~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | People MASSIVELY underestimate the math imbalance on the dating app marketplaceYoure dumb lmao. Good bye for real | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/26 11:31 PM |
| 4 | People MASSIVELY underestimate the math imbalance on the dating app marketplaceYou are either a girl posing as a dude to argue or genuinely that obtuse. Either way good day Edit cuz im having fun: OP -> "Next, assume only the top ~20% of men are attractive enough to consistently get matches" TO GET MATCHES aka online dating YOU -> "The fallacy is believing that women can only be attracted to the top 20% of men. That's plainly false. " Generalizing beyond OLD. LOL genuine bad actor | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/26 11:21 PM |
| 5 | People MASSIVELY underestimate the math imbalance on the dating app marketplaceYoure being obtuse and arguing in bad faith. Nobody said that. We’re only talking about dating apps, where only a few photos paint a picture of a person. Nothing else to go on other than looks and a few prompts. Nobody said women in society only go for top 20 of looks but when thats all there is to judge, then thats all that will be judged. Orange vs apples, totally different Argue within premise at hand, not weaselling other scenarios to try to one up | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/26 11:08 PM |
| 5 | People MASSIVELY underestimate the math imbalance on the dating app marketplaceIt is. Look based app = screening for looks. All humans are hypergamous, men and women its biology. Unfortunately for men sperm is cheap so women get to choose sex partners. People always screen for the best thry can get. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/26 11:02 PM |
| 4 | People MASSIVELY underestimate the math imbalance on the dating app marketplaceIts reality | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/26 10:56 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter