter